Your own mouth condemns you, and not I; your own lips testify against you.
Job 15:6 · ESVView all translations

Eliphaz has stopped arguing and started prosecuting. He tells Job that he need bring no charge himself, because Job's own words have already done it. So the verse raises a hard question. Are a man's words, spoken under crushing pain, fair evidence of what he is?

The Accusation Behind the Accusation

Eliphaz plays the bystander while he makes the charge himself. One writer notes that he never quotes a single sentence of Job's to back it up:

He tells Job that his own iniquity leads him to speak as he does and that Job chose cunningly devised words to cover up his sin (v.5). Clearly Eliphaz was condemning Job in the strongest terms, yet he claims he is not the one condemning him: Job's own words are. He never tells Job which words condemned him. He simply used one sweeping accusation to cancel everything Job had said. Of course this was grossly unfair, but he smugly insists, "Your own lips testify against you" (v.6).

Leslie M. Grant

Judging by Appearances

Job had spoken rashly, and Eliphaz seized on it. One writer treats this moment as the warning the whole book exists to give:

No lesson could teach us more than this one about the danger of judging by appearances. It is beyond question a main point in this wonderful book. A quick look at the surface is never the way to form a right judgment; the Lord Himself warned of that in His day. If it was wrong in them then, it deserves far more blame in us. Here we have a whole book given to guarding us from that trap... Appearances were against Job. "Your own mouth condemns you," says Eliphaz, referring to his undoubtedly improper expressions.

William Kelly

True Words, False Target

The trouble with Eliphaz is not that he says false things about God. It is where he aims them.

As before, there is weighty truth in what he says, and he presses it with great force. But he aims it at a suffering man with no grounds at all, and so it is as unjust as it could possibly be.

William Kelly

Half Right, Wholly Wrong

Part of the charge landed and part of it did not. One writer separates them. Job's reckless talk is itself the answer to the charge of cunning speech:

Job's wild language really did leave him open to the charge of throwing off fear, since such talk is the opposite of prayer or devotion. His own words, says Eliphaz, confirm what the friends suspect and charge: wickedness and godlessness. But when he accuses Job of craftiness, the charge is untrue. The poor sufferer had poured out his misery with no thought for the consequences. Whatever he is, Job is no hypocrite.

Samuel Ridout

The Rule That Made Job Guilty

Eliphaz was not simply cruel; he was working from a principle. He measured a man's standing with God by what that man was getting out of life, so Job's ruin could only mean one thing:

In his view, godliness paid. It brought God's favour, and that favour showed itself in earthly prosperity. If it did not, what was the practical gain of godliness? So, he thought, Job's terrible sufferings could have only one explanation — however strongly Job kept insisting that he was upright.

F. B. Hole

When Comforters Turn Into Opponents

The men beside Job did not set out to break him. One writer traces how their sympathy turned into attack, and sees the same thing happening long after:

Job 15 holds the second speech of Eliphaz, and we can hear a harsher tone in it. The friends had come to comfort, but their efforts soon turned into argument. Their tempers rose and bitterness spoiled their spirits, as each man argued to prove his own point of view. How often, over the centuries, has this tragedy ended in quarrels and division, and spoiled the witness of God-fearing people, right down to our own day.

F. B. Hole

Not Villains, But Men Who Misjudged

It would be easy to write the three friends off as frauds.

God was showing the danger of misjudgment, a danger even for holy men of God... We lose the whole profit of the book if we treat them as nothing but self-righteous men in the bad sense of the word.

William Kelly

Summary

- Surface — Eliphaz reads Job's outburst as the confession of a guilty man. A quick look at the surface never produces a right judgment.

- Sweep — He names no actual words, using one broad charge to cancel everything Job had said.

- Split — Job's language really was wild. But the charge of craftiness is untrue. Whatever else he is, Job is no hypocrite.

- Standard — The false verdict grows from a false rule: godliness should pay in earthly prosperity, so ruin must mean sin.

- Slide — Friends who came to comfort ended in argument and bitterness. The same tragedy has repeated ever since.

Reviewed by Orion on September 6, 2026