And Jehovah spoke to Moses, saying,
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
Bring the tribe of Levi near, and present them before Aaron the priest, that they may minister unto him;
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
and they shall keep his charge, and the charge of the whole assembly, before the tent of meeting, to do the service of the tabernacle.
Numbers 3:7 sets out the working life of the tribe of Levi. At the tent of meeting they had a charge to keep: Aaron's, the people's, and the service of the tabernacle. What does keeping a charge involve? And does work assigned this closely by God still shape how believers serve today?
The verse names more than one party the Levites answered to, and the order matters. One writer traces it outward, from Aaron to the people (his wording follows an older translation):
So the Levites were commanded to "keep the charge of Aaron" — this was the primary consideration — and to keep "the charge of the whole congregation before the tabernacle of the congregation, to do the service of the tabernacle" (Num. 3:7). Christian service is for Christ, but it is carried out for the benefit of God's people and for the sake of the testimony for God.
A "charge" is not just a task to do. It is a trust to protect. God gave the tabernacle vessels into the Levites' keeping:
The Levites are now to be brought near and given to Aaron and his sons, to serve him and to keep the charge of the vessels of the tabernacle. It is a weighty service, and for it they must depend on the Priest. They are given wholly to the service of the priests. Ministry belongs to those who worship, and its first and most urgent duty is to guard and care for the holy things they handle. The tabernacle vessels, we know, set forth the truth of what Christ is in all His offices; and all ministry must watch over and preserve this.
No Levite chose his own post. One writer calls that a mercy, though not every heart feels it as one:
The priest appointed each Levite's service. Self-will had no more room among the Levites than it had among the men of war. God settled it all, and this was a marked mercy to everyone whose heart was in a right condition. A man whose will was unbroken might feel it a hardship, a tiresome task, to have to stay in the same place and do exactly the same work… But where the will was subdued and the heart adjusted, each one would say, "My path is perfectly plain; I have only to obey."
The same point is pressed on the question of who does the choosing:
It was no question at all of picking out those who might seem best for carrying the boards and the curtains, or the vessels of the sanctuary. God arranged it all, taking it completely out of man's hands: He chose suited men Himself.
The tabernacle filled a Levite's whole working life. One writer turns that into a test for the Christian:
It is just the same for Christians now. Their exclusive business — their one great work — their absorbing service, is Christ and His belongings… A true Levite of old could say, "To me to live is the tabernacle;" and a true Christian now can say, "To me to live is Christ." In everything that comes before the Christian, the great question is this: "Can I connect Christ with it?" If not, I have nothing whatsoever to do with it.
One writer asks who the Levites are today, and counts practical help as real service:
The Levites now, as then, are to minister to the priests, that is, the church. Who are the Levites? They are the ones who watch over the saints and care for the flock of God: they teach, explain the word, do pastoral work, rebuke, and warn against the evil around them. In Israel there were different orders of Levites, each with its own duties. In the same way, those who had to serve tables (Acts 6:1-4) were doing true Levitical service. All, whether teachers or simply caring for the wants of the poor, ministered to the saints of God. These servants are called by the Master, and they take up the service willingly, not under compulsion… The Lord distributes to each according to his ability.
The priests and the Levites picture two sides of the Christian's place, and many prize one and neglect the other:
If Aaron and his sons represent the Church as a holy priesthood offering up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God through Jesus Christ, then the Levites picture the saints as set apart to God for His will and service… Some prize the privilege of being in God's presence as worshippers above everything else. Others count it the highest favour that they are allowed to serve. But the perfection of the Christian life lies in the combination of the two, as seen, for instance, in Elijah. "As the Lord of hosts lives," he says, "before whom I stand." He lived within, and so he was ready to serve without. The one who most enjoys his priestly privilege will be the best qualified for his Master's service.
- Charge, not career. God handed the Levite a trust to keep: Aaron's charge first, then the people's, then the tabernacle service.
- Keep means guard. The charge covered the holy vessels, so the first duty was to watch over and preserve them.
- Assigned, not chosen. God fixed each man's post; self-will had no room, and a subdued heart finds that a mercy.
- One thing only. The tabernacle was the Levite's whole business, as Christ is the Christian's.
- Inside, then outside. Standing before God as a worshipper is what equips anyone to keep the charge for others.
And they shall keep all the utensils of the tent of meeting, and the charge of the children of Israel, to do the service of the tabernacle.
God set the Levites apart from the rest of Israel and placed them around the tabernacle. This verse hands them two charges — the furnishings of the tent of meeting, and the people of Israel — and both raise one question: what does God want from those He calls to serve Him?
The duty here points two ways. The Levites served Aaron the priest, but their work also met the needs of the whole camp.
As well as serving Aaron, the Levites attended to the needs of the whole congregation of Israel (v.7). Those needs centered on the tabernacle and its service. They had to care for all the furnishing of the tabernacle (v.8). Today the answer to this is the ministry God has provided for the Church of God. Are we concerned to minister what will be of real help and blessing to the people? Every believer should have such a concern.
The order matters. One commentator puts the priest first and the people second:
So the Levites were commanded to "keep guard over" Aaron — this was the primary consideration — and to keep guard "over the whole congregation before the tent of meeting, as they minister at the tabernacle" (Num. 3:7). Christian service is for Christ, but we carry it out for the benefit of God's people and for the sake of the testimony for God.
The verse tells the Levites to guard. Commentators read the tabernacle's vessels as pictures of Christ, so guarding them comes first for anyone who serves.
God now commands that the Levites be brought near and given to Aaron and his sons, to serve him and to keep the charge of the vessels of the tabernacle. It is a weighty service, and for it they must depend on the Priest. They are given wholly to the service of the priests. Ministry belongs to those who worship, and its first and most urgent duty is to guard and care for the holy things they handle. We know that the tabernacle vessels set forth the truth of what Christ is in all His offices, and all ministry must watch over and preserve this.
God left nothing here to the servant's preference. The priest directed the work, and each Levite kept the place given to him.
All who would be true Levites — proper workmen, intelligent servants — need to weigh this point with all seriousness. The priest's appointment regulated Levite service. Self-will had no more room in the service of the Levites than it had in the position of the men of war. God settled it all, and this was a clear mercy to everyone whose heart was in a right condition.
The same point is drawn from God's choosing of the men themselves:
It was no question at all of picking out those who might seem best for carrying the boards and the curtains, or the vessels of the sanctuary. God arranged it all, taking it completely out of man's hands: He chose suited men Himself. Where is there any happiness except in simply carrying out the will of God?
Their service also had a boundary. The tabernacle and its belongings were their whole occupation.
Their service had to do only with the tabernacle and its belongings. They had nothing else to do. If a Levite had turned his hand to anything else, he would have denied his calling, abandoned the work God gave him, and defied God's commandments… A true Levite of old could say, "To me to live is the tabernacle." A true Christian today can say, "To me to live is Christ."
Behind the duty stands an earlier fact: God had already taken the Levites for Himself.
Verse 12 of Numbers 3 reveals the secret behind the special place of the Levites: God had chosen them "instead of all the firstborn". In Egypt, God had spared the firstborn of the Israelites on the basis of the blood of the Passover lamb. This was the price that redeemed the firstborn. So they belonged to God. A Levite would therefore regard himself as redeemed by God and so as God's possession.
- Redeemed. God took the Levites for Himself in place of the firstborn He had spared. They served as men who already belonged to Him.
- Given. God then gave them to Aaron. Commentators apply this to service done for Christ, and wholly for Him.
- Guarding. Their first duty was to watch over the holy vessels. These picture what Christ is in all His offices, so ministry guards the truth about Him.
- Reaching. The charge reached the whole congregation. Work done for the priest brought real help to the people.
- Assigned. No Levite chose his own place or load. God settled it, and happiness lay in simply obeying.
And thou shalt give the Levites to Aaron and to his sons they are wholly given to him out of the children of Israel.
Numbers 3 sets the tribe of Levi apart for service. Verse 9 settles who they belong to, and commentators read that handover as a picture of every servant of Christ. The word that carries the weight is "wholly."
The order matters. God claims the Levites as His own first, and only then do they pass into the priest's hands.
Notice too, on the passage just quoted, that the Levites are first declared to be God's property. Only then are they "WHOLLY GIVEN TO AARON." So we read: "Yours they were, and you gave them to me, and they have kept your word" (John 17:6).
Levites and priests are not the same thing. One group pictures believers serving; the other pictures them coming near to God.
In Numbers 3 we have the Levites set apart, according to the thoughts of God, for service. They are a figure of the church, or rather of the members of the church in their service. The priests are the figure of Christians drawing near to the throne of God. Both are a shadow, not a perfect image.
Commentators read Aaron as a picture of Christ. That changes how a Christian sees his own life: God does not only rescue him; He gives him away.
The Levites were given as a gift to Aaron and to his sons, for service in the tent of meeting. Seen in this light, the Levites picture all believers as servants. So we learn that the Church is given to Christ for His service on the earth. We were given to Him for salvation, as every believer is. But we must also remember that we are a gift to Him for His absolute disposal. Our only proper attitude, therefore, is that of Saul of Tarsus, who said, "Lord, what do you want me to do?"
A total gift leaves nothing for a second owner. One writer traces what that means for a servant: how God separates him, how plainly his call must show, and whom he stands for.
They were separated "from among the people of Israel, and the Levites shall be Mine." It is no light thing, then, to enter on the Lord's service... They were marked out for their work by the Lord Himself. So every true servant must be marked out by God, and so plainly that his call will be clear to God's people. They were wholly the Lord's. He claimed them completely, for they were His through redemption. In the same way now the servant must recognise that he is not his own, that he is wholly devoted to the Lord's will. He must never allow any other claim to come between him and the Lord. In their service they stood for the whole congregation.
The Levites also had the tabernacle's furniture in their care. One writer takes those objects as standing for Christ Himself, which makes the job far bigger than carrying equipment.
The Levites are now told to be brought near, and to be given to Aaron and his sons. They are to minister to him and keep charge of the vessels of the tabernacle. It is a weighty service, and for it they need to depend on the Priest. Indeed, they are wholly given to the service of the priests. Ministry belongs to those who worship. Its first and most urgent duty is to guard and care for the holy things they handle. The tabernacle vessels, as we know, set out the truth of what Christ is in all His offices. All ministry must watch over and preserve this.
Levi's character earned him nothing. Something had to change first — and the place he was given is not the fighter's or the worshipper's.
What a place for the self-willed, fierce and cruel Levi! What a triumph of grace! What an illustration of the power of the blood of atonement and the water of purification! By nature and by practice they were far off from God. But the "blood" of atonement, the "water" of cleansing and the "razor" of self-judgment had done their blessed work. So the Levites were now fit to be presented as a gift to Aaron and to his sons, and to be joined with them in the holy services of the tent of meeting. In all this the Levites were a striking picture of God's people now... As men of war, we are called to fight; as priests, we are privileged to worship; but as Levites, we are responsible to serve.
- Owned. The Levites are God's property before they are Aaron's. Verse 9 hands on what God already owned.
- Given. God hands what He owns to the priest — the Church given to Christ for His service on earth, at His absolute disposal.
- Wholly. A total gift leaves no room for a second claim. The servant is not his own, and God marks out his call plainly enough for others to see.
- Guarding. The gift comes with a charge: care for the holy things, which show what Christ is. That weighty task keeps the servant leaning on the Priest.
- Grace. Blood, water and self-judgment made fierce, self-willed Levi fit to serve. The whole arrangement is a triumph of grace, not a reward.
And Aaron and his sons shalt thou appoint that they may attend to their priest's office; and the stranger that cometh near shall be put to death.
The chapter has just given the Levites to Aaron as helpers for the tabernacle, and this verse draws the line where their work stops. Only Aaron and his sons may serve as priests, and anyone else who steps in faces death — so why did God guard the way to Himself so closely?
The death sentence here has a positive truth behind it: God gave the priesthood, and no man could take it. One writer ties that rule to Christ, and to men who ignored it.
As to the appointment of the earthly priest, "no one takes this honor for himself, but only when called by God, just as Aaron was." Here again there is an analogy to the priesthood of Christ. No one can truly take the place of priest, in any sense of the word, who is not called of God. The judgment that overtook Korah and those with him shows how serious it is to neglect this great truth. They sought to establish themselves in the priesthood without being called of God.
The threat was not idle. One writer points to a king who tested it.
Aaron's family had a great privilege. It was forbidden — under penalty of death — for an outsider to take up the priest's office (see Numbers 3:10, 38). When king Uzziah presumed to claim this office and tried to burn incense, he was struck with leprosy. He remained a leper until the day of his death (see 2 Chronicles 26:18-21).
Verse 10 follows straight after God gives the Levites to Aaron, and the two halves belong together. Writers draw a lasting principle from that link.
The ministry of the tabernacle depended at its root on the priesthood of Aaron; apart from that it had no place and no right to exist. The value and acceptance of the outward service hung entirely on the inner worship... All real service flows from the Lord, and so it depends on Him in the sanctuary and refers to Him there. Otherwise it becomes false — when its source becomes human, or its motives worldly.
Another writer draws out where ministry should lead, and what happened to the intruder.
Verse 9 insists again that the Levites were to be given to Aaron and his sons, reminding us that all true ministry is subject to the more important function of worship. Ministry done right will lead the hearers to worship the Lord. But if a man who was not a priest or Levite dared to come near, as though he had some place there, he would suffer the penalty of death (v. 10).
Verse 10 shuts one door. The verses around it show how the Levites came to be inside at all.
Jehovah took them in a very special way as the formal substitute for the firstborn of Israel, who were spared when the destroying angel struck Egypt. They were redeemed by blood, and counted in the fullest sense as belonging to Jehovah... So the Levites, tied in this way to mercy — the great distinguishing mercy that rescued Israel from the doom of Egypt — were all the better fitted to do the service of the sanctuary. Who can presume to undertake the service of God without knowing that God has accepted him on the ground of redemption? Salvation precedes ministry.
The barrier still stands, but the line has moved. One writer says who may now come near to worship.
First, it is evident that worship is the privilege only of the children of God. Worship is offered "in spirit and truth," and it is offered to Him who cannot admit sin into His presence. So only those who are washed in the blood of the Lamb, and who have received the Spirit, can draw near to God to adore Him. If a man who is not converted thinks he can draw near to God, that only proves he does not know what he is in himself, or who the God is whom he means to serve.
No one could install himself among Aaron's sons. One writer applies that to the practice of ordaining a separate class of priests today.
Forgetful or ignorant of the truth that all true believers, and no others, are priests (1 Peter 2), they have devised a way of making priests — of filling their "holy" offices by a human ordination. And such, when appointed this way, claim for themselves the exclusive right of approach to God... God alone makes priests, and everyone who is washed with water (born again) is brought under the value of the one sacrifice of Christ... and is set apart by Him for this office.
- Called — Priesthood was never taken; it was given. "No one takes this honor for himself, but only when called by God, just as Aaron was."
- Redeemed — The Levites stood in for the firstborn spared in Egypt. Salvation comes before service; no one serves God who has not first been accepted on the ground of redemption.
- Given — Handed to Aaron, their work had no meaning apart from him. Service cut loose from Christ in the sanctuary becomes false.
- Guarded — The outsider who pushed in died. Uzziah's leprosy and Korah's judgment show the warning was carried out.
- Opened — Now every believer is a priest, and no human ordination can make one. The line now runs between those brought near by the blood of Christ and those still outside.
And Jehovah spoke to Moses, saying,
The Lord speaks to Moses again, and what follows is startling: God takes a whole tribe for Himself in place of every firstborn son in Israel. The verses that follow explain why God had any claim on those sons, and what it cost when the Levites came up short of the number.
God's claim on the firstborn was not new. It went back to the night of the Passover in Egypt.
The Lord spoke to Moses again (v.11). He insisted that He Himself had set the Levites apart from among the people of Israel to stand in place of every firstborn in Israel. God had declared the firstborn His from the time of the Passover in Egypt, when the firstborn of Egypt were killed. The blood sprinkled on the doorposts and crossbars of their homes had in effect redeemed them. It is good for us too to recognise that God's rights come first.
The Levites did not simply volunteer. The Lord took them in place of sons He had already spared, and that shaped the service they gave.
The Lord took them in a very special way as the formal substitute for the firstborn of Israel. Those firstborn were spared when the destroying angel visited Egypt. They were redeemed by blood, and counted without question as belonging to the Lord. In place of Israel's firstborn He accepted the Levites: "They shall be mine." So they stand as a lasting witness that the firstborn are the Lord's due, from people and animals alike. The grace of God had spared those whom they replaced at the time of judgment. So the Levites were identified with mercy — the great mercy that set Israel apart and rescued them from the doom of Egypt. That fitted them all the better for the service of the sanctuary. Who can presume to take up the service of God without knowing that God has accepted him on the ground of redemption? Salvation comes before ministry.
The two counts did not match. God did not round the figure off or waive the difference.
At the census, the firstborn in Israel outnumbered the Levites by 273. God claimed these 273 just as much as the 22,000 who each had a Levite as a substitute. So five shekels each had to be paid for them as redemption money. According to Exodus 13 the firstborn were to be redeemed at their birth. Our chapter stresses again the principle that redemption comes before the service of God.
The Levites did not serve on their own terms. God gave them to the priest, and one writer reads that as a picture of service now.
The Levites were given to Aaron the high priest, and to him alone. The service of the church, or of its members, depends completely on Christ in the presence of God. It has no other object than what concerns Him. It is tied to the place and service He Himself renders to God in the true tabernacle, and it flows from that... The service of God's people has no value — in fact it is sin — except as it is joined to the priesthood. That is, joined to Christ on high, in the presence of God for us.
Standing in the firstborn's place marked the Levites out. One writer draws the line from there to the church.
The Levites pictured the Church — or the individual Christian — in service, just as the priests pictured the Church in worship. Taking them for the service of the Lord in place of the firstborn gave them a very special character. They were firstfruits to the Lord. So it is that the Church is as the firstfruits, holy to the Lord — "the church of the firstborn ones."
The same picture comes with an appeal.
The Levites were in a special way a redeemed company. So they are clearly typical of Christians, both in our redemption and in the claim God has on us for service as redeemed. "I appeal to you therefore, brothers, by the mercies of God" — redemption-mercies here — "to present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship."
- Claim. God owns the firstborn because He spared them under the blood in Egypt; His rights come first.
- Substitute. Levi is taken in their place, so the whole tribe stands as a living reminder of that night of mercy.
- Price. Five shekels redeem each of the 273 firstborn beyond Levi's number. God counts the shortfall.
- Priest. The redeemed tribe is then given to Aaron; service that is not joined to the high priest has no value.
- Possession. Redemption comes first, then service — salvation before ministry, ownership before work.
And I, behold, I have taken the Levites from among the children of Israel instead of every firstborn that breaketh open the womb among the children of Israel, and the Levites shall be mine;
On the night He spared Israel's firstborn in Egypt, God claimed them as His own. Here He takes a whole tribe in their place, and the verse asks what it means to belong to God.
The phrase "instead of" reaches back to the night in Egypt when the blood of a lamb kept Israel's eldest sons alive.
Verse 12 reveals the secret behind the special place of the Levites: God chose them "instead of all the firstborn." In Egypt, God had spared Israel's firstborn because of the blood of the Passover lamb. This was the price by which the firstborn had been redeemed. As a result they belonged to God. Now, this is the place God gave the Levites: He chose them instead of all the firstborn. A Levite would therefore regard himself as redeemed by God and so as God's possession.
Levi did not earn this place. What fitted the tribe for holy service was its link with mercy.
In a very special way Jehovah took them as the formal substitute for the firstborn of Israel, the ones spared when the destroying angel struck Egypt. They were redeemed by blood, and counted beyond question as belonging to Jehovah... God's grace had spared the very ones they stood for when judgment fell. So the Levites were identified with mercy — the great mercy that set Israel apart and rescued it from the doom of Egypt. That fitted them all the better for the service of the sanctuary. Who can take up the service of God without knowing that God has accepted him on the ground of redemption? Salvation precedes ministry...
Notice the order. God says whose they are before He says what they must do.
The service of the Levites flowed entirely from their being the Lord's. "The Levites shall be mine." For as it is written, "You are not your own, for you were bought with a price" (1 Corinthians 6:20). It is blessed to say, "My beloved is mine," but it is greater progress and a deeper joy to say, "I am His."
The exchange was not vague. God counted it person by person, and where the tribe fell short, silver made up the difference.
The history of the firstborn was this: God had His tabernacle, with its many and varied services. Performing them took a huge number of men. This service belonged to the firstborn, but their places were taken by the tribe of Levi. Each Levite represented a firstborn man in Israel. The eldest sons who outnumbered that tribe were redeemed at five shekels of silver each (Numbers 3:46-48, and 8). So the Levites were in a special way a redeemed company. Clearly they are in this way a picture of Christians, both in our redemption and in the claim God has upon us for service as redeemed... Looked at this way, the firstborn has, so to speak, a double history from his redemption, and so have we. First he dies in his substitute; then he lives as a servant in the Levite.
Belonging to God did not leave the tribe free to run itself. God handed them over to Aaron the priest as a gift.
The Levites were given as a gift to Aaron and to his sons, for service in the tent of meeting. Viewed in this way, the Levites picture all believers as servants. So we learn that God gives the Church to Christ for His service on the earth. We were given to Him for salvation, as every believer is. We must also remember that we are a gift to Him, for Him to use as He pleases. Our only proper attitude, therefore, is that of Saul of Tarsus, who said, "Lord, what will you have me to do?"
God's care for the firstborn did not stop with Egypt. One writer follows that line forward, carefully, to the church.
God in His grace has always had the firstborn before His mind. So as soon as He had sheltered His people from judgment in Egypt by the blood of the Passover lamb, He claimed all their firstborn, and the firstborn of their cattle too... Later God took the Levites instead of the firstborn and gave them to Aaron and his sons, to do the service of the people of Israel in the tent of meeting. In this way they stood for the firstborn of Israel. They were joined to Aaron, who was himself a firstborn. So they became a shadow, if not a type, of the church of the firstborn.
- Blood first. The claim began in Egypt. Israel's firstborn lived because a lamb died, and what blood saves belongs to God.
- "Mine" next. Before any duty in the tent, God says, "The Levites shall be mine."
- Substitutes counted. The exchange was exact, man for man, with five shekels paid for every firstborn the tribe could not cover.
- Given away. Those who were God's were handed to Aaron as a gift, which points to the servant's proper question: "Lord, what will you have me to do?"
- Then service. Salvation comes first. No one can serve God without knowing He has accepted him on the ground of redemption.
for every firstborn is mine. On the day that I smote all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, I hallowed unto me all the firstborn in Israel, both of man and beast; mine shall they be I am Jehovah.
God's reason for taking the Levites reaches back to one night in Egypt. That night He spared Israel's firstborn and struck down Egypt's. The verse tells us what that night created: a permanent divine claim, and a tribe set apart to answer it.
The firstborn who lived through that night did not simply escape death. Commentators point out that the same act which spared them also claimed them.
If we follow the history of the firstborn further, it is full of interest and instruction. The blood at the passover saved the firstborn of Israel. But those redeemed in this way were God's in a special and particular way. "Consecrate to me all the firstborn... is mine." So the firstborn was not only redeemed from death. He was bought for God — "you were bought with a price, so glorify God in your body."
The tribe of Levi did not earn its position. God accepted them in exchange for men who owed their lives to blood already shed.
The LORD took them in a very special way as the formal substitute for the firstborn of Israel. Those firstborn were spared when the destroying angel struck Egypt. They were redeemed by blood, and counted emphatically to belong to the LORD. In place of Israel's firstborn He accepted the Levites. "They shall be mine." So God made them the standing witness of the firstborn owed to Him from man as well as beast. The grace of God had exempted those they answered for in the time of judgment.
God counted the exchange man for man. Where the numbers did not match, silver made up the difference.
God had His tabernacle, with its many varied services. Performing them required a huge number of men. This service belonged to the firstborn, but the tribe of Levi took their places. Each Levite represented a firstborn man in Israel. Five shekels of silver redeemed each of the eldest children beyond that number.
Writers turn God's claim into a question about who may serve Him at all.
Who can dare to take up the service of God without knowing that God has accepted him on the ground of redemption? Salvation comes before ministry. That is clear if we listen to God and take seriously the solemn warning of the Lord and His apostle.
The redemption money paid for the extra firstborn makes the same point.
The redemption money went to Aaron for the service of God. This showed that it met His claims on the redeemed. Let us never forget that as redeemed people we belong to God. On this fact rests the life of service to His name, to which we are committed.
Several writers read the tribe of Levi as a shadow of believers set apart for work. They are careful to call it a shadow, not an exact image.
The Levites were firstfruits offered to God, for they stood in place of the firstborn in whom God had taken Israel to Himself, when He struck down the firstborn of the Egyptians... The number of the firstborn being greater than that of the Levites, those left over were redeemed, as a sign that they belonged to God, and the Levites became God's possession for His service (verses 12, 13). It is the same with the church: it belongs wholly to God to serve Him down here.
Being God's did not leave the Levites free. God then handed them over to the high priest.
The Levites were a separated people — God's special possession. They took the place of all the firstborn in Israel — those whom the blood of the lamb saved from the sword of the destroyer. In type they were a dead and risen people, set apart to God. God then presented them as a gift to Aaron the high priest, to do the service of the tabernacle.
That double ownership settles who chooses the servant's work.
God gave us to Christ for salvation, as He does every believer. We must also remember that we are a gift to Christ, for Him to use as He pleases. Our only right attitude, then, is that of Saul of Tarsus, who asked, "Lord, what will You have me to do?" How precious to remember that we are wholly the Lord's! As His, there is no room at all for self-will or for pleasing people.
- Spared — Israel's firstborn lived through the night Egypt's firstborn died. The blood of the lamb was the only reason.
- Owned — being spared made them God's property: not merely rescued from death, but bought for Him.
- Exchanged — God took the Levites man for man in their place, and silver paid for the extra. The whole tribe stood as a redeemed company.
- Qualified — redemption, not merit, fits anyone for the service of the sanctuary. Salvation comes before ministry.
- Given — God handed His own possession to Aaron for the work of the tabernacle. Writers see there a picture of believers given to Christ, with no room left for self-will.
And Jehovah spoke to Moses in the wilderness of Sinai, saying,
God speaks to Moses in the wilderness of Sinai and orders a second count — this time of one tribe only. Why does God count Levi apart from Israel, and why from one month old, when chapter 1 counted men fit to fight?
This separate count goes back to something that happened earlier, in Egypt. God had spared Israel's firstborn sons when the blood of the Passover lamb was on the door, and He then took Levi in their place:
Verse 12 of Numbers 3 unveils the secret behind the special place of the Levites: they had been chosen by God "instead of all the firstborn". In Egypt, God had spared the firstborn of the Israelites on the basis of the blood of the Passover lamb. This was the price by which the firstborn had been redeemed. As a result they belonged to God. Now, this is the place God gave the Levites: He chose them instead of all the firstborn. A Levite would therefore see himself as redeemed by God and so as God's possession.
Another writer ties this ownership to joy rather than loss.
Those whom He delivers He claims, and only in being His can deliverance be known. This is the joy of salvation, that we then belong to Him, and that He gains in us what He has been seeking.
The order matters for anyone who wants to serve God:
Who can take up the service of God without knowing that God has accepted him on the ground of redemption? Salvation comes before ministry.
Chapter 1 counted men of twenty and upward who could go to war. Here the line drops to one month old, because this roll served a different purpose.
The Levites were then numbered separately from the other tribes of Israel. Yet not only the males twenty years old and above were numbered, but all males from one month old and over. For this was not for military service, but for service to God. They were not to serve in the sanctuary until they were thirty, and their service ended at fifty. Even so, they were plainly trained with that service in view. This reminds us that the Lord Jesus Himself did not begin His public service until He was about thirty years of age (Luke 3:23). His earlier years were an important preparation for it.
An infant of one month has no strength to serve. Yet he is on the roll.
Here they are numbered — apart from Israel, but still numbered — from infants of days, marked out for service long before it could begin. (Compare Galatians 1:15.) Strength is given before service is claimed; but from their earliest days they are counted apart according to the grace and intentions of God.
F. W. Grant asks what it would suggest if only strong men were worth counting:
They are numbered from a month old and upward, as the firstborn are, and for the same reason. If only men in their strength were to be redeemed or numbered, would it not look as if God took "pleasure in the legs of a man"? (Psalm 147:10.) But it is the soul He values, and the soul of an infant is precious in His sight: His "delight" is "in the sons of men."
Levi is counted family by family. Picture what that looked like in the wilderness:
It must have been beautiful to watch God's workers in the wilderness. Each one was at his post, and each moved in the sphere God had appointed him. So the moment the cloud was lifted up and the order came to move, every man knew what he had to do, and he gave himself to that and to nothing else. No man had any right to think for himself. The Lord thought for all.
Darby draws out three principles for our own service:
So, as regards our service, we have these three principles. First, we are redeemed, delivered from the judgments under which the enemies of God lie, and taken out from among those enemies. Second, as a result of this first fact, we belong entirely to God. Bought with a price, we are no longer our own, but God's, to glorify Him in our bodies, which are His. Third, we are entirely given to Christ, who is the Head of the house of God, the Priest, for the service of His tabernacle.
- Redeemed. The blood of the Passover lamb spared Israel's firstborn, and Levi's separate count rests on that rescue.
- Claimed. Those God delivers, He claims. He took Levi "instead of all the firstborn", and the tribe became His own possession.
- Counted early. God puts month-old infants on the roll. He values the soul, not a man's strength, and He marks out His servants long before their work begins.
- Trained. This roll is for service to God, not for battle. The years before thirty were preparation, as they were for the Lord Jesus.
- Assigned. God appointed each man his place. The question is not what he prefers, but what the Lord has given him to do.
Number the sons of Levi according to their fathers' houses, after their families; every male from a month old and upward shalt thou number them.
God tells Moses to count Levi on a different basis from every other tribe: not fighting men of twenty, but every male from a month old, listed by household. Two questions follow — why does God count babies, and why does He count them by household?
Moses counted the other tribes from twenty years old and up. He counted Levi from a month old, and the reason lies in the place this tribe now filled.
Notice the difference between the numbering of the tribe of Levi and the other tribes. In the previous chapter the count took in those who were twenty years old and over. The count of the Levites took in "every male from a month old and upward." The difference is that the Levites stood in the place of the firstborn — and the firstborn were either redeemed or given up at that tender age of weakness and helplessness (18:16).
That substitution is no bookkeeping detail. It settles who the Levites belong to, and who may serve God at all.
Jehovah took them in a very special way as the formal substitute for the firstborn of Israel, who were spared when the destroying angel visited Egypt. Blood had redeemed them, and they were counted as clearly belonging to Jehovah. Instead of Israel's firstborn He accepted the Levites. "They shall be mine." ... Who dares take up the service of God without knowing that God has accepted him on the ground of redemption? Salvation comes before ministry, if we listen to God and take seriously the solemn warning of the Lord and His apostle. (Matt. 7:22; 1 Cor. 9:27)
Counting one-month-old boys makes no military sense. One writer draws out why: God does not count by strength.
The count takes them from a month old and upward, as it takes the firstborn, and for the same reason. If God redeemed or counted only men in their strength, would it not look as if He took "pleasure in the legs of a man"? (Ps. 147:10.) But it is the soul He values, and the soul of an infant is precious in His sight: His "delight" is "in the sons of men."
A baby of one month can do nothing at the sanctuary. Yet his name is already on the roll.
Here the count includes them (apart from Israel, but still counted) from babies whose age is still measured in days. God marks them out for service long before that service can begin. (Compare Gal. 1:15) He gives strength before He claims service. Yet from their earliest days He counts them as a people apart, according to His own grace and purpose.
Another writer asks how early God's eye rests on a servant.
With the Levites, an exception was made. Everyone was counted, almost from birth (from a month old – Num. 3:15). Does this detail not show that God takes notice of everyone He intends to use in His service, even from the earliest age? Paul tells us that God had 'separated him', and not only from the time of his conversion but 'from his mother's womb' (compare Jer. 1:5).
The gap between the count at one month and the work at thirty is not wasted time. One writer reads those years as training.
This count was not for military service, but for the service of God. The Levites did not take up sanctuary service until they were between 30 and 50, yet clearly they were trained with that service in view. This reminds us that the Lord Jesus Himself did not begin His public service until He was about 30 years old (Lk. 3:23). His earlier years were an important preparation for it.
The second half of the command matters as much as the age. Each Levite is listed under his father's house, and that listing fixes the work he will do.
The Levites were arranged by their families, and each one's service was clearly assigned. The servant always has his own particular service from God, to be carried out under responsibility to the Lord. He is never left to choose his service for himself.
The servant's part is to find that work and hold to it.
Nothing is more important in practice than that each servant of God should know the work He has given him to do, and should stick to it once he knows it. It also matters never to interfere with another's service. The Lord is sovereign in this: He divides the work according to His own will.
- Redeemed. Levi was counted from a month old because Levi replaced Israel's firstborn. Blood spared those sons in Egypt, so they belonged to God.
- Owned. Redemption comes before work. No one takes up God's service before knowing that God has accepted him.
- Valued. God counts infants because He values the soul, not the strength — He takes no pleasure in the legs of a man.
- Marked. God marks a servant out long before he can serve. He gives strength before He claims service.
- Placed. Each Levite is counted inside his own family. With the family comes his own work, and the Lord, not the servant, divides it.
And Moses numbered them, according to the commandment of Jehovah, -- as he had been commanded.
Numbers 3 sets one tribe apart from the rest of Israel, and verse 16 records that Moses counted them just as God told him. Two questions follow: why does the way of this census matter, and why does the list start with babies a month old?
God set the whole arrangement of this tribe. He gave each family its work and its place around the tabernacle, Israel's tent of worship. No part of it came from human preference.
In Numbers 3 we get the details of God's order for the tribe of Levi. God took this tribe for the service of His house, working under the priests, in place of all the firstborn from every tribe, whom He had claimed for Himself. Levi had three sons, Gershon, Kohath and Merari, and each of them became the head of a section of the tribe. God gave each section its own special service at the tabernacle, and each pitched its tents in a set position around the tabernacle. They decided nothing for themselves.
In Israel's other tribes, the count began at twenty years old. Levi's count began much earlier, because Levi's work was different.
God counted the Levites separately from the other tribes, because they had no land of their own as an inheritance. They were also not called to go to war, but to serve the Lord. So their census did not start with men of twenty years old, but with boys one month old. Training in the things of God is to start almost from birth, while training for physical war needs the strength of a grown man.
The starting age also shows what God values in a person.
They are counted from a month old and up, just as the firstborn are, and for the same reason. Suppose God redeemed or counted only men in their strength. Would it not look as if He took "pleasure in the legs of a man"? But it is the soul He values, and the soul of an infant is precious in His sight: His "delight" is "in the sons of men."
The list holds the names of children who could not yet carry a thing. Their names still stood on it.
Now we come to their special numbering, which marks out the place given to each family. Here they are counted — apart from Israel, but still counted — from infants only days old, marked out for service long before that service could begin. God gives strength before He asks for service. But from their earliest days He sets them apart, according to His own grace and purpose.
Each Levite family had its own work. The family you were born into settled which work was yours.
So not every Levite had the same area of work — and none of them could choose his own service. If you were born a Merarite, you could not take care of the vessels of the sanctuary; that charge belonged to the Kohathites. It is the same with Christian service: God gives different types of service to different believers.
God had already given the orders, so the Levites had nothing left to organise.
Each man had his own specific work. There could be no misunderstanding about it. How strange it would have been if these 22,000 Levites had formed committees and sub-committees to divide up the work and direct it! All that would have brought in disorder. All they had to do was the work the Lord had called them into. They had all the instructions already. Obeying them, and carrying the work out faithfully, were the essential things.
The reason this tribe is counted at all is that its men stand in place of Israel's firstborn sons, whom God had claimed for Himself. When the totals did not match, money made up the difference.
When they took the census, the firstborn in Israel outnumbered the Levites by 273. God claimed these 273 just as much as the 22,000 who each had a Levite standing in for them, so five shekels each had to be paid for them as redemption money. In this chapter we again see the principle that redemption comes first, before the service of God.
- Claimed — the Levites stand in place of Israel's firstborn, whom God claimed. His claim comes first, and redemption opens the door into service.
- Counted — the list starts at one month old. God does not measure muscle. He values the soul, and an infant's soul is precious to Him.
- Called — God writes infants onto a service list years before they can serve. He gives strength first and asks for the work later.
- Assigned — every family receives its own charge, so no one chooses his own service and no one has to guess.
- Obeyed — Moses counts by God's word alone. Nothing in the whole arrangement comes from human choice, and that still holds wherever God's work goes on.
And these are the sons of Levi by their names Gershon, and Kohath, and Merari.
Three names look like a simple family record. But everything that follows in the chapter — who camps where, who carries what, who serves whom — runs along these three lines.
The verse is a heading. The chapter then takes each name in turn and gives that family its own load to carry.
Levi had three sons: Gershon, Kohath, and Merari (Num. 3:17). Their families and descendants formed three different groups, each with different tasks. The Gershonites looked after the tabernacle, the tent and the coverings (v. 25). God entrusted the instruments of the sanctuary to the Kohathites (v. 32). The Merarites took care of the boards, the bars, the pillars and sockets of the tabernacle (v. 37).
Levi's family did not earn this position. It rests on what God did in one night in Egypt.
The Levites were firstfruits offered to God. They stood in place of the firstborn, in whom God had taken Israel to Himself when He struck down the firstborn of the Egyptians.
A Levite knew whose he was before he knew what he carried. That belonging goes back to a price paid in Egypt.
In Egypt, God had spared the firstborn of the Israelites on the basis of the blood of the Passover lamb. This was the price by which the firstborn had been redeemed. So they belonged to God. Now, this is the place God gave the Levites: He chose them instead of all the firstborn. A Levite would therefore see himself as redeemed by God, and so as God's possession.
Commentators note that each name matches the load that family carried. Gershon means "stranger," and his family carried the coverings.
This is what makes the saint "a stranger" in the world — which is what the name Gershon means. If we walk showing the character of the Lord Jesus, and so realise that our place is the wilderness, we can be sure of the result. It will plainly mark us out as strangers in the world.
The middle family carried the ark, and their name matches that charge.
"Kohath," all are agreed, means "assembly." He does indeed have the ark in his charge, the centre of gathering. God reveals Himself to us in Christ, and as the fruit of His work. So to lift up Christ is to draw people to Him, just as He promised.
Merari's family handled the frame — the boards, bars, pillars and sockets that held the tabernacle up. Their name matches that work too.
So Merari's service has to do with the house of God... with supporting, strengthening and steadying what is His witness in the world. He stands for the workman, as Gershon stands for the "stranger" and pilgrim, and Kohath for the one occupied with Christ. His name — Merari, "bitterness" — speaks of how painful this service is, and self-love will break down under it.
The split into three families was never a ranking.
Although the whole tribe of Levi stood "joined with Aaron," for service they fell into different classes. "They did not all have the same office"... Paying careful attention to this important point would save us from much of that "unwise" comparing of ourselves and our service with other people and their service. Such comparing is most unholy, and as a result most unhealthy.
Birth decided which of the three families a man belonged to, and with it his work. He did not apply for it.
So not every Levite had the same area of work – and none of them could choose his own service. If you were born a Merarite, you could not look after the vessels of the sanctuary, which God had entrusted to the Kohathites. So it is with Christian service: God gives different types of service to different believers.
One mind lay behind all three assignments.
God puts the families of the tribe into their different places. He is sovereign in appointing them, so of course everything stands in its place, perfectly ordered — Kohath with his precious vessels, Gershon with his fine linen, Merari with his boards and pillars. Service is a gift, and so the gift is what appoints a man to his service, since the Giver can make no mistake.
- Redeemed first. God took the Levites in place of the firstborn He spared in Egypt. They belonged to Him before they carried anything.
- Named for the work. Gershon means "stranger," and his family carried the coverings. Kohath means "assembly," and his family carried the ark. Merari means "bitterness," and his family carried the frame.
- One standing, three offices. All alike stood joined with Aaron, yet they did not all have the same job. So there is no ground for comparing yourself with others.
- Assigned, not chosen. A Merarite could not take a Kohathite's job. The Giver makes no mistake, so the place He gives is the right one.
- Bitterness included. Merari's name means "bitterness": holding up God's witness is painful work, and self-love breaks down under it.
And these are the names of the sons of Gershon according to their families Libni and Shimei.
Numbers 3 sets the tribe of Levi apart for the work of the tabernacle. The chapter moves by names: Levi's three sons, then the sons under each of them. Verse 18 names Gershon's two sons, and with the name comes a family line and a load to carry.
The Levite count did not start at working age. It started in infancy. Kelly notes how early it began, and what that shows about God's grace.
Here they are counted — apart from Israel, but still counted — from infants only days old, marked out for service long before it could begin. (Compare Gal. 1:15) God gives strength before He asks for service; but from their earliest days He sets them apart, according to His grace and His purposes.
Libni and Shimei did not step forward to claim a role. Kelly points to who did the choosing.
It was not at all a question of picking out the men who seemed best suited to carry the boards and the curtains, or the vessels of the sanctuary. God arranged it all, taking it completely out of man's hands: He chose suited men Himself.
Birth decided the branch, and the branch decided the task, with no crossing over:
So not every Levite had the same area of work – and none of them could choose his own service. If you were born a Merarite, you could not take care of the vessels of the sanctuary; God entrusted those to the Kohathites. So it is with Christian service: God gives different types of service to different believers.
One writer reads the names themselves, joining the two sons to their father.
"Gershon" means "exile." His two sons are Libni, "white," and Shimei, "my report" — names that are not hard to join into one meaning. A true exile is someone who feels his exile from the home of his heart, even if it lasts only a while. Out of that spirit of being a stranger comes power for purity and freedom from defilement. And the last name may well speak of what has the greatest value for him here: the "report" of things he cannot yet see.
after-check: meaning kept
Later in the chapter these two families receive the tent and its coverings to carry. Mackintosh asks what those coverings stood for.
There was little to attract anyone in the rams' skins and badgers' skins. But little as there was, it was the Gershonite's high privilege to take them all up and carry them gladly on his shoulders across the trackless sands. So what are we to understand by the covering of the tabernacle? I believe that, in a word, it pictured the character of the Lord Jesus Christ. It was the part that met the eye.
Mackintosh ties that carrying back to the name Gershon itself:
This is what makes the believer "a stranger" in the world — which is what the name Gershon means. If we walk showing the character of the Lord Jesus, and in doing so know our place is in the wilderness, we can be sure it will give our character a very clear mark of the stranger in this world.
Gershon's load was not Kohath's or Merari's. Mackintosh shows how the separate loads still leaned on each other.
The boards and sockets were no use without the curtains, and the curtains were no use without the boards and sockets. And the pins looked so small — yet who could measure how much they did to hold things together and keep the visible unity of the whole? So everything worked to one common end, and each man reached that end by attending to his own special line.
- Named — God counted the Levites while they were still infants, marking them out for service "long before it could begin," because He gives strength before He asks for service.
- Placed — Libni and Shimei did not apply for a post; God "chose suited men Himself," and no Levite could swap branches.
- Burdened — the Gershonites carried the tent and its coverings, which Mackintosh reads as a picture of "the character of the Lord Jesus Christ" — the part that met the eye.
- Strangers — carrying curtains instead of settling in a house stamped the family with the meaning of their father's name, "exile."
- Joined — curtains needed boards, boards needed curtains, and even the pins held the whole together. Different tasks, one end.
And the sons of Kohath according to their families Amram and Izhar, Hebron and Uzziel.
This verse lists four names: Amram, Izhar, Hebron and Uzziel — the families of Kohath. Commentators read the list as a picture of how God hands out work, and of the limits He sets on it.
These families had a fixed place in the camp and a fixed set of holy things in their care.
Kohath (which means assembly), with the Amramites, Izharites, Hebronites and Uzzielites, numbered 8,600 people. Their place was on the south side, and they had charge of the ark, the table, the lampstand, the altars, the screen, and all the service that went with them.
What they carried points beyond itself.
The things the Kohathites carried are all pictures of the objective truths of Christianity — not the subjective ones, as we have seen in Gershon. For all this furniture speaks of Christ and His perfect work. So Kohath stands for the ministry of the glory of the Lord Jesus, set out in unique excellence, far above and apart from any human understanding or appreciation of it. It is absolute, living and real. John's Gospel presents this beautifully, and so does Hebrews 1.
Read in the order the verse gives them, the meanings of the four names fit together.
Kohath's first son is Amram, "people of the Exalted One." It is a beautiful name, if we link it with that gathering to Christ which Kohath's own name seems to speak of. The next is Izhar, "oil," the undoubted type of the Spirit as the Anointer. Then we have Hebron, "union," as some put it, or "communion," as we have taken it elsewhere. Either way, it is the effect of the Spirit's work. Last comes Uzziel, "the power of God," the father of Elizaphan. Plainly these names run together in the most natural way, and they harmonize in a blessed picture of what Kohathite ministry produces.
The count of these families did not start with grown men.
They are counted from one month old and upward, just as the firstborn are, and for the same reason. If God redeemed or counted only strong men, would it not look as if He took "pleasure in the legs of a man"? But it is the soul He values, and the soul of an infant is precious in His sight: His "delight" is "in the sons of men."
This family received nothing from the princes' offering. What they carried explains why.
The sons of Kohath had the privilege of carrying all that was most precious among the instruments and furniture of the sanctuary. So they received no part of the princes' offering. It was their high and holy service to carry these things on their own shoulders, and not to use wagons or oxen. The more closely we look at the things put in the charge of the Kohathites, the more we shall see that they set forth, in type, the deeper and fuller ways God has shown Himself in Christ.
Each family of Levi had its own work, and no one was to take up another's.
Korah came from Izhar, the second name in this verse.
Korah was the son of Izhar, a son of Kohath. With Dathan and Abiram he led the rebellion against Moses and Aaron, saying that they took too much on themselves, when all the people were holy.
The tragedy was not that Korah had too little, but that he would not stay with what he had.
How much better it would have been for Korah if he had stayed content with his Levite service, which was of the very highest order. His work as a Kohathite was to carry some of the most precious vessels of the sanctuary, but he aimed at the priesthood, and fell into the pit.
- Named — Amram, Izhar, Hebron and Uzziel head the four families of Kohath. They camped on the south side, with the ark, table, lampstand and altars in their charge.
- Counted — the count starts at one month old. God values the soul, not a man's strength, and the soul of an infant is precious to Him.
- Meaning — in order, the names make one picture: a people of the Exalted One, anointed by the Spirit, brought into communion, and held by the power of God.
- Carried — this family used no wagons and no oxen. What they carried spoke of Christ, and it went on their own shoulders.
- Kept — each family had its own load and was not to reach for another's. Korah, of Izhar's line, refused that limit, aimed at the priesthood, and fell.
And the sons of Merari according to their families Mahli and Mushi. These are the families of the Levites according to their fathers' houses.
Numbers 3 counts the tribe of Levi family by family. This verse closes the list with Levi's third son, Merari, and his two sons, Mahli and Mushi. The list looks like plain record-keeping. But commentators see God giving names, places and work to the people He had taken for Himself.
God chose the Levites in place of Israel's firstborn. That choice had a price behind it:
In Egypt, God had spared the firstborn of the Israelites on the basis of the blood of the Passover lamb. This was the price by which the firstborn had been redeemed. So they belonged to God. Now this is the place God gave the Levites: He chose them instead of all the firstborn. A Levite would therefore regard himself as redeemed by God and so as God's possession.
The names are strange for a tribe set apart to serve. One writer ties their meaning to the work these families were given:
The last of Levi's three sons is Merari, "bitter," with his two sons, Mahli, "sick," and Mushi, "yielding." These are the strangest names of all for sons of Levi. These families have charge of the boards of the tabernacle and its bars, its pillars and sockets, and those of the court and the pegs and cords. Here it is clear that Merari is taken up not so much with Christ Himself as with the people of the Lord... His work is mainly what we may call church work. And who has ever done this work without finding the bitterness that Merari's name expresses?
Each of Levi's three sons led a group with its own charge. Merari's group got the framework, not the furniture or the coverings:
The Gershonites looked after the tabernacle, the tent and the coverings (v. 25). The Kohathites were trusted with the vessels of the sanctuary (v. 32). The Merarites had the care of the boards, the bars, the pillars and sockets of the tabernacle (v. 37).
Those parts held the whole structure together. One writer sees a picture in that:
Merari had charge with his sons of the boards, the sockets, pins and cords. These held the building together... In the framework of the tabernacle, bars of acacia wood join the boards. This is a picture of the building Ephesians speaks of, "the whole structure, being joined together" — the church. The work of Merari suggests the thought of union.
The verse groups these men by clan and father's house. Nobody chose his own role, one writer notes:
Merari, with the Mahlite and Mushite families, numbered 6,200, and their place was on the north side, opposite Dan... Each had his specific work given, and there could be no misunderstanding about it. How strange it would have been if these 22,000 Levites had formed committees and sub-committees to divide the work and direct it! ... God had given all the instructions. Obeying them and doing the work faithfully were the essential things. The same is true in connection with the church. Every member in the body of Christ has a service to render. The Lord Himself puts each member in place, and He gives each one his service. He did the same for these sons of Levi and their families, giving them their specific work in and around the tabernacle.
Merari's portion was the boards, sockets, pegs and cords — the plainest load in the camp. One writer ties that to the meaning of his name:
His name — Merari, "bitterness" — speaks of how painful such service is. Self-love breaks down under it, or runs off into some odd path that is easier on flesh and blood... Who cares for these boards and bars, and pillars and pins and cords? Who thinks of God's plan and pattern, and all the small details of divine appointment? Who wants work of this menial kind, costing so much and bringing in so little? ... It calls only for steady accuracy and careful obedience.
Yet one writer makes the smallest item in Merari's charge a test of whose taste the work serves:
Putting one "pin" in its true place may mean giving up your own will to God. It means willingly taking up what is little, and not counting it little. It means listening carefully to God's words, which is sweeter to Him than much that people think a costlier sacrifice. Service about God's house must own Him as Master, and that He may have things to His taste, not we to ours.
- Redeemed. God took Levi in place of the firstborn He spared by the blood of the Passover lamb. Every man in this list belonged to God before he ever served Him.
- Named. Merari, Mahli and Mushi mean "bitter," "sick," "yielding." They are strange names for a serving tribe, and commentators tie them to the work these families were given.
- Assigned. Merari's families carried the boards, bars, pillars, sockets, pegs and cords. These parts held everything together — a picture of the church joined together.
- Ordered. God gave the work; nobody chose it, and no committees divided it. The Lord Himself still places each member of the body of Christ.
- Costly. Self-love runs from this service: plain, unnoticed, detailed. Yet putting one pin in its true place is obedience God values above showier offerings.
Of Gershon, the family of the Libnites, and the family of the Shimites these are the families of the Gershonites.
This verse takes Gershon, the first of Levi's three sons, and names his two clans. Behind that dry roll-call lies a question the rest of the chapter answers: why does God count a family at all, and who decides what each branch of it will do?
The census reaches down to babies one month old, long before any of them could lift a curtain.
Here they are counted — apart from Israel, but still counted — from babies only days old. They are marked out for service long before that service could begin. God gives strength before He claims service. But from their earliest days He sets them apart according to His grace and His intentions.
Another writer asks why the count did not start with grown men.
The count runs from a month old and upward, as it does for the firstborn, and for the same reason. If God redeemed or counted only men in their strength, would it not look as if He took "pleasure in the legs of a man"? (Ps. 147:10.) But it is the soul He values, and the soul of an infant is precious in His sight.
The three names form one picture, each feeding the next.
"Gershon" means "exile"; his two sons are Libni, "white," and Shimei, "my report": these names are not hard to join into one meaning. A true exile is someone who feels his exile, even if it lasts only a while, from the home of his heart. Out of that spirit of being a stranger comes power for purity and freedom from defilement. The last name may point to what has the fullest value for him in this case: the "report" of things not now seen.
The Gershonites carried the outside of the tabernacle, not its treasures. That load was no small honour.
Here was Gershon's work, to carry through the waste and howling wilderness the tabernacle and its coverings. There was little that was attractive about the rams' skins and badgers' skins. Yet it was still the high privilege of the Gershonite to take them all up. He was glad to carry them on his shoulders across the trackless sands. What, then, are we to understand by the covering of the tabernacle? I believe it pictured the character of the Lord Jesus Christ. It was what would meet the eye.
One commentator reads the same charge forward into Christian service and names the ministry it stands for.
The Gershonites were responsible for the coverings of the tabernacle, the hangings for the entrance of the tabernacle, all the hangings of the court, its entrance hangings and cords, and so on. These all speak of the practical moral character of the Lord Jesus or of His saints. Gershon would therefore stand for the ministry that insists on the moral perfection of the Lord Jesus. It also insists on the practical righteousness that should mark all believers, as a witness to our faith in the perfect one.
The tent they carried matched the name they bore.
This is what makes the believer "a stranger" (as the name Gershon means) in the world. Suppose we walk in the display of the character of the Lord Jesus. Suppose that, in doing so, we realise that our place is in the wilderness. Then we may be sure it will give our character in the world the clear tone of a stranger. The curtain pictured another feature of the stranger character: looking ahead. This was most blessed. God dwelling in curtains made it clear that neither He nor the ark of His strength had found a resting place. Both were still travelling on towards "a rest that remained."
Splitting Levi into named clans was not bookkeeping; it fixed who did what.
So not every Levite had the same sphere of activity – and none of them could choose his own service. If you were born a Merarite, you could not look after the vessels of the sanctuary. Those were the Kohathites' charge. So it is with Christian service: God gives different types of service to different believers.
The clan lines divided the work without dividing the tribe.
In standing, the whole tribe of Levi was "joined with Aaron." In service, they fell into different classes. "All had not the same office." I know of nothing in the walk and service of the Christian that demands more attention than this. Proper attention to it would save us from much of that "unwise" comparing of ourselves and our service with other people and their services.
- Counted — God counted Gershon's clans from a month old. He marked them out for service long before they had strength for it. He values the soul, not the legs.
- Named — Gershon is "exile," Libni "white," Shimei "my report." The sense of exile produces purity, and purity lives on the report of what is not now seen.
- Charged — they carried the coverings and hangings, the outside that meets the eye. It pictures the character of Christ and the practical righteousness expected in His people.
- Strangers — they carried a tent, not a house. Neither God nor the ark had found a resting place, so they kept moving toward a rest still ahead.
- Assigned — no Levite chose his own work, and in standing they were all one. That leaves no room for comparing your service with anyone else's.
Those that were numbered of them, according to the number of all the males, from a month old and upward, those that were numbered of them were seven thousand five hundred.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
The families of the Gershonites encamped behind the tabernacle westward.
Numbers 3 gives each Levite family its own station around God's tent, and verse 23 puts the Gershonites at the back, on the west. Why did God fix where each family camped, and what did that spot have to do with their work?
Each Levite house received its own line of service from God. One writer draws out what that means for anyone who serves:
There were three principal houses — Gershon, Kohath, and Merari. They, with their sons, each have a line of service given into their hands in Numbers 4... In practice, nothing is more important than this: each servant of God should know the work He has given him to do. And once he knows it, he should stick to it. It also matters greatly never to interfere with another's service. The Lord is sovereign in this. He divides according to His own will.
God placed each family; none of them chose. Another writer ties that placing to the gift behind it:
In the first part of this section God puts the families of the tribe into their different places. He is sovereign in appointing them. So everything is of course in its place and perfectly ordered — Kohath with his precious vessels, Gershon with his fine linen, Merari with his boards and pillars. Service is gift, and therefore gift is the appointment to service, since the Giver can make no mistake.
Set the Levite positions side by side and a square appears:
It should be noted that Merari's camping north of the tabernacle is significant. Kohath camps to the south, Gershon to the west, while Moses, Aaron, and his sons camp toward the east. So they fill Judah's place in the inner circle.
Moses and Aaron camped on the east, at the entrance the priests guarded. Gershon lay at the far end, behind the tent, with Ephraim camped further out on the same side:
Gershon (exile) with his sons, Libni and Shimei, were 7,500 souls. Their place was on the west side of the tabernacle, opposite Ephraim... They had charge of the tabernacle, the tent, the coverings and the hangings of the door of the tabernacle.
The reason for all this ordering was the One in the middle of it:
God has His people numbered and gathered around Himself. He dwelt in the camp — "in the midst of which I dwell." Could love do more? Impossible! The twelve tribes guarded the tabernacle of the Lord. The Levites camped right around the court. Moses, Aaron, and the priests guarded the entrance through which people came to God... But what gave the camp in the wilderness its unity, strength, and glory was the presence of God in His tabernacle, at the centre of His chosen people.
The name Gershon carries its own lesson:
First, his name — "exile" — speaks plainly of separation from the place he belongs to. For us that place is heaven. Gershon belongs by birth to Canaan, and his life afterward in Egypt fits his name. Is this not to be our character too — "strangers," because we belong to heaven, "partakers of the heavenly calling"?
What they carried matched the name they bore:
Notice too that the curtains, coverings, and hangings that Gershon handles are in fact all lines of separation. They define the tabernacle itself, or they mark off the court and separate it from the wilderness around. So they speak easily and naturally of the boundary lines of God's special enclosure — which is what the Church is in the world.
One writer applies this to the Church:
If we walk showing the character of the Lord Jesus, and in doing so realise that our place is in the wilderness, we can be sure of the result. It will mark us out clearly as strangers in the world... The Church has laid down the rams' skins and badgers' skins, and with them the Gershonite character. In other words, the Church has stopped walking in the footsteps of her rejected Lord and Master. So she is no longer the weary, worn stranger she should be, walking the dry and barren desert with the burden on her shoulders. She has settled down in the green places of the world and made herself at home.
- Centre. God dwelt in the middle of the camp. Every tent, Levite or tribal, took its place from Him.
- Assigned. God gave Gershon the west side. No family chose its own ground.
- Named. Gershon means exile — a family whose very name marked them as people away from home.
- Matched. Their charge was the curtains and hangings, the lines that separated God's enclosure from the wilderness around it.
- Kept. Do not lay the burden down. Carrying it is what keeps a believer a stranger instead of a settler.
And the prince of the father's house of the Gershonites was Eliasaph the son of Lael.
Numbers 3 sets the tribe of Levi around the tabernacle — Israel's tent sanctuary — family by family, and this verse names the man put over the Gershonite branch. God chose this leader; the people did not. And both his name and his father's fit the work his family carried.
The whole arrangement of Levite service came from God, down to who would head each family.
It was not at all a matter of picking out those who might seem best for carrying the boards and the curtains, or the vessels of the sanctuary. God arranged it all, taking it completely out of man's hands: He chose suitable men Himself. Where is there any happiness except in simply doing the will of God? Nothing else is so sweet.
The verse calls Eliasaph chief of his father's house — head of one branch of the family. Older translations call him its prince. Both his name and his father's point past the man himself.
His prince is Eliasaph, "God has added" — a name we met before in the leader of the tribe of Gad, and close in meaning to Joseph. "Increase" fits the practical line of Gershon's work. The reminder that increase comes from God is a good one for those on this path. They may be in danger of self-occupation, and that always means self-confidence. He is the son of Lael, "of God," or "belonging to God." The name seems to well up out of the deep joy of a soul that has found here the secret of its strength and progress.
The most honoured load — the holy vessels — did not go to the eldest line.
Here the principle of election was displayed. Gershon was the eldest son of Levi, so his descendants might have expected the task of carrying the sacred vessels on their shoulders. Instead God gave that work to the descendants of Kohath, Levi's second son. How often we see in Scripture that blessing and privilege do not run in the order of nature.
Their load looked plain — skins and cloth. One writer reads the outer covering as a picture of what people saw in Christ.
Here was Gershon's work: to carry the tabernacle and its coverings through the barren, howling wilderness. This was true Levite service, and most blessed service. There was little that was attractive in the rams' skins and the badgers' skins. Yet it was the high privilege of the Gershonite to take them all up and carry them cheerfully on his shoulders across the trackless sands. What, then, are we to understand by the covering of the tabernacle? I believe, in a word, it pictured the character of the Lord Jesus Christ. It was the part the eye would see.
Carrying that covering marked the man who carried it. One writer applies this to the church of today.
This is what makes the believer a stranger in the world — and "stranger" is what the name Gershon means. Suppose we walk in the character of the Lord Jesus and, in doing so, realise that our place is the wilderness. Then we may be sure it will give us the clear mark of a stranger in the world… The Church has laid down the rams' skins and badgers' skins, and with them the Gershonite character. She has stopped walking in the footsteps of her rejected Lord and Master. She should be the tired and worn stranger, treading the dry and barren desert with the burden on her shoulders. Instead she has settled down in the green places of the world and made herself at home.
Naming a head over the Gershonites drew a line around their work. Neighbouring families depended on them but could not do their job for them.
Gershon had nothing to do with the boards and the pins, and Merari had nothing to do with the curtains or the coverings. Yet they were closely connected and depended on each other. The boards and sockets would not do without the curtains, and the curtains would not do without them… Suppose a Gershonite took it into his head to leave the curtains and turn to the pins. He would leave his own work undone and interfere with the work of the Merarite. That would never do.
- Chosen — God appointed the head of the Gershonites. No one picked the man who seemed best suited.
- Named — Eliasaph means "God has added," Lael "belonging to God." Increase comes from God, which leaves no room for self-confidence.
- Passed over — Gershon was the eldest, yet the holy vessels went to Kohath's line. In Scripture, privilege often ignores the order of nature.
- Loaded — the coverings they carried had little to attract the eye. They pictured the character of the Lord Jesus as people saw Him.
- Distinct — the curtains were Gershon's, the pins Merari's. Leave your own charge to take up another's, and both jobs suffer.
And the charge of the sons of Gershon in the tent of meeting was the tabernacle and the tent, its covering, and the curtain of the entrance to the tent of meeting.
God handed one Levite family the soft parts of the tabernacle: its curtains, its coverings, and the screen at the door. Why this family, and what does a job made of cloth and cords teach about serving God?
Gershon was Levi's firstborn son. The most honoured job might have gone to his line. It did not:
God appointed the duties of the Levites as it pleased Him. So each Levitical family could set to work, and no one was to interfere with them. They were responsible to God, and from Him they had received authority for their service. Here the principle of election showed itself. Gershon was the eldest son of Levi. His descendants might have expected to be chosen to carry the sacred vessels on their shoulders. But God entrusted that work to the descendants of Kohath, Levi's second son. How often we see in Scripture that blessing and privilege do not run in the order of nature.
The verse names fabrics and skins, not gold. Each material carries meaning:
These curtains are made of goats' hair or fine twined linen. The coverings are rams' skins and badgers' skins. From Revelation 19:8 we are clear that the "fine linen" is "righteousness" — practical righteousness. The curtains that form the tabernacle itself represent this righteousness in Christ. In His flesh the divine Word "tabernacled," as John 1:14 puts it. The hangings for the court represent the righteousness of saints, shown outside the sanctuary in the world. The hangings for the "door" and "gate" again represent Christ, the only way of access.
All these pieces have one thing in common. They are edges:
The curtains, coverings, and hangings that Gershon has to do with are in fact all lines of separation. They define the tabernacle itself, or mark off and separate the court from the wilderness around. They speak, then, easily and naturally, of the boundary lines of God's special enclosure — which the Church is in the world.
The outer covering was the plainest part of the structure, and the part everyone saw:
Here was Gershon's work: to carry the tabernacle and its coverings through the waste and howling wilderness. There could be little attractiveness in the rams' skins and badgers' skins. Yet even so, it was the high privilege of the Gershonite to take them all up and carry them cheerfully on his shoulders across the trackless sands. What, then, are we to understand by the covering of the tabernacle? I believe, in a word, it pictured the character of the Lord Jesus Christ. It was what would meet the eye.
The family's name fits the job:
Gershon and his sons had charge of the coverings and the fine linen. Gershon means exile, a stranger. His service shows us that we are separated ones and strangers in the world. This separation must show itself in practical righteousness.
Curtains also said something about God: He had no settled house yet. That brings a warning:
The Church has laid down the rams' skins and badgers' skins, and with them the Gershonite character. In other words, the Church has stopped walking in the footsteps of her rejected Lord and Master. She should be a tired and worn stranger, crossing the parched and barren desert with the burden on her shoulders. Instead she has settled down in the green places of the world and made herself at home. But there was another feature of the stranger character pictured in the curtain — anticipation. God dwelling in curtains showed plainly that neither God nor the ark of His strength had found a resting-place. They were journeying on toward "a rest that remained."
Each family had its own job, and that was the point:
Gershon had nothing to do with the boards and pins, and Merari had nothing to do with the curtains or the coverings. Yet the two depended on each other. "The boards and sockets" would not do without "the curtains," and the curtains would not do without the boards and sockets. Suppose a Gershonite had decided to abandon "the curtains" and turn his hand to "the pins." He would have left his own work undone and interfered with the work of the Merarite.
This removed all competition over which task was grander:
Seen in this light, it would be a matter of complete indifference whether a man had to carry a pin, a curtain, or a golden lampstand. The great question for each and for all was simply, "Is this my work? Is this what the Lord has given me to do?"
- Chosen — God assigned each family's work. Being firstborn won Gershon nothing; privilege in Scripture often runs against the order of nature.
- Covering — this family carried the outer fabric and skins: a picture of the character of Christ, the part that met the eye.
- Boundary — curtains, hangings and screens are all lines of separation. They mark off God's enclosure from the wilderness around.
- Stranger — the name Gershon means exile or stranger, and the work fitted the name. A people carrying curtains has not settled down.
- Content — God assigns every task, so pin and curtain and lampstand rank alike. One question is left: is this the work He gave me?
And the hangings of the court, and the curtain of the entrance to the court, which surrounds the tabernacle and the altar, and the cords thereof for all its service.
Numbers 3 gives each Levite family its share of the tabernacle, and Gershon's share ends here: the linen wall of the courtyard, the curtain at its gate, and the ropes. Why would God spell out ropes and curtains by name, and what did this humble charge teach the people who carried it?
No Levite picked his own job. One writer draws out what that means for every servant of God:
Nothing is more important in practice than this: every servant of God should know the work He has given him to do, and once he knows it he should stick to it. It also matters greatly never to interfere with another's service. The Lord is sovereign in this. He divides according to His own will.
A fixed task feels different depending on the heart:
To someone whose will was unbroken, it might seem a hardship and a very tiresome task to have to keep the same position, or to do exactly the same line of work. Such a person might long for something fresh — some variety in his work. But where the will was subdued and the heart adjusted, each one would say, "My path is perfectly plain; I have only to obey."
One writer reads the fine linen of these hangings as a picture of righteousness — first in Christ, then in His people:
Revelation 19:8 makes it clear that the "fine linen" is "righteousness" — practical righteousness. The curtains that make up the tabernacle itself represent this righteousness in Christ. In His flesh the divine Word "tabernacled," as John 1:14 puts it. The hangings for the court represent the righteousness of saints, shown outside the sanctuary in the world.
One writer sums up what this family's work stood for:
Gershon would therefore stand for the ministry that insists on the moral perfection of the Lord Jesus. It also insists on the practical righteousness that should mark all believers, as a witness to our faith in the perfect One.
Notice what all of Gershon's items have in common: they mark edges.
Notice that the curtains, coverings and hangings Gershon deals with are all lines of separation. They define the tabernacle itself, or they mark the court off from the wilderness around it. So they speak, easily and without strain, of the boundary lines of God's special enclosure — and the Church is such an enclosure in the world.
That boundary is no theory. Linen means conduct:
Gershon's separation is not imaginary. It is not a line drawn in the air. Practical righteousness keeps it up, as these linen hangings suggest. How much depends on it! If God cannot walk with the world, then my walking with Him needs one thing first: separation from it.
The verse names the screen for the entrance apart from the hangings around the court:
Here, then, was the entrance to the court. There was only one. To see inside, people had to come to that many-coloured hanging. The white curtains on the other three sides were five cubits high, about seven and a half feet — only a giant could look over them.
The plain linen speaks of the character of God's people. The curtains at the door and gate speak of someone else — they "represent Christ, as the only way of access" (Frederick W. Grant).
The verse ends with cords. One writer imagines dropping the man whose whole job is pins and cords:
Why not let this sad-faced Merarite go, with his pins and cords of the tabernacle always getting tangled, and be content with Kohath and Gershon? But if we are to set up the Lord's tabernacle in the wilderness, we must have the pins and cords.
Which is why the size of the task was never the point:
Seen in this light, no one would care whether a man had to carry a pin, a curtain, or a golden lampstand. The great question for each and for all was simply: "Is this my work? Is this what the Lord has given me to do?"
- Assigned. God handed out the work, family by family. Know your own task and leave other people's alone — that is the first mark of a real servant.
- Linen. Gershon carried fine linen — a picture of righteousness: perfect in Christ, then seen in the daily conduct of His people.
- Boundary. Those hangings drew the line between God's enclosure and the wilderness outside. Practical righteousness keeps that line up, not talk.
- Door. The wall had one entrance only. Commentators read the curtain at that gate as Christ, the one way in.
- Cords. The ropes look like nothing, but the tent will not stand without them. The only question is this: did the Lord give you this work?
And of Kohath, the family of the Amramites, and the family of the Izharites, and the family of the Hebronites, and the family of the Uzzielites these are the families of the Kohathites.
The verse lists four families that came out of Kohath — Amram, Izhar, Hebron and Uzziel. Why does God name and count households like this, and what did it mean to belong to this branch of Levi?
The list is not filler. One writer sees in it God's care to leave no guesswork in His service.
Their number is given, and they were to camp on the south side of the tabernacle. Everything was set out with the greatest possible care. God would avoid confusion in the service of the tabernacle, and also room for human will. He would make it the humblest thing on earth — a matter of simple obedience.
Kohath's line is where the priests came from. So this short list of families stands close to the ark and the priesthood.
Out of Kohath came Aaron and the priestly family, and the sons of Kohath had special charge of the ark and the other vessels of the sanctuary.
Kohath was not Levi's eldest son. Yet his families carried the holiest things, and one writer sees a pattern in that.
Whilst Gershon was the eldest son of Levi, and so his descendants might have expected that they would be selected to carry the sacred vessels on their shoulders, that work was entrusted to the descendants of Kohath, who was Levi's second son. How often do we see in Scripture that blessing and privilege do not run in the order of nature.
The Kohathites got no cart to help them. That was an honour, not a hardship.
Gershon and Merari might need wagons and oxen to carry the boards, but not Kohath. His charge was too precious to hand over to anyone or anything but himself. So it was his high and honoured place to carry it all on his shoulders. What a privilege it was to carry the ark, the table, or the golden lampstand! Would it not show he could not value his high calling at all, if he had looked for oxen to help him in his holy service?
One writer finds these names hard to read, then draws out what the leader's name says about this service.
Kohath comes next with his four sons, whose names (with his own) are much harder to read. His charge was the ark, the table, the lampstand, the altars, and the utensils belonging to all this. As a picture, the Kohathite service looks outward: he is occupied with what is outside himself, in Christ. Fittingly, his prince is Elizaphan, "whom God has hidden." Here, in the presence of God and taken up with Christ, self is lost. He is the son of Uzziel, the "power of God."
Korah was one of these Kohathites. The highest privilege did not keep him from wanting more.
How much better it would have been for Korah if he had stayed content with his Levite service. It was of the very highest order. His work as a Kohathite was to carry some of the most precious vessels of the sanctuary. But he aimed at the priesthood, and fell into the pit.
Birth settled what each Levite handled. One writer carries that over to Christian service today.
Not every Levite had the same area of work — and none of them could choose his own service. If you were born a Merarite, you could not care for the vessels of the sanctuary. God had entrusted those to the Kohathites. So it is with Christian service: God gives different types of service to different believers.
- Named — God names four families, leaving no room for confusion or human will in His service.
- Chosen — Kohath was not the eldest, yet his families got the holiest charge. Privilege does not follow the order of nature.
- Carried — No wagon spared them. They bore the most precious vessels on their own shoulders, and that was their honour.
- Hidden — Their leader's name points to a service where, in the presence of God, self is lost.
- Content — Korah held this very charge and still reached for the priesthood. The greatest privilege is wasted on a heart that wants someone else's place.
According to the number of all the males, from a month old and upward, there were eight thousand six hundred, who kept the charge of the sanctuary.
The count of Kohath's families ends with more than a number. It gives 8,600 males, counted from babyhood, and a job: "keeping guard over the sanctuary." Two questions follow. Why does God count babies among His servants? And what does it mean for a whole family to stand guard over holy things?
God counted Levi from the nursery, long before any of them could serve. One writer draws out what that says about God's timing:
Here they are counted — apart from Israel, but still counted — from infants only days old, marked out for service long before that service could begin. God gives strength before He claims service. But from their earliest days He sets them apart according to His own grace and intentions.
Another writer gives the reason God did not wait for strength:
They are numbered from a month old and upward, as the firstborn are, and for the same reason. If God redeemed or counted only men in their strength, would it not look as if He took "pleasure in the legs of a man"? But it is the soul He values, and the soul of an infant is precious in His sight.
The guard had a King to protect. One writer sets the Levites' work beside the priests' work:
They are to be the bodyguard of the divine King. The priests go in to God to perform their intercessory service on behalf of the people. In the same way, the Levites keep the people from the wrath that would follow if a stranger intruded into the tabernacle of God. And they carry the holy things of that tabernacle through the desert on all their journeys.
These 8,600 men were not priests. One writer shows where the line fell:
The priests were given the ministry of the sanctuary. There they acted as worshippers and intercessors. The work of the Levites as given in this chapter, and the one that follows, was of a more outward nature. They had to guard the tabernacle. They put it up and took it down. They carried its different parts. The LORD ordered every detail of this work.
The 8,600 did not pick their post. One writer reads the care behind that as the lesson:
God laid it all down with the greatest possible care. He would avoid confusion in the service of the tabernacle, and He would leave no room for human will. He would make it the humblest thing on earth — a matter of simple obedience. Their charge, we gather, was to be a most honourable service: the ark, the table, the lampstand, the altars, the vessels of the sanctuary that they minister with, and the screen, and all its service.
The limits went further than the choice of job:
They could not choose their burden. They were not even allowed to touch the holy vessels. First the priests covered them in the ordered way and put them on bars or poles. Only then did the Kohathites come forward, each to receive his appointed service and learn what his duty was.
The family name itself points to what this guard duty was for:
"Kohath," all are agreed, means "assembly." He has indeed in his charge the ark, the centre of gathering. In Christ, and as the fruit of His work, God reveals Himself to us. To lift Christ up in that way is to draw men to Him, just as He promised.
Another writer warns what follows when the Church stops carrying them:
The Church grew weary of the curtains and the boards, and laid aside her Gershonite and Merarite character. In the same way she has laid aside her Kohathite character, because she has stopped carrying the ark and the table on her shoulder.
No Kohathite carried alone. The load itself set the rule:
They must walk together. No vessel of the sanctuary could be carried without a bar, which supposes at the very least two bearers. They had to set aside every personal consideration. One might be stronger than another, or able to walk faster. But neither the strong nor the weak could decide the pace or the time. That depended on the cloud alone, which directed every movement of the camp.
- Redeemed — God counted the Levites like the firstborn, and for the same reason: they were His own before they were His workers.
- Counted — the count starts at one month old. God values the soul, and He marks out His servants long before they can lift anything.
- Assigned — no Kohathite chose his burden. God fixed every detail, leaving no room for human will, only obedience.
- Guarding — they stood as a bodyguard around the King's tent. They kept the stranger out, and so kept the wrath away.
- Carried together — every holy vessel needed two bearers on one bar. The cloud set the pace, not the strongest man in the pair.
The families of the sons of Kohath encamped on the side of the tabernacle southward.
Numbers 3 gives each Levite family its own place around the tabernacle, the tent where God lived among His people. Kohath's descendants get the ground to the south. One line about a compass direction raises real questions. Who chose the spot? What came with it? Why record it at all?
The families do not select their ground. One writer sees a purpose behind such exact instructions:
Their number is given; and these were to be on the side of the tabernacle southward. Everything was laid down with the greatest possible care. God would avoid confusion in the service of the tabernacle, and also room for human will. He would make it to be the humblest thing on earth — a matter of simple obedience.
The south side was not a neutral address. The priests came from this branch of Levi, and its charge was the holy furniture itself:
Out of Kohath came Aaron and the priestly family, and the sons of Kohath had special charge of the ark and the other vessels of the sanctuary. Kohath was to pitch tent on the south side of the sanctuary. Aaron and the priests, along with Moses, had to dwell on the east side, facing the entrance to the court. They kept charge there, and no stranger could come near, on pain of death.
Wagons and oxen could carry the loads of other Levite families. Not Kohath's. One commentator treats that as an honour, not a hardship:
Gershon and Merari might need wagons and oxen to carry the boards, and so on, but not Kohath. His charge was too precious to trust to anyone or anything but himself. So it was his high and honoured place to carry it all upon his shoulders. What a privilege, for example, to be allowed to carry the ark, the table, or the golden lampstand! And would it not have shown a complete failure to appreciate his high calling if he had looked for the help of oxen in his holy service?
The name Kohath also carries meaning. One writer links it to what the family carried:
"Kohath," all are agreed, means "assembly." He has indeed in his charge the ark, the centre of gathering. To lift up Christ as the One in whom, and as the fruit of His work, God reveals Himself to us, is to draw men, according to His assurance, to Him.
The names of Kohath's own sons are read the same way — Amram as "people of the Exalted One," Izhar as "oil," Hebron as "union" or "communion" — and the leader named in the next verse fits the pattern too: "His prince is beautifully Elitzaphan, 'whom God has hidden,' for here it is indeed in the presence of God, and in occupation with Christ, that self is lost."
One writer draws a lesson for teaching today from what they carried:
Everything the Kohathites carried pictures the truths of Christianity as they are in themselves. They are not truths about our own experience, which is what we saw with Gershon. For all this furniture speaks of Christ and His perfect work. So Kohath stands for the ministry that sets out the glory of the Lord Jesus in unique excellence. That glory is far above and apart from anything we can understand or appreciate of it.
The south side had another occupant. Reuben's tribe camped on that same side. One writer sees grievances growing out of that closeness:
Turn to Numbers 2, which gives the order in which the tribes were to encamp around the tabernacle. Then turn to Numbers 3, which gives similar details about the Levites. We find that both the tribe of Reuben and the Kohathites had their place on the south side. As a result they were close together to discuss and stir up their imagined grievances.
Korah was a Kohathite. He held the privilege this verse describes, and reached past it:
How much better it would have been for Korah had he rested content with his Levite service, which was of the very highest order. His work as a Kohathite was to carry some of the most precious vessels of the sanctuary. But he aimed at the priesthood, and fell into the pit.
- Place — God chose the south side; Kohath did not. He ordered the camp so there was no confusion and no room for human will.
- Charge — That place came with the ark, the table, the lampstand and the other vessels of the sanctuary, held by the family that gave Israel its priests.
- Shoulder — No wagons for Kohath. The most precious load rode on men's shoulders.
- Assembly — Kohath means "assembly." He carried the ark, the centre of gathering. Lifting up Christ draws people to Him.
- Contentment — Korah held this very honour and reached past it. The highest service becomes ruin the moment it stops being enough.
And the prince of the father's house of the families of the Kohathites was Elizaphan the son of Uzziel.
Numbers 3 gives every branch of the tribe of Levi its place in camp, its leader, and its exact work at the tabernacle — the tent where God lived among Israel. Verse 30 names the leader of the Kohathites: Elizaphan son of Uzziel, set over the families who carried the holiest furniture of all.
God fixed every detail here. He chose which side of the tent each family slept on, and who led them. One writer draws out why God left nothing loose:
Their number is given; and these were to be on the side of the tabernacle southward. Everything was laid down with the greatest possible care. God would avoid confusion in the service of the tabernacle, and also leave no room for human will. He would make it the humblest thing on earth — a matter of simple obedience.
A dictionary entry gathers what else is recorded about him:
Son of Uzziel, and a 'chief' of the Kohathites. Numbers 3:30; 1 Chronicles 15:8. He is called ELZAPHAN in Exodus 6:22; Leviticus 10:4. With Mishael he had the painful duty of removing the dead bodies of Nadab and Abihu.
The man who once carried out those dead bodies is now the head of the families who carry the holy things.
after-note: DELETE
The Kohathite charge was the ark, the table, the lampstand, the altars. This was the one load no cart could carry:
Gershon and Merari might need wagons and oxen to carry the boards and so on, but not Kohath. His charge was too precious to hand to anyone or anything but himself. So it was his high and honoured place to carry it all on his shoulders. What a privilege, for example, to be allowed to carry the ark, the table, or the golden lampstand!
And the men under Elizaphan handled these things without ever looking at them:
Whenever Israel travelled, the Kohathites carried these things, though they did not see them. Before they could carry them, the priests had to cover them with the right coverings and insert the carrying poles.
Some commentators read the Hebrew names as part of the picture:
His charge was the ark, the table, the lampstand, the altars, and the utensils belonging to all this... So it is easy to see that, in the picture, the Kohathite ministry looks outward. His occupation is with what is outside himself in Christ... His prince is fittingly Elizaphan, which means "whom God has hidden." For here it is indeed in the presence of God, and in occupation with Christ, that self is lost. He is the son of Uzziel, the "power of God."
Mackintosh draws a lesson for Christians out of the family name:
Nothing shows higher character in the world than the gathering spirit expressed in the name of Kohath. Should not Christians rebuke man's often-repeated attempts at forming associations, by a real union in everything? And how can they do that? Only by gathering more closely around their common centre, Christ, in all the blessed fullness and variety of that Name.
Elizaphan did not campaign for the post. God placed him, as God placed each family of the tribe:
In the first part of this section God puts the families of the tribe into their several places. He is sovereign in His appointment here, and so of course everything is perfectly ordered in its place — Kohath with his precious vessels, Gershon with his fine linen, Merari with his boards and pillars. Service is gift, and therefore gift is the appointment to service, since the Giver can make no mistake.
Another writer imagines what would have happened had the Levites organised themselves instead:
Each had his specific work given. There could be no misunderstanding about it. How strange it would have been if these 22,000 Levites had formed committees and sub-committees to divide the work and direct it! All this would have brought in disorder. All they needed to do was the work into which the Lord had called them.
- Placed — the south side, the named chief, the listed vessels. God fixed each family's position, leaving no confusion and no room for human will.
- Given — Elizaphan's headship was appointment, not ambition. Service is gift, and the Giver makes no mistake in handing it out.
- Honoured — the men he led carried the ark and the table on their shoulders. No cart, no oxen: the charge was too precious for that.
- Hidden — his name means "whom God has hidden," son of "the power of God": in occupation with Christ, self is lost.
- Enough — the Levites needed no committees to divide the work. Knowing the task God gave, and doing it, was the whole of their obedience.
And their charge was the ark, and the table, and the candlestick, and the altars, and the utensils of the sanctuary with which they ministered, and the curtain, and all that belongs to its service.
Numbers 3:31 gives the Kohathites, one family of the tribe of Levi, the most valuable load in the camp. Why did God hand the holiest things to men who were not even allowed to touch them, and what did carrying such a load do to those men?
The charge is a specific inventory, not a general duty, and the priests had to prepare each piece before a Kohathite could touch it.
They were responsible for the care of the ark, the table, the lampstand, the two altars together with the utensils and the veil, with all that related to these things. Whenever Israel travelled the Kohathites carried these things, though they did not see them, for before they were allowed to carry them, the priests were required to cover them with their appropriate coverings and insert the carrying poles.
These were not just expensive furnishings. One writer explains what the tabernacle vessels stood for, and how carefully they reached a Kohathite's shoulder.
The special service of the Kohathites had to do with the vessels of the tabernacle, the dwelling-place of God among His people. Those vessels each set forth a different aspect of Christ's glory. When the camp moved on — and travelling was the mark of the wilderness — their duty was to carry the holy vessels. They could not choose their burden. They were not even allowed to touch the holy vessels. But after the priests had covered them in the appointed way and put them on bars or poles, the Kohathites came forward. Each one received his appointed service and learned what his duty was.
Another writer goes through the same list and asks what such a charge does to the man himself. He finds the same lesson in the leader's name from the previous verse.
His charge was the ark, the table, the lamp-stand, the altars, and the utensils belonging to all this. With them went the one linen item, which speaks, as we know well, of the humanity of Christ. So it is easy to see that the Kohathite ministry, as a picture, looks outward. The man is occupied with what is outside himself, in Christ… His leader is beautifully named Elizaphan, "whom God has hidden," for here it is indeed in the presence of God, and in occupation with Christ, that self is lost.
The other Levite families could use wagons. Kohath got none, and one writer calls that an honour, not a hardship.
Gershon and Merari might need wagons and oxen to carry the boards and so on, but not Kohath. His charge was too precious to trust to anyone or anything but himself. So it was his high and honoured place to carry it all on his shoulders. What a privilege, for example, to be allowed to carry the ark, the table, or the golden lampstand!
But an outsider saw none of that honour. The coverings hid everything.
From the outside, no one could tell what these vessels were, though each Kohathite might know his own appointed charge. Nothing in the service itself, or in what could be seen of it, brought glory to the men doing it. To an onlooker, the Kohathites simply looked like the men picked out for the hardest labour.
God handed out the duties in this chapter. One writer takes that straight over to Christian service today.
Not every Levite had the same area of work — and none of them could choose his own service. If you were born a Merarite, you could not take care of the vessels of the sanctuary; those were entrusted to the Kohathites. So it is with Christian service: God gives different types of service to different believers.
God assigned the work. So the size of the load in a man's hands stopped being the point.
Seen in this light, it made no difference at all whether a man carried a pin, a curtain, or a golden lampstand. The great question for each and for all was simply, "Is this my work? Is this what the Lord has given me to do?"
The poles needed more than one man. The timing was never theirs to set.
They had no choice in the matter. Their service was one of simple obedience, yet it kept them very near to God, and if their heart was in it, it was a delight like no other. And notice too, they had to walk together. No vessel of the sanctuary could travel without a pole, and a pole needs at least two bearers… Neither the strong nor the weak could decide the pace or the time. That depended only on the cloud, which directed every movement of the camp.
One writer warns what follows when Christians stop carrying this load.
If we knew more of Christ in these blessed aspects of His character, we would not be what we are — a proverb and a byword because of our deep divisions. The Church grew tired of the curtains and the boards, and laid aside her Gershonite and Merarite character. In the same way she has laid aside her Kohathite character, because she has stopped carrying the ark and the table upon her shoulder.
- Charge given. God assigned Kohath's load: the ark, table, lampstand, altars, utensils and screen. No Levite picked his own work, and Christian service runs the same way.
- Charge covered. The priests covered each vessel and fitted the poles first. Only then did a Kohathite step forward to receive his load.
- Charge shouldered. No wagons carried these things. The most precious load went on a man's own shoulders, and its honour stayed hidden from every onlooker.
- Charge shared. Every pole needed at least two bearers, and the cloud set the pace — the work forced them to walk together and to look up.
- Charge kept. What Kohath carried was a picture of Christ. When His people stop carrying the ark and the table, they lose that character and fall into division.
And the prince of princes of the Levites was Eleazar the son of Aaron the priest he had the oversight of them that kept the charge of the sanctuary.
Numbers 3 gives each family of the Levites its own place around the tabernacle, God's tent, and its own work. At the end of that list one man stands over them all: Eleazar, son of Aaron the priest. Who decides what a servant of God does, and who is he answerable to?
Chapter 3 fixes every detail. Preference and strong personalities decide nothing.
God laid down everything with the greatest possible care. God would avoid confusion in the service of the tabernacle, and would leave no room for human will. He would make it the humblest thing on earth — a matter of simple obedience. Their charge, we gather, was to be a most honourable service.
The Levite families did not all do the same work. God chose who did what.
The order of the service of the Levites, on the other hand, was according to the sovereignty of God, who put each one in his place. So in the service of the church you find the greatest differences, and God gives each one his own place.
The verse sets Eleazar over men who were leaders in their own right.
Verse 32 tells us that Eleazar the priest, son of Aaron, was chief over the leaders of the Levites. He appointed them to the particular work they had to do.
Eleazar oversaw the work as a priest. One writer carries that forward to today.
All of this happened under the priestly supervision of Eleazar, son of Aaron (verse 32) — just as Christ directs Christian service.
Because the priest appointed the work, the Levite's part was obedience. The same rule met two kinds of heart in opposite ways.
The priest's appointment regulated the Levite's service. The Levites had no more room for self-will than the fighting men had. God settled it all, and this was a clear mercy to everyone whose heart was right. To someone whose will was unbroken, it might seem a hardship to be kept in the same position. It might seem a most tiresome task to do the very same line of work. Such a person might long for something fresh — some variety in his work. But where the will was subdued and the heart adjusted, each one would say, "My path is perfectly plain; I have only to obey."
Eleazar was a priest, not only a Levite. His name and his later history point beyond him.
The priest did have a nearer place than the servant, the Levite — a place of enjoyment of the Lord's presence... Eleazar's name means "God is Helper," and he succeeded Aaron in the high priesthood when Aaron died (Numbers 20:23-28). He is therefore a picture of Christ as High Priest in resurrection.
Eleazar's oversight fell on the Kohathites, the family that carried the sanctuary furniture. What they carried shows what their ministry means.
These things the Kohathites carried all picture the objective truths of Christianity — truth that stands outside us, not our inward experience. All this furniture speaks of Christ and His perfect work. So Kohath stands for the ministry of the glory of the Lord Jesus. That glory is shown in unique excellence, far above and apart from anything we can understand or value in it. It is absolute, living and real... May we prize such ministry, and seek grace to present it faithfully.
- Appointed, not chosen. God's sovereignty set the order of Levite service: He "put each one in his place." The same variety marks service in the church.
- Assigned by the priest. Eleazar was chief over the leaders, and "appointed them to the particular work they had to do."
- Answerable to Christ. That priestly supervision pictures how Christ Himself directs Christian service.
- Obeyed without self-will. Where the will is subdued, the servant answers, "My path is perfectly plain; I have only to obey."
- Helped by a living High Priest. Eleazar's name means "God is Helper." He pictures Christ as High Priest in resurrection, so this oversight helps the servant rather than burdens him.
Of Merari was the family of the Mahlites, and the family of the Mushites these are the families of Merari.
Numbers 3 gives each branch of the tribe of Levi a place around the tabernacle and a share of the work. This verse names Merari's two clans, the Mahlites and Mushites — the men who carried the heaviest and least admired load, and whose names speak of bitterness, weakness and yielding.
God took the whole tribe of Levi for Himself. Then He split the work among Levi's three sons.
In Numbers 3 we get the details of God's order for the tribe of Levi. God took this tribe for the service of His house, under the hand of the priests, in place of all the firstborn in the other tribes, whom He had claimed for Himself. Levi had three sons, Gershon, Kohath and Merari, and each of them became the head of a section of the tribe. God gave each section its own service at the tabernacle, and each camped in its own set place around it. Nothing was left for them to arrange.
The Mahlites and Mushites carried the frame of the tabernacle. One writer reads that frame as a picture of believers held up and held together.
before-note-none
They camped on the north side of the tabernacle. They were given the work of caring for the boards of the tabernacle, its bars, pillars and sockets, the pillars of the court, their sockets, pegs and cords. The boards of the tabernacle speak of the basic facts of what believers are "in Christ," and as united in one building, the Church of God. They were of acacia wood overlaid with gold, standing upright on sockets of silver — that is, believers upheld on the basis of redemption, covered with Christ (the gold) and united together with bars of the same materials… Merari therefore emphasizes the ministry that unites believers to Christ and to one another as dependent on the redemption that is in Christ Jesus.
The names in this verse are unexpected. One writer reads them as a description of how such work feels to the person doing it.
Last of Levi's three sons we find Merari, "bitter," with his two sons, Mahli, "sick," and Mushi, "yielding." These are the strangest words of all to find attached to Levi's sons… Here it is clear that Merari is occupied not so much with Christ Himself as with the people of the Lord… His work is mainly what we may call church work; and who has done this work without finding the bitterness that Merari's name expresses? Anyone who could not feel it would be poorly fitted for ministry.
The two clan names split the load between them: the strain of the work, and the temper it takes to bear it. Their leader's name answers both.
Mahli may express the faintness that comes from too much labour, while Mushi may point to that spirit of patience and gentleness which, where the truth allows, can give way in everything else. How necessary that spirit is in just such a relation to the Church of God as is hinted at here! The lack of it may be as common a cause of trouble among believers as any. Merari's captain stands in striking, comforting contrast to these names: Zuriel, "my rock is God," the son of Abihail, "the father of valor."
Setting up the sockets of silver was Merari's work. One writer applies it to taking a stand for Christ in the world, and asks why so few do.
Let anyone take a firm, clear stand for Christ in the world… and there let him begin to set up "the sockets of silver." Be sure of this: he will find that such a course brings much sorrow and bitterness of soul. In a word, he will find it a path where the cross has to be taken up "daily," and not only taken up, but carried… There are very few of the hard-working Merarite character to be found. Why is this? Because showing such a character will always bring much labour and sorrow to nature, and nature loves ease… nothing will make us true Merarites but deep fellowship with Him who was "THE MAN OF SORROWS."
Pins and cords attract no attention. The point is that God specified them, and the servant's job is accuracy, not improvement.
Merari represents the workman, as Gershon does the stranger and pilgrim, and Kohath the one occupied with Christ. Who cares for these boards and bars, and pillars and pins and cords? Who thinks of God's plan and pattern, and all the details of divine appointment? Who desires work of this menial kind, costing so much and bringing in so little? The pattern is old, and will not adapt itself to the fashion of changed times. It gives no room for human invention to display itself in. It requires only plodding accuracy and diligent obedience.
Naming the clans one by one means the work was distributed before anyone volunteered or argued.
Their service consisted in handling the boards of the tabernacle, pillars, sockets, pins and cords. Each had his specific work given. There could be no misunderstanding about it. How strange it would have been if these 22,000 Levites had formed committees and sub-committees to divide the work and direct in it! All this would have brought in disorder. All they needed to do was to do the work into which the Lord had called them.
- Named. God lists Merari's two clans, the Mahlites and Mushites, one by one. He assigns service family by family and leaves nothing for them to arrange.
- Given. Their charge was the framework: boards, bars, pillars, sockets, pegs and cords. Writers read it as a picture of believers upheld by redemption and joined to Christ and to each other.
- Costly. The names carry the tone of the work: Merari "bitter," Mahli "sick," Mushi "yielding." The job costs bitterness and spent strength, and it asks for gentleness that gives way where truth allows.
- Steadied. Against those three names stands their leader Zuriel, "my rock is God," son of Abihail, "the father of valour."
- Fitted. Few take up this work. It demands plodding accuracy and obedience to an old pattern, and only deep fellowship with the Man of Sorrows makes anyone fit for it.
And those that were numbered of them, according to the number of all the males, from a month old and upward, were six thousand two hundred.
The census of Numbers 3 stops at the family of Merari and records a plain figure: 6,200 males, counted from a month old. That number raises two questions — why God counts babies, and why He tracks one branch of one tribe so closely.
The chapter before counted Israel's men from twenty years old and up. The Levite count works differently, and one writer links the change to whom the Levites replace:
Notice the difference between the numbering of the tribe of Levi and the numbering of the other tribes. In the previous chapter the count took those who were twenty years and over. The count of the Levites took "all the males from a month old and upward." The reason for the difference is that they stood in place of the firstborn. At that tender age of weakness and helplessness, the firstborn were either redeemed or given up.
The starting age also says something about what God values. One writer asks what a count of grown men only would suggest:
God numbers them from a month old and upward, as He numbers the firstborn, and for the same reason. If He redeemed or numbered only men in their strength, would it not look as if He took "pleasure in the legs of a man"? But He values the soul, and the soul of an infant is precious in His sight.
This list records men who already belonged to God, and one writer explains how they came to be His:
Verse 12 of Numbers 3 uncovers the secret behind the special place of the Levites. God had chosen them "instead of all the firstborn." In Egypt, God had spared the firstborn of the Israelites because of the blood of the Passover lamb. That blood was the price that redeemed the firstborn. So they belonged to God. Now this is the place God gave the Levites: He chose them instead of all the firstborn. A Levite would therefore regard himself as redeemed by God and so as God's possession.
The figure belongs to the last of Levi's three sons. One writer weighs the family names against the work these men carried:
Last of Levi's three sons we find Merari, "bitter," with his two sons, Mahli, "sick," and Mushi, "yielding." These are the strangest words of all to find among Levi's sons. These families have charge of the boards of the tabernacle and its bars, its pillars and sockets, and those of the court and the pegs and cords… Merari's work is mainly what we may call church work. And who that has taken up this work has not found the bitterness that his name expresses?
Merari's share of the tabernacle was the timber and metal — the heavy freight. One writer notes how God treated the families with the heaviest loads:
If God called people to do His work, He will provide all that is needed to carry it on. The Gershonites and the Merarites had clear proof of this… Moses gave the Gershonites two wagons and four oxen, and the Merarites four wagons and eight oxen. These came from the offering of the princes of the twelve tribes when the Tabernacle was set up. God took thought for both of these great families, and the one which had the heaviest burden had the greatest help… Carrying burdens took strength, and God would not overtax the strength of anyone called to work for Him. So no Levite was called to carry burdens before he was thirty, nor asked to continue after fifty.
Levi's three families — Kohath, Gershon and Merari — each had their own total and their own charge. That division guards against a temptation:
Each family had a particular work to do… The family of Merari carried the boards of the tabernacle and the bars, also the pillars around the court and their sockets and pins and cords. It was also their work to set up the tabernacle when they moved to a new site… Each had his own work to do. They were not to covet the work of another. The man who carried the tent-pegs was not to envy the Kohathites, who carried the furniture of pure gold.
- Counted early. The Levite roll begins at one month, not twenty years. These men stood in place of the firstborn, so God records a life before it can do anything for Him.
- Counted as redeemed. Blood spared the firstborn in Egypt. God then took the Levites in their place, so every name on the list marked someone who already belonged to Him.
- Counted as Merari. The 6,200 belong to a family whose name means "bitter." Their load — boards, bars, pillars, sockets — has often proved bitter to those who take it up.
- Counted and supplied. The family with the heaviest load received the most wagons and oxen. A call from God arrives with the means to carry it.
- Counted separately. Each family had its own total and its own charge, so the man carrying pegs had no cause to envy the man carrying gold.
And the prince of the father's house of the families of Merari was Zuriel the son of Abihail. They encamped on the side of the tabernacle northward.
Israel camped in rings around God's tent, with the three Levite families closest to it. This verse sets the last of them in place: Merari camps on the north side under Zuriel son of Abihail, and the names, the direction, and the family's load all carry meaning.
Each Levite family had one side of the tabernacle. One writer notes how deliberate the arrangement is:
It is significant that Merari camps north of the tabernacle, Kohath to the south, and Gershon to the west. Moses, Aaron, and his sons camp toward the east, filling Judah's place in the inner circle.
Merari carried the frame and fastenings of the tabernacle. One commentator reads a picture of believers in it:
Their work was caring for the boards of the tabernacle, its bars, pillars and sockets... The boards of the tabernacle speak of the basic facts of what believers are "in Christ," and as united in one building, the Church of God. They were of acacia wood overlaid with gold, standing upright on sockets of silver. That is, believers are upheld on the basis of redemption, covered with Christ (the gold) and united together with bars of the same materials... So Merari highlights the ministry that unites believers to Christ and to one another, a ministry that depends on the redemption that is in Christ Jesus.
The names in this branch of Levi are dark. One writer reads them as describing the work itself:
Last of Levi's three sons we find Merari, "bitter," with his two sons, Mahli, "sick," and Mushi, "yielding." These are the strangest words of all to find among Levi's sons... Here it is clear that Merari is taken up not so much with Christ Himself as with the people of the Lord. His work is mainly what we may call church work. Who that has done this work has not found the bitterness which expresses itself in Merari's name? Anyone who could not feel it would be poorly fitted for ministry.
The two names in this verse say something different:
Merari's leader stands in striking, comforting contrast to these names: Zuriel, "my rock is God," the son of Abihail, "the father of valour."
One writer carries Merari's work over into Christian life, and counts its cost:
Let anyone take his stand firmly and decisively in the world for Christ. Let him go into those places where "the world" is seen in its full strength. Let him set himself, firm as a rock, against the deep and rapid tide of worldliness. Let him begin there to set up "the sockets of silver," and be sure of it: such a course brings much sorrow and bitterness of soul... There are very few of the hard-working Merarite character to be found. Why is this? Because showing such a character always costs nature much labour and sorrow, and nature loves ease. Nothing will make us true Merarites but close fellowship with Him who was "THE MAN OF SORROWS."
The verse names a leader, a family and a place. That precision is the lesson:
Merari (bitter) with the family of Mahlites and Mushites numbered 6,200, and their place was on the north side, opposite Dan... Each had his specific work given. There could be no misunderstanding about it. How strange it would have been if these 22,000 Levites had formed committees and sub-committees to divide the work and direct it! All that would have brought in disorder. All they needed to do was the work the Lord had called them into.
The Lord did not leave that labour unpaid:
If the Gershonite and the Merarite had to take a place where they endured much of the burden and heat of the day, the Lord graciously met them in that with a very rich reward... If they had to labour and toil among their brothers, they were richly served by their brothers in return: "Two wagons and four oxen he gave to the sons of Gershon, according to their service. And four wagons and eight oxen he gave to the sons of Merari according to their service."
- Placed. God gave Merari one side of the tabernacle: the north. Kohath had the south, Gershon the west, the priests the east.
- Named. Merari means "bitter," his sons "sick" and "yielding." Anyone fit to serve God's people tastes that bitterness.
- Strengthened. Over that bitterness God set Zuriel, "my rock is God," son of Abihail, "father of valour." The leader's name answers the family's name.
- Loaded. Merari carried the framework: boards, bars, pillars and sockets. One writer reads it as believers upheld by redemption and joined to one another.
- Supplied. The heaviest service drew the largest gift — four wagons and eight oxen, double what Gershon received.
And the charge of the sons of Merari consisted in the oversight of the boards of the tabernacle, and its bars, and its pillars, and its bases, and all its furniture, and all that belongs to its service,
God gives Merari's family the heavy, structural part of the tabernacle: the frames, bars, pillars and bases that hold the whole tent up. Every item on that list pictures something. So the writers ask what this plain, heavy work says about the workers God chooses. (Older translations, which they quote, call these the "boards," "sockets," "pins" and "cords.")
This work belongs to Merari and to nobody else. One writer shows how the jobs never overlapped, yet each one needed the others:
All this was clear and distinct. Gershon had nothing to do with the boards and pins, and Merari had nothing to do with the curtains or the coverings. Yet they were closely connected, for each depended on the other. "The boards and sockets" would not do without "the curtains," and the curtains would not do without the boards and sockets. And what about "the pins"? They look so unimportant. Yet who could measure their value in holding things together and keeping the whole visibly one?
Each frame stood upright in bases of silver. One writer reads the materials as a picture of believers:
The boards of the tabernacle speak of the basic facts of what believers are "in Christ," and of their union in one building, the Church of God. They were made of acacia wood overlaid with gold, standing upright on bases of silver. That is, believers are upheld on the basis of redemption, covered with Christ (the gold), and joined together with bars of the same materials. … So Merari's work stands for the ministry that unites believers to Christ and to one another, and that ministry rests on the redemption that is in Christ Jesus. Such ministry matters greatly in our own day.
The bars ran through golden rings to lock the separate frames into one wall. A second writer draws out what the ring adds:
The bars of acacia wood, covered with the same gold and fitted into golden rings on the boards, speak of special gifts given to hold everything in place. But those gifts need a matching openness in each believer before they can be used: the "bar" was of no use without the "ring."
Merari also cared for the pillars around the courtyard, with the pegs and ropes that held them steady. One writer reads them as a picture of public witness:
The pillars of the court rest on bronze bases, and their tops are covered with silver, while the fine linen curtains hang from them on silver hooks. So grace enables us to hold up the character of Christ before the world, and divine strength is what we rest on while we do it. The pins and cords come in as well, bracing everything against opposing forces that are too strong for us on our own.
A tent peg is the smallest thing on Merari's list. Yet the writers refuse to rank the items by size:
In the whole world there was nothing to compare with that boarded tent and all its symbolic furnishings. It was a holy dignity and privilege to touch the smallest pin of that wonderful tabernacle in the wilderness. It was far more glorious to be a Merarite looking after the pins of the tabernacle than to sit on the throne of Egypt or Assyria.
Merari means "bitterness" or "sorrow." Both writers tie the name to the work itself. One pictures the contrast between what Merari carried and where he set it up:
Could anything be more unlike than silver and barren sand? But Merari must not shrink back from all this. No — when he reached a spot in the desert where the cloud stopped, he said, "I have come to set up the patterns of things in heaven right in the middle of all the desolation and misery of the wilderness around." All this was very hard work. No doubt it gave Merari's character a tone of sadness or sorrow, and his very name expressed it, for it means "sorrow."
The other writer says why this work is rare, and what it asks of the worker:
His name — Merari, "bitterness" — speaks of the painful character of such service. Self-love breaks down under it, or runs off into some odd path that is easier on flesh and blood… Who cares for these boards and bars, and pillars and pins and cords? Who thinks of God's plan and pattern, and all the small details He has appointed?… It leaves no room for human invention to show itself. It calls only for plodding accuracy and diligent obedience.
- Redemption holds. Each frame stood upright in bases of silver: believers are "upheld on the basis of redemption."
- Gold holds. The wood was overlaid with gold: those same believers are "covered with Christ."
- Bars hold. Gifts lock the separate frames into one building, but a bar needs a ring — the gift needs a readiness to receive it.
- Pins hold. The smallest peg braces the whole against forces too strong for us alone. To touch it was a greater dignity than a throne.
- Sorrow is the cost of holding. Merari's name means bitterness. Setting up silver in barren sand gives self-love nothing. It calls only for "plodding accuracy and diligent obedience."
and the pillars of the court round about, and their bases, and their pegs, and their cords.
This verse ends the list of what Merari's family carried — no golden vessels, no curtains, just the fence around the court and the hardware that held it up. Why would God name tent pegs and ropes at all, and why give one family that work for life?
The tabernacle was God's tent at the centre of Israel's camp, and the Levites were the tribe who carried it. Merari's share was all structure: frames, bars, pillars, bases, pegs, cords. One writer sees a picture of the church in that framework.
Merari had charge with his sons of the boards, the sockets, pins and cords. These held the building together... The framework of the tabernacle joins the boards with bars of acacia wood. It is a picture of the building we read about in Ephesians — "the whole structure, being joined together" — the church. The work of Merari suggests the thought of union.
The court was the outer fence around God's tent, and the bases are the sockets its pillars stood in. Pegs in the ground held the cords that steadied them. One writer reads each material here as a picture of the Christian life.
The pillars of the court stand on copper sockets and carry silver tops. The fine linen curtains hang from them by silver hooks. So grace enables us to hold up before the world the character of Christ, and divine strength is what we rest on while we do it. The pins and cords come in further to brace it all against opposing forces that are too much for our unaided strength.
Commentators differ on who the pillars stand for. Another writer sees Christ in them.
The pillars of the court were made of copper and rested on copper sockets. They speak of Christ as the One who holds His people up. The hooks that held up the curtains were silver, the picture of redemption. So in holding His people up, He also unites them together. Merari's work therefore highlights the ministry that unites believers to Christ and to one another, resting on the redemption that is in Christ Jesus.
Merari's job began the moment the camp stopped. He had to set up God's dwelling on open desert ground. One writer applies that to anyone who takes a stand for Christ in the world.
Let anyone take his stand firmly in the world for Christ. Let him go into the places where "the world" is seen in its full force. Let him set himself, firm as a rock, against the deep and rapid tide of worldliness, and there let him begin to set up "the sockets of silver." Be sure of it: he will find such a course brings very much sorrow and bitterness of soul. He will find it a path where the cross is to be taken up "daily," and not only taken up, but carried... There are very few of the hard-working Merarite character to be found. Why is this? Simply because showing such a character will always cost nature very much labour and sorrow, and nature loves ease. So human nature never could be a Merarite. Nothing will make us true Merarites but deep communion with Him who was the Man of Sorrows.
A peg is the least impressive object in the whole list. What raises it is not the peg but what it belongs to.
Doing what we are told always has moral worth. But there was also a special dignity in the work of a Merarite, even though that work was only looking after a few "pins" or "sockets." Everything connected with the tabernacle was of the deepest interest and highest value... To touch the smallest pin of that wonderful tent in the wilderness was a holy dignity and privilege. It was far more glorious to be a Merarite looking after the pins than to hold the sceptre of Egypt or Assyria.
No Levite picked his own load. God handed each family its task.
Nothing is more important in practice than that each servant of God should know the work He has given him to do. And when he knows it, he should stick to it. Be sure of this too: it is of no small importance never to interfere with another's service. The Lord is sovereign in this. He divides according to His own will.
It is tempting to admire the sacred vessels and the curtains and write off the thankless part of the work. One writer imagines letting Merari's family go and keeping the other two.
Why not let this sad-faced Merarite go, with his pins and cords of the tabernacle always getting tangled, and be content with Kohath and Gershon? But if the Lord's tabernacle is to be set up in the wilderness, we must have the pins and cords.
- Union. Merari's frames, bars, pegs and cords held the building together — a picture of the church joined into one.
- Bracing. The pegs and cords existed to steady the pillars against forces stronger than they were on their own.
- Cost. Setting up God's dwelling out in the world is sorrowful, daily, cross-carrying work. That is why so few take it up.
- Dignity. The smallest peg belonged to God's own tent. Handling it outranked holding the sceptre of Egypt.
- Assignment. No Levite chose his load; know the work given you, stick to it, and never interfere with another's.
And those who encamped before the tabernacle eastward, before the tent of meeting toward the sunrising, were Moses, and Aaron and his sons, who kept the charge of the sanctuary for the charge of the children of Israel; and the stranger that cometh near shall be put to death.
Numbers 3 gives each Levite family its post around God's tent. This verse fills the last side of that inner square — Moses, Aaron and his sons at the front, facing the entrance — and it raises two questions: why the east, and why an outsider who came near had to die.
The camp formed rings. Twelve tribes made the outer square. The Levite families closed three sides of an inner square, and this verse supplies the fourth.
To complete the inner circle of residents around the tabernacle, Moses, Aaron and his sons take the east side (v.38). That is the front. They guard, as it were, the entrance of the court, keeping charge of the sanctuary. Any outsider who trespassed on what belonged to the priests was to be put to death.
They did not choose their spot. It faced the one way in to God.
Three tribes on each side of the court kept the tabernacle of Jehovah. Levi alone was the exception, to be consecrated to the service of God. So the tribe of Levi camped by families right around the court. Moses, Aaron, and the priests took the place facing the entrance, the way of approach to God.
God fixed each family's place and each family's work.
Levi had three sons, Gershon, Kohath and Merari, and each of them became the head of a section of the tribe. God gave each section a special service connected with the tabernacle, and each pitched its tents in a set position round the tabernacle. They arranged nothing for themselves.
The care behind these details had a purpose.
All was laid down with the greatest possible care. God would rule out confusion in the service of the tabernacle, and rule out any room for human will. He would make it the humblest thing on earth — a matter of simple obedience.
Their front position set the priests beside one particular tribe.
At the front are Moses and the priestly family of Aaron, so they stand in direct relationship with the tribe of Judah. Priesthood and praise go together. Levi takes the place of the firstborn of all the tribes spared in Egypt. They are "joined" to the priesthood as a connecting link between worship and warfare.
Later builders copied this east-facing layout.
In putting up their religious buildings (cathedrals and the like) men have copied the position. But true priestly instincts will always hold the sunrise in their affections (Numbers 3:38).
Where a tent stood in that camp said something about it.
Facing the east, the tents of Moses and Aaron guard the entrance to the court of the tabernacle. (Num. 3:38.) … Here, again, the eastward position is that of honour.
Later, Israel said that anyone who came near the tabernacle would die. One writer shows what that fear cost them.
They said that anyone who came near the tabernacle would die, and the result is that they are forbidden to come near. From then on the people of Israel must not "come near the tent of meeting, lest they bear sin and die" (Numbers 18:22). Their unbelief and mistrust of God does more damage to their standing before God than their earlier presumption did. They are brought down to the level of the outsider. "Any outsider who came near was to be put to death." Now Israel can come no nearer than the outsider; that privilege is lost.
These men stood in for Israel's firstborn, who were spared in Egypt on the night of judgment.
The grace of God had exempted those whom the Levites answered for in the time of judgment. So the Levites were identified with mercy — the great distinguishing mercy that rescued Israel from the doom of Egypt. That fitted them all the better for the service of the sanctuary. Who can dare to take up the service of God without knowing that God has accepted him on the ground of redemption? Salvation precedes ministry.
- Redeemed. Mercy spared Israel's firstborn in Egypt, and the Levites stood in their place — salvation comes before service.
- Assigned. Every family's tent and task was fixed by God, leaving no room for human will and making the work "a matter of simple obedience."
- Front. Moses, Aaron and his sons filled the east side, facing the one way of approach to God.
- Guarded. Their charge protected the way in; an outsider who pushed past it forfeited his life.
- Facing the dawn. The place of honour looked toward the sunrise, and true priestly instinct still keeps that direction in view.
All that were numbered of the Levites, whom Moses and Aaron numbered at the commandment of Jehovah, according to their families, all the males from a month old and upward, were twenty-two thousand.
Numbers 3 ends its count of Levi with one figure: 22,000 males. That is the size of the company God took for Himself in place of Israel's firstborn — and, as the next verses show, it falls short.
Levi stands apart in the count because God claimed this tribe for Himself. The reason goes back to a night in Egypt:
Verse 12 of Numbers 3 unveils the secret behind the special place of the Levites: God chose them "instead of all the firstborn." In Egypt, God had spared the firstborn of the Israelites because of the blood of the Passover lamb. This was the price by which the firstborn had been redeemed. As a result they belonged to God. Now, this is the place God gave the Levites: He chose them instead of all the firstborn. A Levite would therefore regard himself as redeemed by God and so as God's possession.
Chapter 1 counted fighting men from twenty years old. For Levi the line falls at one month, and the substitution explains why:
The difference between the numbering of the tribe of Levi and the other tribes must be noted. The previous chapter counted men who were twenty years old and over. The count of Levi took in "every male from a month old and upward." This difference was because they stood in the place of the firstborn. The firstborn were either redeemed or given up at that tender age of weakness and helplessness.
Infants could carry nothing. That is part of the point:
They are numbered from a month old and upward, as the firstborn are, and for the same reason. If only men in their strength were to be redeemed or numbered, would it not look as if God took "pleasure in the legs of a man"? But it is the soul He values, and the soul of an infant is precious in His sight: His "delight" is "in the sons of men."
Add up the three clan figures earlier in the chapter and the sums do not agree. Commentators admit it:
The number of the Levites is given as 22,000. If we add the number of the Gershonites, Kohathites and Merarites — 7,500, 8,600 and 6,200 — we get 22,300. Here is a difficulty which seems to remain unsolved. The total in verse 39 must be correct. Verse 46 tells us that the firstborn outnumbered the Levites by 273.
The Levites were counted to replace the firstborn. The two numbers did not match:
Then the day came to count the Levites (remember, they were replacing the firstborn). As it turned out, there were 22,000 Levites, but there were 22,273 firstborn. In other words, the Levites were short of 273 people. A coincidence? A negligible difference? Hardly. God notes the difference and commands a ransom to be paid for the 273 missing Levites.
Silver covered the gap, and the silver carries a lesson:
To make up this difference, the Lord said the 273 would be redeemed by paying five shekels of silver for each person. It is not likely that 273 people each had to give five shekels. More likely the tribes shared the cost of redeeming the 273. This was to be given to the priests, Aaron and his sons, since the Levites were also given to them. Silver was used in such cases to illustrate the truth of redemption. But we must always remember that today "you were ransomed… not with perishable things such as silver or gold… but with the precious blood of Christ" (1 Peter 1:18-19).
The shortage never went away:
Over the course of history, the lack of Levites became more pronounced. In the time of Ezra and Nehemiah, Levites were scarce. We find just 74 in Ezra 2, and when, in chapter 8, Ezra sends eleven men to search for Levites, they find only 38. Today, there is still a search for Levites: people willing to carry the burden that goes with God's testimony.
Commentators read the Levites as a picture of service, and the priests as a picture of drawing near to God:
In Numbers 3 we have the Levites set apart, according to the thoughts of God, for service. They are a figure of the church — or rather of the members of the church in their service. In the same way, the priests are the figure of Christians drawing near to the throne of God. Both are a shadow, not a perfect image.
- Redeemed — the Levites stand where the firstborn stood. The blood of the lamb spared those firstborn in Egypt, so they belonged to God.
- Counted — from a month old, not twenty, because God values the soul, not the strength of a man's legs.
- Short — 22,000 Levites against 22,273 firstborn. God notices the 273 and asks a ransom of five shekels each, shared by the tribes.
- Unsolved — the clan totals add up to 22,300. Commentators admit the gap with verse 39 is still a difficulty.
- Wanted — few then, fewer in Ezra's day, and still sought now: those willing to carry the burden of God's testimony.
And Jehovah said to Moses, Number all the first-born males of the children of Israel from a month old and upward, and take the number of their names.
Moses has just counted the tribe of Levi; now God has him count the firstborn sons of every other tribe, name by name, from a month old. Why does God count people at all, and why does He want one tribe standing in for the eldest sons of the rest?
A census is an act of ownership.
He had the right to take their number, for they were all His own. If He had no right to them, if He had nothing to look for in them, He would not have counted their total. Scripture says the same about His divine title in another part of His realm: "He determines the number of the stars; He gives to all of them their names." This is the expression of His sovereignty among the heavenly hosts. (Psalm 147:4.)
God has a specific reason for this count. He is making a swap, and He wants exact numbers on both sides.
The Levites were to be dedicated to the Lord in place of the firstborn in Israel. So it was necessary to find out how closely the number of the Levites matched the number of the firstborn. That is why the Lord told Moses to number all the firstborn males, from one month and above, just as Moses had numbered the Levite males (v.40).
God's claim on the firstborn did not come out of nowhere. It rests on a rescue He paid for.
If God redeems through sacrifice and judgment, He claims those whom He redeems... So every firstborn son in Israel was bought with a price — the price of the blood of the Passover Lamb, a picture of the precious blood of Christ.
The Levites stood in for people God had already spared. One writer asks what that means for anyone who wants to serve God.
God's grace had spared the firstborn whom the Levites stood for when judgment fell. This tied the Levites to mercy — the great, distinguishing mercy that rescued Israel from the doom of Egypt. It fitted them all the better for the service of the sanctuary. Who dares to take up the service of God without knowing that God has accepted him on the ground of redemption? Salvation comes before ministry, if we listen to God and fear the solemn warning of the Lord and His apostle.
Moses counted Israel's fighting men from twenty years upward. Here the line falls at one month.
In the previous chapter Moses numbered those who were twenty years old and over. But the Levites were numbered "every male from a month old and upward." The difference was that they stood in the place of the firstborn. At that tender age of weakness and helplessness, the firstborn were either redeemed or given up.
The same age limit shows what God values in those He counts.
They are numbered from a month old and upward, as the firstborn are, and for the same reason. If only men in their strength were to be redeemed or numbered, would it not look as if God took "pleasure in the legs of a man"? (Ps. 147:10.) But it is the soul He values, and the soul of an infant is precious in His sight.
The two figures did not match. The gap was small enough to ignore.
As it turned out, there were 22,000 Levites, but there were 22,273 firstborn (Num. 3:39-42). In other words, the Levites were short by 273 people. A coincidence? A negligible difference? Hardly. God notes the difference and commands a ransom to be paid for the 273 missing Levites (v. 46, 47).
The shortage did not stop there. It became a pattern in Israel's later history.
Over the course of history, the shortage of Levites grew worse. In the time of Ezra and Nehemiah, Levites were scarce... Today the search for Levites goes on: people willing to carry the burden that goes with God's testimony.
- Claimed. God's claim on the firstborn dates from the night in Egypt; those He redeems by blood, He owns.
- Counted. He numbers what is His own — the count itself is the proof of the title, as He numbers and names the stars.
- Valued. God counts from a month old, not from fighting age. He is not measuring strength; He values the soul.
- Substituted. The Levites are taken in place of the firstborn, and the swap is exact to the last 273, who are redeemed by a price.
- Serving. Mercy is what fits a person for service — salvation first, ministry after. And the search for willing Levites has never closed.
And thou shalt take the Levites for me (I am Jehovah) instead of all the firstborn among the children of Israel; and the cattle of the Levites, instead of all the firstlings among the cattle of the children of Israel.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And Moses numbered, as Jehovah had commanded him, all the firstborn among the children of Israel.
Numbers 3 ends with an unusual census: not soldiers, but the firstborn son of every family in Israel, counted one by one against the tribe of Levi. Why does God claim these sons, and what happens when the numbers do not match?
The claim goes back to the night Israel left Egypt. Death passed over every house marked with the blood of a lamb.
Verse 12 of Numbers 3 reveals the secret behind the special place of the Levites: God chose them "instead of all the firstborn." In Egypt, God had spared the firstborn of the Israelites because of the blood of the Passover lamb. That blood was the price that redeemed them. So they belonged to God.
So the claim does not rest on being a creature. It rests on being sheltered — and one writer carries that on to Christians today.
Of course, every creature ought to serve God. But He made this claim only on those whom He had sheltered from judgment. Generation after generation were to learn that claim and the ground it rests on (Exodus 13:14-16)... Christians, as we learn in Hebrews 12:23, are the assembly of firstborn ones... sheltered from divine judgment, like the firstborn males of Israel, we should accept His claim on us to serve Him. It is His claim, and there is no doubt about that. Yet seen in another light, we can and should call it a privilege — the privilege of serving our God, as the Levites did.
The count exists because God is making a swap. He takes the whole tribe of Levi in place of the firstborn sons of the other tribes.
Jehovah took them instead of the firstborn sons of the whole nation. The blood in Egypt had sheltered those firstborn sons from judgment, and Jehovah claimed them as His own. But He took the tribe of Levi instead of them for special service in His house and for His Name. They were a privileged people, called to give themselves to God's interests, and He gave them special care (Numbers 3:40-51 tells us all about this).
The line here falls at a month old, so babies are in the list. That choice carries its own message.
They are numbered from a month old and upward, as the firstborn are, and for the same reason. If only men in their strength were to be redeemed or numbered, would it not appear as if God took "pleasure in the legs of a man"? (Ps. 147:10.) But it is the soul He values, and the soul of an infant is precious in His sight: His "delight" is "in the sons of men."
A census can look like cold bookkeeping. In Numbers it says something about who owns the people being counted.
This was an expression of His rights as Lord of Israel. He had title to take their number, for they were all His own. If He had no right to them, and no plans for them, He would not have counted their total. The same is said of His divine title in another part of His realm: "He determines the number of the stars; He gives to all of them their names."
Moses' total came to 273 more firstborn sons than there were Levites. God did not waive the extra ones.
When the census was taken, the number of the firstborn in Israel exceeded the number of the Levites by 273. God claimed these 273 just as much as the 22,000 who had a Levite as a substitute. So five shekels each had to be paid for them as redemption money... Our chapter again stresses the principle that redemption comes before the service of God.
That silver carries a meaning, but it is only a picture.
It is not likely that 273 people each had to give five shekels. More likely the tribes shared the cost of redeeming the 273... Silver in such cases pictures the truth of redemption. But we must always remember that today we are "ransomed... not with perishable things such as silver or gold, but with the precious blood of Christ" (1 Peter 1:18-19).
- Blood — God's claim goes back to the night He sheltered them from judgment in Egypt. Blood was the price, so they were His.
- Exchange — He took the tribe of Levi instead of those sons, for the work of His house. They were a privileged people, called to His interests and cared for by Him.
- Every soul — The count starts at a month old, because it is the soul God values, and the soul of an infant is precious to Him.
- Title — He numbers because He owns; the God who counts the stars and names them counts His people too.
- Shortfall — God still claimed the 273 who had no Levite substitute. Silver redeemed them — a picture of the precious blood of Christ. Redemption always comes before service.
And all the firstborn males, by the number of the names, from a month old and upward, according to their numbering, were twenty-two thousand two hundred and seventy-three.
God ordered this census for one purpose. He was taking the tribe of Levi in place of the firstborn sons of Israel, and the two lists had to match man for man. The totals do not quite match, and what God does about that small gap is where the meaning lies.
The two lists almost matched. One commentator works through the numbers and the gap:
The count of Levite males came to 22,000 (v.39). Now the number of the firstborn was very close to the same, but 273 larger than the number of the Levites (v.43). To make up this difference, the Lord set a redemption price of five shekels of silver for each of the 273 (vv.46-47). It is not likely that 273 people were each required to give five shekels, but rather that the tribes should share the cost of redeeming the 273. The money went to the priests, Aaron and his sons, since God had given the Levites to them too. In such cases silver illustrated the truth of redemption. But we must always remember that today we are not ransomed "with perishable things such as silver or gold, but with the precious blood of Christ" (1 Peter 1:18-19).
God counted the firstborn "from a month old and upward" — the same age as the Levites. One writer sees a reason for counting infants:
They are numbered from a month old and upward, as the firstborn are, and for the same reason. If only men in their strength were to be redeemed or numbered, would it not appear as if God took "pleasure in the legs of a man"? (Ps. 147:10.) But it is the soul He values, and the soul of an infant is precious in His sight.
Another writer sees God's eye on a servant long before the service begins:
When counting the people, the normal threshold was 20 years (Num. 1:3). The Levites were an exception. Everyone was counted, almost from birth (from a month old – Num. 3:15). Does this detail not show that God takes notice of everyone He intends to use in His service, even from the earliest age? Paul tells us that God had "separated him", and not only from the time of his conversion but "from his mother's womb".
No Levite could be found for the extra 273. God claimed them all the same:
When the census was taken, the number of the firstborn in Israel exceeded the number of the Levites by 273. These God claimed equally with the 22,000 for whom a Levite was found as a substitute, and so five shekels apiece had to be paid for these as redemption money. According to Exodus 13 the firstborn were to be redeemed at their birth. Our chapter again stresses the principle that redemption comes before the service of God. Did the Levites during Israel's history realize that God brought them into His service only as redeemed people? That may be open to question. But we should not miss the fact pictured here.
The claim goes back to the night in Egypt. One writer names the price paid then, and what it means for us now:
All the firstborn among the children of Israel were bought with a price, the price of the blood of the Passover Lamb, a picture of the precious blood of Christ. The basis of the Lord's claim upon the Levites was the destruction of the firstborn of Egypt. If God redeems through sacrifice and judgment, He claims those whom He redeems. Now all these things were pictures, written for our instruction. They show that we belong to the Lord, on the ground of redemption, as completely as the Levites did. We are not speaking here of gifts, or of those called out for service in a special and extraordinary way, but of all Christians. All alike have been redeemed, bought with a price, and are therefore the Lord's servants.
The shortfall is small — barely one percent — yet the record preserves it. One writer refuses to treat it as a rounding error:
As it turned out, there were 22,000 Levites, but there were 22,273 firstborn (Num. 3:39-42). In other words, the Levites were short of 273 people. A coincidence? A negligible difference? Hardly. God notes the difference and commands a ransom be paid for the 273 missing Levites.
The same writer traces that shortage forward into Israel's later history, where those willing to serve grew fewer still:
Over the course of history, the lack of Levites became more pronounced. In the time of Ezra and Nehemiah, Levites were scarce. We find just 74 in Ezra 2, and when, in chapter 8, Ezra sends 11 men to search for Levites, they find only 38. Today, Levites are still being looked for: those who are willing to bear the burden connected with God's testimony.
- Claimed. The firstborn belonged to God. The Passover blood had spared them in Egypt, and God claims those He redeems.
- Counted. God counted them from a month old, not from fighting age. He values the soul, and He notices His servants from the earliest age.
- Short. The Levites fell 273 people short of the firstborn, and God refused to let that small gap pass unnoticed.
- Ransomed. Five shekels each covered the gap, paid to the priests. Redemption always comes before service.
- Wanted. Levites grew scarcer through Israel's history. The search for those willing to carry God's work has never ended.
And Jehovah spoke to Moses, saying,
The count is finished, and the numbers do not match: Israel has more firstborn sons than Levites to stand in their place. God speaks to Moses again to settle it, and He shows both why He claims Israel's firstborn and what it costs to make that claim exact.
The exchange God commands here is not a matter of convenience. It reaches back to the night in Egypt. Blood spared Israel's firstborn, and God kept what He had saved.
The Lord took them in a very special way as the formal substitute for the firstborn of Israel, who were spared when the destroying angel struck Egypt. They were redeemed by blood, and they plainly belonged to the Lord. In place of Israel's firstborn He accepted the Levites. "They shall be Mine." ... So the Levites were linked with mercy — the great mercy that marked Israel out and rescued them from the doom of Egypt. That link fitted them all the better to serve in the sanctuary.
God does not accept a rough match. The tribe of Levi covers the firstborn as far as it goes. Every man past that number must still be redeemed.
The substitution was made so solemnly and so exactly that the 273 firstborn of Israel who were more than the number of the Levites all had to be redeemed. The price was God's own estimate of their value. Now all these things were pictures, and they are written to teach us that we belong to the Lord, on the ground of redemption, as fully as the Levites did.
Silver covers the shortfall, at a fixed rate, and it goes to the priests. One writer thinks the tribes carried that cost, not the 273 men themselves.
To make up this difference, the Lord commanded that the 273 be redeemed at five shekels of silver each. Probably the 273 men did not each pay five shekels themselves. Instead, the tribes shared the cost of redeeming them. The money went to the priests, Aaron and his sons, because the Levites were also given to them. The total came to 1,365 shekels.
Money could settle this case. But silver was only a picture of a better price.
Their fathers had been redeemed with silver and gold. That was a picture of redemption, carried out under Jewish law. Sometimes actual money was paid, as in Exodus 30:11-16 and Numbers 3:44-51. Sometimes it was by sacrifice, as in Exodus 13:13-15. Even then silver and gold came into it, because money was needed to buy the animal for the sacrifice. Silver and gold are the least corruptible of metals, yet they are corruptible. The price of our redemption was incorruptible and precious.
The order matters, and one writer presses it home as a question.
Who can dare to take up the service of God without knowing that God has accepted him on the ground of redemption? Salvation comes before ministry, if we listen to God and take to heart the solemn warning of the Lord and His apostle (Matthew 7:22; 1 Corinthians 9:27).
Commentators see the Levites as a picture of believers today: claimed by God, then given over to serve.
The Levites were to be offered to God in place of the firstborn. God took all the firstborn to Himself when He struck down the firstborn of the Egyptians. The firstborn outnumbered the Levites, so the rest were redeemed. This is a picture of the saints seen as firstborn ones, and as redeemed. They are wholly claimed as God's, and given to Aaron (that is, to Christ), to serve in God's house. He is set as Lord over that house.
The writer quoted earlier is careful about who this covers.
In saying this, we are not speaking of "gifts," or of those called out for service in a special and extraordinary way. We are speaking of all Christians. All alike have been redeemed, bought with a price, and are therefore the Lord's servants.
One writer follows that shortfall of 273 forward, and finds the shortage never ended.
God notices the difference and commands that a ransom be paid for the 273 missing Levites. ... As history went on, the lack of Levites grew worse. In the days of Ezra and Nehemiah, Levites were scarce. Only 74 are listed in Ezra 2, and when Ezra sends eleven men to look for Levites in chapter 8, they find only 38. Today, Levites are still being looked for: those willing to bear the burden connected with God's testimony.
- Claimed. God's right to the firstborn dates from the night He spared them in Egypt; the blood that saved them also bought them.
- Counted. The swap is exact — one Levite for one firstborn, and every extra man is written down.
- Covered. The 273 left over cost five shekels each — 1,365 shekels, paid to Aaron and his sons.
- Costly. Silver settled the picture; the real price behind it cannot decay.
- Consecrated. Redemption comes first, service follows — the Levites belonged to God before they served, and so do His people.
Take the Levites instead of all the firstborn among the children of Israel, and the cattle of the Levites instead of their cattle; and the Levites shall be mine I am Jehovah.
On the night God passed through Egypt, He claimed every firstborn son of Israel, and here He names the exchange that settles the claim: a whole tribe taken in their place, animals and all. Why does God accept a substitute, and what does it mean to belong to Him?
The claim behind this verse reaches back to the night the destroying angel passed through Egypt.
The LORD took them in a very special way as the formal substitute for Israel's firstborn, who were spared when the destroying angel struck Egypt. Blood had redeemed them, and they were counted, beyond all doubt, as belonging to the LORD. In place of Israel's firstborn He accepted the Levites. "They shall be mine." So they stand as the lasting witness that the firstborn belong to the LORD, from man as well as from beast. In the day of judgment God's grace had spared the very ones they match. The Levites are therefore tied to mercy — the great mercy that set Israel apart and rescued them from the doom of Egypt. That fitted them all the better to serve in the sanctuary.
The exchange is not symbolic or approximate. It is counted out, and it includes the animals.
Since the Levites were to be dedicated to the Lord in place of the firstborn in Israel, it was necessary to ask how closely the number of the Levites matched the number of the firstborn. So the Lord told Moses to number all the firstborn males, from one month old and upward, as the Levite males had been numbered (v. 40). Verse 41 also notes that the livestock of the Levites would take the place of the firstborn livestock of the other tribes, though we are not told that the livestock were numbered.
Normally a firstborn son was bought back with money. What happens here stands outside that pattern.
The normal method, and the one that was to hold good for all time, was a money payment of five shekels to the priest (Num. 18:16). There was one exception, and only on one occasion. It is the one before us now. We call it an exception because this transaction was never repeated, though it held good for ever. The tribe of Levi was taken instead of the firstborn males of the twelve tribes, as far as man could be exchanged for man. The extra firstborn among the people of Israel were then redeemed by five shekels each, according to the shekel of the sanctuary, which was fixed at twenty gerahs.
It is easy to read this exchange as though the Levites absorbed a punishment.
The redemption we are speaking of here was in no sense a redemption from judgment. People have too often confused the two. There is a redemption from divine judgment, and every child of God shares in it. That is provided by the blood of Christ (Eph. 1:7; Col. 1:14). Now the redemption of the firstborn males was in no way like that. This will be clear to the simplest reader if he notices two things. The clean animal could not be redeemed at all. And the males of Israel were redeemed at the outset, when the Levites were taken in their place, as far as that could be done. Were the Levites chosen to bear divine punishment instead of the firstborn males of the twelve tribes? No. They were taken to minister to Aaron.
The count did not come out even.
When the census was taken, the number of the firstborn in Israel was 273 more than the number of the Levites. God claimed these 273 just as much as the 22,000 who each had a Levite as a substitute. So five shekels had to be paid for each of them as redemption money. According to Exodus 13 the firstborn were to be redeemed at their birth. Our chapter stresses again the principle that redemption comes before the service of God.
What made the Levites servants was whose they were.
Here is the true character of service — "first gave themselves to God," then God employs them… The service of the Levites was entirely the result of their being the Lord's. "The Levites shall be mine." For as it is written, "you are not your own, for you were bought with a price." It is a blessed thing to say, "My beloved is mine." But it is greater progress and a deeper joy to say, "I am His."
The firstborn son and the Levite who replaced him together sketch two sides of one life.
The firstborn, seen this way, has a double history from his redemption onward, and so do we. First he dies in his substitute, then he lives as a servant in the Levite… So the Israelite father might say, "My son has died in that lamb." That history ends there. But even so, "I live." Now we have a new life — "Christ who lives in me." At this point we have the Levite before us: saved from death, but devoted to God.
- Mine by blood. God's claim goes back to the night He spared Israel's firstborn. Blood redeemed them, and He counted them as His.
- Mine by exchange. God takes a whole tribe, man for man and cattle for cattle — a transaction never repeated, yet holding good for ever.
- Mine, down to the last 273. God overlooks no one. Five shekels are paid for each of the 273 extra, because redemption comes before service.
- Mine, but not punished. This is not redemption out of judgment. The Levites were taken to serve Aaron, not to bear a penalty.
- Mine, therefore Yours to use. Service follows ownership. The firstborn died in his substitute and lived on in the Levite, and the redeemed can say, "I am His."
And for those that are to be ransomed, the two hundred and seventy-three of the firstborn of the children of Israel, which are in excess over the Levites,
In this chapter God counts the tribe of Levi alongside the firstborn sons of Israel, man for man. The firstborn outnumber the Levites by 273. This verse deals with that surplus. Why did God claim the firstborn at all? And what does a payment of silver settle that a substitute could not?
Why did God own these firstborn sons at all? It goes back to Egypt, where the blood of the Passover lamb spared their lives.
First, notice that the basis of the Lord's claim on the Levites was the destruction of the firstborn of Egypt. If God redeems through sacrifice and judgment, He claims those He redeems... So all the firstborn among the children of Israel were bought with a price — the price of the blood of the Passover Lamb, a picture of the precious blood of Christ.
Paying five shekels for a firstborn son was the standing rule in Israel. What happens here is different — a swap of one whole tribe for a nation's firstborn, done once and never repeated.
The normal method, as we would call it, and the one that was to hold good for all time, was a money payment of five shekels to the priest (Num. 18:16). There was one exception to this, and only on one occasion. That is what we are looking at now. We call it an exception because it was a transaction that was never repeated, though it held good for ever. The tribe of Levi was taken instead of the firstborn males of the twelve tribes, as far as man for man such an exchange could be made.
273 out of more than twenty-two thousand is a rounding error by any human accounting. God stops and legislates for it.
As it turned out, there were 22,000 Levites, but there were 22,273 firstborn (Num. 3:39-42). In other words, the Levites were short of 273 people. A coincidence? A negligible difference? Hardly. God notes the difference and commands a ransom be paid for the 273 missing Levites.
Who paid the money is worth asking.
It is not likely that 273 people each had to give five shekels. More likely the tribes shared the cost of redeeming the 273. The money went to the priests, Aaron and his sons, since the Levites were given to them too. The total came to 1365 shekels.
The next verse fixes the price "according to the shekel of the sanctuary," twenty gerahs to the shekel — God's own weight, not the market's.
The word comes from a root meaning to weigh — at first, perhaps, to balance. It is what forms a true estimate of the value of things. The shekel of the sanctuary, or sacred shekel, may have been heavier than the usual one... One thing we know: the shekel of the King of kings would be just and unchanging.
It is easy to read this payment as buying a child out of condemnation. One writer argues that it is not that at all.
So the redemption we are speaking of here was in no sense redemption from judgment, though the two have too often been confused. There is a redemption from divine judgment, and every child of God shares in it. The blood of Christ provides that... This will be clear to the simplest reader if he notices two things: the clean animal could not be redeemed at all, and the males of Israel were redeemed at the outset when the Levites were taken in their place... Were the Levites chosen to bear divine punishment instead of the firstborn males of the twelve tribes? No. They were taken to serve Aaron.
The silver went to the priests, and where it went carries the lesson.
The redemption money was handed to Aaron for the service of God, showing that it met His claims on the redeemed. Let us never forget that as redeemed people we belong to God. On that fact rests the life of service to His Name, to which we are committed.
Commentators read the Levites as a picture of Christians for this reason.
Each Levite stood for a firstborn man in Israel. The eldest sons who were more than the number of that tribe were redeemed for five shekels of silver each. So the Levites were, in a special way, a redeemed company. Clearly they picture Christians, both in our redemption and in the claim God has on us for service as redeemed people.
- Claimed — God owned Israel's firstborn because the blood of the lamb spared them in Egypt. Redemption is what creates His claim.
- Exchanged — God took the Levites in their place, man for man. The swap was never repeated, yet it held good for ever.
- Counted — The extra 273 were too few for a statistician to notice, and too many for God to ignore. Each cost five shekels.
- Weighed — The sanctuary shekel set the price, twenty gerahs — God's estimate of value, not the market's.
- Given — The money went to Aaron and his sons. The redeemed belong to God, and they are redeemed into His service. Commentators add that this payment was not a ransom from judgment. That redemption comes by the blood of Christ, not by silver.
thou shalt take five shekels apiece by the poll, according to the shekel of the sanctuary shalt thou take them, -- twenty gerahs the shekel;
Numbers 3 ends with an arithmetic problem that God Himself solves. God had taken the tribe of Levi in place of Israel's firstborn sons, but 273 firstborn were left over. This verse sets their price: five shekels each, weighed by the sanctuary standard of twenty gerahs.
The count left a shortfall, and silver settled it. One writer walks through the figures and names who paid and who received.
The count of the Levite males came to 22,000 (v. 39). Now the number of the firstborn was very close to the same, but 273 larger than the number of the Levites (v. 43). To make up this difference, the Lord told them to redeem the 273 by paying five shekels of silver for each person (vv. 46-47). It is not likely that each of the 273 paid five shekels himself; more likely the tribes shared the cost of redeeming them. The money went to the priests, Aaron and his sons, since the Levites were also given to them. The total amounted to 1,365 shekels.
A gap of 273 could look too small to bother with. God did not treat it that way.
When the Levites were counted, there were 22,000 of them, but there were 22,273 firstborn (Num. 3:39-42). In other words, the Levites were short of 273 people. A coincidence? A negligible difference? Hardly. God notes the difference and commands a ransom be paid for the 273 missing Levites (v. 46, 47).
The same writer traces that shortage forward through Israel's history.
Over the course of history, the lack of Levites became more pronounced. In the time of Ezra and Nehemiah, Levites were scarce. We find just 74 in Ezra 2, and when, in chapter 8, Ezra sends 11 men to search for Levites, they find only 38. Today, there is still a search for Levites: those who are willing to bear the burden connected with God's testimony.
The verse names which shekel to use, and defines it. Everyday trade in Israel may have used another weight.
The Old Testament mentions two shekels. One goes by "the king's weight," and was probably the standard shekel used for all ordinary business (Ex. 38:29; Joshua 7:21; 2 Sam. 14:26; Amos 8:5). The other is called the "shekel of the sanctuary," and of it we read, "the shekel is 20 gerahs" (Ex. 30:13; Lev. 27:25; Num. 3:47; Num. 18:16). This implies perhaps that the common shekel was different.
Convenience had no say in the matter. The standard came from God's house.
One more law held firm through all these dealings. "And all your valuations shall be according to the shekel of the sanctuary: twenty gerahs shall be the shekel." Israel might wish to pay with whatever coin was most convenient in their dealings with the nations. But as in relation to the temple service and their redemption price, so here they must make their payments "according to the shekel of the sanctuary."
The payment is not an afterthought tacked onto a census.
God claimed these 273 extra firstborn just as much as the 22,000 for whom a Levite stood in as a substitute, and so the people had to pay five shekels apiece for them as redemption money. According to Exodus 13 the firstborn were to be redeemed at their birth. Our chapter again stresses the principle that redemption comes first and service follows.
One writer presses a careful distinction here about what this money did and did not buy.
The redemption we are speaking of here was in no way redemption from judgment, though people have too often confused the two. There is a redemption from divine judgment, and every child of God shares in it. That is provided by the blood of Christ (Eph. 1:7; Col. 1:14). The redemption of the firstborn males was nothing like that. … Were the Levites chosen to bear divine punishment instead of the firstborn males of the twelve tribes? No. They were taken to minister to Aaron.
Silver was a picture, and pictures have limits.
They knew, and so do we, that we are redeemed with the precious blood of Christ. Their fathers had been redeemed with silver and gold — a redemption under Jewish law that pictured something greater. Sometimes they paid actual money, as in Exodus 30:11-16 and Numbers 3:44-51. … Silver and gold are the least corruptible of metals, yet they are corruptible. The price of our redemption was incorruptible and precious.
- Counted — 22,000 Levites stood in for 22,273 firstborn. God counted the 273 short rather than passing over them.
- Ransomed — five shekels covered each of the 273 left over, 1,365 shekels in all, paid to Aaron and his sons. The tribes likely shared the cost.
- Weighed — the price used the sanctuary shekel of twenty gerahs, not whatever coin was handiest in trade.
- Claimed — redemption came first, service after. The Levites were taken to minister to Aaron, not to bear punishment.
- Surpassed — silver pictured redemption, but silver corrupts. The price paid for believers was incorruptible and precious.
and thou shalt give the money unto Aaron and unto his sons for those in excess among them who are to be ransomed.
The count of Levi came up 273 short of the firstborn sons of Israel, and God required a payment for every extra son. This verse names the price and the hands it went into, raising three questions: why silver, why Aaron, and what the arrangement says about belonging to God.
Levi had been taken in exchange for the firstborn of the whole nation, man for man, as far as the numbers would stretch. They did not stretch far enough.
The Levite males numbered 22,000 (v.39). The number of the firstborn was very close to the same, but 273 larger than the number of the Levites (v.43). To make up this difference, the Lord instructed that the 273 be redeemed by paying five shekels of silver for each one (vs.46-47). It is not likely that 273 men each had to give five shekels. More likely the tribes shared the cost of redeeming the 273. This money went to the priests, Aaron and his sons, since the Levites too were given to them.
The money is weighed out "according to the shekel of the sanctuary." One writer explains what that standard was.
The word comes from a root meaning to weigh, and perhaps at first to balance. It is what forms a true estimate of the value of things. The shekel of the sanctuary, or sacred shekel, may have weighed more than the usual one... One thing we know: the shekel of the King of kings would be just and never changing, for "unequal weights and unequal measures are both alike an abomination to the LORD" (Prov. 20:10). This shekel was divided into twenty gerahs.
A five-shekel payment was the standing rule for firstborn sons. The exchange with Levi was the one-off exception:
The normal method, as we would call it, and the one that was to hold good for all time, was a money payment of five shekels to the priest (Num. 18:16). To this there was an exception, but only on one occasion... We call it an exception because it was a transaction that was never repeated, though it held good forever. The tribe of Levi was taken instead of the firstborn males of the twelve tribes, as far as man for man there could be such an exchange.
The silver went to the priest. Where it went says something about who the redeemed now belong to.
Aaron received the redemption money for the service of God, which showed that it met His claims on the redeemed. Let us never forget that as redeemed people we belong to God. That fact is the basis of the life of service to His Name that we are committed to.
It is easy to read "redemption price" as a payment that turns away punishment. One writer says this is not what happens here, and gives two reasons from the text.
The redemption we are speaking of here was in no sense redemption from judgment, though people have too often confused the two. There is a redemption from divine judgment, and every child of God shares in it. The blood of Christ provides that (Eph. 1:7; Col. 1:14). The redemption of the firstborn males was nothing like that. This will be clear to the simplest reader if he notes two things. The clean animal could not be redeemed at all. And the males of Israel were redeemed at the start by the Levites being taken in their place, as far as that could be done. Were the Levites chosen to bear divine punishment instead of the firstborn males of the twelve tribes? No. They were taken to serve Aaron.
One writer reads Aaron here as standing for Christ, and the whole arrangement as a picture of believers.
The Levites were to be offered to God in place of the firstborn, all of whom God took to Himself when He struck the firstborn of the Egyptians. Since the firstborn outnumbered the Levites, the rest were redeemed. This is a picture of the saints seen as firstborn ones and as redeemed. They are wholly claimed as God's and given to Aaron (that is, to Christ), to serve in God's house, over which He is set as Lord.
Silver could settle the account for 273 boys in the desert. It could never settle more than that.
They knew, and so do we, that we are redeemed with the precious blood of Christ. Their fathers had been redeemed with silver and gold — a redemption in picture form, carried out under Jewish law. Sometimes actual money was given as in Exodus 30:11-16; Numbers 3:44-51... Silver and gold are the least corruptible of metals, yet they are corruptible. The price of our redemption was incorruptible and precious.
- Counted — Levi fell 273 short of the firstborn, and God required a price for every extra son.
- Priced — five shekels each, weighed by the sanctuary standard. God fixed that measure, not the payer.
- Handed over — the silver went to Aaron, showing that God's claim on the redeemed was met.
- Owned — redemption is what makes a person God's, and being God's is the ground of a life of service.
- Surpassed — silver is the least corruptible metal, yet it still corrupts. The price that redeems us is the precious blood of Christ.
And Moses took the ransom-money from them that were over and above those who were ransomed by the Levites;
Numbers 3 ends with an exchange: God takes the tribe of Levi in place of Israel's firstborn sons, man for man — but the firstborn outnumber the Levites by 273. Verse 49 records Moses collecting silver for that surplus, which raises two questions: why did God claim these sons, and why did 273 matter?
The claim goes back to the night God struck the firstborn of Egypt, when the blood of the Passover lamb marked Israel's homes. From that night the firstborn sons of Israel belonged to God.
All the firstborn among the children of Israel were bought with a price, the price of the blood of the Passover Lamb... From chapters 3 and 4 we learn that afterwards all the Levites were taken instead of the firstborn of the children of Israel. The transaction that made the substitution was so solemn and exact that the 273 firstborn of the children of Israel, who were more than the number of the Levites, all had to be redeemed according to God's estimate of their value.
The chapter's arithmetic is what creates verse 49. One writer works through the totals and shows who carried the cost.
The count of Levite males came to 22,000. The number of the firstborn was very close to the same, but 273 larger than the number of the Levites. To make up this difference, the Lord told them to redeem the 273 by paying five shekels of silver for each one. It is not likely that 273 people each had to give five shekels. More likely the tribes shared the cost of redeeming the 273. This was to be given to the priests, Aaron and his sons, since the Levites were also given to them.
The shortfall looks small enough to ignore.
The Levites were short of 273 people. A coincidence? A negligible difference? Hardly. God notes the difference and commands a ransom be paid for the 273 missing Levites.
God fixed the price, and He weighed it against His own standard. The word shekel itself points to weighing.
The word comes from a root meaning to weigh — at first, perhaps, to balance. It is that which forms a true estimate of the value of things. The shekel of the sanctuary, or sacred shekel, may have been heavier than the usual one... One thing we know: the shekel of the King of kings would be just and unvarying, for "unequal weights and unequal measures are both alike an abomination to the LORD" (Proverbs 20:10).
The five-shekel payment was not invented for this moment. It was the permanent price for a firstborn son — what made this occasion unusual was the swap of a whole tribe.
The normal method, as we would call it, and the one that was to hold good for all time, was a payment of five shekels to the priest (Numbers 18:16). To this there was an exception, but only on one occasion... It was a transaction that was never repeated, though it held good for ever. The tribe of Levi was taken instead of the firstborn males of the twelve tribes, as far as man for man such an exchange could be made. The surplus of the children of Israel were then redeemed by five shekels each.
What kind of redemption is this? One writer answers with a sharp distinction.
The redemption we are speaking of here was in no sense redemption from judgment. People have too often confused the two. There is a redemption from divine judgment, and every child of God shares in it. That is provided by the blood of Christ. Now the redemption of the firstborn males was in no sense like that... Were the Levites chosen to bear divine punishment instead of the firstborn males of the twelve tribes? No. They were taken to serve Aaron.
Moses did not keep the silver or give it back. It went to Aaron the priest.
The redemption money was handed to Aaron for the service of God, showing that it met His claims on the redeemed. Let us never forget that as redeemed people we belong to God. The life of service to His Name that we are committed to rests on that fact.
- Claimed — the Passover blood spared Israel's firstborn on the night Egypt's firstborn died. They were bought with a price, so they were God's.
- Substituted — a whole tribe was accepted in their place, man for man, as far as the numbers of Levi could stretch.
- Counted — 273 had no Levite to stand for them, and God refused to treat the shortfall as too small to matter.
- Priced — five shekels each, by the sanctuary standard: the just and unvarying measure of the King of kings.
- Serving — the silver passed to Aaron for the service of God. What met God's claim also became the ground of a life given to Him.
of the firstborn of the children of Israel he took the money, a thousand three hundred and sixty-five [shekels], according to the shekel of the sanctuary.
The 1,365 shekels here were a redemption price for the firstborn sons of Israel who had no Levite to stand in their place. Two questions sit behind the number: why did God claim these children, and what could silver buy?
The number comes from subtracting one census from another:
The count of Levite males came to 22,000 (v.39). The number of the firstborn was very close to the same, but 273 larger than the number of the Levites (v.43). To make up this difference, the Lord required five shekels of silver to redeem each of the 273 (vv.46-47). Most likely the 273 did not each give five shekels themselves. Instead the tribes shared the cost of redeeming them. The money went to the priests, Aaron and his sons, since the Levites too were given to them. The total came to 1,365 shekels.
God's claim on these children goes back to the night Israel left Egypt:
The basis of the Lord's claim on the Levites was the destruction of the firstborn of Egypt. If God redeems through sacrifice and judgment, He claims those whom He redeems. So all the firstborn among the children of Israel were bought with a price — the price of the blood of the Passover Lamb, a picture of the precious blood of Christ. From chapters 3 and 4 we learn that afterwards God took all the Levites instead of the firstborn of the children of Israel. The substitution was so solemn and exact that the 273 firstborn beyond the number of the Levites all had to be redeemed according to God's own estimate of their value.
The verse names a price and also the standard that weighs it. Israel traded with other nations and could have paid in their coin:
One law applied without exception throughout these transactions. "And every valuation shall be according to the shekel of the sanctuary: twenty gerahs shall make a shekel." Israel might wish to pay with whatever coin was most convenient in their dealings with the nations. But as with the temple service and their redemption price, so here they had to make their payments "according to the shekel of the sanctuary." ... We are under grace, not law. But what a serious error to think that we as Christians are left to our own will or wisdom! We are bought with an infinite price, and we are in no way our own.
The law treated three cases differently, and that difference shows what this payment was not:
God required redemption for the males of Israel. For the firstborn male of a donkey it was optional, and depended on the owner's will. For the firstborn male of a clean animal it was impossible. That went onto God's altar. So the redemption we are speaking of here was in no sense redemption from judgment, though people have often confused the two. There is a redemption from God's judgment, and every child of God shares in it. The blood of Christ provides it. But the redemption of the firstborn males was nothing like that. Even the simplest reader can see it. The clean animal could not be redeemed at all. And God redeemed the males of Israel at the start by taking the Levites in their place, as far as that could be done. Did God choose the Levites to bear His punishment instead of the firstborn males of the twelve tribes? No. He took them to serve Aaron.
The chapter sets an order the Levites themselves may not have grasped:
Our chapter again emphasises the principle that redemption comes before the service of God. Did the Levites through Israel's history realise that they came into God's service only as a redeemed people? That may be open to question. But we should not miss this fact, which is set out here in picture form.
Silver settled the account for these 273. It could never settle the deeper one, and the payment was only a picture:
Their fathers had been redeemed with silver and gold — a redemption in picture form, carried out under Jewish law. Sometimes they gave actual money, as in Exodus 30:11-16 and Numbers 3:44-51... Silver and gold are the least corruptible of metals, yet they are corruptible. The price of our redemption was incorruptible and precious.
- Counted. The census left 273 firstborn with no Levite to stand for them, and God required a price for each one.
- Claimed. The firstborn were His because blood had spared them in Egypt — bought first, then counted.
- Weighed. God fixed the price by the sanctuary shekel, twenty gerahs — His estimate of their value, not the market's.
- Commissioned. God took the Levites to serve Aaron, not to bear punishment. Redemption came first, service followed.
- Surpassed. Silver and gold are the least corruptible metals, yet they still corrupt. The price of our redemption was incorruptible and precious.
And Moses gave the money of them that were ransomed to Aaron and to his sons, according to the commandment of Jehovah, -- as Jehovah had commanded Moses.
Israel's firstborn sons outnumbered the Levites who stood in their place, so silver had to cover the gap. Here Moses hands that silver over — and commentators ask what it bought, who took it, and what it pictures for us.
The sum in this verse comes from a gap in the numbers. One writer shows how the count worked out and who paid:
The count of Levite males came to 22,000 (v.39). The number of the firstborn was very close to that, but 273 larger (v.43). To make up this difference, the Lord told them to redeem the 273 by paying five shekels of silver for each person (vs.46-47). Probably the 273 did not each pay five shekels themselves. Instead the tribes shared the cost of redeeming them. The money went to the priests, Aaron and his sons, since the Levites were also given to them. The total amounted to 1365 shekels.
God claimed the extra 273 as fully as the rest, and someone had to pay for each of them:
When they took the census, the firstborn in Israel outnumbered the Levites by 273. God claimed these 273 just as He claimed the 22,000, who each had a Levite as a substitute. So five shekels of redemption money had to be paid for each of them. According to Exodus 13 the firstborn were to be redeemed at their birth. Our chapter again stresses the principle: redemption comes first, before the service of God.
The silver went to Aaron, and where it went carries the point of the verse:
The redemption money was handed to Aaron for the service of God, showing that it met His claims upon the redeemed. Let us never forget that as redeemed people we belong to God. On this fact rests the life of service to His Name, the life we are committed to.
Writers read Aaron here as a picture of Christ, and the redeemed as those handed over to Him for His use:
The Levites were to be offered to God in place of the firstborn, all of whom God took to Himself when He struck down the firstborn of the Egyptians. The firstborn outnumbered the Levites, so the rest were redeemed. This is a picture of the saints, seen as firstborn ones and as redeemed. They are wholly claimed as God's, and given to Aaron (that is, to Christ). They serve in God's house, and He is set as Lord over it.
It is easy to read the five shekels as a payment that saved these sons from punishment. One writer warns against that reading, and argues from the animals in the same law:
So the redemption we speak of here was in no sense redemption from judgment. People have too often confused the two. There is a redemption from divine judgment, and in that every child of God shares. That is provided by the blood of Christ (Ephesians 1:7; Colossians 1:14). Now the redemption of the firstborn males was in no sense like that. Even the simplest reader will see this clearly. Notice that the clean animal could not be redeemed at all. Notice too that the Levites were taken in place of the males of Israel at the outset, and so redeemed them as far as that could be done. Were the Levites chosen to bear divine punishment instead of the firstborn males of the twelve tribes? No. They were taken to minister to Aaron.
One writer sets a payment like this one beside the price that redeems us:
They knew, and so do we, that we are redeemed with the precious blood of Christ. Their fathers had been redeemed with silver and gold. That redemption under Jewish law was a picture of something greater. Sometimes actual money was given, as in Exodus 30:11-16 and Numbers 3:44-51. Sometimes it was by sacrifice, as in Exodus 13:13-15. Even then silver and gold came into it, since they bought the animal used for sacrifice. Silver and gold are the least corruptible of metals, yet they are corruptible. The price of our redemption was incorruptible and precious.
- Counted — The firstborn outnumbered the Levites by 273, and God claimed every one of them.
- Bought — Five shekels each, 1,365 shekels in all, and the tribes carried the cost, not the 273 alone.
- Given — The silver went to Aaron, meeting God's claim on the redeemed and marking them out as His.
- Different — This was not a ransom from judgment. The Levites served the priest; they did not bear punishment.
- Surpassed — Silver wears away. The price here points past itself to the precious blood of Christ.