And he carried me away in [the] Spirit, [and set me] on a great and high mountain, and shewed me the holy city, Jerusalem, coming down out of the heaven from God,
The last vision of the Bible opens with John lifted to a mountain-top. He sees a city coming down from God, and the angel showing it to him is one of the seven who had already shown him Babylon. That pairing raises the questions of this verse: why a mountain, why a city, and what John is really looking at.
Babylon and the bride are set side by side on purpose, and so are the places John saw them from.
Babylon claimed to be the bride of Christ, but the claim was false... Now the true bride, the Lamb's wife, is shown in all her beauty — the expression of the thoughts of God, as Babylon had been the expression of the thoughts of man. To view Babylon, John was carried in spirit into the wilderness, a scene of moral drought and desolation. To see the holy city Jerusalem he was carried away in the Spirit to a great and high mountain. Moses looked out over the promised inheritance from Mount Pisgah. In the same way John is allowed to see promise and prophecy fulfilled in this glorious city, from the high place where the angel set him.
Throughout this book John's standing place always suits what he is about to see.
It is striking how different the standpoints are from which John views each vision as it passes before him in this book. Each place suits what he sees. He stands on the "sand of the sea" to see the beast rise "out of the sea"... The "wilderness" is a fitting place from which to see the symbolic Babylon, drunk with the blood of saints and martyrs of Jesus.
The mountain is not only scenery. It pictures the state of soul needed to take in what is shown.
It takes no great moral height to spot and name evil. A man of the world can go far in condemning the corruptions of Christendom. But the natural mind is completely unable to enter into the things of God. Even true believers will only value the coming glories of "the bride, the Lamb's wife" as they are lifted above the things of earth and walk apart from the corruptions of Christendom.
Older English versions read "that great city, the holy Jerusalem."
As far as the bride of the Lamb is concerned, "the great city" is left out by everyone who claims to give the best reading from the most ancient authorities. They read Revelation 21:10 as "showed me... the holy city Jerusalem." It is not a question of greatness for her even when glorified, but of holiness. What Babylon aims at and wins — at the cost not only of herself but of truth, grace, and Christ Himself — is present earthly greatness.
The angel promised John a bride and then showed him a city. The two are not separate things.
It seems clear that this New Jerusalem is not a real city. It is described not as the home of the bride, but as the bride herself, and her marriage to the Lamb has already been celebrated in heaven. Its shape too, shown in the verses that follow, is a beautiful symbol of the divine symmetry of the true Church. But no real city could have that shape.
Others see the vision covering both the people and the place they will live.
We judge from many a detail that it is not solely a symbol of the saints themselves, but rather a symbolic description both of the Church in glory and of her eternal home.
The two images — woman and city — say two different things.
The one sets out what the church will be to Christ. The other sets out what it will be for Him. As the bride, she is the object of His love. As the city, she is the centre from which His powerful rule will go out.
Every word of the city's origin is deliberate.
"Holy" describes its state. Then other marks follow. It "descends out of heaven" — its source stamps its character — "from God." It might have been from God, and earthly. It might have been heavenly and angelic. It was neither. It descended out of heaven from God.
She comes down, but she never lands.
This heavenly Jerusalem — the bride, "descending out of heaven from God" — does not come to the earth. She is let down so that the earth may see her glory, the glory of God displayed in her.
- Lifted. The wilderness showed Babylon; the mountain shows the bride. God gives the standing place that matches the sight.
- Separated. Condemning corruption needs no height; seeing the coming glory does. Only souls raised above earth take this vision in.
- Holy. The better text drops "great." Greatness was Babylon's ambition; holiness is the bride's character.
- Bride. The angel promised a bride and showed a city — not her address, but herself: love's object, and the centre of Christ's rule.
- Descending. Not from earth, not from angels — out of heaven from God, and let down near enough that the earth can see the glory shining in her.
having the glory of God. Her shining [was] like a most precious stone, as a crystal-like jasper stone;
An angel promised John a sight of the bride, the Lamb's wife, and showed him a city coming down from heaven with the glory of God. That raises two questions: what glory can a creature hold, and why describe it as a precious stone?
This vision is set on purpose against an earlier one. The same writer also says who this city is.
The first thing that strikes the reader is the designed contrast between this scripture and the one in Revelation 17, where an angel calls John to see the judgment of the great prostitute who sits on many waters. That chapter shows us Babylon; Revelation 21 shows us the new Jerusalem. The first is man's city, the second is God's. One expresses what man is. The other is the perfection of God's thoughts, robed in the glory of God… One more thing must be noted: the city is the bride, the Lamb's wife. This settles its character. It is the Church, which Christ has now presented to Himself as a glorious Church, without spot or wrinkle or anything of the kind, holy and without blemish, beautified with His own beauty, and having the glory of God.
So which glory does the city have?
This clearly cannot be the essential glory of God. It means, I think, that the glory was not human but divine. There is in God what He can give to the creature, and there is what cannot be shared. The glory meant here is divine glory, set against creature glory — not a glory that takes away from His majesty, but one that reflects it.
The stone is not chosen at random. It links the city to the One on the throne earlier in the book, and it marks the city off from Babylon.
Greatness was the mark of the prostitute city, Babylon. Coming from God is the mark of the bridal city, New Jerusalem. So it is holy and heavenly, and it has the glory of God — not the glory of man. Because of this, it comes down over the earth as a light, and its shining is compared to a jasper stone, clear as crystal. Jasper appears three times in the description of the city. The word turns up only once more in this book: in the description of the One who sits on the throne in Revelation 4:3. What describes God describes the city.
The glory belongs to God. Yet older translations call the shining hers, where the ESV has "its radiance." One writer asks why.
She has the glory "of God," and yet it is called "her light." Why is this? Suppose God has produced the graces of Christ in the saints here. Pure grace has done it, yet He has counted it to them. So here: if the church has the glory of God, it is still her light, and by His grace… In the same way, in Revelation 19:8 His wife was granted fine linen, white and clean, and that linen is called the righteous acts of the saints — though His own grace in her produced all of it.
The word behind "radiance" turns up in one other place worth knowing.
The word translated light, or shining, is the one found in Philippians 2:15, applied to believers — "among whom you shine as lights in the world." It is the word used of the lights in the sky. So we learn this: what believers should be now in character, the holy Jerusalem will be in fact in the coming age. And all the light of testimony that goes out now, from the saints or from the whole Church, comes from the same divine source as the "shining" of the holy city in the future day of glory.
Romans 5:2 holds this glory out as a hope. Here it is a fact, and the city does not keep it to itself.
"Having the glory of God." What Romans 5:2 presents as a hope has here become a reality… She is not only the vessel of God's glory. She also reflects that glory to the world. The city bride will be a glorious canopy of light, unfading beauty and brightness, over the scene of the thousand years. It will be the grandest sight ever seen.
- Source. The city is holy and heavenly because it comes from God. Babylon was only great, and it showed what man is.
- Gift. Its glory is not God's own essence, which cannot be shared. It is the glory He can give a creature — divine, not human, a reflection of His majesty.
- Likeness. Jasper is the stone used of the One on the throne in Revelation 4:3, so what describes God now describes the city.
- Grace. The glory is God's, yet called her radiance — as with the fine linen granted to the bride, He counts His own work in her as hers.
- Display. Its shining is the word used of believers who shine as lights now. What the church should be in character today, this city will be in full view, reflecting God's glory to the world.
having a great and high wall; having twelve gates, and at the gates twelve angels, and names inscribed, which are those of the twelve tribes of [the] sons of Israel.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
On [the] east three gates; and on [the] north three gates; and on [the] south three gates; and on [the] west three gates.
The verse counts the gates of the holy city, and the count is even: three on each of the four sides. Why does one city need so many gates, and why do they face every direction?
One writer contrasts what gates normally do in a great city with what these gates are for.
The city will be four-square, facing without fear or shame every point of the compass. It will be equal on every side, and on every side there will be three gates... A great city like London keeps its gates open all the time, because it depends on every part of the earth for its very life. Supplies pour into it from north, south, east, and west. But the gates of the holy city will open for the opposite reason. They will open not to let supplies flow in, but to let blessing flow out — blessing for the whole earth.
One commentator breaks twelve into its two factors and finds a meaning in each.
The wall has four sides, and in it are twelve gates — three gates on every side, for going out and coming in. This city is the home of a life that never stops working. The number 12 is stamped on the whole city. It is an expanded 7, with the same factors (4 × 3 instead of 4 + 3), and it is the sign of open divine government, with God clearly supreme here... The 12 here is the usual 4 × 3. The 3 still speaks of God showing Himself, while the 4 shows that this is universal, the sides facing every way.
These gates are set in the city wall. Wall and gates do opposite jobs, and both are needed.
Walls are to keep out what ought to be out. On the other hand, its twelve gates are to allow in what ought to be in... Three gates stand on each side of the city (v. 13). This reminds us how the tribes of Israel camped around the tabernacle in the wilderness (Num. 2:1-31).
Another writer draws out what a wall with no openings would have meant.
It also has twelve gates. Since the city is foursquare, it looks the same from every side you approach it, and the way in is generous. If the wall had no gates it would be a poor thing.
The previous verse writes the names of Israel's tribes on these gates. One writer explains what those names mean, with a picture from everyday town naming.
In cities on earth people often name the main streets after the towns those streets lead to. In the same way, the gates of the heavenly city carry the names of the tribes that its blessings flow to. That blessing will reach every quarter of the globe in equal measure, because there are three gates on each of the four sides of the city.
The names sit on the gates, but they do not make up the city itself.
As for the twelve tribes of Israel, their names are only written there, nothing more. Nothing at all suggests that they make up the city; their names are simply inscribed on the outside. That city will be a constant reminder of those who came before restored Israel on earth, and it will certainly be used for their blessing during the thousand years — but not for theirs alone. On the contrary, we shall find that the city looks out toward the whole universe, and yet Israel has its special place there.
An earlier prophet saw a city with the same shape and the same gate count. Setting the two side by side shows where they part company.
In Ezekiel the city is also four-sided, with twelve gates, three on each side, named after the twelve tribes of Israel. (Ezek. 48:30-35.) In both cases there is complete order and symmetry, and in both cases a connection between the city and Israel. But in Ezekiel's city the connection is earthly. In the city of Revelation the connection is heavenly, for twelve angels stand at the gates.
- Shape — the city is equal on every side. Three gates stand on each of the four sides, so the city favours no direction and forgets none.
- Number — twelve is four times three: three for God showing Himself, four for the universal spread, with the sides facing every way.
- Guard — the wall keeps out what ought to be out; the gates let in what ought to be in. A wall with no gates would be a poor thing.
- Channel — the gates carry Israel's names, the way city streets carry the names of the towns they lead to. Blessing flows out to every quarter of the globe in equal measure.
- Reach — Ezekiel saw a city of the same shape, but its link was earthly. Here the link is heavenly, and this city looks out toward the whole universe.
And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and on them twelve names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.
The wall of the heavenly city rests on twelve foundations, and each one carries the name of a man who had walked with Jesus. Commentators read this as a picture of the church's foundation, and it raises questions: why apostles and not Israel, why twelve, and where is Paul?
The names on the foundations point back to real work done on earth.
The names of the twelve apostles connect the City with the foundation work of the apostles at Pentecost. Their work, under the control of the Holy Spirit, formed the Church on earth as the House of God where God dwells, rules and blesses. So a sphere of heavenly blessing and rule came into being on earth. That work began on earth through the apostles, and the City in glory shows it completed.
What they laid down was teaching, and no single apostle carried the whole of it.
The names on the foundations show that the truth of God about His Son Jesus Christ, ministered by the apostles, is the solid basis of true separation according to God. Each apostle received his own line of ministry, so that together they might form a well-balanced foundation that cannot fail.
The verse does not call them apostles of Christ. It calls them apostles of the Lamb — a title that points back to His sacrifice.
The city is clearly the fruit of His own work. Its foundations begin with Him: twelve foundations, with the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb on them. The names written there are the names of the sent ones of the Lamb who once suffered as a sacrifice. Had there been no Lamb there would have been no apostles. And if each foundation had one apostolic name on it, then every one of the twelve was a reminder of the Lamb whose apostles they were.
The gates carry the names of Israel's tribes. The foundations underneath carry the names of the apostles. The two places are not interchangeable.
The wall is what fences a city off from the world outside. The gate is what gives it contact with the world outside. The apostles appear in what marks the Church as distinct and set apart. The twelve tribes appear in what marks its relationship with the world. This is because the apostles are the foundation course of the Church, while Israel is always God's first thought in His government of the world.
Paul's name is not among the twelve. Is he left out? One writer treats the number as a set figure, not a headcount, and draws a parallel with Israel's own tribes.
They have laid the foundations, and their names are stamped on their work. We are surely not to imagine any individualising here, as if any one foundation could be assigned to any one apostle. Nor is the number twelve itself anything but characteristic... It is remarkable that almost the same difficulty comes up with the twelve tribes of Israel. They often exclude and often include the tribe of Levi... Why may not the apostles, despite the addition of Paul to their number, be counted here as twelve?
Another writer points to which side of the church this city shows.
The City does not show the Church as the Apostle Paul presents it — in its close relations to Christ as the body of Christ, or in its privileges of access to the Father's house. It is the aspect of the Church presented by the twelve apostles: the vessel for the display of the glory of God before the world.
Names on a foundation could suggest that the church rests on men. One writer answers that from the high priest's breastplate.
The names of the apostles are engraved on the foundations of the Church, but Christ Himself is the true foundation. In the high priest's breastplate, the perfections of Christ gleamed in the precious stones. Those stones were linked with the tribes whose names were cut on them. In the same way, the many perfections, beauties and glories of Christ, the true foundation, bear up the Church in its heavenly brightness.
- Lamb first. No Lamb, no apostles — every foundation stone carries a name that exists only because of His sacrifice.
- Apostles next. Their Spirit-led work at Pentecost formed the church on earth; the city in glory is that same work finished.
- Truth as base. Each apostle carried a distinct line of ministry, and together they form a foundation that cannot fail.
- Church, not Israel. Israel's names mark the gates that face outward; the apostles' names mark the wall that sets the church apart.
- Christ beneath all. The apostles' names are on the foundations, but Christ Himself is the true foundation, and His many glories hold the Church up.