Now when the adversaries of Judah and Benjamin heard that the returned exiles were building a temple to the LORD, the God of Israel,
The builders had just laid the temple foundation when men arrived offering to help. The verse names them before they speak: they are adversaries, and God's people must learn to spot an enemy who talks like a friend.
Opposition follows the foundation
Dennett links this moment with what Paul met later.
Edward DennettNo sooner had the foundation of the temple been laid than adversaries appeared on the scene. It was so also in New Testament times. Wherever the apostle went and laid the foundation of the assembly, the enemy stirred into action… But as with Paul, so also with Zerubbabel and Jeshua, the enemy took on the appearance of friendship.
Who the adversaries were
Their own words in verse 2 give them away. They claim to have sacrificed to God "since the days of Esarhaddon king of Assyria."
Arno Clemens GaebeleinThe adversaries were the Samaritans… These words revealed their true origin. They were a mixed race settled by heathen kings in the conquered territory of the house of Israel, the ten tribes. We find their history in 2 Kings 17:24. The king of Assyria brought men from Babylon, Cuthah, Ava, Hamath, and Sepharvaim and settled them in Samaria… One of the captive priests taught them at Bethel the corrupt worship which had ruined the ten tribes.
Rossier reads the word "adversaries" in verse 1 as God's own name for them:
H. L. RossierHere God describes the instruments of Satan with this word: "the adversaries of Judah" (v. 1)… The second book of Kings tells us about the religious state of these nations. They kept their gods. At the same time they acknowledged the God of Israel. In the language of the Bible, "these nations feared the LORD and also served their carved images" (2 Kings 17:41).
Named before they speak
The verse settles their character before we hear a word from them.
Edward DennettThe reader is not left in doubt for a single moment about the character of these would-be helpers of God's people in their work. The Holy Spirit tells us plainly that they were "the adversaries of Judah and Benjamin," although words of peace were on their lips. He knew their hearts, their aims and ends. And indeed they give themselves away in the very words they use… By their own confession they were Assyrians, not children of Abraham, with no claim to belong to Israel. They were, in fact, the ancestors of the Samaritans, who kept trying to push into the place of privilege and blessing. That is why the Jews had no dealings with the Samaritans… From this incident we may learn the source of one of the gravest dangers in the work of the Lord. The kisses of an enemy are both deceitful and dangerous, though it seems so ungracious to refuse the offered help of professed friends.
Why the exiles refused
In verse 3 the exiles turned the offer down. Rossier asks what such helpers could bring to the house of God.
H. L. RossierThese people came from an idolatrous mixture. They offer to build together with the people, but what materials could they bring to the house of God?… Do God's people today understand that His work cannot allow any mixture with the world in those He entrusts with it?… In speaking this way, the remnant show no spiritual pride. They admit that they are under the king of the Gentiles because they had been unfaithful. But they have understood that they alone are called to this work.
The mask comes off
Once turned down, the same men dropped the mask. Rossier names the two forms the enemy takes.
H. L. RossierThe enemy had presented himself as a friend. This called for special watchfulness and caution. But once refused, these men soon show their true character openly… The people had been firm. They had resisted the tricks and cunning that belong to the ancient serpent. But they become frightened when the adversary appears as a roaring lion. They forget that their enemy is a defeated enemy, and that he would have fled from anyone who stood up to him.
How the refusal looked to onlookers
Mackintosh gives the ground for such a refusal, and the names it earns.
C. H. MackintoshA child of God should refuse to be yoked with an unbeliever. This holds at home, in business, or in religion. He refuses simply because God tells him to be separate, and not because of his own personal holiness… People will call it intolerance, bigotry, narrow-mindedness, exclusiveness, and the like. But we cannot help all this… No doubt the remnant in the days of Ezra must have looked very intolerant when they refused the help of the surrounding people in building the house of God. But they acted on a divine principle in that refusal.
Summary
- Foundation — work for God draws opposition as soon as it starts. The foundation went down, and the adversaries appeared.
- Flattery — the first attack came as an offer to help. An enemy is far more dangerous as a friend than as a foe.
- Fingerprints — their own words gave them away. They feared the LORD and served their idols at the same time.
- Firmness — the refusal was obedience, not pride. God's people stay separate because God says so, not because they are better.
- Force — flattery refused turns into open attack. They stood up to the serpent, then feared the lion — forgetting he was already beaten.