Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man by lying with him.
Numbers 31 closes Moses' public service with an order that still shocks readers: the captives Israel's army brought home from Midian were not to be spared. The reason lies behind the battle, not in it — commentators trace it to Balaam's advice and to what the women of Midian had already done inside Israel's camp.
Why the anger fell on the captives
The soldiers thought they had won. Moses looked at the prisoners and saw the people who had ruined Israel.
Leslie M. GrantMoses' anger flared at once, and he rebuked them sharply for sparing the women. He reminded them that it was the women of Midian who had seduced the men of Israel, following Balaam's advice (vs.14-16). Phinehas should have seen what this meant, for he had already killed the woman of Midian, and the man of Israel with her, for their corrupt relationship.
Who was killed and who was spared
The command was not blind slaughter. It divided the captives, and it had a stated purpose.
Leslie M. GrantMoses commanded them to kill the young boys and all the women who had been intimate with a man. The other girls could stay alive and be brought into Israel (vs.17-18). Only in this way could Israel guard against contamination. How different is the truth of Christianity, which deals in grace to lead the ungodly to judge themselves and be saved!
One writer ties the sentence on the males to how completely the evil itself had to be dealt with.
C. H. MackintoshBut the evil had to be judged thoroughly. "Every male" had to be put to death — everyone in whom the energy of the evil was at work had to be completely wiped out.
A war Israel should never have had to fight
This campaign was not one of the battles for Canaan. Writers point out that Joshua, already appointed to lead, is absent from it entirely.
C. H. MackintoshThis war was, we might say, out of the ordinary. By rights, the people should never have had to fight it at all. It was not one of the wars of Canaan. It was simply the result of their own unfaithfulness — the fruit of their own unholy dealings with the nations outside Israel. So although Joshua, the son of Nun, had been appointed to succeed Moses as leader of the congregation, we find no mention of him at all in this war. Instead, the command of the expedition goes to Phinehas, the son of Eleazar the priest, and he sets out "with the holy instruments and the trumpets."
Whose vengeance was it?
God and Moses each described the campaign — and each named the other party as the one wronged.
William KellyWhen Jehovah spoke, He told His servant to avenge the people of Israel on the Midianites; but when Moses spoke, he told them to avenge the LORD on Midian. How exactly Jehovah secures His own glory, and in grace to His people! Jehovah thought of the children of Israel, and the children of Israel would think of Jehovah. It was one common interest — Jehovah and Israel had at heart one and the same thing.
Nothing allowed to survive unjudged
The same thoroughness reaches the metal, cloth and cattle in the verses that follow.
C. H. MackintoshThe women of Midian had trapped the people by their schemes, under the evil influence of Balaam the son of Peor. Now the people are called to clear themselves completely of all the defilement they had picked up by failing to keep watch. The sword must fall on the Midianites. All the spoil must pass either through the fire of judgement or through the water of purification. Not the smallest scrap of the evil thing may go unjudged.
Answering the charge of cruelty
Critics have long used the severity of this chapter as an argument against Scripture. One writer replied to a critic who objected to this very campaign.
J. N. DarbyMidian had been the means of corrupting Israel and leading them into idolatry, so that twenty-five thousand Israelites fell in the plague God sent. And it came about through the unspeakable wickedness of Balaam. When he could not curse Israel, he advised Balak to lead them into sin, and then God could not bless them. God punished them for this, and destroyed them as a settled nation there… The question is not one of history, but of the whole ways and dealings of God in judgment.
A second answer asks who passed the sentence, and who only carried it out.
William KellyIt was righteous vengeance on earth. It was not wrath from heaven, and still less was it grace reigning through righteousness as in the gospel… The vengeance was not Israel's but God's, and He chose to make His people the ones who carried out His judgment.
What Midian pictures for us
One writer turns this chapter into a warning about alliance with the world.
C. H. MackintoshOur proper business is to pass through the world as pilgrims and strangers… But we fail to keep this clear separation. We let ourselves be drawn into alliance with the world, and so we get caught up in trouble and conflict that never belonged to us at all. War with Midian formed no part of Israel's proper work. They had to thank themselves for it. But God is gracious… God, in His infinite goodness, brings good out of evil.
Summary
- Cause. The order goes back to Balaam's advice and to the women of Midian who seduced Israel. It punished a named crime.
- Purpose. Contamination drew the line among the captives. This was the only way to keep the source of Israel's ruin out of the camp.
- Authority. Israel swung the sword, but the sentence was God's. The vengeance was His, not the nation's.
- Thoroughness. Nothing the evil had touched escaped. Captives, metal and cloth all had to pass through judgement or purification first.
- Warning. The war was avoidable. It grew out of Israel's alliance with the world around them, and that alliance still brings trouble today.