True Bible Answers

Why does God allow evil?

This is a question that presses upon thoughtful minds, and Scripture does not shrink from it — though the answer it gives is not quite what human philosophy expects. Several strands of truth come together.

The Origin and Entrance of Evil

F. B. Hole confronts the question head-on in his paper on Creation and the Fall. He first establishes that evil was not native to creation — it was an invader:

All that God made was good. Five times over is this said (in verses 10, 12, 18, 21, and 25) about matter, whether animate or inanimate. These are important statements in view of the fact that the ordered scene of creation was so soon invaded by evil. It proves that it was an invasion from without and not produced from within. All as it left God's hand was perfect and undefiled.

F. B. Hole

Then he addresses the deeper question — why God permitted evil to invade His creation at all:

Difficulties arise in many minds as to the origin of evil and why God should permit it at all. Is there scriptural light as to this?

His answer is striking in its honesty:

There is ample light as to the origin and entrance of evil into this world, and with that we have been dealing. Scripture also indicates that it was through pride that sin found a place originally with the devil (1 Tim. 3:6), and under the title "King of Tyre" we appear to get a description of Satan's original glory and irremediable fall in Ezekiel 28:11-19. But as to why God, knowing all that would ultimately be involved, ever created Satan or man, and why He permitted evil to ever invade any part of His fair creation, Scripture is silent, and we know nothing.

After all, these are matters which lie beyond the reach of finite minds. Is it likely that God would reveal to us such secrets of His high and eternal counsels as must lie on the plane of infinity? If He did, should we be any the wiser? No! It is well for us to call a halt here and say with the Psalmist, "Such knowledge is too wonderful for me: it is high, I cannot attain to it" (Ps. 139:6).

Creatfal

The Enemy's Hand Is Under God's Hand

But if the ultimate reason lies beyond finite reach, Scripture reveals a great deal about how God governs evil. The book of Job is the supreme Old Testament study of this question. William Kelly writes of it:

The problem handled in the book is the moral government of God: how to conciliate His righteousness with the sufferings, and even extreme sufferings, of a just and godly man? how to understand the permission of evil, in its worst form of malignant persecution, with His own good, and this before and apart from His revelation in Christ and by redemption?

William Kelly

What emerges from Job is not an abstract theory but a living drama. God — not Satan — took the initiative. Kelly notes:

How perfect the rebuke to man's dream of God indifferent to all! It was Jehovah who here raised the question: Satan could only avail himself of the prosperity of Job to insinuate self-interest. ... Jehovah gives the adversary permission to put forth his hand, but not against his person. What a comfort that even the enemy's hand is under God's hand! All is measured on the side of evil, infinite on that of good.

And again:

Thus we see that not only men's lusts and passions but the elements were in Satan's hand, so far as God allowed.

Evil operates, but only within boundaries set by a sovereign God. Satan is powerful, but he is not free — his hand is always "under God's hand."

The Refiner's Fire: Why God Allows Suffering Rather Than Preventing It

C. H. Mackintosh takes up the question of why God does not simply use His power to remove evil and suffering, and gives a deeply searching answer. Writing on Daniel 3, where Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego were cast into the furnace, he observes:

But could not the Lord have preserved His beloved servants from being cast into the furnace? No doubt. This would have been but a very small matter to Him. He did not, however, do so: it was His will that the faith of His servants should be put to the test — should be tried in the furnace — should be passed through the most searching crucible, in order that it "might be found to praise and honour and glory." Is it because the refiner sets no value on the wedge of gold, that he puts it into the furnace? No; but because he does. And, as some one has beautifully remarked, "His object is not merely to remove the dross, but to brighten the metal."

C. H. Mackintosh

God could have used raw power to prevent the trial. He chose something better:

It is very evident that had the Lord, by an act of power, kept His servants out of the furnace, there would have been less glory to Him, and as a consequence, less blessing to them. It was far better to have His presence and sympathy in the furnace, than His power to keep them out of it. What glory to Him in this! And what unspeakable privilege to them! The Lord went down and walked with His Nazarites in the furnace into which their faithfulness had brought them.

Then Mackintosh states the principle in its broadest form:

It is well to bear in mind that this is not the day of Christ's power; but it is the day of His sympathy. When passing through the deep waters of affliction, the heart may, at times, feel disposed to ask, 'Why does not the Lord display His power, and deliver me?' The answer is, This is not the day of His power. He could avert that sickness — He could remove that difficulty — He could take off that pressure — He could prevent that catastrophe — He could preserve that beloved and fondly-cherished object from the cold grasp of death. But, instead of putting forth His power to deliver, He allows things to run their course, and pours His own sweet sympathy into the oppressed and riven heart, in such a way as to elicit the acknowledgment that we would not, for worlds, have missed the trial, because of the abundance of the consolation.

DISCIPLP

God's Sovereignty Is Never Separated From His Righteousness

Norman Anderson, writing on Romans 9, shows that God's sovereignty is never arbitrary — it is always exercised in perfect righteousness:

Vessels of wrath have fitted themselves for wrath, while vessels of mercy will forever be indebted to Him for preparing them for glory, in spite of the fact that this epistle elsewhere says, Rom. 3:22-23, "For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God."

Norman Anderson

F. B. Hole acknowledges the tension between God's sovereignty and human responsibility, and the honest limits of our understanding:

If any would say to us, If God in His electing mercy is pleased to save this one and that one, why should He not elect and save all? — we have no answer to give. What lies behind His decisions is not revealed to us, who are but His creatures; but He has revealed Himself to us in Christ, and so we are sure that what He decides is right, and ultimately all will see how right it has been.

F. B. Hole

The Answer Is Not a Theory But a Person

Rather than offering a philosophical system to explain evil, Scripture points to a Person who has defeated it. E. L. Bevir, writing in The Christian's Friend, puts it well:

We need not torture our minds with Byzantine questions as to the origin of evil; we have enough in that which is revealed in Scripture, which presents to us the Son of God manifested that He might undo the works of the devil. It is blessed to think of the end of the controversy.

E. L. Bevir

And A. J. Pollock writes with characteristic directness:

There are many questions that men will never be able to answer, whether it be as to the origin of life, or the origin of evil, or why God does this or does that, but we can testify that the knowledge of Christ as a personal Saviour satisfies the deepest aspirations of the heart, and renders the soul content and more than content with God's revelation — the Bible.

A. J. Pollock

The testimony of these writers converges on several points. First, evil did not originate from within God's creation — it was an invasion, and all that God made was good. Second, the ultimate reason God permitted evil lies beyond the reach of finite minds, and Scripture is honestly silent on it. Third, though the why remains hidden, the how of God's government is clear: the enemy's hand is always under God's hand — evil operates only within divinely measured bounds. Fourth, God's present purpose in allowing suffering is not indifference but refining love — He withholds His power in order to give something better: His presence, His sympathy, and the deepening of faith. This is not the day of His power but the day of His grace. Fifth, and most importantly, the answer to evil is ultimately not a theory but a Person — the Son of God, manifested to undo the works of the devil. The end of the controversy is not in doubt.