Then Bildad the Shuhite answered and said:
Job 8:1 · ESVView all translations

Job has just poured out his anguish in reply to Eliphaz, and now a second friend breaks in. The verse gives only a name and an introduction. Yet everything after it hangs on three questions: who this man was, why he speaks, and whether God will accept his explanation of Job's ruin.

The man who answers

Commentators identify him by his family line and by how his part in the story ends:

One of Job's friends, "the Shuhite," perhaps a descendant of Shuah the son of Abraham and Keturah. He in no way understood Job's case, and could only judge that God was punishing Job for wickedness, though God had called Job a righteous man. God became angry with Bildad. But Bildad and his two companions brought a sacrifice, and when Job prayed for them God accepted him.

Morrish Bible Dictionary

So the reader knows the outcome in advance. God Himself will later judge this speech — and not in Bildad's favour.

A harder tone than the first friend

"Answered" is a mild word for what comes next. Bildad picks up where Eliphaz left off, but his tone has changed:

Bildad the Shuhite now speaks to Job. He is less dogmatic than Eliphaz, and less courteous, but more outspoken. He must have lost his patience listening to Job's reply. Above all he resents what Job had said about God, the veiled accusations that had fallen from his lips. But as we will see, he too follows the logic of Eliphaz: God punishes Job for his sins. He starts at once to rebuke Job for what he had said.

Arno Clemens Gaebelein

Right about God, wrong about Job

Bildad's motive is not malice. He hears Job's complaint as an attack on God's character, and he will not let it stand:

Bildad now takes up what is fast becoming a controversy. He shows perhaps less of the courtesy and dignity that marked the speech of Eliphaz, and some harshness toward Job. This harshness seems to come from Job's bitter charge against God. For all his ignorance of divine principles, Bildad is jealous for the honor of God, and cannot let anyone accuse Him. In this he is surely right. But he fails to convince Job, because of the root error in the thinking of all of them: God must punish sin, and Job must be a sinner because God is punishing him.

Samuel Ridout

This is where the argument goes wrong. Bildad takes a true instinct about God's honor and builds a false rule on it.

Tradition as his authority

Bildad does not argue from his own experience. He rests his case on the wisdom of earlier generations:

Eliphaz had appealed to his own observation when he supposed that Job was guilty of some secret sin… Now Bildad appealed to tradition… In doing this, Bildad actually contradicted Eliphaz. If Eliphaz had only been born "yesterday", what was his observation worth? But Bildad's appeal to tradition was just as empty as Eliphaz's appeal to observation, because Bildad also reached the wrong conclusion.

Leslie M. Grant

What the theory costs

Bildad's rule must also explain the death of Job's children. It does — at the cost of a father's heart:

Bildad assumes that Job's children had received the due reward of their wickedness, and had been cut off… This tears at the feelings of a parent who had found no evidence of such wickedness in his children, and who had watched carefully over their spiritual state. Bildad is driven to this by his wrong theory of God's ways.

Samuel Ridout

True things, wrongly placed

The warning here reaches anyone who speaks to a person in pain:

There is nothing so dangerous as a truth falsely applied. One can do the greatest harm with a word of Scripture in a wrong place. This is one of the devil's methods, and only unbroken communion with God can keep us from it. How important, then, is the call to "be slow to speak," above all in spiritual matters. People often come to regret quick conclusions and hasty judgments. Job's friends were surely ashamed of their mistakes when it was too late.

H. L. Rossier

The deeper lack was not information but understanding of God Himself:

Not one of the three friends understood Job. What is more, they did not know God's character, or His purpose in dealing with His dear servant… Instead of leading Job to judge himself, they only fed his desire to defend himself. They did not introduce God into the scene. They said some true things; but they had not the truth.

C. H. Mackintosh

Summary

- Who — Bildad the Shuhite is the second of Job's three friends. He "in no way understood Job's case," and God was later angry with him.

- Why — He speaks because Job's words sounded like an accusation against God. He is "jealous for the honor of God" — right in that, wrong in his rule.

- How — His authority is tradition, the wisdom of earlier generations. It proves "just as empty" as Eliphaz's appeal to what he had seen himself.

- Cost — The theory forces him to read the death of Job's children as their punishment, a blow to a grieving father.

- Lesson — "There is nothing so dangerous as a truth falsely applied." Bildad and his friends said some true things, but they did not bring the truth.

Reviewed by Orion on September 11, 2026