that that might be fulfilled which was spoken through Esaias the prophet, saying,
Kommentar til dette verset
Matthew 4:14 marks the transition from the Lord's temptation in the wilderness to the beginning of His public ministry in Galilee — "That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Esaias the prophet, saying..." The verse is the Spirit's own comment on why Jesus left Nazareth and settled by the sea in the borderland of Zebulun and Naphtali. Two strands run through the commentary: the dispensational meaning of His withdrawal from Jerusalem, and the significance of Isaiah's prophecy being fulfilled in that particular despised region.
The move to Galilee as a judgment on Jerusalem
J. N. Darby reads the Lord's departure into Galilee as a quiet but weighty verdict on the centre of Jewish religion:
J. N. DarbyJohn being cast into prison, the Lord departs into Galilee. This movement, which determined the scene of His ministry outside Jerusalem and Judea, had great significance with respect to the Jews. The people (so far as centred in Jerusalem, and boasting in the possession of the promises, the sacrifices, and the temple, and in being the royal tribe) lost the presence of the Messiah, the Son of David. He went away for the manifestation of His Person, for the testimony of God's intervention in Israel, to the poor and despised of the flock; for the remnant and poor of the flock are already in Matthew 3 and Matthew 4 clearly distinguished from the heads of the people.
Darby sees in this a quiet re-founding of the stock of promise outside the official religious centre:
He thus really became the true stock, instead of being a branch of that which had been planted elsewhere; although this effect was not yet fully manifested.
The fulfilment of Isaiah's prophecy
Darby then draws out the force of the Isaiah citation itself. The prophecy Matthew quotes looks back to the Assyrian invasions of the north and forward to a greater light:
At the same time this manifestation of the Son of David in Galilee was the fulfilment of a prophecy in Isaiah. The force of that prophecy is this: although the Roman captivity was far more terrible than the invasion of the Assyrians when they came up against the land of Israel, there was nevertheless this circumstance which altered everything, namely, the presence of the Messiah, the true Light, in the land.
He is careful to note that Matthew is not giving us biography here but a positional portrait:
We observe that the Spirit of God here passes over the whole history of Jesus until the commencement of His ministry after the death of John the Baptist. He gives Jesus His proper position in the midst of Israel — Emmanuel, the Son of David, the Beloved of God, acknowledged as His Son, the faithful One in Israel, though exposed to all Satan's temptations; and then at once, afterwards, His prophetic position announced by Isaiah, and the kingdom proclaimed as at hand.
And in a footnote he adds that the removal from Nazareth was itself prophetic of a deeper displacement:
And we may remark here, that He leaves the Jews and Jerusalem, as already remarked, and His natural place, so to speak, what gave Him His name, Nazareth, and takes His prophetic place. The casting of John into prison was significant of His own rejection. John was His forerunner in it, as in his mission, of the Lord.
Light springing up where darkness was deepest
The Bible Treasury notes on Matthew (contributed by Les Hodgett) fasten on the moral beauty of Christ choosing the darkest corner of the land to make His home:
Les HodgettThe various events recorded here, no matter how brought about — the going down to Egypt or here to Capernaum, were all to fulfil the word of God. Israel's greatest privilege was to be custodians of the word of God.
And again, on why Galilee of all places:
He identified Himself with the poor of the flock, those in the greatest danger, bordering on the Gentile world. In that place of darkness light sprang up. Yes, they were farthest from that which was intended to be the centre of light. In the millennium it will be recorded, "this man was born there," not in darkness. The light always becomes darkness if we refuse "the light of life." Whatever belittles the Lord must bring in darkness. "If the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness."
Hodgett also ties the gathering of the first disciples to this same moment — the Messiah, having bound the strong man in the wilderness, now begins to spoil his goods in the region Isaiah had named:
Satan had for the first time met one stronger than he; he was spoiled, not yet annulled. With the Lord's word there was power. If He said, "Follow me," there was power with it, and those who left all to be identified with Him formed the remnant.
Synthesis
So Matthew 4:14 is far more than a geographical footnote. By citing Isaiah, the Spirit tells us why the King moved where He did. Jerusalem — proud of its temple, its sacrifices, and its royal tribe — was quietly passed over, and the Messiah went to live among the poor and despised of the flock on the Gentile border, in the very region Isaiah had marked out as sitting "in darkness" and the "shadow of death." The imprisonment of John, the withdrawal from Nazareth, and the settling at Capernaum were not accidents of circumstance but the unfolding of prophecy: the true Light rising precisely where the darkness had been deepest, gathering a remnant around Himself, and proclaiming the kingdom of heaven at hand. The verse therefore fixes both a dispensational shift — Messiah leaving the official centre — and a prophetic confirmation that the One walking by the sea of Galilee is the very Emmanuel of Isaiah's vision.