Epaphras, my fellow prisoner in Christ Jesus, sends greetings to you,
Paul's letter to Philemon closes with greetings from the men who were with him. The first name is Epaphras, and the title Paul gives him carries weight: a fellow prisoner, and a prisoner "in Christ Jesus."
The man behind the name
Epaphras is not a stranger dropped into the last lines. One dictionary gathers his whole story from three short mentions:
Morrish Bible DictionaryFellow prisoner with Paul at Rome. He worked at Colossae, the place he belonged to. He is described as "a faithful minister of Christ," and as one who agonised in prayer for the Colossians, with zeal for their welfare. Col. 1:7; Col. 4:12; Philemon 23.
The force of "fellow prisoner"
What does "fellow prisoner" mean here? Kelly sets the word beside other titles Paul uses, and will not press it too far:
William KellyIt is not "fellow-soldier," as said of Archippus in verse 2... It is not exactly desmios, "prisoner," as Paul speaks of himself in this and in other letters. Nor do we have enough reason to say that Andronicus, Junias and Epaphras were bound in a literal chain. The apostle himself was bound, for Christ's sake. Yet it is a word of force, and means a captive, or war prisoner. Certainly we hear of no outward event in the conflicts of the gospel that gives a ground for such a title.
Why Epaphras here and Aristarchus in Colossians
One writer sets the two letters side by side and stops at a question:
The Christian's FriendIn the letter to the Colossians Aristarchus was his fellow prisoner. Here it is Epaphras. Did the saints take it in turn to share the apostle's imprisonment?
Kelly knows the same suggestion from other writers. He finds one text stands in its way:
William KellyMeyer, following Fritzsche, suggests that some of the apostle's companions chose to share his prison by turns. On this view, it was the turn of Aristarchus when he wrote to the Colossians, and of Epaphras when he wrote to Philemon... This is ingenious, no doubt; but Rom. 16:7 presents no small difficulty to accepting it.
What the prison produced
Why did the Lord leave Paul in prison? One writer answers by looking at what the prison produced:
The Bible TreasuryThere is nothing more blessed than this thought: Jesus is able to throw Himself into our own circumstances. He was in prison with Paul. He could as easily have delivered him out of prison as He had delivered Peter. But He chose rather to share the prison with him. There He made him the keeper of His deepest thoughts. We have the prison to thank for the deep revelations of the mind of God in the letters to the Ephesians and Colossians. It was not the active travelling. And so it was, in a lower degree, with Paul and Epaphras — the prison deepened their fellowship with one another.
Known for prayer
Prayer is what Epaphras is known for. Mackintosh makes it the test for every kind of service:
C. H. MackintoshBut behind everything, we want a spirit of prayer — fervent, agonising, persevering prayer. Without this, nothing can prosper. A prayerless man is a dried-up man. A prayerless preacher is a profitless preacher. A prayerless writer will send out barren pages. A prayerless evangelist will do little good. A prayerless pastor will have little food for the flock. We want men of prayer, men like Epaphras. Only the walls of the room where they pray alone see their agonising labours.
The order of the names
Epaphras comes first in this list of names. Kelly warns against reading rank into that:
William KellyLuke, called "the beloved physician" in Col. 4:14, here comes last among the fellow workers: clear proof that the order in no way marks, as men do, the spiritual value or the honourable rank of those brought before us.
Summary
- Captive. Paul's word for Epaphras is not "prisoner" or "fellow soldier" but captive — a war prisoner. It is a word of real force, though we have no firm ground for saying he wore literal chains.
- By turns. Colossians gives this title to Aristarchus, Philemon to Epaphras. One suggestion is that friends shared Paul's prison by turns. Kelly finds Romans 16:7 stands in the way.
- Shared. The Lord could have opened the prison, as He did for Peter. He chose instead to keep Paul company inside it, and the prison deepened the bond with Epaphras too.
- Prayer. What Epaphras left behind was agonising prayer for his home town. That labour needs no gift and no platform.
- Unranked. First place in the list is not first place in value; the order of names carries no spiritual rank.