the which [is] an image for the present time, according to which both gifts and sacrifices, unable to perfect as to conscience him that worshipped, are offered,
The verse pauses the description of the tabernacle to say what the whole arrangement meant. It was a picture for its own time, and its offerings had a fixed limit: they could not settle the worshipper's conscience. So why could animal sacrifices not reach that deep, and what makes a conscience perfect?
A picture, and only for a time
The tabernacle was a teaching picture. Its offerings dealt with outward things, and they came with an end date.
William KellyThe provisions of the law were admirable as a witness to man's sinfulness and to a coming Redeemer. But they were only surface-level and temporary. They went no further than outward "meats and drinks and various washings." In keeping with that, they touched no deeper needs than "the errors of the people" (verse 7). They were called here "ordinances of flesh imposed until a time of setting right."
The arrangement pictured something, but the picture itself could satisfy no one — neither God nor the worshipper.
Hamilton SmithThirdly, these things during their existence were a figure of things to come. The figures, however, could never satisfy God nor meet the need of man. Under such a system God was shut in and man was shut out. The Jewish system could neither open heaven to us nor fit us for heaven.
Why the offerings could not reach the conscience
The problem lay in the value of what the worshipper brought. A conscience can never rise higher than the sacrifice it rests on.
C. H. MackintoshThe former could never give a perfect conscience, simply because they were imperfect in themselves. It was impossible that the blood of a bull or of a goat could ever give a perfect conscience. It might do for a day, a month, or a year, but no longer. So the conscience of a Jewish worshipper was never perfect. He could never say that his conscience was perfectly purged, because he had not yet reached a perfect sacrifice.
The yearly repetition proved the point in the worshipper's own experience.
Samuel RidoutHere is a poor Israelite. He brings his sacrifice, lays his hands on it and kills it. He sees the priest take the blood, sprinkle it on the altar, and burn the victim. He sees the smoke rise, and the priest says, Your trespass is forgiven. And yet on the day of atonement those trespasses, and all the others, were mentioned all over again. He had to conclude they were not really forgiven at all. In other words, his conscience was not perfect, he did not yet have perfect assurance of acceptance, or forgiveness.
What "perfect" means here
"Perfect" is not about a flawless character. It describes a person fit to stand before God and stay there.
James L HarrisFirst, the sacrifices offered under the law could never put those who came to them in the place of constant worshippers. That is clearly what "perfect" means in this passage. They failed both because they were ineffective in themselves and because they had to be repeated... Now note, to be perfected as a worshipper is to have no more conscience of sins. Surely this exalts worship very highly, because worship is not at all the means of our justification, but that for which we are already justified.
This purged conscience is not the same as a good conscience.
Hamilton SmithThe purged conscience is one that, being "once purged", has no more conscience of sins (Hebrews 10:2). It assumes a conscience that has been exercised about its sins. That exercise is then met: the believer learns that the precious blood of Christ cleanses him from all sins, and that he will never come under judgment. A good conscience is a conscience free of offence in practical ways and walk.
Where the ceiling is broken
What the old offerings could not do, one finished work has done. Ease comes because nothing is left for us to do.
James L HarrisNo conscience can be at ease before God where anything depends on what the person himself is doing or has to do. Yes, I would say, not even if it now had to depend on what Christ has to do, instead of resting on what He has already done... Christ does not have to enter in again, He has no more sacrifice for sin to offer — no other blood to carry in; for where could any be found of like preciousness? All is done once, and once for all.
The warning in calling it a figure
The tabernacle was a picture. Copying it as a model for worship turns its lesson upside down.
Hamilton SmithChristendom, instead of seeing in the tabernacle a figure, has used it as a pattern for its religious services. In doing so, it has lost the "good things" the figures speak of. So the mass of people in Christendom have again set up magnificent buildings. They have again railed off one part of those buildings as more holy than the rest. And they have again set up a priestly class distinct from the ordinary people, who perform religious services on their behalf. So Christendom has adopted a system modelled on the Jewish camp. It keeps people at a distance from God and can never make the conscience perfect.
Summary
- Figure — The tabernacle was a picture with an end date. Its rules touched only outward things, and they lasted only until God set things right.
- Ceiling — A conscience can never rise above its sacrifice. Imperfect blood gives an imperfect conscience, and the yearly repeat proved the forgiveness was never final.
- Perfect — "Perfect" here means fit to stand as a constant worshipper, with no more conscience of sins. It is not the means of justification but the fruit of it.
- Once — There is no ease before God while anything still depends on what we, or even Christ, have yet to do. Rest lies in what is already finished.
- Warning — Treat this picture as a model — special buildings, holier zones, a priestly class — and you rebuild the very distance that could never perfect anyone.