Then this Sheshbazzar came and laid the foundations of the house of God that is in Jerusalem, and from that time until now it has been in building, and it is not yet finished.’
The elders end their report to the Persian officials with a plain fact. The man Cyrus appointed laid the foundation, and the house still stands unfinished. Their words are both a legal defence and an honest confession.
The man named in the report
Writers identify the Sheshbazzar of this report with a leader the same book names in Hebrew:
Arno Clemens GaebeleinZerubbabel (the name means sown in Babylon) came from the royal line, a direct descendant of David. In Ezra this royal leader goes by his Persian name, Sheshbazzar.
The report traces his authority back to Cyrus, along with the temple vessels:
Leslie M. GrantIn his first year, they said, Cyrus had issued a decree to build this house of God (v. 13). He also ordered that the gold and silver articles of the house of God be brought back from Nebuchadnezzar's temple in Babylon to Jerusalem. Cyrus put these things in the care of a man named Sheshbazzar, whom he had made governor. This governor came to Jerusalem and laid the foundation of the temple (v. 14).
One house through every ruin
The temple Solomon built, the temple Nebuchadnezzar destroyed, and the temple now going up are one house. That is how Scripture treats it:
H. L. RossierWhatever destruction this house suffered, and however complete that destruction seemed — like the destruction Nebuchadnezzar carried out — the Word always treats it as the house. It has one history only, one existence in the eyes of God, through all its stages of building or ruin. Rebuilt, it is not a new temple in God's eyes, but the same temple with different glories.
A foundation relaid, not invented
So Sheshbazzar did not invent a foundation. He uncovered the one already there:
H. L. RossierIn the time of the book of Ezra, as today, the foundation could not be new. After centuries of abandonment it came to light again and was laid down as the only foundation able to carry the house, the Assembly of God.
Why the unfinished state was no shame
Their report packs the whole history of the house into a few lines. Admitting the work was unfinished was also their strongest legal ground:
Edward DennettWhat a history! Solomon had built the house, and Nebuchadnezzar had destroyed it, and the cause of all this sorrow was their fathers' sins… They added, "Then this Sheshbazzar came and laid the foundations of the house of God that is in Jerusalem, and from that time until now it has been in building, and it is not yet finished" (v. 16). If the account the Jews gave was correct, they were fully justified even in the eyes of man. It was a well-known feature of the laws of the Medes and Persians (and Cyrus was king of Persia) that no one could change them (Dan. 6:8, 14, 15, etc.), and their opponents proved to be in the wrong through ignorance of the law.
Owning the ruin while building
The people in Ezra's day stayed conscious of their ruin. That consciousness belongs to God's people still:
H. L. RossierThe consciousness of our ruin should mark us today, as it marked the people in the times of Ezra. We cannot and should not deny it or shrug its burden off our shoulders. Instead we must bear the humiliation of this ruin, while we set the house of God back on its only real foundation, Christ, with the apostles and prophets who gave witness to Him.
Bringing materials to a house still going up
The house is still going up. Rossier applies that to the church now:
H. L. RossierIt is in no way a question of building a new Church. She already exists, built by God Himself, and grows into a holy temple in the Lord… But God expects His people to make her visible to all, by bringing materials suitable for her construction… each witness of Christ is responsible to bring noble and living material to the house of God. Our unfaithfulness has scattered these materials instead of gathering them, so that only the eyes of God can see them.
The hands that will finish it
The verse stops at "not finished," but the story does not:
An Outline of Sound WordsGod also decreed that "The hands of Zerubbabel have laid the foundation of this house; and his hands shall finish it." No opposition from the great of this world can frustrate what God has set Himself to do. It may be a "day of small things," which God's people tend to despise. But the faithful will see that the outward appearance does not show the true value of the work of God.
Summary
- Foundation. Sheshbazzar is the Persian name of Zerubbabel, of David's line. Cyrus gave him the vessels and the work of laying the foundation.
- Same house. However complete the ruin, God counts the rebuilt temple as the same house, with different glories.
- Relaid. The foundation could not be new. It came to light again after long abandonment, because only Christ can carry the house.
- Unfinished. They admitted the delay, and that honesty became their defence. It rested on a decree of the Medes and Persians that no one could change.
- Finished. The hands that laid the foundation will finish it. Opposition cannot frustrate what God has set Himself to do, even in a day of small things.