“How long will you hunt for words? Consider, and then we will speak.
Job 18:2 · ESVView all translations

Bildad the Shuhite speaks a second time, and instead of comfort he asks how long Job will keep talking. Job has lost his children, his wealth and his health — so how did three sincere friends come to treat a sufferer's grief as evidence against him?

A Reproach, Not Comfort

Bildad opens harshly. He treats Job's long replies as proof that Job will not listen, and he speaks as if Job stood for a whole party:

As usual in the later speeches, the address opens with a reproach, showing none of the courtesy that marked the first address of Eliphaz. Bildad, who keeps his own speeches quite short, accuses Job of piling up words, and of being so full of talk that he will not listen to others. Notice that Bildad addresses Job as if others stood with him: "How long will you hunt for words?" This does not have to mean that others were with Job at that time and place. Rather, he stands as the representative of everyone who would question the friends' position. But, as we know, Job was holding to the truth, at least in his opposition to their argument. We may think of him as standing at the head of that great company of the righteous who have passed through deep suffering for no apparent reason. If Job had used strong language, the friends' charges had given him great provocation.

Samuel Ridout

The Wording of the Demand

The picture behind "hunt for words" is of a man chasing after things to say. The next line demands that Job first get some sense into him before the friends will bother replying:

How long will you make a hunt for words? Consider, and afterwards we will speak. Why are we accounted as cattle, stopped up [that is, stupid] in your eyes?

William Kelly

No Reason to Stop Speaking

The demand assumes Job should have finished speaking by now. But the friends had given him no reason to stop:

Yet Bildad begins his second speech, recorded in Job 18, on a very harsh note. Job certainly had not yet come to the end of himself, and in his friends' arguments there was nothing to cause him to "make an end of words." The second part of verse 2 has been translated, "Be intelligent, and then we will speak." He evidently saw Job's rejection of their position and of the claims they put forward as degrading to them, as though they were beasts. So he hit back with an insult.

F. B. Hole

The Verdict Behind the Question

Behind the complaint about how much Job talks lies a settled verdict. Bildad has decided that Job's suffering proves hidden evil, and that Job claims to stand outside God's government:

Bildad, who is always brief, hits back at Job's long and passionate answers. He treats them as contemptuous towards his friends, and as useless in Job's effort to justify himself, while Job was evidently an object of divine displeasure and judgment for hidden evil. Was he alone an exception to the always righteous government of God? If not, why such a volume of words, and why such fierce attacks?

William Kelly

An Accusation Job Never Made

Bildad orders Job to gain understanding before the friends will speak. He also complains of being treated like a dumb animal — a charge Job never made:

Job's words did not teach Bildad to be a little more considerate than before. He shows only stronger opposition, reproving Job unjustly. He thought Job's words showed no understanding, so he told him to "gain understanding" — then his friends would be more free to speak to him. No doubt if Bildad had not acted like a beast, Job would not have spoken to him as he did. Yet Job had not accused them of being stupid. He had only insisted that he was not inferior to them, and that he found no wise man among them.

Leslie M. Grant

Sincere, and Completely Wrong

Bildad believed every word he said. That is what makes his speech so searching for us:

Such is the spirit of Bildad. He was sure that, whatever the appearances had been, they were all hollow, and that now the truth could no longer be hidden. God's judgments and Job's words were making it plain that he had been simply a prosperous fool. Such folly has its just and usual end in this life. In Scripture the "fool" means a man without God. No folly is like it. So he believes it was with Job. Is it not humbling and solemn that we may be ever so sincere in what we believe, and yet be completely wrong? We are just as responsible for what our convictions are as for what we do or say. Only one can give us the right thought or feeling: He who alone gives the wisdom and strength to carry it out. It is God Himself.

William Kelly

Summary

- Reproach. Bildad's second speech attacks Job's talking instead of answering his grief. The courtesy of the earlier speeches is gone.

- Words. Bildad wants Job to stop talking and "be intelligent" before the friends reply — yet their arguments gave Job no reason to stop.

- Verdict. Behind the impatience sits a fixed conclusion: Job's suffering proves hidden evil, and Job claims to be an exception to God's righteous government.

- Distortion. Bildad answers an insult Job never gave him. A dispute slides fast from the issue to the person.

- Warning. Sincerity is no protection from error. We are as responsible for our convictions as for our actions, and only God can form them.

Reviewed by Orion on September 18, 2026