Genesis 14:1: Four kings, four countries, and nine hundred miles between the first and the last

Read it →
AFGHANISTANALGERIAAUSTRIAAZERBAIJANBENINBOSNIA AND HERZ.BULGARIABURKINA FASOCHADCYPRUSDJIBOUTIEGYPTERITREAFRANCEGEORGIAGREECEHUNGARYIRANIRAQISRAELITALYJORDANLEBANONLIBYAMALIMAURITANIAMOROCCONIGERNIGERIAOMANPAKISTANPORTUGALQATARROMANIASAUDI ARABIASERBIASOMALILANDSPAINSUDANSWITZERLANDSYRIATUNISIATURKEYTURKMENISTANUNITED ARAB EMIRATESUZBEKISTANYEMENMesopotamiathe ZagrosEuphratesTigristhe Arabian desertHebron — Genesis 13:18Canaan — Genesis 13:12Jordan Valley — Genesis 13:12Sodom — Genesis 13:12Ellasar — named here, no site fixedGoiim — named here, no site fixedShinar — named here, no site fixedElamEllasarGoiimShinarElamCanaanJordan ValleyHebronSodom

Genesis 13:18ESV

So Abram moved his tent and came and settled by the oaks of Mamre, which are at , and there he built an altar to the LORD.

ESV

In the days of Amraphel king of , Arioch king of , Chedorlaomer king of , and Tidal king of ,

Genesis 14:5ESV

In the fourteenth year Chedorlaomer and the kings who were with him came and defeated the Rephaim in , the Zuzim in , the Emim in ,

Commentary on Genesis 14:1

Genesis 14 opens with a list of foreign kings, and for the first time the Bible turns to armies and politics. Why does Scripture stop over a border war between small local rulers — and what does Abram, camped nearby, have to do with it?

The First War in Scripture

Genesis has already told of Babel and the scattering of the nations. This is the first battle in the Bible, and one writer explains who these "kings" were and why they marched.

The confusion of tongues at Babel divided mankind into nations, and we can have little doubt that this soon led to fighting and regular warfare. But Scripture gives no record of a battle until we reach Genesis 14. There four kings from the Mesopotamian district marched towards the Dead Sea, destroying cities on the way, and in the end defeated the five kings of the cities of the plain. The "kings" named were mostly, if not all, the leaders of single cities — what we would now call petty chiefs. Chedorlaomer seems to have been the overlord of the kings with him, and he had spread his rule over the region of Sodom. They threw off his rule, and that was the reason for the expedition.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The list of allied kings also shows what the world is like.

The chapter opens with a solemn picture of this present evil world. It is a scene where the nations form themselves into groups, and make alliances to push their plans for power and to defend themselves from attack.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Why Scripture Bothers to Record It

A small local war fills a whole chapter of the Bible. One writer gives two reasons for that.

The campaign of Chedorlaomer and his allies against the king of Sodom and his partners was not a great thing in itself. Yet Holy Scripture gives a whole chapter to it, for two important reasons. First, because a saint of God, Lot, was caught up in it. Second, because the world's first recorded battle is in many ways a foreshadowing of the last great disaster of Armageddon.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Abram Stands Outside It

Abram's name is missing from this list of kings, and that absence is the point.

Here we have a very detailed account of a battle fought by "four kings with five," and we may ask: what did this quarrel between "the potsherds of the earth" have to do with the history of the people of God? With Abram, in one sense, nothing, for he was outside it all. His tent marked him as a stranger to all these things. It marked him as one to whom the battle of "four kings with five" would matter very little. His altar marked him as one whose pursuits were of another kind — heavenly. His tent showed him to be a stranger on earth; his altar showed him to be at home in Heaven.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Lot's case was the opposite. His suffering traced back to a choice he made long before the armies moved.

Lot's sufferings at the hands of the Gentile kings were entirely due to his unfaithfulness to God. Had he stood apart from the world and its ways, as Abram did, his path might have been as peaceful and happy as Abram's. He sought worldly advantages for himself and his family, so he sank to the world's level, and he suffered with the world in the day of trouble.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Reading the Two Alliances as a Picture

One writer looks past the geography. He asks what the two sides stand for, starting with the land the invaders came from.

The names are hard to read, and at least two of the allied countries are just as doubtful. But in the first list Amraphel, king of Shinar, stands first. He is beyond question the representative of the kingdom of Nimrod, although Chedorlaomer appears the most active and interested. They all seem to be only divisions of this Babylonish empire, though no doubt changed into an alliance of more or less equal powers… These four kings… are at war with the five petty kings of the plain of Jordan. As a picture, these last stand for the world in its open and sensual wickedness. The Babylonish kings stand for the religious world-power, which always seeks to hold that more open form of evil captive — and generally succeeds.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Names Found in the Ground

The kings of verse 1 are not legends. Sir Henry Rawlinson reported finding one of them in ancient records.

He had found the record of a king matching the Chedorlaomer of Genesis 14, about 1900 B.C., who was given the title "the ravager of Syria."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Such confirmation is welcome. But one writer warns against resting faith on it.

Faith accepts the record in Genesis 14, not because the clay tablets confirm it (however interesting that fact may be), but because the Spirit of God has written it. Anyone who accepts the statements of Scripture only when outside evidence confirms them is at heart an unbeliever.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

What Came Out of a Forgotten Campaign

We no longer know what this war settled politically. Something else came out of it and remains.

Genesis 14 gives the first campaign on record. We cannot say what its political results may have been. But a spiritual outcome came out of it, and its value will last "for ever."

Modernised from J Wilson SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- War — The Bible's first battle: four city-rulers against five, after Chedorlaomer's subject kings threw off his rule.

- World — Verse 1 shows this present age: nations forming blocs for gain and defence, and God nowhere in the picture.

- Separation — Abram's tent and altar kept him clear of the fighting. Lot went after worldly gain near Sodom, and his losses followed his choice.

- Shadow — Writers see Babylon behind the invaders, and see this first war as a picture of the world's last great war.

- Outcome — The politics of this war are forgotten. What came out of it lasts forever.

Map of Genesis 14:1: Four kings, four countries, and nine hundred miles between the first and the last — 1 sites plotted