Should he argue in unprofitable talk, or in words with which he can do no good?
Job 15:3 comes at the start of Eliphaz's second speech, where he tells Job flatly that his words are empty. The question is whether that charge is fair.
The charge that replaces an answer
Job had just given a long reply. Notice what Eliphaz does with it.
Leslie M. GrantEliphaz shows less self-restraint here than in his first speech. Then he at least spoke with some consideration for Job. Now he flatly accuses him of gross sin and hypocrisy. He says in effect: if Job thought himself wise, why did he speak with empty knowledge, his words like the east wind? Eliphaz does not answer what Job has said. He accuses him of unprofitable talk and speeches that can do no good (vv.2-3). He tells Job that he casts off fear and holds back prayer before God. But Job's words showed a very real fear, and he had prayed to God in front of his friends. What was Eliphaz talking about?
He keeps it up in the lines that follow, handing down a verdict without any evidence.
Leslie M. GrantHe never tells Job which words condemned him. He simply uses one sweeping accusation to wipe out everything Job had said.
What "unprofitable" means here
The two halves of the verse repeat the same idea: speech that carries no weight and yields no return. One rendering puts it:
William KellyArguing with speech that avails not, / And with words in which is no profit.
The image in the previous line sets the tone for it — the east wind, which brings nothing but dryness.
Samuel RidoutIs it wisdom, he asks, for a man who claims to be wise to pour out empty words like a blast of the east wind — something dry and withering? Job's uncontrolled language did leave him open to the charge of casting off fear. It was the opposite of prayer or devotion.
True words, wrong target
Commentators draw a careful line here. Eliphaz is not talking nonsense. He is aiming true words at the wrong man.
William KellyThe second round of speeches opens with the appeal of Eliphaz. He now shows less restraint about the growing sense in his soul that Job must lack integrity. As before, there is weighty truth in what he presses, and he presses it with great force. But applying it to this sufferer had no ground at all, and so it was unjust in the highest degree.
Ridout grants that Job's wild language gave Eliphaz something to seize on. But he stops short at the charge of craftiness:
Samuel RidoutBut when he accuses Job of craftiness, the charge is untrue. The poor sufferer had poured out his misery without caring what it would cost him. Whatever else Job is, he is no hypocrite.
Why Eliphaz measures words by profit
His whole test is usefulness — and he applies the same test to godliness itself.
F. B. HoleThis speech of Eliphaz is short, for he felt that he was a wise man reasoning with unprofitable talk, and listening to speeches that were worth nothing. Job, he thought, was casting off fear — or as another version puts it, making godliness of no effect — and so holding back prayer. In his view, godliness paid: it brought God's favour, shown in prosperity here on earth. If it did not, where was the practical gain of godliness?
This was not only Eliphaz's mistake:
William KellyHere is where they went astray. They assumed that the way the world looks now is a fair expression of God's judgment on men's ways. We find this assumption running through the speeches of the three friends. At first they voiced it fairly calmly, but in the end it ripened into severity.
The warning the chapter leaves us
The friends judged Job by what they could see. That is the trap this book exists to expose.
William KellyNo lesson teaches us more than this one about the danger of judging by appearances. It is without question a main point in this remarkable book. A quick look at the surface is never the way to reach a righteous judgment. The Lord Himself warned of this in His day. If it was wrong in them then, it is far more blameworthy in us.
And underneath the words Eliphaz dismissed as worthless, something real was still there:
William KellyUnderneath there was faith. Job's trust in God was far stronger and truer than that of anyone who blamed him, and God did bring that out in the end.
Summary
- Unprofitable — Eliphaz's verdict on everything Job has said is that it achieves nothing. His picture for it is the east wind: dry and withering.
- Unanswered — the charge takes the place of a reply. Eliphaz never names which words condemn Job. One sweeping accusation cancels the whole defence.
- Untrue where it counts — there is weighty truth in what Eliphaz presses, but it had no ground in this sufferer. Whatever his faults, Job was no hypocrite.
- Unexamined — his measure of profit rests on a belief that godliness pays in visible prosperity. So suffering can only mean guilt.
- Unseen — the friends judged by the surface. Underneath Job's wild speech lay a faith stronger than that of anyone who blamed him.