These are also proverbs of Solomon, which the men of Hezekiah king of Judah transcribed.
Chapter 25 opens with a note about history, not a proverb. These sayings came from Solomon, but they reached the book through other hands, generations later. That one line shows how part of the Bible came together, and why a king who ruled long after Solomon took care to copy it.
These sayings are only a fraction of what Solomon produced. One writer traces them back to the wisdom Solomon asked God for.
All of these proverbs were spoken by Solomon, except those in the last two chapters. We may regard these wise principles and sayings as part of the three thousand spoken by the famous king of Israel (1 Kings 4:32). They are the fruit of the wisdom he asked from the Lord at the start of his reign (1 Kings 3:12). His name appears at the start of each of the three divisions of the book (see chapters 1, 10, 25), and God selected and arranged them here by His inspiration. The compiler was probably one of the prophets living in the days of Hezekiah, if indeed the king himself did not do it. We know at least that his servants copied out a number of these proverbs (Proverbs 25:1).
Another writer dates that gap, and uses it to fix the span over which the book came together.
The book of Proverbs collects only around a thousand of Solomon's proverbs. Divine inspiration and preservation kept them. King Hezekiah's men collected some of Solomon's proverbs only 200 years later (compare Proverbs 25:1)... Solomon reigned around 970 to 931 BC. Hezekiah reigned around 716 to 687 BC, and in his time many ancient things came to honour. This fixes the beginning and the end of the book's origin.
They were not casual admirers. One writer connects their work to what else was happening in that reign.
This title is interesting. It proves that a revival of literary activity went along with the revival of religion and national prosperity that marked Hezekiah's reign. The men of Hezekiah were no doubt a body of scribes engaged under the direction of the king in literary work.
The same writer draws out what this says about the king himself.
This godly king must have cared greatly about collecting and preserving certain parts of the Word of God. According to this statement in Proverbs, he must have told certain scribes to add more of Solomon's proverbs to the earlier collection. Until then those proverbs had not been collected.
Commentators differ on who did the compiling: a prophet, the king himself, or the scribes he commissioned.
Because these chapters arrive as an appendix, some treat them as second-class. One writer answers that objection head-on.
This section (chapter 25:1-7) is openly a supplement of "proverbs of Solomon" not found in the earlier collection. What is there in this to object to? Those we have already had remain in their excellence. If more is added of no less divine excellence, why be ungrateful to God? Is our eye evil because He is good? Let us not be faithless, but believing.
The verse says the men of Hezekiah copied — they produced nothing new. One writer makes that the pattern for recovery today.
These proverbs were not new in Hezekiah's time. They had been there since the beginning of the glorious kingdom of Israel. But they have particular meaning for the difficult times of Hezekiah... God's revelation was completed with the coming of Christianity into the world... But it has been neglected and ignored, and we are badly broken and in reproach. Yet that same Word has already made provision for recovery, where hearts are concerned about recovery... So let us have the energy of faith. Our work is not to invent new methods or plans for such a day, but to "copy out" what is already written, and set ourselves to obey it.
Another writer finds the same instinct across Hezekiah's reign, and makes it the test of any real revival.
The Word of God says the same thing about Josiah as about Hezekiah (2 Kings 22:2). This confirms that these two kings returned to what was there at the beginning. No revival today can be called a true revival which does not have this character.
- Spoken. The words are Solomon's. They are part of the three thousand proverbs that grew out of the wisdom he asked God for.
- Preserved. Two hundred years stand between the speaking and the collecting. The sayings survived, kept by divine inspiration and preservation.
- Copied. Hezekiah set a body of scribes to work. A revival of religion in his reign brought a revival of care for the written Word.
- Added. These later chapters are a supplement of no less divine excellence. The right response is gratitude, not suspicion.
- Applied. Recovery does not come by inventing new methods. It comes by copying out what is already written and obeying it.
It is the glory of God to conceal a thing; but the glory of kings is to search out a thing.
The verse sets two glories side by side: God's glory in hiding, and a king's glory in digging out. Why would God hold anything back? And if He does, what does that ask of us?
Hiding is one side of God's glory. One writer points to a greater side: the way God makes Himself known to sinners.
The Old Testament has told us that "it is the glory of God to conceal things" (Prov. 25:2). So busy, curious men keep searching and keep coming up baffled. Our New Testament passage tells us something more. It is also the glory of God to reveal Himself in the greatness of His mercy to rebellious sinners. That second glory is greater than the first. If anyone asks, what is glory? We may answer: it is excellence on display.
The Hebrew here holds a small surprise. All through Proverbs God is called by His covenant name "Jehovah" (printed "the LORD" in most Bibles) — except in this one verse, where another Hebrew word for God stands in its place.
It gives a very distinct character to this book, and to Ecclesiastes, that in this book the name is always "Jehovah". Only once is "Elohim" used: Proverbs 25:2.
So what has God kept hidden? One writer points to a great example: Christ and the church, kept secret until the right moment came.
A great mystery, truly, for it concerned Christ, and with Him the Church as His body. It was hidden in God through the ages and generations. In that time God dealt first with people one by one, then with His ancient nation, while man was tested in every way: could he be brought to God by himself, or represent God as he should?... This is a most wonderful proof that it is His glory to conceal things. But the principle reaches much further. He would have us learn to depend on what He alone can give in His ways with us.
God hides truth on purpose. A clever mind cannot simply grab it.
When difficult times come, we must look beneath the surface of things. We will not find answers to our problems without real searching of soul. God means faith to be tested and grown. So in His infinite wisdom He sets out the truth in His Word in a way that natural cleverness alone will never see... But it is work of kingly dignity to search out the truth of God and find out His mind — above all when truth has been trampled in the streets and treated as worthless.
Hidden is not the same as lost. God puts truth where effort will reach it, and no one can do that searching for you.
We are even told that "it is the glory of God to conceal things" (Prov. 25:2) — He hides truth where a diligent person can find it as a reward. All this calls for personal work that you cannot hand over to someone else, though we are all to help one another in it. God does not accept a class of ordinary members who are spoon-fed once or twice a week and take what they are given with little question.
The second line has a plain first meaning: a ruler must dig into a case before he judges it. It also points ahead to one King who will finish every search.
God keeps many things hidden about Himself, the great universe, creation, and His ways in ruling the world. But kings should look closely into the matters brought before them and search them out when they give judgment. One day the great King who is coming, the King of Kings, will search out all things and bring the hidden things to light. He knows every secret of God, and the hearts of men too.
One writer finds this verse acted out in the book of Esther.
reason: excerpt was opaque ("the above touching facts"); ESV wording; drop shouting caps
- Glory hides. God's hiding is not stinginess. Glory is excellence on display, and His greater glory is mercy shown to rebellious sinners.
- Glory hid Christ. The great hidden thing was Christ and the church, kept in God through the ages until the moment came to unveil it.
- Glory trains you. God keeps truth out of reach of mere cleverness on purpose, so that faith has to grow.
- Glory rewards the digger. God hides truth where a diligent person will find it. No professional class can do that digging for you.
- Glory crowns the search. Searching things out is kingly work now, in judgment and in Scripture. One day the King of Kings will bring every hidden thing to light.
The heavens for height, and the earth for depth, and the heart of kings is unsearchable.
This proverb sets the mind of a ruler beside the two things no one can measure: the height above and the depth below. It follows a verse about what God hides and what kings must search out, and it leaves a plain question — how far can anyone see into the one who rules?
The verse just before puts hiding and searching side by side. One commentator draws the line between what God keeps back and what a ruler must dig into.
While it is the glory of God to conceal a thing, the glory of kings is to search out a matter. God keeps many things hidden about Himself, the great universe, creation and His ways in providence. But kings should look carefully into the matters brought before them and search them out when they give judgment.
Why must a king dig? Another writer ties it to the office itself.
With kings it is the other side: sifting out good or evil on behalf of their subjects, to reward it or punish it. God has appointed them. They are likewise the source of honour on earth, and they do not carry the sword for nothing, but to punish those who do evil. So there is a need to search a matter out.
The man who wrote the proverb had already proved it. Two women claimed one living child, and no one in the room could read what he was doing.
No ruler shows better than Solomon that the heart of kings is unsearchable. Look at his decision in the dispute between the two mothers, over whose was the dead child and whose the living one. Was there a single person who saw into his heart when he called for a sword and said, Divide the living child in two, and give half to the one and half to the other? The false mother was as willing as the true was not, but who could have anticipated it but the king? What sounded cruel, turned out wise and kind.
A king's heart is closed to his subjects. It is not closed upward. The same writer presses the point: what makes a ruler hard for us to read leaves him no harder for God to turn.
Because of his position and duty, a king's heart might naturally seem more guarded and unbending than any other man's. But who resists Him who rules in secret as He wills, even in the worst of circumstances?... Little as he thinks it, he serves Him. He is like brooks of water serving the man who controls every stream for his gardens, his vineyards, or his fields. It is turned as He pleases.
Another writer turns this into a warning for those who govern.
Kings and their advisers should remember one thing. The secrets of the council chamber are all known to God, however closely they keep them from the people.
One commentator carries the words past the palace and applies them to the person led by God's Spirit.
Things higher than natural wisdom become the normal food and delight of him who is led by the Spirit of God. And "the deep things of God," which the natural man cannot understand, are no problem where the Spirit of God is the Interpreter (1 Cor. 2:8-10)... The spiritual man is a strange enigma to the world. His wisdom and understanding are plain to see, but his attitude puzzles and baffles those who do not have the Spirit.
Another writer applies the height and the depth to Christ, who was set as a sign to be opposed.
Surely this sign is worthy of God, who is "the ALL WISE." It stands in "the depth" of sorrow and woe, and yet in "the height" of the glory of "THE CHRIST, THE LORD."... Search the Scriptures. "It is they that bear witness about Me," said the Son of God! Finding Him, we shall fill our treasures with the finest gold and enrich our store with all manner of precious things.
The closed royal heart has a famous exception. The queen of Sheba came to Solomon with hard questions.
She opens her heart to Solomon; the secrets of her heart come into the open (1 Cor. 14:25); but they find a perfect response from the one from whom nothing is hidden... The king has the secret of all things. He does not keep it to himself. He shows that His secret is with those who fear Him (Ps. 25:14).
- Concealing. God hides; that is His glory. What He keeps back is not a gap in our knowledge but an invitation to search.
- Searching. A king's honour is to dig out the facts, because he carries the sword and must reward and punish rightly.
- Unsearchable. Solomon's verdict over the disputed child shows a mind no onlooker could read. What sounded cruel proved wise and kind.
- Governed. The heart closed to subjects is still a stream in God's hand, and the secrets of the council chamber are open to Him.
- Opened. The King whose heart no one can measure holds nothing back from the seeker: His secret is with those who fear Him.
Take away the dross from the silver, and there cometh forth a vessel for the refiner
This proverb starts in a metal workshop. The silver is real, but the fire must burn off the dross before anyone can shape it. The next verse moves the same picture into a royal court. Commentators take it further still — to God's work in His people, and to what a person must refuse in order to be useful.
Dross is the base alloy mixed in with the silver. A refiner's whole trade is getting it out.
All the more important, if there is precious metal, that the base alloy be taken away. Then only comes forth a thing of beauty and for use.
Older translations end this verse with a different phrase: "a vessel for the finer." The finer is the refiner — the worker who burns the waste out of the metal
This trade becomes a picture of God's own work. Commentators name the craftsman without hesitation.
God is the refiner of His people, just as precious metals have to be separated from the dross that clings to them. So God tests the believer's heart, and his faith, which leads to endurance.
One writer explains the craft behind Malachi's picture of the Lord sitting as a refiner of silver.
People say that a refiner of metals watches by the crucible until his own face is reflected in the molten mass. In the same way, the Lord Jesus sits as the refiner and purifier of His silver until His own image is mirrored in it. That is the aim and object of all His dealings with His people. The comparison is certainly true. God has predestined us to be conformed to the image of His Son... so we may be sure that He will never rest until His purpose is fulfilled.
Another writer names the moment the image appears: "when the child of God comes to the point where he can say, 'Your will be done,' that is the reflection of His image" (J Wilson Smith).
The next verse turns the metal into people. Refining is not a private matter; it decides whether a throne stands.
So the wicked should not enjoy favours at court. Righteously rejecting evil people establishes a throne in people's consciences.
God made the same promise to Israel when the nation went wrong. The purging and the return of good rulers come together.
God said to backsliding Israel, "I will smelt away your dross … and I will restore your judges as at the first, and your counselors as at the beginning" (Isa. 1:25-26).
Refining also has an everyday form. One writer applies the proverb to sorting truth from error, and points to Paul's words to Timothy.
A true searching of the Word of God by the Spirit does two things. It gives positive knowledge of what is good and pure, and it separates out everything that is false and dross. This is negative work, but it is necessary... This evil doctrine must be refused. It is dross, and the silver must be freed from it. Teachers who keep spreading such falsehood must not be tolerated. "The Finer" is God Himself. He looks for vessels that suit His own character, and only separation from evil will form such a vessel — "a vessel for honorable use, set apart as holy, useful to the master of the house, ready for every good work" (2 Tim. 2:21).
The vessel is the goal of the whole process. One writer puts it this way: God "may take up bad clay and grit, and have to put it through every kind of process, but the skilful Master-hand will shape it into a vessel fit for His own use" (G. V. Wigram).
- Dross — the base alloy clings to real silver. The more precious the metal, the more urgent it is to strip the waste away.
- Finer — the craftsman is God Himself. He separates His people from what clings to them, and He tests heart and faith.
- Fire — He watches the crucible and does not stop until His own image is mirrored in the metal. The work has an end in view.
- Vessel — only after the separating does anything beautiful and usable come out: a vessel fit for the Master's use.
- Throne — the same rule scales up. Remove the wicked from the king's presence, and the throne stands. Purge a nation's dross, and its judges return.
take away the wicked from before the king, and his throne shall be established in righteousness.
Verse 5 finishes a picture that begins in verse 4: silver becomes a useful vessel only when the dross comes out. A throne works the same way — so can any government stand secure while evil men stay close to the king?
The proverb borrows its logic from metalwork. One writer points out why removal matters most when something valuable is there:
All the more important, if there is precious metal, that the base alloy be taken away. Only then does something of beauty and usefulness come out.
The same writer applies the picture to a king's court:
So it is that the wicked should not enjoy the favours of the court. Righteous rejection of evil people establishes a throne in the consciences of men.
Solomon was not writing theory. He set the rule down in Proverbs, and then he acted on it:
We can learn Solomon's views from his Book of Proverbs: "A king who sits on the throne of judgment winnows all evil with his eyes" (Prov. 20:8). "Take away the wicked from the presence of the king, and his throne will be established in righteousness" (Prov. 25:5). After Solomon carried out judgment on Joab and others, the Holy Spirit says: "So the kingdom was established in the hand of Solomon" (1 Kings 2:46).
Sometimes the wicked remove themselves. They cannot stay in the king's presence. One writer traces this in the life of Jesus:
Take again the words: "Take away the wicked from the presence of the king" (Proverbs 25:5). Perhaps the most solemn example of this is Judas going out into the dark of that night, a night that was morally dark for him. There is also the case of those who brought the sinful woman for Him to condemn. The answer of His lips so exposed them that they were shamed out of His presence and all slipped away.
One writer reads the verse forward, to the reign of Christ:
He will come to establish His throne of righteousness and to rule as the true Melchizedek, the King of Righteousness and of Peace. When He does, the wicked and the evildoers will be taken away in judgment. Only then can there be a righteous government.
W. W. Fereday looks past both David and Solomon to the King still to come:
Neither David nor his son was perfect. When David wrote Psalm 101, the Spirit of inspiration carried him far beyond himself to describe the King who is yet to come... Right through His rule He will meet every act of defiance against the will of God with righteous judgment... Nothing on earth in that age will offend the eye of God.
One writer makes the proverb a test for the people of God today. He treats the "wicked" as the man who twists the King's word:
Is it fitting that a wicked man should have any fellowship or influence in the king's presence? And how much less in the presence of Him whom we know is King of kings! If someone falsifies the King's word, his punishment should be a solemn one, no matter how pleasant a personality he may have. So the people of God must give no fellowship to a teacher who is false at the root... "Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers" (2 Cor. 6:14) is a warning the Word of God repeats again and again. It is urgently needed if truth is to stay pure. In days like ours, this also becomes a most serious test of how devoted the people of God are.
Commentators apply the proverb at three levels: Solomon's court, Christ's coming reign, and the fellowship of God's people now.
- Dross first. The verse follows verse 4: the useful vessel appears only after the refiner takes out the worthless metal.
- Then the throne. Rejecting evil men is what makes a throne secure — it is established in the consciences of those who watch.
- Solomon proved it. He wrote the principle, then acted on it. Scripture then records that his kingdom stood firm.
- The King fulfils it. Judas walked out into the night, and the accusers slipped away. When Christ reigns, He will take the evildoers away, and righteous government becomes possible at last.
- The test reaches us. A pleasant personality counts for nothing when a man twists the King's word. Refusing that fellowship tests how devoted we are.
Put not thyself forward in the presence of the king, and stand not in the place of the great;
This proverb is about how a person behaves near power: whether to push forward or hold back. The advice is practical, but writers read it as touching something deeper — the difference between a place you take and a place God gives.
One writer links the proverb to what Jesus taught about choosing a seat at a feast.
But there is another moral element of great importance here and everywhere else — not self-seeking, but a truly humble mind. As our Lord said, if it were only about a place at a feast, go and take the last one, so that when the host comes he may say, Friend, go up higher. So here: "Do not put yourself forward in the king's presence or stand in the place of the great." What a rebuke to vanity, to be pushed lower — and in the prince's presence too! Let us not forget Him. He lived what He said, and said it to build us up: "everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted."
The verse places the reader in front of a king. One writer takes that presence as a privilege, and asks who alone should be honoured there.
Evil has no place in His presence. Take that truth to heart, and "the presence of the King" becomes wonderfully precious. How subduing to the soul, how awesome and holy! And what a privilege to be allowed — in fact welcomed — into that presence. But if so, then all selfish seeking of position and honour there is unbecoming. Only One is to be exalted there, the Lord Jesus Christ, the Center and Object of all adoration and praise.
Part of the warning is about public embarrassment. One writer takes the same risk into life among God's people.
Jesus watched the dinner guests taking the best places for themselves. He advised them not to take such a place. The host may have meant it for a more honoured person, and the social climber could end up humiliated. If this is true in the natural realm, how much more so among the saints of God! Aspiring to a high place is both unseemly and exposes a person to the shame of humiliation.
Christ Himself took the lowest place. One writer sets His path beside the first Adam's.
"When you are invited, go and sit in the lowest place, so that when your host comes he may say to you, 'Friend, move up higher.'" He had done so Himself. He took the form of a servant and was found in human form. He humbled Himself and became obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. "Therefore God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name that is above every name." … The first Adam tried to exalt himself. Instead he fell through Satan's deceit. The Second Man humbled Himself and is set above all rule and authority and power.
If you may not take a place, you must wait for one. One writer weighs what a man gains by waiting against what he loses by grabbing.
If I am conscious of being a sinner, and therefore deserving no place, I will take none, but wait until God gives me one. I will have real honour when God gives me a place. … When the eye is on God like this, self is forgotten. If not, I am thinking about the slights I receive, and neither faith nor grace is in exercise. … When God gives me a place, it is one of power and nearness to Himself. When a man takes a place for himself, it is one of weakness and distance from God, because self is the object.
Refusing to push forward does not mean refusing responsibility. One writer describes how leading among God's people actually comes about.
Where godliness, lowliness and true spiritual growth are found, the Lord orders things so that such people take the lead in the assembly. They lead in matters of order and government, and of course in the exercise of various gifts. This is normal, proper growth. Such men will not seek in any way to take the lead. But because of their lowly devotion and knowledge of the Word of God, the Lord Himself will place it on their shoulders in the end.
- Place — A place taken is weak and distant from God; a place given is one of power and nearness to Him.
- Presence — Only One is to be exalted before the King. Every bid for personal standing there is out of place.
- Pattern — Christ took the lowest place, and God highly exalted Him. The first Adam grasped at height and fell.
- Peril — The climber risks being moved down in public. What is out of place at a dinner is worse among God's people.
- Promotion — Those who never reach for the lead are the ones the Lord eventually entrusts with it.
for better it is that it be said unto thee, Come up hither, than that thou shouldest be put lower in the presence of the prince whom thine eyes see.
The proverb sits in a royal court. Verse 6 warns against pushing yourself forward before the king. This verse gives the reason: hearing "Come up here" is far better than being moved down while the ruler watches. So where does honour come from, and who hands it out?
Kelly reads the proverb as more than court etiquette. What it calls for is a humble mind. He links it to what Jesus said about taking the last seat at a feast.
But there is another moral element of great importance there and everywhere else — not self-seeking, but a truly humble mind. As our Lord said, if it were only about a place at a feast, go and take the last. Then when the host comes he may say, Friend, go up higher. So here: "Do not put yourself forward in the king's presence or stand in the place of the great." What a rebuke to vanity, to be pushed lower, and in the prince's presence too!
Notice who does the speaking. Someone else says, "Come up here." Someone else moves you lower. Either way, the host decides the place. Darby carries that up to God.
If I know I am a sinner, and therefore deserve no place, I shall take none. I will wait until God gives me one. I shall have honour indeed when God gives me a place. The point is, what does He bestow upon me? … When God gives me a place, it is one of power and nearness to Himself. But when a man takes a place for himself, it is one of weakness and alienation from God, because self is the object.
Kelly traces the same pattern in Christ's own path.
He took the form of a servant, was found in human form, humbled Himself, and became obedient to death, even the death of the cross. "Therefore God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name that is above every name." … The first Adam sought to exalt himself, but only fell through the deceit of Satan. The Second Man humbled Himself and is set above all rule, and authority, and power.
Grant takes up the phrase "the presence of the King" and asks who belongs there.
How wonderfully precious "the presence of the King" becomes when we take to heart the truth that evil has no place in His presence. How subduing to the soul, how awesome and holy; and how marvellous the privilege of being allowed — in fact welcomed — in that presence. But if so, then certainly all selfish seeking of position and honour there is unbecoming. Only One is to be exalted there, the Lord Jesus Christ, the Centre and Object of all adoration and praise.
Grant sees the same pattern in how leaders emerge among God's people. The verse also speaks of a ruler in plain sight; some translations read "the prince whom your eyes have seen."
Yet where godliness, lowliness and true spiritual growth are found, the Lord will so order things that such people take the lead in the assembly. They lead in matters of order and government, and of course in the exercise of various gifts. This is normal, proper growth. Such men will not seek in any way to assume the lead. But because of their lowly devotion and knowledge of the Word of God, the Lord Himself will eventually place this on their shoulders. How good to remember that in all assembly activity, and in the exercise of every spiritual gift, we are "in the presence of the Prince whom our eyes have seen." What sanctifying power this understanding would have over our whole service for Him!
The proverb targets an instinct, not just a seating mistake: the urge to push yourself forward.
Oh, to be nothing! This is true liberty — true happiness — true moral elevation. What intense power of attraction there is in someone who makes nothing of himself! On the other hand, how repulsive is a pushing, elbowing, self-exalting spirit! How completely unworthy of one who bears the name of Him who made Himself of no reputation! It is a settled truth that ambition cannot possibly live in the presence of One who emptied Himself. An ambitious Christian is a glaring contradiction.
- Place. The host decides both outcomes. "Come up here" and the move down are given, never grabbed.
- Down. The way up is down: take the low seat, and let the One who invited you assign the honour.
- Christ. He lived the proverb — He went to the lowest place, and God gave Him the name above every name.
- Presence. Only Christ is exalted where God's people gather. Pushing for position there is out of place.
- Result. A place God gives brings power and nearness to Him. A place you grab brings weakness. Real influence is never grabbed; the Lord lays it on the lowly.
Go not forth hastily to strive, lest [thou know not] what to do in the end thereof, when thy neighbour hath put thee to shame.
The verse before this warned against pushing yourself forward among important people. Here the danger changes shape: rushing into a quarrel. The proverb does not call the cause wrong. It calls the hurry wrong. And it asks about the end, not the start: anyone can begin a fight, but what will you do when the argument collapses in your hands?
One writer ties this verse to the ones before it. Self-promotion and quarrelling are twin faults with the same ending.
The rebuke is not only for the self-conceit that pushes forward among the great, in case a greater humiliation falls on you. You must also avoid a contentious spirit.
The verse targets the hurry, not the dispute. One writer shows what that hurry costs.
Haste exposes you to all sorts of mistakes. This is most true when it takes the form of strife with another. He can soon prove you wrong where you least suspected it. The over-confident critic is put to shame, and looks in vain for somewhere to retreat and hide.
There is a reason the neighbour can shame you. So far you have heard one side only — your own.
Someone who can present his own case in a plausible, persuasive way may look right. But we had better be careful about accepting this testimony. His neighbour may question him in such a way that a very different result comes to light. Every person tends to put himself in the most favourable light.
Speed is not always a fault. Scripture praises hurry when God is the object, and warns against it when self is.
Let us not forget, dear Christian readers, that one of the marks of faith is to hurry. Abraham hurried when it was a matter of the Lord's service (Gen. 18:6-8). Zacchaeus did so when the Saviour invited him to receive Him into his house (Luke 19:6). Mary did so when the Lord called her to come to Him (John 11:29). If it is about Him and His Person, can we ever hurry enough? But on the other hand, should we not keep ourselves from the haste that so often marks the flesh and the old man? "Their feet run to evil, and they make haste to shed blood" (Prov. 1:16; 6:18), "to strive" (Prov. 25:8), "to be rich" (Prov. 28:20, 22). When it concerns ourselves, let us not act like the world.
Being right does not license fighting. One writer applies the verse to defending the truth.
The messenger is not called on to enforce his message. Striving is unbecoming; mere argument will not produce results for God. The truth itself, which we are trying to defend, will suffer from our contentious attitude. Our neighbour will blame our doctrine for our "hasty striving." We will be put to shame, and left embarrassed about how to get out of such a mess. Peter is a striking example. He took a sword and cut off the ear of the high priest's servant. It may have looked like bravery, but it led only to Peter's humiliation.
The verse warns against rushing to law. One writer turns its own question — what will you do in the end? — on the lawsuit.
How often it happens that people go to law to be put right of their wrongs, and, in the end, find themselves wronged of their rights!
The alternative is not winning but waiting.
Why not suffer injustice, if necessary? "Why not rather suffer wrong?" (1 Cor. 6:7). Why not wait for the Lord to overrule in things that may come up between brothers?
The next verse gives the path Solomon prefers — deal with the person, and keep other people's business out of it.
You may discuss with a neighbour what concerns you deeply. But beware of betraying anything you have learned that would injure him.
- Haste — the proverb condemns the speed, not the grievance. Hurry leaves the confident critic with no hiding place.
- Shame — you sound right because you spoke first. The neighbour's questions bring a very different result to light.
- The end — those who go to law to be put right of their wrongs often end up "wronged of their rights."
- Manner — a true cause pushed by striving spoils itself. Onlookers blame the doctrine for the temper, as Peter's sword only shamed him.
- Direction — hurry is right when God is the object (Abraham, Zacchaeus, Mary), and wrong when self is.
Debate thy cause with thy neighbour, but reveal not the secret of another;
This verse follows a warning about rushing into a quarrel, and it draws one line: settle the dispute with the person himself, and leave his private business out of it. Two questions follow: why does telling a third party feel so natural, and why does it end in your own disgrace?
A person who rushes to accuse often finds the accusation collapsing under him.
Haste opens the door to all sorts of mistakes. This is most true when it turns into a quarrel with another person. He can soon prove you wrong where you least suspected it. Then the over-confident accuser is put to shame, and looks in vain for somewhere to retreat and hide.
Once ill-feeling exists, the instinct is to tell somebody else about it. The proverb points the other way — toward the harder conversation with the one person who can actually settle it.
How carefully we must guard the doors of our lips! Disagreement, discord and bad feeling have come between neighbours. Will spreading it elsewhere settle it? Let us have grace and honest courage of heart to face our neighbour in a spirit of meekness and true concern, so that we reach a proper understanding. Think of the countless cases of offence that were never settled, but only made worse, by selfish, thoughtless gossip — when one word of simple apology could have ended them forever!
The person we choose to confide in is rarely chosen at random.
Perhaps we know someone who is not on friendly terms with the person who has hurt us. We have little doubt that he will listen eagerly to the story of our wrongs. The danger is that our selfishness sends us to him — though if we cared about his soul, he would be the last person in the church we should ever tell... It is much to be feared that we are not altogether sorry to punish the one who wronged us by lowering him in other people's eyes.
The second half of the verse turns from the quarrel to what you know about the other person. Real discussion is allowed; using private knowledge as ammunition is not.
You may discuss with a neighbour what concerns you deeply. But be careful never to give away something you have somehow learned, and so harm him.
Where that line falls is not always obvious.
This is a very delicate area. It needs real energy of communion with God to have the wisdom to act rightly. In certain cases there may be facts that others should know, and where to draw the line calls for serious exercise of heart. But I must be careful not to put my neighbour in a wrong or bad light. And before I speak, I must always judge in myself any feeling of personal grievance.
The proverb's threat falls on the speaker, not on the neighbour.
Otherwise telling it will disgrace the one who spreads it, and the harm will last a long time.
Truth is not the test. What matters is what the words are for.
Even if a gossip's words were completely true — which they seldom are — they do harm in every way, and they come under the condemnation of evil speaking. They have no moral purpose and no loving manner. At best this is gossip. Mostly it is simply the pleasure of talking about things that right feeling would rather keep hidden. The result is wounds that go very deep, in the places where they are least curable.
Holding your tongue is not weakness — though there is one thing it must never hide.
Whoever covers an offense seeks love. This does not mean covering your own wrongdoing, which we ought to confess honestly to the Lord. It means we should not expose someone else's wrongdoing unless the matter affects others. There are also smaller matters that we may hear but ought not to repeat, because such carelessness can separate friends.
- Haste — Rush into a dispute and you will make mistakes. The one you accuse may prove you wrong where you least expected it, and leave you no place to hide.
- Him — Face your neighbour yourself, with meekness and honest courage. Spreading it elsewhere settles nothing. One word of apology can end what gossip only inflames.
- Held — You may discuss your own case. You may not give away what you have learned and so harm him. Knowing when others need to know takes communion with God, and honest judgment of your own grievance first.
- Hurt — Even true words wound deeply when they serve no loving purpose, and those wounds are the hardest to heal.
- Home — The disgrace comes back on the one who spread it, and the harm lasts. Covering a matter, not repeating it, is the path that seeks love.
lest he that heareth [it] disgrace thee, and thine evil report turn not away.
This verse looks past the quarrel itself to what happens when you take it to a third party. The warning falls on the one who talks. The shame he meant for his neighbour lands on him, and the bad name never lifts.
The grievance may be real. The line falls at one place:
You may discuss with a neighbour what concerns you deeply, but you must beware of betraying what you have somehow learned to his injury.
The result lands on the speaker:
Otherwise its disclosure will disgrace the one who spreads it, so that the ill effect will long remain.
The previous verse gives the alternative: argue your case with your neighbour himself.
How guarded the doors of our lips must be! Disagreement, discord and ill-feeling have come between neighbours. Will spreading it elsewhere settle it? Let us have grace and honest courage of heart. Let us face our neighbour in a spirit of meekness and true concern, so that we reach a proper understanding. How painful are the countless cases of offence that were never settled! Selfish, thoughtless gossip only made them worse, when a word of simple apology might have ended it forever.
We know who will enjoy hearing it:
Perhaps we know a fellow believer who is not on the friendliest terms with the one who has injured us. We have little doubt that he will lend a ready ear to the tale of our wrongs. The danger is that, in our selfishness, we go to him. Yet if we thought of his soul's welfare, he would be the last person we should ever tell... We may well fear that we are not altogether sorry to punish our brother by lowering him in the eyes of others.
Why does the ill repute have no end? Look at what such words do to the person who hears them:
This is exactly how the soul reacts to the words of talebearers. They are like deep, internal wounds — the Hebrew word means "to burn in." Such things have so deep an effect that they may never be forgotten, while other forms of wrong are soon dismissed from the mind. Talebearing may easily lead to a permanent break between saints of God.
Even accurate reports fall under this warning:
Even if the words were strictly true, which they rarely are, they do harm in every way. They fall under the censure of evil speaking. They wholly lack a moral object or a loving way. At best it is gossip. Mostly it is the mere indulgence of talking about things that right feeling would rather keep quiet.
Silence is not always the right answer:
This area is very delicate. It needs real energy of communion with God to have the wisdom to act rightly. In certain cases there may be facts that others should know, and where to draw the line calls for serious exercise. But I must be careful not to put my neighbour in a wrong or bad light. And before I speak, I must always judge in myself any feeling of personal grievance.
The verse names the listener: "he who hears you." He has a duty of his own:
Accept nothing said in this way, and rebuke the talebearer. That will soon check such people and put them to shame. To repeat slanderous tales is to share the guilt and the mischief.
The same lips can do the opposite:
On the other hand, the proverb compares a word spoken to the point, or in season, to apples of gold in baskets of silver. It is the fruit of divine righteousness served up with fitting grace.
- Direct. Settle a grievance with the neighbour himself. Spreading it elsewhere has never settled anything; it only made things worse.
- Disclosed. Tell others what would injure your neighbour, and the disgrace lands on you, the one who spread it.
- Deep. Such words burn in like internal wounds. Other wrongs fade; these are never forgotten, and they can break a friendship for good.
- Discerned. Some facts must be told. Knowing where the line falls takes real communion with God — and judging your own grievance first.
- Different. The alternative to the tale is the word spoken in season — gold apples in silver baskets, righteousness served with grace.
[As] apples of gold in pictures of silver, is a word spoken in season.
One sentence, said at the right moment, can do more than a long speech. This proverb sets a well-timed word beside a piece of fine craftsmanship, which raises a practical question: what makes a word fit?
The comparison is to something made with skill, though translators differ on exactly what object is in view.
In Proverbs 25:11 "apples of gold in pictures of silver" probably describes some piece of jewellery, judging from the words that follow right after; others prefer to translate it "carved images."
The gold and the silver are not rivals. One is the content; the other is the setting that shows it off.
On the other hand, a word spoken to the point, or in season, is compared here to apples of gold in baskets of silver — fruit of divine righteousness served with fitting grace.
The value lies in the timing as much as in the amount said. The proverb praises something small, deliberate and aimed.
In marked contrast to a "multitude of words," this is but "a word," yet spoken in the proper time and place to meet a particular need.
Speech is not a neutral tool. The same tongue that makes this piece of art can also do serious damage.
Speaking the right word at the right time is like rare art: "A word fitly spoken is like apples of gold in a setting of silver" (Prov. 25:11). The tongues of sinful men, on the other hand, can be sharp instruments causing havoc: "They sharpen their tongues like a serpent; the poison of snakes is under their lips" (Ps. 140:3). Even believers need this warning: the tongue, used the wrong way, can do great damage, like a small fire setting a great forest ablaze (Jas. 3:2-12).
One writer sees the two metals as pictures of definite subjects.
Apples are well known for giving health, and gold is a lovely symbol of the glory of God shown in the Person of Christ, just as light from the sun reveals the glory of the sun itself. Isn't it precious that this picture appears the moment the subject of ministry comes up? And the gold sits in a setting of silver, a picture of the work of the Lord Jesus in redemption.
One life met this standard in full. The same care marks the record of those words.
"A word fitly spoken is like apples of gold in a setting of silver," and "A word spoken in due season, how good it is." All the words of the Lord were like this. Each one came at its own time and in its own circumstance, and none was more fitly spoken than this word. In the written record of His words too, every one is placed by God.
A fit word also has an order: what comes first, and what can wait. A correction can be deserved and still come at the wrong moment.
Such a rebuke would be well deserved, but the One Who was speaking knew how "to speak a word in season to the one who is weary." Compassion came first; correction may follow.
A fit word can also be very short. Scripture gives an example: a captive servant girl in the house of Naaman, a Syrian army commander with leprosy, a disease of the skin.
Despite all this, this poor child was in the right place, at the right time, with the right aim, and in the right spirit to do the right thing. All the happy results that followed turned on her little word, so fitly spoken: "I wish my master were with the prophet who is in Samaria, for he would heal him of his leprosy." She seeks nothing for herself. She does not say, "I wish my master were relieved of his misery," but that he "were with the prophet." That is the first thing; bodily healing would follow.
Such words are not just for public speakers.
True, all are not evangelists in the sense of being public preachers, but all may evangelize by saying a word for the heart or conscience as the Lord gives opportunity. All that such a work needs is love for souls — a love which acts in harmony with the heart of Christ. Millions of souls will be in heaven at last, and will swell the song of the redeemed, who were brought to know the Lord by a word fitly spoken, by personal conversation and prayer.
- Fit — the praise falls on a word "spoken in season": one word, at the proper time and place, to meet a particular need.
- Gold — the content is solid: fruit of divine righteousness, read by some as the glory of Christ Himself.
- Silver — the setting matters as much as the metal. Serve truth with fitting grace; do not fling it.
- Order — with the weary, compassion comes first and correction can follow. A rebuke can be deserved and still come at the wrong time.
- Reach — a captive girl's one sentence changed a commander's life. Such a word needs love for souls, not a platform.
An ear-ring of gold, and an ornament of fine gold, is a wise reprover upon an attentive ear.
Nobody enjoys being told they are wrong. Yet this proverb calls a wise correction gold, and hangs it on the ear that will listen.
The proverb sits among sayings about speech that lands well. Where a leaked secret leaves lasting disgrace, the wise word does the opposite.
It is not so with such a blessed display of what is precious; for a wise reprover on an attentive ear is a prized object and an ornament of great value.
The verse names two ornaments, not one. Older translations read the first as an earring of gold, and the comment below follows that wording.
The "earring of gold" speaks of an influence that stirs the soul with motives of concern for the glory of God. It stirs these instead of self-interest, self-justification or self-pleasing. How precious is that ministry which directs souls altogether to the Lord and His own glory! As well as an earring of gold, it is "an ornament of fine gold," not only influencing the ear, but an adornment of the person.
The word "wise" carries the weight here. True service includes reproof, and the manner of it matters.
True ministry must reprove evil, whether privately or publicly. But this does not mean mere censure or impatience. This urgently needs lowly wisdom. The ministry must be given in the spirit of serving the need of souls, for the Lord's sake. This will have a real and precious effect upon every "obedient ear".
A rebuke can be sharp in content without being harsh in tone.
The oil makes the nail drive without splitting the board. The word never enters the heart more kindly than when it falls most gently: "Ride out victoriously... for the cause of truth and meekness" (Ps. 45:4). Be as rough to your people's sins as you can, so long as you are gentle to their souls. Do you take the rod of reproof into your hand? Let them see that love, not wrath, gives the blow. The word preached comes best from a warm heart.
Half the gold in this proverb belongs to the listener. The same words fall on two kinds of people and produce opposite results.
Correction and reproof are for those who have an ear to hear. They keep them from living in a way that contradicts what they profess. That is why we are told here to "reprove a wise man, and he will love you." A wise man may not always follow the path of wisdom; he may need reproof. A fool is one who never hears, though he is always ready to find fault. A wise man listens and weighs; when he recognises what is of God, he will love you.
Such an ear is rare, and no one produces it in himself.
The readiness to take reproof to heart is a rare and precious trait in anyone. Poverty and shame must belong to the one who has no ear for the instruction which enriches all, and which all need. But what honour falls to the wise and lowly mind that welcomes and weighs reproof! Grace alone can make it real.
The Lord Himself shows what a wise reprover looks like. He did not handle two men the same way.
When Peter was moved by the spirit of the world, the Lord exposed him on the spot, without sparing him: "Get behind me, Satan." But when John the Baptist sent Him a message that was a reproach to Him, the Lord did rebuke him, yet with marked consideration. He sent back a message that none but John himself could measure. No one else could feel its point and sting: "Blessed is the one who is not offended by me." Even John's disciples, who carried the messages between them, could not have understood this. They were not aware how their master had been feeling, and Jesus would not expose their master to them. He would expose John to himself, but not to them. The disciples going to Emmaus He rebuked in a very unusual way. He spoke a sharp word to them: "O foolish ones, and slow of heart to believe." Yet while He rebuked them, He warmed and blessed them. He spoke sharply to their ear, but He kindled their hearts.
He was sharp with one and gentle with another. Bellett also marks the limit of this kind of reproof.
I am speaking here of the Lord's dealing with His own. With opponents, or with the world, His rebuke was not really for correction, but in judgment. All His rebukes or reproofs were "earrings of gold" and "ornaments of fine gold" in themselves, and we may hope they commonly hung upon "obedient ears."
- Gold, not injury. Correction given well and taken well is treasure. The proverb ranks it with fine jewellery.
- Gold on the ear. The earring stirs concern for God's glory instead of self-interest. The ornament of fine gold goes further and adorns the whole person.
- Gold needs a wise hand. Reproof is part of true ministry, but not as censure or impatience. It takes lowly wisdom, and the aim of serving souls for the Lord's sake.
- Gold needs an open ear. A wise man listens, weighs, and ends up loving the one who corrected him. A fool never hears, though he is always ready to find fault.
- Gold seen in Christ. He matched each rebuke to the person. He exposed John to himself, not to onlookers. His reproofs were gold, and we may hope they found obedient ears.
As the cold of snow in the time of harvest, [so] is a faithful messenger to them that send him for he refresheth the soul of his masters.
Solomon reaches for an image that would strike anyone working under a summer sun: something cold arriving exactly when the labour is hottest. The comparison is not accidental, and one commentator explains where the snow came from and what kind of relief it gave.
Most take this to mean snow stored from the winter before. It gave cooling refreshment in the heat of harvest. So here is a messenger whose faithful message does not warm, comfort or soothe. It stirs and refreshes. Faithful ministry must avoid mere "good words and fair speeches" (Rom. 16:18). It should stir hearts and consciences to true labour in God's great harvest field. Warming, comforting ministry is also badly needed at times, especially in trial, distress and sorrow. But in the heat of work, how we need that cooling, reviving ministry of the Spirit of God through the lips of a faithful messenger.
One writer weighs this messenger against the world he lives in.
A faithful messenger in a world of unfaithfulness is a great comfort to those who send him. The proverb compares him here to the cold of snow in the time of harvest. He does indeed refresh the soul of his masters.
The second half of the verse names who is refreshed — and it is not the hearers.
Notice that the verse says nothing about refreshing his hearers. It says instead: "he refreshes the soul of his masters." Can we not easily apply this to the delight of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit in all ministry that faithfully represents the Word of God?
One writer draws out what being sent does to a servant's sense of his own importance. He quotes the verse in an older translation, which reads "his Master" where the ESV has "his masters."
A great honour rests on him, certainly, but he is not the important one — the message he carries is. Since he is sent, his first thought must be the One who sends him… His first thought must be his Master, and his last thought too. He must return from his mission to Him and give account of how he carried it out and what came of it… He must also keep his Master in mind during the mission, for it will be a complete failure if he loses contact with Him. And the Lord never takes His eye off His servants. Here is a marvellous thing: "A faithful… messenger refreshes the soul of his Master"… The thought of the faithful messenger brings the Lord Himself to mind. He is called "the faithful Witness," and how perfectly refreshed His Father's heart was as He looked on Him.
The same writer sets this verse beside two other proverbs, quoted in an older translation, to sketch three descriptions of the preacher.
The preacher is a messenger sent out with a report. He is not to seek popularity with the people he is sent to, but to be faithful to the One who sends him. "A FAITHFUL MESSENGER refreshes the soul of his Master" (Prov. 25:13). He is an ambassador of peace from Christ to man. He must know God's terms if he is to present them and explain them according to the mind of his Sovereign-Master. "A FAITHFUL AMBASSADOR is health" (Prov. 13:17). He is himself a witness to the delivering power of the message he carries. So he can seek out with confidence those who need the deliverance he has known. "A TRUE WITNESS delivers souls" (Prov. 14:25).
Scripture names many people God sent. One stands apart; one refused to go.
I think there has been only one Messenger who was entirely faithful: "the messenger of the covenant," sent by His Father. But we read of many others in the Scriptures who have been sent: Joseph, Moses, David, Elijah, Jeremiah, Philip, Timothy, and many others. These all were, in a measure, faithful messengers; they all went, when and where their Master sent them. But Jonah was also sent, and he did not go. To his shame and sorrow he disobeyed. He was not a faithful messenger. And now, to come nearer home — have you, my reader, a Master? Has He ever said to you, "Go!"?
- Sent — the whole proverb turns on being sent. The messenger's honour is not himself but the message he carries. His first thought and his last must be the One who sent him.
- Faithful — he is loyal to the sender, not popular with the hearers. In a world of unfaithfulness, such a messenger is rare.
- Snow — stored winter snow reaching the field at harvest. Faithful ministry is not soothing but bracing. It stirs hearts and consciences to real work.
- Refreshing — the relief flows back to the sender, not out to the audience. Faithful ministry brings delight to God Himself.
- Returning — every messenger comes back to give account, under an eye that never leaves him. Only one Messenger, sent by the Father, was entirely faithful. Jonah shows what it is to be sent and not go.
Clouds and wind without rain, [so] is a man that boasteth himself of a false gift.
The sky darkens, the wind rises, and not a drop falls on the dry ground. Proverbs turns that disappointment into a picture of a man who promises much and gives nothing.
The proverb works because clouds and wind are real promises of rain. One writer applies it to ministry among God's people.
But this question of ministry and gift is not without its dangers. Imitations of what is good will certainly soon raise their heads, and the saints of God must be on their guard. Promising outward signs may be there — the clouds and wind — but no rain, no vital ministry of the Spirit of God to actually meet the need of souls. One may appear earnest and serious as the clouds, and his words may be as strong and forceful as the wind. Yet he may have no true gift from the Spirit of God at all, so that he provides nothing for the thirst of souls.
The same writer points to Paul's instructions to Timothy.
We must not ignore Paul's warnings to Timothy: "avoid irreverent babble, for it will lead people into more and more ungodliness." "Have nothing to do with foolish, ignorant controversies; you know that they breed quarrels" (2 Tim. 2:16, 23).
Nobody has to expose this man. Older translations read "a false gift" where the ESV has "a gift he does not give." One commentator holds both senses together.
Whereas he who boasts of a false gift, or falsely giving, convicts himself as a sham, like clouds and wind without rain.
This verse sits right after its opposite: verse 13 praises the messenger who does deliver.
Again, a faithful messenger in a world of unfaithfulness is a great comfort to those who send him, here compared to the cold of snow in the time of harvest. He does indeed refresh the soul of his masters.
Both men arrive with expectation attached. Only one leaves anything behind.
The proverb bites hardest when the boast is a spiritual one. One writer replied to people who claimed miraculous gifts were returning to the church.
These words seem to be an echo of the boastful speech of Laodicea: "I am rich, I have prospered, and I need nothing" (Rev. 3:17). They will surely meet a like judgment from the Lord of the churches in the day of Christ. Meanwhile, they recall the maxims of the wise man: "Many a man proclaims his own steadfast love." "Like clouds and wind without rain is a man who boasts of a gift he does not give" (Prov. 20:6; Prov. 25:14).
One writer traces the same picture into the New Testament.
Jude has strong words for these intruders. He searches creation for fitting pictures of their wretched character, likening them to clouds, trees, waves and stars. As clouds they bring promise of God's blessing but there is not a drop! … We expect rain from clouds, and so we might expect good instruction from these teachers, but we find none. The supposed advanced teaching with its new light has really nothing to offer the Christian at all.
Two chapters later the same book gives the cure.
Then further, "Let another praise you, and not your own mouth; a stranger, and not your own lips" (Prov. 27:2). We are not to blow our own trumpets. An egotistical man is nearly always an empty man. True greatness and conceit do not run together.
- Promise. Clouds and wind are real signs of rain. That is why a boaster raises real hope before he lets people down.
- Emptiness. An earnest manner and strong words can copy a real gift. They still leave the thirst of souls untouched.
- Exposure. Nobody needs to accuse him. The man who boasts of a gift he does not give "convicts himself as a sham."
- Contrast. The faithful messenger of verse 13 arrives like snow at harvest. He refreshes those who sent him — same expectation, opposite outcome.
- Cure. Let someone else do the praising. The self-important man is nearly always empty.
By long forbearing is a ruler persuaded, and a soft tongue breaketh the bone.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
Hast thou found honey? Eat so much as is sufficient for thee, lest thou be surfeited therewith, and vomit it.
Honey is sweet, and finding some is a gift. This proverb still attaches a limit to it — not "don't" but "enough" — and that raises the question of where else the same measure belongs.
The honey is found, not earned. One writer reads it as the kind things God gives along the way, friendship included. The caution falls on those same mercies.
Honey is pleasant and good in its place sometimes. I was thinking of Jonathan. The Lord does refresh us with outward mercies, kind things, the friendship of other believers, but with caution as to how we use them. "If you have found honey, eat only enough for you, lest you have your fill of it and vomit it" — and too much even here does have that effect.
(Jonathan was a soldier in Israel's army who tasted wild honey in the middle of a battle and found fresh strength.)
The verse never calls honey bad. It says sweetness alone cannot tell you how much to take. Overdo it, and other people suffer too.
Sweetness is not all; one may have too much of it. A little honey is excellent; but if you have found it, eat enough and no more, or you will prove it a bad feast, and sickness follows, disagreeable to others no less than to yourself. But honey, or natural sweetness, must not enter an offering to the Lord. In divine things, seasoning with salt is essential, not sweetening to suit the natural palate.
One writer applies the honey to human ministry — what other believers gather from Scripture and pass on. He then marks the line between that and Scripture itself.
We must realise that all human ministry has its limitations. We cannot live entirely from what others gather, and however deeply we may enjoy the ministry of a man of God, we must be careful not to saturate ourselves with his thoughts. We must rather get to the Word of God ourselves. Scripture itself will never sicken us, though man's thoughts about it may do so. The Word is "sweeter also than honey and drippings of the honeycomb" (Ps. 19:10): it stands far above all ministry... If we dare to give ministry the place that the Word itself should have we shall soon begin to vomit it.
The same caution fits a time of endless information. More intake does not mean more nourishment.
The present is a time when many are running here and there to increase knowledge of all kinds. And this must be a caution to our souls, for the believer always has to watch against the spirit of the times. In these present times of light and knowledge — even knowledge of God — we still have to remember that it is not food merely, but digestion, that nourishes. The clean animal, under the law, chewed the cud.
Ordinary pleasures fall under the same rule. The line is not in the thing itself, but in how far it takes hold of you.
There is much in nature that the free-born soul can enjoy without spiritual damage... scenery, the beauties of nature, needed bodily rest, and much else, can be a true refreshment to the Lord's tired people. "If you have found honey, eat only enough for you." This is the divine rule. The world, among the "all things," is ours. But we are to use it and not to abuse it, or to be brought under its power... Needed relaxation may degenerate into slackness; cheerful conversation into unholy silliness which blights true spiritual growth.
The same measure covers people, not only food. Kindness to a neighbour can be overdone, and then it turns into its opposite.
Neighbourly kindness suits us, and promotes good will. But here again danger lurks, if one overdoes it. It is apt to degenerate into a thoughtless or a meddling habit; and instead of love, hatred follows.
- Found — honey stands for the sweet things of ordinary life: kindness, friendship, rest along the way. They are God's gift, not forbidden.
- Enough — appetite is not the measure. Past the right point the sweet thing sickens you, and that is unpleasant for others too.
- Digested — more intake is not more life. The clean animal chewed the cud; knowledge you never chew over does not feed you.
- Second-hand — one writer reads the honey as the ministry of others. It is good, but it never replaces reading Scripture yourself. Scripture alone never sickens.
- Off the altar — natural sweetness belongs in daily life, but it had no place in an offering to the Lord. God's portion takes salt, not sweetening to suit our taste.
Let thy foot be seldom in thy neighbour's house; lest he be weary of thee and hate thee.
Proverbs 25 gathers short sayings about everyday life. This one raises a question few people say out loud: how does welcome company turn into something a neighbour resents?
The saying is not isolated. One commentator groups it with the sayings around it and offers his own rendering of the line, which brings out the picture of a neighbour who has had his fill:
Verses 15–20 remind us how much a patient spirit and a gentle tongue gain, even with men of high authority… "Have you found honey? Eat only as much as you need, or you will have too much and vomit it."
(That wording is the commentator's own translation of verse 16, not the ESV.) Honey is good. Too much of it makes a man sick. Our verse takes that same picture and applies it to company: a neighbour can have his fill of you.
The verse is not a warning against being neighbourly. It is a warning that a good thing can spoil by excess, and it names the exact result:
Kindness to a neighbour suits us, and it builds good will. But here too a danger hides, if we overdo it. Such kindness easily slips into a thoughtless or meddling habit, and instead of love, hatred follows. We must not hand anyone an excuse, above all those who are looking for one.
Notice two things. The drift is thoughtless, not planned. And some people are watching for an excuse to take offence, so wisdom refuses to hand them one.
Another commentator asks what this means for anyone who visits to help someone. His answer turns on who the neighbour really needs:
We were not made to enjoy each other's talk all the time, or each other's company all the time… It is never like that when we seek the Lord's company. But we need sober wisdom, so that we know how to serve our neighbour well and then go on our way. However gifted I may be at teaching him, I must remember that he does not need my presence. He needs the Lord's presence. How good it is to give him just enough help to send his soul back into the Lord's presence, where he learns deeply and rightly, in a way he could never learn from me.
Notice the contrast he sets up: with God there is no such thing as coming too often. The limit belongs to human friendship, not to the Lord's door.
The same writer pushes the point further. Even the best-intentioned visit can go wrong. So what about a visit with poor motives and nothing worth saying?
Even with the very best intentions, and the best thing to say, I can go wrong by spending too much time in my neighbour's house. How much more harm will I do when my intentions are poor and my talk is empty! "Consider the warning to young widows" in 1 Timothy 5:13.
What does idle visiting turn into? A commentator on that verse in 1 Timothy names two faults, and shows what is missing from both:
A gossiper repeats stories and idle chatter that damage other people. A meddler interferes in other people's business and gives opinions on matters that are not his concern. Neither one is thinking of helping the needy or of putting a wrong right… Gossipers and meddlers, whether what they repeat is false or true, are both "saying what they should not."
The test is not whether the talk is accurate. It is whether the visit exists to help anyone at all.
- Enough is sweet. The verse sits beside the honey saying and shares its logic. What is good in small amounts makes you sick in large ones. A neighbour can have his fill of you.
- Too much turns love around. Visiting too often slips into a thoughtless or meddling habit, and instead of love comes hatred.
- Give no excuse. Some people are looking for a grievance. Wisdom will not supply one.
- Point them to the Lord. Give enough help to send your neighbour's soul back into the Lord's presence. He learns there what no one else can teach him. Then go on your way.
- Empty visits do the worst. A good visit can overstay. An idle one turns into gossip and meddling — saying what should not be said, true or false.
A maul, and a sword, and a sharp arrow, is a man that beareth false witness against his neighbour.
A man can wreck his neighbour without ever touching him. This verse hands him a club, a sword and an arrow — and every one of them is made of words.
Commentators read the three as three kinds of damage, not one picture repeated three times.
But false witness against a neighbour is quite another thing, and extremely serious. The one who bears it is here said to be harmful in a great many different ways. He is a club to crush, a sword to pierce when the target is close at hand, and an arrow to wound from a distance.
Older translations call the first weapon a "maul". A Bible dictionary gives its meaning:
after
A mallet or war-club for breaking in pieces or attacking.
Israel already had a law against this, and a penalty to go with it. One writer sets the proverb beside both.
The law of Sinai forbade the Israelite in plain words to bear false witness against his neighbour (Ex. 20:16). Scripture also said that a false witness should not go unpunished (Prov. 19:5, 9), but should perish (Prov. 21:28). He was a menace to the nation, and the proverb pictures him as "a maul and a sword and a sharp arrow" (Prov. 25:18). It does so because lying testimony bore its victim down by sheer force. It cut deep into the vital organs. It wounded even from a distance.
Two things make this sin so grave: whom it offends, and how far it runs.
It is most hateful to God and most injurious to man. No one can say where the evil may spread, or how it may end here, but we do know how the Lord judges it forever.
Slander does not announce itself. It works by hint and suggestion, and that is what makes the arrow fitting.
The arrow also flies in secret, and the upright man is above all its target. The voice of slander takes its inspiration from the first tempter. It loves insinuation and suggestion. An open assault would be repelled, and a specific charge might prove the integrity it attacks. "Has God said?" might be the voice of innocence itself.
Writing on the same sin in the law of Exodus, one commentator turns to the listener.
Someone hears a report. It seems true, so he passes it on. Yet if he had taken any trouble to check it, he might have found it false. Christians above all should be careful here. They should refuse every report that damages another person unless testimony no one can question stands behind it. So the responsibility falls on the hearer as well as on the one who repeats reports. If we remembered this, many a slander would stop at the start, many a tale-bearer would be uncovered, and many a broken fellowship avoided.
Because false witness is common, it is easy to treat it as a small thing. One commentator refuses that logic and turns the verse on the people of God.
The commonness of such evil does not lessen its seriousness... How extremely careful we ought to be! We must care for the real unity of the Spirit of God. We must also know the facts fully before we speak, above all when our words will put someone in a bad light.
The worst example in Scripture came from the men who were charged with enforcing this very law.
The Spirit of Christ foreshadowed this sin in the prophets: "False witnesses have risen up against me, and they breathe out cruelty"; "they charge me with things I do not know" (Ps. 27:12; Ps. 35:11). And so it happened. In the fullness of time the Anointed One presented Himself to the chosen people. It was not the mob but the religious leaders of the Jews who sought false witness against Jesus to put Him to death. In this very point they broke the law they were appointed to administer.
- Weapon. A club crushes, a sword pierces what is near, an arrow wounds what is far away. The false witness does all three with words.
- Wound. Lying testimony bears its victim down and cuts deep. The law forbade it, and warned that the false witness would perish.
- Whisper. Slander prefers the hint to the open attack. You cannot disprove a hint the way you can disprove a charge.
- Willing ear. The one who repeats a report he never checked shares the guilt. Turn it away at the door, and the slander stops there.
- Worst case. The men appointed to enforce the law against false witness used it on Christ. Know the facts before you speak.
A broken tooth, and a tottering foot, is confidence in an unfaithful [man] in the day of trouble.
This proverb pictures the man who fails you at the worst possible moment, and it asks what such trust costs when the weight comes on. (Older translations say "a broken tooth and a foot out of joint," and that is how the writers below quote it.)
The sting is in the timing. A tooth and a foot fail you just when you need them.
Confidence in an unfaithful man is a fault, and it is worst in time of trouble. That is when you are counting on the support you had expected in vain. It fails your spirit as a broken tooth does the mouth, or a foot out of joint the body.
A tooth is for eating and a foot is for walking. Trust that gives way damages both.
Trials and troubles of many kinds will test us, and we need faithfulness urgently then. Paul had very real reason to tell Timothy, "What you have heard from me in the presence of many witnesses entrust to faithful men, who will be able to teach others also" (2 Tim. 2:2)... Suppose someone has confidence in us. Then, under the acid test, we withdraw, give up, become lax or weakened, and fall back on human reasoning instead of wholesome faith. He will find that confidence to be "a broken tooth." Its nerve is exposed, and it stands for a distressing hindrance to feeding on the truth of God. He will find it "a foot out of joint" too — a painful inability to walk with God. Let us be most careful. If we are going to have confidence in any man, we must be sure he is a faithful man, one who stays steadfast in the path of obedience to the Word of God.
Read one way, the verse tells you whom to avoid. Read the other way, it asks what people find when they lean on you.
It is good to dwell on the joy and the blessing, for these are great — "A faithful man will abound with blessings" (Prov. 28:20) — but warnings are needed too: "Let anyone who thinks that he stands take heed lest he fall"; "Confidence in an unfaithful man in time of trouble is like a broken tooth, and a foot out of joint."... The man who carries the Master's message and yet contradicts it by his life is a false witness.
The habit is old. Moses would not face Egypt alone, and the help he leaned on was his brother Aaron.
Moses hesitated to go into Egypt when God told him to. But the moment he heard that Aaron would go with him, he was ready. And yet this very man caused Moses the deepest sorrow he ever tasted. This was the man who made the golden calf! How full of warning all this is! What a sad mistake it is to lean on human strength! And yet how ready we all are to do it in one way or another! We lean on our fellow-mortal instead of leaning on the living God, and in the end we find we have been trusting a broken reed.
The same writer sees God's own hand in it when a human support gives way.
How ready we are on every occasion to look to our fellow-men for sympathy, help and counsel instead of looking directly and only to God!... Our God, in real faithfulness to us, will make our fellow-man fail us, so that we may learn the folly of leaning on human strength.
Paul lived the worst case of this proverb, and it still did not leave him without support.
We learn that no one stood by the Apostle in his defence before the emperor. Indeed, all deserted him. But in grace he asked that it might not be held against them. If others fail, we must seek grace to go on in faithfulness to the Lord. Like Paul, we can count on the unfailing support of the Lord in every circumstance in which we are found for Him.
- Timing. A broken tooth and a slipping foot fail you the moment you put weight on them. Trouble, not calm, exposes misplaced trust.
- Cost. Misplaced trust hinders feeding on the truth of God and makes walking with Him painful.
- Test. Trouble tests everyone. Choose whom you trust with care: a person who keeps obeying the Word of God, not just a likeable one.
- Mirror. The proverb also asks what others find when they lean on you. A man who carries the message and contradicts it by his life is a false witness.
- Refuge. In faithfulness God makes people fail us, so that we stop leaning on human strength. All deserted Paul at his trial, yet the Lord's support never failed.
[As] he that taketh off a garment in cold weather, [and as] vinegar upon nitre, so is he that singeth songs to a sad heart.
Proverbs takes its pictures from daily life. Here a coat pulled off in the cold and vinegar poured on soda show what a cheerful song does to a breaking heart.
Older translations call it "nitre." The ESV calls it "soda." A Bible dictionary explains what it was, and why the mixture fits the verse:
This is the natron we know today, not what we now call nitre, which is saltpetre. Pour vinegar on natron, or alkali, and it fizzes and evaporates. Singing cheerful songs to a heavy heart is just as unsuitable. It is a mineral alkali, and mixed with oil it makes soap.
Critics once used this verse as evidence that Solomon knew no chemistry, since saltpetre does not fizz when acid is poured on it. One writer traces the mistake to the translators rather than to the text:
Boastful modern philosophy has often laughed at Solomon's ignorance of chemistry when he spoke of the action of vinegar upon nitre in Proverbs 25. For nitre does not effervesce when acid is poured on it. But the fault does not lie with the origin but in the medium of transmission. The respected Westminster theologians, although great linguists, knew nothing of chemistry and were misled by the form of words. The Hebrew word used by Solomon was nether, corresponding to nitron in the Greek, which really describes sodium carbonate (our familiar "washing soda"), the source of all effervescence on a modern commercial scale.
Both images work the same way. They do not just fail to help. They make things worse.
Then, again, what is it to remove a wrap in cold weather? Does it not make the chill worse? So vinegar acts on nitre, not to soothe but to irritate. Both are like the one who "sings songs to a heavy heart." Prayer suits the afflicted, and so does sympathy; but songs are for the merry, not the sad. Mirth and its outflow must jar, as being wholly out of place.
The proverb also exposes a habit: meeting deep trouble with forced cheerfulness. The fizz looks like life, but leaves nothing behind:
Sadly, one mark of the last days is a shallow, frivolous spirit. It tries to brush aside genuine soul-searching with pretended happiness or excitement. Singing songs to a heavy heart will not meet the need of that heart. It might rather expose him to the cold winds of unbelief, like the taking away of a garment. Suppose he comes to think that Christianity is only a sentimental, emotional appeal to the physical senses. Then he will conclude that it holds no answer to the real need of his soul. He is left exposed in the cold… Vinegar on soda would effervesce, giving an appearance of activity, but empty as foam.
Job's three friends came to help him, and they meant well. One writer explains why they failed:
Human efforts to comfort, on their own, apart from God and the truth, fall short, because they are more or less ignorant. And the bitterer the trial, the more obvious that failure becomes. Job's history shows this. His three friends were clearly sincere in their care for the sufferer. They were eager to serve him in the hour of his sorrow. But the cause of Job's affliction completely baffled them… They might have helped in an ordinary case. But here was an outstandingly righteous man, stripped of every earthly possession in a way no one had ever seen, and they had nothing to say.
The same warning applies when someone needs practical help and gets only kind words:
So our visiting should be practical. Suppose we call on a widow and her children who are well off. A few well-chosen words spoken in true sympathy might bring real comfort. But suppose we visit a poor widow and destitute children: a few pious words with no material help might only harden a widow in her grief.
The verse condemns a mismatch, not music. Commentators differ on how far to press it. One was asked about singing at funerals:
A person may be so bowed down with sorrow that they cannot sing at all. But you could not make such a person the rule for everyone else, or stop others singing out of sympathy with him. We believe nothing can be more magnificent, more morally grand, than a hymn of praise, a song of triumph, sung in the very dust of death. To hear a gathering of believers singing at the grave of a brother or sister is a real triumph over the enemy. But if anyone is so crushed by the sorrow that they cannot sing, we are sure the loving, tender heart of Jesus feels that sorrow and puts their tears into His bottle. The One who wept and groaned at the grave of Lazarus would not rebuke the tears and groans of a crushed and desolate heart.
- Read — vinegar on soda fizzes, and a coat pulled off in the cold chills. Wrong help is not neutral; it makes things worse.
- Withhold — forced cheerfulness that brushes aside real soul-searching leaves the sufferer more exposed, not less.
- Warm — prayer and sympathy suit the afflicted; songs suit the merry. Match what you bring to the state you find.
- Ground — comfort tried apart from God and the truth fails, however sincere. Job's friends prove it.
- Sing — praise at a grave can still be a triumph. But no one forces it on a crushed heart, and the Lord who wept at Lazarus's grave does not rebuke tears.
If thine enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat; and if he be thirsty, give him water to drink
Proverbs 25 collects short sayings for daily life, but this one asks what no law demands: feed your enemy when he is hungry. Paul quotes it again in Romans 12, and its reason — coals of fire on his head — has drawn close attention ever since.
Nature, and even law, treats hostility as it deserves. This saying breaks the pattern, and one writer points to a time when Israel obeyed it on a national scale.
This first saying must have startled an ordinary Israelite. It rises above nature and law, which deal with evil feelings and evil ways as they deserve. Here it is "the kindness of God," and His call to act on a goodness seen in Him, which can only flow from Him. We see it done literally, and on a large scale, when God's power drew a Syrian army, sent to arrest Elisha, blinded into the capital city of Israel. The king asked the prophet, Shall I strike them? Shall I strike them? But God's spokesman said, No; "set bread and water before them, that they may eat and drink and go to their master." No wonder the Syrian raiders came into the land of Israel no more... It was God in Christ, it is God in the Christian.
The proverb does not stop at holding a man's hand back from revenge. It puts bread and water in that hand.
Instead of taking revenge himself, he bends before the storm and looks to God. He seeks to do real good to his enemy in his need and distress... He not only holds back from vengeance, he shows love. He returns good for evil, kindness for injury, blessing for cursing. The words feed him and give him drink stand for every duty of kindness.
The next verse gives the reason: coals of fire on his head. Writers take the picture from metalworking, where fire softens hard metal.
To heap coals of fire on an enemy's head is to care for him, feed him well, and treat him kindly. This is the most effective way to subdue him, to melt him down. Who ever conquered an enemy's heart by revenge? How many have been conquered by love? ... "Surround the stubborn metal below and above. Do not only put it over the fire; heap coals of fire on top of it. Few hearts are so hard as not to melt under the energy of patient, self-denying, burning love."
Commentators differ on the result. Others read the fire as a test with two possible outcomes:
Heaping coals of fire on an enemy's head by kindness becomes a test to him, as fire tests metal. The kindness shown him will either bring him to sorrow for his wrong and to friendship, or harden him even more.
Paul does not quote the whole proverb. One writer notes what he leaves out.
Verse 20 in Romans 12 quotes Proverbs 25, but leaves out the words, "the Lord shall reward you." This is interesting. It shows one of the early hints of grace scattered here and there in the Old Testament... We are to leave an enemy in the Lord's hands. Our own hearts, instead of calling down judgment, are to go out in tender compassion towards him... We show him every kindness we can. In this we represent the heart of God towards us when we were still enemies. So, with God's blessing, we will make him feel the effect of coals of fire on his head. The coals still mean judgment — but self-judgment produced in his heart, not judgment poured on him.
The command is not a theory. Christ Himself fed a hungry crowd, knowing what many of them were.
Did the Lord Jesus Himself not do this very thing when He multiplied the loaves and fishes? He provided for all the tired and hungry crowd, many of whom proved to be His enemies, and He knew it... whether in material things or spiritual, we who have the bread that men need should always be ready to give it freely.
So the excuse that it cannot be done falls away:
Do not hold the common thought that all these commands cannot be kept — that they are only an ideal, something to admire but never actually practise. This is unbelief.
- Startling. The saying rises above nature and law, which repay evil as it deserves. It calls for the kindness of God, which can only come from Him.
- Active. The believer does more than refuse revenge. Bread and water stand for every kindness he can put in his enemy's hand.
- Melting. Coals of fire picture kindness heaped on hard metal. It may melt an enemy; writers say it may also test him and harden him further.
- Grace. Paul drops "the Lord shall reward you" when he quotes it. The enemy stays in God's hands, and compassion stays in ours — the very way God met us when we were enemies.
- Possible. Christ fed hungry enemies with His own hands. Calling the command impossible is unbelief, and Proverbs still promises the Lord's reward.
for thou shalt heap coals of fire upon his head, and Jehovah shall reward thee.
This verse gives the reason for the strange command just before it: feed your hungry enemy, and give your thirsty enemy a drink. So are the coals a hidden curse on that enemy, or a mercy aimed at his heart?
Commentators take the image from metalwork. Kindness is the fire that softens what force can never bend.
To heap coals of fire on an enemy's head is to care for him, feast him, and treat him kindly, as the most effective means of subduing him, of melting him down. Who ever conquered an enemy's heart by revenge? How many have been conquered by love? What was it that dissolved the hardness of our unyielding hearts? A Saviour's love. "Try it," says Charles Bridges. "Surround the stubborn metal below and above. Do not only put it over the fire; heap coals of fire on it. Few hearts are so hard as not to melt under the energy of patient, self-denying, burning love."
But the outcome is not guaranteed. Fire tests metal as well as melting it:
Heaping coals of fire on an enemy's head by kindness (Prov. 25:21-22; Rom. 12:20) becomes a test to him, as fire tests metal. The kindness shown him will either bring about contrition and friendship, or harden him yet more.
This rule does not belong to the world of deserved returns. It comes from God's own character, and a prophet once acted it out on a national scale.
This saying would normally have startled an Israelite. It rises above nature and above law, which deals with evil feelings and evil ways as they deserve. Here it is "the kindness of God," and His call to act on a goodness which is seen in Him and can only flow from Him. We see it acted out in real life, and on a large scale. God's power drew a Syrian army, sent to arrest the prophet Elisha, blindfolded into the capital city of Israel. The king asked the prophet, Shall I strike them? Shall I strike them? But God's spokesman said, No: "set bread and water before them, that they may eat and drink and go to their master." No wonder that the raiding bands of Syria came no more into the land of Israel… It was God in Christ, it is God in the Christian.
Elsewhere in Scripture, burning coals fall on enemies as judgment. When Paul takes up this proverb, he leaves out the closing clause about reward:
Note first that Romans 12:20 quotes Proverbs 25, but leaves out the words, "the Lord shall reward you." That is interesting. It shows one of the early hints of grace scattered here and there in the Old Testament. When the Psalmist cries, "Let burning coals fall upon them," the context makes clear that he wants judgment on his enemies… But under the reign of grace all is changed… We show him every possible kindness. In this we represent the heart of God towards us when we were still enemies (see Romans 5:8). And so, with the blessing of God, we make him feel the effect of coals of fire on his head. The coals keep the meaning of judgment — but self-judgment produced in his heart, not judgment falling on his head.
A believer can afford to feed an enemy because judgment belongs to the Lord, and its hour has not yet come.
The Lord does not take that place now. He is saving sinners, and displaying full grace in other ways… Suppose someone sets himself against a believer with evil intent. It would be foreign to Christianity, and against all that Christianity breathes, for that believer to wish him dead or hurt. Christianity shows that the victory grace gives us is to show love and kindness to one's enemy. It may be heaping coals of fire on his head; but such is the Lord's way — overcoming evil with good.
The promise at the end of the verse does not depend on the enemy's response.
Such treatment should burn into the conscience of an enemy, like coals of fire on his head, whether he is converted by it or not. But the Lord will reward that reality of faith.
And the standard is not an admirable ideal hung out of reach:
We close our reflections by begging all our readers not to hold the common thought that these precepts cannot be practised. They are not mere ideals, to be admired but never carried out. This is unbelief… Let us rather use the words of the apostle: "I can do all things through him who strengthens me."
- Fire melts. The coals are kindness, not cruelty. They are the heat that softens hard metal, as a Saviour's love once softened us.
- Fire tests. The same warmth either brings the enemy to contrition and friendship, or hardens him further. The result is not in your hands.
- Fire is God's. Vengeance belongs to the Lord, and He is not judging now. So the believer's only weapon is good done to the one who wronged him.
- Fire startles. Bread and water for a captured army ended Syria's raids. What shocked Israel is now the Christian's plain rule.
- Fire rewards. Whether the enemy is won or not, the Lord rewards the faith that fed him. And this rule is for doing, not for admiring.
The north wind bringeth forth rain, and the angry countenance a backbiting tongue.
This proverb puts the weather beside the human face: wind and rain on one side, a hard look and a whispering tongue on the other. The question is which half causes which: does the angry look silence the gossip, or does it cause the gossip in the first place?
Translators have read the Hebrew in opposite directions. The ESV makes the gossip the cause: a backbiting tongue brings the angry looks. One commentator prefers the reverse, where the look comes first and the whispering follows:
Verse 23 has drawn very different senses out of translators, as we can see in the text and the margin of the Authorized Version. Even here the opposite sense in the last clause seems better — that as the north wind brings forth rain, so an angry face provokes a secret or backbiting tongue. If this is right, it is a call to gentleness even in the look, and a warning about what follows when we fail in that respect.
Read that way, the hard face is the cause. Kelly also pairs backbiting with a second word: secret. This talk happens out of the hearing of the person it is about.
Another reading runs the other way, and it turns on local weather:
While the west wind in Palestine brings rain from the sea, the cold clear north wind will drive it back. Rain is needed at times, and it pictures the ministry of the Word of God by the Spirit. But on the other hand, one may use his gift of speech in a very wrong way, as we have also seen. This becomes like a pelting, vicious cloudburst... we must not listen to a backbiter. He is worthy only of the cold anger of the north wind. If we treat him in this decided way, it may stun him, but it will drive away his evil speaking. The first sign of discord and disunity is in our words.
Gossip is no small social fault. One writer names its source, and sets it beside a sin that looks like its opposite:
The backbiter does the work of Satan. The Lord hates the slandering tongue as He hates the flattering tongue. The believer can show an angry face without sinning, and so cut short the harmful work of the backbiter (Ephesians 4:26).
So the cold look needs testing. The same face can spring from two very different roots:
There is such a thing as being rightly angry. But such anger is indignation against evil, not against the evil-doer. Behind such anger there is grief because of the evil. So we read that the Lord looked on the wicked leaders of the synagogue with anger, grieved at the hardness of their hearts (Mark 3:5). The anger of the flesh always has self in view. It is not grief because of evil, but resentment against someone who has caused offence.
The talker is not the only one at fault. One writer shows that the sin covers two acts, not one:
The command against a false report has a wider meaning. It includes receiving a false report as well as raising one. Many who would never raise one fall into the trap of receiving it. A person hears a report, it seems true, and he passes it on. If anyone had taken the trouble to check it, he might have found it false. Christians above all should be careful here. They should refuse every report that damages another, unless solid evidence backs it up. The responsibility therefore rests on the hearer as well as on the repeater of reports. If we remembered this, we would stop many a slander at the start, uncover many a tale-bearer, and avoid many a break in fellowship.
One writer tells of a friend who hung a reminder where he would see it at every meal:
...he had a text made to hang opposite his place at the dinner table. It read: "The brother for whom Christ died." (See 1 Corinthians 8:11). Suppose we remembered these few words, and kept in mind how Christ loves him. How slow we would then be to listen to evil reports about a brother, or to think them over, or to repeat them. Another Scripture we might remember is Proverbs 25:23... That, I have no doubt, is the Lord's way to treat most of the evil reports about the saints of God.
- Wind. The picture comes from real weather — the west wind carries rain in, the cold north wind drives it back. Speech behaves the same way: it can water, or it can pelt.
- Ways to read it. Translators differ on the direction. A cold face may stop the gossip, a hard face may provoke it, or the gossip may be what puts the anger on the face. Each reading ties the face to the tongue.
- Source. If you use the cold look, test where it comes from. Anger against the evil is one thing; resentment with self in view is another.
- Ear. The gossip needs a listener. Refuse to receive the report, and the slander stops before it spreads.
- Remedy. Keep in mind who you are talking about — the one Christ died for and still loves. That thought does more than a frown.
It is better to dwell in a corner of the housetop, than with a contentious woman, and a house in common.
This proverb appears twice in the book, and both times it prefers a cramped roof corner to a house full of quarrelling. Behind the humour lies a hard question: when peace and comfort cannot both be had, which one should you give up?
The proverb pictures a man retreating to the roof. One writer reads the escape as relief from noise:
The next verse expresses how miserable it is to share a house with a quarrelsome woman. That misery made a corner of the housetop a welcome escape from all that noise.
On the earlier version of the same proverb, the same writer adds that the corner gives more than quiet:
A quarrelsome woman is bound to be a trial to every member of the household, but most of all to her husband. The house may be roomy, but only clashes follow her. If visitors call, that only adds to his pain. There is no better place for him than a corner on the housetop. There he can find quiet, and, for his devotion to God, access to the Most High.
The contrast is not between a hut and a mansion. It is between a private corner and a space open to everyone. The ancient Greek translation of the Old Testament used a word meaning "common" here:
The word koinos is also used in the Greek Old Testament for "common," but more in the sense of fellowship. It is also used to mean a "wide or open" house, as if accessible to all, Proverbs 21:9; Proverbs 25:24.
So the shared house is not small. It is open to all — and the roof corner is the one place the man has to himself.
One writer traces the line from careless speech to a ruined home:
This may appear startling just in this place, but it fits the subject of the chapter completely. Backbiting, if it is not judged, may become a habit. It is a genuine long-term disease that leaves the guilty person unmanageable and quarrelsome. How much better to live in quiet in a small, despised place than in large and impressive circumstances with such a woman.
The same writer says the whole chapter is about "principles that make for unity, harmony, peace" — and everything that works against them must be dealt with severely (Leslie M. Grant).
The same writer takes the picture further. He reads the crowded house as an image of the professing church today:
It is as though a beautiful mansion, once prepared for one family only, has fallen into disrepair and ruin. It has become a lodging house not only for the family but for strangers as well. A contentious woman takes up a large amount of space in it. She may want everyone eating at the same table, agreeing to disagree, putting on a show of unity while only discord and loud words are heard.
On that reading the roof corner is not isolation. It is a deliberate move toward what is clean, and it is not made alone:
But every professing Christian is in this "great house," and cannot leave it. What then is a concerned child of God to do? He is to purge himself from fellowship with this mixture. It is better to have a clean place "in the corner of the housetop." That means not living with the ungodly, but staying in quiet separation from them, while still making full room for fellowship "with those who call on the Lord from a pure heart."
One writer points out that Solomon knew this trouble first-hand — and had the money to dodge it:
It may be that Solomon learned the truth of this proverb by experience, for he had too many wives — but we do not read of him living in the corner of a housetop! Of course, he was wealthy enough to give his wives their own houses, so that he might see them only when he pleased.
- Small. The corner on the roof is the least desirable spot in the house — and the proverb calls it the better one.
- Shared. The other choice is a wide, open house available to all. The man gives up room and keeps quiet and access to God.
- Sour. Backbiting left unjudged hardens into a habit. It makes a person quarrelsome, and it drives quiet out of the big house.
- Separate. Every professing Christian is inside the great house. The roof corner means purging yourself from the mixture, while still making full room for those who call on the Lord from a pure heart.
- Sober. Solomon was rich enough to dodge the lesson he wrote. Most readers cannot, and must choose peace over room.
[As] cold waters to a thirsty soul, so is good news from a far country.
Solomon sets two things side by side: cold water for a thirsty person, and news that has travelled a long way. Commentators ask why distance makes the news sweeter, which country is far away, and who a person must be before cold water tastes of anything at all.
The proverb stands next to others in the chapter about strife at home. Word from far off arrives where no one expected it, and that is what gives it its taste.
On the other hand, good news from a far country is no less refreshing than cold waters to a thirsty soul. One looks for pleasant sounds at home, instead of noisy strife or murmurs. But if one receives good news from a far land, it is all the sweeter.
Writers who apply the verse to the gospel first ask how heaven came to be distant at all. It was not distant at the beginning.
In the parable of the Pounds in Luke 19 the Lord likens heaven to "a far country." Why is this? In the opening chapters of Genesis heaven seems very near, and God a neighbour close at hand. We read there of a garden planted by the Creator, full of everything that was pleasant to see and good for food. There the Lord God used to come and talk with the first man and his wife. But all this was quickly changed. There came the day when Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the Lord God among the trees of the garden. Sin was the cause of this. Later God said to Israel, "your iniquities have made a separation between you and your God" (Isa. 59:2). Once sin entered, God's pleasure in man ceased, and from that moment heaven has seemed "a far country."
Nothing in human thinking would predict a favourable message from that direction. Left to himself, man reads God as an enemy, so the arrival of anything good is a shock.
Who would have expected it? What child of Adam would ever have dreamed of hearing anything from God that could be called good news? Not Adam himself, with his sin staring him in the face, and a guilty conscience forcing its deadly sting into the centre of his trembling soul, and the sound of his Maker's footsteps in his ear as He walked in the garden in the cool of the day; not one of that rebel sinner's race, whose guilty life calls loudly for the judgment of the righteous Ruler of the universe... for the wisdom, the grace and the resources of God are past finding out.
Men killed the One who came down from that far country. What heaven sent back after that murder is the news itself.
In Acts 1 we see Him going up again to where He was before. He carried the wounds which men had inflicted on His sacred Person right up to the throne of God — sight of all sights for the angelic host! What response did God give to this? For ten days there was a lull. Then heaven opened once more, and the Holy Spirit came forth. What for? To destroy the guilty sons of men? No, but to preach the gospel... Before He went on high, the Saviour said that repentance and forgiveness of sins were to be preached in His name to all nations, beginning from Jerusalem (Luke 24:47). So His very murderers were to have the first chance of blessing. Surely the message of forgiveness of sins for everybody is "good news from a far country." We deserved wrath, and look, we are offered pardon and peace!
The proverb does not say cold water refreshes everyone. It says it refreshes the thirsty. That one limit explains why people respond so differently.
Why are men not keen for such blessings? Our text tells us. They are not "thirsty." Cold waters are only welcome to thirsty souls. Thirsty ones are most tenderly invited. Revelation 22:17 says, "let the one who is thirsty come." In John 7:37 we hear the Saviour's call, "If anyone thirsts, let him come to me and drink." But men are not thirsty. They have no sense of need, and so they are not interested. Yet when "good news" of another kind comes along men are interested enough. Suppose someone in our town inherited a fortune... how keen he would be. Down would go his tools for ever, and he would set off to take possession of his own.
If the news travels, someone carries it. That person answers to the sender, not to the hearers.
He is an ambassador of peace from God to the world. He must know God's conditions and terms of peace if he is to present them to men, and explain them according to the mind of his Sovereign Lord. He is a bringer of good news to men from the Lord in heaven... And if he is "a faithful ambassador he is health" (Prov. 13:17). He is himself a witness to the delivering, healing power of the message he carries... his Master, his Master's message, and his Master's interests absorb him.
Commentators differ on whether the best news from the far country is forgiveness now or the Lord's return still ahead. One writer reads the verse forward, to news that keeps a believer going when everything close at hand has failed.
The sad state of ruin and shame in the church has called us to a path of real separation, with trial and reproach, and no hope of recovering the true witness of the church. How much more precious, then, becomes the "good news from a far country." If everything on earth has failed, how much more does the soul thirst for heaven! Is this verse not a very clear reference to the coming of the Lord Jesus?
- Distance — sin, not distance, made heaven a far country; at the start God came and talked with man in the garden.
- Content — after men murdered the Saviour, heaven sent back an offer of pardon — to His murderers first.
- Thirst — cold water only tastes good to the thirsty, which is why the same message that stirs one person leaves another cold.
- Carrier — the news travels through an ambassador who answers to the Sender, not to his hearers, and whose own health shows the message works.
- Ahead — the far country still has news to send: writers point this verse on to the coming of the Lord Jesus.
A troubled fountain, and a defiled well, is a righteous [man] that giveth way before the wicked.
This verse compares a righteous man who gives way to evil with a spring someone has fouled. Two questions follow: what does giving way look like, and why does the harm show up in the water?
The word for "spring" means a permanent source. Scripture uses the same word for the fountain of life and the fountain of living waters.
maqor means "source, perpetual spring." It is translated "spring" in Proverbs 25:26... It is also used for the "fountain of life," applied to the LORD for Israel (Psalm 36:9); the "fountain of tears" (Jeremiah 9:1); and the "fountain of living waters" (Jeremiah 2:13; Revelation 21:6).
The proverb stings because of what people expected. They came for clean water and found it spoiled.
But there is a report, or a fact, that is bound to give pain and to make people stumble: a righteous man totters before the wicked. From him you hoped for a spring rising up, and maybe a clear river flowing out. How sad to find only a muddied spring and a polluted well!
Proverbs elsewhere calls the righteous man's mouth a fountain of life. God means his words to bless others.
Here it is the mouth of a righteous man, and it is called a fountain of life. This is God's mind about such a person in this desert world... So he becomes an active source of blessing to others... By grace the righteous man's mouth is a fountain of life. He is a witness of God in Christ, and because he believes, he speaks.
The water was never his to keep. God put it there to flow out to others, and it can be blocked.
When a believer receives the gospel, he finds "in him a spring of water welling up to eternal life" (John 4:14). That water must then flow out in blessing to others — the ministry of the Spirit of God. Will we let this spring get clogged or polluted by unfaithfulness to our blessed Master?
One writer sees the proverb acted out when Jacob met his brother Esau.
Jacob's shameful bowing down before Esau, cringing before him like a servant, misrepresented the God he served (Genesis 33:3). God had already said, "the older shall serve the younger." But a bad conscience produced this weakness. Faith would have given him a calm dignity, so that he could stand face to face with his brother and bear a true witness for God. The spring did not bring out what it should have... To bow to the spiritual authority of an unbeliever will stop the lips from ministering the pure water of the Word of God... Showing courteous respect to others is good, but giving way to evil is bad.
The same writer turns it on the church, where deference to men who do not know God quietly silences ministry: "To bow to the spiritual authority of an unbeliever will effectively stop the lips from ministering the pure water of the Word of God."
One writer applies the proverb to Christians in Corinth who took each other to court before unbelieving judges. Their quarrel preached a sermon the world could read.
They should have remembered that the spirit gains nothing from the flesh. The world never helps God's people except at the price of their dishonour. And a righteous man who gives way before the wicked is like a muddied spring or a polluted fountain... It was also a wrong done to the world itself. What power is there in a testimony that contradicts itself, preaching the cross and yet fighting in the flesh?
- Spring — the word means a permanent source, the same word used for the fountain of living waters. A righteous life should be safe to drink from.
- Supply — what flows out is not his own. It is the spring of water welling up to eternal life, the Spirit's ministry through him to others.
- Silt — giving way to the wicked clogs and corrupts the spring, so nothing worth drinking comes out.
- Stoop — Jacob cringed before his brother Esau. A bad conscience produced weakness where faith would have stood and borne witness.
- Spectators — the world loses too. A testimony that preaches the cross while fighting in the flesh contradicts itself and loses its power.
It is not good to eat much honey; and to search into weighty matters is [itself] a weight.
This proverb sets a warning about food beside a warning about ambition. Two questions follow. What does honey stand for in Scripture? And what does eating too much have to do with chasing your own reputation?
One commentator reads the second line as a warning against straining after things too heavy for us. He rests this on a double meaning in the Hebrew:
To eat too freely of what is sweet to the taste is not good. We may have proved that to our cost, through lack of subjection to the Word. But there is the opposite danger: an excessive search after weighty things. Such a search becomes a weight instead of a pleasure or a profit. The Hebrew word translated glory, as is well known, also means weight.
Commentators differ. Others keep the familiar reading, where the second line exposes a man hunting his own honour. Either way, the shape is the same. Something good, pushed past its measure, turns sour.
Honey is not an evil thing in Scripture. It marked the richness of the promised land. But it came with a limit, and with one place it could never go:
Honey was so plentiful in Palestine that people often called the country a land "flowing with milk and honey" (Exodus 3:8, 17). It is a symbol of what is sweet in nature, to be taken with discretion, in case it causes vomiting (Proverbs 25:16, 27). God strictly forbade adding honey to the offerings made to Him by fire (Leviticus 2:11). What belongs to nature, even if it is sweetness, can have no place in what is offered to God.
The same discretion shows in how Jesus spoke. One writer sets His words to His mother in John 2 beside His words from the cross in John 19:
The Lord's ways and words were always gracious. But in John 2:4 we read of Him saying to His mother, "Woman, what have I to do with you?" Such words may have been a normal way of speaking in that day. To our ears they sound harsh. I am sure that our Lord did not speak harshly to His mother. On the other hand, there was no trace of natural sweetness or flattery. There was no honey. But in John 19 the Lord is on the cross, and His mother and the disciple John are looking on. His words were, "Woman, behold your son," and to John, "Behold your mother."
Another writer takes the honey as a picture of one believer's ministry of the Word to another. Too much of it shows up as attachment to a favourite speaker:
We have seen that honey is a picture, not of the Word of God itself, but of the ministry of the Word of God by His saints. This must have a limit, though it is good. If it leads us to prefer one person above another, this is only glorying in men… Often it is our own pride that puts a gifted man on a pedestal. If we then feed his pride as well, this is not true glory. May the Lord keep us from letting any gift of ministry become an occasion for boasting.
Jesus refused to seek His own glory. One writer draws out what that means for anyone who serves Him:
He had come to seek the glory of God instead of seeking His own by speaking as from Himself. Suppose it was unrighteous for Him to seek His own glory, even though all glory was His by right. How much more unrighteous is it for any of us who serve Him to seek our own glory, when by right we have no glory at all.
- Sweet. Honey pictures what is sweet in nature. It is good in its place, but God shut it out of every offering made to Him by fire.
- Measured. A little sweetness refreshes; too much makes you sick. The proverb sets a limit, not a ban.
- Weighty. The Hebrew word for glory also means weight. On one reading of the second line, a search pressed too far becomes a burden instead of a profit.
- Borrowed. In teaching, the honey is one believer's ministry of the Word. It is sweet, but limited. It never replaces the Word itself.
- Empty. Self-glory is the last excess. Jesus sought the glory of God, not His own, though all glory was His by right. Those who have no glory of their own gain nothing by chasing it.
He that hath no rule over his own spirit is [as] a city broken down, without walls.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
As snow in summer, and as rain in harvest, so honour beseemeth not a fool.
Proverbs 26 opens with a picture from the farmer's year: weather that comes at the wrong time, set beside honour given to a fool. Judge honour the way you judge weather — not by whether it is pleasant, but by whether it belongs where it falls.
The picture only works if you know the climate behind it. One writer fills in the timing:
Wheat harvest came at Pentecost, about the beginning of our June. Rain at that time was most unusual — extraordinary, really (Prov. 26:1).
Another writer presses the point further: for that land, such weather is not just rare but unthinkable.
As snow in summer and rain at harvest time are quite impossible in Palestine, so is honour for a fool.
Everything depends on the word "fool." It has nothing to do with a low IQ:
The basic character of a fool in the Bible's sense is that he leaves God out of his calculations. He is simply a rationalist. He says in his heart, "There is no God." He builds greater and greater barns to store his earthly goods, and forgets eternity (Psalm 14:1). A man like this receiving honours is grossly out of his place; for he is worthy only of dishonour and contempt. Only faith can maintain what is truly fitting to any position. Snow in summer and rain in harvest are both unfitting, and they get in the way of proper work, however right they may be at the right time. So honour is right for some men, but not for a fool. Folly is the exact opposite of faith. Pharaoh held the highest place of honour in Egypt, yet he openly defied God: "Who is the LORD?" "I do not know the LORD" (Ex. 5:2).
The Hebrew behind the English is not one word but three:
The Hebrew uses three different words for fool. The first is "avil," which means weakness. The second, "kesil," occurs nearly fifty times and means fat or dense. The third is "nabal." It comes from the verb to fade or to wither, and it means a vulgar, bad man who has given himself over to wickedness.
Honour still lands on fools. The royal preacher saw the reversal and called it an evil under the sun:
There is an evil that I have seen under the sun, says the royal preacher (Eccles. 10:6-7), as an error that proceeds from a ruler; folly is set in great dignities, but the rich sit in a low place. I have seen slaves upon horses, and princes walking as slaves upon the earth. But both sights are unseemly, as strange as snow in summer or rain in harvest.
The same writer shows what wisdom does under such a ruler:
The ruler's proud spirit naturally provokes people. But wisdom keeps what is fitting: the subject stays in his place, and if an answer is called for, he gives a soft one. Simply being in the right never puts a wrong right; the grace that gives up self and serves does. And what the great king saw is not an uncommon sight in any age. It is trying even to the wise and meek — the error comes from the ruler, who lifts up the unworthy and puts down the worthy. But wisdom can bow and wait without arguing, since arguing would not cure the evil but only add another.
Misplaced honour damages more than the man who receives it. It reflects on whoever gave it:
If God takes up people who have no claim and no fitness for the high place and relationship He gives them, is He indifferent about how they behave in it? Certainly not. Suppose a king handed out his honours freely to unworthy men. It would bring him, the source of honour, into contempt. The throne itself would lose its credit, and the nobility would become a laughing stock. We can be sure that God is not less careful than the king about the conduct of those He lifts up. Their lives and ways must match their relationship to God.
The word "fool" dominates the first half of Proverbs 26. The repetition is not mockery; it is training for the reader:
"The fool" fills a large place in the first part of this chapter, and it is not a place anyone would envy. He is there so that those who are not foolish may take warning, steer clear of thoughtlessness, and know how to act toward such a person.
- Season — Snow in summer and rain in harvest are not evil in themselves; they are right things at the wrong time. Honour works the same way.
- Sense — A fool is not the dim-witted man. He is the man who leaves God out of his calculations and says in his heart that there is no God.
- Sight — The royal preacher saw folly in high places and worthy men walking below. He called it an evil under the sun. It does happen.
- Silence — Wisdom bows and waits instead of arguing. Arguing only adds a second evil to the first.
- Self — Honour scattered on the unworthy shames the giver. So weigh whom you lift up, and live in a way that matches the place God has given you.
As the sparrow for flitting about, as the swallow for flying, so a curse undeserved shall not come.
Proverbs 26 opens with a run of sayings about the fool. This second line uses two birds in flight to make a point about angry words: a curse nobody has deserved never lands. So does hostile speech carry power in itself, or does it only work where there is a real cause?
The word "fool" runs all through this chapter. One writer sets the two opening verses side by side: an impossibility in nature, then a wish that fails to take effect.
Eleven times we meet the word fool in this chapter. The Hebrew uses three different words for it. One is "nabal," which comes from the verb to fade, or to wither. It means a vulgar, bad man who has given himself over to wickedness… As snow in summer and rain at harvest time are quite impossible in Palestine, so is honor for a fool. A fool may utter a curse, as they often do, and wish something evil, but being causeless, it will not be fulfilled.
The picture comes from the way these birds move.
Next, the picture comes from the restless movement of the sparrow, and from the flights of the swallow that look aimless. It shows how empty the folly is that indulges in an undeserved curse.
Even the Hebrew name of the second bird carries the idea of never staying put:
deror. This is interpreted 'roving about,' which agrees well with the habits of the swallow or swift. They come and go, and are not domesticated. Prov. 26:2. In Psalm 84:3 the same bird pictures the wanderer finding rest and protection in God's house.
The proverb is not only about the person cursed. It also describes the restless character of the one who curses. And it holds out the opposite picture to the believer.
A curse does not come without some cause. Moreover it is most characteristic of a fool to be a wanderer, and as restless as the swallow, always on the wing. The bird may have been made for this, but not so man, and he will reap the harmful effects. The believer, on the other hand, is like the sparrow that has found a house — no more wandering. He is like the swallow that has found a nest in the courts of God — no more restlessness (Psalm 84:3). So let the believer act in character, and not like the fool. He should not wander from God's place for him, or allow a restless, discontented spirit. These are real enemies of the truth, and will bring bad results.
The reverse case appears when Shimei hurled abuse at David as the king fled Jerusalem. Shimei meant it unfairly, yet David did not brush it aside.
All of David's integrity might rise up against such an accusation — and yet indeed he was a man of blood! Shimei did not know it, but God knew it. This wicked man was a divine instrument to remind David of his fault: "So let him curse, for Jehovah has said to him, Curse David!" (v. 10). David accepts the curse. His broken heart looks for no defence, no excuse, and no payment of any kind for his past righteousness. For him this is God's judgment and his only recourse is grace.
Balak hired Balaam to curse Israel, and the plan collapsed. One writer traces the reason back to God's care for His people.
The great principle of the Balaam story is that God was the unasked Guardian and Blesser of His people. First God forbade Israel to touch Moab. Next Balak says, "He whom you bless is blessed, and he whom you curse is cursed." Yet he was seeking to bring the curse on Israel when God had said, "Blessed is he who blesses you, and cursed is he who curses you." So he was just bringing it on himself.
One writer applies the same rule to the cross. If no curse can settle where there is no cause, then the curse Christ bore points to the sin He carried.
Without sin no curse could have existed; the curse causeless cannot come. But it clings, like its own shadow, to wrongdoing… God must punish sins in judgment and also cancel them by sacrifice, and He must set righteousness in their place, before the blessing can replace the curse. The cross accomplished both, when God "made Him to be sin for us who knew no sin."
- Cause first. A curse never lands where there is nothing to attach to; it flits past like a bird that will not settle.
- Flight of folly. The picture exposes the curser, not the cursed — restless, aimless words that mark a person as a fool.
- Shelter instead. The wandering swallow of this proverb finds a nest in God's house. Rest, not restlessness, marks the believer.
- Cause found. Shimei cursed David without knowing any real cause, yet David bowed, because God knew a fault Shimei did not.
- Cause borne. The curse could fall on Christ only because God laid our sin on Him. This verse's rule explains the cross.
A whip for the horse, a bridle for the ass, and a rod for the back of fools.
Three tools stand side by side in this verse: one for a horse, one for a donkey, and one for a man. The shock is that Scripture places a person beside two animals. The proverb raises two questions: who is this "fool," and why is a rod the only thing left for him?
The logic runs from the stable to the person. No one argues that a horse needs a whip. The proverb starts there, then turns to people — and only where nothing gentler can hold them.
Again, the horse and the donkey, which need the whip and the bridle, are taken to show that a rod is no less necessary to chastise fools if nothing less can restrain them.
This chapter returns to the word "fool" again and again. Three different Hebrew words stand behind it.
Eleven times we meet the word fool in this chapter. Three different words are used in the Hebrew for fool. The first is "avil," which means weakness. The second word, "kesil," occurs nearly fifty times and means fat or dense. The third is the Hebrew "nabal." It comes from the verb to fade or to wither. It means a vulgar, bad man who has given himself over to wickedness. Much of what this book says about the fool fits the natural man — his condition, his darkened mind, his sinfulness. … The fool needs correction, the stripes for his back.
Reasoning only works with someone willing to listen. Some people are not, and gentle words leave them exactly as they were.
The horse and the donkey are both unclean animals. Each pictures the unbeliever in a different way. The horse of Palestine is unwilling to work. The donkey is usually wild and refuses to be controlled. Soft, soothing measures are hopeless in such cases. About rebellious, empty talkers the apostle says they "must be silenced" (Titus 1:10-11). The rod of authority is the only language they understand. In certain cases Paul had to use this authority, however much it pained him. He handed Hymenaeus and Alexander over to Satan, so that they would learn not to blaspheme (1 Timothy 1:20).
If folly were only picked up from bad company, a change of surroundings would cure it. Proverbs puts it somewhere much harder to reach.
It is a sure and solemn thing that folly is no disaster from outside. It is bound in the heart. And it is there not only in the conflicts of busy life, but from our earliest days, since all of us have now departed from God by nature. "Folly is bound in the heart of a child"; no one is exempt, even from the most tender age. Even the greatest love or care does not restrain folly enough. There is the rod of correction to drive it far away, by the LORD's prescription and with His blessing. It is the folly of a father or mother to think their way is better than God's.
The rod does not always arrive as a literal beating. It can be shaped out of the very thing a person leans on instead of God.
God constantly makes the earthly object of trust become the rod for the back of fools.
The rod is not God's first choice. He has two ways of directing a person, and which one you get depends on your will.
The Lord guides us — or rather controls us — in another way. He uses the circumstances He arranges, so that we may not go wrong, even though we are people who have no understanding. And we ought to be thankful that He does so. But it is only as the horse or mule. If your will is subject to Mine, He says, "I will counsel you with my eye upon you." But if you are not subject, I must keep you in with "bit and bridle." That is plainly a very different thing.
Writers apply the verse in more than one direction. Grant reads it of the unbeliever who refuses all counsel. Kelly applies it inside the family, where a parent's love alone will not remove a child's folly.
- Root — Folly is not caught from outside. It is "bound in the heart" from earliest childhood, so no amount of love or care removes it by itself.
- Reach — Three Hebrew words stand behind "fool": weakness, dullness, and a man given over to wickedness. Each one fits the natural man's darkened mind.
- Remedy — When soft, soothing measures are hopeless, the rod of authority is the only language such a person understands. Paul used it with Hymenaeus and Alexander.
- Rod — God often shapes the rod out of what the fool trusted. The very thing he leaned on becomes the thing that strikes him.
- Release — The bridle is God's second choice. He counsels a willing heart with His eye. Only a will that resists Him needs bit and bridle.
Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.
Proverbs 26 gathers a string of sayings about the fool, and this one warns against meeting foolish talk on its own terms. The very next verse tells you to do the opposite — so which is it, and how do you know when?
Three Hebrew words lie behind the English word. One writer takes them in turn.
Eleven times we meet the word fool in this chapter. The Hebrew uses three different words for fool. The first is "avil," which means weakness. The second word, "kesil," occurs nearly fifty times and means fat or dense. The third is the Hebrew "nabal," which comes from the verb to fade or to wither; it means a vulgar, bad man who has given himself over to wickedness. The natural man — his condition, his darkened mind, his sinfulness — matches much of what this book says about the fool.
The reason the verse gives is about what such an argument does to you.
A fool will argue for the sake of ridicule, with no real reasonableness. It is a mistake, then, to lower oneself to the same unwholesome level of argument. Heated words are likely to betray a believer into using the same unsound argument and ridicule. So we make ourselves like the one we so resent! A fool's objections ought to make us most careful to weigh our answers well.
Verse 5 says the opposite of verse 4. One writer says the clash exists only for a reader who has shut out a divine Master.
To man's mind it is a contradiction. No wonder, for he shuns a divine Master — One who owns a man that may be called to act rightly, but who gives a standard like Himself, and who deals with the senseless in what looks like inconsistency. In one case He leaves folly unnoticed, as it deserves. In another He exposes it. So He may convince even a fool of his folly, or warn someone else who is too easily taken in — and that is common enough in this world.
There is still a way to reply that does not drag you down. The same writer points to how the Lord Jesus handled men with cunning questions.
We should avoid mere argument on the same level. Yet it may be very necessary to answer a fool in a way that shows his argument up as folly, without resorting to argument… The wisdom of the Lord Jesus in answering quarrelsome men shows this well. Rather than merely answering their cunning questions, He answered the men. Consider Luke 10:25-37 and Matthew 22:15-22. There could then be no argument: they were silenced.
The New Testament gives the same counsel to Christian workers. Paul told Timothy, "Have nothing to do with foolish, ignorant controversies; you know that they breed quarrels" (2 Timothy 2:23). One writer draws the practical line between an honest questioner and a hostile one.
Foolish questions are usually a sign of a heart unwilling to be subject to the Word of God. Such questions need no answer. Avoid them, or they will only lead to strife… If someone really wants to know the answer to a question, let us give him proper help. But if he asks with the clear intention of disputing against the truth, he deserves no answer.
The clearest case is David and Nabal, the man whose name is that third Hebrew word for a fool. Nabal treated David badly, and David set out to pay him back himself.
David was rashly taking himself out of the place of dependence — the only happy, the only holy place. Nor was it on behalf of the congregation of the Lord. No, it was to avenge himself on one who had treated him badly. Sad mistake! It was a happy thing for him that there was an Abigail in Nabal's house. God was about to use her to keep him from answering a fool according to his folly. This was just what the enemy desired.
There is also a matter of where you spend your strength. Rather than chasing every mocker into his own territory, another writer urges attention to what is yours to keep.
It may be well enough sometimes to answer a fool according to his folly. But it is usually best not to chase these dupes of Satan into the swamps of darkness and error, where their rebellion against the true light has led them. Our business is to keep the fortress of our own souls well guarded.
- The fool — the Hebrew words mean weakness, dullness, and a man given over to wickedness. This is the natural mind, not a slow one.
- The trap — arguing on his level turns you into him; heated words hand you his ridicule as your own weapon.
- The discernment — verses 4 and 5 call for guidance, not a fixed rule. Sometimes you leave folly unnoticed. Sometimes you expose it, to convince the fool or warn a bystander.
- The method — when you must speak, answer the man rather than his question, as the Lord did. Then there is nothing left to argue about.
- The safeguard — a heart set on revenge, like David's toward Nabal, is what the enemy wants. Guard your own soul instead of chasing scoffers into the dark.
Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own eyes.
Proverbs stacks two commands side by side that seem to cancel each other out: verse 4 forbids answering a fool, and verse 5 commands it. The difference is not a fixed rule. It depends on the man in front of you, and on what your silence or your answer will do.
Behind the one English word "fool" stand three different Hebrew words.
Eleven times we meet the word fool in this chapter. Three different words are used in the Hebrew for fool. The first is "avil" which signifies weakness. The second word "kesil" occurs nearly fifty times, means fat or dense. The third word is the Hebrew "nabal," which comes from the verb to fade, or to wither; it means a vulgar, bad man who has given himself over to wickedness. The natural man — his condition, his darkened mind, his sinfulness — matches much of what this book says about the fool.
The command not to answer is about the manner of your reply, not the fact of it. Meet ridicule with ridicule and the two of you become indistinguishable.
"Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest you be like him yourself." The connection here with the previous verse is obvious. A fool will argue for the sake of ridicule, with no real reasonableness. It is a mistake therefore to lower oneself to the same unwholesome level of argument. Heated words are likely to betray a believer into the use of the same unsound argument and ridicule. Thus we make ourselves like the one whom we so resent!
The second command is not permission to argue on the fool's terms.
There is a delicate balance to keep here. What follows looks on the surface like a contradiction, though of course it is nothing of the kind: "Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own eyes." We must avoid mere argument on the fool's own level. Yet it may be very necessary to answer a fool in a way that exposes his argument as folly, without arguing at all. Titus 1:9 implies this: sound teaching should both encourage and refute those who contradict.
The pair only looks self-defeating if you expect a fixed formula.
Verses 4 and 5 are full of instruction, except to those who do not know to look for a guidance above appearances — a guidance that goes by the realities seen by eyes that see where man cannot. To man's mind it is a contradiction. No wonder, for he refuses a divine Master, who accepts a man that may be called to act rightly but gives a standard like Himself, and who deals with the senseless in what looks like inconsistency. In one case he leaves folly without notice, as it deserves. In another he exposes it, hoping to convince even a fool of his folly, or to warn someone else who is too easily taken in — a thing not uncommon in this world.
Kelly gives a second reason: the answer may be for the bystander, not for the fool.
The Lord Jesus faced men who came to trap Him with questions.
The Spirit of wisdom and understanding marked every step, every word and every action of the Lord Jesus. But there were times when these features were obvious to all. The spies of the chief priests and scribes tried to trap Him with the question, "Is it lawful for us to give tribute to Caesar, or not?" (Luke 20:22)... The Spirit of understanding is seen in His discerning the thoughts and motives of His questioners, and the Spirit of wisdom in His replies that silenced them.
Grant notes that the Lord answered the men themselves, not just their questions.
The verse names the outcome it means to prevent: a man wise in his own eyes.
The wise are lowly and dependent on the only wise God. The foolish man is wise in his own eyes; he who only adds conceit to folly is the most hopeless of men.
Conceit shuts the door on the counsel that could correct him.
"Do you see a man who is wise in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him" (Prov. 26:12); of all fools the conceited fool is the worst. Pride makes a man incapable of receiving counsel.
- Read — The two verses are not rivals but one instruction. God judges by realities, not appearances. The same folly may call for silence one day and exposure the next.
- Refuse — Verse 4 bans the fool's method. Ridicule answered by ridicule leaves you looking just like the man you resent.
- Reply — Verse 5 calls for an answer that lets the folly show itself, not an argument fought on the fool's ground.
- Rescue — An answer may be owed to the onlooker as much as to the fool, guarding those who are easily taken in.
- Result — The aim is to keep a man from becoming wise in his own eyes. Pride makes him unable to receive counsel, and that is worse than plain folly.
He that sendeth a message by the hand of a fool cutteth off [his own] feet, [and] drinketh damage.
This proverb pictures an everyday decision: handing an errand to the wrong person. It then traces where the damage lands. The harm does not fall on the messenger. It falls on the man who chose him. So who does the Bible call "a fool," and why is using him like cutting off your own feet?
The word does not describe someone slow-witted. Writing on the opening lines of this chapter, one writer defines the fool by what he leaves out:
In the Bible's sense, the basic character of a fool is that he leaves God out of his plans. He is simply a rationalist. He says in his heart, "There is no God." He builds bigger and bigger barns to store his goods on earth, and forgets eternity. Folly is the precise opposite of faith.
The proverb does not say the message might go wrong. It treats the outcome as settled from the moment the choice is made:
To send a message through a foolish person makes error so certain that it is nothing short of cutting off your own feet — the feet that would have done better to take the trouble themselves. And you are fortunate if it does not also mean drinking damage. It risks harm as well as total failure.
The severed feet and the drink are not the messenger's punishment. They are the sender's. One writer applies the proverb to the appointing of preachers who have no faith of their own:
To employ a fool to convey a serious message would be itself folly even in the world's view. Should men then ordain an unbeliever to preach the message of God to a sinful world? Such men are not born again. They have no love for the Lord Jesus and no regard for the truth of the Word of God. You can only expect them to misrepresent the message they pretend to carry. In this way the senders of such a man cut off their own feet. They make themselves unfit to walk properly. Their link with the fool is the drinking of a deadly portion that damages their own testimony for God.
Later in the same chapter, Proverbs widens the picture. The man who hires a fool does not just injure himself:
So too, the man who hires the fool or the untried casual worker is like an archer who wounds everyone instead of hitting the target. He is a source of hurt and danger to all.
The chapter keeps returning to this pattern, and one commentator points out that the person being corrected is often not the fool at all: "it is not the fool who is here reproved: it is that one who gives honour to the fool; just as we have seen that one who sends a message by the hand of a fool damages himself."
Proverbs sets a bright contrast beside this one. The right messenger brings comfort back to the one who sent him:
Again, a faithful messenger in a world of unfaithfulness is a great comfort to those who send him. Here he is like the cold of snow at harvest time. He truly refreshes the soul of his masters.
The cure is not caution but careful choosing. One writer sets Paul's charge to Timothy against this proverb:
What a contrast this is to Paul's words to Timothy: "what you have heard from me in the presence of many witnesses entrust to faithful men, who will be able to teach others also." This is no human ordination. It is godly discernment of men's characters and earnest passing on of the precious truth of God. It connects the messenger directly with God as the Sender, rather than with men. Let us have no association with a fool who claims to be carrying a message from God.
- Fool — not the unintelligent man. He is the man who leaves God out of his plans. Folly is the exact opposite of faith.
- Send — choosing such a man to carry your message guarantees failure; it does not just risk it.
- Feet — you disable your own walk; your feet should have gone, and now they cannot.
- Drink — you swallow the harm yourself, a deadly portion that damages your own testimony.
- Faithful — the cure is discernment. Commit what matters to faithful men. Their service refreshes the one who sent them.
The legs of the lame hang loose; so is a proverb in the mouth of fools.
A fool can repeat a wise saying, but he cannot walk in it. Older translations read "the legs of the lame are not equal," so commentators use both pictures: a saying that dangles, and an argument that limps.
A proverb does not work by itself. Using it well takes wisdom, and that is what the fool lacks.
A parable is a wise saying, but it demands wisdom in its application. In the mouth of a fool, it is as incongruous as a cripple's legs which hang about or do not match.
Later in the same chapter the picture changes:
Again, a sharp, wise saying — a proverb in the mouth of a senseless man — is like a thorn that goes into a drunkard's hand. Instead of instructing others, it torments himself to no profit.
The word does not mean someone slow or uneducated. Scripture itself defines it.
We do well to understand who it is that God calls a fool. Psalm 14:1 tells us, "The fool says in his heart, 'There is no God.'" Scripture also calls a fool the man who questions the truth of resurrection (1 Cor. 15:35-36). More than this, God called the rich man a fool — the man who piled up so much wealth that he thought he could live in luxury for many years (Luke 12:16-21). In each case, the one who leaves God out of his life deserves that ugly title, "fool"! Such a man will always despise true wisdom, so it is hopeless to expect any proper response from him.
Read as "legs that are not equal," the verse warns about an argument built on a comparison that limps. One writer traces this in the story of the woman of Tekoa and King David.
A parable should re-present exactly what it is meant to teach. But clever twisting can use a parable to lead to a completely false conclusion. A fool will use comparisons that are not equal, not parallel at all. His whole argument is then lame, because it is not balanced. Joab hired the wise woman of Tekoa, and she used clever, worldly wisdom to put a case before David. Her case was in some measure like that of his son Absalom, but not parallel at all: in fact completely at odds on basic points. David allowed himself to be deceived by it. This was plain dishonesty, the kind of thing an unbeliever will fall back on to get his own way, the resource of one who in God's eyes is a fool. David ought to have seen easily that these legs were not equal (2 Sam. 14). No believer should be taken in by such things.
The same limp shows up in how people handle the Bible. One writer saw it in those who say eternal life lasts for ever, but deny that punishment does:
Truly the legs of the lame are not equal. What a pitiful sight — people receiving the word of God when it suits them, and refusing it when it does not suit them.
The same test applies to our own service. One writer measures King Hezekiah by it.
To resist evil and bring in good shows the possession of divine power; it is not one-sided. Where there is only conviction or persuasion, and not divine power, there will always be marked imperfection. "The legs of the lame are not equal." There may be a great effort to resist the enemy, but no matching effort to recover the truth. On the other hand, there may be an open desire to recover the truth alongside a tampering with what is hostile to it. There may be a cry to put down vice without any regard for the testimony of God. Or there may be a going along with what is really opposed to Christ while professing His name. Hezekiah is not of this order; he is not lame.
One writer applies the proverb to the way we talk about our own walk with God.
It is not that you have to go around announcing that you are heavenly. Those who do so usually illustrate the proverb, "The legs of the lame are not equal" (Prov. 26:7). The person who is enjoying what is heavenly always feels most deeply in his soul how little he shows this truth in his life. The nearer we are to the Lord, the less we are in our own eyes. But the further away from the Lord we are, the bigger we become in our own eyes.
- Saying. A proverb is a wise saying, but it takes wisdom to use one. The words alone carry no one.
- Speaker. A fool is not the slow man but the man who leaves God out. Truth in his mouth goes nowhere.
- Limp. His comparisons do not match, so his whole argument is lame. David himself was deceived that way by the woman of Tekoa.
- Test. Ask whether both legs match: do we take the parts of God's word that suit us and refuse the rest? Do we resist evil yet never recover the truth?
- Cure. Nearness to the Lord makes us small in our own eyes. Distance makes us large — and loud talk about a truth we do not live is the limp others see.
As a bag of gems in a stoneheap, so is he that giveth honour to a fool.
This proverb sets side by side two things that do not belong together: an act meant to display worth, and a person with no worth to display. Three questions follow. How should we translate the picture? Whom does Scripture call a fool? And who does the verse really correct?
The word is not an insult aimed at slow thinkers. One writer gathers the places where God Himself hands out the title.
It is good that we understand who it is whom God calls a fool. Psalm 14:1 tells us, "The fool says in his heart, 'There is no God.'" Scripture also calls a fool the man who questions the truth of resurrection (1 Corinthians 15:35-36). More than this, God called a fool the rich man who piled up so much wealth that he thought he could live in luxury for many years (Luke 12:16-21). In each case, the one who leaves God out of his life deserves that unpleasant title, "fool"! Such a man will always despise true wisdom, so that it is hopeless to expect any proper response from him.
Translations differ here. One writer gives both readings and draws the same conclusion from each.
One who has no sense is unfit for trust and incapable. So he is unworthy of honour too. He is as out of place as a bag of gems in a heap of stones. The Authorised Version reads instead: a stone bound up in a sling, a danger to those nearby.
A Bible dictionary names the Hebrew word here and prefers the second reading:
Proverbs 26:8 uses another word for sling, margemah. But a better translation may be "he who puts a precious stone in a heap of stones," as the margin shows.
Read quickly, the proverb looks like another swipe at the fool. Read carefully, it is not.
This reminds us of present-day corruptions of Christianity. But note this: the verse does not reprove the fool. It reproves the one who gives honour to the fool. So if we give honour, dignity, or any place of spiritual standing to someone who dishonours our Lord, we are in effect like precious jewels in a stone heap. It is a thoroughly unfitting match. Shall we set a common, ugly stone in a lovely setting, giving it a place among precious jewels?
Misplaced honour comes back on the one who gives it. One writer pictures a king handing out titles.
Suppose the King handed out his honours freely to unworthy men. That would bring him, as "the fountain of honour," into contempt. The throne itself would lose respect, and the nobility would become a laughing stock.
The danger also reaches the man receiving the praise. Undue honour has ruined useful workers.
It is a very serious thing to attach undue importance or give an undue place to men, however much the Lord may use them in His work. We have seen the work spoiled and workmen morally ruined by this very thing. It is a fatal mistake. This mistake takes men out of the place in which God has put them. People praise them, treat them as celebrities, and stare at them as something remarkable. They write and publish their lives before they die. This lifts them into a completely false position, like a person walking on stilts. Then some terrible fall comes, to bring them to their senses and call them back to their true place.
- Fool defined. The fool is not the unintelligent man. He is the man who leaves God out — who says in his heart there is no God, and who will always despise true wisdom.
- Honour misplaced. Honour fits him as little as a gem fits a heap of rubble. He is unfit for trust. On the other reading, he is as dangerous as a stone tied into a sling.
- The giver is the target. The proverb does not scold the fool. It scolds the person handing out the honour — above all when we give spiritual standing to someone who dishonours the Lord.
- The giver is cheapened. A king who hands out honours to unworthy men brings his own throne into contempt and makes his titles a joke.
- The honoured man is endangered. Praise a man beyond his place and you set him on stilts. The fall that follows puts him back where God had him.
[As] a thorn goeth up into the hand of a drunkard, so is a proverb in the mouth of fools.
This proverb puts a wise saying in the wrong hands. Picture a thorn in the hand of a man too dulled by drink to feel it or pull it out. That is what happens when a fool carries a proverb on his lips.
The saying itself is sharp and true. But in this mouth it teaches no one. It only wounds the man who says it.
Again, a pointedly wise saying, a proverb in the mouth of the senseless, is like a thorn going up into a drunkard's hand. Instead of instructing others, it torments himself to no profit.
Of all the appetites a man can give in to, this one brings the most shame. It also dulls him more than the rest.
Of all the lusts of the flesh, none from first to last exposes a person so much to shame and grief as intoxication. Others may be fatally ruinous to us or to our partners. But this one is more stupefying and more senseless. It leads to both folly and violence… Drinking without restraint always seeks more and stronger stimulants, until the thirst for them becomes overpowering.
The damage in this picture does not land on the listeners. It lands on the fool himself. That should change how we treat people who handle holy words badly.
A parable can be dangerous when used by a fool. We have already seen feet cut off and lame legs (verses 6, 7), and now the hand damaged. It is clearly the fool's own hand. He is a kind of drunkard, drunk with pride in the clever use of his tongue. The thorn badly damages his own hand, that is, his work. And "thorn" is the very word Scripture uses for sin. He is sinning against his own soul by such misuse of a parable. He is the same type of person as "those who oppose themselves," spoken of in 2 Timothy 2:25… We shall have a more balanced, godly attitude in meeting them if we remember they are harming themselves even more than others.
Grant quotes an older wording of 2 Timothy 2:25, "those who oppose themselves," where the ESV reads "correcting his opponents with gentleness." His point rests on the older phrase: such men work against themselves.
The fool is not inventing anything. He repeats a saying that is wise in itself. A man can carry such words around without understanding them, and that is where the danger starts.
This is a great evil, and the children of God should know about it. Take any saying of this kind. If it is not understood, it is not only worthless. It is deeply deceiving and dangerous. It is like a faulty bow, or a badly tempered sword, useless to the man who trusts it on the day of battle. They have a stale and worn-out set of phrases at their fingertips, but their minds are empty of ideas. We cannot do without words, but we want the things the words stand for. The danger is to those who will not take the trouble to search the Scriptures in the fear of God, so that their faith rests in His power and not in the wisdom of men.
The words being quoted are God's own, so a small twist is not a small matter.
How careful we should be about quotations from Scripture! And how little careful we often are. Scripture twisted even a little out of line puts the authority of God behind a lie. And our very faith in it may then betray us to the enemy.
So what do we do when someone twists Scripture at us? The Lord Himself shows the way.
If Satan quotes Scripture wickedly or falsely, the Lord does not leave Scripture for argument. He answers in a way that is completely and at once convincing — "It is written again."
- Thorn. The saying is sound; the hand is not. A wise word in a foolish mouth teaches no one. It only torments the man holding it, to no profit.
- Drunkard. The image is chosen with care. No appetite dulls a man more than drink. Here the man is drunk on pride in his own clever tongue.
- Hand. The hand is his own work, and the thorn is the word Scripture uses for sin. He is sinning against his own soul, harming himself even more than the people he aims at.
- Emptiness. Worn-out phrases at the fingertips, with an empty mind behind them, are worse than worthless. They deceive, like a faulty bow on the day of battle. The cure is to search the Scriptures, so that faith rests in God's power and not in the wisdom of men.
- Answer. A small twist puts God's authority behind a lie. So never drop Scripture for argument. Answer as the Lord did: "It is written again."
A master roughly worketh every one he both hireth the fool and hireth passers-by.
Translators differ sharply over this verse: one reading warns against hiring a fool, the other looks up to the great God who formed all things. Both readings sit in a chapter full of fools, and both ask who is in control when a fool is let loose on other people's lives.
First, who is the fool? One writer counts the word in this chapter and traces its roots.
Eleven times we meet the word fool in this chapter. The Hebrew uses three different words for fool. The first is "avil," which signifies weakness. The second word, "kesil," occurs nearly fifty times, and means fat or dense. The third word is "nabal," which comes from the verb to fade or to wither. It means a vulgar, bad man who has given himself over to wickedness. The natural man — his condition, his darkened mind, his sinfulness — matches much of what this book says about the fool.
Commentators openly admit the wording is uncertain. One notes that his own rendering is only one of several in circulation.
This verse is rendered by others, "A master roughly works everyone; he both hires the fool and hires passers-by." Nor are these the only varieties.
Another calls the tenth verse doubtful and offers this as a better rendering, with the sense that follows from it:
A master workman forms everything rightly himself. But he who hires a fool hires a transgressor. That is, a master does everything right; a fool spoils everything.
On the reading the ESV follows, the archer is the employer. The damage spreads out from the man who put the fool to work.
Whoever hires the fool, or the untried casual worker, is like an archer who wounds everyone instead of hitting the mark. He is a source of hurt and danger to all.
The same chapter shows the pattern running through it. Sending a message by a fool is like cutting off your own feet; the wise saying in his mouth is a thorn in a drunkard's hand. The harm always doubles back.
He is sinning against his own soul by such abuse of a parable… It is well to keep this in mind when considering such men, whose words no doubt seek to damage others. We shall have a more balanced, godly attitude in meeting them if we remember they are harming themselves even more than others.
Older translations read the verse as a statement about God. One writer builds the whole comfort of the chapter on that reading.
"The great God that formed all things both rewards (or hires) the fool, and rewards (or hires) transgressors." The name God does not appear in the Hebrew here, but it seems implied in the words "the great one who formed all." However great the damage caused by a fool may be, there is One infinitely greater than he. He has formed all things, and He still holds everything in the control of His own hand. He is a Master who hired even the fool, or the "passer-by," as another translation renders "transgressors." True, He will reward each one in perfect righteousness. But the true word here seems to be "hires," and it points to the sovereign power of God, who makes even the wrath of man praise Him and holds back the rest of that wrath. He has a wise reason for allowing the fool to work out his evil plans, and He uses every chance "passer-by" in a way that exactly matches His great wisdom. So the believer is to see God's hand in the most dreadful cases of trial, persecution and opposition — and in every small detail of his path, whether deeply distressing or only irritating. Does this not encourage calm confidence in the face of all hostility against the path of faith?
after_note: DELETE
So commentators differ. One reads the verse as a warning about who you employ. The other reads it as a window into who employs everyone.
If God hires even the fool and the transgressor, He still pays in perfect righteousness. One writer points to Jehu, a king of Israel, as an example.
God ordained him as His executioner. As someone has well said, "No one was ever better fitted for the work he was appointed to than Jehu." And he had his reward. It was for this world alone, and the fourth generation of his children saw its end.
- Fool — Three Hebrew words lie behind the term: weakness, dullness, and a man given over to wickedness. The natural man's darkened mind answers to all of it.
- Wound — Put a fool on the payroll and you have handed a bow to an archer who hits everybody. The hurt reaches everyone in range, not only the man who was hired.
- Hire — The older reading turns the picture around. There the great One who formed all things is Himself the Master. He hires fool and passer-by alike, for reasons of His own wisdom.
- Control — Nothing a fool does escapes that hand. So the believer looks for God in the dreadful trial and in the small irritation, and stays calm.
- Reward — Jehu was the fitted instrument, and Jehu was paid. His wages were for this world only, and four generations later they ran out.
As a dog turneth back to its vomit, [so] a fool repeateth his folly.
The picture is disgusting on purpose: an animal going back to what its own body threw out. The proverb describes a pattern, not a single crime: a man who has seen where his folly leads and walks straight back into it. Why does anyone do that, and can he change?
The proverb is not about a single lapse but about a settled direction. One writer describes the fool's road as an endless multiplying of the same wrong turn:
He will go on from one folly to another, repeating and increasing his departure from the one way of God's wisdom.
Behind the repeated act stands something the man cannot change by trying harder. One writer traces this behaviour straight back to what the animal is:
Why does the dog return to his vomit? Because he is a dog. And why does the sow go back to rolling in the mud? Because she is a sow, and nothing else. You may wash a sow as much as you like, but you cannot make a sheep of her. The point of the picture is that the sow has an unclean nature, and loves the mud.
This is why an improved life can still end where it began. A cleaned-up fool may look, for a while, like a changed man:
Whatever you do to such animals, their nature remains the same, and will show itself. So the fool may reform to some extent and even appear to be a converted man. But since his nature has not changed, he will return to his folly. This is what happened with Simon the sorcerer (Acts 8), who had no "part nor lot" with the people of God.
Simon was a magician who professed faith, then tried to buy God's gift with money.
There is a sorrow that looks like repentance and produces nothing. It fears the consequences instead of hating the sin. One writer explains why its promises always break:
This is an entirely selfish experience... In this sorrow the devil seems very near. He mocks the soul in its distress and increases its fears. Again and again the man vows that, if he can escape the consequences, he will avoid that trap in future. The devil can mock with confidence. He knows that as long as the soul is self-centred, it will go back to the sin that holds it, as the dog returns to its vomit.
Peter takes up this proverb and applies it to people who once professed to follow Christ. One writer names what the dog stands for:
The characteristic of dogs is that they go back to what they had rejected before (Prov. 26:11 and 2 Peter 2:22) — in one word, apostasy.
Apostasy means abandoning a faith once professed. Peter's use raises the stakes. His subject is not an untaught fool but someone who knew the message well:
We hear of the dog returning in Prov. 26:11, where it applies to the fool going back to his folly. Here it is said even more strongly of the man who once knew clearly the good news of Christ and the truth of God in a general way. The better the knowledge, the worse it is if corruption follows.
The proverb closes no door, but it points the way out through something the fool does not possess in himself:
There is no hope of better things unless the fool repents and learns wisdom from above. Left to himself, he goes back to his folly just as a dog returns to its vomit.
- Nature, not habit. The dog returns because it is a dog; behaviour repeats because the nature behind it never changed.
- Nature defeats reform. A fool may clean up, look converted, and still go back — Simon the sorcerer looked the part and had no share in it.
- Nature defeats resolutions. Sorrow over consequences is not sorrow over sin. It leaves the soul self-centred, and the old trap catches it every time.
- Nature makes knowledge dangerous. Peter applies this to those who once knew the gospel well. The better the knowledge, the worse the fall.
- Only a new nature ends it. Left to himself, the fool circles forever. Hope begins when he repents and learns wisdom from above.
Hast thou seen a man wise in his own eyes? There is more hope of a fool than of him.
Solomon does not compare a wise man with a fool here — he compares a fool with someone worse. Why does the harsher verdict fall on the man who is wise in his own eyes?
The phrase is not about brainpower. It is about where a man looks for wisdom.
The wise are lowly and dependent on the only wise God. The foolish man is wise in his own eyes; he who only adds conceit to folly is the most hopeless of men.
Self-confidence also costs a man the trust of others.
Whenever I see a man confident in himself (and of course we are all open to it, at least in some things), I have no confidence in him.
A fool has not shut the door; the conceited man has locked it from the inside.
Of all fools, the conceited fool is the worst. Pride makes a man incapable of receiving counsel.
The difference lies in the posture each one takes.
Verses 12 to 16 show a different kind of hostility to the truth: the proud, self-opinionated lazy man. A fool may be actively opposed to God. But this man takes a haughty, contemptuous attitude. He thinks himself wiser than everybody else, so he is indifferent to what is good and precious. He can tell anyone how everything should be done, but does nothing himself. A man of this kind is less likely to be converted than is a fool.
The most dangerous form of this self-wisdom is not crude arrogance but religion. A man can be religious and still be the man this proverb describes.
So it is with the man who, satisfied with himself, thinks he is secure because he relies on Christian ceremonies. Yet his heart may never have truly known one syllable of saving grace. He may never have felt his need of the precious blood of the Lamb of God, as a sinner who condemns himself and stands convicted by the truth.
Jesus drew the same portrait in a parable. One man is a Pharisee, a strict keeper of religious rules. The other is a tax collector, a man his neighbours despised.
Not that the Pharisee represents a man who denies God, or who is not a religious man. He is religious, but such religion is the most damning thing about him. The evil is not just his sins, but his religion. Nothing blinds him and other people more. Nothing dishonours God more. On the other hand, the poor tax collector has neither clear light nor peace. But at least he reaches the beginning of all true light: he has learned enough of God to condemn himself.
If conceit closes the mind, humility is what opens it.
The humble mind learns according to the power of God's truth. The self-satisfied man handles it like a weapon that wounds himself, and may wound others... So the humble soul prospers. He has God's own word, he feeds in these green pastures, and as this truth becomes part of him, he may become a blessing to others. The self-confident mind has never come to God in His word at all. If he had, he would have stopped being self-confident.
So God's deepest truths reach the lowly and pass the clever by.
Only he who owns his nothingness, who takes his place in weakness at His feet, and is like a baby, can receive these things. Never does the Lord entrust His secrets and His counsels to the wise and prudent.
- Hope — the proverb weighs hope, not brains. A fool can still be taught. The man sure he already knows cannot.
- Lock — conceit is what closes the door. Pride makes a man unable to receive counsel, so the very thing that would help him cannot get in.
- Posture — the fool may fight God openly. The self-satisfied man looks down on what is good and stays indifferent. That man is the harder one to reach.
- Disguise — the deadliest form wears religion. A man resting on ceremonies may never have felt his need of Christ, and his religion blinds him more than his sins.
- Key — the door opens from the side of humility. The self-confident mind has never come to God's word. The lowly soul learns, feeds, and becomes a blessing to others.
The sluggard saith, There is a fierce lion in the way; a lion is in the midst of the streets!
This proverb lets us listen in as a lazy man talks himself out of going outside. The question is not whether lions are real, but why this man keeps seeing them.
His will invents the excuse, not his eyes. One writer ties the cry to a job the man is avoiding:
But slothfulness is an evil to be dreaded, even if a man is far from a fool. And it is no uncommon thing for someone who is otherwise wise to imagine a danger where there is none. It is because he is a sluggard, and because he is dodging a duty that has to be done; he sees imminent danger, and cries, A lion in the road! A lion in the streets!
He is alert to one danger and blind to a worse one:
The sluggard can always spot difficulties standing in the way of doing good; but he does not see the tragic harm his laziness brings to his own soul. He has no faith to give him courage to overcome difficulties, whether real or imagined. If Satan (the lion) is in our way, the believer may count on the power of God to overcome this. But the slothful man gives up before he ever tries.
Kelly points to an enemy much closer than the street:
Again, the sluggard who likes to lie in bed says in his foolish imagination, A lion is outside. I shall be killed in the streets! He is blind to the worst enemy that besets his room and holds his soul in chains.
One writer sets three answers side by side. Only the last one reckons with God:
It is not the place of faith, nor its path, to deny that God's people meet difficulties. That would be the height of folly, since the difficulties are real. To deny them would be only recklessness, fanaticism, or fleshly enthusiasm. It is always good for people to know what they are doing, and not to rush blindly into a path they are not prepared for. An unbelieving sluggard may say, "There is a lion in the road!" A blind enthusiast may say, "There is no such thing." The true man of faith will say, "Though there were a thousand lions in the road, God can soon dispose of them."
The trouble with a good excuse is what it leaves out:
A difficulty may be real. But if you are on the path of God's will, it becomes an obstacle only through unbelief of heart. For faith counts on God and does what He wills, and difficulties are nothing before Him. Unbelief can always find excuses, and excuses that look well founded too. They have only this one great defect: they leave God out.
His fear does not match the facts. Safety belongs to the road he refuses to take:
Satan flourishes where the path of obedience is left. There is no lion in the path of obedience. It is the slothful man who says, There is a lion outside! I shall be killed in the streets! No one was ever killed in the street. He may have been attacked while he was on the path of disobedience. But as Bunyan pictures it in his story, the lions are chained so that they cannot reach the path of obedience. In God's path Satan can never attack. The path of obedience is the path of safety. Leave that path, and the lion is there.
When a Christian who was once eager starts finding new dangers, something inside has cooled:
Perhaps one of the earliest outward marks of inward decline in a Christian is the readiness to excuse oneself from devotedness and diligence in the Lord's service. He talks of difficulties nobody had heard of before, and he fears dangers too. So his plain neglect is both explained and excused… The human mind can easily imagine or invent obstacles to unselfish, God-honouring service. Give in to that, instead of holding to the truth at all costs, and a place of ease is soon found.
The answer to the lion is not more nerve. It is love with its eyes on Christ:
You cannot go out in the power of that love and see "a lion in the road" — no, for you see Christ beyond.
- The lion is manufactured. The sluggard imagines danger where there is none, because there is a duty he is dodging.
- The lion is misplaced. He fears the street and ignores the enemy in his own room, and the harm his laziness does to his own soul.
- The lion is not denied. Faith admits real difficulties, then says God can dispose of a thousand of them.
- The lion is on the road he refuses. There is no lion on the path of obedience — but leave that path, and the lion is there.
- The lion vanishes behind Christ. Excuses look sound but leave God out; love that sees Christ beyond the road cannot see a lion in it.
[As] the door turneth upon its hinges, so the sluggard upon his bed.
Proverbs 26:14 draws a man who moves all day and gets nowhere. The question is not whether the sluggard stirs — he does — but whether the turning ever takes him past the edge of his bed.
The hinge in this proverb is not a modern metal one.
The only hinges that have come down to us from ancient times are pivots sticking out above and below the door. The door turned on these. In old houses that still stand, with stone doors, the hinges are stone projections at the top and bottom of the doors.
The pivot lets the door move without going anywhere.
"As a door turns on its hinges, so does a sluggard on his bed." If this deserves strong blame in ordinary life, how much more in the things of God! The door swings, but only in the same place. So the sluggard never gets free from selfish, self-centred habit. He never acts in faith for God. The believer too must take care not to hide his light under a bed.
The sluggard's sin is not violence or dishonesty. It is smaller and duller than that.
And what could be more graphic of the sluggard on his bed of ease than the door turning on its hinges! The believer has his new nature from Him, apart from whom no sparrow falls, and who counts the very hairs of his own head. The sluggard gives in to the do-nothing spirit of self-pleasing in its lowest form.
Rest is not the problem. Rest in place of work is.
Ish-bosheth, the son of Saul, seems to have been a lazy man. At any rate he was resting in the middle of the day. And when he was lying on his bed at noon, two men rushed on him and assassinated him. If he had been up doing some useful work as a king's son, he might have lived longer. Sloth is a great enemy. The sluggard lies at his ease, turning first one way and then another like a door on its hinges. Where is the light? There is none shining. The lamp is cold and dead. The bed has put it out.
This proverb also fits a life that still looks active from the outside.
Perhaps one of the earliest outward marks of inward decline in a Christian is this. He is quick to excuse himself from devotion and diligence in the Lord's service. He speaks of difficulties nobody heard of before. He fears dangers too… A drowsy state has taken hold of them. Their spiritual movements are little more than mechanical, "as a door turns on its hinges." They grow as lazy about the welfare of their souls as a sleeping man.
Left alone, this condition does not stay mild.
Here is the truth. We stop enjoying the love of God to us in Christ. Christ Himself is no longer the Object and Hope of our hearts. Meditation on the word of God becomes tiresome, and private prayer fades… Then we begin to be slothful Christians. How serious is this state! For "slothfulness casts into a deep sleep, and an idle person will suffer hunger." Notice that it is a deep sleep — so deep that ordinary means fail completely to wake them.
The way out is not a mood but a decision, and it has a price attached.
Take this as a basic principle of your inner life. The Scriptures urge you toward practical virtues, and you gain them only at the cost of constant self-denial and labour. It is the diligent soul that is "made fat," as an older translation puts it. To make progress in the divine life, you must be ready to give up a good deal of ease, pleasure and worldly advantage.
So what keeps a believer moving?
Purpose, prayer, and progress go together; but let the believer only become purposeless and prayerless, then paralysis will soon creep over the spiritual system.
- Hinge. The ancient door turned on a pivot fixed top and bottom. It moved all day and went nowhere. That is the sluggard.
- Bed. The bed holds him, and it puts out his lamp. Sloth is not just wasted energy; comfort has killed the light.
- Excuse. The swing begins with excuses. Difficulties nobody mentioned before appear, and service turns mechanical.
- Sleep. It starts when Christ stops being the heart's object. It ends in a sleep that ordinary warnings cannot break.
- Purpose. Self-denial breaks the pivot. Purpose, prayer and progress travel together; drop them and paralysis creeps in.
The sluggard burieth his hand in the dish it wearieth him to bring it again to his mouth.
The proverb shows a man at his meal with food already in reach, beaten by the short distance from the bowl to his own mouth. Is this really about eating, or about a soul that has all it needs and still starves?
This is not a man at work but a man at his meal, and even that defeats him. One writer follows the hand into the dish, then asks who could ever count on such a man.
Another vivid likeness is of the sluggard when he rises to take his meals. In his listlessness he buries his hand, not in his bosom but in a dish; and he is weary of even lifting it to his mouth. From such a person, who could look for gratitude to God or kindness to a suffering fellow man?
The problem is not a shortage of food but unwillingness. That moves the proverb from the table to the Bible left unopened.
It is clear this is not meant merely literally, but who can doubt its spiritual meaning? Food is available for him: he knows it, and reaches out his hand, but only to trifle with it. He does not even have the energy to eat it. How well this describes the way many treat the food of the Word of God! They complacently think they know all about it, and have no concern about digesting it!
William Kelly sets the sluggard against the person who fears God, and follows him past the meal to his end.
The faith that fears Jehovah is earnest. The sluggard, by contrast, is so absorbed in himself that he will not so much as raise his hand from the dish to his mouth. So he lives, dies, and perishes.
Nobody announces that they have stopped caring. First comes a reason: a hardship never mentioned before, or a danger just discovered. One writer names what lies underneath such excuses.
Perhaps one of the earliest outward marks of inward decline in a Christian is the readiness to excuse yourself from devotion and diligence in the Lord's service. People speak of difficulties they never mentioned before, and of dangers they fear, so their plain neglect is both explained and excused… We can lose the authority of the Word on our conscience — the Word that says it has been granted to us, for the sake of Christ, not only to believe in Him but also to suffer for His sake. Then we easily think of our present advantage and personal ease in this passing scene. We drift away from wisdom's ways of pleasantness and peace, and become weak and helpless in divine things… Such people have not only left their first love. They turn away from those who stand for God's truth at all costs. A drowsy state has taken hold of them, so that their spiritual movements are little more than mechanical.
The hand does not stop halfway all at once. Another writer draws the same man as a young Christian, and shows how ordinary the slide looks from the inside.
I went to the house of young Mr. Slothful. His Bible was completely hidden by many other books, with thick dust over its back and sides. His regular habits of daily prayer were quite broken down… Young Mr. Slothful had been indulging in a little more sleep in the mornings, a little slackening off with the usual duties, a little more self-ease in everything. And now spiritual poverty has come upon him like a robber… First he simply left off the regular habit for once. Then he did the same thing again, and again, and each gap between the times was shorter, until now the well-ordered Christian life has become a disorderly wilderness of evil weeds.
The cure is not more food but the effort to take it. One writer points back to Israel in the desert. Bread — manna — lay on the ground each morning, and they had to gather it before sunrise.
The Israelite in the desert had to rise early to get the manna while it was still morning, or go hungry. Christians must show the same diligence in feeding their souls. They are not allowed to eat the bread of idleness and prosper in their souls at the same time.
- Provision. The dish is full and within reach; this man's trouble is never a shortage of food, and neither is ours.
- Paralysis. The hand goes in and stops. He knows the Word, reaches for it, trifles with it, and never digests it.
- Excuse. Before the hand stalls, the mouth explains. New dangers appear, and ease passes for wisdom.
- Poverty. A little more sleep, a little more self-ease, each gap shorter than the last. The well-ordered life becomes a field of weeds, and the sluggard so lives, dies, and perishes.
- Diligence. Israel gathered manna before sunrise; no one eats the bread of idleness and prospers in soul at the same time.
A sluggard is wiser in his own eyes than seven [men] that answer discreetly.
Proverbs 26 gathers a small gallery of the lazy man — inventing lions in the street, rolling on his bed like a door on its hinges, too tired to lift food to his mouth — and this verse is where the series ends. The surprise is that the man who does least thinks most highly of his own judgment.
One writer treats verses 12 to 16 as a single unit and shows the mood running through it:
"Do you see a man who is wise in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him." A fool may openly fight against God. But the sluggard takes a proud, scornful attitude. He counts himself wiser than everybody else, and so he cares nothing for what is good and precious. He can tell you how everything ought to be done, but he does nothing himself. A man like this is less likely to be converted than a fool is.
The self-flattery is not a side effect of laziness. It protects the laziness. A man who already knows everything has no reason to try.
The sluggard, like the fool, is certainly wise in his own eyes. He even counts himself wiser than seven men who answer with discretion. He is so satisfied with himself that he avoids any effort to learn. Learning is all very well for other men, but he does not need it! He is a genius, and can afford his never-failing nap. So self-conceit flatters those who dislike work. They want a position that belongs only to those who do not dodge hard work — and hard work is a healthy discipline for man as he is. But their conceit usually ends in their own ruin, and in trouble for those close to them.
The verse does not weigh the sluggard against one rival opinion. It sets him against a whole body of sound judgment — and he still comes out on top, in his own estimate.
Seven men may be careful, sensible and honourable, and may give a united judgment on a matter. But the sluggard rejects their judgment with contempt. His only basis is his own self-centred opinion. He thinks wisdom belongs to him alone. May we who are Christians be careful that we do not in any measure resemble such egotists.
The same writer sees this self-satisfaction take a religious form:
How easily we can see a fat, lazy, comfortable religion here. It turns God's grace into loose living. There is no effort of soul, no earnest feeding on the Word of God — only self-satisfied boasting: "I am rich, I have prospered, and I need nothing." … The boaster is not a worker: how much better to work, and not boast!
The wise man is the reverse: he does not trust his own eyes. One writer adds that even asking for advice can be a dodge:
There is nothing a man dislikes more than thinking badly of himself, unless it is believing good of God. Truly the way of a fool is right in his own eyes. The wise man distrusts himself and listens to counsel. He does not cheat God and his conscience by asking advice from the weak and easy-going. He asks the godly.
Humility of this kind is the Spirit's work, and it shows in how a person treats those who can help:
The humble are glad when someone helps them in their difficulties. They do not run down those who see more clearly than they do… The proud spirit of independence may aim high, but there are still leaders and guides among God's people. No one can ignore or slight them without loss to himself. The Holy Spirit does not lead to self-conceit, but to genuine humility and a warm value for fellowship.
The same laziness has a spiritual form. One writer names its cost:
It is the diligent soul that is "richly supplied." You must be ready to give up a good deal of ease, pleasure and worldly advantage to make progress in the divine life. The spiritual sluggard avoids all this for the sake of his own comfort. But his laziness has a result: the works of the flesh choke the fruit of the Spirit in him.
- The link. Laziness and self-conceit are one thing. The sluggard is so pleased with himself that he sees no need to learn.
- The insulation. Conceit is the wall that keeps effort out. He can tell everyone how to do the job, and does nothing himself.
- The scale. He is not outvoted by one adviser but by seven sound ones, and rejects them all on the sole basis of his own opinion.
- The reversal. The wise man distrusts himself and listens. He seeks counsel from the godly, not from the easy-going who will agree with him.
- The test. The Spirit never produces self-conceit. He produces humility and a real value for the help of others. Measure yourself there.
He that passing by vexeth himself with strife belonging not to him, is [like] one that taketh a dog by the ears.
In a chapter about fools and sluggards, this verse gives us a picture: a man walks past a quarrel that is not his and grabs a passing dog by the ears. The question is not whether he means well, but what happens when he tries to let go.
The force of the image is that there is no safe exit. Letting go invites a bite, and holding on has no end.
But to trouble ourselves with other people's quarrels, where no duty of ours lies, is like taking a dog by the ears. It either threatens to bite the moment we let go, or keeps us holding on forever to avoid the bite. And who is to blame?
Notice the phrase "where no duty of ours lies." The proverb does not condemn help. It condemns stepping into a fight when no duty calls you in.
Another writer identifies what drives the meddler — and it is not the same failing as the rest of the chapter.
This is not simply the case of someone who leaves God out of his thinking (the fool), nor of the proud, lazy onlooker (the sluggard). It is the case of pride that thinks itself able to settle other people's quarrels. This is dangerous. If someone steps into family matters — between a husband and wife, for instance — he may find them both turning on him as vicious enemies. Nations do this today. Once they have taken the dog by the ears, they are afraid to let go. The longer you hold a dog's ears, the more violent the reaction is likely to be when you finally do let go… Even a believer may try something like this, and come to regret it.
Placing the verse in its chapter helps. The sluggard has just been described at length; now a warning swings the other way.
Laziness is not the only fault to avoid. There is a kind of activity to dread that does even more harm, and it is vividly set out in verses 17-22. We have to beware of meddling, or of any sympathy with such ways.
Being busy is not always better than being idle.
Meddling also changes the meddler.
Some minds fall into the trap of meddling with evil. They dabble in it, wanting to mend it, and all the while the evil is drawing out their energies. The simple Christian rule is to be simple about evil and wise about good. Meddling with evil gives us an appetite for strife without our realizing it.
A good motive does not change the result.
Two writers turn to the same example: Josiah, a godly king of Judah, who attacked Necho, king of Egypt, in a fight that was not his.
Josiah should have known this proverb well, copied out as it was by the men of Hezekiah. His attack was not made in faith — or why "disguise" himself? There is no record of any prayer before the battle, as there was with so many of his godly ancestors. This rash act of Josiah is hard to explain. He may have suspected that Necho had some hidden plan against his kingdom. But the king of Egypt firmly denied any such intention, so Josiah's unprovoked attack on him was completely unjustified.
Two marks stand out: no prayer beforehand, and a disguise — not the marks of faith.
When the trouble really is aimed at you, the answer is not your own strength.
The Lord has called us to be occupied with His things, not to meddle with the affairs and strife of this world. If the Lord allows the enemy to come against us, our defence is not in any imagined strength of our own. Josiah should have learned the lesson of Hezekiah. Hezekiah did not meddle with strife, but when he was attacked he took the whole matter to the Lord. So it became a conflict between the Assyrian and the Lord, ending in the complete defeat of that proud and arrogant enemy.
The New Testament gives the same warning, and one writer notes where it comes — right after a call to love one another.
It is very telling how we move from brotherly love to the plain instructions of verses 11 and 12. Love among believers has been known to sink into unloving interference with fellow believers. Here we have the healthy corrective: "Seek earnestly to be quiet, and mind your own affairs and work with your own hands," as one translation renders it.
- Passing by. The verse targets the person who was only walking past — the quarrel was not his, and no duty called him into it.
- Grabbing. The pull is pride — the quiet belief that we can settle a fight the people in it cannot.
- Holding. There is no clean release. Hold on and you are stuck; let go and you are bitten — and the longer the grip, the worse the bite.
- Spreading. Meddling in other people's strife grows a taste for strife, so one time is rarely the last.
- Josiah. A godly king made an unprovoked attack in a fight that was not his — no prayer, and a disguise. Hezekiah, when attacked, took the whole matter to God, and God won it.
As a madman who casteth firebrands, arrows, and death,
Verse 18 is only half a sentence: a madman hurling burning sticks, arrows and death at random. Verse 19 names him — the man who tricks his neighbour and calls it a joke.
Laziness is the obvious failing in this part of Proverbs. One writer points out that busyness can be worse.
Sluggishness is not the only fault to be avoided. There may be activity to dread of a still more damaging sort, and it is vividly set out in verses 17-22. We have to beware of being meddlesome, or of sympathising with such ways.
He then shows where that meddling ends up.
Such uncalled-for activity grows the more someone gives in to it. It is likely to end in playing the madman, throwing burning material and things that wound and even kill. All the while he deceives his neighbour with the pretence that he meant nothing more than a joke.
Firebrands and arrows thrown at random land wherever they land. One writer applies the picture to the way people handle God's Word.
Here is the man who trifles with truth as though it were a toy to use as he pleases. He will even deceive another and then excuse himself on the grounds that it was a joke. The condemnation of such conduct here is strong. He is compared to a madman who throws firebrands and arrows about at random, likely to cause death. Suppose someone dares to use the Word of God in this light, frivolous way, making fun of its infinitely serious truths. What deadly influence that may have on others! Let us hold the truth in the pure, serious, noble dignity that belongs to it.
One writer weighs rash speech against the speech of the wise.
Babbling or rash speaking is well compared to the stabs of a sword. It inflicts wounds and pain. It comes from a light spirit if not from malice, and it aims at no good. The tongue of the wise carries conviction to every upright heart. It may wound when duty rightly calls for it, but even then it is a kindness. Such wounds heal, because they test and remove what only harms.
Verse 19 puts the excuse in the deceiver's own mouth. One writer applies this to David. Running from King Saul, he lied to the priest Ahimelech about why he had come.
His deceitful trick when Ahimelech spoke to him was a blot on his own character as a man of God. Indirectly it caused the destruction of that whole small town. Whether Ahimelech was truly deceived by the reply or not does not affect David's guilt. In his dread of the king's revenge, the fugitive may have thought it a small matter to pretend he was on Saul's business. But God is not mocked. What a man sows, that will he reap. We are to remember what a huge fire a little spark will cause.
The joker pays a price himself. One writer traces this cost back to Lot.
When Lot warned his sons-in-law of the coming doom of Sodom, they thought it was just a deceptive joke. If someone gets a reputation for never being serious, then when he is in earnest he will have no effect.
Another writer explains why they took it that way.
Note, it does not say that they mocked him, but that they thought he was mocking or making sport of them — that he was really joking. He had come into Sodom and invested everything he had in it. So they could not believe he was serious when he suddenly announced that the whole place would be destroyed in a moment. His previous course of life completely contradicted his present testimony.
Another writer turns the same picture on the whispered word.
Let us beware of using the flesh against one another. Beware of stirring up and inflaming what feeds on corruption. Suppose you tell a whispered word that you know will stir up resentment and make enmity. It seems to me that you are getting ready to put a torch to a jackal and turn it loose.
- Spark. A little spark starts a huge fire. The deceiver's guilt does not depend on whether his neighbour was fooled.
- Firebrand. The joke is the weapon. Words spoken in fun, not only in malice, pierce like a sword and aim at no good.
- Target. Treating truth as a toy is the worst form of this madness. Making light of God's Word can have a deadly effect on others.
- Ash. The man known for joking loses the power to be believed. Lot warned his family of real ruin, and they heard a joke.
- Fuel. The verse sits among warnings about meddling and whispering. Stop feeding the fire and it goes out.
so is a man that deceiveth his neighbour, and saith, Am I not in sport?
This proverb sets two pictures side by side: a madman flinging blazing torches and arrows, and a man who tricks his neighbour and then laughs it off. Is "I was only joking" a defence at all, and what about the people standing where the sparks fall?
Why does this proverb put a joker beside a madman? One writer starts further back, with the man who keeps stirring in matters that are not his.
This uncalled-for activity grows the more a man gives in to it. It is likely to end with him playing the madman, throwing firebrands and things that wound and even kill, while he deceives his neighbour by pretending he meant no more than a joke.
The deceiver treats truth as his own property, to bend as he likes. Then he hands over an excuse as if it settled everything.
Here is the man who trifles with truth as though it were a toy to use as he pleases. He will even deceive someone else and then excuse himself on the ground that it was a joke. How strong is the condemnation of such conduct here! He is likened to a madman throwing firebrands and arrows about at random, likely to cause death.
The same writer notes what this costs a person in the long run. Lot warned his sons-in-law that Sodom was about to be destroyed, and they took him for a joker:
If one acquires a reputation for frivolity, then when he is in earnest he will have no effect.
David once told a lie that looked harmless. On the run from King Saul, he came to the town of Nob and gave the priest Ahimelech an untrue story about himself. One writer follows what came of it.
Wrongdoing cannot stay hidden for long. David was to find that the evil seed he had planted in Nob would bear its evil fruit, and very quickly. Doeg, the chief of the royal herdsmen, had no love for him and saw him there. He carried the news of Ahimelech's kindness to his master. The king was furious. He gave the cruel order to kill everyone in Nob — men, women and children.
The man who threw the firebrand was not the one who died in the flames.
Samson once tied torches to jackals and let them run through the Philistines' fields. One writer turns that picture on the way we talk about each other.
Let us beware of fighting with jackals; let us beware of trying to use the flesh against one another. Beware of stirring up and inflaming what feeds on corruption. Suppose you pass on a whispered word that you know will stir up resentment and make enmity. It seems to me that you are getting ready to put the torch to a jackal and turn it loose.
What should take the place of the deceiver's laugh? One writer points to a different kind of speech.
Nor let us allow our talk to descend to the level of foolishness or jesting. A Christian is neither a fool nor a jester, so let us not appear as either in our conversation. Thanksgiving is what suits the lips of those who are forgiven and have become children of God.
This is not a call to gloom. Another writer says the Lord "in no way forbids the happy cheerfulness which He loves in His saints" (The Bible Treasury). What this proverb condemns is the wit that wounds and then claims innocence.
- The spark. Meddling grows the more you give in to it, until a man throws firebrands and calls it play.
- The excuse. "I was only joking" is the cover story of a man who has deceived his neighbour. This proverb answers it by calling him a madman.
- The spread. A whispered word meant to stir resentment is a torch tied to a jackal. You do not get to choose where it runs.
- The cost. David's untrue words at Nob cost a town its life. Sparks land on people who never heard the joke.
- The cure. Thanksgiving is the speech that fits forgiven people. Get a name for joking, and no one will believe you when you are serious.
Where no wood is, the fire goeth out; and where there is no talebearer, the contention ceaseth.
A fire lives only as long as something feeds it. This proverb applies that plain fact to human conflict: quarrels die when the fuel runs out. The picture forces a question on anyone caught in a dispute — who, or what, is the wood?
The proverb does not blame the flame. It points to the person who keeps handing over the wood. One commentator shows how hidden that work is.
But there is a very sly form of evil, and perhaps a more harmful one still, where the damage is done in secret, by influencing others for evil. What is worse than the whisperer, or talebearer, whom this proverb compares to the wood that feeds the fire?
Elsewhere in Proverbs, one writer defines the figure.
He is the one who speaks to others behind a person's back about that person's failures, or imagined failures, and so seeks to undermine confidence.
Why does a whisperer do more harm than an open troublemaker? Because the work does not look like evil at all.
The next three verses speak of the talebearer. Here evil takes a further step. The talebearer does more real damage than the joker, because he gives his evil work the appearance of zeal for righteousness. "For lack of wood the fire goes out, and where there is no whisperer, quarreling ceases." Discord among the people of God stops as soon as no one adds fuel to the fire. "It is an honour for a man to cease from strife." But to spread the details of trouble or wrongdoing — or imagined wrongdoing — is grievous guilt. It multiplies the fury of the flames.
What does this fire actually burn? One writer weighs the harm the tongue has done among Christians.
What mischief the rash, foolish and wicked use of the tongue has caused among Christian people! When we read that the tongue "defiles the whole body," the context shows that James meant the human body. Yet it would be just as true of the church, which is the body of Christ, and of which we are all members. The tongue has brought more defilement into the church of God than anything else.
What should you do when the report reaches you? One writer gives a plain rule for the listener, and points to what love does instead.
But what if another believer comes to us with an evil report about a brother or sister? Ask that person to stop speaking this way. How much evil speaking would die in its tracks if we did this. Of course, the person may want to unburden himself or herself. But we should allow that only if we are truly ready and willing to help them resolve the difficulty with the brother or sister in question. Remember: even where real sins have been committed, there is no blessing in sharing the details with others when there is no need. Keep the circle of information as small as possible — to those who can deal with it righteously. Our Lord's instructions in Matthew 18:15-17 make this very clear. Peter writes, "Above all, keep loving one another earnestly, since love covers a multitude of sins" (1 Peter 4:8; see also Proverbs 11:13 and 20:19).
Silence alone is not the whole answer. Where a real grievance exists, there is a direction to take it — toward the person, not around him.
How guarded must be the doors of our lips! Disagreement, discord and ill-feeling have come between neighbours. Will spreading it elsewhere settle it? Let us have grace and honest courage of heart to face our neighbour with meekness and true concern, so that we reach a proper understanding. How painful are the countless offences that selfish, thoughtless gossip has never settled but only made worse, when a word of simple apology might have ended them forever!
- Fuel. Strife does not burn on its own. The whisperer is the wood that keeps it going, and he works in secret.
- Disguise. The fuel looks respectable. The talebearer gives his work "the appearance of zeal for righteousness," so he does more damage than an open troublemaker.
- Fire. The blaze is costly. The tongue has brought more defilement into the church of God than anything else.
- Starve it. Discord stops when no one adds fuel. Refuse to carry the report, ask the speaker to stop, and keep the circle of information small.
- Face it. Take a real grievance to the person, with meekness and honest courage. A word of apology can end what gossip only inflames.
[As] coals for hot coals, and wood for fire, so is a contentious man to inflame strife.
Proverbs sets this saying beside its twin in the previous verse: one man removes the fuel and the fire dies, another keeps piling it on. The quarrelsome man need not start the fire. He makes any quarrel he touches burn hotter.
Coals do nothing on their own; they matter because the embers are already hot. One writer knows that pain firsthand.
On the other hand, coals to hot embers, and wood to fire, is a contentious man to inflame strife. How often have we known it to our pain! Happy is the one who hates it enough to avoid its beginning by living in love.
The verse just before this one sets the test: are you supplying the fuel or withholding it?
The talebearer will do more real damage than the trifler, simply because he gives his evil work the appearance of zeal for righteousness. "For lack of wood the fire goes out, and where there is no whisperer, quarreling ceases." Discord between the people of God can certainly be stopped simply by adding no fuel to the fire. "It is an honor for a man to keep aloof from strife." But to spread abroad by talebearing the details of trouble or wrongdoing (or imagined wrongdoing) is grievous guilt, and multiplies the fury of the flames.
The quarrelsome man of verse 21 and the whisperer of verse 20 are not two problems. They are one. The test is what you do once the damage starts.
The talebearer and the contentious man are the same here. Their spirit is identical — the opposite of the peacemaker. If the fire is doing damage, they are all ready to add further coals or wood. "If anyone is inclined to be contentious, we have no such practice, nor do the churches of God" (1 Cor. 11:16). If I dare to speak of another's wrongs, it ought always to be out of a genuine desire to see him restored. And only when there is real need.
Fire and water behave alike: easy to stop at the start, impossible later.
And who has not seen what a blaze a little spark may become, if godliness and grace do not rule? It is like letting out water when someone starts a quarrel. At first only drops trickle. Then the opening widens into a flow that sweeps everything before it. "Therefore quit before the quarrel breaks out."
The coals and wood are usually words. One writer counts what the tongue has cost God's people.
What mischief has been caused among Christian people by the rash and foolish and wicked use of the tongue. When we read, "The tongue is set among our members, staining the whole body," the context shows that James was speaking of the human body. Yet it would be just as true if we read it of the church, which is the body of Christ and of which we are all members. More defilement has been brought into the church of God by it than by anything else.
Strife costs the people inside it, and few of them think they are the contentious man.
Contentions put a stop to the growth of grace. The soul can no more prosper when it is on a flame with strife and contention than the body can thrive in a fever. We are prone to mistake our heat for zeal. But in strife between believers it is usually a fire-ship sent in by Satan to break their unity and order. While they stand in that unity they are an invincible fleet, and Satan knows he has no other way but this to shatter them.
Refusing to add fuel is only half of it. Someone still has to put the fire out.
A little good sense, a little patience and waiting on God may go far. They can silence the strife of tongues, calm an angry temper, remove opposition, and win hearts for Christ. No other Christian grace shows God in His children as clearly as this peace-making spirit. "They shall be called sons of God."
- Fuel. The contentious man does not invent the fire; he feeds it. Coals go to embers already glowing, wood to a flame already burning.
- Spark. Small beginnings decide everything. Strife starts as trickling drops and ends as a flood, so quit before the quarrel breaks out.
- Blaze. The fuel is usually words. The tongue has brought more defilement into the church of God than anything else.
- Starve it. Add no fuel and the fire dies. Refuse to carry the story, and discord among God's people stops.
- Peace. The opposite of the contentious man is not the quiet man but the peacemaker. Patience and waiting on God can silence the strife of tongues.
The words of a talebearer are as dainty morsels, and they go down into the innermost parts of the belly.
This verse pictures words as food: easy to swallow, impossible to bring back up. So who does more harm — the person who tells the tale, or the person who enjoys eating it?
The saying works on the body: something goes down and stays down. An older translation calls the whisperer's words wounds rather than morsels. One writer follows the Hebrew behind that word.
This describes exactly how the soul normally reacts to the words of talebearers. They are deep, internal wounds. The Hebrew word means "to burn in." Such things sink in so deep that we may never forget them, while we soon put other kinds of wrong out of our minds. Talebearing can easily lead to a permanent break between God's people.
Nobody forces these words in. They go down — into the soul. Something in the hearer opens the door and welcomes them.
The flesh is still in believers, and it makes the whisperer's hints far too easy and welcome. We take them in instead of refusing them. Then they go down and take possession of our souls, right to the innermost part. It is a serious danger when the guard falls asleep at wisdom's gate. Our own simplicity leaves us open to cruel deception.
People defend gossip by saying the story is true. The same writer rejects that defence and tests such words by their aim.
Even if such words were strictly true, which they seldom are, they do harm in every way, and they come under the condemnation of evil speaking. They have no good purpose and no loving manner. At best it is gossip. Mostly it is simply the pleasure of talking about things that right feeling would rather cover up. The result is wounds that cut very deep, in the places where they are least likely to heal.
Another writer adds what talebearing does to the facts:
Anyone given to talebearing is almost certain to exaggerate, because he wants to put his victim in the worst light possible. This is bad work.
Earlier in the chapter, the whisperer appears as fuel for a fire.
The next three verses speak of the tale-bearer. Here evil takes another step forward. The talebearer does more real damage than the joker, because he makes his evil work look like zeal for righteousness. "For lack of wood the fire goes out, and where there is no whisperer, quarreling ceases." You can stop discord among the people of God simply by adding no fuel to the fire.
If words only do harm once someone swallows them, the hearer holds the power to stop them. One writer asks whether we take receiving a report as seriously as spreading one.
What great harm false reports have done among Christians! We all admit that it is wrong to start them. Do we all see the wrong of receiving them? An argument breaks out among Christians, and someone brings a bad report about the other side. How tempting it is to accept it at once as certainly true, when after all it is false. We should examine any evil report with care and check it before we accept it.
The practical method is blunt, and it costs nothing but silence.
You can be sure of it: a deaf ear is a very valuable thing to have. Say a person comes to you and starts a long, rambling account of So-and-so's bad ways. Turn your deaf side to him at once. Stay as quiet as you can while the abuse goes on. Make him feel he is getting as much encouragement from you as he would from a gatepost.
The cure is not total silence. It is a change of direction: speak to the person, not about him.
Someone has truly said, "The backbiter injures three people: himself, his hearer, and the person he is talking about." If I have any fault to find with someone, he ought to be the very first to hear of it… We need to be more faithful in how we speak to people, and more gracious in how we speak of them. If we see anything wrong in a person, let us go straight to him and speak plainly. And if we have nothing good to say of him, let us kindly draw a curtain of silence around him.
- Morsel — the words go down easily. Something in us welcomes the whisperer's hints and lets them take over the soul.
- Wound — the treat we swallowed becomes a deep, inner injury. We may never forget it, and it can split God's people for good.
- Fire — the tale-bearer is firewood. Remove him and the strife dies out, however much his work looks like zeal for righteousness.
- Ear — receiving an evil report is as wrong as starting one. Check it before you accept it, or turn your deaf side to the talker.
- Face — backbiting injures three people at once. So take the fault to the person first, and draw a curtain of silence over the rest.
Ardent lips, and a wicked heart, are [as] an earthen vessel overlaid with silver dross.
The proverb puts two things side by side: broken pottery with a shiny coat, and warm words from a heart set on evil. It raises a hard question — how do you tell real warmth from a cover-up?
The writers quoted here use older translations. Where the ESV says "the glaze covering an earthen vessel," they read "silver dross covering a potsherd" — a piece of broken pottery smeared with the waste left over from refining silver. Either way, the point turns on what the covering is made of. It is not silver.
"Burning lips and a wicked heart are like a potsherd covered with silver dross." Someone may cover a piece of a broken earthen vessel — not with silver plate, but with the dross left from refined silver. Of course it will look silvery, and it barely hides the roughness of the dross. So 2 Timothy 2:20 speaks of vessels of wood and of earth as being unbelievers: but the covering of silver dross is of course deception. "Burning lips" are the silver dross, hot with what looks like zeal. Yet the hypocrisy is clear enough for those who walk with God to see it. A wicked heart will stoop to such things, but the believer ought not to be deceived.
Two worthless things are joined. The scrap of pottery has no value, and neither has the layer smeared over it. Grant reads the vessel through 2 Timothy 2:20, where vessels of wood and earth stand for unbelievers: the man is the broken pot, and the coating is the deception. The shine is close enough to fool a careless eye — but not those who walk with God.
"Fervent lips" sounds like anger, since hot words and a wicked heart often go together. William Kelly says anger is not the point here.
There is no real difficulty here, and no good reason to doubt the force of the opening words of verse 23. In this setting they do not imply the heat of anger at all. Anger might well go with "a wicked heart" in the usual case. But what is meant here is the extraordinary combination of warm affection expressed alongside the desire to do evil. That combination, not anger, is rightly compared to an earthen vessel overlaid not with silver, but with its "dross."
That reading makes the proverb more unsettling. The heat is warmth, not rage. It is eager, glowing and personal — and under it sits the intention to harm.
This verse is not a stand-alone saying. It opens the closing section of the chapter, and Kelly reads it as the start of a long warning.
To the end of the chapter, the same kind of mischief is condemned, hiding behind fair speech and flattery. It is deceit in various forms, and we are strongly warned against it — a caution we need in this evil age, and the Christian who walks in grace and refuses to avenge himself needs it most.
Notice who is most at risk. The person who has decided not to hit back is the easiest person for a flatterer to work on.
Warmth by itself proves nothing, because the coating is made to please. Kelly follows the thought into the next verses, and sets one testimony against it — the only one that can be trusted without reserve.
So when such a person's voice is gracious, that is the strongest reason not to believe him. There is no sure faith except in a testimony that is completely reliable. So this is the blessing of a Christian: his faith and his hope rest in the God who cannot lie. He has spoken to us in His Son, who came in love as sure as the truth.
So the proverb is not teaching suspicion of everyone. It shows where certainty lies. God cannot lie, so His word is safe to rest on; a flatterer's warmth is not.
A coating this thin cannot hold forever. Later in the chapter, the layer comes off.
Hatred cannot cover itself forever. There comes a point when hypocrisy is laid bare. "Nothing is covered up that will not be revealed, or hidden that will not be known" (Luke 12:2). Would you not shrink from both — from the disgusting sin of hypocrisy, and from the shame of being exposed? But there is no doubt of such exposure.
There are two reasons to hate this sin, then — what it is, and where it ends. Either one should be enough.
- Cheap cover. The shine is dross — the waste left from refining silver — spread over a broken piece of pottery. Nothing in the picture has any value.
- Warm cover. The lips are not angry but eager and warm. The shock of the proverb is affection spoken while evil is planned.
- Chosen target. The warning runs to the end of the chapter. It lands hardest on the believer who refuses to hit back, because he is the easiest to flatter.
- No proof. A gracious voice is the strongest reason to hold back belief. Sure faith rests only on a testimony that cannot lie — God's, spoken in His Son.
- Cover off. Hypocrisy cannot hide forever. Hate the sin for what it is, and dread the exposure that is certain to come.
He that hateth dissembleth with his lips, but he layeth up deceit within him
Proverbs 26 ends with a run of sayings about damage done behind a friendly face. This verse describes a man whose lips say one thing while his heart stores another, and it raises a hard question: if hatred can dress itself in warm words, how is anyone meant to spot it?
The verse belongs to a closing block of warnings. One writer notes who needs them most.
To the end of the chapter are denunciations of similar mischief under the disguise of fair speech and flattery. It is deceit in various forms, and these warnings put us strongly on our guard. We need that caution in this evil age. The Christian who walks in grace and refuses to avenge himself needs it most.
Loud hostility is not what this proverb has in view. The same writer separates hatred that erupts from hatred that hides. He says which one is more dangerous.
So the most dangerous hatred here is not the kind that explodes in violent words. It is the kind that would work its way out unnoticed, and so it disguises itself with the lips. The kind words only conceal the deceit inside the man.
The second half of the verse describes activity, not just a hidden thought. One writer works from an older translation, which reads "lays up deceit within him." He treats it as a deliberate stocking of supplies, and sets against it what the believer should store instead.
But the wicked "lays up deceit within him." That is, he feeds on it, conceives it, stores it up to use whenever he pleases. But let every believer be able to say with the Psalmist, "I have stored up your word in my heart" (Psalm 119:11).
The same writer adds that hypocrisy is not the believer's character. Yet a believer can still fall into it. Galatians 2:13 says that "even Barnabas was led astray by their hypocrisy." There the motive was fear, not hatred.
The verse works as a diagnosis. Where disguise has become a settled habit, the same writer reads back from the behaviour to the motive. He also says what such a person does among Christians.
If a person's character is formed by hypocrisy, we may be certain that actual hatred is behind it. "Everyone who hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him" (1 John 3:15). To think of a man of this kind having any place among Christians is dreadful: he can be there for no other purpose than to scatter the sheep. His own immediate aim may be personal gain, but behind it is the Satanic intention of undermining what is of God.
A parallel proverb says, "The one who conceals hatred has lying lips" (Proverbs 10:18). One writer comments on it, and explains why Scripture speaks so openly about people we cannot see through.
So says He who searches the mind and heart, which we cannot do, and so we need to profit by His word. Malicious lies, once exposed, prove hatred that was covered up... The divine word does not stoop to the deceiving politeness of society. It speaks out so that all the saints may hear, whether for comfort or for warning.
The disguise does not last. Later in the chapter comes a promise of exposure, and this writer names two things that should make us recoil.
Hatred cannot cover itself forever. There comes a point where hypocrisy is laid bare. "Nothing is covered up that will not be revealed, or hidden that will not be known" (Luke 12:2). Would one not recoil both from the disgusting sin of hypocrisy, and from the humiliation of being exposed? But there is no doubt of such exposure.
- Covered — The proverb targets hatred that hides, not hatred that shouts. The friendly words are the cover, and that is what makes it dangerous.
- Cultivated — "Harbors deceit" means the hater feeds it, stores it, and keeps it ready to use. The believer stores God's word in the heart instead.
- Confirmed — Settled hypocrisy is evidence, not just a flaw. Real hatred stands behind it, and among Christians such a person can only scatter the sheep.
- Corrected — We cannot search another person's heart. So God speaks plainly in His word, instead of copying the polite evasions of society.
- Uncovered — The cover never holds. What hatred hides now will come to light. That warns the deceiver and comforts the deceived.
when his voice is gracious, believe him not, for there are seven abominations in his heart.
Proverbs 26:25 warns about a voice that sounds warm while the heart behind it is not. How should you treat kind words from someone who hates you?
The verse before says that a hater covers himself with his lips. The danger is not the enemy who shouts:
The hatred (v. 24) that is most dangerous is not what explodes in violent words. It is the hatred that works its way out unnoticed, and so pretends with the lips. The kind words only hide the deceit inside the man.
The same warning runs to the end of the chapter, and it touches Christians too:
The rest of the chapter condemns the same mischief, carried on under the disguise of fair speech and flattery. It is deceit in various forms, and we must be strongly on our guard against it. In this evil age we need the warning, and the Christian who walks in grace and refuses to avenge himself needs it most.
The instruction is blunt: do not believe him. Faith needs a witness it can rely on, and this man's gentle voice is the trap.
So (v. 25), when such a person's voice is gracious, there is the strongest reason not to believe him. There is no sure faith except in a testimony that is fully reliable. This is why it is such a blessing to a Christian that his faith, and his hope too, rest in the God who cannot lie. He has spoken to us in His Son, who came in love as certain as the truth. But how different fallen man is! "for there are seven abominations in his heart." His heart is full of every evil — corruption as well as violence, as the Saviour testified.
The number in the verse carries its own meaning:
Seven. Spiritual completeness — usually of good, but sometimes of evil… There are seven abominations in man's heart. Prov. 26:25.
Another writer takes the same number further, and names the place where this man does most harm:
If hypocrisy shapes someone's character, we can be sure that real hatred lies behind it. "Everyone who hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him" (1 John 3:15). To think of a man like this having a place among Christians is dreadful. He can only be there to scatter the sheep… He may speak fair, and his voice may sound gentle and gracious. But that is where the danger is greatest: "believe him not." The "seven abominations in his heart" show that he has completely given himself over to idolatry. Seven is the number of completeness, and abominations is a word for idols.
The next verse says the covered hatred will be exposed in the assembly. That exposure does not wait for the end:
Pretences (v. 26) may succeed among men for a while. But God knows how to check Satan and expose malicious craft during the evil day — even before His kingdom appears in open power. So from time to time He strips the covering off hatred, and "wickedness is made manifest in the congregation."
Where does warm praise turn into flattery? One writer draws the line at excess:
If we are honest ourselves, then we will see that the flattery of others is actually falsehood. Commendation, approval and appreciation are right in their place. But if they are excessive, they are unbecoming. If they take the form of flattery, they are simply not true. You cannot trust the person who does this. Ruin follows close behind his words, if he succeeds in deceiving his victims.
Honest correction is the thing to welcome instead:
"Let a righteous man strike me — it is a kindness; let him rebuke me — it is oil for my head; let my head not refuse it." This is to humble yourself under God's mighty hand, and God will exalt you in due time.
- Hidden, not loud. The hatred this verse warns of does not explode. It pretends with the lips and works unnoticed.
- Gracious voice, greatest danger. Fair speech is where the risk is highest. That is why the command is "believe him not."
- Seven means full. Seven stands for completeness — here, completeness of evil. This heart is wholly given over, full of corruption as well as violence.
- Trust rests on reliable testimony. Faith needs a witness it can rely on. That is the blessing of the God who cannot lie.
- The covering comes off. Pretence lasts a season only. God strips it away and the wickedness shows. So welcome honest rebuke, and refuse flattery that ends in ruin.
Though [his] hatred is covered by dissimulation, his wickedness shall be made manifest in the congregation.
Proverbs 26:26 ends a run of verses about a man whose warm words hide cold hatred. It makes one promise about him: the cover will come off, and it will come off in public.
The verses just before this one sketch one enemy with one aim.
But now the final and most flagrant display of evil fills the last five verses of the chapter. It deals with the deliberate pretender. He is driven by hatred, he puts on a cunning disguise, and he aims to break apart the people of God and any testimony for God. This is the enemy's work, so opposed to the precious unity emphasised in chapter 25.
What makes this hatred dangerous is that it does not shout.
So the hatred (v. 24) that is most dangerous is not the hatred that explodes in violent words. It is the hatred that would work itself out unnoticed, and so it pretends with the lips. The kind words only conceal the deceit inside the man.
The image in verse 23 explains why the covering never quite works. Dross is the waste skimmed off refined silver — it shines, but it is rubbish.
Someone may cover a piece of a broken earthen vessel, not with silver plate, but with the dross from refined silver. Of course it looks silvery, and it hides the roughness of the dross badly... "Burning lips" are the silver dross, glowing with apparent zeal, yet those who walk with God can see the hypocrisy plainly. A wicked heart will stoop to such things, but the believer ought not to be deceived.
The strange part is the mix: not bad temper, but affection and malice worn together.
The opening words of verse 23 do not suggest the heat of anger here. Anger might well go with "a wicked heart" in the usual way. But what is meant here is the extraordinary combination of expressing warm affection along with the desire to do evil. This, not that, is rightly compared to an earthen vessel overlaid not with silver, but with its dross.
Verse 25 tells you not to believe this man when he speaks kindly. One writer asks what he is doing among God's people at all.
To think of a man like this having any place among Christians is dreadful. He can be there with no other purpose than to scatter the sheep. His own immediate aim may be personal gain, but behind it is the Satanic intention of ruining what is of God. He may speak kindly, his voice gentle and gracious, but this is where the greatest danger lies: "believe him not." The "seven abominations in his heart" show he is completely given over to idolatry, seven being the number of completeness, and abominations a term for idols.
This verse does not only warn the victim. It warns the pretender: the cover will not last.
Hatred cannot cover itself forever. There comes a point where hypocrisy is laid bare. "Nothing is covered up that will not be revealed, or hidden that will not be known" (Luke 12:2). Would anyone not shrink from the disgusting sin of hypocrisy, and from the shame of being exposed? But there is no doubt about such exposure.
God does not wait for the end to act. He breaks up the deception now.
"Pretences" (v. 26) may succeed among men for a time. But even before the kingdom of God appears in displayed power, He knows how to check Satan and expose malicious craft during the evil day. So from time to time God strips the covering off hatred, and "his wickedness will be exposed in the assembly."
It is easy to read this verse as a description of somebody else. But one writer warns that the behaviour can creep into a believer's life.
No believer actually has the character of the pretender, any more than of the fool. Yet a believer can still be guilty of pretending. We see it in Galatians 2:13, when "even Barnabas was led astray by their hypocrisy." Peter's influence in this was terribly wrong — not because of hatred, but because of fear. The believer must take care to act true to his character, and not like the wicked enemy of God. But the wicked "stores up deceit within him." That is, he feeds on it, conceives it, stores it up to use whenever he pleases. But let every believer be able to say with the Psalmist, "I have stored up your word in my heart" (Psalm 119:11).
- Covered. Hatred here does not shout; it dresses up. The dangerous hatred works in the dark and speaks kindly, storing its deceit inside.
- Thin. The covering is silver dross on broken clay — it shines, but those who walk with God can see the roughness through it.
- Distrusted. Because the disguise is words, the smooth voice is the signal to stop believing, not to relax.
- Uncovered. Concealment has a limit. God strips the covering off even now, and nothing hidden stays hidden.
- Public. The unmasking happens in the assembly, in front of the very people he hoped to divide. So guard your own life against pretending.
Whoso diggeth a pit shall fall therein; and he that rolleth a stone, it shall return upon him.
Proverbs 26 closes with sayings about hidden hatred: smooth words that cover a plan to harm. Verse 27 gives the outcome of that plan, and it raises two questions — who turns the harm back, and does it hold for everyone?
Verse 26 has just described hatred hidden behind pretence. God does not wait for a future day to strip that cover off.
Deception (v. 26) may succeed among men for a time. But even before the kingdom of God appears in displayed power, He knows how to check Satan and expose malicious craft during the evil day. So from time to time God strips the covering off hatred and shows that wickedness to everyone.
The two images make one point: work done to injure someone else lands on the worker instead.
When the man who plans harm (v. 27) digs a pit for others, he is the one made to fall into it. When he rolls a stone at his neighbour's head, it comes back on himself. Even people outside Israel, who did not know God, sensed that such payback comes in this life.
Scripture records this happening twice, to people who had arranged another's ruin.
"Whoever digs a pit will fall into it, and a stone will come back on him who starts it rolling." The aim in these cases is of course to harm another. But "whatever one sows, that will he also reap." Haman built a gallows for Mordecai, and was himself hanged on it (Esther 5:14; 7:10). Jezebel with cunning cruelty had Naboth murdered. But the poor deluded woman never expected to be thrown from a window herself, trampled by horses, and eaten by dogs (1 Kings 21; 2 Kings 9:30-37).
Proverbs deals with one side of God's ways: not His pardon of sin, but His ordering of life on earth. That is why the proverb makes no exception for good people.
The book of Proverbs refers to the government of God here below. It works on the principle that "whatever one sows, that will he also reap" (Gal. 6:7). This is true of saint or sinner. Grace saves the vilest, but the government of God is over all. So if a man wastes his money, his time, or his health, he will reap the fruit of his ways in the loss of these things. A true Christian may do something without discretion, and without listening to Wisdom's words, and he may have to repent of it all his days.
A person can be forgiven and still live with what his own hands set in motion.
"Whatever one sows, that will he also reap." The sin of sowing weeds may be forgiven, but the reaping must match the sowing. The first is grace, the second is government. Each acts in its own sphere, and neither interferes with the other. God let David walk the courts of the sanctuary as a subject of grace (2 Sam. 12:20) before calling him to climb the rough slopes of the Mount of Olives as a subject of government (2 Sam. 15:30). And David's heart never had a deeper sense of divine grace than at the very time he was feeling the righteous action of divine government.
The chapter's last verse applies the same principle to speech.
The last verse tells us of the extreme wickedness of fallen man. He is not content with deceiving. "A lying tongue hates its victims", and "a flattering mouth works ruin" for the speaker as well as the target. "Let a righteous man strike me — it is a kindness; let him rebuke me — it is oil for my head; let my head not refuse it." That is what it means to humble yourself under God's mighty hand and be lifted up at the right time.
- It returns. You dig the pit for someone else, and you are the one who falls in. You roll the stone at a neighbour, and it rolls back on you.
- God governs. Proverbs describes God's rule over life on earth. What a man sows, he reaps — saint or sinner alike.
- After pardon. Grace forgives the sowing of weeds; government still brings in the crop. David knew both, and knew grace most deeply while feeling the government.
- Masks fall. Hatred can hide behind warm words for a while, but God pulls the cover off and shows it to everyone.
- Sow differently. Welcome honest correction instead of flattery. Humble yourself under God's hand, and He will lift you up at the right time.
A lying tongue hateth those that are injured by it, and a flattering mouth worketh ruin.
Proverbs 26 closes with warnings about people whose words are pleasant and whose intentions are not. Verse 28 pairs lying with flattery, and it raises two questions: why does a liar hate the person he has already hurt, and what harm can a compliment do?
Verse 28 is not a stray saying. It caps a run of sayings about smooth speech that hides ill will. One writer points out who most needs the warning.
The rest of the chapter denounces the same kind of mischief hidden under fair speech and flattery. It is deceit in various forms. We must be strongly on our guard against it — a needed caution in this evil age, especially for the Christian who walks in grace and refuses to avenge himself.
The first half of the verse sounds backwards. We expect people to hate those who have harmed them. Here the harm runs the other way, and the hatred still grows.
Falsehood and hatred always go together. One person may have done not the slightest harm to another. Yet because the second lies about the first, the hatred of the guilty toward the innocent will only increase. The remedy, of course, is honest confession. But a person used to falsehood hardens himself against admitting the truth. If someone is accused of lying about another, the wise believer will watch for signs of hatred before drawing his own conclusions.
The proverb closes the chapter as a verdict on human nature. The liar has gone past misleading someone.
The last verse tells us of the extreme wickedness of fallen man, who is not content with deceiving. A lying tongue hates its victims, and a flattering mouth works ruin — for the speaker as well as the one spoken to. "Let a righteous man strike me — it is a kindness; let him rebuke me — it is oil for my head; let my head not refuse it." This is to humble yourself under God's mighty hand and be exalted in due time.
The second half of the verse calls flattery ruinous. Flattery belongs with the lying tongue in the first half, because it is untrue.
If we are honest ourselves, we will recognise that the flattery of others is actually falsehood. Commendation, approval and appreciation are right in their place. But if they are excessive, they are unbecoming. And if they take the form of flattery, they are simply untrue. You cannot trust the person who does this: ruin follows close behind his words, if he succeeds in deceiving his victims.
The verse therefore has a use for the person being praised, not only for the person praising. Receiving flattery is its own decision.
Accepting flattery means accepting falsehood, for flattery is really deceit: it is not even honestly meant, nor is it sober, real fact. Satan is extremely skilful in such methods.
"Works ruin" is strong language for something that feels harmless. Commentators take it at full weight, and one measures flattery against outright attack.
Flattery overcomes more of God's people than the sword does. Where fierce opposition defeats its tens, smooth words overcome the thousands.
The damage has a purpose behind it.
Let us distrust the flattery of the world. A moment's reflection before the Lord would tell us that the world flatters to weaken us, and to take from us the weapons we fight it with.
If flattery ruins, honest words heal — though they hurt at the time. One writer sets a friend's rebuke against an enemy's affection.
A friend's wounds, by contrast, are faithful. Through them God does His will, even though people misunderstand and resent them for a while. An enemy gives himself away by the sheer abundance of his kisses.
- Lie — A lie does not settle the matter; it deepens it. The one who lies about an innocent person grows to hate him. Admitting the truth would cost too much.
- Harden — The way out is honest confession. But a habit of lying trains a person never to make it.
- Flatter — Flattery is the same sin in a pleasant voice. Praise beyond what is true is not kindness; it is untruth, and it marks the speaker as untrustworthy.
- Ruin — Smooth words disarm people that open attack never could. The ruin falls on the flatterer as well as on the one flattered.
- Heal — The cure is to welcome honest correction. A friend's wound is faithful; an enemy's warmth is the giveaway.
Boast not thyself of to-morrow, for thou knowest not what a day will bring forth.
Solomon opens this chapter with a blow at the confidence we place in a day we have never seen. The words are short, but they raise two questions: who owns tomorrow, and what should we do with today?
The verse does not stand alone. One writer reads it as the first shot in a series aimed at a single target.
The counsels before us in chapter 27:1-6 all aim at self-confidence. Self-confidence takes the place of dependence on God. That dependence is the first principle of the life of faith, and the enemy tries to destroy it — whether for earth, in the coming kingdom of the Messiah, or for heaven, as with Christians.
The reason given for the warning is simple ignorance. We may guess at the future; we never know it.
Clearly, no human being can see things before they take place. Solomon says: "for you do not know what a day (that is, the next day) may bring" (Prov. 27:1). We may hope or expect that certain things will happen, but we will never know them in advance. Only our God is a "God of knowledge" (1 Sam 2:3). He alone can foresee things before they happen. He knows the future. In fact, He knows the end of all things, and has done so even before the created universe came into being.
Commentators tie this proverb to James, where the same boast is met with the shortness of life.
The word in James 4:13-16 is very vivid in its call to beware of similar boasting… "What is your life? For you are a mist that appears for a little time and then vanishes. Instead you ought to say, 'If the Lord wills, we will live and do this or that.' As it is, you boast in your arrogance. All such boasting is evil." In these moral matters both the Old Testament and the New bring in the Lord, who judges self and sets it aside.
Readers sometimes hear this as a command to stop thinking ahead. One writer is careful to say it is not.
As we see straight away, he does not mean to forbid all thought about tomorrow. He is against only the spirit of those who plan without God and forget how uncertain everything here is… It is the spirit of self-confidence he is condemning, which boasts of what it can do without God.
The cure is a short phrase we add whenever we speak of the future.
The child of God who walks in godly fear trusts the Lord and plans under Him. Such a person always remembers that everything depends on the Lord and on His will. It is a healthy habit to add, whenever we speak of the future, "if the Lord wills and we live." This pleases Him. It shows that we submit to Him and depend on Him.
Trusting a day we do not own has a practical cost. It steals the day we do own.
True wisdom does not trust the future day, for it may never come. Nor are we to dwell in the past. While it is today we must live and act, and leave nothing undone that we can do today… Someone put it well: "The thief that cheats us of our days and robs us of our wealth is the plausible thought that tomorrow belongs to us." The illusion is as old as the world, but today it is as fresh and powerful as ever.
Another writer names what it takes to break the drift.
It takes the honest energy of faith to strike hard at this lazy drifting, to put us on our feet, and to get done now what ought to be done. Only the present is ours. We know nothing about the future. Let us act while we have the time.
One writer applies this to the gospel, where two voices name two different days.
Today is a moment of priceless value, tomorrow you cannot call yours. The Lord's gospel is today, the devil's gospel is always tomorrow.
Worrying over the unknown future costs us more than peace of mind.
Worse still, we have lost Him from our thoughts in all this calculating about the unknown future, which is in His hands. How often has love disappointed all our fears in ways we never dreamed of!
- The boast. The verse targets self-confidence. It pushes out dependence on God, which is where the life of faith begins.
- The blindness. No one can see ahead; foreknowledge belongs to God alone, who knew the end of all things before the world existed.
- The correction. Planning is not forbidden; planning without God is. The remedy is the habit of saying, "If the Lord wills, we will live and do this or that."
- The theft. The belief that tomorrow belongs to us robs us of today; faith answers by doing now what ought to be done now.
- The day that is yours. Today is God's day for the gospel; tomorrow is the delay the enemy offers. The unknown future is in His hands, and His love keeps disappointing our fears.
Let another praise thee, and not thine own mouth; a stranger, and not thine own lips.
This advice is not about whether you have anything worth saying. It is about who says it. It moves the praise to two other mouths: "another," and even "a stranger" — someone who does not know you.
Self-praise works against the one who uses it. One writer puts it plainly:
"Let another praise you, and not your own mouth; a stranger, and not your own lips" (Prov. 27:2). We are not to blow our own trumpets. An egotistical man is nearly always an empty man. True greatness and conceit do not run together.
This verse does not stand alone. One writer reads it together with the verse just before it as a single lesson in self-control:
This verse is closely tied to the first. Both deal with a man's proper self-control… A single heart does not exalt self, but the Lord. Even the roughest unbelievers despise a braggart. Let us not trust ourselves to talk about what we have done. It is certainly no more than we ought to have done. If it is worth advertising, someone else will usually do it. In any case, the believer is to live under the eye of God, not as answerable to men.
Anyone who knows his own failures has little to boast about. One writer draws out why silence fits so well:
The Old Testament believer knew his own failure well, and knew his need of sovereign grace. That was enough to banish high thoughts of himself and to make him attribute every right word to God. How inconsistent to sound his own praise! How fitting to be silent about any good on his part. If a stranger praised him, it was more than he deserved.
Job listed his own kindness to the needy, and every word of it was true. One writer applies this proverb to that speech:
The ear which heard his voice blessed him; the eye looked on a benefactor and a friend. It is indeed a beautiful picture, but spoiled by the pride of personal recital. "Let another praise you, and not your own mouth." Job had won the respect and affection of all… Truly he was a model man! But as for us, let it be far from us to boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ.
There is a sly way to be praised: run yourself down until someone contradicts you. One writer calls that what it is:
Do not always be telling people that you are a mere nobody. They will suspect, and probably rightly, that you are fishing for a compliment. You appear very eager to put yourself down. All the while you are hoping that your complaints will push your hearers into saying that you are really a person of considerable worth. This is deceit and pretence on your part, and a long way removed from humility.
The verse tells me to keep quiet about myself. It does not give you a free hand to flatter me. One writer warns the praiser:
One man cannot do a greater injury to another than by praising him and feeding his pride. "He who flatters his neighbour spreads a net for his feet," and a flattering mouth works ruin. And be sure of this: we are far too short-sighted to judge how godly another believer is.
Even a stranger's praise is not the last word. What a man says about himself carries no weight where it counts most:
Self-praise and self-commendation do not mean approval from the Lord, but the opposite. "For it is not the one who commends himself who is approved, but the one whom the Lord commends." Self-commendation and the love of human praise, in some form, hidden or open, are common in many who preach and teach a great deal of truth. These are boastful days. Happy is the servant who hides himself, whose aim is to please the Lord and who looks to Him for approval.
- Mouth. Shut the one mouth God never authorised to praise you — your own; people hear a boaster and judge him empty, not great.
- Heart. The mouth follows the heart: a single heart does not exalt self, and counts its best work as no more than it owed.
- Record. Job's good deeds were real and still spoiled — a true account told by yourself loses what it was worth.
- Others. The rule cuts both ways. Fishing for compliments is pretence, and flattery can feed a neighbour's pride and ruin him.
- God. Leave the verdict where it belongs. The approved man is not the one who commends himself, but the one the Lord commends.
A stone is heavy, and the sand weighty; but a fool's vexation is heavier than them both.
A stone is a weight you can feel, and so is a load of sand. This proverb puts a third thing on the scales — the provocation of a fool — and says it outweighs them both.
Sand is heavy even though each grain weighs almost nothing. What makes the third weight heavier still is that there is no reason for it.
We cannot, and should not, shrug off "a fool's provocation" as if it did not matter. We should feel how deeply wrong it is. "A stone is heavy, and sand is weighty," small as its particles are. But a fool's provocation, groundless as it is, outweighs both — a dead weight, and unbearably out of place.
The same writer describes the fool first, then his opposite. One trusts his own judgment and explodes; the other feels the insult and refuses to feed the fire.
For a man with a fallen nature, living in a fallen world, to trust himself is to play the fool. God is not in any of his thoughts. He is sure he needs no advice; he is right in his own eyes. The vexation of the fool breaks out in immediate and uncontrollable anger. He forgets God, himself, and everybody else. The prudent man does the opposite: he hides shame instead of exposing it. He feels the insult, rather than despising his brother and hardening his own heart in worldly pride. But his quiet spirit adds no fuel to the flame. It may even help the offender to judge his own unbridled behaviour. How wise it is to ignore such provocations, to hide shame not only from others but from ourselves!
This verse is not alone. One writer gathers what the Bible says about anger, and lists this proverb among the passages that mark it as the trait of a fool.
Turning for a moment to what Scripture says about it, we find that it is expressly forbidden (Matt. 5:22; Rom. 12:19); it is a work of the flesh (Gal. 5:20); it is characteristic of fools (Prov. 12:16; 14:29; 27:3; etc.); it brings its own punishment (Job 5:2; Prov. 19:19); it is often stirred up by bad words (2 Sam. 19:43, etc.), but pacified by meekness (Prov. 15:1); that we should not provoke others to it (Eph. 6:4; Col. 3:21).
The proverb weighs the fool's outburst, but the person on the receiving end is the one carrying it.
This second section of the chapter, verses 3 to 6, speaks of conflict and of help. The child of God must expect such opposition. Still, it is bound to weigh on him, as the oppression of Egypt weighed on Israel. Notice that here the proverb has in view the effect of a fool's wrath on others. Through this a believer may find out what his real, inward state is. Persecution will bring out what is actually in us. Like the stone or the sand, is it simply too heavy to bear? Or do we find the strength of God enough to enable us to bear it?
Grant's question has an answer. Another writer shows what to do with the offence instead of returning it.
If we are treated with contempt, let us not meet the "flesh" with the "flesh" and retaliate. Instead, let us turn to the Lord and lay our case at His feet. Then let us busy ourselves with His will and Word, and leave our defence with Him. It may not be that He will remove the trying circumstance, but He will surely give grace to bear it.
- Two weights. A stone is heavy. So is sand, though each grain weighs almost nothing.
- The heaviest weight. A fool's provocation outweighs both. It is a dead weight with no reason behind it, and that is what makes it so wrong.
- What it is. Scripture forbids such anger, calls it a work of the flesh, and marks it as the trait of a fool. Meekness calms it.
- Who carries it. The proverb measures the effect on others. The pressure shows what is really inside the one who bears it.
- How to carry it. Add no fuel to the flame. Lay your case at the Lord's feet, and expect grace to bear what He may not remove.
Fury is cruel, and anger is outrageous; but who is able to stand before jealousy?
This verse lines up three evils: wrath, anger, and last of all jealousy — which older translations call "envy." It ends with a question instead of a statement, and it treats the quietest of the three as the worst.
Commentators take the first half of the verse at face value. Then they add a warning about how we answer anger.
Everyone admits that wrath is cruel and anger is outrageous. But that gives no excuse for hitting back in the same spirit. If we did, we would lower ourselves to the same sinful level. We ought to be able to stand in the face of this.
One writer puts the sudden outburst and the anger held in silence under the same warning. Then he marks jealousy as worse than both.
Before God we have to face more than petty complaints. We also face the cruelty of wrath and the outrageousness of anger. Surely the sun should not set on either the outburst or the anger we hold back. But there is another evil feeling still more unworthy and dangerous: "Who is able to stand before jealousy?"
Envy is harder to face — and it tempts the one facing it.
But who does not know that envy is a greater provocation still? Who is able to stand before it? Who can hold himself back at such a time from impatience and self-righteous indignation? Envy will take countless forms of opposition, more underhand than wrath and anger, and so persistent that it wears its victims down.
One writer traces two murders back to this single root.
Envy, or jealousy, whether in a sinner or in a saint is one of the greatest incentives for evil in the world. It was envy that led to the first murder, when Cain killed his brother: it was envy that led to the greatest murder when the Jews killed their Messiah.
Another writer finds the same sin in people we would least suspect. Here it is Aaron the high priest, and Miriam.
They did not like how close Moses was growing to God. They did not like that the Lord spoke to him in one way and to them in another. Envy led them to DESPISE GOD'S SERVANT. But the Lord did not leave Moses to fight his own battles: Miriam became leprous, white as snow.
Verse 4 comes just before the words about open rebuke and a friend's faithful wounds. Quote those later verses on their own, and a grudge can look like faithfulness.
How often the envious man tries to hide his jealousy. He protests that he has no bitterness in his heart, and that he is only resisting evil and standing for the truth. Suppose we claim to be exposing some evil and telling a brother the plain truth for his good. If we then choose to say hurtful things, we can be sure that malice in the heart lies behind those words. How often people have excused the most malicious words by quoting the scripture, "Open rebuke is better than secret love. Faithful are the wounds of a friend." How few could quote the words that come just before.
Envy does not stay a private feeling.
How often we envy the wealth, or the ability, or the gift, or the holiness of another. This spirit of envy raises in my heart a spirit of enmity against my brother, and a long list of works of the flesh may result; all started from envy.
One writer finds hope in the exact form of the question.
But notice: it does not say that no one can stand. It asks a question instead. Anyone in real communion with the Lord will not be caught by this subtle attack of the enemy. But mere confidence in the flesh always ends in defeat... Therefore, only constant communion with God will protect us.
Kelly points to the remedy, and to what happens without it.
Let us look up for grace to value anything good in another, and all the more if we know we do not claim that particular good for ourselves. To allow jealousy in ourselves, or to let others plant it in us, is to give room to the great enemy.
- Ranked: The verse grades three evils. Jealousy sits at the top — above cruel wrath and overwhelming anger.
- Hidden: Wrath shows itself. Jealousy works underhand, in countless forms, and wears its victims down.
- Deadly: It armed Cain against his brother, and it armed those who killed the Messiah. Envy in a believer is as dangerous as envy in anyone else.
- Disguised: Envy borrows the language of faithfulness — "open rebuke," "faithful wounds." That is why verse 4 comes first.
- Answerable: The verse asks a question, not a verdict. Communion with God, and grace to value the good in another, keeps us standing.
Open rebuke is better than hidden love.
Proverbs 27:5 compares two things most people would never put together: a rebuke said out loud, and affection kept quiet. It puts the rebuke first. So when does silence stop being kindness and start being self-protection?
The verse does not condemn love. It condemns love that never surfaces when something needs to be said.
Real love proves itself by acting. If it stays hidden when the heart calls it to speak or work, it betrays self rather than true affection. Even if there is a fault, love is bound to give "open rebuke." Indifference passes for much in this world. But it is the opposite of love. It cares for self when it hides to avoid danger and yet pretends affection.
Keeping quiet feels generous to the one who keeps quiet. It is not generous to the person left in the wrong. Older translations render "hidden love" as "secret love."
When wrong is present, wisdom will seek to bring the help that meets the wrong. Secret love may wink at the evil, but this is not the true love of God: it is no help to the guilty party. Candid open rebuke in a spirit of kindness, not of mere censure, is both honesty and goodness. It may wound to some degree, even when done in a lowly, friendly way. But even the offender should recognise faithfulness in this. If he takes it to heart in the right way, his wounds will heal well. Moreover, it may lead him to love the wise reprover.
The next verse gives the test. Warmth is not proof of friendship, and pain is not proof of enmity — sometimes the reverse is true.
A wise man welcomes open criticism and rebuke, though such rebuke may wound, yet being given by the faithfulness of a friend, it is far better than the deceitful kisses of a flattering enemy. Verse 14 may be linked with these statements: "Whoever blesses his neighbour with a loud voice, rising early in the morning, will be counted as cursing." Insincerity lurks behind such loud, showy protestations of friendship.
Kelly reads the same contrast as a question of who is really at work in the two responses.
A friend's wounds, on the contrary, are faithful. In this way God's will is done, even though people misunderstand and resent it for a while. An enemy gives himself away by the very lavishness of his kisses. God is not in such a display, but too often it is no more than taking sides in a human cause.
This proverb allows plain speech, so it is a favourite cover for cruel words. One writer points to the verse just before it as the safeguard.
Suppose we say offensive things on purpose, under the pretence of exposing some evil and telling a brother the plain truth for his good. Then we can be sure that malice in the heart is behind our offensive words. How often people have excused the most malicious words by quoting the scripture, "Better is open rebuke than hidden love. Faithful are the wounds of a friend." But how few could quote the words that come just before. Those words warn us not to use this scripture carelessly, for they ask, "who can stand before jealousy?" (Prov. 27:4-6).
"Open" is not the same as public gossip. It means the person hears it from you first.
If we have to oppose a brother, then it should be to his face, and not behind his back. Too often the opposite happens. The man judged to be at fault is the last to hear of it, and perhaps only by a side hint. Meanwhile others freely discuss his supposed errors. All this is wrong. If we have anything to say to a brother, let us go to him and say it to his own face first of all. And let us say nothing behind his back that we would not say to his face.
The content may be sharp; the manner must not be.
The oil makes the nail drive without splitting the board. The word never enters the heart more kindly than when it falls most gently. Be as rough to your people's sins as you can, so long as you are gentle to their souls. Do you take the rod of reproof into your hand? Let them see that love, not wrath, gives the blow.
The proverb also has something to say to the one being corrected. Shrinking from honest words is itself a symptom.
There is yet another case. It is exceptional, no doubt, but by no means impossible. Someone takes these words of Scripture and uses them to shut down all faithful correction. This shows a very unhealthy condition of soul. It is shrinking from the light. For "whoever does what is true comes to the light, so that it may be clearly seen that his works have been carried out in God" (John 3:21).
- Hidden. Love that stays silent when it should speak is protecting itself, not the other person.
- Open. Naming the fault is the help the wrong needs. Hiding it leaves the person where he is.
- Faithful. A friend's wound is trustworthy; a flatterer's warmth is a display with nothing behind it.
- Checked. Weigh the verse just before this one. Envy can dress itself up as faithfulness.
- Received. Using this verse to silence correction of yourself is shrinking from the light. A healthy heart comes into the light instead.
Faithful are the wounds of a friend; but the kisses of an enemy are profuse.
Proverbs sets two kinds of affection side by side. One friend hurts you by telling the truth. One enemy lays his warmth on thick. The verse asks the question most of us dodge: do we want honesty, or do we want warmth?
The line before this one praises open rebuke over love that stays concealed. Love that stays silent when the moment calls for it is guarding itself.
It is the property of real love to prove its activity. If it stays hidden when it is called to speak or work according to the heart, it betrays self rather than true affection. Even if there is a fault, love is bound to give "open rebuke." Indifference passes for much in this world. But when it hides to spare danger and yet pretends affection, it is the opposite of love and cares for self.
A wound is not faithful because it stings. What makes it faithful is whose will it serves.
A friend's wounds, on the contrary, are faithful, because they carry out God's will, even though people misunderstand and resent them for a while.
There is a way of wounding that mends and a way that only cuts. The difference lies in the spirit of the person who speaks.
Secret love may turn a blind eye to the evil, but this is not the true love of God: it is no help to the guilty party. Open, honest rebuke in a spirit of kindness, not of mere blame, is both honesty and goodness. It may wound to some degree, even when done in a lowly, friendly way. But even the offender should see faithfulness in this. If he takes it to heart, his wounds will heal well. It may even lead him to love the one who wisely corrected him. Again, to do this work rightly takes true self-judgment and communion with God.
The second half of the verse turns on quantity. Too much affection is what gives an enemy away.
An enemy betrays himself by the very abundance of his kisses. God is not in such a display, but too often it is no more than taking sides in a human cause.
Scripture supplies two pictures: two women saying goodbye to Naomi, and Judas greeting Jesus on the night he betrayed Him.
Note this: Orpah showed more outward affection for Naomi than Ruth did. But Ruth's affection was deeper and more sincere. Orpah kissed her mother-in-law, but Ruth clung to her. Judas kissed the Saviour and betrayed Him… It is not the outward profession of Christianity that counts, but practical affection for the Person of Christ. How do we stand in this?
One scene shows both halves of the proverb at once. What makes Paul's rebuke faithful rather than cruel is what he believed about Peter as he spoke.
Judas illustrates the last part of this verse, in his betrayal of Jesus. Paul illustrates the first part, in his treatment of Peter. He goes to him openly, and in public he exposes the glaring inconsistency Peter had been just as publicly guilty of… He was convinced that Peter, deep down, loved the Lord, the Gentiles, and himself. That explains the faithfulness of his public address. It is a model of plain speaking joined with tact, and of clear reasoning joined with persuasion.
This proverb is a favourite cover for malice. The test is not the words we say, but the heart behind them.
Sometimes we say offensive things on purpose, under the pretence of exposing some evil and telling a brother the plain truth for his good. When we do, we may be sure that malice in the heart is behind our offensive words. How often people excuse the most malicious words by quoting the scripture, "Better is open rebuke than hidden love. Faithful are the wounds of a friend." How few could quote the words that come just before it. Those words warn us not to use this scripture lightly.
- Hidden love fails. Love that stays silent when it should speak is guarding itself, not the friend.
- Faithful wounds work. They are faithful because they carry out God's will, even while people misunderstand and resent them.
- Faithful wounds heal. Given in kindness rather than censure, they mend the offender and can even win his love.
- Lavish kisses warn. An enemy gives himself away by the sheer amount of affection — Orpah kissed and left, Judas kissed and betrayed.
- Check the heart first. People quote this verse to excuse malice. Judge your own heart, in communion with God, before you wound anyone.
The full soul trampleth on a honeycomb; but to the hungry soul every bitter thing is sweet.
The same honeycomb is worthless to a full man and priceless to a starving one. The food has not changed — the eater has. So what do our tastes say about the state of our souls?
The saying is obviously true of the body. That invites us to look for a deeper meaning. One writer finds it in two satisfied churches, Corinth and Laodicea. He then names hunger as the true mark of a believer.
This observation is obvious and simple. That should lead us to expect a far more important spiritual meaning. Paul rebukes the Corinthians: "Already you have all you want! Already you have become rich!" (1 Cor. 4:8). They were satiated with earthly advantages, pride, self-complacency. It is the very spirit of Laodicea — "I am rich, I have prospered, and I need nothing" (Rev. 3:17). The heart has no longing for an absent Lord and Master. Instead it feeds on the trash of this world, until it loathes the precious, sweet ministry of the Spirit of God. But, "Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be satisfied" (Matt. 5:6). This is the true character of the child of God in a barren world. And when it is so, "He satisfies the longing soul, and the hungry soul he fills with good things" (Ps. 107:9).
In the parable of the great supper, the invited guests all made excuses. The master then sent his servant out again, this time to the needy. One writer traces the refusals to fullness.
Only a sense of the need of our immortal souls will make anyone embrace God's way of salvation. Nothing else will bring us into the joy God has in our deliverance. So He sends His servant a second time. He does not send him to the proud religious leaders of the Jews, but to the needy… Needy souls do not refuse the grace of God. Those that feel no need are always full of the spirit of refusal. "One who is full loathes honey, but to one who is hungry everything bitter is sweet."
The first half of the verse can be read another way. The man too full to want honey may just be living too well. Then the honeycomb he loathes becomes evidence against him.
However much money a God-fearing person has, self-indulgence is unworthy of him. He lives in a world where we have the poor always with us, and where many sudden losses call for special compassion. What a lesson for the Christian! Both times the Lord fed the crowd by a miracle, He used barley loaves and small fish. How far from showy or appetising! And He taught the disciples to pray for bread that is enough. The full soul is unworthy of His name. The honeycomb he loathes convicts him of following the Lord of glory at a distance.
Fullness itself is not the problem — what fills you is. Turned around, the proverb describes a heart full of the Father. The world then has nothing left to offer it.
But how touching is that word "Father" — the Father's love, the Father's heart, the Father's care. What room or need is there in the soul that happily enjoys these for the things that are in the world? It is satisfied, and "one who is full loathes honey." Does not even the first hint of worldliness show a heart growing cold toward the Father?
The second half of the verse goes further. Hunger changes the taste of hard things.
Moreover, "everything bitter is sweet." When the soul hungers and thirsts after God, even the bitter trials and experiences of the wilderness turn into sweetness. Is that not true? God's ways are wonderful. His very judgments are bitter to the belly. Yet they fulfil the truth of prophecy, so they are sweet to the taste of the man of God (Rev. 10:8-10).
The same principle explains dry seasons in Bible reading. It also shows the fruit that comes when appetite returns.
To experience the sweetness of honey you have to taste it! When our hearts are full of other things, of worldly things, then we have no appetite for the Word. It is a good thing when we are hungry enough to accept every bitter thing put before us by our God and Father. Surely this is the result of reading and absorbing the Word of God. It makes us pliable in His hands and willing to do His will, which is always good and acceptable and perfect.
- Appetite decides. The honeycomb never changes; the eater does. What you find sweet or dull is a reading of your own condition, not of the food.
- Fullness refuses. Corinth's "already you have all you want" and Laodicea's "I need nothing" are the full soul. The full soul turns down the supper.
- Fullness convicts. Loathing the honeycomb exposes self-indulgence in a world full of poor and suffering people. It marks someone following the Lord at a distance.
- Hunger receives. Only a sense of need drives anyone to Christ; those who feel no need are full of the spirit of refusal.
- Hunger sweetens. To the hungry soul even the wilderness turns sweet. Bitter things become welcome, and the Word makes its reader pliable in the Father's hands.
As a bird that wandereth from her nest, so is a man that wandereth from his place.
A bird off its nest is one of the plainest sights in nature, and the verse uses it for a person who leaves the place God gave them. Two questions follow: what is that place, and what makes a heart drift from it?
Even a creature without reason feels the pull of home. One writer sets the proverb beside Cain, whom God did sentence to a wandering life:
God declared Cain a fugitive and a wanderer because he killed his righteous and accepted brother. Cain would have done well to heed the word of the Lord. But no one else is normally called to such a life. The family is the place appointed as the rule in the world as it is. Even the bird owns the attraction of her nest. Wandering from either is a picture of wretchedness.
Older translations read "his place" rather than "his home." That place begins with something ordinary: the household and the ties God has set a person inside. To leave it without cause is not adventure. It is misery.
The bird does not leave the nest by accident. Something inside moves first. One writer traces the drift back to what the heart is hungry for:
The hungry soul will not wander from the place God has for him. He thirsts for the living God with a whole heart that will not turn aside after other interests. But wandering feet follow a wandering heart. If we reason only from what we can see, we may think that far-off fields look greener. Then, following our own thoughts, we may wander like a bird from the plain truth of the Word of God. That Word sets every believer in the body of Christ as He pleases. How much better to know His mind, and firmly stand where He has set us!
Wandering rarely stops at wandering. Writing about the tribe of Dan, who abandoned their allotted territory and ended up setting up an idol, one commentator traces the whole slide back to a heart that never enjoyed what it already had:
It is an empty heart, a heart that has never taken up its own portion, that lies open to these attacks... the heart that is not filled with what is its own, that is not enjoying it, is ready for the enemy to come in and lead it into idolatry. The Danites become restless, just as the Levite did: "Like a bird that strays from its nest is a man who strays from his home."
Jotham's parable in Judges tells of trees invited to rule over the others. The olive, the fig and the vine each refused, asking why they should give up their own fruit for promotion. One writer draws the practical rule out of their reply:
Notice that in all three cases they knew the place — the honoured place — God had given them. And in each case they ask, and well they might, "Should I leave...?" Here comes a very important principle, and the young Christian will do well to remember it. Step out of the place God has set you in, and you leave behind your power for glorifying God and blessing people. You gain nothing but loss and sorrow.
The same writer looks at the trees that stayed where they were:
The olive and fig and vine trees glorified God by remaining where He had put them; and their fruit was useful to man.
Restlessness can wear the look of service. One writer names where it starts:
Perhaps, out of a desire to be noticed, they go out into a public path of service instead of living the path of home duties. That is where God would have them adorn the teaching they profess. So the restlessness never stops. They get uneasy, disappointed, discouraged — not settled here, not settled there, but never at rest.
The root is simpler still:
What is at the bottom of restlessness with us is wanting to be somewhere or something the Lord does not want us to be.
- Place. God gives each person a place, starting with the family and home. Even a bird knows the pull of its own nest.
- Heart. Feet wander because the heart wandered first. A soul hungry for God is not looking at greener fields.
- Emptiness. A heart that never enjoyed its own portion lies wide open to the enemy. Dan's restlessness ended in idolatry.
- Loss. Leave the place God gave you and you lose your power to glorify God and bless people. You gain only sorrow.
- Will. Restlessness, even when it looks like service, is wanting to be somewhere the Lord does not want you.
Ointment and perfume rejoice the heart; and the sweetness of one's friend is [the fruit] of hearty counsel.
This proverb sets two pleasures side by side: the lift a sweet scent gives the heart, and the warmth of a friend who speaks honestly. Both were built into the world, and both raise a question about what makes counsel sweet.
The first half of the verse matches experience. Fragrance revives a person who is low. One commentator sees this as God's own arrangement: even barren land yields the raw material for perfume. He then puts the second half of the proverb on the same level.
God has arranged the earth and man so that even the desert produces oil and perfume. These refresh a heart in low spirits — not only in the desert, but in lands where there is plenty. But the hearty counsel of one's friend is no less sweet.
Why should fragrance be the picture chosen? One commentator traces the picture back to the holy oil and incense of the tabernacle, the tent where Israel worshipped God. Both belonged to God alone.
God made us so that sweet scents please us in a special way. This teaches us that the Creator Himself delights in what is spiritually fragrant. Ointment is plainly a symbol of the worship of the heart, as Mary's anointing of the feet of the Lord Jesus shows (John 12:3)... It served to anoint the priests and the vessels of the tabernacle, the one place where Israel worshipped the Lord alone... God cannot share His glory with man. He will not let anyone give anything like worship to a creature (Exodus 30:34-38).
One writer names what that perfume stands for: the name of Christ, held in the heart. He also warns how little it takes to spoil it.
Merely copying the excellence of our Lord — claiming faith without the heart behind it — will meet His severe rebuke (Amos 6:6). And does it not apply to the sinful nature still in the believer? Wherever we allow quarrelling, pride and empty boasting, they are dead flies in the perfumer's oil (Ecclesiastes 10:1). They spoil all its fragrance... Let His name be in the hearts of His redeemed people here like "oil poured out" (Song of Solomon 1:3). This is the "oil and perfume" that "make the heart glad" (Proverbs 27:9).
The second half of the verse does not say a friend is sweet simply for being agreeable. In one rendering the sweetness is the fruit of hearty counsel. It grows out of open, honest talk — with God, and with other believers.
"The sweetness of one's friend is the fruit of hearty counsel." When people take counsel together openly and whole-heartedly, the effects are sweet. How true this is of our communion with God. It is just as true wherever there is honest, warm trust among God's people.
The same chapter presses the point further. Real exchange between friends leaves a visible mark.
"Iron sharpens iron, and one man sharpens another" — older translations read "sharpens the countenance of his friend." Fellowship will always have results... True Christian fellowship shares the truths we have learned from God. It sharpens believers into keener joy in the Lord and greater usefulness in serving Him. If we want results, we must practise what brings results.
Scripture does not treat fragrance as always innocent. The same thing that gladdens the heart can also serve plain luxury and sin.
Proverbs 27:9 says, "Oil and perfume make the heart glad." But people can also use it for plain luxury, or for sin, when the heart is away from God. Proverbs 7:17; Isaiah 57:9.
- Made for fragrance. God arranged the earth so that even the desert yields perfume. The gladness of this verse is designed, not accidental.
- Fragrance means worship. The holy oil and incense belonged to God alone. Our delight in sweet scent mirrors His delight in what is spiritually fragrant.
- The perfume is a Person. The name of Christ held in the heart is the oil poured out. Quarrelling, pride and boasting act like dead flies that spoil the whole jar.
- Friendship carries the same fragrance. The sweetness of a friend is the fruit of hearty counsel — open, whole-hearted talk, with God and with other believers.
- Fragrance can be faked. The same oil that gladdens the heart becomes luxury or sin when the heart is away from God. Test what you are pouring out, and on whom.
Thine own friend, and thy father's friend, forsake not; and go not into thy brother's house in the day of thy calamity better is a neighbour that is near than a brother far off.
This proverb gives two warnings, then a comparison that is harder to swallow. How can a neighbour rank above your own brother?
The first half of the verse guards ties that already exist, including one handed down from a father. One writer warns against letting personal feelings decide who stays in our lives.
True friendship does not change. Personal feelings often ruin a friendship when we let them take over. But let us not be guilty of forsaking a friend if he should leave; at least let us not cause a separation. Constancy, loyalty, faithfulness — what a precious character that is! Here the brother spoken of is of course a natural relative. But the "friend" does not speak of a natural relationship. It speaks of another relationship that is willingly taken up, and so it applies to spiritual fellowship. Will we dare to abandon fellow believers whose fellowship God has given us? Will we do it over personal feelings, irritations or jealousies — or just because we want easier circumstances and more agreeable company? But staying steady needs honest self-judgment and real work in the soul. It is not natural, and it is not automatic.
The second half is more surprising. Running to a brother in trouble sounds like the obvious move. One writer explains why it often backfires.
In a world that forgets, we should make even more of our own friend, and of our father's friend too. Still, in the day of calamity, it is unwise to rush for sympathy, even to a brother. A neighbour who is near is likely to prove better than a brother far away. A claim irritates; love is free and holy.
"Far away" is not only about miles. Distance also grows inside families over time.
If disaster comes on us, wisdom does not look for comfort from a mere natural relative, "a brother who is far away." We all know how families tend to drift apart. In time any real understanding between brothers is lost. This painful fact is strong evidence that natural relationships on their own are not stable or lasting. "A neighbor who is near" is better — that is, of course, when one has the proper character of a neighbor. Compare Luke 10:36-37. Certainly this is meant to teach us the closer relationship of those who are born of God. Their comfort, help and encouragement rest on faith and true understanding. In the same way the Lord Jesus recognised no relationship except that of "those who hear the word of God and do it" (Luke 8:21). Of course, if a brother is also a brother in the Lord, that makes all the difference.
Grant points here to the good Samaritan — the stranger who stopped for a wounded man while others walked past. Another writer turns that story into a question aimed straight at the reader.
Do you ever want a neighbour? Whom do you go to in your trouble? ... He came where the poor man was. The priest and the Levite passed by. But He sees and enters into the whole character of the evil and of the suffering man. ... He comes to meet you in your distress. He does not stretch out His hand and send favours from a distance. He enters into all the circumstances. He knows closely the need of the one who needs help.
The verse sets a friend beside a brother. One writer takes that comparison further, and points to the Friend who is closer than any brother.
Where friendship is true and real there is no restraint, and a friend may be better than a brother. This "Friend who loves at all times" is the one who "sticks closer than a brother." We do not tell our secrets to strangers. But to a friend we love and trust we tell our innermost thoughts and unload our cares. The basis of friendship is confidence and love.
- Keep. Hold on to a friend, and to a father's friend too. Personal feelings, jealousy or the wish for easier company are no reason to let go.
- Don't presume. In trouble, rushing to a brother for sympathy is unwise. A claim irritates; love is free.
- Near beats blood. Families drift, so blood ties alone are not stable. A neighbour near you helps more than a brother far away — when he truly acts like a neighbour.
- Nearness defined. The good Samaritan shows what nearness means. It is not favours sent from a distance. It is entering the whole situation of the one who needs help.
- The nearest of all. Behind the proverb stands the Friend who loves at all times and sticks closer than a brother. Real friendship rests on confidence and love.
Be wise, my son, and make my heart glad, that I may have wherewith to answer him that reproacheth me.
A father asks his son for wisdom, and the request reaches far past the home. The father's gladness is his answer to someone who reproaches him. Who is that reproacher, and how does a son's ordinary conduct answer him?
The two halves of the verse hang together. The parent does not ask for an argument to use against the critic. He asks for a life, and the life does the arguing.
When a son walks wisely, what joy to a parent's heart! It is the best answer to the reproach which a watchful life must expect from those who are lax.
The words are not limited to a human father. The believer hears God asking the same thing. A child's conduct reflects on his parent, and it reflects on God in the same way.
In this instruction the child of God hears a higher voice than that of his natural parent. The conduct of a child reflects on his parent, who feels it according to what it is. How much more so for the child of God and his Father in glory! Men do dare to reproach God, and they take advantage of every failure of His children to do it. How good it is when a wise, consistent walk on our part gives a clear answer to such charges!
The gladness in this verse is not only a human feeling. John felt it over his children in the faith, and God feels it far more deeply.
The apostle John could write, "I have no greater joy than to hear that my children are walking in the truth." The same can be said of God Himself. This is His joy, and He knows it far more deeply than the most devoted servant on earth has ever known it.
The same complaint appears in Psalm 119, where the psalmist looks for an answer to the one who reproaches him. The reproach has a source, and it reaches us through people.
The Hebrew verb "reproach" means to scorn, to find fault, to reproach. We all know that Satan is described in the Bible as the accuser of our brothers (Rev. 12:10). Satan uses human beings also to inflict scorn on their fellow men. Unbelievers may scorn and mock the believer, or ask him "tricky" questions. The verse goes on to tell us that it is only as "I trust in Your word" that the psalmist is able "to answer."
The book of Job shows this happening in the open. Satan accuses, and God answers by pointing to a man's life.
"Have you considered my servant Job?" asks the LORD. He takes up for Himself the description of Job already given. God delights in His beloved people, and in their righteous ways. If Satan accuses, He will commend. It is always so. Judgment is His strange work. He would rather dwell on good, and "if there is any excellence, if there is anything worthy of praise," He thinks about that.
Enemies once searched a man's whole life for a single charge and found nothing. His circumstances were as dark as any, and he was still a clear witness.
What a testimony! How truly refreshing to the heart! "No error or fault!" Even his most bitter enemies could not put their finger on a single blemish in his character, or a flaw in his practical career. This was a rare and admirable character — a bright witness for the God of Israel, even in the dark days of the Babylonian captivity. His life proves something no one can argue with. It does not matter where we are placed, or how our circumstances stand. It does not matter how unfavourable our position, or how dark the day we live in. It is still our happy privilege to conduct ourselves, in every detail of daily life, so that we give the enemy no occasion to speak reproachfully.
- The reproach. An accuser scorns and mocks, and he uses people to do it. The taunt against your Father may come from an unbelieving neighbour.
- The opening. Men reproach God by using every failure of His children. Careless onlookers watch the careful ones and wait for a flaw.
- The gladness. Wisdom in the child makes the parent's heart glad, and God feels that joy over His children more deeply than John felt it over his.
- The answer. A wise, consistent walk is the answer to the charge. Bitter enemies searched one man's whole record and found no error or fault.
- The precedent. When Satan accused, God named Job. He would rather commend than judge, and He still looks for a life He can point to.
A prudent [man] seeth the evil, [and] hideth himself; the simple pass on, [and] are punished.
Proverbs keeps setting two men side by side: one sees trouble coming and hides, the other walks straight into it. So what is the danger, and where do we hide?
The contrast is not between a clever man and a slow one. It is between sight and blindness:
Prudence sees evil beforehand and hides from it; the simple is blind, goes forward and suffers.
The same saying appears earlier in the book, and there the same writer draws out what "hiding" involves — not escape after the fact, but action taken while there is still time:
The value of prudence in a world like this is next urged. The circumspect sees the evil and seeks timely shelter; the heedless goes boldly forward and suffers the consequence.
Nobody sees danger ahead by instinct. Scripture gives the sight, and it warns two different people: the sinner who faces judgment, and the child of God who faces the dangers of the Christian path:
The wisdom of true sanctification is clear here. But it is the Word of God that is able to make wise (2 Tim. 3:16). It warns the sinner of coming judgment. If he is wise, he will take refuge in the blessed shelter of divine grace, the atoning death of the Lord Jesus. That is the only shelter from the wrath of God against sin. Then there are the dangers of the Christian path: the snares of Satan, threats against personal faith and godliness, cunning attacks upon the truth of the Church of God. The child of God ought not to be ignorant of these. By knowing Scripture he should foresee the grave dangers that threaten him, and take refuge in the truth God has provided.
Hiding means going to a real shelter. The Bible's history shows the men who went, and one who would not:
Men are living in danger at this hour. The day of judgement is hurrying on. In God's eyes the "prudent" are those who have fled to Christ for refuge. The sadly "simple" are those who make light of Him and His great salvation, however wise they think they are.
Why is the danger announced ahead of time? One writer answers, and then names what it is to ignore it:
Often the warning does come, and the man will not have it. Two men were told exactly what they would do:
This unwillingness to accept an unpleasant truth about oneself is nothing new in man. The prophet Elisha drew a vivid picture of Hazael's future violence. "Is your servant a dog," said the astonished man, "that he should do this thing?" But as one commentator remarks, "The dog went and did it." … The same attitude shows in the devoted Simon Peter. He did not know the weakness in himself. He burst out, "Though I should die with you, yet will I not deny you." What followed proved how true the Lord's words were. How much better if the self-confident man had heeded the gracious warning.
One writer applies this proverb to the small checks God puts in a believer's way. A blocked path is not always a setback. It can be mercy:
When we are doing our own will, or are careless about our walk, God, in His mercy, may warn us through an obstacle. It stops us if we pay attention to it, while "the simple go on and suffer for it" (Prov. 27:12). Where there is a great deal of activity and business in the work, God may allow Satan to raise up obstacles, to keep us dependent on the Lord… It is a means for our correction.
- Warning. The danger is never a surprise. Scripture warns the sinner of coming judgment, and God warns the careless believer by putting an obstacle in his way.
- Sight. The prudent man's advantage is not cleverness. He sees. The simple man is blind and keeps walking.
- Shelter. Hiding means going somewhere real. The sinner shelters in the atoning death of Christ. The believer shelters in the truth God has given against Satan's snares.
- Refusal. Hazael and Peter both heard exact warnings. Both refused to believe they applied. Self-confidence is what makes a man "simple."
- Outcome. Those who flee to Christ are prudent in God's eyes. Those who walk on are not unlucky. They suffer what they walked into.
Take his garment that is become surety [for] another, and hold him in pledge for a strange woman.
This proverb is not addressed to the reckless man. It tells whoever deals with him to take his coat as security first — which raises a question: why does Scripture treat standing good for someone else as a warning sign rather than a virtue?
The proverb does not rescue the man who has pledged himself for a stranger. It tells the lender to make him carry what he took on. One writer applies that to any case where we vouch for a stranger.
If a stranger deceives us, we must be ready to bear the responsibility for it. If someone is willing to be surety for a stranger, this verse tells us to make sure he bears the consequences if the stranger proves unreliable. Hold the one who gives a letter of recommendation fully responsible for it.
The pledge is the man's own clothing. One writer treats that loss as the next step for someone who has already thrown away his judgment.
Thoughtlessness is a direct road to ruin, even if one listens to the spendthrifts of one's own family. But what happens when a man is so weak as to become surety for a stranger? Worse still, when he listens to a strange woman. You may relieve him of his clothing at once.
The second line moves from a stranger to an adulteress. One writer weighs the two cases.
No one should become surety unless he is ready to lose. That holds when the debt belongs to a man. It is still more dangerous with a strange woman.
Proverbs returns to this subject often, and writers draw one rule from it.
Proverbs condemns going surety for another as unwise: "he who hates striking hands in pledge is secure." Going surety for a stranger it condemns completely. Many a Christian has suffered by standing surety for a friend. It may be difficult to refuse, but it is unrighteousness unless the one who acts as surety can bear the loss if it falls on him.
Another writer begins with Christ's own suretyship, then sets the limit for ours.
Yet He who was best and wisest chose to be surety for us, and suffering followed to the very end. As He knew beforehand, so He endured it all for us, to God's glory. In our own way and measure we too may take the risk. But we should only do it where we are ready to stand the loss, and can act with care and honour. Otherwise it is right as well as safe to refuse. Speculation without means, or beyond our means, is never justified. It is not kindness. It is dishonesty.
One writer applies the warning to promised giving.
We do not know how badly we may suffer through such a rash act, because it involves making promises we may find ourselves unable to keep. There is no reason for a believer ever to make such a pledge. Yet many organisations urge people to pledge a certain amount of money. If one wants to give to any project, let him do it without any pledge whatever.
Two writers dwell on that one exception.
He became surety of a better covenant (Hebrews 7:22). Solomon, who was both wealthy and wise, warns in his book of Proverbs against suretyship. "Whoever puts up security for a stranger will surely suffer harm" (Proverbs 11:15). Still, the Lord Jesus Christ, in His matchless grace, took up our cause — strangers indeed. He Himself took on our liabilities and paid our debts. The sorrows and sufferings of the cross show us the price He had to pay for our redemption.
Another writer sets our ability beside His.
When the Lord Jesus became surety for us, He was fully prepared to bear all the consequences of our countless sins, and He did this perfectly. He had both the ability and the willingness for this. Even if we should be willing to be surety for another, do we have the ability for it? In most cases, the answer is no!
- Strangers. Proverbs condemns guaranteeing a stranger's debt outright. Take a pledge from the man who does it.
- Garment. Taking his coat is not cruelty but consequence. The thoughtless man carries what he agreed to carry.
- Worse. The second half raises the danger. A pledge for an adulteress is more reckless still.
- Test. Never stand as surety unless you can absorb the whole loss. Beyond your means it stops being kindness and becomes dishonesty. Give now instead of promising what you may not have.
- Surety. Every human guarantor lacks the power to pay. Christ had both the willingness and the ability. He took our liabilities as strangers and settled them at the cross.
He that blesseth his friend with a loud voice, rising early in the morning, it shall be reckoned a curse to him.
Praise can curse. Spoken too loudly and too early, a word of blessing lands as an injury. This proverb weighs how we praise, not only what we say.
Rising early is not the problem. What a person does with that hour is. One commentator sets the two uses of the morning side by side.
To rise early in the morning and spend quiet time in prayer and fellowship with God brings the deepest blessing. But to disturb others with loud, unbecoming flattery of a friend will bring a curse. If verse 13 warns us not to let strangers deceive us, verse 14 shows that it is not the Christian's business to advertise his friends.
Why should warm words earn a curse? One commentator reads the verse beside earlier sayings in the same chapter.
A wise man welcomes open criticism and rebuke. Such rebuke may wound, but it comes from the faithfulness of a friend, and it is far better than the deceitful kisses of a flattering enemy. The fourteenth verse may be linked with these statements. Insincerity lurks behind such loud, hypocritical declarations of friendship.
The curse falls on the friend as well as on the flatterer. One writer replied to a man who had praised him:
I am sure you will feel, my dear friend and brother, that one man cannot do a greater injury to another than by praising him and feeding his pride. "A man who flatters his neighbor spreads a net for his feet," and a flattering mouth works ruin. Be assured, too, that we are far too short-sighted to judge how much piety our fellow believers have. We cannot weigh it rightly without the balance of the sanctuary, and that balance is in the hands of Him who searches the heart.
There is a reason our compliments overshoot. We see very little of the person we praise.
Flattery is completely impossible when it comes to God. All praise and worship offered to Him falls short of what He is worthy of. We cannot rate Him higher than He is. On the other hand, it is almost impossible to avoid flattery when we begin to praise people. We see one or two features on the surface of their character or their work, and those appeal to us. Many other features lie deep below the surface, and we do not see them. They would not appeal to us at all — they would horrify us. So our praise of people always has an element of flattery in it, even when we have no desire at all to flatter. Let us beware of the praise of people. When we indulge in it we damage each other, though it is very sweet to the flesh.
Public praise of Christian workers falls under the same warning.
I shudder when I see the names of Christ's servants paraded in the public journals, with flattering comments on their work and its fruits. Surely those who write such articles should think about what they are doing. They may be feeding the very thing they ought to want put to death and subdued.
None of this silences honest thanks. There is a way to weigh praise before we give it.
Paul speaks like that of the Philippians, making much of their service. He uses the balances of the sanctuary in doing this. Otherwise it would be flattery. He makes all these statements in the light of the holiest place, for he weighs these things before God. We may flatter one another and injure one another. We may point out a brother's service in front of others and injure him by doing it — unless we weigh it in the balances of the sanctuary.
The measure matters as much as the motive:
Praise, approval and appreciation are no doubt right in their place. But too much of it is unbecoming, and if it turns into flattery it is simply not true.
- Weigh the volume. Right words at the wrong pitch and hour turn into a curse. Loudness signals that something other than love is speaking.
- Weigh the motive. Insincerity hides behind loud declarations of friendship. An open rebuke from a real friend is worth far more.
- Weigh the damage. Praise feeds pride. No one can injure a friend more than by flattering him, so the curse lands on the friend too.
- Weigh your eyesight. We see one or two surface features and miss what lies below. So our praise of people carries flattery even when we never meant to flatter.
- Weigh it in the sanctuary. Appreciation is right in its place. Weighed before God it is Paul's warmth toward the Philippians. Unweighed it is a net spread for a friend's feet.
A continual dropping on a very rainy day and a contentious woman are alike
A leaky roof in a downpour is not a disaster — it is just a drip, and then another, and another, until you cannot think. That is the picture Proverbs uses for a quarrelsome home. Commentators read it as a warning about what wears people down. They also read it as a pointer to where the strength to change it comes from.
Why a drip? One writer explains where the picture comes from, and what it says about the woman it describes.
This has been understood as a drip through a leaking roof. In a land of flat roofs, that is common enough when the rain is very heavy. Only those who have been through it know how irritating and wearying it can be. But that is the character of an argumentative woman. She is out of her place, not showing the godly qualities of submission and of a meek and quiet spirit.
Proverbs names more than one sorrow in family life. One writer weighs them, and says which one comes closest.
Another brings the calamity nearer still, and more constantly: a contentious wife. Her cross and fractious spirit is a continual dropping. Not a spot in the house is safe from her turmoil.
The whole household suffers, but one person suffers most. The same writer asks where that person can go, and what he finds there.
A contentious woman is bound to be a trial to every member of the household, but most of all to her husband. The house may be roomy, but only jarring follows her; and if visitors call, it only increases his pain. He can find no better place than a corner on the housetop. There he finds quiet, and, for piety, access to the Highest.
A quarrel starts small, and that is what makes it easy to leave alone. One writer traces where it ends.
And who has not seen what a blaze a little spark can become, if godliness and grace do not rule? It is like water let out when someone starts a quarrel. At first there are only drops trickling. Then the opening widens into a flow that sweeps everything before it.
The next verse compares holding such a person back to catching the wind, or gripping oil in the right hand. One writer takes that as an admission, and then answers it.
It is no small matter to restrain someone who is contentious. Mere human power is not enough for it. But if we use the power of God, He can surely restrain even the wind. This is good work, and only the living presence of the Spirit of God can do it. The right hand is the hand of power. Meeting the oil proves the power of the Spirit of God (the oil) in a living way, through these severe tests of the wilderness path.
Grant widens this beyond the home. Such contention, he says, "is to have no place in the assembly of God: it is of the world." Timothy was warned against allowing that spirit among God's people.
He points to two men who met contention while filled with the Spirit.
When filled with the Spirit, Paul solemnly silenced the unholy contentions of Elymas the sorcerer (Acts 13:6-12). Stephen faced the contentious, angry Jewish council and bore most blessed witness to the glory of the Lord Jesus at the right hand of God (Acts 7:55-60).
Proverbs also names the opposite of the quarrelsome wife. One writer points out where she comes from.
So it is important to look to the Lord for a gracious and faithful counterpart. House and wealth may be an inheritance from fathers, as they usually were in Israel. A prudent wife was from Jehovah. What was everything else worth, however fine or plentiful, if the one who shared it all had no meekness of wisdom? Even if every material thing were lacking, what comfort and happiness to have one from Jehovah, with His light within her and around her!
- The drip — the trouble here is not one loud storm. It is small, constant, wearing repetition. Only those who have lived under a leaking roof know how draining it is.
- The drenching — a quarrelsome spirit reaches everywhere. No spot in the house is safe. Every member of the household feels it, the husband most.
- The drops first — strife starts as a trickle before it floods. Stop it early, while godliness and grace can still rule.
- The dry corner — the roof-corner escape is not just for quiet; it is also where a man finds access to the Highest.
- The downpour of the Spirit — holding back such a person is like grabbing wind or oil. Human power fails. Only God's power can restrain it — and a wife with "the meekness of wisdom" is His gift.
whosoever will restrain her restraineth the wind, and his right hand encountereth oil.
This proverb finishes a picture begun in the verse before it. There, a quarrelsome woman is like rain that will not stop dripping. Here the proverb weighs what it takes to hold her back. The question it leaves is a practical one — if force will not silence strife, what will?
Commentators read verses 13 to 16 as one small group with a shared theme.
Now verses 13 to 16 form the fourth section, dealing with testing in a strange and contentious world.
The "her" of this verse is the woman of verse 15. Grant describes the wear of that contention and says plainly where it has no place.
Only those who have experienced it know how irritating and wearying this can be. But such is the character of an argumentative woman. She is out of her place, not displaying the godly qualities of submission and of a meek and quiet spirit. This kind of contention is to have no place in the assembly of God: it is of the world. Timothy is strongly warned against allowing any such spirit among the saints of God.
An alternative rendering shifts the second line from something lost to something met:
"Whoever will restrain her restrains the wind, and his right hand encounters oil" (New Trans.).
Read that way, the two images stop being jokes about failure and become a lesson in whose strength is needed. Wind is beyond us; it is not beyond God. Oil, met by the hand of power, is read as the Spirit at work.
It is no small matter to restrain someone who is contentious. Mere human power is not enough for it. But if we make use of the power of God, He can surely restrain even the wind. Only the living presence of the Spirit of God can do this good work. The right hand is the hand of power. Meeting with oil is the proving of the power of the Spirit of God — the oil — in a living way, through these severe testings of the wilderness path. How much better this is than the emotional excitement and thrilling experiences of ecstatic joy that many today eagerly seek! It is far more sound and real. They chase such things as though that were the filling of the Spirit of God... When filled with the Spirit, Paul solemnly silenced the unholy contentions of Elymas the sorcerer (Acts 13:6-12). Stephen faced the contentious, angry Jewish council and gave a most blessed witness to the glory of the Lord Jesus at the right hand of God (Acts 7:55-60).
Older English translations end this verse with the ointment of the right hand "which bewrayeth itself." A dictionary of Bible words gives the sense of that old word:
To accuse or betray. Isa. 16:3; Prov. 27:16; Prov. 29:24; Matt. 26:73. From the Anglo-Saxon.
The Hebrew word behind the oil in this verse is the ordinary word for oil:
It is used for "fatness, oil, spiced oil," and so "ointment." On joyful occasions people anointed the head with it, Ps. 133:2. Elsewhere it is called the "oil of gladness."
If wind cannot be gripped, then contention cannot be met by matching it. Kelly applies this to the Lord's servant. The weapon that feels most natural is exactly the one he must not use.
Further, "a servant of the Lord must not quarrel [or fight], but be gentle towards everyone." This is what the Lord had taught and practised... But are not some people so trying that they deserve at least a sharp word? He ought to be "gentle towards everyone." It is not a question of human unpleasantness, but of presenting Christ properly. It is easy enough to wound or defeat a man. But what if it grieves the Holy Spirit of God and dishonours Christ? Are we resolved, as we should be, to bear things in patience and to win in the irresistible might of meekness?
The verse's picture of oil has a positive counterpart. A quiet spirit is the opposite of strife, and God Himself sets a high value on it. (The older wording quoted below, "of great price," reads "very precious" in the ESV.)
A meek and quiet spirit in a Christian woman — this we read "is in the sight of God of great price" (1 Pet. 3:4)... it is fragrant to God, as was Mary's ointment, it is beautiful in His eyes as the church is in Christ's. What could Christian women desire more than this? Here is fragrance that no perfumer's skill can produce. Here is an ornament that no jeweller can design. Here is beauty greater than anything art or nature can show. And it lasts, for what is of great price in the sight of God, He will preserve for ever.
- The setting. Verses 13–16 form one section on testing in a strange and contentious world.
- The problem. Contention is a wearying, endless drip. It belongs to the world, and God's people must not tolerate it.
- The impossibility. Human strength cannot hold a contentious spirit, any more than a hand can hold wind.
- The provision. The right hand meets oil. God's Spirit, proved in real testing, restrains where human effort fails — not the excitement many mistake for His filling.
- The result. The servant does not fight. He wins "in the irresistible might of meekness." And the quiet spirit that replaces strife is a fragrance God Himself keeps for ever.
Iron is sharpened by iron; so a man sharpeneth the countenance of his friend.
The proverb sets two pieces of the same hard metal against each other, and the result is not damage but an edge. Commentators read it as a plain statement about friendship. What passes between friends leaves a mark. So the question is who your friends are, and what you talk about.
One writer works out the comparison in detail: the file, the blade, and the change you can see in a sharpened man's face.
Fellowship will always have results. An iron file sharpens an iron blade. In the same way, when friends exchange thoughts, each sharpens the other, and it shows in his face. It is true even of ordinary knowledge: the more you use it, the more it produces. Let it be so then among Christians about the knowledge of God and the truth of His Word. When Christians share the truths they have learned from God, that fellowship sharpens them. It gives them a keener joy in the Lord and makes them more useful in serving Him. If we want results, we must practise what brings results.
This sharpening is not just a matter of personality. One writer traces it back to the way God built human society. No one person has every ability.
There are other needs even more common than this. We need to work together, and we need to divide the work between us. God gave us different abilities, so we depend on one another. This is how He meets our need for company. Here we form and strengthen the ties that hold the world together. And when mind meets mind, and heart meets heart, every hidden ability is stirred and grows.
The same writer adds that difference between friends is no obstacle here.
Yet man finds the help he seeks. "Iron sharpens iron, and one man sharpens another." Bringing men together encourages this. And the more different those men are, the more this help may show. It is struck out, you might say, when contrasted qualities collide.
When two are unequal in strength, the help runs mainly one way.
Fellowship with other Christians is also vital. It feeds the new life God gives, and helps it grow... Being with fellow Christians draws out the new nature. It strengthens the desires God has given. "Two are better than one... For if they fall, one will lift up his fellow" (Ecclesiastes 4:9-10). Someone weak in the faith may be close to falling. Friendship with stronger Christians will lift him up and make him strong.
Since contact shapes us, the choice of friends matters. The counsel is blunt.
Select only decided Christians to be your friends. Be sure your companions are strongly on the Lord's side. A man is known by the company he keeps. Stay clear of people with loose opinions and lax morals. Your companions will influence you either for good or for evil.
Good company also does something with what each friend already has.
In close walking with those who fear the Lord, the experiences and joys of each become a common blessing to all. They are multiplied in being shared together.
Sharpening depends on the subject as much as the company. In a barren time, one small group kept talking with each other. Their topic never changed.
"Those who feared the Lord spoke with one another" is God's resource for days of ruin. Look at these few faithful believers. All around them, religion had gone dead. Yet they looked for each other, found each other, and talked together... Notice too that all these faithful ones talk about only one subject. It is the comfort of Israel. It is Christ, the Messiah. It is the person of the Saviour. Such conversation pleases God, and He listens closely to it.
Closeness that can sharpen can also wound. What matters is what you stir up in the other person.
At times God may test us with loneliness. But practical fellowship is His way for His people... Proud, self-sufficient flesh may treat the help of others as worth little. But if we truly see how small we are, we will look first and above all to the One who is faithful. We will also value the support of our brothers and sisters... How easily the flesh gives in to a little spite. It loses its temper and provokes a brother, saying what it knows will offend when there was no need to say it. Let us instead provoke one another to love, by showing love.
- Contact — God made us to depend on one another. When mind meets mind, hidden abilities come out.
- Company — Because contact shapes us, choose friends who are decided for Christ. Your companions will influence you for good or for evil.
- Content — What sharpens is sharing what you have learned from God. In a dead time, the faithful had one subject — Christ.
- Caution — The flesh can use that same closeness to needle a brother. Aim to provoke love, not offence.
- Consequence — Fellowship always produces results. Shared joys multiply, the strong lift the weak, and the sharpening shows in a person's face.
Whoso keepeth the fig-tree shall eat the fruit thereof; and he that guardeth his master shall be honoured.
Two pictures stand side by side: a man caring for a tree, and a man caring for a master. Both end the same way. What does a servant get back from a life spent on someone else's interests?
This verse belongs with the one before it, and both are about the same thing.
The fifth section of our chapter covers only verses 17 and 18. It speaks of recompenses, the reaping of what is sown.
It is the harvest that grows from what a person gives himself to.
Commentators read the fig tree as a picture of Israel. That changes who the fruit-eater is, and it brings a warning with the promise.
The fig tree speaks of the nation Israel; and a Jew whose love for the nation led him to seek the blessing of his nation would himself be blessed through this. In the same way, the child of God today may care for the church, the body of Christ, and for its proper interests. If he does, he himself will reap proper spiritual benefit. This is good service to our Master, in reference to His interests — "waiting on the Master" — and it cannot but result in honour for the servant. Seeking our own honour will, on the other hand, result in our dishonour.
So the fruit-eater is not the one who plants for himself. He is the one who tends what belongs to another and finds himself fed in the process.
Where the ESV says "guards," an older translation reads "waits on his master." Writers tie that word to the promise made to those who wait on the Lord.
It is good when Christians who feel their own weakness "wait on the Lord." We are indeed like water spilled on the ground that cannot be gathered up again. We wait on Him because "in the Lord Jehovah is everlasting strength." And we are told, "he who waits on his Master will be honoured." At the time Isaiah spoke, all was weakness and confusion in Israel... Then came the blessed and definite promise, surely not less for us than for Israel: "they that wait on Jehovah shall renew, or change, their strength. They shall mount up with wings like eagles; they shall run and not be weary; they shall walk and not faint." This overcomes faintness and weariness. He gives power to run in His service, and strength to walk carefully — to all who wait on the Lord.
So waiting is not idleness. It is where the strength for the work comes from. It also settles whose interests the servant works for.
We are afraid that this seeking of our own interests and not Christ's is sadly common among believers today. No servant of God can serve the saints so effectively as the one who moves among them seeking nothing but the interests of Christ.
The verse promises honour but does not say who gives it. Writers point to the words of Jesus: "If anyone serves me, the Father will honor him." They also ask who this Master is.
"If any man serve Me" — who is this ME? The humbled and rejected Son of God! Who serves Him in the hour of His unpopularity and rejection? Such are honoured by the Father, and the honours will be publicly theirs when the day of the great review arrives. The highest honours of the world are only tinsel compared with this.
The verse does not say when the honour comes. Commentators point to the Master's return.
The servant may care for His interests with zeal, and do His work faithfully and with intelligence. He seeks sinners earnestly so that they may be saved. He loves and tends the saints because they are precious to Him. The Lord is not unmindful of the service; nor is God unrighteous to forget the work. For that servant whom the Lord on coming shall find so doing, He will set over all that He has. And has He not pledged Himself to act this way, He who is Heir of all things? The servant shall share in the display of his Lord's glory, if he serves faithfully now in the day when He is slighted.
- Recompense. The verse speaks of "the reaping of what is sown" — the return that comes to a life poured into something.
- Tending. The fig tree pictures Israel. The same care now goes to the church, and the one who gives it reaps the benefit.
- Waiting. "Waiting on the Master" is where the servant finds strength; those who wait on the Lord run without weariness and walk without fainting.
- Interests. Nobody serves God's people so well as the one who seeks only the interests of Christ. Seeking our own honour ends in dishonour.
- Honour. The Father honours those who serve His rejected Son. The reward is public at His return — a share in the display of His Lord's glory.
As [in] water face [answereth] to face, so the heart of man to man.
Still water gives back a face. Solomon says the human heart does the same thing, giving back the heart of every other person — "so the heart of man to man," in the older wording the writers below follow.
Before glass, a quiet pool was the only mirror people had:
The still pool of water was man's first mirror. Gazing into it, a person sees his face reflected. As truly as the face seen in the pool is like the face which the water reflects, so truly does one man's heart reflect the other's. Though there may be culture, education and a certain refinement, underneath each human being there is the same corrupt, fallen human nature.
Another writer notices which mirror Solomon named:
It is not "As in a mirror," but "As in water." It is almost impossible to get an absolutely flat surface on either glass or metal. And to see a perfect image of yourself, you must look at a surface that is perfectly flat. An ordinary mirror only reflects a resemblance. There is always more or less distortion. But look into a pail or pool of water perfectly at rest, and you see an exact image of yourself in the reflection.
The proverb tells you what the mirror does, not where to find one. One writer finds it in Scripture:
Water will act as a mirror to reflect a man's face just as it is. The Word of God is likened to water (Eph. 5:26) and in this I see the reflection of my own heart, answering to the heart of all mankind. The deceitful motives and ways of people that Scripture exposes are only a true reflection of my own heart, and of every human heart.
The verse says hearts match. It does not say lives look identical:
"As in water face answers to face, so the heart of man to man" — the heart, not necessarily the life. As to the life, God has given many restraints and hindrances that keep it from being just what the heart is. Evil also has many forms, and some look very different from others — indeed, in a true sense they are different. In the coming day of judgment, as we know, God will judge each person separately. But toward God, at bottom, there is no difference by nature.
If the reflection is exact, the respectable person is no better inside than the criminal. One writer tests this on two men: Hezekiah, the king of Judah who feared God, and Sennacherib, the Assyrian invader who mocked Him:
Are we ready to admit such a verdict — to believe that "there is no distinction," and that the God-fearing Hezekiah and the godless Assyrian are no different in nature? … The Holy Spirit would teach us that the flesh in a Hezekiah is no better than the flesh in a Sennacherib. "No human being can boast in the presence of God." "As in water, face answers to face, so does the heart of man to man" — one heart matches another exactly as the face looking out of the water matches the face looking in.
The same verse turns the record of past failures into a warning about the present:
"For whatever was written in former days was written for our instruction." The history of the professing Church has often repeated Israel's history; for "as in water face answers to face, so the heart of man to man." Only, in the Christian world, the corruption has been even worse and the turning away from God even more obvious.
If no one's heart is better, no one is saved by being better. That leaves only a new birth that starts with God:
But if some — if we have yielded, is it because of some betterness in us? Were our hearts naturally more teachable or obedient? Scripture shall answer for us: "As in water face answers to face, so the heart of man to man." Therefore it was necessary that we should be born again, "not of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God" alone.
The same writer looks at the way people treated Jesus and sees his own face there:
Murder, in seed form, lies buried in the natural heart of every person born into the world. … I know from this verse in Proverbs what I am looking at when I see the Jewish heart showing itself in the presence of Jesus here on earth. I see, not a resemblance of my Gentile heart, but an exact image. And yet, wonder of wonders! He loved, and loves, me still! And when He came to earth He knew just what treatment He would receive at the hand of man.
- The mirror. Still water was the first looking-glass. It gives back an exact image, not a rough likeness — that is why Solomon named water and not polished metal.
- The face. Scripture is the water held up to you; what it exposes in other people's motives is a true reflection of your own.
- The depth. The likeness is in hearts, not in behaviour — God-given restraints keep many lives from showing what is inside.
- The level. Hezekiah and Sennacherib share one nature, so the verse ends every claim that some are made of better stuff.
- The answer. No one looks into the water and sees a better face. The way out is to be born of God — and Christ came already knowing what He would see.
Sheol and destruction are insatiable; so the eyes of man are never satisfied.
The verse sets two pictures side by side: the realm of the dead, which swallows one generation after another and never fills up, and the human eye, which sees everything and still wants more. If desire works like the grave, can anything on earth fill it?
What death does to bodies, the eyes do to everything they look at. (Older translations render the two Hebrew words as "hell and destruction.")
What the eye sees seems to wake covetousness again and again. It takes stern self-judgment to hold back this natural impulse of our hearts. It is a disease of all mankind. It is like the way sheol and destruction devour mankind and are never satisfied. Sheol is the state of the spirit after death, apart from the body. Death feeds on mankind without a pause. It lays the body low in destruction and sends the spirit into the realms of the unseen, leaving only mourning and depression. In the same way, man's eyes feed on all they can see, and never gain a satisfying, living, vital result. All is transient and vain.
The name itself carries the idea of demanding.
The word seems to come from shaal, which means "to ask." Most think it takes its meaning from the way death keeps "demanding" its victims and is never satisfied.
The second word, "Abaddon" or "destruction," does not mean that things stop existing.
Scripture never has annihilation in view in any of these passages. Even in material things, everyone agrees that nothing is ever annihilated. Some passages speak of destruction as a place or a state of existence: "Hell and destruction are before the Lord"; "Hell and destruction are never full."
Scripture traces a chain from looking to wanting to taking. Achan, the soldier who took spoil God had forbidden, is the classic case.
This man had followed his natural inclinations; he had begun where we all begin, where the first man began. "I saw" (v. 21) — "when the woman saw" is said in Genesis 3:6. He had eyes that knew how to pick out the fine things among the spoil. His eyes were the avenue to his heart, but there was no sentinel on watch, no challenge sounded in case of an attack. The forbidden thing takes hold of the heart through the eyes, and stirs the heart to lust: "I coveted them." "Then when lust has conceived, it brings forth sin": "I took them."
So the practical question is who is using the eye.
The Spirit of God may be using my eye to take in and survey everything important for me to see on my course. Or the natural mind may be using it to gather materials for its own support. That is why the "lust of the eye" belongs with the "lust of the flesh," though no one ever thinks the two are morally equal. Both tie us to the world, which is not of the Father. And the "lust of the eye" is even the more dangerous of the two, because people fear it least and discourage it least.
Everyone assumes there is a point where wanting stops. Even a common saying about "enough" shows there is not.
"Enough is as good as a feast," says the world, and for things that wear out as you use them, that is true in its way. Yet even here the world convicts itself, for it admits that by enough every man means something more than he has. So in practice he never reaches his "enough" — and how much less the feast? ... The human heart is too large for any earthly thing to fill it!
One writer finds the same restlessness in eye and ear, and points to what ends it.
Even for the senses of widest range and the easiest to please, the eye is not satisfied, nor is the ear filled. The result is weariness and disappointment, not happiness. What a difference when one beholds the Son and believes on Him! For He is the Bread of life, and the believer feeding on Him neither hungers nor ever thirsts again.
- Never full. The grave takes life after life without pause. Human desire works the same way: always feeding, never finished.
- Never enough. By "enough" everyone means more than they have now. So the target moves every time you reach it.
- Never neutral. The eye is the avenue to the heart. Eve saw, Achan saw; each then coveted, then took, with no sentinel on watch.
- Never harmless. The lust of the eye ranks alongside the lust of the flesh. It is the more dangerous of the two, because so few people fear it.
- Finally satisfied. What earth cannot fill, Christ can: the one who feeds on Him as the Bread of life neither hungers nor thirsts again.
The fining-pot is for silver, and the furnace for gold; so let a man be to the mouth that praiseth him.
The proverb sets a compliment beside a furnace and calls them the same thing. Metal goes into the fire to show what it really is. Praise does the same to a man.
Heat adds nothing to the metal. It only brings out what was already there. One writer finds a safeguard in the verses just before this one.
Intense heat tests silver and gold. In the same way, the praise of men's lips tests a man. Let him remember the two previous verses, and human praise will not puff him up. Mere flattery will not deceive us if we remember the simple, honest fact of what we are. Silver is mentioned here. Is that not a reminder that Christ has redeemed us by His precious blood? That work for us is infinitely precious. Gold stands for the glory of God, and if His glory delights our hearts, it will drive out every desire for our own glory.
We usually think of testing as hardship. This proverb locates it somewhere else — in the applause — and one writer traces that in Hezekiah, the king who had already been through severe illness and deliverance, and then welcomed visitors from Babylon.
In the matter of the ambassadors from Babylon, Hezekiah shows what he really is. After deep searching of soul he had vowed, "I will walk slowly all my years." Even so, he has no defence against the flattery of the world… The man who has learned resurrection through discipline still has no defence when Babylon recognises him and makes much of him… When men acknowledge a man and make much of him, that is when he is tested. "The crucible is for silver, and a man is tested by his praise." Our flesh enjoys being recognised and exalted, and that simple fact proves how dangerous praise is for us.
The praise itself is also faulty. People are not being malicious. They simply cannot see past the outside.
It is almost impossible to avoid flattery when we begin to praise men. We see one or two features on the surface of their characters or their actions, and those features appeal to us. But we do not see the many other features, deep below the surface, that would not appeal to us at all — they would horrify us. So our praise of man always has an element of flattery in it, even when we have not the slightest desire to flatter. As saints, let us beware of the praise of men. By indulging in it we damage each other, though it is very sweet to the flesh.
The proverb watches the man being praised. But someone is doing the praising. One writer turns the warning on the speaker, and points to the day when the Lord gives His verdict.
I am sure you will feel, my dear friend and brother, that one man cannot do a greater injury to another than by praising him, and feeding his pride… we are far too short-sighted to judge how godly another believer is. We cannot weigh it correctly without the balance of the sanctuary, and that balance is in the hands of Him who searches the heart. So judge nothing before the time. Wait until the Lord comes, brings to light what is in the heart, and gives to every man his praise.
Earlier in the same chapter comes the instruction to let someone else do the praising. Commenting there, one writer treats even a stranger's compliment as generous rather than deserved.
How inconsistent to sound his own praise! How fitting to be silent about any good on his part. If a stranger praised him, it was more than he deserved. Here too the New Testament shows the truth more deeply in Christ. It calls for lowliness of mind, valuing one another as more excellent than ourselves — not as a nice feeling, but as a living truth of faith.
Human praise is a test, not a verdict. The real verdict is still to come.
How often the saints praise us for the very things in which we can find the flesh at work — some selfish motive that we have to judge in ourselves before the Lord. We are therefore to judge nothing before the time. Both the condemnation and praise of men may be equally at fault.
- Furnace — praise does to a person what fire does to metal: it does not improve him, it reveals him.
- Flattery — human praise always contains some flattery. People see the surface, not what lies beneath.
- Fall — the danger point is honour, not hardship. Hezekiah stood through discipline, then gave way to Babylon's flattery.
- Fuel — praising others is not harmless; it feeds pride, and we lack the ability to weigh anyone rightly.
- Final word — the true verdict waits for the Lord. He alone reads the motives behind the actions people admire.
If thou shouldest bray a fool in a mortar among wheat with a pestle, yet will not his folly depart from him.
Crushing grain under a pestle was the most thorough treatment a home could give it. The proverb says even that leaves a fool unchanged. So what makes a person a fool here? And if pressure cannot remove folly, what can?
The mortar and pestle were everyday tools, and the image turns on how thoroughly they crushed the grain.
The monuments of Egypt show that in ancient times, as now, people used stone mortars with stone pestles to pound hard seeds. The manna was ground in mills or beaten in a mortar (Numbers 11:8). This pounded the seeds very small. Even so, such treatment would not cure a fool of his folly. It shows that nothing can correct the man who despises wisdom and instruction.
Folly here is not low intelligence. It is a settled attitude toward counsel, and it has a direction — away from God.
He is the person who is uninstructed, and disregards both counsel and instruction. So it borders on irreverence toward both man and God. It flows from a groundless independence of will, with no independence of understanding and knowledge... This, as regards God, is practical atheism. The Psalms and Proverbs are full of matter connected with this.
The verse sets the fool among the wheat, and that detail matters. Pounding does grain good. The same treatment does nothing for a fool.
The mortar was a vessel in which wheat was pounded with a pestle, to remove the husks and make it edible. The true child of God is likened to wheat (Matthew 13:30, 38), and the wheat must be sifted, the Lord sometimes allowing even Satan to do this work (Luke 22:31). But if a fool is put in company with the saints of God, and pounded with the trials that ought to remove all dross, this will still not remove his folly from him. Environment and training will not decide an issue like this. "You must be born again." Only a real work of God in the soul will accomplish true and permanent results.
The proverb states a rule that runs through Scripture. Pain can be severe and still leave the heart untouched. One writer traces the same pattern in a scene of judgment.
Nor does the darkness produce repentance: "People gnawed their tongues in anguish and cursed the God of heaven for their pain and sores. They did not repent of their deeds." That is how hardening sin is. And that is how powerless judgment is on its own to break the heart and bring the soul to God.
If crushing cannot remove folly, then improving what is already there aims at the wrong target. Something must come in from outside.
There is no use in trying to make foolishness wise. You must bring heavenly wisdom into a heart that folly alone has governed until now. Again, "you have put off the old self" (Colossians 3:9). He does not say, You have improved, or are trying to improve, "the old self"; but, You have put it off. This gives us a totally different idea.
The verse closes a door. Commentators agree that only new birth opens another. One writer puts the appeal straight to the reader.
You are opposed to God at the very source of your being. So it is clear that you will not do for God. You must be born anew, every one of you. You cannot be reconstructed. You cannot be patched up. I know you go in for reformation; but it will not do. It is like painting up a rotten ship, putting in new rigging and new masts, and sending it out to sea only to sink in the first storm. You must have an absolutely new nature, and you cannot get it from anyone but the blessed Son of God. Self-improvement is a huge delusion.
The proverb describes a condition, not a verdict with no appeal. One writer ties the hopelessness to the fool's own choice; another names what would end it.
Verse 22 sums up the hopelessness of man's condition, if he chooses to remain a fool, ignorant of the grace of God, a stranger to new birth.
Nor is there any hope of better things, unless the fool repents and learns wisdom from above.
- The mortar. Pounding grain with a pestle was the harshest treatment a home could give. The proverb takes that extreme and says it still fails on a fool.
- The fool. He is not stupid. He is uninstructed by choice. He brushes off counsel, and that independence toward God is practical atheism.
- The limit. Pounding improves wheat; it does nothing for folly. Trials, good company and training reach the circumstances, never the nature.
- The mistake. Reformation aims to improve what must instead be put off. You cannot make foolishness wise; wisdom from above has to be brought in.
- The cure. Only new birth changes what pounding cannot. So the verse is hopeless only for the man who chooses to stay a fool.
Be well acquainted with the appearance of thy flocks; look well to thy herds
The verse tells a farmer two things: know your animals one by one, and keep your eye on them. Commentators read the picture as a charge about caring for people — knowing them, watching over them, and doing it while there is still time.
Human effort by itself comes to nothing. That is no reason to go slack in what God has given us to do.
The fact that mere human work is empty is no reason to be lazy in the Lord's work. Faith in the Living God and diligence go together, for in this there is no emptiness: "in the Lord your labor is not in vain." Our verse implies shepherd care. However weak the day we live in, the need of souls should draw out tireless work and concern from our own hearts.
Knowing the condition of a flock is not a head count. It means being able to tell what is wrong with one person.
The public teacher cannot do this. Certainly, if he has something of the pastor in him, his public preaching can reach a great deal of the soul's private struggles, sorrows, and difficulties. But he cannot fully meet the soul's individual need. This is the pastor's holy work. As we see it, a pastor is to the soul what a doctor is to the body. He must understand disease and medicine. He must be able to tell what is wrong. He must be able to discern the spiritual condition, so as to apply the true remedy.
That kind of knowledge costs the one who carries it.
What I mean by a pastor is a person who can carry the whole sorrow, care, misery, and sin of another on his own soul. He takes it to God, and brings back from God what will meet it, before he goes to the other person.
The second half of the verse asks for the shepherd's eye — and an eye catches small changes early.
He needs a skilled eye to watch faces, to notice movements, and to catch the first change in behaviour. Someone hurries off at the end of a meeting to avoid speaking or being spoken to. Why is this? He was not like that a while ago. Ask, and you find that he took offence at what he thought was neglect, or that the leader himself seemed to show favouritism and hurt him.
Looking well also means going out after what has drifted off.
Shepherding the sheep is more than feeding them. It is going after the sheep when they have slipped away under the hedge and may be torn by the thorns. It is comforting them, caring for them as well as feeding them, and nursing and tending them in every way.
The verse says "your flocks." Yet the flock of God was bought, and its price sets how tenderly it must be handled.
The sheep had been "purchased with the blood of His own," that is, God's own Shepherd (Cf. Zech. 13:7), and therefore of priceless value to Him. This fact should move our hearts in diligent, tenderest care for all the flock of God.
The window for this work has an end.
Time for work in natural things is limited, and natural wisdom makes use of the present. How true this is in the things of God! We have only the present to work for the Lord, to gain for Him what will please Him in the day of rewards. "Engage in business until I come," He says. When He comes, the account cannot be put off.
The flock also feeds and clothes the one who tends it. The care comes back to the carer, and the animals point past the farm.
Care for souls, young and tender as they may be, works for our own benefit too. The wool of the lambs clothes the shepherd, and the price of the goats is enough to buy land. There is also a reminder of sacrifice here. The lamb pictures the Lord Jesus in His quiet submission in death for us, and that is what really clothes us in the eyes of God.
- Diligence — the emptiness of human effort is no excuse for laziness. Faith and hard work belong together, because work for the Lord is never wasted.
- Know — real care works like a doctor with a body. It tells what is wrong with one person and brings the right remedy.
- Look — watching means catching the first small change. Then it means going after the one who slipped away, instead of waiting for them to come back.
- Whose — the flock was bought with the blood of God's own Shepherd. Its value, not our energy, sets how tender the care must be.
- Now — we only have the present to work for the Lord. That work feeds and clothes the shepherd himself, and it points back to the Lamb who clothes us before God.
for wealth is not for ever; and doth the crown [endure] from generation to generation?
The verse just before this one tells the owner to know his flocks and herds well. Here Solomon gives the reason for that care: wealth runs out, and no crown lasts through every generation.
If nothing we build lasts, why work hard at all? One writer turns that thought around.
The emptiness of man's own work is no reason to be lazy in the Lord's work. Faith in the Living God and diligence go together. In the Lord's work there is no emptiness: "your labour is not in vain in the Lord." Our verse implies shepherd care, of course. However weak the day we live in, the need of souls should draw out tireless labour and concern from our own hearts.
The same writer draws out the deadline inside that reason.
Time for work in natural things runs out, and natural wisdom makes the most of the present. How true, too, in the things of God! We have only the present to labour for the Lord, to acquire for Him what will please Him in the day of rewards. "Engage in business until I come," He says, for then there will be no delaying of the account.
One writer sets out the two warnings the apostle gives to people with money.
So the apostle warns first against pride, and then against resting your hopes on wealth. Money soon grows wings and flies away. Its owner is often called away himself, in the middle of his plans to make himself great. "Uncertainty of riches" indeed: how true and expressive!
The same writer names the one thing riches cannot outlast.
Confidence in riches is unsafe. Riches certainly make wings for themselves and fly away like an eagle toward heaven. No wonder that the man who trusts in them will fall. On the other hand, righteousness endures, whatever comes from outside.
The verse's second line moves from private wealth to public power. One writer answers from history, then names the one exception.
The fact is that there never has been a king in this world who has not, sooner or later, lost his crown. There never has been a kingdom that has not been overthrown, or is going to be. But God is about to bring in a King who will never lose His crown, and a kingdom that will never pass away.
If nothing here stays with us, ownership itself needs rethinking. One writer puts the danger in our hearts, not in the things themselves.
Our danger lies in the tendency of our hearts to seek a portion here, to hold present things as though they belonged to us. In truth, nothing here belongs to us. Our portion is in the eternal things. We hold what we have only as stewards, on trust. We must give account for all.
The verse asks whether a crown endures. One writer points to the one crown that does.
"When the chief Shepherd appears, you will receive the unfading crown of glory" (1 Peter 5:4). Here the Apostle Peter is speaking to the pastors of the flock of God. He tells them of the unfading crown of glory that the Chief Shepherd will award to faithful under-shepherds. It is an unfading crown, unlike the laurel crown of the Corinthian games, which began to fade as soon as the winner put it on his head.
- Nothing here endures — riches grow wings and fly away, and no king in this world has kept his crown.
- So work now — our time runs out; the present is all we have to gain what will please the Lord "in the day of rewards."
- Hold, don't own — nothing here belongs to us; we hold it as stewards, and we must give account.
- Tend the flock — the care our verse calls for is shepherd care, and the need of souls should draw out tireless concern.
- One thing endures — righteousness outlives riches, and the Chief Shepherd's crown never fades.
The hay is removed, and the tender grass sheweth itself, and herbs of the mountains are gathered in.
This verse paints a farming scene. The farmer has cut the hay, new grass is already pushing up, and the mountain plants are ready to gather. So what does a picture of grass and hay teach anyone who is not a farmer?
The lines just before this one deny that wealth or a crown lasts. What follows is not resignation but work — and one commentator reads the shepherd's watchfulness as a picture of caring for people.
Because mere man's work is vanity is no reason to be slothful in the Lord's work. Faith in the Living God and diligence go together, for in this there is no vanity: "your labour is not in vain in the Lord." Our verse implies pastoral, shepherd care. However weak the day we live in may be, the need of souls should draw out tireless labour and concern from our own hearts.
The whole verse turns on timing. Each stage — hay cut, grass rising, herbs gathered — has its own short season.
Time for labour in natural things is limited, and natural wisdom takes advantage of the present. How true, too, in the things of God! We have only the present to labour for the Lord, to acquire for Him what will please Him in the day of rewards. "Engage in business until I come," He says, for then there will be no delaying of the account.
Grass and hay come and go fast. Yet the verse ends with a gathering, not with withering.
This also shows how quickly the present passes. Our lives are only a vapour, come and gone, like the grass and the hay. Yet something is gathered. Fruit brought forth for the Lord in this short life will keep its value long after our story here is over. "Your fruit shall remain" (John 15:16). It is a wonderful thing that the believer's life is not all emptiness and frustration. God's work in his soul will bear much fruit.
Grant's own rendering of the verse keeps that sense of a cycle in motion rather than a landscape stripped bare:
"The hay is removed, and the tender grass shows itself, and herbs of the mountains are gathered in" (New Translation).
The new growth matters because it feeds the flock. One writer follows the picture of grass from Proverbs into the Gospels, where the Lord makes a crowd sit down on the grass.
"Green pastures" — what restful freshness, what comfort too, in a scene of dry waste and barrenness. The "tender grass" has its place in the welfare of the flock (compare Proverbs 27). And "His favour is as dew upon the grass" (Proverbs 19) — so wonderfully seen when He made the people sit down where "there was much grass in the place" (John 6:10). Blessed, compassionate Lord!
The next verses spell out the return: clothing, land, and food. Commentators read the animals themselves as pointing beyond the farm.
Care for souls, young and tender as they may be, will work for our own benefit. The wool of the lambs clothes the shepherd, and the price of goats is enough to buy property. There is of course a reminder of sacrifice here. The lamb is a picture of the Lord Jesus in His quiet submission in death for us. That death is the real means of clothing us in the eyes of God. The goat speaks of Him taking our place, a propitiation "for the whole world," that is, "the field," which His death has purchased. Not that the world is redeemed, but redemption is available for it, and all who receive the Lord Jesus receive the eternal benefits of this great work.
And the harvest is not hoarded. It reaches past the man who worked for it:
The goats' milk of course speaks of the nourishment that comes from the sacrifice. It is enough for the individual, for his household, and for others who depend on him — serving maids. For faith cannot help considering the welfare of others. Here the calm confidence of faith and the devoted energy of faith come together beautifully. It is a scene of quiet prosperity and rest.
- Season. Hay, new grass, gathered herbs — each has its moment. Wisdom uses the present.
- Labour. Human effort on its own is empty, but work done for the Lord is not — and the flock in the picture stands for people needing care.
- Grass. Our lives are a vapour, as short-lived as the hay in the picture.
- Fruit. Yet the harvest still comes in. What we bring forth for the Lord outlasts the life that produced it.
- Provision. The harvest clothes, buys and feeds. It supplies the worker, his household and all who depend on him.
The lambs are for thy clothing, and the goats are the price of a field;
Proverbs 27 ends with a farm scene. The man who tends his flocks finds that they clothe him, buy him land, and feed his house. Commentators read this as plain wisdom about hard work. They also read it as a picture of care for people, and of the sacrifice that clothes us and buys the field.
The verse follows a call to know your flocks well. Leslie Grant takes that as a call to steady work with people, not just animals.
Man's own work is empty, but that is no reason to be lazy in the Lord's work. Faith in the Living God and diligence go together, for in this work there is no emptiness: "your labor is not in vain in the Lord." Our verse implies pastoral, shepherd care, of course. However weak the day we live in, the need of souls should draw out the tireless labor and concern of our own hearts.
Grant reads the passage as a lesson about time.
Time for labor in natural things is short. Natural wisdom makes the most of the present. How true this is in the things of God too! We have only the present to labor for the Lord, and to gain for Him what will please Him in the day of rewards. "Occupy till I come," He says, for then there will be no delaying of the account.
The wool of the lambs becomes the shepherd's coat, and the goats fetch enough to buy ground. Grant sees both a return on care and a picture of sacrifice.
Care for souls, young and tender as they may be, will work for our own benefit. The wool of the lambs clothes the shepherd, and the price of the goats is enough to buy property. There is of course a reminder of sacrifice here. The lamb is a picture of the Lord Jesus in His quiet submission in death for us. He is the real means of clothing us in the eyes of God. The goat speaks of Him in substitution for us, a propitiation "for the whole world" — that is, "the field," which He purchased by His death. Compare Matthew 13:44; 1 John 2:2. The world is not redeemed, but redemption is available for it. All who receive the Lord Jesus receive the eternal benefits of this great work.
"The price of a field" links this verse to the parable of the treasure hidden in a field. William Kelly notes that the buyer takes the whole field, not just the treasure in it.
The Lord bought the world and every soul in it: all mankind belongs to Him. He does not own the earth only as the One Who created it; He has also bought it. After sin entered and brought in confusion and every evil work, He bought all here below with a price. So, in the parable of the treasure hidden in a field (Matt. 13:44), the man who found it goes and sells all that he has and buys that field — not the treasure but the field. No doubt it is the treasure that gives him joy, but he buys the field, and not the treasure only.
Frederick Grant answers from the goat chosen by lot for the Lord. Propitiation means the satisfying of God. Substitution means one taking the place of another.
The goat chosen by lot for the Lord speaks as plainly of substitution as it does of propitiation. The goat stands for the sinner, and it is the very thing that speaks of substitution. No picture could convey the thought more exactly. It proclaims propitiation to be by substitution.
The chapter ends with goats' milk. Grant reads those closing lines as a scene of supply that reaches past the owner himself.
The goats' milk of course speaks of the nourishment that comes from the sacrifice. It is enough for the man himself, for his household, and for others who depend on him — the serving maidens. For faith cannot help considering the welfare of others. Here the calm confidence of faith and its devoted energy blend beautifully. It is a scene of quiet prosperity and rest.
- Know — the verse rests on knowing your flock. Commentators apply that to caring for people: "your labor is not in vain in the Lord."
- Now — time for labor is short, so the present is when we work for the Lord and gain what will please Him in the day of rewards.
- Clothing — the lambs' wool covers the shepherd. The Lamb, in His quiet submission in death, clothes us in the eyes of God.
- Bought — the goats are the price of a field, and the field is the world He bought by His death. The buying covers all mankind; redemption belongs to those who receive Him.
- Enough — the sacrifice supplies the owner, his household and his servants. It is a scene of quiet prosperity and rest.
and there is goats' milk enough for thy food, for the food of thy household, and sustenance for thy maidens.
Proverbs 27 closes its picture of farm life with a promise of milk. Two questions follow. Where does this steady supply come from, and how far is it meant to reach?
The milk comes to someone who keeps working. One commentator sets that work against the emptiness of merely human effort:
Because mere man's work is empty is no reason to be lazy in the Lord's work. Faith in the living God and diligence go together, for in this there is no emptiness: "your labour is not in vain in the Lord." Shepherd care is of course implied in our verse. However weak the day we live in, the need of souls should draw out the tireless labour and concern of our own hearts.
Lambs and goats give the wool, the milk, and the price that buys land. They are also the animals of sacrifice, and that shapes how one commentator reads the whole scene:
Care for souls, young and tender as they may be, will work for our own benefit. In the same way, the wool of the lambs clothes the shepherd, and the price of goats is enough to buy property. There is of course a reminder of sacrifice here. The lamb is a picture of the Lord Jesus in His quiet submission in death for us. That death is the real means of clothing us in the eyes of God. The goat speaks of Him standing in our place, a propitiation "for the whole world" — that is, "the field," which He purchased by His death. This does not mean the world is redeemed. Redemption is available for it, and all who receive the Lord Jesus receive the eternal benefits of this great work.
Milk is everyday food in the Bible, not a luxury. Scripture builds a picture out of that plain fact:
Milk from cows, goats, sheep and camels is widely used in the East. People drink it fresh, or shake it in a skin until it turns sour and curdled — what Scripture calls "butter." Flocks and herds were so many, and wild honey so plentiful, that the country was rightly called "a land flowing with milk and honey." Gen. 18:8; Ex. 3:8, 17. Milk is such a necessary food that it stands with wine to picture what grace now supplies, without money and without price, and grace will supply the same to Israel in a future day. Isa. 55:1. In the New Testament milk is a symbol of the nourishment of God's word. 1 Peter 2:2. It also stands for the food of infants, in contrast to the solid food adults use. 1 Cor. 3:2; Heb. 5:12-13.
The verse counts three circles: the man, his household, and his servant girls. The supply reaches everyone in the house, and one commentator sees faith at work in that:
The goats' milk of course speaks of the nourishment that comes from the sacrifice. It is enough for the individual, for his household, and for other dependants — the serving maidens. For faith cannot help but consider the welfare of others. Here the calm confidence of faith and the devoted energy of faith blend beautifully. It is a scene of quiet prosperity and rest.
One commentator divides the chapter into sections, and this last one ends in a way the ones before it do not. His reason for the change is short:
The seventh section is in every way a contrast to the sixth, for its subject is sufficiency and rest. Is it not simply because only the number one is added — that is, God? His work accomplishes the complete change.
Read this way, the milk is not the product of clever farming. It is what God adds to honest care.
- Diligence. Faith in the living God and hard work belong together. The need of souls should draw out tireless labour and concern.
- Sacrifice. The lambs and goats picture Christ. His quiet submission in death clothes us, and He purchased the field by standing in our place.
- Nourishment. Milk in Scripture is necessary food, not a luxury. It pictures what grace supplies without money, and in the New Testament the nourishment of God's word.
- Reach. The supply reaches three circles: the man, his household, his dependants. Faith cannot help but consider the welfare of others.
- Rest. The closing note is sufficiency and rest. One thing makes the difference from the section before: God is added.
The wicked flee when no man pursueth; but the righteous are bold as a lion.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
By the transgression of a land many are the princes thereof; but by a man of understanding [and] of knowledge, [its] stability is prolonged.
Solomon reads a nation's politics as a health report: a crowd of rulers is the symptom, and the sin of the land is the disease. The cure is not a new system but one man who knows and understands.
The first line traces the crowd of princes back to something wider than the palace. When a whole people accepts what is wrong, authority loses its footing. Rulers then come and go fast.
When evil gains the upper hand in a nation, among the people themselves, there will be many princes, and no one maintains true authority. They may rise and fall fast, and many will be pushing for the highest places. Conscience will not make them flee, as in verse 1, because evil has become popular. On the other hand, one man of understanding and knowledge can hold authority and prolong the peace and welfare of a nation. But the nation must submit to his authority.
One writer sees the proverb at work in Judah. War had wiped out a whole generation of princes. The people were then free to choose their own king, and they chose Uzziah.
The Syrians had destroyed the princes toward the close of Uzziah's grandfather Joash's reign, and this left the people a free hand. "When a land transgresses, it has many rulers," wrote Solomon, more than a century before. Perhaps this clearing out was not a thing to regret, nor was it unnecessary. Princes who "seek their own" interests cannot judge fairly. A needy, suffering people turn by instinct to a deliverer. Their choice of Uzziah was a good one, as later events proved.
The instinct described here is worth pausing on. Suffering teaches a people to look for one deliverer rather than many rivals.
Rulers do not fall because they lack ambition. They fall because they lack the qualities named in the second half of the verse. One commentator applies that test to every ruler, and then to Christ's own throne.
Countless rulers have come to grief because they lacked some or all of these qualities that a throne needs! Kingdom after kingdom has decayed or been destroyed for the very same reason! But His throne takes its character from Himself. He is just and righteous altogether. No one can measure His wisdom and knowledge and understanding. He is Himself "the wisdom of God" and also "the salvation of God." How stable, then, must the throne be on which He sits!
Jeremiah's day shows the proverb's first half running to its end. God's complaint is not about policy. It is about a people who had abandoned Him, with no one left to hold the breach.
There was no man to stand in the breach. No one carried out judgment. No one even sought the truth. What else could come! The desolation of such a nation, which had turned its back on the Lord, was inevitable. Corrupt princes and a corrupt people called for this... The man was not there. Both the land and the nation must wait for the coming again of "The Man Christ Jesus". He was raised from among the dead. He is a descendant of David, and He is now hidden in the heavens. They shall not wait in vain!
So the proverb starts a search that history never ends. A wise ruler only prolongs a nation. The search ends in a Man who is now out of sight.
The sin of the land is the cause, so the cure must reach the whole people, not just its rulers. One commentator explains what raises a nation and what shames it.
Righteousness exalts not only a man but a nation. Righteousness is a right sense of our relationship to God and to man. It is the very opposite of being absorbed in our own interest, which before long ruins those blindly devoted to it. Sin is a real reproach to peoples as well as to individual people.
This knowledge shapes what a believer expects. Grant says what it means in daily life:
The Christian is to discern all these principles and to know how to act in whatever condition he meets. He is not here to change world conditions or national conditions, but he is not to be ignorant of them either.
- Transgression first. Constant change at the top is the effect. The cause is a land where evil has become popular. Many princes means no real authority anywhere.
- One man. The answer to a crowd of rivals is one person of understanding and knowledge. His effect depends on whether the nation will submit to him.
- The qualities, not the crown. Kingdom after kingdom has decayed for lack of the wisdom and knowledge this verse names. A throne stands or falls on the ruler's character.
- The man was not there. Jeremiah's nation had no one to stand in the breach, so ruin was certain. The proverb's promise waits for the return of "The Man Christ Jesus".
- Righteousness exalts. What lifts a nation is a right sense of relationship to God and man. That is the opposite of self-interest. Sin shames a whole people, just as it shames one person.
A poor man who oppresseth the helpless is a sweeping rain which leaveth no food.
The proverb pictures something worse than a rich man grinding down the poor: it shows one of the poor doing it. And it compares him to rain, not drought — rain that should feed a harvest, but instead strips the fields and leaves people hungry.
The verse begins with a man who has known poverty and is then given some power over others. His own hardship could push him either way.
A poor man who had learned through his hardship, if placed in any authority, could be like refreshing rain, producing food. But if he has not learned to bow to the will of God, he is likely to take shameful advantage of his position. He will exalt himself and oppress without pity the very people he should feel for most. Like rain driven by a fierce wind, this will devastate rather than produce. The antichrist will have this revolting character (Psalm 55:12-14), just as Saul, raised to the throne, persecuted David.
Rain is one of God's standing kindnesses to everyone alive. Here the same rain destroys. The writer below quotes this verse in an older wording, "sweeping rain."
He "makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust" (Matthew 5:45)... On the one hand, God witnesses to Himself by giving "fruitful seasons" through sun and rain and other forces, filling men's "hearts with food and gladness" (Acts 14:17). On the other hand, by "sweeping rain" (Proverbs 28:3) and the burning heat of the sun, He destroys the food of both man and beast (James 1:11).
How a person treats the poor says something about God, because God made the poor.
Of the poor and the rich we read that the poor is hated, while the rich has many friends (14:20). "Whoever oppresses a poor man insults his Maker, but he who is generous to the needy honors him" (14:31). To deal kindly with the poor and the lowly is God-like. The righteous person shows his righteousness in a practical way, by giving thought to the poor.
A worker cheated of his pay has no one on earth to appeal to. What the employer dismisses, God does not.
The rich think nothing of the aching heart of that man. He goes home to his family to tell them of the disappointment to himself and to them... If we want to know what God thinks of such behaviour, listen to these words of holy indignation. "Behold, the wages of the laborers who mowed your fields, which you kept back by fraud, are crying out against you, and the cries of the harvesters have reached the ears of the Lord of hosts" (James 5:4). "The Lord of hosts" hears the cry of the wronged and disappointed labourer.
The sharpest edge of this proverb is that oppressor and victim stand on the same ground. A servant let off a huge debt turns on an equal in the same way.
Anyone whom God forgives has been forgiven a debt far beyond anything we could ever pay. Certainly we should therefore have the same forgiving spirit toward others. Yet his fellow servant begged him to have patience. This servant refuses to budge. He demands payment of a debt of a hundred denarii, and has him imprisoned until he should pay it. He himself had owed 700,000 times as much, yet he forgets how great the mercy was that he received.
There is another kind of ruler. Scripture gives the picture of refreshing rain to a coming King.
Of Solomon, a type of Christ, we read: "May he be like rain that falls on the mown grass, like showers that water the earth" (Psalm 72:6). Men, His people, are affected by His rays. Grass mown down by judgment gives way to new grass: the remnant, a willing people. He comes down like refreshing rain on His humbled people. Then the shining of the sun of righteousness makes it spring up with abundance of blessings.
- Rain tests the ruler. Give the same man authority and he becomes rain that feeds a field or rain that flattens it. Hardship does not decide which. Bowing to God's will does.
- Rain that ruins. Sun and rain are God's witness of kindness to everyone. Here that same rain destroys the food of man and beast.
- Rain and the Maker. Kindness to the poor is God-like. Oppressing a poor man insults the God who made him.
- Rain and the cry. The wronged worker has no one to appeal to on earth. His cry still reaches the Lord of hosts, who answers what the oppressor never heard.
- Rain still promised. The servant forgiven a debt 700,000 times bigger showed no mercy. The coming King does the opposite. He falls like showers on ground that judgment has mown bare.
They that forsake the law praise the wicked; but such as keep the law contend with them.
The verse measures two ways of relating to God's law by one test: what does a person do about wicked people? That leaves two questions: how does anyone get from ignoring God's word to applauding evil, and what does the striving look like?
Dropping God's law is not a neutral act. One writer follows the path. A person first turns his back on what God has said, then sides with the wicked.
Those who forsake the law turn their backs on the revelation of God and refuse obedience to Him. They praise the wicked; they make common cause with them. Those who keep the law, who obey God's Word, are contenders for the faith.
The drift is gradual, and it starts small. That is why one commentator turns the verse into a question about how we handle even minor commands.
Let the spirit of disobedience to God once take hold of a man, and in the end he will commend the most wicked doers. Should our hearts not tremble, then, at treating even the least of God's commandments carelessly? This is no justification of a hard, legal spirit, but an insistence that God has a right to my complete obedience.
Praise for the wicked is not a lesser fault than wickedness itself. One writer comments on people who have no love for good. In his reading, approving of evildoers is the last stage of evil.
A pagan could say: I see and approve what is better, but I follow the worse. An apostle names the last degree of evil in such people: they not only practise things that deserve death, but take pleasure in those who do them (Rom. 1:32)... Godlessness destroys the moral landmarks, just as it did among the Jews: "Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!" (Isa. 5:20).
The second half of the verse does not picture a quarrelsome temper. One writer describes that life as complete separation from the works of darkness, and then a step beyond it. He also weighs the word used for that step.
So the believer's life comes down to this. He brings forth the fruits of the light, since he is a child of the light. And he keeps complete separation from the unfruitful works of darkness, for he is no longer of the darkness. Indeed he is to go even further and reprove them... The meaning of that word is not exactly to admonish or rebuke, but rather to expose. It is to expose, as by light, the true character of the works in question. If a believer shines out in his true character, his whole life will have that effect.
Keeping the law puts a person in conflict. So the danger is fighting over the wrong things. One writer draws a sharp line around what is worth a fight.
We ought not to be contentious people. There is only one thing we have to contend for, and that is the faith of the Gospel. We do not have to contend for our rights or our reputation. We have to contend for one thing that is more precious to us than our name, more precious than our reputation in this world. That one thing is the faith of the Gospel.
The two groups in this verse pull against each other. So a life with no friction in it is worth a second look. One writer asks what it means when the marks of a godly life are missing.
We may be sure of one reason why we clash so little with the men of this age. We are so little marked by these features, which stand in such sharp contrast with them... But if the wicked of this age compliment us and pat us on the back, it raises some serious questions!
- Forsake — turning your back on God's revealed word is where it starts; nobody sets out to applaud evil.
- Praise — the person who has dropped the law commends the worst doers. He makes common cause with them.
- Peak — taking pleasure in evildoers is evil at its furthest reach. That is where the moral landmarks are gone.
- Expose — keeping the law puts you on the other side. The contending is a life that shows evil for what it is, not a scolding temper.
- Test — if the wicked of this age keep patting you on the back, the verse has a question for you.
Evil men understand not judgment; but they that seek Jehovah understand everything.
The verse sets two kinds of people side by side, and what separates them is direction, not brainpower. That raises two questions: why does evil blind a person to plain right and wrong, and how far can "understand all things" be taken?
The failure here is not a gap in education. Some translations read "judgment" where the ESV reads "justice." One writer traces the problem to an unwillingness to bow.
The solid, sober principles of God's governing judgment are a foreign language to an evil man, because he has no intention of bowing to God's judgment. A disobedient spirit will not humbly accept the consequences of wrongdoing. And the one who tries to dodge that judgment only makes it heavier in the end.
Another writer calls that failure blindness, and names what opens the eyes.
Evil men are blind, but with seeking the Lord comes understanding; the blind eyes are opened.
The second half of the verse rests everything on seeking. One writer describes that search, and where it ends.
If a person values wisdom as priceless, digs for her like hidden treasure, and openly and deliberately goes after her, the result is that he grasps the fear of Jehovah and arrives at the knowledge of God. Here we do not have a call to people. We have the heart itself seeking true wisdom as its portion and treasure... "For Jehovah gives wisdom." I do not simply grow wiser by human understanding. Jehovah gives true wisdom. It is what He has said, His word, that gives true knowledge and understanding, and he who seeks it will get it.
That understanding comes with a condition. Reverence for God opens His word. Refusing to obey keeps it shut.
Where there is spiritual discernment, things get simple and clear as daylight. "The secret of the LORD is with those who fear Him."... Where there is the fear of the Lord, there will be the understanding of His word and mind. But the word of God will not be simple without subjection to Him.
It might seem natural that the ignorant would be the ones hunting for knowledge. The book of Proverbs turns that around, and the promise of Jesus stands behind it.
Everyone can see that those who lack intelligence ought to get knowledge, and that the unwise should seek it. But in fact the opposite is true here. The intelligent are the ones who set their hearts on getting knowledge, and the wise are the ones who seek it. The Lord promised as much while He was on earth: Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you. Who ever asks God for our real good and asks in vain?
Commentators link this promise to 1 Corinthians 2:15. The understanding on offer is moral discernment, and the Spirit gives it.
"But the spiritual person judges all things" (1 Cor. 2:15). The believer has the mind of Christ, because the Spirit of God lives in him. So he may understand the significance of every matter of moral importance, for the Spirit of God produces true self-judgment and dependence on the Living God.
That phrase has limits. It does not turn anyone into an expert on everything, and it does not remove the need to grow.
The spiritual man is therefore in the light, and discerns all things. That does not, of course, mean that he knows everything, or that he no longer has to grow in knowledge. But his eyes are open, and he is in the light. And so he now becomes a puzzle to the natural man.
- Refusal blinds. The evil man cannot read God's dealings, because he never meant to bow to them. Dodging that judgment only makes it heavier.
- Seeking opens the eyes. The verse divides people by what they chase, not by how clever they are. God gives wisdom to the one who digs for it like hidden treasure.
- Fear opens the book. Fear God, and His word and mind become clear. Refuse to submit to Him, and Scripture stays hard.
- The Spirit gives sight. The believer has the mind of Christ, so he can weigh every matter of moral importance. That is what "understand all things" means.
- Open eyes, not all knowledge. The one who discerns all things must still grow. What he has is open eyes and a place in the light, and that makes him a puzzle to everyone outside it.
Better is the poor that walketh in his integrity, than he that is perverse, double in ways, though he be rich.
Two men stand side by side in this proverb: one has nothing but a straight path, the other has everything but a bent one. The verse says which one is better off, and it says so before either story has ended.
The proverb states something no one would dispute in a calm moment. The difficulty is that we rarely weigh money in calm moments.
This is so simple and basic that it needs no explanation. But it does need serious attention. We forget such things too easily when the lure of riches works its harm on the mind. Ten thousand times rather be poor than to resort to crooked ways to gain wealth.
"Integrity" here is not a natural talent that some people happen to have. Commenting on the twin proverb in chapter 19, one writer traces integrity back to its source:
To walk in integrity is the fruit of divine grace. Faith alone can enable anyone to do this. The world around him is empty show. His own nature is corrupt or false, and proud or vain. Either way, it is given to self-satisfaction and open to self-conceit. The upright man may be ever so poor. He is still far better than the man who talks crookedly and is a fool, however rich that man may be.
The same writer looks at this pair of men again and spells out the outcome. Notice which of them has anything to fear:
The man whose heart is upright will walk in an upright way. He need have no fear at all of the dangers that threaten the man who twists things. That man should be ready to expect terrible results from his abuse of the kindness of God.
The verse does not condemn riches. It describes a rich man whose paths have gone crooked — and the danger sits in the wanting, not the having. One writer shows what a man must guard against:
Even more subtle and gripping, if that is possible, is the danger of seeking riches and setting the mind on being rich. Here the thing to guard against is not mere appetite. You have to stop relying on your own understanding. It is so quick to find good reasons for an evil and selfish thing... Our wisdom is to set our mind on the eternal weight of glory where Christ is, and not to look at the things we can see. Those things last so short a time, while the unseen things are eternal.
Wealth easily persuades a man that he is better than other people. One writer names what he should have concluded instead:
It is one of the strange follies of man to think his wealth comes from his own superiority over others, or that his wealth makes him superior to others. A wise man would only be humbled, and would value the grace of God that had prospered him. Very few show that second attitude. But when a man is wise in his own eyes, a poor man of understanding can speak to his conscience and shake his self-confidence.
Two well-known lives show the difference between quiet trust and haste for money:
The first was true of Abraham. His faith depended on God, and he kept on calmly and faithfully. He increased little by little, with blessings overflowing. Lot, on the other hand, hurried to be rich. The well-watered plain of Jordan caught his eye, and the glitter of Sodom drew him. He lost all his possessions, and his end was sad and bleak. What memories must have pierced his soul with grief as he ended his days!
- Walk, not wallet. The proverb measures a man by the road he walks, not by what he carries. The poor man's straight path beats the rich man's crooked one.
- Walking is grace-given. Integrity is the fruit of divine grace. Faith alone produces it in a world of empty show, in people whose nature loves self-conceit.
- Walking crooked is self-inflicted. The man who twists his ways should expect terrible results. The upright man has nothing to fear.
- Money bends the walk by supplying reasons. The mind set on being rich leans on its own understanding, which is quick to find good reasons for a selfish thing.
- Abraham walked; Lot hurried. Abraham increased in calm dependence on God. Lot chased the glitter, lost everything, and ended in grief.
Whoso observeth the law is a son that hath understanding; but he that is a companion of profligates bringeth shame to his father.
The proverb sets two sons side by side: one holds to God's law, the other holds to bad company. Only the second son's choice reaches his father, and it reaches him as shame.
The proverb speaks of a human family. A commentator carries it into the family of God.
If this is true in natural relationships, how much more so spiritually! An obedient child of God is wise; but if he is disobedient and takes up wrong companionships, the shame of it will reflect on his Father in Heaven.
So understanding here means obedience. And the shame of disobedience never stops with the son who earns it.
The same writer traces where a disobedient spirit ends up, and what the obedient child of God does instead.
Once the spirit of disobedience to God takes hold of a man, he will end up praising the most wicked people. Do our hearts not tremble, then, at the thought of taking even the least of God's commandments lightly? This is no justification of a hard, legal spirit; but it insists that God has a right to my complete obedience. Moreover, the obedient child of God will "take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them" (Ephesians 5:11).
This joins the two halves of the verse. The man who lets go of God's word ends up admiring the very people he should avoid. Obedience and the choice of friends are one subject, not two.
How can a son's friends reach his father's name? Because company is never neutral. One writer shows where that power works, and it is not in business hours.
The lowest society you keep is what colours you. Many a person, I have no doubt, gets into low society, and he is leavened and damaged before he knows where he is... A man or woman is spoiled by the company they keep. I do not mean in business. There is no idea of company in business. That is not company. You are on the alert then. I mean social company, where you can unbutton your coat; do you understand? In business you keep your eyes open.
So the danger is not a crime. It is an evening with friends, an unbuttoned coat, and a change of colour the son never notices.
Some intend to go only part of the way with bad company. A writer answers that confidence.
Some think they may go at least some distance with such people, reckoning that they are strong enough to resist strong temptation. But this attitude is itself fatal. A person of that kind has already slipped, and will find himself utterly weak very soon.
Notice the order. The fall is not the first step down; the confidence before it was.
The verse names an appetite, not a crime. A commentator marks the difference between using food and living for it, then follows the account past the grave.
We need to eat and drink to live. But to live for eating and drinking is folly. You see it in the rich man of Luke 12:16-21. He said with confidence, "Soul, you have ample goods laid up for many years; relax, eat, drink, be merry." That very night God told him, "Fool! This night your soul is required of you." Proverbs 23:21 says the drunkard and the glutton will come to poverty. It may not come in this life. But how much worse is eternal poverty!
So the table can end in poverty. And the poverty that matters most comes after this life, not in it.
- Two teachers. Something teaches every son: the law he keeps, or the company he keeps. This verse asks which one is doing it.
- Obedience is wisdom. A wise son is not the informed one but the obedient one. God has a right to complete obedience — not a hard legal spirit, but a whole heart.
- Company colours. Bad company does its work off duty, not in business hours. It damages a person before he knows where he is.
- No half-measure. Thinking you are strong enough to walk part of the way is already the first slip. Real weakness follows fast.
- Shame travels. No one carries the cost alone. It lands on a father's name here, and on our Father in Heaven when His children take up wrong companionships.
He that by usury and unjust gain increaseth his substance gathereth it for him that is gracious to the poor.
This proverb watches money change hands twice. It piles up first with a man who lends at interest for profit. Then it passes to someone who is generous to the poor. God, not the lender, has the last word on where wealth settles.
The term used here does not carry the modern sense of a loan-shark's rate. It covers any charge on a loan, and Israel's law placed a fence around it:
In Scripture this word does not mean unfair interest, as it does today. It means interest of any kind. The Israelites were forbidden to charge interest to their own people. The borrower was always assumed to be poor, since otherwise he would not need a loan. To foreigners, though, they were allowed to lend at interest. Exodus 22:25; Leviticus 25:35-38; Deuteronomy 23:19-20. When the Jews returned, Nehemiah sternly rebuked the nobles and the rulers for taking interest from their poorer countrymen. Nehemiah 5:3-13. Scripture firmly commands the rich to help the poor.
So the ban was tied to who was borrowing, and to what the people of Israel were to each other:
Charging interest between one Israelite and another was forbidden. It was not wrong in itself. It was banned because it did not fit their special standing, or their relation to each other as brothers by birth. They were free to lend at interest to people of other nations, but not to fellow Jews.
The verse links interest with profit. But gain can stay inside the law and still be crooked:
God's ways are fair, even when man's ways are not. A man may use his wits to take dishonest advantage of another, legal as it may be. He may lend money at a high rate of interest, or use other means that are not fully honourable. But in the end he will lose it, before death or at death. Then someone else may use it with compassion toward the poor. At least God will pity the poor, and greed will get what it deserves.
The same transaction can rescue or ruin, depending on the terms:
A loan can be a great help to a borrower in a time of real trouble. But if the lender charges a huge rate of interest, the deal turns very evil. How many a moneylender has ruined his clients this way, locking chains on them they cannot break.
The sharp word in the verse is "gathers." The man works and collects, and it all ends up in another man's hands. One writer sees the same reversal in what a sinner leaves behind:
Blessed by God, a good man leaves an inheritance to his children's children — not gold and silver perhaps, but something better and lasting. The wealth of the sinner, great as it may seem, is stored up for the righteous. Ungodly people may plan, scheme, and arrange who gets their estate; but God cares for those who serve Him. So the righteous will wear the clothes meant for others, and the innocent will divide the silver, if He sees fit.
The verse names the heir by his character, not his bank balance: he is generous to the poor. One writer, quoting an older English Bible, points to the security such a man holds:
Man was meant to represent God in a wilderness world — the God who loves a cheerful giver, and who here urges a man to pity those who have nothing. "Whoever pities," or is gracious to, "the poor lends to the LORD," as He is pleased to count it; "and what he gives He will pay back to him." What security can match this? And think of the honour of being God's creditor!
The point is plain, but the pull of money makes it easy to forget:
Such a simple, basic observation needs no explanation. But it does need serious attention. These things are easily forgotten when the lure of riches works its harm on the mind. Ten thousand times better to be poor than to turn to crooked ways for wealth.
- Word. In Scripture "interest" means any charge on a loan, not just a harsh rate. Israel could not charge it to a poor fellow Israelite, though they could lend at interest to outsiders.
- Fence. The ban rested on their bond as brothers. Nehemiah rebuked the nobles for breaking it.
- Loophole. A man can take dishonest advantage and stay inside the law. He still loses what he gained, if not before death then at death.
- Transfer. He gathers, but not for himself. The wealth of the sinner is stored up for the righteous, and God decides who divides the silver.
- Heir. The one who inherits is the man who pities the poor. God counts his giving as a loan to Himself, and He repays it.
He that turneth away his ear from hearing the law, even his prayer is an abomination.
This proverb ties two things together: what a person does with God's word, and what happens to that person's prayers. A closed ear turns even prayer into something God detests — so why does God refuse such a prayer, and is there a way back?
The verse is not about a man who fails to keep the law, but about one who will not even listen to it. One writer links it to a line in the Psalms:
This saying is the same truth as stated in Psalm 66:18: "If I had cherished iniquity in my heart, the Lord would not have listened."
"Abomination" is the word Scripture uses for what is unfit to bring to God at all. It covers sin, blemished sacrifices and idols — and religious service that has gone hollow:
Scripture uses the word "abomination" in the Old Testament for any sin as seen by a holy God. It also marks out what was unfit to bring into the service of God. Examples are an animal with any blemish offered as a sacrifice, or the price of a dog put into the treasury (Deuteronomy 17:1; Deuteronomy 23:18). The service of God itself became an abomination to Him when it sank into mere outward observance, or went along with sin (Isaiah 1:13; Proverbs 28:9). But idolatry was the special thing declared to be an abomination to the LORD.
Prayer from someone who ignores God's word is not neutral. One writer puts it in family terms:
Suppose a child calmly refuses to obey his parent, yet still asks for everything he wants. Is that not so brazen that the parent would refuse his demands? In God's sight such prayer is "abomination" — that is, it has the character of idolatry.
God's refusal is not arbitrary. It matches the way a person has treated His word:
When people do not mind what God speaks to them in His word, God as little minds what they say to Him in prayer.
God weighs the person before He weighs the gift. One writer comments on a companion proverb, about the sacrifice of the wicked:
When a Jew sinned, it was natural and a plain duty to bring the appointed offering to God. For a godless man, though, the offering did no good; it only insulted God further. That changed only if he judged himself before Him, hating the evil he had done — a hatred that makes a person more careful not to repeat it. Repentance had to be genuine. So this proverb shows how serious such self-deception is: trying to settle accounts with God for sin. "The sacrifice of the wicked is an abomination to the LORD." This is as certain as that He has delight and favour in the prayer of the upright. He looks into the heart.
The state of the heart is not a side issue in prayer. Another writer traces this through Proverbs:
If I have sin in my heart, Scripture says God will not hear me. Read through the book of Proverbs and you will find this said again and again: the prayers of the unrighteous are an abomination to God. Moral condition is a tremendous necessity in this matter of prayer.
The closed door is not the end. One writer describes the order God keeps:
When God refuses to hear, we may be sure the Spirit refuses to assist. God never rejects a prayer which His Spirit prompts. Have you defiled yourself with any known sin? Do not think He will help you in prayer until He has helped you to repent. He will take you to the washing basin before He goes with you to the altar.
The proverb also works the other way round. One writer turns to God's promise to answer prayer:
And we shall receive: there is no doubt whatever about it — God has pledged His Word. If one should not receive, then it only follows that obedience is compromised somewhere.
- Ear: The sin named here is not weakness but refusal — turning the ear away from hearing what God has said.
- Offering: Once the ear closes, worship becomes mere outward observance. Scripture calls that an abomination — its word for what is unfit to bring to God.
- Exchange: God treats our words as we treat His; the man who will not mind God's word finds God will not mind his prayer.
- Heart: God looks at the person before the petition — which is why He has real delight in the prayer of the upright.
- Repair: When prayer goes unanswered, look for the disobedience behind it. God brings a person to repentance first, then to the altar.
Whoso causeth the upright to go astray in an evil way, shall himself fall into his own pit; but the perfect shall inherit good.
The proverb sets two men side by side: one drags an upright person into evil, the other simply walks straight. Where does each one end up, and why does the trap close on the man who set it?
The sin here is not just doing evil. It is pulling someone else into it.
Evil does not stand still. If someone harbors it, as in verse 9, he is likely to go further. He works treacherously on others who are not so inclined, until subtle words draw them in. But the tempter here is criminally guilty, and God will bring his evil back on his own head. See how Absalom craftily turned the men of Israel against his own father, then led them in rebellion. His end was swift and dreadful (2 Sam. 15-18).
Absalom was King David's son.
So how does the Lord view a person who trips someone else up?
The Lord pronounces a woe against the world because of causes of stumbling. These are things that tend to make souls think less of the truth of God, and the world is full of such deceitful efforts. It is inevitable that such things will come, and souls are tested by them. Of course if one stumbles it is his own fault if he remains lying on the ground: it is foolish to put his confidence in one who stumbles him. But the man who is guilty of this offense comes under a sentence of a solemn woe.
The same writer comments on a near-identical saying earlier in Proverbs. He names two people the trap closed on.
"Whoever digs a pit will fall into it, and a stone will come back on him who starts it rolling." The aim in these cases is of course to harm someone else. But "whatever one sows, that will he also reap." Haman built a gallows for Mordecai and was himself hanged on it (Esther 5:14; 7:10). Jezebel in cunning cruelty had Naboth murdered. But the poor deluded woman was little prepared for her own end: thrown from a window, trampled by horses, and eaten by dogs (1 Kings 21; 2 Kings 9:30-37).
Haman and Jezebel both held power. Mordecai was a Jewish man Haman hated; Naboth owned a vineyard Jezebel wanted.
The danger comes from people who look respectable. So the safeguard is the company you keep.
Every believer should know enough to choose his friends carefully, so that no one leads him astray. There are always people who present themselves in a good light but are wicked, and they soon lead others in wrong ways.
So what does each man finally own?
Such men use others as tools for their own gain, and in the end they own nothing. The upright, though, "will have a goodly inheritance" as a permanent possession. Luke 16:12 comments well on this: "And if you have not been faithful in that which is another's, who will give you that which is your own?" Our present means are God's property. Only true faithfulness in using them leads to His entrusting us with what is permanently our own.
The same writer, commenting elsewhere on the days of the blameless, ties that lasting portion to daily trust. Older translations call them "the upright."
"The LORD knows the days of the blameless" (v. 18). That is, He takes account of every day. So the upright can have perfect peace as they entrust each day to Him. In fact, "their heritage will remain forever." The accumulation of days will only add up to an eternity of blessing.
- Drift — Evil does not stand still. A man who keeps it in his own heart moves on to pulling others in with subtle words.
- Guilt — The tempter is criminally guilty. The Lord pronounces a solemn woe on him.
- Return — What he sows comes back. Haman hanged on his own gallows. Jezebel thrown from her own window.
- Guard — Choose your friends carefully. People who lead others into wrong ways present themselves in a good light.
- Possession — The schemer ends with nothing. The upright are faithful with what is God's, and God entrusts them with what is theirs forever.
A rich man is wise in his own eyes; but the poor that hath understanding searcheth him out.
Wealth quietly persuades its owner that he has earned the right to think well of himself. Scripture sets an unlikely rival against that self-flattery — a poor man who sees straight through him.
The self-confidence here is not pride in general. It is the illusion that money proves something about the man who holds it.
One of the strange follies of man is to think that his wealth is due to his own superiority over others, or that his wealth makes him superior to others. If he were wise, wealth would only humble him, as he recognised the grace of God that had so prospered him. Few indeed show this second attitude.
This danger is not a rare flaw in a few people. It comes with money itself.
The Apostle's words show first of all the dangers that come with having wealth. Wealth tends to make a man arrogant. It turns him away from trusting God to trusting money. The worldly rich man thinks highly of himself. He feels safe from the ordinary troubles and struggles that other people face.
The second half of the verse gives the rich man a challenger. The poor man does not argue about money. He reaches the conscience, and that is where self-confidence gives way.
If a man is wise in his own eyes, a poor man of understanding can speak to his conscience. He can deeply unsettle that man's self-confidence. May God give us such wisdom. We see this clearly in our Lord's dealings with the Pharisees, who trusted in themselves and despised other people.
The poor man's advantage is not education. Grace gives it to him. He is free from the demands that "society" puts on those who serve it.
Grace makes the low position of the poor a clear advantage when they are called. There is no slavery more demanding than the one "society" lays on those who serve it… The poor believer sees this. He is rich in faith, and he escapes the drive of his class to rise in the world, whether by religious means or by any other. His insight may not be deep or wide, but he gladly accepts the gospel that lifts him spiritually.
His discernment reaches beyond spiritual matters — and no one reads him in return.
One who is spiritual discerns all things. He discerns spiritual things, and he also sees the true meaning of natural things in a way the natural man cannot. Yet no one discerns him. He is a puzzle to other people. He thinks and acts on a different level, driven not by self-centredness but by a genuine regard for the glory of God.
The proverb is not only about bank balances. The same mistake appears when the blessing is spiritual and the person who receives it takes the credit. That is what went wrong in the church at Laodicea.
Deuteronomy 8 and other Scriptures show this. In the wilderness, the danger for God's people is grumbling and unbelief. In the land, surrounded with blessings, the danger is self-sufficiency and self-exaltation. Laodicea has fallen into this second danger… she forgets where her wealth came from, and takes all the credit herself.
Behind the poor man's insight stands God's own searching. The Lord met this self-satisfaction in the Pharisees, who loved money.
The Pharisees could not hide their irritation at the Lord's words, so they mocked Him. This exposed their covetousness — their greed for unrighteous wealth. He spoke straight to them as men who wanted human approval. They never considered that God knew their hearts, and that He would expose their deceit. What people value highly is often an abomination in the sight of God. Our great God discerns every motive of every heart.
- Cause — Wealth breeds a strange folly: the idea that riches prove a man is better than others. Money also shifts his trust from God to itself.
- Correction — Wealth would humble a wise man. He would trace it to the grace of God, not to himself.
- Discernment — The poor man with understanding is not fooled. He speaks to the conscience and unsettles a self-confidence that no argument could touch.
- Danger — The same conceit survives inside religion. Laodicea forgot where her wealth came from and took all the credit.
- Verdict — God's estimate settles it. He knows every heart, and what people prize highly is often an abomination in His sight.
When the righteous triumph, there is great glory; but when the wicked rise, men conceal themselves.
When power changes hands, ordinary people feel it before they can explain it. This proverb reads a society by its mood, and raises a hard question: why does the rise of the wicked drive people into hiding?
Commentators read this as a rule for every sphere of authority, not one throne in one century. The test is what ordinary people feel.
In any sphere of government this is true. Where righteous men are in power, there is peace, joy, and no fear. But if the wicked rise, fear and worry spread through the whole atmosphere.
The verse sets two pictures side by side. Glory is out in the open. Fear drives people out of sight.
"When the wicked rise" names the moment of promotion. Promotion tests what a man learned before he rose. Earlier in the same chapter, a poor man is lifted into authority. Commentators compare him to rain — rain that feeds a field, or rain that flattens it.
A poor man who had learned through his hardship could be like refreshing rain, producing food, if placed in any authority. But suppose he has not learned to bow to the will of God. Then he is likely to take shameful advantage of his position. He will exalt himself and cruelly oppress the very people he should feel most for. Like rain driven by a fierce wind, this will devastate rather than produce. The antichrist will have this disgusting character (Psalm 55:12-14), just as Saul, raised to the throne, persecuted David.
"Great glory" is not flattery organised from above. Elsewhere the same book says the city rejoices when things go well with the righteous. Even men who resent that life, commentators say, cannot silence their own conscience.
Men may feel ill will toward a way of life that condemns them without a word. Even so, conscience must justify the true-hearted. So when it goes well with the righteous, the city rejoices. Compare Esther 8:15-17. In the same way, when the notoriously wicked fall, men cannot disguise their loud satisfaction.
The hiding in this verse describes a frightened society. It is not an instruction to the godly. Fear, commentators warn, makes a believer look like the very men he is running from.
A bad conscience of course breeds cowardice, and fleeing is what you expect from a wicked man. It does not follow that all fear comes from a bad conscience; still, a believer should learn never to give in to fear. Faith gives courage to stand as boldly as a lion. Why should we even resemble a wicked man by acting in the timidity of fear? "God gave us a spirit not of fear but of power and love and self-control" (2 Timothy 1:7). When he was tempted to hide in the temple, Nehemiah firmly replied, "Should such a man as I run away? ... I will not go in" (Nehemiah 6:11).
Commentators do not stop to prove this proverb. They ask the believer to carry it further than politics.
History itself is comment enough on these matters. The believer has only to think of them in connection with his spiritual associations too.
The full answer to this proverb is not a better election. It is a Person. One commentator traces the world's long suffering to bad authority, and points to its cure.
Authority in the hands of a man with evil, selfish motives will spread sorrow and distress everywhere. How the world has suffered from this! But real peace and joy will come to earth only when the One who is absolutely righteous takes authority into His own hands.
- Rise — the verse turns on who rises to power. Power does not change a man's character; it shows it. A man who never learned to bow to God uses his position to oppress the people he should protect.
- Atmosphere — where righteous men hold power, there is peace, joy and no fear. Where the wicked rise, fear spreads through everything.
- Glory — the gladness under good rule is honest. Even men who resent the righteous find their conscience justifying them, so the city rejoices.
- Hiding — people hiding pictures a frightened society. It is not a rule for the godly. Faith makes the believer bold as a lion, ready to say with Nehemiah, "I will not go in."
- The King — history proves the proverb again and again. But real peace arrives only when the One who is absolutely righteous takes authority into His own hands.
He that covereth his transgressions shall not prosper; but whoso confesseth and forsaketh [them] shall obtain mercy.
Proverbs 28:13 sets two ways of handling sin side by side: hide it, or name it and leave it. Only one ends well. The real question is who does the covering, and on what terms God gives mercy.
God does not bargain with cover-ups. He meets people as they are, not as they claim to be:
There is no such thing, in dealing with God, as covering up sin. "Whoever conceals his transgressions will not prosper," and God only deals with men on the basis of what they are. If a man comes to God claiming to be righteous, God must refuse him: "the haughty He knows from afar" (Psalm 138:6). The Pharisee and tax collector teach us this. He will only meet in grace those whom His holiness has already convicted of sin.
Arguments can cover sin just as silence does. One writer applies the verse to teaching that redefines sin:
Every effort to cover up sin fails. How much of this goes on today — not merely the covering of individual sins, but the denial of sin itself. Modern theology uses much clever argument that tries to make sin into something else. It speaks of sin as a mere defect, as if sin were a taint in the blood — an inherited and therefore unavoidable weakness, something for which man is not responsible. All these inventions sweep aside the declarations of the infallible Word of God. They are "covering up." There can be no mercy for those who deny sin and sins.
Man covers sin one way, God another. One writer sets the two side by side:
Man thinks of covering as concealment. God's covering is by atonement: "Whoever conceals his transgressions will not prosper." "For when I kept silent, my bones wasted away... I acknowledged my sin to you, and I did not cover my iniquity" (Psalm 32:3, 5). For such a person God provides a perfect and eternal covering. To the returning prodigal saying, "I have sinned," the Father replies, "Bring quickly the best robe, and put it on him" (Luke 15:21-22).
David's case shows what follows when a person stops hiding:
Confession leads directly and at once to the reception and enjoyment of grace. As David puts it, "you forgave the iniquity of my sin." He uncovered his sin, and just as surely he entered into the blessedness of the man "whose sin is covered." Confession on his side led to covering of his sin on God's side. He was put right with God.
The verse names two actions. A person can fake either one without the other:
It is sadly possible to make confession of wrongdoing, and yet continue in it in more subtle and unseen ways. It is also possible to see that a certain sort of wrongdoing does not pay, and so to forsake it, but with no confession of wrong in the matter. But when the conviction of sin is genuine, confession of the sin comes first, and then a forsaking of it. Proverbs 28:13 shows this plainly.
The proverb is not only for people who do not yet believe. It shapes the Christian's daily walk just as much:
This is an unchangeable, divine principle. It applies in the first place to the salvation of the soul, and just as much to the conduct of a believer. If a sinner deceitfully covers up his guilt, he can expect no mercy from God, no prospering, but eternal judgment. If he honestly confesses his sins, having faith in the blessed Son of God, then mercy forgives him, and for eternity. On the other hand, take a true believer who walks in disobedience to God and seeks to cover up his wrongdoing. God will not allow him to prosper in his Christian path: he will suffer. But if he honestly confesses his wrongs to his God and Father, then he will prove the sweetness of God's mercy as his present experience.
If we will not open the matter ourselves, God has ways of opening it — and that is kindness, not cruelty:
It is good when God acts like this with us, as indeed He often does. "Whoever conceals his transgressions will not prosper." If we will not confess our sin willingly, it is good that God should use His own means to force that sin into the open. Only then can He bring blessing to us.
- Cover — hiding sin gets nowhere. Silence and clever arguments fail alike. God deals with people as they are.
- Uncover — confession reverses concealment. You bring the hidden thing into the light and name it to the Lord.
- Covered — what we uncover, God covers by atonement, not by concealment. The son who comes home saying "I have sinned" receives the best robe.
- Forsake — confession without leaving the sin is incomplete. So is leaving it without confessing. Real conviction gives both.
- Reach — one principle covers both. The sinner who confesses finds mercy for eternity. The believer's path will not prosper while wrongdoing stays hidden.
Happy is the man that feareth always; but he that hardeneth his heart shall fall into evil.
This proverb sets two men side by side: one keeps fearing God, the other hardens his heart. Happiness belongs to the first and disaster to the second — so what kind of fear is a forgiven person meant to carry?
One commentator ties this fear to what happens after honest confession of sin.
When there has been true confession, this fear sobers the soul to watch seriously against the many snares that evil sets. This is godly fear — not terror, but a sensible guarding of oneself from further danger. If this is habitual with us, we shall be happy. But a callous, proud attitude of indifference to spiritual danger will lead to disaster. This is what always follows when we cover our own sins deceitfully. The pride that resists confession will harden more and more. Let us beware of it.
Some assume that fear and the enjoyment of God's love cancel each other out. One commentator says they come together. He points to a psalm where God's forgiveness is what makes people fear Him.
The fear asked of the believer during his life here is not only consistent with enjoying our Father's love. It is the inseparable companion of that love. "But with You there is forgiveness, that You may be feared," says Psalm 130:4. So too, "Blessed is the man who fears the LORD, who greatly delights in His commandments" (Psalm 112:1).
If this fear is not terror, what is it afraid of? One writer answers by naming what it dreads. He adds that it marks someone moving forward, not someone drifting away.
This fear is not the state of heart that keeps back from the Lord. It is the path of progress — not the path of the backslider. Solomon says, "Blessed is the one who fears the LORD always." This is not the fear of judgment and wrath. It is that holy and blessed fear in the soul which the Spirit of God always produces — a fear that we might fail to walk in everything in a way that pleases Him.
The blessing does not rest on occasional seriousness. It rests on a fear with no gaps in it — the fear of someone who already knows God has forgiven him.
The next proverb (verse 14) contains a beatitude. "Blessed — or happy — is the one who fears always." The person who has found forgiveness is sheltered by the precious blood of Christ. He walks in newness of life and in godly fear all the day long.
Hardness sounds like coldness. One commentator finds something under it that feels more like strength — confidence in oneself. He reads the second half of the verse as God's own account of why people fall.
False confidence is what always deceives a man into his fall. A false faith is as powerful for evil as true faith is for good, and this false faith is always self-confidence in some form. "Putting no confidence in the flesh" means, for the Christian, power in the Spirit. In this sense, "Blessed is the one who fears the LORD always, but whoever hardens his heart will fall into calamity." Here is the divine explanation of failure.
One writer lists what a Christian owes to other people, and where fear fits in that list.
Two words sum up our political duties — "subjection" and "honour." … Our freedom and our liberty is the freedom of God's servants. Our fear is due to Him. "Blessed is the one who fears the LORD always." Our love is due to our fellow believers.
- Confessed — this fear starts with honest confession: sins uncovered and forgiven, not hidden.
- Sobered — it is not terror. It is a sensible guard against snares, and it marks progress, not backsliding.
- Companioned — it walks arm in arm with the Father's love. God's forgiveness is the very reason we fear Him.
- Constant — "always" means all day long: a settled habit, not a passing mood.
- Contrasted — a hard heart is a self-confident heart. Pride that refuses to confess hardens further and falls. That is the divine explanation of failure.
A roaring lion, and a ranging bear, is a wicked ruler over a poor people.
A lion roaring and a bear on the prowl — that, the proverb says, is what a wicked ruler is to poor people under his hand. It raises two questions: what turns a man into that, and does God see the people he crushes?
The proverb sits after a warning about hearts that grow hard. One writer follows that hardness to a throne.
When this hardened character shows up in a ruler, how dreadful the results will be! He dishonours God and badly abuses his own conscience. Worse, he is like a destroying beast toward the poor: at their expense he and his rich friends will seek their gain.
Note the last clause. The poor are not just neglected. They are the food source.
One writer puts his finger on what separates a man from a beast — and points to Nebuchadnezzar, the king who was reduced to living like an animal.
The essential difference between a beast and a man is this: the beast has no understanding of God, and is incapable of it. It is bent only on its wants, or natural instincts. There is no link of relationship with God in its conscience. It is not so with man. He may reject the knowledge of the true God. He may be spiritually what Nebuchadnezzar became physically; that is to say, he may have a beast's heart given to him.
So the roaring lion and the charging bear are not just insults thrown at a bad man. They describe what a man becomes when he drops the one thing that separates him from the animals.
Hazael was horrified when the prophet Elisha told him what he would one day do. Then he did it, once he had power.
It is likely that he had never before done such terrible things, and so he drew back from the suggestion. But the result proves that when he found himself in the place of power he committed all the ferocious deeds of which Elisha warned him. Someone has rightly said that many of us are harmless only because our position in society does not allow us to be otherwise.
The proverb names no penalty for such a ruler. Another writer does.
God is not indifferent to this unrighteousness. Those who pervert judgment will themselves come under judgment. The high position God gave them, as His representatives, will not protect them from His just judgment. They will fall even as any earthly prince who rules without fear of God.
The warning is not only for palaces. Another writer aims it at courts and at the church.
Instead of favouring the wicked, the judges ought to judge for the poor and needy. They should defend them from the persecution of the wicked and rescue them from cruel oppression. Many of our courts of justice need this same call today, and so does the professing church of God, where those in outward honour are too often guilty of oppressing the common people.
God's standard for a ruler is plain: he must be just, and rule in the fear of God. One writer measures history against it.
This is God's standard. Nothing less will do; and where among the ranks of human rulers shall we find any to come up to it? We may travel down the entire list of those who have occupied the thrones of this world. We will not find so much as one who could answer to the great characteristics set out in that verse.
That failure is not the end of the story. Another writer names the cure.
A king does not have to be a tyrant. But human nature being what it is, that is what we should expect. God's thought, after all, is for a king. It must be the true King, who will reign in righteousness, and there is only One such King in all the universe of God. When He comes whose right it is to rule, and the government rests on His shoulders, oppression will cease.
- Cause. A hard heart in a seat of power turns three ways at once: against God, against conscience, against the poor.
- Character. A beast lives by appetite and knows nothing of God. A man who drops that link becomes the lion and bear of the picture.
- Caution. Many of us are harmless only because our position does not allow anything else. Power reveals the heart; it does not change it.
- Court. Rank is no shelter. Those who pervert judgment come under judgment — in courts and churches, not only on thrones.
- Cure. No earthly ruler has ever met God's standard. Oppression ends only when the true King reigns.
The prince void of intelligence is also a great oppressor he that hateth covetousness shall prolong [his] days.
This proverb sets two men side by side: a ruler who crushes people, and a man who hates dishonest gain and lives long. Commentators ask where oppression starts, and why the cure is an inward hatred of dishonest gain, not a better system.
The proverb does not say the oppressor is uninformed. One writer reads the chapter as a chain of linked verses. He traces the missing understanding back to an earlier refusal: refusing to own sin before God. (The ESV's "cruel oppressor" appears in older translations as "a great oppressor," the phrase this writer quotes.)
Trace the sequence here. A lack of understanding clearly comes from the stubbornness that refuses to confess sin before God. Put that attitude in anyone who holds a place of authority, and it will make him "a great oppressor." Evil never stands still. Indulge it, and it goes on to greater lengths.
The same writer sets true confession against the covering of sin, and shows what each does to a man.
True confession sobers the soul. It puts a man on serious watch against the many traps that evil sets. This is godly fear — not terror, but a sensible guarding of oneself from further danger. But a hard, proud attitude of indifference to spiritual danger will lead to disaster. This always follows when we deceitfully cover our own sins. The pride that refuses to confess only hardens more and more.
Few people oppress others for the sport of it. One writer comments on a proverb that pairs two lovers of money: the man who squeezes the poor to get rich, and the man who gives gifts to the rich.
In both cases the root of the matter is personal greed. The result is always poverty — the opposite of what the person wanted. If it is not poverty in this life, then in eternity it will be complete, total poverty!
The verse ties hating dishonest gain to holding office. One commentator, writing on Samuel as a judge in Israel, explains why that quality belongs among a judge's qualifications.
Covetousness is a sin that tempts administrators more than most... Jethro, Moses' father-in-law, describes the men who should be chosen "to judge the people at all times." They must be "able men... who fear God, who are trustworthy and hate a bribe" (Ex. 18:21). Samuel met all these conditions. He also had the added virtues of gentleness and loving sympathy.
Older translations of that line in Exodus read "hating covetousness" — the same words this proverb uses.
The promise attached to hating dishonest gain has a dark mirror image. One commentator writes on the enticement of Proverbs 1. There greed reaches for another man's life and loses its own.
Covetousness, and the robbery that feeds it, are drawn in sharp colours. Violence follows lust, and a man forfeits his own life... In reality they lie in wait for their own blood, as surely as God knows how to deliver. Many a man escapes the plot laid against him, while those greedy of gain lose their own lives — the end in this world of their wicked schemes!
Solomon knew what a ruler ought to be. A commentator takes the counsel to a king at the close of the book. He measures Solomon against it, then looks past him.
It ought to have been a simple matter for him to follow this sound advice of his mother. Yet do we find it so?... his son Rehoboam later admitted to Israel, "My father made your yoke heavy... my father disciplined you with whips" (1 Kings 12:11). The taxes he laid on the poor evidently reached the point of oppression... How the earth groans for the coming of the King of kings and Lord of lords! His reign will be perfect fairness, kindness and compassion. He will judge righteously and plead the cause of the poor.
Few readers govern a province, but everyone holds some authority over someone. Nehemiah rebuked the nobles of Israel for charging interest to their own poor. Writing on that, a commentator turns the matter on the reader.
Their enemies were watching them. If those enemies saw the rich oppressing the poor of Israel, they would have cause for reproach and ridicule. Are we not also concerned about what the world around us sees in our testimony? Timothy was told... to "flee youthful passions," which surely includes the greed for money. Unbelievers will certainly be watching to see what our attitude is in this matter.
- Root — Oppression starts inside. A ruler who will not confess sin loses understanding, and pride hardens him further.
- Growth — Evil never stands still. Give it authority, and it grows into open oppression of the people underneath.
- Motive — Personal greed drives oppression, and it ends in the poverty it was trying to escape.
- Guard — Greed tempts judges and rulers most. So fearing God and hating dishonest gain head the list of qualifications for office.
- Contrast — Greedy men lose the very life they grasp at. Solomon failed this test himself, and the earth still waits for the King who pleads the cause of the poor.
A man laden with the blood of [any] person, fleeth to the pit let no man stay him.
This short, grim proverb sits in a chapter about rulers, oppression and confession. It raises two hard questions: why does God refuse this man any rescue, and is there hope for hands that have shed innocent blood?
(Older translations read "flee to the pit; let no man stay him." The writers below use that wording.)
One commentator reads the verse with the ones just before it. He traces a chain that starts with something far smaller than murder.
Follow the sequence here, and it is clear. A lack of understanding grows out of the stubbornness that refuses to confess sin before God. This attitude in anyone who holds a place of authority will make him "a great oppressor." Evil will not stand still. If a man indulges it, it will go on to greater lengths.
"Let no one help him" sounds merciless. But it belongs to God's ordered rule of the world. The law made room for the accidental killer. It shut every door on the man who killed on purpose.
Both grace for the slayer and judgment for the murderer had to uphold the glory of God and the claims of His government. Mercy made provision for the man who killed without meaning to. The guilty murderer fell under the stern sentence of justice that never bends. Take words like these, "Your eye shall not pity him." Who spoke them? The LORD. Who wrote them down? God the Holy Spirit. What do they mean? Solemn judgment on wickedness. Let men be careful how they trifle with these weighty matters... A false sentimentality constantly joins with bold unbelief in questioning the solemn rules of divine government.
The refusal to pity rests on something older than Israel's law. It goes back to creation itself.
Where evidence showed intent to kill, the image of God in which He had made man pleaded against pity. God had already decided this case long before (Gen. 9). There has been, and can be, no reversal of it: "Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in his own image." That ground remains. This passage also affirms the guilt resting on a land that does not avenge such blood. Those who in our day would abolish the death penalty may well weigh it: "the land cannot be cleansed of the blood that is shed in it, except by the blood of the one who shed it."
Israel's history supplied a case. Zimri seized the throne by killing his master.
Zimri's treachery became a byword in Israel. Jezebel could point back to him and say, "Is it peace, Zimri, murderer of your master?" "Treason is punished by treason," someone has said, "and the killer is killed." Zimri fulfilled the true proverb: "A man who does violence to the blood of any person shall flee to the pit; let no one stop him." Let Zimri's end warn deliberate king-killers and traitors.
The same commentator follows the chain to its end. It lands at the cross, where the line between hope and hopelessness falls.
Oppression too often ends in murder. Man's callous treatment of the Lord Jesus shows these same steps in all their naked horror. It ended in violence done to His blood. This cool, calculated bloodguilt will find no forgiveness. On the other hand, some acted in ignorance and "knew not what they did." For them there was a real possibility of forgiveness, as Saul of Tarsus found. But only the pit awaits a different kind of man. Hatred of God has shaped his character, and he has committed himself to outright rejection of the blessed Son of God. It is the spirit of the deliberate murderer: "let no man stay him." His case is beyond hope.
The law had already drawn that same distinction. It left an opening for the nation that killed Jesus.
Under the law the LORD drew a distinction between a manslayer and a murderer. For the murderer there was to be no mercy; for the manslayer there was safety in the cities of refuge (Num. 35). God is graciously pleased to regard Israel — the killer of Jesus — as a manslayer. So there is still mercy for that blood-stained nation.
- Cause. Refusing to confess sin hardens into stubbornness. Stubbornness in power becomes oppression. And oppression "will not stand still" — left alone, it runs on to bloodshed.
- Claim. Blood must be answered, because man bears the image of God. That verdict in Genesis 9 has never been reversed. A land is cleansed of shed blood only by the blood of the one who shed it.
- Closed door. "Let no one help him" is God's government, not cruelty. The accidental killer had a refuge; the deliberate murderer had none. Sentiment that overturns this sides with unbelief.
- Case. Zimri murdered his master and became a byword in Israel — the proverb fulfilled in one man, and a warning to every calculated traitor.
- Cross. The worst violence ever done to blood was done to Christ's. Those who acted in ignorance, like Saul of Tarsus, found forgiveness. Settled hatred of the Son of God leaves a man exactly where this verse leaves him: running, unhelped, with only the pit ahead.
Whoso walketh in integrity shall be saved; but he that is perverted in [his] double ways, shall fall in one [of them].
Two roads run through this proverb, and each has a fixed end: one walk ends in rescue, the other in a fall that comes all at once. So what is "integrity" as a way of walking, and why does God tie safety to it?
One writer traces the outward walk back to the heart. He reads the second half of the verse as a warning the crooked man should expect.
The one whose heart is upright will walk uprightly. He need have no fear at all of the dangers that threaten the man who twists his ways. That man ought to be ready to expect dreadful results from his abuse of the kindness of God.
The same writer explains why God's judgment means nothing to such a man.
The solid, sober principles by which God governs and judges are a foreign language to an evil man. He has no intention of bowing to God's judgment. A disobedient spirit will not humbly accept the consequences of wrongdoing. But the man who tries to dodge such judgment only makes it more severe in the end. … Having the mind of Christ through the indwelling Spirit of God, the believer can understand the meaning of every matter of moral weight, for the Spirit of God produces true self-judgment and dependence on the Living God.
"Walking uprightly" has a fixed reference point. One writer measures it by God Himself — by what we know of Him and trust Him for.
He is their shield and protects them in their walk. He watches over His own way. God Himself protects that way. He keeps and guards "the paths of justice" when men walk in the fear of God, and "He preserves the way of His saints" … Walking uprightly means walking in line with what we know of God, and in faith of it.
A parallel proverb says that righteousness guards the upright. One writer names that shield, and shows why the upright man still leans on God.
Consistency in his relationship with God and man is the shield that Satan attacks in vain. Yet, as a Christian, he loves to be kept by God's power through faith. Grace is dear to his soul, and he knows well that he owes everything to Him.
A companion proverb sets the same two men side by side. The ruin of the crooked one comes out of his own conduct.
"Whoever walks in integrity walks securely": his actions do not trip him up. The man who is crooked in his ways will expose his own folly, and nearly everyone will see through him.
One writer draws the contrast more sharply, and adds what grace does for the upright man.
The man to whom grace has given a single eye sees the way straight before him, while the wicked needs no executioner, as he shall die by his own evil.
One writer applies the same lesson to Zimri, who came to the throne by murder.
"The triumphing of the wicked is short." Zimri shows it sharply — just one week. He appears to have had no support from the people, who knew his character and did not want his rule. As soon as news of his taking the crown reached the army camped at Gibbethon, they rejected his claim and made their commander-in-chief, Omri, king.
The same writer sees Zimri's end as typical of murderers.
Murderers are usually desperate men. When they can no longer destroy the lives of others, they often destroy their own, as wretched Zimri did.
- Heart first. The walk is the outside of the heart. An upright heart walks uprightly. The crooked man should expect the results he invites.
- Walk defined. Walking uprightly means living in line with what we know of God, and in faith of it.
- Walk guarded. God shields that walk. The upright man does not keep himself; God's power keeps him, and he knows he owes Him everything.
- Walk crooked, walk exposed. Crooked ways trip the man who takes them and show his folly to everyone. The wicked need no executioner; they die by their own evil.
- Walk ended. Zimri seized a throne by murder and held it one week, then destroyed himself. The fall comes all at once.
He that tilleth his land shall be satisfied with bread; but he that followeth the worthless shall have poverty enough.
The proverb sets two men side by side. One works the ground he has. The other chases what has no substance. It measures both by what ends up on the table — bread, or want.
One writer reads the first half of the verse against man's fallen condition. What sounds like hardship, he calls a mercy.
We turn then to the contrast of diligence in one's duty with the companionship of idlers. Whoever works his land will have plenty of bread, while the man who follows worthless people shows he has no sense. In a fallen condition it is a mercy to eat bread in the sweat of the face. Idleness is not only profitless but a misery.
Another writer pictures two fields side by side. One is overrun with thorns and nettles. The other is full of grain:
This passer-by must have seen the sluggard's field in summer, when the thorns and nettles were growing fast. It was a poor outlook for the owner as harvest came near. His neighbour's field had a very different appearance. A fine crop of grain covered it. This proved the truth of Proverbs 28:19: "Whoever works his land will have plenty of bread." The slothful man had missed his season.
The second man is no criminal. What he chases may not be wicked at all. It is empty — and that is the problem.
One who works hard at tilling his land will find good results. But one who follows frivolity — vain things, things empty of any value — has no proper understanding, even though those things may not be grossly wicked.
Commentators differ on what this man follows. Some read it as empty things. Others read it as idle company. Either way, the proverb does not say poverty falls on him. It says he will have it in full. One writer traces that back to the company he chose, and warns that the same law works in the life of the soul.
Honest work will follow an upright walk, and God has decreed that this is the true means of prospering. But if one chooses lazy, vain companions, he is choosing poverty. How true is this spiritually! Laxity, self-indulgence, wrong companions will cause spiritual decay, stagnation, poverty.
One writer applies the picture to the Christian's own ground: the Bible. The tools matter less than the digging, and the increase comes from God.
Proverbs 13:23 tells us "Much food is in the tillage of the poor." The poor may scratch the ground with nothing but a broken tool. The rich man may work the soil with up-to-date and efficient implements. But it is God who gives the increase to both. So in searching the Scriptures the Holy Spirit is the real power of increase. He dwells in every Christian, whether gifted or not, and produces food if we till the ground of God's Word. But without labor and searching our possessions will yield no profit.
The same call comes to anyone who leaves Bible study to specialists:
Our portion is workable land: it calls for diligence, for labor upon it; and it will repay labor richly too. Would that the people of God would realize this more! ... And so with the precious Word of God. Only through it does our portion become our own. How we should search it and dig into it! We should not be content to leave it so much to a special class who claim exclusive rights as its interpreters.
There is one more field in view. It is not made of soil.
As it is naturally, so it is spiritually. Man's heart is, at the very least, a fallow field. It must be broken up before the seed of the word of God can be sown there and bear fruit.
The seed comes second. The ploughing comes first.
- Ground. Everyone has a field. The sluggard in Proverbs owned land too. The difference was never opportunity. It was whether he worked what was already his.
- Bread. Eating bread by the sweat of your face is a mercy, not a punishment. Idleness is not just unprofitable — it is misery.
- Emptiness. What the second man follows need not be wicked at all. Being empty of value is enough to show he has no sense.
- Poverty. Choose lazy, empty companions and you have chosen the result. The same drift brings spiritual decay and stagnation.
- Harvest. The best field is the Word. It repays hard work, whatever tools you bring. But the heart is fallow ground, and it must be broken up before any seed grows.
A faithful man aboundeth with blessings; but he that maketh haste to be rich shall not be innocent.
Proverbs sets two lives side by side: one man is trustworthy, the other is in a hurry to get rich. One path fills up with blessing. The other cannot stay clean. So what does haste do to a person?
Commentators read the two halves of the verse in two men: Abraham and Lot.
The first was true of Abraham. His faith depended on God, and as he calmly and faithfully kept on, he increased step by step, abounding with blessings. Lot, on the other hand, hurried to be rich, his eyes fascinated with the well-watered plain of Jordan and drawn by the glitter of Sodom. He lost all his possessions, and his end was pitiful and dismal. What memories must have pierced his soul with grief as he ended his days!
Speed itself is not the problem. Scripture praises it in some places and condemns it in others.
Let us not forget, dear Christian readers, that one of faith's characteristics is to hasten. Abraham made haste when it was a matter of the Lord's service (Genesis 18:6-8). Zacchaeus made haste when the Savior invited him to receive Him into his house (Luke 19:6). Mary made haste when the Lord called her to come to Him (John 11:29). If it is a matter of Him and of His Person, can we ever hasten enough? But should we not keep ourselves from the haste that so often marks the flesh and the old man? "Their feet run to evil, and they make haste to shed blood" (Proverbs 1:16; 6:18), "to strive" (Proverbs 25:8), "to be rich" (Proverbs 28:20, 22). When it concerns ourselves, let us not do as the world does. Scripture says elsewhere: "Whoever believes will not be in haste" (Isaiah 28:16; Romans 9:33).
The two halves of the verse do not just contrast. They rule each other out.
Scripture tells us that whoever is greedy for unjust gain troubles his own household. An inheritance gained hastily in the beginning will not be blessed in the end. A faithful man will abound with blessings, but whoever hastens to be rich — and so cannot be faithful — will not go unpunished. A stingy man hastens after wealth and does not know that poverty will come upon him.
This shows up in ordinary life:
Many people fall for "get rich quick" schemes. But all of these will need dishonesty in some way, and God will see to it that this ends in something worse than disappointment.
It would be easy to read the verse as a warning against money itself. One writer puts the danger somewhere else.
They fall into temptation and a snare and into many unwise and hurtful desires that sink men into destruction and ruin. But oh, the unbelief of believers, when something other than Christ carries them away — something opposed to His will and glory! It is not the riches themselves that are the worst danger, though they make the path more difficult. The worst danger is the lack of the faith that counts riches as the Lord's, not our own — the faith that therefore seeks only to be a faithful steward according to His mind, and to be blessed in doing His will. It is our own will or purpose that is so often wrong and to be dreaded most.
The promise is not that the faithful man gets rich slowly. The blessing follows a different rule.
But if I am found faithfully doing whatever the Lord calls me to here, this is not forgotten. If you are a faithful servant, the Lord will make you an honoured ruler. If you have been faithful in a little, He will exalt you over much. Such is the order given, and such is the manner of His dealing with us.
- Haste — Running is right when the goal is Christ. The same speed aimed at money is the mark of the flesh.
- Honesty — Racing for wealth and being faithful cannot live in the same man. Shortcuts need a lie somewhere.
- Heart — The danger is not owning money. It is aiming at it, and forgetting that what you hold is the Lord's.
- History — Abraham waited on God and increased. Lot chased the glitter of Sodom, lost it all, and ended his days in grief.
- Harvest — Faithfulness in little is never forgotten. The Lord answers it with much.
To have respect of persons is not good; but for a piece of bread will a man transgress.
This proverb puts two things side by side: a warning against favouritism, and a shocking price tag. A scrap of food is enough to make a man do wrong. Commentators read it as a rule for anyone who judges between people, and as a mirror of how cheap the human heart is.
One writer reads the two halves together as a verdict on character.
The man who shows favouritism to any person is not to be trusted: he will transgress for any trifling thing. How important to do nothing by partiality, but to be thoroughly fair and honourable in every matter of judgment.
The same writer offers a second sense. Here the second half explains the first: no one deserves special regard, because anyone can be bought.
Or take a slightly different view of the verse. It is not good to show favouritism, because the flesh cannot be trusted: a man will do wrong for the smallest reason. So let us give no man a place of dignity that belongs to the Lord alone.
One writer widens the price far beyond money. What buys a man is often not cash, but some advantage he is afraid to lose.
The "wages of unrighteousness" — this is what really dulls the soul's eye. This is the great twist away from straight dealing. And these wages are not only a matter of money. Anything that flatters self-love, anything that looks after the comfort of the flesh — in a word, any advantage at all that we risk losing, or are sure of gaining, or hope to gain — may be the wages of iniquity. Does a man hesitate, bargain, refuse to keep clear of it? Then let him search himself well, if he is still able to, and he will find that he is tied to some interest which is not the interest of Jesus Christ. Is it a way of making a living? A friendship he wants to keep? A position he fears to lose? A quiet life he dreads having disturbed?
Another writer applies the law's ban on bribes beyond the courtroom.
Where bribery is widespread, justice is almost unknown. As another translation puts it, "The bribe blinds those whose eyes are open." Let us read this command in its spirit as well as its letter. Self-interest can blind the eyes of a sincere Christian who would never for a moment think of taking a bribe.
One writer reads the command given to Israel's judges as a mirror of the human heart.
And how important this warning is! "You shall not be partial in judgment. You shall hear the small and the great alike. You shall not be intimidated by anyone." How these words expose the poor human heart! How ready we are to show partiality! Personal influence sways us. We attach importance to position and wealth. We are afraid of people!
What is the divine antidote against all these evils? Just this — the fear of God. If we set the Lord before us at all times, it will deliver us from the harmful influence of partiality, prejudice, and the fear of men. It will lead us to wait humbly on the Lord for guidance in everything that comes before us.
Left to itself, that tendency becomes open corruption in those who hold power.
So human judgment and human government are open to the worst corruption. Judges and governors, if left to themselves and not ruled by divine principle, can twist justice for dishonest gain. They can favour a wicked man because he is rich. They can condemn a righteous man because he is poor. They can give a verdict that flatly contradicts the plainest facts, all for some advantage to be gained — money, influence, popularity, or power.
One writer makes the same principle a plain test of Christian life.
In the world, apparent dignity and wealth always win special treatment. It must not be so among those who know the Lord Jesus Christ. It is still a test for us today. What would we do if one clearly wealthy person and one clearly poor person came into a meeting? Would we be as considerate of the one as of the other? And is it so in our daily dealings with people?
- Cheap. A man will do wrong for a piece of bread. The size of the price shows the weakness of the heart that takes it.
- Bread. The price is often not money. A friendship kept, a position guarded, a quiet life protected — any advantage can become the wages of unrighteousness.
- Blind. Self-interest blinds even a sincere Christian who would never take cash. The antidote is the fear of God: set the Lord before you at all times.
- Trust. The flesh cannot be trusted. So give no man a place of dignity that belongs to the Lord alone.
- Test. The proof is ordinary. How do you treat the rich man and the poor man who walk into the same room?
He that hath an evil eye hasteth after wealth, and knoweth not that poverty shall come upon him.
Proverbs 28:22 links what a man looks at to what he loses. The grasping eye comes first; the poverty he never saw coming follows. Two questions follow: what is wrong with his eye, and why does chasing money so often end in losing it?
The ESV calls him a stingy man; older translations read "he that hath an evil eye." One commentator sets that eye against the Lord's picture of a clear, undivided eye:
An evil eye is the opposite of a single eye (Matthew 6:22-23), which shows simple, straightforward honesty. But a man grasping after riches is devious and crooked in his ways, and his eye will betray him. He is not completely honest and careful in his dealings.
Other passages trace that eye back to the heart, and forward to how a person treats the poor:
The eye is a main road to and from the heart. Through the eye, sinful desires wake up and go to work… In the Scriptures, the evil eye is often a close companion of covetousness, selfishness and envious jealousy. The evil eye ignores the sufferings of others when personal gain can be had that way. The Lord warned the people of Israel against having an evil eye toward a poor brother in need, and against withholding the help they owed him (Deuteronomy 15:7-9; Deuteronomy 28:54-55). Men were told to avoid stinginess of spirit and to grow the generous eye that gives freely to the needy (Proverbs 22:9).
Speed itself is not the problem. Scripture praises hurry when its object is God, and warns against it when its object is self:
Let us not forget, dear Christian readers, that one of faith's characteristics is to hasten. Abraham hurried when it was a matter of the Lord's service (Genesis 18:6-8). Zacchaeus hurried when the Savior invited him to receive Him into his house (Luke 19:6). Mary hurried when the Lord called her to come to Him (John 11:29). If it is a matter of Him and of His Person, can we ever hurry enough? But on the other hand, should we not keep ourselves from the haste that so often marks the flesh and the old man? "Their feet run to evil, and they make haste to shed blood" (Proverbs 1:16; Proverbs 6:18), "to strive" (Proverbs 25:8), "to be rich" (Proverbs 28:20, 22). When it concerns ourselves, let us not do as the world does. Scripture says elsewhere: "Whoever believes will not be in haste" (Isaiah 28:16; Romans 9:33).
The verse turns on what the man never weighs up:
He does not stop to consider that he is defeating his own ends. Grasping eagerly for riches, he is inviting poverty! Let the believer take this to heart.
Another writer applies the warning to a whole society that treats getting rich as the aim of life:
These grave warnings of Wisdom are much needed wherever the open and unrestrained pursuit of riches is more and more accepted as the proper aim of life. Few people feel any shame in admitting this is their goal. What comes to light in our home life, our business life and our criminal life confirms every day where this passion ends… "Do not toil to acquire wealth." Though your own wisdom may recommend it, this is pure folly. It carries a load of calamity for the unfortunate seeker, for his household, and for everyone who depends on him.
A commentator on Paul's warning about the love of money says that failing to get the money can itself be a kindness:
It is a great mercy for many a man that he does not get the money he wants. It would only lead him into more sin… Covetousness will lead a person far astray from the faith. Some had already been overcome by it, piercing themselves through with many sorrows. It will always defeat its own ends.
Gehazi, the prophet Elisha's servant, chased Naaman's wealth and lied to get it. What he gained and what he kept were not the same thing:
After the exposure comes the judgment. If Gehazi had taken Naaman's wealth, he must also take Naaman's disease. He had gained two changes of clothing from Naaman by lying and deceit. By the judgment of God he also gains a change of skin. And the leprosy he acquires will cling to him all the days of his life. He will soon spend the wealth he gained, but the leprosy will remain.
- Eye. The evil eye is the opposite of the single eye. It is a divided, crooked look. It shows in dealings that are not honest, and in ignoring the suffering of others when personal gain is at stake.
- Haste. Hurry is right when its object is Christ, and wrong when its object is self. The one who believes God is not driven to run.
- Blindness. The grasping man never weighs what he is doing. He is inviting the very poverty he is running from.
- Reach. The calamity does not stop with him. It falls on his household and on everyone who depends on him.
- Result. Greed always defeats its own ends: Gehazi's silver was soon spent, but his leprosy stayed for life.
He that rebuketh a man shall afterwards find more favour than he that flattereth with the tongue.
This proverb sets two ways of speaking side by side: honest correction and smooth praise. It turns on one word — afterward — and asks us to judge our words not by today's reaction, but by the friendship still standing years later.
A rebuke rarely lands well at the time. Its value shows up later, while the flatterer's warmth has a short life.
It may not be easy for us to rebuke wrong in a kind, gentle, faithful way. We cannot expect people to take it well at first, but the long-range results will be valuable. On the other hand, someone who flatters a wrongdoer may seem very kind and considerate at first. But his friendship will not be wanted for long, because he cannot be trusted. Yet let us always be careful to tell the difference between mere criticism and true faithfulness.
Not every sharp word qualifies. The rebuke that earns favour later is the one that helps the person. It also costs the speaker something before he says it.
When wrong is present, wisdom will seek to bring the help that meets the wrong. Hidden love may overlook the evil, but this is not the true love of God: it is no help to the guilty party. Honest, open rebuke in a spirit of kindness, not of mere fault-finding, is both honesty and goodness. It may wound to some degree, even when done in a lowly, friendly way. But even the offender should see the faithfulness in it. If he takes it to heart in the right way, his wounds will heal well. Moreover, it may lead him to love the wise reprover. Again, to do this work rightly, we need true self-judgment and communion with God.
There is a motive to check first, because a person's fault can become an opportunity we secretly enjoy.
At times it may be necessary, and right, to correct a fellow believer for something that is clearly wrong. But if we hold any personal feeling against him, the danger is that we do it harshly. We may even enjoy that his wrong has given us a chance to rebuke him.
Flattery belongs with lying, and it does its worst damage among the Lord's servants.
"A man who flatters his neighbor spreads a net for his feet." Flattery is close to lying and can never be right. It is always a mistake, and the consequences are the gravest. More servants of the Lord have been spoiled by flattery than in any other manner.
The line between honest praise and flattery is thin. We only ever see part of the person we praise.
Flattery is absolutely impossible when God is in question. All praise and worship offered to Him falls short of what He deserves. We cannot rate Him higher than He is. On the other hand it is almost impossible to avoid flattery when we begin to praise men. We see one or two features on the surface of their characters or their actions, and these appeal to us. But we do not see the many other features deep below the surface. Those would not appeal to us at all; they would horrify us. So our praise of man always carries some flattery in it, even when we have not the slightest wish to flatter. As saints let us beware of the praise of men. When we give in to it, we damage each other, though it is very sweet to our sinful nature.
The proverb also puts us in the second chair. The man who gives the favour "afterward" is the one who accepted the wound.
"Let a righteous man strike me — it is a kindness; let him rebuke me — it is oil for my head; let my head not refuse it." This is to humble oneself under God's mighty hand and be exalted in due time.
Paul lived out the awkward middle stage of this proverb — loved at first, resented for telling the truth, and hoping to be thanked later.
They had forgotten that "faithful are the wounds of a friend" (Prov. 27:6). He puts it in the form of a question, so as to leave a doubt, and give the Galatians the opportunity to answer, "No, Paul, you are not our enemy! You are our best and dearest earthly friend."
- Afterward, not at first. Today a rebuke feels bad and flattery feels good. Later the truth about each one comes out. Wait for that verdict.
- Afterward needs kindness now. Open rebuke in a spirit of kindness is honesty and goodness. Mere criticism is not the same thing, so guard the difference.
- Afterward needs self-judgment first. This work calls for communion with God. It also calls for a check on any personal feeling that makes us enjoy having something to rebuke.
- Flattery has no afterward. It is a form of lying. It spreads a net for the flatterer's own feet, and it has spoiled more of God's servants than anything else.
- Afterward you become the friend. Take reproof as a kindness — oil for the head, which the head does not refuse. That is humbling yourself under God's mighty hand, to be lifted up in due time.
Whoso robbeth his father and his mother, and saith, It is no transgression, the same is the companion of a destroyer.
A son takes what belongs to his father or mother and sleeps well. He has told himself that family property is not theft. This proverb rejects that reasoning. It puts him in company he never chose: the company of a destroyer.
The wrong here is not only about money. The thief targets the people who fed and sheltered him before he could do anything for himself. He tears down the relationship that kept him alive.
How grossly ungrateful that a young man should rob those who have cared and provided for him from his youth — and his own flesh and blood. He is a companion of a destroyer, for this is the very principle of destruction. It destroys a proper, solid relationship. It destroys the very blessings he has depended on for years. And yet his moral sense is so warped that he considers it no transgression. He excuses himself for this wickedness because of his relationship to his parents. They are not likely to press legal charges against him.
He turns the closeness that should protect his parents into his cover.
The words "That is no transgression" are the heart of the verse. Excuse-making is a habit, and it has a direction.
The human heart, where it has not been thoroughly broken down, is always excusing itself. You will find it in the Christian who has fallen and is not really humbled about it: he makes excuses even to himself. The excuse was Eve's condemnation. There is no good in an excuse, because it admits the evil. It leads into falseness if we try to excuse ourselves. Did you ever find a child in the habit of excusing itself that did not end up telling lies? Never!
Calling it "no transgression" is false. God set both a promise and a penalty on how a child treats a father and mother.
So, as not one of His hearers could deny, the LORD had encouraged and warned every son in Israel. Each son was to keep the commandment of his father, and not to depart from the law of his mother (Prov. 6:20). The word of God declared long and prosperous days in the land for the obedient, but a criminal's death for the disobedient.
This sin can even wear a religious face. In Jesus' day teachers had invented a way out. A man could dedicate his property to the temple, and so keep it from his parents.
But what did the elders say? They contradicted both the letter and the spirit of the law of God. In the name of piety they devised a wicked scheme. By it a man could release himself from every duty towards his parents. Whatever benefits he owed to his father and mother, let him dedicate those benefits to the service of the temple. The Jewish council would then free him from all duties as a son.
The Lord's verdict on that scheme was blunt. A rule invented by men cancelled a command given by God, and trampled natural instinct with it.
The Lord contrasted their practice with the original commands of the law. Then He summed up the effect of their conduct in one of His weighty sayings. He charged His accusers with making the word of God of no effect through their tradition. They effectively repealed the law from heaven, and at the same time outraged the instincts of nature. It was not right that they should take the parents' bread and devote it to the altar.
The opposite of robbing parents is not just leaving them alone. It is supporting them, and that support tests whether godliness is real.
Notice how clearly this passage teaches that children and descendants are responsible for the support of their parents. In this way they show godliness, or piety, at home. Let us fix this in our minds. It is easily forgotten in these days of state payments and other forms of public support. The condemnation of the man who avoids or neglects this duty is very severe. It shows how serious a sin this is in God's sight. Some men are famous for piety in public. Yet for lack of this piety at home they are branded as worse than an unbeliever.
- The debt. Parents cared and provided from a child's youth. Robbing them is ingratitude against your own flesh and blood.
- The denial. A warped moral sense calls the theft no transgression, because parents are unlikely to press charges.
- The excuse. An excuse admits the evil while refusing to own it, and a habit of excusing breeds outright lying.
- The cover-up. Traditions invented in the name of piety can cancel God's command and take the parents' bread for the altar.
- The repayment. True godliness starts at home, where children support their parents. God judges neglect of that duty severely.
He that is puffed up in soul exciteth contention; but he that relieth upon Jehovah shall be made fat.
The proverb sets two people side by side: one breeds conflict, the other leans on God and grows rich. So what makes a person hard to live with, and what makes a soul prosper?
The ESV calls the first man "a greedy man." Other translations read the same words as a swollen soul: "he that is puffed up in soul." One commentator takes the proverb as self-importance set against dependence on God.
Man's self-importance is like a wild beast that no one can hold back from its destroying effects. It will stir up resentment and contention, and among the people of God that is disastrous. Putting your trust in the Lord is the opposite of pride of heart. Confidence in God means no confidence in the flesh.
One writer traces contention back to a single root. He warns that it shows up worse inside the church than outside it.
Pride is the root of contention. What is emptier than self-applause and self-seeking? What rules so widely, both among people who chase greatness in high places and among the lowest of mankind? So it works in every circle of the world. It works even more shamefully in the Church. To that Church Christ has given the pattern of what pleases God completely and builds up man by love in the truth. Pride leads to confusion, contention, and every evil work. The old nature is always proud in one way or another. It is as self-sufficient as it is careless and forgetful of Christ.
The confidence this verse praises is often mistaken for arrogance. One writer points to David, whose own brother Eliab called his confidence in God pride.
The flesh angrily replies to us, "It is pride," as often as we speak of confidence in the Living God. That very confidence is the deepest humility, yet the flesh always calls it pride. There is no depth of humility so great as self-abandonment, to bring in the Living God. David, in the whole of this action, loses sight of himself. He sees only God and the armies of God. This is what Eliab calls pride. Now the truth is that the flesh is the proud thing. I trust we know this, and know also that faith is a self-emptying thing, because faith receives everything from God.
The proud heart stirs things up; trust settles them. One commentator compares two roots and the fruit each one grows.
The fretful spirit is like a root out of which springs a good deal of evil. Confidence in God is a root out of which nothing but good springs. It sets the heart at rest: it calms the spirit: it delivers from fretfulness. Evildoers may be very irritating and annoying. They may provoke us to the limit. But after all, the Lord is on high, and He has not relaxed His grip on things. He is infinitely good, and we can trust Him completely.
The trusting man "will be enriched." Older wording calls this being "made fat." One writer explains what kind of wealth that is, using John's prayer for his friend Gaius.
It is an easy step from enjoying our spiritual blessings to the subject of fatness. This points to prosperity, not in natural things but in spiritual things. The apostle John refers to this in his third letter, written to his dear friend Gaius. "Beloved, I pray that all may go well with you and that you may be in good health, as it goes well with your soul" (3 John v. 2). Perhaps this man did not enjoy good health. But it was high praise that his soul was healthy.
- Heart first. The trouble named here is not a quarrel but a heart. Self-importance is "like a wild beast" no one can hold back, and contention is what it produces.
- Heart hidden. Pride is the root of the quarrel. It "leads to confusion, contention, and every evil work," and it looks worst of all inside the church.
- Heart emptied. Trust is the exact reverse. Confidence in God means no confidence in the flesh, and "faith is a self-emptying thing." That is why the flesh keeps calling it pride.
- Heart calmed. The fretful spirit is a root that grows evil. "Confidence in God is a root out of which nothing but good springs." It sets the heart at rest.
- Heart enriched. The one who trusts is "made fat." That fatness is prosperity of soul — the health John prayed for Gaius, whatever his body was doing.
He that confideth in his own heart is a fool; but whoso walketh wisely, he shall be delivered.
Solomon sets two ways of running a life side by side. One trusts your own inner judgment and is called foolish; the other walks in wisdom and ends in rescue.
We know how to doubt other people. One adviser slips past the test. (Where the ESV reads "his own mind," the older translations quoted here read "his own heart.")
It is a fact beyond dispute that each of us knows a man we are sorely tempted to trust. We are more likely to trust him than all other men put together. The man you are likely to trust is yourself. The man I am likely to trust is myself. Yet, "He that trusts in his own heart is a fool" (Prov. 28:26).
Why such a hard verdict? The answer lies in what the heart is.
"He that trusts in his own heart is a fool." And why? Because it "is desperately wicked," and "deceitful above all things." Only a fool would trust a wicked man. Only a fool would believe a thorough deceiver.
There is a sharper reason still. Watch how Jesus treated people who believed because of miracles.
He that trusts his own heart is a fool (Prov. 28:26), for God cannot trust it. There is nothing in man that God can trust. Some believed when they saw the miracles that Jesus did, but Jesus would not commit Himself to them.
What does this folly look like in daily life?
"The man that trusts in his own heart is a fool," because he leaves God out of account. He lets his own biased opinions and proud desires sway him instead of the word of God. He goes by what his eyes see rather than by the faith of his heart.
Wisdom takes the opposite road.
For a man with a fallen nature in a fallen world, to trust himself is to play the fool. God is not in any of his thoughts. He is sure he needs no advice; he is right in his own eyes... The wise man distrusts himself and listens to counsel. He does not cheat God and his conscience by asking advice of the weak and easy-going. He asks the godly.
This proverb catches sincere people too. David wanted to serve God, but he acted without waiting for God's counsel.
No doubt he was to be blamed. In those matters he had not waited on the counsel of the Lord, as he used to do. But this came from his desire to be doing service for God. He thought, to be sure, that in these things he must be right. He trusted his heart in them, and therefore acted foolishly (Prov. 28:26).
Peter fell for the same reason.
In these few words Peter lets out the real root of the whole matter. That root was self-confidence... We do not in the least question Peter's sincerity... He did not know himself. Ignorance and self-confidence usually go together. Knowing yourself destroys self-confidence. The better you know yourself, the more you must distrust yourself.
Where does your certainty of being safe come from?
Are you safe under the shelter of the blood of Christ? I do not ask, do you hope to be? I ask, are you safe? If you believe God, you are. If you believe your own heart, you are deceived: "He that trusts in his own heart is a fool" (Prov. 28:26).
The verse does not end with the fool. Against him it sets a wise walk, and a promise.
The previous verse stresses the damage done by the proud heart. This verse goes further and names the man's character as a fool. A solemn condemnation! Yet it is the Word of God that speaks this way. A man's own heart is completely untrustworthy, and the man who trusts it is worse than ignorant. Against this the verse sets a wise walk, for this walk delivers from the traps and pitfalls that the ignorant easily fall into.
- The adviser — of all the people we might trust, the one we question least is ourselves.
- The reason — the heart is deceitful and desperately wicked. No sensible person trusts a known deceiver, and God does not trust it either.
- The folly — trusting your heart leaves God out and lets your eyes rule you. Wisdom starts by distrusting self and taking godly counsel.
- The reach — it catches sincere people. David served God without waiting on Him; Peter was sure he would never fall.
- The rescue — believe God rather than your own heart. The wise walk delivers you from the traps that trip the self-confident.
He that giveth unto the poor shall not lack; but he that withdraweth his eyes shall have many a curse.
The verse sets two men side by side: one who opens his hand to the poor, and one who looks away. God gives the first a promise and the second many a curse — which raises the question of how far that promise reaches, and why looking away brings so heavy an answer.
Open-handedness is not a personality trait here. It is what trust in God looks like when need is standing in front of you.
A generous spirit is only the normal product of faith. The Lord cares for the poor, and faith in Him will show the same care. What is more, the Lord will see to it that kindness never leaves the giver poor: he will not want. But a cold, selfish spirit that looks away when real need appears will reap its proper reward in "many a curse."
What makes the promise firm is who stands behind it. God counts money put into a poor man's hand as a loan made to Himself. (The wording below is from an older translation.)
In a wilderness world, man was to represent God, who loves a cheerful giver. Here God encourages him to pity those who have nothing. "He that pities," or is gracious to, "the poor lends to the Lord," as He is pleased to count it; "and what he gives He will pay him again." What security can match this? Think too of the honour of being creditor to Him!
God does not always repay in the same currency.
Anyone who sows seed by scattering abroad what he has to give is dealing with a God "who is able to make all grace abound." ALL grace — grace of every kind, grace in spiritual things and grace in material things. God enriches the generous giver so that his giving can go on and grow. That enrichment may not take the form of material things. It may please God to enrich him in spiritual things instead, so that the man who began by giving a little money ends by handing out a rich store of spiritual blessing.
There is a way of sounding generous that costs nothing.
Some people will give the poor good words, and that is all. Good words are only a cold kind of charity. Your words may be as smooth as oil, but they will not heal the wounded. They may drop like honey from the comb, but they will not feed the hungry… It is better to be charitable as a saint than eloquent as an angel.
The opposite of hiding the eyes is more than answering a request. It is watching for need before anyone speaks.
The generous eye does not wait for need to make its appeal. It looks out for need in this world of disorder and distress. The hand and heart of such a man go with the good will of his eye, for he gives of his bread to the poor. And such a one is blessed, and shall be blessed.
Looking away feels harmless, because it does nothing. God sees it otherwise, and answers in kind.
Then the world is full of want, suffering, and misery. Is anyone disposed to stop his ears at the cry of the poor? God is not mocked, but resents hardness of heart; for that man "will himself call out and not be answered."
One picture of that exchange is a rich man and the beggar at his gate.
"For judgment is without mercy to one who has shown no mercy" (James 2:13). The rich man denied Lazarus a crumb of bread, and the rich man was denied a drop of water.
Refusing to hide the eyes does not mean handing out money to everyone who asks.
A man who does not want to know about need can usually persuade himself he knows nothing of it. But the righteous want to know, and they consider the cause of the poor. This does not mean handing out money or goods to anyone at all. It means help given with thought, and at the right time.
Giving does not lose what you give. It only changes where it is kept.
The way to store up is to give out. The rest of your estate you leave behind, but what you give to Christ's poor God stores up in heaven. That kind of giving is blessed: though it makes the purse lighter, it makes the crown heavier… The interest comes to infinitely more than the principal.
- Faith gives. A generous spirit is the natural fruit of trusting the God who Himself cares for the poor.
- Faith lends. God counts what reaches the poor man's hand as a loan to Himself — and He repays, sometimes in material things, sometimes in spiritual riches.
- Faith looks. The generous eye does not wait for a request; it goes looking for need in a world full of it.
- Faith acts. Warm words feed nobody; the promise is to the one who gives, not to the one who only feels.
- Both reap. God answers in kind: the open hand is blessed, and the eye that hides from a cry will one day cry and go unanswered — the rich man refused a crumb, and was refused a drop.
When the wicked rise, men hide themselves; but when they perish, the righteous increase.
The last verse of Proverbs 28 reads like a weather report on public life. Why do good people vanish when bad rulers rise, and what brings them back when those rulers fall?
The verse is about who holds power. One writer says the same rule works in every kind of government.
In any sphere of government this is true: where righteous men are in power, there is peace, joy, and no fear. But if the wicked rise, fear and worry soak into the whole atmosphere.
The same writer thinks the proof needs no argument, and he adds that the saying is not limited to politics.
History itself is enough comment on these matters, and the believer has only to consider them also in connection with spiritual associations.
Scripture shows the picture in Ahab's court. Jezebel was killing the prophets, and Obadiah, an official in the palace, sheltered a hundred of them in caves. A commentator describes both the cost and the compromise of that position.
Obadiah, the governor of Ahab's house, feared the Lord in the secret of his own spirit. But he was planted in a most unholy atmosphere. The house of wicked Ahab and his still more wicked wife must have been a painful school for the righteous soul of Obadiah. And so he found it. He was hindered in service and testimony. He served the Lord in secret. He was afraid to act openly and firmly. Yet he did quite enough to show what he would have done in better soil and a healthier atmosphere. "He took a hundred prophets and hid them by fifties in a cave and fed them with bread and water." This was a most precious sign of a heart devoted to the Lord — a blessed triumph of divine principle over the most difficult circumstances.
Hidden believers leave no trace in the records, which is why an evil age can look totally dark. A survey of the centuries before the Reformation argues that the darkness itself was the reason for their obscurity.
We firmly believe that the Lord had His hidden ones — His true witnesses, who grieved over the evil ways and intolerance of the high and dominant party. The Lord Himself, in His message to the church in Thyatira, speaks of a faithful few who had separated from the corruptions of Jezebel. He says their good works increased as the darkness thickened. "I know your works, your love and faith and service and patient endurance, and that your latter works exceed the first." The lives, faith and works of these few were no doubt regulated by the word of God. But this very fact ensured their obscurity, and kept them off the page of history.
The proverb's hinge is the word "perish." Commenting on the fall of evildoers in Psalm 36, one writer insists the crash is certain and final, and that it lands on the oppressor rather than the oppressed.
There are the workers of iniquity FALLEN. At the end the inevitable crash comes. Poor little man may look impressive enough for a time. The godly may cry out, "Let not the hand of the wicked remove me." But it is the wicked who is removed, not the godly. He is to be destroyed by the outshining of the coming of the Lord. He and his helpers are to fall, and once cast down they will not be able to rise.
The line he quotes is Psalm 36:11; the ESV reads, "let not the hand of the wicked drive me away."
The proverb reports what men do; it does not make fear a virtue. The same chapter opens by saying the righteous are bold as a lion, and one writer applies that directly to anyone serving Christ.
Every servant of Christ should be bold. He has nothing to hide and should have nothing to fear. "The righteous are bold as a lion" (Prov. 28:1). Holding the truth with a good conscience in the fear of God lifts the soul above every other fear.
Every change of government brings only short-term relief. One commentator looks past all human rulers.
Only when the One who is absolutely righteous takes authority into His own hands will real peace and joy be established on earth.
- Rule — those in power set the mood of a whole society. Righteous rulers bring peace and joy. Wicked rulers spread fear.
- Retreat — fear drives people into hiding. Obadiah feared the Lord inside Ahab's house. He was afraid to act openly, yet he hid and fed a hundred prophets.
- Refuge — the Lord has His hidden ones. History books miss them. Their works increase as the darkness thickens.
- Ruin — the crash is certain. It is the wicked who is removed, not the godly. Once cast down he cannot rise.
- Return — no human change of power lasts. Real peace and joy come when the One who is absolutely righteous takes authority Himself.
He that being often reproved hardeneth his neck, shall suddenly be destroyed, and without remedy.
This verse states how God deals with people: warning comes first, and warning refused ends in ruin. Why should repeated mercy make the final blow heavier — and what does it mean to be broken "beyond healing"?
The word "often" is the hinge of the verse. Every fresh reproof is a fresh act of patience, and a man may read that patience as permission to keep going.
God's patience is great, and His warnings and reproofs are many. Yet the more often He has reproved, the more awful and swift the judgment will be. Because a man appears to get away with rebellion once or twice, he dares to harden his heart still more against reproofs. His sudden destruction without remedy — no hope of appeal or of restoration — is an awesome answer to such arrogance.
A stiff neck sounds like a dramatic sin. What it names is very ordinary.
Being stiff-necked refers to the stubbornness of wanting our own way.
The hardening described here does not happen in one dramatic moment. It sets in slowly, in people who keep hearing the truth and never act on it.
There is another kind of hard conscience, far too common in our land, which is richly supplied with gospel truth. Some people have often heard the truth, and just as often treated it lightly. They stop feeling its thunder. They are like workmen who work where hammers ring on iron all day, until they can no longer hear.
The proverb is not theory. Scripture supplies the examples, and points to one last case still ahead.
Scripture is full of examples of people hardening the neck and the heart, like Pharaoh, Ahab and others. This proverb will be proved true at last. A godless age will end in judgment on those who were often reproved and still went on sinning.
One writer traced the same road through the whole life of Israel's first king.
Nothing in Scripture ever awed me more with thoughts of what man is than this meditation on poor, wretched, miserable Saul. It shows us the way of man — the way of a child of this world, who goes on in self-will, with a desperate set purpose, to take the world as his portion at any cost. And this is no theory, and no rare case. We can see its match in our world every day — and we would see it in ourselves, but for the gracious keeping of our God.
A long delay can feel like safety. Athaliah, queen of Judah, found out otherwise on the day Judah crowned its rightful king, Joash.
Athaliah was kept unaware of what was happening until she heard the noise of people running and praising the king. The celebration brought her to the temple, where she saw Joash standing, crowned, by the pillar. She cried out, "Treason, treason," but she herself was the only person guilty of treason, and guilty of murder and many other crimes as well. Her judgment came far more suddenly than she expected, but it confirms the truth of Proverbs 29:1.
Where the ESV says "broken beyond healing," older translations read "without remedy." That same phrase closes the history of Judah.
The Lord waited in infinite patience for His people to return. Judgment is His strange work, but He delights in mercy. He sent them messengers who urged them and brought God's messages, because He had compassion. But they mocked the messengers, despised God's gracious offers and misused His prophets, till there was no remedy. An awful statement. Their falling away and defiance of God grew until there was no remedy. The threatening clouds of judgment broke at last, and the people were carried away into captivity... And this age too, with its rejection of God's best, is coming to a day when there will be no remedy and the judgment will fall.
If the danger lies in delay, the answer is not a resolution for later.
But do not presume on the grace of God. If it is good to be saved, it had better be NOW. If you mean to be saved some day, let that day be TODAY. You do not know when death may meet you.
- Often — Repeated reproof is repeated patience. But it works the opposite way to how people read it. The more often God has warned, the heavier and quicker the judgment.
- Hardened — A stiff neck is simply the stubbornness of wanting your own way. Hearing the truth and taking it lightly deadens the conscience, the way constant noise deafens the ear.
- Suddenly — Athaliah's end came far sooner than she expected. Delay is not safety. It is the time you still have to listen.
- Without remedy — God sent Judah messenger after messenger, in compassion. They mocked them all, till there was no remedy: no appeal, no restoration.
- Today — Pharaoh, Ahab and Saul walked a road anyone could walk, "but for the gracious keeping of our God." So do not presume on grace. Take it now.
When the righteous increase, the people rejoice; but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn.
This proverb ties the mood of a whole nation to the character of the few who hold power. That raises a hard question: where do you find rulers righteous enough to make a people rejoice?
A ruler's motives never stay private. One writer sets the two kinds of authority side by side.
Proper authority, though firm and decided, is a cause of peace and rejoicing among the people. But authority in the hands of one whose motives are evil and selfish will spread sorrow and distress everywhere. How the world has suffered from this!
"Righteous" here is not vague. One writer starts from David's last words and holds every throne in history up against them.
David's last words get their point and force from knowing what God asks of a ruler. God's standard is this: "When one rules justly over men, ruling in the fear of God." Nothing less will do; and where among the ranks of human rulers will we find any to come up to it? We may go down the whole list of those who have sat on the thrones of this world. Not one of them answers to the great marks set out in that verse.
The groaning under a bad ruler is not only the fallout of bad decisions. One writer describes the reign of Jehoahaz, a king of Israel.
The record of these kings of Israel keeps repeating the same sad line: "He did what was evil in the sight of the LORD." His ways may not have looked sinful to the people around him. But God, who "sees not as man sees," called it "evil." He sent on him and on his subjects the chastisement their wicked idolatry deserved.
Why not simply find righteous rulers and put them in power? One writer answers with questions of his own.
Still the cry because of oppression goes up into the ear of God, and He is quiet, and men think He takes no notice. And because they think so, they are rising up today to take things into their own hands and settle them in their own way. Yet they can never be settled so: where are the righteous who are fit to rule? … And if they could get one perfectly righteous, would they submit to him with joy? What does the Cross say about that? The One they need has come and been rejected. … But the craving for righteousness will be satisfied at last. Only the coming of the Lord can bring that about. There is One who can be safely trusted — only One. He had power in His hand once, on earth, and He used it, but never for Himself.
History has not yet shown the joy of the proverb's first half. One writer sums up the record of human government.
The best of rulers have failed in many ways. Most rulers have plainly worked for laws that benefit their own country above others, or in many cases benefit themselves. Simple, unselfish righteousness has never been practised. … How great will be the relief when the Lord Jesus takes His place of supreme power!
Until then, believers live under the rulers they are given. One writer explains why Paul told Timothy to pray for kings and all in authority.
We are to seek that the sovereign goodness of God would control the rulers of this world. Then His people may lead "a peaceful and quiet life, godly and dignified in every way". It is clearly God's mind that His people should lead a quiet life as they pass through this hostile world, not asserting themselves as if they were citizens of it. … Long ago the prophet Jeremiah sent a letter to God's captive people in Babylon. He urged them to seek the peace of the city that held them captive, by praying to the Lord for it. As the prophet says, "in its welfare you will find your welfare" (Jeremiah 29:7). In the same spirit we are to seek the peace of the world, in order that God's people may have peace.
- The standard. God asks anyone in power to rule justly and in the fear of God. No one on the thrones of history has met that standard.
- The failure. Most rulers work for their own nation or their own gain. Simple, unselfish righteousness has never been practised.
- The groaning. A ruler's sin is never private. God called Jehoahaz's idolatry evil and sent chastisement on him and on his people.
- The exposure. Human effort cannot supply a righteous ruler. The one perfectly righteous Man came, and men rejected Him.
- The relief. Real relief comes when the Lord Jesus takes His place of supreme power. Until then we pray for those in power, so that God's people may lead a quiet life.
Whoso loveth wisdom rejoiceth his father; but he that is a companion of harlots destroyeth [his] substance.
The verse sets two sons side by side. One gladdens his father. The other drains his money and years into bad company. Behind the contrast lie two questions: what is a life spent on, and who feels the result?
The wisdom praised here is not cleverness or a head start in life. One writer draws the line between what this praises and what it does not:
It is important to cultivate wisdom in a son. This is not the knowledge that makes a man stand out among others, or that advances the interests of the family or of himself. That guards against vanity and pride, selfishness and greed. What Scripture commends here cannot exist without the fear of Jehovah. How sad if God's people were as indifferent as the nations that do not know Him! Wisdom makes "a glad father," and where it is missing the grief falls on the "mother" especially. How many sons, bright, applauded, and successful, end in shame and ruin!
The father's joy is meant to pull at a son. One writer traces that pull past the family home to God Himself:
The desire to rejoice a father's heart should itself be a strong incentive to love wisdom. How much more so for a child of God, whose love of wisdom rejoices the heart of his God and Father.
Elsewhere in Proverbs the same appeal comes from God Himself:
But Proverbs 23:26 brings in Jehovah, it seems, who claims the heart without reserve. "My son, give me your heart, and let your eyes observe (or, delight in) my ways." He, rather than the natural father, can speak like this without limit. And where the heart is given to Him in this way, the eyes truly delight in His ways. For His ways are goodness and mercy, truth and faithfulness.
One writer follows, step by step, how a young man arrives at the second half of this verse. It rarely begins with a settled appetite for evil:
On one side is a young man, idle and thoughtless rather than evil or immoral in habit. On the other is a woman given up to shameless immorality. When a woman drops every claim to modesty, who can be so recklessly corrupt or so seductive? But the warning is all the more telling because in the youth there is no set purpose of lust, and no particular passion either. There has been no thought or room for undermining his moral principles. There has been no long wearing away of the barriers that kept improper advances out. A weak character, harmless until now as men say, vain and self-pleasing, walks into the way of temptation. He edges nearer the point of danger as the twilight grows and the darkness favours shameful deeds.
Older translations read "substance" here rather than "wealth," and it covers more than cash. One writer turns it into a question of stewardship:
The opposite of loving wisdom is selfish unfaithfulness toward God. It chooses evil companionships and wrong associations, and so squanders his substance — everything he might have used in serving God to good purpose. Natural things, natural abilities, spiritual benefits: we are stewards, and we must give account of how we have used them.
The spending has an end. One writer follows a man's own will through to where it leaves him:
It is the picture of a man left to himself, doing his own will in this world, with ruinous consequences for the next life as well as this... Such, again, is the picture — not only of the active course of sin but of its bitter results. Sin indulged in brings misery and want. There is an emptiness that nothing can fill. The selfish waste of everything he had only makes that emptiness felt all the more at the end... Here we find the sinner's degradation, for love is not there, but self is. There is no slavery so deep or degrading as the slavery of our own lusts.
Proverbs is blunt: this is not a ruin a man climbs out of by his own resolve:
On the other hand, the snare of a prostitute is dangerous indeed. Lost to shame, her schemes are subtle and varied. She "is a deep pit," and "an adulteress is a narrow well." Getting out of it can only happen through divine mercy and power.
- Love — the wisdom here is not talent or success. It cannot exist without the fear of the Lord. Bright, applauded sons still end in ruin.
- Joy — a son who loves wisdom gladdens his father. A child of God who loves wisdom gladdens the heart of his God and Father.
- Company — the slide starts with an idle, self-pleasing heart that drifts near danger. It rarely starts with a settled taste for evil.
- Waste — "substance" covers money, natural abilities and spiritual benefits. We hold all of it as stewards, and we must give account of how we used it.
- Rescue — the waster ends emptier than he began, and no slavery is deeper than the slavery of his own lusts. Getting out of that pit comes only through divine mercy and power.
A king by just judgment establisheth the land; but he that taketh gifts overthroweth it.
Two rulers stand side by side in this verse: one steadies a whole country by fair dealing, the other pulls it down by his appetite for gifts. A nation's wellbeing hangs on the man in power — but has any ruler ever met that standard?
The justice in this verse is not a theory. It is the way a government handles real people and real cases. One writer calls it the only foundation a nation's prosperity can rest on, and treats bribery as its exact opposite:
This judgment is of course a just administration. The only basis for solid prosperity in any government. Bribery and corruption is the opposite of this. A ruler receiving such gifts will be false and unjust in his rule, and the land itself be overthrown.
A ruler who takes gifts still holds court and still gives verdicts. But the verdicts now follow the money. One writer describes what judges do when God's principles no longer control them:
Human judgement and human government are open to the worst corruption. Judges and governors, if left to themselves and not under the direct control of divine principle, can twist justice for the sake of money. They can favour a wicked man because he is rich, and condemn a righteous man because he is poor. They can give a judgement in open opposition to the plainest facts, for the sake of some advantage they hope to gain — money, or influence, or popularity, or power.
So a "gift" is never only cash. Influence, popularity and power buy a judge just as well.
The proverb is not theory. God tied the blessing of a whole nation to the man on the throne. Israel's own kings show the rule working both ways:
But what a principle of great grace it is that made all Israel's blessing depend on the king! Most of them were bad, and punishment fell on the nation. Some were good, though none was perfect, and prosperity followed.
Note the verdict inside that sentence: none perfect. Even the best of Israel's kings fell short.
Most readers will never sit on a throne. But the same pull works in ordinary life. A bribe succeeds because it appeals to what a person wants:
Bribery is an appeal to the feelings of the one who is bribed. Where bribery is rampant, justice is practically unknown. Let us read this verse in its spirit as well as in its letter. Self-interest can blind the eyes of a sincere Christian who would never for a moment consider accepting a bribe.
Words can do the work of money. One writer warns the believer about flattery:
This of course is the same principle as bribery. Let the believer take care to avoid such ensnaring nets. Accepting flattery is accepting falsehood, for flattery is actually deceit: it is not even honestly meant, nor is it sober, real fact.
A world full of bought verdicts is waiting for a ruler who has no price. One writer looks ahead to that reign:
Think what it will mean for this oppressed and groaning earth to be governed by the excellent laws recorded in the inspired pages of the first five books of the Bible. That day comes when a king reigns in righteousness and princes decree justice. He will "judge your people with righteousness, and your poor with justice" (Psalm 72:2) — no twisting of justice, no bribery, no one-sided verdicts then.
Another writer closes his comment on this verse by turning to that Ruler:
Is the child of God not deeply thankful for a Ruler whose justice is absolutely perfect?
- Justice builds. A fair administration is the only solid basis of prosperity for any government.
- Gifts demolish. A ruler who takes gifts becomes false and unjust, and the land itself is overthrown. The "gift" may be money, influence, popularity or power.
- Nobody is exempt. Where bribery is common, justice all but disappears. Self-interest can blind a sincere believer who would never dream of taking a bribe.
- Flattery counts. Flattery works on the same principle as a bribe. To accept it is to accept falsehood.
- One King qualifies. Israel's kings proved the rule: some were good, none perfect. The groaning earth still waits for the King who will reign in righteousness.
A man that flattereth his neighbour spreadeth a net for his steps.
This proverb turns a compliment into a trap. It raises a hard question: when someone praises you, who ends up caught in the net?
The proverb does not treat flattery as harmless. One writer puts it in the same family as lying, and points to the people it damages most.
Flattery is akin to lying and can never be right. It is always a mistake, and it results in the gravest consequences. More servants of the Lord have been spoiled by flattery than in any other way. It is literally, as this proverb says, "spreading a net for his feet."
The person who receives it is not neutral either. Taking it in is itself an act of agreeing with something untrue.
This is the same principle as bribery. Let the believer take care to avoid such ensnaring nets. Accepting flattery is accepting falsehood, because flattery is deceit. It is not even honestly meant, and it is not sober, real fact. Satan is extremely skilful in such methods.
Why does praise work as a trap? Because it feeds pride.
One man cannot do a greater injury to another than by praising him and feeding his pride. "A man who flatters his neighbor spreads a net for his feet," and a flattering mouth works ruin. Be sure of this too: we are far too short-sighted to judge how much real godliness our fellow believers have. We cannot weigh it properly without the scales of the sanctuary. Those scales are in the hands of Him who searches the heart.
Praise given to God can never be flattery. Praise given to people is a different matter.
Flattery is impossible when it comes to God. All praise and worship offered to Him falls short of what He is worthy of. We cannot rate Him higher than He is. On the other hand, it is almost impossible to avoid flattery when we begin to praise men. We see one or two features on the surface of their characters or their actions, and those appeal to us. But we do not see the many other features deep below the surface — features that would not attract us but horrify us. So our praise of people always has some flattery in it, even when we have no wish at all to flatter. As saints, let us beware of the praise of men. By indulging in it we damage each other, though it is very sweet to the flesh.
Scripture gives a worked example. Absalom, King David's son, set out to take his father's throne, and his tool was flattery.
Two main aims are clear: undermining the king, and doing it to glorify himself. So, as the quickest way, he flatters the people. He never loved them as David did; he despised them. And he despised none more than those caught in his nets of fair words and good speeches.
The verse says the net is spread for someone's feet. The person who enjoys the flattery pays a price too.
He who accepts flattery becomes, in the same measure, the slave of the slave who offers it.
If soft words are the net, honest words are the rescue — though they feel worse at first.
It may not be easy for us to rebuke wrong in a kind, gentle, faithful way. We cannot expect people to take it well at first. But the long-range results will be valuable. On the other hand, people may think that someone who flatters a wrongdoer is very kind and considerate at first. But no one will want his friendship for long, because he cannot be trusted. Yet let us always carefully distinguish between mere criticism and true faithfulness.
- Bait — flattery is a form of lying, so both giving it and enjoying it mean trading in something untrue.
- Net — the trap works by feeding pride, which makes praise the deepest injury one person can do another.
- Blindness — we see only the surface of people, so even well-meant praise carries flattery in it.
- Chain — Absalom caught a people with fair words, and whoever accepts flattery becomes the flatterer's slave.
- Cut free — honest rebuke stings first but pays off later. The flatterer pleases first, but no one can trust him.
In the transgression of an evil man there is a snare; but the righteous shall sing and rejoice.
Solomon sets two lives side by side in one line. One man's wrongdoing builds a trap around him. The other man is free to sing. Who ends up caught, and why does a clear conscience produce music?
The snare here is not laid by an enemy. The trap is the man's own wrongdoing. One writer finds a picture of it in Haman, a royal official who built a gallows to hang his enemy Mordecai on.
A man's own transgression traps his feet. He may think he is safe, but he will be caught. Haman is the example: he was hanged on the gallows he had built out of spite for Mordecai. But the righteous have a calm conscience. They need not fear snares like these. They sing and rejoice.
The same trap can close through what a man says. Commenting on a parallel proverb, one writer shows both sides: what the guilty man's words do to him, and what trouble cannot do to the righteous.
Words, as well as deeds, have their proper place in moral government here on earth. The transgression of the lips is not only a great offence in God's sight. It is also an evil snare to the guilty. They may boast that their tongues are their own, but they learn at their own cost that neither God nor man will allow it. The righteous know what trouble is; but, instead of being snared by it, they come out of it. So Scripture says of the Christian: "through many tribulations we must enter the kingdom of God."
Singing is the second half of the verse, and it is not a mood. It belongs to people whose conscience is on their side. David shows the reverse: after his sin, he could not sing.
Note that Moses and the people of Israel could sing, "the Lord has triumphed gloriously." Deborah and Barak in their turn could sing too, "so let all your enemies perish, O Lord." Songs belong to a happy heart. They belong to people whose conscience speaks for them. But there could be no music in David's heart now. That heart was no sanctuary of praise now. How could David at this time enter the gates and praise the Lord? Those gates open only to the righteous nation that keeps the truth. David had to stay silent there, because he had sinned against the Lord.
If the song belongs to a clear conscience, how can a man who has already sinned ever sing? One writer answers by counting what grace does with guilt.
We have noted six things in these verses: three that concern guilt, and three that concern the grace that puts it away. The seventh thing we observe is the climax: he was "surrounded with shouts of deliverance." He had been delivered from the guilt of his sin, and even from the crushing power of storms of trouble. He was a joyful man indeed. Such was the grace of God.
The proverb describes what happens now, not only later. Commenting on a companion proverb, one writer sees God at work on both sides in this life, with something better still ahead.
"The righteous is delivered from trouble, and the wicked walks into it instead." Even here the believer proves that God is his great Deliverer. How much more when the morning dawns without clouds! The wicked even here are not without evidence that God's eye is on them, to let them taste the fruit of their own way. "In the net that they hid, their own foot has been caught."
- Snare — wrongdoing sets its own trap. The evil man thinks he is safe, but his own transgression catches his feet. Haman died on the gallows he built for Mordecai.
- Guilt — sin offends God and traps the sinner. People who claim their words are their own learn otherwise, at their own cost.
- Silence — a song needs a clear conscience. After his sin, David had no music left in his heart.
- Song — guilt put away gives the song back. The forgiven man was surrounded by shouts of deliverance. That was the grace of God.
- Now — both endings are already visible. The righteous prove God their Deliverer in this life, and a cloudless morning is still to come.
The righteous taketh knowledge of the cause of the poor; the wicked understandeth not knowledge.
This proverb divides two men by what they know about the poor. It raises a sharp question: is not knowing a lack of information, or a choice?
The two halves of the verse differ over one thing: the will to find out. One writer says the wicked man makes his own ignorance, while the righteous man wants to know.
If someone does not want to know it, he can probably persuade himself that he is ignorant of it. But the righteous want to know, and they consider the cause of the poor. This does not mean handing out money or goods to anyone who asks. It means help given wisely, at the right time.
If ignorance can be self-produced, it can also be offered later as a defence. Commenting on a nearby passage in the same book, one writer weighs that defence against the One who hears it.
If we ignore the needs of those in trouble, we may excuse ourselves by saying we did not know their condition (v. 12). Let us consider that God knows exactly whether this is true. Mere excuses will carry no weight with Him. We cannot expect to escape the consequences when we fail to care for the needs of others. God will repay each one according to his deeds.
The verse calls this man righteous, not kind. One writer reads it beside two other proverbs, where how a man treats the poor touches his Maker.
About the poor and the rich we read that the poor man is hated while the rich man has many friends (14:20). "Whoever oppresses a poor man insults his Maker, but he who is generous to the needy honors him" (14:31). To deal kindly with the poor and the lowly is God-like. The righteous man will show his righteousness in a practical way by considering the poor.
The poor man's case is the one nobody wants to argue. One writer shows why the poor are an easy target, and who takes their side.
It may seem strange to say, "Do not rob the poor," and especially "because he is poor." But the warning is needed, because human nature is now so low, selfish and cruel. The rich might look like the more tempting prey for dishonest men. But they can protect themselves in ways the poor would not or could not try. So bad men flatter the rich for profit, while they rob or oppress those who ought to be objects of pity. But the LORD has His eye on such crime, at the very gate where justice should flow. He pleads the cause of the poor and the afflicted, and He repays heavily those who plunder them.
One writer, reading the letter of James, points out whose company the poor are in.
James addresses the rich. They have possessions in this world, and they do not consider the poor. Yet "Blessed is the one who considers the poor!" (Psalm 41:1). Whoever despises the poor man because of his poverty despises the Lord Himself... The Lord had pronounced His blessing on the poor. The gospel came to them, and this was a sign announcing the Messiah. We all know that a poor man may be just as wicked as anyone else. But riches are a real danger to us. They feed pride, and they tend to make the heart keep its distance from the poor — and the Lord joined Himself to the poor in this world. "Though he was rich, yet for your sake he became poor, so that you by his poverty might become rich."
No government has ever fully matched this proverb. One commentator points to the reign that will, and names who carries the duty until then.
Only under the reign of the Lord Jesus will the poor be truly considered. In the meantime the Spirit of God insists through the apostles, "Only, they asked us to remember the poor, the very thing I was eager to do" (Gal. 2:10). So today public government does not care properly for the poor, and the church of God is made responsible to do so — though of course in a very limited sphere.
- Want to know. The righteous man seeks out the case of the poor. The wicked man arranges not to hear it, and talks himself into believing he never knew.
- Know wisely. Knowing leads to help given wisely, at the right time — not to money scattered without thought.
- Known by God. The excuse of ignorance may satisfy the man who makes it. God knows whether it is true, and repays each according to his deeds.
- God's own case. The poor man's cause is not left undefended: the LORD pleads it Himself and repays those who plunder him.
- Christ's own company. The Lord joined Himself to the poor. To despise them for their poverty is to despise Him. Until His reign puts this right, His people carry the duty.
Scornful men set the city in a flame; but the wise turn away anger.
This proverb puts two kinds of people side by side, and a whole city hangs on which of them is in charge. So who is a "scoffer," and how do the wise turn wrath away?
Proverbs pictures more than one kind of person who will not listen. One writer sets the scoffer beside the simple, and finds the worse disease in him:
The simple are the many weak ones. They lack all moral discernment and any aim in life, so evil can reach them on every side and at every turn. By this easy indifference they become a prey. The scorners show a more positive corruption. They reject every appeal to conscience and every reference to divine things with crude jokes and insulting sneers. It is a moral disease that keeps growing, and it has never been more widespread than in these last days.
Scoffers do more than sneer in private. One writer traces their contempt into the future, when men like this rule a city.
Another translation renders this, "Scornful men set the city in a flame." This attitude is one of proud contempt for the Word of God and for warnings of danger. Isaiah 28:14 speaks of "scoffers who rule this people in Jerusalem." It is clearly prophetic of the time of the end, when the King of the North threatens the nation. But their brazen self-confidence, and their trust in "the beast," the revived Roman Empire, will set their own city in a flame. They will be trodden down. If wise men were rulers, they would know how to "turn away wrath," rather than invite it.
A ruler's folly does not stay with the ruler. One writer tells how Hoshea's treachery brought a stronger king down on the whole nation.
But his evil doings, whatever their character, quickly brought the Assyrian, "the rod of God's anger," upon him and his guilty subjects. The man who had conspired against his weaker Israelite master tried the same thing — to his sorrow — with his powerful Gentile lord. "The king of Assyria found treachery in Hoshea, for he had sent messengers to So king of Egypt, and offered no tribute to the king of Assyria. Therefore the king of Assyria shut him up and bound him in prison."
So what should a city do with such a man? The same writer is blunt:
The scorner is not only ungodly and a sinner. He is a source of trouble wherever he goes. If you want quarrelling to disappear, you must get rid of him. His presence surely brings strife and shame along with it.
How do the wise turn wrath away? By how they answer — and without going soft on evil.
Fury is already there. Since it dishonours God and does not suit man, a soft answer disarms it. A hurtful or humiliating word, on the other hand, stirs anger up. Christ is our example; grace was poured into His lips, and when He was reviled, He did not revile in return. Yet who was more withering to the proud and the hypocritical? Who spared even an apostle less when he became a stumbling block?
- Contempt — the scoffer's mark is not weakness. He sneers at correction and at God's Word, and waves off the warning that would have saved him.
- Fire — that attitude does not stay private. Rendered "set the city in a flame," it makes proud self-confidence at the top into public ruin at the bottom.
- Snare — Hoshea's treachery brought the Assyrian down on him and on his guilty subjects. One ruler's scheming, and his people paid with him.
- Removal — the scoffer is a source of trouble wherever he goes. Strife and shame leave when he does.
- Wisdom — the opposite of setting a fire is putting one out. A gentle answer disarms fury. Christ is the pattern: reviled, He did not revile back, yet He never flattered the proud.
If a wise man contendeth with a fool, whether he rage or laugh, [he] hath no rest.
What happens when a wise man tries to reason with a fool? This proverb answers: the fool explodes or he sneers, and either way the matter never comes to rest.
The verse does not say the wise man loses. It says the dispute never closes. Better arguments do not help. The problem is not the reasoning. It is the man listening.
A case like this can have no satisfactory end. The wisest, clearest arguments will likely only enrage a foolish man, or make him laugh in scorn. So it is wise to "leave the presence of a fool, for there you do not meet words of knowledge." We are to have "nothing to do with foolish, ignorant controversies" (2 Tim. 2:23).
That advice to leave has a reason behind it. There is nothing to gain from the fool, and something to lose.
What should you do when you are with a foolish man, where "you do not meet words of knowledge"? Get away. He can do you no good and may do you no little harm. He will receive no reproof, and you risk provocation and loss of temper.
That is the sting of this proverb. The wise man starts out wise, and may not end that way. Still, do not walk away too soon. The fool should first get a chance to change.
If a man is plainly foolish, he will not accept wise counsel. It is right to leave him — after giving him the chance to change his attitude, of course. Arguing with such a man is certainly worse than useless.
Matching a fool blow for blow costs more than time. You start to copy him.
"Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest you be like him yourself." A fool argues in order to mock, with no real reasoning. It is a mistake, then, to sink to that same unhealthy level of argument. Heated words easily trap a believer into using the same unsound argument and ridicule. So we make ourselves like the man we resent!
Proverbs also says the opposite: answer a fool. The same writer holds the two together.
You should avoid mere argument on the same basis. Yet it may be very necessary to answer a fool in a way that shows his argument up as folly... The wisdom of the Lord Jesus in answering contentious men illustrates this beautifully. Rather than merely answering their cunning questions, He answered the men.
So the test is not whether to speak, but what a question is really for.
If someone really wants to know the answer to a question, let us give him the help he needs. But if he asks questions with the clear intention of disputing the truth, he deserves no answer.
The New Testament gives the same warning to anyone serving God. Being correct is no protection once you have agreed to fight.
Whatever happens, the servant of the Lord is not to be drawn into strife — "the Lord's servant must not be quarrelsome." If he lets himself be drawn in, he may end up thoroughly defeated, even while he stands for the absolute truth. The servant is to remember that he is only the servant and not the Master. As the servant of the Lord, his business is to show the character of the Lord — gentleness, readiness to teach, patience and meekness when he is opposed.
The aim, then, is not to win the exchange. It is to show the Master's character while the opposition lasts.
- No rest. Fury and mockery both refuse the answer instead of meeting it. So the clearest case ever made settles nothing.
- No profit. He can do you no good and may do you real harm — he will not take correction, and you risk losing your temper.
- No imitation. Heated words drag you down to his level of ridicule. You end up looking like the man you resent.
- No blanket rule. Two proverbs stand together. Do not argue on his terms, but a false argument may still need exposing. The Lord answered the men, not their trick questions.
- No striving. A servant can stand for absolute truth and still lose, once strife pulls him in. His job is to show his Master's character: gentleness, patience and meekness under opposition.
The bloodthirsty hate the perfect, but the upright care for his soul.
A blameless man draws two opposite responses: some seek his life, others care for souls. Why should he attract murderous hatred at all, when he has harmed no one?
This hatred is not new. One writer traces it back to the first family on earth, and names what stirs it.
This has been true since the days of Cain, "who was of the evil one and murdered his brother. And why did he murder him? Because his own deeds were evil and his brother's righteous." This hateful spirit shows what the man is; for "the just" care for men's souls. If someone claims to be a Christian and yet shows hatred toward believers, it is the same proud attitude as Cain's. He defied God with the answer, "Am I my brother's keeper?" The reason for this is that the honourable practice of a believer irritates the conscience of the man who chooses evil.
The blameless man gives no cause. Commenting on Psalm 37, a writer rules out the obvious reason and names the real one.
They plot against the righteous as the Pharisees plotted against the Lord Jesus (v. 12). Their hatred is so deep that it moves them to gnash their teeth. Why is this so? It is certainly not because believers harm or threaten them. The reason seems clear: the godly character of believers is a testimony that grates on their consciences. They resent a testimony so contrary to their own character, because it exposes them.
"Bloodthirsty men" sounds like a group most readers can rule themselves out of. One writer warns against that comfort.
This is the enmity of the seed of the Serpent to the Seed of the woman. "Cain was of the evil one and murdered his brother. And why did he murder him? Because his own deeds were evil and his brother's righteous." This was the cause. It was the enmity of sin to godliness, the enmity of the mind set on the flesh against God... It was the world's hatred of Christ, because He testified about the world that "its works are evil." This enmity does not always wear clothing stained with blood, but it is always in the heart. "The mind set on the flesh is hostile to God."
Translations split over the second half of the verse. The ESV has the bloodthirsty seeking the life of the upright. Another reading has the just caring for men's souls. The commentators quoted here take that second sense. It makes the upright man the exact opposite of the murderer: he wants his enemy saved. That is what the Lord taught.
He told them, "Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you." Love is not just a kind feeling. It is real concern for the true and proper welfare of another. If that person returns hatred, that is all the more reason to care for him, for he needs special help. Doing good in return for evil represents God rightly. It also sets an example that should touch the hearts and consciences of others.
The last word does not belong to the plotters. One writer shows what God does for the man they hate.
But just because he is obedient to God, he has his enemies in the wicked, who watch him, and even seek his death. They may even go through the form of a trial. They surround themselves with the appearance of justice to reach their cruel ends. But the Lord is against them. Despite all that may seem to be true, He cannot abandon the righteous to their hand, nor condemn him because they do this. No, He will surely justify him.
- Cause. Men hate the upright man for nothing he has done. His honourable life irritates the conscience of the man who has chosen evil.
- Ancestry. This is the oldest quarrel on earth, running from Cain's murder of his brother to the world's hatred of Christ.
- Reach. Bloodshed is the extreme form, not the boundary. The same enmity sits unseen in hearts that will never lift a hand.
- Reversal. The bloodthirsty seek to end a life; the upright seek the soul. Hatred received becomes a reason to care for the hater.
- Outcome. Their watching and plotting can wear the appearance of justice. Still God will not abandon the righteous to them; He will surely justify him.
A fool uttereth all his mind; but a wise [man] keepeth it back.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
If a ruler hearken to lying words, all his servants are wicked.
What the man at the top is willing to hear decides the character of his whole household. This proverb traces the wickedness of every servant back to the ruler's ear, not to the servants.
When a leader accepts a false report, he shows everyone under him what kind of talk gets rewarded.
A ruler carries a serious responsibility. He must establish beyond doubt whether a matter is true or false. If he listens to lies, he encourages the falsehood of his servants: all his servants will be wicked. David was usually careful in such matters. Even so, he failed sadly when he listened to Ziba's slander of Mephibosheth, a loyal servant of David (2 Sam. 16:1-4; 19:24-30). Later on, David still did not judge the matter as he should have.
Scripture treats the person who listens to a lie as sharing the character of the one who tells it.
Those who wish evil and do evil are no small trial to us. Here we are shown how closely malice and falsehood are linked. An evildoer listens to false lips, and a liar gives ear to a mischievous tongue. Such is mankind without God, each in his own way, but all astray and malicious.
William Kelly (Proverbs 17:4, in his own rendering)
The story the commentators keep returning to shows how the trap works.
Next we have Ziba and his slander of Mephibosheth, and again we find David making the saddest "haste." He judges while the accused is absent. He believes a most unlikely story, told by a man who could well expect that slandering his master would be his own stepping-stone to promotion. So the help he brings to David is credited to himself, and he wins a royal reward for it at his master's cost.
The damage did not end when the truth came out. Pride kept the wrong judgment standing.
David was plainly annoyed. He did not like to admit his blunder in accepting Ziba's slander of Mephibosheth. He ought to have apologised to Mephibosheth for this. He ought to have faced Ziba with the seriousness of his lie. Instead he sent Mephibosheth away with no real courtesy. He told him he had decided that he and Ziba should divide the property — property that really belonged to Mephibosheth.
Slander rarely arrives as a shout.
Breathing out lies traps more people than a loud attack does. A loud attack would catch attention and be answered at once. But breathing lies out spreads the malice far and wide. Trusted friends pass them on, taken in themselves, and the people being slandered never learn what is going on. It is a picture of utter corruption.
The law forbade inventing an evil report. It also forbade taking one in. That duty falls on ordinary people, not only on kings.
Notice that the first thing forbidden is "a false report."... False reports have done great harm among Christians! We all admit that it is wrong to raise them. Do we all realise the wrong of receiving them?... Examine any evil report with care and check that it is true before you accept it.
Those who lead are the natural target, so Scripture puts a guard on charges brought against them.
"Do not admit a charge against an elder except on the evidence of two or three witnesses" (1 Timothy 5:19). No one is so open to attack from discontented people. So God's wisdom holds back any readiness to take up such charges unless serious evidence supports them. Otherwise the work of oversight would become a dreaded task instead of a good work that a serious-minded man might want to take up.
Solomon wrote about a king whose eyes scatter all evil. Then he failed that standard himself.
If ever a king sat on the throne whose eyes did much to scatter away all evil, it was the man who wrote these words in the Spirit. Yet we have the sad tale of failure, so typical of man. In the end his eyes approved evil that dishonoured Jehovah and did great harm to Israel. But He who inspired Solomon has always had a greater One in view. "Behold, a king will reign in righteousness, and princes will rule in justice." The time hastens.
- The ear rules. A ruler who listens to lies encourages the falsehood of his servants, until all of them are wicked.
- The listener shares. Whoever gives ear to a mischievous tongue is a liar himself. Malice and falsehood travel together.
- David proves it. He judged with the accused absent. He believed an unlikely story from a man who gained by it, and he never put the matter right.
- So guard the ear. Raising a false report is plainly wrong. Receiving one is the sin we forget. Check every evil report, and hear no charge against a leader without two or three witnesses.
- One King never fails. Solomon wrote of eyes that scatter all evil, then approved evil himself. The standard waits for the King who will reign in righteousness.
The indigent and the oppressor meet together; Jehovah lighteneth the eyes of them both.
This proverb sets two men side by side. One has nothing. The other takes from those who have nothing. Yet both receive their light from the same Lord. So what does that shared light do when the two of them stand face to face?
Neither man can plead ignorance. One commentator presses the moment when the two stand together:
Whether to the poor, or to the oppressor, it is the Lord who gives light and understanding. When they meet together, is it possible that the oppressor's conscience is asleep when the Lord has lightened his eyes? Can he think the poor man is so unenlightened that he does not see he is being oppressed? Oh no! The Lord gives them both light to see the situation. Let them look one another in the eye, and see whose conscience writhes.
Writing on another proverb, the same author explains what God has placed in every person:
"The spirit of a man is the lamp of the Lord" (v. 27). It is the Lord who gives man a spirit. By that spirit he ought to be enlightened, and he will be if he considers what his spirit seeks to teach him. For his spirit is marked by knowledge, understanding and conscience. These should certainly take the lead over natural desire and feelings, which are the marks of the soul. So the Lord has given us in our spirits the ability to search the inner depths of our hearts. Yet we too often ignore this and do as our soul desires.
Proverbs pairs rich and poor the same way elsewhere, and gives the reason: God made them both. One writer shows how little really separates the two:
In the essentials, how little the difference is! Alike they come into the world, and alike they stand when the world passes away. "Rich and poor meet together; Jehovah is the maker of them all." The poor man is entitled to remember this, and the rich man ought not to forget it. Job had it clearly before him: "If I have rejected the cause of my manservant or my maidservant... what then shall I do when God rises up? ... Did not He who made me in the womb make him? And did not one fashion us in the womb?"
The oppressor picks the poor man precisely because the poor man cannot fight back. Commenting on the warning not to rob the poor because he is poor, one writer traces the calculation:
The rich might seem the more inviting prey to ruthless men. But they can take care of themselves in ways the poor would not or could not try. So bad men flatter the rich for gain, while they also rob or oppress those who ought to be objects of pity. But Jehovah has His eye on such villainy, at the very gate where justice should flow. He pleads the cause of the poor and the afflicted, and He repays heavily those who rob them.
The injury does not stop with the victim. Oppressing the poor insults God Himself: "what is it to oppress the poor, but to reproach Him who made both him and his lot?" (William Kelly).
Light is not approval. God's kindness reaches men who have no interest in Him at all. That makes their case worse, not better:
God delights in doing good. Yes, He does; and not merely to the righteous, but to the unthankful and evil. Is it that He takes pleasure in them? Quite the contrary. But out of His own goodness — as our Lord put it so simply and so grandly — He causes His sun to shine on the evil as well as on the good. And He sends His rain on the just as well as on the unjust. The man who profits by all these benefits and never thinks of God at all is a most wicked man, the greatest enemy of God alive on the earth. There he is, so completely unfeeling — possibly more unfeeling than an animal. He shows less gratitude than the poor unreasoning animal that knows its master's kindness and care.
- One Maker. God made the poor man and his oppressor. They come into the world alike, and they stand alike when it passes away.
- One light. The same Lord lights the eyes of both. The spirit He gives is His lamp: knowledge, understanding and conscience.
- One look. Because both see, neither can pretend. Let them face each other, and the question becomes whose conscience twists.
- One insult. Crushing the poor is not merely cruelty to the weak; it reproaches the God who made him and gave him his lot.
- One reckoning. God's goodness falling on the evil is no verdict of approval. He watches the villainy, pleads the cause of the afflicted, and repays those who plunder them.
A king that faithfully judgeth the poor, his throne shall be established for ever.
The proverb ties the survival of a throne to a single test: how the king handles the case of the poor. But the commentators press a further question. Has any ruler ever passed that test?
One commentator writes on an earlier proverb about robbing the poor. He shows why the poor are the ones at risk, and what God does about it.
It may seem strange to say, "Do not rob the poor," and especially "because he is poor." But the warning is needed. Human nature is now that low, selfish, and cruel. The rich might seem the more tempting prey for an unscrupulous man. But they can look after themselves in ways the poor cannot. So bad men flatter the rich for gain, while they rob or oppress those who should be objects of pity. But the LORD has His eye on such villainy, at the very gate where justice should flow. He pleads the cause of the poor and the afflicted. He repays those who plunder them, and repays them heavily.
Another writer points to what that care shows about God.
To deal kindly with the poor and the lowly is God-like. The righteous man will show his righteousness in a practical way by considering the poor.
A ruler might assume that firmness against wrongdoers keeps him safe. A comment on another proverb says otherwise.
Here again we learn what preserves the king. It is not unbending firmness against the wicked, but "mercy and truth." Negative qualities fail to sustain. "His throne is upheld by mercy" — a godlike prerogative. He needs love as well as fear, not only for the people's happiness, but for the stability of his rule.
One writer applies the verse and finds only one King who fits it. Every other government has failed, today's included.
In the full, absolute sense this will be true only of the reign of the Lord Jesus Christ. Here is a King perfectly faithful and true in deciding matters for the poor of the land. Today men may loudly advertise their anti-poverty campaigns. Yet the poor are still treated unfairly and oppressed. It is only a thin veneer. How the earth groans for a King who will reign in righteousness and fully plead the cause of the needy. His throne alone will be established forever. All others have failed, though some have been blessed in measure, according to the measure of faithfulness in the particular king.
Many people hope that better laws will fix the world. One writer answers that hope head-on.
All injustice will be instantly put right. This is bound up of necessity with the Messiah's righteous rule. So we read, "He delivers the needy when he calls, the poor and him who has no helper... From oppression and violence he redeems their life, and precious is their blood in his sight" (Ps. 72:12-14). Men fondly dream that this is the goal of human enlightenment and progress. But they do not know, or they forget, how incurably corrupt human nature is. So they fail to see one thing: even if the whole world were given just and equal laws, those laws would still fail — either in how they are carried out or in how they are applied.
"Established forever" is a promise no human dynasty can keep. One writer shows what an endless reign gives the person at the bottom.
It is the rule of the Eternal: while other kingdoms rise and fall, this one lasts... There is no danger that the line of succession will fail. There is no uncertainty from a throne passed through many hands. The glorious Priest-King never resigns His throne or loses it to others. He is Himself the dynasty, and its character will never change... One King is King to all, giving incorruptible justice to all alike. Rule is now true service, and the oppressed is sure of a ready hearing in the one court of appeal that is always open.
Waiting for that reign still leaves believers work to do now.
Only then will the poor be properly cared for. In the meantime, in the church of God, the Spirit of God insists through the apostles, "Only, they asked us to remember the poor, the very thing I was eager to do" (Gal. 2:10). So today public government does not care properly for the poor. God has made the church responsible to do so, though of course in a very limited sphere.
- Test. How a ruler treats the poor tests the throne. God Himself watches the courts and repays those who plunder the defenceless.
- Likeness. Kindness to the lowly is God-like. Mercy, not severity alone, holds a throne up.
- Fulfilment. Only Christ's reign meets the standard. Every other king was blessed only as far as he was faithful.
- Limit. Human progress cannot close the gap. Even perfect laws break down in the hands that run them.
- Permanence. His throne needs no successor. He is the dynasty. So the oppressed always have one court open to them, and meanwhile the church must remember the poor.
The rod and reproof give wisdom; but a child left [to himself] bringeth his mother to shame.
This proverb sets two ways of raising a child side by side. One is active: correction and words that confront. The other is passive: leaving the child alone. Only one of them produces wisdom, and the verse names the person who pays for the other.
The verse pairs a rod, which is physical, with reproof, which is spoken. One writer treats them as a single need:
If someone is not wise, he will not learn wisdom by mere education: the rod and reproof are essential needs. They may not be taken kindly at the time, for they are meant to hurt. A child needs this, and so does a child of God when disobedient. God may arrange circumstances to chasten and discipline us, and we know it is for good. If a child is left to himself, his ignorance will lead him badly astray, so that the shame of it will fall on his mother's shoulders.
The rod seems severe until you ask what it is treating. Commentators point to what is already inside the child before anyone teaches him:
This is sure and solemn: folly is no disaster coming from outside. It is bound in the heart. And it is there not only in the struggles of busy life, but from our earliest days, since all of us have now departed from God by nature. "Folly is bound in the heart of a child"; no one is exempt, from the most tender age. Nor is the greatest love or care enough to restrain folly. There is the rod of correction to drive it far away, by the Lord's prescription and with His blessing. It is the folly of a father or mother to think their way is better than God's.
Scripture supplies a case study. Eli was a priest whose sons ran wild. God's summary of the failure names one thing the father did not do:
It is sad to turn from Hannah's son to Eli's sons. "His sons were blaspheming God, and he did not restrain them" (1 Sam. 3:13). The Lord Himself has summed it all up in the verse just quoted, and He has given us the reason for both the sins and the judgment: he did not restrain them. Eli was ninety-eight years old, and at that point he protested to his sons, but it was too late.
Few parents plan to abandon a child. It happens when they let go of the reins:
God has put into the parents' hands the reins of government and the rod of authority. But suppose parents let the reins drop from their hands through laziness. Suppose false tenderness or moral weakness stops them using the rod of authority. Need we be surprised if the children grow up completely lawless? How could it be otherwise? Children are, as a rule, very much what we make them.
The wrong hand on the rod does the opposite of what this verse promises. Children read the motive behind the punishment before they feel the punishment itself:
Children's eyes are quick, and their young hearts feel deeply. Even while under the rod, they sense whether it is love, or anger and temper in the parent, that applies it. When anger holds the rod, it produces anything but correction. Anger provokes anger. "Fathers, do not provoke your children to anger, lest they become discouraged." Then every stroke of the rod drives the child farther and farther away — the very child the parent means to correct.
The verse ends with the mother's shame. One writer applies that to the kings of Judah:
Good women do not always prove to be good mothers. It would be no strange or unusual thing if some of these Hebrew heirs to the throne were left to do pretty much as they pleased. That would prepare them to act the part of self-willed offenders and rebels against God when the time came for them to take the kingdom. For "a child left to himself brings shame to his mother."
A wayward son wounds each parent in a different place:
Here it is not only a grief to the father, but a bitterness to the one who bore him. Such a son defies and despises his father's authority. He tests and abuses his mother's affection. How little such a son feels their anguish!
- The root. Folly does not come from outside. It is bound in the child's heart from the earliest age, and love and care alone do not restrain it.
- The remedy. Education by itself does not make anyone wise. The rod and reproof are meant to hurt, and a child needs them.
- The neglect. No parent decides to leave a child to himself. The reins just drop, through laziness or false tenderness. God's verdict on Eli was blunt: he did not restrain them.
- The manner. A rod swung in temper drives the child away. The child must feel love in it, or the correction corrects nothing.
- The cost. What a parent will not pay in correction, the home pays in shame. The son defies his father's authority and abuses his mother's affection, and hardly feels their pain.
When the wicked increase, transgression increaseth; but the righteous shall see their fall.
This proverb sets two facts side by side: evil spreads, and evil falls. It does not say how long the gap between them lasts, or what the righteous are to do while they wait.
The verse ties two things together: more wicked people, more transgression. Evil does not just add up. It feeds on itself.
This is how things are as the end of an age draws near. The wicked multiply, and evil grows bolder, spreading at an alarming rate. Here is the law of cause and effect. But the wicked seldom stop to consider that such an effect in turn becomes the cause of another effect: "the righteous will look upon their downfall." Wickedness builds in a frenzy, piling its tower higher and higher, and that tower is far out of balance. At a certain point it must fall.
The same chapter shows one way the wicked multiply. A leader who accepts lies breeds liars around him.
How serious is a ruler's responsibility to make certain whether a matter is true or false. If he listens to lies, he encourages the falsehood of his servants: all his servants will be wicked. Even David failed here when he listened to Ziba's lies about Mephibosheth, a servant who was true to him (2 Sam. 16:1-4; 19:24-30).
Why does God wait while the wicked increase? One writer answers from what God told Abram about the Amorites.
The Lord told Abram, as a reason for not judging the Amorites, that the cup of their iniquity was not yet full. The cup of Sodom and Gomorrah was filled, as we know, but that of the Amorites was not. God let them go on in their evil ways until the earth was ready to spit them out. Then the sword of punishment fell on them at His command. It is always a principle in God's dealings that the iniquity which He judges must be thoroughly out in the open.
The second half of the verse gives the righteous sight, not a sword. One writer explains what the godly do with malice they cannot fight.
Notice, he speaks of the fear of the enemy. This malice tends to produce fear. The godly man is no match for it; he can use no weapon against it. He leaves it to God by laying it before Him. God trains His saints. The outcome is that the wicked bring His judgment on their own heads. They even fear and see and acknowledge God's work. For this the godly must wait, and then joy will be complete. Their deliverance is a divine one, so it must wait for God's time of judgment.
One writer sets this verse over the reign of King Ahab. Ahab went into his last battle in disguise; the king fighting beside him was left exposed.
The king died. They buried him in Samaria and washed his chariot and armour by the pool there, and the dogs licked up his blood — all just as the Lord had said. God's arrow found him, despite his disguise. His colleague was an obvious target for every archer in the Syrian army, yet he escaped.
What the righteous will see is not a dip in their opponents' fortunes. It is a collapse with no getting up.
There are the workers of iniquity FALLEN. At the end comes the inevitable crash. Poor little man may look impressive for a time. The godly may cry out, "Let not the hand of the wicked remove me." It is the wicked who is removed, not the godly. The outshining of the Lord's coming will destroy him. He and his helpers are to fall, and once cast down they will not be able to rise.
- Started — A ruler who listens to lies makes all his servants wicked. Evil spreads from the top down.
- Multiplied — Evil then compounds. Each wrong becomes the cause of the next, and the growth speeds up as an age nears its end.
- Full — God waits until the evil He judges is fully out in the open. He did that with the Amorites in Abram's day.
- Waiting — The godly have no weapon against malice. They hand it to God and wait for His time. The wicked bring His judgment on their own heads.
- Fallen — Ahab's disguise did not save him, and the final crash is permanent: once cast down, they will not rise.
Chasten thy son, and he shall give thee rest, and shall give delight unto thy soul.
This proverb links a parent's hardest duty to a parent's deepest reward: correction now, rest later. So is discipline a burden on love, or the proof of it?
Wisdom does not come from information alone. One writer says what a child needs instead.
If someone is not wise, he will not learn wisdom by mere education: the rod and reproof are absolute necessities. They may not be taken kindly at the time, because they are meant to hurt. A child needs this, and so does a child of God when disobedient. If a child is left to himself, his ignorance will lead him badly astray, so that the shame of it will fall on his mother's shoulders.
The verse names two results, and one goes further than the other.
The child must be corrected in order to be kept from greater wrongdoing. Beyond that, this will bring rest to the faithful parent, and more than that, a real and solid delight. Notice throughout this whole chapter the value of proper, careful government.
Correction is not the opposite of affection. One writer pictures a child who is still young enough to be shaped.
The young twig is pliant, and may be bent straight or pruned to bear fruit. Love is not indifferent but takes pains, and chastening is a greater sorrow to a father than to the son who needs it. To allow evil, whatever the excuse, is to set your heart on causing him to die.
The same writer names the true motive behind sparing the rod:
To spare is really to please oneself, and harm deeply one's son.
Why should a loving parent ever cause pain? One writer answers by pointing to how God Himself treats those He receives as His own.
Are you going to reduce your own children to illegitimate children, by raising them on the no-punishment principle? Prove that he is your son by disciplining him. This is how God dealt with you and me. "He chastises every son whom He receives." And why? Because He loves us. Does discipline look like receiving? Or chastening like loving? Certainly not in any other relationship, but this is exactly what marks out the love of a father for his son. First, it is true, came the Father's kisses of welcome. Then the best robe, then the ring and the sandals. Then the fattened calf, the music and dancing. And afterwards — the rod. The rod does not taste like the kiss, but the same love that gave the kiss holds the rod.
The first word to fathers restrains the father, not the child.
Fathers hold almost absolute authority. So the first thing the Spirit of God does, when He turns to parents, is to warn them how to use it. He knows what the flesh is, even in a Christian. He knows how quickly we turn tyrannical and domineering in the place where God has set us. So, in tender care for those placed under our authority, He says, "Do not provoke your children to anger."
Scripture also shows the opposite case. Eli's sons were ruined, and God gave one reason for it.
The Lord Himself has summed it all up. He has given us the reason for both the sins and the judgment: "his sons were blaspheming God, and he did not restrain them." Eli was ninety-eight years old when he finally protested to his sons, but it was too late. Perhaps no passage in Scripture should speak more seriously to the hearts of us parents than this sad story.
- Left alone — ignorance leads an uncorrected child astray, and the shame falls on his mother.
- Corrected — the rod and reproof give wisdom; education by itself does not.
- Loved — correction costs the father more than the son; sparing it pleases the parent and harms the child.
- Received — God disciplines every son He receives; the same love that gave the welcome later holds the rod.
- Rested — the fruit is twofold: rest for the faithful parent, and a solid delight in his heart. That is the line: left alone, corrected, loved, received, rested.
Where there is no vision the people cast off restraint; but happy is he that keepeth the law.
This proverb sets two ways of living side by side: a people with no word from God, running loose; and one person who holds to what God has said. It raises three questions: what "vision" is, why losing it wrecks a society, and why the one who keeps God's word is happy.
One writer explains what kind of sight this is, and what its absence lets loose:
Vision here is the kind of sight that sees beyond what nature alone can observe. It is a spiritual insight, and the only thing that really keeps honor and order safe. "The spiritual person judges all things" (1 Cor. 2) — even things that are only earthly. If that insight is missing, the people will "cast off restraint." The way people today recoil from the blessed truth of God is a powerful comment on this! This falling away from God has brought a reckless abandon that scorns every warning of His judgment. Even so, there is still blessing for the individual whose heart bows to the truth of God. In Israel, the man who still kept the law was happier than those who cast off restraint.
In the days of Eli the priest, Scripture says there was no open vision. One writer explains the phrase:
"No open vision" means there was no public revelation of God's will concerning His people; no clear showing of His mind, whether by dreams, by a prophet, or by the Urim and Thummim.
Another writer sees the same period as the proverb proved in real history, and notes a telling detail about Eli himself:
By way of contrast we recall the closing days of Eli. "There was no open vision," and Israel's history proved this word from Proverbs to the full! As to Eli himself we read, "his eyes were dim," and his life ended sadly, with the glory gone.
One writer traces the collapse of authority back to the days of the judges, and finds the same collapse today:
When kingship is lost, rule by the people rises, and with it the reign of self-will. People fling aside all restraint and indulge every kind of license. The people of God sank to that condition in the days of the judges. Sadly, this same low condition shows up in many ways in the world today, and among people who profess to belong to God. The same principles are at work, and they produce the same results. Man's self-will has no patience with restraint, and it casts off authority more and more.
But a shortage of vision is never the end. One writer sees God stepping in at the lowest point:
Often in times of ruin the enemy hinders God from revealing His mind… But though it was hindered, the word had not been stopped. Grace provides for the needs of each age. And here is the great comfort: it is often in the darkest days of decline that God gives the most new light, to guide and encourage His own. At a time when vision was rare, God raises up the first real prophet in Israel… He gives Samuel — that is, He gives prophecy. Through it He comes near to man in sovereign grace and tells him His mind.
One writer applies the proverb to service, and points to Paul — first known as Saul of Tarsus — as the model. He quotes the verse in an older rendering, "the people perish":
We read in Proverbs 29:18, "where there is no vision, the people perish." It seems that no service can keep the affections of the saints alive unless the one who serves has had a vision. Paul is introduced, as Saul of Tarsus, as a man who had a vision, a vision of Christ in glory. For the moment that vision blinded him to everything on earth. But it opened his heart, as well as his eyes, to the glory of that blessed Person at God's right hand.
- Vision — spiritual insight that sees past what the eye can observe. It is the only real safeguard of honor and order.
- Loss — no vision means no public word from God. Eli's dim eyes and lost glory show the proverb proved in Israel's own history.
- Ruin — when people fling authority aside, self-will reigns. The same principles work the same way today.
- Grace — the enemy hinders the word but never stops it. In the darkest days God gives the most new light, and raises up a Samuel.
- Happiness — the heart that bows to the truth is happier than the crowd that has thrown restraint away. And only the one who has seen can serve others well.
A servant is not corrected by words he understandeth indeed, but he will not answer.
This proverb draws a servant who hears correction and gives nothing back — no answer, no obedience, no sign the words landed. So why do words fail on a person like this, and what does God do when they fail?
An early Greek translation of the Old Testament, the Septuagint, names the servant's problem outright.
The Septuagint translation renders this "a stubborn servant," which would of course seem more clear. But it is a painful thing for a master to get no response to his words of correction. So let the servant of God pay attention. Let him receive with thanks the correction a wise Master sees He must give. And let him answer Him with true submission of heart.
Why do words fail? Another proverb answers by setting the fool beside two animals that words cannot manage.
"A whip for the horse, a bridle for the donkey, and a rod for the back of fools." The horse and the donkey are both unclean animals, and each pictures the unbeliever in a different way. The horse of Palestine would not work. The donkey was mostly wild and would not be controlled. Soft, soothing measures are hopeless in such cases. About people who are "insubordinate, empty talkers and deceivers", the apostle says, "They must be silenced" (Titus 1:10, 11). The rod of authority is the only language they understand.
The same writer says the rod is not only for unbelievers.
If a person is not wise, education alone will not teach him wisdom. He must have the rod and the reproof. We may not welcome them at the time, for they are meant to hurt. A child needs this, as does also a child of God when disobedient. God may use providential means to chasten and scourge us and we know it is for good.
The servant in the proverb is not ignorant. He understands, and still gives no answer. Scripture treats that gap between knowing and doing as a serious thing.
It is not enough to know what ought to be done. "If you know these things, blessed are you if you do them" (John 13:17). Indeed it is a serious matter not to obey; for we read, "So whoever knows the right thing to do and fails to do it, for him it is sin" (James 4:17). The Lord also gives a solemn warning: "And that servant who knew his master's will but did not get ready or act according to his will, will receive a severe beating" (Luke 12:47).
Silence toward God is not neutral. Refusing to hear Him has a cost.
When God speaks to His people about their moral and spiritual state, the least they can do is listen. They should take to heart whatever God has to say. People who refuse to hear, when God speaks, are indeed in a hopeless case, be they saints or sinners. Refusal to hear brings down the chastening hand of the Lord upon His people. Their blessings are withered up.
There is also a wrong way to answer: the retort that pushes back at the master. One commentator shows what frees a servant from it.
Many a person could do or even bear a great deal. The hard thing is to avoid contradicting — answering back by his actions, no less than by his words. But the word of the Lord to the servant is "not answering back". Is he not the Lord's freedman? Can there be such a release as His? Could money buy freedom like this? Let him thank God and go on his way rejoicing. Let him carry out his master's wishes and never block them, serving his Over-Lord and Saviour, Whose eye is always on him to cheer and guide.
What replaces both stubborn silence and back-talk is work aimed at pleasing the Lord Himself.
The ultimate object of their honest hard work is to please the Lord, not men. For God is watching always and we should always practice obedience from the heart. If Christ is the Object of our service, then it will never become irksome.
- Stubborn. An early translation calls him "a stubborn servant". The problem is not the message. It is the man who gives no response.
- Painful. It hurts a master to correct someone and get nothing back. We do that to God when His words reach us and stop there.
- Rod. When soft measures fail, the rod is the only language left. God uses it on His own children too, and it is for their good.
- Knowing. Understanding raises the stakes. The servant who knew his master's will and did not act on it gets the sharpest warning.
- Answer. God looks for neither silence nor back-talk. He looks for obedience from the heart, the service of one who knows he is the Lord's freedman.
Hast thou seen a man hasty in his words? there is more hope of a fool than of him.
Solomon points at a common habit — speaking before thinking — and his verdict is severe. Why does he rank the man who blurts out whatever comes to mind below the fool?
Scripture has a settled sense of what a fool is. This verse puts someone below him:
Scripture regards a fool as one who leaves God and eternity out of his reckoning. We may ask, can there be anything worse? Yes, at least there is still a very real possibility of such a man's conversion. But a man in the habit of speaking his mind without consideration is almost a hopeless case. He is so self-opinionated that he thinks he need never take time to consider anything. Such an attitude clearly blocks any change in the man. What he hears he will hastily condemn if it does not suit his own selfish thoughts.
Hope is the key word. Something may still get through to a fool. The hasty talker condemns what he hears and shuts the door.
Rushing to speak looks like a small fault of temperament. Underneath, it is a decision about whose thoughts matter:
Haste or vanity leads men to trust in themselves and to ignore what others have to say. That is how they get the discredit of folly and shame, to their surprise and pain.
That self-trust is what makes the case so hard. A related proverb reaches the same verdict, and one writer names the cause:
"Do you see a man who is wise in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him" (Proverbs 26:12). Of all fools, the conceited fool is the worst. Pride makes a man incapable of receiving counsel.
The opposite of hasty speech is not silence. It is thought — weighing both the words and the person who hears them:
A fool will pour out all that he knows, or thinks he knows. He gives no thought to the need or condition of those he speaks to, and none to the damage he might cause. He may even pride himself on being "frank and outspoken," while he is in fact crude and ill-mannered. A wise man, on the other hand, will be careful to weigh what he speaks. He takes time to consider what people might read into his words. Not that he will in any way be deceitful, but he will consider the condition and the need of those he speaks to.
People defend hasty speech as honesty and plain dealing. It is a flattering name for bad manners.
Guarding the mouth protects the speaker as much as the hearer. Letting everything spill out costs him dearly:
But there is a bridle needed too. So the one who guards his mouth keeps his soul. As a good man said, one should think twice before speaking once. If anyone does not stumble in word, he is a perfect man, of thorough integrity, able to bridle the whole body as well. How much sorrow and shame he spares himself! He also spares others, who avenge a little folly by despising the wisdom they themselves lack. On the other hand, some go about loud-mouthed, opening their lips wide to tell everything they think, feel, or hear about others. They will get the destruction their malicious folly deserves.
Among God's people the toll is heavier than most of us guess:
Here Scripture records an unwise speech of Moses, made in a moment of irritation. When I read it, I see what a deep need there is for a bridled tongue. This is where Satan gains such an advantage over us. Unwise talk is where God's people constantly need correction. No one can measure the sorrow this brings on souls. Perhaps it is not too much to say that almost all the trouble among God's people comes from rash words.
If the problem is confidence in our own minds, the cure is knowing how little we have taken in:
We speak rightly only as God controls our thoughts. If we think God's thoughts we shall be able to speak things that are right. We may be quick to hear God's thoughts. But we shall only speak them after we have absorbed them for ourselves and made them our own. We absorb them slowly, and so we should be slow to speak. A healthy sense of how little of God's mind we have yet taken in will deliver us from self-confidence and shallow self-assertiveness. That is what makes men ready to speak at once on any and every matter.
- Hope — God can still reach a fool. The man who never pauses to consider has shut out the one thing that would change him.
- Root — hasty speech grows out of self-trust. It ignores what others say, and pride leaves a man unable to take counsel.
- Damage — rash words cause almost all the trouble among God's people. The one who guards his mouth spares himself sorrow and shame.
- Contrast — a fool empties himself out and calls it being outspoken. A wise man weighs his words against the need of the hearer.
- Cure — we take in God's mind slowly. Knowing that kills the self-confidence that makes men ready to speak at once on everything.
He that delicately bringeth up his servant from a child, shall in the end have him as a son.
The verse watches one household over many years. A master raises the boy who serves him with tenderness from childhood, and in the end that servant stands in a son's place. So is this a promise or a warning? And does God Himself deal with people this way?
One writer reads the proverb as a plain rule of cause and effect. He also sets it against the hasty man of the previous verse.
Faithful, true dealing with a servant will normally produce a response of faithfulness. God's own dealings with mankind show this beautifully, as Galatians 4:1-7 bears witness. In the Old Testament, believers are like young children under guardians and stewards, no different from servants. But in the New Testament, every believer has received the adoption of sons, by virtue of the redemption that is in Christ Jesus. They are no longer in the place of mere servants. God gives them a place of trust and dignity. What wisdom and faithfulness there is in all God's ways with us, to bring about such results! The contrast to verse 20 is evident: God is not hasty, but patient, faithful, considerate; and this bears fruit.
The proverb turns on the gap between servant and son. That gap is about what a person can be trusted with.
Whatever a child may be, even if he is the heir, he is still kept in a place of subjection and under rules and regulations. In that respect he is no different from a servant. He cannot yet be trusted with the freedom of his father's house. When, however, he comes of age all is changed. He then leaves the nursery regime behind, and the time of his training is over. He takes his place as a son, in the liberty and nearness that belongs to that intimate relationship.
That new freedom is not permission to please oneself.
His liberty is not a right to do his own will. It is a freedom that finds real fellowship and delight in the Father's will. This is the place of a son, though believers do not always act as sons. Still, they are sons. Any action apart from the will of the Father is shamefully out of keeping with the place given them.
One writer points to what people have seen happen in real families.
Then again, who has not known someone from the lowliest place promoted for his wisdom over a son who brings shame? Such a man is even given a share in the family inheritance. A son crushes the family with his disgrace. A wise servant, especially in such a case, gains love, respect, and honour along with his full share.
Translations pull the verse in two directions. Older wording reads it as a simple outcome: the servant ends up as a son. The ESV reads it as a warning against pampering a servant. Taken that second way, the proverb is a caution, and writers say something very like it about children.
Sometimes unwise fondness tempts a parent to pamper the will of the child. But that is sowing to the flesh, and it must yield corruption. It is not true love at all to indulge a child's will; nor can it possibly serve his real happiness or proper enjoyment. An over-indulged, self-willed child is miserable himself, and a heavy burden on all who have to deal with him.
The proverb speaks to the one with authority, not to the one under it. And warmth on its own will not hold a household together.
Masters especially have to remember their responsibility to give what is just and equal. They act as before God, dealing patiently and fairly with all under their charge. Masters have to govern, and no amount of kindness will make up for a lack of even-handed justice where rule is concerned. Indeed, if a master forgets this instruction, the relationships between the members of the household will soon fall apart.
- Patience — The verse sits against the hasty man of the previous line. Steady, faithful dealing over years shapes the person under your authority. Quick words do not.
- Promotion — A servant raised with care can end up in a son's place, sharing the inheritance. Households have long seen a wise servant honoured above a son who disgraces the family.
- Picture — God's own way with people shows it best. Believers once stood under guardians, no different from servants. Through redemption they receive the adoption of sons, with a place of trust and dignity.
- Position — A son leaves the nursery routine for liberty and nearness. But that liberty delights in the Father's will, not his own.
- Proportion — Commentators differ on whether the proverb promises a reward or warns against pampering. Either way, giving in to someone's will is not love. And kindness never replaces even-handed justice in those who govern.
An angry man exciteth contention; and a furious man aboundeth in transgression.
This proverb sets two men side by side. It measures them by what they leave behind: one starts fights, the other piles up sin.
The verse works by cause and effect. A man may be right about the wrong he sees. He can still make everything worse by the heat of his words.
Here again we see cause and effect. A man may have clear thoughts about right and wrong. But his strong anger against the wrong will not correct it. It will stir up strife instead, and cause worse friction than the evil he condemns. If a man has formed a character of this kind, the harm he will do cannot be measured. In fact, his fury against what he thinks is wrong will make him abound in transgression: his own wrongs will be more than the ones he denounces.
That last line is the sting of the proverb. The furious man ends up with a longer account against him than the person he was attacking.
Not all anger is sin. One writer draws the line between anger that grieves over evil and anger that is wounded self.
There is such a thing as being rightly angry. But that anger is indignation against the evil, not against the evil-doer, and behind it there is grief because of the evil. So we read that the Lord looked at the wicked leaders of the synagogue "with anger, grieved at their hardness of heart" (Mark 3:5). The anger of the flesh always has self in view. It is not grief because of evil, but resentment against someone who has given offence. Such anger against the evildoer only leads to bitterness that fills the soul with thoughts of revenge. Anger against evil leads to grief instead, and that grief turns to God, where the soul finds rest.
The test is simple: does the anger grieve over the wrong, or resent the person?
The second half of the verse says the angry man causes much transgression. One writer tests the excuse that such anger is defending God's honour.
Men may sometimes feel that their anger is for God's glory. But that is very doubtful: the anger of man does not produce the righteousness of God. Man's anger is linked instead with filthiness and overflow of wickedness, as something to be laid aside. Losing your temper is clearly that overflow of wickedness.
after_note: DELETE
Temper, then, is not a small slip. It is wickedness overflowing.
The angry man stirs strife up. So deal with a conflict while it is still small. A related proverb pictures water breaking through a gap.
Who has not seen what a blaze a little spark can start, when godliness and grace do not rule? Starting a quarrel is like letting out water. A few drops trickle at first, until the opening widens into a flood that sweeps everything away. "Therefore quit before the quarrel breaks out."
If fury creates strife, the calm man does more than avoid it. He puts it out.
How truly a furious man stirs up contention! But the man who is slow to anger not only gives no occasion for strife; he calms it. Peacemaking begins in a heart that bows to God in Christ through grace, and it marks the whole spirit and walk.
Choose an angry man for a friend, and his temper rubs off on you.
A man given to anger finds it hard to keep friends, and it is unsafe to become his friend. Walk with a furious man and you risk learning his ways. You end up with a trap instead of a warning. The Apostle says, "Do not let the sun go down on your anger." To refuse to hear him here is to give place to the devil. Even when we have serious reason, the only right Christian feeling is to forgive: "if you do not forgive others their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses." If you are slow to forget your wrongs — wrongs that may only be imagined — do you believe Christ's words?
- Cause — anger is measured by what it produces. Strong feeling against wrong does not correct the wrong. It stirs up strife and causes worse friction than the evil it attacks.
- Multiplied — fury does not stop at one sin. The angry man's own wrongs end up "more than the ones he denounces." That is the much transgression the verse names.
- Tested — right anger is "indignation against the evil, not against the evil-doer," with grief behind it. Anger of the flesh "always has self in view."
- Contained — strife starts as a few drops trickling through a gap. Stop it early, or you will not stop it at all.
- Reversed — the slow-to-anger man is the proverb's answer. He gives no occasion for strife, and he calms the strife of others. That peacemaking "begins in a heart that bows to God in Christ."
A man's pride bringeth him low; but the humble in spirit shall obtain honour.
One man climbs and ends up lower than he started, while another stays small and receives honour he never chased. The proverb puts the question plainly: who does the lifting?
The first half of the verse is not a punishment added on top of pride. Pride itself does the work:
So pride produces the opposite effect to the one a man intends by it. He wants to exalt himself, but he actually brings himself low. How many people since Eve has Satan deceived with this same sweet but poisonous bait, "You will be like God"! But the humble in spirit are different. They seek no place of distinction and no honour in the world. Yet God in grace puts honour on them, and that honour holds them up. They honour God; He honours them. We see this beautifully in men like Joseph and Daniel. We see the opposite in men like Absalom and Haman, and how many more!
Another proverb sharpens the point. It exposes the man who admires his own judgment, and it turns our idea of promotion upside down:
Connect it with the proverb in chapter 26:12, "Do you see a man who is wise in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him." Pride always brings low; humility always brings up. The highest place is the lowest place.
A devout life is no proof that pride has gone. Pride can feed on religious work itself:
A man may be very zealous in prayer and hard-working in preaching. And all the while pride is the master he serves, though he wears God's uniform. It is hard to starve this sin; there is almost nothing it cannot live on. Nothing is too low for a proud heart to swell over, and nothing is too sacred for it to profane. … So far as pride rules, the man prays and preaches so that others will think him good. He wants his hearers to enthrone him rather than Christ in their opinion and hearts.
Being brought low is not the only option. A man can go low himself, and the difference matters:
The happiest of all is to be humble; the next best is to be humbled. It is better to be humble than to be humbled, but there is no comparison between being humbled and being lifted up. Humility is the effect of grace; humiliation is more the effect of God's righteous government where we are not humble. … The best place of all is to be so taken up with the grace and glory of the Lord that we are nothing before Him. Humility does not come so much from a moral process worked on ourselves, but from being occupied with Him. The Lord humbles us when He sees the need to break us down — it may be to use us, and certainly for further blessing.
So what is the honour the lowly receive? God Himself comes to live with them:
He dwells also with the one "who is of a contrite and lowly spirit," because He finds there what suits Himself. The highest place in heaven takes its honour from the presence of the One who still stoops to make the lowly heart His throne. … The God whom the highest heavens cannot contain is the God we may have as our Guest — but only by getting down ourselves into the lowest and humblest place.
Two men show the two halves of the verse in full:
What a far better thing to humble ourselves under His mighty hand and have Him exalt us, than to exalt ourselves and have Him put us down! "Everyone who exalts himself will be humbled." That is the first man. "He who humbles himself will be exalted." That is the second Man. The first man sought to make himself God, and fell into companionship with Satan. The second Man was God, and He made Himself nothing. God has exalted Him to the very highest glory.
- The aim — Pride sets out to lift a man up. It is his own hand on the lever, and the lever runs the wrong way.
- The reversal — He gets the opposite of what he wanted; the lowly get an honour they never reached for. They honour God; He honours them.
- The cure — Pride can live on anything, even prayer and preaching. Starve it by getting low on purpose. It is better to be humble than to be humbled.
- The honour — God comes to live with the contrite and lowly. He makes the lowly heart His throne.
- The pattern — The first man tried to make himself God, and fell. The second Man, who was God, made Himself nothing — and God has raised Him to the highest glory.
Whoso shareth with a thief hateth his own soul he heareth the adjuration, and declareth not.
A man may never steal a thing himself. But he keeps company with a thief, and the proverb says he hates his own life. Why is his silence so serious?
One writer links this verse to the faults listed just before it, and shows how the partner harms himself.
The evils we have already seen (hasty words, bad temper, pride) can easily lead to bad company. In fact they are almost bound to, if they are not judged. A man may not be a thief himself, but keeping company with a thief will surely brand him. He is showing hatred for his own soul: he does not care that such folly makes his own soul suffer. He knows the guilt of the other man. He hears the call to testify, but he says nothing. This refers to Leviticus 5:1: "If anyone sins in that he hears a public adjuration to testify, and though he is a witness ... yet does not speak, he shall bear his iniquity." If he knows the thief's guilt and does not report it, he may expect the same judgment as the thief. The same principle holds in every wrong association: let the believer be careful not to involve himself in any questionable company.
The law behind this puts a witness under oath to tell what he knows. One commentator, writing on that law in Leviticus, notes it has a name in human law too.
Verse 1 is a sin of omission. A man may hear and know about a serious matter and still not report it. In law this is called misprision, but before God it is sin. "The voice of adjuration" put a man under solemn obligation to testify to what he knew was true. So the Lord said nothing in His own defense before the Jewish council. Yet when the high priest put Him under oath in God's name, He answered with the truth: that He is the Christ, the Son of God (Matt. 26:63-64).
This is not just a matter for courts. It happens wherever people who could speak choose not to.
The first case of guilt is a man who forgets that there is a "time to be silent," and forgets also that there is a "time to speak." He has failed to tell what he was responsible to make known. Among the people of God it is not unknown for those who could have given evidence to keep a shameful silence in order to shield a wrongdoer. This is a serious matter, above all in the things of God.
What keeps a man quiet when he knows the truth? The same writer, moving on to the next verse, names the fear behind it and the only cure.
A man who is partner with a thief will be afraid to expose him. If I put myself under obligation to a man, the fear of that man will control me to that same degree. I am trapped by my own fear. How dreadful it is that, through fear of offending a mere man, I may end up offending God! The only safety from such traps is a real, dependent trust in the Lord.
Behind such a partnership there is something to gain. Writing on a psalm about the same behaviour, one commentator shows how a man talks himself into thinking God does not care.
Such people will readily join a thief if they see any prospect of personal profit, and they will not keep clear of adulterers. So the question of who he associates with means nothing to him... This is the case of "deceiving and being deceived." People of this kind deceive themselves into thinking they are right, and that God does not care about their gross evil. But God's patience is not indifference.
The proverb states a law that runs far beyond theft: you cannot stay clean while linked to what is unclean.
These instructions are very important. Experience, as much as Scripture, teaches us that we cannot keep personal holiness and spiritual fitness while we are joined to evil. Righteous Lot may form links with Sodom. God-fearing Jehoshaphat may make an alliance with Ahab, who worshipped the false god Baal. Both are bound to be dragged down and defiled in the process. It will be the same for us today. So let us take the warning.
- Partner. You do not have to steal to share a thief's guilt. Keeping his company is enough to mark you as one of them.
- Silence. The guilt here is the word held back. He hears the oath, refuses to give evidence, and so bears his own iniquity.
- Fear. Owe a man something, and you will fear him. Fear of offending a man ends in offending God.
- Profit. The bait is personal gain, and the lie behind it is that God does not care. But His patience is not indifference.
- Self-harm. So the man hates his own life. The tie he thought would serve him is what makes him suffer. Only trust in the Lord sets him free.
The fear of man bringeth a snare; but whoso putteth his confidence in Jehovah is protected.
Two forces compete for control of a life: the pressure of what people may think, say, or do, and quiet confidence in God. This proverb calls the first a trap and the second a shelter. But how does something as ordinary as caring what people think become a trap?
One writer traces this fear back to its root and follows it forward into the habits it breeds:
The fear of man is born of unbelief. The Christian who fears man shows clearly that he is not looking to the Lord, but to man. The fear of man surely brings a snare; it leads to men-pleasing and men-praising. The person seeks the honour that comes from man, not the honour that comes from God only. So he fears man — his approval or his disapproval.
The word "snare" pictures a hidden trap. The trapper here is not the person you fear; it is your own fear, and it tightens the more you owe to others:
The more I put myself under obligation to man, the more the fear of man will influence me. I am trapped by my own fear. But what a dreadful thing! For fear of offending a mere man, I may end up truly offending God. The only safety from such snares is a dependent, genuine trust in the Lord.
Israel's first king, Saul, used this very excuse after he disobeyed God. One writer takes his confession at face value and draws the verdict:
Saul says in 1 Samuel 15:24, "I feared the people and obeyed their voice." The chief priests and elders feared the people in our Lord's day. By their own confession, all such people are completely unfit to hold power… But in the meantime, should we not seek to walk in the fear of God? Should we not seek above all things to do what pleases Him?
Pilate, the Roman governor who tried Jesus, is the other classic case. One writer looks past the moment of the choice to what comes later:
Pilate was not the last who has agreed to what was wrong for the sake of temporal interests. Such a course, however successful it may appear at the time, very often turns out anything but happy for the person in the end. Sooner or later, conscience will speak and make itself heard. And those he tried to please at the expense of righteousness may in the end turn round and attack the one who acted to please them.
Peter, one of the disciples closest to Jesus, loved his Master deeply — and still failed Him. One writer asks what defeated him:
What powerful enemy so weakened this fervent, affectionate follower of the Lord Jesus? Simply "the fear of man," which "lays a snare"… In the things of God, natural courage will fail. Only God's divine power and grace can sustain us and keep us from fear. "When I am afraid, I put my trust in you" (Psalm 56:3).
The cure is not the absence of fear but a greater fear:
"The fear of man lays a snare," and it is closely connected with "the leaven of the Pharisees" — their hypocrisy. But "the fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom." It makes a man always carry himself — think, speak, and act — as in the full blaze of the light of Christ's judgement seat. This would give immense dignity and elevation to the character.
Trust does more than calm the heart; it frees the mouth. The same writer links bold witness to a heart raised above people's opinions:
Suppose my heart rises above the influence of the fear of man. Suppose the assurance that God counts the hairs of my head calms it sweetly. Then my soul is in a fit state to confess Christ before men… The only proper ground of testimony for Christ is this: full deliverance from human influence, and settled confidence in God with no reserve. When God fills the heart, there is no room left for man.
- Root — the fear of man grows out of unbelief. It shows that a man is looking at people, not at the Lord.
- Snare — every debt you owe a person pulls the trap tighter, until dodging one man's displeasure means offending God outright.
- Cost — Saul lost his fitness to rule. Pilate learned that those he pleased at the cost of righteousness may turn on him later.
- Weakness — natural courage collapses, as Peter's did. Only God's power and grace hold a person steady when afraid.
- Safety — trust in the Lord puts the fear of God in place of the fear of man. A heart full of God has no room for a rival. That soul is free to confess Christ before people.
Many seek the ruler's face; but a man's right judgment is from Jehovah.
It is a familiar scene: a crowd pressing toward the door of a powerful man, hoping his face will turn their way. The proverb lets them queue, then says plainly that the verdict they want is not his to give.
Why do so many crowd the ruler's door? The answer is in their motive.
Why do so many seek the ruler's face? The reason is plain: their aim is usually selfish. They want to sway the ruler in their own favour. Do we seek God's face for that reason? Many do, not realizing that God shows no partiality. He will act in complete truth and justice in every case. On the day of accounts there will be no favouritism. Let that shape our character now. Right judgment for a person comes from the Lord, so let us judge ourselves honestly, with a fair balance.
Something moves that queue along. And the great men at the end of it are not always worth reaching.
Here we see the way of a man with men, and without God, as we saw in the chapter before. Gifts go a long way with most people. They open a path for the least honourable man into the presence of great men — who are often, like those flattering them, neither good nor wise. There are notable exceptions.
The same world that courts a generous man treats God very differently.
An earlier proverb says that many beg favours from important men, and everyone is a friend to the man who gives gifts. That is usually how a corrupt world works. Yet those same men are enemies of the greatest Giver of all good, who offers eternal life as a gift to all people — and they dare to treat Him with scorn and contempt!
The crowd has left out one fact. The man whose decision they chase is not the one in control.
Of all people, a king seems the least likely to be moved. His position and his duty make his heart look guarded and unbending. Yet who resists the God who rules in hidden ways, as He wills, even in the worst circumstances? He will reign in righteousness and for the greatest blessing when He takes the kingdom of the world. But even now the king's heart is in the hand of a God he may not know, or may even despise. Little as he thinks it, he serves God's purpose — the way streams of water serve the gardener who directs every channel into his gardens, his vineyards, or his fields. That heart is turned wherever God pleases.
What the ruler grants today he can take back tomorrow. Haman was the king's favourite at the Persian court until the day he fell.
When the favourite falls, no one raises a voice to shield him. The very people who had bowed to him like slaves say nothing. In fact, the man once blamed for his nerve in refusing to bow to Haman is now praised for his service to the king. Such is man: as changeable as the wind, and nowhere more so than at court. But the God who rules unseen carries out His righteous judgment wherever He sees fit. One day He will act directly and perfectly. He will act through the One to whom the right belongs, and the whole earth will have joy and peace.
The tactics that work at a ruler's door carry no weight where the final judgment is made.
Who will sway God on his behalf? Who will plead his own standing, importance, position or earthly advantage before the only true God? None of it matters to Him. Big names may count for a great deal in the proud, empty judgment of men. But let no one think he can pass God's inspection wearing that cloak. Let him look hard at his credentials instead, and see that they are in order — in such order that they meet the demands of perfect righteousness and truth.
Joseph, a prisoner in Egypt, once pinned his hopes on a man close to the throne.
Joseph asked to be remembered when the chief cupbearer was restored to honour, and he was forgotten. For that moment he put his confidence in a man, and he was disappointed.
The alternative is not doing nothing. It is going on as His servants until He steps in.
There is no promise that He will step in at once. But step in He will, sooner or later. The danger is this. Instead of staying poor in spirit, living in the fear of God, and so seeking His face with a broken heart, trusting Him and going on as His servants, we start to take the law into our own hands and fight our own battles.
- Motive — most people in that queue want one thing: the decision bent their way.
- Currency — gifts open those doors, even for the least honourable. And the great men behind them are often no wiser than the crowd flattering them.
- Control — God turns the ruler's heart like water, as He pleases.
- Collapse — court favour shifts like the wind. When the favourite falls, no one speaks for him.
- Court — before God, prominence and position count for nothing. Judgment is His. So judge yourself honestly now, and seek His face instead of fighting your own case.
An unjust man is an abomination to the righteous; and he that is of upright way is an abomination to the wicked [man].
Proverbs closes its practical sayings with two moral natures that cannot share a room. Each side finds the other detestable. Is that gap temporary, or fixed for good?
The verse leaves no middle ground. Even the loudest voices for tolerance draw a line somewhere.
The world may speak of "tolerance," as though man ought to tolerate everything. Yet that is impossible. Even the strongest champion of "tolerance" will himself be intolerant of at least some things. It should be clear that a just man and an unjust man can have no agreement: there is "a great gulf" between the two. And God's government will rightly "fix" this gulf unless, before death, the unjust man turns in repentance to the Lord.
The second half of the verse says the upright man disgusts the wicked. The first murder in the Bible shows what stirs that hatred.
Cain's works were wicked, and because of this he hated his brother, and killed him… What provoked him, and set all his evil nature in motion, was what was of God in Abel: "Why did he murder him? Because his own deeds were evil and his brother's righteous." So believers should not be surprised when the world hates them. It is only natural for the world to do so… "I have given them Your word, and the world has hated them because they are not of the world, just as I am not of the world" (John 17:14). The word of God received into the heart, and kept there, brings out in a person the moral features of God. This arouses all the evil and hatred of the corrupt fallen nature.
The phrase describes a man whose life matches what he claims to believe. One writer shows what protects such a man, and what happens to the man who lacks it.
"Righteousness guards the upright in the way." Such a person is not only as bold as a lion — for what is man worth? Consistency in his relationship with God and man is the shield that Satan attacks in vain. Yet, as a Christian, he loves to be kept by God's power through faith. Grace is dear to his soul, and he knows he owes everything to Him. On the contrary, "wickedness overthrows the sinner." Self and sin are all that he takes pleasure in, and the end of those things is death. If he told out the secret of his heart, no one would be so terrible to him as God, and no name so hated as Christ. The more he hears of Him, the more he hates his Judge.
The first half of the verse turns it around: the unjust man is detestable to the just. That does not mean the believer must treat him as a crook in every dealing.
Believers and unbelievers live by opposing principles. Righteousness can have no fellowship with unrighteousness, nor light with darkness. The Apostle does not mean that the unbeliever must be dishonest in his dealings with other people. But he acts according to his own will, without reference to God, and walks in ignorance of God.
That same instinct, misapplied, can cut a person off from the people God has set apart for Himself.
With the ungodly we cannot, dare not, walk; nor should we have the least desire to walk with such. But let us be careful that we do not separate from the godly. Psalm 4:3 tells me that "the LORD has set apart the godly for Himself." Now if I reject the ungodly, I am doing what He tells me to do. The world at least must admit that I refuse to walk with bad people. But if I reject the godly, I am at odds with Him who has set such people "apart for Himself." Then all the world can see in me is a man who will have no one but those who agree with him. I am at odds with God, and I have no testimony in the world.
Where this saying sits in the book points to something settled.
This verse closes the fifth section of the book, which deals with God's government and with man reaping what he sows. Placed there, it seems to point to the solemn truth of Revelation 22:11: "Let the evildoer still do evil, and the filthy still be filthy, and the righteous still do right, and the holy still be holy." It is a state fixed for ever. There is no hope of agreement between the first two and the last two: the "great gulf" is "fixed."
- Two natures. The recoil goes both ways: the unjust man repels the just, and the upright man repels the wicked. No neutral middle exists.
- Two causes. What is of God in a person provokes the wicked man's hatred — the pattern set when Cain killed Abel.
- Two shields. Consistency before God and man shields the upright man. Wickedness overthrows the wicked man, and the self and sin he loves end in death.
- Two errors. Refusing to walk with the ungodly is obedience. Refusing to walk with the godly leaves you at odds with God, with no testimony left.
- Two ends. Death fixes the gulf. That is why repentance belongs to now.