If therefore thou shouldest offer thy gift at the altar, and there shouldest remember that thy brother has something against thee,
이 절의 주석
Matthew 5:23 — "Therefore if thou bring thy gift to the altar, and there rememberest that thy brother hath aught against thee..." — sits at the heart of the Lord's unfolding of the inward righteousness that belongs to the kingdom. Having just traced anger and contempt back to their root as the very seed of murder, He turns to show what this inward holiness demands positively: not merely the absence of violence, but the pursuit of reconciliation.
The setting: inward righteousness, not outward act
William Kelly draws the connection between verses 21–22 and verse 23 very carefully. Having shown that the Lord treats contempt and angry words as the equivalent of murder in God's eyes, he writes:
William Kelly"He is expanding the law; He is showing now One who looks at and judges the feeling of the heart. Therefore it is not at all a question merely of the consequences of violence to a man, for there might be no very bad effect produced by these words of anger, but they proved the state of the heart; and this is what the Lord is dealing with here."
It is precisely because the heart is in view that the Lord presses the matter onto the disciple who had already arrived at the altar:
"'Therefore if thou bring thy gift to the altar, and there rememberest that thy brother hath aught against thee, leave there thy gift before the altar, and go thy way: first be reconciled to thy brother, and then come and offer thy gift' (vers. 23, 24). He is not yet manifesting the Christian in his entire separation from the Jewish system. These words clearly show a connection with Israel — though the principle applies to a Christian; for the altar has no reference to the Lord's table." (`authors/kelly/2Newtest/MATT_PT1.html`)
So the setting is Jewish — a disciple literally approaching the temple altar with an offering — yet the moral principle reaches every believer.
The priority of reconciliation over worship
Kelly takes up the passage again in his Gospel series and draws out what an extraordinary demand this is upon the conscience:
"The Lord was not content, with authority peculiarly and emphatically His own, to lay down the hateful evil of anger in heart and word, even if not in violent deed. He proceeds to carry out the revealed mind of God for the kingdom by requiring reconciliation if any had stumbled one's brother. Throughout, disciples are in view, not mankind in general. Sin in disciples is exceeding sinful: good is peremptory (surely not evil) for the kingdom of the heavens."
Notice the direction of the offence. It is not "if thou hast aught against thy brother" but "if thy brother hath aught against thee." The worshipper is to examine whether he has given offence, not whether he has received one. Kelly presses the point:
"Thus the Lord enjoins the disciple who was bringing his gift to the altar, if he remembered that his brother had anything against him, to stop short of his devoted purpose as to God Himself, and be reconciled to his brother, before returning to offer his gift. What tenderness of conscience was looked for, brotherly affection, lowliness of mind, readiness to own wrong, and desire to win an offended brother! It was the very reverse of anger, contempt, or hatred, which He had just treated, as His servant in measure re-echoed at a much later day (1 John 3:11-15)."
And Kelly does not miss the sting of application to the very hearers who stood before the Lord:
"And that reverse was the Jews' case. For absorbed in bringing their offering to the altar, they were blind to their wrong against Him who deigned to be their brother, with far more than brother's love, born for adversity as they knew not. But they refused to be reconciled, and persisted in their offering, however offensive to God. It was presumptuous sin, and high-handed self-will under cloak of religion." (`authors/kelly/gospel/12.html`)
The deeper layer: Israel and their Messiah
The verses that follow (vv. 25–26) about agreeing with the adversary "while thou art in the way" expose a second, prophetic layer that Kelly sees running just beneath the surface of the personal exhortation. Kelly writes:
"What follows points to a still more solemn consideration. Who that weighs scripture can doubt that the Lord in vers. 25, 26 refers to the position in which the Jew then stood with God? This was a far deeper consideration than any other brother aggrieved: their Lord became their brother. The awful truth is that He who loved Israel and would die for them, Jehovah-Messiah, was made their adversary by their perverse disobedience and blind unbelief; and His presence, which had been their salvation and best blessing if received, must bring on the inevitable crisis by their utter rejection and hatred of Him."
And again, linking the failure to be reconciled with Israel's national consignment to prison:
"I believe that Israel were guilty of that very folly — Israel as a people — that they did not agree with the adversary quickly. There was the Messiah, and they, being adversaries of Him, treated Him as their adversary and compelled God to be against them by their unbelief... The Jewish nation, from their rejection of the Messiah, have been shut out from all the promises of God; as a nation they have been committed to prison, and there they must remain till the uttermost farthing is paid." (`authors/kelly/2Newtest/MATT_PT1.html`)
Darby on the same progression
J. N. Darby, in his Synopsis, sees the same double bearing — personal and national — compressed into one sentence:
J. N. Darby"All this supposes the case of the possibility of the kingdom being established in the world, but the opposition of the greater part of men to its establishment. It is not a question of the sinner's redemption, but of the realisation of the character proper to a place in the kingdom of God; that which the sinner ought to seek while he is in the way with his adversary, lest he should be delivered to the judge — which indeed has happened to the Jews." (`authors/darby/synopsis/matthew/matthew5.html`)
So for Darby as for Kelly, verse 23 stands within a wider call: the kingdom's righteousness is not an outward routine of worship but a moral condition of heart, and the very people who heard Christ utter these words were themselves acting out their failure upon a vastly larger scale.
Synthesis
Matthew 5:23 teaches that God will not accept the worship of a hand that has wounded a brother and done nothing about it. The altar is not a refuge from moral obligation; it is the place where moral obligation becomes most acute. The Lord does not say, "finish your offering first" — He says leave the gift and go. Worship is suspended until the breach is healed, because the state of the heart toward one's brother is the true measure of the state of the heart toward God.
Three threads run through the verse:
- The law is deepened, not loosened. Where the old commandment dealt with the hand that killed, Christ deals with the heart that despises and the conscience that would still presume to bring a gift as though nothing were wrong.
- Responsibility flows outward. It is not enough to have no grievance of one's own; the disciple must ask whether he has given one, and must take the first step — "go thy way: first be reconciled to thy brother."
- There is a prophetic shadow behind the personal command. Israel stood in the very posture Christ describes: bringing gifts to the altar while refusing to be reconciled with the Brother who had come to them in love. Their failure at the altar becomes the pattern of their national failure at the cross, and the closing word about the prison and the uttermost farthing traces out the long discipline that has followed.
The command is thus as urgent today as it was then. No offering, no prayer, no service is so pressing that it cannot wait while a believer goes to put a wrong right with his brother — because God values the tender conscience and the reconciled heart far above any gift brought to His altar.