For she leaves her eggs to the earth and lets them be warmed on the ground,
The ostrich is one exhibit in a long parade of creatures God sets before Job, a suffering man who wanted answers. She buries her eggs in the dust and walks away. Why would the Creator make a mother like that?
What the Verse Describes
One commentator describes a bird that does the opposite of what nesting birds do:
Leslie M. GrantThe ostrich is another most interesting creature of God — a bird, but not a flying bird, using its wings only to help it run at a fast rate. Also, unlike other birds, she makes no comfortable nest to lay her eggs in and hide them from predators. She leaves them in the ground and warms them in the dust, in places where animals or people may walk. She does not consider the danger: these eggs break easily.
The Stork in the Background
The verse begins with "For," tying it to the wing mentioned just before. Translations of that earlier line differ, and commentators read it as a contrast between two birds:
William KellyThere is nothing here about peacocks at all. It is a mistake. It should read, "The wing of the ostrich waves joyously; is it the pinion and plumage of the stork?" The first part of the verse is about the ostrich, and the second part about the stork. The ostrich, with its great fluttering and its stupid indifference to its young, stands in contrast to the stork. The stork is the most affectionate bird that God created. No bird has such great care for its offspring.
The same writer says where that difference comes from:
William KellyAnd who is to dispute with God? The God who gives one bird its remarkable character of affection takes the commonest sense away from another bird of immense power and great swiftness. An ostrich could outrun a racehorse for a while.
What Observers Have Found
Critics have long said the description is inaccurate. Commentators differ on how much of the bird's behaviour is real neglect and how much observers misread. One note explains the bird's name and records what watchers have found:
Morrish Bible DictionaryIn the previous verse the ostrich is named by a word that means "a crying or wailing." The ostrich leaves its eggs in the sand, well covered up. The sun keeps them warm by day, and the parent sits upon them at night. The bird leaves other eggs unprotected nearby, to feed the young birds when they hatch, and these may be trampled on. As for the parents' indifference to their young, people say that when a hunter comes near, the birds leave their nests and often cannot find the place again in the wide desert. But dead jackals have been found near the nests, killed by the parent birds.
Another writer answers the critics by asking who is speaking here:
Arno Clemens GaebeleinIt would be amusing, if it were not so sad, when critics declare that the author of "the poem" made a mistake about the eggs of the ostrich. But it is not an "author" who speaks. It is the Creator Himself, and He knows more about His creatures than all the "scientists" in the world.
Someone Still Cares for the Eggs
The eggs left in the dust are not left unwatched. One commentator puts the point as a question:
Samuel RidoutAll things, however wild and seemingly senseless, are His creatures, and He does not forget them. Here is a creature that God Himself seems to have deprived of the ordinary mother's instincts. Yet some One — Who? — cares for the helpless brood.
The Only Fitting Response
Job had been arguing with God's handling of his life. The ostrich is a creature man cannot account for. One writer draws the response that fits:
William KellyAs to the ostrich, let its wing speed ever so joyously, God is still sovereign here, whatever man may reason… But this is not without God, who takes in more than man can grasp. Let man then mark, learn, and worship, and not set up to judge God or to murmur.
The Argument Aimed at Job
The whole tour of wild creatures is building to one point about Job himself:
Samuel RidoutIt is significant that the series opens and closes with mention of beasts and birds of prey. They might seem worthless, or even harmful, and yet He cares for them with unerring wisdom. Shall He fail to watch over His child who knows and trusts Him?
Summary
- Contrast. The stork guards its young. The ostrich leaves hers in the dust. The difference is God's doing, not the birds'.
- Sovereignty. God gave one bird tender care. He withheld ordinary sense from another. He gives no reasons.
- Care. The eggs lie unguarded, yet they hatch. Someone is watching over a brood their own mother forgot.
- Worship. The honest response to a creature you cannot explain is to mark, learn, and worship, not to argue with the One who made it.
- Comfort. If God cares even for creatures that look worthless, the child who trusts Him will not be the one He overlooks.