(what wise men have told, without hiding it from their fathers,
Eliphaz has just called man "abominable and filthy." Now he backs his case with an authority he expects Job to respect. It is not his own opinion but teaching handed down by wise men from their fathers. That raises a hard question. Does old wisdom, however widely agreed, fit the case of a man who is suffering?
What Eliphaz Is Appealing To
Here Eliphaz names his sources. He offers no new insight of his own. He leans on teaching handed down from the fathers, and he adds that no outsider ever broke in on it.
Leslie M. GrantEliphaz had shown mankind in general to be "abominable and filthy." Now he dwells on the character and actions of wicked men. So he does make a distinction between the wicked and the righteous. But he wants to compare Job to the wicked man. "I will tell you, hear me," he says, implying that this was the instruction Job needed. For he was depending on what wise men had told, receiving it from their fathers. This shows again that tradition was most important to Eliphaz. He says, "no stranger passed among them" — that is, there were none to disagree with their conclusions.
Two Supports Under One Argument
Alongside the fathers, Eliphaz keeps returning to what his own eyes have seen. Both his speeches rest on the same footing.
F. B. HoleAs we open Job 5, we find Eliphaz continuing on this note and again he refers to what he had seen. Verse 3 begins, "I have seen…". Turn to Job 15, which holds his second speech, and again we find him saying, "what I have seen I will declare" (verse 17). So his argument stands or falls mainly on his own powers of observation. In those powers he trusted for his opinion of the meaning of the calamities that had fallen upon Job.
Respect for those who have gone before is right in itself. The fault lies in how Eliphaz uses it — to shame Job for daring to disagree with better men.
William KellyEliphaz was a man who strongly stood for the great value of experience. Are the great and good men who have gone before us a standard? No one with any decency denies the honour due to elders. But Eliphaz used that honour in the wrong way. He told Job, "Why, you are going against everything the best men who ever lived have held. Are you the first man? Are you as old as the hills, talking like this, as if you knew better than these most excellent men, older than your father?"
The Faulty Premise in the Tradition
The teaching Eliphaz inherited carried a hidden assumption. That assumption, not his sincerity, is where he and his friends went wrong.
William KellyTheir error was not unusual at all. You find it most among the righteous, who know God but have never been thoroughly broken down about themselves. You still find such people among His own on the earth. But here is where they went astray. They assumed that the present state of the world is an adequate expression of His judgment of men's ways.
Where The Handed-Down Wisdom Lands
What follows verse 18 is not neutral teaching. Eliphaz turns each old saying into a description of Job himself.
Leslie M. GrantSo tradition said, "The wicked man writhes with pain all his days" (v.20). Of course Job was writhing with pain, so this was another cruel thrust at Job… "In prosperity the destroyer comes upon him" (v.21). Trouble came upon Job suddenly while he was enjoying prosperity. So Eliphaz concluded that Job must be a wicked man. He did not stop to consider that others besides wicked men had trouble too.
Why Old Sayings Could Not Meet Job's Case
There is a deeper reason the friends' stored-up answers could not fit Job.
William KellyOne of the wonderful ways of God is this: no tradition can ever meet present circumstances. Even the same facts may occur, but they stand in a different light. The circumstances change them greatly, and you have to take all of that into account.
The book itself supplies the answer, and it does not come from the three friends.
Leslie M. GrantEliphaz tried to comfort Job. He presented his own observation as a conclusive witness that he was right in what he said (ch. 4:8). Bildad came after him. He appealed to the tradition handed down from older men as a reliable witness. Then Zophar virtually told Job that he was right because his own intuition told him so! All this was in vain. Elihu alone insisted that mankind is totally ignorant of God unless God reveals Himself. Now God can speak!
Summary
- Source. Eliphaz builds on two things: what he has seen, and what wise men passed down from their fathers. Neither one is a word from God.
- Seal. No outsider ever broke in on that teaching, he boasts. But agreement among the teachers is not proof that they were right.
- Slant. The handed-down rule assumes the world as it stands shows God's verdict on each person. That error runs under every speech of the three friends.
- Strike. In Eliphaz's hands the old sayings turn into accusations. Job is in pain and has lost his wealth, so he must be wicked.
- Silence broken. Observation, tradition and intuition all failed. The case settles only when God reveals Himself.