Psalms 105:23–38

Psalms 105:23 · Darby

And Israel came into Egypt, and Jacob sojourned in the land of Ham.

Psalm 105 is a song of thanksgiving that retells Israel's story as proof that God keeps His promises. Verse 23 marks the moment the family of promise steps into a foreign land, and it raises the question the rest of the psalm answers: how can a move into Egypt belong to a song about God's faithfulness?

Where the verse stands in the psalm

The psalm follows an order. Joseph rises to power first; only then does the family arrive. One writer traces the whole sequence, and marks the same order in Acts 7:

Psalm 105 — The psalm next celebrates grace and election, which carry out the promise of giving the inheritance to Israel... In the psalm, the mind of God rests first on Jehovah's faithful care of the pilgrim of faith (vv. 8-15), then on the lifting up of the afflicted Man (vv. 16-22; cf. Acts 7:1-10). After this, Israel came to Egypt, and Jacob sojourned in the land of Ham (cf. Acts 7:11-16). There they met oppression and hatred, but He brought them out with power (vv. 23-38), and Egypt was glad when they left.

Modernised from WhybrowOriginal wording

Why Egypt is called "the land of Ham"

Egypt takes this name from Ham. Genesis 10 lists his son Mizraim among the nations. One commentator draws out what the word itself carried:

In the list of the nations in Gen. 10, Mizraim appears as the son of Ham; and in the Psalms, Egypt bears the name "the land of Ham" (Ps. 105:23, 27). Chem or Khem is surely the same word, and it is the name Egypt carries in the hieroglyphic inscriptions. Its meaning is "black," or "sun-burnt" — darkened by the light. And this is what we call the "natural state." It is not a darkness caused by the absence of light. It is the effect of the light itself on a man such as he is.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Two names for one people

The verse uses the national name in the first line and the personal name in the second. The same writer treats that as deliberate. Each name meets a different danger: one from outside, one from within:

"Israel came to Egypt": the people of God, favoured by God's own purpose, were in the land of "double narrowness." It was the place where desert and river fight each other — where life struggles with death. Sadly, it was the land of Ham, the "sun-darkened"... The people of God are in a world opposed to God... But this people of God are also looked at from another side — as "Jacob." And Jacob, though only a stranger passing through the land of Ham, is in danger from more than opposition. He needs every part of the discipline God takes him through.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

An arrival already announced

Nothing here caught God by surprise. The move looked like promotion: royal favour, and the best land in Egypt. But God had already told Abram it would mean something very different:

Abram went down into Egypt under natural pressure. In the same way, God let him know in a prophetic vision, with a smoking furnace and a flaming fire, that his offspring would live as strangers in a land not their own, and would be in bondage and affliction for four centuries... Israel came down under the prestige of Egypt's greatest governor and the warmest royal favour. They might have looked for nothing but ease and honour, settled as they were in the best of the land, in Goshen... But despite appearances, Egypt in Jehovah's eyes meant servitude and affliction. And so it turned out, once Joseph's protection was gone.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A stay with a fixed end

The word "sojourned" says they lived there without belonging there. Their stay had a set length, and no power could stretch it:

Their slavery was not accidental in any way. God had foreseen it, and had even told Abram about it while he still had no child (Gen. 15:13-16). God was training a people marked out for a very high position, and part of that training was to live as strangers in a foreign land and endure affliction there for four hundred years. God rules everything so completely that Satan had no power to hold the people one single day beyond the appointed time.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

What the years produced

The stay was not wasted time. One writer names what came out of it, then asks why God chose that method:

They grew into a nation in that hard Egyptian school. But why was this furnace promised to them in the covenant? Why did they need the Refiner's fire?

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Promised — God told Abram about Egypt before he had a child, so the hardest chapter was already part of the covenant.

- Sent ahead — the psalm puts Joseph's exaltation before the family's arrival; God provided the man before He allowed the need.

- Darkened — "the land of Ham" means the sun-burnt land, a picture of darkness that comes from the effect of light on man as he is, not from any absence of light.

- Two names — "Israel" faces a world opposed to God; "Jacob" is the sojourner who himself still needs the discipline of the journey.

- Timed — the stay had a fixed span no enemy could lengthen, and out of that furnace God formed a nation.

Psalms 105:24 · Darby

And he made his people exceeding fruitful, and made them mightier than their oppressors.

Psalm 105 retells Israel's story as a record of God's faithfulness to His promise to Abraham. Verse 24 marks the turning point: a small family in Egypt becomes a nation stronger than the people around them. Why did God's blessing come in a land of slavery? And why did hatred follow the growth at once?

God's own work

The verse credits the growth to God, not to Israel. One writer sets the numbers side by side. What looked like disaster was promise working itself out:

Here we see grace in its first actions. A nation had a small beginning: the seventy people who came into Egypt with Jacob. Set that against their marvellous and unstoppable increase. Even the bondage they came into had already been announced to them. What seemed most against them was really the working out of promise for them. The hand of power works in disguise, yet faith can see right through it. The story is essentially the same, whether told of the nation of Israel or of any of the Lord's redeemed.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Stronger than their enemies — and hated for it

"Stronger than their foes" echoes Egypt's own fear. The same writer links this to the next verse, where hearts turn to hatred:

Through the favour of God they increase greatly, and become stronger than their enemies. Pharaoh's own words declare it (Ex. 1:9). And here, no doubt, is how we are to understand the verse that follows: "He turned their hearts to hate his people." God had only to show His favour like this, and the tide of opposition ran at full force.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Egypt, the chosen nursery

Egypt was the setting God picked for a family to become a people:

Egypt was the nursery God provided for the chosen race. There they grew from one great family — the sons and grandsons of one father — into a people ready for the inheritance destined for them. In mercy He sheltered them for a time, so they would grow all the more under hardship when it came. And it had to come, because people hate anyone who claims a link with the true God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The furnace that made a nation

The pressure meant to crush them did the opposite:

God, however, took them in hand and allowed them to feel the scorching heat of Egypt's furnace. "But the more they were oppressed, the more they multiplied and the more they spread abroad" (Ex. 1:12). In that furnace of affliction they were welded together as a nation. They entered Egypt a feeble and disunited family; they left it a compact and powerful nation.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

One writer treats this as a standing rule, not a one-off:

Egypt was the place where Jacob suddenly grew into a nation. Growing under affliction is the rule in every age there has ever been, for all God's people... "Jacob" is said on purpose. It was his natural, not his spiritual, name — Jacob, the "supplanter." Jacob needed humbling, but he grew by it.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

A record of grace

Verse 24 belongs to a psalm that leaves Israel's failures out:

The psalm then tells how God had cared for the fathers, and judged Egypt to deliver His people. Despite the bondage, there was not a weak person among their tribes... All their later failure is left untouched. For now again (v. 8) He had remembered His covenant with Abraham. He had delivered His people by judgments, for it is the carrying out of promise. And the gifts and calling of God are irrevocable.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer reads the whole psalm the same way:

In Psalm 105, God reviews His people — all that they were and all that they had done — before His eyes. Right through that psalm, whatever He may have to say, grace triumphs.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Promise — Seventy people went into Egypt. The increase that followed worked out God's promise to Abraham. He had even announced the bondage in advance.

- Nursery — Egypt was the place God chose for a family to grow into a nation. He sheltered them for a time, so they would grow all the more under hardship.

- Furnace — The heat did not shrink them. They entered as a feeble, divided family and left as a strong nation, welded together by affliction. The same rule holds for all God's people.

- Fear — "Stronger than their foes" repeats Pharaoh's own alarmed words. God's favour was all it took to turn Egypt's heart to hatred.

- Grace — The psalm records all of this and never mentions Israel's later failure. The gifts and calling of God are irrevocable.

Psalms 105:25 · Darby

He turned their heart to hate his people, to deal subtilly with his servants.

Psalm 105 tells Israel's story as God's story. Here the mood turns dark. Egypt once welcomed these people; now it hates them and hunts them. And the psalm names God, not Pharaoh, as the one who turned those hearts. How can an oppressor's hatred be traced back to God?

Why the psalm puts God behind it

One writer answers by looking past this one dark line to the whole story, and to who is at work in it.

God is at the bottom of everything. He works, and the fruit of His labour is the blessing of His own. If the truthful record of their ways must mention evil, it is still He who is around, and above, and beneath it all. He saves by power the people whom He has created for Himself in grace. Egypt is only a vessel and tool fitted for His purposes towards His own name, as the portion of His chosen people.

Modernised from Arthur PridhamOriginal wording

The blessing that provoked the hatred

The verse just before this one gives a reason for the change. God had made His people strong. One writer says that alone was enough to turn Egypt against them.

Through the favour of God they increase greatly and become stronger than their enemies, as Pharaoh's own words declare (Ex. 1:9). And this, surely, is how we are to read the verse that follows: "He turned their hearts to hate His people." Nothing more is needed. Let God's favour appear in this way, and the tide of opposition runs in full force.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

A short retelling of the history makes the same link, and shows what the hatred turned into. Egypt welcomed Israel at first, "until their number increased so that they became stronger than the Egyptians. This moved the Egyptians to hate them, and Pharaoh worked out deceitful ways to cut their numbers down" (L. M. Grant).

The enemy behind the crafty king

The verse speaks of more than hatred. It speaks of scheming. One writer looks behind the king to the enemy who moved him, and names the moment such attacks come.

It is always like this. There is always war between God and the enemy. Nowhere does it rage so hotly as where His people are concerned, and when a clear display of divine mercy is close at hand. God's approaching favour to Israel drew out the enmity of Satan. Satan stirred up a fitting instrument for his malice in the prince of the world of that day — "another king who did not know Joseph."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The instrument is used, but not excused

If God turned their hearts, were the Egyptians innocent? One writer answers by holding both sides together. The oppressor is a rod in God's hand, and God still reckons with the rod.

God may put power into the hand of the Gentile. He may grant success to his armies, even against the nation of His choice, and even to the overthrow of the Zion that He loved. Still He does not overlook the pride of heart, the lust of power, the self-will and violence of the rod that He uses to correct His erring people. Again and again the nations invaded His land and destroyed life and property without restraint. They were His instruments to correct His obstinate and stubborn people. But doing the will of God was far from the mind of any one of them.

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

The scheme that defeated itself

Pharaoh's plan worked. It also did something he never intended.

His slaves made Egypt magnificent; their misery built his temples. But, though Pharaoh did not know it, he did more — he made these Hebrew slaves long for liberty, and cry to their God for rest. This is how the enemy always defeats himself by his success.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

And the reversal was not only Pharaoh's own doing. The same writer says his cruel efforts were "just as clearly to be defeated by God, for, say or do what he might, 'the people multiplied and grew very strong'" (William Kelly).

Summary

- Favour first. The hatred did not come out of nowhere. God's blessing made His people many and strong. That favour alone was enough to turn Egypt against them.

- Hatred follows. The war rages hottest around God's people. It flares when a clear act of His mercy is near.

- Craft is the weapon. Pharaoh used scheming as much as force. He worked out deceitful ways to cut their numbers down.

- The instrument is still guilty. God uses the oppressor as a rod, yet He does not overlook the pride and violence of the rod. Doing God's will was the last thing in the oppressor's mind.

- Defeat is certain. The plan backfired. The people multiplied under it, and their misery made them cry to God for rest. The enemy defeats himself by his own success, because God is above, around and beneath it all.

Psalms 105:26 · Darby

He sent Moses his servant, [and] Aaron whom he had chosen

Psalm 105 retells Israel's story, and here it reaches the darkest point: a people enslaved in Egypt. At that moment the psalm names two men. It credits both to God's sending and God's choosing, not to Israel's planning.

The psalm where this verse stands

Israel's history holds plenty of failure. This psalm still tells it as a story of grace:

In Psalm 105, God reviews His people — all that they were and all that they had done lay before His eyes. And right through that Psalm, whatever He may have to say, grace triumphs.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What the verse records

Here is the history packed into that one line:

Then the Lord sent Moses, who had been born in Egypt, back to that country to deliver His people from their bondage. Aaron, his older brother, was chosen to support Moses.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The timing of the sending

God sent Moses when the pressure on Israel was at its worst:

In Egypt, the burdens of the Israelites had grown to their highest, just when the Lord was preparing Moses's deliverance for them… As has been said, the hour of preparation for a better order of things is not a time when things look promising. It is the opposite.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Another writer points to where the call was given, and whose cry it answered:

Alone with God in the distant desert of Horeb, Moses received his commission of deliverance. He was sent to break the iron yoke of those whose groan of helpless misery had come into the ears of Israel's God.

Modernised from A. PridhamOriginal wording

Why Aaron was joined to Moses

Aaron's place at Moses's side began with a failure in Moses himself:

This is how one of the very greatest of God's servants grieved God. He was angry at the unbelief. But in mercy He stooped to the weakness of His servant. He joined Aaron with him to carry out the deliverance He had planned for Israel.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

"Whom He had chosen"

The psalm attaches the word "chosen" to Aaron, the man who would later hold the priesthood. That office never rested on popular support or personal ambition:

Aaron was not the people's choice, just as the need for priesthood was not something the people discovered for themselves. Nor did he elect himself. His fitness for the office came from the God who called him, and who laid down the pattern of his consecration and the order of his ministry.

Modernised from A. PridhamOriginal wording

The seal on their commission

God did not send the two men without backing. The verses that follow supply the proof:

Moses is sent, and Aaron too. Signs and wonders clearly show the broad seal of their commission.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Two sent men, one greater Sender

Moses led the people out; Aaron stood as priest between God and the people. Commentators see the two offices meeting in one Person:

The separate ministries of Moses and Aaron come together, in the fullness of divine perfection, in the Person of the Son of God… The heavenly Deliverer was sent in the same way. He had come from the secret of the Father's bosom to do His bidding as the Saviour of His people. They lay without any strength, in hopeless bondage under sin and death.

Modernised from A. PridhamOriginal wording

Summary

- Sent, not self-starting. Moses went back to Egypt because God sent him. The psalm keeps the whole rescue in God's hands, where "grace triumphs" from start to finish.

- Sent at the worst hour. The burdens had "grown to their highest" just as God was preparing the deliverance. The hour of preparation does not look promising.

- Sent with help for weakness. Moses met God's call with unbelief. God did not drop him. He "stooped to the weakness of His servant" and gave him Aaron.

- Chosen, not self-elected. Aaron held his place only because God called him. His fitness "came from the God who called him," not from anything in himself.

- Sealed, and pointing beyond. Signs and wonders were "the broad seal of their commission." The two ministries they carried — deliverer and priest — meet in the Son, sent from the Father's bosom to free people from a deeper bondage.

Psalms 105:27 · Darby

They set his signs among them, and miracles in the land of Ham.

Psalm 105 is a song of thanksgiving. Here the singer reaches the moment when two men stand before the king of Egypt and the wonders begin. Three questions follow. Whose power was at work? Why does the psalm call Egypt the land of Ham? And why does a song of praise dwell so long on disasters?

Plagues to Egypt, signs to Israel

The same events carry two names, depending on who is watching.

In relation to Egypt, God's dealings were plagues. Each one displayed the wrath and power of God. Through them God made His name known throughout all the earth, and He overthrew Pharaoh, whose stubborn resistance was useless. Yet Pharaoh's spirit remained unchanged. But to the people of God these "great judgments" were signs and wonders. By them God would bring His people out of the enemy's power, out of the house of slavery.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Two men perform the signs, but the rod is God's.

The whole land of Egypt trembled under the repeated strokes of the rod of God. God made everyone feel the terrible weight of that rod, from the king on his throne to the servant at the mill.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The land of Ham

The psalm's name for Egypt reaches back to the family lists in Genesis. The old Egyptian word for the country also has a meaning.

The family record of the nations in Genesis 10 lists Mizraim as the son of Ham. In the Psalms, Egypt bears the name "the land of Ham" (Ps. 105:23, 27). Chem or Khem is surely the same word. It is the name for Egypt in the hieroglyphic inscriptions. Its meaning is "black," or "sun-burnt" — darkened by the light. And this is what the "natural state," as we call it, really is. It is not a darkness that comes from the absence of light. It is the effect of the light itself on someone like man.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Signs meant to teach

The plagues were not only punishment. They carried a lesson, and it had two audiences.

The plagues were signs as well as judgments. God sent them to prove who Jehovah was. Egypt once knew enough of God to stay clear of idolatry, but it did not want to hold on to that knowledge of God, and so it sank into the worst idolatry. Above all, God sent them to teach Israel that Jehovah alone is God.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

A contest with Egypt's gods

Each plague took a particular shape, and God chose the shape with care.

The character of the plagues shows the wisdom of God. They were suited to humble Egypt and its king. It was not only a blow on the land, with all the pain and anguish it brought the people. It was a solemn contest between Jehovah, the true God, and the false gods of Egypt. God aimed His judgment at the false gods the Egyptians worshipped. He stained the glory they boasted in and made them something to loathe.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

God chose the setting with care.

Egypt was both the chief centre of civilization and the country with the most animal gods. There God showed Himself in judgments that humbled their king and their many gods at the same time.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Why the psalm sings it

This psalm never mentions Israel's failures. The next psalm is full of them.

Psalm 105 shows only God's goodness to Israel, along with His judgments on their enemies, and it ends in Hallelujah. Psalm 106 begins and ends with Hallelujah too. But there we have only Israel's evil ways confessed, and divine mercy in answer to their cry.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One detail stands out to anyone who knows the story. The plagues here are not in the order they happened.

God also led them in performing signs and wonders that proved God had sent them. The psalm mentions darkness first (v. 28). That was not the first of the plagues but the ninth. Yet from the very beginning the darkness in the hearts of the Egyptians was clear... We may be sure that God has good reason for changing the order of these plagues here, even if we understand little of it.

Modernised from L M GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Sent — Moses and Aaron do the work, but the psalm calls the wonders His. The servants hold the rod. God swings it, and it lands on king and servant alike.

- Signs — the same events are plagues to Egypt and signs to Israel. They judge one nation and teach the other.

- Sun-darkened — "the land of Ham" names Egypt by its ancestor. The word means black, or sun-burnt. Man's natural darkness is not missing light; it is what light does to him.

- Showdown — each blow was aimed. The whole was a contest between the living God and Egypt's gods. It humbled king and gods together in the most civilized nation on earth.

- Song — this psalm remembers it all as pure goodness, and even rearranges the order of the plagues. Confession waits for the next psalm. Here praise stands alone.

Psalms 105:28 · Darby

He sent darkness, and made it dark; and they rebelled not against his word.

Psalm 105 is a song of thanksgiving. It retells Israel's story from Abraham's wanderings to the gift of Canaan. Verse 28 opens its account of the blows that fell on Egypt. Two questions press on the reader. Why does the psalm open the plagues with darkness, which came ninth in Exodus? And who are the "they" who did not rebel?

The psalm's theme

The plagues sit inside a larger argument: God had made a promise, and He kept it.

Psalm 105 offers thanksgiving to Jehovah, and calls on the descendants of Abraham and Jacob to remember Him and glory in His name. Verses 7, 8 give the occasion. He is Jehovah, their God. His judgments are in all the earth. And He has remembered His covenant for ever... The psalm then tells how God had cared for the fathers, and judged Egypt to deliver His people. And despite their slavery, there was not one weak person among their tribes.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What the darkness was

Exodus fills in what those three days were like. One writer retells them, and admits the cause is beyond us.

And first, the supernatural darkness. Without any warning to Pharaoh it spread over the land; a mysterious, dense darkness, which people on earth had never known. We cannot say what caused it. "He sent darkness," we read, "and made the land dark" (Ps. 105:28). That continued for three days. The morning light did not spread over the land. The noonday sun did not scatter the thick covering of darkness. Nothing could pierce it... He who long before divided the light from the darkness (Gen. 1:4) sent darkness on Egypt, while light shone in Goshen... How it subdued the people! They did not see one another, nor did anyone rise from his place for three days (Exodus 10:23).

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Why darkness struck Egypt so hard

This plague struck at the heart of Egypt's religion. It also carried a purpose beyond punishment.

Egypt worshipped the sun as the source of light... Suddenly a darkness you could feel came over Egypt. Pharaoh and all Egypt learned now that their idols were helpless. Darkness is the withdrawal of light. It stands for the solemn truth of being forsaken by God... God was about to abandon Egypt; the darkness was the herald of it. The severest judgment of all was about to fall on Egypt: the death of the firstborn. This darkness was God's final appeal to repentance. For three days it shut them in, and all business stopped. Rich and poor, king and beggar, the learned and the ignorant — that dreadful darkness covered every class... God waited, and in that silence and darkness appealed to their conscience.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why darkness comes first in the list

The psalm's order of the plagues does not match Exodus. One writer finds a deliberate grouping behind the change, and ties the place of darkness to the second half of our verse.

The psalm gives the miracles in a different order from the history. There must, of course, be a reason for this. It seems they fall into two groups. First come the signs proper, whose force lay mostly in their testimony to the conscience. The second group holds those that flattened the land — miracles of destruction that left Egypt desolate. Among the signs proper, darkness stands at the head, the light of heaven withdrawn... In fact, they did not move from their seats during the three days it lasted. That is what the psalmist refers to here when he says, "they did not rebel against His words."

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Who did not rebel

Commentators differ over the closing words. The same writer sets aside the reading most others take, and applies the words to the Egyptians in the dark.

Most interpreters apply this to the Israelite leaders, contrasting it with how they behaved at the waters of Meribah. That seems quite against the flow of the passage. It cannot refer to the Egyptians' final surrender either. Here terror held them perfectly still — only for the moment, no doubt. But that made their later attitude all the more solemn.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Another writer points to a detail of the ninth plague. Unlike the others, it came with no warning to Pharaoh.

The psalm mentions the ninth plague first. It stands out because no warning came beforehand, so that "they did not rebel against His words," as before. (v. 28.)

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Sent. The darkness was not weather. God sent it, and no one can say what caused it.

- Exposed. Egypt worshipped the sun, so withdrawing the light showed their idols to be helpless.

- Stilled. For three days nobody moved from his place. One writer reads that frozen silence as the non-rebellion the verse names.

- Warned. The stillness was God's last appeal to conscience before the firstborn died. Patience came before the final blow.

- Remembered. All of it sits inside a song of thanks. God judged Egypt because He had remembered His covenant with Abraham.

Psalms 105:29 · Darby

He turned their waters into blood, and caused their fish to die.

Psalm 105 calls Israel to remember what God has done. Here the memory turns to Egypt, where the first blow fell on the water that kept the whole country alive. Why does a song of thanksgiving stop to describe a river of blood and dead fish?

The hand behind the plague

The verse gives no second cause. God is the subject of both halves. One writer sets this act beside Cana, where He also changed water.

A terrible infliction this must have been. Blood in every vessel, and the river literally running blood! Who was working? The magicians did the same, though no doubt in a very limited sphere. But divine power was at work. At Cana He turned the water into wine to cheer His creatures. The same One turned the water of the Nile into blood in His judgment on the Egyptians. All the fish dead. Men and animals who depended on water found it turned into blood. Who had known such a thing before?

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

The river that was Egypt's life

The waters here are the Nile. Egypt lived off that river and worshipped it.

We now consider the first plague, the turning of the Nile and its branches into blood. The river was the very life of Egypt. The food, the wealth, and the beauty of the land all came from it. The first judgment of God fell upon Hapi, or Nilus. All Egypt owes its existence to this generous river. But the Egyptians did not own the fruitful Nile as made by God. They took it as the product of the Sun's impulse and of Creative Power, a stream produced, as it were, by nature out of nature. Now it was to be a river of death in the middle of the land.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Why the dead fish matter

The dead fish were a loss every household in Egypt could measure. Israel remembered them later in the wilderness.

The water of the Nile and of the canals and pools was turned into blood. The water stank, and the fish died. This was a real punishment, for it was the water they all drank, and they prized it. The fish too was plentiful: the Israelites in the wilderness could not forget the fish they had eaten freely, or "for nothing."

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Out of sequence on purpose

The psalm does not follow the order of Exodus.

Darkness is mentioned first (v. 28), though it was not the first of the plagues but the ninth. Yet from the very first, the darkness in the hearts of the Egyptians showed itself. The turning of the waters into blood was the first plague, followed by the infestation of frogs (vv. 29-30). Flies are then mentioned here, and lice afterward (v. 31), though Exodus 8:16-20 has the reverse order.

Modernised from L M GrantOriginal wording

Another writer sees the order as deliberate. He asks what those two plagues would have done to Egypt:

The psalm mentions two plagues first: the darkness and the water turned to blood. They touched the two main sources of Egypt's existence and prosperity. The sun went dark and the water of the river turned into blood. This, if continued, would have brought the country to speedy ruin.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Judgment inside a song of praise

This plague was not only against Egypt. It was part of what God did for His people.

Next comes the history of Israel in Egypt. It shows not only God's care for His people, but His judgment on all who oppose and oppress them. The psalm names eight of the plagues that fell on Egypt. They are grouped together, not in historical order. The grouping brings out the devastating character of these judgments.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

What Israel forgot

Israel later longed for the fish that died in this plague. One writer traces how fast the plagues dropped out of their memory.

It was all very well to escape out of Egypt when the terrible judgments of God were falling on it one after another. At such a moment the meat pots, the leeks, the onions and the garlic held little attraction. They were bound up with the heavy plagues sent from the hand of an offended God. But now they have forgotten the plagues, and they remember only the meat pots.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- He turned. The verse names no natural cause. The same power that made water into wine at Cana made the Nile into blood, and the verse calls it His own act.

- He struck the source. Egypt's food, wealth and beauty all came from that river, and Egypt worshipped it. The blow fell on the nation's life supply and on its god at once.

- He killed the fish. The loss was measurable: the drink of every household and the food eaten for nothing were both gone.

- He reordered the telling. Blood comes second here, not first. The psalm groups the plagues for effect, not in the order of Exodus.

- He meant it to be remembered. This is a thanksgiving psalm, and the plague belongs in it. Yet Israel later cried for the very fish God had destroyed. Forget the judgment, and the old food looks good again.

Psalms 105:30 · Darby

Their land swarmed with frogs, -- in the chambers of their kings.

Psalm 105 retells Israel's history, and this line reaches the plagues in Egypt. The frogs filled the land — and they even reached the private rooms of the kings, where Egypt's power should have kept them out.

Where the verse sits in the psalm

The psalm lists the plagues as a group, and not in the order they happened.

The psalm now brings the history of Israel in Egypt before us. It shows not only God's care for His people, but also His judgment on all who oppose and oppress them. It refers to eight of the plagues that fell on Egypt. It groups them together, not in historical order, but in a way that brings out the devastating character of these judgments.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Three of these plagues, the frogs among them, hit the Egyptians themselves.

The next three plagues — the frogs, the flies and the lice (or 'gnats') — touched the persons of the Egyptians, humbling their pride and making life unbearable.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The weapon God chose

Even the Hebrew word for frogs points to how lowly the instrument was.

Here the order differs from the order in Exodus, and two miracles stand together to make the lesson clear. Two of the lowliest instruments bring down the pride of Egypt: the "swarms" (no doubt, of insects) and the "croakers of the marsh." That is what the word for frogs seems to mean in Hebrew.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Into the chambers of their kings

The frogs did what frogs do not do. At God's word they left the water and took over the land.

At the word of the Lord the frogs swarmed over the country in huge numbers, against the ordinary instinct of the creature. They afflicted all things — houses, bedrooms, beds, ovens or dough. They afflicted all persons, whether the king or the people. Nothing and nobody was exempt from their slimy presence, their loud croaking and yelling.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

A blow at Egypt's religion

Egypt honoured the frog. That is what made the plague humiliating as well as unbearable.

The Egyptians counted frogs among their sacred animals. How humbling this second judgment must have been to them — to see these objects of disgust crowd their houses, and beds, and ovens, and kneading bowls! These animals never trouble the Egyptians at the beginning of the year. Still less do they come and go at the command of a man like Moses.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Egypt even had a goddess whose job was to keep frogs away.

Egyptologists tell us the Egyptians believed a special goddess presided over the frogs and protected the land from them. Her name was Heki, and the monuments sometimes show her with the head of a frog. The Egyptians had to learn that Heki was nothing before the Lord. It illustrates the word, "on all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgments" (Exodus 12:12).

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The king brought to his knees

The magicians could produce frogs. Nobody but God could take them away.

When had anyone known such a plague before? The Lord, the God of Israel, brought the frogs. The gods of the Egyptians could not guard their worshippers against them. The magicians brought up frogs too. But could they take them away? … Pharaoh knew then that the God of the Hebrews was more powerful than all the gods of Egypt. So he turned to Moses to plead with the Lord for him. Frogs crawled over the proud king's body, and he had to ask Moses to intercede for their removal. He did not appeal to the magicians, nor to those frog-shaped idols. He knew they could not help him.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

What the swarm pictures

One writer reads a moral meaning in the creature God chose.

The first plague taught the serious lesson of death. The second signifies uncleanness (Rev. 16:13-14). It pictures a far more revolting pollution — the moral and spiritual kind that infects every level of society when people refuse the Word of God. … God had done this to discipline Egypt. He wanted to expose to them the real state of moral uncleanness that spread through their nation.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Remembered. The psalm retells the plagues to show two things at once: God's care for His people, and His judgment on those who oppress them.

- Lowly. He used "croakers of the marsh" — one of the lowliest instruments — to bring down the pride of a world power.

- Everywhere. Houses, beds, ovens, dough; king and commoner alike. Nobody was exempt, which is the force of "the chambers of their kings."

- Exposed. The creature Egypt held sacred became its torment. The goddess said to control frogs proved to be nothing.

- Owned. With frogs crawling over him, Pharaoh turned to the Lord, not to magicians or idols. Judgment had taught him where the real power lay.

Psalms 105:31 · Darby

He spoke, and there came dog-flies, [and] gnats in all their borders.

Psalm 105 is a song of thanksgiving that retells Israel's story. Here the psalmist reaches the plagues that fell on Egypt. One short line covers two of them, and it raises two questions: how did they come, and why are they listed in this order?

Only a word

The psalm names no rod, no messenger, no natural cause. God spoke, and that was all. One writer draws out what such words mean:

"For He spoke, and it was done; He commanded, and it stood fast" — these mighty and stable powers came into existence by His mere command. He who brought them into being clearly still has them under His control.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

What the swarms were

Older English Bibles did not translate the word behind "swarms of flies" the same way twice:

arob, the dog-fly. In Psalm 78:45 and Psalm 105:31 the King James Version translates this word as "divers sorts of flies," referring to one of the plagues in Egypt. In Exodus 8:21-31 it translates the same word as "swarms [of flies]." So more than one kind may have been meant.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The second creature is no clearer. One writer notes how suddenly it came, and how uncertain its name still is:

There was no warning. The rod was lifted, the dust struck, and at once Egypt was filled with lice, or mosquitoes — the exact meaning of the word translated "lice" is not at present known.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Small things that break a proud nation

The creatures God sent were small. Grouped with the frogs, they struck the Egyptians in person:

The next three plagues were the frogs, the flies and the lice (or "gnats"). They touched the persons of the Egyptians, humbling their pride and making life unbearable.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The source of these pests carries its own lesson. What Egypt depended on for its prosperity became the very thing that tormented it:

The very dust, the soil that yields rich crops, produces lice — the disgusting corruptions that flourish alongside the world's prosperity (Exodus 8:16). The plague of flies is similar (Exodus 8:20). It shows how all that the world values, if separated from God, will turn into plagues in the end.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A border for the swarms

The verse says the swarms reached every part of Egypt's territory. What it does not say is where they stopped — at the border of Goshen, the region where Israel lived:

Was there no limit to this plague? There was. The limit was territorial: not one of these insects found its way to the land of Goshen. God kept the Israelites free from them, while the insects tormented the Egyptians. The Lord plagued the Egyptians; the Lord sheltered His people… Here His power was on display. His directing hand could be seen keeping the insects within the set limits, and His mercy would be seen in removing them from the Egyptians.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Not the order of Exodus

Read this psalm beside the book of Exodus and the plagues come out of sequence. This verse is part of that pattern:

Flies are mentioned here, and lice afterward (v. 31), though Exodus 8:16-20 has them in reverse order… We may be sure that God has good reason for changing the order of these plagues in this report. We may understand little of it.

Modernised from L M GrantOriginal wording

Commentators differ on the reason. One leaves it with God; another sees the plagues sorted into two classes:

It would seem that we have a classification of them in two divisions. First come the signs proper: those whose force lay for the most part in their testimony to the conscience. The second division consists more of those that really laid the land low — miracles of destruction that made Egypt desolate.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Sung, not just recorded

This is a psalm of praise. It calls people to remember the plagues — even people born long after, in the millennium:

Those in the millennium were not present when God freed Israel from Egypt by His marvellous works. Yet they are still told to "remember His marvellous works." They can do this just as we can remember the whole history of the Lord Jesus… We can remember because we have God's Word for all this.

Modernised from L M GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Spoken — God spoke, and the swarms came. The One who brought all things into being still controls them.

- Small — He used insects. Egypt's own dust and prosperity turned against it, humbling the nation's pride and making daily life unbearable.

- Sweeping — The swarms filled the whole country. Writers still debate which creatures the words "swarms" and "gnats" name.

- Stopped — Goshen was untouched. The same hand that sent the swarms drew the line they could not cross, sheltering His people.

- Sung — These judgments sit in a song, out of their historical order. People who never saw them can still remember them from God's Word.

Psalms 105:32 · Darby

He gave them hail for rain, [and] flaming fire in their land;

Psalm 105 looks back over God's dealings with Israel — from the patriarchs to the wilderness — as proof that He keeps His word. The verse sits inside a list of the blows that fell on Egypt. It raises two questions. Why does a storm of ice and fire belong in a song of praise? And why does the psalm list the plagues out of their historical order?

Why the Plagues Appear in a Song of Praise

The psalm reviews Israel's past, and one writer points out what it leaves out:

In all these dealings with His people — in the days of the patriarchs, in the days of Israel's slavery, or on their journey through the wilderness — there is no mention of their sins, their complaining and their rebellions. The psalm recounts it all to remind us of Jehovah's wonderful works, and of His faithfulness to His covenant.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

So the psalm does not tell the hail as a horror story. It tells it as proof that God had not forgotten His covenant.

Psalm 105 reviews the special dealings with Israel in past times. The psalm also has a present deliverance by judgment in view, but it looks at that deliverance as His faithfulness to His promise and grace. Here a present display of goodness awakens the memory of all God's past ways. That is what He is, what He always was.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Order of the Plagues

Anyone who compares this list with Exodus finds the plagues in a different order. One writer explains why:

The psalm next sets Israel's history in Egypt before us. It shows not only God's care for His people, but His judgment on all who oppose and oppress them. It mentions eight of the plagues that fell on Egypt. The plagues are grouped together, not in historical order, but in a way that highlights how devastating these judgments were.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Another writer notes the same change and leaves the reason with God:

Hail and flaming fire come next (v. 32), though two other plagues came in between before God sent these. Then come locusts beyond counting (v. 34), which ate up the plants of the land. We may be sure that God has good reason for changing the order of these plagues in this report, however little we understand it.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Hail Instead of Rain

What should have come down as water came down as ice. The gift became the weapon:

If the earth, away from God, is turned into a scene of corruption and ruin, heaven will frown on it as well. In the plague of hail we see the result of this contempt for God. Hail is rain chilled into ice. The very mercies of heaven, when despised, become pitiless judgment.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Fire Running on the Ground

The second half of the verse has lightning striking the ground itself. One writer describes the storm and what it proved:

The storm was terrifying. It thundered; it hailed; and the lightning fire ran along the ground. There was hail, and fire mixed with hail, such as no one had ever seen. He who had power over the waters, the dust, and even over people's bodies, had power over the air as well. The God of the Hebrews was almighty.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The hail also struck at what the Egyptians owned:

The next two plagues — the hail and the locusts — destroyed their possessions and left them with nothing.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Warning Before the Storm

The hail did not fall without notice. God warned first, and some acted on the warning:

These judgments reveal Jehovah's holiness, His almighty power and His justice, as well as His patience and longsuffering. They point forward to all the judgments still to come on this earth. The advice God gave through Moses was loving and gracious (verse 19). No doubt there were many Egyptians who believed and escaped. The unbelieving suffered. Divine mercy still lingered.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

A Pattern Still to Come

This storm appears again in Revelation, and Pharaoh's response carries its own warning:

Fire (lightning) came with the fearful hail and ran along the ground, and there was thunder too. The Hebrew calls these "the voices of God." The storm is a picture of God's wrath in judgment. Revelation mentions hail again and again, and there it is called "the plague of hail" (Rev. 8:7, 11:19, 16:21). The plagues of Egypt will come on this earth again during the great tribulation. Notice Pharaoh's confession. It shows what a deep impression this plague made on him (verse 27)... What a desperately wicked thing the human heart is. He sinned more after this than before.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Remembered — the psalm lists Egypt's plagues but never Israel's sins. Its subject is God's faithfulness to His covenant.

- Rearranged — the psalm groups the plagues to show how devastating they were, not to give the order in which they fell.

- Reversed — hail is rain chilled into ice; the mercy of heaven, despised, comes back down as judgment.

- Reaching — the God who ruled the water, the dust and men's bodies ruled the sky as well.

- Repeated — God warned first, and some Egyptians believed and escaped. Pharaoh was shaken, then sinned worse. The plague of hail returns in Revelation.

Psalms 105:33 · Darby

And he smote their vines and their fig-trees, and broke the trees of their borders.

Psalm 105 is a song of thanksgiving. It retells Israel's history, and this line sits inside its account of the plagues on Egypt. The line just before it names hail and lightning. Here the blow falls on Egypt's vines, fig trees and forests.

The storm behind the line

The psalm says in one line what Exodus tells at length. One writer retells that storm:

It thundered; it hailed; and the lightning fire ran along the ground. There was hail, and fire mixed with hail, such as no one had ever seen. He who had power over the waters, the dust, and even over men's bodies, had power over the atmosphere as well. The God of the Hebrews was almighty. Man and beast must bow under His hand. "The hail struck down every plant of the field and broke every tree of the field." Never before had such a storm struck the land. Never since has one matched it. Yet mercy appeared. The hail struck the flax and the barley, and those crops, we conclude, spoiled for that year. But the wheat and the rye escaped, because they had not yet sprung up. So there would be food for the year from these crops.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Why vines and fig trees

Grain can be replanted next season; a vine or a fig tree takes years to grow back. The psalm names the plagues in groups, and this pair belongs to the group that emptied Egypt's storehouses:

The next two plagues — the hail and the locusts — were destructive to their possessions, reducing them to destitution.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The trees mattered for more than food. Egypt held them sacred:

The plague of the locusts, together with that of the hail, destroyed the sacred trees of the land. These were especially prayed to at harvest time, and to the sycamore, people of every rank gave homage and offerings from the fruits of the earth.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Heaven's mercy turned against them

One writer finds the meaning of this plague in what hail is:

If the earth away from God becomes a scene of corruption and desolation, heaven will frown on it too. In the plague of hail we see the result of this despising of God. Hail is rain chilled into ice. The very mercies of heaven despised are changed into pitiless judgment.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Not the order of Exodus

The psalm does not list the plagues in the order Exodus gives. Hail comes before two plagues that in fact came earlier. One writer leaves the puzzle open:

Hail and flaming fire are next noted (v. 32), though two other plagues actually came before these were sent. The locusts without number are mentioned (v. 34), which ate up the vegetation of the land. We may be sure that God has good reason for changing the order of these plagues in this report, little as we may understand it.

Modernised from L M GrantOriginal wording

Another suggests the grouping itself is the point — that the plagues are arranged to show how total the ruin was: they are set out "not in historical order, but in a way that brings into prominence the devastating character of these judgments."

A verse of judgment inside a song of thanks

Why does a song of thanks list the ruin of another nation? One writer sets this psalm beside the next:

In Psalm 105 only divine goodness appears to Israel, and His judgments on their enemies, ending in Hallelujah. In Psalm 106, which begins and ends with Hallelujah, we have only Israel's evil ways confessed, but divine mercy on their cry.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Hail appears again in Scripture, in past judgments and in judgments still to come:

Though hail is usually formed by natural causes not yet perhaps well understood, it is often referred to in Scripture as one of the judgments of God. It formed one of the plagues in Egypt. Ex. 9:18-34; Ps. 78:47-48; Ps. 105:32… It will also form a notable part of the judgments of God in His future dealings with this guilty world. Rev. 8:7; Rev. 11:19; Rev. 16:21.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Summary

- Struck — The storm broke every tree of the field. Yet mercy appeared: the wheat and rye had not yet come up, so there was still food for the year.

- Stripped — Hail and locusts took Egypt's possessions and left the nation destitute. They also felled the trees Egypt prayed to at harvest.

- Reversed — Hail is rain frozen; heaven's despised mercies came back as judgment.

- Rearranged — The psalm lists the plagues out of order, and one writer trusts God's reason for it even where we cannot see it.

- Remembered — Israel sang all of this as thanks. Psalm 105 tells of God's goodness to Israel and His judgment on her enemies, and it ends in praise.

Psalms 105:34 · Darby

He spoke, and the locust came, and the cankerworm, even without number;

Psalm 105 is a thanksgiving song. It retells Israel's story — the promise to Abraham, the slavery in Egypt, and the blows by which God forced Egypt to release His people. Verse 34 records one of those blows in the fewest possible words.

The Psalm's Purpose

The plague list sits inside a call to give thanks. One writer ties it to God keeping His covenant with Abraham.

Psalm 105 offers thanksgiving to Jehovah. It calls on the descendants of Abraham and Jacob to remember Him and glory in His name. Verses 7, 8 give the occasion. He is Jehovah, their God. His judgments are in all the earth. And He has remembered His covenant for ever... The psalm then recites how God had cared for the fathers, and judged Egypt for the deliverance of His people.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer marks how narrow the focus is — this psalm is not the whole account of God's government of Israel:

The hundred and fifth psalm is not the story of God's governmental ways with Israel as a whole, but simply of that which has to do with His action on their behalf, mainly in the deliverance in Egypt, and ending with their possession of the land.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

He Spoke

The whole event hangs on two words: He spoke. No weapon, no army, no delay. One commentator points to what bends when God speaks:

Notice the stress laid on the word of God here. The natural system must bend to His will. Even His enemies set up fixed laws to shut Him out of sight and hearing. Again and again those laws have bowed to His word — not only in a small sphere, but on the largest scale... But His word He exalts above all His name. It is the expression of His mind, purpose and love, as well as His majesty in judgment.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Without Number

The verse stresses quantity, not size. One small insect becomes overwhelming in vast numbers. The order inside the swarm shows whose command it obeys:

Man may have turned away from God and become hostile to Him. But nature, in its whole framework, is obedient and serves Him still. So the sinner finds himself in a stream of hostile forces — the hosts of the Lord. The army of locusts gives us a vivid picture of them. "The locusts have no king," says Agur, "yet all of them march in rank" (Prov. 30:27)... They keep this discipline by instinct, with an invisible king. It shows whose hosts they are, and who marshals them: "His army," the Lord calls them (Joel 2:11).

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The same writer states the conclusion plainly: nature is not neutral ground.

So nature, with its laws, serves the Law-giver, and woe to those who contend against their God. They are hopelessly in the grasp of destructive forces which fully own the One they do not.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Nothing Left

This blow came last in a series, and its work was to finish what earlier ones had started:

Horses, donkeys, camels, oxen and sheep had died of the disease. The hail had killed cattle too. It struck every plant of the field and broke every tree, and the flax and the barley with them. The desolation was indeed widespread. Now the locusts would complete it. Every green thing would be eaten.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Yet God announced it in advance and left one door open:

Even in those days locusts were well known as a serious plague. This one was announced as worse still: it would destroy all that was left in the land... Only one way of escape was pointed out: Pharaoh humbling himself before the Lord, and letting Israel go.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The Order of the Plagues

Psalm 105 does not list the plagues in the sequence Exodus gives. One writer notes this and does not force an explanation:

The psalm notes hail and flaming fire next (v. 32), though two other plagues came before them. Then it mentions the locusts without number (v. 34), which ate up the plants of the land. We may be sure that God has good reason for changing the order of these plagues in this report, little as we may understand it.

Modernised from L M GrantOriginal wording

A Standing Symbol

Locusts stand for God's judgment right across Scripture. One writer also notes which Egyptian god this plague exposed:

Locusts covered the face of the whole earth and destroyed every green thing. On the ravages of the locusts we find a vivid description in the book of Joel. Locusts are typical of God's punitive judgments. The locust plague was aimed at showing the powerlessness of the Egyptian god Serapis. The Egyptians trusted him as their protector against locusts. Locusts are likewise mentioned in a symbolic way in Revelation 9:1-12.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

And the record speaks to readers now, not only to Israel then:

These things are pictures for us, and the God of Israel is as full of power today as ever He was: these very locusts may remind us of that.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Summary

- He spoke — the verse has no machinery in it. God's bare word sets the created order moving, and that same word is "the expression of His mind, purpose and love, as well as His majesty in judgment."

- They came — the locusts arrive as an army with an invisible king. Nature "serves the Law-giver," so those who resist God are already inside the forces that obey Him.

- Without number — the smallest creature, multiplied, is enough. God needs no great instrument to finish what earlier blows had begun.

- Nothing green — God announced the plague in advance and left one way out: Pharaoh humbling himself. Judgment declared in advance is judgment that still offers escape.

- Remembered — the whole list stands inside a thanksgiving psalm. God judged Egypt to keep His promise to Abraham, and the power He showed there is unchanged today.

Psalms 105:35 · Darby

And they devoured every herb in their land, and ate up the fruit of their ground.

Psalm 105 is a song of thanksgiving, yet here it pauses over ruin. Why does praise dwell on a land picked clean, and what has that to do with God keeping His promise?

The Psalm's Purpose

This plague sits inside a psalm built on God's promise. One writer traces where the psalm's praise rests:

Psalm 105 takes up the simple purpose of promise, and that God has remembered His covenant. His judgments are now in all the earth, and He is Jehovah their God. The Lord has acted in their favour, according to His promise, to give them the land of promise. So their story is traced out: judgment on Egypt, and pure faithfulness of grace towards them... for the praise and blessing rest on Abraham, not on Sinai, and end in hallelujah.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Plagues Grouped by Effect

The psalm does not list the plagues in the order Exodus gives them. That rearranging is deliberate:

The psalm next brings the history of Israel in Egypt before us. It shows God's care for His people, and also His judgment on all who oppose and oppress them. The psalm mentions eight of the plagues that fell on Egypt. It groups them not in historical order, but in a way that brings out how devastating these judgments were.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The hail and the locusts form one pair with one target:

The next two plagues — the hail and the locusts — destroyed their possessions and left them with nothing.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

What "Devoured" Means

Locusts were no strange sight in that part of the world:

Several species of locusts visit Palestine; the wind brings them, and the wind carries them away... Huge numbers swarm over a district all at once, and in a very short time they strip its plants bare. As the prophet says, the land in front of them may be like the Garden of Eden. Behind them it is a desolate wilderness. Nothing escapes them.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Insects as God's Army

The swarm did not arrive by chance. Someone was directing it:

Man may have left God and turned hostile to Him. But the whole framework of nature still obeys Him and serves Him. So the sinner stands in a stream of hostile forces, the hosts of the Lord, and the army of locusts pictures them for us. "The locusts have no king," says Agur, "yet all of them march in rank." One observer says nothing in their habits is more striking than the way they all keep the same line of march, like a disciplined army. This built-in discipline, under a king no one can see, shows whose hosts they are and who is marshalling them. The Lord calls them "His army." ... To fight them is hopeless, and the destruction they cause is total.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Aimed at Egypt's God

Egypt trusted a god to keep locusts away:

Locusts covered the face of the whole earth and destroyed every green thing... Locusts are typical of God's punitive judgments. This plague aimed to show how powerless Serapis was. The Egyptians trusted that god to protect them from locusts.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Egypt Emptied, Israel Enriched

Two peoples came out of the same day in opposite conditions:

The people of Egypt suffered the destruction of their land. But God delivers His people, and despite the oppression they had endured, He brings them out with gold and silver. Not one feeble person is found among their tribes.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

One writer pictures what was left of the land, including Goshen, the district where Israel lived:

Every juicy green plant fell before them. They took all that the hail had left. As far as the eye could reach, the land of Egypt was a wilderness, as barren as the yellow deserts on its borders. Goshen — the garden of Egypt — also fell under the plague, because its fruits and its crops were no longer needed for Israel.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Promise first. The psalm sets these plagues inside praise that rests on God's covenant with Abraham, not on Sinai, and it ends in hallelujah.

- Grouped for effect. The psalm lists the plagues out of order to press home how devastating they were. Hail and locusts together stripped Egypt's possessions.

- Nothing escapes. Locusts leave total destruction: a garden in front of them, a wilderness behind them.

- An obedient army. These insects march in rank under a king no one can see. Anyone who fights God finds nature itself still serving Him.

- Emptied and enriched. Locusts stripped Egypt's fields, and the god Egypt trusted proved powerless. God's people walked out with silver and gold, and not one weak person among them.

Psalms 105:36 · Darby

And he smote every firstborn in their land, the firstfruits of all their vigour.

Psalm 105 is a song of thanks that walks back through Israel's story and praises God for keeping His covenant. Verse 36 names the last plague, and raises two questions: why the firstborn, and why call them a nation's strength?

The Blow That Broke the Chains

Within the psalm's list of wonders, this one stroke does something the others do not.

The psalmist then recalls His ways as the Deliverer of His people in Egypt, and right on into the land. The striking of the firstborn was the blow that broke their chains off them. Yet it was only part of a long series of signs and wonders in which He had shown Himself for their deliverance.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

One writer weighs what this last blow would have cost Egypt in the end.

The last plague fell on their children. If it had gone on, it would have wiped out the whole people.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

What "All Their Strength" Means

Older translations read "the chief of all their strength" where the ESV has "the firstfruits of all their strength." Either way, the phrase is not about age or birth order. It names what a nation counts as its best.

The firstborn was the chief of their strength, all that man would glory in, the fulfilment of his hopes and desires. He struck down what stood for the "excellency of dignity" and the "excellency of strength" by human standards... Egypt pictures the world in its opposition to God. Pharaoh is its god and prince, and his spirit drives those he rules — not by right, but by seizure. So it is of the greatest importance for the children of God to realise that everything man glories in lies under the judgment of God. Death is on everything here, and all is shut up under death.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The same pattern runs back through Genesis. There the firstborn sons keep losing their place.

The firstborn are pictures of human excellence. They were the sons with a natural claim to the birthright — the place of honour and rule. "Reuben," says Jacob on his deathbed, "you are my firstborn, my might, and the beginning of my strength, the excellency of dignity and the excellency of power." Yet he had to add, "Unstable as water, you shall not excel." So the firstborn sons in the book of Genesis lose the place of blessing. Cain — what is he? Ishmael gives place to Isaac; Esau to Jacob; Reuben to Joseph. "That which is first is natural, and afterwards that which is spiritual."

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

A Judgment Shaped to Egypt's Own Crime

God named this judgment at the very start. It answered what Pharaoh had refused.

At the start of Moses' mission the LORD said to Pharaoh: "Israel is my firstborn son, and I say to you, 'Let my son go that he may serve me.' If you refuse to let him go, behold, I will kill your firstborn son" (Ex. 4:22-23)... There was no respect of persons. Every country shields its royal palace as far as it can from the disasters that fall on the poor. That night the palace was no safer than the prison cell or the stable. Anguish tore the king's heart just as it tore the heart of the poorest of his subjects.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Difference God Put

Israel's own firstborn were no better in themselves. What separated them was something God supplied.

It is the Lord alone who can "put a difference" between those who are His and those who are not... in the case before us, we see it to be a simple question of life or death. This is God's great "difference." He draws a line. On one side of it is "life," on the other "death." Many of Egypt's firstborn may have been as fine and attractive as those of Israel, and much more so. But Israel had life and light, founded on God's purposes of redeeming love and established by the blood of the lamb.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Why the Psalm Puts This Into a Song of Praise

The psalm does not stop at the judgment. It turns the whole story into praise.

Psalm 105 offers thanksgiving to the LORD, and calls on the offspring of Abraham and Jacob to remember Him and glory in His name... He is the LORD, their God. His judgments are in all the earth. And He has remembered His covenant for ever... The psalm then recounts how God had cared for the fathers, and judged Egypt for the deliverance of His people... All their later failure is not touched on.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Strength. The firstborn were Egypt's strength — its dignity, its power, its hope.

- Struck. God's judgment landed right there. No rank escaped: palace and prison lost alike.

- Shackles. That one stroke was the blow that broke Israel's chains, the last in a long series of wonders.

- Sheltered. Israel's firstborn were no finer in themselves. God drew the line between life and death, and the blood of the lamb marked it.

- Sung. The psalm turns all of it into thanksgiving. It rests on the covenant God remembered, and leaves Israel's later failures out.

Psalms 105:37 · Darby

And he brought them forth with silver and gold; and there was not one feeble among their tribes.

Psalm 105 retells Israel's story as a record of God's faithfulness. Verse 37 marks the turning point. A nation of slaves walks out of Egypt loaded with wealth, and not one of them lags behind. Two details carry the weight: where the silver and gold came from, and how a whole people left without a single weak member.

(The writers quoted below use an older wording of the second half: "there was not one feeble person among their tribes.")

Where the Verse Sits in the Psalm

One writer sets out what each psalm in this group is about.

Psalm 103 reviews God's moral dealings with the people. Psalm 104 reviews His dealings with creation, celebrating Jehovah, God of Israel, in connection with creation. Psalm 105 shows God's positive, special favour to them as His people, and Psalm 106 their failure under it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Set beside the plagues just described, the verse draws a sharp line between two peoples on the same night.

The people of Egypt suffered the destruction of their land. But God delivers His own people. Despite the oppression they had endured, He brings them out with gold and silver. There is not one feeble person among their tribes.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The Silver and Gold

The silver and gold were not stolen. Israel collected wages that Egypt had never paid.

In truth their wages were long overdue. No one had ever paid them. It is plain folly to think there was even the smallest breach of what was right and proper... They were to plunder their oppressors by God's authority. There was no question at all of deceit or dishonesty. Older translations give the impression of "borrowing," but that word is not needed here, and the passage does not support it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

That treasure had a purpose ahead of it — and a possible misuse.

God set apart the wealth that Israel took out of Egypt for His service in the tabernacle. It had a proper use, and God's claim rested on the wealth that came out of the land with them. Later the abuse of it comes out clearly, when the golden calf came before the dancing.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Not One Feeble Person

To feel the size of the claim, count the crowd it covers.

There were 600,000 men, so with the women and children the Israelites numbered at least two million... It must have been a wonderful sight to see such a crowd moving away from the scene of their slavery. It is often called the work of the mighty God.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The way they left says something about God. One writer applies that to the reader.

When God does His work, He does it in a way worthy of Himself. When Israel came out of Egypt, they did not come out ashamed of themselves. They came out full-handed and equipped. They came out as the host of God should. Not a dog dared to move his tongue against them, nor was there one feeble person among their tribes. And so with us sinners going out from under the power of darkness with our Redeemer. We are not to go out with fear and suspicion, as though we could hardly trust the arm that was saving us.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

What Changed Later

This strength did not last. One writer reads the change as a warning.

"Remember what Amalek did to you on the way as you came out of Egypt, how he attacked you on the way when you were faint and weary, and cut off your tail, those who were lagging behind you" (Deut. 25:17-18). Does this not show some decline? When God brought them out of Egypt in all the triumph of the salvation He had worked, the Psalmist tells us that "there was not one feeble among their tribes." ... God's provision for the wilderness meets every need. But only as we take in that rich provision as food for our souls do we stay strong and fresh in spirit. Otherwise we grow weak, and then Amalek attacks us.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

A Future Departure Like It

One writer also reads the verse forward, to a future return of God's people.

None of those returning will be weary or slumber or sleep. That reminds one of the time when the Israelites came up out of Egypt, when "there was not one feeble person among their tribes." Something like this will happen again.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Brought — this psalm is about God's special favour to His people. Leaving Egypt was His act, not Israel's success.

- Paid — the silver and gold were long-overdue wages. Israel took them by God's authority, with no dishonesty.

- Destined — that wealth was marked out for the tabernacle; turned to a golden calf instead, it became sin.

- Whole — around two million people left, and not one lagged behind. God works in a way worthy of Himself, so His people go out full-handed, not ashamed.

- Kept — that strength did not last. Later weakness left them open to Amalek. Only feeding on God's provision keeps a redeemed people fresh.

Psalms 105:38 · Darby

Egypt rejoiced at their departure; for the fear of them had fallen upon them.

Psalm 105 retells Israel's history as a record of God's acts, and verse 38 stops on one odd detail: Egypt was relieved to lose its slave workforce. Why the relief, and why did a great nation dread a crowd of leaving labourers?

A nation's will reversed

Egypt's own wishes had turned around:

The Egyptians were at first so eager to keep them. At last, after their punishment, they were just as anxious to get rid of them. "He will drive you away completely." "They were driven out of Egypt and could not wait" (Ex. 11:1; Ex. 12:39).

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

The change started inside Egyptian hearts:

In fact, "Egypt was glad when they departed" (v. 38), for God put His fear into their hearts. The psalm does not mention that Pharaoh changed his mind after they left and tried to recapture them. But that foolish attempt ended in humiliating failure. He and his army drowned in the Red Sea.

Modernised from L M GrantOriginal wording

Where the dread came from

The dread began on the night when the firstborn died and God judged Egypt's gods with them:

To add to the dismay, the hand of Jehovah was heavy also upon "all the gods of Egypt." (Ex. 12:12.) In this act He judged their gods — probably the living creatures that represented them. It must have caused terror in every temple. God's vengeance fell on the gods of the land. It proved Jehovah's supremacy over all the powers men worshipped… Besides, Jehovah's hand struck only the firstborn, whether of people or of cattle. It showed His power so clearly that all Egypt dreaded death. They begged Israel to be gone, so that they would not all die as the firstborn had died.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Egypt's panic serving God's plan

Israel left in a rush because their masters pushed them out. But the push came from God, and it kept to His timetable:

Israel left Egypt in such haste that they took no supplies for immediate use. All they carried was the dough and the kneading troughs, bound on their shoulders with their clothes. In this way they depended wholly on Jehovah's care. The haste of their departure did more than satisfy the urgency of the Egyptians, who were God's agents in the matter. It also made sure they left at the time Jehovah had appointed.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The rush also guarded Israel from one particular failure:

There is a wonderful little sidelight here. It was not leavened because they were driven out of Egypt… I think what God gives us here is this. If they had not been in such a hurry, the leaven might have got in. I will help them to start right, says God. And so they were hurried out so quickly that they had no time to fail in obedience. I will at least help them to keep My word once in their history, says God.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Driven out now, led out later

Israel went out looking less like a triumphant army and more like escapees. A later deliverance will have a different character:

A remarkable Scripture in Isaiah struck me recently. It speaks of Israel in a day to come, when God will deliver them again. "For you shall not go out in haste, and you shall not go in flight, for the LORD will go before you, and the God of Israel will be your rear guard" (Isa. 52:12). That is what they did in Exodus 12. They were like a lot of timid, frightened creatures fleeing from an angry enemy. They were "driven out of Egypt" (Ex. 12:39), so they went out in haste, and word reached the king of Egypt that "the people had fled" (Ex. 14:5)… One day it will not be in haste. By then they will have learned that the question is not between themselves and Pharaoh. It is between God and Pharaoh, as to whom they belong.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Why the psalm tells it this way

The psalm sets the whole exodus, Egypt's fear included, inside the keeping of an old promise:

Psalm 105 takes up the simple purpose of promise, and how God has remembered His covenant… So their history is traced from of old. It shows judgment on Egypt, and pure faithfulness of grace towards them… and the gift of the land, which was pure grace according to promise also.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Judgment — God struck Egypt's gods along with the firstborn, and terror filled every temple.

- Dread — that judgment left the whole nation afraid of death, so dread fell on Egypt.

- Driven out — the masters who once refused to let Israel go now pushed them out and could not wait.

- Haste — God used Egypt's panic. It held His people to His timetable, and even kept them from disobeying.

- Grace — the psalm credits none of it to Israel. It records God remembering His covenant.