What do you know that we do not know? What do you understand that is not clear to us?
Eliphaz is partway through a run of sharp questions aimed at Job. This one sounds like a call for humility. But it carries a claim of its own: that he and his two friends already know all that Job knows about God and suffering.
An accusation of pride
The question is not asking for information. It is a verdict on Job's character.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinAs wrong as Eliphaz's rebuke is, he adds still another charge. He tells him he is filled with pride. Whatever Job knows, they know also.
Job had asked much the same question earlier, and he meant less by it.
Leslie M. GrantJob had asked his friends almost the same question that Eliphaz asks in verse 9. He had said, "What you know, I also know; I am not inferior to you" (ch. 13:2), but Eliphaz accused him of claiming to be superior to them. Eliphaz should have rebuked Zophar for assuming that he knew the secrets of wisdom and that Job did not. Instead, his own arguments only showed how one-sided he was.
The tone of the questions
This verse is one of six questions in a row, and they carry a sting.
F. B. HoleEliphaz now attacked Job in strong terms, and somewhat unfairly, as we see in verse 6. To him, Job's arguments were crafty and condemned Job himself. He met them by a series of six questions, recorded in verses 7-9, all of them having the sting of sarcasm in them.
Where the friends' certainty came from
Eliphaz's "we" rests on what he has watched happen in the world.
F. B. HoleIf we turn to Job 15, which contains his second speech, we again find him saying, "What I have seen I will declare" (verse 17). So it is clear that his argument depends mainly on his own powers of observation. He trusted those powers to tell him what Job's disasters meant.
Each of the three friends leaned on a different source of knowledge. One writer shows how each one falls short of God's wisdom:
Leslie M. Grant"No eye has seen": human observation could find nothing here. It was this to which Eliphaz appealed in reproving Job (Job 4:8); but he was wrong. "Nor ear heard." The ear had never received this from all the combined wisdom of ages past. That was the tradition Bildad appealed to when he judged Job (Job 8:8-10). He was just as wrong. "Nor the heart of man imagined." No man's intuition could have imagined any wisdom like God's. Yet Zophar (Job 11:6) treated his own intuition as the final word.
The mistake underneath the question
One assumption lay underneath everything the three friends said.
William KellyHere was where they went astray. They assumed that the present state of the world fully expresses His judgment of people's ways. We find this assumption running through the speeches of the three friends. At first they say it calmly enough, but in the end it hardens into harshness... Here was a soul suffering a succession of troubles beyond all example. Who could point out the man subjected to such dealings since the world began?
Because that assumption was wrong, their reading of Job was wrong too. The whole book stands as a warning about it.
William KellyThere cannot be a more instructive lesson to us on the danger of judging by appearances. It is beyond question a main point in this marvellous book. A quick look at the surface is never the way to form a righteous judgment... Here we find an entire book devoted to guarding us from such a snare.
What their knowledge left out
For all they claimed to know, one subject never appears in their speeches.
William KellyWhy do they never once speak of that blessed One who was to make good and show that grace is above all evil? Why was it that they could not rise above the fear of evil underneath?... Their conclusion was that his evil was finding him out, that judgment was pursuing the hypocrite. Sadly, not one man among them knew what it is to overcome evil with good.
Summary
- Claim. Eliphaz asks what Job knows that the three of them do not. It is a charge of pride against a man who had claimed only to be not inferior.
- Source. The claim rests on three human props: what Eliphaz saw, what Bildad was told, and what Zophar assumed.
- Flaw. All three sources share one wrong rule: that what happens to a man now measures God's verdict on him.
- Danger. Judging by appearances is the snare this whole book exists to warn us against.
- Gap. Their combined knowledge never reached grace — the One who overcomes evil with good.