What then shall we say? Should we continue in sin that grace may abound?
Paul has just said that where sin increased, grace abounded all the more. Here he puts the objection that statement invites into words. Does a salvation given apart from any works of ours leave a person free to go on sinning?
The objection grows out of the closing words of chapter 5, and Paul refuses it outright.
The Apostle's statement at the end of Romans 5 — that "where sin increased, grace abounded all the more" — raises the subject of death to sin. That statement at once leads the mind ruled by the flesh to ask the foolish, if not wicked, question, "Are we to continue in sin that grace may abound?" The Apostle rejects this unholy suggestion completely. He will not allow that the believer — who is true to the position in which God has set the Christian — can continue living in sin.
The suggestion is that a believer should sin on purpose, so that grace has more to cover. It is not a harmless idea:
Shall we take advantage of the abundance of grace, and by our self-indulgence make a fresh occasion for its display? The more we sin, the more grace will bestow. Those who talk or think in this way, whether intentionally or not, are liable to turn, as we read, "the grace of our God into sensuality" (Jude 4). And history shows that many gross evils have arisen in Christendom from such abuses of God's abounding grace.
The objection also exposes those who make it:
They show that they have no idea how hateful sin is. They assume that punishment is the only thing to fear. So the moment the fear of punishment is gone, all restraint is gone.
This verse opens a new section, with a different subject from the chapters before it.
As we enter this branch of the Gospel of God, we find that sin, not sins, is the subject before us. Fruitfulness for God, not peace of conscience, is an end in view. It is the sinful nature, and not the acts — what we are, our condition, not what we have done — that has now to be considered. So attention goes to the death of Christ, not to His blood. His blood is not named once throughout this section of the letter.
Paul does not reply by scolding. He replies with a fact:
In chapter 6 he goes on to notice that some will say, "Oh, if Christ has done all, it does not matter what I do. If it is righteousness without works, then we may walk as we like." The answer is not "That ought not to be," but "That cannot be." For we are speaking of death: I have part in righteousness by death. If the thing is real, I cannot live in what I am dead to, and that makes it impossible. If I live, being dead in this way, it is by being alive to God, in Jesus Christ our Lord.
And the answer he gives is not the law:
The question in Romans 6 is the usual objection of the flesh, that sovereign grace seems to allow living in sin. The apostle answers this, not by asserting the law as the Christian's rule as if we were Jews. He answers by declaring that in our very baptism we died with Christ to sin. Buried with Him, we now have to walk in newness of life. He argues, not from a motive, but from the blessed fact of Christ's death and resurrection, in which the baptised profess to have a part.
That answer also rules out every other route to freedom from sin.
Here, then, is that principle of deliverance from sin so greatly ridiculed — deliverance from sin by death. Nor shall we find any other deliverance from sin in the word of God. For centuries, many sincere people sought deliverance by fasting and by shutting themselves away in monasteries. Many sincere people now seek it by trying to reach a false perfection of the flesh. But here is the full truth of God — deliverance from sin by death.
And the question is practical: we stand between grace at the start and glory at the end.
Grace took us up at the start — grace is going to glorify us at the end; but we are not yet glorified. What are we going to do in between, since we are the recipients of such grace? Continue in sin? "By no means!"
- Grace provokes — grace abounded all the more where sin increased, and that truth draws out this objection.
- Grace exposes — those who propose sinning so grace may abound show they fear punishment, not sin itself.
- Grace redefines — the subject is now sin the nature, not sins the acts. The goal is fruitfulness for God, not peace of conscience.
- Grace kills — the reply is not "that ought not to be" but "that cannot be"; you cannot live in what you have died to.
- Grace holds — grace took us up at the start and will glorify us at the end. In between, the answer is death with Christ, not law and not self-effort.
Far be the thought. We who have died to sin, how shall we still live in it?
Paul has just said that where sin increased, grace increased all the more. Someone will always twist that into a licence to sin, and this verse is his reply. The reply is striking for what it does not say: it does not appeal to our feelings or to the Saviour's love.
May we continue in sin, so that His grace may be displayed more richly? Away with such a thought. Here the apostle deals with the wicked charge. He answers it not because the thought is appalling in itself, nor because it slanders the character of God, as in Romans 3:8, but because it contradicts the first principles of Christianity. He does not use a motive drawn from our sense of our Saviour's love. He is not asking here how we could so wound His heart or grieve the Holy Spirit of God.
Notice the form of the sentence. Paul does not give a command. He asks a question.
Later in the chapter the apostle will show how the believer is dead to sin. But at the start he assumes that the only possible attitude for the believer to take towards sin is that he is "dead to sin." So he asks, "How can we who died to sin still live in it?" His question does not suggest that we ought not to live in it. It says that, having died to sin, we cannot live in it. The principle behind his words is plain: we cannot die to something and live in it at the same time.
One small word changes everything.
The matter stands like this. He died FOR our sins, making atonement for them. He died TO sin. Taught by the Spirit, we recognise that we are identified with our great Representative, and faith takes His death as ours. We too, then, are "dead to sin," and cannot go on living in it without contradicting ourselves.
Some have wanted to read the dative here as "dead by sin" — that is, killed by our sins, and therefore frightened to go on in them. Commentators differ, but one writer argues the whole chapter rules this out:
The desired translation is the result of misunderstanding the whole passage. It makes it a motive drawn from a previous evil result and nothing more; whereas it is perfectly certain that the passage is about our dying when we become Christians, not our dying by our sins... the doctrine of the chapter is dying out of our old man and living in newness of life — not our dying by our sin so as to be afraid of living in it now.
Many read the verse as a claim that the sinful nature is gone. But the verse says that we died.
Scripture points to death itself as the barrier to sin's activity... Note carefully what the verse says, for people often misunderstand it. They misquote it or misread it. Paul does not say that sin itself is dead. He does not imply that the evil nature has disappeared altogether. It is we ourselves who have died to sin. How then can we go on living in sin? It is a dangerous deceit to think that believers no longer have sin within them.
Some believers hesitate here, because their own experience does not match the words. Paul is not describing experience at all.
This settles the matter at once against the so-called perfectionists. Paul is not saying that any believer has the experience of being dead to sin. He is certainly speaking of all Christians, and this is not the universal experience... His words later on are, "consider yourselves dead to sin" (older translations read "reckon"), and that reckoning rests on this: Christ "died to sin, once for all." So it is a reckoning of faith, not an experience.
If freedom comes by death, then every other method is a detour.
Here, then, is that principle of deliverance from sin which is so much ridiculed — deliverance from sin by death. We shall not find any other deliverance from sin in the word of God. For centuries many sincere souls sought deliverance by fasting. Many shut themselves away in monasteries. Many sincere souls now seek it by striving after a false perfection of the flesh. But here is the full truth of God — deliverance from sin by death.
This truth is not the finish line of the Christian life. It is where obedience starts.
A dead man is free, or justified, from sin. I cannot charge a dead man with the evil of his past life. Death has taken him right out of it altogether... Death is the starting point for practice. We are set free as dead to sin, and so the apostle says, "Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, to make you obey its passions."... I can say to sin now: I am no longer your slave. I belong to someone else. God has set me free from sin and given me a life to yield to Him.
- Question — The verse answers the charge that grace encourages sin. It does not scold. It shows that living in sin contradicts what a Christian is.
- Death — Christ died for our sins to atone; He died to sin, and faith takes that death as ours.
- Distinction — We died to sin; sin did not die in us. Anyone who claims the sinful nature is gone is deceived.
- Faith — This reckoning is true of all Christians. It rests on Christ's death, not on a level of experience a few have reached.
- Freedom — Death is the only deliverance from sin's power that Scripture offers. It is also where practice begins: a dead man owes his old master nothing.
Are you ignorant that we, as many as have been baptised unto Christ Jesus, have been baptised unto his death?
Paul has just said that grace overflows where sin abounded. Someone is bound to twist that into a licence to keep sinning. His reply is not a warning but a reminder. He points the Roman Christians back to their own baptism, and to what that act said about them.
The question in verse 3 is not new information. It points to something every believer has had since the day they confessed Christ.
The apostle answers from the starting point of every person who confesses Christ. Not only did He die for our sins, laying us under an infinite obligation, but we died to sin: how then shall we go on living in it? This is the meaning of our baptism. Are you ignorant of so plain a truth? It is not a special blessing that only a few Christians enjoy; it is the common property of all the baptized.
Here the commentators part company with many modern versions. Several argue the Greek preposition should read "to" or "unto" rather than "into." The difference matters, because it guards against the idea that the act itself does the work.
The Greek preposition means "to" or "unto" as often as "into." Which one it is depends on the context, or on the nature of the case. It is impossible to think that the Israelites in 1 Corinthians 10:2 were baptized into Moses; there the word must be "unto."… Baptism is the symbol of profession. Reality depends on faith, and faith might or might not be true of the person baptized… To say "into" therefore goes beyond God's word. It claims for the act a life-giving power that Scripture does not grant and does not allow… Not everyone has faith, and baptism will no more save an unbeliever than a dead faith will.
Baptism pictures a funeral, and a funeral has two obvious effects on the person concerned.
In the figure of baptism we were identified with the death of Christ. This was so that we might share, here and now, in the position His death gives us in relation to sin and the world. Baptism is a figure of death and burial. It is clear that a dead man has finished with the life of self-will he once lived. And a buried man has passed out of the sight of the world he once lived in.
Baptism points to a particular Christ, and that is why it carries this meaning at all.
They were baptized to a Christ who had died to sin, and we are buried with Him by baptism to death. John baptized to a living Messiah on earth; Christian baptism is to a Christ who has died and risen again. This is why the disciples of John in Acts 19 had to be baptized again in the name of the Lord Jesus. He had died and risen, and God had made Him Lord and Christ.
If the meaning is burial, then the effect is a clean break with everything on this side of the grave.
Now baptism is, in one word, dissociation. It is only an outward ordinance, yet it has a meaning, and that is its meaning. It is based on the death and resurrection of Christ, for we are baptized to His death, and so we are "buried with Him." Nothing cuts our links with the world, and separates us from the present order of things, more effectively than death and burial.
That break is easy to admire and hard to accept, which is why the argument turns into a searching question for anyone who has been baptized.
Every passage of Scripture that speaks of baptism sets out death, not life. Baptism marks a definite separation from the whole world-system. From now on we count its aims, its pleasures, its politics, its honours and rewards among the "things that lie behind." But are we really prepared for such a clean sweep as this? This is what our baptism means — but do we mean it? It is easy to boast about a correct mode, while in the heart refusing all that baptism stands for.
Death is not the end of the argument. Baptism commits a Christian to a Christ who is alive, and that life has one direction.
The one baptism is Christian baptism. It commits us to all that is bound up in the truth of Christ Jesus. It announces our identification with the death of our Lord Jesus Christ in all its bearings, and implies our obligation to walk in newness of life. The water we pass under is a picture of death. Understanding our identification with Christ dead and risen again teaches us that we are no longer free to be under sin's dominion, no longer available for sin's control. He — Christ — lives to God. Every pulse, every movement of His risen manhood is Godward, to accomplish God's will and pleasure.
- Death answers the question. Grace does more than give a Christian better motives against sin. It ends the old life, and no one lives in what he has died to.
- Death is what baptism pictures. Not new life, but burial — burial with Christ, the One who died and rose.
- Death separates. A buried man is out of the world's sight, so baptism cuts the links with its aims, pleasures and rewards.
- Death professed must be death meant. Baptism goes no further than profession. Reality rests on faith, and the right form without the heart is empty.
- Death opens onto life. Christ raised lives wholly to God, and baptism commits us to walk in newness of life.
We have been buried therefore with him by baptism unto death, in order that, even as Christ has been raised up from among [the] dead by the glory of the Father, so *we* also should walk in newness of life.
Romans 6 opens with a question: does grace leave us free to keep sinning? Paul answers with a fact, not a rule. The believer has died with Christ, and baptism pictures that burial. This verse then looks past the grave, to a resurrection by the Father's glory and a new way of living that matches it.
The verse answers an objection raised at the start of the chapter.
Is this the conclusion to draw from the gospel of God? May we continue in sin, so that His grace may be displayed more richly? Away with such a thought. The apostle answers this wicked inference, not by showing how evil it is in itself, but by showing that it flatly contradicts Christianity in its first principles. He replies from the starting point of every believer in Christ. Christ did not merely die for our sins, laying us under an infinite obligation; we died to sin. How then shall we go on living in it? This is the meaning of our baptism. It is not some special blessing that only a few Christians have. It is the common property of all the baptized.
Notice how the apostle frames his answer.
He rejects the thought outright and puts it away with another question: "How can we who died to sin still live in it?" Asking it as a question shows how unanswerable he thinks it is. And unanswerable it is, if the premise is taken rightly. If we are dead to sin, then we cannot live in it. That consequence cannot be denied.
One writer stresses what baptism points to, and what it does not do.
Notice, then, that deliverance from sin is not the improvement of self, or of an evil nature — the flesh. Instead, "We were buried therefore with him by baptism into death." We are not baptised to the work of the Spirit in us. We are baptised to His death, who died for us and rose again. So the death that delivers from sin is not a death to sin that we reach by ourselves. It is the death of Christ on the cross, and our identification with it — "buried with him." And notice, there is no thought that baptism gives life. Baptism is to death, and life in the risen Christ is beyond it.
The meaning of this burial is for daily life.
A buried man has died to the scene where he once lived. Now suppose a man goes to his own funeral by his own choice. This is exactly what happens to the believer, and he surely believes he will gain by it. What a loss the believer suffers when he leaves the inner meaning of his baptism out of his daily life!
The verse traces the resurrection to the Father's glory. One writer explains why glory is named.
In relation to God, every attribute of His has been perfectly glorified by the atoning death of our blessed Lord. So the resurrection is said to be "by the glory of the Father." It is as though that glory, which the Son had vindicated and displayed so perfectly, waited for the very first moment at the tomb on the first day of the week. It waited to call the perfect obedient One out from death.
The verse ends by describing how the Christian now lives.
Let us notice the closing words of verse 4, "newness of life," for they give a brief answer to the question the chapter opened with. Instead of continuing in sin, which is in effect continuing to live the old life, we are to walk in a life which is new.
One writer draws out what this new walk aims at.
This suggests to me that there is a realm where everything matches the glory of the Father. That is the realm Christ is in. He has been raised from among the dead by the glory of the Father... It suggests to me that if I am walking in newness of life, the goal before me is the glory of the Father.
Romans speaks of burial with Christ, but not of rising with Him. One writer marks the difference.
He does not say we are risen with Him. That would in itself assume full redemption, with life, and a place and condition before God. Here it is practical — a new character of life. We are to walk in newness of life.
- Died — A fact answers the objection, not a warning: those who died to sin cannot go on living in it.
- Buried — Baptism points to Christ's death. It does not point to self-improvement, and it does not give life. Life lies beyond it, in the risen Christ.
- Raised — Christ came out of the tomb by the Father's glory, because His atoning death had glorified every attribute of God.
- Walking — The new life is practical and present. The glory that raised Christ is now the goal the believer walks towards.
- Not yet risen — Romans stays with burial and a new walk. To say we are risen with Christ would assume more: full redemption and a settled place before God.
For if we are become identified with [him] in the likeness of his death, so also we shall be of [his] resurrection;
Paul has just asked how people who died to sin can keep on living in it, and here is his answer: whoever shares Christ's death shares His resurrection. Older translations say "planted together in the likeness of His death," and writers ask what that joining means and when the resurrection comes.
The verse looks back to baptism. One writer asks what that ceremony means.
What then does baptism mean? It means identification with Christ in His death. It means that we are buried with Him, and that we are put under obligation to walk in newness of life, just as He was raised into a new order of things. This is its meaning and this the obligation it lays on us, and we lose much if we do not know it.
Translators have handled the word behind that older phrase in different ways.
"Identified" seems a loose translation. The word means, as a note on it says, "grown together," and the Revised Version's "united," which most commentators follow, seems better. There is no "Him" in the original, but it is clearly implied. Read that way, the passage argues this: if what baptism stands for is real in the soul, and in it — "the likeness of His death" — they were truly united with Him and not united in profession only, then the result would show in the practical "likeness of His resurrection," that "walk in newness of life" he had spoken of just before.
The logic rests on where Christ Himself stands.
Where the head of the race stands in relation to sin is where everyone under that head stands. Christ has died to sin. Christians, therefore, have died to it. So we have been planted together in the likeness of His death, and now wait for the likeness of His resurrection.
Commentators differ over the timing. Some read the second half as pointing on to the day when God raises the believer's body.
The fifth verse looks on to the future. For, as surely as Christ Himself is raised, we shall be raised in fact, and fully delivered then, even as to our bodies.
One writer uses that certainty against the idea that only some believers will share it. He sums up the verse: "so also we (not some only) shall be of His resurrection" (William Kelly).
Others read the future tense as marking result, not date. The chapter argues about how we live now.
The likeness of His death is baptism itself, and being united to Him in His death is what baptism represents. So if what baptism represents is fulfilled in us, then we shall also be in the likeness of His resurrection. This may well go on to full realization in physical resurrection, yet it is surely meant to have a present, practical application as well, in keeping with the whole drift of the thought here. "We shall be" has to be future only when we look at it from the point of union with Him in His death, and its force as an argument for the present is weakened if we limit it to the body.
Another writer puts it in one line. The "shall" of this verse "is not future but consequence" (The Bible Treasury).
One writer points out what Paul does not say here.
He does not go into the truth taught in Ephesians, but we find here what exactly fits the subject he is treating. He does not speak of being made alive together with Christ, or of being raised up and seated in Him in the heavenly places. Instead he says, "If we are planted together in the likeness of His death, we shall be also in the likeness of His resurrection."
On this reading the verse points to resurrection life at work in the believer now. The same writer puts it plainly: "if planted in the likeness of His death, we shall be of His resurrection; that is, the power of His life will show itself in us" (J. N. Darby).
- Union. "Planted together" means grown together. It is a real joining with Christ, not one in profession only.
- Death first. Baptism pictures burial with Christ. The verse starts there, and that identification brings an obligation: walk in newness of life.
- Head and members. Christ's condition as to sin settles the condition of all who stand under Him: He died to it, so they have died to it.
- Resurrection follows. The two halves hold together. Commentators differ on "we shall be": some point to the body raised at Christ's coming, some to the result seen now, and several allow both.
- Life shown. Romans holds back the language of being raised and seated with Christ. It presses instead the power of His life at work in the believer's daily walk.
knowing this, that our old man has been crucified with [him], that the body of sin might be annulled, that we should no longer serve sin.
This verse tells believers something they are to know. At the cross the person we once were was put to death with Christ, and sin lost its grip as our master.
The phrase does not name a nature living inside us. It pictures a whole person: everything we were as children of Adam, gathered into one figure.
It is not always easy to grasp the thought behind "our old man." One way to explain it is this: the Apostle is personifying all that we are as the natural children of Adam. Imagine a person whose character held every ugly feature ever shown by anyone in Adam's race. That person could be described as "our old man."
The difference between a person and a nature decides where responsibility lies.
Between person and nature there is a real and important difference. If we take the inspired words as a perfect guide — and we should — then "the old man" is person, not nature. This matters, because responsibility belongs to the person and not to the nature. The person is the one who acts.
The verse opens with knowing. So the question is when this crucifixion happened, and whether it waits on our progress.
There is no thought here of this being a state that belongs to some Christians and not to others. It is the very truth of our Christian position. Knowing this, that our old man has been crucified. When? In our experience? That is not the thought here, but "has been crucified with him." Surely that was on the cross. Not only did He, in infinite love, bear our sins on the cross, but our old man was fully judged there too.
Feeling follows the fact; it does not create it.
This verse says nothing about our feeling it. But when faith learns the fact from God, it shapes our moral life, and we know its blessed power.
Crucifixion is a sentence, not a treatment. God did not repair the old man; He condemned and ended him.
To convince us of the hopeless character of this man, God has fully tested the "old man" under every possible test. He has been tried without law, under law, under priesthood, under royalty, and finally by the presence of Christ in grace. Under every test man has broken down. This proves that the old man is completely evil, and that all hope of improving or reforming the "old man" is useless... Sins can be forgiven. But there can be no forgiveness for an evil nature. It can only be condemned and ended.
The manner of the death carries its own verdict, and it was God who assigned it.
There are many forms of death. Crucifixion carries shame and disgrace, and under the law of Moses, a curse. The "old man," because of its evil tendencies, was worthy — in the language of the text — not only of death but of the death of the cross. Man's injustice and malice assigned the Son of Man to death by crucifixion. But it was the justice and grace of God that sentenced our "old man" to be crucified with Christ.
Older translations read "destroyed," but writers call that too strong. The sense is that a power is cancelled, as in "brought to nothing".
The "body of sin" is the whole of sin in its dominating energy. But "our old man is crucified with Him" (Christ) "that the body of sin" (that dominating energy) "might be annulled." "Destroyed" is a wholly incorrect translation. The end in view is "that we should not serve sin."
That cancelling covers sin as a whole, not just the one sin we most want relief from.
We tend to link sin with some particular failing we are prone to — the one where sin's rule over us is felt most. We might be quite content to be free from sin's rule in that one form. But God would have us free from sin's rule as a whole, not just in part... Sin, indeed, still exists, but can have no power over a corpse.
The closing clause shows what problem the chapter solves.
Sin is a master, a slave-owner, and we had fallen under its power. The point discussed in the chapter is not the presence of sin in us but the power of sin over us. We have got our discharge from sin.
- Who. "Our old man" is the whole person we were as children of Adam, personified as one man, not a nature.
- Sentence. God tested that man in every way and found him past mending. Death was the only remedy, and crucifixion was the verdict He assigned.
- Fact. It happened at the cross, not in our experience. Faith knows it because God says so, and feeling follows the fact instead of producing it.
- Effect. Sin's dominating energy is annulled. Sin is cancelled as a power, not removed as a presence, and it has no hold on a corpse.
- Aim. The verse ends in freedom of service. The issue is not sin's presence in us but sin's power over us, and that mastery is broken.
For he that has died is justified from sin.
Paul has just spoken of the old self crucified with Christ, so that sin would no longer be our master. Now he adds a short legal rule, and its force turns on one word: older translations read "justified from sin" here — but which sin does he mean?
Other translations word the end of the verse differently, and that wording carries the true sense of "freed".
So we have this rather abstract statement: "For he that has died is justified from sin" (New Translation). That is the real meaning of the word "freed".
The end of verse 6 sets the picture of sin that runs through the chapter.
Take note of the closing words of verse 6. They show us clearly how this chapter views sin. Sin is a master, a slave-owner, and we had fallen under its power. The point discussed in the chapter is not the presence of sin in us but the power of sin over us. We have got our discharge from sin. We are justified from it, as verse 7 states.
Earlier in Romans the subject was our sins and the blood of Jesus that answers for them. Here God settles a second thing.
We have seen how God justifies His people from their sins by the blood of Jesus. Now we see how He justifies them from sin, the root, or nature. "For he that is dead is justified from sin" (margin). Sins are forgiven, and now sin cannot be charged to him who is dead; he is justified from sin.
Salvation covers both, and each one has its own verse:
Indeed we have a full salvation not only from sins but from sin, justified from the bad fruit (Rom. 5:1), justified from the bad tree (Rom. 6:7).
The argument rests on a fact everyone knows. Death ends every claim an owner had.
God counts us as having died with Christ, and that death has won us complete freedom from slavery to sin. The picture of death settles the matter, and it should silence every doubt about our deliverance. All a person's obligations stop binding him at his death. A purchased slave dies, and his owner can demand no more service from him. Death frees the slave from bondage.
The word "justified" here surprises some readers. They expect the teaching from earlier in the letter. But watch the pronouns.
Up to now Paul has said "we" and "our", and in verse 8 he returns to "we". But verse 7 says "he". That shows he is making a general statement. A dead man's condition is a complete answer to any charge of sin brought against him after his death. So let Christians who have died to sin live and walk as freed from its bondage. The justification here comes from the person's state — he is dead. So do not confuse it with the justification of ungodly people, which has such a prominent place in the Gospel of God. His state as dead blocks every charge of sin after his death. Of course, it says nothing about how he lived before he died. This justification is true of everyone who has died. The justification of Romans 3 is true only of believers.
The obvious objection is that we are still alive, and sin is still in us. The answer points to whose death this is.
Anyone who has done with sin must be dead to it. When a man is dead you cannot charge him with anything; his life has ceased to exist, he is out of the scene. You may say, "How can I be free from sin when I still find it in me?" The thing sin was attached to is gone. We are not told to die, for we are dead... You may ask, "How can that be, when I find I am not dead?" The answer is that you died in Christ. Christ took your place... The freedom we have is holy freedom from sin, not freedom to sin.
That is why the following verses tell us to reckon rather than to feel.
How can I realise that I am dead to sin? All my own experience, my own feelings, my own inner sense of myself seem to contradict this truth flatly. I cannot realise that I am dead; but God tells me I am... If I were sinless, if I had no sin in me, I should never be told to reckon myself dead to sin.
- Discharge. "Set free" renders the word "justified" — a release from every charge, not a change we feel.
- Root. Earlier chapters justify us from sins, the bad fruit; this verse justifies us from sin, the bad tree.
- Death. A dead slave owes his owner nothing; death ends every claim the old master had.
- Distinct. This justification rests on a state — being dead. It differs from the justification of ungodly people in Romans 3, which belongs to believers only.
- Reckon. We died in Christ, not in our feelings. So we count ourselves dead because God says so — free from sin, never free to sin.
Now if we have died with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with him,
Paul has just spoken of our old self crucified with Christ, and now he draws his conclusion. Death with Christ opens the door into life with Him — but is the "if" a doubt or a fact, and is living with Him ours now or still ahead?
The opening word does not put the believer's death in question. It marks off what is real from what is merely outward, and then reasons forward from it.
Having "died with Christ" is true only of real believers. It is not true of people who have only been baptized into His death and so are identified with Him on the outside. It is the reality of identification with Christ in His death, as also in verse 5. The argument moves from the form to the reality of being identified with His death. From there it moves to being identified with Him in His lasting life in resurrection. If our identification with His death is real — if we have indeed died with Him — faith gives us the assurance that we shall live with Him. It is faith about the future, certainly, but a principle of faith to be put into practice now.
This also settles how we died. It was not an achievement of ours, not even of our renewed will:
He argues that "the one who has died has been justified from sin" — so the Greek [the ESV reads "set free from sin"] — and that "if we have died with Christ, we believe that we will also live with him." So he is speaking of atonement and what it does for us, not of any work in us... Our dying with Christ is not something accomplished by the energy of our own wills — even of our renewed wills... no one can pretend that Scripture anywhere tells us to die with Christ.
The whole movement of the passage turns here.
Death for the believer is the way into life. So, from speaking of death, the Apostle now passes on to speak of life... Looking into the future the Apostle sets before us the full and glorious result of having died with Christ... Who can grasp the blessedness that lies behind these words, "live with Him"? We know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that He became poor and lived with us, full of grace and truth. That, however, was only a means to an end; the glorious end being that we should live with Him.
Commentators are careful about the tense here. The verse names what faith looks for, not what we already hold.
Verse 8 repeats the conclusion as to the future which follows from the death and resurrection of Christ... Our condition when we are risen is once more looked forward to and set out.
Some writers see this verse as the far edge of what Romans says about resurrection. From here the theme passes on to other letters:
In Romans the believer is dead with Christ to sin, dead to the law, but not risen. Romans 6 does not go so far as being risen with Christ... The nearest approach to it is the statement of Romans 6:8... and this verse leads us on towards Colossians. It presents this as a result of the doctrine unfolded there, forming the link with that letter.
Notice where the certainty comes from. It is not found by looking inward.
Verses 8-10 make one thing very clear. The Spirit of God sets aside the natural ideas and guesses of the mind. In their place He gives the view from outside ourselves: what Christ has been and is — both His past sufferings and His eternal condition as the now re-established heir of liberty in resurrection. "We believe that we shall live with Him, knowing that He dies no more," and so on. The whole ground of confidence moves from self to Christ.
Why give up what this world offers and walk a different path? The answer lies outside this world.
These two things are worth weighing. Resurrection and living with Him are both in view, and both look on to the future. What would be the use of giving up life in this world and walking in this path? None, if we did not know that the newness of life we have now really belongs to another sphere — the sphere we are going into at the appearing of Christ.
- Died. The "if" tests what is real, not what is likely. Every true believer has already died with Christ. Baptism without faith is only the outward form.
- Given. That death happened in His atonement, not by the energy of our own wills. Scripture never tells us to die with Christ.
- Believed. The Spirit sets our own ideas and guesses aside. Confidence moves off self and onto Christ, who dies no more.
- Ahead. "We shall live with Him" is future — Romans stops short of saying we are risen with Christ, and points on to that hope.
- Now. The coming sphere gives the present path its point: newness of life here belongs to the world we are going to.
knowing that Christ having been raised up from among [the] dead dies no more death has dominion over him no more.
Paul has just said that we died with Christ and will live with Him. Verse 9 rests that hope on one fact: the risen Christ stands outside death's reach forever, and our position hangs on His.
The verse opens with what we know. One writer separates two kinds of knowing in this chapter.
We know that our old self has been crucified with Christ only because we are taught it, as a truth outside us. Many would like to make this a matter of inner experience, but it is not. That would flatter the flesh in its religious moods and longings, instead of honouring the grace of God in the death of Christ. On the other hand, we have an inward, conscious knowledge that Christ, being raised, will never die again: death no longer has dominion over Him. This is not just an outward fact we are told. We feel in our soul that it is so, and must be so. Sin never had dominion over Him, but death did — so that God would be glorified, sin judged, Satan's power destroyed, and we set free.
The words "no longer" imply that death once did hold Him. But it never held Him against His will.
So death had no dominion over Him except as He submitted to it. Having done so, He is finished with that responsible order of life which death applied to — the order that sin attached to in you and me. The Father raised Him from the dead by His glory, and He has left forever the condition that death's dominion belonged to — a condition He had once entered by His own choice.
Others in Scripture were raised and later died. This verse rules that out for Christ — and, by the same pattern, for those who belong to Him.
The resurrection of God's people will match their Lord's in character. Lazarus died again — otherwise he would be on earth today. But Christ, being raised from the dead, will never die again; death no longer has dominion over Him (Rom. 6:9). And Scripture says of God's people: "those who are considered worthy to attain to that age and to the resurrection from the dead neither marry nor are given in marriage, for they cannot die anymore" (Luke 20:35-36).
The verse says He will never die again. One writer explains why He had to die even once.
He came about sin, to take our place as sinners, and He died to sin. He died out of grace toward us, and He died with sin in view. He did it once, when, for our sakes, He needed to do it — and He did it once for all. It was a work He had to do about sin, and He has done it. He has nothing more to do with sin. He will judge sinners, no doubt, but He is finished with sin, finished with being occupied with it, once and for ever. Up to the cross He, the sinless One, had to deal with sin. On the cross sin was the whole question, though it was for the glory of God that He was made sin. But now He has done with it once and for ever.
Verse 8 said we shall live with Him. Verse 9 tells us what that life is like, because His life sets its measure.
"Now if we have died with Christ, we believe that we will also live with Him." The life that has now begun is bound up with His life and depends on it, just as the death we have been considering is bound up with His death. So that life is changeless, eternal, beyond the power of death.
Commentators press this beyond the future and into the present.
He no longer lives under sin's dominion. In grace He once came under it, but by dying and rising again He now lives in eternal deliverance from sin's power. As people who are under grace — as being in Him — we are in the same sphere of life He is in, where sin cannot enter. It is not simply that we have life in Him; we live with Him. And living with Him means living in practical deliverance from sin's dominion.
- Dominion, submitted to. Sin never ruled Christ. Death did — but only because He chose to enter that condition, for God's glory and our freedom.
- Dominion, broken. Lazarus died again; Christ never will. He has left death's order of life behind forever, and His people's resurrection will match His.
- Dominion, done with. He dealt with sin once for all at the cross. Now He has nothing more to do with it.
- Dominion, shared. Our new life is tied to His life, and so carries His character: changeless, eternal, beyond death's power.
- Dominion, in practice. We live with Him where sin cannot enter. So freedom from sin's rule is meant for today, not only for the resurrection.
For in that he has died, he has died to sin once for all; but in that he lives, he lives to God.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
So also *ye*, reckon yourselves dead to sin and alive to God in Christ Jesus.
Paul has just said that Christ died to sin once and now lives to God. Now he turns that fact on the believer with one command — so what does it ask of me, and how can I count myself dead to sin while sin still stirs inside me?
The ESV says "consider"; the writers quoted here use the older wording, "reckon." The command rests on facts already settled:
Once we know this, the reckoning commanded in verse 11 becomes perfectly plain to us. Our case is governed by Christ's, for we are identified with Him. Did He die to sin? Then we are dead to sin, and so we reckon it. Does He now live to God? Then we now live to God, and so we reckon it. Our reckoning is not make-believe. We are dead to sin and alive to God by His own acts, accomplished in the death and resurrection of Christ.
The word "likewise" sets the believer's death to sin on the same footing as Christ's:
Now notice what follows. Everyone believes verse 10 is true of the blessed Lord. Nobody believes that He died to the love or the practice of sin, but to sin itself. But what does verse 11 say? "Likewise reckon" — that is, account. "Likewise" means "in the same way." It plainly means that the believer is to reckon himself dead to sin and alive to God in the same sense that Christ is.
It is an accounting word, not a report on my inner state:
I would not have to reckon if I were really dead, and the context makes that clear. "Reckon" is the estimate I form by faith of my condition and standing. It is the estimate of my faith, not a statement about the state I am in. The same is true of "alive": the statement here is not that I have life, but that I account myself so.
Turning this into a matter of experience leads to one of two bad ends:
We reckon this so, we do not feel it to be so. It is an entire mistake to imagine that this being dead to sin is a feeling or an experience. That mistake carries serious consequences. We cannot feel Christ's death on the cross, and it was there He died to sin, and we because He died. If it were experience, it would have to be a perfect one — never an evil thought, feeling, or desire in the heart. And that would be true of all Christians always, not just the more advanced. This is contrary to everyone's experience. Trying to produce such a condition in oneself ends in the misery of utter failure, or, worse still, in self-satisfaction.
The verse has a negative side and a positive one, and neither stands alone:
In the same way we are responsible to reckon for ourselves. As to sin — dead TO IT; as to God — alive IN CHRIST JESUS. It is not that sin is dead; it is that we reckon that in Christ's death we have died to it. It is not that we already have our resurrection bodies; it is that we reckon that in Christ Jesus we are alive to God.
Where does the right to reckon come from? One writer answers with a picture:
An illustration may help. Suppose you had committed murder. Someone else was accepted as your substitute and hanged instead of you. The person who took your place would certainly be dead indeed to sin. And would you not clearly be entitled to take the same position? So it is with the believer. Christ has died on our behalf. The value of His death is all for us. Our connection with it is of the most vital kind. It is in Him that we can reckon ourselves "dead indeed to sin."
Reckoning is not the same as realising, and the command itself shows that sin has not left the believer:
Note carefully the force of the apostle's word, "reckon." How very different it is from our word "realise"! We can realise natural or physical facts. But with a spiritual truth, it is not a question of realising but of reckoning. How can I realise that I am dead to sin? All my experience, my feelings and my inner sense of myself seem to contradict the truth flatly. I cannot realise that I am dead; but God tells me I am... If I were sinless, if I had no sin in me, I would never be told to reckon myself dead to sin. I would never need to hear the words, "Let not sin reign in your mortal body."
- Ground. Christ died to sin once and now lives to God. Your reckoning agrees with what God has already done in that death and resurrection.
- Gauge. "Reckon" is an accounting word — the estimate faith forms of my standing, not a report on how I feel.
- Guard. Treating this as experience ends in either the misery of failure or self-satisfaction.
- Grip. Hold both halves — dead to sin and alive to God — and hold them only "in Christ Jesus," where His death counts as mine.
- Goal. Sin still lives in the believer. That is exactly why God commands the reckoning — so sin does not reign.
Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body to obey its lusts.
Romans 6 has argued that the believer has died with Christ. Verse 12 turns that truth into a command. It raises a sharp question. If sin still needs forbidding, what has Christ's death changed?
The word that opens the verse ties it back to verse 11. Faith counts first; obedience follows.
Our responsibility is bound up with what Christ has already accomplished... It is to "reckon" ourselves dead to sin. We must meet every evil suggestion, craving and impulse that rises within us by remembering that we have died with Christ. This act of faith is the secret of strength to overcome. Only in this way can believers obey the apostle's command: "Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body."
The command itself is evidence about the Christian's condition. You do not warn someone off a power that has already vanished.
The flesh exists in the believer and will be there to the end... In Romans 6 we read, "Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body." Such an instruction would be pointless if the flesh were not in the believer... There is a great difference between dwelling and reigning. It dwells in a believer, but it reigns in an unbeliever.
The precise wording carries the weight. Paul chose one verb and not another.
Not, let it not be, but Let it not reign: a very small result if we were actually and experimentally dead to it.
The command has three parts, and each needs defining.
Verse 12 has three things in view: the evil principle of sin, or self-will, the mortal body, and the lusts of the body. Sin is the determination to do one's own will by satisfying lust. The body is the instrument for satisfying the lust. We are still in these mortal bodies, and the principle of sin is still in us. But if we reckon ourselves dead to sin and alive to God in Jesus Christ, our mortal bodies will in practice be free from the rule of sin.
The description "mortal" is not a throwaway word either.
Paul calls the body our "mortal body," or body of death, because it is in our present body that sin seeks to reign to death (see Rom. 5:21).
Sin acts here like a king pressing for the throne.
The truth is then, not that sin is dead. Christ's death and resurrection entitle us to regard ourselves, in the reckoning of faith, as dead to sin and alive to God in Christ Jesus... Sin is spoken of here as a person, as it sometimes is elsewhere, seeking the upper hand in our mortal body so as to subject us to its lusts. But through Christ it has no claim over us... As dead to sin we owe it no allegiance whatever.
Refusing one ruler means serving another.
The truth behind this command is that by nature the evil principle inside us rules us completely. Selfish pursuits and pleasures carry away the whole person. The gospel delivers us from this slavery and brings us under a new Master, even Jesus the Lord.
Much religious effort aims at removing the sinful nature. Verse 12 asks for something else, and that saves the believer from a hopeless task.
I cannot rid myself of the enemy. But God has judged it, and I have only to act on that judgment. I must keep it in the place of death where He has already put it. So we are not told to expel sin, to root it out, to cast it away from us, as moralists, and even clergy who do not know the Scriptures, sometimes urge us to do. We are told not to let it reign. That is, we must keep it under, in the place and under the sentence of death already passed on it... Indwelling sin is strong and active, yet He who tells us to reckon ourselves dead to it has supplied the power to obey. The Spirit of God is our strength in this warfare, the all-sufficient power He gives so that we can keep sin from reigning in our mortal body.
Sin regains the throne by one route only: our consent.
While sin is in our mortal body, it has no more right to reign there. However it will reign, if we yield to the desires of the old nature... Whenever temptation comes, the believer must take refuge in prayer, self-judgment and self-surrender. He must present his members afresh as instruments of righteousness to God... Therefore sin shall not have dominion over a believer because he is under grace. But we must take hold of this promise by faith.
- Reign, not reside. Sin still dwells in the believer; the command is that it must not rule. Dwelling and reigning are two different things.
- Reckon before you resist. The "therefore" points back. Faith counts itself dead with Christ first, and that counting gives the strength to obey.
- Dethroned, not destroyed. Christ's death has cancelled sin's title as master, so we owe it no allegiance.
- Refuse, don't uproot. Scripture never tells us to expel the sinful nature. We keep it in the place of death God has already assigned it.
- Consent is the only door. Sin reigns again only if we yield. Prayer, self-judgment and the Spirit's power keep the new Master on the throne.
Neither yield your members instruments of unrighteousness to sin, but yield yourselves to God as alive from among [the] dead, and your members instruments of righteousness to God.
Romans 6 has just told believers to count themselves dead to sin and alive to God. Now it turns that into a daily question: who gets the use of your hands, your tongue, your eyes?
This command is not for everyone. The phrase "as those who have been brought from death to life" marks out who it is for:
"Free" has a double sense in English. People say, "that horse is free from vice," meaning he has none at all. But suppose a man had been a slave and he is now free: we are "free from sin" in that sense. He does not say to a person who has never turned to God, "Give yourself to God." He says, "Present yourselves to God as those who have been brought from death to life." You have died in Christ. As those alive from the dead, what are you going to do with yourselves? Give yourselves to God, completely... God comes in. Grace cleanses us from guilt, then He says: "Now you are set free, and you have the privilege and title of giving yourselves."
The Greek uses two forms of the same verb, and they are not the same shape. One describes something ongoing, the other something settled once and for all:
The first occurrence of "yield" means, in the form of the word, the habit of yielding; the second, by its form, implies the surrender already made. This is not a gradual improvement of the nature or the will, as people speak of it. It is giving ourselves up to God in one complete act, as those alive from among the dead, and giving our members to God as instruments of righteousness.
That single act has a parallel later in the letter, where the same appeal returns:
In Romans 6:13 the Apostle had indicated that the way of deliverance from the service of sin was to yield ourselves to God, and our members as instruments of righteousness to God. We were to have the thing done, definitely and for ever, as a settled thing... Once each of us held his body as the vehicle in which his own will would be expressed. Once we each said in effect, "I am the captain of my body and it shall serve my pleasures."
The verse names two things to give, and it names them in a deliberate sequence. Conduct is not the starting point:
Notice that in giving ourselves to God, it is not only the details of conduct that are mentioned, and not only our members. The order is first, "present yourselves to God," and afterwards "your members." What rich and profitable teaching this is!... It is one thing to try to make my conduct fit God's desires. It is another to give myself to Him. But once I have given myself fully and held nothing back, let my members become steady "instruments for righteousness."
"Members" means the actual parts of your body. Each one has already served a master:
This yielding is a very practical thing, as verse 13 makes plain. It affects all the members of our bodies. In the past, sin enlisted every member in its service, so each one became an instrument of unrighteousness. Is it not a wonderful thing that every member may now serve God? Our feet may run His errands. Our hands may do His work. Our tongues may speak His praise.
Elsewhere Scripture tells believers to put their "members" to death, which sounds like the opposite of this verse. Commentators resolve it by noting that the word covers two different things:
The Christian is called to put these members of the flesh to death... The members of which the Apostle speaks in that passage can hardly refer to the members of the body. Far from putting the parts of our bodies to death, Romans 6 tells us to give our members to God as instruments. The members here seem to be all the sinful things through which the flesh expresses itself, just as the actual parts of the body are the instruments it uses for its own service.
The next line — "you are not under law but under grace" — is given as the reason the command can be kept, not as a loophole:
But note this well. The source of practical power — and that is the real question — is grace: "sin will have no dominion over you, SINCE you are not under law but under grace." If God and sin are in question, God is without doubt the strongest!
- Freed — the command speaks to people already set free through Christ's death. Only a freed slave can give himself away.
- Given — one decisive act of surrender, not a slow improvement of the old will. And never hand your body back to sin.
- Order — yourself first, your members after. Tidying up conduct without giving the person reverses the verse.
- Reach — feet, hands, tongue: every part that once served sin can now serve God. Put the flesh's sinful ways to death; hand the body's members over.
- Power — grace, not law, is the reason sin will not rule you.
For sin shall not have dominion over *you*, for ye are not under law but under grace.
Paul has just called believers to give themselves to God as people brought from death to life. Now he gives the reason such a life is possible, and it raises an old question: does taking a believer out from under law make him safer from sin, or more dangerous?
Dominion means rule. One writer connects the promise to the meaning of the name Jesus:
The very first page of the New Testament tells us there is something more than the forgiveness of our sins. It says, "You shall call His name Jesus, for He will save His people from their sins." He saves not only from the penalty of our sins, but from our sins themselves. "Sin shall not have dominion over you." Literally this is, "Sin shall not lord it over you."
The promise is not that sin disappears from the believer. One writer draws the line between now and later:
We speak of the power of sin, not of its presence. Let the reader carefully note this. On the question of sin, there is a real difference between a Christian now and a Christian in the life to come. Now he is set free only from the power of sin. Later he will be free from its presence. In his present condition sin lives in him, but it is not to reign. One day it will not even live in him. The reign of sin is over and gone. The reign of grace has begun.
That leaves room for real struggle. It also ties our freedom to how well we know grace:
There may be sudden temptation — yes, failure — but sin shall not have dominion — it shall not reign. But why shall sin not reign? "For you are not under law but under grace." … The more the free favour of God in Christ Jesus is known and enjoyed, the greater our deliverance from the slavery of sin, and the more we can live a holy life.
The reason the verse gives is surprising: law itself leaves a person under sin's mastery. One commentator lists what law fails to supply:
Being under law leaves me under the dominion of sin. What we want is a free life, free from bondage to sin; for he who commits sin, says the Lord, is the slave of sin. Law gives no life, no freedom, no strength, and not even an object to turn our hearts elsewhere. It rightly forbids sins, as it must, but it gives no life and no power. But under grace we have power. Life is given, strength is given, and an object is given; none of which, as we have seen, law gives. So, under grace, sin has no dominion over me. Under law it does.
These two phrases mark two positions, each with its own history:
"Under law" simply means a position where law has authority. Israel was in that position from Mount Sinai until the cross of Christ. "Under grace" means a position where grace rules. The contrast is drawn clearly and completely. The two things cannot be mixed. "Under grace" is our position, and it comes from the blessed cross of Christ. "Under law" was a position that supposed no cross and no salvation from bondage.
Some fear that grace makes people careless about sin:
Sin, then, is not to have dominion over us, for the very reason that we are not under law but under grace. Some say that if we tell people they are no longer under the rule of law, they are sure to plunge into sin. Here is God's answer to them. The fact is that nothing so subdues the heart and promotes holiness as the grace of God.
Elsewhere the same writer shows how grace does this:
In Christianity grace not only saves but teaches, and what an effective teacher it is! It does not fill our heads with cold rules and regulations. Instead it brings our hearts under the subduing influence of the love of God. We learn what pleases Him, as shown to us in Jesus. And because we have the Spirit, we begin to live the sober, righteous, and godly life.
- Dominion — sin will not lord it over you. Christ saves not only from sin's penalty but from sins themselves.
- Dwelling, not reigning — now you are free from sin's power, later from its presence. Failure may come, but rule may not.
- Law's poverty — law forbids sin but gives no life, freedom, strength, or object for the heart. So it leaves sin in charge.
- Grace's supply — grace gives life, strength and an object for the heart. That is why sin no longer rules you.
- Grace's schooling — grace is not permission but a teacher. Nothing subdues the heart and promotes holiness like the grace of God.
What then? should we sin because we are not under law but under grace? Far be the thought.
Paul has just told believers they live under grace, not under law. He raises the obvious objection himself — if law no longer rules us, are we free to sin? — and rejects it outright.
This is the second challenge in the chapter, and it is not a repeat of the first. One writer keeps them apart:
Two questions in this chapter are worth noticing, for people often confuse the second with the first. The first is in verse 1: "Are we to continue in sin?" The second is in verse 15: "Are we to sin?" The first asks about the moral sphere a person lives in, and so the chapter contrasts being "in sin" with being "in Christ Jesus." The second asks about acts or practice, and so it contrasts yielding yourself to serve sin with becoming servants to God. These are two deeply important lines of thought: the first developed in verses 1-14, the last in verses 15-23.
Paul is not inventing an unlikely opponent. He is answering the mind that hears God's kindness and calculates an advantage from it.
This further truth of practical righteousness comes in with the question, "Are we to sin because we are not under law but under grace?" Here the Apostle answers in advance the reasoning of the flesh. The flesh is always ready to abuse the goodness of God and pervert the word of God. If God says, "You are not under law but under grace", the flesh says, Then we are set free to do what we like.
Some fear that telling people they are not under law will send them straight into sin. That fear misreads what grace does:
Sin, then, is not to have dominion over us, for the very reason that we are not under the law but under grace. Some tell us that if we tell people they are no longer under the rule of law, they are sure to plunge into sin. Here is the divine answer to them. The fact is that nothing so subdues the heart and promotes holiness as the grace of God.
Another writer calls this question, and the one in verse 1, the natural doubts of unbelief. To let sin run free "would be thorough despising of grace rather than understanding and appreciation of it." (L. M. Grant)
The objection assumes that law is what keeps sin down. In fact law does the opposite:
The law is the strength of sin; for by its restraint and prohibition it can only provoke the flesh. It never gives power for holiness, any more than it gives life. Grace, not law, gives life, saves, and strengthens. If believers could be under law, sin must have dominion over them.
Paul's reply is not a rule but a question about ownership. There is no neutral space where a person sins without belonging to sin.
He proves that the question shows entire ignorance of the terrible result of yielding to sin. "Do you not know", says the Apostle, "that if you present yourselves to anyone as obedient slaves, you are slaves of the one whom you obey?" Yield to sin and we become the slaves of sin. Every fresh act of sin forges another link in the chain that holds us in bondage. This is an intensely solemn thought, whether for a sinner living in sin or for a saint who turns aside to trifle with sin.
Freedom is not release to do as we please. It is service under a new Master, and that changes what "doing right" means:
But grace uses this liberty to make us all the more His slaves, free from sin to serve the Lord Christ… The Christian's righteousness is never doing things because they are right — that is pride, independence, or making a god of self. We do them because they are God's will for us. We must obey to have practical righteousness.
Those who raise this objection reveal what they have never known:
No doubt, dear young believer, many will tell you that such teaching will lead you to sin as your old nature likes… Those who talk like that have never known what the grace of God is. They have never known what true liberty is — not liberty to sin, but liberty from sin… God has given you a new life, and that His free gift. He has now placed you in His own unchanging, boundless grace.
- Two questions. Verse 1 asks about the sphere you live in. Verse 15 asks about the acts you do. The chapter answers the first in verses 1-14 and the second in verses 15-23.
- Flesh's logic. The objection is the reasoning of the flesh, always ready to hear "not under law" as permission to do as it likes.
- Grace's power. Nothing subdues the heart and leads to holiness like grace. Law only stirs up the flesh and gives no power to be holy.
- Sin's chain. Whoever you obey owns you. Every act of sin forges another link in the chain — a solemn warning to anyone living in sin, and to any Christian playing with it.
- True liberty. Grace does not free you to sin; it frees you from sin, into obedience that does right because it is God's will.
Know ye not that to whom ye yield yourselves bondmen for obedience, ye are bondmen to him whom ye obey, whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?
Paul points to a fact from ordinary life: whoever you obey owns you. Only two masters are on offer. One road ends in death, the other in righteousness.
The verse opens with a question, not a doctrine. It rests on something anyone can check from daily life.
He appeals to that practical knowledge which is common to us all. We all know that if we obey anyone, we are their servant in practice, even if no one calls us their servant. That is the case also in spiritual things, whether it be serving sin or God. Judged by this standard, we were without question once the slaves of sin.
The verse offers only two options. It never lists a third, in which a person belongs to himself.
Any creature is wise to admit openly that he is under authority. Even the most rebellious, degraded wretch in the world is under authority. So is the most proud, respectable, reputable member of society, however independent and self-sufficient he thinks he is. Their natural characters may be very different. Yet both are without Christ, and both have yielded themselves to the authority of sin. A man may hate the word "yield." But it is in his very nature to yield. No creature can do anything else. If he does not yield to God, he is plainly yielding to sin.
Trying to rule yourself does not bring freedom. It brings a worse owner.
Man is not enough for himself. He is only a creature, and so he must depend on God. If he seeks to be his own master, if he claims to be independent, he only falls further under Satan. Instead of obeying God, he becomes the slave of sin.
The verse says you present yourself. That one word decides where the blame falls.
In this life people buy and sell slaves, and the slave gets no voice in the matter. The slavery spoken of here is not like that, whether it is slavery to sin or to righteousness… Men are sinners by birth through Adam's disobedience. They become slaves of sin by yielding to it. This declares and upholds man's responsibility. He is not responsible for being a sinner, or for having an evil nature. He is responsible for giving in to what that nature demands… He was born a sinner, a child of wrath by nature. He was not born the bondslave of sin. He became that by the exercise of his will — yielding himself to it.
The two halves of the verse do not mirror each other. Sin leads to death, but obedience leads to righteousness — not to life.
Death was the natural and appointed wages of sin, and it came as the judgment of God. We could not say obedience leads to life. If we obey, we are already alive to God through Jesus Christ our Lord. But obedience bears the fruit of practical righteousness. And notice the character of what stands against sin here. It is not righteousness in itself — doing right as conscience or law knows it — but obedience. We are alive to God, and that is, and must always be, obedience. We cannot live to God in any other way than in obedience. So Christ lived. He was the obedient Man — He came to do God's will.
The verse sets obedience against sin. So the standard is not a person's own sense of what is right.
Grace uses this freedom to make him all the more Christ's slave, free from sin to serve the Lord Christ. It was exactly what He did here on earth, always the true and perfect servant… The Christian's righteousness is never doing things because they are right. That is pride, independence, or making a god of self. We do them because they are God's will for us. We must obey to have practical righteousness.
Freedom does not lower the stakes for a Christian. It raises them.
God has called us to freedom, and He equips us with power. That makes the service of sin now deeply solemn. On man's part it is clearly the choice of evil. It is man's will rejecting the grace of God.
- Obedience reveals ownership. Not what you claim, but whom you actually obey, tells you whose servant you are.
- No third master. Self-rule is an illusion; refusing to yield to God is simply yielding to sin.
- You hand yourself over. People are born sinners. They become slaves of sin by their own yielding, and that is why they answer for it.
- The opposite of sin is obedience. Not doing right because it seems right, but doing it because it is God's will, with Christ as the pattern.
- Two wages, two ends. One road runs to death; the other bears its fruit in practical righteousness now.
But thanks [be] to God, that ye were bondmen of sin, but have obeyed from the heart the form of teaching into which ye were instructed.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
Now, having got your freedom from sin, ye have become bondmen to righteousness.
Paul has just thanked God that his readers obeyed the teaching handed to them. Now he states what that obedience produced: a change of owner. Two questions follow. What does freedom from sin mean when sin is still at work in us? And why does that freedom hand us straight to a new master?
The word "sin" here is not a list of wrong acts but a power that held people. One writer draws the distinction that unlocks the whole chapter.
Take note of the closing words of verse 6. They show us plainly how this chapter looks at sin. Sin is a master, a slave-owner, and we had fallen under its power. The chapter is not discussing the presence of sin in us but the power of sin over us. We have got our discharge from sin.
That distinction matters. The verse never says that sin has left the believer.
We know from God's word and bitter experience that as believers we are still able to sin. But Christian liberty means we no longer have to sin. This is a great liberty.
Paul says in the next verse that he is speaking in human terms. He uses a picture from ordinary life so his point is clear. (Some quotes on this page use older wording for the verse.)
"Being now made free from sin." (Rom. 6:18, 22.) The apostle tells his readers that he speaks to them "after the manner of men, because of the weakness of their flesh." He uses the term "made free" in contrast to a state of slavery. To mark that contrast, he adds that they have become servants to God. It is a simple picture of slaves and freed slaves, and the apostle uses it to make himself better understood. Moreover, the condition spoken of is that of all Christians, without exception.
The freedom did not come by effort or resolve. It came by a death: the believer's death with Christ. That is the argument running through the earlier part of the chapter.
Yes, this is how you changed masters: through death, from sin to righteousness. And all this in perfect grace. Once you were under sin and free from righteousness. Now you are servants of righteousness and free from the slavery of sin. Yes, this chapter looks at sin and righteousness as two masters. The Christian is perfectly free from the old tyrant.
Many people try to serve God so they can get free. Paul puts it the other way round, and the order of his words matters.
So every Christian is made free from sin: "Being then made free from sin, you became the servants of righteousness." (Ver. 18.) It does not say, You became the servants of righteousness, and then you were made free from sin. There can be no true fruit to holiness until we are made free from sin.
Notice that the verse does not end with liberty. It ends with a second slavery, and for a creature there is no other option.
Man is not enough on his own. He is only a creature, and so he must depend on God. If he seeks to be his own master, if he chases independence, he only falls more completely under Satan. Instead of obeying God, he becomes the slave of sin. Redemption sets the believer free from this slavery. But it frees him only to bind him with all his heart to do as the Christian form of teaching instructs us — all the more because he is under grace, not law.
The new master needs defining too. Righteousness is not a standard we set for ourselves.
A Christian's righteousness is never doing things because they are right. That is pride, independence, or making a god of self. It is doing them because they are God's will for us. We must obey to reach practical righteousness.
The verse makes no demand. The demand comes in the next verse, and the difference matters.
Verse 18 deals with actual fact: verse 19 with practical character. This is easy to see, above all in the New Translation, which puts verse 18 more strongly: "Now, having got your freedom from sin, you have become bondmen to righteousness." Verse 19, by contrast, urges us to "now yield your members servants to righteousness unto holiness."
- Master — This chapter treats sin as an owner, not a habit. The issue is its power over us, not its presence in us.
- Discharge — Freedom came through death with Christ, and all in grace. The old tyrant lost his hold on us.
- Order — Freedom comes first, then service. No one serves righteousness to become free.
- Owner — Liberty is not self-rule. Chasing independence lands a creature back under sin. Redemption frees us to bind us to God's will.
- Practice — Verse 18 says what you are. The next verse says what to do with your body. The fact stands; the yielding is daily.
I speak humanly on account of the weakness of your flesh. For even as ye have yielded your members in bondage to uncleanness and to lawlessness unto lawlessness, so now yield your members in bondage to righteousness unto holiness.
Paul has just called his readers slaves to righteousness, and he stops at once to explain why he picked such a word. The verse then sets two histories side by side: what our bodies once served, and what they are to serve now. Will we give ourselves to the second as fully as we gave ourselves to the first?
The word "slave" could sound like a heavy chain, so Paul pauses to say he is borrowing an everyday picture. Commentators point out that the apology is not about the truth being taught, but about the limits of the hearers.
The words "slaves to righteousness" might be taken to mean a harsh yoke, with all freedom lost. So the Apostle is careful to explain that he is only speaking in human terms. Serving righteousness is not miserable slavery. It is happy freedom. But our flesh is weak, and that makes the truth hard for us to grasp. So he uses the words "slaves to righteousness" to set the happy result of living under practical righteousness against the terrible bondage sin holds over its slaves.
Paul is comparing a slave with a freed man. And the freedom he describes belongs to every Christian, not to an advanced few.
He says "made free" in contrast to slavery. To mark that contrast he adds that they had become servants to God (Romans 6:22). It is a simple comparison between a slave and a freed man, used to make the matter easier to understand. And please notice that this is not the condition of a perfect Christian only. It is the condition of all Christians without exception.
The verse repeats a word: lawlessness leading to more lawlessness. Their old service kept sliding further down.
Their old condition showed its corruption and self-will more and more. Evil ripens and grows worse and worse. Willing service leads not only to a right sense of our place before God and other people, but to an ever deeper sense of being set apart for God.
If sin deepens by repetition, so does righteousness. One writer shows the same rule at work in everyday skills.
Romans 6:19 lays down this principle of practice. A wicked person who practises lawlessness becomes more wicked — "lawlessness leading to more lawlessness". In the same way, he says, a good man who practises righteousness arrives at holiness. Everyone knows how this works. Knowing the theory of music does not by itself make a person a brilliant pianist. Only constant, long practice brings the touch of a master that no one can mistake... So just as a man becomes an expert in wickedness by practice, a man is adorned with every Christian virtue in the same way. For the simple reason, as someone has said, "our acts re-act upon ourselves."
The verse names two things, and they are not the same.
To give the parts of our body to sin is to become the slaves of impurity in practice. It builds a character of lawlessness that grows into more lawlessness... But if we give those same parts to the service of practical righteousness, it will build a character and condition of holiness. Here, for the first time since the opening verses of the letter, the Apostle speaks of holiness... Righteousness has more to do with right acts toward other people. Holiness has to do with the new nature, and so with what is inside... We not only practise righteousness; we also hate what is unrighteous.
The two do not stand as equals.
Holiness, or sanctification, is the end in view, and righteousness is the means to it.
The command assumes a struggle. That is what makes obeying it remarkable.
All this assumes that the old master, sin, is still inside us, only waiting for a chance to assert itself. That makes the triumph of grace all the greater... We learn how to give the parts of our body as servants to righteousness, and so to holiness, even while sin lurks inside, eager to take control again. In serving righteousness we serve God, because doing the will of God is the first element of righteousness. And righteousness in all our dealings leads to holiness of life and character.
- Borrowed word. Paul says he is speaking in human terms. "Slave" pictures a change of owner, not a harsh yoke.
- Same members. The same parts of the body that once served impurity are the ones now handed over. God asks for no new equipment, only a new master for the old.
- Same law. Practice shapes character both ways. Sin ripens into worse sin, and righteousness practised arrives at holiness.
- Means and end. Righteousness is the means — right acts toward others. Holiness is the end — an inward nature that hates what is wrong.
- Same struggle. Paul gives this command to people with sin still lurking inside. Obeying it shows the triumph of grace, not natural strength.
For when ye were bondmen of sin ye were free from righteousness.
Paul has been urging believers not to go on in sin. Here he reminds them what their old life really was. There was a freedom in it, but it was freedom from the wrong thing.
Commentators hear irony in the word "free." Paul is not paying a compliment to their past.
There seems to be a grave but cutting irony in this reference to their old condition. The only freedom they knew was freedom in regard to righteousness. They were slaves of sin and had nothing to do with righteousness. And what was the result? Nothing to boast of, certainly. There was so much to fill them with shame! And what is the end of those things? Death.
Another writer keeps the older wording, "free from righteousness," and adds that no one serves both masters at once.
By nature man is a servant of sin. And as a servant of sin he is "free from righteousness" — terrible freedom to be "free from righteousness"! That is what the Apostle says the Romans were before their deliverance. They were not servants of righteousness, but servants of sin. No one can serve sin and righteousness at the same time. They needed deliverance from the power of sin.
That freedom meant they felt no claim of righteousness at all. For the believer, the refusal now runs the other way.
"For when you were slaves of sin, you were free in regard to righteousness." We recognised no claims of righteousness over us while in sin's bondage. Now, as servants of righteousness, we must refuse sin's claims just as completely.
Some assume this describes only ruined lives. One writer answers that objection.
He reminds them of their past: they were the servants, or slaves, of sin. They were not under the rule of righteousness. Righteousness is the will of God, and it was not ruling them. Sin was ruling them. Some say, "Oh, I do not think that I am. I will admit it in the case of the drunkard, but not me." There are plenty of things other than drink that enslave people. We can see it in the case of alcohol. But when it is a case of our manner and our temper, anger, words, lusts and passions, these are not so public. It is not so clear, but it is there all the same. We are all naturally enslaved by sin.
The following verses set two accounts side by side, and one of them has nothing on the credit side.
In Romans 6:20 there is an "end" but no fruits. The end is death.
What that empty account cost is spelled out further.
When they were the servants of sin, they followed their own wills. They gave no thought to the claims of righteousness. Such a course produced no lasting and pleasant fruit, but only shame and, in the end, death. They wasted their lives and their bodies in self-will. It covered them with shame and ended in death.
The point of the reminder is practical. It shuts down the idea that grace leaves a Christian free to carry on sinning.
The apostle has spoken of a change of masters. He will now contrast the result of serving the one with the result of serving the other. When the saints in Rome were the servants of sin they were free from righteousness. Such a service could not produce holiness… So this checks the tendency to treat grace as a licence. It silences any pleading for such practices, and leaves its advocates no ground to stand on. It is irrational, and thoroughly anti-Christian. Continuing in sin denies the Christian's condition, and undermines Christian profession.
- Freedom — Sin gave only one freedom: freedom from righteousness. Commentators call it a cutting irony and a terrible freedom.
- Master — Sin and righteousness are two masters, and no one serves both. Where one rules, the other's claims go unheard.
- Slavery — The bondage is wider than drink. Temper, words and passions enslave just as truly.
- Fruit — Serving sin produced nothing worth keeping, only shame at what they had done.
- Death — That service paid no fruit, but it still had an end, and the end of those things is death.
What fruit therefore had ye *then* in the things of which ye are *now* ashamed? for the end of *them* [is] death.
Paul turns to people who once served sin and asks them to name what they got out of it. He expects silence, because the whole chapter is arguing that a believer cannot go back.
Earlier in the chapter Paul reasons from a fact — the Christian has died with Christ. Here the ground shifts to something the reader must weigh for himself.
Here then we stand on the ground of motives which test the heart. At the beginning of the chapter the ground was a great fact about the Christian: he has a part with Christ in His death, and so is dead to sin and lives to God. Here it is no longer that. It is an appeal to his appreciation of the grace of God which has freed him from his slavery to sin. So what use is he going to make of his freedom?
The verse before it says these people were once "free in regard to righteousness" — and that phrase is not a compliment.
There seems to be a serious but cutting irony in this reference to their old condition. The only freedom they knew was freedom in respect to righteousness. They were slaves of sin and had nothing to do with righteousness. And what was the result? Certainly nothing to boast of — and how much there was to fill them with shame! And what is the end of those things? Death.
The word "fruit" expects a return. Sin gives none.
When they were the servants of sin, they followed their own wills without any thought of the claims of righteousness. Such a course produced no lasting and pleasant fruit. It was a fruitless wasting of their lives, and of the parts of their bodies, in self-will that covered them with shame and ended in death.
Notice the two time frames in the verse: the fruit was then, the shame is now.
When I was in that old bondage, my behaviour was just as shameful. And then I had no thought of "fruit" for God, let alone bringing it forth. Now my former conduct can only make me ashamed. Christ has redeemed us by His precious blood. Let all who belong to Him learn to be more ashamed of that past part of their lives. In those days they walked in step with this world, with little sense of God's claims upon them. "The end of those things is death": the only direction they lead is toward death.
Paul names no particular sins. That silence widens the verse far past the obvious vices.
But now they were ashamed of the former fruitless works. Let us observe how wide the language is in this chapter. There is no specification. The contrast lies between nature and grace — God's glory and man's will. Anything that did not make for holiness was fruitless, even if it was not evil in itself. Such things did not fit the liberty of an obedient servant of God. A spiritual man judges himself. When he remembers hours wasted on trivial pursuits, shame brings a blush to his face — even though what he was doing might look quite harmless to other people.
The verse is one half of a pair. Paul sets the barren past against a present service that does yield something, and both have an "end."
What fruit did they have then in the things they were now ashamed of? It was a fruitless wasting of the parts of their bodies in lawlessness, and the end was death. But now we are free from sin — free in the sense of being out of bondage, no longer sin's slaves. We have become slaves to God, entirely given up to serve Him, and we have our fruit unto holiness. The end is everlasting life. Along the way we also grow in the knowledge of God, in likeness to Him, and in separation of heart to Him from all evil, according to what He is.
This chapter has been answering people who would go on sinning. Verse 21 is part of that answer.
So the idea that a Christian may keep on sinning is checked. Any pleading for such practices is silenced, and those who argue for them have no ground to stand on. It is irrational, and thoroughly anti-Christian. Going on in sin denies what a Christian is, and it undermines any Christian profession. Allowing sin at all does not fit the change of masters that all saints in Christ claim to be under.
- Freedom — the only freedom sin ever gave was freedom from righteousness. That is nothing to boast of.
- Fruit — the honest answer is none. That service wasted life and body and returned nothing lasting or pleasant.
- Shame — all that is left of it now is a blush. It covers even wasted hours the world would call harmless.
- End — those things run in one direction only, and the destination is death.
- Exchange — the new master yields fruit for holiness, growth in the knowledge of God, and an end of everlasting life. Going back denies what a Christian is.
But *now*, having got your freedom from sin, and having become bondmen to God, ye have your fruit unto holiness, and the end eternal life.
Romans 6 answers the charge that grace makes people careless about sin. But what does it mean to be "set free from sin," and why does that freedom lead into service?
(The ESV says "sanctification" where the older translation says "fruit unto holiness." The writers quoted below use the older wording.)
Many take "set free from sin" to mean the sinful nature is gone. One writer marks out what the freedom covers and what it does not:
"Free from sin" does not mean free from the old nature, as many teach. It means free from the ruling power of the sin that still lives inside. Then comes the contrast: the old state in sin, and the place of deliverance grace has brought the believer into. In the former life, as unsaved slaves of sin, there was an awful fruit, and the end of it is death. But now they are servants of God, freed from sin's awful slavery. Their fruit is different: the fruit of holiness, and the end is eternal life.
Another writer puts it in a phrase: the believer is free "from the slavery, not from conflict" (C. Stanley).
Paul does not describe a person set loose with no master. He moves from one ownership to another, and one commentator explains why there is no third option:
Independence is not possible for a creature. He is a servant of good or of evil. But his natural condition was that of bondage to sin. Grace, then, has delivered him from that. He has gone out from the house of bondage; but it is to meet and to serve the God of his salvation. Redemption has made him His.
Another writer shows what this freedom is for:
Christ sets free the soul that was once the slave of sin. He calls it to stand fast in His liberty and never wear a yoke of bondage again. For there is no middle ground or other alternative. But grace uses this liberty to be so much the more His bondman, free from sin to serve the Lord Christ.
The verse names two things: fruit now, and an end later. One writer keeps both in view and describes the fruit that comes now:
But now we are free from sin — his great theme, as we have seen. Free here means out of bondage, no longer sin's slaves; that alone is the sense of the words here. We have become slaves to God, entirely given up to serve Him, and we have our fruit to holiness. The end is everlasting life. But along the way there is growing in the knowledge of God, and likeness to Him, and separation of heart to Him from all evil, according to what He is.
Another writer traces this fruit to its source. Under sin's control "there was the hatred of holiness, and we were utterly powerless to be holy... But the divine nature delights in holiness, and this is the fruit it produces" (An Outline of Sound Words).
If the change of master is real, then the argument "sin freely, grace covers it" collapses. One commentator draws the conclusion:
This checks the drift toward lawlessness. It silences any argument for such practices, and shows their advocates have no ground to stand on. It is irrational, and thoroughly anti-Christian. Continuing in sin is a denial of Christian standing, and destroys Christian profession. Allowing sin at all clashes with the change of masters that all saints in Christ claim as their own.
Here eternal life stands at the end of the road. Elsewhere Scripture speaks of it as something the believer already holds. One writer shows these are two angles on one gift, not two doctrines:
Everlasting life is here viewed as the end of the wonderful story. In the writings of the Apostle John we find it presented as a present possession of the believer. There is no conflict between these two views of it. What is ours now in its essence will be ours in its full extent when eternity is reached.
Another writer states the same contrast between the two apostles and then guards it carefully:
For Paul the end is everlasting life; for John, "Whoever has the Son has life." I do not mean a difference in doctrine, for there is none, but a difference of aspect and grasp in the Word — one is intrinsic life, the other is condition in result before God.
- Freed — the freedom is from sin's rule, not from its presence; the conflict remains, but the old owner is gone.
- Enslaved — nobody stands masterless; grace takes you out of the house of bondage to make you God's servant.
- Fruitful — the new service bears fruit the old life never had: knowing God better, growing like Him, a heart set apart from evil.
- Consistent — the master has changed, so living in sin denies the standing a Christian claims.
- Finished — the road ends in eternal life; what is ours now in essence will be ours in full in eternity.
For the wages of sin [is] death; but the act of favour of God, eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
This verse closes the chapter by setting a wage beside a gift. One life is what a person has earned; the other is what God hands over free — and the commentators press hard on that difference.
The verse assumes a service relationship. A wage means work has been done for someone. One writer asks whether a person can ever quit that job.
But someone may ask: is man, in his natural condition, a slave of sin? Can he never practise righteousness? Must he always obey this terrible master? This master pays death as wages for all the service his poor, degraded servants give him. Yes. Unless a power greater than his own sets him free, he must serve that merciless tyrant as long as he is in this world. That master's only payment brings him to the grave in disgrace.
Calling death a wage rules out treating it as simply how bodies work.
"The wages of sin is death," a solemn sentence which Adam and countless others have proved in their own bodies. Death is the wages of sin, not the debt of nature. God did not make man to die, but by sin man forfeited his life.
Commentators notice what the sentence does not say. It never claims death is the entire settlement, and it never claims eternal life is the whole of what God gives.
Note carefully how the phrase is built. The Holy Spirit avoids saying that the wages of sin stop at death. Judgment remains, and God appoints it to man just as He appoints death. Together they are the full wages of sin. It would not be safe to say that even eternal life is the whole of God's free gift. As we shall find in Romans 8, and in many other Scriptures, He gives the Holy Spirit to be the believer's portion. Add to that the relationship of a son, and the inheritance that goes with it.
The second half of the verse changes category, not just outcome. A gift has only one possible response.
What a contrast between "wages" and "gift" — wages earned: death, the judgment of God in all its terror. Gift — what can you do with a gift? You cannot buy a gift — then it would be a sale. You cannot earn a gift, or it would be your due. All you can do with a gift is receive it and thank the giver. Sin has forfeited our natural life. But eternal life is God's gift. It cost the atoning sacrifice of the Lord Jesus Christ.
If God simply waived the wage, the first half of the verse would be empty. One writer points to the cross. There God did not cancel the penalty He had announced. He paid it.
Where was His truth, which had pronounced death on the offender? Where was His majesty, which had been trampled underfoot? Sin called the whole character of God into question. The Lord offers Himself for His Father's glory, according to the counsels of God. His truth is made good. The wages of sin is death. The cross is absolute proof of it. It was the wages of sin paid by the Son of God Himself. No one escaped except through His dying for them — and He was the Son of God.
The closing phrase locates the life. Some older translations read "through Jesus Christ our Lord." One writer argues that the wording matters more than it looks.
This is not just life from another source. It is life of a completely new character and quality. It is not the old failed life restored, but a far higher life — a divine life. Only one life is eternal. The words "in Christ Jesus our Lord" show that its source is a divine Person who has now become man. The wording is "in," not "through," as the older translation has it. And it is "Christ Jesus," not "Jesus Christ." Such differences may look small, but in Scripture they always carry meaning.
The previous verse made eternal life the end of a road of holiness, which could sound like a prize for good conduct. This verse blocks that reading — and one writer turns the phrase around to show how large the gift is.
The end is everlasting life, received in its full result in glory, as it is in God's purpose. But that is the gift of God. The path to it is the path of obedience and holiness, but the thing itself is the gift of God. Death we have earned — it is the wages of sin; but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. It is not merely that eternal life is the gift of God, but that the gift of God is nothing less than eternal life.
- Master. Sin is not a mood but an employer, and no one serves it part-time. Without a rescue greater than himself, a man works for it until the grave.
- Wage. Death is what that work earns, not what nature owes. Judgment still waits beyond it, so death alone is not the full settlement.
- Substitute. God did not cancel the wage; the cross is proof He paid it, and none escape except through the Son who died for them.
- Gift. A gift cannot be bought or deserved, only received with thanks. Eternal life is never the reward for the holy path, though holiness is the path.
- Life. The gift is held in a Person: not the old forfeited life patched up, but divine life in Christ Jesus. And even that is not the whole of what God gives.