For I do not wish you to be ignorant, brethren, of this mystery, that ye may not be wise in your own conceits, that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the nations be come in;
Has God finished with Israel? Paul answers by letting his Gentile readers in on a secret: the hardening is partial, it has an end point, and the nation is still on God's books.
Paul shares this so that his Gentile readers will not think too highly of themselves. Darby says the professing church made that very mistake.
It is precisely through being wise in its own conceit that the professing church has fallen. It has looked on the Jews as entirely set aside, forgetting that "the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable" (older translations: "without repentance") — that He never changes His mind.
Older translations read "blindness in part" where the ESV has "a partial hardening." Hughes explains how strong that word is.
Note carefully that "blindness in part" has happened to Israel. "Blindness" is a very strong word. It means being hardened like a stone. The noun in verse 25 is a medical term, "callus" — the hardening of skin. This then is the moral state of God's earthly people. And it is not limited to Israel. Ephesians 4:18 uses the same word for the state of the Gentiles.
Two words keep this from being a death notice: "in part."
The blindness that has come upon Israel is only blindness in part. The nation is not blinded nevermore to see, nor fallen never to be restored, nor cast off never to be received. The time of their casting off will end when the fulness of the Gentiles has been brought into blessing.
Some readers mix this phrase up with "the times of the Gentiles." Snell says the two are not the same.
"The fulness of the Gentiles" is a very different thing. Israel, as a people, are now set aside, though a remnant is saved by the gospel, according to the election of grace. God is filling up the number of Gentiles He intends to save. The word "fulness" might be rendered "complement." In this way He is calling out of the Gentiles a people for His name. He is gathering to Himself the allotted number out of every nation, tribe, people and tongue. When that number is complete, the fulness of the Gentiles will have come in — come in to God. So "the times of the Gentiles" and "the fulness of the Gentiles" are two very different things.
Some read this verse as a promise that the whole world will turn to Christ first, and Israel later. Kelly says the chapter itself rules that out. He weighs two small words: "in part" and "until."
"In part" strictly means in part. It is not just a softening of a severe statement. And "until" marks the point in time when the great change takes place. Calvin said that "until" does not mark this, and means no more than "that." That shows the strong prejudice of a good man whose knowledge of the language was imperfect… "The fulness of the Gentiles" cannot mean the general conversion of the world to Christ. The apostle's earlier reasoning in this chapter makes that certain. He asks: if the slips of the Jews were the world's riches, how much more their fulness?
The gospel is open to Jewish people right now. So why call the present gathering "Gentile" at all?
It is because the apostle is speaking here of the Church as a stage in God's dealings. It came in through Israel's blindness, and it cannot go together with Israel's national blessing. Seen that way, the Church is Gentile, and it does not stop being Gentile when individual Israelites come into it. When they do, they take the same ground as the Gentiles… and they become detached from the nation as pictured here.
So the count has an end. Gaebelein traces what follows it.
The fulness of the Gentiles means the full number of the saved, gathered out from among the Gentiles. They make up the church, the body of Christ. And when the body is joined to the Head in glory… the Lord will turn again to Israel. All Israel — that is, all Israel living in that day — will be saved, when the Deliverer comes out of Zion.
- Mystery — Paul tells the secret so that no Gentile believer grows proud. Treating Israel as finished for good is the error that ruined the professing church.
- Hardening — the word means a callus, a stone-like hardness, not weak eyesight. The same word describes Gentiles, so no one may boast.
- Partial — the blindness is only "in part." Israel is not blinded never to see, nor cast off never to be received.
- Until — a fixed point, not a vague hope. God is filling up a set number of Gentiles, not converting the whole world first.
- Then — when that number is full, God turns back to Israel. The Deliverer comes out of Zion for a nation He never stopped calling His own.
and so all Israel shall be saved. According as it is written, The deliverer shall come out of Zion; he shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob.
Paul ends his long argument about Israel with a promise of national salvation. Three questions follow: who is "all Israel," when does this happen, and who is the Deliverer who comes out of Zion?
This verse is the last step in an argument Paul builds across the whole chapter. One question drives it: has God finished with His ancient people?
Israel is the subject of God's plans. God does not cast away what He has foreknown and appointed to blessing. This rests on positive grace. God does not change His plans, even though Israel has no righteousness... The apostle gives three proofs of this truth. First, there was a remnant chosen by God. Next, salvation has come to the Gentiles, to make the Jews jealous. Third, the Deliverer will come out of Zion to turn away the ungodliness of Israel.
Commentators agree that "Israel" here means what it means everywhere else in the chapter. The test is simple: see who the chapter sets against whom.
It is the future national restoration and salvation of Israel. They will be restored to their place in the line of God's testimony and promises on earth; heavenly hopes do not come into view here... Plainly it is the Jews, the literal Jews, who are meant here. The chapter distinguishes them from the Gentiles, and contrasts them with the Gentiles, from verse 11 on, and very clearly in this verse 26. "The fullness of the Gentiles" means the complete number of Gentiles who believe — all the Gentiles who share in the blessing while Israel stays stubborn.
So the nation is saved through a remnant.
A chosen remnant of Israel is spared. God will bring them to believe and graft them back into their own olive tree — not into the Christian church, which was never their own olive tree. They will become the nation — the "all Israel."
The word "until" in the previous verse sets the order. Nothing here is happening yet.
As the Spirit interprets the prophecy there, we are not to look for it to be fulfilled in the salvation of all Israel until after the full number of the Gentiles has come in. That is only going on now, so it is not complete. So the moment has not even arrived to begin applying it to Israel. But faith can profit by it at any time.
The promise turns on a place: Zion. Christ has come, but not from there.
But what will bring this about? "The coming of the Deliverer out of Zion," replies the apostle. But is not Christ the Deliverer? And has He not come? Yes; but not out of Zion. He has come out of Bethlehem, and out of Nazareth, and, thank God, out of the grave also. But not yet out of Zion. Zion is the royal city, David's city; and when the King of kings reigns there, then Israel's deliverance will be complete.
The prophecy Paul quotes has the Redeemer coming to Zion; Paul has Him coming out of Zion. (Older translations read "out of Zion" where the ESV reads "from Zion.")
The apostle cites the prophecy of the Redeemer coming to Zion as His coming out of Zion. Both are true, and each fits its place. The Redeemer must come to that mountain of royalty in the Holy Land so that He can come out from there. He will come to the righteous remnant, to those who turn from transgression in Jacob, and He will also turn away ungodliness from Jacob. Their hearts will be converted before Jehovah appears at the worst of their distress and destroys their enemies. But that appearing will deepen all their feelings toward Himself, and bring them into peace and blessing fully and for ever.
The title changes too: Redeemer in the prophecy, Deliverer here. One Person, two comings.
The Redeemer is now called the Deliverer, for He will prove to be both. When He came as the humbled Servant of the Lord He did redemption's mighty work. When He comes to Zion in His glory, He will bring the deliverance that redemption made righteously possible.
Paul wrote this chapter against Gentile pride. Handing Israel's promises to the church feeds the conceit he attacks.
Some try to read the church into every Scripture. They do not see that the glory of Christ will have an object of His love on earth as well as in the heavens. They have fallen into the Gentile conceit that Romans 11 denounces and corrects.
- Not cast away. Israel's salvation is the third and final proof that God has not discarded the people He foreknew.
- Not the church. "All Israel" means the literal nation. A chosen remnant is grafted back into their own olive tree and becomes the nation.
- Not yet. The blessing waits for the full number of believing Gentiles. That is still coming in now.
- Not from Bethlehem. He came from Bethlehem, Nazareth and the grave. The Deliverer of this verse comes out of Zion, the royal city, where the King must reign.
- Not only rescued. He turns ungodliness away from Jacob. Hearts turn to Him before He appears, and every feeling deepens when He does.
And this is the covenant from me to them, when I shall have taken away their sins.
Paul is quoting the prophets to show that God has not finished with Israel. The reason he gives is God's own promise: a covenant, dated to the moment He takes their sins away. So who is the covenant with? When does it start? And how can God forgive a nation that refused its Messiah?
Commentators link this covenant to the promise God made through Jeremiah. The promise rests on what God says He will do.
In Jeremiah's beautiful prophecy there is no "if." The words that mark it are, "I will." Israel and Judah do come into the picture. But they come as those who receive, not as the important actors. The new covenant will come when God acts in the sovereignty of His mercy. Its righteous basis was laid in the sacrifice of Christ, which Isaiah spoke of. God will put His law inside them and write it on their hearts. Keeping it will then be as natural to them as breaking it once was. They will come into the light of the knowledge of God. All their sins will be forgiven, and even the memory of them dropped. And all of it comes by an act of God's sovereign mercy, as the closing verses of Romans 11 make so plain.
This removal of sins is not happening now. It waits on the end of God's present work among the nations.
Israel's hardening was true then and still goes on — though, we may bless God, only in part. It was announced long before. Yet the same prophet, and the rest of the prophets too, look ahead to the bright day for the earth when all Israel, as such, will be saved. The fullness — the full number — of the Gentiles who now believe will have come in. And so the long guilty, long chastened people of the Lord will turn to Him. They will own Him in the crucified Nazarene as their Lord and their God. It will be just like Thomas, who represents them here: he saw Him and believed.
This raises the obvious question — how? One writer rules out the answer most readers would expect.
But how is this to come about? By the Gentile Church preaching the gospel to Jews? Not at all. Their faith will not be in an absent Christ. It will be in One they see with their own eyes, coming out of Zion to turn away ungodliness from Jacob. When they see, they will believe.
The cleansing follows an order. God washes the heart first.
The heart of Jerusalem must be washed (Jer. 4:14) before God can place salvation in Zion for Israel His glory (Isa. 46:13)… But in that day a fountain will also be opened for the house of David and the people of Jerusalem, for sin and for uncleanness (Zech. 13:1). Then His people will know the once-rejected Jesus as their Saviour. He saves them from their outward enemies, and from the sins they will then admit. The verse next following claims for Israel the full blessing of the New Covenant.
God does not just overlook the sins. Their removal has a date, and it has a cost.
This is no doubtful issue: God's covenant with them was to send His Son to them in glory and majesty. True, He came once in lowliness, and they refused Him. But that cannot cancel God's promise about His coming in glory. At that time He will take away their sins — and of course Calvary laid the basis for it.
The covenant that clears Israel is not a lower arrangement. It rests on the same mercy that already holds up believers today.
Mercy through the Lord our righteousness has raised us up and seated us in heavenly places (Eph. 2:6). In the same way, in the day when all Israel will be saved, mercy will rejoice in the lower parts of the earth. Only one covenant takes away sin through the Deliverer. That covenant will establish Israel, just as it now establishes the saints.
Some take Zion here as a picture of the church. Kelly checks every New Testament use of the word.
It is the Jew, not the church, that is in question throughout. Zion measures the privilege and the guilt of Judah. Nowhere in Scripture is it applied to the church, which is Christ's body… And so it is with Rom. 11:26. To read the church into any New Testament use of Zion would yield no right meaning.
- Deliverer. The sins go when the Deliverer comes. Israel turns at the sight of Him, not at the sound of preachers.
- Timing. His coming waits until God finishes gathering from the nations. So this covenant belongs to a future age, not to ours.
- Covenant. Its terms are God's repeated "I will": He writes His law on their hearts, He forgives their sins, and Israel receives.
- Cost. The removal is still future, but Calvary laid the ground. God buys this forgiveness; He does not ignore the sin.
- Mercy. One covenant takes sin away through the Deliverer. It will settle Israel just as it settles believers now.
As regards the glad tidings, [they are] enemies on your account; but as regards election, beloved on account of the fathers.
God gives two verdicts on Israel at once. As to the gospel they are enemies; as to His choice they are loved. So has God finished with the Jewish people, or does their unbelief serve a purpose in a plan He has not dropped?
The two halves of the verse look at Israel from different angles, and they belong to different times. One writer traces both, and says what God will and will not go back on.
The Jews proved hostile to the gospel instead of being saved by it. God turns that, as we have seen, into His gracious call of the Gentiles in the meantime. But in the last days the love of election will still prove faithful to the sons for the sake of the fathers... He may regret creation (Genesis 6), but never what grace gave in promise to Abraham and to his offspring.
The enmity has a purpose. God treats the nation as an enemy and puts its promises on hold. Into that gap He gathers the Gentiles.
"As regards the gospel, they are enemies for your sake" — and God treats them as such. Their own distinctive promises are put on hold, so that He may gather the Gentiles into the church... These are words often quoted, but rarely applied the way the Spirit of God applies them here — to the calling and promises of the nation of Israel!
Their hostility was not passive. It showed itself in resisting the very mercy now reaching outsiders:
Instead of accepting it and believing themselves, they are enemies. The apostle says they hinder us "from speaking to the Gentiles that they might be saved."
Notice where the love rests. Not on what Israel is now, but on promises made to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
As regards the gospel, they are enemies as a people, so that the Gentiles may be brought in. But as regards the election of the people, they are loved for the sake of their fathers. Clearly this is the election of the people. It stands in contrast with blessing through the gospel, and the ground of their being loved is the fathers — as we find again and again in the Old Testament, in places like Exodus 32:13 and Leviticus 26:42.
Some read "Israel" here as a picture of the church. Neither half of the verse fits Christians, and the choosing it names is not the choosing that takes people to heaven.
This does not apply at all to what people call the spiritual Israel, for they are friends as regards the gospel, and loved by God the Father — not because of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Take it as the literal nation of Israel, and everything is simple... The election spoken of here is the election of the beloved people Israel. It must not be confused with the election according to grace, by which, during the time of Israel's rejection, called Jews and Gentiles are taken for heaven. The first is a national election, the second an individual election, which sets us in far greater blessing, since its aim and result are to bring us into heaven.
God may discipline Israel hard and for a long time, and His choice still stands. How God governs the earth is one thing; what He has purposed is another.
In God's government of the earth, Israel, or a great part of it, may be cut off because of sin and unbelief. "Lo-ammi" — "not my people" — may stand written over the nation for centuries. But God's affection and final purpose never change, and Israel can never stop being the nation of His choice.
The promise stands, but Israel will not collect it as a debt. Losing every claim is what makes the final blessing pure gift.
Through this unbelief they lose all right to the promises. So they must receive what the promise gives on the ground of pure mercy and the sovereign grace of God, just like the poor Gentile... Their apparent loss of everything is only the means of their receiving everything from sovereign grace, instead of having it by human righteousness or by a promise they never forfeited.
God still loves them for the sake of their fathers. So taking their promises for ourselves is no harmless way to read the Bible.
He loves Israel — loves them for the sake of their fathers. We can be sure He will not approve our meddling with their place, their portion, or their future.
- Two angles. As to the gospel, Israel stands as an enemy. As to God's choice, the same people are loved. One nation, two true verdicts.
- Your sake. God holds their promises in suspense so that He can gather the Gentiles in. Their enmity serves the mercy now reaching you.
- Their fathers. The love rests on promises made to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, not on Israel's record. So Israel's failure cannot cancel it.
- Government, not purpose. God may write "not my people" over them for centuries, yet they never stop being the nation He chose.
- Mercy alone. They forfeited every claim. So the promise reaches them as it reached you — pure mercy, not a reward for human righteousness.
For the gifts and the calling of God [are] not subject to repentance.
Paul has just said that Israel's rejection is not the end of its story. This verse gives the reason, and it turns on one word: irrevocable. What does God never take back, and whom is He speaking about?
Older translations render this "without repentance," which can confuse a reader. It does not mean God feels no regret about anything. It means He never changes His mind about what He has given and whom He has called. One writer contrasts God's acts with God's gifts:
If God is the giver of the blessing, He does not change. The gifts of God are without change of mind on His part. When it is not a gift or a calling of God, He may repent. So He repented of making the world (Gen. 6:6), as we are told; and He destroyed it. That was not a gift; it was simply an act, however immense. But in sovereign love He calls poor guilty men to Himself to make them His own. He gives eternal life, for instance, or forgiveness of our sins, or the place of a child. Such benefits are the gifts and calling of God, and they are without repentance. Here His mind never changes.
Elsewhere Scripture says God changed His mind. One writer divides God's gifts from His ways with sinful men:
When it is a question of God's gifts and calling, which are according to His purpose, no change of mind is possible. When it is a question of His ways with sinful men, they vary in detail, though in the end all achieve His purpose. God tested Abraham, telling him to offer up Isaac, but when he had fully responded, God cancelled the order, having reached His purpose.
Christians love this sentence. One writer asks who it was first said about:
We Christians boast of this, that "the gifts and calling of God are without repentance"; well we may — it is a scriptural principle. But to whom does the apostle apply it? Not to us, but to the Jews.
The verse explains the line just before it, where Paul calls Israel "beloved for the sake of their forefathers":
The meaning is this. The Jews proved their hostility to the gospel instead of being saved by it. God turns that, as we have seen, into His gracious call of the Gentiles meanwhile. And election love will still prove faithful in the last days to the sons for the sake of the fathers. This is not the principle on which souls are blessed now, whether from Gentiles or from Jews. But after the actual unbelief of the Jews, sovereign mercy will step in at the end of the age. He never repents of what grace gave in promise to Abraham and to his descendants, nor of His call, first shown publicly in Abraham, the father of the faithful.
How can God discipline a nation and still love it? One writer separates how God rules the earth from whom He has chosen:
As to God's government of the earth, Israel, or a great part of it, may be cut off because of sin and unbelief; and Lo-ammi, "not my people," may be written over them for centuries. But God's affections and final purpose never change. Israel can never cease to be the nation of His choice.
One writer uses the same principle against a common fear: that bad behaviour can throw a Christian out of grace:
The words "fallen from grace" are sometimes used wrongly. People take them to mean that a believer once stood in the grace of God, and God has now thrown him out of it because of his bad behaviour... In the case of a true believer being caught up in this, the fall, we repeat, is in his own mind and conscience. God's grace and the relationship that grace created stay the same, for "the gifts and calling of God are without repentance."
Paul's point is not Jewish privilege but universal mercy — nobody, in either group, gets in on merit:
The Gentiles had no claim to salvation; they were dead in sins, in unbelief. God showed them pure mercy. Israel would not believe such mercy. They forfeited all their privileges through unbelief, so that God might at last save them as a whole nation — but as objects of mercy... Not one will be found in the church above or in the future kingdom of God on earth who has not been saved as an object of mercy.
- Irrevocable. God may change His mind about an act. He regretted making the world and destroyed it. He never changes it about a gift He has given or a person He has called.
- Purpose, not moods. God's ways with sinful people vary; His purpose never does. That is why God changing His mind elsewhere in Scripture does not contradict this verse.
- Israel first. Commentators insist Paul applies this verse to the Jews. Election love stays faithful to the sons for the sake of the fathers, even while they are hostile to the gospel.
- Government, not choice. God may write "not my people" over a nation for centuries without cancelling His choice of it.
- Mercy for all. No one — Jew or Gentile, on earth or in heaven — stands there on any ground but mercy.