Numbers 23–24

Numbers 23:1 · Darby

And Balaam said to Balak, Build me here seven altars, and prepare me here seven bullocks and seven rams.

Balak, king of Moab, has hired Balaam to curse Israel. He brings him up to the high places of Baal, above the camp. Balaam's first move is not to speak: he calls for seven altars, seven bulls and seven rams. What was all this religious machinery for? And what could it do against a people God had already blessed?

Where the altars stood

The place where the altars stood tells you who Balaam was really serving.

The last verse of chapter 22 shed light upon the evil power that animated Moab and Balak their king. They had among them the "high places of Baal." So when in the first verse of our chapter we read that Balaam said, "Build for me here seven altars," we at once see that this man, who claimed to be a prophet of the Lord, was really in league with the powers of darkness. When in conflict with Baal, Elijah repaired the one altar of the Lord that was broken down, and he prevailed. In contrast with that, we are now to see that the seven altars of Baal can achieve nothing against the blessing of God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Seven altars, not one

The number itself gives him away.

Balaam exposed his idolatrous character immediately by asking Balak to build seven altars, offering on each one a bull and a ram. God allowed only one altar of burnt offering (Ex. 27:1; Heb. 13:10), for the altar speaks of Christ, the only way of approach to God. But Balaam believed in "many gods and many lords" (1 Cor. 8:4-5).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Balaam knew God's word could not be beaten. What he never grasped was who God is.

He evidently had no sense of the supreme power and glory of Jehovah, while he knew that no power could prevail against His word. To him Jehovah was only the First among many, and not the supreme and only God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What the sacrifices were really for

Balaam's own words sound godly. The next chapter gives him away.

Balaam pretended that the sacrifices were to Jehovah, for he said to Balak, "Stand by your burnt offering, and I will go; perhaps the Lord will come to meet me." We learn in the first verse of the next chapter what Balaam really sought: "When Balaam saw that it pleased the Lord to bless Israel, he did not go, as at other times, to look for omens." This is the key that unlocks the puzzle for us. It was not Jehovah's presence he sought, but enchantments; that is, he sought the spirit or spirits he was familiar with, and his sacrifices were for them.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Sacrifice as a bargaining chip

Where did Balaam get the number seven, and what did he hope to gain by it?

It would seem that not only the name "Jehovah" but the use of the number "seven" was borrowed from Israel by the nations outside. For on the high places Balaam had seven altars prepared, with a bull and a ram on each; and to make himself acceptable to God he says, "I have arranged seven altars, and I have offered on every altar a bull and a ram." This is how man — the flesh — tries to win God over; is there anything more offensive to Him?

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The irony God turned on it

Balak chose Baal's ground on purpose. It backfired on him.

Balak's plan in taking Balaam up to the high places of Baal was probably that such a stronghold of his false worship would help the business in hand. Surely at such a spot Baal would help him! But he reckoned without God, and in a short time he had to listen to the good news of God from the Devil's own platform! ... But whatever the oxen and rams on the altars meant to Balaam, they suggested Christ to God; and when Christ is before Him in the perfection of His great sacrificial work, what can He do but bless His people? Balaam understood nothing of this. He was as blind as the wicked men who put the blessed Son of God upon the cross of Calvary. There was an aspect to that cross of which they knew nothing. Little did they imagine that God would bring vast blessing out of their appalling deed!

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The contest Israel never saw

Who was Balaam really up against?

The whole question now was between God and His enemy, and it took place up at the top of the hill, the people knowing nothing at all about it. What could Balaam do with God about the people? Nothing.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Altars. Seven altars on Baal's high ground expose the man who ordered them. God gave Israel one altar, "for the altar speaks of Christ, the only way of approach to God."

- Intent. His godly-sounding words were cover. The next chapter shows he was hunting enchantments, and his sacrifices went to the spirits he knew.

- Offence. Here is the flesh trying to win God over with offerings. Nothing is more offensive to Him.

- Reversal. The bulls and rams meant one thing to Balaam and another to God. He saw Christ in them and could only bless.

- Outcome. No pile of altars changes God's mind. God settled the matter with His enemy on the hilltop, while Israel below knew nothing about it.

Numbers 23:2 · Darby

And Balak did as Balaam had said; and Balak and Balaam offered up a bullock and a ram on [each] altar.

Balak has brought the hired prophet Balaam up to the high places of Baal. The first move is not a curse but a religious ceremony: seven altars, seven bulls, seven rams. The king obeys the prophet to the letter. It all looks like worship. But whose altars are these? What were the offerings for? And what did God make of them?

Altars Built on Enemy Ground

The place matters. One writer reads the seven altars in light of where Balak had taken Balaam.

The last verse of chapter 22 shed light upon the evil power that animated Moab and Balak their king. They had among them the "high places of Baal." So in the first verse of our chapter we read that Balaam said, "Build me here seven altars." We see at once that this man, who claimed to be a prophet of the Lord, was really in league with the powers of darkness. When in conflict with Baal, Elijah repaired the one broken-down altar of the Lord, and he prevailed. In contrast with that, we are now to see that the seven altars of Baal can achieve nothing against the blessing of God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Balak chose that hill himself. One writer points out what he expected from it — and what he got.

Balak probably thought that such a stronghold of his false worship would be a good place for the business in hand. Surely Baal would help him there! But he had not reckoned with God, and in a short time he was forced to listen to the good news of God from the Devil's own platform. What a defeat!

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Seven Altars Where God Gave One

The number itself is the giveaway. God's own arrangement for Israel had no room for a row of altars.

Balaam exposed his idolatrous character at once. He asked Balak to build seven altars, and offered a bull and a ram on each one. God allowed only one altar of burnt offering (Ex. 27:1; Heb. 13:10), for the altar speaks of Christ, the only way of approach to God. But Balaam believed in "many gods and many lords" (1 Cor. 8:4-5).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Motive Behind the Offerings

Commentators differ on Balaam's motive. Was he trying to bribe God, or was something darker going on?

It might be hard to work out why Balaam told Balak to build his seven altars and prepare his seven oxen and seven rams. He may have wanted to appease God by sacrifice, trying to turn Him from His purpose to bless Israel; but the sacrifices were more likely offered to the demons that lie behind all idolatrous worship, as Paul writes, "What pagans sacrifice they offer to demons and not to God" (1 Cor. 10:20).

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Notice how Balaam speaks about the offerings once they are burning.

Balaam, however, as verse 3 shows, treated the offerings burned on the seven altars as Balak's. He himself went off to a lonely place, in case the Lord might meet him and instruct him there. He clearly had no sense of the supreme power and glory of Jehovah, though he knew that no power could prevail against His word. To him Jehovah was only the First among many, and not the supreme and only God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Religion Offered as a Bribe

Where did the number seven come from? And what was Balaam doing with it?

It seems that the surrounding nations borrowed from Israel not only the name "Jehovah" but also the use of the number "seven." On the high places Balaam had seven altars prepared, with a bull and a ram on each. To make himself acceptable to God he says, "I have arranged the seven altars, and I have offered on each altar a bull and a ram." This is how man — the flesh — tries to win God over. Is there anything more offensive to Him?

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What God Saw on Those Altars

Here is the turn that makes the chapter good news. The animals meant one thing to the men who killed them, and something else to God.

But whatever the oxen and rams on the altars meant to Balaam, they spoke of Christ to God. When Christ is before Him in the perfection of His great sacrificial work, what can He do but bless His people? Balaam understood nothing of this. He was as blind as the wicked men who put the blessed Son of God on the cross of Calvary. There was a side to that cross of which they knew nothing. Little did they imagine that God would bring vast blessing out of their appalling deed!

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Altar — counterfeit. Seven altars rise on a high place of Baal. God had appointed one altar only, for the altar speaks of Christ, the only way to God.

- Altar — borrowed. Balaam borrows Israel's number and Israel's sacrifices and offers them as a bribe. This is the flesh trying to make itself acceptable to God.

- Altar — disowned. He calls the offerings Balak's when he leaves. Then he claims them as his own before God. He handles holy things without knowing who God is.

- Altar — unmoved. No amount of sacrifice turns God from His purpose to bless Israel. Seven altars of Baal achieve nothing against His blessing.

- Altar — overruled. Two men meant a bribe. God saw a picture of Christ and answered with blessing — the same reversal He later worked at the cross.

Numbers 23:3 · Darby

And Balaam said to Balak, Stand by thy burnt-offering, and I will go; perhaps Jehovah will come to meet me; and whatever he shews me I will tell thee. And he went to a hill.

Seven altars were smoking on the high places of Baal. Balaam left the king of Moab beside them and walked off alone to a bare hilltop. The word "perhaps" raises the whole question of the scene: who was he hoping to meet, and who met him?

"Stand Beside Your Burnt Offering"

Balaam does not stand at the altar himself. He assigns the offerings to Balak and walks away. One writer reads that as a clue to how small Balaam's God was to him.

As verse 3 shows, Balaam treated the offerings burned on the seven altars as Balak's. He himself went off to a lonely place, in case the Lord would meet him there and instruct him. He clearly had no sense of the supreme power and glory of Jehovah. Yet he knew that no power could prevail against His word.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The altars themselves tell the same story. Why seven?

Balaam exposed his idolatrous character at once. He asked Balak to build seven altars, offering a bull and a ram on each one. God allowed only one altar of burnt offering (Ex. 27:1; Heb. 13:10), for the altar speaks of Christ, the only way of approach to God. But Balaam believed in "many gods and many lords" (1 Cor. 8:4-5).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Word "Perhaps"

The hesitation gives the man away. Why would a prophet be unsure whether God would come?

Such a speech was an exposure of the man. Why the word "perhaps"? Did God ever refuse to meet any soul that sincerely sought Him? Why this language of uncertainty? It was pious cant. When he turned aside to "a bare height" Balaam had no wish whatever to meet Jehovah. His one desire was that Jehovah would let him alone, so that he could do what Balak wished, and so earn his reward. But God met Balaam, and put a word in his mouth, and told him to go back to Balak and speak it.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

What He Really Went Looking For

One writer finds the answer in the next chapter.

Balaam pretended that the sacrifices were for Jehovah. The first verse of the next chapter shows what he really wanted: "When Balaam saw that it pleased the LORD to bless Israel, he did not go, as at other times, to look for omens" (older translations: "to seek for enchantments"). This is the key that unlocks the puzzle. It was not Jehovah's presence he sought, but enchantments. That is, he sought the spirit or spirits he knew well, and his sacrifices were for them. This is not surprising, for Satan desires the worship that is due to God alone.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The same writer sees a double meaning in that "perhaps."

When the princes of Moab came to him in Syria, he went to seek enchantments, but each time God met him, and he probably feared the same would happen again. His words might have been a claim to be Jehovah's servant, or a sign that he feared Jehovah would step in as He had in Syria. He probably wanted Balak to think he was Jehovah's servant. It seems he succeeded in this deception, for Balak later said to him, "the LORD has held you back from honor" (Num. 24:11).

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

What the Offerings Said to God

Balaam meant nothing good by the bulls and rams. But they carried a meaning he never intended.

But whatever the oxen and rams on the altars meant to Balaam, they spoke of Christ to God. And when Christ is before Him in the perfection of His great sacrificial work, what can He do but bless His people? Balaam understood nothing of this. He was as blind as the wicked men who put the blessed Son of God upon the cross of Calvary. There was an aspect to that cross of which they knew nothing.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

God Steps Between

God met Balaam, and the meeting was no favour to the prophet. It was God taking His place in front of His people.

The moment any enemy or accuser enters the scene, Jehovah places Himself in front to receive and answer the accusation. His answer is never founded on what His people are in themselves. It is founded on what He has made them through the perfection of His own work. His glory is linked with them, and in vindicating them He maintains His own glory. He places Himself between them and every accusing tongue.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Seven altars. God appointed one altar, because the altar speaks of Christ, the only way to God. Seven altars belong to a world of many gods.

- One "perhaps." His word of doubt was pious cant. God never refuses a soul that truly seeks Him, so the doubt lay in the seeker, not in God.

- One bare height. He climbed it hoping to reach his familiar spirits, and hoping God would leave him alone. What he called seeking the Lord was seeking enchantments.

- One meaning missed. The animals meant one thing to Balaam and another to God. They spoke of Christ, and with Christ before Him God can only bless His people.

- One defender. God met Balaam. He stands between His people and every accusing tongue, and answers by what He has made them, not by what they are.

Numbers 23:4 · Darby

And God met Balaam; and [Balaam] said to him, I have disposed seven altars, and have offered up a bullock and a ram upon [each] altar.

Numbers 23:4 records a private meeting on a bare hilltop: God comes to a hired prophet, and the prophet answers with a list of altars. Who sought whom here, and what were those seven altars for?

Who Was Looking for Whom

The verse says God met Balaam. One writer asks what Balaam himself went up the hill to find.

When he turned aside to "a bare height" Balaam had no wish whatever to meet Jehovah. His one desire was that Jehovah would let him alone, so that he might do what Balak wished and so earn his reward. Numbers 24:1 tells us clearly that he went "to seek for enchantments." He was trying to reach the demons he was used to dealing with. But "God met Balaam" — to his dismay, we have no doubt! He told God of his altars and sacrifices. Did God not have eyes to see for Himself?

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

So the meeting was an interception. God stepped in front of the demons Balaam was reaching for.

Seven Altars

The number itself gives the man away. One writer traces that count back to what Balaam believed about God.

Balaam exposed his idolatrous character at once. He asked Balak to build seven altars, and offered on each one a bull and a ram. God allowed only one altar of burnt offering (Ex. 27:1; Heb. 13:10), for the altar speaks of Christ, the only way of approach to God. But Balaam believed in "many gods and many lords" (1 Cor. 8:4-5).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Boast

Balaam's first words to God are an inventory of his own religious effort. Another writer traces the number seven itself back to Israel.

It seems that the nations outside Israel borrowed not only the name "Jehovah" but also the use of the number "seven." On the high places Balaam had seven altars prepared, with a bull and a ram on each. Then, trying to make himself acceptable to God, he says, "I have arranged the seven altars and I have offered on each altar a bull and a ram." This is how man — the flesh — tries to win God over. Is there anything more offensive to Him?

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What God Did Instead

Notice what God does not say in verse 4. He gives no verdict on the altars. He just speaks.

When Balaam went to the hill, God met him. Balaam spoke to God as if the offerings had been for Him. He could deceive Balak, but he could not deceive God. God takes no notice of his sacrifices. Instead He puts a word in his mouth and commands him to "return to Balak, and this is what you shall speak." Satan may have lured his willing dupe with tempting silver and gold. But God had determined that Balaam would be the unwilling instrument to declare His thoughts about His people.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

What God Saw in the Animals

One writer asks about Balaam's motive first, then about what God saw in the same animals.

He knew that burnt offerings were acceptable to Him. But did he really imagine that sacrifices from a man like himself would please Jehovah so much that He would let him have his own way and curse the people? Whatever the oxen and rams on the altars meant to Balaam, they suggested Christ to God. And when Christ is before Him in the perfection of His great sacrificial work, what can He do but bless His people? Balaam understood nothing of this. He was as blind as the wicked men who put the blessed Son of God on the cross of Calvary. There was an aspect to that cross of which they knew nothing. Little did they imagine that God would bring vast blessing out of their appalling deed!

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

God Answers the Accuser

Israel knew nothing of this hilltop conversation. That, for one writer, is the whole comfort of the scene: when an accuser appears, God does the answering.

The moment any enemy or accuser enters the scene, Jehovah places Himself in front to receive and answer the accusation. His answer is always founded, not on what His people are in themselves, but on what He has made them through the perfection of His own work. His glory is linked with them, and in vindicating them He maintains His own glory. He places Himself between them and every accusing tongue. If the enemy comes to curse and accuse, Jehovah answers by pouring out the rich flow of His everlasting delight in those He has chosen for Himself. He has made them fit to be in His presence for ever.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Met, not found — Balaam went out for enchantments; God crossed his path instead. The verse records God's initiative, not a prophet's success.

- Met with altars — seven altars betray a man who thinks God is one among many. God appointed one altar, and it speaks of Christ.

- Met with a boast — "I have arranged... I have offered." God takes no notice of the inventory; He puts His own word in the man's mouth.

- Met by Christ — whatever the animals meant to Balaam, they spoke to God of His Son. With Christ before Him, God can only bless.

- Met on Israel's behalf — God defended a people who never knew it. He stands between His own and every accusing tongue, answering out of His work, not theirs.

Numbers 23:5 · Darby

And Jehovah put a word in Balaam's mouth, and said, Return to Balak, and thus shalt thou speak.

Balak, king of Moab, has hired Balaam to curse Israel, and the sacrifices are already burning. Balaam walks off alone to see what he can get out of God — and at that moment the initiative leaves his hands.

The Meeting Balaam Did Not Want

Why the word "perhaps"? Did God ever refuse to meet any soul that sincerely sought Him? Why this language of uncertainty? It was religious pretence. When he turned aside to "a bare height" Balaam had no wish at all to meet the Lord. His one desire was that the Lord would leave him alone, so that he might do what Balak wished and earn his reward. Numbers 24:1 tells us plainly that he went "to seek for enchantments," which means he tried to get through to the demons he was used to dealing with. But "God met Balaam" — to his dismay, we have no doubt!

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Altars God Passed By

Balaam's first words to God are a report on his sacrifices. God's reply says nothing about them at all.

When Balaam went to the hill, God met him. Balaam spoke to God as if the offerings had been for Him. He could deceive Balak, but he could not deceive God. God takes no notice of his sacrifices. Instead He puts a word in his mouth and commands him to "return to Balak, and thus you shall speak." Satan had lured his willing victim with tempting silver and gold. But God was determined that Balaam would be the unwilling instrument to declare His thoughts about His people.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

A Word Put in His Mouth

The wording here — a word put in his mouth — is what Scripture says of its true prophets.

People heard these prophets speak in a completely natural way, as one man might speak to another. But the words they spoke were the words of God, put into their mouths by the Holy Spirit... So whether we turn to Balaam or to Jeremiah there is no difference. The historian said of Balaam, the son of Beor, that "the LORD put a word in Balaam's mouth." The Lord Himself said the same of Jeremiah: "I have put my words in your mouth." So these Old Testament prophets spoke by nothing less than verbal inspiration. What they spoke were the words of the living God.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Balak and Balaam were alone on the hill, and Israel knew nothing of it. So how did the account ever reach the page?

The unwilling prophet is forced to say what the Lord put into his mouth. Here is a hint about inspiration... How did Moses find out what Balaam said? Balak would certainly not report the words to Moses, and Balaam did not tell him either. Israel did not know what happened at the different places where Balak and Balaam stood. The Holy Spirit gave the correct report to Moses of all that took place and all that was said.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Eyes, Ears and Lips Taken Over

God's hold on Balaam went further than his speech.

Here we see the way Balaam was brought to see the deep things of God, and to testify to His good pleasure in the people of His choice. Eyes, ears and lips were brought under the mighty power of God. He was obliged to see "the vision of the Almighty," and to hear "the words of God," and to speak what the Lord put in his mouth.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Why God Intervened at All

God did more than block a curse. He stepped in front of His people and answered for them Himself.

The moment any enemy or accuser comes on the scene, the Lord places Himself in front to receive the accusation and answer it. His answer never rests on what His people are in themselves. It rests on what He has made them through the perfection of His own work. His glory is linked with them, and in vindicating them He maintains His own glory. He places Himself between them and every accusing tongue.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Moses later named the reason, and one writer draws the line straight from it to the believer today.

In His righteous government He may discipline us, just as He disciplined Israel long ago. But He will never abandon His purposes of grace... Listen to Moses in Deuteronomy 23:5: "But the LORD your God would not listen to Balaam; instead the LORD your God turned the curse into a blessing for you, because the LORD your God loved you."

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Met. Balaam went looking for spirits and got God instead; the meeting he dreaded was the one he could not escape.

- Ignored. God said nothing about the altars. The sacrifices bought Him nothing, and the man who fooled Balak could not fool God.

- Filled. God refused what was in Balaam's hands but filled his mouth. Scripture uses the same wording of Jeremiah — verbal inspiration, God's own words.

- Controlled. Eyes, ears and lips came under God's power. A greedy man became the unwilling witness to God's pleasure in His people.

- Loved. God steps between His people and every accusing tongue. He answers not by what they are, but by what He has made them — because He loved them.

Numbers 23:6 · Darby

And he returned to him, and behold, he was standing by his burnt-offering, he, and all the princes of Moab.

Balaam has come back from the "bare height" where God met him, and Balak waits at the altar with all the princes of Moab. The burnt offering the king stands beside, not the price he paid, will decide what happens.

The waiting court

Balak has not come alone. The nobility of his whole kingdom stands with him at the altars.

A distinguished gathering awaited Balaam. The King stood by the altars, surrounded by all the princes of his realm. Surely there was never a more important occasion in the history of Moab! Balak had taken much trouble, and gone to considerable expense to get Balaam's help... Balaam returned from the "bare height" where God stepped in and spoke to him. Balak and his princes were full of expectation. What would he say? Would he pour out curses to destroy the power of the people they dreaded? Then the armies of Moab and her allies could easily destroy them.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Standing by the burnt offering

The verse fixes Balak in one place — beside his burnt offering. The attack on Israel was launched from that spot, and that is where it failed.

The attack begins with an elaborate set of mysterious rites and sacrifices by the king and Balaam. They then look at the unsuspecting Israelites from the top of the hills. They prepare to call up the mysterious power and evil craft of the demonic realms against them. But Balaam stood too near to the burnt sacrifice (Num. 23:6) to be able to do this. The savour of what represented the work of Christ rose up to the God who never fails to honour that sacrifice. So the curse becomes a blessing.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The men at the altar had no idea what they had put in front of God.

But whatever the oxen and rams on the altars meant to Balaam, they suggested Christ to God. When Christ is before Him in the perfection of His great sacrificial work, what can He do but bless His people? Balaam understood nothing of this. He was as blind as the wicked men who put the blessed Son of God upon the cross of Calvary. There was a side to that cross of which they knew nothing.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

What Balaam was really after

Balaam's words to Balak sounded like reverence for the Lord. One line in the next chapter shows what he was really doing.

Balaam pretended that the sacrifices were to Jehovah. He said to Balak, "Stand by your burnt offering, and I will go: perhaps the Lord will come to meet me." The first verse of the next chapter shows what Balaam really sought: "When Balaam saw that it pleased the Lord to bless Israel, he did not go, as at other times, to seek for enchantments." This is the key that unlocks the puzzle. It was not Jehovah's presence he sought, but enchantments.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The message he carried back

Balaam comes back down with a word, but not the one he went looking for.

Balaam spoke to God as if the offerings had been for Him. He could deceive Balak, but he could not deceive God. God takes no notice of his sacrifices. Instead He puts a word in his mouth and commands him to "return to Balak, and this is what you shall speak" (Num. 23:5). Satan lured his willing dupe with tempting silver and gold. But God had determined that Balaam would be His unwilling instrument, to declare His thoughts of His people.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The people who never knew

The verse names Balak and his princes. It says nothing about the people they are discussing.

What a remarkable scene this is! And Israel is completely unaware of how they were being presented to Balak, their enemy, by the word of God... There was nothing of Israel's weaknesses or sins unknown to God, but He had not cursed them. They were loved as the chosen people of God. This was not because of what they were in themselves, but because of the promises made to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and because of God's sovereign choice and sovereign love.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Balak's attempt to curse Israel is what drew out this description of them.

Humanly speaking, we never should have had such a glorious view of Israel... had not Balak sought to curse them... Balak and Balaam with "all the princes of Moab" may gather to hear Israel cursed and defied; they may "build seven altars"... but not all the powers of earth and hell, men and devils combined, in their dark and terrible array, can produce a single breath of curse or accusation against the Israel of God.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- The altar decides. Balak stands beside a burnt offering he did not understand. That sacrifice, not his money or his princes, settles the outcome.

- The savour rises. Whatever the oxen and rams meant to Balaam, to God they suggested Christ. He never fails to honour that sacrifice.

- The pretence fails. Balaam's talk of meeting the Lord covered a search for enchantments. God took no notice of his sacrifices.

- The mouth is commandeered. The man hired to curse became God's unwilling instrument. He declared God's own thoughts about His people.

- The blessing is sovereign. Israel knew nothing of the plot and was far from faultless. God loved them for His promises and His choice, so the curse could only turn into blessing.

Numbers 23:7 · Darby

And he took up his parable, and said, Balak the king of Moab hath brought me from Aram, from the mountains of the east Come, curse me Jacob, and come, denounce Israel!

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Numbers 23:8 · Darby

How shall I curse whom God hath not cursed? or how shall I denounce whom Jehovah doth not denounce?

Balak hired a prophet to curse Israel, and paid for altars and sacrifices to get it done. What came back was a question that handed the whole matter over to God.

The verdict was already given

Balaam is not saying the job is too hard for him. He is saying God has already settled it, and God told him so before he ever left home. One writer notes that two different names for God sit in the two halves of the line. What God said in private, Balaam must now say in public:

Balaam first states Balak's summons and his wish that he should curse Jacob and denounce Israel. Then he states that to curse and to denounce is impossible. God has not cursed him; He has not denounced him. In the original the name El, God, goes with Jacob, and Jehovah, the covenant-keeping God, goes with Israel. When Balak's messengers came to Balaam, God had said to him, "You shall not curse the people, for they are blessed." What God told him there in secret he must now speak here in public.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Attack turns into blessing

Balak's plan does not just fail. It produces the very thing he was trying to prevent. The curse he paid for turns into a blessing said out loud:

Balaam stated clearly what Balak expected. Then he had to say, "How can I curse whom God has not cursed? How can I denounce whom the LORD has not denounced?" This should have been enough to break up the meeting. No success was possible. What followed proved it: the more the enemies of God's people tried to draw out a curse against them, the fuller and richer the blessing flowed.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

A guard no one asked for

Israel knew nothing about the plot against them. They asked for nothing and prayed for nothing, and God guarded them anyway. Balak's own words fell back on him:

The great principle of the Balaam history is that God was the unasked Guardian and Blesser of His people. The schemes of enemies go on, unknown to Israel, who therefore seeks nothing from God. But He is active for His people out of His own grace to them, and nothing escapes Him… Balak said, "He whom you bless is blessed, and he whom you curse is cursed." He was trying to bring the curse on Israel when God had said, "Blessed are those who bless you, and cursed are those who curse you." So he was just bringing it on himself.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Seen from above

Balaam was standing high up, looking down on the camp. That physical position pictures something: he is not seeing Israel as their neighbours saw them, but as God sees them — and that is the only reason a blessing is possible at all.

Here we get the answer to the great question: how can God bless a people who in themselves are stiff-necked and rebellious? He can bless them only as He views them from His own standpoint, from the point of His purpose, and with the work of His blessed Son in view. That work is the righteous ground on which He can bless man in a way that agrees with His attributes.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Why the curse had nothing to grip

Timing explains Balaam's failure. He came too late: the evil state that a curse could fasten on had already been dealt with. One writer draws a line from that to where the believer stands today:

This also shows us why Balaam could not curse the people. He came after the evil state that the curse belonged to had, as a picture, been removed in death. He also came after the song of the springing well had been sung, and that song speaks of the Spirit. So Romans raises the same challenge: "Who shall bring any charge against God's elect?" For those who are in Christ Jesus there can be no condemnation (verse 1), no accusation (verse 33), and no separation (verse 39).

Modernised from James McBroomOriginal wording

The same shelter today

What was true for a nation camped in the plains of Moab is applied by more than one writer to Christians now. The identity of the people has widened; the principle has not moved:

So Balaam was forced to say, "How shall I curse whom God has not cursed? And how shall I denounce whom the Lord has not denounced?" If this is true of Israel, it is certainly true also of those who today are redeemed by the precious blood of Christ. God will not allow them to be cursed.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Settled — Balaam cannot curse, because God has not cursed. He can only say in public what God told him in private.

- Unasked — Israel never prayed about Balaam, because Israel never knew. God guarded them out of His own grace, unasked.

- Standpoint — God blesses a stiff-necked people only as He sees them from His own side. The righteous ground is the work of His Son.

- Backfire — Every new try to force a curse drew out a fuller blessing. The curse fell back on the man who paid for it.

- Yours — No prophet could reverse God's word over Israel. No accuser can reverse it for those in Christ Jesus: no condemnation, no accusation, no separation.

Numbers 23:9 · Darby

For from the top of the rocks I see him, and from the hills I behold him Lo, [it is] a people that shall dwell alone and shall not be reckoned among the nations.

Balak hired Balaam to curse Israel. Instead, looking down on the camp from a height, Balaam blessed them. He saw a people God had set apart for Himself. Two questions follow: what does it mean to "dwell alone," and why could no curse touch this people?

(The quotes below say "the top of the rocks." That is an older wording for "the top of the crags.")

Why the Curse Died on His Lips

Balaam's problem was not lack of will but lack of permission.

Even from the enemy's standpoint you can see that the people of God are different from other people. The curse he wanted to hurl dies unspoken on Balaam's lips. Jacob, the supplanter, cannot be cursed; and Israel, God's prince, cannot be defied. El, the Mighty One, has not cursed! Jehovah — the truth-keeping covenant God — has not defied!

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The View from the Heights

Balaam sees Israel from a height, and where he stands changes what he sees.

Here we get the solution to the great question: how can God bless a people who in themselves are stubborn and rebellious? He can do it only as He views them from His own standpoint, from the point of His purpose. He also has the work of His blessed Son in view. That work is the righteous ground on which He can bless man in a way that matches His own character.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

That same view changes how we treat one another.

If I look at the people of God "from the top of the rocks," I shall see them as God sees them. I shall see them clothed with all the beauty of Christ — complete in Him, accepted in the Beloved. This is what will enable me to get on with them, to work with them, to have fellowship with them. It lifts me above their points and angles, their blots and blemishes, their failures and weaknesses. If I do not look at them from this high, divine ground, I shall be sure to fix my eye on some little flaw. That will spoil my communion and cool my affection.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Dwelling Alone

So what does "dwell alone" mean?

He states in the plainest way the great and certainly basic privilege of Israel. They were a nation called out to be alone with Jehovah and for Him. This is the basis of all their blessing. They were unlike all the rest of the world in this: they were set apart to be with Jehovah, the true God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Does this make Israel better than everyone else?

Here we have Israel singled out and set apart to be a separate and distinct people. According to God's thought about them, they were never to be mixed in with the nations or counted among them — not at any time, on any ground, or for any purpose whatever. This is true of Abraham's literal descendants, and true of all believers now. God's people are to be separated to Him. Not because they are better than others, but because of what God is, and of what He would always have His people to be.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Alone, Yet Not Lonely

Being uncounted by the world sounds like loss. One writer answers that the emptiness is filled by a Guest.

If they are content to "dwell alone," and content not to be "counted among the nations," God Himself will come and live among them. What a wonderful word that is: "Judah became His sanctuary!" Here was a place where the Creator could find rest. All around, the waves of sin rolled over everything. And this is the positive side of separation.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The Man Who Said It Did Not Believe It

Balaam spoke the truth under compulsion. What he later advised shows he understood exactly what he had said.

Under the compelling power of God, this evil man speaks of the people dwelling alone. But when he had the chance, he advised Israel's enemies to mingle with them. He knew full well what would happen if Israel were drawn into sinful ties with the nations around. Their witness to their God would weaken.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The Words Still Standing

Centuries later, the words still hold.

Other races have merged, and their national identity has been lost. Israel remains distinct still, not counted among the nations, just as Balaam said.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Alone by God's choice. God set Israel apart to be with Him and for Him. That standing is His gift and the basis of all their blessing, not a reward for being better than others.

- Alone, so no curse lands. Because God had not cursed them, Balaam could not; the verdict was already spoken from above.

- Alone, seen from above. God views His people from His own standpoint and purpose, with the work of His Son as the ground of blessing.

- Alone, so God moves in. Not counted among the nations, they have God Himself living among them. That is separation's positive side.

- Alone, and still standing. Balaam knew mixing would break the witness, and advised it. Nations have merged and vanished; Israel remains uncounted among them.

Numbers 23:10 · Darby

Who can count the dust of Jacob, and the number of the fourth part of Israel? Let my soul die the death of the righteous, and let my end be like his!

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Numbers 23:11 · Darby

And Balak said to Balaam, What hast thou done to me? I took thee to curse mine enemies, and behold, thou hast blessed them altogether.

Balak paid for a curse and got a blessing. His protest here is the cry of a man learning that a prophet's words are not for sale. It raises the question the Balaam story exists to answer: who decides whether God's people are blessed or cursed?

Balak's Outrage

Balak is angry and stunned. Stranger still, he does not send the failed prophet home. He asks for a second try from another hilltop.

Balak was astounded and indignant at what Balaam said concerning Israel. Balaam could only reply that he was in the hands of Jehovah. Do we wonder that Balak did not at once drive the prophet out of his territory? Sadly, flesh is always foolish and stubborn toward God (Rom. 1:22; Eph. 4:18). The king suggested that they go to another place and try again.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The new location came with a smaller view of Israel, as if seeing less of the people would make them easier to curse.

Was he so foolish as to think that if they took a more limited view of God's people that would make any difference? How very little these two men really knew of God!

Modernised from George BellOriginal wording

Not Balaam's Blessing to Give

"What have you done to me?" Balak asks, as if the outcome had been the prophet's choice. It was not. Balaam had every reason to want to curse Israel, and no power to do it.

God had committed Himself to bless Israel. So Balaam said, "Behold, I received a command to bless: He has blessed, and I cannot revoke it." Israel's blessing came from God, and Balaam had to announce it. If Balaam had the power to reverse God's blessing, he would gladly have done it. Balak's silver and gold were worth more in his eyes than the people God had blessed.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Defended Without Knowing It

The bargaining on the hilltop happened out of Israel's sight and hearing. They never asked for protection; they never knew they needed it.

How little did Israel know or imagine what was going on between Jehovah and the enemy. They may have been complaining in their tents at the very moment when God was displaying their perfection through the mouth of the greedy prophet. Balak would gladly have Israel cursed; but, blessed be God, He will not allow anyone to curse His people. He may have to deal with them Himself, in secret, about many things. But He will not let anyone else speak a word against them.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Curse Rebounds

Balak calls Israel "my enemies" — but Israel had been forbidden to attack Moab. He aimed his hired curse at a people God had promised to bless. The words fell back on him.

The great principle of the Balaam story is that God was the uninvited Guardian and Blesser of His people. The schemes of enemies go on, and Israel knows nothing of them. So Israel asks nothing from God. But He is active for His people out of His own grace to them, and nothing escapes Him... First Israel was forbidden to touch Moab. Next Balak says, "The one you bless is blessed, and the one you curse is cursed." He was seeking to bring the curse on Israel, though God had said, "Blessed is he who blesses you, and cursed is he who curses you." So he was just bringing it on himself.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why the Attack Failed

The altars on the hilltop were built to buy a curse. The reason it never came lies in what those sacrifices represented.

But Balaam stood too near to the burnt sacrifice (Num. 23:6) to be able to curse them. The fragrance of what that sacrifice represented — the work of Christ — went up to God, who never fails to honour it. So the curse is changed into a blessing.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Pressure That Enlarges Blessing

Balak would not quit. His stubbornness is the very reason each blessing came out richer than the last.

Hatred and unbelief think of circumstances... His persistence in seeking the curse enlarged the blessing; it is always so. He does not know God. And God could not just repeat the blessing already given, so He kept unfolding it further.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Commentators say the same protection covers more than Israel.

If this is true of Israel, it is certainly true also of those who today are redeemed by the precious blood of Christ. God will not allow them to be cursed.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Hired — Balak paid for a curse. The prophet was greedy enough to deliver it, but the words were never his.

- Unasked — God guarded a people who never asked Him to. They may have been complaining in their tents at that very hour.

- Unbreakable — the man hired to undo God's blessing could not take back one word of it.

- Rebounding — the curse aimed at God's people fell on the one who paid for it.

- Enlarged — each new try at cursing drew out fuller blessing. That same protection covers all who are redeemed by the blood of Christ.

Numbers 23:12 · Darby

And he answered and said, Must I not take heed to speak that which Jehovah puts in my mouth?

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Numbers 23:13 · Darby

And Balak said to him, Come, I pray thee, with me to another place, from whence thou wilt see them; thou shalt see only the extremity of them and shalt not see them all, and curse me them from thence.

Balak hired Balaam to curse Israel and heard him bless them instead. So he tries a new tactic: not a new prophet, but a new viewpoint. Can moving the prophet change what God has already decided?

Balak's Strategy: Shrink The People

One writer sees a calculation behind Balak's choice of viewpoint:

Chapter 22:41 tells us that Balak brought Balaam to the high places of Baal to prophesy against Israel. Here he saw only "a portion of the people" (NASB). Balak wanted Balaam to think that Israel was not a large nation, so that he might curse them more safely.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

That plan backfired:

Balak's first effort is to diminish them in Balaam's eyes — he would not have him see too much. This gives force to what Balaam says: "Who can count the dust of Jacob, and the number of the fourth part of Israel?" The end camp was only the fourth part. The partial view did not diminish the greatness of the people. It only moved him to say, "If only the end is so much, what must be the whole?"

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

A Question Of Tense

Commentators differ on what the new place was meant to show. Some read Balak as narrowing the view further. Others say the Hebrew points the other way, and that older English translations have misled readers:

In Hebrew, future and present are the same tense. With Keil, we need only read the present instead of the future: "you see only the outermost part of them," instead of "you shall see." From where he had been standing, he had seen only the outermost part of them. Now Balak is going to show him all. He thinks he made a mistake before, and that this was perhaps why he had not succeeded. Divination depended on what was before the eyes.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

On this reading, the wider view makes the coming verdict unanswerable:

What force this gives to the announcement! Balaam is looking over the whole camp, from one end to the other: "God has not beheld iniquity in Jacob"! ... Balak might have said, "Balaam, you may see no spot there, but there are plenty elsewhere." Now it is impossible to say so. Look where you will: those whom God has justified cannot be condemned.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

A New Location, The Same God

Behind the request lies a small idea of God, as if His mind depended on geography. One writer compares a later enemy of Israel who made the same mistake:

What low and contemptible thoughts both King and prophet had of their Creator! They imagined that such tricks and changes of position could completely change His mind about His people. The King of Syria and his advisers were just as stupid when they were at war with Israel in the days of Ahab. They said that the Lord was God of the hills, but not of the valleys. So if the Syrians fought on the lower ground, the victory would be theirs (1 Kings 20).

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Prophet Who Did Not Refuse

God had already told Balaam plainly that these people could not be cursed. That he moved on to a new hilltop anyway shows where his heart was:

Balak seems to have imagined that the huge numbers of Israel were the reason Balaam was afraid to curse them. Should Balaam not have said to him: "I cannot go on with this. The Lord has told me clearly, both in Syria and here, that the people cannot be cursed, for He has blessed them"? Balaam stayed with Balak and went where Balak wanted. That shows clearly that he would gladly have cursed God's people if it had been in his power.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The Real Ground Of The Blessing

Balak kept changing the conditions. He assumed the blessing depended on something in Israel itself. It did not:

At first Balak had evidently thought that if Balaam saw only a small number, he would count them as unimportant, and so curse them. Now he has to change his mind... Balak did not know why God blessed Israel. It was not because they were worthy of blessing. It was because they were His people, chosen by sovereign grace, and redeemed from sin and slavery by the Passover and the crossing of the Red Sea.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The next hilltop carried a fitting name:

The place of the second prophecy is the field of Zophim on the top of Pisgah. "Zophim" means "watchers," and Pisgah, with its wide view, was just the right place for them. It suits the purpose of God all the more to bring out His thoughts about His people.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Summary

- Move — Balak answers a failed curse with a change of scenery, not a change of heart. He assumes the verdict depends on the viewpoint.

- View — he first tried to shrink Israel in the prophet's eyes. The small part Balaam saw only made him wonder at the size of the whole.

- God — a new hilltop cannot change the mind of the Creator, any more than fighting in the valleys could.

- Ground — the blessing rested on God's choice and redemption, not on anything Balaam could see or count.

- Result — even with the whole camp in view, the verdict stands: those whom God has justified cannot be condemned.

Numbers 23:14 · Darby

And he took him to the watchmen's field, to the top of Pisgah, and built seven altars, and offered up a bullock and a ram on [each] altar.

From the high places of Baal, Balak heard Israel blessed instead of cursed. So he tries again: a new hill, fresh altars, the same paid prophet. The verse raises the question the chapter answers. Can a new view, or more sacrifices, change what God has said about His people?

A New Location, the Same God

Balak blamed the first failure on where they stood. So he moved the prophet and rebuilt everything.

Balak now took Balaam "into the field of Zophim, to the top of Pisgah," and there he built seven fresh altars and offered a bull and a ram on each one. What low and shameful thoughts both king and prophet had of their Creator! They imagined that such schemes and changes of position could change His mind about His people. The king of Syria and his advisers were just as stupid when they were at war with Israel in the days of Ahab. They suggested that the Lord was God of the hills, but not of the valleys. So if the Syrians fought on the lower ground, victory would be theirs (1 Kings 20).

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The mistake behind the move was not geography. It was the king's idea of God.

Balak still hoped that Balaam might be allowed to curse Israel. He had no idea of the faithful, unchanging nature of the living God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Zophim — The Place of Watchers

The name of the field is not decoration. It marks a spot chosen for seeing.

"Zophim" means "watchers," for whom Pisgah, with its width of view, was just the right place. Balak knew all about this place, of course; and many a keen and jealous eye, no doubt, had watched the camp from there. All the more, this suits God's purpose of bringing out His thoughts about His people.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The Whole Camp in View

From the high places of Baal, Balaam had seen only the edge of Israel. Balak now corrects that, and in doing so hands God a wider stage than he intended.

From the place where he had been standing, he had seen but the outermost part of them; now Balak is going to show him all. He thinks he made a mistake before, and that this was perhaps why he had not succeeded. Divination depended on what was before the eyes. Balaam is now looking over the whole camp, from one end to the other. Think what force that gives to the announcement: "God has not beheld iniquity in Jacob"! How it would spoil this to suppose that Balaam had here only got a partial view! Balak might have said, "Balaam, you may see no spot there, but there are plenty elsewhere." Now it is impossible to say so. Look where you will: those whom God has justified cannot be condemned.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Balak's first calculation had failed. His second rested on a mistake about why God blesses at all.

At first Balak had clearly thought that if Balaam saw only a small number, he would think of them as insignificant, and so curse them. Now he has to change his mind. If a small number could be blessed, perhaps Balaam would decide that a large number was less likely to deserve blessing. Balak did not know why God blessed Israel. It was not because they were worthy of blessing. It was because they were His people, chosen by sovereign grace, and redeemed from sin and slavery by the Passover and the crossing of the Red Sea.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Seven Altars Once More

The sacrifices repeat the first set: seven altars, a bull and a ram on each. Writers see human religion at work here.

This is how man — the flesh — would try to propitiate God. Is there anything more offensive to Him?

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The number of altars is the giveaway, and it points to what Balaam believed.

God allowed only one altar of burnt offering (Ex. 27:1; Heb. 13:10), for the altar speaks of Christ, the only way of approach to God. But Balaam believed in "many gods and many lords" (1 Cor. 8:4-5).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What God Does When His People Are Accused

Israel had no idea any of this was happening. That is exactly the comfort of the scene.

The moment any enemy or accuser enters the scene, the Lord places Himself in front to receive and answer the accusation. His answer never rests on what His people are in themselves. It rests on what He has made them through the perfection of His own work. His glory is linked with them, and in vindicating them He maintains His own glory. He places Himself between them and every accusing tongue.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Move. Balak shifts Balaam to Zophim on Pisgah, imagining a change of position could change God's mind about Israel.

- Motive. The move exposes a man with no idea of God's unchanging faithfulness, or why God blessed Israel — by sovereign grace, not merit.

- Machinery. Seven altars and fresh sacrifices are human religion at work. God's own way of approach was a single altar, pointing to Christ.

- Magnitude. The wider view backfires. With the whole camp in sight, the verdict "God has not beheld iniquity in Jacob" covers every part of it. Those God has justified cannot be condemned.

- Mediator. Behind the scenes, God steps in front of His accused people. He answers on the ground of His own work in them, not their record.

Numbers 23:15 · Darby

And [Balaam] said to Balak, Stand here by thy burnt-offering, and I will go to meet yonder.

Balak's first try to have Israel cursed has failed, so he moves the prophet to a new hilltop and builds fresh altars. Two questions follow: can a change of place change God's mind, and whom was Balaam going out to meet?

A New Vantage Point, the Same God

Moving the ritual to the top of Pisgah was Balak's idea of a fix. One writer calls this a low view of God, and compares it to a later enemy who thought God's power stopped at the hills:

Balak now took Balaam "into the field of Zophim, to the top of Pisgah." There seven fresh altars were built, and a bull and a ram were offered on each one. What low and shameful thoughts both king and prophet had of their Creator! They imagined that such schemes and changes of position could completely change His mind about His people. The king of Syria and his advisers were just as stupid when they were at war with Israel in the days of Ahab. They suggested that Jehovah was God of the hills, but not of the valleys. So if the Syrians fought on the lower ground, victory would be theirs (1 Kings 20).

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

"I Will Go To Meet — Over There"

Balak moved Balaam to a spot with a fuller view of the camp. There his sentence breaks off. English versions, including the ESV above, add "the LORD," but the Hebrew does not:

It seems Balak tried to make Israel look fewer and weaker in Balaam's eyes. He first took him to a place where he could see only a part of them, the outermost part, a fourth of the people. When that plan failed, Balak took Balaam to Pisgah, where the view was more complete. Here Balaam tells Balak to stand by the burnt offering while, he says, "I go to meet." The King James Version says "the Lord," but that word does not appear in the original. In Hebrew it reads, "I will go to meet — over there."

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Another writer hears in this the speech of a man who has lost his bearings:

He tells Balak, "Stand here by your burnt offering, while I go and meet — over there." He does not seem to know whom he was going to meet. It is all the most thorough and perfect confusion.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Who He Was Really Looking For

Balaam was not looking for the LORD at all. One writer draws comfort from what happened next:

The words "the Lord" should not have been put into the King James Version of Numbers 23:15. Balaam said to Balak, "stand here by your burnt offering while I meet over there." He did not go to meet Jehovah; he did not wish Him to cross his path again. Numbers 24:1 says plainly that he went "to look for omens"; but Jehovah, in His love to His people (though they were unworthy), would not allow this. So He stepped in a second time, and met Balaam... It is immense comfort to our souls to note these divine activities. The God with whom we have to do delights to "stand between us and the foe."

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Watchers' Field

The name of the place Balak chose works against him:

The place of the second prophecy is the field of Zophim on the top of Pisgah. "Zophim" means "watchers," and Pisgah, with its wide view, was just the right place for them. Balak knew all about this place, of course, and no doubt many a keen and jealous eye had watched the camp from there. All the more, as we have seen, it suits the purpose of God to bring out His thoughts about His people.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Sacrifice Cannot Move God's Purpose

Balak waited by his burnt offering for a better answer. He did not get one:

Whatever Balaam's purpose was in raising his altars, he had to learn one thing. No amount of sacrifice could make God change His mind. "God is not man, that he should lie, or a son of man, that he should change his mind" (Numbers 23:19). God could count Israel as His chosen people, quite apart from what they were in themselves. So "He has not beheld misfortune in Jacob, nor has he seen trouble in Israel." God viewed them in the light of His purpose. Not all the altars and sacrifices — whether to Jehovah or to the spirit Balaam consulted — could change God's purpose to bless those He had chosen.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- New place. Balak disliked the blessing, so he tried a new hilltop and more altars — as if a change of scenery could change God's mind.

- Vague word. Balaam says only that he will go and meet "over there." The name "the LORD" is not in the original. One writer calls the whole scene perfect confusion.

- Wrong appointment. He was not seeking Jehovah at all but omens, and had no wish for Jehovah to cross his path again.

- God intercepted. In love for an unworthy people, God met him anyway and put His own word in his mouth — He delights to stand between His people and the foe.

- Fixed blessing. From the field of "watchers," with the camp in full view, God brought out His own thoughts about Israel. No altar and no sacrifice could move His purpose to bless.

Numbers 23:16 · Darby

And Jehovah met Balaam, and put a word in his mouth, and said, Return to Balak, and thus shalt thou speak.

Balak has moved Balaam to a new lookout on the top of Pisgah and built seven fresh altars. He hopes a change of place will change God's mind about Israel. Instead, God meets the prophet a second time and hands him words he never wanted to speak.

The Meeting Balaam Was Avoiding

Before he withdrew, Balaam told Balak he would go and meet "yonder," naming no one. (The ESV supplies "the LORD" here; commentators note those words were added by translators.) One writer reads that vagueness as evasion:

He does not claim to be going to meet Jehovah; he only says, "I will go to meet yonder." The prophet would have been glad to meet his familiar spirits at the meeting place, but instead, "The LORD met Balaam." Balaam had chosen to ignore the plain command of Jehovah about His people. Now he must be the unwilling instrument for announcing His thoughts about them.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

God Between His People and the Threat

Balaam had no wish to meet God again. God stepped in anyway, and one writer explains why:

He did not go to meet Jehovah; he did not want Him to cross his path again. Numbers 24:1 says plainly that he went "to look for omens"; but Jehovah, in His love for His people (unworthy as they were), would not allow this. So He stepped in a second time and met Balaam. He put a fresh word in his mouth and said, "Go again to Balak and speak thus." It is a great comfort to our souls to notice these actions of God. The God we deal with delights to "stand between us and the foe."

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

A Word Put in His Mouth, Not Chosen by Him

A word "put in the mouth" leaves the speaker no say in what he says. Balaam had once reported only part of what God told him. This time he could not hold anything back:

Back with Balak, Balaam has to speak the word that God had put in his mouth. This time God will not let him keep anything back. He had told only part of the truth to the leaders of Moab, when God commanded him not to go with them and not to curse His people. Now he must speak all that God has given him. What he says takes the form of a parable or proverb. It is a revelation from God, and it points forward as prophecy.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The Word Itself: No Change of Mind in God

The message Balaam carries back corrects Balak's idea of God. Balak thought God could be talked round:

Balak had no proper idea of who God is. So Balaam told him, "God is not man, that He should lie, or a son of man, that He should change His mind." This was a lesson both Balak and Balaam needed. Because they could change their minds to suit themselves, they thought God was the same kind of being as they were.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

That is why the second try fails just as the first did. One writer carries the comfort further:

Now it is impossible for God to lie, as Titus 1:2 tells us. His word stands: when He speaks, He makes it good. God's blessing rested on Israel, and no power of the adversary that Balaam could use could reverse it. The blessings given to the church are far higher than those given to Israel. So as we think about the spiritual and heavenly blessings that are ours in Christ, let us rejoice in the assurance these verses give.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Israel Described From God's Side

The word God gives is not about how Israel was behaving in the camp below. It shows Israel as God Himself sees them:

Here we find ourselves on truly high ground, and on ground as solid as it is high. This is, in truth, "the top of the rocks" — the pure air and wide view of "the hills," where the people of God are seen only in "the vision of the Almighty." They are seen as He sees them, without spot or wrinkle or anything like that. All their flaws are hidden from view, and all His beauty is seen upon them.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Met. Balaam went out hoping for a familiar spirit, not for God. God met him instead and stopped the second try as He stopped the first.

- Guarded. God stepped in because He loves His people. He "delights to stand between us and the foe," so the door Balaam wanted was shut.

- Compelled. A word put in the mouth leaves nothing to the speaker. Balaam had once held part of the truth back. Now he must deliver all of it.

- Unchanging. God is not a man who lies or changes His mind. So the blessing He has already spoken cannot be reversed.

- Seen. From the heights, God describes Israel as He sees them, not as they were behaving. Writers apply the same assurance to believers blessed in Christ.

Numbers 23:17 · Darby

And he came to him, and behold, he was standing by his burnt-offering, and the princes of Moab with him; and Balak said to him, What has Jehovah spoken?

Balaam has just met God a second time on Pisgah, where the king of Moab waits beside fresh altars with his princes around him. The king's question sounds reverent, but he had wanted this prophet to curse Israel.

A New Height, the Same God

Balak stands by his burnt offering again, but on new ground.

Balak now took Balaam "to the field of Zophim, to the top of Pisgah," and there they built seven fresh altars and offered a bull and a ram on each one. What low and shameful thoughts both the king and the prophet had of their Creator! They imagined that such tricks and changes of place could completely change His mind about His people. The king of Syria and his advisers were just as foolish in Ahab's day. They said Jehovah was God of the hills but not of the valleys, so the Syrians expected victory if they fought on lower ground (1 Kings 20).

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Meeting Balaam Did Not Seek

Before this verse, Balaam told Balak to wait while he went off alone. What happened out of sight explains the message he brings back.

The words "the Lord" do not belong in the older English translation of Numbers 23:15. Balaam said to Balak, "Stand here by your burnt offering while I meet over there." He was not going out to meet Jehovah. He did not want Him to cross his path again. Numbers 24:1 says directly that he went "to look for omens." But Jehovah loved His people, unworthy as they were, and He would not allow this. So He stepped in a second time, and met Balaam. He put a fresh word in his mouth and said, "Go again to Balak and speak this way." It is an immense comfort to our souls to notice these divine activities. The God with whom we have to do delights to "stand between us and the foe."

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

So Balaam comes back to Balak carrying words he did not choose.

The Princes of Moab as Witnesses

The place-name carries its own message, and Balak was not hearing the answer alone.

There, at the "Watchman's field," Jehovah was indeed watching over His beloved people. He put a word in Balaam's mouth, and Balaam had to speak it to the man who wanted him to curse God's people. Balak was not alone; his princes were with him as witnesses to what the God of Israel thought of His people. Balaam claimed to be the Lord's servant, and Balak asked him what the Lord had spoken. So he had no excuse. He himself admitted that the message through Balaam came from Jehovah, the God of Israel.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Asking Without Submitting

Balak names the LORD, yet he is not waiting on God — he is hoping for better news. One writer sets him beside Cornelius, a man who invited Peter to Caesarea and then listened.

Balak's question when Balaam returned to him was remarkable: "What has Jehovah spoken?" But we know he was not willing to accept whatever Jehovah might choose to say. His hope was that the second message would be more favourable to Moab than the first. What a delightful contrast is the attitude of Cornelius and his friends! Peter went to them in Caesarea at their invitation, and they told him: "You have been kind enough to come. Now therefore we are all here in the presence of God to hear all that you have been commanded by the Lord." (Acts 10:33) Such an attitude of soul brings blessing.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

A person can ask what God has said and still be no better for the answer.

The Answer Given

Balaam's reply is not another excuse about being unable to curse. It is a statement about who God is.

He returns to Balak, but this time he does more than confess that he cannot curse. There is a commanding power in his reply: "God is not man, that He should lie." The word Balaam uses here — "El" — expresses absolute Deity. This sets man in sharp contrast with God in His essential Being. Blessing — our blessing through grace — depends on what He is.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

One writer draws out the difference between God and people:

Men lie to one another, but God is altogether different. Men may change their minds, because they do not know where their own commitments will lead; but God knows the end from the beginning and has no need to change His mind. What He had said to Balaam and through Balaam, He would carry out; He would accomplish every word.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Position. Balak changed the place, the altars and the view. He imagined new scenery could change God's mind about His people.

- Protection. Balaam went off hoping to find omens. God met him instead, because He delights to stand between His people and their enemy.

- Publicity. The princes of Moab stood there as witnesses. Balak's own question admitted the message came from the God of Israel, so he had no excuse.

- Posture. Asking what God has said is not the same as accepting it. Balak wanted a better answer; Cornelius wanted the answer.

- Permanence. The reply moved from Balaam's weakness to God's nature. God does not lie and does not change His mind, so He will carry out every word He has spoken.

Numbers 23:18 · Darby

Then he took up his parable and said, Rise up, Balak, and hear! hearken unto me, son of Zippor!

Balak's first attempt to get Israel cursed has failed. He moves Balaam to a new spot and asks again what the LORD has said. The answer opens with a command, not a curse: the king must stand up and listen.

"Took up his discourse"

Older translations render this phrase "took up his parable." That wording can mislead a reader today.

The Old Testament often uses the word "parable" for figurative language where no actual parable is told. So Balaam "took up his parable," Numbers 23:7, 18, and Job "continued his parable," Job 27:1; 29:1.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Why there was a second attempt at all

The reason a second discourse exists is that Balak thought a different view of Israel would produce a different verdict.

This setback did not stop Balak. He suggested they go to another place to see the armies of Israel: "You shall see only a fraction of them and shall not see them all. Then curse them for me from there." Was he so foolish as to think a more limited view of God's people would make any difference? How very little these two men really knew of God!

Modernised from George BellOriginal wording

Addressed by name, in front of witnesses

The summons names the king himself. Other men heard it too.

Balak was not alone; his princes were with him as witnesses to what the God of Israel thought of His people. Balaam claimed to be the Lord's servant, and Balak asked him what the Lord had spoken. This left him without excuse. He had admitted that the message through Balaam came from the LORD, the God of Israel.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

A command that rebukes the hope behind the question

Balak had asked his question expecting a softer answer the second time. He got a rebuke instead.

What an awful rebuke this was to unbelieving Balak. He had surely expected a change in the mind of that God whose aid and help Balaam was to call upon. Maybe he thought that God would give way after a second asking. Maybe He would let Balaam speak a kinder word, as He did when Balak's princes first came to him. Instead, Balaam shouts to Balak to rise and listen, with an awful commanding voice — for so it must have been. Now Balak hears that God's promises to Israel are unchangeable. Nothing can ever reverse them.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

What the summons introduces

Balaam has more to say this time than he did the first time.

Balaam continued: "Behold, I received a command to bless: He has blessed, and I cannot revoke it." This is a step beyond his first message. "God has not cursed"; now he passes from the negative to the positive. "He has blessed" — but his added words were venomous: "and I cannot revoke it." He would gladly have done so for reward. But how delightful to our souls to hear the enemy of God's people confess in public that he cannot reverse God's grace towards His chosen.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Being told to hear is not the same as hearing

Balak is commanded to listen, and he does listen — and gains nothing. The difference between his posture and a believing one is set out plainly.

Balak's question when Balaam returned was remarkable: "What has the LORD spoken?" Yet from what we know of him, he was not willing to accept whatever the LORD chose to say. His hope was that the second message would be more favourable to Moab than the first. What a delightful contrast was the attitude of Cornelius and his friends! They had invited Peter to Caesarea, and when he came they said: "You have done well to come. So now we are all here in the presence of God to hear all that you have been commanded by the Lord" (Acts 10:33). Such an attitude of soul brings blessing.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Rise — the man Balak hired orders the king to his feet; the king who paid for a curse becomes the audience for a blessing.

- Hear — "taking up a parable" means figurative speech, not a story with a hidden meaning; Balaam speaks only what God commands him to say.

- Named — "son of Zippor" makes it personal, and his princes stand by as witnesses, so he has no excuse.

- Unchanged — a new place and a narrower view of Israel change nothing. Balak hoped a second asking would soften God's mind. Instead he hears that nothing can reverse the promise.

- Unmoved — Balak hears and gains nothing. Cornelius and his friends gathered to hear all that God commanded. The command to hear blesses only those willing to accept the answer.

Numbers 23:19 · Darby

God is not a man, that he should lie; neither a son of man, that he should repent. Shall he say and not do? and shall he speak and not make it good?

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Numbers 23:20 · Darby

Behold, I have received [mission] to bless; and he hath blessed, and I cannot reverse it.

Balak paid Balaam to curse Israel, but the prophet must bless instead — and that blessing cannot be taken back. So what does a people's blessing rest on, if not on how they behave? (Older translations, quoted by the writers below, read "I cannot reverse it.")

An advance on the first message

This is Balaam's second try, and his words go further than the first time.

Here Balaam goes further than he did in his first message. Then it was "God has not cursed"; now he moves from the negative to the positive: "He has blessed." But his added words carry poison: "and I cannot reverse it." He would gladly have reversed it for a reward. What a delight to our souls, to hear the enemy of God's people confess in public that he has no power to reverse God's grace towards His chosen ones.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Security resting on God, not on Israel

The verse before it says God is not a man that He should lie. That is the ground on which this one stands.

In this majestic message, Israel's blessing and safety do not rest on Israel at all. They rest on the truth and faithfulness of Jehovah. "God is not a man, that He should lie, nor a son of man, that He should change His mind." This puts Israel on safe ground. God must be true to Himself. Is there any power that can stop Him from keeping His word and His oath? No. "He has blessed; and I cannot reverse it." God will not reverse the blessing, and Satan cannot.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Words spoken in the face of the enemy

Balak keeps moving Balaam to new viewpoints. One writer sees a bigger dispute behind the scene on the hills of Moab.

Balak may take Balaam from place to place to look the people over, but God lets the prophet speak from only one point of view — what they are in the eyes of God. Remember, God is answering the enemy. What is happening on the high places of Moab is a dispute between Himself and the useless power of Satan. He has His own way of speaking to His people, and His own way of speaking about them in front of the enemy. It is a sweet and precious privilege that His people get to hear how He speaks of them. Such is our God. Our blessing depends on what He is.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

A picture of justification

This second message does more than shield Israel. It shows how God accounts for a people with a bad record.

Balaam said he had received a command to bless, for God had blessed Israel and Balaam could not reverse it, much as he wanted to. More than this: "He has not observed iniquity in Jacob, nor has He seen wickedness in Israel." God had disciplined Israel severely for their disobedience and rebellion. Yet He tells Israel's enemies that He had not seen iniquity in Israel. Why? Because God saw them as sheltered by the blood of sacrifice… The first prophecy sees Israel as sanctified; the second adds that they are justified.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The two names he uses matter as well.

Notice too that he used the natural name Jacob ("Supplanter") as well as the name of grace, Israel ("prince with God"). This shows God's grace in justifying the ungodly.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The reason underneath: God's love

Why was the curse never allowed to land? Moses later gives the answer, and writers apply it to believers now.

But can our failures change God's purposes of grace toward us? Will He stop loving us, erase our names from the book of life, and throw us back where He found us? Blessed be His holy name, NO! He chose us in Christ before the world was made… He has washed, sanctified, and justified us, and has sealed and anointed us with the Holy Spirit. All this must stand for ever, for God is faithful, whatever His people may be. In His righteous government He may discipline us, just as He disciplined Israel long ago, but He will never abandon His purposes of grace. "The gifts and calling of God are irrevocable" (Rom. 11:29). Listen to Moses in Deut. 23:5: "the LORD your God would not listen to Balaam; instead the LORD your God turned the curse into a blessing for you, because the LORD your God loved you."

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Commanded — Balaam is not offering an opinion; he is under orders. The blessing came from the heart of God, not from the prophet. Neither Balak's money nor Balaam's greed could bend it.

- Grounded — the blessing holds because God does not lie and does not change His mind. Israel's safety rests on His character, not on their record.

- Positive — the first message said God has not cursed; this one says He has blessed. First sanctification, then justification: God sees no iniquity in Jacob, because He sees them sheltered by the blood of sacrifice.

- Public — God says this in front of the enemy. The very man hired to curse them announces what God thinks of His people.

- Irreversible — God will not reverse it and Satan cannot. The reason lies further back still: He turned the curse into a blessing because He loved them.

Numbers 23:21 · Darby

He hath not beheld iniquity in Jacob, neither hath he seen wrong in Israel; Jehovah his God is with him, and the shout of a king is in his midst.

Balaam came to curse Israel. Instead God made him say what He Himself sees when He looks at His people, at a time when they were at their worst. How can a holy God look at a sinful people and say He sees no iniquity in them?

(The writers below use an older English translation. It reads "iniquity" and "perverseness" where the ESV has "misfortune" and "trouble.")

Words Spoken over the Enemy's Head

God is not speaking to Israel here. He is speaking about Israel, to someone who wanted them destroyed.

We must remember that God is answering the enemy. What is taking place on the high places of Moab is a controversy between Himself and the futile power of Satan. He has His own way of speaking to His people, and He has His way of speaking of them in the face of the enemy. What a sweet and precious privilege, that His people may hear how He speaks of them!

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

What God Does Not See

This is not a claim that Israel behaved well. It is about where God's eye rests.

Only on the ground of the grace that justifies could God call them what they were not. He saw them even now as what He would make them through the Saviour. This is what is before His mind. Clearly, God cannot justify sinners unless He blots out what they are and brings in what they are not. How can this be? Justification comes through another alone. Only in this way has God "not beheld iniquity in Jacob." It is not that He denies it; nor that there was no iniquity on their part, for indeed there was. "Neither has He seen perverseness in Israel." It is a question of what He looks at.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Blood on the Mercy Seat

Something stood between God's eye and the people's sin. It also explains how He could discipline the very people He refused to condemn.

God compels Balaam to say, "He has not beheld iniquity in Jacob, neither has He seen perverseness in Israel." Balaam says it at a time when they were as perverse as they could possibly be in themselves. But the blood was on the mercy seat. God's eye rested on that blood, which spoke to Him of a perfect sacrifice for sin. So He would not allow the enemy to curse His people, or even to accuse them. He still disciplined them for their faults, as a people who ought to have been as holy in their ways as in their standing before God. All this was a picture, and imperfect under the law. But now it is completely and eternally true that God does not charge sin to those who are under the shelter of the blood of Christ.

Modernised from Christian TruthOriginal wording

A Blessing That Cannot Be Reversed

In the first oracle Balaam could only say God had not cursed them. Here he says God has blessed them — and no one can argue God back into looking at what He has removed.

It is not merely that they are a separated people dwelling alone; they are a justified people, having the Lord their God with them, and the shout of a king among them. "He has not beheld iniquity in Jacob, neither has He seen perverseness in Israel." The enemy may say, "There is iniquity and perverseness there all the while." Yes, but who can make Jehovah behold it, when He Himself has been pleased to blot it all out as a thick cloud for His name's sake? If He has cast it behind His back, who can bring it before His face?

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

God With Them

Being cleared of charges is not the whole story. God clears His people so that He can live among them.

"The LORD their God is with them, and the shout of a king is among them." The distinguishing mark of the people of God is that He is in them and among them. Wherever this is not the case, the saints show utter feebleness. It is a blessed truth that God has forever saved and justified His children. But He did it so that He may "dwell among them."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Shout of a King

One writer reads the word the ESV gives as "trouble" as "labour," and finds its answer in the sound at the end of the verse.

When Balaam's unwilling lips said that God "has not beheld labour in Israel," the word used is "labour" — what perverseness produces — and not "perverseness" itself. Balaam then shows how this comes about, when he says that not only is "the LORD their God with them," but also "the shout of a king is among them." That ringing shout of loyalty which welcomes the King is indeed the jubilee cry which proclaims liberty to the worn-out worker. No rest but in "the shout of a King!" Would that our hearts knew it better, and echoed it with the joyous songs that fit it! A King! our King!

Modernised from Frederick William GrantOriginal wording

Standing, Not Excuse

This truth does not make sin a small thing. It tells the believer where he stands while the Spirit still judges the evil within.

When we apply this to ourselves, we must clearly separate two things. One is the judgment of the Spirit of God within us about the evil of the flesh. The other is the testimony of the Spirit about what we are before Him in Christ. We often find the soul judging itself rightly, yet forgetting the ground on which it stands before God. That resting place of faith is what He has done for us in the Lord Jesus.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Blessed — God would not let the enemy curse His people, so the hired curse never had a chance. He spoke these words to the enemy, not to Israel.

- Blotted — He does not deny the iniquity. He blots it out, and He will not even let the enemy accuse the people He has justified.

- Blood — His eye rests on the sacrifice on the mercy seat. That never stops Him disciplining the people He refuses to condemn.

- Beside them — God justifies His people so that He can live among them. Where He is not among them, His people are weak.

- Blast — the shout of a King in the camp is the cry of liberty and loyalty, the mark of a people who know who reigns over them.

Numbers 23:22 · Darby

God brought him out of Egypt; he hath as it were the strength of a buffalo.

Balak sent for Balaam to curse Israel. Instead, Balaam could only say what God had done for them and what God had made them: the verse points away from Israel to the God who brought them out and to the strength He gives them. (Where older translations read "unicorn," the ESV has "the horns of the wild ox.")

The God Who Brought Them Out

Balak had spoken of Israel as a people who came out of Egypt. The reply corrects him: someone brought them out.

These words are repeated to stress that Israel was under the care and protection of God. They had not come out of slavery under Pharaoh by their own strength. When Balak sent for Balaam, he had said to him, "Behold, a people has come out of Egypt" (22:11). God wanted Balak to understand that they came out of Egypt by His all-powerful arm.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Their story began in slavery and fear.

What were they, this famous people? Where did they come from? "Your father was an Amorite and your mother a Hittite" (Ezek. 16). And later, what were they? A nation of slaves! Their first steps out of Egypt were a flight, and fear marked them until their enemies drowned in the sea. "God brought them out of Egypt." But now they have the strength of a unicorn.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Animal Behind the Image

The word behind "unicorn" points to a real animal, not a mythical one.

The Hebrew word is reem. The Greek translation rendered it with a word meaning "one-horned," and from that the older English versions took "unicorn." Nothing in Scripture suggests the animal had only one horn. In fact Deuteronomy 33:17 speaks of "the horns of a unicorn," and it must have been an animal the Israelites knew. Its great strength, and the fact that it cannot be tamed, are its main features: unlike the tame ox, it cannot be put to work on a farm… Most likely it was a species of wild ox, the Bos primigenius.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The strength was borrowed, and the same image returns in Psalm 22.

The mighty strength of the wild ox was not their own. Their God gave it to them. The power of the wild ox, or buffalo, stands for what is most powerful. In Psalm 22:21 the Lord Jesus met the full force of the power of death, and God answered Him from the horns of the wild oxen — from the place where death, at the height of its power, had spent all its energy against Him. Here Israel had strength that no nation could overcome, given by God Who lived among them.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

A Comparison That Falls Short

Even so strong an image has its limit.

He had brought them out of Egypt, and His strength is compared to that of the aurochs, or wild ox. No man can resist such strength. Yet this is only a picture, for God's strength is far greater than any picture can show.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Kept From Harm, and Sent Against Enemies

The verse has two halves, and the next two verses take them up in turn.

There are two parts in Numbers 23:22. The first presents Israel as the objects of God's care; the second, as the instruments of God's vengeance on the nations. Verse 23 answers to the first part, verse 24 to the second. "God brought them out of Egypt." It is the pledge that He never stops watching over them. When God begins to bless, He never stops… It is the assurance of His power always working for them, a power that would keep them safe from the world itself, and from the malice and hidden scheming of Satan.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Balaam's Own Conclusion

Balaam explains why he dare not touch them — and he says it when Israel looked weakest.

"God brought them out of Egypt; he has, as it were, the strength of a wild ox." I dare not meddle with them, Balaam says. I understand far too well what they are. They are connected with God, with His strength and power. "According to this time it shall be said of Jacob and of Israel, What has God done!" According to what time? The time when Israel was faint and weak, worn down by the long journey, with none of their enemies beyond the Jordan yet beaten.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What God Has Done, Not What Man Has Done

One writer applies these words to the believer.

For the believer it is said, "according to this time" — not what men have done, but "what God has done" (Num. 23:21-23).

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Brought: Balak saw a people who came out of Egypt. God says He brought them out. The rescue was His arm, not their escape.

- Given: The strength of the wild ox was never Israel's own. God gave it to them, and He lived among them.

- Untamable: The reem is likely a wild ox — strong, and impossible to tame or put to work. Even that image falls short of God's power.

- Two-sided: The first half shows Israel as the objects of God's care. The second sends them out as His instrument against the nations.

- Wrought: Israel was weak and their enemies unbeaten when Balaam spoke. The verdict still stands: not what man has done, but what God has done.

Numbers 23:23 · Darby

For there is no enchantment against Jacob, neither is there any divination against Israel. At this time it shall be said of Jacob and of Israel, What hath God wrought!

Israel camped on the border of Moab. Its king, Balak, hired the prophet Balaam to curse them. Instead, the hired mouth says that no spell or omen can touch them. The verse then turns from magic to a coming announcement about this people. The surprise is who gets the credit.

The real contest

A bigger question lies behind Balak's fee. It comes at the end of Israel's journey, after all their failures are on record.

The great question in this moving scene is this: "Can Satan succeed in cursing the people of God, and so keep them out of the promised land?" This is not only a question about redemption, and about the joy of redemption at the start of their journey. It is a question at the end, when they have shown all their unfaithfulness — unfaithfulness even after the Lord had brought them to Himself. Can Satan succeed then? No.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Enchantment and divination

Both words in the first half of the verse name Balaam's own trade.

Balaam, who used enchantments, had to admit that "there is no enchantment against Jacob, no divination against Israel." When the elders of Moab and Midian came from Balak, they were sent "with the fees for divination in their hand" (Num. 22:7); and when Balaam claimed to go and meet the LORD, he went "to look for omens" (Num. 24:1). No natural power could overcome the people of God, and no devilish power could prevail against them either.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Why no curse could land

An accuser has to work on legal ground. Commentators trace the failure of the curse to a ransom already given.

In His own dealings with the people He will see everything and take notice of everything. But with the accuser it is a question of righteousness. God sees only this: according to the purposes of His grace, He has given a ransom, and the sins of His people are atoned for. He could not in justice see those sins. So the accuser's mouth is forced to confess that there are none. The enemy has no power against Jacob. And the ground is clearly taught. The words are said of Jacob and Israel, not of God; and they say not what Israel has wrought, but what God has wrought. Israel had the place, but the work was God's work.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

"According to this time"

Older translations read here, "according to this time it shall be said." One writer asks which moment that is. The answer lies in how unimpressive Israel looked just then.

According to what time? The time when Israel was faint and weak. They were discouraged by the long road, and they had not yet conquered any of their enemies across the Jordan. Their enemies were much mightier than they (Deut. 7:1, etc.), and yet he says, "What has God wrought!" The moment he sees them under the eye of God he says that.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The speaker God chose

God's wisdom picked the speaker with care.

In God's wisdom he was just the man to declare even to the enemy that it is entirely a question of what He has wrought, not in any way of Israel's doings or deserts.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Jacob and Israel

The verse names the people twice, and neither name weakens the point.

God delights to speak of Jacob and of Israel. When we see Jacob in all his weaknesses and failures, God's mercy and grace shine out in His dealings with him. When we see Israel, the prince with God, we see the one whom God has enabled to be an overcomer. Whether in Jacob or in Israel, God's greatness stands out.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

What it settles for us

Writers apply the verse in two directions. For life now, it removes fear without removing watchfulness:

We need to be sober and watchful. We need to be strong in the Lord, wearing the breastplate of righteousness and the belt of truth. But we have no need for alarm and dread. We may walk through this evil world with a calm mind. We know the Lord's hand protects us, and we know the enemy has no power.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

The same holds for what is still ahead. One writer points back to Egypt to show why.

Egypt could hold Israel for centuries, but Egypt's wickedness ripened. When the hour came, no power in the air or on the earth could stop God's judgments on Egypt and His mercies on Israel. No enchantment and no divination will ever frustrate God's plan in the future.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Wrought. The verse's key word is God's work, not Israel's record — "entirely a question of what He has wrought, not in any way of Israel's doings or deserts."

- Ransom. The curse fails on legal ground. God has given a ransom, the sins are atoned for, and the accuser has nothing left to say.

- Timing. The words come when Israel is weak, worn out by the road, with every enemy still unbeaten. The credit belongs to God right then.

- Reach. No natural power and no dark power can touch what God has done. Balaam's own trade of divination was useless against it.

- Result. Watchfulness stays and alarm goes. What God has done stands, and no spell will ever undo His plan.

Numbers 23:24 · Darby

Lo, the people will rise up as a lioness, and lift himself up as a lion. He shall not lie down until he have eaten the prey and drunk the blood of the slain.

Balak hired Balaam to curse Israel. Instead God made him bless them, and his words end with a lion rising to hunt. Two questions follow. What made a weary, wandering nation look like this? And when does the picture come true?

"What God Has Wrought"

The lion of verse 24 is the answer to the exclamation just before it. One writer points out who is speaking here, and where the whole force of the words lies.

We have the bold announcement made through the lips of a man who was a complete outsider, in race and in heart. It is all the more glorious for that, because the man who states its great principle could see how deeply blessed it was, without ever knowing its comfort in his own soul. In God's wisdom he was just the man to declare, even to the enemy, that everything turns on what He has wrought. It has nothing to do with what Israel did or deserved.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Lion Seen While Israel Was Weak

The striking thing is the timing. Balaam is not describing a nation already crowned with victories.

According to what time? It was the time when Israel was faint and weak. They were discouraged by the long journey, and they had not yet conquered a single enemy on the other side of the Jordan. Their enemies were much mightier than they… and yet he says, "What has God wrought! Behold, a people! As a lioness it rises up…" The moment he sees them under the eye of God he says that.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Balaam himself drew the practical conclusion: "I dare not meddle with them… they are connected with God, with His strength and power."

From Protection to Attack

The verses just before this show God shielding Israel. Verse 24 puts them on the attack.

God not only acts for His people, He also uses them to defeat those who rise up against them, just as it is written here.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

One note on wording: where the ESV has "a lioness" and "a lion," the older translation these writers quote reads "a great lion" and "a young lion."

"It Does Not Lie Down"

The phrase sets a limit on when rest may come.

This was a solemn warning for the king of Moab. God's people would show all the mighty strength of the great lion and the unstoppable energy of the young lion as they fought the people living in Canaan. Victory for them was not in question; it was already assured by their God. The time for them to lie down in peace would come, but not before their foes had been overcome and devoured.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The following parable completes the picture. There the same lion appears in a different posture:

Israel is again seen as a lion. But now he is not rising up, as in chapter 23, verse 24; he is lying down… After defeating all his foes, Israel would be able to rest in the land God had marked out for them. No one would dare disturb a nation so majestic and strong.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

History, and Still Prophecy

Part of this has already happened. The rest has not.

This was prophecy when Balaam spoke it, but it is now history. Even so, the prophecy has not been completely fulfilled. Because of their failure, Israel lost the land God gave them. They became a prey to their enemies, who carried them off as captives. Yet the day is coming when this word will have its final fulfilment, and Moab will be among the enemies subdued, as Isaiah 11:14 says.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The Lion Behind the Lion

The lion figure points beyond Israel. Baines ties it to a title that belongs to Christ:

The lion is a picture of unstoppable strength. It may act lawlessly, or, as here, carry out God's judgments in righteousness… These prophecies are still unfulfilled. The One who holds God's mighty power, pictured by the lion, has not yet appeared in this character. He has been on earth as a lamb led to the slaughter, but not as "the Lion of the tribe of Judah."

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

Summary

- Source. The lion's strength is not Israel's doing. Balaam has to say what God has wrought — it has "nothing to do with what Israel did or deserved."

- Timing. God calls them a lion while they are still "faint and weak" and have "not yet conquered a single enemy on the other side of the Jordan."

- Direction. Protection turns into advance: God "also uses them to defeat those who rise up against them."

- Limit. The lion "does not lie down" until it has taken the prey. Rest is real, but it comes after the fighting, as the next parable shows.

- Fulfilment. Part history, part still ahead. The strength pictured belongs to Christ. He came as the Lamb, but has not yet appeared as "the Lion of the tribe of Judah."

Numbers 23:25 · Darby

And Balak said to Balaam, Neither curse them at all, nor bless them at all.

Balak had brought Balaam to a second lookout hoping for a curse, and heard a second blessing instead. So he asks for silence instead: if Balaam cannot curse Israel, let him say nothing at all.

A King Who Would Rather Have Silence

Balak's words are not repentance. They are the reaction of a man who has calculated that no word is safer than a good word.

Balak, deeply frustrated, told Balaam neither to curse nor bless Israel. Balaam's prophecy spoke of positive blessing for Israel, and Balak decided it would be better to say nothing. Balaam could only answer that he must speak as the Lord commanded, which was true, for he was only a tool in the hand of God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Source of the Blessing

Balaam's answer points past himself. He did not compose these words, so he cannot take them back.

Such revelations should have brought both Balak and Balaam down in repentance before God. They should have sought His mercy, for both knew well that they were dealing with the God of Israel. Confused and ashamed, Balak said, "Do not curse them at all, and do not bless them at all." Balaam only answered, "Did I not tell you, 'All that the LORD says, that I must do'?" The blessing was not from the heart of Balaam, but from the heart of God. Neither Balak nor Balaam could stop Israel being blessed.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Wickedness That Will Not Stop

The verse reads like a man giving up. The next verse shows he has not.

We have learned something of how stubborn the flesh is. Otherwise it would amaze us that Balak and Balaam tried yet again to bring disaster on Israel. Balak was very angry at what he had to listen to. He said to Balaam, "Do not curse them at all, and do not bless them at all." Yet almost at once he added, "Come now, I will take you to another place. Perhaps it will please God that you may curse them for me from there." This was sheer wickedness. The LORD had already thwarted his plans twice. Yet he still meant to try again, and Balaam did not object.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Curse Turned Back on Balak

Balak believed Balaam held real power over blessing and cursing. He never noticed that a far older word had already settled which way any curse would travel.

Balak is in complete and all-distorting darkness. First Israel was forbidden to touch Moab. Next he says, "He whom you bless is blessed, and he whom you curse is cursed." He was trying to bring the curse on Israel when God had said, "Blessed are those who bless you, and cursed are those who curse you." So he was only bringing it on himself.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

More Blessing From Every Attack

Balak wanted the speaking to stop because each round of it left Israel better off, not worse.

The enemy's attempt did not just make God repeat the same blessing. It drew out His activity, as it were, to bring out all the riches of His blessings. He carries out His own purposes according to His own will and thoughts.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A Battle Fought Over Their Heads

Israel camps in the valley through all of this, and knows nothing of the bargaining on the hill. Our own case is much the same.

So it is with us, dear friends. We are taken up with our own (often) foolish thoughts. The accuser is speaking against us. Yet nothing can succeed, because God works for us.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Danger That Came Next

The curse failed, but the threat did not end. The next chapter shows where the real damage came from.

Balaam knew enough of God to be sure that if the people of Israel could be tempted into sin, the LORD's hand would come down on them in judgement. So we read in Numbers 25:1-2: "While Israel lived in Shittim, the people began to whore with the daughters of Moab. These invited the people to the sacrifices of their gods, and the people ate and bowed down to their gods."

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Frustration. Two tries to buy a curse produced two blessings. So Balak asked for silence — the wish of a man who cannot control the outcome.

- Source. Balaam could not agree, because the words were not his. The blessing came from the heart of God, and neither man could stop it.

- Backfire. By seeking a curse on the people God had blessed, Balak was only bringing the curse down on himself.

- Overflow. Each fresh attack did not just repeat the old blessing. It drew out more, until God had brought out all the riches of His blessings.

- Warning. Hatred failed on the hilltops, and temptation followed in the valley. God defeats the accuser over our heads, but sin we welcome in still brings judgement.

Numbers 23:26 · Darby

And Balaam answered and said to Balak, Did I not tell thee, saying, All that Jehovah shall speak, that will I do?

Balak has heard Balaam bless Israel twice, and in frustration he tells the prophet to say nothing at all. Balaam's answer admits that he has no freedom here — so why is a man who knows God's word so well still so far from God Himself?

Balak's Refusal to Accept the Answer

Balak's words sound like surrender. In the same breath he suggests another place to try again.

We have learned something of the stubbornness of the flesh. Without that, we would be amazed that Balak and Balaam should try yet again to bring disaster on Israel. Balak was very angry at what he had to listen to. He said to Balaam, "Neither curse them at all, nor bless them at all." Yet at once he added, "Come, please, I will bring you to another place; perhaps it will please God that you may curse them for me from there." This was plainly sheer wickedness. The Lord had already thwarted his plans twice. Still he meant to make another effort, and Balaam did not object.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Balak moved from place to place because of a wrong idea of who God is.

Balak no doubt believed in many gods, each with his own areas or high places. He saw the Lord as only another of these. So he thought a change of place might produce the cursing he wanted. But again the Lord met Balaam and put in his mouth the words he had to speak.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Where the Blessing Came From

Balaam says he must speak what the LORD says. So the blessings Balak has been hearing did not start with the prophet.

Such revelations should have brought both Balak and Balaam down in repentance before God, and they should have sought His mercy. Both knew well that they were dealing with the God of Israel. The blessing was not from the heart of Balaam, but from the heart of God; and neither Balak nor Balaam could stop Israel being blessed.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Restrained, but Not Reconciled

Balaam does what God says, but he shares nothing of what God feels.

He had no sympathy at all with the thoughts of the heart of God, none with God Himself. The fear of consequences ruled him. If it were otherwise, the blessing of the people would have made him so happy that he would have shuddered at the idea of cursing what God had blessed. God, however, will use him to give a glorious testimony on behalf of His people. At the same time He condemns the crooked ways of the prophet, for they were indeed crooked.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Commentators describe his role in different ways — some stress that he was compelled, others that God was exposing his heart. On his position in the scene, one writer puts it simply:

Balaam could only answer that he must speak as the Lord commanded, which was true, for he was only a tool in the hand of God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Conversation Israel Never Heard

All of this happened out of Israel's sight and hearing.

How little did Israel know or imagine what was going on between the Lord and the enemy. God was setting out their perfection through the tongue of the covetous prophet. At that very moment they may have been grumbling in their tents. Balak would gladly have Israel cursed; but, blessed be God, He will not allow anyone to curse His people. He may have to deal with them Himself, in secret, about many things; but He will not allow another to move his tongue against them.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Why the Curse Could Not Land

Balaam cannot curse Israel, because of what God has already done for them.

So the moment any enemy or accuser comes on the scene, the Lord places Himself in front to receive and answer the accusation. His answer is never founded on what His people are in themselves. It always rests on what He has made them through the perfection of His own work. His glory is bound up with them, and in defending them He maintains His own glory. He places Himself between them and every accusing tongue.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Warning in Balaam's Own Words

A man can say, "All that the LORD says, that I must do," and still serve someone else.

Balaam shows what a man can become when his heart is covetous. He sold himself to Satan for rewards in this life. He ignored every warning from God that stood in his way on a path leading to destruction. He professed to be the servant of God, but in reality he served Satan, to get the rewards his heart was set on. He was willing to curse the people God had blessed, and to give advice that would bring God's judgment on them.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Must — not may. Balaam's reply is not devotion but limitation: he can only say what God gives him to say.

- Must, because the blessing is God's. The words came from God's heart, not the prophet's. Neither the king nor the hired prophet could stop Israel being blessed.

- Must, even through an enemy. God turned a hired curser into a witness for His people. He used the man's mouth and condemned his crooked ways.

- Must, because God answers accusers Himself. He stands in front of His people, and His reply rests on what He has made them, not on what they are in themselves.

- Must without love is not obedience. Balaam feared consequences but shared nothing of God's heart. A man can claim to serve God while greed owns him.

Numbers 23:27 · Darby

And Balak said to Balaam, Come, I pray thee, I will bring thee to another place; perhaps it will be right in the sight of God that thou curse me them from thence.

Balak has now heard Israel blessed twice instead of cursed. His answer is to move Balaam to a third hilltop. Everything turns on one word: "perhaps." Can a new place, or a new angle, change what God has already said?

Persistence Against a Plain Word

God had just declared through Balaam that He does not lie or change His mind. Balak's reply shows he had not taken any of it in.

It is amazing to see Balak keep trying to curse God's people after all that God had said to him through the lips of Balaam. God had just said, "God is not man… that He should change His mind." Yet Balak said to Balaam, "Come now, I will take you to another place. Perhaps it will please God that you may curse them for me from there." This is man in his self-will and ignorance of God, bringing God's just judgment on himself by opposing His will. To get what he wanted, Balak takes Balaam to the top of Peor, named after his god, Baal-Peor.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

A God Made in Balak's Image

Balak's "perhaps" reveals the God he imagined — a god that a better location might sway, or a smaller view of the enemy.

In Balak we see how completely the knowledge of God was lost… He thought God was just like himself, or like the god he imagined for himself… To him, circumstances and place could influence gods and men alike. So, judging the LORD as he would judge Baal, he says, "You shall see only a fraction of them, and shall not see them all; and curse them for me from there." But God is not man, that He should lie, or a son of man, that He should change His mind. He had spoken, and He would make it good.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Israel's Safety Did Not Rest on Israel

No third site could help Balak. Israel's blessing never rested on Israel.

In this magnificent parable, Israel's blessing and security do not depend on themselves. They depend on the truth and faithfulness of the LORD. "God is not man, that He should lie, or a son of man, that He should change His mind." This places Israel on safe ground. God must be true to Himself. Is there any power that can possibly prevent Him from fulfilling His word and oath? Surely not. "He has blessed; and I cannot reverse it." God will not, and Satan cannot, reverse the blessing.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Each New Attack Drew Out More Blessing

Balak meant the third site to produce a curse. But opposition never stalls God's purpose.

The enemy's attempt did not make God merely repeat the same blessing. It drew out His activity, so to speak, to bring out all the riches of His blessings. He carries out His own purposes according to His own will and thoughts.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

God described Israel in glowing terms while they were still in the desert. The New Testament speaks of believers in the same way.

The new viewpoint was "the top of Peor, that looks towards Jeshimon" (Jeshimon means "the waste"). This time Balaam was forced to give a truly delightful description of the people as God saw them. But the people were not yet in Canaan, resting in possession of every promised blessing. They were still in the desert wastes. Look at the New Testament letters. There we find wonderful descriptions of God's saints — not only as they will be in heavenly glory for ever, but as they are today, while in this evil world!

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

From Cursing to Seduction

Cursing had failed three times. The enemy's real strength lay elsewhere.

Balaam could not succeed in enchantment against Israel… The effort was to get the LORD to curse His people. Balaam could not do it, and had to bless instead. There is no possibility of using Satan's power against the people of God… He has no power as an adversary. It is as a tempter he has power. When the enemy could not bring a curse on the people, he tried to seduce them into wickedness.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Perhaps. Balak's whole third try rests on a word God had already ruled out. Pushing on after God has spoken plainly is self-will, not hope.

- Place. He thought a new location might move God. He judged God by himself — a god bound by circumstances and place.

- Ground. No site could work. Israel's security rested on God's faithfulness to Himself, not on Israel.

- Overflow. Every fresh attack drew out richer blessing. From the third hilltop came a delightful description of the people as God saw them.

- Seduction. Unable to curse, the enemy turned to tempt. He has no power as an adversary, but real power as a seducer.

Numbers 23:28 · Darby

And Balak brought Balaam to the top of Peor, which looks over the surface of the waste.

Balak has already heard Israel blessed twice. Instead of giving up, he moves the prophet a third time — now to the top of Peor, a hill facing the wasteland where Israel camped. If God has spoken twice, what can a change of scenery achieve?

Persistence Against A Settled Word

God had just spoken through Balaam, and His word stood. Balak's reply was to suggest one more vantage point.

It is amazing to see Balak still trying to curse God's people after all that God had said to him through the lips of Balaam. God had just said, "God is not man… that He should change His mind." Yet Balak said to Balaam, "Please come to another place; perhaps it will please God that you may curse them for me from there." Such is man in his self-will and ignorance of God. By opposing God's will, he brings God's just judgment on himself. To get what he wanted, Balak takes Balaam to the top of Peor, named after his god, Baal-Peor.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Why A Change Of Place Seemed Worth Trying

Moving the prophet only makes sense if a god's power stops at the edge of his own land.

Yet again Balak picks another place (v. 27). He does not know the God of heaven and earth. To his dark idolatrous soul, was the Jehovah of Israel any more than the local god of one people, or of one small area? There He might be supreme, while in another place another god would rule. The idolatry of every land and age never went beyond this. Each nation had its own god… Long afterwards the Syrians said the God of Israel was the god of the hills, and not of the valleys.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Hill That Looks Toward The Waste

Balaam now looked out over a region whose name described where Israel still stood.

The new point of view was "the top of Peor, that looks towards Jeshimon" (meaning, "the waste"). This time Balaam was forced to give a truly delightful description of the people as God saw them. But the people were not yet in Canaan, resting in possession of every promised blessing. They were still in the desert wastes. In the New Testament letters we find wonderful descriptions of God's saints. They show us not only how they will be in heavenly glory forever, but how they are today, in this evil world! God sees His saints as "in Christ," and faith says with joy, "as He is, so we are in this world" (1 John 4:17).

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Closer With Each Move

Balak's three viewpoints were not the same distance from Israel.

But now he comes nearer still. From the top of Peor, Balaam sees the people staying in their tents, tribe by tribe. The nearer he gets, the deeper the impression made on him. Now he says, "How lovely are your tents, O Jacob!" The nearer vision you have of the people of God, the more fully you will realise the wonder of their blessing.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Opposition That Backfires

Balak's motive for shifting ground was fear of what he had seen. The outcome was the opposite of what he wanted.

Hatred and unbelief think of circumstances. The sight of Israel had frightened Balak, and in the folly of unbelief he tries to draw Balaam away from the influence of what he dreaded himself. Unbelief never thinks of the thoughts of the Lord, and the people were not hidden from Him. His persistence in seeking the curse enlarged the blessing; it is always so. He does not know God. And God could not simply repeat the blessing already given, so it grows fuller each time.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Real Danger At Peor

The curse failed on that hilltop. Two chapters later, the same name reappears — this time as the scene of Israel's fall.

The effort was to get Jehovah to curse Israel, but they could not. God held Balaam's lips and forced him to speak blessings instead of curses, despite himself. "Resist the devil, and he will flee from you." When the devil comes as an adversary, he has no power. The secret of his power lies in coming in as a tempter and seducer. Satan could not get Jehovah to curse Israel. So he seduced them into wickedness, leading them "to eat things sacrificed to idols, and to commit sexual immorality." Then how could the holy God bring them in? (See Numbers 25.)

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Place. Balak's third move assumed God's favour changes with the scenery. That is how a man thinks who knows only local gods.

- Peor. The hill carried the name of Balak's own god. It faced Jeshimon, "the waste" — God's people seen as He sees them, still in the desert.

- Nearer. Each new viewpoint brought Balaam closer to the camp. The closer he looked at God's people, the greater the blessing he had to speak.

- Enlarged. Pressing for a curse never repeated the old blessing — it drew out a fuller one. Opposition to God's people develops what God has to say about them.

- Tempter. As an accuser the enemy achieved nothing at Peor; as a seducer he later succeeded there. The danger to guard against is not the curse but the bait.

Numbers 23:29 · Darby

And Balaam said to Balak, Build me here seven altars, and prepare me here seven bullocks and seven rams.

Balak paid for a curse and got two blessings. Now he moves Balaam to a third hilltop and repeats the same order: seven altars, seven bulls, seven rams. Can religion, repeated often enough and from a better angle, make God say what He has not said?

A third attempt

Two failures have taught Balak nothing.

Balak and Balaam tried yet again to bring disaster upon Israel. That would amaze us, if we had not learned something of the wilfulness of the flesh. Balak was very angry at what he had been forced to listen to. He told Balaam not to curse them at all and not to bless them at all. Yet almost at once he added, "Please come, I will take you to another place. Perhaps it will please God that you may curse them for me from there." This was sheer wickedness. The LORD had already thwarted his plans twice. Still he was determined to make another effort, and Balaam did not object. The enemies of God's people were never more persistent in their hatred than at this time.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Seven altars and one

The number itself is the giveaway.

Balaam exposed his idolatrous character at once by asking Balak to build seven altars, offering on each one a bull and a ram. God allowed only one altar of burnt offering (Ex. 27:1; Heb. 13:10), for the altar speaks of Christ, the only way of approach to God. But Balaam believed in "many gods and many lords" (1 Cor. 8:4-5).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Baal was Balak's own god.

In the first verse of our chapter Balaam says, "Build for me here seven altars." We see at once what this man was. He claimed to be a prophet of the LORD, but he was in league with the powers of darkness. When Elijah was in conflict with Baal, he repaired the LORD's one broken-down altar, and he prevailed. In contrast to that, we are now to see that the seven altars of Baal can achieve nothing against the blessing of God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A god made in Balak's image

A fresh hilltop only helps if scenery can change God.

Balak's words to Balaam make his idea of God clear. He thought God was just like himself, or like what he imagined his own god to be. At his highest, he could not imagine anything beyond nature. He might picture a monster with every attribute nature could suggest. His god Baal was only the expression of his own imagination. He might think that the LORD was a more powerful God than Baal, and so he did not tell Balaam to consult the god of Moab. But to him, gods and men alike were not beyond the influence of circumstances and place.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Sacrifice cannot buy a different answer

Who were these offerings meant for? Commentators differ — some say Balaam hoped to win God over, others that he was courting the spirits he consulted. Either way they failed.

Whatever Balaam's purpose was in raising his altars, he had to learn one thing. No amount of sacrifice could make God change His mind. "God is not man, that he should lie, or a son of man, that he should change his mind" (Num. 23:19). God could treat Israel as His chosen people, quite apart from what they were in themselves. God viewed them in the light of His purpose. The altars and sacrifices could not alter God's purpose to bless those He had chosen — whether they were offered to the LORD or to the spirit Balaam consulted.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

What God saw on those altars

The bulls and rams meant one thing to Balaam and something else to God.

Whatever the oxen and rams on the altars meant to Balaam, they suggested Christ to God. When Christ is before Him in the perfection of His great sacrificial work, what can He do but bless His people? Balaam understood nothing of this. He was as blind as the wicked men who put the blessed Son of God on the cross of Calvary. There was a side to that cross of which they knew nothing. They never imagined that God would bring vast blessing out of their appalling deed.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The altars give way to blessing

This third set of altars is the last.

By now Balaam had at least learned that the LORD had the unchangeable purpose of blessing Israel. So this time he knew it was useless to seek enchantments from evil spirits. Instead he set his face toward the wilderness, where Israel was camped as God had ordered (Num. 24:1). Then the Spirit of God took possession of him to convey another wonderful prophecy.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Persistence. Two defeats did not stop Balak. His third round of altars shows how persistent the enemies of God's people can be.

- Seven, not one. Seven altars exposed Balaam as a man of many gods. God allowed one altar only, because the altar speaks of Christ, the only way to God.

- Wrong god. Changing place only helps if place can change God. Balak imagined a God like himself.

- Unmoved. No amount of sacrifice could shift God's purpose. He saw Israel in the light of that purpose, not their record.

- Blessing. Those bulls and rams spoke of Christ to God. With Christ before Him He could only bless. The third hilltop ends in blessing, not a curse.

Numbers 23:30 · Darby

And Balak did as Balaam had said, and offered up a bullock and a ram on each altar.

Balak has already heard Israel blessed twice. Still he obeys Balaam and builds a third set of altars on Peor, hoping that more religious acts will bend the purpose of God.

The Third Attempt

Two failures have not stopped either man. One writer points out how little this should surprise anyone who knows the human heart:

We have already learned something of the wilfulness of the flesh. Without that, we would be amazed that Balak and Balaam should try yet again to bring disaster on Israel. Balak was very angry that he had to listen to such words. He said to Balaam, "Do not curse them at all, and do not bless them at all." Yet almost at once he added, "Come, please, I will bring you to another place; perhaps it will please God that you may curse them for me from there." This was plain, sheer wickedness. The Lord had already blocked his plans twice. Yet he still wanted another try, and Balaam did not object.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

A New Place, the Same God

Balak's plan rests on the idea that a change of scenery might move God:

God had said in plain words that He means exactly what He says. Even so, Balak hoped that a new location might change His mind! There, on the top of Peor, Balaam asks again for seven altars with a bull and a ram offered on each. Balaam himself had not yet learned there is only one God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Seven Altars

The number itself is a confession. God's own arrangement for Israel allowed a single altar, and that limit carried meaning:

Balaam exposed his idolatrous character immediately by asking Balak to build seven altars, offering on each one a bull and a ram. God allowed only one altar of burnt offering (Ex. 27:1; Heb. 13:10), for the altar speaks of Christ, the only way of approach to God. But Balaam believed in "many gods and many lords" (1 Cor. 8:4-5).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Commentators differ on who Balaam thought he was sacrificing to. One suggests the offerings were aimed lower than heaven:

It is hard to say why Balaam told Balak to build his seven altars and prepare his seven oxen and seven rams. He may have wanted to appease God by sacrifice, trying to turn Him from His purpose to bless Israel. But the sacrifices were more likely offered to the demons that lie behind all idolatrous worship. Paul writes, "What pagans sacrifice they offer to demons and not to God" (1 Cor. 10:20).

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Sacrifice Used as a Bribe

One writer sees the flesh at work in Balaam's counting of altars and animals:

On the high places Balaam had seven altars prepared, with a bull and a ram on each. To make himself acceptable to God he says, "I have arranged seven altars, and I have offered on each altar a bull and a ram." So man — the flesh — would try to propitiate God. Is there anything more offensive to Him?

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What the Bull and the Ram Said to God

The animals on the altar have another side. God saw in them something Balaam never intended:

Whatever the oxen and rams on the altars meant to Balaam, they suggested Christ to God. When Christ is before Him in the perfection of His great sacrificial work, what can He do but bless His people? Balaam understood nothing of this. He was as blind as the wicked men who put the blessed Son of God on the cross of Calvary. There was an aspect to that cross of which they knew nothing.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Persistence That Backfires

Each new altar-site produced not a curse but a fuller blessing, and that is no accident:

Hatred and unbelief think of circumstances. The sight of Israel had frightened Balak, and in the folly of unbelief he tries to draw Balaam away from the influence of what he dreaded himself. Unbelief never thinks of the thoughts of the Lord, and the people were surely not hidden from Him. His persistence in seeking the curse enlarged the blessing; it is always so. He does not know God. And God could not merely repeat the blessing already given, so He unfolds it further each time.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Place. Balak moves to Peor expecting a new view to change God's mind, but God means exactly what He says.

- Altars. The seven altars show a man who had not yet learned there is only one God, and his sacrifices were more likely aimed at demons than at God.

- Motive. Balaam offered bulls and rams to make himself acceptable to God. One writer asks whether anything offends God more.

- Christ. The animals on the altar spoke to God of Christ. With Christ before Him, God can only bless His people.

- Result. Every fresh try at a curse only drew out a larger blessing.

Numbers 24:1 · Darby

And Balaam saw that it was good in the sight of Jehovah to bless Israel, and he went not, as at other times, to seek for enchantments, but he set his face toward the wilderness.

Balaam was hired to curse Israel, and the curses kept coming out as blessing. Now he stops hunting for omens, turns toward the wilderness, and looks down at the camp.

What "Enchantments" Exposes

Balaam kept telling Balak to wait by the altar while he went off to meet God. This verse says what he was really going out to find. One writer treats it as the solution to a puzzle:

Balaam pretended that the sacrifices were to Jehovah. He said to Balak, "Stand by your burnt offering, and I will go; perhaps the LORD will come to meet me." We learn in the first verse of the next chapter what Balaam really sought. This is the key that unlocks the puzzle for us. He was not seeking Jehovah's presence, but enchantments. That is, he sought the spirit or spirits he was familiar with, and his sacrifices were for them.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

(The ESV says "omens." The older wording these writers use is "enchantments.")

Religious Language Over Occult Practice

Balaam's danger was not open paganism. He wrapped dealings with demons in the name of the God of Israel. His own wording exposed him:

Why the word "perhaps"? Did God ever refuse to meet a soul that sincerely sought Him? Why this language of uncertainty? It was pious cant. When he turned aside to "a bare height" Balaam had no wish whatever to meet Jehovah. His one desire was that Jehovah would let him alone, so that he could do what Balak wished and earn his reward. Numbers 24:1 tells us definitely that he went "to seek for enchantments," which means he was trying to get through to the demons he was used to dealing with.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Why He Gave Up

He stopped because nothing had worked. The reason lay outside his skill:

Balaam used enchantments himself. Yet he had to confess, "Surely there is no enchantment against Jacob, neither is there any divination against Israel."... If there was no natural power to overcome the people of God, neither was there any diabolical power that could prevail against them.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

But giving up the practice is not the same as repenting of it:

Balaam was now fully convinced that it was useless to turn aside any more to seek enchantments. He had proved by experience that the power of Hell is of no use against the power of God, and that nothing could turn His heart away from the people of His choice. This should have produced in him a broken and contrite spirit, but sadly it produced no such effect!

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

God Standing Between

Balaam tried again, and God blocked him. The same writer draws comfort from that:

He did not go to meet Jehovah; he did not wish Him to cross his path again. Numbers 24:1 says plainly that he went "to seek for enchantments." But Jehovah, in His love for His people (although they were unworthy), would not allow this... It is an immense comfort to our souls to notice these divine activities. The God we have to do with delights to "stand between us and the foe."

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Facing the Wilderness

Two things change at once — what he stops doing, and where he looks:

Balaam sees at last that God is set on blessing. He yields to the power of God, no longer goes out after enchantments, and the Spirit of God comes upon him... Notice here that this is not a look ahead to Canaan, nor Israel in their permanent homes. Balaam turns his face towards the wilderness and sees Israel living in their tents. There the Spirit sees them, and declares the beauty and the order of the people in the eyes of God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer raises the obvious objection:

It is not what will be true in the future Canaan that he is speaking of, but what is true of the people of God here and now, in the wilderness... He says, What! with all their miserable sins, sorrows, and quarrels? Yes, for God sees the things that are not, as He had already refused to see the things that were — their iniquity and perverseness. Let anyone stumble at it who will: we glory in it!

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Order in the Blessings

God does not stop at clearing His people of sin:

When we have any matter completely cleared before God from all question of sin, it is not His way to stop there. As we know, freedom follows for the Christian, quite apart from what he once was. He is free to enter into the positive enjoyment of two things: the place of blessing in which he stands, and God Himself, now truly known in Christ.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Exposed. This verse is the key to everything before it. What Balaam called "meeting the LORD" was really a hunt for omens.

- Disguised. He hid dealings with demons under pious talk about the LORD.

- Defeated. He stopped because he had failed, not because he repented. No power of hell can prevail against God's people.

- Guarded. Israel lived in their tents while God stood between them and the foe.

- Beautiful. With sin cleared, the Spirit describes the people as they are now, in the wilderness — and they are lovely to God.

Numbers 24:2 · Darby

And Balaam lifted up his eyes and saw Israel dwelling [in tents] according to his tribes; and the Spirit of God came upon him.

Balaam set out to curse Israel and found he could not. Here he turns toward the wilderness, looks down on Israel camped tribe by tribe, and the Spirit of God comes on a man who never wanted to bless them.

The View from Above the Camp

Balaam is not walking among the people when he sees them. He is up on the hilltop, looking down.

But Balaam set his face "toward the wilderness" — why? Because the children of Israel were still in the wilderness. The wilderness was not Canaan, but Israel was there. The world is not heaven nor the glory, but the church is there now. While the church is in the wilderness, the Spirit of God can take up the parable and show what the church is in God's eye. So here, Balaam is not walking through the tents of Israel, or he would have heard the murmurings and discontent of Israel. He is not in the camp. He has gone up to the top of the hill. Looking at them with God's eye, what does he see? Israel abiding in their tents according to their tribes.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

An Unconverted Mouth, a True Word

The Spirit coming on Balaam is not a sign that Balaam was right with God. Commentators return to this again and again as one of the most sobering facts in the chapter.

Notice how remarkably the Spirit of God works here. Balaam is not regenerate, and he is linked with the enemies of God, and yet the Spirit puts a word in his mouth and compels its utterance. That word is as true as any that inspiration ever uttered — blessedly true — and yet spoken by the unwilling lips of a wicked man! What an illustration of the mighty, irresistible power of that Spirit, and what a joy to know that the power is for us and not against us. Alas, poor Balaam! He may speak by the Spirit, but be a stranger to the Spirit.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The same danger reaches past Balaam. We can speak about holy things and stay cold toward them.

We must pause here and put a question to our own hearts. Is it not possible for us to "see" in an intellectual way, and even to speak of the precious things of God, without our own hearts being moved by them? As we read God's Word and come to understand its teaching, let us exercise our hearts and consciences. Then the truth may get a firm hold of us, and shape and influence our lives.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

"According to Their Tribes"

The phrase describing how Israel camped is not a throwaway detail. Their positions were assigned, not chosen.

What order! Balaam saw Israel abiding in tents "according to their tribes." Our God is a God of order. When the Lord Jesus fed the five thousand, He did not let them drop down on the grass as they pleased. He said, "Have them sit down in groups of about fifty each" (Luke 9:14). Jehovah Himself planned Israel's camp in the wilderness. He arranged the tribes around the Tabernacle in four groups of three, each under its own banner (Num. 2). In the same way, God has placed every member in the body of Christ. He supplies each one from the endless resources of the Head in heaven, giving all that is needed for the blessing and growth of the whole. "God arranged the members in the body, each one of them, as He chose" (1 Cor. 12:18).

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Tents That Cover

Where the ESV has Israel "camping," older translations read that Israel was "abiding in his tents." The word for tents carries the sense of covering, and that is where one writer finds the reason the curse failed.

Why could Balaam not curse God's people? The secret is found in Numbers 24:2, where Balaam "saw Israel abiding in his tents [covered] according to their tribes." Again, "How lovely are your tents [covered], O Jacob" (v. 5). The people were stubborn and rebellious, but in the picture they were covered. So Balaam, the false prophet, had to speak truth against his own will, because he had received a command to bless.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

God's Estimate, Not the Enemy's

Balaam's opinion of Israel had nothing to do with the outcome, and neither did Israel's opinion of themselves.

The great question is not so much what the enemy may think of God's people, or what they may think about themselves, or what they may think of one another. The real, all-important question is: what does God think about them? … God sees us, thinks of us, speaks about us, and acts towards us according to what He Himself has made us and has done for us. He deals with us according to the perfection of His own work. "Onlookers may find many faults"; but as regards our standing, our God sees us only in the comeliness of Christ; we are perfect in Him.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Sight — From the hilltop Balaam sees what God sees. Inside the camp he would have heard only murmuring.

- Spirit — The Spirit came on him with irresistible power, yet he stayed a stranger to the Spirit. Speaking by the Spirit is not the same as knowing Him.

- Order — God arranged the camp Himself, tribe by tribe. He places each member in the body of Christ the same way.

- Covering — The tents speak of a covering. No curse could touch the people, because in the picture they were covered.

- Verdict — The enemy's view settles nothing, and neither does the people's view of themselves. God sees them in the perfection of His own work.

Numbers 24:3 · Darby

And he took up his parable, and said, Balaam the son of Beor saith, and the man of opened eye saith,

Balaam has tried twice to curse Israel, and both times God made him bless them. On his third try he starts by describing himself, not Israel. The titles he uses raise the question this scene turns on: can a man see what God sees and still be lost?

Why He Faced the Wilderness

This time Balaam changes his method. One writer reads the change as a move to keep his distance from God:

Balaam knew God's will better than Balak did. Yet greed blinded him, so he too kept on in his own self-will, clearly imagining that Balak's purpose could still be reached. Knowing that God was determined to bless Israel, he did not go "as at other times, to look for omens, but set his face toward the wilderness." This is the plainest statement of Balaam's evil intention: he tried to avoid getting into God's presence, because he knew God would not let him curse His people.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The Spirit Takes Over the Speaker

The Spirit of God came on Balaam before he spoke. That settled what came out of his mouth:

From this high place God would make Balaam speak out His thoughts about His people, and to this end "the Spirit of God came upon him." Balaam would gladly have spoken to curse Israel, under the influence of his familiar spirit or out of the depths of his own wicked heart. But under the compelling power of God's Spirit he must only speak what God determines.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Open Eyes, Unchanged Heart

The title Balaam gives himself sounds like a boast. One writer weighs how much it really proves:

In saying that his eyes were now opened, he confessed that they had been shut, and so he had been in the dark. It does not follow that his opened eye meant he had turned to God. Indeed his later history proves he had not. But his opening words assure us that he did speak as a prophet, and the words he spoke were the words of God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Falling — With His Eyes Open

Balaam goes on to call himself a man who falls down. One writer refuses to soften that:

The man knew that God had opened his eyes, and that he was looking at things his heart had no interest in. While he described the blessing and final triumph of the people he hated, he knew himself to be a fallen man. Not "fallen into a trance," as the older translation says, but truly fallen. This privileged but wilful man has gone down to eternal ruin.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

This condition is not rare. One writer finds the same thing in the Gospels:

He was like the Pharisees of John 9, who asked the Lord, "Are we also blind?" The Lord answered them with these solemn words: "If you were blind, you would have no guilt; but now that you say, 'We see,' your guilt remains" (John 9:41). This is the state of religious men, who claim to be enlightened with the knowledge of God, but in reality are blind guides of the blind.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

What the Opened Eye Saw

Commentators differ on why he faced the wilderness. Another writer sees it simply as the place where Israel was:

But Balaam set his face "toward the wilderness" — why? Because the children of Israel were still in the wilderness. The wilderness was not Canaan, but Israel was there. The world is not heaven or the glory, but the church is there now. While the church is in the wilderness, the Spirit of God can take up the parable and show what the church is in God's eye. So Balaam is not walking through the tents of Israel, or he would have heard their murmuring and discontent. He is not in the camp. He has gone up to the top of the hill, and looks at them with God's eye.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

God's Point of View

All the effort to curse Israel could not produce one word against them. One writer shows what it takes to see God's people as He does:

Not all the powers of earth and hell, men and devils combined, can draw out a single breath of curse or accusation against the Israel of God… They shine in all the beauty which He has put upon them. To see them like this, we only have to climb to the top of the rocks and have our eyes open, looking at them from His point of view, so that we may see them in "the vision of the Almighty."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

One writer points out that the same three things belong to Christians now:

The Spirit of God came upon Balaam, his eyes were open and he heard the words of God — three advantages which we have. We are responsible to use them. Because we have the Holy Spirit our eyes have been opened, but we must want to understand the truth.

Modernised from George BellOriginal wording

Summary

- Sight given. Balaam's opening words confess that his eyes had been shut. God opened them, and he said so before anything else.

- Sight compelled. The Spirit of God came upon him, so a man who wanted to curse could only speak what God determined.

- Sight without heart. Open eyes are not a changed heart. He praised a people he hated, and his later history proves he never turned to God.

- Sight and judgment. He was falling even while he saw. To claim sight and not obey it is the state of religious men who say "We see" and keep their guilt.

- Sight to use. From the top of the rocks he saw God's people as God sees them. The same Spirit, open eyes and words of God are ours.

Numbers 24:4 · Darby

He saith, who heareth the words of God, who seeth the vision of the Almighty, who falleth down, and who hath his eyes open

Balaam was hired to curse Israel, yet he opens this oracle by describing himself, not the people. His own words tell us where his message came from, and they raise a hard question: how can a man receive so much from God and still be lost?

The man behind the words

Balaam's opening words claim prophetic authority. One writer also hears in them an admission of what he had been before.

As Balaam opened his lips for the third time he spoke of himself in a remarkable way. In saying that now his eyes were opened he confessed that they had been shut, and therefore he had been in the dark. The Spirit of God had come upon him, and he was saying what the Spirit forced him to say. So his opened eye does not mean that he had turned to God. His later history proves that he had not. But his opening words assure us of this: he really did speak as a prophet, and the words he spoke were the words of God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Hearing and seeing

Balaam heard God's words and saw God's vision. Both came to a man who knew he was fighting God.

In the opening words of this oracle, Balaam tells us that his eyes were open. He was not ignorant of the evil of his way. He knew full well that he stood in deadly opposition to the will of God when he sought to curse His people, and now he has to proclaim his own guilt. He had "heard the words of God," and he had seen "the vision of the Almighty." In other words, God had shown him His mind and will about His people. God even let him see the people as God Himself saw them.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Where Balaam stood shaped what he saw. One writer applies the same view to God's people today.

The world is not heaven or the glory, but the church is there now. While the church is in the wilderness, the Spirit of God can take up the oracle and show what the church is in God's eye. So Balaam is not walking through the tents of Israel, or he would have heard the murmuring and discontent of Israel. He is not in the camp, he is gone up to the top of the hill, and, looking at them with God's eye, what does he see? Israel resting in their tents according to their tribes.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why "the Almighty"

This verse calls God "the Almighty." One writer explains what that title guarantees.

The word Balaam uses for God — "El" — is the expression of absolute Deity. Blessing — our blessing through grace — rests on what He is… This title of God is put into Balaam's lips, and it speaks of the absolute character of the blessings pronounced. "Has He said, and will He not do it?" So a further title is used (Num. 24:4), "Almighty" — the Accomplisher of all that He has spoken.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Falling — with his eyes open

Commentators differ over the words "falling down with his eyes uncovered." Some read them as a physical collapse before the vision.

When he saw the visions of God, Balaam had to fall down, just as he did before the angel (ch. 22:31). Yet his eyes were so opened that he saw Israel from God's viewpoint. How sad that this had no lasting effect on his heart!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer rejects the older "trance" wording. He hears in the word a verdict on the man.

The man knew that God had opened his eyes, and that he was looking at things his heart cared nothing for. Even while he described the blessing and the final triumph of the people he hated, he knew he was a fallen man. Not "fallen into a trance," as the Authorised Version puts it, but truly fallen. This privileged but wilful man has gone down to eternal ruin.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Light without life

The beauty of these words makes the man's end even more solemn.

Where can we find nobler or more glowing words than what Balaam said in Num. 24:4 and the verses that follow? Yet what can be more appalling than the terrible history of his later life, and of his end? "Balaam also, the son of Beor, they killed with the sword" (Num. 31:8). Part of his prophecy came true in his own shameful death and beyond — "I see him, but not now; I behold him, but not near." No, wretched Balaam! no, indeed!

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Opened. Balaam says his eyes are open. That admits they had been shut, and that God opened them.

- Given. God gave him two things: His words in Balaam's mouth, and a sight of His people as He Himself sees them.

- Almighty. This title marks God as the One who carries out all He has spoken. That is why a hired curse could never land.

- Fallen. He fell down before the vision. Commentators read the word two ways: bowed low by God's power, or ruined as a man.

- Lost. The noblest of words came from a man who died under judgment. Sight and gift are no proof of a changed heart.

Numbers 24:5 · Darby

How goodly are thy tents, Jacob, and thy tabernacles, Israel!

Balak hired Balaam to curse Israel, but from the heights above the camp the prophet blessed them instead. What did he see from up there, and why is God's view of His people so unlike the view at ground level?

The prophet who spoke against himself

The man who said these words was not a believer. The quotes below follow an older translation, which reads "goodly" where the ESV reads "lovely," and "tabernacles" where it reads "encampments." One writer uses him as a warning that the Spirit can work through someone who is still lost:

A person may share in the Holy Spirit — that is, take part in His workings — without necessarily having received the Holy Spirit who lives in the saints. In them He is the seal of their faith and redemption. It was by the Holy Spirit that Balaam looked down from the heights on the beauty of the camp of Israel. He rejoiced and exclaimed, "How goodly are your tents, O Jacob, and your tabernacles, O Israel!" — and yet what followed shows that he was not a child of God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The view from above the camp

Where Balaam stood decided what he saw. Ground level would have given him a very different report:

Balaam is not walking through the tents of Israel, or he would have heard the grumbling and discontent of Israel. He is not in the camp; he has gone up to the top of the hill, and, looking at them with God's eye, what does he see? Israel settled in their tents according to their tribes.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why the tents come first

Balaam's blessing opens with the tents, not with the people living in them. One writer traces those coverings back to the tabernacle itself:

Read his whole third parable carefully and you will see that Balaam begins with the coverings of the people before he speaks of the people themselves. In Exodus 26 the instructions for the tabernacle and its fittings describe its layers by three names: the tabernacle (v. 6), the tent (v. 12), and the coverings (v. 14). All these things spoke to God of Christ, whose personal perfections cover His people and secure every blessing for them. How suggestive, then, are Balaam's words: "How goodly are your tents, O Jacob, and your tabernacles, O Israel!" Sadly, the unhappy man was incapable of appreciating the sweetness of what he said.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Two ways of seeing the same tents

Human eyes saw shabby desert dwellings. God saw something else — and learning to see as He sees changes how you treat other believers:

Suppose one had gone down to examine those tents and dwellings. In the sight of man they might have looked "black as the tents of Kedar." But looked at in the vision of the Almighty they were "goodly," and whoever did not see them that way needed to have "his eyes opened." If I look at the people of God "from the top of the rocks," I will see them as God sees them: clothed with all the loveliness of Christ — complete in Him, accepted in the Beloved. This is what will enable me to get on with them, to work with them, to have fellowship with them, to rise above their rough points and angles, their blots and blemishes, their failures and weaknesses.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

A verdict that failure could not reverse

God's holiness and His verdict never clash. The same writer holds both together:

In the very next chapter Israel fell into terrible evil. Did that change God's verdict? Surely not. He judged and disciplined them for their evil. He is holy, and He can never approve in His people anything contrary to His nature. But He could never reverse His verdict about them... the moment an enemy comes out to curse or accuse, He stands in front of His people and says, "I see no iniquity" — "How goodly are their tents."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Gathered around God's dwelling

Balaam saw a camp gathered around the God who lived among them. One writer carries that straight over to today:

God had deep pleasure in viewing His people gathered around Himself, as He dwelt in their midst. It is the same today. God dwells among His people; they are a "dwelling place for God by the Spirit" (Ephesians 2:22); and it is with deep delight that He views His own as gathered around the Lord in the assembly.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Why this does not excuse sin

One objection remains, and the writer meets it head-on:

Do you think that such views of God's grace will feed a spirit of lawlessness? Far from it! We may be sure we are never further from that terrible evil than when we are breathing the pure and holy air of "the top of the rocks"... And the only true and effective way to raise the standard of moral conduct is to keep resting in this most precious and calming truth, that God sees us perfect in Christ.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Height — Balaam speaks from the hilltop, not from inside the camp. At ground level he would have heard only grumbling.

- Covering — He praises the tents before the people. Those coverings picture the perfections of Christ, which cover His people and secure their blessing.

- Verdict — What man calls black, God calls lovely. The difference is not in the tents but in whose eyes are open.

- Defence — God disciplines His people for their sin. But the moment an accuser appears, He stands in front of them and says He sees no iniquity.

- Effect — Living in that verdict does not loosen conduct; it lifts it. It also teaches you to bear with the faults of other believers.

Numbers 24:6 · Darby

Like valleys are they spread forth, like gardens by the river side, Like aloe-trees which Jehovah hath planted, like cedars beside the waters.

From the heights, Balaam looked down on a camp of tents pitched on bare desert sand. What he spoke was a picture of watered valleys, planted gardens, fragrant trees and cedars.

The gap between the sand and the vision

The scene in front of the prophet and the words he spoke do not match. One writer explains why.

Balaam spoke not only of the order of the children of Israel, but also of their beauty and fruitfulness... Balaam set his face towards the wilderness. What he would in fact have seen was many tents pitched round a tabernacle in the middle of the bare sand of the desert. That was a dreary enough sight in itself. What Balaam saw, however, was no mirage of the desert; it was the vision of the Almighty. The trees planted by the river spoke of refreshment, fruitfulness and beauty.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Each figure carries its own sense

Each image says something of its own about the people camped below. Older translations open the verse with valleys spread out rather than palm groves, and the writers quoted here follow that wording.

They are spread out low, as the valleys are. But all the streams of the hills water them. That is the law of nature, and God's own ordering: the streams serve what lies low. The next picture brings out this thought more fully. They are "like gardens beside a river" — yes, gardens planted by the LORD Himself, with aloes, rare and sweet-smelling plants from far lands, or with cedars, which Scripture elsewhere calls the grandest things in nature, with a leaf that never fades.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

In a desert, water is the last thing anyone expects to find.

I believe all the glories of Christ are connected with the rivers of living waters. Everyone who believes can say, in one sense, "God has made us like the aloes and cedar trees beside the waters." Every stone might be baking hot, with not a drop of water to cool it. But there is one place in the wilderness where there was not only a drop, but rivers of living waters.

Modernised from G. V. WigramOriginal wording

More than no fault — real beauty

God had already said He saw no iniquity in Jacob. This picture goes further.

What a blessed picture this is! And could we be happy to see them stunted, dishonouring the Lord? The glory of Christ is at stake, for His character should show in us. Paul says to the saints at Corinth (not, you ought to be, but), "You are a letter from Christ, written with the Spirit of the living God." No, I must grieve when I find in them what is contrary to their beauty in Christ. They are "like aloes," and like "cedar trees." It is not merely that God has not seen iniquity in them — He has seen beauty.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Where you stand decides what you see

Balaam spoke from the top of the rocks. One writer makes that height the test of how we treat God's people.

If I am looking at the people of God "from the top of the rocks," I shall see them as God sees them. That is, clothed with all the beauty of Christ — complete in Him — accepted in Christ, the Beloved. This is what will let me get on with them, work with them and have fellowship with them. It lifts me above their points and angles, blots and blemishes, failures and weaknesses. If I do not look at them from this high, divine ground, I shall surely fix my eye on some little flaw. And that flaw will completely spoil my communion and cool my affections.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Seen now by faith, true later for Israel

Commentators press the verse in two directions. One holds that it shows what grace does for believers now:

Balaam does not speak of what they were to become in Canaan. He speaks of what God saw them to be while they were still in the wilderness. So it is a lovely picture of what grace does for the Christian and the church now. No doubt it is a vision only for faith. But it is a vision for open eyes, not shut ones, as it says here. It is no illusion, no heated human imagination of what they are going to be. It is what God sees, and delights to let us see by faith, in His people here below.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another holds the words open for a literal fulfilment still ahead:

This has not yet come true. Israel is still living in miserable huts, far from being like gardens by the riverside, or aloe trees and cedars beside the waters. But the prophetic eye sees it all done. Balaam's vision leaps over centuries to the time of the end, when Israel's unbelief has ended.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Position — Balaam spoke from the top of the rocks. From the ground the same camp is only tents on sand. Where you stand decides what you see.

- Planting — the gardens, aloes and cedars are the Lord's own planting, not Israel's work. Streams water what lies low.

- Provision — cedars stay green because they stand beside water. In the desert God gives not a drop, but rivers.

- Portrait — God does more than find no fault. He sees real beauty: the character of Christ in His people.

- Practice — look at other believers from that height and you can work with them. Look from below and one flaw spoils everything.

Numbers 24:7 · Darby

Water shall flow out of his buckets, and his seed shall be in great waters, And his king shall be higher than Agag, and his kingdom shall be exalted.

Balak paid Balaam to curse Israel, and Balaam instead described a nation overflowing with water and a king above the strongest ruler of the day. The verse looks past the tents in the wilderness to a throne, and asks when such words come true, and in whom.

Buckets that overflow

The picture is of a container so full it spills. That fullness is not meant to stay with the one who holds it.

Those who are drawing on the infinite resources of God have something to give to others. They take in more than they can hold. So Balaam says, "Water shall flow from his buckets, and his seed shall be in many waters." If Balak had understood what he was hearing, he would have had no fear of Israel. The people were meant to be a blessing to all the nations. They were to spread the knowledge of the one true God, and to share His wonderful grace with others. Israel has never yet risen to this.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The blessing is Israel's own as well, not only something they pass on.

Material prosperity and spiritual blessing await Israel. They will also be the means of blessing to others, and with no stingy hand. "Water shall flow from his buckets" is a figure that shows the lavish abundance of the blessing. Wherever the Israelite goes, he carries blessing.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Seed in many waters

The second clause widens the map. The waters stand for peoples, so the promise spreads outward.

"Water shall flow from his buckets" (v.7) reminds us of the "rivers of living water" that flow from within a believer (John 7:38), for the blessing of others too. So Israel will be a source of refreshment for all the nations in the Millennium. "His seed shall be in many waters." The waters speak of the Gentile nations (Rev. 17:15). So the descendants of Israel will spread an influence of great blessing over the whole world.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Agag and Amalek

The verse measures Israel's king against Agag. So who was he?

Agag was the title of the kings of Amalek, probably a general title, like the title Pharaoh, king of Egypt. (1 Sam. 15:9, 32; Num. 24:7)... Amalek descended from Esau, through Eliphaz. (Gen. 36:12, 16)

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The name itself carries a claim to height, which is exactly what the comparison overturns.

In this picture of fullest blessing, we cannot miss Israel's supremacy over Amalek. We have seen what Amalek stands for (Ex. 17). In the earlier prophecy, the meek King of Israel meets the restlessness of the flesh, and His rest-giving yoke conquers it. Now, as the direct result, Amalek's king comes down. Simonis gives the meaning of his name as "very high," which seems to fit the sense best. Israel's King is higher than the highest. And is not self-exaltation the very thing that gives free rein to the lusts of the flesh?

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The King in view

Israel's later kings answer the words in part, but not to the full height of them.

Israel had no king, and would not have one for many years to come. Even so, it could be foretold that "his king shall be higher than Agag, and his kingdom shall be exalted." The Spirit of God who had come on Balaam was looking forward to the coming of Messiah. He would not only be higher than Agag, the king of Amalek, "the first among the nations." He would be King of kings and Lord of lords. There was a partial fulfilment of this prophecy in David and Solomon, but the Lord Jesus is the One the Spirit of God has in view.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Present beauty, future exaltation

Notice the change of tense. Balaam speaks of the camp as it is now, and of the throne as still to come.

Then, besides this, there is strength. "His king shall be higher than Agag, and his kingdom shall be exalted."... Notice the difference: the tents "are" lovely now, but the king "shall be" higher than Agag. The people did not yet have a king. Their visible blessing in power had not yet come. Their exaltation was to be a future thing in the land.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Yet the beauty was real while they were still camped in the desert, and that is where the lesson turns personal.

Balaam is not speaking of what they would become in Canaan. He speaks of what God saw them to be — indeed, what God let him see them to be while they were still in the wilderness. It is therefore a wonderfully lovely picture of what grace does for the Christian and the church now... No doubt it is a vision only for faith; but it is a vision not for closed eyes, but for open eyes, as it says here.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Source. The water is not Israel's own. They draw on the infinite resources of God.

- Overflow. The buckets spill on purpose — the figure speaks of lavish abundance, not a careful ration.

- Reach. "Many waters" points to the nations; the blessing travels outward until the whole world feels it.

- King. Agag was the royal title of Amalek, and the name means "very high." Israel's King is higher than the highest — seen in part in David and Solomon, in full in Christ.

- Kingdom. The tents were lovely already, but the throne was still to come. God shows His people what He sees now, and what the world will see later.

Numbers 24:8 · Darby

God brought him out of Egypt; he hath as it were the strength of a buffalo. He shall consume the nations his enemies, and break their bones, and with his arrows shall smite [them] in pieces.

Balak sent for Balaam to curse Israel. Instead the prophet traces the whole strength of the nation back to the God who brought them out of Egypt. If their power is not their own but His, who can stand against it?

Redemption as the Foundation

The verse opens by naming where Israel came from. One writer calls this a refrain the prophecy keeps coming back to, because the name Israel only carries power if it rests on that foundation.

Yet "Israel" is a name of power; but to make that power real, we must come back again to the foundation. So here the refrain of redemption comes back, with its results.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Glory is coming to this nation. At that very moment, God reminds them of what they once were.

While this glory is coming, God reminds the people where they came from. The same words come back from the second prophecy (23:22), where they go with God not looking on iniquity, and with Israel kept safe from every spell — there too with power against their enemies. But here, in this third prophecy, there is not only victory over the enemy in battle, but the complete conquest of the "nations his enemies." God would not have them forget that He brought them out of Egypt. However high they rise in glory and power, they were once a nation of slaves. God is the source of all good, clothing with beauty and endowing with power.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Balak's Own Words Corrected

Balak had told Balaam that a people had come out of Egypt. He never said who brought them. This verse repeats the fact and names God as the one who did it.

The repetition surely stresses that Israel were under the care and protection of God. They had not come out of Pharaoh's bondage by their own strength. When Balak sent for Balaam he had said to him, "Behold, a people has come out of Egypt" (22:11). God wanted Balak to understand that His all-powerful arm had brought them from Egypt. He had freed them from the bondage of Pharaoh, and had cared for them all through their wilderness journey.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The Strength of the Wild Ox

Older translations call this animal a "unicorn"; the ESV has "wild ox". It was not a fanciful creature but an animal Israel knew, and two things about it mattered.

Nothing in Scripture shows that the animal had only one horn. In fact Deut. 33:17 speaks of "the horns of a unicorn" (see margin), and it must have been some animal the Israelites knew well. Its great strength and wildness are its main features: no one can put it to farm work, as they could the tame ox.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Balak was listening to all this. To take on Israel meant taking on something no man handles alone.

It was hopeless for Balak to oppose Israel, for he had, as it were, the supreme power and strength of the buffalo; God had given him strength like that of this very powerful animal. By repeating this, God left Balak in no doubt: he could no more hope to defeat the people of God than he could meet the charge of the buffalo single-handed.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Power That Reaches Forward

The second half of the verse looks forward. It promises victory over enemies still ahead, and one writer sees it reaching far beyond Balaam's day.

Balaam's final parable is about the victorious power of the people of God, when Christ takes His place at their head… Balaam paints a vivid picture of the power of God as it acts for His chosen people, and in them… For the second time he points back to the great deliverance from Egypt. The God who broke the power of the enemy at that time will break the power of even mightier foes in the coming day (Micah 5:8).

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Balaam's Own Conclusion

Balaam drew the conclusion himself. Standing in front of the king who had sent for him, he said why he would not touch Israel.

I dare not meddle with them, Balaam says; I have too much understanding of what they are, to do so; they are connected with God, with His strength and power.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Foundation. One act holds up everything else: God brought Israel out of Egypt. Every promise of power in the verse rests on that.

- Gift. The strength is not their own. God's arm brought them out of Pharaoh's bondage. He clothes them with beauty and gives them power.

- Picture. The "wild ox" (older versions say "unicorn") stands for strength and wildness. No one can harness it for work, and no king could meet its charge alone.

- Reach. The same power that broke Egypt will break mightier foes in the coming day. That is when Christ takes His place at the head of His people.

- Result. Balaam's own verdict: I dare not meddle with them — they are connected with God, with His strength and His power.

Numbers 24:9 · Darby

He stooped, he lay down like a lion, and like a lioness who will stir him up? Blessed is he that blesseth thee, and cursed is he that curseth thee.

Balaam was paid to curse Israel. Instead his third speech pictures a nation like a lion that has eaten and lain down, and it warns anyone who would disturb that lion. Where did these words come from, since the speaker never wanted to say them? And how far does the blessing and cursing reach?

The Curse Rebounds

Balak thought a hired prophet could hand out blessing and cursing at will. He never saw that the rule already ran the other way.

First Israel was forbidden to touch Moab. Next Balak says, "He whom you bless is blessed, and he whom you curse is cursed." And he was seeking to bring the curse on Israel when God had said, "Blessed are those who bless you, and cursed are those who curse you." So he was just bringing it on himself.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A Mouth Under Control

Nothing here came from Balaam's own heart. He was a tool in God's hand.

We must remember that in all this Balaam could no more resist the power of God working on him and through him than his donkey could stay silent earlier. We must not suppose that there was the smallest measure of real sympathy with what God was doing. The whole event was God's power at work, despite all that could be done against His people. He acted so because He would confound the enemy who turned to Satan's power to bring a curse on Israel.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Two Old Promises, One Hostile Voice

Neither half of the verse is new. Balaam is repeating two much older promises.

In Numbers 24:9 Balaam was forced to repeat two ancient prophecies about Israel. Jacob said of Judah in Genesis 49:9: "Judah is a lion's cub; from the prey, my son, you have gone up. He stooped down; he crouched as a lion and as a lioness; who dares rouse him?" The LORD said to Abram in Genesis 12:3, "I will bless those who bless you, and him who dishonors you I will curse." So the God of Israel confirmed His word through the lips of a determined enemy!

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Lion Lies Down

A crouching lion is not a tired lion. This picture reaches to the end of history.

After devouring the prey the lion lies down. God brings rest to Israel after the defeat of all their enemies. So He promises, "Jacob shall return and have quiet and ease, and none shall make him afraid" (Jer. 30:10). No nation will want to stir up Israel's anger all through the thousand years of peace. Even at the end of that time, nations will come together in hostility against Israel. Israel will have no need to fear, because God will destroy their enemies with fire from heaven (Rev. 20:7-10).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Judah's Lion

The lion picture does not stop with the nation. It reaches a Person: the Lion of Judah, who opens the book of God's purposes.

David's throne is to be lifted up from the dust, and Judah's long-delayed hope is to open into fulfilment. It is strange that critics and commentators can see, in the Lion of Judah opening the book of God's purposes, only the general truth of Christ on the throne ruling the course of events. The clear reference ties Judah's Lion to Judah taking the prey, and then crouching with a strength that no one will dare to provoke.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Where the Blessing and the Curse Land

The last clause has a track record. Nations have tested it.

In attempting to curse the people of God, both were judged by God. It has been the same all through Israel's uneven history. Nations that have interfered with God's people have not done it without cost. God may have used nations, like Assyria, as the rod of His anger to discipline His people, but in imagining they could act as they pleased in this, they brought God's judgment down on themselves.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Looking forward, the same principle sorts the nations at the end.

The blessing of all nations, as we have seen, is bound up with the blessing of Israel because they are the LORD's people. So Balaam closes his parable with the words of God to Abraham. Matthew 25 gives the fulfilment. There the Son of Man sits on the throne of His glory. He separates the nations one from another by how they treated one of the least of His brothers, the children of Israel.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Compelled. Balaam had no sympathy with his own words. God's power overruled an enemy hired against His people.

- Confirmed. Both halves of the verse repeat older words: Jacob's blessing on Judah, and God's promise to Abram. A hostile mouth sealed them.

- Couched. The lion has eaten and lain down. That pictures rest after every enemy falls, with no one left willing to disturb it.

- Crowned. The same lion language runs on to the Lion of the tribe of Judah. He takes the prey, then settles in a strength none will provoke.

- Counted. Blessing and cursing are not idle words. Nations that touched Israel have paid, and the Son of Man sorts the nations by how they treated His people.

Numbers 24:10 · Darby

Then Balak's anger was kindled against Balaam, and he smote his hands together; and Balak said to Balaam, I called thee to curse mine enemies, and behold, thou hast altogether blessed [them] these three times!

Balak has moved Balaam from hilltop to hilltop, hoping for a curse on Israel, and each time the prophet has blessed instead. Here the king's patience snaps, and his angry complaint becomes an exact summary of what God had been doing.

A king's rage

Balak's fury follows the third and richest description of the people he wanted destroyed.

Balak was greatly disappointed with the first and second parables; but after he heard the third, where the people he hated were described as not only sanctified and justified, but positively lovely in the eyes of the LORD, he was furious… He now wished to get rid of his visitor.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Three blessings, not one repeated

Balak counts three blessings, and he counts correctly.

In a word, we see the separation of the people from the world. We see their justification. We see their order and their beauty, as planted by God near the everlasting sources of the river of God. And then we see the coming of Christ. The prophecy is perfectly beautiful. Notice too that the prophecies, in the renewed effort to bring a curse on them, are not repetitions. Each such effort brings out something more of what God had in His mind for His people — for blessing.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The irony is that the world owes these words to a plot against God's people.

Israel's tents are seen as beautiful in the eyes of the LORD. And more than that, the people themselves are presented to us as holding fast to those ancient sources of grace and living ministry found in God… And only to think that we owe these magnificent words to the godless partnership between Balak and Balaam!

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Blessing without sympathy

It would be easy to read the blessings as the prophet's change of heart. Commentators are careful to shut that reading down.

In the earlier vision of Numbers 24, Balaam uses still stronger terms about the power God would give them. Those words bring Balak's anger to a head… We must remember this: in all of it, Balaam could no more resist the power of God working on him and through him than his donkey could stay silent earlier. We must not suppose that there was the smallest measure of real sympathy with what God was doing. The whole transaction was one of God's power, in spite of all that could be done against His people.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Anger aimed at God

Balak shouts at Balaam, but the target of his anger is higher up.

Three times the enemy has tried and three times failed. Now Satan, in the person of Balak, appears in more open opposition. He acts as though he would take revenge on his helpless servant. For Balak here is only the mouthpiece of Satan. In anger and disappointment he tells Balaam to flee to his place… It is against the LORD that Balak speaks. The king now declares himself openly against His will.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Why the curse could never land

What settled the matter was not Israel's behaviour but God's own answer to every accuser.

The moment any enemy or accuser comes on the scene, the LORD places Himself in front to receive and answer the accusation. His answer is always based, not on what His people are in themselves, but on what He has made them through the perfection of His own work. His glory is bound up with them, and in defending them He maintains His own glory. He places Himself between them and every accusing tongue.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The same question presses on believers today: can our failures undo God's grace toward us?

But can our shortcomings affect God's counsels of grace concerning us? Will He stop loving us, erase our names from the book of life, and throw us back to where He found us? Blessed be His holy name, NO!… "For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable" (Rom. 11:29). Listen to Moses in Deut. 23:5: "the LORD your God turned the curse into a blessing for you, because the LORD your God loved you." In the same way, the risen Christ secures all our blessings.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Dismissed, but not released

Balak orders Balaam away. He does not get to end the meeting.

The king, as we would judge, might easily have walked away after dismissing Balaam. But the LORD held him to the spot. There is no other explanation of his staying there another minute… The enemy of the people of God had raised a very serious question about them. The LORD would give His answer in full, and Balak had to hear all of it.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Attack. Balak hired a curse; what he got was blessing, and his rage is the admission that his plan has collapsed.

- Advance. The three blessings were not repeats. Every fresh try drew out more of what God had in mind: separation, justification, beauty, and then Christ.

- Agency. Balaam blessed under God's power, not from sympathy. He could no more resist it than his donkey could stay silent.

- Aim. Balak's anger lands on Balaam, but he speaks against the LORD, whose people he cannot touch.

- Anchor. The curse failed because God answers accusers by what He has made His people. Moses gave the reason: "the LORD your God loved you."

Numbers 24:11 · Darby

And now flee thou to thy place; I said I would very highly honour thee, and behold, Jehovah has kept thee back from honour.

Balak has heard Israel blessed three times over, and his patience snaps. He sends the prophet home with a jab that blames God for the unpaid fee. Two questions follow. Why is a pagan king so clear about who blocked the deal? And what did Balaam gain by chasing honour he never received?

Anger Aimed Higher Than Balaam

The dismissal sounds like a quarrel between a king and his hired prophet. One writer sees a greater enemy behind the failed scheme, and hears Balak's complaint name the real obstacle:

Three times the enemy has tried and three times failed. Now Satan, in the person of Balak, appears in more open opposition. He acts as if he wants revenge on his helpless servant. For Balak here is only the mouthpiece of Satan. He had his rewards for the prophet, but they were offered in vain. In anger and disappointment he tells Balaam to flee to his place. … It is against Jehovah that Balak speaks. It was against His will that the king now openly declares himself.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Knowing And Still Refusing

Balak's words contain a true confession. That makes his reaction all the more telling:

But Balaam's message greatly stirred Balak's anger (v.10). Why did he not bow to the Word of God? Simply because of a stubborn will! He knew that the Lord had kept Balak from honouring Balaam. But he had no intention of listening to the Lord, despite the three testimonies to the blessing of Israel. He gave up all hope of having Israel cursed, and only wanted Balaam to get away, without payment for his services.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Bait That Brought Him

The honour now withdrawn was the very thing that drew Balaam to Balak in the first place:

There is something especially dreadful in the case of Balaam. He clearly loved money — no rare love, sadly, in our own day. Balak's gold and silver proved a very tempting bait to the wretched man — a bait too tempting to resist. Satan knew his man, and the price at which he could be bought.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

So the taunt cuts both ways. Balaam agreed with it, and regretted it:

To all this Balaam's poor covetous heart would say a regretful "Amen." … So if the result of this extraordinary business disappointed Balak, it disappointed Balaam just as keenly.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Whose Hand Held Him Back

The restraint was not bad luck or a bad mood in the king. It was a lesson in who is stronger:

The Lord had indeed kept Balaam back from Balak's honour. This taught Balaam that God's power is greater than the power of Satan whom he served. It also taught him that God will not let anyone interfere with the people He has chosen for Himself.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The Religious Pretence Exposed

Balaam's reply reaches back to the warning he gave Balak's messengers at the start. One commentator notices what has dropped out of his vocabulary:

The false prophet reminds the king of Moab of his warning to the messengers. Not all the wealth of Balak could make him say anything beyond God's commandment. It was true that he had said this. He had even spoken of "the word of the Lord my God." Now the evil man stood fully exposed. Both God and the king of Moab rebuked him. And he no longer speaks of the Lord as his God.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Dismissed, But Not Finished

The king says "go" — and nobody goes. God still has something to say, and Balak must stay and hear it:

However, Balaam did not leave then, as Balak told him to. For God required Balaam to speak one more prophecy. Balak could not help listening, even though Balaam announced Israel's conquest of Moab in the latter days. Balak had challenged God without knowing it when he set out to have God's people cursed. So God gave him four messages that he could not avoid hearing — much as he might have wished to silence at least the fourth!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Where The Chase Ends

Balaam had earlier wished to die the death of the righteous. A writer sets that wish against the road he took:

But he did not care to live the life of the righteous. How could he expect to die the death of the righteous? Reward glittered before his eye. He went his way to hell for the sake of what he could pick up on the road. Yet he must leave it all at the edge of the grave. He and his sins alone could pass through the gates of eternity.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Bait. Honour and money were the hook that drew Balaam to Moab; the enemy knew his man and the price he could be bought for.

- Blessing. Three times the curse came out as blessing. God will not let anyone interfere with the people He has chosen.

- Restraint. The king's own taunt admits it: the Lord held Balaam back, proving His power greater than the power Balaam served.

- Exposure. Rebuked by God and by a pagan king, the prophet who once said "the Lord my God" stops saying it.

- End. Balak keeps his gold, Balaam keeps his covetous heart, and Balaam must leave the glittering reward at the edge of the grave.

Numbers 24:12 · Darby

And Balaam said to Balak, Did I not also speak to thy messengers whom thou sentest to me, saying,

Balak, the king of Moab, has just exploded in anger: the prophet he hired to curse Israel, Balaam, has blessed them three times instead. Balaam answers that he warned Balak's men from the start: his mouth was not his to sell — and yet he wanted the bribe with all his heart.

True words from a covetous heart

Balaam's defence is true to fact. He had told Balak's messengers exactly this. One commentator adds a remark in brackets that exposes the man behind the words:

If Balak would give me his house full of silver and gold [the very thing his poor heart craved intensely], I cannot go beyond the commandment of the Lord, to do either good or bad of my own mind. But what the Lord says, that will I speak.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Words put in his mouth

Balaam's point is about his words, not his willingness. He is saying God put those sentences in his mouth. One writer shows how far that went:

He loved "the wages of unrighteousness," and, if he could, would have uttered what Balak desired. But a power that he could not resist held sway over him. He was for the time being the mouthpiece of God, and spoke, however unwillingly, the words of God. He knew that inspiration was real, and real word by word. So at his first meeting with Balak, before he spoke one prediction about Israel, he told him, "Have I now any power to say anything? The word that God puts in my mouth, that shall I speak."

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

What he wanted to say

What held him back was not conviction. With a different source feeding him, the same tongue would have cursed:

Balaam could only respond as before, that he must speak what he was given to speak. If an evil spirit had given him a message of cursing, he would have been glad to speak it. But God stepped in and gave a message that He forced Balaam to speak. A house full of gold and silver could not change that, as Balaam knew.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The hand that held him back

Balak had told Balaam that the LORD kept him from honour. He was right about the cause, but he missed what it meant:

The Lord had indeed kept Balaam back from Balak's honour. He was teaching him that His power is greater than the power of Satan, whom Balaam served. He was teaching him too that He will not let anyone interfere with the people He has chosen for Himself.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The same grip was on the king. He had dismissed Balaam; he should have walked off. He did not:

The King, we would think, could have walked away once he had dismissed Balaam. But Jehovah held him to the spot. There is no other explanation of his remaining there another minute. And how else can we explain his silence when Balaam spoke plainly of disaster to his own nation? The enemy of God's people had raised a very serious question about them. Jehovah would give His answer in full, and Balak had to hear it.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The two words he drops

Balaam points the king back to what he told the messengers. But his earlier words had two more in them:

The false prophet reminds the king of Moab that he had warned his messengers: not all the wealth of Balak could make him say anything beyond God's commandment. It was true that he had said this. He had even spoken of "the word of the Lord my God." Now God and the king of Moab had both exposed and rebuked the evil man, and he no longer speaks of the Lord being his God.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Restraint, not reverence. Balaam's boast that money could not move him was true of his mouth only. A power he could not resist held him, and he spoke God's words unwillingly.

- Restraint on the prophet. The LORD kept him back from Balak's honour. God's power is greater than the power of the one Balaam served, and God will not let anyone touch the people He has chosen.

- Restraint on the king. Balak had dismissed his hired man. Yet the LORD held him to the spot and made him hear His full answer to the charge against His people.

- Restraint exposes. That same hand uncovered the man. God and Balak both rebuked him, and he drops the words "my God" for good.

- Restraint is not salvation. A tongue used by God is no proof of a heart that belongs to Him. With a different source, Balaam would gladly have cursed what God had blessed.

Numbers 24:13 · Darby

If Balak gave me his house full of silver and gold, I could not go beyond the commandment of Jehovah to do good or bad out of my heart what Jehovah shall say, that will I speak?

Balak hired Balaam to curse Israel. Instead Balaam blessed them, and the king has just sent him away in anger. Balaam's answer is not a new defence. He simply repeats the terms he set at the start — terms that confess God's power and expose his own heart at the same time.

A promise repeated, with one word dropped

Balaam's reply sounds consistent. He says he warned Balak's messengers from the start. But one writer notices that he does not repeat himself exactly. Something has dropped out.

The false prophet reminds the king of Moab that he had warned his messengers: not all of Balak's wealth could make him say anything beyond God's commandment. He had indeed said this. He had even spoken of "the word of the Lord my God." Now God and the king of Moab had completely exposed this evil man and rebuked him. And he no longer speaks of the Lord as his God.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

A refusal that sounds brave

On the surface, money cannot buy this man and threats cannot move him. One commentator reads the scene that way:

But the prophet seems neither won by desire for his bribes, nor afraid of the king's power.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Others look past the surface to what Balaam would have done if he had been free to choose. He was not turning the money down. God was stopping him from earning it.

Balaam could only respond as before, that he must speak what he was given to speak. If an evil spirit had given him a message of cursing he would have been glad to speak that, but God intervened to give a message that He compelled Balaam to speak. A house full of gold and silver could not change that, as Balaam knew (v.13).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

"Of my own will" — words that were not his

The heart of the verse is the limit Balaam admits. He cannot produce good or bad out of himself. He can only pass on what God puts in his mouth. One writer presents Balaam as proof of how far God's control over a speaker's words can reach, even when the speaker is unwilling.

We know he loved "the wages of unrighteousness," and he would have said what Balak wanted if he could. But a power he could not resist ruled him. For the time being he was the mouthpiece of God, and he spoke the words of God, unwilling as he was. He was so aware that this was real inspiration, down to each word, that at his first meeting with Balak, before he made one prediction about Israel, he told him, "Have I now any power of my own to speak anything? The word that God puts in my mouth, that must I speak."

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Eyes, ears and lips all taken over

The control was not limited to his tongue. Another writer follows it through his eyes and ears too. The result was not just silence about cursing. Balaam had to speak of God's delight in the people He had chosen.

Here we see the way God brought Balaam to see the deep things of God, and to testify to His good pleasure in the people of His choice. God's mighty power took hold of his eyes, ears and lips. He had to see "the vision of the Almighty," to hear "the words of God," and to speak what the Lord put in his mouth.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Neither man wanted more — God did

Both men were ready to walk away from each other. God was not finished.

Balak did not want to hear any more, and Balaam did not want to say any more. But the power of Hell had been called up against His chosen people, so Jehovah had taken the matter up, though no one asked Him, and He would see it through to the end. What is more, it had to end in His time and in His way. God's power held Balak there, and he had to listen to a remarkable prediction of earth's final military catastrophe.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

That prediction reaches far past anything Balak had in mind. One writer sums up its range:

It really embraces the end of this age.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Price. Balaam names the highest bid he can imagine, a house full of silver and gold, and it still buys nothing. The word of the Lord is not for sale.

- Limit. Balaam admits he has no range of his own. He cannot produce good or bad from himself. He can only repeat what God gives him.

- Mouthpiece. He spoke God's words against his own will. Commentators say he would have cursed Israel if he could. He is a witness to how God controls a man's words, not an example of faith.

- Exposure. Repeating his old pledge, he drops the words "my God." Once the profit was gone, so was the claimed relationship.

- Reach. Neither king nor prophet wanted the meeting to go on. God carried it on, into a prophecy that reaches the end of the age.

Numbers 24:14 · Darby

And now behold, I go to my people come, I will admonish thee what this people will do to thy people at the end of days.

Balak paid Balaam to curse Israel and got three blessings instead. He has just sent the prophet away in anger, and Balaam answers with one last word: a preview of what Israel will do to Moab at the end of history.

A prophecy nobody asked for

Balak wanted the prophet gone. Neither man wanted to hear or say another word, yet this was not over.

Balak had no wish to hear more, and Balaam had no wish to say more. But the power of Hell had been called up against His chosen people, so the LORD had taken the matter up, though no one asked Him to, and He would see it through to the finish. What is more, it must finish in His time and in His way. God's power held Balak there, and he had to listen to a remarkable prediction of earth's final military disaster.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

So the king who hired a curse ended up with a forecast of his own defeat.

Balak was left with the statement that to curse Israel was to bring a curse on the head of the person who spoke it. This made him angry, and he wanted to send Balaam away on the spot. But the Lord was about to speak again through Balaam's lips, and Balak had to listen... So Balak had to hear not only Israel's present blessing but also their victorious destiny.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What "the latter days" points to

The phrase is not vague. The same words run right through the Old Testament, and they always point to the same stretch of time.

"The last," or "latter days," is an expression with a clear prophetic meaning. It occurs just 14 times (Gen. 49:1; Num. 24:14; Deut. 4:30; Deut. 31:29; Isa. 2:2; Jer. 23:20; Jer. 30:24; Jer. 48:47; Jer. 49:39; Ezek. 38:16; Dan. 2:28; 10:14; Hosea 3:5; Micah 4:1). In every one of these the reference is to the closing scenes of Jacob's time of trouble and the setting up of the Millennial kingdom, as a study of the context of these passages will show.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Israel's doing and Messiah's doing

Balaam promises news about what one people will do to another. Three verses later he speaks of Messiah's scepter.

Balaam had said, "I will let you know what this people will do to your people in the latter days" (verse 14). As soon as the prophet speaks of Messiah's scepter, he says that He "shall crush the forehead of Moab and break down all the sons of Sheth." This points to God's dealings with Moab in the "latter days," at the time when the millennium begins. Israel is to deal with Moab, according to verse 14, but it is Messiah too, according to verse 17.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

"I am going to my people"

Balaam announces his departure. It did not turn out to be a homecoming.

With his words finished, Balaam went off "to his place." This does not mean that he returned to his own land... later we find that when Moab and the Midianites were destroyed, he died among them.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The man who described Israel's future stayed on the losing side of it.

When the five kings of the Midianites were killed in battle, Balaam died with them (Num. 31:8). He was a long way from home at that tragic moment. But death found him among the bitter, long-standing enemies of the people of God, still trying to harm Israel.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Seeing the blessing from outside

Balaam saw the blessing and spoke about it. He never stood inside it.

His greed led him to try to serve the wicked king of Moab by cursing the people of God. When God gave him an answer, he goes to God a second time, because his heart wanted its own way. It is a solemn thing to learn that if God gives you up, you may get what you want... He was indeed a man whose heart was not with God. He said some true things, but his spirit was not in them. He always speaks from the outside, as a miserable man, far off from the blessing that he saw. "I see him, but not now; I behold him, but not near," and so on. He goes on step by step, until he lends himself to corrupt even God's chosen people through the world.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the future is told at all

Balaam tells Balak what is coming. The Bible tells us what is coming, and it has a purpose in doing so.

Most of the Bible deals with the great crisis that is now coming, when God will bring the Man of His choice out into full view, and put all things under His rule... "Horns" and "beasts" may be very interesting, and may give plenty of material for discussion. But the aim of the Spirit of God in showing us the future is to separate us from man's hopelessly evil order of things, and to fix our minds on Christ.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Last word. Balaam wanted to stop, and Balak wanted him gone. God kept the last word, and He made Balak hear it.

- Last days. "The latter days" is a settled phrase, pointing to Israel's time of trouble and the kingdom that follows it.

- Last enemy. What Israel does to Moab is also what Messiah does — the Scepter strikes through His people.

- Last journey. He said he was going to his people; he died among Israel's enemies instead.

- Last aim. Prophecy is not there to fuel debate about symbols. It loosens our grip on this world order and fixes us on Christ.

Numbers 24:15 · Darby

And he took up his parable, and said, Balaam the son of Beor saith, and the man of opened eye saith,

Balak wanted Israel cursed, and Balaam could not do it. This fourth oracle opens with a portrait of Balaam himself: a man who sees God and is still lost.

The end of the enchantments

What changed in the way Balaam received these prophecies?

How were these prophecies given? When Balaam found he could not turn God aside from His purpose of blessing the people, he stopped looking for enchantments.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

An opened eye that is not a new heart

The phrase "whose eye is opened" sounds like conversion. It is not. Commentators distinguish between accurate knowledge about God and living knowledge of Him.

Balaam begins this prophecy in much the same way as his third. He speaks as the man whose eyes were opened, who hears the words of God and has knowledge of the Most High. How sad that this knowledge came only from evidence. It was not the living knowledge of a believer. Yet it was accurate, for he did see the vision of the Almighty, subdued before God, falling down with his eyes open. So what he prophesied is absolute truth, and he could know it only because God revealed it.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Inspired words and three names for God

Balaam's words pile up hearing, knowing and seeing, and they name God three ways. One writer draws a lesson from each.

Ungodly as he was, for a fourth time Balaam was forced to speak inspired words, and verse 16 is instructive about what inspiration involves. He not only "saw" and "knew," but also "heard the words of God." So the very words he spoke were given to him. What is more, he used three names. There is "God." There is "the Most High," a name that seems tied in a special way to His supremacy in the millennial age. And there is "the Almighty," the name by which He revealed Himself to Abraham, from whom Israel came. If Balaam had really known God for himself in the way these names suggest, he would have been stopped in his evil course. He gives us a solemn example of the good things a man may say while he himself remains in "the bond of iniquity," like Simon the sorcerer in Acts 8.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Eyes, ears and lips under God's hand

Balaam presents himself as a man who sees and speaks. Neither was under his own control.

Here we see the way Balaam was brought to see the deep things of God, and to testify to His good pleasure in the people of His choice. Eyes, ears and lips were brought under the mighty power of God. He was obliged to see "the vision of the Almighty," and to hear "the words of God," and to speak what the Lord put in his mouth (see Numbers 22:38; 23:5, 12, 16, 26; 24:13).

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

"Falling, but having his eyes open"

The oracle goes on to speak of Balaam falling down with his eyes open. One writer takes the falling at face value: the man is going down, and he can see it happening.

Balaam declares that he is falling — falling down to ruin, "but having his eyes open." He was like the Pharisees of John 9, who said to the Lord, "Are we also blind?" The Lord answered them with these solemn words: "If you were blind, you would have no guilt; but now that you say, 'We see,' your guilt remains" (John 9:41). This is the condition of religious men who claim to be enlightened with the knowledge of God, but are really "blind leaders of the blind."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The view from the top of the rocks

The opened eye has a second side. What Balaam had to see is what God's people most need to see — and Balak's attack is what drew it out.

To speak in human terms, we would never have had such a glorious view of Israel if Balak had not tried to curse them. It is the view seen in "the vision of the Almighty," "from the top of the rocks," by one "having his eyes open"… They shine in all the beauty He has put on them. To see them this way, all that is needed is to climb to "the top of the rocks" — to have "the eyes open" and look at them from His point of view, so that we may see them in "the vision of the Almighty."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Sight — Balaam's eye is open. What he sees is real, and his words are true, because they come from God and not from him.

- Without life — the sight comes from evidence, not from life. He knows about the Most High; he does not know Him, or God would have stopped him in his course.

- Under compulsion — eyes, ears and lips are all commandeered. The enchantments have stopped; only what God gives him comes out.

- Falling — the same oracle in which he boasts of open eyes records him going down. Knowing and seeing saved nobody; claiming to see while walking in self-will is the guilt of John 9.

- Reversed — what condemned Balaam is what believers should want: the opened eye that sees God's people from God's point of view.

Numbers 24:16 · Darby

He saith, who heareth the words of God, who knoweth the knowledge of the Most High, Who seeth the vision of the Almighty, who falleth down, and who hath his eyes open

Balaam was hired to curse Israel, yet he opens this oracle by describing himself — a man who hears from God and sees what the Almighty shows him. How could someone with that much access to God still end up lost?

The man behind the words

Balaam is describing himself, and the description gives him away. One writer notes what a man admits when he says his eyes are now open:

As Balaam opened his lips for the third time he spoke of himself in a remarkable way. In saying that now his eyes were opened he confessed that they had been shut, and so he had been in the dark. The Spirit of God had come upon him, and he was saying what the Spirit forced him to say. It does not follow that his opened eye meant he had turned to God. His later history proves that he had not. But his opening words are meant to assure us that he really did speak as a prophet, and the words he spoke were the words of God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What kind of man was he? One writer answers from how he lived and how he died:

That Balaam was a man of God, no one, I think, would dare to claim... He "loved the wages of unrighteousness." He put himself among the open enemies of the Lord. He agreed, for money, to curse the people of God — though God turned the curse into a blessing. And you know how he died, set against the armies of the Lord, despite his prayer, "Let me die the death of the righteous"... He was never a converted man. Still — and this is very solemn to consider — God could use him as a vessel to express His thoughts of His people.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Knowledge without life

Balaam claims to know the Most High — the language of a saint. One writer separates two kinds of knowing:

Balaam begins this much as he began his third prophecy: the man whose eyes were opened, who hears the words of God and has knowledge of the Most High. How sad that this knowledge was only a knowledge from evidence, not the living knowledge of a believer. Yet it was accurate, for he really did see the vision of the Almighty, subdued before God, falling down with his eyes open. So what he prophesied is absolute truth, which he could only know by God's revelation.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Can a person know God like that and still be unconverted? Another writer points to Romans:

It is clear from Rom. 1:21, etc., that a certain knowledge of God may exist apart from conversion or the working of divine life in the soul.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Why these three names of God

The verse names God three ways, and each name carries its own weight:

The word Balaam uses here — "El" — is the expression of absolute Deity... It is put into Balaam's lips, and speaks of the absolute character of the blessings pronounced. "Has He spoken, and shall He not make it good?" So a further title is used (Num. 24:4), "Almighty" — the One who accomplishes all that He has spoken. He is also in relationship with those He blesses — "Jehovah his God is with him." And when the rising of the Star out of Jacob is predicted, then the title "Most High" is brought in (Num. 24:16). For the Sceptre of universal rule arises out of Israel, and Jehovah their God is then Most High over all the earth. It is His millennial title.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

That same title links this oracle to a wider line running through the Bible:

Melchizedek, the priest of the Most High God, met Abram returning from the slaughter of the kings and blessed him in the name of the Most High God, possessor of heaven and earth (Gen. 14:18-20). This event appears to prefigure the millennial day when the saints of the Most High shall take the kingdom and possess it for ever (Dan. 7). Again, Balaam, through "the knowledge of the Most High," prophesied of the same time (Num. 24:16).

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The falling man

The verse ends with Balaam describing himself as falling down. One writer takes that fall as more than a physical collapse:

Balaam knew that God had opened his eyes, and that he was looking at things his heart cared nothing for. While he described the blessing and the final triumph of the people he hated, he knew himself to be a fallen man. Not "fallen into a trance," as an older translation puts it, but really fallen. This privileged but stubborn man has gone down to eternal ruin.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The ESV says nothing about a trance here. It reads "falling down with his eyes uncovered."

What it asks of the reader

One writer turns Balaam's story on the reader:

Let none of us be content with mere externals, however good they may be. The essential thing is heart-faith in the Son of God. Even the smallest true faith in Him is worth infinitely more than stores of Bible knowledge and church privileges. Balaam's case was all the more serious because light shone across his path but never entered his soul.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Light. Opened eyes admit they were once shut. Balaam confessed he had been in the dark, and the Spirit forced true words out of him.

- Light without life. He knew about the Most High, but the knowledge was not living — real facts about God, no divine life in the soul.

- Light still true. The messenger's state did not spoil the message. What he spoke was absolute truth, and only God's revelation could give it.

- Light on the kingdom. "Almighty" means He accomplishes all He has said. "Most High" is His title for the day when rule rises out of Israel and He is Most High over all the earth.

- Light that condemns. Balaam fell with his eyes wide open. Without heart-faith in the Son of God, privilege only deepens the loss.

Numbers 24:17 · Darby

I shall see him, but not now; I shall behold him, but not nigh There cometh a Star out of Jacob, and a Sceptre shall rise out of Israel, and he shall cut in pieces the corners of Moab, and destroy all the sons of tumult.

Balaam came to curse Israel, but standing over their camp he described a Person still far off — a Star out of Jacob, a Sceptre out of Israel. Three questions follow: who is this coming One, when does He come, and why did the man who saw Him gain nothing?

A curse God turned into a promise

The whole scene is a failed attack. One writer sets the two wills side by side:

Never was Satan more determined to curse; never was God more determined to bless! Satan never had a more willing servant. And no man was ever more powerless than Balaam once the Almighty took hold of him!

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

What came out instead reached far beyond the moment on the hilltop:

So the curse Balaam intended became the most magnificent statement of blessing ever pronounced on the people of God. It reaches down to the last days, when Israel will be exalted under the Most High God, the possessor of heaven and earth.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Two images, two meanings

The Star and the Sceptre are not decoration. Each carries its own idea:

The star is for watchers. We must be up early in the morning if we wish to see the early star. The sceptre speaks of authority and rule.

Modernised from George BellOriginal wording

Another writer names each one in a word: "The Star speaks of hope, and the Sceptre speaks of rule and government. Where is our hope? We answer, In the Lord Jesus Christ" (F. B. Hole).

A Person, not a nation

Balaam's earlier speeches looked at the whole nation. This one narrows to one Person:

We recall his first parable. From the top of the rocks he said in the same way, "I see him and from the hills I behold him." There it was the nation; here it is a person — the King of Israel whose shout he had heard before among the wonderful people. The description of this coming King is glorious. He sees Him first as a star coming out of Jacob. Then he calls Him a sceptre risen out of Israel, striking through the sides of Moab and turning all the sons of tumult against each other.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

When the Star rises

Commentators differ over how much of this has already happened. One writer sees it fulfilled twice — once in David, and once still to come: "As a fulfilled prophecy, this star is David; and, as a prophecy yet to be fulfilled, this star is Christ, David's Son" (H. L. Rossier). Others place the whole weight in the future. Gaebelein calls it "a very pronounced Messianic prophecy relating to the time when the kingdom is to be restored to Israel." He says many teachers have made a mistake by applying it to Christ's first coming. Kelly, weighing nation after nation, reaches the same conclusion:

So it does not matter whether the powers are western or eastern. It does not matter whether the enemies are many or few, what resources they have, or where they come from… It is the day of Immanuel, not of David or the Maccabees.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"The sons of Sheth"

Some read the phrase "sons of Sheth" as a description rather than a family line:

Instead of "children of Sheth," it is better to read "sons of tumult"; that is, "tumultuous war will be destroyed."

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The man who saw and gained nothing

The verse opens with a confession that condemns the speaker. Older translations put its first words in the future — "I shall see him, but not now":

But at the start he is made to speak of his own tragic position: "I shall see Him, but not now; I shall behold Him, but not near." … Balaam's fate will be that of all unbelievers. Believers see the Lord Jesus now by faith. But Balaam had no intention of bowing his heart to Him at the time. So in the future he will see Him, but not near. It will be only in awesome judgment, when he sees Him at the Great White Throne.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Seeing was never the problem. "He thus beheld in vision a glorious Person to whom he could never come near. Distance must be his portion for ever" (W. W. Fereday).

The Star and the morning

The wording here stops short of something the New Testament adds:

He had been predicted as coming "a Star out of Jacob," without any reference to the morning. As the bright Morning Star, Jesus presents Himself as the One who runs ahead of the coming day and guarantees it. Now Israel does not know Him like this, for it has rejected Him and treated Him as an impostor. The Church, and the Church alone, knows Him in this character.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Curse — Balaam came to curse. God made the same mouth speak the greatest blessing ever pronounced over His people, reaching to the last days.

- Star — the Star is for watchers, seen by those awake before dawn. It speaks of hope, and our hope is Christ.

- Sceptre — the Sceptre means authority: tumult ended, a King on the throne — "the day of Immanuel," not of David or the Maccabees.

- Person — the earlier oracles looked at the nation; this one narrows to one Man, the King of Israel Himself.

- Distance — Balaam saw Him and stayed far off. Sight without surrender leaves a man watching the glory from outside it.

Numbers 24:18 · Darby

And Edom shall be a possession, and Seir a possession, -- they, his enemies; but Israel will do valiantly.

Balaam was hired to curse Israel. Instead, his last prophecy describes the day when the Star out of Jacob rises and Israel's enemies lose their land. The verse raises two questions: why name Edom and Seir, and when does this happen?

An old grudge answered

Edom is not a random target. Edom had already refused to let Israel pass through its land. Commentators tie that refusal to the judgment announced here. (The quote below uses an older translation; the ESV says, "Edom shall be dispossessed.")

And as Balaam foretold long ago, Edom — which in the days of Moses refused to let Israel pass through his border (Num. 20:21) — "will be a possession, Seir also will be a possession for his enemies; and Israel shall do valiantly."

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Seir is named next to Edom for a simple reason. It was the land Esau settled in.

Esau had made Seir his home (Gen. 33:16), so it lies close to Edom and Moab. These will be fully brought under Israel's rule.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The conquest belongs to the King

The previous verse names a Star out of Jacob and a Sceptre out of Israel. This verse tells us what follows, and who wins the victory.

First he sees Him as a star coming out of Jacob. Then he calls Him a sceptre risen out of Israel… Because of this, Edom becomes His possession, and Seir as well. All His enemies are conquered, and Israel stands with the King and does valiantly. It is a very clear prophecy about the Messiah. It points to the time when the kingdom will be restored to Israel. Many teachers of God's Word have made a mistake in applying this prophecy to the first coming of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Israel's part in the victory

Scripture describes some future victories as God's act alone, with no human army. This one is different.

Israel (that is, the spared remnant) is destined to play an important part in defeating the enemies of God and His people… The destruction of the Western armies described in Revelation 19:19-21, and the overthrow of the armies of Russia and her allies in Ezekiel 39, will happen with no human help at all. But against other foes, God intends to use a delivered Israel.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Yet the strength Israel shows is not Israel's own.

He is the Star out of Jacob, the Sceptre out of Israel. "Israel shall do valiantly" but by His power. Christ alone is before God, as He always was and is.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Edom as a picture of the flesh

Some writers also read Edom as a picture of something in us. Esau was Jacob's brother, and that family tie is the point.

The judgment passes on to Edom, the typical enemy of Israel, who… pictures for us the world of the old man — the natural fallen man. He is the most real enemy we have as Christians. He is no less an enemy for being related to us all by nature, just as Edom was the brother of Israel who acted like no brother. His enmity is described here as revenge. He had a quarrel from the beginning — the loss of his birthright-blessing, which he sold for a bowl of stew and has since forgotten.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

That raises a question about the coming kingdom: will the old nature be gone by then?

Edom speaks of the flesh, and the flesh then will be put in the place of nothingness. For Israel in the Millennium will not be in the perfect state: the flesh will still be in them, but put under control.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Triumph at the end of a hard road

The promise comes at the end of a hard road, not instead of one.

It is not for the false prophet to speak of God's discipline of His people. God would only allow someone who was set on cursing them to speak of their blessing. Yet we know that God had to discipline His beloved people. They will still have to pass through times of dreadful judgment because of their sins. But in the end, they will "do valiantly."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Curse reversed. Balaam was hired to curse Israel. God let him announce only Israel's blessing.

- King first. Edom and Seir change hands only because the Sceptre has risen; the possession is His before it is Israel's.

- Then the nation. Other enemies fall by God's hand alone. Here God uses the spared remnant, and its courage comes from His power.

- Then the flesh. Edom, the brother who acted like no brother, pictures the old nature. God will hold it under control, not make friends with it.

- Then the end. Discipline comes first, blessing last. Commentators place this prophecy in the coming kingdom, not at Christ's first coming.

Numbers 24:19 · Darby

And one out of Jacob shall have dominion, and will destroy out of the city what remaineth.

Balaam's last message ends not with a curse but with a coming Ruler. Commentators press two questions here: who is this Ruler, and how will He rule?

A hostile prophet forced to bless

Balaam took money to curse Israel. The opposite came out of his mouth, and one writer explains why.

God used the false prophet Balaam to declare His mind. He also forced the High Priest of Israel, who was plotting the death of Jesus, to say that He would die for the nation (John 11:51). Balaam would gladly have cursed Israel, but twice over God made him speak the word He put in his mouth. The third time, when Balaam tried to escape God, "The Spirit of God came upon him" and made him bless. In his fourth parable, Balaam prophesies about Christ's coming as "a star out of Jacob, and a scepter … out of Israel."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

A person, not a nation

In an earlier speech Balaam described the nation. Here he sees one person, and one writer warns against placing the fulfilment too early.

After this introduction he says again that he sees Him and looks on Him. But not now, and not near. We remember that in the first parable he said, from the top of the rocks, "I see him and from the hills I behold him." There it was the nation. Here it is a person: the King of Israel, whose shout he had heard before among that wonderful people… This is a very clear prophecy about the Messiah. It points to the time when God will restore the kingdom to Israel. Many teachers of God's Word have made a mistake here. They apply this prophecy to the first coming of the Lord Jesus Christ… Balaam says, "Out of Jacob one has dominion and destroys what is left from the city." These words refer to His reign and rule in the coming age.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Dominion by power, not persuasion

One writer tests the word "dominion" against the idea that Christ's kingdom is only inward and spiritual.

That this points to the rule of Christ is obvious. But in what sense does His first coming, or the Church, fulfil it? If words have any meaning, the dominion here spoken of is not spiritual but earthly — not brought in by persuasion, but by power.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

"Him that remains of the city"

Commentators differ on what "the city" means. One takes it as human society organised for its own strength.

Whatever city this means, the large fellowship it stands for will be destroyed. People want their cities to find strength in unity. But corruption thrives in men's cities, and the Lord Jesus will destroy all this.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another links it to Cain's city, and sets a very different city against it.

"For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet" (1 Cor. 15:25). Cain built his city after he murdered his brother, and after he "went out from the presence of Jehovah." But destruction will fall on "him that remains of the city." Yet there is another city, not built by man. Abraham, the friend of God, looked for it — "the city that has foundations, whose designer and builder is God" (Heb. 11:10).

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Israel's part in the victory

The Ruler comes out of Jacob, and Jacob does not just watch. One writer separates the victories God wins alone from those He wins through His people.

Rev. 19:19-21 describes the destruction of the Western armies, and Ezek. 39 the overthrow of the hordes of Russia and her allies. God will do both without any human help. But against other enemies He intends to use a delivered Israel… "out of Jacob shall come He that shall have dominion, and shall destroy him that remains of the city." Israel's armies will be unstoppable, led on by Christ, who will then indeed be "a man of war" (Ex. 15:3; Ps. 45:3-5).

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Why the prophecy does not stop here

Verse 19 sounds like a closing line. Three short additions follow, and the first one looks at Amalek.

Balaam's words in Num. 24:19 seem to be final. What more could be added to the statement that "out of Jacob shall come He that shall have dominion," and destroy even the remnants of His people's enemies? But the Spirit of God had still more to say in three short additions… "Amalek was the first of the nations, but in the end he will perish forever." Ancient fame may look wonderful to men, but it will count for nothing when God arises in His might.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Compelled — the man paid to curse ends up announcing the King. God can make even an unwilling mouth serve His purpose.

- Person — the earlier speech saw the nation; this one sees a Man, the King of Israel, "not now" and "not near."

- Power — the dominion promised is earthly and enforced, not a rule brought in by persuasion.

- City — what man builds for himself falls, whether that means human society or Cain's city. The city with foundations is God's.

- People — the delivered nation shares in the victory, but only when led by the One who comes out of Jacob.

Numbers 24:20 · Darby

And he saw Amalek, and took up his parable, and said, Amalek is the first of the nations, but his latter end shall be for destruction.

Balaam's last words turn from Israel's future to the nations nearby. The first he names is Amalek. The title he gives them sounds like a compliment. The sentence that follows is total ruin.

The first among the nations

What does that title mean? One writer reads it as a matter of timing — who struck first at God's people after they left Egypt:

Here we read of Amalek's unprovoked attack on Israel, just as they had escaped from the power of Pharaoh. Through Samuel we learn what Moses did not tell us in Exodus 17: that "he lay in wait for him," like a serpent lurking in the road. For this cowardly attempt to destroy His people, the LORD swore that He would have war with Amalek "from generation to generation." Balaam, in his prophecy, calls them "the first among the nations." That probably means they were the first of the desert tribes to attack the people of God as they traveled to the land of promise. But their end, he says, is utter destruction.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Why the sentence is so severe

Balaam does not explain the judgment; earlier Scripture does. The charge rests on how Amalek chose its targets.

The reason for this severe judgment lies in Exodus 17, where the LORD says, "I will utterly blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven," and in Deuteronomy 25, where Moses says, "Remember what Amalek did to you… how he attacked you on the way when you were faint and weary, and cut off your tail, those who were lagging behind you, and he did not fear God." Exalted as the first among the nations, Amalek now faces the sentence of utter destruction, and it seems God has already carried it out.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Age and reputation count for nothing

Amalek was an old and famous name. Balaam's verdict says what that is worth:

When Balaam looked on Amalek, "he took up his discourse and said, 'Amalek was the first among the nations, but its end is utter destruction.'" Ancient prestige, however wonderful it may be in the eyes of men, will count for nothing when God arises in His might.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The verses just after this one name other enemies. Being first or last on the list makes no difference:

So it makes no difference whether the powers are western or eastern, whether the enemies are many or few, what resources they have, or where they come from. Amalek may be the first of the nations, and Asshur may look like the last; yet trouble comes to Asshur and Eber, and "he too shall come to utter destruction." It is the day of Immanuel, not of David or the Maccabees. The LORD alone shall be exalted in that day.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Amalek's end in history

One writer traces the sentence through Israel's history to what may be its end:

Moses charged Israel, "When the LORD your God has given you rest… you shall blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven; you shall not forget" (verse 19). Samuel recalled the word of God and the charge of Moses, and sent Saul to destroy Amalek… For failing in his mission, through disobedience, Saul lost his kingdom. David, in recovering his wives, whom the Amalekites had taken captive at Ziklag, helped on the destruction of Amalek. This destruction, it would seem, was almost complete when, in the days of Hezekiah, some of the sons of Simeon "struck down the remnant of the Amalekites who had escaped." It may be that Haman and his sons were the last of Amalek.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Commentators differ here. The words quoted earlier put this judgment in "the day of Immanuel," not in the days of David.

Amalek as a picture

Amalek's judgment is heavier than Moab's or Edom's. One writer gives the reason:

However, Israel will bring Moab and Edom under its rule, but Amalek will suffer a more solemn judgment. Though Amalek was first among the nations, he will totally perish, as Exodus 17:14 affirms, "I will utterly blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven." For Amalek symbolizes the lusts of the flesh, which God will not spare.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Read that way, the verse shapes how believers treat the flesh now — and promises its end:

The flesh and its lusts were never to be seen as anything but enemies. There is to be, not constant conflict, but absolute hostility between the people of God and the lusts of the flesh. The time is coming, thank God, when the very name of the flesh, with all its wretched meaning, will be blotted out for the beloved people of God. It will be only a memory of what we once were, and of a grace that has delivered us completely.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- First — Amalek's title points to who struck first at God's people, right after they escaped Egypt.

- Cause — Amalek attacked the faint and weary at the rear, and did not fear God.

- Doom — an ancient name counts for nothing when God arises. Amalek's end is utter destruction.

- Reach — first nation or last empire, east or west, no enemy escapes; the LORD alone is exalted in that day.

- Picture — Amalek stands for the lusts of the flesh: no truce with them now, and one day their very name will be gone for God's people.

Numbers 24:21 · Darby

And he saw the Kenites, and took up his parable, and said, Firm is thy dwelling-place, and thy nest fixed in the rock;

Balaam's last words turn from Israel to the nations camped nearby, naming each one's future in a line or two. He pays the Kenites a compliment — a home set high in the rock — and then cancels it. What is any stronghold worth when God acts?

Who the Kenites Were

These were not enemies. One writer traces their family line, their friendship with Israel, and the sin at their heart:

They appear to be a branch of the Midianites, and therefore descendants of Abraham. Midian was a son of Abraham (Gen. 25:2). Jethro, the father-in-law of Moses, was priest of Midian. In Judges 1:16 we read of the children of the Kenite, Moses' father-in-law. The record of the Kenites shows friendship. Not a few lived among the Israelites, though most remained with the Midianites. And there were those who boasted of their strong dwelling places and put their nest in a rock. They thought themselves secure from Him who must reign over all. They thought the land given to Abraham (Gen. 15:19) could never be made good to his children. The sin of the Kenites was self-confidence; they boasted in their strongholds. Nevertheless they would be wasted until Asshur carried them away captive.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Nest and the Name

The word for "nest" sounds like the tribe's own name. One writer reads their whole character out of that pun:

They settle among the people of God, but they never unite themselves with them. Balaam's prophecy views them as separate to the last. The play upon the name there — "you put your nest (ken) in the rock" — shows plainly what it means. They are Midianites, men of the world, but not at war with Israel as others of their race were. Instead, they make a nest for themselves among them. It is for the nest that they are there… All this describes only too well the state of many others. In every age they attach themselves to the people of God, yet are not of them.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Secure, and Still Not Safe

Two things could not keep the Kenites alive — the rock fortress, and their place beside God's people:

The dwelling place of the Kenites was strong. They could rest in comfort and security in their rock fortress. But without the help and blessing of the God of Israel they could not continue as a nation. Even leaving their natural security and joining God's people would not save them… They were not like Amalek, though they lived among them. Israel had no hostility from them to rebuke, as it had from Moab. But they were not the chosen of God, and He did not preserve them from the forces that consume nations.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Defences and the Day of the Lord

One writer widens the point to every defence a nation can build:

Great fortifications, strong natural frontiers, and every possible build-up of military force will be worthless when the day of the Lord opens. He is wiser and stronger than men. Everything will collapse before Him.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Even the Conqueror Is Judged

Balaam does not stop with the Kenites. Asshur (Assyria), the conqueror, gets a verdict too:

But what about victorious Asshur? "And he took up his discourse and said, Alas, who shall live when God does this! And ships shall come from the coast of Chittim, and shall afflict Asshur." So it does not matter whether the power is western or eastern. It does not matter whether the adversaries are many or few, what resources they have, or where they come from. Amalek may be the first of nations, and Asshur seems set to be the last. Yet affliction comes to Asshur and Eber… It is the day of Immanuel.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Two Sins on Display

Only two peoples in this prophecy have their fault named. One writer sees the same pair at the end of the age:

Only two have their evil recorded… Amalek is foremost in his hatred of God. The Kenites are strong in self-confidence, putting their trust in nature — in man. These are common traits of the natural man. When the Lord Jesus appears to take the kingdom, these two characteristics will be most prominent… Along with this will come extreme confidence in man and his boasted progress. Like the Kenites of old, they will put their trust in the rocks.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Commentators differ on how far this reaches. Some read the captivity as history under Assyria. Others place it among the judgments at the end of the age.

Summary

- Nest — The Kenites came for the nest, not for the God of Israel. The pun on their name says it all. They stayed separate to the last.

- Neighbours — Jethro's people were friendly to Israel and related to them. Closeness to God's people is not the same as belonging to them.

- Nevertheless — The rock fortress was strong. It was not strong against God. One word overturns the whole compliment.

- Nations — Assyria carries them off. Then ships from Chittim afflict Assyria. Every power in the chain meets the same end, first or last.

- Now — The Kenite sin is trust in man, not hatred of God. Both are common traits of the natural man, and both reach their height at the end.

Numbers 24:22 · Darby

But the Kenite shall be consumed, until Asshur shall carry thee away captive.

Balaam looks past Israel to the nations around it, and his eye stops on a people who were no enemy of Israel at all. The Kenite had a strong home and a record of kindness, yet the word over him is burning and captivity — so why is he judged?

Who the Kenite Was

The Kenites were not strangers to Israel. They were relatives by blood and by marriage.

He looks on the Kenites and again takes up his parable. They will be laid waste. They appear to be a branch of the Midianites, and therefore descendants of Abraham. Midian was a son of Abraham (Gen. 25:2). Jethro, the father-in-law of Moses, was priest of Midian. In Judges 1:16 we read of the children of the Kenite, Moses' father-in-law. The record of the Kenites shows friendship. Not a few lived among the Israelites, though the greater part stayed with the Midianites.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Nest in the Rock

So why did they settle among God's people at all? Their own name answers it.

They never unite themselves with the people of God, though they settle among them, and Balaam's prophecy views them as separate to the last. The play upon the name there — "you put your nest (ken) in the rock" — clearly shows the meaning of it. They are Midianites, men of the world, but not at war with Israel as others of their race were. Instead, they make a nest for themselves among them, and it is for the nest that they are there... All this describes only too well the condition of many who attach themselves, in every age, to the people of God, yet are not of them.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Friendly, but Not Spared

Being near God's people is not the same as belonging to God. The Kenites were nothing like Israel's open enemies.

The dwelling place of the Kenites was strong. They could rest in comfort and security in their rock fortress. But without the help and blessing of the God of Israel they could not continue as a nation. Even if they left their natural security and joined themselves to God's people, that would not save them. The time would come when they would go into captivity, and until then their numbers would shrink. They were not like Amalek, though they lived among them, and there was no hostility against Israel to be rebuked, as there was in Moab. But they were not the chosen of God, and He did not keep them safe from all the different forces that destroy nations.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Their kindness to Israel is on record. But kindness is not the final test.

The prophecy then describes the Kenites as having a lasting dwelling place, established in the rock (v. 21), but "Kain (the Kenites) shall be burned and Asshur carry him away captive." The Kenites had shown kindness to Israel when they came out of Egypt (1 Sam. 15:6), but clearly at the last their character of disobedience to God will call for their judgment too. What appears to be good, if it does not have Christ as its Object, will be proved at the last to be only "enmity against God" (Rom. 8:7). Asshur (Assyria) will take them captive at the time of the end.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Strong Walls in the Day of the Lord

The word translated "nevertheless" turns the whole sentence. The Kenite's defences are real, and they still fail.

Great fortifications, strong natural frontiers, and every possible build-up of military force will be worthless when the day of the Lord opens. He is wiser and stronger than men. Everything will collapse before Him.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The fault was not hostility. It was trust in the wrong place.

Some of them boasted of their strong dwelling places and put their nest in a rock. They thought they were safe from Him who must reign over all. They thought God could never make good His gift of the land to Abraham (Gen. 15:19) for his children. The sin of the Kenites was self-confidence; they boasted in their strongholds.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Asshur's Own Turn

Asshur carries the Kenite off. Balaam's next words turn on Asshur himself.

But what about victorious Asshur? "And he took up his parable, and said, Alas, who shall live when God does this! And ships shall come from the coast of Chittim, and shall afflict Asshur." So it does not matter whether the powers are western or eastern, whether the enemies are many or few, with what resources or from what direction... It is the day of Immanuel.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Nest — The Kenite's name carries the word for nest. He built a safe, comfortable place among God's people without ever becoming one of them.

- Near — He was related to Moses by marriage and lived among Israel. The prophecy still views him as separate to the last.

- Nevertheless — Rock walls, natural borders and armies hold firm. Then the day of the Lord opens, and they collapse.

- Not Christ — Real kindness stands on his record. But what looks good without Christ as its Object proves at the last to be enmity against God.

- No exception — Asshur carries the Kenite away, then ships from Chittim afflict Asshur. No power escapes; it is the day of Immanuel.

Numbers 24:23 · Darby

And he took up his parable, and said, Alas! Who shall live when God doeth this?

Balaam has just seen a Star rise out of Jacob and a Sceptre crush Israel's enemies — Moab, Edom, Amalek, the Kenite. Now the prophet stops predicting and cries out: if God does this, who is left alive?

A cry, not a song

The words are wrung out of a man forced to describe a glory he does not want. Balak hated Israel, but Balaam has had to announce Israel's coming King. The sound he makes is not praise.

In prophetic vision he saw Christ. But the Lord Jesus could not say of him what He said to the Jews about Abraham: "Your father Abraham rejoiced that he would see my day. He saw it and was glad" (John 8:56). It gave Balaam no joy to see Christ. It gave him no joy to be forced to describe the great day. On that day He will lift up the people Balak hated and destroy all their enemies, Moab included. Indeed he said, "Alas, who shall live when God does this?" This sounds like a wail of disappointment and despair.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The same future that drew this groan from Balaam draws songs from others.

The Spirit led David to describe the blessedness of that time in Psalm 72, and carried him far beyond himself into overflowing worship and praise. Faith looks at the future and breaks out: "Blessed be the Lord, the God of Israel." The enemy on the outside can only say with sadness, "Alas, who shall live when God does this?" (Psalm 72:18; Numbers 24:23).

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The scale of the day in view

Balaam's question is not just panic. It points to a day that is still to come.

There shall come a day, connected with the bringing in of the sceptre and dominion of the promised ruler. It will be a day so great and terrible that it puts the lives of all the sons of men in apparent danger. Who shall live when God does this? The flood had gone over the earth. God had promised, seven times over, that all flesh would never again die in a flood of waters. But here comes another judgment, and it looks universal — or nearly so.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Another writer sets this cry beside the Lord's own words about the end times.

In Matthew 24 we have a description of these end times: "And if those days had not been cut short, no human being would be saved. But for the sake of the elect those days will be cut short" (24:22). Just compare this verse with Numbers 24:23: "Alas, who shall live when God does this!" It is clearly the same period of time. After these terrible days, Christ will appear and set up His Kingdom, and peace will be the result.

Modernised from George BellOriginal wording

No power is exempt

But what about victorious Asshur?… It does not matter whether the powers are western or eastern. It does not matter whether the enemies are many or few, what resources they have, or where they come from. Amalek may be the first of nations, and Asshur may seem to be the last. Yet affliction comes to Asshur and Eber; "and he also shall perish for ever." It is the day of Immanuel, not of David or the Maccabees. The Lord alone shall be exalted in that day.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer asks who is acting here, and who gets drawn in.

Neither the pride of power nor the strong dwelling place can stop the one from perishing for ever, or the other from being wasted in captivity. For Balaam's parable does not here speak of Israel accomplishing these things, but, "Alas, who shall live when God does this?" Then in a few words the parable brings the three families of Noah on the scene. Kittim was a descendant of Japheth, Asshur of Ham, and Eber of Shem. All of them will take part in the final conflicts of the last days.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The answer to Balaam's question

Balaam asks his question and moves on. One writer sets out what God is doing, and who is still standing at the end.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

That day also clears the ground for the reign that follows.

God's intervention will sweep the earth clear of all that fills men with pride and vain glory.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Alas — the cry is a groan, not worship; Balaam sees Christ's day and finds no gladness in it.

- Scale — the judgment is so wide that survival itself is the question; the Lord said those days must be cut short, or no one would be saved.

- Reach — east or west, many or few, first nation or last: no power escapes.

- Agent — the parable does not credit Israel with the blow; it is God doing this, and the Lord alone is exalted in that day.

- Answer — those who live are those God in mercy spares, and beyond the terror stands the reign of the King.

Numbers 24:24 · Darby

And ships shall come from the coast of Chittim, and afflict Asshur, and afflict Eber, and he also shall be for destruction.

Balaam's last prophecy looks past his own day and out to sea, where ships sail from the west to strike a great eastern power. Three questions follow: where is Kittim, who are Asshur and Eber, and who is the "he" that comes to utter destruction?

Chittim: the west

The name is tied throughout the Old Testament to ships. One writer sets out the geography and the persons together, reading the verse as a picture of the last conflict.

In a few words Balaam spoke of "Armageddon," where the last terrible clash of the nations will take place (Rev. 16:13-16)... "Chittim," strictly speaking, means the island of Cyprus. But Scripture uses it as a general term for the West (Jer. 2:10), seen from the Holy Land as God's centre. In Dan. 11:30 Chittim clearly means the Roman Empire. Asshur stands for the cruel Assyrian of Isaiah and Micah, the King of the North of Dan. 11:40. He wins at first in the world's last crisis. He overthrows many countries (Dan. 11:41)... But God has appointed both the Assyrian and the Roman to destruction. The "he" of Num. 24:24 is the last head of the Roman Empire (compare Dan. 7:8).

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Daniel parallel

Ships from Chittim appear by name in only one other place: Daniel 11. That link shapes how commentators read this verse.

Daniel gives a similar prophecy about the king of the north. Ships from Chittim come against him, so he is discouraged, turns back, and rages against the holy covenant (Dan. 11:30). The king of the north here was the king of Syria, yet the Spirit of God seems to identify him with the Assyrian of the last days. The ships of Rome came against Antiochus Epiphanes. But they were a foreshadowing of Balaam's prophecy being fulfilled. In the last days it seems the navies of the western powers will come against the king of the north, the revived Assyrian.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

No power escapes

Balaam names one nation after another, and judgment falls on each in turn.

Amalek may be the first of nations, and Asshur seemed set to be the last. Yet affliction comes on Asshur and Eber, and "he too shall come to utter destruction." It is the day of Immanuel, not of David or the Maccabees. Jehovah alone will be exalted in that day. So it does not matter whether the powers are western or eastern, whether the enemies are many or few, what resources they have, or where they come from.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who is Eber?

Eber is the ancestor whose name lies behind the word "Hebrew." One writer reads it as a cut-down title for the Jewish people, used at a time when God does not own them as His people.

Asshur, or Assyria, was the power that carried Israel captive, and now Asshur's turn to feel God's judgment comes. The ships of Chittim afflict Eber as well as Asshur. The Western powers become the instrument of God's anger against Eber — that is, Israel, or the Jew. But not as Israel: they are "Lo-ammi" and are no more than the children of Eber, Hebrews. God does not acknowledge them, and for a time their title and name of power is lost. But when the Star out of Jacob comes, and the Sceptre from Israel, they will receive this name of power again, and "Lo-ammi" will be reversed for ever.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Not everyone agrees. Another writer maps the names onto the four world empires of Daniel's visions instead.

There is no doubt that Asshur stands for the first of the Gentile empires, that is, Babylon. Eber probably stands for the other, the Medo-Persian. Kittim, the isles of the west, stands for the Greek and Roman rule.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The victor perishes too

The conqueror does not outlive his own conquest.

We see the final judgment of the ships of Chittim — that is, of the west, north of the Mediterranean. We see the judgment of their chief as well, after he has afflicted Asshur and Eber. It will be the terrible judgment of God at the end of this age.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What the collision ends in

Balaam's cry, "Alas, who shall live when God does this!", is not the last word. The verse sits under the promise of the Star and the Sceptre a few lines earlier.

The verse looks at the great conflict still to come, since nothing in the past quite fits it all... West and East and Israel will clash and suffer. But the word just before it stands: Israel acts bravely, and one from Jacob will rule. Eber surely stands here as a figure for the Jews. The prophets declare that they rise to the first place on earth, when God destroys the destroyers of the earth and Messiah reigns.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- West — Kittim means Cyprus, but Scripture uses it for the West, seen from the Holy Land as God's centre. In Daniel 11:30 it means Rome.

- East — Those ships strike Asshur, the Assyrian, the King of the North. He wins at first in the world's last crisis.

- Israel — Eber is the name behind "Hebrew." Some read it as the Jewish people, stripped of their title for a time. Others read it as the Medo-Persian empire.

- The victor — He too "shall come to utter destruction." The western chief goes down with those he afflicted. Numbers, resources and direction of attack save no one.

- The King — The day belongs to Immanuel. When God destroys the destroyers of the earth, the Star out of Jacob reigns and Israel gets its lost name back.

Numbers 24:25 · Darby

And Balaam rose up, and went and returned to his place; and Balak also went his way.

Numbers 24 ends not with a battle but with two men walking away from each other. The curse Balak paid for never came, yet one chapter later 24,000 Israelites lie dead — so what passed between these two men before they parted?

Nothing Gained On Either Side

The parting is the failure of a partnership. Commentators trace the collapse of the plot to one thing neither man had reckoned with.

God was above all, and nothing changes His affection. Whom He loves, and as He loves, He loves to the end. So the alliance between these two, who picture the "beast and false prophet," proved fruitless. God blessed Israel, and no one could curse them.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Both men had heard God speak. Neither was better for it.

Balaam then went home. His heart was unchanged by the truth he was forced to announce. Balak left too, a much sadder man, though we might wish we could say a wiser man as well. But we fear the knowledge he gained did not make him wiser.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

"His Place" Was Not His Homeland

The phrase sounds like a man heading home for good. The rest of his story rules that out.

His utterances finished, Balaam departed "to his place." This does not mean that he returned to his own land... later we find that he died among the Moabites and Midianites when they were destroyed.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The place where he died shows where he had chosen to belong.

When the five kings of the Midianites were killed in battle, Balaam died with them (Num. 31:8). He was a long way from home at that tragic moment. But death found him among the sworn enemies of God's people, still seeking Israel's harm.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Advice Given As They Separated

Something passed between the two men here that Numbers does not record.

But before the fortune-teller left his disappointed employer, it seems he made a vile suggestion to him. If Jehovah could not be turned away from His people, perhaps the people could be turned away from Jehovah! Balaam knew enough of God to be sure of one thing. If the people of Israel could be tempted into sin, Jehovah's hand would fall on them in judgment... Satan first tries to destroy. When he finds that impossible, he tries to corrupt, because a pure testimony for God on earth is hateful to him.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Money, not conviction, had held Balaam to this alliance from the start.

For money he would curse the people of God. "He loved the wages of unrighteousness" (2 Peter 2:15)... The prophet and the king went their separate ways (Num. 24:25). But the trick succeeded... So Balaam was even more guilty than the king. Under Satan he was the real instigator of Israel's fall, which brought the striking judgment on 24,000 of the people (Num. 25:9).

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Eyes Open, Will Unchanged

Balaam's own words in this chapter describe a man who saw clearly. That is what makes his exit so serious.

He was not acting in ignorance. He was a man "whose eye is opened," who "hears the words of God, and knows the knowledge of the Most High," and who "sees the vision of the Almighty." Despite the divine knowledge he had gained, and the things he had seen and heard from God, this wicked man went his own way in defiance of God's expressed will.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The Name That Outlived The Man

Balaam leaves the story here. The New Testament returns to him under three headings:

"The way of Balaam" in 2 Peter 2:15. "The error of Balaam" in Jude 11. "The doctrine of Balaam" in Rev. 2:14.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

One writer defines the middle one, and traces it through the centuries since.

"The error of Balaam" was the corruption of ministry for the sake of personal gain. Balaam has had no lack of successors down the centuries. Many who serve only for pay have pushed themselves forward, caring nothing for the glory of God or the blessing of others. Their own advantage has been uppermost in their thoughts.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- The alliance — king and prophet joined against Israel and gained nothing. God's affection for His people does not change.

- The parting — both men leave with knowledge of God. Neither leaves changed. Balak goes away sadder, but no wiser.

- The plot — what curses could not do, corruption did. Balaam's parting advice produced the fall of chapter 25.

- The place — "his place" was not his homeland. Balaam died among Israel's enemies, still seeking their harm.

- The name — Scripture keeps him as a warning: the way, the error, and the doctrine of Balaam. His error was ministry twisted for personal gain.