For that which I do, I do not own for not what I will, this I do; but what I hate, this I practise.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
But if what I do not will, this I practise, I consent to the law that [it is] right.
Paul has just said that he does the very thing he hates. Now his failure leads him to a verdict — not about himself, but about the law: it is good.
The person described here hates his own sin. Commentators take that hatred as the mark of someone already born of God.
In Romans 7 we meet a man with a renewed conscience. He recognises the claims of righteousness — or more correctly, holiness. He hates evil and desires good. But his utter powerlessness to do the good fills him with dismay and wretchedness. His is plainly the case of a soul born of God, for no unbeliever actually hates evil… Still, here the soul must learn that abhorring evil and loving good is not in itself the power for doing good.
This agreement is not grudging surrender to a fact he cannot escape. It is the heart siding with the law against itself.
Nor is it bowing to an unavoidable fact only, but the heart agreeing that what it bows to is good. Faced with the truth, the soul does not wish to weaken the spirituality of the law. It will not drag the law down to the level of what people are able, or unable, to do. The soul reaches this point through the deep and terrible process of learning itself. Then it makes no excuses. It says in secret, "I agree with the law, that it is good." God is justified as to His holy law, and "I" is silent. An immense gain, spiritually, is reached.
Earlier in the chapter the law was declared good; here the same verdict is reached a different way.
He discovered by experience the good and holy character of the law. It is good as verse 9 states; but he now has to say "I agree with the law, that it is good."
This man is far past the person described earlier in the letter, who neither understands nor seeks God. He now understands. He submits. Yet one thing is still missing.
You will find in Romans 3 these three characters of unconverted man — none righteous, none who understands, none who seeks after God. Now in Romans 7 the man has become intelligent; he acknowledges that the law is good, and he submits to it (Rom. 7:12-16); his will is broken, for he takes pleasure in it (Rom. 7:22); but the third thing fails — he has no righteousness. The more he understands how spiritual the law is, and the more he wants to fulfil it, the more he sees that righteousness is not in him. He is a miserable man.
Verse 16 is an argument, and the next verse is its result. If the will sides with the law, the wrongdoing comes from something else at work inside.
First of all, he has found a fleshly "I," sold under sin — captive to it like a slave. He did not approve what he did. He did what he hated instead of what he wanted. But if he would not do it, his will was agreeing with the law that it was good. And if his will agreed, then it was not really he who was doing it. He would not do it, and yet he did. It was sin dwelling in him. There is an "I" distinct from the sinful principle — an "I" that was not his flesh. So he could see the sinful working of the flesh as coming from sin that dwelt in him. It did not come from the "I," which he knew was his own inmost will.
Distinguishing yourself from indwelling sin is genuine relief, but it is not rescue. Two more discoveries must follow before he cries out for a deliverer.
First, the discovery that there are two natures in the believer… two directly opposite energies come to light, one against the other. That is a relief, but not yet full clearance. Second, the conviction that "nothing good dwells in me, that is, in my flesh." This conviction goes far beyond admitting and confessing particular sins. Third, that I have no strength: I find no ability to carry out what is good. So the distressed one looks outward for a deliverer, since he knows there is no good and no strength within.
Writers point out what is missing from this whole part of the chapter.
The second half of the chapter gives us the experience of a man who wants to fulfil the righteousness of the law. He wants to bring forth fruit to God while standing under the law. God has awakened him, and the new life is at work in him. He understands how spiritual the law is, and what it requires. He wants to keep it, and his conscience cannot rest until he does. The new nature loves the righteousness of the law. But the flesh opposes it, and so the new nature does not fulfil it… in this passage there is no mention made either of Christ or of the Holy Spirit.
- Agreement. His failure becomes his witness. A man who hates what he does has sided with the law and called it good.
- Acquittal of the law. God is justified as to His holy law, and "I" falls silent. The soul does not try to lower the law to what a person can manage.
- Diagnosis. If the will agrees with the law, the wrongdoing comes from sin dwelling in him — an "I" distinct from the flesh.
- Dead end. He understands and submits. His will is broken. But righteousness is still not in him — real relief, without full clearance.
- Deliverer. No good and no strength are inside him. So he must look outward — and that is where the chapter is driving him.
Now then [it is] no longer *I* [that] do it, but the sin that dwells in me.
The man in this chapter keeps doing the very evil he hates. Verse 17 is what he concludes from that defeat: the wrong act is real, but it no longer says who he is. Two questions follow. What is this "sin" that lives in him? And does calling it "not I" excuse anything?
The wording matters. He does not simply deny the deed; he marks a change of ownership that has taken place in him.
In that miserable experience, grace taught him how to tell himself apart from the sin that lived in him and that he now hated. This is a great step forward, and a relief to an honest soul. The next step was to tie himself to the new desires, and to seek deliverance through Christ Jesus, so that he might do what he now wanted, and not the sin he hated. He could then say, "It is no longer I … but sin." He does not say "Not I," as he does elsewhere. He says "No more I" or "No longer I," because before the change took place it was "I."
The discovery is not that he slipped once. It is that something permanent lives inside him, and it is stronger than his best intentions.
The moment I seriously set out to do what the law asks, I become aware of a force inside me working against me. It is too strong for me to fight. It wakes me up to the fact that "sin dwells in me." It is no accident and no habit. It is a principle I was born with. So I am forced to separate myself from myself.
The believer now has two natures. Which one does he call himself? God's own view of them settles it.
Our wisdom is to fall into line with God's thoughts and to treat it as He does. Begin by recognizing that you are now identified with the new nature and entitled to disown the old. "It is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells within me." The new nature is your true self, not the old. It is like a grafted apple tree: as soon as the graft takes, the tree is the cultivated apple.
Naming the real enemy is itself a gain. Seeing its strength sends a person looking outside himself for help.
So sin is at least marked out as the terrible and powerful enemy of the soul. This is good, because it would be ruinous to fail to recognise an enemy, or to underrate his power. Once we see the true character of our souls' enemies, comparing it with our own weak forces may stagger us. But it would drive us to seek another refuge — in Him who alone is stronger than all enemies.
This chapter teaches three lessons. Verse 17 is the second, and many people stop there.
There he finds out that there is no good in him. Then he learns a second thing, one that people are often content with — but it is no deliverance. I hate it; well then, it is not I. The third thing is that the flesh is too strong for me. The will is there, but he does not find how to carry it out.
The verse gives no licence. Telling the new "I" apart from the sin inside does not make the wrong act a small thing.
We can say when we sin, "It is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells within me." Even so, we cannot say that our doing evil does not matter. Nor can we escape the condemnation of the law, under which we feel ourselves to be. We cannot reach such unworthy conclusions as that God would condone our sins.
The old nature cannot be improved. So the practical step is to take God's side against it.
Sooner or later the believer discovers that sin still dwells in him, and that the old nature is as bad as ever, or worse. Then, instead of trying uselessly to make it better, he can take sides with God against it. He never treats it as anything but the deadliest enemy. He always distrusts it and never indulges it. He knows that God has completely condemned it at the cross, and so he condemns it completely too. He counts himself dead to it, but alive to God in Christ Jesus.
- Discovery — the honest struggle uncovers a resident. Not an accident, not a habit, but a principle stronger than my own will.
- Distinction — "no longer I" admits there was a time when it was simply "I." The new nature is now the true self, and the believer may disown the old.
- Direction — seeing the enemy's real strength shows how weak our own forces are. It drives us to a refuge outside ourselves: deliverance through Christ Jesus.
- Danger — many people stop at this distinction and mistake it for freedom. Commentators call it a real gain, but no deliverance.
- Duty — the verse excuses nothing. God does not condone our sins; the believer takes His side against the sin that dwells in him.