And I saw a new heaven and a new earth; for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and the sea exists no more.
After the great white throne, John's vision turns from judgment to a new creation. Commentators ask three things: how new it is, why the sea is gone, and how it differs from Isaiah's promise.
The verse follows straight on from the judgment of the dead.
The previous chapter closed with the solemn scene of eternal judgment. Now a vision of the cloudless beauty of the eternal state of blessedness opens before our eyes. The contrast is as sudden as it is magnificent.
Isaiah also promised new heavens and a new earth. Commentators draw a line between his picture and John's. Two things mark the difference: righteousness, and the sea.
Today righteousness suffers. In the millennial day it reigns. But in the eternal day it dwells happily; it is quite at home... This is not what Isaiah refers to (Isa. 65:17). His new heavens and new earth are only new in a moral sense, to suit the millennium. The sea also exists there, for he speaks of "the coastlands far away."
The change from reign to dwell carries the weight.
During millennial days, we read that "a king will reign in righteousness, and princes will rule in justice" (Isa. 32:1). In the eternal state, righteousness will dwell. Ruling supposes there is evil to be repressed. In the eternal state there will be no sin to mar the new heavens and the new earth.
Commentators differ here. Some read the new creation as the old one transformed, on the pattern of the body raised from the grave.
No doubt the new heaven and earth will be made out of the old. By the power of God, the resurrection body will be formed out of our present lowly body. The present earth and heavens are destined for a similar change. After the dissolution they will reappear in the form of the new heavens and earth.
Others argue that renovation is too weak a word for what happens here.
You cannot call a renovated thing a new thing, and an earth purified by fire would simply be renovated. In Revelation 20:11 the earth and the heaven flee from the sight of Him who sits on the great white throne, and no place is found for them. A renovated earth must have a place found for it.
Whatever happens to the old creation, it is not wiped out of existence.
Fire brings about this dissolution, not annihilation (2 Peter 3:10). Scripture says nothing about any future act of creating material in a literal sense. It says nothing either about what some foolishly argue for: annihilation, the total extinction of being... Our planet will be put in the crucible, altered, changed, and made new, to remain for ever.
An older translation read "there was no more sea." The Greek decides which reading is right.
As a question of exact translation... if the Greek word for sea had no article, the older translation would have been justified. As it stands, the right reading is "the sea was no more", whatever the interpretation. In verse 4 of the same chapter, the same rule about the article shows the right reading to be "death shall be no more."
Its absence carries two meanings. One is about distance between people. The other is about what the sea pictures in this book.
The sea forms a barrier to contact. So the first and most obvious thought is that there will then be no more separation. Then we remember the symbolic meaning of earth and sea in this book. The earth speaks of ordered government. The sea speaks of unorganised masses of people or nations that are not in subjection. It teaches that every part of the new earth will be in ordered subjection to God, under His governmental control.
There is also a plain physical side.
One broad physical fact marks off the eternal state from everything that has ever been: the sea is gone. As the world now is, the loss of the sea would be fatal to all natural life. How vast the change then! The fact is that all mere nature will have completely passed away. The course of God's dealings through the ages is then over. All will be fixed for ever.
Nothing in this state will ever change again.
All is new. All is according to God in His nature. All is fixed... This is not the scene of the Lamb fulfilling purpose and prophecy. It is not the kingdom Christ holds as Mediator, nor the reign of righteousness. It is the kingdom handed over, and God all in all.
- New after judgment. The vision opens the moment judgment ends. Beauty stands right against the great white throne.
- New beyond Isaiah. Isaiah's new heavens and earth are new in a moral sense and still have a sea; John's belong to eternity.
- New, not merely repaired. Commentators differ. Is the old creation transformed, or replaced? Neither side allows annihilation.
- New without the sea. No barrier between people, no masses outside His control — every part of the new earth in ordered subjection to God.
- New for ever. Righteousness no longer reigns over evil but dwells at home, and God is all in all.
And I saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down out of the heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.
The old heaven and earth have just passed away. Now John sees something arriving in the new creation: a city that is also a bride. Who is this city, why does she come down from heaven, and how can a city be a bride at all?
This chapter shows the same city twice, and the two scenes are a thousand years apart. The verse that comes later on the page describes the earlier moment.
The scene in verse 10 of this chapter comes a thousand years before this one in verse 2. In verse 10 John sees the "holy city, Jerusalem" in her glory during the thousand years, in relation to the earth of that day. In verse 2 that thousand-year kingdom has passed away for ever. John now sees the "holy city" coming down from the place she held during the kingdom, to take up her appointed place on the new earth. It is the "holy city," holy according to the nature of God. And it is "new Jerusalem," not the old one described in the Old Testament.
Many take the description as a picture of the believer's future home. One writer warns against reading a symbolic book literally here.
To grasp its meaning we must first clear our minds of one idea that sentiment has encouraged. It is the idea that the holy City is a literal description of the eternal home of believers. In a book where all the other visions are symbolic, it is unlikely that in this vision symbols should give way to literal description. Scripture names the City in so many words: "the Bride, the wife of the Lamb." So it is clear that the City is a symbol of the Church in glory. Yet many details show that it is not only a symbol of the saints themselves. It is a symbolic description both of the Church in glory and of her eternal home.
Earlier in the book John saw a false woman and a false city. This one is their opposite.
In the future the Church is pictured as a Woman and a City… The Bride is spoken of as the Lamb's Wife, and is likewise described as "that Great City, the Holy Jerusalem." It is interesting that Revelation 17 presents the doom of the false bride, and chapter 18 of the false city — the Christian world that has abandoned the faith in the last days.
The verse gives two facts about where the city comes from.
It descends "from God," since it is all His own workmanship. And it comes "out of heaven," for its calling was from heaven. To heaven it had gone when the Lord Jesus came for all His saints.
Time wears out earthly brides. It has not touched this one, and now she comes the whole way down to the new earth.
Earlier she was only coming down from heaven towards earth. Now she comes right down to earth, because God has suited the new earth to this heavenly city… I have seen a good many brides in my day. I have met them a few years later, and what lines are on the brow, what cares are plain on the face, and how soon grey hairs have appeared… But what does John see? He sees, coming down from heaven, the one who has been the Lamb's wife for a thousand years, and she looks as bright, as beautiful and as fresh as the day she went up. Not a grey hair, not a wrinkle can be seen.
Scripture uses two words for her, bride and wife, and each carries a different sense.
The bride is more an object for the affections. The wife speaks of a vessel fully fitted to be a helper to the man… In her eternal place she is seen as "a bride adorned for her husband", and the term wife is not used. It suggests the closest possible relationship. It shows the place of favour and nearness we shall have with the Son throughout that eternal day.
The last four words of the verse turn a vision of the future into a question about the present.
"Prepared as a bride adorned for her husband!" Let us think about these last four words. In the light of them, could we bear the thought of being indifferent to His wishes now? Thank God, SHE will be for HIM then.
- Timing. Verse 2 stands after the thousand years. Verse 10 shows the same city a thousand years earlier, in her kingdom glory.
- Identity. The city is a symbol, not a street plan — she is named the bride, the wife of the Lamb. The picture covers both the church in glory and her eternal home.
- Origin. She descends "from God" because she is entirely His work, and "out of heaven" because heaven was her calling.
- Contrast. Babylon was the false bride and the false city, judged in chapters 17 and 18; this is the true one.
- Result. After a thousand years not a wrinkle shows. The word chosen for eternity is bride — the nearest place of affection, held for ever.
And I heard a loud voice out of the heaven, saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God [is] with men, and he shall tabernacle with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, their God.
A loud voice announces that God has come to live with people, in the language of Israel's ancient tent of worship. Older translations read "the tabernacle of God is with men" — so what is this tabernacle, and who are the "men"?
The word points back to Moses. After Israel crossed the Red Sea, Moses sang about preparing a dwelling for God. Older translations of Exodus 15:2 read "I will prepare him a habitation."
Moses says, "The LORD is my strength and my song, and He has become my salvation; I will prepare Him a habitation," a tabernacle. But God says, I will prepare Myself a tabernacle. At the end of the times, after the millennium, this desire of God will come true, just as Revelation 21:3 says. The word tabernacle always has the sense of a habitation of God with men.
God once offered this to Israel on terms, and the terms were never met.
The tabernacle was God's first dwelling place on earth among His people Israel, after He redeemed them out of Egypt. While still in the wilderness... the LORD gave this promise, a promise conditional on their obedience: "I will make my dwelling among you... And I will walk among you and will be your God, and you shall be my people" (Lev. 26:11-12). This promise, because of Israel's transgressions, was never entirely fulfilled... Coming to our scripture, we find almost the same words again. Only now they are not a promise, but a statement of fact and accomplishment.
The verse names a dwelling and it names men. Commentators read these as two different groups.
I understand that the New Jerusalem is the tabernacle of God. It is where He lives in a very special sense. And this tabernacle of God comes down out of heaven to be with men. The heavenly saints make up the tabernacle of God. Those on the new earth are simply called "men."
Being God's house and being God's people are not the same blessing, yet neither is a lesser one.
They are not, as the church is, the dwelling place of God, but their place and blessing are as perfect in their relationship as the church's are in hers. There are differences which God in His sovereignty has been pleased to make, but these only illustrate His own perfections and grace.
The verse says two things, not one: the dwelling is here, and then God Himself is here.
"He shall tabernacle with them." This emphatic statement is an advance on the previous one. There we read, "The tabernacle of God is with men"; now, "He shall tabernacle with them." In the one case it is the tabernacle. In the other it is Himself. What an amazing truth, that God, the very God, the Maker and Sustainer of heaven and earth, will actually and really dwell with men on earth.
God has been with people before, but not like this.
God dwelling with men — not merely as a visitor, as He was with our first parents in the garden of Eden, but as one who lives there.
The old labels that divided humanity do not survive into this scene.
In the eternal state, when everything will be according to God's mind, nationality will be gone. The distinction between Jew and Gentile, between one nation and another, will have perished. All the redeemed, with one heart, one object, and one occupation, will be "HIS people."
The title itself is not new, but its scope is. Then the verse comes closer still.
"They shall be His people" — that is, God will take the eternal dwellers on the new earth for Himself. Israel of old was the LORD's people. Now the name "His people" takes on a breadth and depth of blessing completely unknown in Old Testament times... "And God Himself will be with them as their God." In this marvellous statement God, so to speak, comes out of His tabernacle and is personally with His people. Nothing is mentioned here that stands between God and His people — no tabernacle, nothing at all. He is "with them," apart from any covering or outward means of communication.
The change of word marks a change of era.
It is remarkable that Revelation 21:22 uses the word "temple" for the church in millennial display. But when we come to the fixed eternal state, we get the word "tabernacle."... The last glimpse we have is of God dwelling among His people for eternity. May we anticipate that day by taking up the divine thoughts even now.
Nothing screens God off, because nothing needs it.
There will be no question of a distinction between light and darkness. There will be no possibility of anything contrary intruding... No shrine is seen, for the glory of God shines from every atom of its constitution. There is no holy place nor holy of holies, for every part of it is new creation, in which righteousness dwells!
- Desire. Moses offered to prepare God a dwelling; God said He would prepare Himself a tabernacle, and this verse is that desire accomplished.
- Promise. What God offered Israel on condition arrives here not as a promise but as an announcement of fact.
- Dwelling. The tabernacle comes first, then God Himself — He no longer visits as He did in Eden, He stays.
- People. Nation, race and every time-bound distinction are gone; all the redeemed are simply "His people" — and God Himself is with them, as their God.
- Openness. The word is tabernacle, not temple: no shrine, no holy place, no holy of holies — the glory shines from everything.
And he shall wipe away every tear from their eyes; and death shall not exist any more, nor grief, nor cry, nor distress shall exist any more, for the former things have passed away.
John's vision has just shown a new heaven and a new earth, with God Himself living among people. Two questions follow: when does this happen, and why does God Himself bend down to dry human eyes?
Commentators place this promise after Christ's thousand-year reign on earth, in the eternal state. Writers give two reasons. Sorrow is not wholly gone from the earth even under Christ's rule. And the same words about tears appear earlier in the book, describing a different scene.
Only in the eternal state does God remove every physical and moral effect of sin. The thousand-year reign, as we have seen, is not a perfect condition. Even under the good rule of the Lord people will still weep on earth. The words, "He shall wipe away every tear from their eyes," are repeated word for word in Revelation 7:17. There, however, it is a millennial scene; here it is the everlasting state. Neither here nor in the earlier scene is the wiping away of tears the work of the Lamb. God does it. If He wipes away every tear, then He removes every cause and occasion of sorrow.
The comfort here is not just that grief stops. It is who stops it. One writer dwells on how personal the wording is.
Not a trace of former sorrow shall remain, and God Himself will remove it. What infinite tenderness that God Himself will do this! A mother gently wipes away her child's tears. In the same way God Himself will delight to wipe away all tears from the eyes of His people. And once wiped away they can never return, for "death shall be no more." Think how many tears death has drawn from grieving people in this world!
Tears end for good only because God dealt with their source. One writer traces the whole story back to Eden and forward to the cross.
God had gone to the source of everything that brought in sorrow, and swept it away in the judgment of the cross. The former things had passed away. God once had to drive the man and the woman out of Eden in tears — the garden He had made for them before they fell. Now He can meet us at the door of a new heaven and a new earth as the One who wipes all tears from our eyes.
The verse says these things will be "no more." That phrase carries its own weight: the evil is gone, and it cannot come back.
Not only has He taken away the evil, but it is never to be any more. That is, there is now full and perfect security and blessedness. All the evil is gone. So are all the trials that tested man and brought him to the point where he could truly meet God. The love of God takes the place of everything. He fills all things with Himself, so evil can never enter again. That is the opposite of the old paradise man was given.
Notice how the verse says almost nothing about what the new scene contains. It describes the blessing by naming what is gone.
Death, and all the trials, pains, and griefs bound up with human life in this world are gone, abolished for ever. Sin has now been taken away (John 1:29; Hebrews 9:26). That is the final result of the death of Christ on the cross. So death is gone from the scene, and with it all the other bitter fruits of sin. Life has swallowed them up in victory. It is not the positive side of eternal blessedness, but the negative.
This is not just information about the future. One writer says why God tells us now.
And He reveals all this to us now, so that we may live in its light through faith. In it we find a remedy for present trials. We also find a rich encouragement to set our minds on things above, where Christ is sitting at the right hand of God.
- Cause removed. At the cross God went to the source of all that brought in sorrow and swept it away in judgment.
- God's own hand. Tears do not just stop. God Himself wipes them away, with the tenderness of a mother drying her child's face.
- Never again. "No more" means more than relief. The evil is gone and cannot return, because the love of God fills the scene.
- Not yet, but certain. Commentators place this in the eternal state. Tears are still shed during the thousand-year reign, and the same promise in Revelation 7:17 belongs to that earlier scene.
- Live by it now. The picture comes in negatives — no death, no mourning, no pain. God gives it now so faith can use it today as a remedy for present trials.
And he that sat on the throne said, Behold, I make all things new. And he says [to me], Write, for these words are true and faithful.
God Himself speaks here, straight from the throne. What He announces is not repair but replacement. Two questions follow: who is the Speaker, and how far does "all things" reach?
One writer points out which figure is missing from the scene:
Notice that it is God who is prominent through this section... The One who sits on the throne speaks. We do not get the Lamb mentioned. It is the glory of God in the fullest possible sense that we have here. And He said to me, "It is done! I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end." No doubt Christ is the Alpha and the Omega too, as we find in Revelation 22:13. But it is not the Lord as such who acts and speaks here. It is God.
Commentators differ here. Others read the same title as belonging to Christ, and draw a parallel between the two creations:
He who acts, to produce these new creation things, is the One "who was seated on the throne" — our Lord Jesus Christ. He acted to bring into existence the old creation, according to Genesis 1. He acts again to bring into existence the new. As before, so here, the word of His power is enough. In the past, "He spoke, and it came to be" (Ps. 33:9). Now again He speaks and His words are, "It is done." Both are accomplished with equal ease.
This is not a tidying up of the present world. God Himself is the measure of what appears in the eternal state:
God on the throne of all power, of absolute sovereignty, declares His will — all things new. The old order of things is not improved. It is not carried over into the eternal state in any way, because that state demands a condition of things that fits it. God is the measure and source of the whole eternal state, whether of persons or things. Nothing short of what suits God can appear in the unchanging state.
The scope takes in the material world:
In the eternal state everything will be new in the fullest sense of the word. The material heavens and earth will be new, and "all things" found in them will be new. All those things that we know at present, spoken of as "the former things," will have passed away.
The word for "new" here makes two claims at once: about origin, and about permanence:
The One who sits on the throne declares that He makes all things new. "New" here is a very distinct word. It does not mean "new" as opposed to "old." It means "new" as never having been in existence before, either in kind or in itself, and never getting old. Nothing and nobody can ever get old in new creation.
Men attempt the same thing in their own strength. One writer sets the two side by side:
Today, the men of the world are trying to get rid of "the former things." They are seeking to "make all things new." They can break hearts and fill the earth with death, sorrow, crying, and distress. But they cannot end the sorrows of the world. They cannot "make all things new," or bring in a new order, as they dream in vain.
God tells John to write the words down, and then guarantees them:
This sentence fixes the character of the eternal state. Grand words indeed, and worth recording! God also confirms His own magnificent declaration by adding, "for these words are trustworthy and true." He demands our attention, and claims our whole-hearted and unqualified agreement... This is not a promise. It is God's own assertion of what will be fact when the moment comes for it to happen.
The verse describes the future, but its principle is not held back until then:
In the new heaven and new earth all will be new. Everything will then be on the basis of "new creation." It will suit the full and unrestrained expression of all God's nature. It will be the fulfilment of His eternal purpose. We, thank God, are on that basis now as "in Christ" (see 2 Cor. 5:17).
- Throne. The announcement comes from the One seated on the throne. Commentators differ on who that is. Some read it as God as such, with the Lamb unmentioned. Others read it as Christ, acting as He acted in the first creation.
- New. The word does not mean an improved version of the old. It means what has never existed before, and what can never grow old.
- Nothing carried over. The old order is not upgraded or imported. God Himself is the measure of the eternal state, so only what suits Him appears in it.
- No rival. Men try to sweep away "the former things" and build a new order. They can fill the earth with sorrow; they cannot make all things new.
- Written. God tells John to write because the words are trustworthy and true. This is not a hope offered, but a fact declared in advance. Those in Christ already stand on that basis.
And he said to me, It is done. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give to him that thirsts of the fountain of the water of life freely.
This verse comes at the point where God's judgments have run their full course and He announces the end. Two questions rise out of it: who is speaking here, and why is water offered to the thirsty in a scene where nothing is lacking?
One writer lists what has already happened by the time God speaks:
Our verse begins, "And He said to me, 'It is done.'" These words seem to announce the curtain coming down after the grand and terrible scene has passed before the eye. Then follows the declaration, "I am the Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end." The end has arrived — "it is done!" The last seal had been broken, the last trumpet blown, and the last bowl poured out. The power of Satan had been crushed and the folly of man rewarded. The kingdoms of this world had become the kingdoms of our Lord and of His Christ. The false prophet and the beast had received their doom. Satan had been thrown into the lake of fire and brimstone. The Great White Throne had pronounced its irreversible sentence on the wicked dead, and Death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire.
Others read the same two words as a guarantee: "His words, 'It is done,' are final and positive. Nothing can hinder God from carrying out His purposes" (L. M. Grant).
One commentator draws out how far this title reaches:
The first and last letters of the Greek alphabet are followed by the explanatory phrase, "the beginning and the end." They show that all testimony on earth had its origin in God, and that its end is His glory. Creation, providence, promise, history, prediction, prophecy, testimony, love, and grace each have their source in God and in Him their end. Nothing on God's side ends in failure. God triumphs at the end.
The last letter carries as much weight as the first: "if Alpha gives the beginning, Omega shows not only a perfect continuance, but the seal placed on the end of all. It means the finish of the road, and the completion of the work" (J. Wilson Smith).
Commentators differ here. Some hold that God as such speaks in this chapter, and that Christ takes the same title later:
It is God who is prominent through this portion... The One who sits on the throne speaks. We do not get the Lamb mentioned. It is the glory of God in the fullest possible sense that we have here... No doubt Christ is the Alpha and the Omega too, as we find in Revelation 22:13; but it is not the Lord who acts and speaks here; it is God.
Others read both places where the title appears the same way: "in both cases the speaker is our Lord Jesus Christ" (F. B. Hole).
The new heaven and the new earth leave nobody wanting, so the mention of thirst points elsewhere:
This is present, not future. No one will hunger or thirst in the "new heaven" and "new earth." The splendid list of negatives in verse 4 rules out the thought of thirsty ones in the eternal state, except in the lake of fire. The heart of God overflows with pity and tenderness towards the needy and unsatisfied sons and daughters of men. The "fountain," the source of life itself, is promised to the thirsty. It is God's gift, and freely given, as all His gifts are.
The offer names a fountain, and one writer weighs that word:
Not of the river, or the stream, note that. The river of life will flow out in a mighty volume in the coming age, but now men are invited to the Fountain. The river has been polluted. Men's opinions and "doctrines of demons" have been poured into it, and the error has spread as the stream has flowed on.
Thirst here is not something you achieve: "This is the thirst of realizing one's own emptiness as a sinner in need and so turning to the one source of this living water, Jesus Christ, who gives freely from a heart of perfect grace" (L. M. Grant). One writer answers the reader who fears he is not thirsty enough. He uses an older translation, which says "freely" where the ESV says "without payment":
"But," you say, "how can I be sure it means me? Perhaps I am not thirsty enough, not anxious enough, for salvation." Very likely; no one ever was as anxious as he should have been... But the point is not the measure of your anxiety, but the fact of your being thirsty or willing at all... "I will give... freely." That is God's side. "Let him take... freely." That is your side. God gives; all you have to do is take what He gives.
Verse 8 names the opposite destiny:
Hear these gracious words! They are placed right beside that awful verse about the lake of fire. God has set them side by side: the fountain of living waters, and the lake of fire... But those who despise the open fountain of living waters must be thrown, with all their evil, into the lake of fire.
- Done. God speaks after the last seal, trumpet, bowl and throne. The curtain falls on judgment, and nothing can stop what He has purposed.
- Source. Creation, history, prophecy, love and grace all start in God and finish in His glory. On His side nothing fails.
- Fountain. He offers not the downstream river that men have muddied, but the spring itself — life at its source.
- Free. The only qualification is thirst — a sense of your own emptiness. God gives; your part is to take.
- Or fire. Verse 8 names the alternative. God sets the open fountain and the lake of fire side by side.
He that overcomes shall inherit these things, and I will be to him God, and he shall be to me son.
God turns from describing the new creation to speak to one person at a time: the one who conquers. Two questions follow: who counts as a conqueror, and what is the "heritage" He promises?
The promise is not for a spiritual elite. Every believer is already in this fight, and Scripture names how to win it.
All God's people must be overcomers. They are passing through a hostile world, open to every trick and all the malice of a powerful enemy. An earlier chapter gives us a glimpse of a faithful remnant in conflict, and of them we read, "They overcame him [Satan] by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives even unto death." (Rev. 12:11) As to the world, John writes, "This is the victory that has overcome the world — our faith." (1 John 5:4) These two scriptures give us the means of victory. The passage in front of us brings encouragement while the fight is still on.
Verse 6 offers the water of life free to the thirsty; verse 7 speaks of conquering. The order matters, and both rest on a victory that was not ours.
From the grace of verse 6 we pass to the overcoming of verse 7. At first sight it looks like a complete change. But no one overcomes except those who have received the grace. This is the last mention of overcoming, or victory, in the book of Revelation, which is the book of victory. The victorious saint will enter into full possession of the inheritance. But no saint at all would overcome if the Lamb had not prevailed (the same word), as we see in chapter 5.
The earlier promises in Revelation 2 and 3 fitted each church. This one is wider. It points back to what the chapter has just described — then goes further.
The promises to the overcomer in the early part of the book (Rev. 2 and 3) concern special circumstances, and have special rewards in view. But here the encouragement to keep going to the end in the general battle of life is fuller. The rewards are fuller too than the ones mentioned earlier. "The one who conquers will have this heritage" — the things just named. But a still deeper and richer blessing is in store for the overcomer, one of a personal kind: "I will be his God." He gives Himself to the conqueror over life's sorrows. In our judgment this remarkable statement goes even beyond Paul's triumphant words, "the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me" (Gal. 2:20). But the tale of grace is not finished, for we read, "he will be my son." Sonship, then, is an eternal relationship. The overcomer has God, and God has the overcomer as son.
The past struggle is not wiped out in eternity. God remembers it differently than we do.
The conflicts of the past are over for ever now. We recall humbling failure and defeat on our part, but His only memory of them is the final overcoming, the fruit of His grace and power. "And I will be his God, and he will be my son," in all the intimacy of an individual relationship enjoyed by all.
Older translations read "inherit all things" where the ESV has "this heritage." John normally writes of believers as children of God. Here alone he uses a different word.
The overcomer will inherit all things (v. 7), for he becomes by faith a joint heir with Christ, into whose hands the Father has entrusted everything (Rom. 8:17, John 3:35). This is the only time in John's inspired writings that the believer is said to be a son ("huios") of God. "Son" indicates a position of dignity, liberty and trust. John's usual word for believers is "children." This one exception fits, because eternity is in view. It stresses the dignity of having part with God in eternal glory, not just the family relationship.
The next verse names the opposite crowd, and the two ends stand side by side.
The list of those who fall under this doom teaches a sad lesson. It begins with the fearful and unbelieving. Being without faith, they feared man and did not confess Jesus as their Lord. The overcomers of verse 7 are sons of God. The damned of verse 8 proclaim themselves sons of the evil one. They share his doom.
- Grace starts it. The free water of verse 6 comes before the conquering of verse 7. Only those who have received grace overcome, and only because the Lamb prevailed first.
- Faith fights it. Every believer passes through a hostile world. The means of victory are the blood of the Lamb, the word of testimony, and faith.
- The heritage crowns it. The heritage is the blessings just described in the chapter, received as a joint heir with Christ.
- God Himself exceeds it. The personal word "I will be his God" goes deeper than any reward. He gives Himself to the one who came through life's sorrows.
- Sonship seals it. John's one use of "son" for the believer marks dignity and a share with God in eternal glory. Verse 8 shows the opposite family and the opposite end.
But to the fearful and unbelieving, [and sinners], and those who make themselves abominable, and murderers, and fornicators, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, their part [is] in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone; which is the second death.
Revelation 21 has just shown a world made new and God living with people. Then, with one word, the chapter turns to those who have no share in it. Why does the list of them start where it starts? And how final is the sentence it announces?
This verse does not describe a passing phase of judgment. It belongs to the same eternal scene as the new heaven and the new earth.
God is the Speaker here, as in the earlier statements. In those earlier declarations God speaks as love. In this final statement of eternity He speaks as light. God never gives up His character as Judge of evil. The lake of fire is an actual and eternal place of punishment. We do not know where in the universe it is. Some today deny eternal punishment. This solemn passage gives them no support. It gives absolute condemnation. The eighth verse is as distinctly eternal as the first or the second.
Readers expect a list of criminals. It opens instead with fear. Older translations read "the fearful" and "the unbelieving" where the ESV has "the cowardly" and "the faithless."
Who praises the coward? Sadly, he stands at the head of the dark list of the lost in Revelation 21:8. "The fearful" here means those who are afraid to confess Jesus as Saviour and Lord, from fear of the consequences. They are cowards when it comes to Christ. In God's sight this is a sin of the meanest and blackest character. Such people know something of Christ and of His goodness, and yet they are ashamed of His name before others.
The next word in the list explains how a person ends up in that company.
"The unbelieving" are those who refuse God's testimony. That testimony was the only thing that could have kept them out of the company of "the abominable, murderers, sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters and all liars." Every unbeliever chooses such company, and he or she will have a part with them in the lake that burns with fire and brimstone. This is the second death — not annihilation, but separation (the basic meaning of death) — separation from God in eternal torment.
The sins named trace a family likeness.
The list of those on whom this doom falls is sadly instructive. It begins with the fearful and unbelieving… Next come those who bore the character of the devil, who is a murderer. They were marked by lust and dealings with the powers of darkness. The list finishes with "all liars." Lying is another characteristic of the devil, and deceit takes many subtle forms. The overcomers of verse 7 are sons of God. The condemned of verse 8 show themselves to be sons of the evil one. They share his doom.
One word on the list sounds quaint today.
Sorcerers are those who claim to have dealings with spirits. Death was the appointed penalty under the law for those who practised spiritualism in those days (Deut. 18:10-12). The lake of fire is God's appointed doom for all who practise witchcraft, spiritualism, devil worship, and other forms of sorcery.
The phrase points back to the death everyone already knows.
The "lake" burns. Its fire is never exhausted. "Fire and brimstone" symbolise torment and agony of a fearful kind (Isa. 30:33)… "Which is the second death." The first death separates soul and body. It is not the ending of existence, and not unconsciousness, as many imagine. Luke 16:19-31 is not said to be a parable. Both it and Revelation 6:9-11 show that the spirit is conscious and active in that state. The lake of fire in its never-ending agony is the second death.
Some hope the sentence might one day end, or that a fire after death might purify.
The misery of the unbeliever is brought in again here, as it seems to me, so that there might be no room for a question about how long their condemnation lasts. Can anything be more conclusive? Be assured, there is no coming out of that pit. It is impossible, for divine judgment and righteousness have put them there. Scripture gives no warrant for a purifying fire after death. Would the blessed Lord have repeated five times within a few verses, "where their worm does not die and the fire is not quenched," if He had not meant to show the final and eternal doom awaiting the guilty and lost?
- Two shares. One eternity holds both: the overcomers of verse 7, and the part in the lake of fire given in verse 8.
- Fear first. The list opens with people afraid to own Christ before others, not with murderers. They knew something of His goodness, yet were ashamed of His name.
- Unbelief picks the company. God's testimony was the only thing that could keep a person out of that company: the detestable, the immoral, sorcerers, idolaters and liars.
- Family likeness. The sins listed — murder, lust, dark powers, lying — are the character of the devil. Verse 7 shows sons of God; verse 8 shows sons of the evil one, sharing his doom.
- Second death, no exit. The first death separates soul from body, but existence goes on. The second death is conscious and lasting. There is no coming out of that pit, and no purifying fire after it.
And there came one of the seven angels which had had the seven bowls full of the seven last plagues, and spoke with me, saying, Come here, I will shew thee the bride, the Lamb's wife.
Near the end of Revelation, an angel invites John to see the bride, the wife of the Lamb. Both the wording of that invitation and the messenger who brings it point back to an earlier vision in the same book.
He is one of the seven who poured out the last plagues. One of that same group had earlier shown John the judgment of Babylon, the false wife. Writers treat the repetition as a signal.
One great feature of the seven bowls was the fall of Babylon. That fall prepared the way for the marriage of the Lamb and the appearance of the bride. So the angels who poured out these bowls are fitting messengers. They were sent to show first the judgment of the false wife, and next the glories of the true... The similarity is not accidental. It shows a link that sharpens the contrast between the two things pictured.
The false wife made a claim she had no right to. The true one is everything Babylon only pretended to be.
Babylon had claimed to be the bride of Christ, but the claim was false. The angel had shown her in her true character, and the judgment from God that would finally overwhelm her. After her destruction the marriage of the Lamb took place in heaven. Now the true bride, the Lamb's wife, is shown in all her beauty. She expresses the thoughts of God, as Babylon had expressed the thoughts of man.
Verse 9 does not carry the story forward from verse 8. A new guide arrives, and the vision changes.
The scene and the person change suddenly. That shows this is not a continuation of the vision we have just been looking at. A new person comes as John's guide... This guide opens a new sight to him. He had already seen it in a general way in his vision of the eternal state. But now its detailed glories will be unfolded before his eyes.
Commentators differ on the exact period in view. Several read the section that follows as a picture of the city during Christ's thousand-year reign, not in the eternal state:
We are brought back from the eternal state to a long description of the bride, the Lamb's wife. Here we see her relation to Israel and to the world at large during the thousand-year reign.
She is not called the wife of the King or the wife of the Judge. The title points to His suffering.
The church is called the Lamb's wife, because He suffered for her. It is impossible without suffering to bring out the fulness and savour of love.
The verse uses two titles at once — bride and wife. The second says something about her own path, and about the order in which glory comes.
Both "bride" and "wife" appear in this same verse, and a careful look at the Scriptures helps us tell the two thoughts apart. As "wife" she stands related to Him as "the Lamb." As the Lamb He walked a path of humility and suffering, even to death. Now, in His exaltation, He will have at His side in the running of the kingdom one who is in every way morally fitted to share His throne. "The Lamb's wife" suggests that she has known the path of suffering herself, in sympathy with the One she loves. Scripture holds to a principle: suffering comes before glory.
The angel promises John a bride. The picture that follows is also a city.
As with Babylon, so here two symbols are brought together — a woman and a city. On the surface they look like a mismatch, but not once we come to their meaning. The one shows what the church will be to Christ; the other, what she will be for Him. As the bride, she is the object of His love. As the city, she is the centre from which His powerful rule will go out.
after_note: DELETE
The vision exists because Christ has an object of affection, and this is her.
As the Bride of the Lamb, the Church is viewed as wholly for Christ the object of His love, and care, and delight. It is this aspect of the Church that we desire briefly to consider. It is an aspect of the Church that, in a special way, brings into display the love of Christ, and for this reason appeals very directly to our hearts.
That love has not waited for the day of display to begin working.
The bride presents the church as the object of Christ's intimate love. As such He loved it and gave Himself for it. As such He has nourished and cherished it in tender love all through its wilderness journey. The church may be weak, failing, persecuted, scattered and broken. Yet it has never ceased to be the object of His love and affection.
- Contrast. One of the same seven angels who exposed the false bride now unveils the true one. Set the counterfeit beside the genuine, and the beauty of the genuine shows.
- Pause. Verse 9 does not advance the timeline; It goes back to fill in a city already seen in outline.
- Cost. She is the Lamb's wife because He suffered for her. Nothing but suffering could bring out love's full flavour.
- Fitness. She shared the path of suffering, so she is fitted to share His throne. Suffering comes before glory.
- Two words, two truths. Bride tells what she is to Him — His love's object; city tells what she is for Him — the seat of His rule.
And he carried me away in [the] Spirit, [and set me] on a great and high mountain, and shewed me the holy city, Jerusalem, coming down out of the heaven from God,
The last vision of the Bible opens with John lifted to a mountain-top. He sees a city coming down from God, and the angel showing it to him is one of the seven who had already shown him Babylon. That pairing raises the questions of this verse: why a mountain, why a city, and what John is really looking at.
Babylon and the bride are set side by side on purpose, and so are the places John saw them from.
Babylon claimed to be the bride of Christ, but the claim was false... Now the true bride, the Lamb's wife, is shown in all her beauty — the expression of the thoughts of God, as Babylon had been the expression of the thoughts of man. To view Babylon, John was carried in spirit into the wilderness, a scene of moral drought and desolation. To see the holy city Jerusalem he was carried away in the Spirit to a great and high mountain. Moses looked out over the promised inheritance from Mount Pisgah. In the same way John is allowed to see promise and prophecy fulfilled in this glorious city, from the high place where the angel set him.
Throughout this book John's standing place always suits what he is about to see.
It is striking how different the standpoints are from which John views each vision as it passes before him in this book. Each place suits what he sees. He stands on the "sand of the sea" to see the beast rise "out of the sea"... The "wilderness" is a fitting place from which to see the symbolic Babylon, drunk with the blood of saints and martyrs of Jesus.
The mountain is not only scenery. It pictures the state of soul needed to take in what is shown.
It takes no great moral height to spot and name evil. A man of the world can go far in condemning the corruptions of Christendom. But the natural mind is completely unable to enter into the things of God. Even true believers will only value the coming glories of "the bride, the Lamb's wife" as they are lifted above the things of earth and walk apart from the corruptions of Christendom.
Older English versions read "that great city, the holy Jerusalem."
As far as the bride of the Lamb is concerned, "the great city" is left out by everyone who claims to give the best reading from the most ancient authorities. They read Revelation 21:10 as "showed me... the holy city Jerusalem." It is not a question of greatness for her even when glorified, but of holiness. What Babylon aims at and wins — at the cost not only of herself but of truth, grace, and Christ Himself — is present earthly greatness.
The angel promised John a bride and then showed him a city. The two are not separate things.
It seems clear that this New Jerusalem is not a real city. It is described not as the home of the bride, but as the bride herself, and her marriage to the Lamb has already been celebrated in heaven. Its shape too, shown in the verses that follow, is a beautiful symbol of the divine symmetry of the true Church. But no real city could have that shape.
Others see the vision covering both the people and the place they will live.
We judge from many a detail that it is not solely a symbol of the saints themselves, but rather a symbolic description both of the Church in glory and of her eternal home.
The two images — woman and city — say two different things.
The one sets out what the church will be to Christ. The other sets out what it will be for Him. As the bride, she is the object of His love. As the city, she is the centre from which His powerful rule will go out.
Every word of the city's origin is deliberate.
"Holy" describes its state. Then other marks follow. It "descends out of heaven" — its source stamps its character — "from God." It might have been from God, and earthly. It might have been heavenly and angelic. It was neither. It descended out of heaven from God.
She comes down, but she never lands.
This heavenly Jerusalem — the bride, "descending out of heaven from God" — does not come to the earth. She is let down so that the earth may see her glory, the glory of God displayed in her.
- Lifted. The wilderness showed Babylon; the mountain shows the bride. God gives the standing place that matches the sight.
- Separated. Condemning corruption needs no height; seeing the coming glory does. Only souls raised above earth take this vision in.
- Holy. The better text drops "great." Greatness was Babylon's ambition; holiness is the bride's character.
- Bride. The angel promised a bride and showed a city — not her address, but herself: love's object, and the centre of Christ's rule.
- Descending. Not from earth, not from angels — out of heaven from God, and let down near enough that the earth can see the glory shining in her.
having the glory of God. Her shining [was] like a most precious stone, as a crystal-like jasper stone;
An angel promised John a sight of the bride, the Lamb's wife, and showed him a city coming down from heaven with the glory of God. That raises two questions: what glory can a creature hold, and why describe it as a precious stone?
This vision is set on purpose against an earlier one. The same writer also says who this city is.
The first thing that strikes the reader is the designed contrast between this scripture and the one in Revelation 17, where an angel calls John to see the judgment of the great prostitute who sits on many waters. That chapter shows us Babylon; Revelation 21 shows us the new Jerusalem. The first is man's city, the second is God's. One expresses what man is. The other is the perfection of God's thoughts, robed in the glory of God… One more thing must be noted: the city is the bride, the Lamb's wife. This settles its character. It is the Church, which Christ has now presented to Himself as a glorious Church, without spot or wrinkle or anything of the kind, holy and without blemish, beautified with His own beauty, and having the glory of God.
So which glory does the city have?
This clearly cannot be the essential glory of God. It means, I think, that the glory was not human but divine. There is in God what He can give to the creature, and there is what cannot be shared. The glory meant here is divine glory, set against creature glory — not a glory that takes away from His majesty, but one that reflects it.
The stone is not chosen at random. It links the city to the One on the throne earlier in the book, and it marks the city off from Babylon.
Greatness was the mark of the prostitute city, Babylon. Coming from God is the mark of the bridal city, New Jerusalem. So it is holy and heavenly, and it has the glory of God — not the glory of man. Because of this, it comes down over the earth as a light, and its shining is compared to a jasper stone, clear as crystal. Jasper appears three times in the description of the city. The word turns up only once more in this book: in the description of the One who sits on the throne in Revelation 4:3. What describes God describes the city.
The glory belongs to God. Yet older translations call the shining hers, where the ESV has "its radiance." One writer asks why.
She has the glory "of God," and yet it is called "her light." Why is this? Suppose God has produced the graces of Christ in the saints here. Pure grace has done it, yet He has counted it to them. So here: if the church has the glory of God, it is still her light, and by His grace… In the same way, in Revelation 19:8 His wife was granted fine linen, white and clean, and that linen is called the righteous acts of the saints — though His own grace in her produced all of it.
The word behind "radiance" turns up in one other place worth knowing.
The word translated light, or shining, is the one found in Philippians 2:15, applied to believers — "among whom you shine as lights in the world." It is the word used of the lights in the sky. So we learn this: what believers should be now in character, the holy Jerusalem will be in fact in the coming age. And all the light of testimony that goes out now, from the saints or from the whole Church, comes from the same divine source as the "shining" of the holy city in the future day of glory.
Romans 5:2 holds this glory out as a hope. Here it is a fact, and the city does not keep it to itself.
"Having the glory of God." What Romans 5:2 presents as a hope has here become a reality… She is not only the vessel of God's glory. She also reflects that glory to the world. The city bride will be a glorious canopy of light, unfading beauty and brightness, over the scene of the thousand years. It will be the grandest sight ever seen.
- Source. The city is holy and heavenly because it comes from God. Babylon was only great, and it showed what man is.
- Gift. Its glory is not God's own essence, which cannot be shared. It is the glory He can give a creature — divine, not human, a reflection of His majesty.
- Likeness. Jasper is the stone used of the One on the throne in Revelation 4:3, so what describes God now describes the city.
- Grace. The glory is God's, yet called her radiance — as with the fine linen granted to the bride, He counts His own work in her as hers.
- Display. Its shining is the word used of believers who shine as lights now. What the church should be in character today, this city will be in full view, reflecting God's glory to the world.
having a great and high wall; having twelve gates, and at the gates twelve angels, and names inscribed, which are those of the twelve tribes of [the] sons of Israel.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
On [the] east three gates; and on [the] north three gates; and on [the] south three gates; and on [the] west three gates.
The verse counts the gates of the holy city, and the count is even: three on each of the four sides. Why does one city need so many gates, and why do they face every direction?
One writer contrasts what gates normally do in a great city with what these gates are for.
The city will be four-square, facing without fear or shame every point of the compass. It will be equal on every side, and on every side there will be three gates... A great city like London keeps its gates open all the time, because it depends on every part of the earth for its very life. Supplies pour into it from north, south, east, and west. But the gates of the holy city will open for the opposite reason. They will open not to let supplies flow in, but to let blessing flow out — blessing for the whole earth.
One commentator breaks twelve into its two factors and finds a meaning in each.
The wall has four sides, and in it are twelve gates — three gates on every side, for going out and coming in. This city is the home of a life that never stops working. The number 12 is stamped on the whole city. It is an expanded 7, with the same factors (4 × 3 instead of 4 + 3), and it is the sign of open divine government, with God clearly supreme here... The 12 here is the usual 4 × 3. The 3 still speaks of God showing Himself, while the 4 shows that this is universal, the sides facing every way.
These gates are set in the city wall. Wall and gates do opposite jobs, and both are needed.
Walls are to keep out what ought to be out. On the other hand, its twelve gates are to allow in what ought to be in... Three gates stand on each side of the city (v. 13). This reminds us how the tribes of Israel camped around the tabernacle in the wilderness (Num. 2:1-31).
Another writer draws out what a wall with no openings would have meant.
It also has twelve gates. Since the city is foursquare, it looks the same from every side you approach it, and the way in is generous. If the wall had no gates it would be a poor thing.
The previous verse writes the names of Israel's tribes on these gates. One writer explains what those names mean, with a picture from everyday town naming.
In cities on earth people often name the main streets after the towns those streets lead to. In the same way, the gates of the heavenly city carry the names of the tribes that its blessings flow to. That blessing will reach every quarter of the globe in equal measure, because there are three gates on each of the four sides of the city.
The names sit on the gates, but they do not make up the city itself.
As for the twelve tribes of Israel, their names are only written there, nothing more. Nothing at all suggests that they make up the city; their names are simply inscribed on the outside. That city will be a constant reminder of those who came before restored Israel on earth, and it will certainly be used for their blessing during the thousand years — but not for theirs alone. On the contrary, we shall find that the city looks out toward the whole universe, and yet Israel has its special place there.
An earlier prophet saw a city with the same shape and the same gate count. Setting the two side by side shows where they part company.
In Ezekiel the city is also four-sided, with twelve gates, three on each side, named after the twelve tribes of Israel. (Ezek. 48:30-35.) In both cases there is complete order and symmetry, and in both cases a connection between the city and Israel. But in Ezekiel's city the connection is earthly. In the city of Revelation the connection is heavenly, for twelve angels stand at the gates.
- Shape — the city is equal on every side. Three gates stand on each of the four sides, so the city favours no direction and forgets none.
- Number — twelve is four times three: three for God showing Himself, four for the universal spread, with the sides facing every way.
- Guard — the wall keeps out what ought to be out; the gates let in what ought to be in. A wall with no gates would be a poor thing.
- Channel — the gates carry Israel's names, the way city streets carry the names of the towns they lead to. Blessing flows out to every quarter of the globe in equal measure.
- Reach — Ezekiel saw a city of the same shape, but its link was earthly. Here the link is heavenly, and this city looks out toward the whole universe.
And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and on them twelve names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.
The wall of the heavenly city rests on twelve foundations, and each one carries the name of a man who had walked with Jesus. Commentators read this as a picture of the church's foundation, and it raises questions: why apostles and not Israel, why twelve, and where is Paul?
The names on the foundations point back to real work done on earth.
The names of the twelve apostles connect the City with the foundation work of the apostles at Pentecost. Their work, under the control of the Holy Spirit, formed the Church on earth as the House of God where God dwells, rules and blesses. So a sphere of heavenly blessing and rule came into being on earth. That work began on earth through the apostles, and the City in glory shows it completed.
What they laid down was teaching, and no single apostle carried the whole of it.
The names on the foundations show that the truth of God about His Son Jesus Christ, ministered by the apostles, is the solid basis of true separation according to God. Each apostle received his own line of ministry, so that together they might form a well-balanced foundation that cannot fail.
The verse does not call them apostles of Christ. It calls them apostles of the Lamb — a title that points back to His sacrifice.
The city is clearly the fruit of His own work. Its foundations begin with Him: twelve foundations, with the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb on them. The names written there are the names of the sent ones of the Lamb who once suffered as a sacrifice. Had there been no Lamb there would have been no apostles. And if each foundation had one apostolic name on it, then every one of the twelve was a reminder of the Lamb whose apostles they were.
The gates carry the names of Israel's tribes. The foundations underneath carry the names of the apostles. The two places are not interchangeable.
The wall is what fences a city off from the world outside. The gate is what gives it contact with the world outside. The apostles appear in what marks the Church as distinct and set apart. The twelve tribes appear in what marks its relationship with the world. This is because the apostles are the foundation course of the Church, while Israel is always God's first thought in His government of the world.
Paul's name is not among the twelve. Is he left out? One writer treats the number as a set figure, not a headcount, and draws a parallel with Israel's own tribes.
They have laid the foundations, and their names are stamped on their work. We are surely not to imagine any individualising here, as if any one foundation could be assigned to any one apostle. Nor is the number twelve itself anything but characteristic... It is remarkable that almost the same difficulty comes up with the twelve tribes of Israel. They often exclude and often include the tribe of Levi... Why may not the apostles, despite the addition of Paul to their number, be counted here as twelve?
Another writer points to which side of the church this city shows.
The City does not show the Church as the Apostle Paul presents it — in its close relations to Christ as the body of Christ, or in its privileges of access to the Father's house. It is the aspect of the Church presented by the twelve apostles: the vessel for the display of the glory of God before the world.
Names on a foundation could suggest that the church rests on men. One writer answers that from the high priest's breastplate.
The names of the apostles are engraved on the foundations of the Church, but Christ Himself is the true foundation. In the high priest's breastplate, the perfections of Christ gleamed in the precious stones. Those stones were linked with the tribes whose names were cut on them. In the same way, the many perfections, beauties and glories of Christ, the true foundation, bear up the Church in its heavenly brightness.
- Lamb first. No Lamb, no apostles — every foundation stone carries a name that exists only because of His sacrifice.
- Apostles next. Their Spirit-led work at Pentecost formed the church on earth; the city in glory is that same work finished.
- Truth as base. Each apostle carried a distinct line of ministry, and together they form a foundation that cannot fail.
- Church, not Israel. Israel's names mark the gates that face outward; the apostles' names mark the wall that sets the church apart.
- Christ beneath all. The apostles' names are on the foundations, but Christ Himself is the true foundation, and His many glories hold the Church up.
And he that spoke with me had a golden reed [as] a measure, that he might measure the city, and its gates, and its wall.
An angel holds a measuring rod of gold, ready to measure the holy city, its gates and its wall. Why measure the city at all, and why is the rod gold?
Earlier in Revelation, John himself measures a temple on earth. Here the measurer changes, and so does the tool.
In Revelation 11:1-2 the temple, altar, and worshippers are measured — all of them on earth. This signifies that they are His; they belong to God. But here the measuring of the heavenly city is above. In the first case the seer measured; in our text the angel measures. The measuring reeds, too, are different. The millennial Jerusalem on earth with its temple, courts and so on, is measured with a line of flax (Ezekiel 40:3). The city of gold is fittingly measured with a golden reed.
The verse names three things, not one: the city, its gates, and its wall.
The golden (divine) reed measures the city, its gates, and its walls — that is, the place where many live, its way in, its way out, and its defences.
To measure something is more than noting its size. It is an act of ownership, and the metal of the rod shows the basis of God's claim.
Here, as in Revelation 11, the measuring signifies owning on the part of God, with the added idea that He takes it for Himself. The thing measured is according to His mind. He owns it to be so, and claims it as His. And the measuring rod being golden testifies that it is in righteousness that He stamps the city, its wall and gates, with His approval.
The city itself is gold, and commentators treat gold as a fixed symbol. As a measuring rod, it turns the scene into a test.
Gold is the well known symbol of Divine righteousness. So the City measured by the golden reed shows that everything is tested by Divine righteousness. The result is that the City, the gates and the walls fully meet what Divine righteousness requires. The City is therefore the display of the righteousness of God in Christ — the answer to the cross of Christ (2 Corinthians 5:21).
A measurement always sets a boundary. That boundary itself carries meaning.
The angel who had spoken to John had a golden reed to measure the city. It was not a reed like a rod (Revelation 11:1), because in that city there is no longer any need to strike with the rod. Instead, the glory of God (gold) has triumphed over evil, and that glory will be displayed in the entire city. Yet the city is measured: God does not display His glory without limit, for no man could endure that (1 Timothy 6:16). The city has limits, so it cannot fully show a God who is infinite.
So what kind of city is this? Commentators read the description as picture language, not brickwork.
I do not mean that we should take this description as if it were of a literal city. I consider it a purely symbolic picture of certain relations of the bride, the Lamb's wife. Scripture itself says very plainly that this is not the dwelling place of the redeemed, but the bride herself, described as a city.
- Rod. The instrument sets the tone. An angel measures here, not John. A golden reed replaces the rod-like reed of Revelation 11 and the flax line of Ezekiel — a heavenly city gets a heavenly measure.
- Claim. To measure is to own. God measures the city, its gates and its wall, and claims them as His: this is Mine, and it matches My mind.
- Righteousness. The rod is gold, the symbol of divine righteousness. So God claims the city on righteous ground, and the city displays the righteousness of God in Christ — the answer to the cross.
- Bride. The city is not brick and stone. Commentators read it as a picture of the bride, the Lamb's wife, described as a city.
- Limit. What can be measured has limits. The city shines with God's glory, yet even so it cannot fully show a God who is infinite.
And the city lies four-square, and its length [is] as much as the breadth. And he measured the city with the reed -- twelve thousand stadia the length and the breadth and height of it are equal.
An angel lays a golden reed to the city, and the answer comes back as a shape: a cube, equal on every side. Two questions follow. Why does God measure the city at all? And why does the answer come in a form no builder on earth has attempted?
The act of measuring is not curiosity about size. It is a claim, and the gold of the reed shows what that claim rests on.
In both cases the measuring means owning on the part of God, with the added idea of appropriation. The thing measured is according to His mind. He therefore owns it to be so, and claims it as His. And because the measuring rod is golden, it testifies that He stamps the city, its wall and gates, with His approval in righteousness.
The three equal dimensions are the point. A cube is complete in every direction, yet every line still has an end. That keeps the city glorious without making it God.
It was a cube. Now a cube is the most perfect figure, being equal on every side — finite perfection. It has what you call finality. It is the most comprehensive, and holds the most — nothing contains as much as a cube. So it is given here as the expression of perfection. Notice, it is finite perfection, divinely given. I do not say it is divine perfection, because that is God Himself; but it is divinely given perfection. The Spirit of God delights to show the absolute perfection of the place in glory which the saints have before God, on the ground of divine righteousness.
The cube speaks of substance, reality. This is the eternal sanctuary, and the full enjoyment of every hope of the saint. Further, the measurements, though surely symbolic, still wait for their interpretation.
The inner room of the tabernacle and of the temple was also a cube. That shape belonged to the place where God dwelt, and the city now wears it.
As in the tabernacle in the wilderness, the most holy place formed a perfect cube inside… The result of God's work is perfect without adding anything or taking anything away. Everything is ordered according to the mind of the Divine Architect. The New Jerusalem is, so to speak, a great most holy place where God can dwell, just as He dwelt in the inner sanctuary of the temple. This is because everything in her answers to His holiness and His righteousness. … God's sanctuary is the Church in glory!
The prophet Ezekiel was also shown a measured city, square in plan. Here a third dimension appears, and it changes what kind of city this is.
In Ezekiel the measuring reed is of ordinary construction, suited to an earthly city; in Revelation it is a golden reed, the type of divine righteousness, suited to the dwelling place of God. In Ezekiel the city is large, as fits a splendid earthly capital; in Revelation the city is vast beyond all possible earthly limits. In Ezekiel it is the four-sided form, often used in Scripture to show perfect earthly symmetry. In Revelation there is another dimension: a height equal to the length and the breadth. This shows a perfect cube, a still higher order of symmetry, heavenly in character, and clearly unsuited to the earth.
Turned into ordinary distance, the figure is enormous. That size is itself a clue to how we should read the passage. And the same number that shapes the city shapes what comes out of it.
A furlong (or stadium, as the word is) was about 200 yards, so 12,000 would equal about 1,375 miles. Its height matches its length and breadth. This helps to confirm the thought that we are dealing with symbolic language, not literal language. In this measurement we again meet with twelve, the number of administration, and the very street of the city is gold like transparent glass. In earth's cities the street is where dirt gathers. There all is divine purity and transparency, and as is the city, so is the government that proceeds from it.
Something so large is meant to enlarge our thoughts of what God is doing.
It seems to indicate that the Church is the greatest thing of all God's handiwork, and yet, vast as it is, it has limits and can be measured.
- Measured — with a golden reed God claims the city as His own and approves it in righteousness.
- Perfect — length, width and height are equal. The cube is finite perfection, given by God through the death and resurrection of Christ, never God's own perfection.
- Holy — the inner rooms of the tabernacle and the temple were cubes too. The city has the shape of the place where God dwells.
- Heavenly — Ezekiel saw a square, earthly city. The added height lifts this one beyond anything earth could hold.
- Governing — twelve runs through every measurement. The street of clear gold shows what the government coming out of that city will be.
And he measured its wall, a hundred [and] forty-four cubits, [a] man's measure, that is, [the] angel's.
The angel measures the wall as well as the city, and the figure comes to 144 cubits. Why is a heavenly city measured by a human standard, and what does the number say?
The tool used for the measuring says something too. The prophet Ezekiel was also shown a city measured with a reed. One writer sets the two visions side by side.
In Ezekiel the measuring reed is an ordinary one, fit for an earthly city. In Revelation it is a golden reed, the picture of divine righteousness, fit for the dwelling-place of God... In Ezekiel the city is a square, a shape Scripture often uses to show perfect earthly symmetry. In Revelation there is one more dimension: a height equal to the length and the breadth. That makes a perfect cube — a higher order of symmetry, heavenly in kind, and plainly unsuited to the earth.
Scripture calls this wall great and high. Each word says something different.
The wall speaks of security and exclusion. The wall is "great," so the City is safe from every assault of the enemy. It is "high," so all evil is shut out. The great wall cannot be broken down; the high wall cannot be climbed... The wall separates the City from everything outside. If the Church had kept a holy separation from the world, it would have stood safe against the attacks of the enemy and against evil getting in.
But a wall that keeps things out also holds things in. Another writer takes up that side.
The wall is not there to shut a single saint of God out of that city, for everyone whose name is written in the Lamb's book of life will go in. The wall will be a wall that includes. Everyone whom sovereign grace has chosen and called to heavenly glory, everyone whom the blood of the Lamb has redeemed — its shining embrace will hold them all... When a man buys an estate and puts a wall around it, he says, "That is mine; I want that for my own pleasure" — and so it is here.
The number 144 is not random. Break it into its two factors and the city's character shows.
The wall measures a hundred and forty-four cubits, twelve times twelve. So every detail displays the governmental character of the city, and shows it to be divinely perfect.
A cubit was the everyday working measure: the length of a forearm. One writer finds the weight of the verse in that ordinary origin.
In Scripture the standard was the cubit, from a word meaning "mother." It was the length of the "mother-arm" — the forearm, the main part of the arm, from the elbow to the fingertip. That is the part we use in all our work. So the standard was taken from man; it was not set above him. God's requirements are entirely reasonable and righteous. They do not ask more than a human being can give. And yet not one of the fallen sons of Adam could measure up to that perfect human standard: "for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God." But God delights in man, and even the heavenly city is measured by the human standard... If God's creatures are to grasp Him at all, it cannot be in that glory and infinity beyond words, which no one knows but the Son. It must be in the One who humbled Himself and was found in human form.
The city's height of twelve thousand stadia beats the imagination. The wall's 144 cubits does not, and one writer sees purpose in the difference.
The measure of the wall is a size we can take in... A hundred and forty-four cubits is about 250 feet, and that is something we can grasp... I do not think any architect has yet designed a city twelve thousand stadia high (though some have the ambition). It is something immense, but not infinite. Grace lets us look at something vast. That is what God keeps putting before us: the immensity of the blessing, the fullness of God's grace and the glory of His grace.
A limit here is not a flaw.
If this measurement is the thickness of the wall — which the text does not otherwise state — it has been suggested that the wall was not there for protection against an enemy. As a whole the city was a cube. It could not be infinite, but it was finite perfection. So there is a completeness and perfection about it, fitting for that day and for ever.
- Measured — the reed is golden, the picture of divine righteousness, so nothing about the city is accidental.
- Guarded — the wall is great, so nothing can break it down, and high, so nothing can climb it; evil stays outside forever.
- Owned — the same wall shuts no redeemed person out. It holds everyone written in the Lamb's book of life, and marks the city as God's own.
- Perfected — 144 is twelve times twelve, so even the wall's measure spells out government made divinely complete.
- Comprehensible — the standard is a man's forearm, a measure we carry with us. The city is immense but not infinite, so grace lets us take in what is coming.
And the building of its wall [was] jasper; and the city pure gold, like pure glass
John is shown a city, and here he is told what it is made of. No gold on earth is clear like glass. Commentators read the city as the Church in glory, so its materials describe her.
A wall marks a boundary and keeps things out. The stone this one is built from has already appeared earlier in this book.
"The wall of it was jasper." From Revelation 4:3 we learn that jasper is a figure of the divine glory of Christ. It is His glory that excludes all evil from the City. The deeper our sense of the glory of the One who dwells in the Church, the more we should see that evil can never be linked with His Name. The glory secures the exclusion of all that defiles.
The same stone turns up three times in this description, and each mention gives it a different job.
The jasper is solid, transparent, and brilliant as crystal. It is also mentioned three times in the detailed description of the heavenly city: first, as her light (v. 11); second, as her security (v. 18); third, as the first foundation of the wall (v. 19). So the glory of God is the light, the security, and the foundation of the glorified Church.
The city itself is gold. Writers take that as a picture of God's righteousness, and they draw a line between what God is and how He rules.
Jasper, as we have seen, is symbolic of "the glory of God." Gold stands for the righteousness of God — not in His government, but in His nature. So the Church shares the righteousness that belongs to God. The saints are made morally "partakers of the divine nature." (2 Peter 1:4.) The glory of God, the jasper wall, also fences the city in. It defends the city from all intrusion of evil, and keeps it in the holy separateness that suits His chosen dwelling. In Israel the dwelling place He took was a cube completely covered with gold. A cube of "pure gold, like clear glass" is the symbolic picture of the "holy temple," the "dwelling place of God by the Spirit," set before us here in the heavens.
The verse does not just say gold. It says pure gold. That one word points to a change from what believers are now.
"The city was pure gold, like clear glass." This shows the absolute righteousness and holiness that marks the City. We know the new man is created in righteousness and true holiness. But much about believers now still speaks of the "old man" and his ways. In every child of God there is the real gold, but with some alloy of baser metal. In the City the dross will be gone. There the gold is pure without alloy. There too all will be transparent like clear glass. Nothing will be unclear — no hidden motives.
Gold blocks light. Glass lets it through. This verse puts the two together.
The building of the wall is of jasper, clear and transparent as the city itself, for the wall is not intended to hide anything. The city is of pure gold, like clear glass (v. 18). Gold is not transparent in nature. But the symbols teach us spiritual facts. The pure gold speaks of God's glory shown there in the person of the Lord Jesus. The clear glass shows that transparent truth will mark the city. Everything will be open and above board: there will be no wickedness thriving under cover.
What the city shows in full is already at work in believers now. The same gold also covers the street, where they walk.
The city itself is the display of divine righteousness. We have divine righteousness now in our complete justification. It is also worked in us, so that the new nature may express it in practice in a world that opposes it. But the city itself is all "pure gold" from its centre to its outermost bounds, and transparent too, like pure glass. On the eternal earth righteousness dwells, but the Church itself is that — the living, glorified expression of divine righteousness. Righteousness is now upon us (Rom. 3:22), also worked in us (Eph. 4:24); we are in glory the display of it (Rev. 21:18), while it is that on which we walk (v. 21).
- Jasper guards. The wall of jasper stands for the glory of God, and that glory keeps every defiling thing outside the city.
- Jasper shines. The same stone is the city's light, her security, and her first foundation — one glory doing three things.
- Gold is God's nature. Gold stands for the righteousness of God's own nature. The same gold once covered His dwelling place in Israel.
- Pure means no alloy. Every believer has real gold now, mixed with baser metal; in the city the dross is gone.
- Transparent means nothing hidden. In nature, gold is never see-through. That is the message: no hidden motives, nothing concealed, ever again.
the foundations of the wall of the city [were] adorned with every precious stone the first foundation, jasper; the second, sapphire; the third, chalcedony; the fourth, emerald;
The wall of the heavenly city rests on twelve foundations, and John notices their colour rather than their strength. Each one is a different jewel. Why would a city built by God have foundations that break light like a prism?
The stones do more than decorate. They are how the light of God reaches a creature's eye.
Next, the foundations of the wall are adorned with precious stones. Besides the general idea of every character of beauty, the stones have a special character, noted elsewhere. Light transforms itself into a varied display of colours when it is seen through a medium. So it is when God is revealed in and by the creature, or in connection with his state: in creation, in priestly representation, and here, in glory.
Jasper appears three times in the description of the city. This verse is its third mention.
The jasper and the sardius are hard and indestructible gems, fit emblems of incorruption in the glorified state (1 Corinthians 15:50). The jasper is also mentioned three times in the detailed description of the heavenly city. First, as her light (v. 11). Second, as her security (v. 18). Third, as the first foundation of the wall (v. 19). So the glory of God is the light, the security, and the foundation of the glorified Church.
Behind the stones stands a Person. Commentators point past the apostles' names to the One who carries the weight.
The names of the apostles are engraved on the foundations of the Church, but Christ Himself is the true foundation. In the breastplate of Israel's high priest, the perfections of Christ gleamed in the precious stones, and each stone carried the name of a tribe cut into it. In the same way, the many perfections, beauties and glories of Christ, the true foundation, hold up the Church in its heavenly brightness. The foundation of all is jasper, "the glory of God."
The second stone already has a history in the Bible.
When Moses and the elders went up the mountain to God, "there was under His feet as it were a pavement of sapphire stone" (Exodus 24:10). In Ezekiel's vision, above the expanse, there was "the likeness of a throne, in appearance like sapphire" (Ezekiel 1:26). It was one of the stones in the breastplate, and it is a symbol of heavenly glory.
Several of the other names are hard to pin down. The ESV reads "agate" where older versions read "chalcedony."
Many of these precious stones are not found anywhere else in Scripture, so it is difficult to say what they are. This may be an indication that there are many glories that we are not even aware of that will be displayed. 1 Corinthians 13:9 reminds us, "we know in part".
Precious stones appear in lists three times in Scripture. Where the jasper stands in each list is the clue.
The names of the stones are then given, beginning with the jasper and ending with the amethyst. Compare the list with the twelve precious stones on the breastplate of the high priest (Exodus 28). The jasper comes first in our scripture, but it comes last on the breastplate. This may mean that the church begins with the glory in the Person of the Head, while for Israel it lies at the end. Morally the stones show the history of souls — as creatures, then as objects of grace taken up and placed on the heart of Christ, and finally as seen displayed in all His various beauties in the glory.
God's own light is not a spectrum. The colours belong to what He gives away.
We may learn from this that in every variety of beauty God will clothe His people in that day of glory. There will be different rays of His glory reflected through them, set forth by these different precious stones. In God's own case it is not so. His essential glory is not described in this way. It is full concentrated light.
The difference of colour is personal.
Although we are all partakers of the grace of God, that grace will shine through each differently, and no two are alike. It would be an immense pity if all the saints were like a cart-load of bricks — all the same shape and colour.
There is a plain lesson in how such stones come to exist.
As far as I understand it, precious stones are the result of two things: heat and pressure. It seems to show that if we are to display in any way the glories of Christ, we will have to pass through heat and pressure. What is both precious in God's sight and precious in testimony is the result of the various exercises we pass through.
- Light — God is undivided light. It breaks into colours only when it shines through a creature. These foundations are a prism, not a lamp.
- Foundation — jasper stands first, and jasper is the glory of God. The glory that lights the city and guards it also carries it.
- Grace — jasper comes last on the high priest's breastplate and first here. The church begins with the glory in the Person of its Head.
- Pressure — heat and pressure make a gem. What you pass through now is the making of what will be displayed.
- Variety — no two stones are alike, and no two saints are. Glory does not erase what makes each one different.
the fifth, sardonyx; the sixth, sardius; the seventh, chrysolite; the eighth, beryl; the ninth, topaz; the tenth, chrysoprasus; the eleventh, jacinth; the twelfth, amethyst.
Revelation 21:20 ends the list of the twelve foundation stones of the city wall, naming the fifth gem through the twelfth. Why did God choose coloured stones to picture the future glory of His people, and does each stone carry a meaning of its own?
(The ESV calls the fifth and sixth stones "onyx" and "carnelian." Older translations call them "sardonyx" and "sardius." Some quotations below use the older names.)
God's own glory is never described this way. The gems belong to what He gives away, not to what He is in Himself.
We will not try to give the spiritual meaning of each of these precious stones. Still, we may learn from them that God will clothe His people in every variety of beauty in that day of glory. There will be different rays of His glory reflected through them, set forth by these different precious stones. In God's own case it is not so. Scripture does not describe His essential glory this way. It is full, concentrated light. Unlike the glory He gives to the church, it is not broken up into a variety of hues.
A stone has no glow of its own. Whatever a topaz or a beryl shows, it first received.
The foundations were "adorned with every kind of jewel." There is variety in the stones, but all are precious. The stones are not a source of light, but they reflect and refract light and so display the beautiful colours of light. Christ is the light. In Him all excellencies combine in perfection to form the light. In His people every excellency is set forth in detail to display, as it were, the colours of the light.
These stones appear three times in Scripture, and the third time they stand for something permanent. Their difference from one another also carries a lesson.
These precious stones appear in Scripture three times. In the garden of Eden we see them in connection with creation. Then in Exodus 28 we see them in the breastplate of the high priest, and there it is clearly a question of grace for a failing people. But when we see these same stones in the foundation of the heavenly city, the thought suggested is permanent glory… Put a light through an emerald, and it is quite different from the light through a ruby. We are all partakers of the grace of God, yet that grace will shine through each of us differently, and no two are alike. It would be a great pity if all the saints were like a cartload of bricks — all the same shape and colour. All are alike in being saved by grace, but all are different in the expression of that grace.
The stones sit in foundations, and foundations carry weight. Commentators tie that weight-bearing role back to Christ.
The names of the apostles are engraved on the foundations of the Church, but Christ Himself is the true foundation. In the breastplate of the high priest, the perfections of Christ gleamed in the precious stones, and those stones were linked with the tribes whose names were cut into them. So here too the many perfections, beauties and glories of Christ, the true foundation, hold up the Church in its heavenly brightness.
Commentators differ here. Kelly gives no separate meaning to each stone. A Bible dictionary does trace one of them, the sardius, through several passages — including one that describes a fall.
One of the precious stones in the breastplate. Exodus 28:17; Exodus 39:10. It also adorned one of the foundations of the holy Jerusalem. Revelation 21:20. It was one of the stones that covered the king of Tyre (no doubt picturing Satan before his fall). Ezekiel 28:13. In heaven the One who sat on the throne "had the appearance of jasper and carnelian." Revelation 4:3. It is thought to be the sard, a superior variety of agate, of various colours, some blood-red, and others of a golden hue.
One stone in this verse appears nowhere else in the Bible. It shows up only here, in the wall's foundations.
Scripture mentions the sardonyx only once — in the fifth place, in the foundations of the wall of the heavenly capital in Revelation 21:20. There it shines as a symbol between the emerald and the sardius.
- One light. God's own glory is one undivided light. The twelve gems show what that light becomes when He shares it.
- Reflected light. No stone shines by itself. Christ is the light, and each foundation gives back a colour of it.
- Three settings. The same gems appear three times: in creation, in grace on the high priest's breastplate, and here in permanent glory.
- Twelve differences. Every believer receives the same grace, yet each displays it in a different hue — sameness would be the loss, not the gain.
- Solid ground. The colours rest in foundations, so the beauty on show is also the strength that holds the city up.
And the twelve gates, twelve pearls; each one of the gates, respectively, was of one pearl; and the street of the city pure gold, as transparent glass.
The description of the city has moved from its wall and foundations to its gates and its street. Now the materials are ones no builder could buy: a gate cut from a single pearl, and gold you can see through.
One writer says the difference between this city and the Jerusalem on earth tells us how to read the passage:
The fair conclusion from God's word is this. Unlike the Jerusalem in Palestine, this city is not of man and not of the earth. It is heavenly and divine. So it has the glory of God, and God describes it in pictures that go deliberately beyond anything in the first creation... Think of jasper clear as crystal, gold transparent as glass, and each gate of "one pearl"! It is all above nature... We must not think of material beauty in the heavenly city; it is a symbolic description.
One writer connects the pearl gates to a story Jesus told about a merchant. He asks who is buying and who is bought:
Why was every gate a pearl? Remember the heavenly merchant in Matthew 13. He was "seeking fine pearls, who, on finding one pearl of great value, went and sold all that he had and bought it." You may say that is a sinner seeking the Saviour. Really? A sinner selling? What has a sinner got to sell but his sins? No — the pearl of great price is not Christ, but the Church, the Church in its unity. Christ is the one who went and sold all that He had. He gave up everything for the Church.
A diver must also bring a pearl up from the sea, and the shell it grew in does not survive. Another writer builds the picture on that detail:
The pearl is lifted out of the deep sea. It is taken out of the rough shell it first grew in, and the creature that gave it life dies in the taking. So the pearl is a fitting picture of those who have been drawn out of the sea of the nations, and out of their rough natural condition, at the cost of the life of Him in whom they were seen and chosen before the foundation of the world.
A pearl forms around something that does not belong there. One writer turns that fact into the meaning of the gate, and then notes what the gate is for:
A pearl is a fitting picture of the Church. It is the result of some foreign substance coming under the oyster shell and causing an injury. The oyster then makes a substance called "nacre," or mother of pearl. Layer after layer it wraps the offending object, until it builds up into a beautiful pearl. We are the offending object. But God's grace covers us and makes us accepted "in Christ," with a beauty that delights His heart of love... But grace is not selfish: it delights to show itself to others, as these open gates suggest.
The street is what the citizens walk on. One writer contrasts that with now, when the Lord still washes His disciples' feet:
The street of the city is of pure gold, like transparent glass; no defilement is any longer possible. Jesus will no more have to wash our feet in order that we may enter into the presence of God for our worship. In the glory we shall be standing on purity... This is great rest to anyone who loves holiness.
A street is not just a surface. It is where a city's dealings happen, and that is exactly what makes the golden street striking:
In the east above all, the street is the place of trade. It is where need and greed keep meeting. But here every circumstance, every dealing, the whole setting, is pure holiness and truth. It is fit for the presence of God, and filled with it.
The text speaks of the street, singular, and one writer builds on that:
The city has only one street — there will be no systems, sects, divisions and subdivisions there. The prayer of our Lord, "that they may all be one" (John 17:21), will yet be answered in glory. Dwelling on this with joy would do much to stir up a longing in us now, by God's Spirit, for the unity of God's people.
- Symbol, not masonry. Gold you can see through and a gate carved from one pearl are pictures beyond anything in the first creation. No builder could make them, and that is the clue: read them as symbols.
- Price. One writer reads the merchant who sold all He had as Christ, and the pearl He bought as the Church — not a sinner buying the Saviour.
- Grace. The pearl forms by covering an intruding object layer on layer — a picture of offenders covered and made beautiful.
- Reach. Twelve gates of pearl stand open, because grace does not keep its beauty to itself.
- Result. The street of everyday dealings holds no defilement — and being one street, it holds no division either.
And I saw no temple in it; for the Lord God Almighty is its temple, and the Lamb.
John sees a city full of glory and gold. Then he tells us what is missing from it. For anyone raised on Israel's worship, a city with no sanctuary would sound like a city with no God. In fact, the missing building says how near God has come.
A temple was never only a beautiful building. It marked the terms on which people could come to God — and those terms included a veil. One writer explains why, and how strange it would sound to a Jewish reader:
Why is there no temple? Because worship is all that is here; it gives character to the whole scene. A Jew could hardly understand how there could be no temple. The temple gave character to his relationship with God. There God dwelt, shut away from every gaze, to be reverenced. But if He shut Himself up within the veil, He shut man out! He could not be there. How different this wonderful scene of glory is. There is no concealment of it. The unveiled mystery of God is there, and the heart has nothing to do but adore.
A sanctuary also sorts people. Who may come close, and who must stay back?
By its very nature, a temple keeps the presence of God within limits. It brings in the thought of nearer and more distant worshippers. "No temple" means that full and free access to God is granted equally to all. Immediate access to God, without a priest or mediator coming between, is open to everyone.
The verse does not just say God is there. It piles up titles, and each one carries its own weight:
Jehovah is the expression of moral relationship. God, El, the mighty One, is the Creator's name of power and sovereignty. The Almighty is all-powerful in every circumstance and over every opposing authority. Add the Lamb to these divine names and titles, and together they form the temple… God and the Lamb make themselves known throughout every part of the vast city of gold.
The name given to Him here points back to what He did:
On earth, coming into God's presence had to follow set rules. That need is gone. Now there is free and unhindered fellowship with God and with His ever-blessed Son, the Lamb. It is precious to hear Him mentioned again as the Lamb. His blessed work, which He accomplished, can never be forgotten by the saints in glory.
Scripture also describes a coming Jerusalem on earth, where the temple fills the picture. The two cities are not the same:
Instead of Jehovah's house being the centre of attraction, there is no temple, for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple. This is a complete contrast with the Jerusalem of that day. There the temple, with its rules and officials, fills by far the largest part of Ezekiel's last great vision (Ezek. 40 – 47)… The difference turns on relationship to Christ. The new Jerusalem is His heavenly bride, and reigns with Him. The earthly Jerusalem is the city of the great King, and He reigns over it.
This is not only about the future. It touches how believers come to God today:
No temple is seen here, because all are at home with God and the Lamb. A temple always gives the idea of the worshipper being at a distance from God; He is, as it were, enshrined, because of His holiness. Even now a temple is out of place for those whom the blood of Christ has brought near. Through the torn veil they have the right and title to approach God Himself.
That has a sharp edge to it. The city has no building and no priests standing in between. Putting both back is a step backwards:
The Christian world has walked very little in the light of the City. That is clear, because people have set up "temples" again after a Jewish pattern, with priests standing between the people and God. In this way it has completely lost the true idea of the Church, with Christ in the midst.
- Missing: A temple marked distance — God hidden behind a veil, man kept outside. The one thing missing from the city is the thing that kept worshippers back.
- Filled: Nothing replaces the temple, because God Himself does. The Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the sanctuary, and they fill every part of the city.
- Named: The titles gather up relationship, creative power, and unbeaten might. Then the Lamb is added, so His finished work is never forgotten.
- Equal: With no building there are no nearer and further worshippers. Access is immediate, and it is the same for everyone.
- Now: The blood of Christ has already brought believers near, and the torn veil already gives them this access. Setting temples and priests up again loses the true idea of the Church.
And the city has no need of the sun nor of the moon, that they should shine for it; for the glory of God has enlightened it, and the lamp thereof [is] the Lamb.
The city John sees needs no sun and no moon. That is not a lack; God's glory fills the place, and the Lamb carries that light. Two questions follow. Why does created light go? And why is the light-bearer the Lamb?
Sun and moon were made for the world we live in now. Where God Himself stands fully revealed, that arrangement is finished.
Created light, as we learn from Genesis 1, is for earth. But after Adam's fall, the only moral light, even for the earth, came from the revelation of God... So where God is fully revealed, there could be no need of created light. And "the glory of God" simply means the display of all that God is, as revealed in redemption, before His redeemed.
The absence of these lights is not poverty. The earthly city will have its lights improved; this city has moved past needing them at all.
As for the earthly land and city, the moon will have her light increased to that of the sun, and the sun shall be sevenfold. But here there is neither; and this again is evidence of gain, not of loss... Creature lights are gone.
The verse names two things: where the light comes from, and what carries it through the city.
The heavenly city needs no created light of its own, like the sun, and no borrowed light, like the moon. God is the source of her light, and the Lamb who died for us is the lamp of the divine glory. It is He who spreads the light through every part of the city. It is concentrated in God; it is made known by the Lamb.
There is a further point here. No one sees the glory of God directly.
Revelation 21:23 is no exception. If the glory of God gave light to the heavenly city, the Lamb is the "lamp" through whom that glory shines. Even now all its rays shine concentrated on His face for faith (2 Corinthians 3:18). Only in this indirect way could the divine glory ever be seen.
Of all His titles, this is the one that stands in the eternal scene.
Christ will always be the One in whom God is revealed. And He is presented as the Lamb, because as the Lamb He not only declares the glory of God but also fits His people for the glory. The sun and the moon did declare the glory of God in His handiwork in their time (Psalm 19). But in the church in glory, the Lamb will be the everlasting witness to the glory of God.
The name has a consequence that never ends.
Never throughout the unending ages shall the cross of Christ be forgotten. Never shall the burst of melody die down. The countless crowds He has ransomed will always adore Him. He once hung on Calvary's cross to redeem them.
The sun and the moon stand for a light this city has no use for. What shines instead does not stay inside the walls.
The sun and moon are natural lights, symbols of the natural mind of man. Such light will not be there. Where all will have the mind of Christ, it will not be needed. God is the light and the Lamb is the "Light-bearer" through whom the light reaches the City. The City reflects the light of Christ and the nations walk in the light of the City... God will be perfectly revealed in Christ, reflected by the Church and seen by the nations.
This is not a strange light. Faith already knows it.
It is the light that has already made everything so bright for our hearts — "the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God." It is the glory of God in the face of Jesus. God is always to be known in Him, the One in whom He was revealed in humiliation, the Man Christ Jesus. And we can look at the brightness of glory without being dazzled. We see it in the face of Him "who loved us and has washed us from our sins in His own blood."
That closing line follows an older translation. The ESV of Revelation 1:5 reads, "To him who loves us and has freed us from our sins by his blood."
- Source. The light starts with God's glory. The city shines because He is revealed there, not because anything shines on it.
- Lamp. The Lamb is the lamp who brings that glory to the city. Faith sees the same glory now, in the face of Christ.
- Sacrifice. The title "Lamb" keeps His death in view forever. The light never leaves the cross behind.
- Reflection. The city receives the light and gives it back, so that the nations walk by what shines from it.
- Result. The city no longer needs created lights. That is not a loss but a sign: nothing stands between God and His people.
And the nations shall walk by its light; and the kings of the earth bring their glory to it.
The Bible's closing vision shows a shining city, with whole nations and their rulers walking outside it in its light. Two questions shape this verse: when does this happen, and are the nations inside the city or outside?
Many read the whole chapter as a picture of eternity. One writer argues that two details here rule that out and point instead to the millennium, the thousand-year reign of Christ on earth.
These verses prove beyond contradiction that the heavenly city is shown here in connection with the millennial earth. There are no "nations" in eternity, and no "kings of the earth" to bring their glory and honour to it. If people had noticed this, they would have avoided the mistake, and they would have gained a valuable key to understanding the dispensations… The nations living during the millennial kingdom will be those spared in the judgments connected with the day of the Lord, brought in at the appearing of Christ.
Older English versions say the kings bring their glory "into" the city. Several writers argue for "to" instead, and the difference matters.
"And the nations shall walk in the light of it." It is plain that they are not in this city. "The kings of the earth do bring their glory and honour unto it" — not into but unto. That is, it is simply an expression of the homage that they pay.
Read that way, the gift becomes an admission about where everything the kings hold comes from.
They thereby acknowledge the heavens, and the heavenly kingdom, to be the source of all they possess and enjoy; they render homage to Him who is the Source.
If the nations stay outside while the city shines in glory, two different states exist at the same moment. One writer met the objection that this cannot be by pointing to a mountain scene the disciples once witnessed.
There is no need at all for the New Jerusalem, which receives the homage, and the nations with their kings to be alike or in the same state… Why should the nations and their kings not be in an earthly condition, while the New Jerusalem is glorified? Why should the city not match the transfigured Moses and Elijah, and the nations and kings match the disciples, still unchanged on the holy mountain? … The simple, natural meaning of the passage joins two different states together: a higher, heavenly one, and a lower, though blessed, earthly one.
The nations walk by means of the shining city. The church has that same job now, and one writer measures the future against the present.
"Of them that are saved," as is well known, has no authority, and it is "by," or "by means of," rather than "in," as in the received text. The world should have been able to walk by the light of the church now. "You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hidden." … But when the Lamb is the Lamp, the faithful and true Witness if all else has failed, the church will do its work for the nations as God intends. In glory it will become the perfect vessel for displaying the light by which they walk.
Another writer pictures how that light reaches the earth. The city passes on what it receives.
The holy city will hang above the earthly Jerusalem. It will send out the rays of the glory of God, which fill and surround it completely… The city enjoys the direct light within; the world gets the light of the glory passed on to it.
Commentators differ on whether the glory goes into the city or only up to it. Earlier in Revelation, "the kings of the earth" keep very different company, and one writer sets the two groups side by side.
Just as the light of God streams out of the heavenly city, so into it shall flow the glory and honour of the kings of the earth and of the nations. In Revelation 17:2 we saw the kings of the earth trading with the false Babylon before the coming of Christ. They have now gone to their doom, along with the nations who forgot God. The kings and nations of our chapter are those who have passed into millennial blessedness in happy subjection to the Lord.
- Light received. The glory of God fills the city, and it enjoys that light directly, from within.
- Light transmitted. What it takes in, it gives out; the nations below walk by means of the shining of the glorified church above.
- Light acknowledged. The kings bring their glory and honour to the city, paying homage to the Source of all they hold.
- Light timed. Nations and earthly kings do not exist in eternity. So this scene belongs to the thousand-year reign, with the heavenly city above the earth.
- Light owed now. The world should already walk by the church's light: "You are the light of the world." What the church fails at now, it will do perfectly then.
And its gates shall not be shut at all by day, for night shall not be there.
Revelation 21 describes the holy city, the new Jerusalem, coming down from God. Here John notes two things no walled city on earth has ever managed: gates that never close, and a day that never ends.
Every ancient city shut its gates because something outside could get in. In the holy city, that reason has vanished, along with the darkness that once made people uncertain of God.
"Its gates will never be shut by day — and there will be no night there." Perfect security — no need to shut those gates; and there is no darkness there. In John's writings, darkness means ignorance of God. Where does doubting come from — where uncertainty? From ignorance of God. All is gone now, and "there is no night there."
Set this beside the old Jerusalem. Nehemiah, rebuilding its walls, gave the opposite order.
During the night, and even when the least trace of darkness lay on the scene, the gates had to stay closed. Otherwise evil, and evil men who always love darkness rather than light, would slip in and corrupt the city. Later, when the gates of Jerusalem began to grow dark before the Sabbath, Nehemiah ordered them shut and told his men to keep them shut until the Sabbath was over. Servants of the enemy were always watching for a chance to slip in unnoticed and tempt the Jews to break the Sabbath day. So when Scripture says there will be no night in the heavenly city, the contrast teaches us that all evil is gone, and the gates will never be shut.
With no gate to close, something else keeps the city pure. One writer connects the unbroken day to the armour God gives believers now.
The light of an endless, unclouded day is sure protection for the entrance to the city, and it is enough. God already gives us that same light as the Christian's armour — "the armour of light." (Rom. 13:12.) For "anything that becomes visible is light." It detects and exposes everything unsuited to itself. So it guards the ways into the heart against anything that would spoil our enjoyment of the presence of Him who is light — and that is where He has set us.
Most cities open their gates to receive. This city opens them to give.
A great city like London keeps its gates open all the time. It depends on every part of the earth for its very life. From north, south, east, and west, supplies pour into it without stopping. But the holy city will open its gates for the opposite reason: not for supplies to flow in, but for blessing to flow out to the whole earth. This city of God will look out in every direction, and wherever it looks it will pour out its blessing.
An open gate can let things in as well as out. Verse 27 rules that out, and one writer draws a lesson from it.
Light and blessing pass out through the gates to the world. Yet Scripture assures us that "nothing unclean will ever enter it." Today we can become defiled by the world while we claim we are carrying blessing to it. In the day of glory the world will receive blessing through the church, and the world will leave no stain on the church.
Many read these verses as a picture of eternity. One writer argues from the wording itself that the scene belongs to Christ's coming reign on earth.
These verses show beyond contradiction that this passage links the heavenly city with the millennial earth. There are no "nations" in eternity, and no "kings of the earth" to bring their glory and honour to it.
Isaiah 60:11 makes a near-identical promise to the earthly Jerusalem. The small difference between the two matters.
Its gates are never shut, for inside it is continuous day. If we compare this with Isaiah 60:11, we find an instructive contrast. In that glad day the gates of the earthly Jerusalem will also stand open all the time. But there will be night there, for Isaiah says they shall not be shut day or night. The wealth of the nations, and their kings, will be brought into that city. So on earth things will be on a lower footing.
- No night — darkness hides evil and breeds doubt about God. It is gone, and everything else follows from that.
- No enemy — no darkness means no danger. Nehemiah barred his gates against evil; this city has none to bar out.
- No guard but light — light exposes everything unfit, so light is the city's protection. Believers wear that same "armour of light" now.
- No limit outward — the gates stand open on every side. Blessing flows out to the whole earth; nothing needs to flow in.
- No stain inward — the world receives blessing through the city, and the city takes no stain from the world. Today we often get that backwards.
And they shall bring the glory and the honour of the nations to it.
The closing vision of Revelation shows the holy city coming down from God, with the nations around it bringing what they treasure. Verse 24 named the kings; this line widens the tribute to whole nations, and raises the question of who may go inside.
The word "nations" tells us when this scene happens, who these nations are, and what they carry:
These verses show beyond argument that the heavenly city is presented here in connection with the earth of the thousand-year kingdom. The reason is plain: there are no "nations" in eternity, and no "kings of the earth" to bring their glory and honour to it. ... The nations living during that kingdom will be those spared in the judgments of the day of the Lord, which begins when Christ appears. ... The kings of the earth will bring some of their wealth, like the Queen of Sheba when she came to Jerusalem, as offerings that show their submissive homage.
Translations differ here. Some read "into it," others "to it," and commentators say the difference matters:
The word translated "into" should be given as "to," or "unto." Otherwise it would seem as if the kings of the earth had access into the heavenly city! ... The kings of the earth will pay their homage by bringing their glory and honour to it as offerings. In this way they recognise it as the object of God's delight, and as the place where God displays His presence and glory, because the throne of God and the Lamb are there.
Another writer ties this homage to Jerusalem on earth:
They will not come into the city. They will show their allegiance to it by willing tribute. Zechariah 14:16-19 explains this further. It shows that the nations must send representatives to Jerusalem on earth every year to keep the Feast of Booths. Jerusalem in Israel will be God's centre on earth. By recognising this, the nations own their allegiance to the heavenly city, the capital of heaven and earth, for God dwells there.
Verse 24 already said the kings bring their glory. So why say it again? The difference lies in who brings:
In verse 24 it is the kings of the earth who bring their glory and honour. In verse 26 it is the glory and honour of the nations that are brought. The same distinction appears in the thousand-year kingdom. Of the honour to be given to the Messiah, Psalm 72:11 says, "May all kings fall down before Him, all nations serve Him!" Both the rulers and their peoples will be of one mind... Now kings and nations serve and exalt themselves. But then... rulers and their subjects will present their glory and honour to the heavenly Jerusalem. They will own their allegiance and pay their tribute to the exalted King of kings and Lord of lords!
The city has no temple inside it. Yet the nations bring gifts to it as people bring gifts to a temple:
It has no temple, for "its temple is the Lord God the Almighty and the Lamb." But to it, as to a temple, the kings of the earth bring their glory and honour. And the kings are not the only ones who come to it this way: they bring the glory and honour of the nations to it.
The gates of the city never shut. So can anything walk in? The next verse answers:
No danger threatens the city; on the contrary, "They shall bring the glory and the honour of the nations to it." ... "But nothing unclean will ever enter it, nor anyone who does what is detestable or false, but only those who are written in the Lamb's book of life." So God's holiness is given the fullest scope. The impure, the detestable and the false are shut out from His presence. They are unfit for it morally and in every way. Yet His sovereignty is kept intact.
One writer traces the direction of it all. Everything good comes down; everything valued goes back up:
Heaven is acknowledged as the source of all light, glory and blessing... And to it they bring honour and glory. The open gates, never closed, mean security. They also suggest contact and exchange with the earth.
- Light down. Heaven is the source of all light, glory and blessing for the earth below.
- Tribute up. Glory and honour travel the other way, carried to the city and not into it. No earthly king walks through those gates.
- Kings and nations. Verse 24 has rulers bringing their own glory. This verse widens it to whole nations, so rulers and peoples are of one mind.
- A temple without a temple. The city holds no temple building. Yet the nations treat it as one and send their gifts where God and the Lamb dwell.
- Timing. Nations and kings of the earth do not exist in eternity. So this scene shows the city over the earth of the thousand-year kingdom.
And nothing common, nor that maketh an abomination and a lie, shall at all enter into it; but those only who [are] written in the book of life of the Lamb.
The last word on the New Jerusalem is a boundary line: what can never get in, and who alone does.
One writer compares the city with Eden, the garden where human life began:
No evil. "Nothing unclean will ever enter it." There will be no intrusion of the flesh to defile. There will be nothing that can raise an idol between the soul and God — no abomination. There will be nothing that deceives — no lie. And it is not only that the flesh, with its defilements, abominations and lies is not here, but that it can never enter there. This was never said of the garden of delights on earth. There everything was perfect as God created it. But of Eden it was never said that evil could never enter. In the City we have not only a City of perfection, but a City beyond the possibility of defilement.
The verse states the matter twice over — first who cannot come, then who can. Each disqualification points to a different root of evil:
The character or qualifications of those who will enter this city of pure gold must be left in no doubt. So it is put in two ways. First comes what disqualifies a person, then the absolute and unassailable title. Three kinds of people will never pass through those gates of pearl. No one with the guilt of sin still on him, for it is sin in its many forms and expressions that defiles. No one who has an evil nature, for it is sin in the flesh which, breaking out, works abomination. And no one who is morally of the family of Satan, who is a liar and the father of lies (John 8:44).
The verse does not stop at what is shut out. Its last clause states why anyone is let in:
The verse solemnly condemns moral unfitness; but it declares sovereign grace as well, in the last clause. Only those who were objects of God's love could be admitted here.
The book carries the Lamb's name for a reason:
The book of life records the names of saints for eternal life in glory. It is called the book of life of the Lamb, and of the Lamb slain. The book is His because He was slain. That is His right according to God's eternal purposes: He died to mark out those who are His own and to secure their eternal interests.
Some readers worry that a name could be dropped from the book of life. One writer answers by pointing to when the names were written:
The Lamb's book of life contains names written in it before the founding of the world... This is the book of the counsels and purposes of God, who knows the end from the beginning... The Lamb's book of life is the record of reality, and out of that book no name is blotted out.
If nothing defiled enters, the obvious question is how defiled people ever get in. The answer is that God Himself makes them fit:
God is "of purer eyes than to see evil." If believers are saved, it is only because He has qualified them "to share in the inheritance of the saints in light." No evil can exist in the presence of His light... None can be there but those written in the Lamb's book of life — those whom He has fitted by His own grace for His own presence.
The city is not just where the saved will live. One writer takes the verse as naming who has to do with the New Jerusalem:
I take Revelation 21:27 in a general way as stating who they are that have to do with the New Jerusalem — those written in the Lamb's book of life. We must always remember that the Church, or the bride, is that holy city. The city is not merely the region of our future glory.
The city's purity is not only a future fact. It carries a warning for today:
Today, under the excuse of carrying blessing to the world, we may become defiled by the world. In the day of glory the world will receive blessing through the church, and the church will be unsullied by the world.
- Shut out. The verse bars three roots of evil: guilt that defiles, a nature that works abomination, and kinship with the father of lies.
- Sealed. Unlike Eden, this city is not merely free of evil — evil has no possible entrance.
- Written. Entry rests on a register named for the Lamb, His by right because He was slain, and no name is removed from it.
- Fitted. Nobody qualifies by being clean; those inside were made fit by His grace for His presence.
- Reflected. What the city will be — pure while blessing the world — is what those who belong to it are called to be now.
And he shewed me a river of water of life, bright as crystal, going out of the throne of God and of the Lamb.
Scripture's last chapter opens with a river, and where it flows from settles everything: a throne. John is still seeing the holy city, and what pours out of that throne is not judgment but life.
The wording marks a moment. One commentator notes that this title for the throne belongs to one stretch of time. The river takes its character from it.
The opening verse lays down a beautiful truth. At the point intended, the throne is now called the throne of God and the Lamb. It was not so before He came to reign. It will not be so when He hands over the kingdom to God the Father, when God — Father, Son, and Holy Spirit — shall be all in all. And out of this throne, now called for the first time the throne of God and the Lamb, comes a river of life bright as crystal. It is the full, unhindered power of enjoying that eternal life which the believer has here in utter weakness and with many hindrances. Such is its source, its character, and its time.
Why is the Lamb named beside God at this throne? One writer shows what that name does to a sinner's fear of it.
"The throne of God" expresses eternal stability. The presence of the Lamb marks it as resting on the immediate ground of accomplished redemption. It is not God's throne in creation, nor in providence, but in redemption. When I see the Lamb, I know its connection with me as a sinner. "The throne of God," on its own, would only frighten me away. But when God reveals Himself in the Person of the Lamb, He draws the heart and quiets the conscience.
One writer sets this river beside what John once saw coming out of the same throne.
First, there is "the river of the water of life" (v. 1), a symbol of the fulness of life in the Spirit flowing from the throne. Earlier in Revelation, John was caught up to heaven. He records that lightning, thunder and voices came out of the throne — fitting symbols of the holy judgments of God that were about to come from it. Here we have passed beyond the judgment. We learn that the throne which dealt out judgment to the nations has become the source of unceasing blessing to the City. For the City, the judgments of the throne were exhausted at the Cross.
One writer measures human government against this throne.
No earthly throne — not even the best of them — has proved itself to be a fountain of life. Their rule has been too harsh or too weak. Or their decisions have passed through lesser human channels and reached the people polluted. Here at last is a throne of absolute righteousness, exercised in kindness, and life is the result. What is more, nothing defiling can touch the city from which it flows out to men, so no pollution reaches it as it flows.
The clearness of the water is not decoration. One writer holds it against what our own lives reflect. (Where the ESV says bright as crystal, older translations read clear as crystal.)
Any small reflection of Christ seen in one another will help to sustain the new life. But in ourselves the stream is often fouled and muddied with the things of earth, so it reflects little of the loveliness of Christ. In Christ the river of water of life is "clear as crystal."
Scripture's first garden also had water and trees, and it ended with man shut out.
Notice there is only one river here, and only one tree. You will remember Genesis 2. There were four rivers there, and two trees — the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, and the tree of life. When man sinned, he was driven out, so that he could not touch the tree of life. But when he was driven out of the earthly paradise, God opened a heavenly one to him.
The vision is future. Yet one writer says its substance belongs to believers now.
In each fresh feature of the heavenly city, we have seen the same thing. What glory pictures, the Holy Spirit has already made true to faith in the Christian... The Holy Spirit has come from the glory where Jesus is, and He lives in us. In the knowledge of Him, He brings into our hearts more than all the joy of the feast of tabernacles in the coming kingdom. He makes us channels of the living waters now.
- Source — Everything depends on the throne. The river has no other spring, and whose throne it is sets its character.
- Lamb — That throne is named for redemption, not creation or providence. God alone on the throne would drive a sinner off; the Lamb there draws him in.
- Reversal — Lightning and thunder once came out of this throne. The cross exhausted that judgment, so now life flows out instead.
- Purity — Clear as crystal. No pollution reaches the stream, because nothing defiling touches the city it flows through.
- Now — What John saw in glory, the Holy Spirit already makes real to faith. He makes believers channels of the same living water today.
In the midst of its street, and of the river, on this side and on that side, [the] tree of life, producing twelve fruits, in each month yielding its fruit; and the leaves of the tree for healing of the nations.
The tree stands in the middle of the street and on both sides of the river. Writers take the river and the tree as a pair, each pointing to a Person.
Second, we learn that in the midst of the street of the City and on either side of the river is the tree of life (v. 2). The river speaks of the Holy Spirit as the Water of Life; the Tree speaks of Christ as the Food of Life. The City will stay fresh for ever as it drinks from the River of Life and feeds on the Tree of Life. The River will never fail, the Tree will never wither and the City will never grow old.
Eden had a tree of life too. One writer marks what the new scene has that Eden did not.
In Eden's paradise there was no "healing" power; there was the tree of life, but only death for the disobedient. Man on the earth has his portion in the goodness of a God who is showing His kingdom openly. From the heavenly city comes provision for healing the nations.
Eden also held a second tree, the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. One writer traces both trees to Christ.
Both trees in Paradise find their answer in Christ, and in Him they agree: the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, sometimes called the tree of responsibility, and the tree of life. On the cross He took up the question of man's responsibility and settled it for ever, as the claims of God's glory required. Then, risen out of death, He became the tree of life for all His people.
Older translations read "twelve manner of fruits," which suggests twelve different kinds. One writer says that wording is wrong:
The words "manner of" are omitted because they misrepresent the fact stated. It is not twelve kinds of fruit. As the next clause shows, it is twelve fruits: one crop gathered every month, a picture of fruitfulness that never ends.
Others read the twelve as variety, and see in it something the city keeps discovering:
The fruits speak of the varied glories of Christ. It is not enough to know and feed upon Christ in one aspect. We need Christ in His fulness. The City will stay fresh for ever as His graces and excellencies unfold one after another.
Healing here reaches whole nations, and it comes through what they see in Christ.
For long centuries the nations have been torn by strife and violence. They will find healing when they come to appreciate the beauty of Christ, for the leaves show His outward beauty. A leaf from the Tree of Life will end strife and conflict, jealousy and distrust. Christ seen in the perfection of His way will end strife among the nations, just as knowing Christ in His graces brings healing among the Lord's people today.
The same tree meets two needs at once.
The tree of life is there, on either side of the river of life. No other tree stands there to threaten death. The tree of life bears full, varied and constant fruit for those inside. It also gives gracious help to the need of those outside: its leaves are for the healing of the nations.
What believers do now — feed first, then pass blessing on — carries into glory.
While we feed on the fruit of it, "the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations." When the church is in glory, it will not lose the character of grace. God now gives us the bread of life to feed on. Our first delight must be in God. Then, in second place, comes the joy of love when He makes us ministers of blessing to others.
Details in the verse itself fix the period it describes.
This glorious tree again bears the mark of the number twelve. Its fruit comes in twelve kinds, and it yields twelve times a year. The fruits seem to be for the heavenly city, but even its leaves bring healing to the nations. The mention of months, of nations and of healing shows that the whole scene belongs to the millennium and not to the eternal state.
- Cause — Christ settled the question of man's responsibility at the cross, then rose as the tree of life for His people.
- Gift — the river pictures the Spirit as the water of life; the tree pictures Christ as the food of life. Neither fails, so the city never grows old.
- Fullness — twelve fruits every month picture supply that never stops. Some writers also see the many glories of Christ unfolding inside the city.
- Reach — what the city enjoys as fruit reaches the nations as leaves; grace does not stop at the city wall.
- Result — healing means the end of strife, jealousy and distrust among nations. Months, nations and healing all point to the kingdom age, not eternity.
And no curse shall be any more; and the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it; and his servants shall serve him,
The Bible's last chapter closes the story Genesis opened. The verse names three things: the curse is gone, the throne of God and of the Lamb stands in the city, and His people worship Him there.
The Bible speaks of the curse long before this verse ends it. One writer traces where it fell.
When sin entered the world the serpent, its source, was cursed (Genesis 3:14), and the ground too (verse 17). Cain, who added to his father's sin and completed it, so to speak, was also cursed (Genesis 4:11). All who are under the works of the law are under the curse (Galatians 3:10). But in the heavenly Jerusalem there is no more curse with its long train of ills and miseries. Neither the curse nor its dreadful effects can ever enter the holy city of God, surrounded by His glory.
The curse did not simply fade. One writer points to thorns to show who carried it.
And then, there is to be no more curse — God and the Lamb shall be in it. The Lamb bore the curse. Thorns the earth was to bring forth, as the product of the curse, and thorns were pressed onto His holy head. He bore the curse that He might remove it.
How much of this belongs to the thousand-year reign of Christ, and how much only to eternity? One writer holds that the earth is not yet wholly free of the curse even in that reign.
Now that the curse is gone, all is unmixed blessing in the city. The throne of God and of the Lamb ensure perfect truth and righteousness, yet with perfect grace in administration (v. 3). During the thousand year reign (the Millennium) the curse of Genesis 3:17-19 is largely removed from the earth, but not completely. Isaiah 65:17-25 says so, and verse 20 in particular. Only exceptional cases will call for a curse.
This throne has appeared all through the book. Here it carries a new name, and it does new work.
Note here, the throne of God and the Lamb are now in it. That throne, which was acting in judgment to bring about blessing, was now fixed in the heavenly city; but it is not the seat of judgment now. The Lamb still holds its place in the scene, and it is the throne of the Lamb as well as of God. The reader will notice that now for the first time it is called the throne of the Lamb.
The verse gives the throne as the reason there is no curse. One writer explains why a holy throne means lasting joy.
The reason given here is that "the throne of God and of the Lamb" is in it. That throne is supreme, and all own it as supreme. Its perfect government therefore secures a state according to God. God's holiness, shown in His throne, will be the eternal guarantee of the happiness of the redeemed. And His love, and the love of the Lamb, will be their eternal and satisfying portion.
The verse names God and the Lamb, then speaks of one Master: "his servants will worship him." Older translations read "serve him." One writer asks the obvious question — whom do they serve?
They are His servants, and now no one else divides their allegiance with Him. Without reserve "they serve Him." Serve whom, it may be asked — God or the Lamb? Here, as often in his writings, John draws no distinction; he speaks of both as one. There is but one throne named, but One whom they serve, but One whom they see, but One whose name is written on their foreheads.
Everything that spoils service now will be gone.
Ours will be a service without stopping, without weariness, without flagging energy. In joy and freedom our service then will be one of pure love, without a flaw, and without one legal thought. How varied the character of service will be! How gladly the whole being enters on an eternal life of service to Him!
This scene is the reality, and it shapes how believers come to God today.
They shall serve and they shall reign at the same time. They shall then be openly priests and kings. But grace has already made them so. Knowing this, they have the privilege of drawing near by faith to that glorious place where they will one day truly stand. Our best instruction is gathered by looking forward.
- Curse — cancelled. It began on the serpent, the ground, and Cain, and rested on all under the law; not one trace of it enters the holy city.
- Cost — the Lamb. The earth's thorns were pressed on His head; He bore the curse to take it away.
- Throne — no longer judging. For the first time it is called the throne of God and of the Lamb, now pouring out life instead of judgment.
- Master — one. God and the Lamb are named, yet the verse says "him" — one throne, one Master, one name.
- Servants — finally free. Service without weariness, without a flaw, without a legal thought. Looking ahead to it teaches us to draw near by faith today.
and they shall see his face; and his name [is] on their foreheads.
Revelation 22:4 closes the description of the holy city with two promises: sight of His face, and His name on the forehead. One answers a refusal God once gave; the other says whose the redeemed are.
Moses once asked to see God's glory, and God said no.
Then comes that glorious statement, "they shall see His face." His face and His glory go together in the revealing of Himself. The law was given, and broken. Then Moses found grace in God's sight, and this made him bold, so he said, "Please show me your glory." The answer was: "You cannot see my face, for man shall not see me and live." Under grace the contrast is great. Now we can say, "God … has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ." But what we have here goes far beyond that. Brought into favour, we shall live in the full light of the knowledge of God, perfectly revealed in Christ. The prayer of our Lord will be fulfilled: "that they also, whom you have given me, may be with me where I am, to see my glory." We shall see the face of God for ever, as we behold Him.
The face now radiant is the same face men once treated with contempt.
"They shall see His face," that face once covered so shamefully with the spit of men, now radiant with the glory of God. The best wine of the kingdom is being poured out. We shall see His face.
In the Bible, seeing someone's face means you are welcome before them. David shut his son Absalom out of his presence — his order, in older translations, reads "let him not see my face."
They shall moreover see His face. We read that the Lord spoke to Moses face to face, as a man speaks to his friend. David, on the other hand, gave orders about Absalom: "Let him return to his own house; he is not to come into my presence." So to see the Lamb's face in glory means close approach and the enjoyment of His presence. It is a place of nearness, and of honour and blessing too. This alone tells us of the saints' perfect condition, just as John writes: "We know that when he appears we shall be like him, because we shall see him as he is."
A name on the brow first says whose they are. The exact wording here adds a second thought.
We have already seen that the name worn on the forehead first means ownership: it marks out those who have it as belonging to Christ. This says a great deal. To be His is the sum of eternal blessedness, for it brings us into everlasting association with Him, both now and in heaven itself. There is, however, another thought. In chapter 14 the Name is "written" on their foreheads; here it is only said to be there. We gather from this distinction that here the leading feature is moral conformity to the One whose name they bear. … What joy it will be to the Lord Himself, as He looks over the countless crowds of His glorified saints, to see His own likeness shining from every face!
If His name is on every brow, then the labels people carried on earth are finished.
They will see His face and He will be seen in their faces… The names we have borne on earth will have passed forever. No more will "thief" be written on the brow of the saved criminal, nor "sinner" on the woman of Luke 7:36-39, nor will "Pharisee" be seen on the face of Saul of Tarsus. These names will have passed with the lives that earned them, and the Name of Christ alone will be written on every sinless brow.
Revelation has already shown the beast marking foreheads. This mark is its opposite, and it carries a call for today.
His name will be stamped on our foreheads. That is the opposite of the number of the Beast stamped on the foreheads of the ungodly (Rev. 13:15-16). This should speak to us now. It should encourage us to give the world a clear confession of His name in both our words and ways.
- Barred — God told Moses that no one can see His face and live; here He gives what He once refused.
- Beheld — the face shining in glory is the face men once spat on.
- Belonging — in Scripture, to see a person's face is to be welcome before them; the name on the brow says whose they are.
- Likeness — here the name is not written but simply is there. It marks a character like His in every face, and every old label — thief, sinner, Pharisee — is gone.
- Now — the mark of Christ answers the beast's mark, and it calls for a plain confession of His name in our words and ways today.
And night shall not be any more, and no need of a lamp, and light of [the] sun; for [the] Lord God shall shine upon them, and they shall reign to the ages of ages.
The vision of the holy city ends with two facts: God is the light, and His people reign. Both last for ever. That raises two questions: what exactly goes, and how long is "forever and ever"?
This verse is not a new subject. It is the last line of a long description of the city, and one writer treats it as that whole vision packed into a sentence.
This is, so to speak, the summary of the blessings the heavenly saints, the Church, enjoy in the state of the thousand-year kingdom. And what a summary! All darkness gone for ever. God Himself is their blessed source of light — not now through instruments, but in His own person. He shines upon them in all His glory, and they are able to rejoice in the glory.
Night is more than the absence of sunshine. One writer reads darkness as not knowing God — something that still dims our light today.
Not only will the light of the City never cease, it will never grow dim. Darkness is ignorance of God even as light is the knowledge of God. Today our light is often hindered by our ignorance. Our ignorance comes mostly from trying to walk in the light of our own reason, instead of walking by the light of Christ and so having His mind.
There is a second loss when night ends. Darkness is also the cover under which wrong things happen.
This verse repeats the fact that there is no night there. So evil gets no chance to work under cover of darkness, and there are no times of dark, dismal experience.
The verse names two kinds of light. One writer points to their two different makers — one man, one God — and says the city needs neither.
Man makes the "lamp," and God has made the "sun," but there is no need for either there. Everything that suits this world, and everything it needs, is past for the heavenly saints — the Bride, the Lamb's wife — and they "will reign forever and ever."
God Himself is the light of that city. One writer turns that into a question for today: would God alone be enough if every other light went out?
The sun stands for God's natural mercies. He is so full of tenderness and mercy that He gives us these things richly to enjoy. He did not spare His own Son, so will He not with Him freely give us all things? These natural gifts are, in a way, light to us. But suppose we lost them. What then? Suppose every natural joy, every comfort, every earthly ray of light were gone. Suppose we also lost everything we have made for ourselves, which is what the lamp pictures. Could we still say, "The Lord God gives us light — He is enough"?
The saints do reign a thousand years over the earth. But this verse says something longer.
There is no night there, and no need of light, for the Lord God gives it. As to their state, they reign — not for the thousand years, as they do over the earth, but for ever and ever.
Another writer weighs the exact wording, and sets it beside the kingdom Christ hands over.
The expression "to the ages of the ages," I believe, carries its strongest sense here. It does not refer only to what we call "the kingdom," though of course the reigning begins then. In 1 Corinthians 15:24 Christ delivers up a kingdom at a definite point called "the end."
The people who reign here were once slaves. One writer traces the crown back to its cause.
These people were once sinners — slaves of Satan, and of the lusts he held them by. The priceless blood of Jesus has set them free and brought them into the communion with the Father and the Son shown here. How could words less glowing than these describe their condition? They need no lamp or light of the sun, because the Lord God gives them light; and they reign forever and ever.
One writer adds that reigning is not the only thing they will do.
We cannot forget that service matters just as much in our lives as reigning. Both will be in perfect balance in that day.
- Night ends. No darkness means no ignorance of God and no cover for evil — the light never ceases and never dims.
- Lights end. Man's lamp and God's sun both go. Everything that suits this world is over for the heavenly city.
- God gives. He is the light Himself, in person, not through instruments — and the test now is whether He is enough when other lights go out.
- The reign extends. Not the thousand years only. Writers take "to the ages of the ages" in its strongest sense — past the point where Christ delivers up the kingdom.
- Grace explains it. Former slaves of Satan reign forever through the priceless blood of Jesus — and serving stands in perfect balance with reigning in that day.
And he said to me, These words [are] faithful and true; and [the] Lord God of the spirits of the prophets has sent his angel to shew to his bondmen the things which must soon come to pass.
The last vision has closed. Now the angel stamps the whole book with a guarantee: these words hold, they come from the God who stood behind every earlier prophet, and they are meant for servants. Two questions run through the verse. How do we know these things are true? And why does it call events still future "soon"?
The affirmation here is not the first of its kind. One writer traces a chain of witnesses running through the book, each one certifying that God's words and ways hold good.
We have several solemn statements about the faithfulness and truth of God in His words and ways: by saints (Rev. 15:3; Rev. 19:2); by the altar (Rev. 16:7); by God Himself (Rev. 21:5); and here by an angel. These prophetic visions, one by one and as a whole, call for our closest and deepest attention. Not because of how they bear on us, but because the glory of our Master and the blessing of the world are bound up with the faithfulness and truth of what God here unfolds about the future.
The guarantee comes just where a reader needs it — right after a picture of glory so vast it sounds too good to be true.
Here we are looking at glories that stretch out into eternity. They would be beyond belief if they were not guaranteed to us as "faithful and true."
Manuscripts differ here: some read "the holy prophets," others "the spirits of the prophets." Taking that second reading, the title says something about how God worked in the men who spoke for Him.
The Lord God directed and controlled the feelings, the hopes and the varied experiences of the prophets of old. He was with them, as He is with us. This unity of moral action links us with the prophets of old, in how we walk and in how we grasp the hopes revealed then and now.
The same title also says something about history itself — that the God who spoke through the prophets is the God who is present now.
"The Lord God of the spirits of the prophets" — the reading now generally admitted to be right — emphasizes for us the presence of the living God as what was for these the constant realization in all the shifting scenes of human history... God in past history, God in the events happening under our eyes, His judgment therefore of everything while controlling everything for His own glory and for the blessing of His people.
The wording of the verse reaches backwards. One writer finds three signals here, and ties them to the faithful group in Israel who will read this book after the church is gone.
The names "Lord God," Jehovah Elohim, must take us back to the Old Testament ground of prophecy. The reason is that the faithful remnant in this book, after the church is gone, will be Jewish, under law, and held up by Jewish hopes... The term "the holy prophets" points to the same conclusion, and "the spirits of the prophets" — if we take the reading mentioned — points to it more sharply still.
The verse names its audience: servants, just as the book's opening chapter did. Older translations say "bondmen" — slaves who belong to a master. That word decides who gets the good of the book.
Here we return to the announcement of the first chapter. The book is, above all, a practical book. It is not for theorists or dreamers, but for servants. These are words to keep, and to apply in their service in the Church and in the world.
Some find the book confusing. One writer puts the trouble with the reader, not the text.
For many people this is a mysterious and confusing book, and they call it all kinds of unflattering things. But it is a revelation of Jesus Christ... Anyone who is not a true bondman of the Lord Jesus, who has not been bought by Him, and who has not realized that we are His to serve Him, will not gain much from Revelation.
Centuries have passed, so why "soon"? One answer sets the church period outside God's prophetic clock altogether.
In the Old Testament the events foretold are described as far off. Here they are things that "must soon take place." The reason is that the Church period always stands outside the course of time. It is an interval, a break in the count, which grace may lengthen, but which may end at any moment. So believers are to be constantly expecting the coming of the Lord.
Another reads the word as describing the pace of the events themselves once they begin.
Our centuries are only so many minutes on God's great clock! We are inclined to think, though, that this word also means that when God acts, He acts swiftly... When Jesus comes it will not be a slow, drawn-out event, but like a flash of lightning.
- Sealed — The book ends as it began, with a guarantee. Saints, the altar, God Himself and now an angel all certify that these words are faithful and true.
- Sourced — The Sender is the God who directed the hopes, feelings and experiences of the prophets of old. He was with them, and He is with us.
- Sent — The name "Lord God" takes us back to Old Testament ground, and points to the faithful people in Israel who read this book after the church is gone.
- Servants — God shows it to His servants. It is a practical book for those who serve, not for theorists or dreamers, and it gives little to anyone who has not owned Christ's claim.
- Soon — The events are near because the church interval stands outside the count of time, and because God, when He acts, acts fast.
And behold, I come quickly. Blessed [is] he who keeps the words of the prophecy of this book.
Near the end of the book, the Lord Himself takes over from His messenger and speaks. He joins a promise about His return to a blessing on those who keep His words. Two questions follow. How can a coming we still wait for be called soon? And what does it mean to keep the words of a book full of visions?
Up to this point an angel has been the messenger. Now the speaker changes. One writer sees the same shift in the Old Testament.
The angel speaks in verse 6. Now the Lord Himself speaks through the lips of the angel, because the testimony is His own. This move from the prophet to the One whose messenger the prophet was is often found in the Old Testament.
That change of speaker changes the weight of the words. The ESV reads "I am coming soon"; older translations say "quickly," and the writers quoted here work from that older word.
"Behold, I come quickly." It is the voice of Christ we hear. It is not the announcement of a prophetic event, but the authoritative word of the Lord Himself. Three times, in different settings, He announces His coming (vv. 7, 12, 20).
One writer compares it with the word "shortly" in verse 6 and finds two ideas in it.
The word translated "shortly" is almost the same as the word translated "quickly" in the next verse... Our centuries are only so many minutes on God's great clock! We also think this word is meant to show that when God acts, His action is marked by swiftness... When Jesus comes, it will not be slow and drawn out. It will be like a flash of lightning.
The long delay since then raises an obvious question.
How can "quickly" fit with a long delay of nearly two thousand years? We have to adjust the way we count, and measure time as the Lord does. "Beloved, do not overlook this one fact, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day" (2 Peter 3:8).
The blessing here echoes one given at the book's opening, but the wording shifts.
"He" (not "they," as in Rev. 1:3) "who keeps the words of the prophecy of this book" is called "blessed." So the blessing at the beginning of the book is repeated at the close, only here it seems more personal... To keep these words is to treasure them, to prize them, and to act on them.
Because keeping reaches into behaviour, failing to keep leaves visible marks.
Keeping these blessed words means more than believing them. Their power is to shape our conduct and walk. What godly lives God's people would live, what unselfish and sacrificing lives, if they always remembered the One who says three times in the last chapter of the Bible, "Behold, I come quickly." Look at the terrible results in the Christian world today, because people have not kept the sayings of the prophecy of this book.
The two halves of the verse are not separate thoughts. One depends on the other.
We will only value the sayings of this prophecy as our souls live in the faith and enjoyment of the great truth of the Lord's coming. No one will interpret Revelation rightly unless they believe and cherish the truth of the second coming of Christ.
Kept this way, the book steadies the reader.
So we are warned not to neglect Revelation, as if what it contains were a matter of idle curiosity with no bearing on our daily Christian lives. We are urged to heed and treasure the truths it speaks of. Only as we do so will our spirits be kept calm while the turning away from the faith grows in the Christian world.
Commentators differ over who is in view. Some read it as spoken to those who will live through the scenes the book describes:
Those who keep it are the people the book is about, who are warned that Christ will soon be there. No doubt we can all profit from it, but we are not in the scenes it describes... Verse 7 was a warning, in the form of a blessing, to those in the circumstances spoken of, to keep the sayings of the book.
Another writer applies it to our expectation now, and rules out waiting for signs first:
To have any thought other than that Jesus is coming quickly is to lose the blessing of keeping the prophetic sayings of this book. It is good to read the signs of the times in the light of these words... But it is a mistake and a misuse to treat such signs as obstacles to the coming of the Lord — to say, until I see this or that forerunner arrive, I cannot expect Jesus in my heart.
- Speaker — the angel steps back and Christ speaks. This is His own word, not a prophetic bulletin. He says it three times in the closing verses.
- Soon — the word fits God's way of counting time, and it also points to swift action. His coming will be like a flash of lightning.
- Keep — to keep the words is to treasure them, prize them, and act on them. Believing them is not enough. They are meant to shape how we live.
- Link — the promise and the blessing hold together. Only those who cherish His coming will value or rightly read this book.
- Result — words kept this way keep the soul calm as the Christian world drifts. No event on the horizon can be treated as a delay to Him.
And I, John, [was] he who heard and saw these things. And when I heard and saw, I fell down to do homage before the feet of the angel who shewed me these things.
At the end of the book John names himself as the man who heard and saw it all. Then, overwhelmed by what he has seen, he falls at the angel's feet. His impulse to worship was right. Its object was wrong. What the angel says next settles who may receive worship and who may not.
The writer signs the book with his own name, and commentators see no puzzle over who he is.
The name John occurs five times (Rev. 1:1, 4, 9; Rev. 21:2; Rev. 22:8), three times at the beginning and twice near the close of the book... It seems foolish to raise any question about the John of Revelation. There is only one John. The Christian heart turns at once to the beloved apostle, the disciple whom Jesus loved. There was only one such person, and without doubt God granted him these visions and messages. John is the writer of the book.
Commentators give two explanations. The first looks at what John was seeing.
When John heard and saw these things, he fell down to worship at the feet of the angel who showed them. He had done so before (Rev. 19:10). The greatness of the vision may have led him to think that it was Christ Himself taking that form. But the angel corrects him at once... instead of being the Lord and an object of worship, the angel was the fellow-servant of John, and of John's brothers the prophets.
The other traces it to the voice John had just been listening to.
Remember that the Lord Himself had spoken in person through the angel. John may have been so absorbed with this one voice, "Behold, I am coming soon," that for the moment he forgot the messenger through whom He had spoken. But even if that is so, it could not be allowed.
The failure came at the peak of his devotion, not away from it.
This warns us of the mistakes that the holiest of men can make when they are most caught up with heavenly things. John falls at the angel's feet to worship him. But the angel refuses it. He claims no higher title than fellow-servant with John himself, with his brothers the prophets, and with all who keep the words of this book. And he adds, "Worship God" — worship, that is, no creature.
There is a further danger. The messenger God uses can come between a person and the Lord.
John tells us that he saw and heard these things, and the effect was overwhelming... Again we find this honoured man at the angel's feet, worshipping that bright messenger who had shown him these things. Again the honoured messenger came between him and the Lord. He makes an idol of the instrument. He worships the creature, though he did it without knowing.
The refusal is instant, and it puts the angel in the same rank as the reader.
The impulse to worship was doubtless right, though falling at the feet of the angelic messenger was wrong. The angel refused it at once, for he took the place of a servant only, and in that respect stood on a level with John, or the prophets, or indeed with all who obey the word of God. Worship belongs to God alone. No holy angel will accept it, though it is the dearest desire of Satan, the great fallen angel, as Matthew 4:9 shows.
The angel carried God's message, but that gave him no claim to worship. Earlier in the book John fell at other feet, and there his worship found a welcome.
Though the angel has brought God's message, John must not treat him as God. He is John's fellow-servant, a dependent creature, but one who keeps the truth which God has given. John must worship only God (v. 9). In Revelation 1:17 John lies at the feet of the Lord Jesus, and there the Lord fully receives his worship, for Christ is God. But no creature must dare to accept such worship.
Why record a failure at all? One suggestion is that others were already doing the same thing.
It is all the more striking, with this on record, that the worship of angels crept into the Church so early — long before this book was written. (See Colossians 2) So it is possible that John's mistake, made twice, was recorded to condemn a widespread practice, and also to teach plainly that no beings, however exalted, must ever come between God and the souls of His people.
- Signed. John names himself as the one who heard and saw, putting the weight of an eyewitness behind the whole book.
- Overwhelmed. Glory misdirected him. Either he took the angel for Christ, or the voice so gripped him that he forgot the messenger.
- Repeated. He had done this once before. The holiest people can stumble when they are most caught up with heaven.
- Refused. The angel claims no title higher than fellow-servant. He stands with John, the prophets, and everyone who keeps this book.
- Redirected. Worship stops at no creature and rests only on God — and Christ, who received John's worship, is God.
And he says to me, See [thou do it] not. I am thy fellow-bondman, and [the fellow-bondman] of thy brethren the prophets, and of those who keep the words of this book. Do homage to God.
Why would John do this at all? One writer suggests what lay behind it.
When John heard and saw these things, he fell down to worship at the feet of the angel who showed them to him. He had done so before (Revelation 19:10). Perhaps the splendour of the vision led him to think it was Christ Himself taking that form. But the angel corrects him at once.
Another writer gives a different reason.
Once before, the visions had so overwhelmed John that he fell down to worship the angel (Revelation 19:10). It may surprise us that he did again what was forbidden then. But remember: the Lord Himself had spoken in person through the angel. John may have been so absorbed with that one voice — "Behold, I am coming soon" — that he forgot for the moment the messenger through whom the Lord had spoken.
The angel refuses at once. One writer explains what made the moment so tempting, and why angels never allow it.
John had heard wonderful words and seen marvellous visions. The glory and dignity of the speaker added to them. In John's eyes this gave the angel a right to be worshipped. But the most exalted of God's creatures themselves worship God. No angel, however high his standing, would accept divine worship... angels are very jealous to maintain the rights of God and of Christ... Creature worship is a sin against God, an affront to the Majesty of the Lord of hosts.
Some read the phrase as though the angel counted himself among the prophets. One writer works through the grammar to show the real sense.
This is commonly taken as if the angel had the testimony of Jesus, and was himself one of the prophets. But it seems to me the sense is simply this: "I am only a fellow servant of you, and of your brothers the prophets." The words pair you with the prophets, not the angel with the prophets.
The angel names a third group alongside John and the prophets: those who keep the words of this book. That places ordinary obedience in remarkable company.
The impulse to worship was doubtless right, though falling at the feet of the angelic messenger was wrong. The angel rejected this at once. He took the place of a servant only. In that respect he stood on a level with John, or the prophets, or indeed with all who take the place of obedience to the word of God. God alone must be worshipped. No holy angel will accept it, though it is the dearest desire of Satan, the great fallen angel, as Matthew 4:9 shows.
Here the angel stops John. Earlier, at the feet of Jesus, nothing stopped him. The difference is not John's posture but who stands before him.
The angel is John's fellow servant, a dependent creature, but one who keeps the truth which God has given. John must worship only God. In Revelation 1:17 John falls at the feet of the Lord Jesus, and there Christ fully receives his worship, for Christ is God. But no creature must dare to accept such adoration.
Why does the mistake appear twice in the book? The same writer points to a practice that had already taken root among Christians.
The angel takes the opportunity to declare his own true character. He presses home the truth that worship is due to God alone. With this on record, it is all the more remarkable that the worship of angels crept into the Church so early — long before this book was even written (see Colossians 2). So John's mistake, made twice, may well be on record to condemn a widespread practice. It also gives plain instruction: no beings, however exalted, must ever be allowed to come between God and the souls of His people.
- Awe misfires. John aims his worship at the wrong object, perhaps mistaking the messenger's glory for Christ Himself.
- Servant, not sovereign. The angel claims no title higher than fellow servant. The grammar links John with the prophets, not the angel with them.
- Level ground. The angel serves alongside everyone who keeps the words of this book. Obedience puts an ordinary believer in the same company as prophets and angels.
- One rule, two outcomes. A holy angel refuses worship at once. Satan longs for it. Christ receives it, and that shows who He is.
- A standing warning. John's mistake is on record twice. Angel worship had already entered the Church, and the answer has not changed: worship God.
And he says to me, Seal not the words of the prophecy of this book. The time is near.
The order John receives here reverses the one Daniel once received: leave this book open, do not seal it. So why is this prophecy public, and how can a time still unfulfilled be called near?
Both orders come with a reason attached, and the reasons are opposites.
The command given here does not refer to any one prophecy, but to all that the book contains. There is a deliberate contrast with the command given to Daniel: "Shut up the words, and seal the book, until the time of the end" (Daniel 12:4). Here it is "do not seal the words"; there, "seal the book." The reason Daniel gives is that the time of the end was then far off. The reason John gives for not sealing the words of the prophecy is that "the time is near." … We are living in the time of the end. So all prophecy lies open. What was sealed is now open for us to examine, for our profit and learning.
Baines presses the point with a picture of two sets of papers.
Why seal up the first, like papers only needed at some future time? Why leave the other unsealed, like papers wanted right now? To say that Daniel's prophecy came six hundred years earlier than the other will not do. If two thousand four hundred years is a distant date, so is eighteen hundred years… The explanation lies in the character of the present period, which has no dates and counts no time. No one is to put off the Lord's return, even in thought.
Kelly points to what changed between Daniel's day and John's, and to where believers now belong.
In Daniel's time it was not at hand. But now Christ has come, and is dead, risen and glorified. To the church the end is always near. In her own path, and in what belongs to her, the church does not know time at all… The church is heavenly. In heaven there are no times or seasons. There may be lights in the heavens to mark times and seasons for the earth. We do well to pay attention to the lamp of prophecy. But the church consists of souls called out from the earth, and is not of the world. So to the Christian the time is always at hand.
An unsealed book can still be misread. Kelly ties the reading of it to Christ and the Spirit, and warns where else people take it.
We are to use and understand it now, because we know Christ and have the Holy Spirit, given by Christ as an anointing by which we know all things. The words of this book are not sealed to us. Christ is the light who reveals this book as He reveals everything else. So it is unbelief if we take it instead to the world and its wisdom, which can only darken it. This, I have no doubt, is the root and reason of the mistakes and difficulties so common in interpreting this book.
Grant weighs what the passing centuries have done to that nearness.
Unlike Daniel's prophecies, the words of the prophecy of this book are not to be sealed up, for the time is near. To the Christian, brought face to face with the coming of the Lord, the end is always near. What time might pass was another question… Daniel was taught to look on through many generations to the end before him. Christians are taught to be always expecting their Lord. No such interval lies before them. They stand in the full light now, though unbelief and wrong teaching may obscure it. But nothing is under a veil except the moment, and its concealment is meant to encourage expectation.
Snell turns the command into a task for the reader.
The things revealed here are therefore to be published. People are to be both instructed and warned, because the time is so very near. How important and necessary it is, then, for anyone who would be a faithful servant of Christ to know these things well! They are no longer to be sealed, but to be made known.
- Sealed → Unsealed. Daniel was told to close his book because the end was far off; John is told to leave his open because the time is near.
- Near, not counted. The nearness is not measured in years. In this period no dates are reckoned, so no one may postpone the Lord's return even in thought.
- Near to whom. Christ has died, risen and been glorified. The church belongs to heaven, where there are no times or seasons. So to the Christian the end is always at hand.
- Open, but to faith. Bring the book to Christ and read it by the Spirit, and it opens. Take it to the world's wisdom, and it only darkens — the root of most confusion about this book.
- Only the moment hidden. Everything stands in full light except the hour. That veil keeps expectation alive. So the contents are to be published, not stored away.
Let him that does unrighteously do unrighteously still; and let the filthy make himself filthy still; and let him that is righteous practise righteousness still; and he that is holy, let him be sanctified still.
Revelation 22:11 sits between two announcements: the time is near, and the Lord is coming soon. Its four lines sound almost like permission to go on sinning — so what does "still" mean?
The verses on either side fix when this line applies.
This verse refers to the fixed, eternal condition of all, whether blessed or unblessed. It comes after "the time is near," and before "Behold, I am coming soon." When that time arrives and the Lord comes for His own, no one will be able to change his condition. The day of grace will be closed. Some were once unjust and filthy, but they believed in Christ as their Saviour. At His coming they will be righteous and holy, and they will remain so for ever. The emphasis in this verse should fall on the word "still" — that is, they remain so.
Is this permission to keep sinning? No — it describes a time when conversion is no longer possible.
It is fixed, for ever fixed for all — hopelessly for some… This is not a time when moral change can happen. It is not a time when sinners can be converted, when a man under the power of Satan can be delivered from that power and brought into the kingdom of God's dear Son. All this is at an end. Men are solemnly settled in the condition in which they are found. The day of grace is over, the day of judgment will have come, and the door will then be shut.
The four descriptions form two pairs. Scott traces a chain from daily habit to eternity.
There are two classes of bad, as opposed to two classes of good. The unrighteous as a class are contrasted with the righteous, and the filthy with the holy. Habits fix character, and character fixes destiny. Everyone acts according to his true nature, and in this everyone is consistent. Death, or the coming of the Lord, fixes character and destiny.
Commentators differ here. Scott says that even in the lake of fire the lost of men and angels act according to their nature, and sinning and suffering never stop. Mawson draws the line elsewhere.
We do not mean that these unrepentant sinners will keep sinning in hell. Prison holds men back from crime, and in the same way God's judgment will hold back the lost in the lake of fire. But the sinful condition will remain, for we read, "Let the evildoer still do evil, and the filthy still be filthy" (Rev. 22:11). And John 3:36 is a decisive word: "Whoever does not obey the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God remains on him." "Shall not see life" shatters the false hope that everyone will be saved in the end. The wrath of God remaining on him meets the error that the lost simply cease to exist.
What will one day be fixed for ever can still be changed today.
The filthy will never become holy; the holy will never become filthy. Now, indeed, it is the day of grace, when the filthy can have all their filth washed away. But here we look into eternity, where the condition of all will be fixed.
Snell sets that one word against ten thousand years.
A few more fleeting moments and man's eternal doom will be fixed for ever. Countless ages may roll on, and the sentence will still be, "Let the evildoer still do evil." Those who now act so unjustly toward the God of all grace and His only Son, the Saviour of sinners, will then be for ever among the unjust. Let ten thousand times ten thousand years pass, and it will still be said, "the filthy still be filthy." They despised the only remedy that cleanses from sin. In outer darkness they will learn that nothing but the blood of Jesus could cleanse a sinner and make him fit to stand in God's infinitely holy presence.
- Still — the whole verse hangs on that one word: not a command to keep sinning, but a statement that no one changes any more.
- Timing — it belongs to the moment the Lord comes, not to today; today the filthy can still be washed clean.
- Character — habits shape character, and character settles destiny. Christ's coming makes permanent what a life has already become.
- Both ways — the fixing is good news too: those who trusted Christ keep their righteous and holy character for ever.
- Urgency — after ten thousand times ten thousand years the sentence still stands. That is why this warning matters today.
Behold, I come quickly, and my reward with me, to render to every one as his work shall be.
Here the Lord announces His return once more, and adds what He brings with Him — a reward measured by each person's work. That raises two questions: what reward can a Saviour who saves by grace still give, and who is being repaid?
Three times in Revelation the Lord says He is coming, and each time the words point somewhere different. One writer sets the three side by side:
In the book of Revelation the Lord says three times over, "Behold," or "Surely, I come quickly." The first is in Revelation 3:11, and clearly concerns the Christian's walk. The second is in Revelation 22:12, and concerns work here and rewards later. The third, as is so well known, is in verse 20, and is only about the heart waiting and watching for Christ.
But how can "quickly" cover a wait of two thousand years? One writer answers by measuring time the way God measures it:
He comes "quickly." Ah! it seems long. But by God's way of reckoning the Lord has not been away quite two full days (2 Peter 3:8). "The Lord is not slow to fulfill His promise."
The reward is not sent ahead, and it is not collected now. That small detail carries weight for anyone serving where nobody notices:
It is possible to make a great religious profession with the object of gaining the applause of men. Of such the Lord can say, "They have their reward" (Matt. 6:2, 5, 16); but it is not Christ's reward, and it is a reward without Christ, for, says the Lord, "My reward is with Me." To enjoy Christ's reward we must wait for Christ's return. What an encouragement to keep serving the Lord quietly! You may be hidden away, unknown to people, and perhaps little valued even by God's people. Still, all is under the eye of the Lord. He knows, and He will not forget. When He comes, every little act for Him, every little sacrifice for Him, every cup of cold water given for His Name's sake, will have its bright reward — but it will be "with Him."
The verse measures reward by work. But work is not why anyone is saved, and one writer draws the line plainly:
When it comes to righteousness and salvation, reward can have no place at all. These privileges are in Christ, and perfect. They are the reward, so to speak, of His labours and work. So if one takes reward as the motive for work, he is wholly on false ground. Love and obedience are the only true motives, as they were in Christ Himself. But rewards are held out as encouragements in the difficulties of the road that love and obedience lead us into.
Salvation is settled by grace. What is left is the Lord's notice of how a life was lived:
All are to be in glory on the ground of free grace. But Christ watches to see if we run well. He will give a reward if there has been faithfulness, and a crown of righteousness if we have loved His appearing.
One writer traces the reward back to its source:
What unspeakable grace! First, He Himself produces in the hearts of His people what is according to His mind. Then He enables them to bear witness for Him in the moral darkness of this world. At the end He credits to them, and rewards, what His own grace has worked. Blessed for ever be His name!
One writer fixes the moment: not when the Lord takes His people to Himself, but when He comes to reign:
The Lord will properly reward the least service when He comes — not into the air for us (1 Thess. 4:17), but into the kingdom with us. He first takes us into the Father's house (John 14:2-3), but the kingdom is the place where He gives out rewards according to service and faithfulness.
The promise reaches further than the Lord's servants. One writer finds two purposes in the announcement:
The announcement has a twofold object — to encourage His servants, and to warn the wicked that judgment is coming fast. We take the first to be the leading thought, since His reward is said to be with Him. Even this can be read two ways, and we must not shut out the idea of repayment to the wicked, in the judgment of the living at the appearing of the Lord.
- Coming. The Lord says three times that He is coming. The first word touches the Christian's walk, this one work and reward, the last the heart that waits for Him.
- Carried. The reward is with Him, not handed out now. Those who take their pay in human applause already have theirs — a reward without Christ.
- Credited. Grace works in His people, grace sustains their witness, and then grace credits them with what it produced.
- Not Salvation. Righteousness and salvation leave no room for reward. They are in Christ and perfect. Reward answers faithfulness in a life already safe.
- Encouragement. Reward is never the motive for serving. Love and obedience are. Reward is the encouragement that keeps a servant going.
*I* [am] the Alpha and the Omega, [the] first and [the] last, the beginning and the end.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
Blessed [are] they that wash their robes, that they may have right to the tree of life, and that they should go in by the gates into the city.
Older English Bibles read this verse differently: "Blessed are they that do His commandments." That one difference decides whether the right to the tree of life is earned or given.
The two readings point in opposite directions. One rests the blessing on what a person does. The other rests it on what washes him.
The Authorised Version reads, "Blessed are they that do His commandments." But every critical scholar of note rejects the reading in our English Bibles. Obedience to commandments is not the ground on which eternal life is bestowed. It is God's gift to all who believe (John 5:24). The reading "that wash their robes" agrees with Revelation 7:14, which uses a similar expression. In both cases only the blood of the Lamb could wash the symbolic robes of the redeemed. In Revelation 7 that blood gave the saved crowd from the nations the right to stand before the throne (Revelation 7:15). Here it gives the title to the tree of life and entrance into the golden city.
Another writer explains how the mistake got in:
The words sounded alike in the original language, and that misled some of the copyists. But the best authorities for the text leave no doubt: it is "wash their robes."
The problem with the old reading is not only about wording. Keeping rules cannot wash away a stain that is already there.
Such washing in the blood of the Lamb is absolutely essential to give one a right to the tree of life — a right to communion with the Lord Jesus Himself. Just keeping His commandments can never give anyone that right. That in itself would be a form of law-keeping and could not wash away the contamination of sin. It is the blood of Christ that gives title to the enjoyment of His person (the tree of life) and to the inheritance (the city). After that washing, though, we are called to obey the Word of God gladly.
The tree of life first appears in the garden of Eden. Man was driven out, and cherubim — angelic guardians — with a flaming sword blocked the way back. This verse says the way is open again, and it says why.
Man's sin in Eden lost him the fruit of the tree of life. The cherubim and the flaming sword shut him out, set there "to guard the way to the tree of life." But now the great work of redemption is finished. The Saviour of sinners has borne the judgment that came in by the tree of the knowledge of good and evil — the tree man ate from, the tree that defiled his conscience. So in the Paradise of God nothing remains but the tree of life, and everyone washed in the blood of the Lamb may come to it. No flaming sword now blocks the way for the simplest believer in Jesus.
The verse names two things, not one, and they are not the same kind of blessing.
The blessed ones are those who wash their robes, and their portion is twofold. They have "the right to the tree of life" — this is their personal portion. And they "enter the city by the gates" — this is their collective portion.
Who exactly is in view? One writer ties the promise to the glorified — all who belong to Christ at His coming. The city and its tree stand on the heavenly side of the scene:
Access to the tree of life and entrance into the city seem to belong to the heavenly side of the kingdom, where the righteous will shine out... Those who have their part in the tree of life and in the heavenly city will be the glorified saints — that is, all who are Christ's at His coming.
The next verse lists who stays outside. Together the two verses show how righteousness and grace hold together.
So while righteousness has been declared the principle of Christ's judgment, grace is the foundation on which the blessing of the redeemed rests... For unless a man is washed in this way, he is defiled in himself and must stay outside. He is counted among the dogs, or unclean, the sorcerers, the sexually immoral, the idolaters, the murderers, and those who love and practise lying — people who have no place in the holy city.
One writer notes how final this "without" is: it is used here in its "final and irrevocable sense, no passage being possible from one side of the fixed gulf to the other."
- Washed, not worked. The true reading blesses those who wash their robes. Obedience to commandments is not the ground of eternal life. God gives it to all who believe.
- Washed in blood. Only the blood of the Lamb could wash those robes. Revelation 7:14 uses the same expression.
- Washed into life. That washing gives the right to the tree of life. The flaming sword once barred it in Eden. Now nothing blocks the way.
- Washed into the city. The tree of life is the personal portion. Entering the city by the gates is the collective portion. Both belong to the same washed people.
- Washed, or without. Grace is the foundation of the blessing. Anyone not washed is defiled in himself and stays outside.
Without [are] the dogs, and the sorcerers, and the fornicators, and the murderers, and the idolaters, and every one that loves and makes a lie.
The Bible's last chapter draws one line: some people are inside the city, and some are outside it. Verse 15 names who stays outside. It raises two hard questions: what do these labels mean, and who do they take in?
The verse works as one half of a pair. One writer sets the two groups side by side and follows the division forward:
Again we find the two classes in verses 14 and 15 — the holy and the filthy... Those washed are within. Those characterised by the evils of verse 15 are without. The Apostle Paul had issued the warning, "Look out for the dogs, look out for the evildoers" (Phil. 3:2), and here we find such excluded for ever. He had also shown that today in the assembly of God there is a "within" that God recognizes, and there is the world "without" (1 Cor. 5:12-13). So here we find the same separation kept up and carried on into eternity.
The names are not just insults. Each one marks a different ruin:
Outside the city are dogs — those unclean in nature. There are sorcerers, those deceived by evil spirits. There are the sexually immoral, those sunk in moral corruption. There are idolaters, those who give to the creature the place of the Creator. And there is everyone who loves and practices falsehood, those who have chosen the lie instead of the truth on purpose. These people are wholly outside the sphere of the grace of God, which they have refused with their eyes open.
Another writer groups the same names by who is wronged in each case:
Outside are the unclean and the violent. Outside too are those who love satanic falsehood and idolatry. Their sins are against purity, against their neighbour, and against God, and they follow Satan.
The first name on the list is the one most readers would shrug off. That is exactly the danger:
No doubt many a reader, even one who is not a believer, would protest at finding himself in any of these classes. But let such a person think again. The very first word used ("dogs") takes in everyone who is unclean. And Scripture teaches that everyone who is not under the value of the blood of Christ before God is unclean. A person may claim a fine moral character. Even so, he is still not fit to enter the city through its gates unless he has washed his robes.
The image behind the word is not a household pet:
Dogs in the East are very different creatures from the pets people value in the West. These stray dogs are wild and dangerous. They belong to no one, and they eat whatever scraps of garbage they can find in the dusty road. In Scripture they are only symbolic of evil.
Revelation has its own word for this sin:
Revelation uses another word for sorcery, φαρμακεία. It refers to drugs — "to stupefy with drugs" — and then to any system of sorcery by spells (Rev. 9:21; Rev. 18:23; compare Rev. 21:8; Rev. 22:15). Scripture ranks sorcery with the worst of sins, and it also applies the word to the professing church in symbolic Babylon.
The last phrase names an affection, not just an act. One writer sets it against the one thing that gives a title to glory:
Eternal life and eternal glory cannot be won by keeping commandments, by the works of the law. The blood of the Lamb alone is the title to glory... The one who rejects Christ, and by doing so denies his lost condition and his need of a Saviour, loves and practices falsehood. He lives according to the old nature, and the fruits of the flesh are there.
A detail in the wording narrows the list, and a comparison with the earlier chapter fills it out:
The definite article the stands before each class shut out of the city. These are not the ungodly in general, but specific, clearly marked classes of people. Substantially the list here is the same as in Revelation 21:8. Here the point is that they are shut out of the holy city. The previous chapter shows the same characters in the lake of fire: outside the city of gold in Revelation 22:15, in the lake of fire in Revelation 21:8.
- Two doors. The chapter ends with two positions only: inside the gates, or outside them. There is no third place.
- One disqualifier. "Dogs" heads the list because it covers everyone unclean. A good moral record buys no ticket in.
- Named sins. Sorcery, immorality, murder, idolatry and lying are sins against purity, against neighbour, and against God. Between them they cover the whole range of human ruin.
- A loved lie. The last class is marked by love: they love the lie they spread, and they chose it instead of the truth.
- One way in. The washed robe, not the kept commandment, gives the right to the tree of life. Grace decides which side of the gate you stand on.
*I* Jesus have sent mine angel to testify these things to you in the assemblies. *I* am the root and offspring of David, the bright [and] morning star.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that hears say, Come. And let him that is athirst come; he that will, let him take [the] water of life freely.
The Bible's last book is full of judgment, yet it ends with an open invitation. In one verse the church calls up to Christ and out to the world. Who is speaking here, and to whom?
The longing in this cry has a source outside the church herself.
It is however the Spirit and the bride who say, Come; that is, the Spirit produces the cry in the church. She raises it, but it is He who has called it forth. So here we are allowed to see the church as the vessel, the willing vessel of the Holy Spirit. It is He who directs her gaze upward to the bright morning Star, and draws out the expression of the desire for His coming. It follows that this is the normal attitude of the assembly.
The cry does not rise out of nowhere. It follows the verse before it, where Jesus names Himself. That changes the whole tone of the response.
So "the Spirit and the bride say, Come." This is not a warning from one coming as a judge and a rewarder. It is the revelation of Himself, and that revelation awakens the desire of the bride, according to the relationship in which grace has set her. It is not a mere sentiment or wish: the Spirit who dwells in the assembly leads and suggests her thought. "Let the one who hears" means the one who hears the voice of the Spirit in the assembly. Let him join in the cry, and say, Come.
Love awakened by the Spirit does not stop with Christ. It moves in a set order.
"The Spirit and the bride say, Come." We get the whole circle of the church's affections. When the Spirit of God is working in the saints, what will be the first affection? Christ… What is the next affection? It is the saints. So it turns and calls on the one who hears to say, Come… And what next? We turn round to those who may be thirsty, telling them to come, and whoever desires, let him take the water of life without price. The believer who knows the blessedness of having drunk the living water Christ gives wants others to have it too.
One word, "Come," runs in two opposite directions here.
"And let the one who hears say Come." Everyone with open ears, every believer, is urged to join in this genuine desire for His coming. Then, suddenly, the word "come" is used in a different way. It becomes a sweet message of gospel grace, showing the great heart of the Lord Jesus: "Let the one who is thirsty come." Has reading God's words awakened thirst in some man or woman? Then let him or her come to Christ, and he will find a wonderful welcome.
The same words serve two very different readers.
It presents the brightest hope of the church, it encourages the simplest believer, and it also holds the fullest expression of sovereign grace to the neediest of sinners, in whatever state he may be found. What can be more open than saying, "Let the one who desires take the water of life without price"? There is no more unrestricted invitation to perishing souls in any part of the Bible.
Some hesitate because they doubt they are thirsty enough. The answer splits the verse into God's side and yours. The writer quotes an older translation, which says "freely" where the ESV says "without price."
The point is not the measure of your anxiety, but the fact that you are thirsty or willing at all… "I will give to the one who is thirsty from the fountain of the water of life freely… Let the one who is thirsty come. And whoever desires, let him take the water of life freely" (Rev. 21:6, 22:17). What charming words! "I will give … freely." That is God's side. "Let him take … freely." That is your side. God gives; all you have to do is to take what He gives.
The book ends by turning to the world outside.
How touching it is that the last appeal from Christ in the glory is a gospel appeal to a needy world, and let us mark well how full and how wide is the appeal. As one has said, "There is no man in the world to whom Jesus does not appeal. He gave Himself a ransom for all, and so He has the right to appeal to every man, whoever he may be: 'Let him take the water of life without price.' Whoever wants it may come and drink of living water without money and without price."
- Source — The cry starts with the Spirit. The church is His willing vessel, not the source of the longing.
- Cause — Christ shows Himself as the bright morning Star. That sight, not a threat of judgment, awakens the answer.
- Circle — Love moves outward in order: Christ first, then fellow believers, then the thirsty, then anyone at all.
- Turn — The word "Come" changes direction mid-verse. First the church calls Christ down; then Christ calls sinners in.
- Terms — God gives freely; the sinner only takes. The Bible's last invitation is also its widest. The only condition is willingness.
*I* testify to every one who hears the words of the prophecy of this book, If any one shall add to these things, God shall add to him the plagues which are written in this book.
A stern warning follows the Bible's last invitation to come and drink. Who speaks it, what counts as "adding," and why does Scripture close with a threat?
The warning comes straight after an open invitation. One writer finds no clash in that.
Man's one-sidedness always leads him to set grace and judgment against each other, while the many-sidedness of God's word gives each its proper place. Tender words of invitation have just been spoken. Right after them, God builds a defensive wall around this book of sevenfold judgments. It is a solemn lesson to see how He shuts out every intrusion of man's reasoning and unbelief.
The "I" who testifies is the Lord Himself. One writer sees His guard over this book pictured in the opening pages of the Bible.
The importance of these revelations could not have been more jealously protected. reason: two very-hard sentences (58 and 72 words), trims length
The threat falls on anyone who tampers with words. Commentators draw a conclusion from that about how God gave Scripture.
The Lord Himself claims every word here for God. If this is not a claim for verbal inspiration, what is it? This is clearly the closing book of New Testament Scripture. So what should we conclude about the verbal inspiration of the other parts? And what woe will fall on those who presume to meddle with God's authoritative message of His mind to man?
The warning aims first at this one book. Its place at the very end of the Bible carries weight.
The warning applies first of all to the words of the book of Revelation. But it comes at the very end, and we believe it applies in a second way to the whole New Testament, if not the whole Bible. We are neither to add to it nor to take away.
The Old Testament sounded the same demand, and no hearer stands outside it.
The Lord refers especially to the book of Revelation here, but the Old Testament sounds a similar warning... The Lord has always been jealous for the maintenance of His own truth... The canon of Scripture is complete. To add to it must be deeply offensive to God. It must be the fruit of a proud and unbelieving heart. The warning speaks to every person who even hears the prophecy of this book. When God carries out the sentence, He will show no partiality.
Baines finds this sin inside the professing Church itself.
The professing Church has set this book aside in practice. This did not happen through simple misunderstanding, which is not what is in view here. It happened because the Church's character and hopes took a worldly form instead of a heavenly one. It refused to believe itself under judgment, and so took away from this portion of God's word. It claimed for itself universal rule, triumph over evil, and a continuance to the end of time. In that way it added to this portion of God's word.
He adds that these judgments do not touch God's children who followed such traditional teaching in honest simplicity.
If nothing may be added to this book, what about later claims of fresh revelation?
To John's prophetic ministry in the Revelation nothing was to be added. God had revealed all the great lines of truth when He made known the special revelation given to Paul. And He set out all things to come, for Christian times at least, when John, the son of Zebedee, recorded the revelations granted to him on Patmos. We look, then, for no more. Claimed additions to revealed truth are not the fruit of the Holy Spirit's teaching now.
The sentence mirrors the offence: the man who adds gets an addition.
Wherever the words of this prophecy are read or heard, this deeply solemn warning applies... The plagues of the book, which are many and varied, are added in righteous retribution to those who add to its words... This is how God guards the book that suffers more neglect than any other in Scripture, and that many treat with contempt.
- Guarded. The Lord who invites also sets a flaming sword around His word. Grace and judgment each keep their place.
- Words. The penalty falls on words, not just ideas. Commentators read this as a claim to verbal inspiration for all Scripture.
- Everyone. The warning names every hearer, and God shows no partiality in carrying out the sentence.
- Closed. The canon is complete; claimed additions to revealed truth are not the Spirit's work today.
- Matched. Add, and God adds — plagues in righteous retribution; the sentence is shaped by the sin.
And if any one take from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part from the tree of life, and out of the holy city, which are written in this book.
The Bible's last chapter ends with a warning about itself: take words away from this prophecy, and God takes your part away. Commentators ask three things here: which reading is original, what "his part" means, and whether a real believer could ever fall under this threat.
The warning comes straight after an open invitation, and that contrast is deliberate.
Man is one-sided. He always sets grace and judgment against each other. God's word has many sides, and gives each its proper place. The tender words of invitation have only just been spoken. Right after them, it is a solemn lesson to see the wall God puts around this book of sevenfold judgments, to shut out man's reasoning and unbelief.
The warning is not tied to one time or place.
Wherever the words of this prophecy are read or heard, this deeply solemn warning applies... This is how God guards the book that people neglect more than any other in Scripture, and that many treat with contempt.
Bibles differ here, and so do the commentators. Some read "book of life" and take the verse as proof that a name can be struck out:
There is a statement that certain names will NOT be blotted out of the Book of Life. That plainly implies that names may be blotted out. God does not hold out empty threats (Rev. 22:19).
Others hold that the true reading is "tree," and explain blotting out differently:
Where Scripture speaks of blotting out, it is like a register of voters: if a name is shown to have no right there, it is blotted out. In Revelation 22:19 it should be "tree of life," not "book of life." God takes away no name that He has written.
If the reading is "tree of life," what exactly does a person lose?
The words "which are described in this book" point to the tree of life and the holy city. Interpreted, these two things mean Christ and the church. Christ, risen from the dead, is the tree of life; the church is the bride of Christ. So the penalty for anyone who "takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy" is exclusion from Christ and the church.
The sin described is not limited to those who reject the Bible outright.
It does not mean only open unbelief, which refuses the book as God's word. No doubt it includes that, but it includes much more. The professing Church has in practice set this book aside. This did not happen through simple misunderstanding — that is not what is meant here — but because its character and hopes became worldly instead of heavenly. It refused to believe that it was itself under judgment, and so took away from this part of God's word.
The threat falls on words. That says something about how God gave Scripture.
Here the Lord Himself claims every word for God. If this is not a claim that God inspired the very words, what is? This is plainly the closing book of the New Testament. So what may we conclude about the inspiration of the words in other parts? And what sorrow waits for those who dare to meddle with what God has said to man with authority?
The same rule stands near the beginning of the Bible:
In Deuteronomy, near the start of Scripture, God tells His people the same thing about the law: do not add to the word He commands you, and do not take from it (Deuteronomy 4:2). Put the two passages side by side — one at the start of God's dealings with men, one at the end. There is no doubt that we can apply this to the whole of Scripture. There is no scripture that we may take away, and no part where we may add anything.
The honest answer given is that the question itself misreads the passage.
To ask that is to confuse this warning with the question of salvation, and so to weaken its seriousness... If these words mean being cut off from Christ and the church for ever, they can only refer to someone whose part in Christ and the church was only a claim. That is the right reading, because taking away from the words of this prophecy is a deliberate, hostile act... It is a very bad sign when believers use the truth that they cannot be lost to push God's warnings aside.
- Guarded — right after the open invitation, God sets a wall around this book to shut out man's reasoning and unbelief.
- Worded — the threat falls on words. The Lord claims every word for God, and the same rule stands in Deuteronomy 4:2.
- Wider — taking away is more than open unbelief. A church can set the book aside by choosing a worldly hope over a heavenly one.
- Weighed — commentators differ on the reading. Some keep "book of life" and see names struck off. Others read "tree of life," which means being shut out from Christ and the church.
- Warned — do not use the truth that a believer cannot be lost to blunt this warning. That itself is a bad sign. Let the verse keep its full force.
He that testifies these things says, Yea, I come quickly. Amen; come, Lord Jesus.
The Bible's last chapter closes with a short exchange: a promise from the Lord, and an answer from the one who heard it. The visions, the judgments and the city all end here, at one promise and one prayer.
Just before this, the book warns against adding to its words or taking any away. Scripture does not end there.
He has kept the best wine until last. He had already spoken of His coming in judgment, and of His coming for the church in full grace. Now He could not leave us on a note of sorrow. He must bring our hearts back to gladness and joy at the thought of His coming again... At once John answers for the church, "Come, Lord Jesus." It is the ready reply of his heart to the Lord.
That warning and its penalty come from Christ Himself. Here He names Himself as the One who testifies.
This announcement of penalty is Christ's own word: "He who testifies these things says, 'Surely, I come quickly.'" When His Word is treated this way, may we not expect Himself more than ever? When people invalidate and deny the testimony of Scripture, is that not when we may most expect the Faithful and True Witness to testify in person?
Older translations read "quickly" here, where the ESV reads "soon." Two thousand years have passed, so the word raises a question.
Perhaps we have taken this word too much as a matter of time and centuries. Its main meaning here may be swiftness — no gradual unfolding when He comes, but swift as a flash of lightning! When He comes, He will bring everything to a triumphant conclusion.
Another writer weighs the wait against God's own reckoning.
"Quickly" He comes. Ah, it seems long. But by God's reckoning the Lord has not been away quite two full days (2 Peter 3:8). "The Lord is not slow to fulfill His promise."
Earlier in this chapter the same promise came with something attached. This one comes bare.
"Surely, I come quickly," is again the word (v. 20). This is a simple promise. It is neither a warning nor an encouragement. Nothing comes with it, as in the other cases. It is simply a promise to bring Himself with Him on His coming again. But it is the highest and the dearest thing. The heart may be silent before a warning and before an encouragement... But this promise of the simple personal return of Christ gets its answer from the saints.
The Lord speaks first, and the church answers with a word of its own.
The Yea and Amen, Greek and Hebrew affirmatives, are united in the introduction to the book (Rev. 1:7). Here they are separated. The Lord assures us that His Coming is certain: "Yea, I come." The Church rejoices that His word never changes: "Amen; come."
Notice also where this answer falls in the whole span of Scripture.
It is the last time our Lord speaks from heaven. The next time His voice sounds will be on the day He descends out of heaven with a shout... It is the Church which answers His positive and certain announcement. It is the last word recorded in the Bible coming from the lips of man.
The promise is not just information. Love is behind it.
It is as though He said, Nothing will satisfy Me until I have you with Myself. It is His love that makes Him say that, and so we must read words like that not with the head but with the heart... From the heavens there sounds this great "Amen," and then, "Even so, come Lord Jesus."
The promise shapes how a believer lives only if it stays undated in the mind.
The Lord considers it important that His people should always expect it as a present thing, and wish for it as a present thing. I say expecting it as a present thing, not knowing when it will come... Now, if we knew for certain that it must be two or three thousand years off, would that not affect this state of mind?
- He speaks. The last voice from heaven in Scripture is Christ's own, and He refuses to leave His people on a note of warning.
- He promises Himself. Earlier announcements came with something attached. This one offers only Himself, and that is what reaches the heart.
- He comes quickly. The word may point to speed — not a slow unfolding, but action swift as lightning. By God's reckoning He has not been away two days.
- We answer Amen. His "Yea" and our "Amen" are the same word; the closing prayer is the last thing a human being says in the Bible.
- We wait today. A promise pushed off for centuries shapes nobody. Held as today's hope, it turns the Bible's last page into a prayer.
The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ [be] with all the saints.
Scripture closes with a blessing, not a warning. The last line of the last book of the Bible turns on two things: grace, and how far it reaches.
The Old Testament ends on a threat. One writer sets that ending beside this one.
The better rendering of the last verse is, "The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ be with all the saints." The last word of Malachi is "curse," but there is no curse as we close Revelation. The grace of the New Testament replaces the curse of the Old. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ will of course be with all the saints, and it will never fail, since it is absolute grace that takes us all to glory. But we are also meant to be conscious of that grace ourselves.
The ESV ends the verse "with all"; the reading these writers follow ends "with all the saints." One commentator hears the heart of Christ in that word "all."
Now finally in verse 21 we have the closing benediction from the Lord through the Apostle John, who was the vessel of these communications. The better attested reading is, "The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ be with all the saints." His full title is used here, and the closing note that is struck is that of His well known grace. This grace is to rest on ALL the saints and not on a few only, who may be specially faithful. And it will rest upon them ALL the time while we wait for Him.
That "all" flattens every distinction believers usually make among themselves — length of service, maturity, and even recent conduct.
It is just like the heart of Christ. His unclouded favour rests upon "all the saints." The strongest and the weakest, the father and the babe, are equally objects of His grace. Irrespective, too, of the ways of His people, His grace rests upon them. Through clouds and sunshine, by night and by day, in all times and circumstances, His unfailing grace is their support and strength. It is grace from beginning to end, from otherwise hopeless ruin till complete redemption.
The word "saints" is often misused. One writer clears the ground first.
The Roman Catholic church has its saints, but they have been dead for centuries; it has no living saints. Among Protestants the word is usually given to people who look serious and live clean lives apart from the world. But the Bible gives it to all who are in Christ Jesus, to all the children of God on earth. They are all sanctified in Christ Jesus and are saints by calling (1 Cor. 1:2). Think of the father of a large family — a true father, who loves and cares for all his children alike. He makes sure they are all inside before he bars the door at night. So the Holy Spirit does not close the divine Word upon a divided family, some inside and some outside. He gathers all within the sacred enclosure and puts this great benediction upon all.
The same writer then asks what that ending cost.
But this victory of God has not come without cost to Himself. Power alone could not have won it. God's bright designs sprang from His heart of love. He wanted all His saints for Himself because He loved them — and love must suffer... God — the beginning, "all the saints" — the end, and the cross of Christ between. Yes, the cross is the heart of the Bible, throbbing with love. No one can write that lesson clearly and leave the cross out.
The blessing follows the promise of a quick return. What carries believers until then?
The apostle in his turn takes his leave of the saints. In the love of the Spirit he commends them to their only provision for the way, until the journey ends. Till He comes — come when He may, bringing His glory with Him — they must stand in His grace. For the Lord gives both, and grace leads to glory.
Grace here is not only a covering over believers; it is meant to work inside them and show.
The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ is to be with us all as we travel on to His coming, through the present scenes of toil and trouble, strife and desert life. It rests on our spirits, forms our characters, shapes our thoughts, enters our hearts, and comes out in the way we live. The whole church of God needs it. The saints of God — you and I and all the rest of us — greatly need it. Blessed be God, it rests upon us, and is available for us in every conceivable emergency.
The Bible's final paragraph is a short conversation between three speakers.
First the voice of the Lord: "I come quickly." Then the voice of the Church in her glad response: "Amen. Come, Lord Jesus." And finally the voice of the Holy Spirit in the blessing: "The grace of our Lord Jesus be with you all." No sweeter close to the Book of God could be imagined. "The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ" is what the Church has had to live on while toiling, suffering, and witnessing here. The storehouse has never failed.
- Grace ends it. Malachi's last word is curse. Revelation's last word is grace, and that grace carries believers all the way to glory.
- Grace cost. The Bible begins with God and ends with all the saints. The cross of Christ stands between the two.
- Grace includes. It rests on all the saints, not a select few. The strongest and the weakest are alike its objects, whatever their recent ways.
- Grace supplies. It is the one provision for the road between His promise and His coming. The storehouse has never failed.
- Grace shows. It is not only over believers but in them, shaping character, thought and daily life until He comes.