Romans 9:3–5

Romans 9:3 · Darby

for I have wished, I myself, to be a curse from the Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen, according to flesh;

Paul has just said that nothing can separate believers from the love of God. Now he wishes himself cut off from Christ for the sake of Israel — words so extreme that we have to ask what he means, and what love can and cannot do for others.

An Answer to a Charge

Paul teaches that God is sovereign. Some heard contempt for Israel in that, and this verse is his answer.

The assertion of God's sovereignty does not affect the apostle's love to Israel... This is the force of verse 3. Instead of despising his brothers — a charge the Jews were always bringing against him — the real impulse of his heart had led him to express a feeling that could never be carried out, though he spoke it in earnest. It was not cool reflection, for the thing was impossible. It was the earnestness of his soul in love to them. And it proved that Paul loved them quite as much as Moses ever loved them. He was willing, as far as affection went, to be like Christ, a curse for his brothers, his kinsmen according to the flesh.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What the Greek Actually Says

The English wording is stronger than the original, and the difference matters.

The English versions, Authorised and Revised alike, put it a little more strongly than the original warrants. The Greek says only, "I was wishing, or praying." It was doubtless only an impossible wish of love, such as Moses had felt and expressed before. Paul was the last man to wish himself "accursed from Christ" on purpose. He knew and valued what it is to be "in Christ" more than anyone. So he must have had the sharpest sense of the infinite misery of losing Christ — if that were possible. Indeed it could not be. No one the Father has given Him can be taken out of the Saviour's gracious hand.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A Wish That Passed Through His Soul

So when did Paul feel this, and how firmly did it hold him?

It was a wish that had passed through his soul. He does not mean the days when he was a Pharisee. His zeal then was great, but his love as a Christian and an apostle was far deeper, and wholly unselfish. Before his eyes were opened there was no question of such a feeling for them, since he had no true sense of their danger any more than of his own. On the other hand, he does not state it as the settled wish of his present mind. It was a passionate, self-sacrificing desire that had been in his heart. It was impossible, no doubt. Yet it showed the strength of his burning love for Israel, and his sense of their extreme danger and utter ruin.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Commentators differ here. Some read the words as a look back:

I take the clause, "I could wish myself accursed from Christ," to be a parenthesis... It was in the past... He was then with them in their rejection of Christ.

Modernised from C. CrainOriginal wording

Moses at Sinai

The wish has a precedent. Moses, pleading for a people who had just made the golden calf, asked God to blot him out of His book instead.

He had so completely made himself one with the people — the source of all strength in intercession when the Spirit of God produces it — that if they were unforgiven he wanted to perish with them. It was the overflow of his intense love for guilty Israel, as in the not dissimilar case of the apostle Paul... God did not grant His servant's request. Moses had no finished atonement to stand on, and nothing with which to make atonement — the only basis on which a holy God could justly forgive His people.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

But love like this saves no one:

The self-sacrificing prayer of Moses in Exodus 32:32, and the passing wish of Paul in Romans 9:3, were doubtless acceptable to God; but no self-sacrifice by a preacher can ever save a sinner.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Shock of the Contrast

Now read it beside the end of chapter 8.

Is it not remarkable that Scripture tells us of his "great sorrow and unceasing pain" right after the great outburst that closes the eighth chapter?... Paul had just been saying that nothing could separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord. At once he speaks of wishing to be not merely separated but accursed from Christ! Even so, do not our hearts understand it?... It is worth remembering, too, that the apostle's anguish was wholly unselfish, which is more than we can always say of ours.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Example Left for Us

What should this leave with us?

The love of his heart is a blessed example for us. We too should long from the heart for these ancient people of God. It is true he had wished what was impossible... but burning love does not stop to reason first. Later, godly wisdom corrected the wish, though it did not cool his love for them. His sorrow never stopped.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. The Jews charged Paul with despising his own nation. This verse is his denial, and it comes from love, not cool reflection.

- Wording. The Greek reads "I was wishing" — a wish that passed through him, not a settled purpose he could ever hold.

- Precedent. Moses asked God to blot him out for Israel. God refused, because Moses had no finished atonement to stand on.

- Limit. The wish was impossible. Love may offer itself, but no one's self-sacrifice can save another.

- Result. Chapter 8 says nothing can separate us. Chapter 9 shows a man who would give up even that for others — love that costs, yet held within the truth.

Romans 9:4 · Darby

who are Israelites; whose [is] the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the law-giving, and the service, and the promises;

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Romans 9:5 · Darby

whose [are] the fathers; and of whom, as according to flesh, [is] the Christ, who is over all, God blessed for ever. Amen.

Paul is listing the gifts God gave Israel, and the list ends with the greatest of them: the Messiah came from their line. The verse then lifts that Messiah above the nation He came from and calls Him God over all.

Love that counts every blessing

Some had doubted Paul's love for his nation. His list of their privileges answers them.

People who hate others take every chance to belittle them. They deny that the ones they hate have any favours from God that are specially their own. Love makes the most of what belongs to the one it loves. Judged by that test, the love of the apostle is beyond doubt. He sets out the marks of God's goodness to Israel as no one had ever done before.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"According to the flesh"

The phrase points to a real birth into a real family line.

The eternal God had become incarnate, taking flesh from that nation. All this is fully allowed. He who is over all, God blessed for ever — as to the flesh, the body, He was born of Mary, of the royal line of that nation.

Modernised from C. StanleyOriginal wording

The patriarchs come just before the Messiah in Paul's list. Israel's claim on Him is real, but it has a limit.

"The fathers" are the well-known figures of Old Testament history. Christ too, as concerning the flesh, belongs to Israel; that is, He came from them. Israel could have, in this sense, no exclusive title to Him, and in fact not even a special title. He is, of course, much more than Man — One over all, "God blessed for ever." … The words as we have them in our version perfectly express the original. They state in the strongest way that Christ is God in the highest sense, the God who is over all.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

A statement of deity that cannot be redirected

Writing to someone who denied that Scripture ever calls Christ God, one commentator singled out this verse above others he could have used.

How you can say the Scriptures do not say He is God, I do not understand: they do so over and over again, directly and indirectly, in equivalent terms. … This last one, however (Rom. 9:5), is as plain a testimony as could well be imagined, and the language is such that it is impossible to apply it to anyone but Christ.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why some editors repunctuated the verse

The Greek has no punctuation, so it has been proposed that the last clause is a separate burst of praise to God rather than a description of Christ. One writer weighed that proposal against the oldest evidence.

It is easy to say that the proposed rendering ("he who is over all, God be blessed for ever. Amen.") is at least as good as the one in the Authorised Version. But I am convinced that the claim is rash and groundless. … The most ancient versions of East and West — the Syriac, the Itala, the Vulgate, and others — leave no doubt as to how the words were then understood and applied. So do the early Greek and Latin writers.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

He also argued that the sentence itself settles the matter. Its two halves answer one another.

Their highest mercy naturally forms the climax, though sadly they despised it. That mercy is the Messiah. He came from their fathers according to the flesh, but in reality He is Emmanuel, God over all, blessed for ever. His being God over all is the opposite pole to His springing from the fathers according to the flesh.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The glory they refused

The crowning item on Paul's list was the one his nation refused.

In their blind unbelief they stumbled at the stumbling-stone. That stone was the infinite grace of His humiliation, and His obedience to death, the death of the cross. It shut out from the eyes of their heart the height of His glory, which reached far beyond the glory of the Messiah.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The closing "Amen"

Paul ends the sentence not with an argument but with a seal.

We can understand something of what Paul felt when he added the Amen here. Nothing could be added to this. No nation could receive a greater privilege or honour than to be linked, according to the flesh, with Him who is God over all, blessed for ever.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Love lists. Some doubted Paul's love for his nation. He answers by naming their privileges more fully than anyone before him. Love makes the most of what belongs to the one it loves.

- Lineage. "According to the flesh" means a real birth in a real family. The eternal God took flesh, born of Mary, of the royal line of that nation.

- Limit. The same phrase draws the boundary. Israel's claim reaches only as far as His flesh. He is much more than Man, and no nation holds an exclusive title to Him.

- Lordship. "God over all, blessed forever" stands as the opposite pole to His descent from the fathers. The oldest versions and the earliest writers applied the words to Christ, and the balance of the sentence points the same way.

- Last word. The nation stumbled over the very glory that crowned their list. Paul could add nothing further, so he sealed the list with worship.