Romans 6:1–2

Romans 6:1 · Darby

What then shall we say? Should we continue in sin that grace may abound?

Paul has just said that where sin increased, grace abounded all the more. Here he puts the objection that statement invites into words. Does a salvation given apart from any works of ours leave a person free to go on sinning?

Where the Question Comes From

The objection grows out of the closing words of chapter 5, and Paul refuses it outright.

The Apostle's statement at the end of Romans 5 — that "where sin increased, grace abounded all the more" — raises the subject of death to sin. That statement at once leads the mind ruled by the flesh to ask the foolish, if not wicked, question, "Are we to continue in sin that grace may abound?" The Apostle rejects this unholy suggestion completely. He will not allow that the believer — who is true to the position in which God has set the Christian — can continue living in sin.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

What the Objection Proposes

The suggestion is that a believer should sin on purpose, so that grace has more to cover. It is not a harmless idea:

Shall we take advantage of the abundance of grace, and by our self-indulgence make a fresh occasion for its display? The more we sin, the more grace will bestow. Those who talk or think in this way, whether intentionally or not, are liable to turn, as we read, "the grace of our God into sensuality" (Jude 4). And history shows that many gross evils have arisen in Christendom from such abuses of God's abounding grace.

Modernised from William J HockingOriginal wording

The objection also exposes those who make it:

They show that they have no idea how hateful sin is. They assume that punishment is the only thing to fear. So the moment the fear of punishment is gone, all restraint is gone.

Modernised from VariousOriginal wording

A New Subject

This verse opens a new section, with a different subject from the chapters before it.

As we enter this branch of the Gospel of God, we find that sin, not sins, is the subject before us. Fruitfulness for God, not peace of conscience, is an end in view. It is the sinful nature, and not the acts — what we are, our condition, not what we have done — that has now to be considered. So attention goes to the death of Christ, not to His blood. His blood is not named once throughout this section of the letter.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Impossibility, Not Disapproval

Paul does not reply by scolding. He replies with a fact:

In chapter 6 he goes on to notice that some will say, "Oh, if Christ has done all, it does not matter what I do. If it is righteousness without works, then we may walk as we like." The answer is not "That ought not to be," but "That cannot be." For we are speaking of death: I have part in righteousness by death. If the thing is real, I cannot live in what I am dead to, and that makes it impossible. If I live, being dead in this way, it is by being alive to God, in Jesus Christ our Lord.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

And the answer he gives is not the law:

The question in Romans 6 is the usual objection of the flesh, that sovereign grace seems to allow living in sin. The apostle answers this, not by asserting the law as the Christian's rule as if we were Jews. He answers by declaring that in our very baptism we died with Christ to sin. Buried with Him, we now have to walk in newness of life. He argues, not from a motive, but from the blessed fact of Christ's death and resurrection, in which the baptised profess to have a part.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Only One Way of Deliverance

That answer also rules out every other route to freedom from sin.

Here, then, is that principle of deliverance from sin so greatly ridiculed — deliverance from sin by death. Nor shall we find any other deliverance from sin in the word of God. For centuries, many sincere people sought deliverance by fasting and by shutting themselves away in monasteries. Many sincere people now seek it by trying to reach a false perfection of the flesh. But here is the full truth of God — deliverance from sin by death.

Modernised from C StanleyOriginal wording

And the question is practical: we stand between grace at the start and glory at the end.

Grace took us up at the start — grace is going to glorify us at the end; but we are not yet glorified. What are we going to do in between, since we are the recipients of such grace? Continue in sin? "By no means!"

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Grace provokes — grace abounded all the more where sin increased, and that truth draws out this objection.

- Grace exposes — those who propose sinning so grace may abound show they fear punishment, not sin itself.

- Grace redefines — the subject is now sin the nature, not sins the acts. The goal is fruitfulness for God, not peace of conscience.

- Grace kills — the reply is not "that ought not to be" but "that cannot be"; you cannot live in what you have died to.

- Grace holds — grace took us up at the start and will glorify us at the end. In between, the answer is death with Christ, not law and not self-effort.

Romans 6:2 · Darby

Far be the thought. We who have died to sin, how shall we still live in it?

The objection behind the question

Paul has just said that where sin increased, grace increased all the more. Someone will always twist that into a licence to sin, and this verse is his reply. The reply is striking for what it does not say: it does not appeal to our feelings or to the Saviour's love.

May we continue in sin, so that His grace may be displayed more richly? Away with such a thought. Here the apostle deals with the wicked charge. He answers it not because the thought is appalling in itself, nor because it slanders the character of God, as in Romans 3:8, but because it contradicts the first principles of Christianity. He does not use a motive drawn from our sense of our Saviour's love. He is not asking here how we could so wound His heart or grieve the Holy Spirit of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Not a prohibition but an impossibility

Notice the form of the sentence. Paul does not give a command. He asks a question.

Later in the chapter the apostle will show how the believer is dead to sin. But at the start he assumes that the only possible attitude for the believer to take towards sin is that he is "dead to sin." So he asks, "How can we who died to sin still live in it?" His question does not suggest that we ought not to live in it. It says that, having died to sin, we cannot live in it. The principle behind his words is plain: we cannot die to something and live in it at the same time.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

What "died to sin" means

One small word changes everything.

The matter stands like this. He died FOR our sins, making atonement for them. He died TO sin. Taught by the Spirit, we recognise that we are identified with our great Representative, and faith takes His death as ours. We too, then, are "dead to sin," and cannot go on living in it without contradicting ourselves.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Some have wanted to read the dative here as "dead by sin" — that is, killed by our sins, and therefore frightened to go on in them. Commentators differ, but one writer argues the whole chapter rules this out:

The desired translation is the result of misunderstanding the whole passage. It makes it a motive drawn from a previous evil result and nothing more; whereas it is perfectly certain that the passage is about our dying when we become Christians, not our dying by our sins... the doctrine of the chapter is dying out of our old man and living in newness of life — not our dying by our sin so as to be afraid of living in it now.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

We died — sin did not

Many read the verse as a claim that the sinful nature is gone. But the verse says that we died.

Scripture points to death itself as the barrier to sin's activity... Note carefully what the verse says, for people often misunderstand it. They misquote it or misread it. Paul does not say that sin itself is dead. He does not imply that the evil nature has disappeared altogether. It is we ourselves who have died to sin. How then can we go on living in sin? It is a dangerous deceit to think that believers no longer have sin within them.

Modernised from William J HockingOriginal wording

True of every Christian, held by faith

Some believers hesitate here, because their own experience does not match the words. Paul is not describing experience at all.

This settles the matter at once against the so-called perfectionists. Paul is not saying that any believer has the experience of being dead to sin. He is certainly speaking of all Christians, and this is not the universal experience... His words later on are, "consider yourselves dead to sin" (older translations read "reckon"), and that reckoning rests on this: Christ "died to sin, once for all." So it is a reckoning of faith, not an experience.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

The only route out of sin's power

If freedom comes by death, then every other method is a detour.

Here, then, is that principle of deliverance from sin which is so much ridiculed — deliverance from sin by death. We shall not find any other deliverance from sin in the word of God. For centuries many sincere souls sought deliverance by fasting. Many shut themselves away in monasteries. Many sincere souls now seek it by striving after a false perfection of the flesh. But here is the full truth of God — deliverance from sin by death.

Modernised from C StanleyOriginal wording

Where practice begins

This truth is not the finish line of the Christian life. It is where obedience starts.

A dead man is free, or justified, from sin. I cannot charge a dead man with the evil of his past life. Death has taken him right out of it altogether... Death is the starting point for practice. We are set free as dead to sin, and so the apostle says, "Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, to make you obey its passions."... I can say to sin now: I am no longer your slave. I belong to someone else. God has set me free from sin and given me a life to yield to Him.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Question — The verse answers the charge that grace encourages sin. It does not scold. It shows that living in sin contradicts what a Christian is.

- Death — Christ died for our sins to atone; He died to sin, and faith takes that death as ours.

- Distinction — We died to sin; sin did not die in us. Anyone who claims the sinful nature is gone is deceived.

- Faith — This reckoning is true of all Christians. It rests on Christ's death, not on a level of experience a few have reached.

- Freedom — Death is the only deliverance from sin's power that Scripture offers. It is also where practice begins: a dead man owes his old master nothing.