Revelation 2–3

Revelation 2:1 · Darby

To the angel of the assembly in Ephesus write These things says he that holds the seven stars in his right hand, who walks in the midst of the seven golden lamps

Christ's Own Portrait of Himself

Each of the seven letters opens with a description of the Lord, drawn from the vision John has just seen, and the first one is deliberately broad. It fits not only Ephesus but the whole Christian testimony.

Here we are on broad ground. The characteristics are general. The first letter, the message to the angel of the church in Ephesus, looks at the state of the Christian testimony on the earth in its widest form. It does so, one may suppose, from the days of the apostle John himself. So the Lord presents Himself with the same breadth.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who the Angel Is

"Angel" here does not mean a heavenly being. Scripture uses the word more widely.

"The angel" is a title we meet again and again in the Scriptures. It has been widely, and we believe rightly, understood to mean a messenger or representative. In Acts 8:26 we read, "An angel of the Lord said to Philip." No one questions that this means the Lord's representative speaking in His name.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The angel stands for the church, not beside it. Praise and blame alike land on him.

There is no real question that the Lord addresses the churches themselves. He says it plainly at the end of each letter: "He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches." Yet each time His words are, "To the angel of the church," and the whole address matches that. He puts the responsibility for everything that is wrong on the angel. It is he who tolerates the woman Jezebel. It is he whom the Lord threatens with the removal of his lampstand.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

The Stars in His Right Hand

The stars are held, not merely owned. Their light is borrowed, and it lasts only while His hand holds them.

It is only in the case of Ephesus that we see the Lord holding the seven stars in His right hand, that is to say upholding them and communicating His power to them as instituted from the beginning. Without contact with Him, they would have no authority. And if He let them fall from His hand, they would have no more power than all the lesser powers of the world — other stars that we often see in the Revelation leaving their place to fall on the earth to devastate it, or to go out (Rev. 6:12; 8:10; 9:1).

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

If teaching and rule belong to His hand, human arrangements take what is not ours.

The stars mean the angels, or mystical representatives, of the seven churches. They are responsible for teaching and for government, just as the stars give light and rule the course of time. The gift and authority for both belong to Christ. Man may make rules for the government of the Church, or for the ordination of teachers and pastors. But this really takes over Christ's authority, however unintended.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

Walking Among the Lampstands

He is among them, but not in the role we might expect.

Here Christ is not presented as standing among the Assembly to lead the praises of His people. He is not among two or three to guide their prayers. He is not the one Shepherd uniting the sheep into one flock, nor the Head of the Church — His body. He is seen here in the solemn character of the Judge among those who profess to be Christians. He walks (Rev. 2:1) among the Assemblies, observing their condition and passing sentence — approval or blame.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

What He measures them by is fixed, and it is not their own opinion of themselves.

He is the One who holds in His right hand of power the seven stars, those who are in the place of responsibility before Him for the assembly, and who now walks in the midst of the seven golden lampstands to survey their condition, to test their state by His word, which is like a sharp two-edged sword, and to judge their character as His responsible light-bearers in the moral darkness of this world. We learn from this, first, that to take the place of rule or responsibility among the saints for Christ according to God is to call in all the sustaining power of Christ; and second, that in weighing the state of an assembly as a witness, the Lord judges by His own unfailing standard of holiness.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Why Ephesus Comes First

The names of the cities are not incidental. Ephesus opens the series because it pictures the beginning.

Take the first one. Ephesus means "desirable," the kind of word a Greek used of the girl he had chosen. Ephesus gives us a picture of the Church as it was in the beginning, when the Lord held the stars (His servants) in His hand, and controlled their ministry. He sent them here and there, just as He would... But human systems have largely changed all that.

Modernised from Henry Allan IronsideOriginal wording

Summary

- Held. The stars shine only because His right hand upholds them. Let go, they are no brighter than any falling light.

- Held for others. The stars carry teaching and rule, and the authority is His. Arrange ministry by human rules and you take what belongs to Christ.

- Held to account. The Lord writes to the angel, the church's representative, and lays every fault in the assembly at his door.

- Held to a standard. He walks among the lampstands here not as Shepherd or Head, but as Judge, weighing each by His own unfailing standard of holiness.

- Held from the start. Ephesus, "desirable," pictures the Church at its beginning, when His hand still held and directed His servants.

Revelation 2:2 · Darby

I know thy works and [thy] labour, and thine endurance, and that thou canst not bear evil [men]; and thou hast tried them who say that themselves [are] apostles and are not, and hast found them liars;

The risen Christ opens His message to Ephesus with praise, not complaint: hard work, endurance, and the courage to expose men who falsely claimed to be apostles. Yet one thing is missing from the praise, and the Lord goes on to expose it.

Eyes That Search

The words "I know" follow from where the Lord has just placed Himself — walking among the lampstands. That has a sharp edge for a church tempted to keep the peace by leaving hard questions closed.

The first expression, found also in the letters that follow, tells us that the Lord always sees the condition of His people. Their state and their activities are always before His eyes, and He examines them. This follows from the position He takes here as walking in the middle of the lampstands. It is good to remember this. There is often a temptation to close up questions, or even to cover up sin, in the assembly — to prevent discussion, or for the sake of peace. That is paying more attention to the faces of men than to Christ, who searches into everything with eyes like a flame of fire. "No creature is hidden from His sight, but all are naked and exposed to the eyes of Him to whom we must give account." (Heb. 4:13.)

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Praise Before Reproof

The Lord does have a complaint to make. Praise comes first.

The Lord commends before He reproves. He loves to count up what grace — His own grace — has produced in the souls and ways of His people. In these letters we see the Church in its downward course, going from bad to worse. But the Lord is unchanged. He loves to commend His saints when and where He can... Always be ready to own gladly, and to say openly, how much you value all that is good and excellent — especially where evil may be present.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Work That Costs

The verse lists "toil" as well as "works." They are not the same thing.

Then the Lord commends the "labour" that marked their works. There may be much service and yet little labour in the service. The word shows that their service called for energy and real toil. It cost these saints an expenditure of labour.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Patient, But Not Tolerant

Patience can slide into putting up with evil men. At Ephesus it did not.

There was patience, and this is the first if not the greatest mark that Paul gives of his own apostleship. More than this, nothing breaks down more readily than patience, after it has stood many a trial. But here at Ephesus there was endurance... Again, where there is patience, there might be a tendency to pass over evil, or at least evil men. But it was not so here. They had borne things for His name's sake, but they could not bear evil persons.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Set beside later practice, that refusal looks sharp:

In the days of Ephesus, believers could not bear those who were evil. In our day, discipline in the church is almost at an end. In many places anyone is welcome to share fully in all church privileges, especially if they have a good bank account. In the beginning it was very different. That little Ephesian assembly said, "We don't want growth at the expense of holiness."

Modernised from Henry Allan IronsideOriginal wording

The False Apostles Exposed

The timing of these false claims was no accident.

The apostles were disappearing, and perhaps all had disappeared except John. It is easy to see why Satan would then try to supply men quite willing to claim to be their successors. The church in Ephesus tested these pretended apostles... When men made such a claim, the church stood together in testing them and refusing those who set themselves up to be what they were not.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The testing was not a hunch but a measurement against a known standard.

Moreover, they had tested the claim of some to rank alongside the apostles. They tested it thoroughly, and the light of the signs which marked the Lord's apostles exposed every false claim... The word "tried" means tested, or put to the proof. "Hast found them liars." The groundless claim of these pretenders to apostolic office and authority was completely overthrown, and the men themselves branded as "liars," or, as Paul puts it, "false apostles."

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

The Missing Spring

The praise is real. But two words are missing from it.

The Lord is aware of their "labour" and their "endurance." But the springs of "love" and "hope" are missing here. Those two were the source of the labour and endurance of the Thessalonian saints (see 1 Thess. 1:3). The searching gaze of the Lord goes right down to the inner springs of the soul. Those springs give character and energy to every action. When an action is cut off from the spring that alone can give our work spiritual vigour and tone, He exposes it faithfully — in love, yet firmly.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Where Ephesus Stands

Commentators read these seven letters as tracing the course of the church as well as addressing seven real assemblies.

As Paul had predicted, failure soon began; and at the time this book was written, first love had already cooled, and the seeds of serious evil, both in doctrine and in practice, were already sown. Still, for a time, evil teaching and practice were resisted, and there was much activity and zeal in labour. This is the state of things described in Ephesus.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

Summary

- He knows. Christ walks among the lampstands and sees everything. Covering a matter for the sake of peace fools people, never Him.

- He commends. What He knows first, He praises first — He counts up what His own grace has produced before naming a single fault.

- He values toil. Their work cost real toil. Their patience was endurance that had already stood many a trial.

- He honours discernment. Patience did not soften them toward evil men. They tested men who called themselves apostles and found them liars.

- He looks deeper. He names labour and endurance. He does not name love and hope as their source, and that missing spring is what He goes on to expose.

Revelation 2:3 · Darby

and endurest, and hast borne for my name's sake, and hast not wearied

This verse finishes the Lord's praise of the church at Ephesus. They held out, they carried suffering for His name, they never gave up — yet one question hangs over the record: does a list like this prove love?

Under His Eyes

Before any praise or blame, the Lord says "I know." One writer shows what those two words settle for every church.

The same expression appears in the letters that follow. It tells us that the Lord always sees the condition of His people. Their state and their activities are always before His eyes, and His eyes examine them. This follows from the position He takes here as walking among the lampstands. This is worth remembering. In the assembly there is often a temptation to shut down questions, or even to cover up sin, to prevent arguments or to keep the peace. That pays more attention to people's faces than to Christ, who searches into everything with eyes like a flame of fire.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Endurance as Evidence

Plenty of people start well and then stop. One writer treats endurance as the mark that tells real work from a good start.

Then they had patience — endurance. Many begin well, like the Galatians, but give way when unforeseen difficulties come. It is the mark of divine work that it endures. Human energy quickly spends itself; faith draws on a supply that never runs down. It was true faith that was at work in these Ephesian saints.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Carried for the Name

They carried their suffering for the Name of Jesus Christ. One writer links that Name to something it had already done for them.

Not only had there been endurance, but it continued. They were still enduring when the apostle, "the Lord's secretary," wrote. They had also borne suffering for His Name. They had suffered much and been severely tried, but they carried it all gladly for the sake of the Name of Jesus Christ. Because of that same Name their sins had been forgiven (1 John 2:12).

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Standing While the Current Runs

"Not grown weary" describes someone still standing when everything around them moves the other way. One writer asks what that looks like for the church now.

The verse sketches the position of a soul standing in integrity for God while the current rushes past it. You may find the evil strong, but you have God and you can endure; you can look for the way out that God will provide. What is the position of the church of the living God now? Everything is tottering and shaking. Have you no heart for what is dear to God?

Modernised from G. V. WigramOriginal wording

Not the Test of First Love

This praise could pass as a full measure of a healthy church. One writer goes through it item by item to show what it cannot prove.

What, then, is the test of "first love"? Not "work" — activity in outward service; they had that at Ephesus. Not even "labour," for they had that too. No, nor "endurance" either — though that is a clearer sign than either of the others of divine power in the soul. Not zeal against evil. Not boldness to examine and refuse the highest claims. Not even suffering for Christ's name, and suffering it without growing weary. All this is good and acceptable to God, and the Ephesians had all of it. Yet the Lord says, "I have this against you, that you have abandoned the love you had at first."

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

The Missing Springs

One writer notices a silence. Another letter praises the same three things in Thessalonica and names the source of each. Here those sources go unnamed.

They had not "grown weary." There was no thought of giving up the conflict with evil. They had not wearied of the contest, nor wearied in it. What a beautiful picture of devotedness to the interests of Christ! But what about the springs of these holy activities? They are not mentioned — not because they were entirely missing, or there could have been no praise at all... "remembering before our God and Father your work of faith and labor of love and steadfastness of hope in our Lord Jesus Christ" (1 Thess. 1:3). The Ephesian assembly showed work, labour, and endurance. But the "work" seems in part separated from "faith," its moral source. The "labour," too, seems not to have drawn its full strength from "love."

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Summary

- Seen — Christ walks among the lampstands and examines everything. No church can settle a question by managing appearances.

- Endured — endurance is the mark of divine work. Human energy spends itself; faith draws on a supply that never runs down.

- Borne — they carried it all for the Name of Jesus Christ, the Name that had already brought them forgiveness.

- Unwearied — they stood in integrity while the current rushed past. They never wearied of the contest or in it.

- Yet lacking — not one item on this list is the test of first love. The work went on, but it had drifted from the springs that feed it.

Revelation 2:4 · Darby

but I have against thee, that thou hast left thy first love.

Ephesus was a hard-working church that endured and refused false teachers. Yet the Lord, who had just praised all of that, says He holds one thing against them — and it is about their love, not their work.

One charge, not a small one

Some older versions soften the charge by adding the word "somewhat." Those versions also read "first love" where the ESV has "the love you had at first," and the writers below use the older phrase. The charge is single, and it is severe.

This uncovers the root of Church and individual failure: the heart has departed from Christ. The fine gold had become dim. The flower was fading… Love is the very heart of Christianity, its crown, and its distinguishing glory. When love is missing, the moral power of Church and individual life is gone. Things may look fine and promising on the outside. Only an all-seeing eye sees the lack within: coldness of heart to Christ… The loss of that first, pure love is a serious matter. We must not treat it as a mere "somewhat," as the Authorised Version does.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

What "first love" is

Commentators describe it as a heart taken up with Christ, gripped by what He has done in redemption.

Ephesus had gone on well in staying consistent. But that forgetting of self, and thinking only of Christ, which are the first fruits of grace, were gone. As we find everywhere in the Scriptures, nothing can make up for a lack of heart for Christ… First love is that absorption of the heart with Christ. An overwhelming sense of His grace and love in redemption always produces it.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Service is not the test

Everything the Lord praised in the verses just before was real. But it was not what He was measuring.

What is the test, then, of "first love"? Not "work" — activity in outward service; they had that at Ephesus. Not even "labour," for they had that too. No, nor "endurance," though that is a clearer sign of divine power in the soul than either. Not zeal against evil, nor courage to examine and refuse the highest claims. Not even suffering for Christ's name, and suffering without tiring. All this is good and acceptable to God, and the Ephesians had it all. Yet the Lord says, "I have this against you, that you have abandoned the love you had at first."

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Love and works are not rivals. Where love is real, works follow.

It is not that works will be lacking where there is love. The Lord Himself, in this message, links "first love" with "first works." There were indeed works at Ephesus that the Lord could approve. But they were not the first works that come out of first love.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Why He cannot let it pass

The reproach itself shows how much He cares.

What must Christ be jealous about but His love to the church, which was stronger than death? It is impossible for Him to forget His love to the church. So it is just as impossible for Him to rest content without her love returning to Him. Remember, only love can satisfy love… There may still be much outward fruit in "works, and labour, and patience." But whatever the toil and labour may be, the spring of it all is gone.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

"Left," not "lost"

The wording matters. Where the ESV says "abandoned," the older text this writer quotes says "left." Either way, they walked away from something; they did not mislay it.

It is not, "lost your first love." I do not think that is a scriptural thought. It is, "left your first love." Something has come in, says that blessed lover in Revelation 2, that has eclipsed Me. All your affection for Me and interest in Me has gone. You can get on without Me now, but there was a time when you could not.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The first step of a long decline

The heart cools in private before anything goes wrong in public.

Any sin a Christian falls into is only the outward act. There were failures in secret before the outward wrong ever showed itself… Notice how significant this is: at the very start of the church's history, love to Christ was already declining. That is the root and starting-point of all failure and sin.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The way back

The remedy is a return to the starting point.

The only remedy is to go back to first things. "You have abandoned the love you had at first… Remember therefore from where you have fallen; repent, and do the works you did at first." There must be a return to the beginning, and in the beginning Christ was everything. His will came first. He alone was "honoured, loved, adored."

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- First — First love means self forgotten and Christ everything. A fresh sense of His grace in redemption produces it.

- Left — Not lost by accident. Something crowded Him out, and He noticed while everyone else saw a model church.

- No substitute — Work, labour, endurance and courage against error were all there, and all praised. None of them can stand in love's place.

- Because loved — He complains because His own love is too strong to accept a smaller return. Only love satisfies love.

- Root — This first cooling is where the whole decline begins. So the cure is to go back to the beginning, where Christ was everything.

Revelation 2:5 · Darby

Remember therefore whence thou art fallen, and repent, and do the first works but if not, I am coming to thee, and I will remove thy lamp out of its place, except thou shalt repent.

The risen Christ walks among His churches. Here He speaks to one that was busy, discerning and patient — yet had let its love for Him cool. Verse 5 is His remedy: three commands, and a warning if they go unheeded.

Remember: measuring the fall

The first word sends the church backwards, not forwards. Commentators read this as a rule that holds everywhere. You cannot see how far you have slipped until you compare where you stand with where you began.

The first clause holds a principle of the first importance, one the Word affirms again and again. To discover the character of our failure, or how far we have backslidden or departed from the truth, we must always go back to the beginning. For example, we can only see the true state of the church today by comparing it — or rather contrasting it — with what it was when it was first founded at Pentecost.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

They were to recall a height of love, not a record of achievement. Even the city's name carries that idea.

The Lord never forgets His joy in the first love of His people. He never forgets Judah's first love. He remembers the Church's first love just as much, and He desires it — which is, in fact, what "Ephesus" really means. Remember the moral elevation you once occupied. To what depths you have fallen!

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Repent: owning the true condition

Memory alone only produces nostalgia. The second command is harder. It means seeing yourself as Christ sees you.

In the eyes of others the assembly at Ephesus might well look like a model assembly. In the sight of Christ it was fallen. The assembly must not only remember; it must repent. It is useless to grieve over the loss of early freshness if there is no repentance. What is repentance but owning our true condition before the Lord?

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The first works

Verse 2 has already credited this church with works. So the call to do the first works cannot mean simply more activity. The difference lies in what drives them.

Recover "first love" and the "first works" will follow as a matter of course. To human eyes these may look just the same as the works mentioned in verse 2, but to His eyes they are very different. He judges everything by the motive behind it. The mainspring matters so much to Him that if first love is damaged for good, the ability to shine departs and the lampstand is removed.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What kind of coming is threatened

"I will come to you" is not the promise of Christ returning for His people. It is a coming that deals with the church where it stands, like His warning to Pergamum.

With Ephesus, the only coming described is a providential coming: "or else I will come to you quickly, and will remove your lampstand out of its place." It is the same with Pergamum, where He fights with the sword of His mouth. But this is not His coming to receive the saints, nor to bring in His kingdom.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Sentence passed, judgment delayed

Older translations add the word "quickly" to this verse, and the ESV leaves it out. The difference matters, because the sentence on Ephesus was not carried out in a hurry.

"Or else I will come to you." He does not say "quickly" here, though our text has it, as it does at the later stage of evil in verse 16. "And remove your lampstand out of its place." He is slow to carry out judgment. This is the warning of the final removal of the assembly from its place of lampstand responsibility. That sentence is only put into force in Laodicea.

Modernised from J. A. TrenchOriginal wording

Losing the lampstand

The lampstand is the church's place as a light-bearer. Losing it can look like a small penalty for a heart grown cold.

This may seem harsh treatment for such an offence, but the Lord looks to the final consequences. A church that was once taken up with work may grow cold in its affections. For a while it may escape scandalous evil and corruption, but it has lost its security. If it does not repent, its fall is sure, though it may be delayed. Its lampstand will be removed. It will stop bearing the light entrusted to it. God will openly disown it as unfit for His use.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

Losing the lampstand raises an obvious fear: is salvation itself at risk?

Removing the lamp as a light-bearer does not in any way weaken the eternal security of all who build on Christ — the Rock of Ages.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Why the warning is love

The severity is not coldness. A church exists to show the world what Christ's love is like.

He cannot let anything remain in the world that fails to show the great love with which He loved the church. If He did, He would not be "the faithful and true witness." This tender, faithful reproach is the blessed proof that His love never grows cold, however much ours may fail.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Remember — measure today against the beginning; that is the only way to see the fall.

- Repent — not regret over lost freshness, but owning your true condition before the Lord.

- Redo — the first works look the same as busy works. The motive behind them is what differs.

- Removal — this coming is a visit in judgment, not the coming for His people. What it takes away is the lampstand, the place of light-bearing.

- Rooted in love — the reproach itself proves His love never cooled, however much ours has.

Revelation 2:6 · Darby

But this thou hast, that thou hatest the works of the Nicolaitanes, which *I* also hate.

The Lord's letter to Ephesus has already praised their work. Then He mourned their lost love and warned of coming judgment. Before He finishes, He goes back to praise, singling out one thing they shared with Him — a hatred.

A Word of Commendation After the Warning

The order matters. The rebuke and the threat of judgment come first. Then the Lord finds something still worth naming.

Whatever the condition of this assembly, the Lord cannot hold back the expression of His love. He had given a solemn warning of coming judgment unless she repented. Even so, He returns to commendation. "Yet this you have: you hate the works of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate." (v. 6.) So far there was communion with His mind. This is what draws out His approval. History suggests the Nicolaitans were a sect who turned the grace of God into loose living. They combined a profession of faith with ungodly lives. Ephesus hated their impurities, and so did Christ.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Their Works, Not Their Persons

Notice what exactly the Lord and the assembly hate here.

The absence of love has been mourned, but hatred, love's opposite, was rightly present. The Nicolaitans were not hated, for they shared in the general love of God (John 3:16). But their works were hated, and for this the angel is commended. They must have been works of a decidedly evil character to call out such a stern word of condemnation.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Who Were the Nicolaitans?

Commentators differ over who these people were. One writer raises the question and leaves it open:

The name of some sect whose deeds and doctrines are condemned without being described. Rev. 2:6, 15. Many suggestions have been made about the teachings of the Nicolaitans, but nothing is known with certainty. Since both their 'doctrine' and their 'deeds' are mentioned, and Christ 'hated' both, it has been thought they were libertines.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Others work from the meaning of the word itself and reach a different picture — not immorality but domination:

Here, if we are left simply with the name, it is startling and instructive enough. Of course, to those who spoke the language, the meaning would be no hidden or obscure thing. It means "Conquering the people." The last part of the word ("Laos") is the Greek word for "the people." It gives us the common term "Laity." The Nicolaitans were just those who put down the laity — the mass of Christian people — so they could wrongly lord it over them.

Modernised from Frederick William GrantOriginal wording

Deeds First, Then Doctrine

The same name comes back later, in the letter to Pergamos. The two letters do not treat it the same way.

Something comes before the state of Pergamos, and it is mentioned in the very first address. But there it is clearly incidental, and does not mark the state of things. In the first address, to the Ephesians, the Lord says, "Yet this you have: you hate the works of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate" (2:6). Here it is more than the "works" of the Nicolaitans. There are now not merely "works," but "doctrine." And the Church, instead of rejecting it, was going along with it. In the Ephesian days they hated the works of the Nicolaitans. But in Pergamos they "had" those who held the doctrine, and did not condemn them.

Modernised from Frederick William GrantOriginal wording

Why Hatred Belongs With Love

Ephesus had lost love yet kept this hatred.

Love and hatred of evil will always be found together. The Psalmist says, "O you who love the LORD, hate evil!" (Ps. 97:10). A false kindness may ignore evil under the excuse of love. It may even treat evil doctrine as of little importance to the Lord. Genuine love will lead us to hate evil without ignoring the good. In our hatred of evil we may overlook much good; or, in trying to hold on to the good, we may compromise with evil.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Commendation. After the rebuke and the threat of judgment, the Lord goes back to praise. He will not hold back the expression of His love.

- Communion. What He commends is agreement with His own mind. They hated what He hates, and this draws His approval.

- Works, not people. The Lord aims His hatred at works, never at persons. The Nicolaitans themselves shared in the general love of God.

- Uncertainty. No one can say for sure who they were. Some take them as an impure sect that turned grace into loose living. Others read the name as "conquering the people," a class lording it over the rest of God's people.

- Progression. Ephesus hated these works. Pergamos later put up with the same evil as doctrine. Evil that is no longer hated ends up accepted.

Revelation 2:7 · Darby

He that has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the assemblies. To him that overcomes, I will give to him to eat of the tree of life which is in the paradise of God.

The letter to Ephesus ends the way all seven letters end: with a call to listen and a promise held out to the one who overcomes. Both halves raise questions. Why does the Spirit speak to "the churches" in the plural, when this letter goes to one church? And what does it mean to eat from a tree Adam was shut out from?

The Individual Ear

The call singles out one person at a time, not a category of specially qualified believers.

Scripture nowhere recognizes a middle class of hearers. If such a class existed, the Spirit would surely address it. But everything here is intensely individual. "He who has an ear, let him hear" points out at once the overcomer and the need of overcoming, and the promise goes with this... There is to be an overcoming now in the Church of God itself, and so no going along with the crowd is possible. Each must be awake to his responsibility.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

The Spirit's Voice

The words are the Lord's, yet the verse says the Spirit speaks them.

The Lord addresses the Church, and the Spirit applies in power the words of the Lord to the individual with the opened ear.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Not One Church, But All

The plural wording widens the audience beyond Ephesus.

Then comes the general call: "He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches." It does not say "to the church," but "to the churches." So the one who has an ear must weigh not only what the Spirit says to his own church, but what He says to all the others. The call is therefore general, and goes to all believers.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

Where the Call Stands

In this letter the call to hear comes before the promise. From the fourth letter on, that order flips.

Here the notable change takes place. The call to hear begins to follow the promise, instead of coming before it. The reason is that a remnant is here formed... The Lord from then on puts the promise first, because it is useless to expect the church as a whole to receive it. In the three previous churches, as anyone may notice, the call to hear comes first. The Lord is still dealing with the general conscience of the church.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What Overcoming Means Here

What has to be overcome? The letter itself names it.

Overcoming here is overcoming the evil specified in the Assembly. What the Lord deplored in Ephesus was the loss of their first love. Anyone who regained that first love — by grace, and by the Spirit's power working in the opened ear and heart — would be an overcomer in the sense of this Scripture. He would have a right to the special promise given here.

Modernised from Raymond K. CampbellOriginal wording

One Tree, Not Two

Some copies of the text add the words "in the midst of." One writer traces those words to a copyist thinking of Eden.

Note carefully that the words "in the midst of" have no place in the true text here... It was doubtless a thought of Eden in the copyist's mind that put them in. In the paradise God made for man in Eden there were two trees: the tree of responsibility, which is the knowledge of good and evil, and the tree of life. But in the Paradise of God there is only one, and it fills the whole sphere. It is Christ. He endured the judgment of it on the cross and became our life. So all the history of our responsibility and our failures will be over for ever.

Modernised from J. A. TrenchOriginal wording

The Paradise of God

The garden Adam lost was man's. The one promised here is God's.

It is to the eye and ear of faith that the Lord brings out the promise of the tree of life in the paradise of God. He sees the church failing in fellowship with God, and so He sets before it the tree of life and the paradise of God. It is God's paradise — blessed security! There can be no falling away there. It was man's paradise first. Then failure came in. To keep man from taking the fruit of the tree of life, and eating, and living for ever, God drove him out. But now the promise to the one who overcomes is to eat of the tree of life freely, and in security, in the paradise of God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Scripture also says where this paradise is:

2 Corinthians 12:2 and 4 identify Paradise with "the third heaven" — the immediate dwelling place of God. Revelation 2:7 speaks of it as "the Paradise OF GOD," where the tree of life is.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Hear personally. Scripture names no middle class of listeners. The call lands on one conscience at a time, and each must be awake to his own responsibility.

- Hear widely. The Spirit speaks to the churches, so every believer weighs all seven messages, not only his own.

- Hear and overcome. At Ephesus, overcoming means facing the fault the letter names. First love comes back by grace and the Spirit's power.

- Hear and eat. The reward is Christ Himself as the tree of life. The tree of responsibility is gone, and one tree fills the whole scene.

- Hear and stay. God drove Adam out of man's paradise. In God's paradise the overcomer eats freely and in security, with no falling away.

Revelation 2:8 · Darby

And to the angel of the assembly in Smyrna write These things says the first and the last, who became dead, and lived

Smyrna is the second of seven assemblies the risen Christ writes to, and the only thing He says about it is suffering. Before a word of instruction He names Himself — so why this title, and why does He speak of His own death before He mentions theirs?

The Name Itself

The city's name carries the message of the letter.

Smyrna means myrrh. Scripture often mentions it in connection with preparing the dead for burial. Myrrh had to be crushed to give out its fragrance. This pictures the time when pagan Rome crushed the church under its heel. Yet the church never gave God such sweet fragrance as in those two centuries of almost constant martyrdom.

Modernised from Henry Allan IronsideOriginal wording

Why the Trial Came

The suffering that follows was no accident of history.

In the letter to the angel of the church in Smyrna we meet a completely different state of things. This is a special case rather than the general one we have already seen. The church had fallen away from the purity of the apostles, and above all from its first love, and the Lord chose to afflict it. He let all kinds of trial come on His people by loosing the power of Satan, who worked through Gentile persecutors.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The First and the Last

The phrase was not invented for this letter. It is a name God claims for Himself in the Old Testament.

Isaiah has three passages that call Jehovah, the God of Israel, "the first and the last" (41:4, 44:6, 48:12). In the same way, Revelation three times calls the Lord Jesus "the first and the last" (1:17, 2:8, 22:13). I would say for myself that this is conclusive proof that the Jehovah of the Old Testament is the Jesus of the New.

Modernised from Frank WallaceOriginal wording

For people about to be killed, that title does real work.

Some are called to meet the power of Satan and to face a martyr's death. What could hold them up and encourage them more than knowing they are in the hands of a divine Person — the First and the Last? He existed before every opposing power. He will still be there when the last enemy lies under His feet. He is therefore above all.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Who Died and Came to Life

The title has four parts, and each one does its own work.

He is the first, so no one can get ahead of Him and block Him. He is the last, so no one but He can have the final word in any matter. He also died and came to life, and this guarantees that He uses resurrection power for those who belong to Him. If the believers at Smyrna grasped Him this way, it must have given them great strength for the troubles coming on them.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The same words also meet the fear of dying.

If they are called to face a martyr's death, Christ Himself has led the way down that path, for He suffered death at the hands of men. He died and came to life: seemingly defeated and killed, yet coming out in victory over the last and greatest of enemies. Death could not defeat Him, so death will not defeat those who are His.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

He Begins With Himself

To a people laid flat by suffering He offers no badge of authority — only Himself.

When Christ sees people laid flat, He does not begin with the badges of His office, which would dampen the heart and crush the spirit. He begins with Himself. "I am the first and the last, who died and came to life." I come to you as the One in whom you will find the answer to every trial you are in.

Modernised from G. V. WigramOriginal wording

Not One Word of Blame

The Lord finds nothing here to correct.

The assembly at Smyrna, like the one at Philadelphia, is free from blame. The word He speaks to the angel is one of comfort and encouragement, suited to their special circumstances. So it reveals the heart of the Lord for His own.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Crushed. Smyrna means myrrh, a burial perfume that gives off its scent only when crushed. Those crushing years gave God the sweetest fragrance of the era.

- Sent. The persecution was not outside the Lord's hand. The church had fallen from its first love, and He let Satan's power loose through pagan Rome.

- First. Isaiah gives this title to Jehovah, and Revelation gives it to Jesus. He stands before every power that opposes His people, and He outlasts the last enemy.

- Risen. He died and came to life. Resurrection power is not a theory offered to the dying, but a road He has already walked.

- Unblamed. To a suffering assembly He gives no rebuke, only Himself. That is His heart toward His own when they are at their weakest.

Revelation 2:9 · Darby

I know thy tribulation and thy poverty; but thou art rich; and the railing of those who say that they themselves are Jews, and are not, but a synagogue of Satan.

Smyrna was a church under pressure and with nothing, and the Lord's letter calls it rich. Two hard questions follow: how can a hunted, penniless church be rich, and who are these false Jews serving Satan?

"I know" — knowledge that comforts

The Lord's opening words are not a general statement about His omniscience. They speak to a specific pain. One writer links them to the way God spoke of Israel's suffering in Egypt.

Besides tribulation, they were in poverty, and He who knows all things knew it all. But that is not the form in which He gives His comfort. He shows them that He knows their sorrows in detail. It was not enough for their hearts, or His, to say that He knew them only as a group. As with Israel in bondage (Exodus 3:7), "I know their sufferings" — so here it is His heart speaking to their hearts.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What tribulation means

The word covers more than ordinary hardship. It names what happens when the world turns on believers.

Nothing escapes the notice of Him whose eyes are like a flame of fire... Tribulation means the trials that come with persecution. That is its usual sense in the New Testament. The strong wind of persecution had set in once more on God's poor flock. The god of this world stirred it up, out of his hatred of Christ. We who live in a day when confessing Christ costs nothing... cannot easily understand the dangers surrounding the saints in the early centuries. Their neighbours and the state often treated them as enemies. Foes surrounded them like a pack of hungry wolves, trying to wipe them off the face of the earth.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Poor here, rich in His eyes

The short phrase "but you are rich" stands against the last of the seven letters. There a church boasts of its own wealth.

He sees the tribulation they bore for His sake. He also sees their poverty in the world's eyes, which fitted so well with spiritual riches. The words here are commendation, not the kind we shall find addressed to Laodicea at the close. In Laodicea they too were rich — they had grown rich — but not with riches Christ could recognise. To Him, though they did not know it, they were the wretched and miserable, the poor and blind and naked. Here He sees the poverty they lived in at Smyrna. And He Himself reminds them how rich they still are.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer sees an honour in their empty hands. It made them like their Lord on earth.

There was a special honour in being this close to Him, and this like Him, who had nowhere to lay His head. I have learnt this: Jesus is in a particular way the partner of His poor servants.

Modernised from C. StanleyOriginal wording

The synagogue of Satan

The blasphemy here targets the saints, not God. The claim to be "Jews" is a claim to a religious standing the Lord refuses to grant.

Some falsely called themselves Jews. That is, they claimed a religious standing before God on earth, as the people He recognised in the world. So they assumed that wealth and possessions were owed to them. And they rejected those in poverty and trouble. So they slandered and abused — for that seems to be the force of "blasphemy" here — those who were true saints of God... They were not Jews, but they were a synagogue, a word that means "a bringing together" — a synagogue of Satan.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Pressure often makes people bend. It did not here.

Their tribulation and poverty did not tempt them into tolerating evil. They rejected the false claim to the position of Jews, which is here called the synagogue of Satan. Judaism is a religion fitted for this world and for man in the flesh. So it put man under law, and had a worldly ritual and priesthood. This is exactly what Satan has brought into Christendom.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

The crushed spice

The city's own name paints the same picture.

Smyrna means myrrh. It is often mentioned in Scripture in connection with embalming the dead. Myrrh had to be crushed before it gave out its fragrance. This pictures the time when pagan Rome crushed the church. Yet the church never gave God such sweet fragrance as in those two centuries of almost constant martyrdom.

Modernised from Henry Allan IronsideOriginal wording

Summary

- Known. He does not say He knows their sorrows in general; He names them one by one, as He named Israel's in Egypt.

- Crushed. Their tribulation is persecution. Myrrh gives its fragrance only under crushing.

- Poor. Stripped of what the world values, they stood where their Lord had stood, with nowhere to lay His head.

- Rich. Laodicea called herself rich and was naked. The only voice that counts calls Smyrna rich.

- Slandered. The abuse came from people claiming God's ancient standing. The Lord calls their gathering a synagogue of Satan.

Revelation 2:10 · Darby

Fear nothing [of] what thou art about to suffer. Behold, the devil is about to cast of you into prison, that ye may be tried; and ye shall have tribulation ten days. Be thou faithful unto death, and I will give to thee the crown of life.

Smyrna is a church already in trouble — poor, pressed, and about to face worse. Here the Lord asks for faithfulness even at the cost of life, and promises a crown in return.

"Do not fear" spoken before the storm

The warning and the comfort arrive together.

"Fear not," or "nothing," is a word of preparation for yet further trials, and is clearly taken from Revelation 1:17. There it came to John as he lay fainting, and it carried complete and unqualified assurance to his soul. Here it reassures the Church as the gathering storm is about to burst upon it. Tribulation and poverty were bad enough, and hard to bear. But worse still was in store.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

He speaks as One who has been further down that road than they will ever go.

And He speaks to them as one who had known the depths of tribulation Himself. "These things says the First and the Last, who died and came to life." He had gone through the deepest sorrow, and through death itself — He had died for them, and was alive again. They had this blessed One to flee to in all their trials.

Modernised from Church HistoryOriginal wording

The devil's power and God's permission

Christ does not promise escape.

Whatever the malice and power of Satan, at the most, if permitted, he has only the power of death. Christ is First and Last, beyond as before death, God Himself; but more than that, He has met and gone through its power. The saints were not to fear. Satan would work, be allowed to sift, to imprison. Let the saints only be faithful to the extreme point of his power; all beyond that was beyond him, was Christ's.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

There is a mercy in the change of attack.

The attack by corruption had failed, so the Lord permitted the devil to turn to violence. As the Lord says, "The devil is about to throw some of you into prison." The devil's violence may indeed be painful to God's people, but it is safer for them than his schemes.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

"Ten days": a measured trial

Whatever else the number means, it fixes an end to the trial before it begins.

It may seem to us that the world, or men of the world, have a victorious course ahead of them. It may seem that the power is all in their hands. But here we see the limit of suffering: "for ten days you will have tribulation." When faith grasps this, it can be still. It knows that God is greater; He is over all... The book of Job lifts the curtain off Satan's doings, and shows that Satan can only go as far as God allows him.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Commentators differ on what the ten days point to.

The 'ten days' of Rev. 2:10 may represent ten different persecutions, or refer to ten years' duration of persecution under Diocletian. In any case it gives the idea of limitation.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

What "faithful unto death" asks

The phrase is often read as "keep going until you die naturally."

It is essential to see what this means. Faithfulness unto death is not faithfulness all through our natural lives. It is martyrdom for the sake of Christ and His word. It is a call to be faithful, even at the cost of life... What would create the temptation to unfaithfulness? The fear of death, or clinging to life in this world.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Christ puts it almost as an exchange.

"I have died for you; now be faithful unto death for Me."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The crown of life

The reward matches the loss. They give up life, and life is what Christ gives them as a crown.

The Lord delights to acknowledge the faith of His saints. If they have shown that they did not love their life in this world even to death, it shall be as though they had gained it in the world to come. Life shall be a crown to them there, as the glorious reward of their not having cared for it here.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

And Christ hands it over Himself, at the moment of crossing.

You are tried for My name's sake, He says, perhaps are going into death for Me, and I have been through death for you. You are standing on one side of the river, and I on the other. You have to come through the waters to get to Me. But the moment your head comes above the waters on this side, I will put a crown of life on it.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Measured — the suffering is real, but its length is set in advance. The devil cannot go one day beyond the Lord's ten days.

- Permitted — Satan is the visible agent, yet he moves only within limits God allows, as in the book of Job.

- Faithful — the call is not to last a lifetime but to hold to Christ even when that costs life.

- Grounded — the One asking it died and lives again, so He asks nothing He has not gone through first.

- Crowned — beyond the point where the enemy's power stops, Christ Himself gives the crown of life.

Revelation 2:11 · Darby

He that has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the assemblies. He that overcomes shall in no wise be injured of the second death.

Smyrna is the church under pressure. Its believers faced loss of goods and even loss of life. Christ ends His letter to them with a word about death. He does not take away the first death. He takes away its fear, by naming a second death that the one who conquers will never meet.

What Overcoming Means Here

Each church has its own battle, so "the one who conquers" carries a different weight in each letter. In Smyrna the enemy is not lost love but fear.

To overcome in Ephesus is to repent, to get back the first love they had lost, and to do the first works. Here it means being found faithful to death, being courageous for the Lord and His testimony in the face of all Satan's terrors. So a saint in Smyrna becomes an overcomer by keeping faithful, and by winning — only in the power of the Holy Spirit — over all fear and cowardice.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The pressure on them was brutal, and Christ was closest in it.

On one side the synagogue of Satan is raging. On the other side stands the pagan world. Both are determined to crush Christianity. Between the two stand the lowly people who confess Jesus of Nazareth, with patience and meekness as their only defence. What was the human prospect? Loss of character, of goods, and of life itself. To overcome in such terrible circumstances took strong faith and clear spiritual sight, as seeing Him who is invisible. Yet He is never nearer than when His saints seem forsaken. He is never more true and tender in sympathy than when He seems to have forgotten them.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

The Call To Hear

The call to hear runs through all seven letters. But its place changes, and that change carries meaning.

This call appears seven times. In the letters to the first three churches it comes just before the promise to the overcomer. In the last four it closes each letter. The first group has the Church as a whole in view, and calls it to repent. In the second group the hopeless state of the Church is all too plain, so a remnant company stands apart from the mass.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

So in Smyrna the Lord still speaks to the whole church, before the promise narrows to the one who conquers.

What The Second Death Is

Scripture defines the phrase later in the book, and the promise is worded with great force.

He will in "no way," on no account — a very strong negative — be hurt by the "second death." That death is the lake of fire, the everlasting home and place of punishment for the devil and the wicked (Rev. 20:14; Rev. 21:8).

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Some argue that the fire simply burns a person out of existence.

The second death is the lake of fire — it is punishment. They claim that it burns a person out in time, and that ceasing to exist is the second death. But Scripture says the punishment itself is the second death. Death never means ceasing to exist.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The First Death Disarmed

Christ does not promise Smyrna escape from the executioner. He promises that the executioner's work stops at the body.

The torturer's rack or the flames of a martyr's death may hurt the body. But the second death cannot hurt the believer's soul. A martyr's death may separate soul from body. The second death will never separate the believer's soul from God.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Death has changed for the believer because of what Christ did with it.

Do not fear the first death; it is only a servant to usher you into the presence of God: the second death will not injure you. The Lord is like that tree of old, thrown into the bitter waters of Marah. He went into the bitterest waters of death, and so they have turned to sweetness and refreshment for us.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Promise For Every Believer

This promise appears in Smyrna's letter, but it is not limited to Smyrna. Each promise stands where the saints needed it most, though it belongs to all believers.

It is certainly true that no saint will be hurt by the second death, and yet this promise appears only in connection with the overcomer in Smyrna. These promises are true for all believers. Yet certain saints get a special reminder of the promises that suit their own circumstances, for their comfort and encouragement.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Hear — The call to hear comes before the promise here. In the first three letters the Lord still speaks to the whole church and calls it to repent.

- Overcome — In Smyrna, conquering is not recovering lost love. It is staying faithful to death, and the Holy Spirit gives the power.

- Die — Nothing here promises rescue from the stake. The body may die; that is the first death, and it only ushers the believer into God's presence.

- Untouched — The second death is the lake of fire. The words are as strong as language allows: on no account will it touch the one who conquers.

- Assured — The promise to persecuted Smyrna holds for every believer. It stands here because here it was needed most.

Revelation 2:12 · Darby

And to the angel of the assembly in Pergamos write These things says he that has the sharp two-edged sword

The letter to Pergamum — Pergamos in older translations — opens with a weapon, not a word of comfort: Christ names Himself as the One holding a sharp two-edged sword. Why did this church need to meet Him armed?

The Sword Is the Word

Scripture uses more than one picture for God's word, and each picture does a different job.

We know from Hebrews 4:12 that the two-edged sword is a figure of the Word of God. The Psalmist can speak of the Word as a lamp to his feet. Here it is not viewed as a light for the Christian's path, but as a sword to deal with all that is contrary to the light. The word viewed as the sword is always judicial.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

A Title Chosen to Match the Condition

Christ never introduces Himself at random. The title He picks here points to something this church had lost.

What the sword is in the hands of man, so is the word that reveals God, searching out and cutting through all obstacles. The Lord applies this in power, and it decides every question that has to do with Him. There is always a great and beautiful connection between the way or title in which He presents Himself and the state of the church He is addressing. The word no longer had living energy to judge in the church. That is why the Lord Jesus takes care to prove that it had never lost its power in His hands.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Satan changed his method between the two cities, and the Lord's self-description changed with it.

In Smyrna Satan tried persecution, but it only stirred up a greater spirit of earnestness and devotion. In Pergamos he tried his tricks, and his worldly traps lulled the church into carelessness and indifference. What a change from the last letter! Smyrna was a people appointed to die. There the Lord makes Himself known as "the first and the last, who died and came to life." Here it is as the Judge carrying the sharp two-edged sword. In Smyrna He reveals Himself as having the power of life; here, as having the power of death.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

What the Name Pergamos Suggests

The city's name itself carries a meaning that commentators tie to the sword.

Pergamos means "a marriage," implying that the Church virtually "married" the world though already promised to Christ (2 Cor. 11:2)... Many thought instead that Christianity had won a great victory by having the world recognise the Lord Jesus. They failed to see that this recognition was in word only and not in heart. Great numbers became "Christians" in a formal way while not knowing the reality of repentance toward God and faith toward the Lord Jesus Christ. Believers and unbelievers were now mixed together. So the Lord speaks to Pergamos as the One who has the sword with two edges, who knows how to divide exactly between the Church and the world.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Commentators differ on the name's sense: one gives "marriage," another "elevation."

The Same Sword That Will Judge the Nations

The sword is not confined to this letter.

His word is a word of penetrating and decisive judgment. It is with this two-edged sword that He later strikes the nations (Rev. 19), so there can be no question as to its meaning. And while it is of course true that it is not His own at Pergamos who are struck with it, yet it is those whom He charges them with having in their midst (Rev. 2:16).

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

A Character He Will One Day Lay Aside

Not every title Christ takes is permanent.

Pergamos, Elevation, is in a bad state. Once we are inside the little halo where this church and Christ stand, the first thing we see is the sharp sword with two edges coming from the mouth of Christ. He will never cease to be the first and the last, but, thank God, He will cease to be the One out of whose mouth goes the sharp sword.

Modernised from G. V. WigramOriginal wording

Summary

- The sword is the Word. Hebrews 4:12 gives the meaning. Here the word is not a lamp for the path but a blade against everything opposed to the light.

- The Word turned on the church. Christ takes this title because the Word had stopped judging inside the assembly. He proves it never lost its edge in His own hand.

- The Word divides. Believers and unbelievers had blended together. The sword cuts an exact line between the church and the world she had married.

- The Word aims true. One day this sword strikes the nations (Rev. 19). Here it aims at those the church harbours among them, not at His faithful ones.

- The Word will finish its work. He remains the first and the last forever; the drawn sword belongs to a season that will end.

Revelation 2:13 · Darby

I know where thou dwellest, where the throne of Satan [is]; and thou holdest fast my name, and hast not denied my faith, even in the days in which Antipas my faithful witness [was], who was slain among you, where Satan dwells.

The Lord's word to Pergamum opens with an address. This church lives where Satan's throne stands. Yet in that same sentence the Lord finds something to praise, and He names one man, Antipas, who died there.

The address: where the church settled down

The Lord points to the world itself, and to a church that had stopped travelling through it.

Satan, we know, is the prince of this world, and his throne is where he rules. It is not in hell, as poets wrongly dream. His throne is where he reigns. It is not the place he will be sent to when his throne is crushed and his reigning time is over. Nor does he merely reign at Rome, or Pergamos. His throne is not local, it is the world. If the professing Church dwells in the place of Satan's throne, we may be sure of this. The Church has given up her pilgrim and stranger character and settled down in the world.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The word "dwell" carries the weight. No believer can avoid being in the world.

For "dwelling in the world" is another thing than being in it. We are in the world because we must be, and we are in no way responsible for that. But to be a dweller is a moral state: it is to be a citizen of the world.

Modernised from Frederick William GrantOriginal wording

Satan's change of method

Persecution had failed to break the church, so the enemy changed his method.

Now notice in Pergamos how Satan changes his tactics. If he cannot succeed by persecution (which only made Smyrna brighter in testimony, as nearer to Christ), he will try seduction. If he cannot be a lion, he will be a serpent. Here she has settled down to dwell where Satan has his "throne." It answers to the time of the emperor Constantine, when the empire took up the profession of Christianity and became the church's patron. So instead of being persecuted and despised by the world, she gained the world's friendship and patronage — and that was her ruin. … The world which her Lord and Master had refused from Satan's hands had attracted and overcome her (Matthew 4). She should have walked in His lowly footsteps.

Modernised from F G PattersonOriginal wording

Holding fast the name, not denying the faith

The Lord gives two commendations here, and they do not weigh the same.

The name of Christ is generally the expression of the truth of what He is; but placed here alongside the faith, the meaning will be slightly different. It will probably mean holding fast the confession of the name of Christ. It means confessing Christ openly, though dwelling where Satan's throne was, and not denying the faith — that is, the truth concerning Christ. "Holding fast" is more positive than "not denying," so the first part of the commendation is stronger than the second.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

They still defended the Person of Christ Himself.

They still maintained His name, and did not deny the faith which was given to the saints; but this was all. They held fast His personal glory, and did not deny what was revealed of Him because of flesh and blood. They believed of Him what eye had not seen — His Deity.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Antipas: the man the Lord names

The title the Lord gives this man carries the weight.

The name of this noble witness for Christ, who sealed his testimony with his blood, has come down to all ages. We know nothing certain about Antipas except his name. Yet there is much wrapped up in that phrase, which another translation gives as "My faithful witness, My faithful one." What Christ was to God, that Antipas was to Christ.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Antipas and the church shared one address. The contrast is the sting.

The faithfulness of Antipas led him to a martyr's death. He was a bright witness to Christ in Satan's world. So he was a shining example of what the whole Church should have been here. By contrast, he was a condemnation of the Church in its low condition. … It is as if the Lord said to the Church, "You live where Satan dwells, but My faithful witness died where Satan dwells."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The call to stand alone

The name itself makes the verse personal.

Antipas means "against everybody." I would like to be an Antipas, if everyone else is giving up the truth, as was then the case about keeping separate from the world. Get hold of the Lord, and if everybody is against you, put your back against the rock and stand. Someone once said to Luther, "All the world is against you." His reply was, "God and I are a match for them."

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Dwelling. Satan's throne is the world he rules, not hell; to dwell there is to stop being a pilgrim and become a citizen.

- Seduction. When persecution failed, the enemy offered friendship instead — a serpent where he could not be a lion.

- Held. Even settled in the world, the church still confessed Christ's name and refused to deny His Deity; that much the Lord commends.

- Named. Antipas is otherwise unknown, yet Christ calls him "My faithful witness" — what Christ was to God, Antipas was to Christ.

- Contrast. They lived where Satan dwells; Antipas died there — the same address, two different answers.

Revelation 2:14 · Darby

But I have a few things against thee that thou hast there those who hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balak to cast a snare before the sons of Israel, to eat [of] idol sacrifices and commit fornication.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Revelation 2:15 · Darby

So thou also hast those who hold the doctrine of Nicolaitanes in like manner.

Pergamos made room for two groups of error, not one: some held the teaching of Balaam, others that of the Nicolaitans. The question is not whether the church believed the error, but why it let the error stay.

Two groups, not one

The Lord's complaint here is plural. It falls on two separate sets of people, and the same assembly sheltered both.

Here the plural "things" points to more than one just cause of complaint. Those who held the teaching of Balaam were one class. Those who held the teaching of the Nicolaitans were another. The Pergamos assembly tolerated both.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Older Bibles end this verse with "which thing I hate." The true word is "likewise," and it ties the second group to the first.

The true reading of verse 15 is "likewise," instead of "which thing I hate," which was probably copied from Rev. 2:6. The sense is that there were some who held the Nicolaitan doctrine, as well as those who held that of Balaam.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

From deeds to doctrine

The Nicolaitans appear at Ephesus too. What changed by Pergamos is how far the evil had gone.

The Lord commended Ephesus for hating the deeds of the Nicolaitans. But this is an advance in evil. After the "deeds" came a doctrine. It justified the deeds and taught on purpose the very things Christ hated. Satan moved with caution at Ephesus. At Pergamum the evil is let in and taught. There is nothing to show that the Nicolaitans were a sect that had separated from the flock… The Lord holds the assembly responsible for having them there. They had not separated as a sect, and the assembly had not put them away as evil persons.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Look at the verb the Lord uses: they hold the teaching.

The words used are very significant. It is not that the church has adopted the teaching. There are people inside who "hold" the doctrine. It seems they were allowed to hold it without being disturbed and without rebuke.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

What the Nicolaitans taught

Commentators differ on what the Nicolaitans actually taught. One reading takes it as grace twisted into permission to sin.

The doctrine of the Nicolaitans seems to be an evil from within, while that of Balaam came from without… It was a corruption of grace, turning grace into licence to sin… Grace has set us completely free through Him who died and rose again. What claim does it not have on our hearts?… Even when we are certain of our deliverance, if the joy of it fades a little, we begin to use the Lord's grace just to serve ourselves. This, carried on without conscience, is Nicolaitanism.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Others read the name itself as the clue, and find in it a clergy set over ordinary believers.

Nicolaitans is Greek; it is a compound. Nikao is a verb and means to have the upper hand, to domineer; laos means the people (our English "laity"). Nicolaitans means "the dominators of the people." A priestly class had grown up in the Church. It domineered over the rest of the people, the so-called laity… Ephesus rejected this evil, but Pergamos fully approves and tolerates it.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Not enough to be sound yourself

The man addressed in this letter was sound himself. That did not clear him.

To be sound himself was not enough. He should have allowed no compromise with evil. He was sound in himself, yet he let evil spread among them. The Lord could not rest satisfied with that state of things… They had authority to act. If they had used it, they would have found they had the power as well. But since they failed to act, the Lord Himself must fight the corrupters with the sword of His mouth. What a place then the assembly occupies, and what responsibility rests on it!

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The call to repent

The Lord's answer to this state is a call to repentance. It reaches the whole assembly, and it reaches each believer in it.

To overcome here is not only to resist the teaching of these groups, and to resist it with success. It is also to listen to the call to repentance. The message comes to believers one by one, and each one is responsible to heed what is said. Even so, no believer can shake off responsibility for the state of the assembly… They must humble themselves before God, because these evils are tolerated, even if they are not accepted. They must mourn over the dishonour this brings on the Lord's name.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Hated — at Ephesus the Nicolaitans showed up as deeds, and the Lord commended that church for hating them.

- Held — at Pergamos the deeds have hardened into a doctrine that defends them. People inside the church held it, and the church never put them away.

- Tolerated — the Lord does not accuse Pergamos of believing the error. He accuses it of housing those who do.

- Disputed — commentators differ on what they taught. Some read it as grace turned into licence to sin. Others read it as a priestly class ruling over ordinary believers.

- Repent — a sound personal creed is no cover for allowed evil. If the assembly will not judge it, the sword of His mouth will.

Revelation 2:16 · Darby

Repent therefore but if not, I come to thee quickly, and I will make war with them with the sword of my mouth.

The church at Pergamos was sound in what it believed, yet it let evil teaching run on among its members. This verse asks whether a church answers for evil it only tolerates, and what the Lord does when the church will not act.

(Note: the ESV says "soon" here. The older translations quoted below say "quickly.")

The Charge: Allowing Evil

The Lord did not charge the angel of Pergamos — the one He holds responsible there — with false doctrine. He charged him with letting others hold it.

To be sound himself was not enough; he ought to have allowed no compromise with evil. Personal soundness, while allowing evil to be rife among them, was a state of things with which the Lord could not rest satisfied. So He must use the sharp two-edged sword out of His mouth (Rev. 1:16) against the evildoers, unless the angel repented. That same sword will one day judge the nations (Rev. 19:15). The effect of repentance would be the expulsion of the evil from among them.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What Repentance Would Mean

The call to repent carries an offer with it, and it reaches back to how God dealt with Israel.

The warning to repent goes to the church. The Lord wants to rouse her to self-judgment for having tolerated this evil teaching among her own people. He will give her the chance to share His own mind about the evil. Then she may have the privilege of caring for the honour of His name. It was so in Israel. When evil and corruption spread, the LORD always called on His people to sanctify His great name. At the same time He warned them: if they failed to do it, He would take the matter in hand Himself and sanctify His own name.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

"Against Them," Not "Against You"

This warning aims at cleansing, and mercy drives it.

The Lord does not say, "I will fight against you with the sword of My mouth," but "against them" (v. 16). It is true that the sword of judgment may act by taking them away in death. That is what happened to the Corinthian saints. The Lord judged them here below so that they would not be condemned later with the world. Christian discipline does not mean putting away those who are not Christians from those who are. It aims at purging out Christians who walk wrongly, to keep the honour and holiness of the Lord among them. Mercy is the great motive of discipline, next to maintaining Christ's character in the church.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the Sword Is

The sword comes out of His mouth. That tells us what it is.

This is divine judgment carried out by the simple force of His Word. No one can ward that judgment off. The sword is two-edged, and that is the point of the picture. We never read of our Lord personally putting His hand on His enemies. He speaks, and it is done… The ungodly in the Church are the first to be threatened with judgment, which it is hopeless to escape unless they repent (Rev. 2:16).

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

The Coming Meant Here

The coming promised here is not the return Christians look for at the end of the book. It is a nearer visit, and it does not fall on everyone alike.

If no self-judgment followed the call to repent, the Lord threatens speedy judgment: "I come to you quickly." The present tense shows how near the judgment is, and so does the word "quickly"… This coming does not mean the personal return of the Lord, or what people call the second Advent. It points to an immediate dealing with the assembly by the Lord, who would visit it in judgment. To the angel He says, "I come to you," but to the still more guilty, "I will make war with them." So the Lord distinguishes. There are degrees of sin and, in proportion, of punishment.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

The Space Between the Warning and the Blow

The Lord leaves a space between the call and the blow.

The angel was responsible to take steps to banish the evil, but he had not done it, so the Lord Himself would take it in hand. He calls first of all on the angel to repent. The Lord would allow a period of grace to give time for self-judgment. If the angel did not use it, the Lord Himself would come quickly. With the two-edged sword of the word of His mouth He would search through and through, and expose the state of those who were prominent in Pergamos. If we shut our eyes to what grieves the Spirit of God in ourselves or among the people of God, the Lord does not.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Tolerated. Sound belief was not enough at Pergamos. The Lord was not satisfied while the church let evil run on inside it.

- Warned. The sword out of His mouth is His Word — judgment carried out by speech alone, and impossible to ward off.

- Given time. The call to repent opens a period of grace for self-judgment. It offers the church a share in the Lord's mind about the evil and a part in guarding the honour of His name.

- Targeted. He comes to the church, but He wars on the guiltier ones inside it. There are degrees of sin and, in proportion, of punishment.

- Answered. If the church will not judge the evil, the Lord comes and judges it Himself. Discipline shown in mercy now spares the church that search.

Revelation 2:17 · Darby

He that has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the assemblies. To him that overcomes, to him will I give of the hidden manna; and I will give to him a white stone, and on the stone a new name written, which no one knows but he that receives [it].

Pergamos was a church settled down in the world, in the very place where Satan's throne stood, and some there held the teaching of Balaam. So the Lord promises no public position — He offers hidden food, a stone, and a name that only one person will ever read.

A word for the individual ear

The promise follows a call to hear, and that call goes to one person at a time.

The fact of the church getting into the world at once isolated the faithful Christian... But if the word reached the one who had an ear to hear, it gave secret fellowship with Christ when the public position had become settled in what was false.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The manna and the hidden manna

The Lord does not promise the daily manna. He promises the hidden manna.

The manna means the Son of God become man to give life to our souls. He entered in humiliation into all our circumstances. The manna is the provision for the daily walk through the wilderness... But what then is the hidden manna? The manna for Israel was spread around the camp, and they were to gather it daily for their food... But this is not the hidden manna. A golden pot of manna was to be laid up before God. When the Israelites reached the land, they would have the memorial of what they had enjoyed in the wilderness. So the hidden manna is the remembrance of a suffering Christ down here. It is the memory of what Christ was in the wilderness — a man, humbled and suffering, who is God's eternal delight in heaven. The one who has overcome has been faithful in separation with Christ from the world. In eternity he will share God's own delight in a once humbled Christ.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

An answer to the exact temptation

The promise fits the evil named earlier in the letter.

There is a very clear relation between the promise and the evil in Pergamos. The temptation was to eat things sacrificed to idols. The Lord says, "I will feed you with that which alone can satisfy." In this way He would encourage His own to resist the seductions and pleasures of the world.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Not only seen, but eaten

The Lord's wording goes further than a memorial.

So the food of the wilderness remained, but remained only as a memorial, to be seen. But to the overcomer at Pergamos the promise is different. "I will give some of the hidden manna" — he shall share in it, not simply see it. Christ as enjoyed in the wilderness shall be enjoyed afresh in the glorious land we are going to.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The white stone

The stone comes from everyday customs the first readers knew.

The ancients made much use of a white stone in social life and legal customs. A white stone marked days of celebration; a black stone marked days of disaster. A host showed his appreciation of a special guest by a white stone with a name or message written on it. A white stone meant acquittal; a black stone condemnation in the courts of justice... It is the expression of the Lord's personal delight in each one of the conquering company. It is in no way a public reward... The new name on the stone, known only to the overcomer, means Christ, then known in a special and personal way by each one — a reward beyond all price.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Commentators differ over whether the stone stays private. Others read it as open honour: it "may teach us that he is to be publicly and specially honoured before men."

H. H. Snell

The name nobody else can read

Why give a reward no one else can see? Some joys between Christ and a soul are not meant to be shared.

There are public joys in heaven common to all, thousands upon thousands of voices in communion and praise... But He must have our individual affections as well as our shared ones. My own particular joy in Christ you can never know, nor can I ever taste yours... That name would have no meaning for anybody else but the one to whom it is given... We may have now in spirit this "white stone" from Christ. It is His secret expression of grace and love, which others cannot have for me... What a secret source of strength it is, even though all the world thinks me wrong.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Hidden setting. The church had settled where Satan's throne was. So the Lord speaks past the crowd to whoever has an ear: faithfulness had become personal.

- Hidden food. Manna was Christ come down in humiliation. The jar kept before God holds the memory of that life, and the overcomer feeds on it.

- Hidden answer. Pergamos was tempted to eat at the world's table. The reply is not a rule but a meal: "I will feed you with that which alone can satisfy."

- Hidden approval. A white stone meant acquittal, and a host's welcome for a valued guest. Here it is Christ's own delight in one who stood alone, though commentators differ on whether that honour stays private.

- Hidden name. The name no one else can read is Christ known to that one person alone. Heaven's shared joy is not the whole story, and that secret strengthens a believer now, even when the world thinks him wrong.

Revelation 2:18 · Darby

And to the angel of the assembly in Thyatira write These things says the Son of God, he that has his eyes as a flame of fire, and his feet [are] like fine brass

The fourth of the seven letters opens with a change of title. To Thyatira the Lord presents Himself as the Son of God. The description that follows fits the trouble in that church. Burning eyes, gleaming feet — both raise one question. Who holds authority over God's people?

Why "the Son of God" here

One writer ties the change to the religious system this letter pictures.

To Thyatira the Lord presented Himself as the Son of God, who has eyes like a flame of fire and feet like fine brass. This is remarkable. In the vision of Revelation 1, John saw these features on One like the Son of Man. But we believe the church in Thyatira is a prophetic picture of the period that saw the Roman hierarchy rise to power. If so, how fitting this change of title is. Rome admits that He is the Son of God, yet lays all the emphasis on His being the Son of Mary, so much so that in the end Mary becomes the more prominent. But no — the Son of God is the One who has the eyes that penetrate and discern all things, and the feet that will crush all evil.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The title also answers what this church claimed for herself. An earlier title gives way to a higher one.

So it is no longer "He that has the sharp sword with two edges," but the "Son of God." He must assert His authority as a divine Being over the Church. He rises into a sphere where she dare not pretend to be. With Him alone are the "eyes as a flame of fire," the insight that is truly infallible and holy. And the "feet like fine brass" go with those eyes, bringing judgment no one can resist.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Eyes of fire, feet of brass

The two images are not decoration. They stand for two things: what He sees, and what He does about it.

Up to now I have understood brass as judgment according to works, when connected with responsibility. The eyes as a flame of fire I have understood as the penetrating power of God's judgment (Rev. 2:18, 23). In the second of those verses God "searches mind and heart," and gives to each one according to their works.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Older translations call this metal "fine brass," and the writers here use that wording. The bronze altar sets its meaning.

Brass is a symbol of righteousness according to the claims of God upon man, as in the bronze altar. In the vision in Revelation the Lord has feet like fine brass, "burning as in a furnace." That is, righteous judgment according to responsibility.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The claim He answers

A church was claiming His authority as her own. One writer applies the point to the system this letter pictures.

The Church of Rome presumes to be the chaste bride of Christ. Against this self-asserting, pretentious bride the Lord has to assert His authority as the Son of God in judgment. He is "a son over His own house" (Heb. 3:6). As such He holds authority and stands ready to act in judgment against evil. The Church of the living God is the house of God on earth, and holiness fits His house (1 Timothy 3:15; Psalm 93:5). So the Lord will not tolerate evil in His house. He will judge it in His own time.

Modernised from Raymond K. CampbellOriginal wording

What the Son of God gives His own

The same title also brings something to His own. One writer draws out what the Son gives.

He gives liberty as well as life. "So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed" (John 8:36). These are the two great blessings that mark Jesus as the Son of God. Not that they have always or necessarily gone together. For a person might have spiritual life and yet be in painful bondage, as one sees too often.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A letter that runs on to the end

Thyatira marks a turning point in the seven messages. From here the appeal narrows, and the Lord's coming enters the text.

In Thyatira there is still much faithfulness and zeal, but the mass is corrupt, and the call to hear is no longer addressed to the whole church, but only to the faithful. Moreover, in this and the following letters the Lord's coming is named, which seems to show that, historically, we have now reached a phase in the story of Christendom that will last until the end of the Church's time on earth.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

That is why the title matters for the overcomer, not only for the offender.

As Son of man the apostle has seen Him in the vision that opens the book. As Son of man He will soon take a throne which He can share with men, His redeemed. Till then they are in the field of conflict, to overcome as He overcame. This is the clear answer to the dream of worldly authority that grips the false church in Thyatira. Rome would reign before Christ reigns.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- The title. He signs this letter "the Son of God" — the divine claim, set against a system that prefers to remember Him as the Son of Mary.

- The sight. Eyes like flaming fire mean judgment that sees through everything. He searches mind and heart, and repays each one according to works.

- The step. Feet like burnished bronze mean righteous judgment, measured by responsibility. It is the metal of the bronze altar, which stood for God's claims on man.

- The rival. A church called herself His bride and claimed her own authority. But the Son over His own house will not leave evil in it.

- The reward. To those who overcome, this Son gives life and liberty now, and a share in His reign later. The false church tries to reign before Christ reigns.

Revelation 2:19 · Darby

I know thy works, and love, and faith, and service, and thine endurance, and thy last works [to be] more than the first.

The Lord's letter to Thyatira opens with very great praise. It comes from the One whose eyes are like a flame of fire, and it comes before He names what is badly wrong there. So how can He praise a place so highly when He is about to judge it so severely?

Praise Before Rebuke

The order surprises many readers.

The previous verse showed the Lord to Thyatira in a severe way. After that, it is surprising to read these wonderful words of praise. But it is always our Lord's way to praise first all that is good and worthy, before He deals with what is grievous and evil to His holy eyes.

Modernised from Raymond K. CampbellOriginal wording

Those same searching eyes also find good. That carries a warning for us today.

He knew even in Thyatira things that were good; not only works but love, faith, service, patience. Moreover their last works were more than the first — they increased as time went on. Though things were very dark, as the following verses show, the eyes like a flame of fire saw the good, where perhaps we would have seen none. That is a helpful thought for us today. When things are really bad, we are too quick to condemn everything without exception.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The Springs Behind the Works

The list is not random. Love stands first, and what follows flows out of it.

Among the things the Lord praises in these faithful believers in Thyatira, love comes first. Love is the great mark of the divine nature, and of God who is love. All spiritual activity springs from it. In the more accurate translations, faith comes next. It is "faith which works through love" (Gal. 5:6), and it shows itself in service to God and man. Then there was patience, or endurance in the middle of much persecution.

Modernised from Raymond K. CampbellOriginal wording

Set this list beside the one given to Ephesus, and the difference stands out.

The work of faith, the labour of love and the patience of hope in the Lord marked the faithful few at Thyatira. These things were missing at Ephesus. Ephesus was guilty of leaving her first love, so she had only work, labour and patience, without the spring that sets them going.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Latter Works Exceed the First

Ephesus went backwards. Thyatira went forwards.

The angel at Ephesus had declined in love, while the angel at Thyatira had increased in works. The darker the night, the more devoted and eager the godly company were. Their "last works more than the first" were more in number, more pure, and higher in character, as the fruit of faith. This church is also praised for its love, faith, service, and endurance: four practical features of Christian life. We judge that "service" here covers ministry in its widest sense, both spiritual and material… Thyatira alone among the seven is praised for its "love" and "service."

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Darkness did not smother this devotion. One writer traces the same pattern back to Israel's worst days under Jezebel.

Such high praise came in a day when the general state of the Christian world was very low. That only shows a truth: the worse the corruption of the crowd who merely profess Christ's name, the greater the energy and devotion of the faithful few. The greatest saints are found in the darkest day. Israel never had a darker day than when the wicked Jezebel ruled… Still, in that dark day, there were seven thousand who had not bowed the knee to Baal.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Who Is Being Commended

If Thyatira as a whole is corrupt, how can He praise it like this? One writer answers by pointing to the faithful few inside it.

This is very great praise, and it has puzzled some… Remember this: all through the Scriptures, whenever a whole body fails, the faithful remnant takes on the place of the whole before God… So it is in the church of God. On this principle the Lord can credit to Thyatira all the state and activity of the devoted saints inside her.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Many of these faithful people lived under Rome's tyranny. History remembers no name for most of them, and enemies blackened the names of others.

We know little of the hidden lives of those who walked humbly and in secret with their God, in the proud and overbearing days of Rome's tyranny. It is a comfort to see how fully Christ could value them, and how openly He will yet acknowledge them… Here is the record: they are not forgotten, those nameless ones, and those whose names were dishonoured. "Works and love and faith" — how they were tested! "And service" — in the face of what discouragement! "And your patience" — that long endurance!

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Known. "I know" comes first. The eyes like a flame of fire that will expose Jezebel are the same eyes that find every good thing in a dark place.

- Rooted. Love heads the list, because all spiritual activity springs from it. Faith working through love then produces the service.

- Contrasted. Ephesus had works, labour and patience without the inward spring. Thyatira had the spring, so the Lord praises its love and service as He does at no other church.

- Growing. Ephesus fell from its first love. Thyatira's latter works exceed the first — devotion that grew as the corruption around it deepened.

- Remembered. The praise belongs to a faithful few credited with the whole. It covers nameless and slandered believers whom Christ will yet openly acknowledge.

Revelation 2:20 · Darby

But I have against thee that thou permittest the woman Jezebel, she who calls herself prophetess, and she teaches and leads astray my servants to commit fornication and eat of idol sacrifices.

The Lord's charge against Thyatira turns on one word: "But." What follows is not a complaint about what the assembly was doing. It is a complaint about what the assembly was allowing.

Weight of the Charge

One older translation softens this into "a few things." The charge is heavier, and it reaches past one town in Asia.

The Authorised Version reads, "I have a few things against you." The Revised Version and others read, "I have against you." The Lord had a grave charge against the angel. Through its representatives, the Church was allowing an evil among them more serious than any that had appeared before. In other words, the papacy stands at the front of this address... It seems obvious that Thyatira pictures the general state of the Church in the Middle Ages.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Sin of Permitting

Notice what the Lord charges them with. Not teaching the error. Not believing it. Letting it alone.

The charge here is not only the personal guilt of the teacher, but the tolerating or allowing of what another does. "But I have against you that you permit the woman Jezebel." You may be clear of the evil doctrine yourself, and you may condemn it. That is important for every child of God. But it is not enough. These addresses show that the Lord calls for more. Where people teach, or even hold, what offends Christ, He demands that we "repent" of their presence among us. All are affected by tolerating the evil inside, whether it is actively taught or only quietly held.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Two Rebukes in One Line

The name here is a symbol. The verse also carries two faults at once, and a smoother translation can hide one of them.

The Lord said, "You permit that woman Jezebel … and she teaches." There is a twofold rebuke in these words, which the Authorised Version obscures. First, they tolerated a wicked person, in defiance of 1 Corinthians 5:13. Second, they let a woman teach, against what 1 Corinthians 14:34 and 1 Timothy 2:12 forbid... The woman in Thyatira called herself a prophetess. That is, she claimed to teach by divine authority. But her teaching was vile, and meant to lead souls astray. We need not suppose that her name was really Jezebel; the name is used symbolically.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Beyond Balaam

The previous letter, to Pergamos, named Balaam. The difference between him and Jezebel is where each one stands.

Balaam, named in the message to the angel of the Church in Pergamos, was a seducer from outside. He stands for the snare which the world became to the Church. Jezebel was a corrupter inside and represents the shameless alliance of the Church with idolatry and with the world.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

What Her Teaching Replaces

Jezebel was a real person before she became a symbol. A system that claims to speak for God does not just add error. It pushes out what held the ground before it.

To understand the meaning of the "woman Jezebel," we must recall Israel's history in the days of the real Jezebel. King Ahab married her, lost his own place and authority as king, and let this wicked woman rule. Under her rule the whole country was led into idolatry... In the same way, a false church system rises up and tries to rule Christendom. Like a prophetess, it claims to speak with divine authority and to pass on the mind of God. It takes the place of "teacher" and "leader" of God's people. For the Lord says, "You permit … that woman … to teach and to lead away My servants." So the teaching of this evil system sets three things aside. First, the Word of God, which gives the mind of God. Second, the Spirit of God as the Teacher. Third, Christ as the Head and Leader of His people.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Fornication and Idol Sacrifices

The verse names two sins. Both are pictures of something else.

The sin of fornication or adultery here is a picture of wicked dealing with the world. For a Christian or a church, such dealing is what marrying a Canaanite would have been for an Israelite. To eat food sacrificed to idols shows communion with what was directly linked to the power of Satan, for "what pagans sacrifice they offer to demons and not to God." And it is an easy thing to have fellowship with demons. Men think little of it, and even Christians fail to weigh how serious it is.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Still "My Servants"

Two words in the verse are easy to rush past: "My servants."

It is striking that the Lord Jesus shows people in Thyatira whom He called "My servants," despite everything against them. And so it has always been. There is every reason to believe that many God-fearing people never left the Roman Catholic system. They had a conscience about the word of God and a love for the Saviour. Yet it was plainer still that they were dulled by accepting a merely human unity and by the doings of Jezebel.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Permit. The charge is not that the assembly taught the error. It let the error stay. Being clear of evil yourself is not enough when Christ asks for repentance over its presence.

- Prophetess. She claims to speak for God. On that claim the assembly allows two forbidden things at once: a wicked person tolerated, and a woman teaching.

- Inside. Balaam seduced from outside. Jezebel corrupts from within. That is why this letter marks the worse stage.

- Replaced. Her teaching displaces the Word as God's mind, the Spirit as Teacher, and Christ as Head and Leader.

- Owned. Even inside that system, the Lord still says "My servants." The evil around His own does not make Him disown them.

Revelation 2:21 · Darby

And I gave her time that she should repent, and she will not repent of her fornication.

In the letter to Thyatira the Lord names a woman called Jezebel, whose teaching the church allowed, and this verse tells us what He did before He judged her. Two questions follow: why does God wait so long over evil, and what happens when someone will not repent?

Delay before judgment

The Lord does not strike the moment evil appears. One writer notes who He is dealing with: not an outsider, but a woman claiming to be a prophetess inside the church.

"I gave her time to repent," and she did not repent. So we see that God does not judge her all at once. He gives her time to repent. He is patient with her, but she does not repent. He was not dealing with the pagan world here. To them He preaches the gospel, so that He may win their souls to Christ. But this was a woman who called herself a prophetess in the church. She taught God's servants "to practice sexual immorality and to eat food sacrificed to idols." God deals with her on the ground of what she claimed to be.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Not "could not" but "would not"

Older translations end the verse with "she repented not." The ESV reads "she refuses to repent." One writer explains why that difference matters.

The Lord's patient grace still waits, even in the case of Jezebel. He says, "And I gave her space to repent of her fornication, and she repented not"; or, more exactly, "And I gave her time to repent, and she wills not to repent of her sexual immorality." How long that time was in Thyatira we do not know. But in the historical church that this assembly stands for, what patience the Lord has shown! What constant calls to repentance, what warnings in one form or another — and all in vain. "She wills not to repent." This is not mere blindness and ignorance. It is her will acting against God.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

The sin, and the long wait

Long patience is not a sign that the case is mild. One writer weighs what the delay proves, and what the word "fornication" pictures.

Repentance was flatly refused, though the Lord had given plenty of space for it. "Fornication" (for that is the figure used) was both taught and practised. His long patience is the sure sign of two things. First, that what He was about to judge was completely evil — otherwise He comes quickly, in the jealous care of true love that counts on a true answer. Second, that when the judgment comes, it must be final and unsparing. … The sin of fornication or adultery here pictures that sinful dealing with the world. For a Christian or for the church, it is what marrying a Canaanite would have been for an Israelite.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The lampstand is missing

In the letter to Ephesus the Lord threatened to remove the lampstand. Here He never mentions it, and one writer takes that silence seriously.

The Lord gave space for repentance; but, He says, "She will not repent." To Ephesus He said that He would remove the lampstand unless there was repentance. Here He never mentions the lampstand. That shows He did not own the system Jezebel stands for as a light for Himself.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The system and the person

Writers read Jezebel as more than one woman. She stands for a whole system, and the verdict on the system is not the last word for every person caught inside it.

There is a third thing that we find only in the last letters: a church inside this great, wide Christendom. The system is never to repent. God "gave her time to repent" of her sexual immorality, and she did not repent — though people may get clear of it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The word that still stands

Jezebel would not repent. But the call to repent keeps sounding, and one writer says what it asks of us.

Seven times the Lord says, "Let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches." We are not told to hear what is said to one particular church, but to all of them. May we not say that the Spirit's first great call is to "repent"? Five times in these letters we hear the call to repentance. The Lord has exposed the evils in the professing church and among His people. So it is for us to own our failure and humble ourselves in the dust because of the low moral condition that lies at the root of all failure.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Space — The Lord does not judge at the first sight of evil; He gives room, and He gives it to those who claim His name.

- Will — Ignorance was not the problem. The better reading is "she wills not to repent" — a will set against God.

- Length — A long delay signals how deep the corruption runs, and how complete the judgment will be when it falls.

- Silence — Here the Lord never threatens the lampstand. He never owned this system as a light of His own.

- Escape — The system never repents, but people can still get clear of it. That is why the Lord repeats the call to repent in letter after letter.

Revelation 2:22 · Darby

Behold, I cast her into a bed, and those that commit adultery with her into great tribulation, unless they repent of her works,

The letter to Thyatira reaches its sharpest moment: the assembly has tolerated a woman named Jezebel, and the Lord now says what He will do to her and to everyone tied to her. Three questions follow — what the bed means, why the punishment differs from person to person, and how far the "great tribulation" reaches.

Patience already spent

The threat does not come first. It follows a period the Lord gave her to repent. She refused it — not from ignorance, but by her own will.

The Lord's patient grace still waits, even in Jezebel's case. He says, "And I gave her space to repent of her fornication, and she repented not." A better rendering is: "And I gave her space to repent, and she wills not to repent of her fornication." How long that space lasted at Thyatira we do not know. But think of the historical church which that assembly pictures. What patience the Lord has shown! What constant calls to repentance, what warnings of one kind or another — and all in vain! "She wills not to repent of her fornication." It is not mere blindness and ignorance. It is her will acting against God.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

The bed

The picture answers the sin. Her bed was the place of pleasure; now it becomes the place of pain. The ESV calls it a sickbed; the older wording quoted on this page reads simply "a bed."

"Behold, I cast her into a bed." The word "bed" stands in sharp contrast to the bed of the harlot with its forbidden pleasure. It will be a bed of affliction. Next come "those who commit adultery with her" — the first and only time the word "adultery" appears in Revelation. Those who have tampered with the evil, who have defiled themselves by association with Jezebel, are the group meant here — a growing crowd in our times, born of the false spirit of tolerating evil and ignoring it.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

A bed is also where the strong are laid low. The Lord puts the woman who claimed to speak for Him where she can do nothing.

At Thyatira, Jezebel, as queen and prophetess, claims that authority rests in herself… She calls herself a prophetess as a cover for spreading her evil teachings. The Lord thinks so little of this authority that, in His anger, He "casts her into a bed", feeble and powerless, and what comes from her He kills with death.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Two different sentences

The verse names one group; the next verse names another. They are not judged alike.

There are two kinds of judgment here, for they were not all the children of Jezebel. In Scripture, committing adultery is a common picture of tampering with evil, especially idol worship, because it meant God's people giving themselves to someone other than Him… Some are not her children, but people who deal with her, who are content to keep company with the evil and share in it… Those who have committed adultery with her, who have tampered with this spirit of false prophecy, "I will cast into great tribulation, except they repent." But those who are her children, who got their Christian place and name through this false doctrine, will have full judgment.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

One rule sets the size of each sentence:

There are varying degrees of guilt, but the main point to grasp is that God judges evil according to the measure of each one's responsible connection with it.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

The door left open

The sentence ends with a condition: "unless they repent." That is how God works.

It is a principle with God always to give an opportunity for repentance before He carries out judgment. "I gave her space to repent." He has always acted this way from the beginning of time, and His Church and His people should act the same way. Even when speaking of the judgment He would bring on Jezebel, the Lord adds, "except they repent." Such is His patience and His longing to see His professed people recover from evil.

Modernised from Raymond K. CampbellOriginal wording

The reach of "great tribulation"

Both writers link this to the judgment described later in the book. One reads it as looking ahead to that destruction:

This vile system will come into "great tribulation." This looks on to the time told in greater detail in Revelation 17 — 18. Then the revived Roman Empire, as God's instrument, will destroy this system.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Another is more careful about pressing the phrase that far:

The verse does not say "the great tribulation" in so many words. Still, we would judge that what Jezebel represents will grow into the mystical Babylon of Revelation 17, and will be destroyed during the great tribulation period. The judgment, when it comes, will be final.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Space — God gives room to repent before He judges. The tragedy here is a will set against Him, not a lack of light.

- Bed — Her bed of pleasure becomes a bed of affliction. The Lord leaves the prophetess who claimed authority feeble and powerless.

- Association — God judges evil by the measure of each person's connection with it. Those who tamper with it and those born of it are not judged alike.

- Exception — "Unless they repent" still stands for those who tampered with the evil. Tolerating evil, not ignorance, is what put them there.

- Reach — The tribulation here points on to the fall of the system described in Revelation 17 — 18. That judgment, when it comes, is final.

Revelation 2:23 · Darby

and her children will I kill with death; and all the assemblies shall know that *I* am he that searches [the] reins and [the] hearts; and I will give to you each according to your works.

The Lord ends His message to the church in Thyatira by judging the children of the false teacher Jezebel, and by claiming to read what is hidden inside people. Who are "her children," and why must all the churches learn from this one local judgment?

Two groups, two judgments

Verse 23 is sharper than verse 22. Commentators see two groups here: people who keep company with the evil, and people the evil produced. They quote the older wording, "I will kill her children with death," where the ESV reads "I will strike her children dead."

There are two kinds of judgment, for they were not all the children of Jezebel... Some commit adultery with her; they have tampered with this spirit of false prophecy. Of them He says, "I will cast into great tribulation, unless they repent." But her children have got their Christian place and name because of this false doctrine. They shall have full judgment: "I will kill her children with death." It is not tribulation only for them.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Who her children are

The word "children" is chosen with care. It points to teaching so active that it reproduces itself in people.

You can see how active Jezebel is, because she has "children." They were born and shaped by her evil teaching. So they presented themselves as the expression of her views and as her spokesmen.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

That definition also draws a line of comfort.

True believers, even though linked with her, are not her children.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Death in full measure

"Kill with death" sounds like repetition. Writers take it as weight instead, and they name more than one death in it. Some also identify Jezebel's system with Rome.

There is full judgment for those who have become devoted followers of Rome and keep this evil system going. There is spiritual death as well as physical death. There is also the second death, which is eternal separation from God (Ezek. 18:4; Rev. 20:12-15).

Modernised from Raymond K. CampbellOriginal wording

Reins and hearts

The ESV says the Lord searches "mind and heart." Older translations say "reins and hearts." "Reins" is an old word for the kidneys, used here as a picture.

The kidneys, used symbolically for the inward thoughts and feelings. Ps. 7:9; Ps. 16:7; Ps. 26:2; Ps. 139:13; Prov. 23:16; Jer. 12:2; Jer. 17:10; Jer. 20:12; Lam. 3:13; Rev. 2:23.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

So the Lord claims to read motives, not just conduct. One writer traces where that claim comes from.

When the Lord exposes the evil in the professing church and judges it, the practical effect is that the churches come to know that Christ searches the reins and hearts. Hidden evil comes to light, and Christ is acknowledged as the divine Searcher of the secret thoughts and hidden deeds of men. In Old Testament times this belonged to Jehovah alone (Jer. 17:10). The churches are to learn the lesson — or rather to know that Christ, the One they have to deal with, carries out this solemn work. He knows everything.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

What the searching means day by day

Those eyes read what is inside. So His dealings with a believer may touch something the believer has not yet noticed.

In Revelation 2 and 3, we see the Lord Jesus Christ walking among the churches with the eyes of fire — not in the world. He is there so that "all the churches may know that I am He who searches the reins and hearts." In His discipline He may be dealing with something in us that we know nothing about, but which He sees... It is a very solemn thing for us to despise the chastening of the Lord. He chastens us because we are loved, because we are His.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Each one according to his works

The last clause could sound like pure threat. One writer reads it the other way.

The closing words of verse 23 are an encouragement. The Lord will deal with the evil system, yet He will judge each soul individually. He will repay each one according to their works. The individual is not lost in the crowd. In the case of Thyatira this leads to the discovery of a remnant that is for God, as the following verses show.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The same words carry a warning:

Every professed believer is also accountable to God for his own works.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Each is sorted. Two sentences fall, not one. Those who dabble with the evil face tribulation. Those who owe their religious standing to it face full judgment.

- Each is defined. "Her children" are the people false teaching formed and produced. Believers who are only caught up in the system do not belong to that group.

- Each is searched. Reins and hearts mean the inward thoughts and feelings. The One who reads them holds what belonged to Jehovah alone in the Old Testament.

- Each is corrected. The same gaze that exposes a system also deals with what a believer cannot yet see in himself. That discipline is a mark of love.

- Each is repaid. No one disappears into the crowd. Judgment is individual — a threat to the pretender, a comfort to the faithful.

Revelation 2:24 · Darby

But to you I say, the rest who [are] in Thyatira, as many as have not this doctrine, who have not known the depths of Satan, as they say, I do not cast upon you any other burden;

The letter to Thyatira has just exposed Jezebel and her teaching. Now the Lord turns to a faithful few, asks almost nothing of them, and marks them out by what they never learned — "the deep things of Satan."

"The rest in Thyatira"

Who is the Lord speaking to here, and what does He expect of them?

The Lord turns to "the rest," or the remnant, in Thyatira, "who do not hold this teaching." Here, for the first time, He formally recognises believers who are not counted in the public state of the assembly, yet who are not as openly separate as believers were in a later day… So the Lord speaks with great tenderness of those who were true to His name. He did not expect great things from them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"As they say" — two readings

The words "as they say" report what others were saying. On one reading, people threw the charge of dealing in Satan's depths at the very ones who had refused the corruption.

So the time had come when people who turned away from evil were counted mad. The people they refused to walk with accused them of knowing the "depths of Satan" — that is, of being led by him, as having fallen into one of his most subtle traps. And what brought on this terrible charge? Separation from evil, and a clear purpose to walk in the path of truth and holiness… But the Lord's verdict was enough for this "rest," as it has been for the true remnant in every age of the church. Anyone who cares for the honour of Christ must be satisfied with His approval.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Other writers read the phrase as a true description of the system around these believers. They lived inside it without knowing its evil.

Even in the darkest period of the Roman church's history, many dear saints of God have been inside it who knew nothing of the evil ways of the bishop of Rome and his council. The Lord Himself hints at this in His address to Thyatira… Here we find a believing remnant tied to a system marked by "the depths of Satan."

Modernised from Church HistoryOriginal wording

What they lacked in knowledge

So what was this knowledge the others boasted of?

"Not knowing the depths of Satan" — that is, what they called by that name — I take to mean plain morality and separation from the world… They said that "the rest" did not know the depths of Satan, because these believers made people think that outward morality and holiness were needed in the church. So the true saints got the name of being led by Satan, and the instruments of Satan got the name of holding the word and Spirit of God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

No other burden

The Lord asks nothing extra of them. So what did their faithfulness consist of?

How kind the Lord's word is to this feeble remnant! No other burden — only hold fast what they had. And what did they have? It is striking that we are told what they did not have: they "do not hold this teaching" and "have not learned what some call the deep things of Satan." This is faithfulness seen from its negative side. The Lord values even this.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What does "no other burden" mean in practice?

Even in Thyatira there are those who have not learned what some call the deep things of Satan. On them the Lord lays no other burden — that is, He leaves them where they are. Sincere, and not knowing the awful system they are in, they can walk before God with an honest heart.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Three firsts

This verse and the ones around it mark a turn in the whole series of letters.

In the message to this assembly we find a marked change, shown by three plain facts. First, the Lord addresses a remnant for the first time. Second, He brings in His coming for the first time. Third, He no longer looks for the hearing ear in the assembly as a whole, but in the one who overcomes. These facts prove beyond all question that in Thyatira all hope of restoring the whole body is given up.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

So the direction the Lord gives is forward, not backward.

He does not expect them to get back to the place the church fell from. He points them forward to His coming… So you must not expect Jezebel to be put right… No, your eye must rest on something else; and here the hope comes in.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Seen. The Lord singles out "the rest" — believers He does not count with the public body. He speaks to them with tenderness, not with big demands.

- Slandered. "As they say" reports what others said. Commentators differ: some read it as a charge thrown at the faithful, others as the real evil around them.

- Spared. The Lord lays no fresh burden on them. Their faithfulness shows in what they refused, and He values even that.

- Steadied. He tells them to hold what they have. He does not ask them to repair what the whole church has lost.

- Summoned. "Until I come" enters the letters here for the first time. Their hope now rests on His return.

Revelation 2:25 · Darby

but what ye have hold fast till I shall come.

Thyatira's message turns here from a corrupt system under judgment to a small group who had kept clear of it, and to them the Lord gives one instruction. What does He ask of believers who cannot fix the evil around them, and why does He set His own return as the limit?

A word to the faithful few

This word is not for the assembly as a whole. It belongs to "the rest" — those named in the previous verse who never took up the teaching the Lord condemns. Three features here show how far the public body had gone.

In the address to this assembly we find a marked change, shown by three plain facts. First, a remnant is addressed for the first time. Second, the Lord's coming is brought in for the first time. Third, the hearing ear is no longer looked for in the assembly at large, but in the overcomer. These facts prove beyond all question that in Thyatira all hope of restoring the whole body is given up. But here the remnant is singled out and cheered — not with the hope of a converted world or a restored church, but with the bright and blessed hope of the Lord's coming.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

"Till I come"

The time limit He sets is not a date but a Person. This letter also differs from the first three.

Here, for the first time, the Lord clearly brings in His coming again. He tells them that this state of things goes on till He comes again. It is not so with the first three. With Ephesus, the only coming described is a providential coming... Here it is in Thyatira for the first time; and, what is more, He introduces it in the body of the letter before the promise... The plain meaning is that what He describes here goes on until He comes.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The lightest of burdens

In the verse before, the Lord says He lays no other burden on them. This verse is the one thing He asks.

How compassionate the word to the feeble remnant! No other burden but to hold fast what they had. What had they? Notice what they did not have — they did not hold this teaching, and they had not learned the depths of Satan. This is faithfulness seen from its negative side. The Lord prizes even this, and in loving pity says, "I will put upon you no other burden." It is useless to try to regain what is lost. Hold fast what you have till I come. As if the Lord said, Only remember Me... His coming is now the only remedy. That does not mean we should rest quietly without bearing testimony, however feeble, against the evil. But there is no complete deliverance till He comes.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

That "no other burden" also implies they were already carrying weight.

Upon such the Lord will lay no other burden — words that would imply they had heavy burdens to bear. Refusing the doctrine of Jezebel brought them into constant suffering and persecution.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

What "hold fast" means

What they must hold, they already have from Him.

Here He is putting a soul in the position of having received a deposit from Him. You have received this; now clutch it, hold it fast. My mind is not occupied with evil only — I noticed the good first — now hold it fast. What are you and I doing? Have we got the truth that has made us free?

Modernised from G. V. WigramOriginal wording

Waiting instead of reigning

The Lord does not ask them to mend the system. He asks them to wait, and He ties a reward to the waiting.

They were not to look for any repentance or reform in this awful system. They were to hold fast to the truth they had until the Lord comes. Then they will have their reward. They refused to reign in the world while Christ is away. In the day of His glory they will rule in power over the nations.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The word for every time

The command was never limited to one city or one century.

The Lord brings in His coming as a hope, and as something to direct the mind to. "Only hold fast what you have until I come." This, I need not say, is an exhortation which applies to all times, to hold fast to what we have. Whatever we have, do not let it slip. Do not be a backslider. If you have the truth, hold it fast.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Hold — the verse asks nothing new. What He has already given is a deposit: clutch it and do not let it slip.

- Held by whom — not the church at large, but "the rest": those who never took the corrupt teaching. Here the Lord singles out a remnant for the first time.

- Held how long — "till I come." His return, not death, is the finish line. The state described here runs on until He comes.

- Held at what cost — they already carried heavy burdens, and He adds none. He does not send them to recover what is lost. They give up reigning now to rule with Him later.

- Held by us — the exhortation reaches every time. If you have the truth, hold it fast.

Revelation 2:26 · Darby

And he that overcomes, and he that keeps unto the end my works, to him will I give authority over the nations,

Thyatira's letter describes a corruption so deep that the Lord singles out those who keep clear of it. To them He holds out a bigger promise than to any church before: a share in His own authority over the nations.

What overcoming means here

Thyatira is the only church where the Lord adds a second condition to the word "overcomes." Commentators see the two parts as two marks of the same person.

Two things make a person an overcomer in Thyatira. The first is holding fast what they had, despite the corruption of Jezebel, keeping their separation, and walking in the path of obedience to the word of God. The second is keeping Christ's works to the end. These are the works praised in verse 19: love, faith, service, patience, and works.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The second demand also fits the situation. When a system keeps the Bible from ordinary believers, the Lord asks for what they can still give.

It is as if the Lord would leave no question about what it means to overcome this fearful system. In the gross darkness of a system that takes the Word of God from believers, the Lord does not seem to expect the overcomer to stand out for deep knowledge of His Word. But this at least He does look for: that they live in practical godliness, and so keep His works until the end.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

"My works" — whose pattern?

The phrase "My works" is chosen with care. It sets Christ's own life as the pattern for the believer's daily walk.

"My works" is an unusual expression. It recalls Paul's words: "Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus." In his daily walk the believer should be, as it were, a reproduction of Christ… There is a contrast, too, between the works of Christ and those of Jezebel. The Lord threatens judgment on those seduced by Jezebel unless they repent "of her works." He promises reward to those faithful to Christ if they keep "His works."

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

Authority over the nations

Notice who else wanted authority over the nations.

This promise of authority over the nations is large, grand and public. It goes beyond anything in the earlier promises to the overcomers in these messages. This is the very thing that was the goal of the corrupt Church in the Thyatiran period… What the corrupt Church seeks by her own power, Christ promises to the overcomer. That overcomer walks apart from evil and takes the place of reproach now.

Modernised from Raymond K. CampbellOriginal wording

Yet the overcomer's share is not the same as Christ's own.

What makes it all the more notable is that the rod of iron is promised to us, not the sword. We are given the dignity of reigning. We are not given the work of judgment pictured in the terrible symbols used of the Lord Himself.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Power received from the Father

The promise points back to Psalm 2.

There we read: "Ask of me, and I will make the nations your heritage… You shall break them with a rod of iron and dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel." Clearly the Lord refers to this scripture… He is really giving the overcomer His own power, the power He received from the Father. It means being joined with Him when He comes to deal in judgment with the nations of the earth.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Christ Himself received this authority from His Father. The same writer links that to the wilderness.

Remember His temptation in the wilderness. The devil showed Him all the kingdoms of the world and said, "All this authority I will give you… if you worship me, it will all be yours." But He answered, "It is written, You shall worship the Lord your God, and Him only shall you serve." He overcame the tempter by staying faithful to Him whose will He had come to do. He refused everything from the hand of Satan and received only from the Father.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

A rule with a shepherd's heart

When does this rule begin, and what kind of rule is it?

The apostle says the Church's time to rule has not come. It comes when all the saints reign together, and reign with Christ. So any claim to rule in the meantime is false by its very nature… And yet the word "rule" here shows the peculiar character of it… It is the rule of a Shepherd. The rod may be iron, a rod of unstoppable power, but in the Shepherd's hands it will always recognise that He is contending for the flock.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Summary

- Received, not seized. Christ refused the world's kingdoms from Satan's hand. He took them from His Father. Every overcomer follows that pattern.

- Received by keeping. Overcoming here has two parts. Stay clear of the corruption, and keep His works — love, faith, service, patience — not her works.

- Received without learning. Where a system keeps the Word from believers, the Lord asks not for deep knowledge but for practical godliness held to the end.

- Received in reach. The corrupt system grasped at worldwide power. Christ gives that same authority to those who take reproach instead.

- Received as shepherds. The overcomer gets the rod, not the sword. It is a Shepherd's rod, held for the flock — and never claimed before Christ reigns.

Revelation 2:27 · Darby

and he shall shepherd them with an iron rod; as vessels of pottery are they broken in pieces, as I also have received from my Father;

This promise to the church in Thyatira looks past its present trouble to a coming day of open power, when Christ takes the nations for His own. Behind it stands Psalm 2 — and one sharp question: will Christ win the world by preaching, or break it by judgment?

Psalm 2 behind the words

The language is not new. It is the Father's grant to His Son, now extended to those who hold out under pressure.

It is striking that the Father grants authority over the nations to Christ alone (Psalm 2). Yet the same unlimited authority and rule is promised to the conqueror who presses on until the end. The overcomers are to share the Son's public place and portion. The Father gives the nations, the peoples, and the earth to its farthest limits to His Son. The Lord uses those very words to give His overcoming people their public portion.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

A rod, not the gospel

Christ is still waiting, and His patience means salvation for now. One writer says plainly what happens when the waiting ends.

"Ask of Me," Jehovah says, and He has not asked; He is still sitting in patience... His long-suffering is now salvation. When that patience is over, delay would no longer be blessing or long-suffering, but weakness. Then He takes the ends of the earth for His possession with the rod of iron — not, as people imagine, with the gospel... The gospel has been going out for centuries and had no effect in converting the mass of mankind. When the Lord comes, this alliance of the nations against Him will be showing itself in full, just as the psalm describes. They will be saying more than ever, "Let us burst their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us."

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

The rod in a shepherd's hand

The verse says "rule," but one writer insists the word behind it is "shepherd." That one fact changes the whole picture of the iron rod.

The rod is the sign of power — "the rod of your power" (Psalm 110:2). Here it is in the shepherd's hands, and the shepherd is the very picture of royalty according to God. Even the iron rod with which Christ will smite His enemies is still represented as in a shepherd's hands. In all these passages it truly reads, "He shall shepherd them with an iron rod." However hard the blow, love guides it. How dreadful for those whom everlasting love must strike in this way!

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

These are older renderings. The ESV has "your mighty scepter" in Psalm 110:2, and "rule them with a rod of iron" in this verse.

Like a potter's vessels

Clay pots do not bend; they shatter. That is the image chosen for the proud strength of the nations under this rule.

The saints' authority over the nations is as wide as Christ's own, and it lasts the full 1000 years. The overcomer shall rule, or shepherd, the angry and rebellious nations with an iron rod. Their will shall be broken, their pride humbled, their glory laid in the dust like brittle vessels crumbling to pieces.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

What Jezebel wanted

The promise answers the very thing Jezebel reached for.

This wicked Jezebel not only persecuted the true saints of the Lord, but sought universal supremacy — a world-wide dominion over souls. The Lord tells them in effect to have nothing to do with her, and He will give the true power when He takes it Himself. Let them stay in the place of patience, even though there is tribulation — and there must be, if they are content to endure for Christ's sake now.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Keeping His works

One writer asks what overcoming looks like in a place like that.

It is as if the Lord would leave no question as to what it means to overcome this dreadful system. A system like this takes the Word of God away from believers. In that thick darkness, it seems the Lord does not expect the overcomer to have a deep knowledge of His Word. But this at least He does look for: a life marked by practical godliness, keeping His works until the end.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Source. No one seizes this authority. The Son receives it from the Father, and the same words hand the overcomer a share.

- Means. It comes by the rod, not by the gospel. His long-suffering now means salvation; then it gives way to judgment.

- Manner. "Rule" is the shepherd's word: an iron rod, but a shepherd holds it, so love guides even the blow.

- Effect. Rebellious wills break instead of bending, like clay pots. Pride lies in the dust for the full thousand years.

- Condition. Jezebel grabbed at world power and lost it. The Lord gives it to the one who waits in patience and keeps His works to the end.

Revelation 2:28 · Darby

and I will give to him the morning star.

Thyatira's letter ends with two rewards: a share in Christ's authority over the nations, and then something more personal — the star. This verse turns on one question: what does it mean for the Lord to give a star to believers surrounded by corruption?

Two Promises, Not One

The star is a second reward, different from the authority promised just before it.

On the one hand there is the public display of association with Christ, when the nations are shattered like a potter's clay pot. On the other hand, we receive from Him the privilege of having Him before that day of glory breaks. Then He is compared to the star that comes before the dawn.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who Sees the Star

A morning star has no place in the ordinary working world.

The sun is the companion of man. But the morning star does not, in this way, call man back to his work. It appears at an hour that is entirely its own, neither day nor night. Only the child of the early morning sees it — the one who is up before the sun — or the watchman who has gone through the night.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The star comes before sunrise, and sunrise is the moment the world cannot miss.

When Christ comes as the "Sun of righteousness" it will be the day when every eye will see Him. That is His appearing, but that is not the Star. No one sees the morning star when the sun is up. But those who are watching in the night see it; it belongs to them.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Christ Himself

The gift is not a symbol. The One who speaks gives Himself.

But in the bright and morning star we have the heavenly character of His coming. "And I will give him the morning star" — that is, I will give the Christian Myself in this way before the day. But Christ gives Himself to the overcomer before the day. If we are to appear with Him in glory, we must first be with Him; we follow Him out of heaven after being caught up.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Star and the Heart

So what is this star, and where does the overcomer keep it?

Christ Himself is the morning star — Christ as the pledge of the day of His glory. The morning star is the herald of the coming day. When the watcher sees it he knows that the darkness of the night will soon pass away. So how does the overcomer have it? There is only one possible answer — in his heart. It is there he holds the precious gift. So he is stronger than all the power of the enemy around him, because his heart is flooded with the light of the day for which he waits. For him the darkness of the night has passed; he lives in the sunlight of the day.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Commentators differ on the timing. Others read the star as a hope still ahead, not a present possession.

In the same way, the heavenly hope of this remnant is to have "the morning star" in the future: the One who is coming. His brilliant light will shine for ever, but the star of Thyatira has gone out.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Watching and Having

So what turns watching into having?

"I will give him the morning star." It is one thing to watch for the morning star, another thing to have it. I shall not have the morning star until I enter into the thoughts of God. His thoughts are these: that this Son of His love should have a bride, that all honour must be His, and that the Father's delight is in Him.

Modernised from G. V. WigramOriginal wording

Who Receives It

The promise is not for everyone in Thyatira. So who is the overcomer?

An overcomer, we judge, is one who lives surrounded by the corruptions described as existing in the church. By the energy of the Spirit he stays faithful to the Lord in holiness of walk and conduct. On the one hand there is complete separation from the evils allowed in the church. On the other hand there is the pressing on, in the power of the Holy Spirit, to keep "the works of Christ" — in fact, to give oneself to Him as the instrument of His will.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Notice when this hope was first given.

It was the darkest age of the church's decline. That is when the hope of the Lord's return first appeared, to cheer the heart of the overcomer.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Night — The star shines while the world sleeps. Only the watcher sees it, so this promise is never public.

- Gift — The reward is not something beside Christ. It is Christ Himself, given to the overcomer before the day of His glory dawns.

- Heart — Some writers put the gift inside the believer: the light of the coming day already floods a heart still in the dark. Others read it as a hope still ahead.

- Distinct — Authority over the nations is public and future. The star is personal, and it comes first.

- Darkness — The promise came at the darkest point of the church's decline. Where faithfulness costs most, Christ offers the most personal thing He has: Himself, before dawn.

Revelation 2:29 · Darby

He that has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the assemblies.

Thyatira's message ends with the same appeal as the other six letters. But here, for the first time, it comes after the promise to the overcomer, not before it. Commentators read that small change of place as a large statement about who is still expected to listen.

The call changes its place

Kelly treats this verse as a turning point in the seven letters. The reason for the change, he says, lies in the state of the church itself.

Here the notable change takes place. The call to hear begins to follow the promise, instead of being before it. The reason is that a remnant is here formed. The public state of the church now calls for the change. From that point the Lord puts the promise first. He does so because it is useless to expect the church as a whole to receive it. The address is to the overcomer, who is therefore put before the call to hear. In the three previous churches, as anyone may notice, the call to hear comes first. There the Lord is still dealing with the general conscience of the church. Now He gives that up. Only a remnant overcome, and the promise is for them. From now on the Lord takes notice of these in His call. As for the others, it is all over with their faithfulness.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Spoken to the overcomers

The new order also narrows who the call expects to reach.

The call to hear the Spirit no longer goes out to the whole Church, as it did before. It now follows the word of cheer to the remnant and the promises to the overcomer. It is therefore spoken to the overcomers. Only they could be expected to have a hearing ear that truly hears and weighs what the Spirit had to say to the churches. The Lord treats the professing body of the Church as unable to repent. He gave her space to repent, and she refused. So the Spirit appeals to the separated remnant who overcome, to hear what He says in this message to Thyatira and to the other churches also.

Modernised from Raymond K. CampbellOriginal wording

Churches, plural

One word in the verse is plural. The Spirit speaks to the churches, not to the church.

Then comes the general exhortation: "He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches." The verse does not say "to the church," but "to the churches." So the one who has an ear must weigh not only what the Spirit says to his own church, but what He says to all the others. The exhortation is therefore general. It speaks to all believers.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

The Spirit, not the church, is the authority

The Spirit is the speaker here, and the churches are what He speaks about. Darby presses what that means for authority.

Take the last thing we have about the church of God, and what do you get there? Is it that you are to hear the church? No. It is just the opposite. It is, "hear what the Spirit says to the churches." How can I hear the Spirit judging the churches, and still listen to the churches as my authority and rule? It is all flying in the face of what God has taught us for these last days.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A voice from outside, a call to one person

Revelation puts the Spirit somewhere Paul's letters do not. And the call He sends lands on one person, not on a group.

Paul's letters present the Spirit as living in the church and in the believers, the divine instrument of spiritual blessings. The book of Revelation does not. It sets Him outside the church, speaking to her and passing judgment on her moral state… Seven times the Spirit sends this solemn call to the hearing ear. The Lord Jesus made a similar call about the seven parables of the kingdom of heaven: "He who has ears, let him hear" (Matt. 13:9, 43)… In each message the call to hear goes with a promise to the overcomer. This call is made personally to an individual, not to the church… Yet each church also has the responsibility to listen, because the angel of the church stands for the whole church.

Modernised from Jean MullerOriginal wording

Still speaking to the reader today

The same appeal closes all seven letters, so it reaches past the seven cities of Asia.

"He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches." That call comes seven times. It points to a direct application of these addresses to the individual hearer. It applies as well to every company of professing believers on the earth at any given time.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Summary

- Position — The call has moved. In the first three letters it comes before the promise. From Thyatira on it comes after. The order itself is the message.

- Reason — A remnant has formed. The Lord no longer works on the conscience of the whole body. So He speaks the promise first, then calls for ears.

- Hearer — The appeal is personal. It comes to one person, not to a group, and the Lord expects that ear in the overcomer.

- Range — That ear must weigh all seven letters, not just its own church's. "To the churches" is plural on purpose.

- Authority — The last word to the church is to hear the Spirit judging the churches, not to hear the churches. That voice still speaks to every reader and every gathering today.

Revelation 3:1 · Darby

And to the angel of the assembly in Sardis write These things saith he that has the seven Spirits of God, and the seven stars I know thy works, that thou hast a name that thou livest, and art dead.

The fifth of the seven letters opens with no word of praise — only a verdict. He first names two things He holds. Then He tells Sardis that its reputation and His verdict are two different things.

The Seven Spirits of God

Each title He claims bears on the state He is about to describe.

With Sardis, again, both characters are mentioned. He has the "seven Spirits of God" — the perfection of spiritual discernment. So He is well able to look past the good reputation and the outward show, and to see spiritual death. He has "the seven stars," so He can keep even a few in Sardis alive.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

One Spirit is in view here, not seven, and His power reaches beyond the church.

The seven Spirits of God refer to the Holy Spirit of God, seen in His many perfections and in the ways He works. And this is not so much within the church as towards the world... It is the Spirit expressed in full quality and power, to carry out God's will on earth.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Seven Stars

To Ephesus the Lord held the stars in His right hand. Here the wording changes.

Christ also has the seven stars. They are His, though the words no longer say, as at Ephesus, that they are in His right hand. In practice man has seized them for himself.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

Yet the same fact is meant to lift the church, not only rebuke it. Everything Sardis lacks is held by the One addressing it.

All the stars belong to Him. He is the One Who meets and makes up for all that His church lacks. If Sardis, with all its failures, would only look at Him walking among the churches, it would find that every failure and weakness is provided for in Him and by Him. Then its light would shine more and more.

Modernised from William J HockingOriginal wording

Who Is "the Angel"?

The Lord addresses this letter to one figure. That figure stands for more than himself.

Wherever "angel" is not used of a heavenly being or a human messenger, it stands for the mystical representative of someone not actually seen... The angel represents the assembly. It stands above all for those Christ looks to for the state of His assembly in His sight — those who are near Him and in communion with Him, or who carry responsibility for the assembly through the working of His Spirit in them for His service.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A Name to Live, and Dead

What went wrong at Sardis was not scandal. That is what makes the verdict so searching.

There is none of the gross evil and corruption seen in Thyatira. But here, for the first time, the Lord finds nothing to praise... It was not shocking wickedness, but respectable death. The form was kept, the heart was gone. Christ was owned in word and ignored in deed. Creeds were correct, conduct was proper, life had gone.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

Onlookers hand out reputations, and they can only see so far.

Mere profession may make a name before people, who only look at the outside. It is not life before Christ, who reads the heart.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The Verdict and Its Reach

"I know your works" is not a passing remark. His verdict rests on full knowledge, and it reaches far past one city.

The works are general, and "knowing" them simply states that nothing escapes the Lord's notice, that He is aware of the whole condition of His people. Then, as the result of His examination — for He walks among the seven golden lampstands — He gives His verdict, His infallible verdict... And this state of things also represents Protestantism as it was after the days of Luther; and, remember, as it will be found until the coming of the Lord.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

A Word for Each Person

No one escapes this word by saying they belong somewhere else.

We must not think we can escape the edge of that word by saying we are not in Sardis. It applies to us one by one as well as together. It may be true of some of us that we have a name to live but are dead.

Modernised from William J HockingOriginal wording

Summary

- Name. People hand out reputations from the outside. Nothing escapes the Lord's notice, and His verdict comes from the One who reads the heart. The two can contradict each other.

- Nothing. Sardis is the first church where He finds nothing to praise. The fault was not scandal. It was correct creeds and proper conduct with the life gone.

- Not held. The stars are still His, but no longer said to be in His right hand. In practice man had seized what belongs to Christ.

- Nothing lacking in Him. He presents Himself as holding the Spirit in full power — the very thing Sardis lacks. He meets and makes up all that His church lacks.

- Now. This word is not aimed only at some other church or century. Anyone can carry a name to live and be dead.

Revelation 3:2 · Darby

Be watchful, and strengthen the things that remain, which are about to die, for I have not found thy works complete before my God.

Sardis had a name for being alive, and the Lord calls it dead. His remedy in this verse raises two questions: what is still alive in a dying church, and by what measure does God call works complete?

Wake Up

The Lord is not correcting weak watchfulness. He tells them to start watching at all.

The words "be watchful" really mean become watchful. This shows that at the time they were not watching at all, for, as we have seen, it was a time of spiritual death. Because they had not watched, the things that remained were drooping and ready to die. These things had once been channels of energy, full of life. Now they were fading for lack of spiritual power. The forms of life were still there, but they were only forms. The life that first produced them had faded, if it had not gone altogether.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Watchfulness is not one act but a settled habit. It goes together with prayer.

Since the whole condition was one of death, the Church's spiritual representatives had to rouse themselves. They were told to watch because of that state, and they were to stay watchful from then on. Watching and praying go together (Mark 13:33) in the light of the Lord's return. Praying and watching go together in keeping up the Christian conflict (Eph. 6:18).

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

What Remains

Something is still there. It is small, but the Lord tells them to build it up rather than write it off.

The fruit of the Spirit (Gal. 5:22-23) was still there, though small in measure and weak in expression. Whatever life and grace remained, they were to build up, cherish and strengthen. Hold fast to whatever is of God, all the more as practical religion dies out in these Christian lands. The call was never more needed than now. The sword and the trowel are always in demand, but the wise and careful use of the trowel is what the Church badly needs.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Strengthening is more than attacking what is wrong. The work is to take hold of truth and let it shape you.

Exposing and condemning what is wrong is of small value. Get the truth, buy it, don't sell it, be it. Get it, keep it, let it shape you, and show it. The Christian is called to that... But there are always smouldering embers of life in Protestantism that may be fanned into a flame, as in times of revival, here and there.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Works Not Complete

Older versions translate this word "perfect"; the ESV says "complete." It is not the usual word for moral perfection.

"I have not found your works perfect (pepleromena) before God." (Rev. 3:2) English readers should know that the word translated "perfect" here is not the same word used in the three passages we looked at earlier. It is usually translated "fulfilled" — "finished" — "accomplished." Its use about the works of the church of Sardis teaches us a solemn lesson that searches the heart. There was a name to live, but the works were not finished under the direct eye of God. Nothing is more dangerous to a Christian than to have "a name." It is a real snare of the devil.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The fault was not corruption. It lay in what drove the works.

The Lord had not found their works complete. Something was failing, something was missing. There was much of man in them. Christ had not found them complete before His God. The problem was not corruption or superstition. It lay in the character and the motive of the works. There was activity, but not the kind that matched Christ's own relationship with God on earth. They were not Christian enough.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Standard Stands

Decline in the church does not move the line God measures by.

God does not lower His standard because of the decline in the spiritual condition of the professing mass. The works He looks for are still measured by His perfect standard. The love was not perfect in Ephesus; the works were not perfect in Sardis.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Sardis and the Reformation

Commentators often read Sardis as a picture of the years after the Reformation. That age recovered justification by faith — God counting a person righteous through faith — but much was left untouched.

The works of faith and of obedience were not complete — that is, they were not filled up. The public fight with Rome almost crowded out the soul's practical dealings with God. Personal godliness and Church life were at their lowest point... The Reformers put nearly all their effort into one great struggle: to win back for themselves, their children and the generations after them the truth of justification by faith. Even that truth is not set out in their writings in its full scriptural measure.

after_note: DELETE

Walter Scott

Summary

- Wake: The call is to become watchful. The drooping state is itself proof that watching had stopped.

- Guard: What remains is real but weak. The Church needs the trowel that builds up more than the sword that tears down.

- Complete: The word means filled up or finished. Their activity never reached its full measure before God.

- Motive: The fault was not corruption. It was character and motive — the works had too much of man in them.

- Standard: God never lowers His measure when a church declines. That is why a mere name for life is so dangerous.

Revelation 3:3 · Darby

Remember therefore how thou hast received and heard, and keep [it] and repent. If therefore thou shalt not watch, I will come [upon thee] as a thief, and thou shalt not know at what hour I shall come upon thee.

Sardis had a name for being alive, but it was dead. The Lord's cure is not a new plan but a return — remember, keep, repent — and if the church will not wake up, He will come to it as He comes to the world.

The three commands

The commentators work from an older wording here: "how you received and heard," and "hold fast" where the ESV has "keep it." One writer takes the three commands one at a time:

To remember "how" they had received and heard would bring back the earnest state of soul in which they first received the truth. It would also open their eyes to the deadness they had now sunk into... To "hold fast" would encourage them to cling to the great truths they were letting slip without realising it. To "repent" would involve self-judgment for their low spiritual condition and poor walk.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Received and heard

The Lord names two things, not one — what they were given, and what they were taught:

The call to "remember" here is in the light of what God had recovered for them... the gospel, the Word of God, and liberty of conscience. Judgment is always according to the measure of responsibility. That measure is greater or smaller depending on what God has given and where He has placed a person. They had both "received" and "heard"... The truths recovered and the gospel heard to the joy of thousands were fading from memory and conscience. So came the command to "keep" and "repent" — to keep what they had, and to repent of the poor use they had made of their blessings.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

And both come from the Head of the church, not from its own system:

The Lord must judge the church not by a lifeless system, but by the resources it has in Christ the Head. He recalls the church to these two great points — grace received, truth heard.

Modernised from Church HistoryOriginal wording

The danger of settling down

The danger is sharpest right after a recovery of truth:

After conflict, Christians come out into the light of truth. Then comes the danger of thinking they may now take a rest and go to sleep. They have the form of truth and think that is enough. This is the danger when the Spirit works a revival or recovery... But then comes the call to "remember" — remember what? "How you received and heard, and" — give up? — no, "hold fast, and repent."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Why "as a thief"

Scripture keeps two things apart: the Lord's coming for His own, and the day of the Lord coming on the world.

When He comes, He raises the dead saints and changes the living ones. That is not "the day of the Lord," and Scripture never calls it that... Scripture never pictures the Lord coming like a thief by night except when judgment is clearly in view, as to Sardis (Rev. 3:3). In 1 Thessalonians 5:2-4 the Spirit brings in the comparison of the thief when He speaks of the day of the Lord coming upon the world. He does not use it of the saints, who wait for Christ and are not in darkness, so that the day should overtake them as a thief.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

So the Lord turns them in two directions — back to the past, and on to His coming:

He calls them to remember the past. Have they declined in conduct from those early days when the truth was first received? Then He recalls them to watchfulness. Let them not only look back, but look on, for He is coming. Are they in a state suited for His coming? If not, His coming would mean judgment rather than blessing. In the day of Sardis the professing church had ceased to watch, and was falling fast into darkness and deadness. Having appealed to the world for its patronage and power, the professing church had become like the world, and is in danger of sharing the world's judgment.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

For us today

The message went to a church, but it lands on each person:

Apply the Lord's words to Sardis to ourselves today. How searching is the call to remember how we have received and heard, and to hold fast and repent! How much precious ministry we have heard over the years! Do we prize and value the truth of God made known to us, and do we hold it fast? Or do we prefer earthly and temporal things above the revelation of Christ and His Word?

Modernised from Raymond K. CampbellOriginal wording

Summary

- Remember — the "how" points back to the earnestness of the first days, and shows up the deadness of the present.

- Received and heard — grace given and truth taught. Together they set the measure of responsibility by which the Lord judges.

- Hold fast — after a recovery of truth, the temptation is to rest in the form of it and let the truth slip.

- Repent — the call is to self-judgment for a low spiritual condition and a poor walk.

- Watch — a church that will not watch meets the Lord as the world does. The thief picture belongs to judgment, never to His coming for those who wait for Him.

Revelation 3:4 · Darby

But thou hast a few names in Sardis which have not defiled their garments, and they shall walk with me in white, because they are worthy.

Sardis had a name for being alive, but the Lord saw death there. Even so, He points to a few people who had kept their garments clean — so what stains a garment, and how can anyone be "worthy" to walk with Him?

Known by name, not by reputation

Numbers and influence were on the popular side at Sardis. The few had no public standing at all — so what did they have?

In Sardis the "few names" undefiled formed a company in whom the Lord could delight. In principle and in practice they were separate from the evil they grieved over. They walked apart from it. The weight of influence and numbers was with the popular side. The mass had a name in the world. The "few" were unknown, and had no official standing. But the Lord knew each one of them personally — He "calls His own sheep by name."

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

What defiles a garment

The Lord is counting persons here, not a crowd. Their stain is not gross corruption but something quieter: the world taken into the heart, and a life shaped to keep its company.

These "names" here mean people whom the Lord had counted up and knew each one by name. These are the ones "who have not soiled their garments." They had not gone on with the world, now that the professing church had defiled their garments. Sardis may not be charged with the seductions of Balaam or the corruptions of Jezebel. But her mind is set on earthly things, and she glories in her shame. ... What He speaks of here is the spirit of the world filling the heart as an accepted object, and the conformity to the world that follows, so that a person can walk with it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Clean of the world outside and the church within

The world outside is one source of stain. It is not the only one.

Not defiling their garments means that they had been kept untainted by the evils around them. James speaks of keeping oneself unstained from the world (James 1:27). Here it would not only be from the world. It would also be from the corruption inside the circle of God's professing people.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

A promise to each person

Notice what the Lord does not promise here. He does not speak of two or three gathered to His name; He speaks of a person walking with Him.

The Lord says of such, "They will walk with Me in white." Separation from the world has its blessed outcome in a walk with Christ. Still, the walk is a personal one. The Lord does not say they will know the blessing of that word, "Where two or three are gathered in My name, there am I among them." He says, "they will walk with Me." Whatever their church connections, their practical ways suit the Lord.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Why "in white" is a distinction

All believers will wear white. So what marks these people out? One writer finds the answer not in the robe but in the walk that goes with it.

The promise is of white robes. Everyone else around me may be spotted, but I have a clean one. I have one on, because I have put on Christ. But what is this distinctive mark? Will not all be white? He says, "They will walk with Me in white." This is His perfect approval of them in the glory. It recognises them as keeping themselves unspotted now in the wilderness.

Modernised from G. V. WigramOriginal wording

"For they are worthy"

Where does this walk end, and what makes them worthy? One writer answers both, and traces the worthiness back to grace alone.

They had kept their integrity here; they would walk with Him there, in robes made white in the blood of the Lamb. That coming day will be a day of full reward, and of holy companionship with our ever blessed Lord. No thought of personal unworthiness, such as we feel now, will ever cast a shadow across the soul. For the Lord adds in His wonderful grace, "They are worthy." It is grace that reckons it so. Each one of this distinguished and honoured company is in himself worth no more than a "brand plucked out of the fire" — someone rescued from a judgment he deserved.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Summary

- Few — the crowd had the reputation. These few had no office and no fame, yet the Lord knew each one by name.

- Undefiled — the stain of Sardis was not scandal. It was the world welcomed into the heart, and a life shaped to keep its company.

- Untainted twice over — clean of the world outside, and clean of the evil inside the circle of God's professing people.

- Walking — the promise is personal, not made to a group. Separation from the world now leads to walking with Christ Himself.

- Worthy — all the redeemed wear white. Walking with Him in it is His open approval of a life kept unspotted. The worthiness itself is grace's reckoning over a brand plucked from the fire.

Revelation 3:5 · Darby

He that overcomes, *he* shall be clothed in white garments, and I will not blot his name out of the book of life, and will confess his name before my Father and before his angels.

Sardis had a name for life, but the Lord judged it dead, and only a few there had kept their garments clean. To them, and to anyone who overcomes in such a place, He makes three promises: white clothing, a kept name, and a name confessed before His Father.

Each Promise Answers a Failure

The three rewards match, point by point, what had gone wrong in the assembly.

The overcomer stands in contrast to the assembly at each point. The assembly had become a worldly mass; he had kept himself unstained by the world. So the promise is that he will be clothed in white garments. The assembly had a name to live but was dead; the overcomer really was entitled to a place in "the book of life." So the promise is that his name will not be blotted out. Again, those at Sardis who merely professed faith had a form of godliness but denied its power. The overcomer had truly confessed Christ in the middle of the general apathy.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

What The White Garments Mean

The white clothing answers to the walk that came before it.

A few in Sardis had not defiled their garments. They had walked in practical separation from the evils around them. The Lord encourages them with the promise that their walk will have its fitting reward in a day to come. They will be clothed in white in the day of glory. The robes they wear in glory are woven in the path that leads to glory.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Revelation uses white robes more than once, and one of those places explains the picture.

In Revelation 4 and Revelation 19 the elders and the Lamb's wife appear clothed in white garments. In Revelation 19 the Holy Spirit gives His own interpretation: "the fine linen is the righteous deeds of the saints." That gives the clue to the white garments of our passage, since the promise points to a future heavenly condition. So the Lord promises that the fruit of overcoming will be shown and enjoyed in heaven.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The Book Of Life And The Registers Of Men

Commentators read the book of life here in different ways. Some take it as the record of profession, listing real and unreal names alike.

"The book of life" here is not the same as that of Revelation 13:8. In Revelation 3:5 it is profession, which may or may not be real. The end would show. Some names would stand, others be erased. In chapter 13:8 every name recorded was that of a true believer, because those names were written from the foundation of the world, before human responsibility began. So chapter 3:5 gives the record of Christian profession; chapter 13:8 gives the record of reality.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Others hold that no name in the book of life is ever removed, and read the promise as pure reassurance.

Under law a name could be blotted out of God's book (Exodus 32:33). Sometimes a person has his name struck off a church register because of his faithfulness to God. But the book of life is a different matter. No name in this book will ever be blotted out, for only the elect are written there. Overcoming, by faith alone, would prove one to be elect of God. This promise is meant for the comfort and encouragement of faith.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Both readings meet at the same practical point: human registers and God's record are not the same list.

How many names held in high honour by Sardis, and written in its registers, would turn out to be mere lifeless professors, while the few names of those who had not defiled their garments were thought little of by Sardis, and even struck off its lists. Even so — whatever men might do — the Lord says, "I will not blot out his name out of the book of life."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Confessed Before The Father

The Lord's honour points back to how little the man's name counted among people.

Does not this high honour imply that before men the overcomer's name had been of little account, if not laughed at? And does it not show how great the Lord's approval is of one who boldly confesses His name in the middle of a lifeless profession?

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Name — Sardis had a name to live and was dead. Every promise here is about a name that is real.

- Garments — a real name shows in a clean walk now. That walk becomes the white clothing worn later: "the robes they wear in glory are woven in the path that leads to glory."

- Register — men can erase a name from their own lists. Commentators differ on whether this book records profession or only the elect, but God's record stands.

- Confession — a name of little account among men is the name Christ announces before His Father and His angels.

- Reach — the promise is for "the one who conquers". It is open to any believer surrounded by dead religion, however few and unnoticed.

Revelation 3:6 · Darby

He that has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the assemblies.

The letter to Sardis ends the way all seven letters end — not with a demand on the congregation, but with an appeal to whoever is willing to listen. In Sardis only "a few names" were left, and this closing line asks who there still has an ear open to God.

The Lord Speaks, the Spirit Shows

The message came from the risen Christ, yet the closing call names the Spirit as the one speaking. One writer traces both voices back to a single source:

It is worth noting that the message, though spoken by "One like a son of man," is also "what the Spirit says." What the Lord says, the Spirit says. The Lord spoke to John from outside him, and the Spirit spoke through him from within, for he was "in the Spirit" at the time. It was all "the word of God." So the unity of the Divine Persons is clear.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The Spirit's speaking did not stop with John. Hamilton Smith points to His ongoing work of making Christ known:

It is the Lord's desire that we should listen to the Spirit and so profit by the Lord's words to each Church. Throughout the ages He takes the things of Christ and shows them to us.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The Hearing Ear

Everyone has ears. The verse asks for something rarer, and the tone behind the call is longing, not scolding:

This appeal to the individual ear shows the intense longing of the Lord over His saints. His eager desire is that His words of warning, reproof and exhortation might find a way into their hearts and produce a full response to His faithful love… All have ears that can hear, but who has an ear to hear and heed what the Lord has to say?

Modernised from Raymond K. CampbellOriginal wording

A reference work traces the ear as a symbol from the law of the servant through to these seven letters:

When a servant whose time of service had ended chose to stay with his master, saying, "I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out free," his master pierced his ear to the door post with an awl. From then on his ear belonged to his master: he was to hear that one master only… The Lord said "He who has ears to hear, let him hear" to His hearers, and to each of the seven churches in Asia… showing that the hearer needed spiritual discernment to catch the meaning of what was said.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Why the Call Comes After the Promise

In the first three letters this appeal comes before the promise to the overcomer. From the fourth letter onward — including Sardis — the order flips:

In the first three churches the call to the hearing ear goes to the whole Church. But in Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia and Laodicea the Lord speaks to the overcomer first, which means there is a remnant of true believers that overcomes… This marks out the position of the remnant in these last four churches as separate from the general body of the church. The call to hear goes especially to the overcomers, for only they will hear the voice of the Lord by His Spirit.

Modernised from Raymond K. CampbellOriginal wording

Churches, Not Church

Each letter goes to one assembly, but the listener must weigh what the Spirit says to all of them:

It is not said "to the church," but "to the churches." So the one who has an ear must weigh not only what the Spirit says to his own church, but what He says to all the others. The exhortation is therefore general, and meant for all believers.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

That widens the mirror. No reader gets to file six of these letters under other people's problems:

We are capable of every evil and corruption found in any phase, or any period, of the Church's history. Whatever time we live in, we do well to pay heed to what the Spirit says to every one of the churches.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

When Only One Is Listening

The appeal is to one person — he who has an ear — and it holds even when the numbers shrink to almost nothing:

In the church of Sardis the remnant is called "a few names"; in Laodicea there is an "if" as to one. But even if there is a single hearing ear, if there is one to open the door, that one is assured of the high privilege, the immense favour, of sharing a meal with Christ… When the shared witness of the church has sunk to its very lowest point, Christ rewards individual faithfulness with intimate fellowship with His own heart.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- One voice. What Christ says, the Spirit says; the Lord spoke to John, and the Spirit still takes the things of Christ and shows them to us.

- One ear. Everyone has ears. This call asks for the ear that heeds, like the servant who chose to hear one master only. It takes spiritual discernment to catch the meaning.

- One position. In Sardis the promise comes before the call, marking out a remnant; only those who overcome will hear the Lord's voice by His Spirit.

- One scope. The Spirit speaks to the churches, so every letter is your letter — no failure described in them is beyond us.

- One listener is enough. Where only "a few names" remain, individual faithfulness is still met with the personal welcome of Christ.

Revelation 3:7 · Darby

And to the angel of the assembly in Philadelphia write These things saith the holy, the true; he that has the key of David, he who opens and no one shall shut, and shuts and no one shall open

The letter to Philadelphia opens with a Person — holy, true, and holding a key. Why does the Lord describe Himself so differently here? And why does a royal official's title become His own?

A Christ described by what He is, not what He holds

The other letters open with something the Lord holds or walks among. Here that changes.

The Lord presents Himself to this assembly in a way that is quite different from His approach to all the other churches of Asia. To Ephesus He comes as the One who holds the seven stars in His right hand and walks among the seven golden lampstands. To Smyrna He speaks as "the first and the last, who died and came to life"... In these presentations what the Lord has stands out most. But in His presentation to Philadelphia what stands out is what He is in His own blessed Person — "the holy one, the true one." What He is in Himself is always greater and more precious than what He has.

Modernised from Raymond K. CampbellOriginal wording

"The holy, the true" are divine titles

The article in the Greek text points to something more than a good quality held in measure.

Here, then, we have Christ in personal character — what He is in Himself. He is the holy, He is the true. Others may be holy and true in a limited degree, so saying that much hardly gives the force of the words "the holy, the true." He is both in His own Person, and always the embodiment of holiness and truth. In themselves these are divine attributes... People and things are called holy and true, but no created being has the essential moral glory of being The Holy One and The True One. As used in our text they are really divine titles.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

"True" means real, not merely truthful

The word behind "true" here is not the one that means "not lying." It contrasts the genuine with the shadowy and the merely professed.

This word is not always the true as opposed to the false. Very often it means the substantial as opposed to the shadowy outline. So in Hebrews 8:2 we have the "true tabernacle," which our great High Priest entered. That implies that the tabernacle in the wilderness was only an earthly copy of what had a most real existence in heaven. So too Christ is called "the true light" (John 1:9), though John the Baptist was also "a burning and shining lamp" (John 5:35).

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The title searches anyone content with a reputation.

Here is His own Person judging according to the truth. He reveals Himself in a way that works in practice. He insists on what is genuine. He no longer allows a mere acknowledgment of truth that is not carried out. He will have moral reality.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The key of David: Isaiah 22 and Eliakim

The Lord takes these words from an older prophecy about a royal official.

In these words and in those that follow the reference is to Isaiah 22:22. Shebna is removed from office and disgraced. Then the prophet announced the appointment of Eliakim to the administration of the royal authority. In depth and fullness the terms of the prophecy are Messianic. They go far beyond what happened in the days of Hezekiah. Isaiah's announcement and the words here are almost the same, and both imply administrative authority: Isaiah's in connection with royalty in Judah, and this one in connection with grace to the Church. The "key" as a symbol means undisputed right to enter and exercise all needful authority.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Opening and shutting: security for the weak

The key is not only a title. It settles what can and cannot be stopped.

We also find Him arranging things in favour of the church. If He opens a door, no one can shut it. If He shuts a door, no one can open it. So there are two things. He is the holy and the true to those who trust in Him. And He also has, not the display of power here, but the key of power... Let all the power of man or Satan do their worst. If I am resting in Christ, who is perfectly true, and He has opened a door, neither man nor devil can shut it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The two words belong together

Because the Lord names both qualities, neither can be traded for the other.

Holiness will not do without the truth, nor the truth without holiness. The absence of either is not of the Spirit of God.

Modernised from F G PattersonOriginal wording

Summary

- Person — This letter leads with what Christ is, not with what He holds. What He is in Himself is the greater thing.

- Holy — Creatures may be holy and true in a limited degree. These words are divine titles, and they belong to Him alone.

- Real — "True" here means genuine and substantial, not just honest. It exposes truth that is admitted but never carried out.

- Key — From Isaiah 22:22, the key of David means undisputed right to act with full authority. Eliakim held it in figure; Christ holds it in fact.

- Door — He opens and shuts, and no one can reverse it. Whoever rests in Him is secure against man and devil alike.

Revelation 3:8 · Darby

I know thy works behold, I have set before thee an opened door, which no one can shut, because thou hast a little power, and hast kept my word, and hast not denied my name.

The Lord who holds the key of David sets an open door before this church. The reason lies not in size or success, but in little power, a kept word, and a name never denied.

The One who holds the key

They were too weak to open the door themselves. One writer shows why the key in Christ's hand was what they needed:

The Lord presents Himself as having the key of David. So they ought not to look to the power of the world, nor to man; for if He had the key, that was the very thing they wanted. Human energy might be at work all around — Jezebel, false prophets, and the rest. But there was this blessed One, the Holy and the True. They were weak, so they needed Him all the more. They had so little strength that perhaps they could not even open the door; but He says He had opened it for them. He had brought them into a large place where there was no bondage or constraint... They valued Christ. They wanted to know more of Him, and He knew their heart.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A door no one can shut

The Lord opens this door for testimony and service, and no opposition can close it:

We gather from this that wherever the condition described here is found, the Lord opens a door for His servants. It is a door for His testimony and service. He will keep it open, whatever hostile efforts men make to close it. It is not a door standing open, but one that the Lord has opened. It was so in the Lord's own service among Israel. To the outward eye He had only a little strength. He was crucified in weakness. He lived by every word that came out of the mouth of God. He did not deny His Father's name. Men were full of cunning, malice, and hostility, yet there was always an open door before Him. To Him the doorkeeper opened, and so it is now for all who have the moral marks given here. So we never need to be anxious about open doors for service. Our only concern should be to be in a fit state for His use. Then a door will always open, even though there are many adversaries.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

"But little power"

The phrase describes a church with nothing impressive to show the world. These writers quote it as "a little strength":

First, the Lord says, "You have but little power." This church is not marked by any display of power that would attract the notice of the world. ... The world delights in a strong man; God delights to carry out His work through weak vessels... Their wisdom, then, is not to claim power they do not have, nor to covet gifts that have passed away. Instead they own their true condition — they have only a little strength. So they find the support of the Lord, the One who has all power, who holds the key, and whom no one can resist.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Little strength is still strength. One writer sets it beside Sardis and Laodicea:

Yet the very expression "a little strength" assumes they had some strength. That is more than could be said of Sardis or Laodicea... Philadelphia has only a little strength. But it is enough to rise above the deadness of Sardis and the self-sufficiency of Laodicea. In doing so it had the Lord's approval.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Keeping His word

Two questions arise here: whose word, and what does keeping it involve?

Not simply the Word as a whole, however true that may be of the Philadelphians, but Christ's word... His word covers the whole circle of Christian truth... Further, "keeping" the word implies that it is treasured in the heart and obeyed in the life. The Lord does not say you have expounded or taught the word, though that may be true. He puts the emphasis on the great fact that His word is kept. Those with little strength may have little gift. But something far more valuable in the Lord's eyes can mark them — obedience to His word.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Not denying His name

One writer links the two commendations and names the target of Satan's attack:

The Word and the Name go together... All the heresies that have come into the world have always had their root in the abuse of the name of Christ... The great assault of Satan is against the Person of Christ, and your safeguard is holding fast that name.

Modernised from G. V. WigramOriginal wording

A character, not a title

One writer warns against turning these marks into a label:

No one need look for great attainments, in themselves or in others, for Philadelphia is marked by "little strength." But there is the keeping of Christ's word and not denying His name. May these features mark each one of us. To be governed by these marks is to be Philadelphian in character. But to claim the name of Philadelphia is the sure road to the state of Laodicea. Any assumption on our part is fatal to true spiritual progress.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- His key — the One who holds all authority opens the door, so weakness is no barrier and opposition no threat.

- His door — it opens for testimony and service; the concern is not to find an opening but to be fit for His use.

- His strength — "a little" makes no display that impresses the world. Yet it lifts Philadelphia above the deadness of Sardis and the self-satisfaction of Laodicea.

- His word — to keep it is to treasure it and obey it, which He values above gift or teaching.

- His name — word and name stand or fall together. Refusing to deny His Person is the safeguard — a character to live, never a label to claim.

Revelation 3:9 · Darby

Behold, I make them of the synagogue of Satan who say that they are Jews, and are not, but lie; behold, I will cause that they shall come and shall do homage before thy feet, and shall know that *I* have loved thee.

The Lord's message to the assembly in Philadelphia turns to a group of opponents. They claimed to be God's earthly people, and He promises to expose the claim and to make them bow one day before the very believers they despised.

The claim that was a lie

Commentators identify these opponents by their principle, not their race. They stand for a religious system that drags Christians back onto ground God had set aside.

The synagogue of Satan, as already said, is the return to Jewish principles. It puts people under law. It restores the priestly ranks and ceremonies that suited an earthly religion like Judaism, but are out of place in a heavenly religion like Christianity. Paul condemns this pouring of new wine into old wineskins as destructive to the truth entrusted to him.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

The claim is a "lie" because they take a title that is no longer theirs, and the promises that go with it.

In their ignorance, these teachers give up the true Christian position. They claim to be the spiritual Israel. They take Jewish promises and Jewish hopes for themselves, and they would put the consciences of Christians under the bondage of Jewish law-keeping. So they are really doing Satan's work.

Modernised from Henry Allan IronsideOriginal wording

The same enemy Smyrna met

The same phrase appeared once before, in the message to Smyrna.

We noted before that Smyrna and Philadelphia are the only two of the seven churches the Lord does not rebuke. Now we notice that both had to face the same religious opposition. Those who are the synagogue of Satan, falsely claiming to be Jews, reappear. In Paul's day Satan was already dressing up as an angel of light. It is nothing new for him to wear religious clothes.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The next writer traces where this counterfeit leads.

Judaism, set aside by God, is now one of Satan's best weapons and most subtle snares. Great Babylon has built her whole structure on this foundation. With the rituals, the priestly caste and the law-keeping of an earlier time, she has pushed out what belongs to Christianity: its simplicity and open speech, its equal priesthood and completed sacrifice, its free grace and full salvation.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

"I will make them"

Twice over, the Lord makes Himself the one who acts. Both the exposing and the bowing are His work.

The Lord can subdue such as far as He sees fit. He can expose their true character, for He says, "I will make them of the synagogue of Satan." Despite their religious display, He will show them up as nothing but a Satanic imitation of the Jewish system. On the other hand, the Lord will make them acknowledge what is according to Himself.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

What the bowing at their feet means

The Greek word behind "bow down" covers a wide range, and the reader is meant to weigh who is bowing and to whom.

We have translated the Greek word proskuneo as "do homage." In Greek it covers every act of reverence, from a simple bow to someone higher up to the worship of God Himself. The reader can decide what kind of homage is meant by asking who receives it and who gives it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Commentators differ on the object of that homage. Some read it as respect paid to the despised believers themselves. One writer holds that the Lord will make them worship Him, not Philadelphia, at Philadelphia's feet (L. M. Grant). Both agree on the reversal itself:

In their religious pride and pretensions, they scorned and despised the Lord's devoted Assembly, but Christ here promises that He would display to their adversaries how much He loved them.

Modernised from Raymond K. CampbellOriginal wording

"I have loved you"

The verse ends with the sentence that gives the whole promise its weight.

We see how readily He speaks as the One who loves when He finds devotion to Himself in the Philadelphian church (Rev. 3:9). The one sentence that stands out in His words to them is "I have loved you." Others are to know that soon. Philadelphia knew it when He spoke, and it was their choicest treasure.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Certain, but the timing is His

Writers are careful here. The Lord guarantees the vindication, but does not say when or how it comes.

But the Lord will compel the recognition of His own testimony. I do not say when, where, or how; but as surely as He lives, will the Lord vindicate the truth He has given, and the testimony He has raised up for His name.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Counterfeit. The opponents claim a place God has set aside. Their religion is law, ritual and rank pressed onto Christians.

- Exposed. The first "I will make them" strips the disguise: the Lord shows their claim to be an imitation, not the real thing.

- Subdued. The second "I will make them" bends the proud to the ground before the weak — the Lord's work, not Philadelphia's.

- Loved. In the end the enemy learns not that Philadelphia was right, but that Christ loved her.

- Certain. The vindication is sure because He lives. He keeps the when and how to Himself, so faith holds on meanwhile.

Revelation 3:10 · Darby

Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, *I* also will keep thee out of the hour of trial, which is about to come upon the whole habitable world, to try them that dwell upon the earth.

The letter to Philadelphia ends with a promise built on a condition: they kept His word about patient endurance, so He will keep them. But what does it mean to be kept from an hour?

The word of His patience

Older translations read "the word of my patience." The phrase points back to how the book opens, where John calls this age a time of endurance shared with Christ.

Revelation 1:9 shows what "the word of My patience" means. John calls himself "your brother, and companion in tribulation, and in the kingdom and patience of Jesus Christ." The whole present time is the time of Christ's patience. He waits at the right hand of God until His enemies are made His footstool. He has taught His people this, and given the word that directs the path, spirit and conduct of the one who waits. They wait with Christ according to the word of His patience.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

That waiting has a practical shape. If Christ is not yet taking His rights, His people do not grasp at theirs.

The Lord can say, "You have kept the word of My patience." His patience is the patient waiting for the moment when He will assert His rights and come out as King of kings and Lord of lords. In the meantime it involves the refusal to interfere in the course of this world. If we keep the word of His patience, we shall accept the place of a stranger with a rejected Christ, and refuse to claim our rights in this world.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Kept out of the hour

The promise names an hour, not just a danger.

The wording of the promise disposes of the theory some hold that the Church, or part of it, must pass through the coming Tribulation to purge itself of its unfaithfulness. No, the guarantee is, "I also will keep you out of the hour of trial" — not brought through it, or kept in it, but complete exemption from it. Lot and Noah were preserved through the tribulations of their own day. Abraham and Enoch were kept out of those same seasons of trial. It is these last two who picture the Church.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Much depends on the small word behind "from." Older translations read "hour of temptation" where the ESV reads "hour of trial."

The language could not be stronger. It reads, "I will keep you out of the hour of temptation" — the Greek word ek means "out of." The trial is worldwide, so no one can escape by fleeing from one part of the earth to another. The only way to be kept out of the hour of trial is to be taken out of time altogether.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Where commentators differ

Kelly held that God works in two ways at once: some people are kept out of the hour, and others are kept through it.

The question is whether Scripture is clear that both of these methods hold good. Some are to be exempted from the hour of trial coming on the whole world. Others are to be kept not out of it, but through it. I have no doubt that both are true, and that God's word teaches both plainly.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who the "earth-dwellers" are

The verse names who is tried: not everyone alive, but a certain kind of person.

This expression appears often in the book of Revelation. It does not simply mean those who live in the world. Read the various passages where this unusual term appears, and it becomes clear that "the earth-dwellers" stand in contrast to those whose citizenship is in heaven. They claim to be Christians, yet they refuse the heavenly calling. Their earthly-mindedness and worldly ways prove that they really belong to this world.

Modernised from H. A. IronsideOriginal wording

A promise larger than one city

Philadelphia was a real congregation, yet the promise outruns it.

These words clearly reach much farther than the church at Philadelphia as it then existed, or any other single church. The hour of temptation has not yet come, and Philadelphia and its church were forgotten ages ago. I do not deny that there was a partial fulfilment at Philadelphia. But I am sure there is a promise here for the last days, for those who have kept the word of the patience of Jesus.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The comfort intended

Christ aimed this promise at hearts under pressure, and gave them comfort in the present.

He reminded them that a time was coming when evil would be on display everywhere, almost unchecked. But they would be kept out of it, because they were keeping the word of His patience. In this way He supported and comforted their hearts then and there. When that season of fiery trial came, they would already have found their eternal joy in His own presence.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- He waits — Christ waits at God's right hand until His enemies are made His footstool. The whole present age is that waiting time.

- They keep — His people wait with Him. They live as strangers instead of claiming their rights in a world that refused Him.

- He keeps — The promise is exemption from the hour itself, not shelter inside it. The trial covers the whole world, so no place on earth is a hiding place.

- Who is tried — "Those who dwell on the earth" are marked by settled earthly-mindedness, not by where they happen to live.

- Why it matters — Commentators differ over whether some believers are carried through the trial instead of kept out of it. All agree Christ gave the promise to steady hearts under pressure.

Revelation 3:11 · Darby

I come quickly hold fast what thou hast, that no one take thy crown.

The Lord's last word to Philadelphia holds a promise and a warning: He is on His way, and something already in their hands can still be lost. What must they keep, and how could someone else take their crown?

"I Am Coming Soon"

The Lord had already warned another church that He would come like a thief. Here the tone changes with what He carries in His hand.

"I am coming soon. Hold fast what you have, so that no one may seize your crown" (verse 11). This is a precious word. The Lord spoke of coming like a thief even to Sardis. Sardis had taken the world as its mistress, and let the unclean govern in place of the Lord. Here He comes as one who has a crown to give. The Lord Himself coming to meet us is the jewel He has given us to keep.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

So how soon is soon? Nothing stands in the way.

We are not to suppose that anything else must take place before the Rapture. We are to look for Christ to come at any moment, certainly not for the tribulation.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

What They Already Have

The verse does not say what they already have. Commentators point to four things.

"Hold fast what you have." The characteristic possessions of Philadelphia were Christ's WORD, Christ's NAME, Christ's PATIENCE, and Christ's COMING. They had to keep them. Death, desertion, and compromise may thin the company and reduce it to a small, feeble few. But all the more need to "hold fast," and on no account surrender one bit of the truth… It is not the start, but the end, that decides fitness to wear the crown. Let go the truth and you lose the crown.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Overcoming By Keeping

Overcoming does not mean the same thing in every letter.

In the five churches before this one — Smyrna may be the exception — overcoming means separation from the evil in each church's own sphere of responsibility, or being kept from it. In Laodicea it means getting out of one state into another; in a word, gaining what is lacking. But overcoming in Philadelphia is simply keeping — keeping what they already have.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

What the Crown Is Not

So what is this crown, and what is lost with it?

The crown speaks of reward. Reward is an entirely different thing from eternal life. Eternal life is the free gift of God, and none who have it will ever lose it, or perish. But we may lose our crown, and be ashamed before Him at His coming.

Modernised from G. C. WillisOriginal wording

Nor is it the shared honour of reigning with Christ, which belongs to all His own alike.

All God's family are recognised as crowned like kings — "we will reign with Him" — so all have the marks of royalty alike. But there is something more: the wreath of victory. I may be an overcomer by faith in Christ, and yet be without a victor's wreath.

Modernised from G. V. WigramOriginal wording

Why Another Could Take It

The warning falls on those who feel most secure.

Do not trifle with it. Do not suppose that you hold it on a lease that never runs out, or that you have insurance to protect you from the traps Satan is setting for you… "Hold fast what you have, so that no one may seize your crown." The crown will be there, the crown is sure; but it does not follow that the same soul will have it. The people may change, but the crown will be given. For the Lord will set aside the proud and lift up the humble. He can gather those who seem far off — the very people who will be found faithful when He comes to receive us to Himself.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

So how does a crown pass to someone else?

Slackness or giving up in the Christian race may in effect forfeit a crown of reward, with another overtaking us and passing us because we lack devotion to the Lord.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Held, and Kept

The one who keeps his hold discovers whose strength was doing the keeping.

For many a crown has been lost, and many a crown will be lost, if the Lord delays. Yet the one who holds fast will find Christ's arms underneath him, Christ's hands upon his hands. He will not only keep, he will be kept. In the might of Christ's victory he will stand. The crown he is given he will cast before the Giver as a trophy of His own conquest, and the fruit of His grace.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Soon — He comes not as a thief here, but as the One bringing a crown; nothing must happen first.

- Have — hold His word, His name, His patience, His coming: things already given, not things still missing.

- Hold — here overcoming means keeping what you have, not gaining what you lack.

- Crown — reward, not eternal life; salvation is a gift that cannot be lost, but the victor's wreath can be.

- Kept — the crown is certain even if the wearer changes. Whoever holds fast will find Christ's hands on his, and will lay the crown back before the Giver.

Revelation 3:12 · Darby

He that overcomes, him will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more at all out; and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, the new Jerusalem, which comes down out of heaven, from my God, and my new name.

Philadelphia is the church of little strength. Christ's closing promise answers that weakness point by point. Pillar, permanence, names written — each image reverses what the faithful lacked here.

What Is There to Overcome

One writer raises the obvious problem and answers it:

The question may arise: if the Lord has nothing to condemn in Philadelphia, what is there to overcome? The overcomer is clearly one who overcomes every effort of the enemy. The enemy works to make him give up the truth that has been revived, and to move him from the place of separation that the truth demands. In a word, the overcomer is one who "holds fast."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Another writer describes the same believer by his staying power:

His progress is not marked by distinguished achievements, but he struggles on. He holds fast with a tight and tightening grip on Christ's Word, Name, patience, and coming. Life itself may be surrendered, but not the things which make up the crown of his testimony.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

A Pillar: Strength for Weakness

The pillar is not a literal fixture, since the New Jerusalem has no temple in it. It is a picture, and the picture is deliberately the opposite of what the Philadelphian was on earth:

He will be as much marked by power in the day of glory as he is by contentedly dependent weakness in God's present ways of grace. To be a pillar in the temple of My God is as truly a figure for the day of glory as the synagogue of Satan is a figure now. For literally there is no temple in the new Jerusalem. It is the one of little strength now made clearly strong in that day and in God's blessed presence.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One writer traces the picture back to the two pillars in Solomon's temple:

We cannot help thinking of those two pillars in the temple of Solomon. One was named Jachin and the other Boaz. The names are meaningful, and they show what alone can make a pillar anywhere: Jachin means "He establishes," and Boaz means "in Him is strength." If only we always remembered this! The strength is not in His creatures, but in Himself.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Never Going Out Again

One writer contrasts the testimony of today with what follows it:

"Never shall he go out of it" is His answer to the place they had been in here. The time of testimony goes on here today, along with the holy privilege of drawing near as priests. But then the idea of testimony in a scene of reproach will have ceased forever. He will go out no more at all. He will remain in the sunshine of eternal love, by the Son's eternal decree and for God's eternal pleasure.

Modernised from James McBroomOriginal wording

The City of My God

The city named on him is the seat of rule in that scene:

There is the administration of the throne, and the city is where the throne is set. The city is the vessel of rule in that radiant scene, and all government will flow out from it. The Lord's word here promises the devoted heart a place of rank and honour, which shows how small the distinctions people chase so eagerly today really are.

Modernised from James McBroomOriginal wording

The Three Names Written on Him

One writer takes the three names one at a time:

"The name of my God" is the expression of all that God is as revealed in Christ and unfolded in His word. "The name of the city of my God, the new Jerusalem" is the display of God's glory in the church in her glorified condition. "And my new name" is given, for here the overcomer had not denied the name of Christ.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Writing a name on someone has a plain sense of its own:

To write one's name on a person is a figure implying appropriation or adoption.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

"My God" and "My New Name"

Christ keeps saying "My" here — My God, the city of My God, My new name.

"And My new name." How beautifully touching this is at the end of such a wonderful message, where He speaks of His God four times over. He had undertaken to do the will of His God, and God raised Him to the highest place because of that work. God had highly exalted Him, giving Him a name above every name. That name is new. It belongs to the new resurrection world, where all His renown shines out. He would not withhold even this from them, but writes upon them His new name.

Modernised from James McBroomOriginal wording

Summary

- Little strength — Philadelphia's mark is weakness that holds on. Overcoming here means refusing to let go of Christ's word and name.

- Pillar — the reward reverses the weakness. Power in the day of glory replaces weakness now, and the strength is in Him, not in the creature.

- No more out — the place of reproach ends for good. Testimony gives way to unbroken rest in God's presence.

- Three names — God as revealed in Christ, the city as the church displayed in glory, and Christ's own name. To write a name on a person is to claim him as your own.

- His new name — the most personal gift of all. Christ received this name in resurrection glory, and He will not keep it back from those who refused to deny Him.

Revelation 3:13 · Darby

He that has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the assemblies.

Each of the seven letters in Revelation ends the same way. Philadelphia is no exception. A church the Lord does not rebuke still gets the same closing call to listen. So who is meant to hear? What must they hear? And why does the Spirit say "the churches," in the plural?

Why This Call Comes Last

In the first three letters the call to hear stands before the promise to the overcomer. From the fourth letter onward, including Philadelphia, it comes after. Commentators read this order as deliberate.

Here a notable change takes place. The call to hear begins to follow the promise, instead of coming before it. The reason is that a remnant is now formed… The Lord from now on puts the promise first. It seems there is no longer any use in expecting the church as a whole to receive it. The address is to the overcomer, and so the overcomer comes before the call to hear. In the three earlier churches the call to hear comes first. There the Lord is still dealing with the general conscience of the church. That is given up now.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

That order also narrows who does the hearing:

In the last four churches the call to hear comes after the words of cheer to the overcomers. From this we gather that none but overcomers hear the voice of the Spirit.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Churches, Not Church

The word is plural. Each reader must weigh the Lord's words to the six other assemblies as well as his own.

Notice: the Spirit does not say "to the Church," to the one Church being addressed, but "to the Churches." The hearing ear in every assembly was to heed what the Lord had to say to each assembly. So the Spirit's word to each single assembly is described as spoken "to the Churches." It was for the concern and exercise of heart of all, not just for the local assembly spoken to.

Modernised from Raymond K. CampbellOriginal wording

Approval Is Not Exemption

The Lord finds nothing to correct in Philadelphia. That does not excuse it from listening to what He says elsewhere.

There may be nothing to condemn in this Church. Still, the Philadelphians must hear what the Spirit has to say to the other Churches as well as to themselves. If they are to have the mind of the Lord, they must heed the message of the Lord to each of the Churches. Listening to what the Spirit says in one assembly does not release anyone from the duty to hear and act on His ministry and administration in other assemblies.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The Lord Speaks, the Spirit Applies

The Lord writes to a whole assembly, yet the letter ends with one person: "he who has an ear."

The address closes with the appeal to the individual who has an ear to hear. "Let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches." The Lord addresses the Church. The Spirit then applies the Lord's words in power to the individual with the opened ear.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

What Having an Ear Looks Like

The hearing described here is not simply taking in information about one's own group. It is a settled posture toward God, and it comes with a warning about who we let claim our attention.

They are not told to "hear the church," as church officials say; nor are they told to name themselves after this assembly or that. They are to hear what the Spirit says to all the assemblies… A true soul in any of these assemblies can take in what the Spirit says to his own assembly. But the one who has an ear to hear is seen as able to take in what the Spirit says to all. He is in communion with God about the state of all the assemblies. He is not only living by the Spirit, but also walking by the Spirit; for the attentive ear and obedience go together.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

A Voice That Lasts Until He Comes

Hearing is not finished business. It runs on until the Lord's return.

One of the things that the little strength secures is to keep hearing the voice of the Spirit until the Lord comes. That is a great blessing… That voice was to them, and that voice is to us. Whatever else we may forget, may we remember the Lord's words: "I am coming soon. Hold fast what you have."

Modernised from Frank WallaceOriginal wording

Summary

- Hearing narrows. The call now follows the promise. In these later conditions the overcomers still listen, not the whole professing body.

- Hearing widens. The Spirit speaks "to the churches" — every message is for the concern and exercise of all, not just for the assembly named.

- Hearing spares no one. The Lord corrects nothing in Philadelphia, yet it must still take in what He says to the others. Otherwise it will not have His mind.

- Hearing is personal. The Lord addresses the church; the Spirit presses His words home to the one individual with the opened ear.

- Hearing is obedience. The attentive ear and obedience go together. That listening lasts until He comes.

Revelation 3:14 · Darby

And to the angel of the assembly in Laodicea write These things says the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God

The last of the seven letters opens with three names the Lord takes for Himself, not with the church's condition. Why does He introduce Himself this way here, and what does it mean to call Him the beginning of God's creation?

"The Amen" as a Name

Most people say this word at the end of a prayer. Here it is a title, and it reaches back to Isaiah.

To Laodicea the Lord presents Himself in a threefold way. All the promises of God are amen in Him. That is, they are firm and carried through to completion in Him. But He Himself is also "the Amen." He takes it as a title. It reminds us of the way Jehovah speaks of Himself twice in Isaiah 65:16 as "the God of truth," or word for word, "the God of Amen." The Jehovah in whom everything is made sure is the Jesus of the New Testament. And it is striking that the word "truly," so often on His lips, is really the word Amen.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What the Titles Guarantee

The first two titles work together: one tells what He guarantees, the other what it cost Him.

As the Amen, He is the One in whom God has taken up and confirmed all His promises. They reach in every direction: to bring about every good, to overthrow every wrong, and to glorify God forever in doing it. As the Faithful Witness, He was always loyal to the One who sent Him. He loved the Father and came to do the Father's will. Whatever it cost Him, He never turned aside from that will and never shrank back from carrying it out.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The Place the Church Vacated

These titles name what the church itself should have been. It stopped being those things, so Christ holds the ground alone.

He alone is "the faithful and true witness." This is exactly what the church should have been, but was not. So He has to take that place Himself. It was so before, when He was here on earth in grace. Now He must take it up again in judicial power and glory. It is hard to imagine a sharper rebuke to people whose whole duty was to be faithful and true witnesses.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The failure shows up in where the church settled down.

The church should have walked consistently apart from the world. In its own measure that walk would have confirmed the truth of the heavenly calling and borne witness to it. Sadly, the professing church has given up the heavenly calling. It has settled down on earth and become the world. Instead of confirming, it has become the denial of the truth of God.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

"The Beginning" — Principle, Not Date

The Greek word behind "beginning" points to a principle, not a date on a calendar.

He is the "beginning" of all things, always, in Himself. He is that, come what may... What the church lacks, He is in Himself — "the beginning of the creation of God," the beginning of all things. Christ is what answers to the original idea in God's mind before all things. The Greek word arche means the beginning in theory and the end in practice. The main thought in building a house is to have a roof; but in practice the roof is the last thing made. The word "principle" comes nearest to the sense, though it does not give the whole idea.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Not Himself a Creature

Some read the phrase as though Christ were the first thing God made. The wording rules that out.

Christ is not, and I think could not be, called ktisma [a created thing], for this would take away from the Creator. He is called the firstborn of all creation and also the beginning of the creation of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

God's New Start

Why this title to this church? Because the old creation Laodicea rests in is already under judgment.

He announces Himself with this: "The Beginning of the creation of God." The old creation, spoiled by sin, is passing away. Its history is almost finished. God pronounced its judgment long ago at the cross. In Christ risen from the dead everything begins that God owns as truly His. It was first and always in His thought, and the ruin of the old only made way for it.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Man as the Beginning

Laodicean teaching starts somewhere else.

Laodicean teaching has man as the beginning — if it does not go further back to the ape, or even to protoplasm. And its end is man, man made into a god. If Christ comes in at all, it is as an example, an encouragement and a helper to man in his climb up the road of progress.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Amen. A divine title, not a closing word: the God of truth of Isaiah 65:16, in whom every promise of God is confirmed.

- Witness. What the Amen promises, the Faithful Witness proved — loyal to the Father's will at any cost.

- Beginning. What He proved in obedience, He is in Himself: the principle behind everything God has begun, and never a created thing.

- Vacancy. All three name what the church should have been. It settled down on earth instead, and so denied the truth it should have confirmed.

- Answer. The titles both rebuke and rescue. Laodicea makes man the beginning and the end; Christ risen is God's new start.

Revelation 3:15 · Darby

I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot; I would thou wert cold or hot.

The last of the seven letters opens with Christ's assessment of a church that felt no need of any assessment at all. He finds neither the cold of open unbelief nor the heat of real love. Either one, He says, would be better.

"I know your works"

The phrase "I know" runs through all seven letters. It lands differently depending on who hears it:

The pointed sentence "I know" occurs seven times, addressed to the angel of each assembly. So seven times over, a divine attribute is affirmed of our Lord: omniscience, the knowledge of everything. To weak Philadelphia this is a truth full of strength: the Lord knows in full what man does not know. To Laodicea in its lukewarmness, with its show and boast and wealth, the thought of that all-seeing eye searching the depths of the heart must be unbearable.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

What "neither cold nor hot" means

The temperature language is about one thing: how they stand towards Christ Himself.

The first and most terrible characteristic of the Laodiceans is indifference to Christ. As regards Christ they are neither "cold nor hot." They do not hate Christ, as the worldly unbeliever does. They do not love Him with the jealous love of the true Christian. They see no beauty in His Person; they put no value on His work. In the "church" of the Laodiceans, you may think what you like about the Person and work of Christ. You may hold what you like and say what you like. It is all a matter of indifference.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Nothing here is scandalous

No sin is named in the letter, which is part of what makes it so searching. Effort and output are not missing:

There is not the gross corruption of Thyatira, nor the hopeless deadness of Sardis. There is something even more offensive to Christ. They turn His name into a means of self-exaltation, instead of loving it. There is activity in the name of Christ, plenty of works, plenty of self-satisfaction — but heartless indifference to His Person.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

Why cold would be better

The wish for cold sounds strange until you see what cold and hot share:

Had it been cold — an active position taken up — or hot — showing some spiritual activity — then the Lord could have done something with it. But an undecided, neutral position towards Christ and the truth is so hateful that it must go at once.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

How the mixture is produced

Commentators differ on where the lukewarmness comes from. Some read it against the two letters just before it, where Sardis is cold and Philadelphia is warm:

We have had the cold state in Sardis: death is cold enough. We have had in Philadelphia the Lord reviving things — something we may call heat. Now the mixture of these two things produces the lukewarmness He speaks of. The heat has only enough effect to change the cold into lukewarm — nothing more. There has been the effect of the truth — the truth must always have effect, God's word never returns to Him empty.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Walter Scott rejects that reading:

We do not agree with those who say that Laodicea's lukewarm condition springs out of the Philadelphian state of the Church. We take it that the legalism of Thyatira, the moral numbness of Sardis, and the rejection of the truth and position of Philadelphia, along with other causes, combine to produce the Laodicean condition of that church — absolute indifference to Christ.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

The verdict that follows

Verse 15 leads straight into a sentence with no conditions attached to it:

Lukewarmness characterises the last state of profession in the assembly. It is nauseous to Christ; He will spew it out of His mouth. It was not mere lack of power, it was lack of heart — the worst of all ills. This threat is peremptory, not conditional.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Where neutrality starts

This warning reaches past the obvious failures. It touches anyone who holds the truth without living it:

Being neutral in principle and practice, they were half-hearted towards Christ. Nothing breeds neutrality faster than a position that is outwardly right, if self-judgment is not kept up with godly sincerity. The more a person stands at the front of the battle, carrying the responsible testimony of God, and the more he puts His grace and truth into words for others, the greater the danger. If his walk does not match the light, sooner or later he lapses back into neutrality, or even into active hostility.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Known. The letter opens with Christ's perfect knowledge. It strengthens the weak who love Him. It is unbearable to the self-satisfied.

- Cold or hot. The words are "cold" and "hot," not "dead" and "alive": the point is not whether they are saved, but how they stand towards Christ. Both are positions He can work with. Lukewarm takes no position at all.

- Mixture. Truth that touches a person without warming them leaves them lukewarm. Commentators differ on how the cold and the heat mixed.

- Heart, not power. The letter names no immorality. It exposes a missing heart for Christ — the worst of all ills.

- Danger. Neutrality grows where the outward position is right but self-judgment has stopped.

Revelation 3:16 · Darby

Thus because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I am about to spue thee out of my mouth.

Laodicea faces no charge of scandal or false teaching — only the charge of being lukewarm. Three questions run through the verse: what lukewarmness is, why Christ would rather have cold, and what He rejects when He spits a church out.

What lukewarm means

The word does not describe people who never heard the truth. It describes people who heard it and stayed unmoved.

"I know your works: you are neither cold nor hot" (verse 15). This is broad indifference. Ignorance is not what does this deadly damage. The damage comes from a heart that stays indifferent to the truth after hearing all of it. Such a person does not want the truth. He feels the sacrifice, and the separation from the world, that must follow if he really obeys it. We ought to be patient wherever ignorance is unwilling. But indifference to truth is quite another thing. It is hateful in the Lord's sight.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same writer names where neutrality grows best:

Being neutral in principle and practice, they were half-hearted toward Christ. Nothing produces neutrality more easily than a position that is outwardly true, when self-judgment is not kept up with godly sincerity. Think of someone standing at the front of the battle, holding the responsible testimony of God. The more His grace and truth come out in his words to others, the more it matters whether he also walks according to the light. If he does not, sooner or later he slides back into neutrality, if not into active hostility.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why cold would be preferable

Why would Christ prefer cold? Because the middle keeps up a good outside.

Christ looks at the lukewarmness with utter disgust. Because "you are neither cold nor hot, I will spit you out of My mouth." Moderation is the cry of men. They want everything in respectable measure — the form of religion without any power. Christ hates this. He would rather have them dead, cold — He would then know what to do with them — if not burning hot. The so-called happy medium gives Him no pleasure. Nothing keeps me from tasting grace like having a fine outside. If I only gain a place and a good reputation for myself, and God is not glorified, I have no taste of mercy in my own soul.

Modernised from G. V. WigramOriginal wording

The missing thing

So what was missing in Laodicea?

The Lord cannot put up with lukewarmness. What Laodicea did not have was heart for Christ. The great thing for you and me to have is affection for Christ. That is what He values above everything — affection for Himself. That was lacking, so came the blunt threat of being spat out of His mouth.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Respectable to men, sickening to Christ

The picture comes from what lukewarm water does to the body.

There is neither burning zeal for His word, nor outright rejection of Christ and the Bible. Instead there is a sickening, lukewarm condition that is repulsive to the Spirit of God. Lukewarm water is itself something that makes you vomit, and this is the picture the Lord uses here.

Modernised from Henry Allan IronsideOriginal wording

Judged by appearance, this church would pass inspection:

This is the last phase of the professing Christian body. It is just about to be spat out as something Christ finds unbearably sickening. To man's eye it may look very respectable; but to the heart of Christ its condition is deeply repulsive.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What being spat out means

Christ names no date. What He names is an outcome.

He does not say when He will do it; but the decree has gone out from His lips, and will never be recalled. It means that He will reject the assembly totally and for ever as His public witness, His responsible light-bearer in the world. That is its primary application. But every believer can learn from it, for instruction and warning: nothing, no state or condition, displeases Christ like lukewarmness or indifference.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Commentators differ on the timing. One ties it to the second coming, when "all empty profession is left behind for judgment" (A. J. Pollock). Another ties it to the moment when "the people of God will have been caught up" (The Bible Treasury).

Grace still working, one by one

Even under this sentence, Christ does not stop appealing — but the appeal changes shape.

He warns the church of what is coming on it — of positive judgment. But until that judgment falls, He goes on working in His own grace. Now He reaches people one by one, for the church is given up. "If anyone opens the door, I will come in to him and eat with him, and he with me"; he will have his portion at my table.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Temperature, not scandal. No immorality, no false doctrine — only being neither cold nor hot. That is indifference to truth already known.

- Cold is cleaner. Christ would rather have them cold than respectable. The form of religion without the power gives Him no pleasure.

- Warmth is affection. What was missing was heart for Christ — the one thing He values above everything.

- Nausea is the verdict. Lukewarm water makes you vomit. A church that looks fine to men can sicken Him. The sentence is final rejection as His public witness.

- The door is still open. The body is given up, but His grace still calls people one by one. Anyone who opens gets Christ's own company at His table.

Revelation 3:17 · Darby

Because thou sayest, I am rich, and am grown rich, and have need of nothing, and knowest not that *thou* art the wretched and the miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked;

Laodicea is the last of the seven churches the risen Christ speaks to. Here He repeats the church's own boast, then gives His own verdict on the same church — and the two do not match.

The boast

The verse turns on two words: "you say." This church has plenty to say about itself.

Philadelphia has not a word to say for itself. Laodicea has. In fact, in almost every respect these two churches stand out in sharp contrast. "You say." The Church was not only self-satisfied; here we also have its proud boast... The city could boast of its material wealth, and the Church boasted of its riches just as much. It had added to that wealth as well: "I have prospered." There is no doubt that the Church in Laodicea had influence, numbers, gifts, showy achievements, learning, and other attractive qualities. It was proud to have them. Sadly, these things came at the cost of spiritual life and of true, warm love for Christ, and gained that way they can only count as a curse.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Where the riches came from

The claim was not empty. They did hold something real. But they had not received it from God, and truth held that way stops working on the conscience.

There is plenty of knowledge if not of truth; for there is a great difference between the two. They are rich, and increased with goods. Where did they get them? They were never given in the grace of God, but borrowed or stolen. They were truths that others had got fresh from God's word. Here they use these truths to lift up man. So the truths never touch the conscience, and they leave Christ out... There is nothing new you can tell them: they know it already.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A church talking about itself

There is a second problem in the boast: its subject. Every claim in it is about the church itself.

The Church was left here to witness for Christ. It has fallen so low that it not only stops witnessing for Christ; it starts witnessing to itself. The Church stops speaking of Christ and talks about the Church. The Assembly gets all the attention, and Christ counts for little. The Assembly seeks to attract to herself and not Christ. It takes the place of Christ by claiming to be the vessel of riches and grace. Christ is outside, and yet it can say, "I have need of nothing." ... In their own estimation the Laodiceans needed nothing; in the sight of the Lord they needed everything.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Five words, weighed one by one

Against the boast the Lord sets five words. Each one names something the church has lost. The writer below works from a translation that keeps the word "the" before the first two.

"You are the wretched one and the miserable one," besides being "poor, and blind, and naked." The definite article — the word "the" — adds a lot to the point and force of the Lord's judgment of Laodicea. "The wretched" and "the miserable," or "pitiable" — misery gathered into one place, and the one object of pity above all others. They were poor, having none of the true riches. They were blind to their own state and to the Lord's glory. They were naked, having no divine righteousness.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

The worst part: not knowing

The phrase "not realizing" is the sting. A church can be full of itself and blind to itself at once.

"You say, I am rich... and I need nothing, not realizing that you are wretched" — there we see the Pharisee, pleased with himself and blind to his real condition. There is no true feeling, no genuine self-judgment. Leaven not only puffs up; it also makes you numb.

Modernised from J. B. CroslandOriginal wording

The opposite verdict

An earlier church in the same set of letters heard the opposite verdict. The contrast points to a pattern.

To the outward eye, trouble and poverty marked them... The Lord, who sees everything, saw it very differently. His surprising verdict was, "but you are rich." That is the exact opposite of what He says later to Laodicea, which claimed to be rich and in His eyes was miserably poor... All through the church's history, times of poverty and trouble have gone together with spiritual riches, and times of wealth and ease with spiritual poverty. It is the same today.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The way out

The Lord's list is not just an accusation. Accepting it is the first honest step anyone in this state can take.

Every man and woman on earth is dependent, not self-sufficient. Some have not discovered it, and others are too proud to own it... It is not easy to confess the truth. It cuts clean across our natural pride, and discovering it is bitter. But it is the way to blessing, and it is better to confess the unpleasant truth than to hug the pleasant lie.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Need nothing — The church speaks first. It boasts of influence, numbers and gifts, while Christ is left outside.

- Need everything — The Lord answers with five words: wretched, pitiable, poor of true riches, blind to His glory, naked of divine righteousness.

- Need to know — The worst part is "not realizing." Pride and numbness come together, and self-judgment stops.

- Need Christ, not knowledge — Borrowed truth used for show leaves a church pointing at itself, not at Him.

- Need is the way in — The church that looked poor was called rich. Owning the unpleasant truth about yourself is the road back to real wealth.

Revelation 3:18 · Darby

I counsel thee to buy of me gold purified by fire, that thou mayest be rich; and white garments, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakedness may not be made manifest; and eye-salve to anoint thine eyes, that thou mayest see.

Laodicea thinks she needs nothing, yet Christ has just called her poor, blind, and naked. Now He offers to sell her the three things she lacks — but how can a bankrupt church buy anything?

The Tone of the Offer

Christ could have commanded a church in this state. Notice the tone He chooses instead.

Laodicea's three main features were their poverty, their nakedness, and their blindness. These are the very things the Lord, ever gracious, offers to meet here. He might have commanded, but no, He counsels, "buy from Me gold refined by fire." Your right to come and buy is your need and poverty.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

The people He speaks to are not humbled sinners asking for help. They are pleased with themselves.

He says, "I counsel you to buy from Me." These words show their need of Christ, and that there is no blessing apart from Christ. They must come to Christ for true riches. What grace! He invites not only sinners who have confessed their sin, but these self-occupied, self-satisfied people who only profess faith, to come to Himself.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

What "Buy" Costs

The word "buy" does not put a price tag on grace.

The first great need of the Laodicean is to have a personal transaction with Christ. That is the thought behind buying. When Christ invites us to come and buy, it is "without money and without price." This reveals the secret of the Laodicean condition. They are indifferent to Christ and full of themselves, because they have never come to know Christ personally.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Yet Laodicea must give something up.

The first part of the payment is to own your need, your fall, your utter poverty. You must admit that the world and pride have dimmed and blurred your eye, till you mistake error for truth.

Modernised from J. Wilson SmithOriginal wording

Gold Tried in the Fire

Laodicea already boasts of wealth. The fire is what separates her riches from His.

They had been boasting in their riches, of which gold is the symbol, but their imagined wealth had not yet faced the fire. When their "goods" went up in smoke, their proud claims would perish. Fire only refines true gold, while it burns up all the showy human things that glitter. They needed a righteousness that came from God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

So where does that righteousness come from?

The gold refined by fire speaks of the righteousness of God. That righteousness is available to every sinner through the death of Christ. The sinner who believes in Christ stands before God a justified man, as clear from sins and judgment as the risen Christ.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

White Garments for Exposed Shame

The second item deals with what other people see.

If the gold speaks of the righteous condition in which the believer appears before God, then the white garments speak of practical righteousness in the believer's life before men (Rev. 19:8). Being clothed in white means that before men we put on the beautiful character of Christ. We show something of His lowliness and meekness, His grace and gentleness, His patience and forbearance, His holiness and sanctification.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Laodicea made her own covering, and she is not the first.

Adam and Eve sewed fig leaves together so that the shame of their nakedness would not show. Yet how useless they found them when they had to stand before God. He gave them a garment that truly covered them. So this church at Laodicea was clothing itself with works and boasting of its success, while the Lord sees it as naked.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

Eye-Salve and Sight

The third item is for the eyes. Learning cannot supply what it gives.

For all their boasted scholarship and learning, the great mass of those who profess Christianity completely lack spiritual discernment. That discernment belongs to the simplest believer in Christ through the Spirit. The Apostle John can say to young believers, "the anointing that you received from Him abides in you... His anointing teaches you about everything" (1 John 2:27).

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Christ makes this appeal from outside the church He is speaking to.

Once again, in our day, the Lord appeals from His place outside to the spiritually blind among those who profess Christianity. He says, "Anoint your eyes with salve, so that you may see" (Revelation 3:18).

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Counsel, not command. Christ could have issued orders. Instead He advises — grace still speaking to the self-satisfied.

- Buy of Me. The blessing costs no money. Your need and poverty are your only claim, and Laodicea lacked the one thing that matters — a personal dealing with Christ.

- Gold. Righteousness from God, tested by fire. It is the one wealth that survives when human glitter burns away.

- Garments. God supplies the covering. We wear it before others as the character of Christ, instead of fig leaves stitched from our own works.

- Eye-salve. The Spirit gives sight. Only then does the church see its poverty, its nakedness, and the Christ who stands outside.

Revelation 3:19 · Darby

I rebuke and discipline as many as I love; be zealous therefore and repent.

The church at Laodicea is lukewarm, and sentence has already been passed on it: it will be spat out. In the same breath, the Lord speaks of love, of rebuke, and of a way back.

Love That Has to Act in Rebuke

The rebuke is not a withdrawal of affection but an expression of it. One writer sets the Lord's steady love against the church's lost love:

The Lord does not stop at speaking to the consciences of these lukewarm Laodiceans. He will also seek to reach the heart of any true believer still left in Laodicea. He says, "Those whom I love, I reprove and discipline, so be zealous and repent." The Church had long since left its first love. But the Lord never left His first love for the Church. No longer can He speak of their love, yet He can still speak of His love. It is not a love that is simply pleased with them. It is a love that has to act in rebuke.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Ignoring His rebuke costs more than comfort:

The Laodiceans seem to have felt themselves safe from both rebuke and discipline. But if we are not touched by the Lord's rebuke, we will not truly know His love... Am I going to assume that the Lord's warning is not aimed at me?

Modernised from J. B. CroslandOriginal wording

A Distinct Class

Older translations read "as many as I love" where the ESV has "Those whom I love." One writer tests who is included:

Does this principle apply to people who claim faith but are not converted? We turn to Proverbs, and there we read, "My son, do not despise the LORD's discipline or be weary of His reproof, for the LORD reproves him whom He loves, as a father the son in whom he delights." (Prov. 3:11-12.) Here the Lord is clearly speaking to someone in a known relationship, as the words "my son" show... The words "As many as I love" remove any doubt. "As many" marks out a distinct class. "As I love" marks out a special relationship to that class — the Lord's own people.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

An Old Principle, Not a New Threat

The first half of the verse states something true long before Laodicea existed, and it explains why the correction is never random:

The Lord had just been speaking with unusual severity. The circumstances called for it... But Christians, then and now, were to know that the Lord's rebukes, and His still more severe discipline, were the fruit of love. They were not the unpredictable treatment a human parent might give. "So be zealous and repent." The Lord would rouse them out of the numbness and dullness they had sunk into.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

The Body Is Sentenced; The Individual Is Not

Verse 16 pronounces judgment on the whole; verse 19 opens a door that judgment does not close:

The church as a whole is not called upon to repent. On it the sentence is not conditional, but absolute: "I will spit you out of my mouth." But grace is always open to each person. And the Lord never stops being faithful to His own people, however far they may have sunk into the coldness or carelessness of the religious profession around them. These saints were real, yet they had caught the lukewarmness that Christ found so sickening. They needed discipline to wake their consciences to the sad state they had fallen into.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

Zeal and Repentance as Exact Opposites

Each of the two commands is the exact opposite of a Laodicean fault:

The discipline falls on "as many as I love," so that it may stir them to zeal and repentance. A zealous person is someone stirred to warm desire — the very opposite of lukewarmness. Repentance is the opposite of the self-satisfaction which marks the haughty. The spirit of Laodicea is very strong in our day, so it is right for us to pay much attention to these solemn words of our Lord.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What He Does Not Ask For

Christ asks for nothing new here. He asks them to look at where they already are:

The Lord is dealing with His people. He keeps putting something before them to humble their thoughts about themselves. He does not tell them to do or try something new. He calls on them "to repent." He does not ask them to stretch their wings for some greater flight in the future. He asks them to see where they are and to confess their failure. But a shallow, self-satisfied heart finds this tiresome.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Love acts. The rebuke is not a break in His love. It is that love at work, since His love has not cooled even where the church's has.

- Love narrows. "As many as I love" points to a definite group: those already in relationship with Him.

- Love reaches. Sentence has fallen on the church as a whole. Grace stays open to each person inside it, however far they have drifted.

- Love wakes. Zeal is the opposite of lukewarm. Repentance is the opposite of self-satisfaction. Each command treats one disease.

- Love humbles. He asks for no new project. He asks His people to see where they are and admit it. That is what a self-satisfied heart finds hardest.

Revelation 3:20 · Darby

Behold, I stand at the door and am knocking; if any one hear my voice and open the door, I will come in unto him and sup with him, and he with me.

These words close the last of the seven letters in Revelation 2–3, addressed to the church at Laodicea. The startling thing is where the Lord stands — outside His own church, asking them to open the door, speaking not to the group but to whoever will listen.

Christ Outside His Own Church

The Lord had just threatened to reject this church. Before He acts on that threat, He takes a place outside the door.

The Lord threatens to reject this church (v. 16). Before He carries that out, He takes a place outside: "Behold, I stand at the door." In this way He disowns the whole body of people who claim the name of Christ. The Lord both knocks and speaks. What a rich display of grace in the worst of circumstances! The Lord does not order them to buy (v. 18), and He does not force His way in. In the one case He advises; in the other He knocks.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

You can read the same fact from either side of the door. Both readings are true.

These words show that the Lord has taken a place outside the church of Laodicea. That is a solemn thing. Its wretched moral state forced Him to take this position. On the other hand, it is just as true that Laodicea has shut its door on Christ. They have shut Him out and left Him outside.

Modernised from Raymond K. CampbellOriginal wording

Knocking That Does Not Stop

Shutting Him out does not change how He feels about them. The wording points to knocking that keeps going.

They may close their door upon Him, but they cannot close His heart against them. If they thrust Him out in utter indifference, He will wait at their door with perfect patience. He does not knock once or twice and then leave. He can say, "I stand at the door and am knocking." He keeps knocking, and He will go on knocking until the day of grace runs out.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

From the Church to the Individual

The letter has spoken to the church as a whole. Here the words "if anyone" narrow it down to one listener.

Here in Laodicea the Lord takes a place outside. The church in name only has in practice moved into the position Israel once held. So the Lord takes His stand outside, and He calls to individual souls who are inside: "Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears My voice." He wants to gain their attention. He wants them to let Him in. He warns the church of what is coming on it — real judgment. But until He carries that judgment out, He still acts in His own blessed grace. That grace now reaches individuals, because He has given up the church.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Hearing Without Opening

Hearing and opening are two different steps. One commentator warns that a person can do the first and never do the second.

Notice the order of the response. First comes hearing His voice — His call to repentance. Then comes opening the door. The bride heard His voice, but she had no energy to open the door until it was too late. So hearing His voice is not enough. Many believers hear it and still stay where they are, tied to evil company.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

A Meal That Runs Both Ways

The promise moves in two directions.

First, "I will come in to him" — not into Laodicea, whose doom is settled. He comes in to the person who, by grace, has opened the door… "I will eat with him." That is, "I will come down to where he is, and share fellowship with him in his things." How wonderful that He should come down so low! But He eats with the one who opened the door for a reason. He wants to lead that person up into the higher blessing of eating with Him, of sharing fellowship with Him in His things, of communion with Himself.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Set beside the other six letters, this promise stands out for when it is kept.

The letters to the first five churches hold no promise that comes true on earth. The letter to Philadelphia holds a promise that comes true as they are caught up from earth. But this last letter holds a promise to enjoy down here — the presence of Christ in close, blessed fellowship.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Use of the Verse in the Gospel

The verse is often preached to those outside the faith, and commentators differ over whether that use fits the setting. Some allow that use, but insist on what the verse first means:

Here the Lord makes this most solemn and weighty appeal not to the sinner outside, but to the professing Church. Christ is not knocking at the door of the sinner's heart, true as that is too. He is knocking at the door of those inside the professing Church.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Others go further. They argue that the letter as a whole rules this out:

Is this how Christ offers Himself as a Saviour to the unconverted? If it is, there is nothing else like it in the Scriptures… To hold this view is also to assume that the unconverted have power of their own. Opening the door goes far beyond simply believing the gospel message.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Outside — Laodicea's state pushed Christ out of His own church, and He disowns the body that claims His name.

- Knocking — He does not force the door and does not walk away; He keeps knocking while the day of grace lasts.

- Anyone — He has given up the church, so the call goes to single souls still inside it: "if anyone hears."

- Opening — hearing is only half the response; the bride heard and stayed put until it was too late.

- Supper — He comes down to where the person is, then draws that person up into His own fellowship. It is a promise to enjoy now, on earth.

Revelation 3:21 · Darby

He that overcomes, to him will I give to sit with me in my throne; as *I* also have overcome, and have sat down with my Father in his throne.

Christ speaks this last of the seven promises to Laodicea, a lukewarm church that has left Him standing outside its door. The promise raises two questions. Which throne does He mean, since He already sits on His Father's throne? And what does overcoming look like in a church that has grown indifferent?

Two Thrones, Not One

Two thrones stand side by side in this verse. They are not the same seat.

The Lord's words to Laodicea distinguish them very plainly. These messages present Him as Son of Man. His own throne, therefore, is clearly what belongs to Him as Man, in contrast with the Father's throne, the divine one. It is plain at once that He promises His saints a seat with Him on the first throne, but no one could sit on the other unless He were Himself divine.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

That distinction fixes the timing of the promise. Christ has not yet taken the throne He calls His own.

The Lord Jesus is not yet seated on His own throne. When He was on earth He had no throne. When He went to heaven, He sat down on His Father's throne... When this promise is fulfilled, He must have left His Father's throne and sat down on His own throne. It is a future thing.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Christ Overcame First

Christ asks for nothing He has not done Himself.

Look at the history of the life of Christ. It was a life of testing and suffering until He reached the cross... Opposition and contempt brought out everything that was in Him. His path grew darker and darker down to the cross. He had to overcome Satan, and He promises others that the one who overcomes will sit with Him on His throne, just as He overcame and sat down with His Father on His throne.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What Overcoming Means Here

In Laodicea, overcoming turns on one thing: the door.

Overcoming here means hearing the voice of Christ and opening the door to Him. This involves judging the condition of Laodicea and separating from it in heart and practice. Everyone who overcomes in this way will sit with Christ on His throne.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

From the Closed Door to the Shared Throne

The reward answers the situation point for point.

Most people have closed the door on Christ. The one who overcomes the indifference of Laodicea and opens the door to Him will enjoy more than secret fellowship with Christ in the day of His rejection. He will also share Christ's place in the open display of the day of His glory. Christ overcame a world that rejected the Father, and He has sat down on His Father's throne. The one who overcomes a world that has rejected Christ will sit down with Christ on His throne.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

How Great Is This Reward?

Commentators differ on whether this is the highest of the seven promises. Some read it as splendid but less intimate than what Philadelphia is offered.

To sit with Christ on His throne is a distinction of power. As a reward it has a grand, glorious, majestic, dignified character. But it lacks the share of Christ's personal affection that Christ promises to the overcomer in Philadelphia.

Modernised from William J HockingOriginal wording

Others deny it is a special rank at all. Yet they still find the reward fitted to the person who receives it.

Some have supposed that this shows an unusually rich kind of blessing. But this is a mistake. There is no special reward here, for it is the common portion of all believers. Still, here as in the other cases, the promise fits exactly... He had let Christ into his heart and known Him in secret fellowship down here. His reward is a place in Christ's own portion in the kingdom and glory up there. The Father received Christ the overcomer up to His own throne, the mark of the Father's approval and love. In the same way, Christ will receive the overcomer who let Him into his heart up to His own throne, the mark of Christ's approval and love.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

Summary

- Door. Overcoming in Laodicea starts at a door. You hear Christ's voice, open to Him, and turn from the lukewarm indifference around you.

- Pattern. Christ's own path is the measure. His trial grew darker down to the cross, where He overcame Satan before He asked it of anyone else.

- Two seats. He now sits on His Father's throne, which no created being can share; the throne He promises to share is His own, as Son of Man.

- Not yet. The promise is future. Christ must first leave the Father's throne and take His own, and no one shares that seat yet.

- Display. Private fellowship behind a closed door ends in public glory with Christ in His kingdom. It is the mark of His approval and love, whether or not it outranks the promise to Philadelphia.

Revelation 3:22 · Darby

He that has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the assemblies.

This call ends every one of the seven messages to the churches, and here it sounds for the last time — closing the letter to Laodicea, a church in danger of indifference and self-sufficiency. Why does the Spirit speak to all the churches, yet tell one person to listen?

The Lord's last word to the churches

This sentence closes more than one letter. It closes the whole series — and it falls right after the letter that described a real revival.

We come now to the solemn close of these addresses, the Lord's last word to the churches. It is very striking that we come to that close here, just after that letter to Philadelphia, where we have seen a real return of heart to Christ and a true revival by His Word and Spirit.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

The call is not aimed at one congregation only. So the message did not die with Laodicea.

The call is to hear the message of the Spirit to the Churches, not just the word to the particular assembly at Laodicea at that time. So it is clear that these messages have been recorded and preserved for the benefit of the whole Church at all times, even for ourselves today.

Modernised from Raymond K. CampbellOriginal wording

The Spirit speaks to churches, but one person must hear

The speaking goes out to churches. The hearing falls on one person.

In these addresses we listen to the voice of the Holy Spirit... But while the Spirit speaks to the churches, it is individuals who are called to hear. The Church as a whole is seen as a body deaf to the pleadings or warnings of the Spirit. So the churches are not called upon to hear, but individuals are: "He who has an ear to hear, let him hear." Recovery of the whole body is hopeless. That is why individual responsibility, always of first importance, is pressed harder and more constantly.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Not "hear the church"

The command is to hear the Spirit. The churches are the ones spoken to, not the voice to obey.

Such a message from the Lord "to the one who has an ear" carries unspeakably solemn power. It contradicts the twisted cry "hear the church." It calls on every faithful soul to "hear what the Spirit says to the churches." The church never was a standard of truth — only God's word is... Christ is the truth, and the Spirit is the power that works inwardly and brings it home. But when decay and false teaching set in, the outward professing church ceased to be even a reliable witness.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the call comes last here

In the first three letters this call comes before the promise. From the fourth letter on, including this one, the promise comes first. That switch says something about the church's condition.

The call to hear begins to follow the promise, instead of coming before it. The reason is that a remnant is now formed... The Lord from then on puts the promise first, and this apparently because there is no use any longer in expecting the church as a whole to receive it. In the three previous churches the call to hear is first, because the Lord is still dealing with the general conscience of the church. That is given up now.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The ear is the only qualification asked

The Lord asks for nothing here but an ear.

It is "He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches." An ear to hear. It is the very lowest qualification. It is not, Can you work? — can you do anything? Israel in the wilderness had no ear, and was overthrown; so will you be also if you have none. God says: Has my word any entrance into your hearts? Have you got blessing from anything I have ever said to you? Here is my challenge to you: "He who has an ear, let him hear."

Modernised from G. V. WigramOriginal wording

What hearing produces

The warning lands on Laodicea, but the danger it names is wider than one church.

The address closes with the deeply important call to the one who has an ear, to listen to what the Spirit has to say to the churches. All may not be Laodicean in the full sense, but all are in danger of the Laodicean spirit, and so comes the warning to hear the Spirit's voice. The one who hears will judge every tendency to indifference to Christ, to self-importance and to self-sufficiency. He will take his place apart from what is so soon to be spit out of Christ's mouth. He will make room for Christ to eat with Him in the day of His rejection, while waiting to reign with Him in the day of His glory.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Last word. This closes the Lord's messages to the seven churches. It is His last word to them.

- Kept for us. The call goes to the churches, not to Laodicea alone. So these messages were recorded and preserved for the whole Church at all times, ours included.

- One hearer. The Spirit speaks to the churches, but the call to hear falls on individuals. Recovery of the whole body is hopeless, so each person answers for himself.

- One voice. The command is to hear the Spirit, not the church — the church was never the standard of truth, only God's word is.

- One ear. No ability is asked for, only an ear. Whoever has it judges his own indifference and self-sufficiency, makes room for Christ now, and will reign with Him later.