When was Numbers written?
Answered from the commentary of Walter Scott, Arno Clemens Gaebelein, Morrish Bible Dictionary and 8 others
Numbers was written by Moses himself, at the time of the events it records, and finished on the Plains of Moab, about 1452 B.C., as Israel stood at the end of the wilderness journey ready to cross the Jordan. The book runs from the second month of the second year after the Exodus to the tenth month of the fortieth year, and it closes with Israel in the plains of Moab by Jordan near Jericho. Numbers 33:2 says that Moses wrote down their goings out according to their journeys by the commandment of Jehovah. That record of the camps was set down when the wilderness journeys were over, while the people were on the very edge of the land and before they entered it. In the same way, Numbers 15:32 reads plainly if it was written, as it probably was, in the plains of Moab. The ground the authors give is that only someone living through these events could have written the book. Christ Himself declares that Moses wrote the law, saying "he wrote of me," and this settles the question for those who own His authority. It follows that if Moses is denied as the writer, the genuineness and trustworthiness of the whole book must be given up.
The authors all agree on this. The later dating is mentioned only to be refuted: the critics who place much of Numbers in a priestly narrative from about the time of the Babylonian captivity, or who say it was put together centuries after Moses. They call these theories foolish, and the priestly code an invention. Some of them allow for slight additions by an inspired editor. Darby, for example, thinks Numbers 21:14-15 may have been added when the book was edited, traditionally by Ezra, or perhaps by Samuel or Jeremiah. Such additions do not touch the claim that Moses wrote the book by inspiration.
Verses: Numbers 15:32, Numbers 21:15, Numbers 33:2, Numbers 36:13, Numbers 1:1, Numbers 10:11, Numbers 12:3, Numbers 21:14, Numbers 33:38, Numbers 22:1, Deuteronomy 31:9, Deuteronomy 31:24, Exodus 24:4, Luke 24:44, John 5:46, Joshua 8:31, 1 Kings 6:1, Mark 12:26
The above is AI generated summary based on the writers below.
What the commentators say
The passages the answer is drawn from, the most direct first, with the words that bear on the question marked.
On the Plains of Moab, about 1452 B.C.
Numbers is closely linked with Leviticus, though it differs greatly from it. Moses wrote the record of the events in the wilderness as he wrote the instructions Jehovah gave concerning the worship of His people. Only a person who was contemporaneous with the events recorded in Numbers could have been the author of this book. In chapter 33:2 we find a statement to the effect that Moses wrote their goings out according to their journeys. If Moses did not write the book, who then was the author? If the Mosaic authorship is denied the genuineness and trustworthiness of the entire book must be given up. Higher criticism, so called, claims that Moses did not write Numbers and that the book itself was not contemporary with the events it describes. They call attention that throughout the book Moses is referred to in the third person. They make much of chapter 12:3, as bearing definite testimony against Moses as the author. (For the explanation see our annotations on that chapter.) The same documents, compilers and redactors, etc., which, as it is claimed, composed the other books of the Pentateuch, and put them into shape in which we have them, centuries after Moses lived, are also brought into play in connection with Numbers. It would be more than unprofitable to follow these foolish theories which have laid the foundation to the most serious denials of the revelation of God.
Just as, at the judgment seat of Christ, there will be a review of all our history here on earth, so we find now a review of Israel's journey from the time they left Egypt. It is noted that Moses wrote the record of these things at the command of the Lord (v.2) and it is quite evident that Moses was the writer of all of Numbers and also of Deuteronomy except the last chapter, or at least the last nine verses of that chapter.
Again, Ex. 16:35-36; Ex. 22:29; Lev. 26:34-35, 43; Deut. 19:14, are only difficult to one who denies the essential claim of scripture. Lev. 18:28 is cleared in its true sense by simply reading verses 24, 25. Num. 15:32 is quite plain if written, as it probably was, in the plains of Moab. Gen. 40:15 is most natural on the lips of Joseph looking back on the land where his father and himself were once together, and designating it by "the Hebrews" — a name familiar among the Gentiles.
Numbers seems to be equally impossible to be attributed to any other than Moses, making allowance for an inspired editor's slight additions. For it presents the circumstances of the march through the wilderness with the suited commandments of Jehovah. It has (if we believe the apostle in 1 Cor. 10) a spiritual bearing on the Christian pilgrim which only divine wisdom could have combined, yet characteristic of the prophets, and of one only inferior to the highest, who had ample leisure and conferred power to indite as God enjoined, with love for Israel and yet more for Jehovah. This spared neither the people nor the misleaders, neither Aaron, nor Miriam, nor himself. Is not this as edifying as it contrasts with any pretended sacred book of man?
The real "priestly" narrative — which does, of course, look sharply after their interests, — came later still. It is supposed to have added largely to Genesis, considerably to Exodus, including all about the special priesthood, the entire book of Leviticus, and much of Numbers. It belongs "approximately, to the time of the Babylonish captivity"! And now, with Ezra's revision, the Pentateuch is complete. But we must take notice, if we are to do justice to Dr. Driver's position, that he allows that there was a certain indefinable amount of tradition long before, and even, as we see, some written documents. The aggregate amount of these it is very hard to determine.
"Although, therefore, the Priests' Code assumed finally the shape in which we have it in the age subsequent to Ezekiel, it rests ultimately upon an ancient traditional basis, and many of the institutions prominent in it are recognized in various stages of their growth, by the earlier pre-exile literature, by Deuteronomy and by Ezekiel. The laws of P [the priestly code], even when they included later elements, were still referred to Moses, — no doubt because, in its basis and origin, Hebrew legislation was actually derived from him, and was only modified gradually."
They call this kind of criticism scientific. It surely has all the marks of so-called science. Speculation, uncertainty and complicated statements are the leading characteristics of this criticism. They claim now that the Pentateuch (the five books written by Moses) was never written by him, but that these books consist of four diverse documents. These they designate as follows: 1. The Jehovist. 2. The Elohist. 3. The Deuteronomist. 4. The Priestly Code. The authorship of Moses has been completely given up and it is claimed that the earliest part of the Pentateuch was written perhaps six hundred years after Moses' death. They put the date of the greater part of these five books after the Babylonian captivity.
The fourth book of the Pentateuch bears in the Greek translation of the Old Testament (Septuagint) the title Arithmoi, of which the Latin Numeri and our English "Numbers" are translations. It is called by this name because the people Israel are twice numbered in this book. The first time when they started on their journey, and the second time at the close of their thirty-eight years wandering (chapters 1, and 26). The Hebrews have given to this book the name Be-Midbar, which means "in the wilderness."
It is the wilderness book and covers the entire period of Israel 's history from the second month of the second year after the Exodus from Egypt to the tenth month of the fortieth year. However, the years of wanderings are passed over in silence, only the different camps are mentioned. Our annotations point out the significance of this.
The Author of Numbers
In a little over a year from the Exodus there had to be a numbering of the people. When we come to Numbers 26 we find there had to be another numbering just before they entered the land; and from these two occasions the book gets its name. It is the Book however in which we get details of the journeyings of the people in the wilderness. If it opens at the end of the first year in the wilderness after the law had been given, it closes with the people on the border of the promised land at the end of the forty years.
Different views are held concerning the period of time consumed in the giving of these words of Jehovah. It is evident that Leviticus and Numbers 1-10:10 were given between the first day of the month and the twentieth day of the second month, that is of the second year after their departure from Egypt .
Verses
- Numbers 15:32And while the children of Israel were in the wilderness they found a man gathering sticks on the sabbath day.
- Numbers 21:14–1514Therefore it is said in the book of the wars of Jehovah, Vaheb in Suphah, and the brooks of Arnon; 15And the stream of the brooks which turneth to the dwelling of Ar, And inclineth toward the border of Moab.
- Numbers 33:2And Moses wrote their goings out according to their journeys by the commandment of Jehovah; and these are their journeys according to their goings out.
- Numbers 36:13These are the commandments and the ordinances which Jehovah commanded through Moses to the children of Israel, in the plains of Moab, by the Jordan of Jericho.
- Numbers 1:1And Jehovah spoke to Moses in the wilderness of Sinai in the tent of meeting, on the first of the second month, in the second year after their departure from the land of Egypt, saying,
- Numbers 10:11And it came to pass in the second year, in the second month, on the twentieth of the month, that the cloud was taken up from off the tabernacle of the testimony.
- Numbers 12:3But the man Moses was very meek, above all men that were upon the face of the earth.