Psalms 105:8–15

Psalms 105:8 · Darby

He is ever mindful of his covenant, -- the word which he commanded to a thousand generations, --

Psalm 105 is a song of thanksgiving. It walks through Israel's history from Abraham to the land. Verse 8 gives the reason for the song: God has not forgotten what He promised. The verse raises two questions — which covenant is in view, and what it means for God to "remember" at all.

The occasion of the praise

Verses 7 and 8 supply the ground on which the whole psalm rests. One writer traces the line from God's judgments in the earth to a gift He never takes back.

He is Jehovah, their God. His judgments are in all the earth. And He has remembered His covenant for ever. It was to be permanent. He commanded it to a thousand generations. He had now remembered it… Now again (v. 8) He had remembered His covenant with Abraham, and He had rescued His people by His judgments. This is the promise being carried out. And God's gifts and calling are never taken back.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Which covenant is remembered

The covenant here is not the one given at Sinai, where blessing depended on Israel keeping the law. The difference matters. A covenant that lasts forever cannot rest on people who broke their side of it at once.

"He remembers His covenant forever" (v. 8). This is not the covenant of Sinai. That covenant demanded the obedience of the people, and the people broke it the moment they came under it… It is the covenant God made with Abraham. It was unconditional, not in the least conditional on the obedience of Israel (v. 9). He affirmed the same covenant again to Isaac, and confirmed it to Jacob, despite Jacob's wandering away. It was an everlasting covenant (v. 10), so it depended only on the faithfulness of God.

Modernised from L M GrantOriginal wording

"A thousand generations"

You cannot work this number out on a calendar. It means "as many generations as there will ever be." The verses that follow use two names, Jacob and Israel, and the covenant takes a different shape with each one.

He has commanded it to a thousand generations — a round number, as it would seem, for as many as may be. He made it with Abraham; and with an oath to Isaac, He confirmed it to Jacob as a decree that cannot be changed, and to Israel as an everlasting covenant. To Jacob, with all the frailty and sinfulness that the name implies, it still takes the form of a decree, the fixed expression of His absolute will. With Israel, the name in which His transforming power has done its work, it is an everlasting covenant.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

What the psalm leaves out

Read the whole psalm and something is missing: Israel's failures. Verse 8 sets the tone and the closing verses repeat it. God's memory frames the history at both ends, not their failures.

In all these dealings with His people — in the days of the patriarchs, in the days of Israel's bondage, or in their wilderness journey — there is no mention of their sins, their murmurings and their rebellions. The psalm tells it all to bring to mind Jehovah's wonderful works, and His faithfulness to His covenant. This leading thought opens the review of Israel's history, as we read in verse 8, "He remembers his covenant forever."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

What the psalm does not yet say

One writer looks at a song that takes in part of Psalm 105. He finds meaning in what it stops short of saying.

There is, to begin, a part of Psalm 105. He shows how He kept Abraham. He recalls the faithfulness of God toward them until then and bids them recollect it. Only He bids Israel be mindful always of His covenant without saying yet that He remembers it, because it is not yet the full blessing.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Still waiting to be made good

Israel did live in Canaan. Yet two writers say the promise of verse 8 still waits for its fulfilment.

The conditional and temporary possession enjoyed by Israel is not, therefore, the fulfilment of the covenant with the fathers.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

Psalm 105 is prophetic of this… Looking back at the past history of the nation, we saw that these promises have never yet been fulfilled. The people took their inheritance under law, and lost it. God will make these promises good to them in sovereign grace.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- He remembers. The praise of the whole psalm rests on one fact stated in verse 8 — God has called His own promise to mind and acted on it.

- Not Sinai. He remembers the covenant with Abraham. It asked nothing of Israel's obedience, so it stands on His faithfulness alone.

- Forever. "A thousand generations" means as many as there will ever be. The promise is a fixed decree, not a temporary arrangement.

- No record of sin. The psalm reviews Israel's whole history and never names their murmuring. His memory fills the space their failure would take.

- Still ahead. Israel's short, conditional hold on Canaan was never the fulfilment. Commentators read verse 8 as a promise God will make good in grace.

Psalms 105:9 · Darby

Which he made with Abraham, and of his oath unto Isaac;

The psalm calls Israel to praise. The ground of that praise is not Israel's record. It is a promise God made to one family and never let go. It reaches back to Abraham and Isaac. What covenant can survive centuries of failure?

Not the covenant of Sinai

Israel had two very different arrangements with God. Only one of them lasts forever.

"He remembers His covenant forever" (v. 8). This is certainly not the covenant of Sinai. That covenant demanded obedience from the people, and they broke it at once when God placed them under it. This covenant is instead "the word that He commanded, for a thousand generations." It is the covenant God made with Abraham. It was unconditional — not in the least conditional on Israel's obedience (v. 9). He again affirmed the same covenant to Isaac, and confirmed it to Jacob, despite Jacob's wandering away. It was an everlasting covenant. So it depended only on the faithfulness of God.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Where the oath to Isaac comes from

The verse sets a promise beside an oath. That oath belongs to Mount Moriah, where God told Abraham to offer Isaac and then gave him back.

We now learn a lesson from Abraham's steadfast endurance, and from God's gracious way with him on Mount Moriah. Abraham released Isaac from the altar and offered up in his place a ram that God provided. Once that day the angel of the Lord called out of heaven to Abraham, telling him to spare his son. Then the angel's voice came a second time. This time God not only spoke, but bound Himself by an oath to fulfil what He would say. Never before had God been said to swear.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Why God bound Himself at all

Why would God add an oath to His word? Writers point to how easily human faith wavers.

What a beautiful glimpse this gives us of God! He stoops to consider the feebleness and weakness that mark even the best of His creatures. Here are Abraham and the later heirs of the promises. How easily their faith may waver! How full of uncertainties is the world in which they find themselves! So God comes down to their weakness. He backs up His Word with His oath, saying, "By Myself I have sworn, declares the LORD."

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Does an oath sworn to one man long ago touch anyone else?

It was not for Abraham's sake only that God gave this twofold guarantee, His Word and His oath. God applies to the children of faith now the same principles by which He acted towards the fathers of old, so that "we might have a strong encouragement." He could swear by no one greater, so He swore by Himself. There are two unchangeable things, His Word and His oath, and in both it was impossible for God to lie. By them He gives strong encouragement to all who have fled to Christ for refuge from judgment. They can lay hold on the hope set before them, instead of turning back because of the difficulties on the way.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The pattern across Scripture

Commentators notice a pattern in Scripture. Whenever Israel's hope is in view, the appeal runs back to this covenant, not to Sinai.

The Spirit of God, in all references to the true hopes of Israel, refers to the unconditional covenant made with Abraham. So we have seen Moses saying, "Remember Abraham, Isaac, and Israel, your servants, to whom you swore by your own self." Such was the hope of Zacharias, filled with the Holy Spirit (Luke 1:72-73); such also the prophetic song in Psalm 105:6-9, 42.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Remembered, and still to be kept

The two words this verse turns on — remembered and sworn — surface again at the birth of Christ, hidden in the names of the parents of John the Baptist.

The names of two people who come before us here are very significant. The first is Zacharias, which means "Jah has remembered." His wife's name is Elisabeth, the same as Elisheba, which means "God has sworn." And in his song of praise Zacharias puts these two things together: "Blessed be the Lord" — that is, Jehovah, of which Jah is a shortened form — "God of Israel, for He has visited and redeemed His people… to remember His holy covenant, the oath that He swore to our father Abraham."

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Commentators also read the psalm forward. They hold that these promises are still waiting.

The unconditional promises to the fathers will be fulfilled in grace. Psalm 105 is prophetic of this. When we looked at the nation's past history, we saw that these promises have never yet been fulfilled. The people took their inheritance under law and lost it. God will make the promises good to them in sovereign grace.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Promise — the covenant remembered here is the one God made with Abraham, not the law given at Sinai. It asked nothing of Israel, so Israel could not break it.

- Oath — God added a sworn word at Moriah, after Isaac was spared. Commentators note this was the first time God is said to swear.

- Reason — God swore because human faith wavers in an uncertain world; He stoops to our weakness.

- Reach — His Word and His oath are two unchangeable things. They bring strong encouragement to everyone who has fled to Christ for refuge.

- Result — Scripture keeps returning to this covenant for Israel's hope. Commentators hold these promises are still future, to be made good in sovereign grace.

Psalms 105:10 · Darby

And he confirmed it unto Jacob for a statute, unto Israel for an everlasting covenant,

Psalm 105 is a song of thanks, and verses 8 to 11 give the reason for it: God has kept His word. Verse 10 is where God fixes that promise in place with Jacob and calls it "everlasting."

Confirmed, Not Made

The verse does not say God made a covenant with Jacob. It says He confirmed one. The timing matters: this came 430 years before the law was given, and God knew all that lay ahead when He gave His word.

This unconditional covenant of God (unconditional because it is "in Christ") was first given to Abraham, and God confirmed it 430 years before He gave the Law. He did not confirm it to Abraham — the dates do not fit — but to Jacob, as Psalm 105:10 says. God wants us to see that when He pledged His word, He acted with full deliberation and perfect knowledge of every circumstance, past, present and future.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The years between the promise and its confirmation were not empty. They showed what kind of people God had tied Himself to.

The time between the giving of the covenant and its confirmation was long enough to expose how unworthy the people of the promise were. Of course, God's Word is enough for faith: it stands forever. But how kind He is to confirm the covenant, so that His undeserving people could be sure of it.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Two Names, Two Words

The verse uses two names for the same man and two terms for the same covenant. One writer reads that pairing as deliberate: one name carries the man's weakness, the other what God makes of him.

He made it with Abraham, swore it to Isaac, and confirmed it to Jacob as a decree that cannot be changed, and to Israel as an everlasting covenant. The double name is used here, and it clearly points to the people as well as to the father of their twelve tribes. As always, that has meaning. To Jacob, with all the weakness and sinfulness that the name implies, it still takes the form of a decree, the fixed expression of His absolute will. With Israel, the name that marks His transforming power at work, it is an everlasting covenant. So He works in perfect sovereignty, and in keeping with the holiness of His own nature.

after_note: DO NOT USE

Frederick W Grant

So "statute" here means a decree of God's own will. It rests on Him, not on the character of the man who received it.

Not the Covenant of Sinai

This covenant is not the law given at Mount Sinai. Commentators mark the difference sharply.

This is not the covenant of Sinai, which demanded obedience from the people, and which the people broke as soon as they were put under it. This covenant in verse 8 is "the word that he commanded, for a thousand generations" — so it lasts through the ages. It is the covenant God made with Abraham, and it was unconditional, not in the least dependent on Israel's obedience (v. 9). He affirmed the same covenant again to Isaac, and confirmed it to Jacob, despite Jacob's wandering away. For it was an everlasting covenant (v. 10), and so it rests only on the faithfulness of God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

That difference shapes the tone of the whole passage.

This is a covenant of pure grace — God's faithfulness to His promises. It stands in contrast to the covenant of Sinai, which rested on the people's responsibility... There is not one word here about the nations oppressing Israel because of their disobedience. All is free grace in this passage.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A Promise Still Outstanding

The covenant is called "everlasting." Yet Israel's history in Canaan was neither permanent nor unbroken.

Israel held the land on conditions, and only for a time. So their possession of it is not the fulfilment of the covenant made with the fathers.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

Commentators read the psalm as looking forward as much as backward.

These promises have never yet been fulfilled: the people took their inheritance under law, and lost it. God will make them good to Israel in sovereign grace.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

God Remembered

The praise in this psalm rests on one thing: God remembered.

He has remembered His covenant for ever. It was to be permanent. He commanded it to a thousand generations. He had now remembered it... None of their later failure is mentioned... And God never takes back His gifts and His calling.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Promised — the covenant was first given to Abraham and sworn to Isaac; verse 10 is the third link, not a new agreement.

- Confirmed — God confirmed it to Jacob 430 years before the law was given, so the promise never rested on the law.

- Decreed — a "statute" is a fixed decree of God's own will. It stands on His faithfulness, not on Jacob's worthiness.

- Everlasting — Israel's hold on Canaan was temporary and conditional. Commentators say the promise still waits for its true fulfilment in grace.

- Remembered — the psalm praises God because He remembered His covenant. He never takes back His gifts or His calling.

Psalms 105:11 · Darby

Saying, Unto thee will I give the land of Canaan, the lot of your inheritance;

Here the psalm quotes the promise itself — God's own words granting Canaan to Abraham's family. Two questions follow: was the gift conditional, and has it ever been fully received?

The terms of the grant

One writer traces how the same promise takes a different shape for each name — Abraham, Isaac, Jacob — and when God made the land sure.

He made the covenant with Abraham, and swore it to Isaac. He confirmed it to Jacob as an unalterable decree, and to Israel as an everlasting covenant. Here the double name is used of the people as well as of the father of their twelve tribes, and (as always) it carries meaning. To Jacob, with all the weakness and sin that the name implies, it still takes the form of a decree — the fixed expression of His absolute will. With Israel, in whom His transforming power is made real, it is an everlasting covenant. He works in perfect sovereignty, and according to the holiness of His own nature. By this covenant the land is made sure to them. He made it sure while they were still only strangers there, a few people whom men counted as nothing.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Promise, not bargain

Two very different agreements shaped Israel. One writer says plainly which one this promise belongs to.

This is certainly not the covenant of Sinai. That covenant demanded the obedience of the people, and they broke it at once when God placed them under it... It is the covenant God made with Abraham, which was unconditional, not in the least conditional on the obedience of Israel. He again affirmed the same covenant to Isaac, and confirmed it to Jacob, despite Jacob's wandering away. It was an everlasting covenant, so it depended only on the faithfulness of God. He promised to give Israel the land of Canaan at a time when they were strangers in the land, and very few in number.

Modernised from L M GrantOriginal wording

What Israel is asked to remember

The psalm tells Israel to remember. One writer notes what it does not tell them to remember.

Israel is called to remember — not Moses and the conditional promises given to the people through him, but the covenant made with Abraham unconditionally. It was an everlasting covenant to give the land to his seed. The psalm reminds Israel how God preserved those heirs of promise as they went from nation to nation.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same writer points to what the psalm leaves out.

All their later failure is not touched on. For now again He had remembered His covenant with Abraham, and had delivered His people by judgments. It is the fulfilment of promise. And God never takes back His gifts or His calling.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A gift not yet fully enjoyed

Israel did hold Canaan for a time. One writer weighs the word "for ever" against what that holding turned out to be.

The land was given to the descendants of Abraham "for ever," or as it is put elsewhere, "for an everlasting possession." Israel's possession of Canaan was certainly not like that. But has the Lord forgotten His promise? Far from it... So the conditional, temporary possession that Israel enjoyed is not the fulfilment of the covenant with the fathers.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

Another writer sees the promise still waiting for its day.

God will then fulfil the unconditional promises to the fathers in grace, brought in, as we have seen, by judgment... Looking back at the nation's history, we saw that these promises have never yet been fulfilled: the people took their inheritance under law — and lost it. They will be made good to them in sovereign grace.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Giver keeps the deed

"I will give" implies an owner. One writer shows that God still calls that land His own.

God has marked off one spot of land to be the centre of the blessing to the earth... He still has a piece of land He calls His own. "I lent it to you," He says to Israel; "but I have cast you out of it for your disobedience." But the land is the object of God's heart now, even though men fight over it today.

Modernised from G. V. WigramOriginal wording

A gift of land marks out a people blessed on earth. Another writer adds that God calls Israel, in turn, His own inheritance.

The land of promise is constantly spoken of as the inheritance of Israel... So when Israel returns to take possession of the land in a future day, it is still called their inheritance. This all shows that they were and will be an earthly people, but God blessed them on earth in relationship with Himself... In connection with this God calls Israel His inheritance: He has chosen them for His own inheritance.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Summary

- Given — God made the land sure to Abraham's family by an oath and a decree, while they were still strangers there, few and small in men's eyes.

- Given freely — not the Sinai agreement, which demanded obedience, but a promise resting only on God's faithfulness.

- Given to remember — the psalm calls Israel to recall the promise, not the law, and says nothing about their failure.

- Given for ever — their short, forfeited hold on the land was never the fulfilment. Writers read the promise as still waiting, to be made good in grace.

- Given by an Owner — the One who says "I will give" still calls that land His own, which is why He can give it again.

Psalms 105:12 · Darby

When they were a few men in number, of small account, and strangers in it.

This line looks back to the very start of Israel's story. The family holding God's promise of Canaan was tiny and owned no land — so what was the promise resting on?

Promise Against the Odds

The psalm reviews Israel's past to show that God keeps His word. It picks the moment when that word looked least likely to come true.

The psalm reviews Israel's history to prove God's faithfulness to His covenant. He made that covenant with Abraham and Isaac, and confirmed it to Jacob. He gave Israel the promise of the land at a time when, to natural eyes, keeping it looked impossible. The people who received the promise were few in number and strangers in the land. Still, they were under the constant care of the Lord.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

A Covenant That Does Not Depend on Them

One writer sets this covenant apart from the later covenant of Sinai — the one that demanded obedience from the people.

This is not the covenant of Sinai. That covenant demanded the obedience of the people, and the people broke it as soon as they were placed under it... This is the covenant God made with Abraham. It was unconditional. It did not depend in the least on Israel's obedience. He affirmed the same covenant again to Isaac, and confirmed it to Jacob, despite Jacob's wandering away. It was an everlasting covenant, so it depended only on the faithfulness of God. He promised to give Israel the land of Canaan at a time when they were strangers there, and very few in number.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Strangers in Their Own Inheritance

The verse calls them "sojourners" — people living in a land that is not their own. Canaan was already theirs by promise, yet they lived there owning nothing.

They are clearly in the place of strangers ("the Canaanites and the Perizzites were dwelling in the land"). They own nothing, "not even a foot's length"; everything rests on their valuing the promises. They have just two things: the altar and the tent. They travel from place to place and worship God. They are strangers and pilgrims on the earth.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why was Abraham a stranger? One writer points to what he had not yet received.

Abraham was a stranger because he had not yet reached the heavenly inheritance. Only one thing could end his life as a stranger: actually holding the inheritance God had called him to.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

A Weak Handful, Kept

"Of little account" means they counted for nothing to the nations around them. The verses that follow show why such a group survived at all.

Verse 9 speaks of Abraham and Isaac. Verse 10 speaks of Jacob. Verses 12-15 show how God protected the weak handful of His people, strangers in the land that was their inheritance. Apart from His protection they would have been destroyed again and again.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

One writer explains why God stepped in when kings came near the man He had called:

It was divine care over one He had called out to walk before Him. "He rebuked kings on their account, saying, 'Touch not my anointed ones, do my prophets no harm!'" God cares for those He calls to walk before Him.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why God Chose So Small a People

Moses later took the same fact — they were the fewest — and made it a comfort.

Moses said to Israel, "It was not because you were more in number than any other people that the LORD set his love on you and chose you, for you were the fewest of all peoples, but it is because the LORD loves you" (Deuteronomy 7:7-8). He could give no reason except what God was in Himself. This is a great comfort, for it puts the love of God on a basis that can never break down.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Few — God promised a whole land to a handful of strangers, at the moment when keeping that promise looked impossible.

- Covenant — the promise to Abraham, then to Isaac and Jacob, was unconditional. It rested on God's faithfulness, not on their obedience.

- Strangers — they owned not a foot of what was already theirs. They had the altar and the tent, and everything hung on valuing the promises.

- Kept — without God's protection this weak handful would have been destroyed again and again. He rebuked kings to keep them safe.

- Loved — being the fewest was never a problem. God gave no reason for His choice except what He is Himself, so that love can never break down.

Psalms 105:13 · Darby

And they went from nation to nation, from one kingdom to another people.

Psalm 105 looks back over Israel's history to prove that God keeps His word. This verse catches the chosen family at its earliest stage: promised a land, owning none of it, and moving on again — so how could that promise stand?

A promise that nature could not support

The promise of a land and this wandering look like a contradiction. One writer explains how both were true at once.

God promised the land to Israel at a time when, judged by nature, it would look impossible to fulfil. The people who received the promise were few in number and strangers in the land. All the same, they were under the constant care of the Lord. They went from one nation to another and from kingdom to kingdom, but God let no one wrong them without coming under His reproof.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Why the wandering proves the covenant

The psalm could have pointed Israel back to Sinai and Moses. It does not. It reaches further back.

Israel is called to remember the covenant God made with Abraham — not Moses, and not the conditional promises given to the people through him. That covenant was unconditional: an everlasting covenant to give the land to his seed. Israel is reminded of the way God preserved those heirs of promise when they went from nation to nation.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer names what this passage leaves out.

This is a covenant of pure grace, God's faithfulness to His promises. The covenant of Sinai was different: it rested on the people's responsibility... We do not find a single word about Israel's oppression by the nations as a result of their disobedience. It is all free grace in this passage.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Kept while they were failing

The wandering was not always noble. Twice Abraham's own faith gave way, and twice God still stepped in.

Even when the sons of Israel were wanderers, going from one nation to another, the preserving mercy of God was with them. It delivered them from any possibility of oppression, and even reproved kings for their sake (v. 14). This happened with Abraham, when his faith lost its energy and he denied his proper relationship to his wife (Gen. 12:17-20), and a second time as well (Gen. 20:2-3)... God showed special care for them despite their own weakness and failure.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer reads the same rescue as God making Himself known.

God shows that He will not let anyone touch His people on earth without consequence. He would show Himself careful of those He owned in this way. This made Him known in connection with His people, and it was of the utmost importance.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Homelessness as a confession

Their moving was not only something done to them. They chose it, and God tied His own name to them.

He was not ashamed to say, "I am the God of Abraham, of Isaac, and of Jacob." Why? Because they gave up the world. They were not mindful of the country they had come out of at the call of God, but sought a heavenly one. They had no home here. They lived in tents, confessing that they were strangers on the earth. Abraham's relatives in Syria had houses; Abraham had none, and neither had Isaac or Jacob.

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

What has changed, and what has not

Another writer sets what God did then against what He allows now.

Psalm 105:13-15 makes plain what the Lord felt of old. His chosen ones went from nation to nation, from one kingdom to another people, and "He allowed no one to oppress them; He rebuked kings on their account, saying, Touch not My anointed ones, do My prophets no harm." Now He may let any or all men do them wrong. For the present He may rebuke neither kings, nor subjects, nor servants, when they scorn His anointed and do His servants all the harm they can. Another day He will repay each one according to his works. But what does He feel now?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Few — God promised the land while the heirs were a small band of strangers in it. Nothing in their size or standing explains what followed.

- Covenant — Their safety rested on God's unconditional promise to Abraham, not on the terms of Sinai. That is why the psalm looks past Moses to Abraham.

- Kept — God preserved them as they wandered, even when their own faith failed. By guarding them He made Himself known: no one could touch His own without consequence.

- Homeless by choice — They had no house anywhere and called themselves strangers on the earth. God was not ashamed to call Himself their God.

- Now — Then God rebuked kings for His people's sake. Now He may let men do them wrong, and He will repay each one on another day.

Psalms 105:14 · Darby

He suffered no man to oppress them, and reproved kings for their sakes,

Psalm 105 looks back to Israel's most fragile days. Abraham's family had no land and no army, and they moved between kingdoms that could have crushed them. This verse says they survived because God warned kings off. Why did He do it, and does He still?

The setting: a covenant of pure grace

This verse sits in a passage about God's covenant with Abraham. One writer notes what that passage leaves out.

This is a covenant of pure grace. It rests on God's faithfulness to His promises. It stands in contrast to the covenant made at Sinai, which rested on the people's responsibility. The passage ends with these words: "He allowed no one to oppress them; He rebuked kings on their account, saying, 'Touch not My anointed ones, do My prophets no harm!'" There is not one word here about the nations oppressing Israel because they disobeyed. All is free grace in this passage.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Whom God protected

The "them" of the verse were not a nation yet. They were a small group in a land God had promised them but had not yet given them.

Verse 9 speaks of Abraham and Isaac; verse 10 of Jacob; verses 12-15 how God protected the weak handful of his people, strangers in the land that was the lot of their inheritance. Apart from His protection they would have been destroyed again and again.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Which kings God rebuked

The psalm does not name the kings. One writer points to two moments when Abraham's own faith had slipped.

Even when the sons of Israel were wanderers, moving from one nation to another, God's preserving mercy was with them. It kept them safe from any chance of oppression, and even rebuked kings for their sake (v. 14). That is what happened with Abraham when his faith lost its strength and he denied that Sarah was his wife (Gen. 12:17-20), and a second time as well (Gen. 20:2-3). Abraham was a prophet of God, as were others among his descendants. God showed them special care despite their own weakness and failure.

Modernised from L M GrantOriginal wording

Protection given, and a rebuke received

In Egypt God protected Abraham and struck Pharaoh's house. Yet He also let Pharaoh rebuke His own servant.

"But the LORD afflicted Pharaoh and his house with great plagues because of Sarai, Abram's wife." What wonderful grace to Abraham! God always delights to quiet His people's fears as well as to answer their faith. He covered His servant, who had gone wrong, with the shield of His powerful protection. Abraham's life and Sarah's purity were both kept safe behind that shield, which nothing could pierce. Meanwhile the household of Egypt's king felt the heavy blow of the LORD's righteous punishment... Abraham had clearly left himself open in all of this. So although God protects him, He still lets Pharaoh rebuke him. It is good to see this. When a man of God steps off the path of faith and honest living, he lays himself open to the men of this world. Had Abraham stayed in Canaan, Pharaoh would never have rebuked him in Egypt.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What the rebuke of kings was meant to show

One writer asks what God was showing when He stepped in against a king.

In the case of Abraham and Abimelech, this was God's care over a man He had called out to walk before Him. "He rebuked kings on their account, saying, 'Touch not My anointed ones, do My prophets no harm!'" Ps. 105:14-15. God cares for those He calls to walk before Him. Gen. 20:3. Abimelech had used his power as a ruler to seize a member of Abraham's family, and he had no right to do it. God shows that He will not let His people on earth be touched without consequence. He would show Himself careful of those He owned in this way. By this He made Himself known as the God of His people, and this was of the greatest importance.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Then and now

Back then God stepped in openly. One writer says it does not always look like that today.

Now He may let any or all people do them wrong. For the present He may rebuke no one — not kings, not their subjects, not the lowest workers — when they scorn His anointed and do His servants all the harm they can. Another day He will repay each one according to his works. But what does He feel now?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Kept by covenant. God kept His promise to Abraham. That promise, not Israel's obedience, is why no one could oppress them.

- Kept though few. They were a weak handful of strangers in a land not yet theirs. Without His protection, enemies would have destroyed them again and again.

- Kept while failing. God rebuked two kings at moments when Abraham's own faith had given way. He covered a servant who had gone wrong.

- Kept, but not flattered. God shielded Abraham from Pharaoh. Then He let Pharaoh rebuke him. Protection is not approval.

- Kept for His name. God guarded those He owned, and by it made Himself known. Commentators note that today He may let His servants be wronged, and settle the account on another day.

Psalms 105:15 · Darby

[Saying,] Touch not mine anointed ones, and do my prophets no harm.

God is speaking about a small group of wandering families. He does not address them. He warns the kings whose lands they crossed. Two questions follow. Who are these "anointed" and "prophets," and does the warning still stand over God's people today?

Who the Anointed and the Prophets Are

The verse looks back to Abraham and the wandering family that came from him. One writer explains why God gives such men the title of prophet:

Again, let us take the patriarchs, whom Scripture plainly calls prophets… The same principle explains their claim to this title. They were the interpreters of the mind of God at that time. God "called out" these men because a new and terrible evil had come into the world — idolatry. We never read of it before the days of Abraham.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why They Needed Such a Guard

God had promised a whole land to a handful of people who owned none of it.

God promised the land to Israel at a time when, to human eyes, it looked impossible to keep. The people who received the promise were few in number and strangers in the land. Still, they were under the constant care of the Lord. They went from one nation to another and from kingdom to kingdom, but no one wronged them without coming under God's rebuke.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Protection Rooted in Grace, Not in Merit

Their safety did not rest on what they deserved. One writer sets this promise beside the covenant made later at Sinai:

This is a covenant of pure grace. It rests on God's faithfulness to His promises. The covenant of Sinai was different: it rested on the people's responsibility… We do not find a single word here about the nations oppressing Israel because Israel disobeyed. All is free grace in this passage.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

God Defends His Own Even When They Fail

God may have a quarrel of His own with how His child is living. It does not stop Him defending that child:

This is how God acts. He may have many a private dispute with His child about the way he lives. But the moment the enemy brings a case against him, the Lord always pleads His servant's cause. "Touch not my anointed ones, do my prophets no harm!" "He who touches you touches the apple of My eye."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Another writer adds what God made known by acting this way:

God shows that no one may touch His people on earth and go unpunished. He would show Himself careful of those He owned in this way. By this He became known in connection with His people, and that was of the greatest importance.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A Warning Kings Have Ignored

A thousand years later the same word still stood over kings:

Jeroboam had forgotten, or ignored, a rebuke God gave to kings almost a thousand years before. It said: "Touch not my anointed ones, do my prophets no harm!" (Ps. 105:14-15).

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

A Verse Often Misapplied

People quote this verse to stop others from speaking up about evil. One writer answers:

I have heard this passage quoted: "Touch not my anointed ones, do my prophets no harm!" (Ps. 105:15.)… I hardly need to say that this twists Scripture. I may seek to walk apart from evil. I may seek to stir the conscience about it where the evil is plain. Or, failing that, I may separate myself from it. None of this does harm to any of the Lord's "prophets." It is the very opposite — it is a blessing to them all. God did not address these words to the Lord's people. He addressed them to the nations, as the context will show. That is another reason why they do not apply.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

How It Reads in Our Own Day

Does the fence still stand today? One writer says God often lets the wrong go for now:

Now He may let any or all men do them wrong. For the present He may rebuke no one: not kings, not subjects, not servants. They may despise His anointed and do His servants all the harm they can. Another day He will repay each one according to his works.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Called — the "prophets" here are the patriarchs. God called them out to hold His mind before a world sliding into idol worship.

- Covered — they were few and owned no land, and it made no difference. Their safety rested on a covenant of pure grace, not on anything they deserved.

- Claimed — God may disapprove of how His child lives and still plead his cause the moment an enemy attacks.

- Corrected — God spoke these words to the nations, not to His own people. Naming plain evil harms none of the Lord's "prophets."

- Coming — today He may let men harm His servants and say nothing. Another day He will repay each person according to his works.