And she said, “If it please the king, and if I have found favor in his sight, and if the thing seems right before the king, and I am pleasing in his eyes, let an order be written to revoke the letters devised by Haman the Agagite, the son of Hammedatha, which he wrote to destroy the Jews who are in all the provinces of the king.
Haman is dead and Mordecai is prime minister of Persia. Yet the letters ordering the slaughter of the Jews are still in force across the empire. Here Esther asks the king to undo what the law says cannot be undone, and she asks it as a favour, not as a right.
Why She Had to Ask Again
The enemy's fall did not cancel the enemy's law. One writer sets out what was still unfinished, and what it cost Esther to raise it.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinMordecai had become the prime minister of Persia. Haman the Agagite had been executed, and all his property given to the queen. Still the horrible decree stood; the first proclamation was still in force. Something had to be done to complete the deliverance of her people. Her life and Mordecai's life had been spared, but what about her beloved people? … Once more she enters the presence of the king. Once more the king holds out the golden sceptre, from which we learn that his decree was still in force and that Esther once more risked her life. But she knew he loved her.
The Name She Uses for the Enemy
Esther does not simply say "Haman." She gives his full title, and that title reaches back centuries.
Morrish Bible DictionaryHaman was the son of Hammedatha the Agagite. Fürst says that Josephus and Jewish tradition both explain Haman's foreign family name as Amalekite. That is, Haman was an Amalekite. This explains why Mordecai refused to bow down before Haman. He belonged to the race with which the Lord had sworn to have war for ever, and which Saul was told to wipe out completely (Ex. 17:16; Deut. 25:19; 1 Sam. 15:3).
A Request Built Entirely on Favour
Four times over, Esther hangs her request on the king's pleasure, not on her rank as queen.
H. L. RossierEsther still has one more duty toward the one who holds supreme authority. She speaks to Ahasuerus, throws herself at his feet, weeps and begs him. Before, she had fasted and had neither eaten nor drunk for three days; now, she humbles herself before the sovereign and implores his grace. He alone, her lawful husband, can turn the calamity aside in grace. He holds out the golden scepter to Esther. Then she makes her request, knowing that only his grace can grant it (v. 5). This will also be the attitude of the Jewish wife in a coming day, when evil plotted by men against the people is about to overtake them. Only grace will be able to put an end to judgment.
One of the Condemned People
Haman wrote the letters "to destroy the Jews," and Esther does not separate her own safety from theirs. That link runs through the whole book.
Michael HardtEsther's lineage and nationality play a central role in the entire narrative. Mordecai had charged her not to reveal her nationality or "birth" (2:10, 20). The Jews are described as "her people" (2:20; 4:8; 7:3). This detail casts much light on the true meaning, though it does not apply to the church at all. The fate of the whole people hangs on their representative, the faithful remnant, pictured in Esther. The fate of the Jewish people is central to the book.
What the King Could and Could Not Do
Esther asks for the letters to be revoked. What she gets is not a cancelled law but a second one.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinThe proclamation of death stood, but alongside it there was given a proclamation of life. They did not need to die. Their enemies were given into their hands. They acted on this second proclamation and believed what it said. The first decree stood and could not be revoked. Yet the second decree set them free from death and gave them liberty.
The second letter did not argue with the first; it armed the people the first had condemned.
Leslie M. GrantThese letters authorised the Jews in all these places to gather together and protect their own lives. They now had permission to destroy, kill and annihilate any people who attacked them on the 13th day of the 12th month. That was the very day the first decree had authorised the killing of the Jews (vv. 11-12). So, though no one could change the laws of the Medes and Persians, the second edict made the first one powerless, and did so legally.
Summary
- Danger — Haman was executed, but his letters were still in force. A dead enemy does not cancel a living sentence.
- Approach — she came before the king a second time and risked death again, trusting his love for her.
- Grace — her four "if" clauses show a woman leaning wholly on favour, not on rank or right.
- Solidarity — she pleads as one of the condemned people, not as the queen who escaped. Their fate hangs on their representative.
- Answer — no one erased the decree of death. A second proclamation of life went out in the same royal name and overtook it.