And he sent messengers to Balaam the son of Beor, to Pethor, which is on the river in the land of the children of his people, to call him, saying, Behold, a people is come out from Egypt; behold, they cover the face of the land, and they abide over against me.
Balak, king of Moab, has watched Israel destroy the armies in front of him. Now he sends messengers to a distant land to hire one man. Two questions follow: why does a frightened king hire a soothsayer instead of praying, and what does it mean that Israel never knew about the plot?
One writer counts the camp, then weighs Balak's fear against what he should have done with it:
The King of Moab and his people saw Jehovah's travelling host camped on their border. In the camp of Israel there were 601,730 men able to carry arms. With women and children there were probably at least three million people. Balak was alarmed. He was all the more alarmed because Israel had just destroyed three military powers that dared to oppose their march: the King of Arad, Sihon King of Heshbon, and Og King of Bashan. Sihon had earlier fought a successful war with Moab and taken some of her land. How then could Balak hope to stand against a nation which had destroyed his powerful neighbour? When men are in trouble, the proper thing is to turn to God in prayer. He cares about the affairs of nations as much as He cares about the troubles and sorrows of individual men and women. But Balak knew nothing of God.
Balak did not look for help nearby. He sent to Mesopotamia, and one writer explains the thinking behind it:
He was not satisfied that military power would be enough to withstand the conquerors of Sihon and Og. So he sent messengers to a well-known soothsayer — Balaam the son of Beor, who lived in Mesopotamia. Outsiders were already crediting Israel's victories to divine power... In sending for Balaam, Balak sought to oppose the supernatural by the supernatural. People said this Mesopotamian prophet had influence with the invisible world.
The names in this verse carry meaning. One writer sets Balak's name against his parentage, and Balaam's against his trade:
"Balak" seems to mean "waster." The name looks like a deliberate contrast with his family line, since he is only ben-Zippor, "son of a sparrow." What grand titles men take to cover how small they are! Balaam the son of Beor matches this Balak in every way. He is a "devourer of the people," son of the "consumer." Men sought him out for his skill in cursing, and he was ready to take a bribe and destroy a whole nation. No doubt he claims loyalty to Jehovah, but he has no real knowledge of Him, as his actions show. In his efforts to destroy the people of God, you cannot even say he hates them. He would destroy them in cold blood, for money.
Balak's message never names Israel. He describes them by where they came from and how many they are. One writer sees the same fear and hatred repeating long after Balak:
He knew that the people had come out of Egypt. He was very afraid. The fate of the Egyptians and Amorites seemed to foretell his own. So fear and hatred fill his heart, and he wanted to oppose and curse Israel. It is nothing less than the history of anti-Semitism in a nutshell. Nations that call themselves Christian still hate and fear this people, whom no Pharaoh and no soothsayer could overcome — a people disobedient, judged and suffering, yet always conquering.
Balaam did not send a quick refusal. One writer explains the delay:
If Balaam's heart had been right with God, he would have dealt with Balak's message at once. It would not have cost him a moment's thought to send a reply. But Balaam's heart was all wrong... His heart was set on going, because it was set on the silver and gold. But at the same time he made some reference to God — an appearance of religion put on as a cloak to cover his greed. He longed for the money; but he wanted to get hold of it in a religious way.
Israel knew nothing about any of this. One writer draws out what that silence means:
The people of Jehovah were now in grave danger. They had been ungrateful and disobedient all through their wilderness journey. They did not know about the danger, so they did not pray to God about it. But Jehovah Himself took the matter up, and there we are reminded of His unchanging favour. He loved the people, despite all that they were, and He would not allow the enemy to harm them.
- Fear sends. Balak watched Israel destroy three kingdoms. Trouble should drive a man to prayer. Balak knew nothing of God, so he sent for a man.
- Fear buys. Armies had not stopped Israel, so Balak fought the supernatural with the supernatural. He hired a far-off soothsayer said to have influence with the invisible world.
- Fear hates. His message names no nation, only "a people has come out of Egypt" — the fear and hatred one writer calls anti-Semitism in a nutshell.
- The hireling. Balaam's heart was set on the silver and gold. He wrapped that greed in religion, wanting the money in a religious way.
- The unseen defence. Israel never learned of the danger and never prayed. God took the matter up Himself, because He loved them.
And now come, I pray thee, curse me this people; for they are mightier than I perhaps I may be able to smite them, and drive them out of the land; for I know that he whom thou blessest is blessed, and he whom thou cursest is cursed.
Balak, king of Moab, watches a nation camped on his border. He reaches for the one weapon he thinks can stop them: a hired curse from a famous prophet in Mesopotamia. His words treat blessing and cursing as goods a man can sell. But can anyone curse a people God has already blessed?
Moab's terror was real. The danger was not. Israel had no orders to touch Moab at all.
There was no need for Moab to fear Israel. God was not giving Israel the inheritance of the children of Esau or that of the children of Lot (Deut. 2:5, 9, 19). The hostility toward God's people was not because of anything Israel had done, or threatened to do, to Moab. Balak does not seem to have expected any attack from Israel. He said to the elders of Midian, "This horde will lick up all that is around us, as the ox licks up the grass of the field" (Num. 22:4). Moab did not like the thought of having God's people as their neighbours, and they wanted to get rid of them.
Balak could not stand their presence, not any threat they made. Commentators trace that reaction back to its source.
We see the hostility of the world against the people of God brought out, and especially against the power of the people of God. God's power was with His people, and this drew out the hostility of Satan. … When that happens, Satan seeks to force others into open opposition to the people of God. Their presence becomes unbearable to their enemies.
Israel had already conquered Sihon and Og. Balak knew his army was not enough, so he changed weapons.
He was not satisfied that military power would be enough to withstand the conquerors of Sihon and Og. So he sent messengers to a well-known soothsayer — Balaam the son of Beor, who lived in Mesopotamia. Outsiders were already crediting Israel's victories to divine power… In sending for Balaam, Balak sought to oppose the supernatural by the supernatural. People believed the Mesopotamian prophet had influence with the invisible world.
Balak's own rule about blessing and cursing pointed the wrong way for him. God had already said who is blessed and who is cursed.
Balak is in complete and all-distorting darkness. First Israel was forbidden to touch Moab. Next he says, "He whom you bless is blessed, and he whom you curse is cursed." He was seeking to bring the curse on Israel when God had said, "Blessed are those who bless you, and cursed are those who curse you." So he was simply bringing it on himself.
Balak's confidence rested on Balaam's name among people. God's verdict on him was the opposite.
Balaam clearly had a great name among men. Balak had said, "I know that he whom you bless is blessed, and he whom you curse is cursed." But before God he was perverse, self-willed, covetous, and an enemy of His people. There was great religious pretence — the claim to be a servant of the true God — but he was a wicked and foolish man… The same features are not hard to see in some people today. They appear great in the eyes of men, yet they are still perverse, rebellious and foolish.
Balak's request is not finally about Moab's border. The real test comes at the end of Israel's journey, just before they enter the land.
Balak sends for Balaam. The great question in this moving scene is this: "Can Satan succeed in cursing the people of God, so as to stop their entrance into the land of promise?" It is not merely a question of redemption and of the joy of redemption at the beginning of their course. The question comes at the end, when all their unfaithfulness has come out — their unfaithfulness even after the Lord has brought them to Himself. Can Satan succeed then? No.
Moses later explained to Israel why the hired curse came to nothing.
Moses told the people about the danger that had threatened them. He said: "They hired against you Balaam the son of Beor from Pethor of Mesopotamia, to curse you. But the LORD your God would not listen to Balaam; instead the LORD your God turned the curse into a blessing for you, because the LORD your God loved you" (Deut. 23:4-5). Precious words — "because the LORD your God loved you!"
- Fear. Moab dreaded a people who had no orders to harm them. The world resents God's people for their presence and their power, not for any harm they do.
- Hire. Balak could not win by force, so he tried to buy the invisible world and fight the supernatural with the supernatural.
- Boomerang. His own rule about blessing and cursing turned on him. God had already said that whoever curses His people is cursed.
- Reputation. Balaam was great in the eyes of men and perverse in the sight of God. A big name proves nothing.
- Love. God turned the curse into a blessing, and He did it because He loved His people.
And the elders of Moab and the elders of Midian departed, having the rewards of divination in their hand. And they came to Balaam, and spoke to him the words of Balak.
Balak, king of Moab, is afraid of Israel camped on his border. He does not raise an army — he hires a prophet. The men who leave in this verse carry the fee in their hands, and the whole episode asks one question: can anything bought prevail against a people God has blessed?
Balak did not send for an army. He sent for a man in touch with unseen powers, and the fee in the messengers' hands gave the errand away.
Balak imagined that he could enlist the aid of Balaam, an agent of Satan, to overcome them. He did not realise that poor Israel could never have been delivered out of Egypt, or brought through their forty years in the wilderness, without their God. It is clear that Balak knew he was sending his princes to one who was in touch with the forces of evil, for they had "the rewards of divination in their hand".
The instinct is older than Moab. Trouble sends people searching everywhere but to God.
Ever since man was driven out of Eden, he has been restless. He is never more restless than when he is in trouble, or when he thinks he sees trouble approaching. He searches north, south, east, and west for help, or for a way of escape. So Balak took alarm when the people of Israel came close to his borders. He sent messengers to neighbouring kingdoms seeking alliances. He also sent messengers to Mesopotamia to bring the famous diviner Balaam. He would have done better to get down before God, who never turns aside the requests of those who feel their need of Him.
The verse calls the travellers "elders" — a title that was not Israel's alone.
In Numbers 22:7 we read of the elders of Moab and the elders of Midian, so the term was not confined to Israel. The word is saqen, which implies "aged man"; they were no doubt also men of repute.
The two peoples travelled together for a reason.
Balaam no doubt was a Midianite, and there was an intimate connection between the Moabites and the Midianites. At the first Balak consulted the elders of Midian, and the elders of both Moab and Midian went together to seek the aid of Balaam and his sorceries.
The ESV calls the payment "the fees for divination"; older wording says "rewards of divination". Balak had studied his man, and sent the fee ahead of his request.
Balak's messengers went to Mesopotamia "with the rewards of divination in their hands". Balak knew that the false prophet "loved the wages of unrighteousness" (2 Peter 2:15), so he sought to make sure of him by sending "cash in advance!" But the treacherous deceiver brought Jehovah's name into it. He lodged the messengers for the night, pretending to seek the mind of God.
Balaam did not refuse God outright. He kept consulting Him with his mind already made up.
If Balaam's heart had been right with God, he would have made very short work of Balak's message. A reply would not have cost him a moment's thought. But Balaam's heart was all wrong, and we see him in chapter 22 in the sad condition of a man pulled by conflicting feelings. His heart was bent on going, because it was bent on the silver and gold. Yet at the same time he still made some reference to God. It was an appearance of religion put on as a cloak to cover his greedy practices. He longed for the money, but he wanted to get hold of it in a religious way.
Every coin was wasted. The prophet himself would later admit it.
Balaam, who used enchantments, had to confess, "Surely there is no enchantment against Jacob, neither is there any divination against Israel." Balak sent the elders of Moab and Midian to him "with the rewards of divination in their hand". And when Balaam claimed to go and meet Jehovah, he went "to seek for enchantments" (Num. 24:1). No natural power could overcome the people of God. No power of Satan could prevail against them either.
Others have walked the same road since.
They have followed the way of Balaam. There is nothing original about their performances. They follow a well-beaten track first trodden by Balaam of infamous memory, who sold his prophetic gifts for money. He was not the first person to prophesy for money; that has always been a custom in religions that worship idols. But he appears to have been the first to offer to prophesy for money in the name of the Lord. With Balaam the supreme question was "Will it pay?"
- Fear hires. Balak's fear sent him searching abroad for help. He should have got down before God, who turns no one away.
- Fear pays. The fee in their hands shows Balak knew the kind of man he was hiring. He paid in advance.
- Fear allies. Moab and Midian were closely tied. Both sent their elders, respected older men, on one errand.
- Fear dresses up. Balaam wanted the silver, and wanted it in a religious way. He consulted God about a matter his heart had settled.
- Fear fails. No enchantment stands against Jacob. The money bought nothing. "Will it pay?" still marks the prophet who is for sale.
And he said to them, Lodge here this night, and I will bring you word again, according as Jehovah shall speak unto me. And the princes of Moab abode with Balaam.
Balak's messengers have arrived with payment in hand. They want a famous prophet to curse Israel, and Balaam answers with the name of the LORD on his lips. Is that reverence, or a cover for a heart already sold?
Balaam's words place him on God's side. He speaks as if he takes no step without hearing from the LORD.
But Balaam claimed to be a servant of the LORD. He said to Balak's messengers, "Lodge here tonight, and I will bring back word to you, as the LORD speaks to me." This false claim made Balaam's position even more serious, as it does with every false servant of the Lord. It is a very serious matter to pretend to be the servant of God while really being an instrument of Satan.
His real trade lay elsewhere. The language of this verse is the wrapping around it.
He sought for Balaam, who had a great reputation as a man who wielded "enchantments." This we see if we turn to Numbers 24:1. If we glance at verses 8 and 18 of Numbers 22, we discover that this man managed to cover his enchantments, which were of course of the devil, with the appearance of reverencing Jehovah as his God. Balak hoped to bring a curse on the people of God by enlisting the help of this professed prophet of God, who was really a servant of Satan.
Balaam promised a night of waiting on God. But payment had already arrived.
Balak knew that the false prophet loved the wages of unrighteousness (2 Peter 2:15), so he made sure of him by sending cash in advance. But the treacherous deceiver brought the LORD's name into the matter, and lodged the messengers for the night while pretending to seek the mind of God. The business in hand was hugely important, for he was asked to ruin a whole nation. Did he then spend the night in prayer to God? Nothing was further from Balaam's thoughts. He just went to bed. God was watching every move with the deepest interest, and He came to Balaam with the challenge, "Who are these men with you?"
after_note: DELETE
He was reaching for the source he normally used, not for the LORD he named.
He could use the Lord's name like this, even though he had no intention of seeking the Lord's guidance. He wanted an answer from the occult power he was used to. Chapter 24:1 tells us this: he was looking for enchantments as a sorcerer.
Inviting the men to stay was itself a decision.
"Lodge here tonight," said Balaam to the men who brought the reward of divination in their hand. Giving a bed to men who came to curse the people of the Lord showed the wicked leaning of his heart. Only God's direct action holds him back.
Israel was camped on the plains of Moab, with no idea that Balak was arranging its destruction.
The people of the LORD were now in great danger. They had been ungrateful and disobedient all through their journey in the wilderness. They did not know about the danger, so they did not pray to God. But the LORD Himself took the matter up, and that reminds us of His unchanging favour. He loved the people, in spite of all that they were, and He would not let the enemy harm them.
Balaam's talk of consulting the LORD did not fool God.
Balaam talks about consulting the LORD in his hypocritical way. This has always been so. Those who have least to do with God often talk about Him most lightly… Balaam was not alarmed, because he was used to an evil spirit. For all he knew, the power that came to him was the same familiar spirit as always. God caught the crafty man in his own net.
The same move comes again when a second group of messengers arrives. Balaam asks for another night, though God had already spoken.
The LORD had already stated His mind. There was nothing left to consult Him about. But Balaam was set on going, and he knew enough of God not to want open conflict with Him… Let us take care never to come before God with our minds already made up. It is a serious insult to God's majesty!
Writers turn this into a warning for ordinary decisions, not just for prophets.
Sometimes we seek God's will about how to act in a situation where His only will is that we should not be there at all. If our conscience were truly awake, its first effect would be to make us leave. Our own will put us there, and still we would like the comfort of God guiding us in a path we chose ourselves.
- Words — "As the LORD speaks to me" claims to be God's servant. Commentators call it a false claim from a man whose trade was enchantments.
- Night — Balaam spent the night set aside for seeking God in bed. God came to him; he never went to God.
- Guests — giving Balak's men a bed showed where his heart leaned. Only God held him back.
- Guard — Israel knew nothing of the danger and never prayed about it. God took the case up Himself, out of unchanging love.
- Warning — asking God about a road you have already chosen is not guidance. It is self-will. One more night becomes the habit of a man set on going.
And God came to Balaam, and said, Who are these men with thee?
Balak's messengers slept in Balaam's house, waiting to hear if he would curse Israel. God came to Balaam that night — so why speak to a fortune-teller for hire, and why ask about men He already knew?
Balaam had told the messengers he would consult the LORD. He was used to hearing a voice, but not this one.
But God did not leave this a matter of demons and deceptions. Balak dared to bring in a power higher than man to ruin the future of God's people. That at once brought out the true God. Balaam in his hypocritical way talks about consulting Jehovah. This has always happened. Those who have least to do with God often speak of Him in the most casual way. It was so then, and it is so now. "God," it is written, "came to Balaam and said, Who are these men with you?" He was not alarmed, because he was used to an evil spirit. For all he knew, the power that came to him was the old spirit he was used to. God caught the crafty in his own net.
God made the first move. Balaam was not seeking Him at all.
Balak's messengers went to Mesopotamia "with the fees for divination in their hand" (Num. 22:7). Balak knew that the false prophet "loved gain from wrongdoing" (2 Peter 2:15), so he made sure of him by sending cash in advance. But the treacherous deceiver brought Jehovah's name into the matter. He put the messengers up for the night, pretending to seek the mind of God. The business in hand was hugely important. He was asked to bring about the ruin of a whole nation. Did he then spend the night in prayer to God? Nothing was further from Balaam's thoughts. He just went to bed. God was watching every move with the deepest interest, and He came to Balaam with the challenge: "Who are these men with you?"
God did not ask because He needed to know. One writer ties this question to the way God opened His talk with Satan about Job.
The great principle of the Balaam story is that God guarded and blessed His people without being asked. He is active for them out of His own grace, and nothing escapes Him. "Who are these men with you?" says God to Balaam. God began as He did with Satan in Job's case, "Have you considered my servant Job?"
Balaam hid nothing in his reply. The same writer asks why he used the LORD's name at all.
Balaam did not get in touch with the spirit he usually consulted. Instead he met the God of Israel, who "came to Balaam and said, 'Who are these men with you?'" Balaam knew exactly why Balak had sent his princes to him. He knew he stood in the presence of God, so he hid nothing of what Balak had told him. You might well wonder why he pretended to serve Jehovah when he had no link with Him at all. No doubt he had heard of all that Jehovah had done for His people, and he sought his own advancement by attaching the Name of Israel's God to his evil work.
In Israel's camp nothing was stirring that night. No one prayed about the danger, because no one knew.
The people of Jehovah had been ungrateful and disobedient all through their desert journey. Now they were in grave danger. They were not aware of it and therefore did not make supplication to God. But Jehovah Himself took the matter up. That reminds us of His unchanging favour. He loved the people, despite all that they were, and He would not allow the enemy to harm them. Oh, the comfort of this thought for ourselves!
Balaam asked whether he should go, and God's clear answer changed his position.
The first time Balaam asked the Lord, "Shall I go?", God answered a clear No. He made the reason for the refusal just as clear. It seems He gave this answer for one of two reasons. Perhaps the fortune-teller was asking Him for advice for the first time. Or perhaps he was not sure it would be wrong to accept Balak's invitation. But once the Lord had told him he must not go, and that Israel was blessed, Balaam's position was no longer the same. He now knew the will of God. Without the possibility of a doubt, it would be evil to go into Moab.
- God moves first. Israel knew nothing of the plot against them. God took it up before anyone asked Him.
- God intercepts. A man waiting for his usual spirit met the God of Israel instead. God caught the crafty man in his own net.
- God exposes. God did not ask for facts. The question pulled into the open what Balaam's religious talk was covering.
- God protects. He loved a people who had been ungrateful the whole way, and He would not let the enemy touch them.
- God settles it. Once God answered, Balaam's doubt was over. What came after was deliberate disobedience, not confusion.
And Balaam said to God, Balak the son of Zippor, king of Moab, hath sent unto me,
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
Behold, a people is come out of Egypt, and it covers the face of the land. Now come, curse me them perhaps I may be able to fight against them, and drive them out.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And God said to Balaam, Thou shalt not go with them; thou shalt not curse the people; for they are blessed.
Balak, king of Moab, has sent messengers to hire Balaam to curse Israel, and Balaam keeps them overnight while he asks God about it. God's answer is a flat refusal with a reason attached, and that reason says more about His people than about Balaam.
Israel is camped nearby and knows nothing about this deal. No prayer of theirs brings God into the story; He speaks first.
The great principle of the Balaam history is that God guarded and blessed His people without being asked. The plots of enemies go on, and Israel knows nothing about them. So Israel asks nothing from God. But He is active for His people out of His own grace to them, and nothing escapes Him. "Who are these men that come to you?" says God to Balaam.
Balaam worked with spirits, and his offer to seek the Lord's mind was cover. What came to him in the night was not what he expected.
Balaam in his hypocritical way talks about consulting the LORD. This has always been so. Those who have least to do with God often talk about Him most lightly... He was not alarmed, because he was used to an evil spirit. For all he knew, the power that came to him was the spirit he always dealt with. God caught the crafty man in his own net. This is just where the mighty power of God shows what He is against every enemy who dares to oppose His people.
Neither Balak nor Balaam speaks Israel's name. They call them only a people who came out of Egypt.
Neither Balak nor Balaam used the people's name "Israel," because they were probably afraid of that name, which means "a prince with God."
God settles the matter in private. Later Balaam has to say the same thing out loud on the hilltops.
When Balak's delegation came to Balaam, God had said to him, "You shall not curse the people, for they are blessed." What God told him there in secret he must now speak in public... How many have tried to curse Jacob and denounce Israel? They have never succeeded. Isaiah's vision has come true in every generation: "No weapon that is fashioned against you shall succeed, and you shall refute every tongue that rises against you in judgment." No magic, no voice, no power, no tongue can undo the decree of God.
In the morning Balaam tells the princes only that the Lord will not let him go. He keeps back the reason God gave.
Balaam could have no doubt about God's thoughts of His people, or about what God expected from him. Yet he does not tell the princes of Balak what God's word to him meant. His own words imply that the only reason he did not go with them was, "The LORD has refused to let me go with you." He would have been glad to go and carry out the evil mission Balak wanted. But having just come from God's presence, he knew he could not.
His edited answer left Balak room to try again.
Had Balaam given Balak's princes the word he received from God, it is not likely that he would have been tempted again. He could have told Balak that these were the people of the living God. He could have repeated God's words to him: "You shall not curse the people, for they are blessed." That would have settled the matter as far as Balaam was concerned.
Later God tells Balaam he may go, and that change puzzles many readers. Commentators answer that verse 12 had already closed the question.
Verses 12 and 13 show that God had first of all forbidden Balaam to go. Balaam clearly wanted Balak's reward, despite his high talk in verse 18. It was wrong of Balaam to ask again. Yet when he did, God used his going as a witness of divine grace to Israel, and of Balaam's own perverseness.
Darby turns from what Balaam did to what he felt.
The blessing of the people never comes into his mind. He is a complete stranger to the generosity of grace. The thought that they were blessed of God does not move him, and he finds no delight in His blessing on His people.
- God speaks first. Israel never asked for protection. God moved first and questioned Balaam before Balaam could act.
- God gives a reason. God does not just refuse. He says why: the people are blessed.
- The secret becomes public. What God said in the night, Balaam later had to announce on the hills. No magic and no tongue can reverse it.
- Man edits the message. Balaam reported the refusal but not the blessing. That half-answer invited a second attempt.
- Self-will gets its way. Asking again after a clear word was wrong. God let him go, and used even that to show His grace to Israel and expose Balaam.
And Balaam rose up in the morning, and said to the princes of Balak, Go into your land; for Jehovah refuses to give me leave to go with you.
God has just told Balaam plainly: do not go with Balak's men, and do not curse Israel, for Israel is blessed. Verse 13 is his answer the next morning. It sounds obedient. Yet it leaves out half of what God said, and it leaves the door open for a second offer.
The words look like submission. One writer hears something else in them — the tone of a man who wanted the trip and lost it.
His words to his visitors next morning carry a trace of disappointment: "The LORD has refused to let me go with you." His heart was not in communion with God about His people. He would gladly have brought them to ruin for the sake of reward; but he was conscious of divine restraint.
God had said two things: don't go, and don't curse, for they are blessed. Balaam passes on the first and buries the second.
Balak's first delegation fails: the LORD refuses, as he tells the messengers, to give him leave to go. He makes no secret that he himself is willing enough. But he hides what God has shown him — that the people are blessed.
Balaam did name the LORD. By the time his words reached Balak, even that had dropped out.
Balaam did say that the LORD refused to give him leave to go with the princes. But the Name of the LORD made no impression on them. When they went back to their master, they only said, "Balaam refuses to come with us." There was no word of the command of God, no word that he was not to curse, and that the people were blessed.
Balak heard only that a prophet had declined, so the temptation came back a second time. The whole word from God would have closed the subject.
Had Balaam given Balak's princes the word he received from God, it is not likely that he would have been tempted again. Suppose he had told Balak two things: that the people Balak wanted cursed were the people of the living God, and that God had met him with the words, "You shall not curse the people, for they are blessed." That would have settled the matter as far as Balaam's part in it went.
Balaam's first question to God may have come from real uncertainty. God's answer ended that.
When Balaam asked the LORD the first time, "Shall I go?" God replied clearly No; and just as clearly pointed out the ground of the refusal. It seems He gave this answer for one of two reasons. The fortune-teller may have been asking Him for the first time. Or he may not have been sure that accepting Balak's invitation was wrong. But once the LORD had told him he must not go, and that Israel was blessed, Balaam's position was no longer the same. He now knew the will of God. Beyond any possible doubt, going into Moab would now be evil.
So why did Balaam consult God at all? One writer answers by pointing to what his heart was set on.
His heart was bent on going, because it was bent on the silver and gold; but at the same time there was a sort of reference to God — an appearance of religiousness put on as a cloak to cover his covetous practices. He longed for the money; but he wanted to get hold of it in a religious way.
The refusal was not Balaam's doing. Behind it stood God, who turned the whole plot to His own end.
As we go on we shall see how wonderful God's way was. He turned Satan's own effort against him. He made this most wicked man Balaam work against all his own interests without meaning to. Held in the mighty hand of God, Balaam became the instrument for sealing God's blessing on His people, as far as a man could do it!
- Restraint, not refusal. Balaam does not say no; he reports that he is not allowed. The barrier is outside him, not inside him.
- Half the word. He passes on the ban and hides the blessing — his own willingness is no secret, God's verdict on Israel is.
- Half invites more. Balak hears only "Balaam refuses," so the pressure comes back; the full word from God would have ended the business.
- Already settled. After the first clear No, the question was closed; any further move toward Moab was not uncertainty but a heart bent on its own way.
- God alone the guard. God's own hand held this man back — and the same hand turned the enemy's plan into a sealing of Israel's blessing.
And the princes of Moab rose up; and they went to Balak, and said, Balaam has refused to come with us.
Balak's messengers come back empty-handed. Their report is short: Balaam will not come. What they say is true as far as it goes. But the reason for the refusal has dropped out of the message, and that gap shapes everything that follows.
Balaam had told these men that the LORD refused to let him go. What reached Balak was something much smaller.
Balaam did say that the LORD refused to let him go with the princes. But the name of the LORD made no impression on them. When they returned to their master they only said, "Balaam refuses to come with us." There was no word of the command of God, no word that he was not to curse, and that the people were blessed.
The same writer weighs what would have happened if Balaam had passed the whole message on.
If Balaam had given Balak's princes the word he received from God, the temptation would most likely never have come back. Suppose he had told Balak the truth. The people he wanted cursed were the people of the living God, and God had met him with the words, "You shall not curse the people, for they are blessed." That would have settled the matter, as far as Balaam's part in it went.
One writer sets the part Balaam passed on next to the part he hid, and shows what Balak made of it.
Balak's first group of messengers fails: the LORD refuses, as Balaam tells them, to let him go. He makes no secret that his own will is good enough, while he hides what God has shown him — that the people are blessed. Balak has reason to think that more pressure will bring him. Everyone knew that the gods of the nations could be made to give in. So he sends more and more honourable representatives: Balaam must let nothing stop him from coming, for Balak will raise him to very great honour.
Balaam sent the messengers home, but not because he wanted to. The tone of his farewell gives him away.
His words to his visitors the next morning have a hint of disappointment in them: "The LORD has refused to let me go with you." His heart was not in fellowship with God about His people. For the sake of reward he would have been glad to bring ruin on them. But he knew God was holding him back.
The scheme Balak kept pushing did not end where he wanted it to.
As the story goes on, we shall see how wonderful God's way was. He turned Satan's own effort against him, and made this most wicked man Balaam work, without meaning to, against all his interests. Balaam was held in the mighty hand of God, and became the instrument for sealing God's blessing on His people, as far as that could be done by a man.
The decision behind that refusal was made where Israel could not see it.
How little Israel knew or imagined what was going on between the LORD and the enemy! They may have been complaining in their tents at the very moment when God was setting out their perfection through the tongue of this greedy prophet. Balak would have been glad to have Israel cursed; but, blessed be God, He will not let anyone curse His people. He may have to deal with them Himself, in secret, about many things; but He will not let another move his tongue against them. He may have to expose them to themselves; but He will not allow a stranger to expose them.
- Refused. The messengers' one word to Balak is true and still misleading. Balaam declined — but they never say who stopped him.
- Withheld. God's full word was that no one may curse Israel, because the people are blessed. Balaam kept that half back. Only the half about himself travelled home.
- Willing. Balak did hear that Balaam's own will was on his side. So he read the refusal as a price, and sent greater men with a bigger offer.
- Wanted. Balaam's own tone gives him away. He would have gone gladly, and writers note the disappointment in his words. Only God's restraint held him.
- Withstood. The real refusal was never Balaam's. God may deal with His people Himself about many things, but He lets no other tongue speak against them — and He turned the enemy's own scheming into blessing.
Then sent Balak yet again princes, more, and more honourable than they.
Balak's first messengers came home with a refusal, so he tries again with a larger and grander delegation. The question here is not Balaam's price, but what a man does when God has already spoken and the offer comes back sweeter.
Balak did not treat the first refusal as final.
Balak's first embassy is unsuccessful: the Lord refuses, as Balaam tells the messengers, to give him leave to go. He makes no secret that his own will is willing enough, while he hides the fact that God has shown him the people are blessed. Balak has reason to suppose that with more pressure Balaam will come, for it was well known that the gods of the nations could be made to give way. He sends more and more honourable representatives.
Balaam had told the first messengers that the Lord would not let him go. He did not tell them why. That silence is what left the door open.
Had Balaam given Balak's princes the word he received from God, it is not likely that he would have been tempted again.
The messengers reported only that Balaam declined:
Balaam did say truly that the Lord refused to give him leave to go with the princes. But the Name of the Lord made no impression on them. On returning to their master they said only, "Balaam refuses to come with us." There was no word of the command of God, no word that he was not to curse, and that the people were blessed.
The second group outranks the first, and the king raises his offer with them.
Balak sent a second group of messengers, princes of higher rank than the elders who went the first time. The king offered more tempting bait: he would raise Balaam to high honour, and he would do whatever Balaam asked.
The bait worked because it matched something already in the man:
His heart was set on going, because it was set on the silver and gold. At the same time there was some reference to God — an appearance of religion put on as a cloak to cover his covetous practices. He longed for the money, but he wanted to get hold of it in a religious way. Miserable man!
Each part of God's first answer closed a door.
The answer of God was in three short sentences. (1) "You shall not go with them." This should have been enough to close the matter completely. A man who really knew God would never raise the question again. (2) "You shall not curse the people." So however much his covetous heart might want Balak's silver and gold, he must not try to do what Balak wanted. (3) "They are blessed." A man who knew God would be sure that God would never go back on this.
He claimed the Lord's will bound him, and he still wanted to go.
Balaam protests that he is strictly bound by the Lord's will. Yet he wants his own way, and God leaves him to it, only making him understand that in the end he must speak His word alone. And Balaam goes.
The same test comes to us when new pressure meets a settled answer.
Whenever God has made His will known to us, we are not to allow any later influence to call it into question. That holds even if the influence takes the form of the word of God. If we were closer to the Lord in heart, we would feel that the only true and right position is to follow what He told us at first.
God does not always stop the man who ignores His first word:
How little Balaam knew what the consequences would be of not bowing to God's first word to him! Suppose God has expressed His will, and we still want our own way. God may well allow us to have our way, so that we may learn by experience the folly of our own self-will.
While this bargaining went on, Israel was unaware of the danger.
The people of the Lord, who had been ungrateful and disobedient all through their wilderness journey, were now in grave danger. They were not aware of it and so did not pray about it. But the Lord Himself took the matter up, and there we are reminded of His unchanging favour. He loved the people, despite all that they were, and He would not allow the enemy to harm them.
- Pressure — Balak judged God by the gods he knew, gods that could be bought. So he met a refusal by raising his offer.
- Silence — Balaam passed on only that he could not come, not that the people were blessed. That half-told answer brought the second delegation.
- Bait — higher-ranking princes, promised honour, and a promise to do whatever he asked. Balaam's heart was already set on silver and gold.
- Settled — "You shall not go," "You shall not curse," "They are blessed." A man who really knew God would never reopen a question God had closed.
- Guarded — Israel never knew the danger and never prayed about it. God took the matter up Himself, and He would not let the enemy harm them.
And they came to Balaam, and said to him, Thus says Balak the son of Zippor Suffer not thyself, I pray thee, to be restrained from coming to me;
Balak's first delegation went home empty-handed. So the king of Moab sends a bigger and grander one. Its message is built to remove every reason Balaam might have for staying home. The words "let nothing hinder you" show how Balak read the situation. He assumed the obstacle was price, not God.
This second group is not a repeat of the first. Balak has raised both the rank of the men and the size of the offer.
Balak sent a second group of princes, of higher rank than the elders who went the first time. The king offered more tempting baits. He would promote Balaam to high honour, and he would do whatever he asked.
Balak had a reason to try again, and it came from inside himself.
Balak judges by the thing every man knows best — his own heart and experience. So he sends princes more honourable than the ones who came to Balaam the first time.
But the deeper problem was not Balak's offer. It was the man receiving it.
It was clear that he loved money — a love that is all too common in our own day too. Balak's gold and silver proved a very tempting bait to the wretched man — a bait he could not resist. Satan knew his man, and the price he could be bought for.
Balaam's first reply named God, but the message that reached Balak did not. The messengers never passed on the real reason for the refusal, so the door stayed open.
Balaam did say that Jehovah refused to let him go with the princes. But the name of Jehovah made no impression on them. When they went back to their master they only said, "Balaam refuses to come with us." There was no word of the command of God, no word that he was not to curse, and that the people were blessed.
When the second group arrives, nothing has changed on God's side. God had already settled the matter, so one sentence would have ended it.
Balak had one desire: the cursing of the people of God. And Balaam had already received God's command, "You shall not curse … for they are blessed." So there was no room for discussion or evasion. Balaam should have given the second group of princes the same answer he should have given the first. If he had told them the whole message God had given him, he would have spared himself and Balak a great deal of trouble and sorrow.
Instead, the reply he gave exposed what he was still hoping for.
Balaam did not simply refuse to go and tell them that God had forbidden it. Instead he says, "Though Balak were to give me his house full of silver and gold, I could not go beyond the command of the LORD my God to do less or more." Does this not show what lay in Balaam's heart — the desire for silver and gold in abundance?
Raising the price makes sense only if God can be bought. Balak's idea of God came from his own religion.
In Balak we see how completely people had lost the knowledge of God. The world by its wisdom did not know Him. Balak's ignorance was no darker than the world's wisdom… His words to Balaam make clear what he thought God was like. He thought God was altogether like himself, or like what he imagined his own god to be.
The same assumption lies behind the pressure itself.
Balak has reason to think that more pressure will bring him; for everyone knew that the gods of the nations could be made to give way.
Israel had no idea that men were bargaining over them. The outcome never rested on Balaam's honesty.
Balak would gladly have had Israel cursed; but, blessed be God, He will not allow anyone to curse His people. He may have to deal with them Himself, in secret, about many things. But He will not let anyone else speak against them. He may have to expose them to themselves; but He will not allow a stranger to expose them.
- Pressure. Balak meets a refusal by raising the offer: nobler princes, high honour, whatever Balaam asks. He judges Balaam by his own heart.
- Price. The tactic works on a man who loved money; the enemy knew Balaam, and knew the price at which he could be bought.
- Silence. The first messengers reported only that Balaam refused. They never said God had forbidden the cursing. That half-told answer invited the second delegation.
- Plainness. There was no room for discussion. If Balaam had repeated God's full word, he would have spared both men much trouble and sorrow.
- Powerlessness. Balak imagined God was like himself, open to a bribe. But God will not let anyone curse His people, whatever the price.
for very highly will I honour thee, and whatever thou shalt say to me will I do; come therefore, I pray thee, curse me this people.
God has refused Balak once already, so the king raises his price: grander messengers, very great honour, and a blank cheque. Two questions follow — what did Balak think God was like, and why did Balaam not give him a plain no?
The king treats the first refusal as an opening bid, not a verdict. One writer explains why:
Balak has reason to think that more pressure will bring him, for everyone knew that the gods of the nations would give way to pressure. He sends still more honourable messengers: Balaam must let nothing stop him from coming, for Balak will promote him to very great honour.
A second writer points to the standard Balak used:
Balak judges by what every man knows so well: his own heart and his own experience. So he sends princes more honourable than the first ones who came to Balaam.
The offer is not random. It hits exactly where Balaam was weak.
There is something especially dreadful about the case of Balaam. He clearly loved money — sadly, a common enough love in our own day. Balak's gold and silver were a very tempting bait to the wretched man — a bait he could not resist. Satan knew his man, and he knew the price that would buy him.
His greed did more than ruin him. It set a pattern others followed:
He was a greedy religious man (Numbers 22-24). His error was that he used his knowledge of the truth of God to advance the work of Satan, if he could, and to collect a reward for it. The false teachers Jude writes about rushed greedily after the same wrong.
Balak's message invites a deal. But Balaam had his answer long before these princes arrived.
Balak had one desire: the cursing of the people of God. And Balaam had already received God's command, "You shall not curse… for they are blessed." So there was no room for discussion, and none for dodging the question. Balaam should have given the princes who came the second time the same answer he should have given the first ones. A plain statement of the whole message God had given him would have spared himself and Balak a great deal of trouble and sorrow.
Instead of closing the door, Balaam asks the men to stay the night while he consults God again:
This sounds well; but he added, "Stay here tonight as well, so that I may know what more the LORD will say to me." Such an attitude was sheer wickedness. The LORD had already made His mind plain, so there was nothing more to ask Him about. But Balaam was set on going. He knew enough of God not to want open conflict with Him. If he could, he would bend the LORD to his own will.
Balak's whole appeal rests on the honour he promises. By the end of the story he throws that honour back in Balaam's face.
The intended curse had become a threefold blessing. Unhappy Balaam would gladly have secured the wages of unrighteousness and the honour of this world. Now he receives Balak's cutting taunt, as the king tells him to run off home: "The LORD has held you back from honour."
Neither the king nor the prophet is running this:
Later we shall see how wonderful God's way was. He turned the enemy's own effort against him. He made Balaam, a thoroughly wicked man, work against all the enemy's interests without meaning to. Held in the mighty hand of God, Balaam became the instrument that sealed, as far as a man could, the blessing of God upon His people.
- Offer — Refused once, Balak just bids higher. He sends grander messengers, because he assumes pressure will make a god give way.
- Man — The bait fits the buyer. Balaam loved money, and Satan knew both the man and his price.
- Word — God had already said the people are blessed. The only honest reply was to say so again, and it would have spared everyone the trouble that followed.
- Delay — Asking God again, when He has already made His mind plain, is not learning His will. It is trying to bend Him to ours.
- Hand — The honour Balak dangled was never his to give. God kept Balaam from it. He turned the enemy's whole effort into a sealed blessing on His people.
And Balaam answered and said to the servants of Balak, If Balak give me his house full of silver and gold, I could not go beyond the commandment of Jehovah my God, to do less or more.
Balak's messengers offer Balaam silver and gold, and he answers with words that sound like pure devotion. Yet the same chapter shows him asking them to stay the night — so is this faith speaking, or a bargain dressed up in God's name?
Balaam does not merely mention God; he claims Him as his own. Commentators read that phrase as the mark of a man who had real knowledge of God but no heart for Him.
The history of Balaam is very solemn. While it brings out the sovereign grace of God, it also reveals the elements of religious corruption that prevail in the last days. Satan cannot defeat the saints of God by open attack, so he corrupts instead. In Balaam we have the character of that which corrupts. There was a knowledge of God. He had this — he even says "the LORD my God." He called Israel's God his God, but his heart was busy with covetous practices. He "loved the wages of unrighteousness." Peter describes Judas the same way. Thirty pieces of silver were the reward of wickedness for the man who greeted Jesus as Master. Both men show a feature of religious apostasy that at last perishes in its own corruption.
Balaam cannot give Balak what he wants. So he turns his refusal into a show of devotion.
Balaam sends word to Balak: "Though Balak were to give me his house full of silver and gold, I could not go beyond the command of the LORD my God." How pious he has become now! If he might have gone, he would. Though he cannot do what he would like to do for Balak, he still keeps up his credit as a prophet of the LORD. Just as if he had the secret of the LORD, he says, "I will know what more the LORD will say to me."
Balaam names the silver and gold in the very act of refusing it. His delay says more than his words.
If Balaam's heart had been right with God, he would have dealt with Balak's message at once. It would not have cost him a moment's thought to send a reply. But Balaam's heart was all wrong, and in chapter 22 we see him in the sad condition of a man pulled by conflicting feelings. His heart was set on going, because it was set on the silver and gold. At the same time there was some reference to God: an appearance of religion put on as a cloak to cover his covetous practices. He longed for the money, but he would gladly get hold of it in a religious way.
Still, what he said was true. He could not cross the line, however much he wanted to.
The greedy prophet replied that if the king gave him a house full of silver and gold, he still could not come without God's consent. His covetous nature showed how strong the restraint on him was.
But his fine answer does not end there. What he adds next undoes it.
Balaam's answer sounds well. But he added, "Stay here tonight too, that I may know what more the LORD will say to me." Such an attitude was sheer wickedness. The LORD had already stated His mind clearly, so there was nothing left to consult Him about. But Balaam was set on going. He knew enough of God not to want open conflict with Him. He would bend the LORD to his self-will if he could!
God did let Balaam go with the men. That permission was not approval.
This was not the course of His holy will. It was God dealing with the stubborn according to his stubbornness. He does this when there is no faith in a man's mind, and no honest, undivided purpose with it. He allows a man to follow his own blind schemes... Where He sees integrity, He graciously meets the trembling heart and the hesitating mind. But there was no hesitation with Balaam. There was self-will, and this in the face of the glorious expression of God's will. At bottom he makes nothing of God or His word.
- Profession. Balaam calls the LORD "my God" and speaks of His command. Knowing about God is not the same as belonging to Him.
- Price. His heart was set on the very silver and gold he claimed to refuse. Religion was the cloak over his greed.
- Restraint. His words were true. He could not go beyond God's word, and his greed shows how strong that hold on him was.
- Pressure. He asked God again about a matter God had already settled. That is not obedience; it is trying to bend God.
- Permission. God let the stubborn man have his way. He meets the honest, hesitating heart with grace. The difference lies in the will, not the words.
And now, I pray you, abide ye also here this night, and I shall know what Jehovah will say to me further.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
Then God came to Balaam at night, and said to him, If the men have come to call thee, rise up, [and] go with them; but only what I shall say unto thee shalt thou do.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And Balaam rose up in the morning, and saddled his ass, and went with the princes of Moab.
God had already forbidden Balaam to go. He asked a second time, and God let him go on one condition. Here he saddles up at first light. That raises the hardest question in the chapter: why does God let a man take a road He has already refused him?
God's answer that night sounds like a green light. It was not approval.
Not that this was the course of His holy will; it was God dealing with the stubborn according to his stubbornness. He does this when a man has no faith and no single eye. He lets him follow his own blind schemes. This is righteous, and this is how God deals with Balaam. Where He sees integrity, He graciously meets the trembling heart and the hesitating mind. But there was no hesitation with Balaam. There was self-will, and this in the face of the glorious expression of God's will. At bottom he makes nothing of God or His word. The true moral could not be plainer. We are told that when Balaam rises in the morning, saddles his donkey, and goes with the princes of Moab, "God's anger was kindled."
God's leave came with a condition: he could go if the men came to call him. Balaam did not wait.
Balaam's heart was filled with hatred of God's people, and covetousness raged inside him. This was no ordinary task, and it would carry no ordinary reward. He did not wait for the men to call him. He rose up in the morning, saddled his donkey, and went with the princes of Moab.
Balaam was not the only one to do this. Others also asked God about a choice they had already made.
God would now deal with the fool according to his folly. He should go as he wished. But God was determined to put him to shame, and to bring great blessing for His own people out of these schemes of Satan. The man's wicked attitude toward God here calls to mind the Jewish captains in Jeremiah's day, who were afraid of the Babylonians. They asked the prophet to pray for them, so that God would guide their path. But they had already made up their minds to go with their whole company to Egypt (Jer. 42). Let us beware of going before God at any time with our minds already made up.
He had wanted to go long before he saddled up. His religion was a cover.
Balaam's heart was all wrong, and we see him in chapter 22 in the sad condition of a man pulled by conflicting feelings. His heart was bent on going, because it was bent on the silver and gold. But at the same time he made some show of turning to God — an appearance of religion put on as a cloak to cover his covetous practices. He longed for the money; but he wanted to get hold of it in a religious way.
Balaam set out eagerly, with no idea how the journey would end.
Balaam had permission from Jehovah. He got up eagerly in the morning, saddled his donkey, and set out with Balak's messengers. He was not walking in the light... Balaam walked in darkness. He hoped to have his own way and to reap a rich reward for his villainy. What a journey!... Never was Satan more determined to curse; never was God more determined to bless!
God had His own purposes in Balaam's journey. That did not make Balaam's heart any less wrong.
On one side, Balaam's presence with the king of Moab would serve certain purposes. That did not change in the least the state of soul that provoked God's anger. Balaam needs a warning. God deals with him much as He had dealt with Moses forty years earlier. Only now He uses the donkey — less senseless than Balaam himself — to save and rebuke him.
Balaam's wrong step did not become God's plan, but God bent it toward His people's good.
Verses 12 and 13 show that God had first of all forbidden Balaam to go. Balaam coveted Balak's reward, despite the high profession in verse 18. It was wrong of Balaam to ask again. Yet when he did, God used his going as a witness of divine grace to Israel, as well as of his own perverseness.
- Asked — God had already closed the matter. Balaam asked again anyway, because he coveted the reward behind his high words.
- Allowed — The leave was not God's holy will. It was God dealing with the stubborn according to his stubbornness, letting a man without a single eye follow his own blind schemes.
- Rushed — He was to go only if the men called him. He saddled up first, and the eagerness of that morning exposed a covetous heart.
- Withstood — God's anger burned at his going. The donkey became a warning meant to save him, not just to stop him.
- Overruled — Satan was never more determined to curse, and God never more determined to bless. The journey became a witness of God's grace to Israel, and of Balaam's own perverseness.
And God's anger was kindled because he went; and the Angel of Jehovah set himself in the way to withstand him. Now he was riding upon his ass, and his two young men were with him.
God had just told Balaam he could go with Balak's men. Now, on the road, God's anger burns against him, and the angel of the LORD stands in his way as an opponent.
God's first answer to Balaam had been a flat refusal. The second answer sounded different, and the difference turns on one small word.
The first time, God had clearly forbidden Balaam to go with Balak's princes. Balaam himself had said, "The LORD refuses to let me go with you." The second time, the LORD did not refuse to let Balaam go with them. But He did not command him to go. There was an "if", which indicated that there was divine permission with a condition attached, but not a divine command.
Why would God say go at all?
This was not the course of His holy will. It was God dealing with a stubborn man according to his stubbornness. He does this when a man has no faith in his mind, and no single, undivided purpose with it. He lets that man follow his own blind schemes. This is righteous, and this is how God deals with Balaam. Where He sees integrity, He graciously meets the trembling heart and the hesitating mind. But it was no question of hesitation with Balaam.
The pattern is not unique to Balaam.
How little Balaam knew what the consequences would be of not bowing to God's first word to him! Suppose God has made His will known, and we still want our own way. He may well allow us to have it, so that we learn by experience how foolish our self-will is.
The anger was not over a technicality of travel. It was over what Balaam was riding toward.
So we picture the prophet setting out from Mesopotamia for Moab, with Balak's silver and gold filling his soul's vision. He was heartless about the devastation and sorrow he was going to try to bring on a people who had done nothing to him, all to get his reward. He was willing to blast a whole nation — men, women, and children. Nothing more horrible could well be imagined.
The word for "adversary" in this verse is also the name Scripture gives to the devil.
Satan is a name for the devil, the great enemy of God and man. The name is the same in Hebrew, Greek, and English, and means "adversary." Several other passages translate the same word that way, where other adversaries are meant: compare Numbers 22:22; 1 Kings 11:14, 23, 25.
Here the opponent is on God's side. Commentators identify Him with a messenger seen elsewhere in Scripture.
A heavenly being stood in the way with a drawn sword in his hand. He is called "the angel of the LORD." This was no mere servant. It is the same messenger who appeared to the wife of Manoah in Judges 13. He told her His name was "Wonderful." To her and to Balaam alike, He spoke with divine authority. He told Balaam that He had come out to oppose him because his way was perverse before Him, and that Balaam could speak only the word God gave him. The speaker was none other than He whom we know as the Lord Jesus Christ.
Two angers appear in this scene.
Balaam was so blinded by the god of this world that he saw less than his donkey. She "saw the angel of the LORD standing in the way". Balaam's anger was kindled against the donkey, and he struck her with his staff because she refused to carry him forward to destruction. His anger was unrighteous. By contrast, it brought out the righteous anger of God. God sent His angel to be an adversary to the man who would curse His people whom He had blessed.
A blocked road is not always something to push through. Sometimes it is mercy.
Sometimes we are doing our own will, or we are careless in how we walk. Then God in His mercy may warn us by a hindrance. It stops us, if we pay attention to it, while "the simple pass on and are punished."
- Permission. God's "go" came with an "if" attached — divine permission, never a divine command, and Balaam treated the two as the same thing.
- Abandonment. When a man will not be warned, God may justly leave him to his own blind schemes. Getting your way can be the judgment, not the blessing.
- Motive. God's anger reached the heart: a man riding toward money, willing to destroy a whole nation that had never wronged him.
- Adversary. The word used for the angel is the word for an opponent. Commentators identify this figure, standing in the road with a drawn sword, with the Lord Jesus Christ.
- Mercy. The blocked road was kindness. God still warns the careless by hindrances, and the wise stop while the simple push on and pay for it.
And the ass saw the Angel of Jehovah standing in the way, and his sword drawn in his hand; and the ass turned aside out of the way, and went into the field, and Balaam smote the ass to turn her into the way.
Balaam is riding out to curse Israel, and God is angry that he goes; ahead of him stands an angel with a drawn sword that only the donkey can see. She swerves aside and takes a beating for it, which raises the question running through the whole episode: why is a prophet blinder than the animal he rides?
The angel meets Balaam as an obstacle, not an escort. Commentators see nothing surprising in that. (Where the ESV says "the LORD," some writers use the older name "Jehovah.")
God's anger burns because he goes. The angel of Jehovah takes his stand in the way as an adversary against him. There is no great need for wonder here... Balaam needs a warning. God deals with him much as He had dealt with Moses forty years before. Only now, instead of Zipporah and the stone of circumcision, He uses the donkey — less senseless than Balaam himself — to save and rebuke him.
The same drawn sword appears at other points in Israel's story. Its meaning changes with who stands in front of it. Here it faces the man on his way to curse the nation.
Three times in the course of the people's history, the Angel of Jehovah steps in with the drawn sword in His hand. The first time it is to preserve them from threatened dangers, when Balaam, on his way to curse Israel, meets the messenger who blocks his road (Num. 22:23). The second time... it is to fight with them and win the victory for them. The third time, it is sad to say, it is to judge the people who had sinned in the person of their king. (1 Chron. 21:16)
Balaam later describes himself as a man whose eyes are open. The road exposes the claim. Every move the animal makes is a rescue he does not recognise.
He boasted that his eyes were open. Yet he did not see what the donkey was given to see. He did not know why she turned aside from the sword drawn in the angel's hand. He did not know why she pressed against the wall, sparing his head and costing him at most a crushed foot. And he did not know why she fell down where there was no other way for her or her master to escape destruction.
The comparison does not stop with Balaam. Commentators point out that God once made it against a whole nation.
The donkey saw the Angel, and turned aside from the threatening sword. Sad, that the beast should have more perception than a man made in the image of God! "The ox knows its owner, and the donkey its master's crib, but Israel does not know, my people do not understand" (Isa. 1:3). That was Jehovah's complaint about the moral dullness of a people He had treated better than any other. The very cattle could put them to shame!
Balaam's blindness had a cause, and the cause was in his own heart.
The blind unbeliever rushes onto the sword of the Lord and is destroyed. God keeps the believer safe despite himself. But when his eyes open, he finds that the Lord has been standing against him... Covetousness was the human element in this man's opposition to God. It was the screen behind which he found himself rushing to destruction.
The angel blocked the road, but the block was for Balaam's good.
How gracious of God to make a man who was hurrying on to destruction pause and think, if anything could rouse him! But no, he was committed to wicked ways.
The lesson goes beyond Balaam. It applies to anyone set on his own way.
Sometimes we are doing our own will, or we are careless in how we live. Then God in His mercy may warn us with a hindrance. It stops us if we pay attention to it, while "the simple pass on and are punished."
- Cause. Covetousness was the screen Balaam hid behind; it did not stop him seeing money, only God.
- Sword. One drawn sword: it blocks Balaam here, fights for Israel later, and later still judges them.
- Blindness. The man who claimed open eyes missed what an animal saw at once.
- Rescue. Every swerve and every fall was the donkey saving the life of the man beating her.
- Mercy. A hindrance in the road is God giving you room to stop; push past it and you keep running at the sword.
And the Angel of Jehovah stood in a hollow of the vineyards, a wall being on this side, and a wall on that side.
Balaam is on the road to Moab, hired to curse Israel, and the angel of the LORD has already blocked him once in an open field. Now the road narrows: the same drawn sword waits in a walled lane, the donkey has nowhere to turn, and the man on its back still sees nothing.
The first block left the donkey room to step aside into a field. This one leaves none, and the cost lands on Balaam's own body.
Balaam needed a sharper lesson. In a path through the vineyards, with a wall on either side, the angel with a drawn sword appeared again, still unseen by Balaam but seen by the donkey. The animal turned to one side and crushed Balaam's foot against the wall. Balaam angrily struck the beast a second time. Still Balaam failed to see that the Lord was standing against him in his self-will (vv. 24-25).
The journey itself was the problem. God had already said no, and Balaam went back a second time hoping for a different answer.
Here again he falls into the trap of his own covetousness. God came to Balaam at night and said to him, "If the men come to call you, rise up and go with them." This was not the course of His holy will. It was God dealing with the stubborn according to their stubbornness. He does this when a man has no faith in his mind and no single eye along with it. He permits that man to follow his own blind devices. This is righteous, and God accordingly deals with Balaam this way. Where He sees integrity, He graciously meets the trembling heart and the hesitating mind. But there was no hesitation with Balaam. There was self-will, and this in the face of the glorious expression of God's will. Deep down he makes nothing of God or His word. He had been clearly told that he was not to curse the people but to bless them. Yet he waits with no other aim than to curse, if he could, those whom God told him to bless.
Balaam had a reputation as a man who heard from God. In the walled lane, the only one who saw anything was the animal he was beating.
Balaam was so blinded by the god of this world that he had less perception than his donkey. The donkey "saw the angel of Jehovah standing in the way." Balaam's anger burned against her, and he struck her with his staff because she refused to carry him forward to destruction. His anger was unrighteous. Yet see how it brought out by contrast the righteous anger of God. He sent His angel to stand against the man who would curse His people whom He had blessed — a man who in self-will opposed His commandment and set his face firmly on a course that would bring him to ruin.
The figure in the vineyard path is no ordinary messenger. One writer traces him to an earlier appearance in the Old Testament, and then names him.
A heavenly being stood in the way with a drawn sword in his hand. He is called "the angel of Jehovah." This was no mere servant. It is the same messenger who appeared to the wife of Manoah in Judges 13. He told her his name was "Wonderful." He spoke with divine authority both to her and to Balaam. The speaker was none other than He whom we know as the Lord Jesus Christ.
Balaam had money in view, and no barrier turned him.
Balaam shows what a man can be when his heart is covetous. He sold himself to Satan for temporary rewards. He disregarded every divine warning that held him back on a path leading to destruction.
The same principle reaches anyone moving in their own will today.
When we are doing our own will, or are careless about our walk, God in His mercy may warn us through an obstacle. It stops us if we pay attention to it, while "the simple pass on and are punished." (Prov. 27:12.)
- Second asking. God said no once. Balaam asked again. God let him go — dealing with the stubborn according to their stubbornness, letting a man follow his own blind devices.
- Narrowing. The first block left an open field to turn into. This one leaves walls on both sides and a crushed foot. God's warnings tighten when they are ignored.
- Blindness. The animal saw the drawn sword; the famous prophet did not. Covetousness blinded him so thoroughly that a beast had more perception than he did.
- Mercy. The obstacle in the road was mercy, not cruelty. It stops the person who heeds the warning; "the simple pass on and are punished."
- Ruin. Every warning disregarded, Balaam kept going for the reward. Selling yourself for temporary gain does not remove the barriers; it just means you hit them.
And the ass saw the Angel of Jehovah, and she pressed herself against the wall, and crushed Balaam's foot against the wall; and he smote her again.
Balaam rides on with his heart set on reward, and the road is closing in on him: no field to swerve into this time, just a wall on each side. Why did the animal see the angel while the man riding her did not?
The angel had already blocked the road once, and Balaam missed it. Now the ground narrows, and so does the discipline.
Balaam did not see the angel, but God allowed the donkey to see him. The animal, naturally afraid, turned out of the way into the field. Balaam needed a sharper lesson. In a path through the vineyards, with a wall on either side, the angel with a drawn sword appeared again, still unseen by Balaam but seen by the donkey. The animal turned to one side and crushed Balaam's foot against the wall. Balaam struck the beast a second time in anger. Still Balaam failed to see that the Lord was standing against him in his self-will.
The animal was not being stubborn. Caught between a drawn sword and a stone wall, she chose the wall. Balaam took the smallest injury on offer that day.
He who boasted of having his eyes open did not see what the donkey was given to see. He did not know why she turned aside from the sword drawn in the angel's hand. He did not know why she pressed herself against the wall, so that Balaam might not have his head struck but at most his foot crushed. And he did not know why she lay down where there was no other way for her or her master to escape destruction.
The reason the warnings bounced off him lies further back. He had asked God about a journey his heart had already chosen.
If Balaam's heart had been right with God, he would have dealt with Balak's message in a moment. But his heart was bent on going, because it was bent on the silver and gold. But at the same time there was a sort of reference to God — an appearance of religiousness put on as a cloak to cover his covetous practices. He longed for the money, but he wanted to lay hold of it in a religious way.
The same blindness settles on anyone who keeps moving under the push of his own will. The outcome, though, is not the same for everyone.
The wall, the pain, the balking animal — none of it was chance.
How gracious of God to make a man who was hurrying to destruction pause and think, if anything could rouse him! But no, he was committed to wicked ways. Lawlessness must pursue its miserable course to an end no less miserable.
The same principle reaches into ordinary life. A blocked plan can be a message, not just a nuisance.
When we are doing our own will, or are careless in our walk, God in His mercy may warn us with a hindrance. That hindrance stops us if we pay attention to it, while "the simple go on and suffer for it."
- Wall. God narrows the road before He blocks it. The field allowed a detour, the vineyard path allowed none. Each stage was a sharper call to a man set on his own way.
- Shield. The crushed foot was mercy in disguise. The donkey pressed to the wall, so Balaam had his foot crushed instead of his head struck.
- Screen. Love of silver and gold, dressed up as consulting God, was the screen. Behind it Balaam ran toward ruin and never saw the drawn sword.
- Sight. Follow your own will, and you lose the ability to read God's mind. The unbeliever runs onto the sword. The believer is spared, then opens his eyes and finds the Lord was the one blocking him.
- Warning. A hindrance in the road can be God's kindness, making us pause and think. Ignore it, and Scripture's verdict stands: "the simple go on and suffer for it."
Then the Angel of Jehovah went still further, and stood in a narrow place, where was no way to turn either to the right hand or to the left.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And the ass saw the Angel of Jehovah, and lay down under Balaam; and Balaam's anger was kindled, and he smote the ass with his staff.
Balaam is riding out to curse Israel for a fee. Three times his donkey has turned aside from an armed angel that the prophet cannot see. The third time she lies down under him, and the man who claims to speak for God answers the rescue with a beating.
The donkey refused to move because she could see. Balaam's rage fell on the one creature on the road that knew the danger.
Balaam was so blinded by the god of this world that he saw less than his donkey, which "saw the angel of the LORD standing in the road." Balaam's anger flared against the donkey. He struck her with his staff because she refused to carry him forward to destruction. His anger was unrighteous. But see how it brought out the righteous anger of God. God sent His angel to oppose him. Balaam would curse the people God had blessed. He set his own will against God's commandment and fixed his face on a course that would bring him to ruin.
The creature without reason sees the danger. The man made in God's image sees nothing.
The donkey saw the Angel and turned aside from the threatening sword. How sad that the beast should have more perception than a man made in the image of God! "The ox knows its owner, and the donkey its master's crib, but Israel does not know, my people do not understand" (Isa. 1:3). That was the LORD's complaint: His people were morally dull, though He had treated them more kindly than any other. The very cattle could put them to shame!
The blows are not a small detail in the story.
Balaam struck his donkey three times. The Angel rebuked him for it, for every act of cruelty to animals is noted by God.
How a person treats a helpless animal measures his character. Balaam is the worked example.
A man of righteous character cares about the welfare of his animals. Even the kindness of wicked men, by comparison, is cruelty (Proverbs 12:10). Balaam proved this when he lost his temper with his donkey, which was submitting to the angel of the Lord.
Balaam next wishes for a sword to kill the donkey. A drawn sword is already waiting for him, and his own words convict him.
Balaam said to his donkey, "Because you have made a fool of me. I wish I had a sword in my hand, for then I would kill you." Those words justified God in sending His angel with a drawn sword in his hand to oppose him. They also justified the angel when he said, "I have come out to oppose you because your way is perverse before me … if she had not turned aside from me, surely just now I would have killed you and let her live."
God had purposes to fulfil through Balaam. Even so, the angel and the donkey were not about the journey. They were about the man.
Of course there is a miracle here… Its strangeness was all the more likely to work on a heart hardened to ordinary appeals. It humbled him by making him realise how far he had sunk below the beast — an animal whose actions his divinations claimed the power to interpret. And the mercy of God broke through the natural boundary lines to convict and save him. It should have broken down with them every barrier of sin and unbelief. The extraordinary means used here show what state of soul they suited. They also show the infinite pity of God. He could not use even a man like this as a mere machine to do His purposes without labouring after his soul.
The miracle did not shake him. Why did he argue with a talking animal instead of falling silent before it?
Balaam was so carried away by his greed that this miracle did not terrify him. He replied just as if he had been speaking to a man. God did not change the nature of the donkey into that of a rational being. He made it say whatever He pleased, to restrain Balaam's madness.
- Sight — The donkey saw the angel; Balaam, blinded by the god of this world, had less perception than the animal he rode.
- Struck — He beat the one creature that was saving him. God noted every blow, and He measures a man by how he treats his beast.
- Spared — The angel's verdict: had she not turned aside, Balaam would have died and the donkey would have lived.
- Spoken to — God gave a voice to an animal and broke through natural boundaries. His pity would not use a man as a machine without labouring after his soul.
- Unmoved — Greed had so numbed him that a speaking donkey drew argument, not wonder.
And Jehovah opened the mouth of the ass, and she said to Balaam, What have I done to thee, that thou hast smitten me these three times?
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And Balaam said to the ass, Because thou hast mocked me I would there were a sword in my hand, for now would I kill thee!
Balaam is riding to Moab to curse Israel for pay, and three times his donkey has swerved away from an angel he cannot see. God now gives the animal a voice, and Balaam answers it with rage instead of wonder.
God had been warning Balaam all along that road. One writer shows how the last warning landed:
Then God put words into the mouth of the donkey, asking Balaam why he had struck her these three times. Even this amazing miracle had no effect on Balaam. He replied in anger to the donkey that he wished he had a sword to kill her! God had given Balaam several chances to see that He Himself was stepping in to wake him up to his own folly. Balaam felt none of it. That would not have been the case if he were a true prophet of God.
Why does Balaam argue with his donkey instead of stopping in shock? One commentator answers that question:
Unbelief and higher criticism scoff at the incident of the speaking donkey. One of their arguments runs like this: Balaam held a conversation with the beast and showed no astonishment at all, so the story cannot be true. Augustine answered this well: "Balaam was so carried away by his greed that this miracle did not terrify him. He replied just as if he had been speaking to a man. God did not change the nature of the donkey into that of a rational being. Yet He made it say whatever He pleased, to restrain Balaam's madness."
The donkey turned aside three times, and each move had a reason. Balaam saw none of them:
He boasted that his eyes were open, yet he did not see what the donkey was given to see. He did not know why she turned aside from the sword drawn in the angel's hand. He did not know why she pushed herself against the wall, so that Balaam's head might not be struck but at most his foot crushed. And he did not know why she fell down where there was no other way for her or her master to escape destruction.
Balaam wished for a weapon he did not have. A weapon was already drawn — pointed at him:
Balaam's anger was unrighteous, but it brought out the righteous anger of God against a man who would curse the people He had blessed… What Balaam said to his donkey — "Because you have made a fool of me. I wish I had a sword in my hand, for then I would kill you" — justified God in sending His angel with a drawn sword in his hand to stand against him. And his words justified the angel. The angel said, "I have come out to oppose you, because your way is perverse before me… If she had not turned aside from me, surely just now I would have killed you and let her live."
Did any of this really happen? One writer answers the ridicule, then names what had gone blind in Balaam:
The story of Balaam's donkey has drawn much unbelieving protest and even ridicule, yet Peter vouches for it. If Satan could speak through a serpent with words of deceit, God can, if He chooses, speak words of warning through a donkey. His greed and his dealings with demons had blinded the eyes of Balaam's heart, and now we see that the eyes of his head were as blind as the eyes of his heart. The eyes of his head were opened, so that at last he saw the angel as clearly as his donkey had done. But the veil over the eyes of his heart remained.
The humbling was not cruelty. One writer reads the miracle as mercy aimed at a hard heart:
The strangeness of it was all the more likely to work on a heart hardened against ordinary appeals. It humbled him by making him see how far he had sunk below the beast… Meanwhile the mercy of God broke through the natural boundary lines to convict and save him, and with those lines every barrier of sin and unbelief in him should have fallen too. The extraordinary means used here testify to the state of soul that called for them. They testify also to the infinite pity of God, who could not use even a man like this as a mere machine to carry out His purposes. He had to labour over his soul.
- Blindness. The donkey sees the angel; the man who boasted of open eyes sees nothing. Eyes can be open while the heart stays veiled.
- Greed. Greed had swallowed him whole. It was so strong that a talking donkey did not even startle him.
- Temper. His answer is pure rage — he wants a sword for the creature that had three times saved his life.
- Reversal. The sword he wished for was already drawn, and aimed at him; his own words condemned him out of his own mouth.
- Mercy. God broke the natural order to reach one hard heart — proof that He labours over a soul instead of just using it.
And the ass said to Balaam, Am not I thine ass, upon which thou hast ridden ever since I was thine to this day? was I ever wont to do so to thee? And he said, No.
Balaam is riding to curse Israel for money. He has just beaten his donkey three times for stopping in the road. Now the donkey speaks. It points to a lifetime of faithful service and asks its master one question about his own conduct — and he answers with a single honest word.
The donkey asks its owner to think back over years of ordinary service. Balaam has to admit that nothing like this had ever happened before. One writer walks through what follows:
The donkey asked whether it had ever been in the habit of acting like this. The prophet admitted it had not. Then God opened Balaam's eyes to see the angel with the drawn sword in his hand. At the terrifying sight he bowed his head and fell flat on his face. The angel then told Balaam that he owed his life to the donkey three times. Balaam admitted that he had sinned, and said he was ready to go back (vv. 30-34).
Balaam's own "No" convicts him: there was no cause for the beating. Another writer weighs how a man should treat his animals:
A righteous man cares about the welfare of his animals. Even the kindness of wicked men, by comparison, is cruelty. Balaam proved this when he lost his temper with his donkey after the donkey submitted to the angel of the Lord. The Lord reproved Balaam for the cruelty of whipping his donkey (Numbers 22:24-33).
The donkey's question is reasonable; the man's rage is not. The animal saw what the prophet could not:
The donkey saw the Angel and turned aside from the threatening sword. What a thing, that the beast should have more perception than a man made in the image of God! "The ox knows its owner, and the donkey its master's crib, but Israel does not know, my people do not understand" (Isaiah 1:3). That was the Lord's complaint about His own people. They were morally dull, though He had been kinder to them than to anyone else. The very cattle could put them to shame!
The choice was deliberate. God picked the messenger that would humble this prophet most:
I grant you it is not a usual thing for God to make a dumb donkey speak; but were these circumstances usual? Was there not something deeply humiliating in having such an animal rebuke the guilty prophet? But this very fact was most significant. A donkey rebuked a man who did not lack natural intelligence. He soon became the vessel of the most beautiful declarations on God's part. Yet first the animal he rode warned him of his folly and sin.
Balaam answers the donkey as if talking with a donkey were normal — no wonder, no fear. One writer traces that calm to his greed:
Balaam was so carried away by his greed that this miracle did not terrify him. He replied just as if he had been speaking to a man. God did not change the nature of the donkey into that of a rational being. He simply made it say whatever He pleased, to restrain Balaam's madness.
Yet the strange method was itself mercy. Ordinary appeals had stopped reaching this man:
The strangeness of it was all the more likely to work on a heart hardened to ordinary appeals. It humbled him by making him realise how far he had sunk below the animal — the very animal whose actions his divinations claimed the power to interpret. And the mercy of God broke through the natural boundary lines to convict and save him. In breaking them, it should have broken down every barrier of sin and unbelief in him as well. … the infinite pity of God could not use even a man like this as a mere machine to carry out His purposes. He had to labour after his soul.
A man can be shaken without being changed. Balaam admitted the facts, saw the angel, confessed his sin — and went on:
Greed and his dealings with demons had blinded the eyes of Balaam's heart. Now we see that the eyes of his head were as blind as the eyes of his heart. At last the eyes of his head opened, and he saw the angel just as his donkey had. But the veil over the eyes of his heart remained.
- Blindness — the prophet could not see what his animal saw. The beast had more perception than a man made in God's image.
- Cruelty — Balaam's own "No" admitted the beating had no cause. The Lord reproved him for it.
- Rebuke — God chose the most humbling messenger possible. The creature he rode warned him of his folly.
- Mercy — the miracle broke through the normal order to convict and save him. God would not use him as a mere machine; He laboured after his soul.
- Hardness — his eyes opened and he saw the angel. But the veil over his heart stayed, and he went on.
Then Jehovah opened the eyes of Balaam, and he saw the Angel of Jehovah standing in the way, and his sword drawn in his hand; and he bowed and prostrated himself on his face.
Balaam is riding to Moab, hired to curse Israel, and three times his donkey has seen the angel of the LORD blocking the road with a drawn sword. Verse 31 is where God opens the prophet's own eyes — so why did he need that, and why did the sight change his posture and not his path?
The donkey needed no miracle to see the danger; the man riding it did.
Finally the Lord opened Balaam's eyes so that he saw the Angel standing in the way with a drawn sword in His hand (v. 31). In shocked terror Balaam fell on his face. The Angel then rebuked Balaam for the bad temper he showed in striking his donkey. He told him that if the donkey had not turned aside, He would have killed Balaam and spared the donkey (vv. 32-33). What a lesson this is, that an unbeliever is more ignorant of God than a beast!
The figure blocking the way is no ordinary messenger.
A heavenly being stood in the way with a drawn sword in His hand. He is called "the angel of Jehovah." This was no mere servant. It is the same messenger who appeared to Manoah's wife in Judges 13 and said His name was "Wonderful." He spoke with divine authority to her and to Balaam. To Balaam He said: "Behold, I have come out to oppose you because your way is perverse before me… Go with the men, but speak only the word that I tell you." The speaker was none other than the One we know as the Lord Jesus Christ.
A drawn sword across the road is not a subtle message. Yet Balaam missed it, and a sword ends his story.
The angel that confronted him held a drawn sword in his hand. You would think its meaning could hardly be missed, especially as the sword blocked his way. Yet Balaam was blind to it, and he went forward to his doom, as the end proved. He never returned to his native land. The wealth and honour, if he ever got them, he never lived to enjoy. He fell by the sword. It was not the sword of the angel, who barred his way to Moab at the start. It was the sword of the very people he tried to curse against the purpose of God, as recorded in Numbers 31:8.
His failure to see was itself a symptom, and the warning in it reaches past him.
This was not in itself a sin. It was the consequence of sin, and it showed the moral blindness that sin always produces. In an unbeliever it is fatal. But take a believer who follows the impulse of his own will, even in the smallest degree. How can he discern the mind of the Lord? The blind unbeliever rushes onto the sword of the Lord and is destroyed. God preserves the believer despite himself. But when his eyes are opened, he finds that the Lord has been standing against him… Covetousness was the human element of this man's opposition to God. It was the screen through which he found himself rushing to destruction.
He falls flat, says he has sinned, and offers to go home. The wording of that offer gives him away.
Balaam saw that the powers of evil and his own cunning were no match for God. So this wilful man offers to return, confessing that he has sinned. But it is clear that the desire of his heart is still the same. He does not say he will go back because he has sinned. He says, "if it is evil in your sight, I will turn back". Why does he say "if"? Was it not perfectly clear that his going displeased God? Yet there was the lingering desire in his heart to go on in order to get the coveted reward.
Seeing something is not the same as being changed by it, and that danger reaches past Balaam to us.
Is it not possible for us to "see" in an intellectual way? Is it not possible to speak of the precious things of God without our own hearts being moved by them? As we read God's Word and come to understand it, let us exercise our hearts and consciences. Then the truth gets a firm hold of us and shapes our lives. "The eyes of your heart being enlightened" is the true rendering of Ephesians 1:18.
- Blind — Balaam's blindness was moral, not physical; commentators name covetousness as the screen he was rushing through.
- Opened — Balaam saw only because the LORD gave him sight, and what he saw was the Lord standing against him.
- Warned — The drawn sword blocked his road as a plain warning; he read no meaning in it, and by Numbers 31:8 he died by a sword.
- Bowed — Falling on his face and saying "I have sinned" is not repentance when the offer to turn back still hangs on an "if".
- Unchanged — Balaam's legacy is opened eyes with an untouched heart; our need is that the eyes of the heart be enlightened.
And the Angel of Jehovah said to him, Wherefore hast thou smitten thine ass these three times? behold, it was I who came forth to withstand thee, for the way [thou walkest in] is for ruin before me.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And the ass saw me, and turned from me these three times; had she not turned from me, I had now certainly slain thee, and saved her alive.
Balaam, a prophet hired to curse Israel, is riding toward Moab, and three times he has beaten his donkey for swerving off the road. Now God opens his eyes: the animal he wanted to kill was the only thing keeping him alive.
The figure in the road is no ordinary messenger. One commentator names Him, and quotes what He said to Balaam:
A heavenly being stood in the way with a drawn sword in His hand. Scripture calls Him "the angel of the LORD." This was no mere servant. It is the same messenger who appeared to the wife of Manoah in Judges 13 and who said His name was "Wonderful." Both to her and to Balaam He spoke with divine authority. To Balaam He said: "I have come out to oppose you, because your way is perverse before Me… Go with the men, but speak only the word that I tell you." The speaker was none other than He whom we know as the Lord Jesus Christ.
The Angel called Balaam's way perverse. What Balaam was riding to do explains God's anger:
So we picture the prophet setting out from Mesopotamia for Moab, with Balak's silver and gold filling his soul's vision. He had no pity at all for the devastation and sorrow he was going to try to bring on a people who had done nothing to him. He did it all for his reward. The people of Israel had done him no wrong, yet he was willing to blast a whole nation — men, women, and children. Nothing more horrible could well be imagined. No wonder we read that "God's anger was kindled because he went" (Num. 22:22).
Balaam was rushing toward that sword and could not see it. One writer shows where such blindness ends:
The blind unbeliever rushes onto the sword of the Lord and is destroyed. The believer is preserved despite himself. But when his eyes are opened, he finds that the Lord has been standing against him. We may take warning even from a wicked Balaam. Satan often turns the tendencies of our own hearts into a thick veil. Then we fail to see the Lord's mind.
Three times the donkey saw what the prophet could not. One writer explains why God let Balaam ride on at all, and what the animal exposed:
God intended him to go, so that he might pronounce a blessing on His people instead of a curse. Morally, for Balaam himself, going was the most wicked act. Yet God brings out all His purposes through it. He is nothing more than a rod in God's hand. He goes, and the Lord meets him by an angel. He rebukes man's ways and man's wisdom by putting more sense into the mouth of a dumb animal than a man has. Though man has a mind, he uses it against God, which an animal cannot do. Man, in one sense, is more blind than Satan, because Satan believes and trembles. God could reveal Himself to an animal's eye as well as to a man's, whenever He pleased.
Every blocked step was a kindness. The Angel explains why only after the donkey has saved Balaam's life:
God then let the prophet know why all these obstacles stood in his way. He heard it in the fullest possible way, from the angel of the LORD Himself. How gracious of God, to make a man who was hurrying on to destruction stop and think, if anything could rouse him! But no, he was committed to wicked ways. Lawlessness must run its miserable course to an end no less miserable.
Balaam's reply in the next verse admits sin and offers to turn back — but the wording gives him away:
Realising that the powers of evil and his own cunning were no match for God, the wilful Balaam offers to return, confessing that he has sinned. But his heart's desire has not changed. He does not say he will go back because he has sinned. He says, "if it is evil in Your sight, I will turn back." Why does he say "if"? Was it not obvious that his going displeased God? Yet there was still the lingering desire in his heart to go on and get the reward he coveted.
- The Sword. An armed Angel stood in the road. Fereday identifies Him as the Lord Jesus Himself. The charge was against Balaam's heart, not his route: his way was perverse.
- The Greed. He was travelling for silver and gold. He was willing to ruin a whole nation that had never wronged him. That is what kindled God's anger.
- The Donkey. God gave sight to the animal and withheld it from the prophet — a rebuke to human wisdom. Balaam himself was only a rod in God's hand: God meant him to bless Israel, not curse them.
- The Mercy. Three blocked steps were three rescues. God stopped a man hurrying to destruction and made him think. Grace came disguised as an obstacle.
- The Waste. Balaam said "I have sinned," then added "if it is evil in Your sight." That is a confession with an escape clause. He rode on for his fee.
And Balaam said to the Angel of Jehovah, I have sinned; for I knew not that thou stoodest in the way against me; and now, if it be evil in thine eyes, I will get me back again.
The angel of the LORD has just blocked Balaam's road, and his own donkey saw what the prophet could not. His answer sounds like repentance: he admits sin and offers to turn back. But his wording carries a condition, an excuse, and a desire he has not given up.
Everything turns on one small word: if.
Realising that the powers of evil and his own guile were no match for God, the wilful Balaam offers to return, confessing that he has sinned. But it is clear that the desire of his heart is still the same, for he does not say he will go back because he has sinned, but "if it is evil in your sight, I will turn back". Why does he say "if"? Was it not obvious that his going displeased God? Yet there was the lingering desire in his heart to go on and get the reward he wanted.
The sin Balaam admits is not the sin he committed.
Balaam acknowledged that he had sinned (v.34), but let himself down easily by pleading that he did not know the Angel was standing in the way. But he knew God had forbidden him to curse Israel, so his way was perverse before the Lord. He still did not decide to bless Israel, but offered to turn back if God was displeased. He had already been told of God's displeasure against any cursing of Israel, but he had no desire to take God's viewpoint himself.
One writer sees a warning in this for believers too:
His thought was only that he had failed to see the angel in the road. This was not in itself a sin, but it was the consequence of sin. As such it showed the moral blindness that sin always produces, and in an unbeliever that blindness is fatal. But what about a believer who follows the push of his own will, in any degree, however small? How can he discern the mind of the Lord? The blind unbeliever runs onto the sword of the Lord and is destroyed. The believer is kept safe in spite of himself, but when his eyes are opened he finds that the Lord has been standing against him... Satan often turns the special tendencies of our own hearts into a thick veil, so that we fail to see the Lord's mind.
after_note: DELETE_NOT_APPLICABLE
Other men in Scripture said the same three words.
Had Balaam any heart-knowledge of God he would have refused to go a step further after his experience with the Angel. His words "I have sinned" no more came from a conscience convicted by God than the same words from the lips of self-willed Saul in 1 Samuel 15:24.
One writer compares the habit to a child owning up:
It is not always a good sign when a man is quick to confess his sin. Have you not seen it in your children? It is a matter of common observation that the child who is always ready to confess his wrong never feels much about it... The quick and hasty owning, "I have sinned," is always suspicious; and it may be found in men even worse than Saul. Judas said the same thing. The readiness to own wrong, at least in general terms, may exist even where the conscience is seared and the state is utterly bad.
God gave Balaam sight, but only of one kind.
The eyes of Balaam's heart were blinded by his greed and his dealings with demons, and now we see that the eyes of his head were as blind as the eyes of his heart. The eyes of his head were opened so that at last he saw the angel as clearly as his donkey had done. But the veil over the eyes of his heart remained.
Every obstacle on the road was meant to stop him.
The angel of the Lord Himself then told the prophet, as fully as possible, why all these obstructions were put in his way. How gracious of God to make a man who was hurrying to destruction pause and think, if anything could rouse him! But no, he was committed to wicked ways. Lawlessness must pursue its miserable course to an end no less miserable.
- Self-will first. Balaam's road was already crooked before the angel blocked it. He had God's word about Israel and no wish to share God's view of them.
- Blindness follows. Not seeing the angel was not the sin; it was what sin produced. A believer who follows even a little of his own will loses the ability to read the Lord's mind.
- Half-confession next. "If it is evil in your sight" is the giveaway: he admits fault but keeps his option open, because the reward still holds his heart.
- Words are cheap. Saul and Judas said the same three words. A quick, general admission of wrong can sit beside a hardened conscience.
- Mercy refused, ruin reached. God blocked the road and explained Himself fully — kindness meant to make a man pause. But a will set on its own way runs to a miserable end.
And the Angel of Jehovah said to Balaam, Go with the men, but only the word that I shall speak unto thee, that shalt thou speak. And Balaam went with the princes of Balak.
Balaam is on his way to curse Israel for a reward. The angel of the LORD has just stopped him on the road — and now tells him to carry on, with one restriction on his mouth. Why would God send a man forward on a journey He had already forbidden? Does permission mean approval?
God's "go" is not a change of mind. Commentators read it as God handing a determined man over to the choice he had already made.
This was not the course of His holy will. It was God dealing with the stubborn according to their stubbornness. He does this when a man has no faith in his mind and no single eye with it. He lets that man follow his own blind schemes. This is righteous, and God deals with Balaam in this way. Where He sees integrity, He graciously meets the trembling heart and the hesitating mind. But it was no question of hesitation with Balaam.
God had already told Balaam plainly not to go. So what happened to that first command?
The conditional permission to go with Balak's servants did not set aside the definite command to Balaam not to go to Balak. We see this in God's anger burning when Balaam went. The thoughts of the false prophet were completely at odds with the thoughts of God, and he knew this very well. But he had made up his mind to get the reward that Balak promised, if he possibly could. He would take it even if it meant cursing those whom God had blessed.
Balaam asked God a second time about a matter God had already closed. We can fall into the same habit.
We may be tempted to wonder at this, but we must remember that God does not change His purpose. If we know this and still persist like Balaam, God may change His dealings with us, as He did with Balaam. He may permit us to go, so that in His discipline we reap the bitter result of our own way. Even so, as with Balaam, He will give us ample warning of what lies before us.
The same trap catches people who pray about a decision they have already settled:
Let us beware of going before God at any time with our minds already made up. It is a serious affront to the Divine Majesty!
The verse calls the speaker "the angel of the LORD." Yet the words He orders Balaam to say are His own.
The Angel of the Lord told him to go, however, with the absolute command that he speak only what the Angel spoke to him (v. 35). Notice what this shows. In the Old Testament the title "The Angel of the Lord" refers to the Lord Himself, and Balaam must speak His words.
Balaam could go where he liked. He could not say what he liked. He admitted this himself before he ever spoke in front of Balak.
He loved, as we know, "the wages of unrighteousness," and, if he could, would have said what Balak wanted. But a power he could not resist held sway over him. He was for the time being the mouthpiece of God, and spoke, however unwillingly, the words of God. He was so sure that inspiration was real, down to the words themselves, that he said so at his first meeting with Balak. Before he spoke one prediction about Israel, he told him, "Have I now any power to say anything? The word that God puts in my mouth, that shall I speak" (Num. 22:38).
Letting Balaam travel was not God losing control of the situation. It was God bringing the plot into the open and turning it inside out.
God knows what is in Balaam's heart. So He allows him to go forward, to expose him fully, and to turn his evil desire against His people into blessing for them. Balaam shows no real desire to turn back. Nor does it seem that God will let him go back. God has His own purpose: to make Balaam the unwilling vessel who speaks out His thoughts about His people.
A drawn sword, a talking donkey and a direct rebuke should have ended the trip. Balaam heard all of it and kept riding.
Had Balaam any heart-knowledge of God he would have refused to go a step further after his experience with the Angel. True, the Angel said, "Go with the men; but only the word that I shall speak to you, that you shall speak." But He also said, "Behold, I went out to withstand you, because the way you walk in is for ruin before me." After hearing all this, Balaam was clearly proceeding to his doom.
- Permitted, not approved. God's "go" answered Balaam's will, not His own; He lets a man with no single eye follow his own blind schemes.
- Permitted, but still guilty. The permission never cancelled the first refusal. God's anger burned as soon as Balaam saddled up.
- Permitted, and warned. God may let us have our way so we reap its bitter result, yet He gives ample warning of what lies ahead first.
- Permitted, and muzzled. He could choose his road, but not his message. A man who loved the wages of unrighteousness became the mouthpiece of God against his own will.
- Permitted, and overruled. God let him ride on to expose his heart. Then He turned the curse Balaam intended into blessing for the very people he came to curse.
And when Balak heard that Balaam came, he went out to meet him, to the city of Moab, which is on the border of the Arnon, which is at the extremity of the border.
A frightened king of Moab has sent for a famous fortune-teller, and the man has now arrived. Balak goes out to the very edge of his own land to meet him, hoping that together they can curse Israel.
Each man came to this meeting with a grievance:
Balak met Balaam at the frontier of his kingdom. Neither the king nor the prophet was in a good mood. Balak was offended, because Balaam had not been quick to do what he asked. Balaam felt that he was under restraint, and that things would not turn out as he and Balak wanted. Balak took his visitor to the town of Kirjath Huzoth, and there he offered oxen and sheep in front of Balaam and the princes who had fetched him from Mesopotamia. We are not told who Balak offered his sacrifices to. The one true God certainly had no place in his esteem.
Balak's choice of hired help shows what he thought he was up against:
He was not convinced that military power would be enough to stand against the conquerors of Sihon and Og. So he sent messengers to a well-known fortune-teller — Balaam the son of Beor, who lived in Mesopotamia. Outsiders were already crediting Israel's victories to divine power... In sending for Balaam, Balak sought to oppose the supernatural by the supernatural. The Mesopotamian prophet had a reputation for influence with the invisible world.
At that border the world's power and the world's religion joined forces:
Two things stand out in Satan's attempt. The first is the dismay that filled Balak's mind when he saw the hosts of Israel. The second is the covetousness that ruled Balaam's soul. Balak sends for Balaam. At this early date we see the power of the world uniting with the religion of the world against what is of God... Here the secular asks help from the religious. Since then the religious has often called on the secular. But whichever one asked, the other always answered. They set aside every difference and jealousy between them to make common cause against the people of God.
God did not stop Balaam from reaching Moab, and one writer explains why:
God knows what is in Balaam's heart. He allows him to go forward, to expose him completely, and to turn his evil desire against His people into blessing for them. Balaam shows no real desire to turn back. Nor does it seem that God will let him go back. God has His own purpose: to make Balaam the unwilling vessel for declaring His thoughts about His people.
Another writer looks ahead to how the attack ends:
Later we shall see how wonderful God's way was. He turned Satan's own effort against him. He made this most wicked wretch Balaam work against all his own interests without meaning to. Held in the mighty hand of God, Balaam became the instrument for sealing the blessing of God upon His people, as far as a man could do it!
The contest was over Israel, yet Israel took no part in it:
How little did Israel know or imagine what was going on between Jehovah and the enemy. Perhaps they were murmuring in their tents at the very moment when God was declaring their perfection through the mouth of the covetous prophet. Balak would gladly have Israel cursed; but, blessed be God, He will not allow anyone to curse His people. He may have to deal with them Himself, in secret, about many things. But He will not allow anyone else to speak a word against them.
- Fear summons. Israel had defeated Sihon and Og. Balak decided armies were not enough, so he hired a man said to have power in the unseen world.
- Fear travels. Balak does not wait at home. He meets the hired prophet at the very edge of his own kingdom.
- Fear allies. At that border the world's power and the world's religion join hands. The two have kept calling on each other ever since.
- God permits. God lets Balaam arrive. The journey exposes the man completely and makes him an unwilling mouthpiece for God's thoughts about Israel.
- God reverses. The attempt to curse ends in blessing. Israel knew nothing about it, and God let no other tongue accuse them.
And Balak said to Balaam, Did I not earnestly send to thee to call thee? why didst thou not come to me? am I not surely able to honour thee?
Balak has sent messengers to bring Balaam to Moab. The two men meet at last on the border. The king's first words are a complaint dressed as a question. Two assumptions sit behind the hurt pride. Honour is Balak's to give, he thinks. And a prophet — along with a prophet's God — can be bought with it.
The question is a reproach, and the bad feeling runs both ways.
Balak met Balaam at the frontier of his kingdom. Neither king nor prophet was in a good mood. Balak took offence because Balaam had not come quickly when he asked. Balaam, for his part, felt he was under restraint. He sensed that things would not turn out as he and Balak wanted.
Balak's question is a reminder of terms already offered. Honour, gold and silver were on the table, and the offer found a willing heart.
There is something especially awful in the case of Balaam. He clearly loved money — no uncommon love, sadly, in our own day. Balak's gold and silver proved a very tempting bait to the wretched man — a bait too tempting to be resisted. Satan knew his man, and the price at which he could be bought.
"Am I not able to honor you?" is the question of a man who cannot picture a power he is unable to bargain with. How he handles Balaam, and where he takes him, follow from the God he imagines.
In Balak we see how completely the knowledge of God was lost… God is known only by revelation, and Balak's ignorance is less surprising than that of the world with all its wisdom… His words to Balaam show what he thought God was like. He thought God was just like himself, or like the god he imagined for himself… In his mind, both gods and men could be swayed by circumstances and place.
This meeting is an alliance. A king joins with a prophet, and each brings his own reason for being there.
Satan's attempt rests on two main things. One is the dismay that filled Balak's mind when he saw the armies of Israel. The other is the greed that ruled Balaam's soul. Balak sends for Balaam. At this early date we see the power of the world uniting with the religion of the world against what is of God. Here worldly power asks religion for help, and religion has often since called on worldly power in return. Whichever one asked, the other always answered. They set aside every difference and jealousy, and made common cause against the people of God.
Balak's question assumes the outcome is still open. He thinks the right fee will buy the right words. It was settled before the two men ever met.
How little Israel knew what was going on between the LORD and the enemy. They may well have been grumbling in their tents at the very moment when God was setting out their perfection through the mouth of the covetous prophet. Balak would gladly have had Israel cursed. But, blessed be God, He will not allow anyone to curse His people. He may have to deal with them Himself, in secret, about many things. But He will not let anyone else speak a word against them. He may have to expose them to themselves; but He will not allow a stranger to expose them.
Balak began by asking whether he was not able to honour Balaam. By the end of the episode he answers his own question, and the answer is not the one he expected.
God does not change. Through Balaam's mouth He pronounced the blessings we have looked at so far. They sound the death-knell of the world in its opposition to God and His people. Balak struck his hands together. The curse he intended had been turned into a threefold blessing. Unhappy Balaam would gladly have secured the wages of unrighteousness and the honour of this world. Instead he gets Balak's withering taunt, and is told to flee to his place: "the LORD has held you back from honor."
- Summons. Balak complains that Balaam did not come at once. Neither man is pleased: the king feels slighted, and the prophet already feels held back.
- Bait. The honour Balak dangles was the lure from the start. Money and rank were the price at which this man could be bought.
- Misjudgement. "Am I not able to honor you?" comes from a king who pictured God as being like himself. He thought God could be persuaded, and swayed by place and circumstance.
- Alliance. Worldly power and worldly religion join hands here against God's people. Balak's fear and Balaam's greed drive them both.
- Withheld. God will not let anyone curse His people. So the promised honour never arrives. Balak's own parting taunt is that the LORD held Balaam back from it.
And Balaam said to Balak, Lo, I am come to thee; but shall I now be able at all to say anything? the word that God puts in my mouth, that shall I speak.
Balak has promised Balaam great honour if he will curse Israel. But the prophet's first words to the king admit that his mouth is not his own — so can a man speak God's true word while his heart is set on money?
Notice who is speaking here. This is a man who wanted the reward, and who has to say these words anyway.
On coming to Balak, despite the honour promised, Balaam has to confess, "Behold, I have come to you! Have I now any power of my own to speak anything? The word that God puts in my mouth, that must I speak." He would gladly have accepted the rewards. But he is conscious that God has intervened against him on behalf of His people, and he seems quite uncertain of what lies ahead.
His words are not modesty. They tell us how a prophet received the word he spoke.
He was for the time being the mouthpiece of God, and spoke, however unwillingly, the words of God. He was sure that inspiration was real, and that it reached even to the words themselves. So at his first meeting with Balak, before he spoke one prediction about Israel, he told him, "Have I now any power of my own to speak anything? The word that God puts in my mouth, that must I speak."
So why did Balaam come to Balak at all? His heart, not his mouth, was the real problem.
His heart was bent on going, because it was bent on the silver and gold. At the same time there was a kind of reference to God — an appearance of religiousness put on as a cloak to cover his covetous practices. He longed for the money, but he would like to lay hold of it in a religious fashion.
Balaam used enchantments, yet these are the words he brings to Balak. His answer also exposes the muddle in the king's request.
We know that he knew and used enchantments. Yet when he comes to Balak he says, "Have I now any power of my own to speak anything? The word that God puts in my mouth, that must I speak." Balak was looking for the power of evil against the children of Israel, God's people, and yet looking for it from God. In some way he was looking to the power and intervention of God, although God was not known, and so everything was confusion.
If God can fill this man's mouth, then the ability to speak for God settles nothing about the speaker. Balaam stands with two others who prove the same point.
Balaam the prophet prophesied while loving the wages of unrighteousness. Caiaphas the priest prophesied while he was thirsting for innocent blood. Judas the apostle worked miracles while he carried the heart of a traitor... But all this tells us that it is not gifts that make us what we should be, and that nothing will do if the heart is not with God.
Why hold this man's tongue at all? Moses later gave Israel the answer, and it had nothing to do with Balaam.
Moses told the people about the danger that had threatened them. He said: "But the LORD your God would not listen to Balaam; instead the LORD your God turned the curse into a blessing for you, because the LORD your God loved you." Precious words — "because the LORD your God loved you!"
- Mouth — Balaam admits he has no power of his own. He can only speak the word God puts there.
- Motive — he makes the admission against his will. He would have taken Balak's reward if God had let him.
- Mask — his talk about God was a cloak for covetousness, a religious way of reaching for silver and gold.
- Measure — with Caiaphas and Judas, he proves that a gift used for God is no evidence of a heart with God.
- Mercy — God held that mouth for one reason: He loved His people, and turned the curse into a blessing for them.
And Balaam went with Balak, and they came to Kirjath-huzoth.
Balaam has argued with God, and his own donkey has rebuked him. Yet here he is, walking beside the king who hired him to curse Israel, down to a Moabite town called Kiriath-huzoth. Why did God let him arrive at all? And what did the journey expose about the man?
Balaam knew Israel was blessed, and he set out anyway. One writer shows how God dealt with him — not by blocking the road, but by exposing his folly and letting him walk on:
He had no sympathy at all with the thoughts of God's heart, and none with God Himself. Fear of the consequences ruled him. Otherwise he would have been so happy in the blessing of the people that he would have shuddered at the idea of cursing what God had blessed. God, however, will use him to give a glorious testimony on behalf of His people. At the same time He condemns the crooked ways of the prophet, for they were indeed crooked. He shows him his crookedness and his folly, and that he was more stupid than the donkey he was riding. But at the same time He makes him go on his way.
God's permission was no favour. One writer draws out the danger of pressing God for an answer you have already decided on:
He was led by his covetousness to try and serve the bad king of Moab by cursing the people of God. When God gave him an answer, he goes to God a second time, because his heart wanted its own way. And it is solemn to learn that if God gives you up you may get what you want. Balaam afterwards falls into even worse evil. He was indeed a man whose heart was not with God. He said some true things, but his spirit was not in them. He goes on step by step, until he lends himself to become the corrupter of even God's chosen people throughout the world.
The verse puts king and prophet side by side, and the mood between them was already sour. The name Kiriath-huzoth means "city of streets: city of broad ways" (J. B. Jackson). What happened there was a state reception:
Balak met Balaam at the frontier of his kingdom. Neither king nor prophet were in good humour. Balak was offended because Balaam had not come quickly when he called. And Balaam felt he was being held back, and that things would not turn out as he and Balak wanted. Balak first took his visitor to Kiriath-huzoth. There he offered oxen and sheep in front of Balaam and the princes who had brought him from Mesopotamia. We may regard this as an official welcome.
He walked on with the reward still in view, and with no idea what was coming:
He would gladly have accepted the rewards, but he knows that God has intervened against him on behalf of His people, and he seems quite uncertain of what lies ahead.
Balaam claimed Jehovah as his God, yet he took his share of Balak's sacrifices:
We can be certain that Balak did not offer these oxen and sheep to Jehovah, the God of Israel. He offered them to the gods the Moabites worshipped, and he sent portions from them to Balaam and the princes of Moab. Balaam claimed to serve Jehovah. Yet he would not hesitate to share in the worship of the false gods of Moab, or to accept anything the king of Moab chose to give him.
Israel knew nothing of this journey, and the plot had no hope:
How little did Israel know or imagine what was going on between Jehovah and the enemy. They may have been complaining in their tents at the very moment when God was declaring their perfection through the mouth of the greedy prophet. Balak would gladly have Israel cursed; but, blessed be God, He will not allow anyone to curse His people. He may have to deal with them Himself, in secret, about many things; but He will not allow another to move his tongue against them. He may have to expose them to themselves; but He will not allow a stranger to expose them.
- Went — Balaam's arrival with Balak is not God's approval. God showed him his own folly and still let him go on his way.
- Wanted — He had asked twice about a matter God had already settled; if God gives a man up, he may get what he wanted.
- Welcomed — At Kiriath-huzoth Balak killed oxen and sheep for gods that were not the God Balaam claimed to serve, and Balaam took his share.
- Words — He said true things, but his spirit was not in them. He still wanted the reward, and he did not know what was coming.
- Worthless — The errand failed before it began. God may chasten His people Himself, but He will not let a stranger curse them.
And Balak offered oxen and small cattle, and sent to Balaam and to the princes that were with him.
Balak meets Balaam at his border, and before a word of cursing is spoken he holds a feast of sacrificed animals. Two questions press on this short verse: who were the animals killed for, and why does a prophet who has just said he can only speak God's words share in them?
The oxen and sheep here look less like worship than like a state dinner. The king stages it in front of the officials who had travelled to fetch the prophet.
Balak met Balaam at the border of his kingdom. Neither the king nor the prophet was in a good mood. Balak was offended that Balaam had not come as soon as he asked. Balaam felt held back, and sensed that things would not turn out as he and Balak wanted. Balak first took his visitor to Kirjath Huzoth, and there he offered oxen and sheep in front of Balaam and the princes who had brought him from Mesopotamia. We may see this as a kind of official welcome. We are not told who Balak offered his sacrifices to; but the one true God certainly had no place in Balak's esteem.
Commentators differ on how far the text lets us go. One says only that we are not told who received the sacrifices. Another has no doubt they went to Moab's gods, and points out that portions from them reached Balaam's own plate.
We can be certain that the oxen and sheep Balak offered, and from which he sent portions to Balaam and the princes of Moab, were not offered to Jehovah, the God of Israel, but to the gods the Moabites worshipped. Balaam claimed to serve Jehovah, yet he would not hesitate to share fellowship with the false gods of Moab, or to accept anything the king of Moab chose to give him.
Balaam has just told the king he cannot say anything except what God gives him. So Balak aims his gift higher than the prophet.
Balaam answered that he had no power even to speak but must receive his words from God. He needed a supernatural power by which to speak, and he called this power "God," though he did not know the true God. Balak responded by offering oxen and sheep (v.40), likely as a bribe to get Balaam's god on his side.
Balaam's readiness to sit at Balak's table fits what we already know of him. God's answer was never unclear to him. His heart was the problem.
If Balaam's heart had been right with God, he would have dealt with Balak's message very quickly. It would not have cost him a moment's thought to send a reply. But Balaam's heart was all wrong. In chapter 22 we see him in the sad state of a man pulled two ways by conflicting feelings. His heart was set on going, because it was set on the silver and gold. At the same time there was some reference to God — a show of religion put on like a cloak to cover his greedy ways. He longed for the money, but he wanted to get hold of it in a religious way. Miserable man! Most miserable!
Nothing here escapes God's hand. He lets the journey, the welcome and the feast go ahead. His purpose in them is not Balak's.
Knowing what was in Balaam's heart, God lets him go forward — to expose him fully, and to turn his evil desire against His people into blessing for them. Balaam shows no real desire to turn back. Nor does it seem that God will let him go back. God has His own purpose: to make Balaam the unwilling instrument who announces His thoughts about His people.
Israel knew nothing about this feast, or about the plan to curse them.
How little Israel knew or imagined what was going on between Jehovah and the enemy! Perhaps they were complaining in their tents at the very moment when God was declaring their perfection through the mouth of the greedy prophet. Balak would have been glad to have Israel cursed. But, blessed be God, He will not allow anyone to curse His people.
- Welcome. The oxen and sheep were a royal reception for Balaam and the princes who fetched him.
- Wrong altar. The true God had no place in Balak's thinking. The offerings went to Moab's gods, and Balaam took his portion anyway.
- Bribe. Told that Balaam can only speak what God gives him, Balak tries to buy the God behind the prophet.
- Cloak. Balaam wanted the silver and gold, and wanted to reach it in a religious way. His religion was a cover for greed.
- Overruled. God let it all go ahead to expose Balaam, and to turn his evil desire into blessing for a people who never even heard of the plot.
And it came to pass on the morrow, that Balak took Balaam, and brought him up to the high places of Baal, and he saw from thence the extremity of the people.
In the morning the king of Moab takes Balaam up to Bamoth-baal — the high places of Baal — and lets him see only the far edge of Israel's camp. Balak chose the hill, and Balak chose how much of Israel his prophet would see.
The hill carries the name of a god whose worship would later cost Israel the land.
This is the first mention of Baal in the Word of God. Baal was the chief male god of the Phoenicians and the Canaanites, and Ashtoreth was the chief female god. This form of idolatry gained a footing in Israel in the days of the judges. It was cast out in the time of Samuel. It became firmly established in the kingdom of the ten tribes in the reign of Ahab. Then Jezebel's daughter Athaliah introduced it into the kingdom of Judah. This great evil was one of the causes of the expulsion of all twelve tribes from the land of promise.
Why choose that particular hill? One writer reads it as home advantage — Balak picking the ground where his own god should be strongest.
Balak's aim in taking Balaam to the high places of Baal was probably this: a stronghold of his false worship would help the work in hand. Surely at such a spot Baal would help him! But he reckoned without God, and in a short time he was forced to listen to the gospel of God from the devil's own platform! What a defeat!
The next chapter opens with Balaam calling for seven altars. Where he stood puts that request in a new light.
The last verse of chapter 22 sheds light on the evil power that drove Moab and Balak their king. They had among them the "high places of Baal." So in the first verse of our chapter we read that Balaam said, "Build me here seven altars." We see at once that this man, who claimed to be a prophet of the Lord, was really in league with the powers of darkness.
Balaam is shown the outermost section of Israel, not the whole. Commentators read this as deliberate management of the prophet's impressions.
Chapter 22:41 tells us that Balak brought Balaam to the high places of Baal in order to prophesy against Israel. Here he saw only "a portion of the people," for Balak wanted to give Balaam the impression that Israel was not a large nation, so that he might more safely curse them.
The plan backfired at the first word out of Balaam's mouth.
Balak's first effort is to make them look small in Balaam's eyes — he would not have him see too much. This gives force to what Balaam says: "Who can count the dust of Jacob, and number the fourth part of Israel?" The end camp was just the fourth part. The partial view does not make the people seem smaller. It moves him to say, "If only the end is so much, what must the whole be?"
This hill is the first of three lookout points.
He speaks these prophecies from three points, all mountain tops. The first from the high places of Baal, the second from the summit of Pisgah, and the last from Peor. Each of the three points is nearer to the camp, and each gives a fuller view.
The people in the camp below knew nothing of the exchange going on above them.
It is gripping to watch the scene played out on the high places of Baal. We see the great question at stake. We listen to the speakers. We get to look behind the scenes at such an important moment. How little Israel knew or imagined what was going on between Jehovah and the enemy. They may have been grumbling in their tents at that very moment. Meanwhile God was declaring their perfection through the mouth of the greedy prophet.
And the answer God gives the accuser is not measured by the people's behaviour.
So the moment any enemy or accuser comes on the scene, Jehovah places Himself in front to receive and answer the accusation. His answer is never based on what His people are in themselves. It is based on what He has made them through the perfection of His own work.
One writer presses the phrase itself — the outskirts are the vulnerable side of a camp.
Would it be possible to curse part of them? "You shall see only the outermost part of them," says Balak, "and shall not see them all." The "outermost part" is a place exposed to danger. It was there that the fire of the Lord burned at Taberah. Nearness is always a safe place, while being at a distance leaves us open to attack. Could the power of the enemy prevail there?
- Place. Balak picked the high places of Baal. It is the first mention of Baal in the Bible, and it was the stronghold of his own worship.
- Platform. The choice backfired. Balak had to hear the gospel of God from the devil's own platform. The seven altars showed whose side the prophet was on.
- Portion. Balak showed Balaam only the outer edge, to shrink Israel in his eyes.
- Proportion. It produced the opposite: if the fourth part is beyond counting, what must the whole be?
- Protection. Israel's conduct did not settle the matter. God answered the accuser on the ground of His own work, while the people sat unaware in their tents.