Moreover, I have given to you rather than to your brothers one mountain slope that I took from the hand of the Amorites with my sword and with my bow.”
Jacob's last words to Joseph hand over property, not a blessing: one strip of land in Canaan, given by a dying man in Egypt. Two questions follow: why does Joseph get it, and when did Jacob ever fight the Amorites for it?
The double portion of the firstborn
Where the ESV reads "one mountain slope," older translations read "one portion above your brothers." One writer ties that phrase to the legal share of an eldest son:
William Kelly"A double portion" refers to the share of a firstborn or eldest heir. So in Genesis 48:22, Israel says to Joseph, "I have given to you one portion above your brothers." Joseph received the birthright of Reuben (1 Chronicles 5:1-2). Deuteronomy 21:17 can be compared too. A similar Hebrew phrase occurs there, and the sense is beyond question a double portion compared with what other heirs might get.
Reuben's birthright was not handed on in one piece. It was split:
Truth & TestimonyThe position linked with the birthright went to Judah, the fourth son of Leah. The wealth linked with it went to Joseph, the first son of Rachel, the loved one. The firstborn had a right to a double portion of the inheritance. Or rather it went to Joseph's sons, Ephraim and Manasseh. Jacob had already blessed them and more or less adopted them as his own sons.
Why the portion fell to Joseph
One writer sees the gift as earned, and the ground itself as a sample of the larger inheritance:
J. G. BellettIt is easy for us to say that Joseph earned the birthright. Judah earned the royalty, Levi the priesthood, and so Joseph the double portion. His father gave him a pledge, a down payment on the inheritance, and it was characteristic of that inheritance. It was a sample as well. It spoke of the inheritance as it would be in Joseph's hand. This portion had been won, and so had Joseph's. Jacob's sword had gained this piece of ground, as Joseph's patience had gained the inheritance and the birthright.
Which piece of ground
Other passages name the same plot. But the earlier record of how Jacob got it does not read like a battle:
F. B. HoleThe last verse of the chapter seems to refer to an event not recorded before. We read of "the field that Jacob gave to his son Joseph" (John 4:5), and Joshua 24:32 seems to refer to this gift as well. If so, we must identify it with the deal recorded in Genesis 33:19. That stands close to the violent action of his sons Simeon and Levi, yet nothing there says anything about a sword and bow in Jacob's hands. Still, Jacob gained a portion in the land by conflict as well as by purchase, and he gave it to Joseph. Joseph became lord of that little piece of the land as well as lord of all Egypt. It was a kind of foretaste and pledge that in the end the whole land would be theirs.
A battle with no record
Commentators differ on how to fill that silence. One lets it stand as an unrecorded conquest, and looks at what it meant for Joseph:
L. M. GrantHe reminds Joseph again that he had given him a portion double to that of his brothers. He speaks of taking it by conquest from the Amorites, the enemies inside the land of Canaan, though we have no record of such warfare. But the sufferer, Joseph, is well repaid for all the affliction he had seen.
Another writer looks at how Jacob had got land earlier — by paying men for what God had given him:
The Bible TreasuryJacob buys a place to live in. He buys from man what God had given him. He had acted the same way before, getting God's gift of grace and Isaac's blessing by craft. He gives up the rights of God, and even denies them, so that he can buy it back for himself.
Land he does not hold
The strangest feature of the verse is the setting. Jacob is nowhere near the property he is signing over:
The Christian's FriendThe only material thing mentioned in this chapter is the portion he had taken out of the hand of the Amorite, with his sword and his bow (v. 22). But Jacob is not in the land of the Amorite now. He does not actually hold it.
What makes the bequest solid is not a title deed but a relationship that death cannot cancel:
The Christian's FriendJacob had faith in God. Death would not end his relationship with God, even "the God of Bethel." Like his fathers, he "died in faith, not having received the promises" (Hebrews 11:13). But he had so "embraced them" that he could count on God making everything good in resurrection.
Summary
- Forfeited. Reuben lost the firstborn's right. Joseph received it, and this verse speaks the language of a firstborn's double share.
- Divided. Rule went to Judah. The double portion of wealth went to Joseph, and then to his sons Ephraim and Manasseh.
- Earned. One writer sees the gift as reward: Joseph gained the inheritance by patience, as Jacob gained this ground by the sword.
- Pledge. The small plot is a down payment: one strip held now, the whole land promised later.
- Trusted. Jacob signs away land he is not standing on. He counts on a God whose promises outlast death.