Numbers 6:3–7

Numbers 6:3 · Darby

he shall separate himself from wine and strong drink he shall drink no vinegar of wine, nor vinegar of strong drink, neither shall he drink any liquor of grapes, nor eat grapes, fresh or dried.

Numbers 6 sets out the vow of the Nazarite — a person who set himself apart for God. Verse 3 makes the vow specific: everything the vine produces is off limits. The list is unusually wide, and that width is the first clue to what God is asking for.

What the list rules out

The ban goes far past anything that could make a person drunk. Commentators see that width as deliberate.

Here, however, the primary concern does not appear to be the danger of drunkenness. Even grape juice and fresh or dried grapes were forbidden. So these instructions to the Nazarite must be about something wider: earthly joys. They are allowed in themselves. But the Nazarite gives them up willingly, because he is specially consecrated to God.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Refusing wine also had a practical side. It touched the mind, not the appetite.

Wine clearly has a stimulating effect, and taken to excess it takes away the understanding (Hos. 4:11). A Nazarite drank neither wine nor strong drink as a matter of principle. So nothing could limit his power of judgment — an important point, especially in spiritual matters. This is why Aaron and his sons were not permitted to drink wine when they entered the sanctuary (Lev. 10:8-11).

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Wine as a picture of joy

Across the commentary, the vine stands for one thing above all, and that is what makes the abstinence meaningful rather than arbitrary.

In the first place, the Nazarite was not to drink wine. The fruit of the vine, in every shape and form, was to him a forbidden thing. Now, wine, as we know, is the apt symbol of earthly joy — the expression of that social enjoyment which the human heart is so fully capable of entering into. From this the Nazarite in the wilderness was carefully to keep himself. With him it was a literal thing. He was not to excite nature by the use of strong drink. All the days of his separation he was called to exercise the strictest abstinence from wine.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What replaces it

Giving up the vine does not leave the Nazarite empty. What he loses is one kind of gladness; what he keeps is another.

Each command has a distinct lesson in it. Wine, in Scripture, symbolises joy (Judges 9:13; Ps. 104:15). The Nazarite must give it up. This world cannot minister to the joy of those who walk with God. Many Christians seem never to learn this. The Nazarite is not without joy. His joys are deeper and purer than this world's vines can offer. The wine of earth may stir and excite the imagination. It can give a thrill of pleasure for the moment. But it can never produce the deep joy that marks the one who walks with God, as Enoch did. "The joy of the LORD is your strength" (Neh. 8:10), but it comes down from heaven. Nothing grown in this cursed world produces it.

Modernised from Henry Allan IronsideOriginal wording

Not a quarrel with what God made

The vow forbids raisins and grape juice — good things in themselves. Writers are careful here: this is no verdict against what God made.

It is separation not only from what was defiling, but from what was the best in nature. This does not condemn nature. A Christian should never do that. We must uphold the honour of God in what He created, right to the end. It is always sad when a person weakens what is due to God in anything He has made. Yet there is no reason to deny the power that lifts us above it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A life that stands out

In a land full of vineyards, a Nazarite could not hide this refusal.

In Mediterranean countries wine is plentiful. Enjoying the fruit of the vine in one form or another was common. So a Nazarite who always refused anything made from the vine must have stood out. But a Nazarite lived for God. He was prepared to give up legitimate earthly pleasures. He viewed life from God's perspective. He looked at things differently from those around him. Whatever got in the way of his consecration had no place in his life.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Christ the true Nazarite, and us

Writers also see in verse 3 a picture of Christ. His separation did not start with a vow.

Verse 3: "Separate himself from wine" — that is, joy. The Lord came expecting to find joy among men. He looked for a response to His love in the hearts of men, but found none. So He was a Nazarite from the first. To be a Nazarite is to be separated from every natural affection that death can touch — to be separated to the Lord... So we are Nazarites too. Our own proper joy lies beyond death. So everything I give up here that has the mark of death is simply giving up what hinders a deeper grasp of the joy and blessing of that life which death cannot touch.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same picture appears when God looks for joy in the nation He planted.

In the Scriptures, wine speaks of earthly joy, and God sought that joy from His earthly people, Israel. In Isaiah 5 God compares Israel to a vine... He had done everything possible. Yet when He came to taste the fruit, there was no wine for Him. He could have no joy in His earthly people.

Modernised from Paul DronsfieldOriginal wording

Summary

- Cost — the ban reaches past drunkenness to juice and raisins. The issue is earthly joy laid down by choice, not just excess avoided.

- Clarity — refusing wine on principle kept the Nazarite's judgment clear, like the priests who entered the sanctuary.

- Gift — the Nazarite is not joyless; he trades a shallow, momentary joy for the deeper joy of walking with God.

- Balance — grapes are good things. The vow lifts a person above nature without condemning what God made.

- Christ — He came looking for joy among men and found none. So He was the true Nazarite from the first, and believers are Nazarites after Him.

Numbers 6:4 · Darby

All the days of his separation shall he eat nothing that is made of the vine, from the seed-stones, even to the skin.

Numbers 6:4 ends the first rule for the Nazirite vow, a promise of holy separation to the Lord: nothing from the grapevine, down to the seeds and skins. Why forbid something that was never sinful, and what does a ban that total teach about a life set apart for Him?

Why the vine

The vine was not picked at random. In Jotham's parable, each fruit tree carries a meaning of its own.

As we know from Jotham's parable in Judges 9, the olive tree speaks of fatness (Judg. 9:8, 9), the fig tree of sweetness (9:11) and the vine of joy: "Shall I leave my wine that cheers God and men?" (9:13). Wine therefore speaks of joy: for God in the drink offering, and for mankind (Ps. 104:15).

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Not a question of harm

The vine itself was not evil. The issue is aim, not morality.

It is not a question of the harm of this, that, or the other. As a rule there was no harm in the vine tree, and nothing wrong with it in itself. But the point is this: if anyone aimed at being a Nazirite, if he wanted this holy separation to the Lord, he had to give up wine and strong drink completely. Others might drink wine; but the Nazirite was not to touch it.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Drunkenness is not the danger in view. The ban covers things that could never make anyone drunk.

Here, however, the primary concern does not appear to be the danger of drunkenness. Even grape juice and fresh or dried grapes were forbidden. So these instructions to the Nazirite must be about something wider: earthly joys. They are allowed in themselves, but he gives them up freely because he is specially consecrated to God.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

From the seeds to the skins

The verse reaches past the vine's products to the two ends of the grape itself. Each end carries its own lesson.

Note too that not even certain parts of the fruit are left out of this instruction: "from the seeds to the skins". The skins stand more for the outward appearance, while the seeds show the secret principles behind them. Think here of 1 John 2, where John reduces all that the world has to offer to three principles: "the desires of the flesh and the desires of the eyes and pride of life" (1 John 2:16)... The Nazirite avoids not only the outward appearance but also what is worldly at the core.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

All the days

The phrase "all the days" sets a boundary at both ends.

On the other hand, the phrase shows that the vow only applied for a limited period of time. That time would pass by. The moment would come when the Nazirite was expressly permitted to experience joy (Num. 6:20). For Christians today this period covers their whole life on earth. It is a restricted time, a window of opportunity, so to speak, when we can show that we wish to live for our Lord.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

The perfect Nazirite

Commentators see this separation lived out in Christ Himself.

Wine makes merry; it makes glad the heart of man. But Christ had not one feeling in common with a world estranged from God. He could love and pity, but He kept away from all earthly joy and gladness. To Him in whom God was well pleased, nothing here below gave Him enjoyment... This blessed Nazirite walked as God's heavenly stranger through the world.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Lord's own vow does not stay with Him alone.

The vine tree has its roots in the earth. The Nazirite, while under his vow, was to taste nothing made from the vine tree, from the seeds even to the skins. He was to be entirely separate from the pleasures of the world to the Lord. Every believer is a Nazirite, according to the blessed Lord's own vow: "I tell you I will not drink again of this fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father's kingdom" (Matt. 26:29). Being associated with Him, we are under His vow, and ought to be true Nazirites to God. But this can only be by finding all our joy, delight, and satisfaction in the love of Jesus.

Modernised from Andrew MillerOriginal wording

Not loss, but exchange

This is not bare self-denial.

The Nazirite knows that there are a thousand things that can have a negative influence on him, or at least be a distraction for him, although they are harmless in themselves, judged by normal moral standards. This has perhaps never been as true as in our own age of electronic communication. Every subject and every distraction is there, right at our fingertips... But as far as we are ready to give things up for the Lord's sake, we find that He grants us more joy than earthly things could ever give.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Summary

- Joy. The vine is the picture of joy — the one thing the Nazirite lays down while consecrated to God.

- Everything. Seeds and skins cover both the outward look of the world and its inner principles. Nothing from the vine is left out.

- Harmless. What the Nazirite gives up was never sinful. The question is not "Is this wrong?" but "Do I want to be a Nazirite?"

- Daily. "All the days" makes it a way of life, not an occasional gesture — a window open only while this life lasts.

- Exchange. Christ kept this separation perfectly and will drink the fruit of the vine again in His Father's kingdom. Those joined to Him give up less joy than they receive.

Numbers 6:5 · Darby

All the days of the vow of his separation there shall no razor come upon his head; until the days be fulfilled, that he hath consecrated himself to Jehovah, he shall be holy; he shall let the locks of the hair of his head grow.

Numbers 6:5 sets one rule for the Nazarite, a person under a special vow to God: while the vow lasts, no razor may touch his head. To everyone else the long hair looked like a disgrace, but the commentators read it as the mark of full devotion.

Hair as the sign of a surrendered dignity

The instruction runs against nature. A man's uncut hair announced that he had stepped down from the place God gave him.

It is plain that this was not the ordinary condition of a man. Long hair did not become him, though it is in character with the woman. Long hair is the sign of subjection to another. Subjection is not God's order for the man. He is meant to be the image and glory of God. But in the Nazarite the rule was altogether special. There was a giving up of man's natural rights, of the place of dignity which God gave him in nature.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Giving that place up left the Nazarite dependent. One writer sees gain in that loss.

The long hair of the Nazarite told everyone that he had given up his dignity and personal rights as a man. He did this to devote himself to the service of God. What was glory for the woman was shame for him… Without this dependence there is no service for God and no power for it. What was a sign of weakness for the Nazarite became the source of his strength.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Not a question of right and wrong

Nothing here makes cutting hair sinful. The rule bound the Nazarite alone.

Here again, note, the question is not as to the right or wrong of the case. As a general rule it was right for a man to cut his hair; but it was not right — no, it was altogether wrong — for a Nazarite to do so. This made all the difference. It was quite right for an ordinary man to shave and drink wine. But the Nazarite was not an ordinary man. He was set apart from all that was ordinary, to walk a path of his own.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

From dishonour to a crown

A phrase later in the chapter, quoted here from an older translation, turns the picture around.

In our chapter we find the interesting statement: "The consecration of his God is upon his head"… Here, to some extent, the threads meet and the connection becomes clear. Because the Nazarite was separated to God and consecrated to Him, he had let his hair grow. In God's sight that hair had become a sign of his consecration — a crown indeed. This is all the more remarkable since long hair, as such, would have been a dishonour for a male Nazarite.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Why hair, of all things

The verse says he shall be holy for the whole time. Hair sits on the boundary between the body and the world outside.

Hair is the outermost covering of all, over the skin. It is the point where the animal meets the outside world. It is also the point of separation… So the Nazarite let his hair grow long as a token of his separation from everything that would defile. If defilement came in, he had to shave off his hair as a token that he had lost his separation.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The one perfect Nazarite

Commentators read the unshaven head as a picture of Christ.

Sin has utterly tainted what would otherwise be lovely. But the Nazarite is a picture of Christ in His separation as a man to God. He was without blemish and without spot. Everything that grew up in that Holy One was lovely and acceptable to God… His food was to do the will of Him who sent Him and to finish His work. To have cut off the beautiful hair of the untainted Nazarite would have been to cut off the feelings, interests, thoughts, affections, purposes and acts of Christ. They were all fragrant and precious in the sight of God.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Until the time is completed

The verse sets a horizon. The vow had an end, and that end was joy.

The phrase shows that the vow only applied for a limited period of time. That time would pass. The moment would come when God gave the Nazarite clear permission to experience joy. For Christians today this period covers their entire life on earth… It is a limited time. It is a window of opportunity, so to speak, when we can show that we wish to live for our Lord.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Summary

- Sign — the uncut hair was a public, unmistakable mark: this man had handed over his rights and taken the place of subjection to God.

- Shame — what nature counts as a disgrace for a man, the Nazarite accepted, because he was no longer living as an ordinary man.

- Crown — what looked like dishonour was, in God's sight, a crown on his head; in Christ the picture is perfect, without blemish or spot.

- Strength — the sign of weakness became the source of his strength; service for God rests on that dependence.

- Span — the vow ran for a set time only; for Christians that window is this whole life on earth, and joy waits at the end.

Numbers 6:6 · Darby

All the days that he hath consecrated himself to Jehovah, he shall come near no dead body.

This verse gives the third condition of the Nazarite vow: anyone who sets himself apart to the LORD must not go near a dead body. Why should death, which nobody chooses, make a person unclean, and what does that rule ask of God's people today?

Why death defiles

The rule is not arbitrary.

Contact with a corpse caused defilement. We know that death is a result of sin. Romans 6:23 states plainly that death is "the wages of sin." This link between death and sin unlocks the meaning of the third mark of a Nazarite. Contact with sin causes defilement, and that is the deathblow for consecration. Defilement interrupts the enjoyment of fellowship. Without day-to-day fellowship with the Lord — without "abiding in Him" — we can do nothing.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

A new standard of judgment

The vow did not just add rules. It changed the question the man asked himself.

Once the consecration of God rested on a person's head, that great and important fact became the standard and test of all morality. It put him on completely new and unusual ground. He now had to look at everything from a new and unusual point of view. He was no longer to ask what suited him as a man, but what suited him as a Nazarite. So if his dearest friend lay dead beside him, he was not to touch him.

Modernised from Charles Henry MackintoshOriginal wording

Not even for father or mother

The strongest ties are family ties, and that is where this condition bites hardest.

The third mark belongs to man since the fall and is part of his very being: sin, proved by its consequence, death. This was what the Nazarite had to avoid at all cost. Even the strongest ties, family ties, must not count when the question is setting oneself apart for the service of God. How little we understand this! Many Christians say, "Let me first go and bury my father." Others say, "I cannot; my relatives would not allow it." Such are not Nazarites.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

What counts as a dead body now

Commentators differ on where the line falls today. Some point to people dead in their sins, and to how long a Christian's separation lasts.

For us, defilement comes through contact with moral death. So a dead man stands for someone dead in his sins. It is a very solemn thought for us all. Many live surrounded by relatives who are not converted, and defilement can be picked up so easily… How much, then, we need to be on our guard in our daily dealings, if we want to keep our place of separation and of communion. Let us never forget that all the days of our separation — and for the Christian that means his whole life — we are holy to the Lord.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Others read it of systems rather than persons.

Contact with a physically dead body does not defile us now. But there are spiritually dead bodies — corrupt religious systems — that insult the holiness of God. He expects believers to keep completely separate from these.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The cost, and the way back

Even accidental contact carried a real price — and no apology could cover it.

Suppose that by accident, as we say, he was with a man who died suddenly. He lost the whole of his previous period as a Nazarite. He had to begin the days or months or years of his separation again. A mere expression of regret would not do. He was defiled by the dead, and the unbending law of defilement applied. Only after the offering of the sacrifice that removes such defilement could he be fit for God's presence and company.

Modernised from W. H. WestcottOriginal wording

But name carefully what is lost. This is about closeness with God, not about being saved.

The reader needs to understand very clearly that this is in no way a question of the soul's salvation, of eternal life, or of the believer's perfect security in Christ… Christianity has two great links. They are closely connected, yet quite distinct: the link of eternal life, and the link of personal communion. Nothing can ever snap the first. The second can snap in a moment, under the weight of a feather.

Modernised from Charles Henry MackintoshOriginal wording

The One who touched and stayed clean

Jesus touched the dead, yet the picture of the Nazarite is not broken by it.

Concerning contact with the dead, here too it is not a case of literal fulfilment. We also know that He touched the frame on which the widow's dead son was being carried. Yet Numbers 19 states, "anything that the unclean person touches shall be unclean." But seen from the spiritual side, the Lord Jesus was completely separate from death, that is, from sin and its consequences.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Summary

- Consecration. The mark on the Nazarite's head reset how he judged everything: not what suits a man, but what suits someone set apart for God.

- Contact. Death defiles because death is sin's wage. Touching it is the deathblow to consecration, and it cuts off fellowship.

- Cost. Even accidental contact wiped out all the days already served, and regret alone could not undo it.

- Confidence. The link of eternal life can never be snapped. The link of personal communion can snap under the weight of a feather.

- Christ. He touched the dead and stayed undefiled. He was wholly separate from sin and its consequences.

Numbers 6:7 · Darby

He shall not make himself unclean for his father, or for his mother, for his brother, or for his sister when they die; for the consecration of his God is upon his head.

The law of the Nazarite reaches its sharpest point here. A man under this vow could not attend even the funeral of his own father or mother. The reason is not coldness. Something of God rested on his head, and it governed everything else.

The Crown on the Head

Why does the verse speak of the head? One writer explains, using an older translation of the words:

In our chapter we find the interesting statement: "The consecration of his God is upon his head." Here the different lines of thought come together and the connection becomes clear. Because the Nazarite separated himself to God and consecrated himself to Him, he let his hair grow. In God's sight that hair became a sign of his consecration — a crown. This is all the more remarkable, since long hair by itself would have been a dishonour for a male Nazarite (1 Cor. 11:14).

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

A New Question to Ask

Once that consecration rested on a man, it reset the whole basis on which he judged what he could and could not do.

Once the consecration of God rested on a person's head, that great and important fact became the standard and test of all morality. It placed him on wholly new and unusual ground. He now had to look at everything from a new point of view. He was no longer to ask what was fitting for a man, but what was fitting for a Nazarite. So if his dearest friend lay dead beside him, he was not to touch him.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Why a Corpse Defiles

Death is not just a sad accident here. It is the proof that sin is in man. That is what the Nazarite had to keep clear of, whatever it cost him:

The third thing has to do with what belongs to man since the fall and is part of his very being: sin, proved by its consequence, death. This was what the Nazarite had to avoid at all cost. He must not weigh even the strongest ties, those of the family, when it was a question of setting himself apart for the service of God. How little we understand this! Many Christians say: "Let me first go and bury my father." Others say: "I cannot, my relatives would not allow it." Such are not Nazarites.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Not a Licence for Hard-heartedness

The verse is not a rebuke of family love. These ties come from God and are good. The danger is letting them take a place that is not theirs.

The ties of nature are right enough, and truly of God in their proper place. But if they are not kept in their place, they are sure to hinder true devotedness… Was ever a son's love so tender as the love that glowed in the heart of the Man Christ Jesus? Was ever obedience to parents so perfect as His? Yet when service made its claims, and the integrity of true Nazariteship had to be held, He could say, "Woman, what does this have to do with me?" And again, "Who is my mother?" Only the true and perfect Servant knew how to adjust conflicting claims and keep each in its place.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Christ the Complete Nazarite

This law also paints a picture of Christ. He gave up the rights that belonged to Him as man, to serve God's glory alone.

Christ made Himself a Nazarite. He did not take His place as a man, or His rights as Son of man. For the glory of God He made Himself completely subject, and He submitted to all that that glory required. He identified Himself with the godly few among the sinful people whom He had loved, and became a stranger to His mother's children… He separated Himself from all the links of human life to devote Himself to the glory and service of God, and to obedience to Him.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What Defilement Costs — and What It Cannot Cost

What does defilement cost? One writer names the loss:

Anything that brings us into contact with sin has its effect on our Nazariteship. We lose the power that comes with communion with God, and the special presence of the Spirit with us — however much of that power God had given us. Sadly, we lose the time that went before too; we must begin again. It is great grace that God does not take away all privilege of serving Him… let us always remember that we are under grace.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

That loss is real, but be clear about what it touches. It breaks communion, not eternal life:

Christianity has two great links. They are closely connected, but they are quite distinct: the link of eternal life, and the link of personal communion. Nothing can ever break the first. The weight of a feather can break the second in a moment.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Crown. His uncut hair was, in God's sight, the sign of his consecration — a crown showing that God's claim rested on his head.

- Standard. That crown changed the question he asked. Not "what suits a man?" but "what suits a Nazarite?" — even with a friend lying dead beside him.

- Death. A dead body defiled him, because death is the proof of sin. Not even the closest family tie could override that.

- Balance. Family love comes from God and is good in its place. Only Christ, the complete Nazarite, kept every claim in its right order.

- Cost. Defilement never breaks eternal life. It breaks communion in a moment, and the days already served count for nothing — so the Nazarite begins again under grace.