You say, ‘I am pure, without transgression; I am clean, and there is no iniquity in me.
Elihu opens his reply by repeating back a claim Job had made in his hearing: that he was clean, with no iniquity in him. Can a suffering man say that about himself, and what does it imply about the God who is afflicting him?
Job's Own Words
Elihu does not invent a charge. He builds his case out of what Job had said, sometimes word for word, sometimes in summary.
Samuel RidoutElihu refers to many of Job's own statements as proof of the dishonour done to God. Some of these he quotes exactly; for others he gives the substance of much that Job had said. He quotes him as saying, "I am pure, without transgression; I am clean, and there is no iniquity in me" (v. 9). Compare statements like these: "You know that I am not guilty" (Job 10:7). Job said, "although there is no violence in my hands, and my prayer is pure" (Job 16:17). Job said, "till I die I will not put away my integrity from me. I hold fast my righteousness and will not let it go" (Job 27:5-6).
That method leaves Job nowhere to escape to.
Leslie M. GrantHe does not question how Job had lived, but deals rather with what Job had clearly spoken. Job's friends had heard this, and Elihu also… Of course Job could not deny saying it. So Elihu had a firm basis for his message to Job.
The Contradiction Inside the Claim
Verse 9 does not stand alone. Job goes straight on to say that God finds occasions against him and counts him an enemy. Put the two halves side by side and something has to give.
C. H. MackintoshWhat words for any poor sinful mortal to utter!… And yet, notice what follows. He was so clean, so innocent, so free from iniquity. And yet he says of God, "He finds occasions against me, He counts me as His enemy." Here is an obvious contradiction. How could a holy, just, and righteous Being count a pure and innocent man His enemy? Impossible. Either Job was self-deceived, or God was unrighteous. Elihu, as the minister of truth, is not long in giving his verdict and telling us which is which.
The insult is not in Job protesting his innocence to his friends, but in what it forces him to say about God.
Samuel RidoutSo the insult against divine majesty becomes glaring — Job is pure, but God treats him as impure!
What Elihu Defends
Elihu's concern is not to settle whether Job was a good man.
Samuel RidoutElihu's chief concern throughout is the defence of God's character from the slurs cast upon it by Job. He is not so much occupied with what Job had done or what he was, and he holds no unworthy suspicions about him. But Job had spoken things in his hearing which he could not let pass without rebuke. This is as it should be. God must always be first, and His honour the chief concern of those who know Him.
The Hidden Root
Job could out-argue his three friends. That was never his real problem.
William KellyJob found it an easy matter to refute them. He seems to have taken considerable pleasure in reducing the three, one after another, to total silence. Yet even Job had not got to the root of the matter. The root was a little complacency in himself — a most subtle evil, one learned only in the presence of God.
Truth Before Comfort
Elihu refuses flattering titles because flattery cannot do the work Job needs done.
C. H. MackintoshTruth puts everyone in his right place. And because it does, it cannot hand out flattering titles to a poor guilty mortal, however much that mortal might enjoy them. Man must be brought to know himself, to see his true condition, to confess what he really is. This was precisely what Job needed. He did not know himself, and his friends could not give him that knowledge. He needed self-judgment; but his friends were wholly unable to produce it.
The same effort shows up in anyone who tries to prove himself right before God.
Charles StanleyNow what is all this but your best effort to justify yourself? God says that you are a sinner. You are doing your utmost to prove it is not so; and the discovery that you really are a sinner fills you with confusion. Of all the millions who have walked this earth, only One could stand before God the Judge, and that One was the blessed Lord Jesus. Now God, in divine righteousness, is calling poor sinners to stand before Him not as the Judge, but as the Justifier.
Summary
- Quoted. Elihu's charge rests on words Job spoke himself, exactly or in substance. Job cannot deny them.
- Contradicted. If Job is clean, then God is treating a pure man as an enemy. Both cannot be true.
- Defended. Elihu's aim is not Job's reputation but God's honour, which Job's words had slurred.
- Rooted. Job's real fault was not gross sin. It was quiet self-satisfaction, and only God's presence exposes it.
- Justified. Job needed self-knowledge, not flattery. Only one Man ever stood clean before God, and God now meets sinners as their Justifier.