He delivers even the one who is not innocent, who will be delivered through the cleanness of your hands.”
Job 22:30 · ESVView all translations

Eliphaz ends his appeal to Job with a promise. A restored man will stand so well with God that God rescues others through him. The words came true — but not for the man Eliphaz had in mind. The old English wording, "the island of the innocent," has confused readers for centuries.

The "island" that never existed

The strange phrase in older versions comes from one Hebrew word that can be read two ways. Commentators point to a familiar name to settle it:

There is a very old mistake in this verse. That word "island" is all wrong. The same Hebrew word means "island" and also "not." Take the name "Ichabod." There the "I" is used as an adverb meaning "not," for "Ichabod" means "not glory," or "the glory is departed." That is the word here. Translate it as a negative and you get the true sense — "him that is not innocent." "Island" only makes nonsense. No one has ever explained the old Authorised Version reading, and it is astonishing that it remains. Man lost his innocence and has never recovered it. Man gains holiness by the faith of Christ, but no recovery of innocence; that could not be.

William Kelly

The oldest translations never had an island in the verse at all:

There is no "island" expressed in either the Septuagint or the Vulgate, which removes one difficulty. But Schultens seems to have been the first to see that the word translated "island" is a negative, as in the name Ichabod.

William Kelly

Not the humble only, but the faulty

Read this way, the verse reaches further than a promise for good people in trouble. One writer catches the force of that word "even":

He will even deliver — not the humble only, but the faulty.

William Kelly

Eliphaz's counsel misses Job

Eliphaz built his whole appeal on a wrong diagnosis. He assumed hidden sin, and so his warm ending landed on the wrong problem:

This seemed wise advice to Eliphaz, and in many a case it would fit well. But it was completely out of place for Job. To him gold and silver weighed no more than dust, and the favour of God was everything. Hidden sin was not the question, nor repentance for it. The question was a deep submission to God's will. God could use the enemy to bring out the patience of the sufferer, and use his friends to lay bare his impatience. Eliphaz did not so much as touch the true question. He misjudged Job, and would have made the illness worse instead of curing it.

William Kelly

Eliphaz also had a role in mind for himself:

Eliphaz allows that a believer may be brought low, but he does not apply this to Job unless Job takes his advice to repent. If Job does repent, he tells him, he will be able to help others... In fact, Eliphaz was trying to do this very thing for Job. He thought the purity of his own hands would deliver Job, if only Job would repent.

Leslie M. Grant

The guilty ones turn out to be the speakers

The book itself supplies the answer to "who is not innocent?" — and it is not Job:

They were the people who were "not guiltless"; they were guilty, they were "not innocent."… That came true in Job's three friends, little as Eliphaz expected it. God treated them as guilty towards their dear brother, whom they had so misjudged. They had accused him of all kinds of hidden evil, and made him out to be a hypocrite as well as a bad man. And Eliphaz here unconsciously utters words that came true.

William Kelly

Rescued by another man's clean hands

So the clean hands in the second half of the verse are the hands of the man they had been accusing:

"He shall deliver him that is not innocent," or "not guiltless" — that is the proper word — "and he shall be delivered by the pureness of your hands." God forced these three men to feel it: Job was more righteous than they were, and his hands were cleaner than theirs. They had dirtied their own hands by attacking Job so shamefully and so violently. They owed it to Job that God spared their lives.

William Kelly

At the end of the book God enforces exactly that:

They had to come to Him with a sacrifice, through the very man they had so badly misjudged… And His servant Job, whose prayers they had despised, would pray for them, so that God would not blot them out of the book of the living… Meanwhile favour and blessing crowned Job more than ever, and the Lord restored his fortunes when he prayed for his friends.

William Kelly

Summary

- Not "island." The old reading rests on one Hebrew word that is really a negative — the word behind the name Ichabod, "not glory."

- Not innocent. There is no isle of innocent people. Man lost his innocence and never got it back. Faith brings holiness, not a return to innocence.

- Not excluded. Read this way, the promise covers the guilty as well as the humble. God delivers the one who is not guiltless.

- Not Job. The guilty men turned out to be the three friends who accused him. They dirtied their own hands by the way they treated Job.

- Not themselves. Job's clean hands and Job's prayer rescued them — and blessing crowned Job more than ever once he prayed for them.

Reviewed by Orion on September 4, 2026