One of themselves, a prophet of their own, has said, Cretans are always liars, evil wild beasts, lazy gluttons.
Paul warns Titus about troublemakers in Crete, and he backs the warning with a Cretan poet's harsh verdict on his own people. Two questions follow: why quote a non-Christian writer, and what does that verdict mean for Cretans who had already believed?
Paul calls the source "a prophet of their own." Commentators name him and explain the strange title.
The Cretans had a bad name as a people, as one of their own showed when he called them always liars, evil beasts, lazy gluttons. The words come from Epimenides, a poet of the sixth century B.C. People quoted his sayings as oracles, which may explain the title "prophet." They needed a sharp rebuke, so that they might be sound in the faith.
The three phrases are not vague abuse. Each names a habit.
Paul had sent Titus to Crete to appoint elders in every city. In Titus 1:12 we find that the Cretans, though they were not believers, had what passed for a prophet of their own. He got stirred up about something and turned blunt. He told the Cretan people a thing or two about themselves… They could not stick to the truth. They rampaged about and injured one another like wild animals. They did not want to work, but they wanted to eat a lot.
Paul adds, "This testimony is true." Quoting a man does not mean approving him.
The apostle here quotes a moral poet, Epimenides of Crete, to press home the known dangers of those concerned. We are not to suppose that he endorses this Gentile author as a prophet of God. So he had to add, "This testimony is true." But it does show how grace stoops to use whatever is true, though the source may be impure. In the same spirit the apostle quoted a famous comic writer to convict the Corinthians more sharply: "Evil communications corrupt good manners."
That last line is 1 Corinthians 15:33 in an older wording. The ESV reads, "Bad company ruins good morals."
The verdict was not only about outsiders on the island.
Conditions in Crete differed from those at Ephesus. Both places faced similar dangers from rebellious people, empty talkers and deceivers. But the natural character of the Cretan people was unusually bad. It was so bad that one of their own prophets, a pagan seer, felt driven to denounce them in strong terms as "always liars, evil beasts, lazy gluttons." That was the old nature of the Cretans who had believed, and it stayed in them after they believed. Sadly, it was showing itself.
Commentators ask what can be done with people like this.
"What bad material!" a person would say — and it is all too true. The law could do nothing with it. That is one of the main reasons why the apostle speaks so severely in this letter about those who were pushing people back under the law of Moses. But grace has done what the law could not do. The material was utterly bad, yet grace has set the flesh aside for ever.
A bad national character can sound like a ready-made excuse. One writer answers it.
A believer today may try to excuse an outburst of temper or some display of the flesh. He says, "Oh well, that's my make-up; that's the kind of person I am." "No doubt it is," we may well reply, "but have you not been washed and so saved from such things?" Godliness is to mark us. That means displaying the divine nature and not our own deformities.
The danger is real, but so is the cure.
Where watchfulness fails, a fall follows. So the evil nature is a constant danger. When we truly lean on Christ and look to Him, the Holy Spirit gives complete superiority over evil. Here the question is about people who are walking after the flesh. So the apostle applies this humbling testimony with full force. Titus did well to keep it in mind. And no Cretan could easily complain that the apostle was harsh, when a well-known man of their own nation had long ago admitted what their people were like.
- Verdict — Epimenides, a Cretan poet, named three national habits: lying, savagery toward one another, and lazy overeating. People quoted his sayings as oracles, which may explain the title "prophet."
- Verified — Paul does not call him a prophet of God. He adds, "This testimony is true." Grace will use whatever is true, even from an impure source.
- Persisting — that old nature stayed in the Cretans after they believed, and it was showing itself among them.
- No excuse — "that's just how I am" will not stand, because believers have been washed. The divine nature, not our own deformities, is to show.
- Remedy — the law could do nothing with such material, but grace set the flesh aside for ever. When we lean on Christ, the Spirit gives complete superiority over evil. That is why the rebuke was sharp: to make them sound in the faith.
This testimony is true; for which cause rebuke them severely, that they may be sound in the faith,
One of Crete's own prophets had called his people liars, evil beasts and lazy gluttons. Paul does not soften that verdict. He calls it true, and tells Titus to act on it. The command is severe. Yet the goal at the end of the verse is health. So why sharpness, and why is sound faith the cure for bad behaviour?
Becoming believers did not erase what the Cretans were by nature.
Crete and Ephesus both faced similar dangers from rebellious men, empty talkers and deceivers. But the natural character of the Cretans was especially bad. It was so bad that one of their own prophets, himself a pagan, was stirred to denounce them in strong terms as "always liars, evil beasts, lazy gluttons." That was the old nature of the Cretans who believed, and it stayed in them after they believed. Sadly it was showing itself, so in verse 13 Titus is told to rebuke them sharply.
Left unjudged, that old nature gives the enemy something to work on. And no Cretan could call Paul unfair, since one of their own had said the same long before.
But it matters greatly to the enemy. He works skilfully on the old nature when we leave it unjudged, and that dishonours the Lord. Where there is no watchfulness, a fall follows. So the evil nature is a constant danger. When we truly lean on Christ and look to Him, the Holy Spirit gives complete victory over evil. Here Paul is dealing with people who are living by the old nature, so he applies the humbling testimony with all its force. Titus did well to keep it in mind. And no Cretan could easily complain that the apostle was too severe, when a well-known countryman of theirs had admitted their national character long ago.
The word "sound" here means healthy. Getting rid of disease is only half the cure. Something good has to be fed in.
Because of teachings that undermined the faith, and of corrupt influences, Titus was to press the truth home to believers, so that they might be found sound in the faith. True believers today need the good — the positive Truth of God! Being done with the bad — the unsound — is necessary, but it is not enough. Yes, "refuse the evil," but feed on "that which is good."
Paul aims at their faith to reach their lives. That is why he goes on to warn against fables and human commandments.
Wrong conduct constantly flows from something unsound creeping into the spirit. To be unsound in the faith is the high road to unholy ways. Here too we find the twisted nature of Jewish fables. It had appeared even then, and no doubt long before. Religious imagination has done untold harm ever since to those who bear the Lord's name. But there is more than fable to watch against. There are also the "commands of people who turn away from the truth." Never trust the practical advice or the moral ways of those who once professed the truth and then turned aside from it. God's word will never mix with man's commandments. Where people try it, in the long run the human element wins, and the divine becomes a powerless form.
Titus had to rebuke others. Each believer has the same reason to rebuke the bent of his own mind.
So what is left for us to do? We must watch against the particular tendency and habit of our own mind. We must rebuke our nature sharply, so that we may be sound, or morally healthy, in the faith. We should not excuse it because it is our nature. We should suspect it all the more for that very reason, and put it to death for the sake of Him who has given us another nature.
Anyone who obeys this verse should expect others to question his motives.
This witness, says the apostle, is true. Therefore Titus was to rebuke them sharply. What sin and folly it is to brand care for their souls as a lack of love or a love of domination! Let us remember the whole case for our own profit and guidance.
Another writer names the same confusion, and what lies underneath the firmness.
The decisiveness and steadiness of true love are mistaken for harshness and unwillingness to forgive. It is love alone which will not tolerate evil in the one it loves.
- Diagnosis. The prophet's charge was true, and it stayed true after the Cretans believed. The old nature remained, and it was showing itself.
- Prescription. Sharpness here is treatment, not punishment. "Sound" means healthy, so the rebuke aims at restoring health.
- Dosage. Health needs food as well as cleansing: refuse the evil, but feed on the positive truth of God.
- Prognosis. Unsound faith is the high road to unholy ways. That is why fables and human commandments are a moral danger, not just a mental one.
- Application. Turn the sharpness on your own habits of mind first. Expect people to read such firmness as harshness. Love alone refuses to tolerate evil in the one it loves.