And the children of Israel journeyed, and encamped in the plains of Moab on the other side of the Jordan from Jericho.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And Balak the son of Zippor saw all that Israel had done to the Amorites.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And Moab was much afraid of the people, because they were many; and Moab was distressed because of the children of Israel.
Israel has come up out of the wilderness and camped on Moab's border. What Balak sees fills him with dread, and that fear drives everything that follows.
Moab saw a huge camp and a fresh run of victories. The sight matched words Israel had sung at the Red Sea forty years before.
Moses and the children of Israel sang their song of triumph on the shores of the Red Sea. They said: "The peoples have heard; they tremble … trembling seizes the leaders of Moab … terror and dread fall upon them" (Ex. 15:14-16). This came true to the letter forty years later, when the King of Moab and his people saw the Lord's pilgrim host camped on their borders. In the camp of Israel there were 601,730 men able to carry arms. With women and children there were probably at least three million souls — a vast company. Balak was alarmed; all the more because Israel had just destroyed three military powers that dared to oppose their march.
The verse states Moab's fear twice. Yet nothing Israel had done put Moab at risk. The dread grew out of Moab's own dislike of its new neighbours.
There was no real need for Moab to fear Israel. God was not giving the inheritance of the children of Esau or that of the children of Lot to Israel (Deut. 2:5, 9, 19). The hostility toward God's people was not because of anything Israel had done, or threatened to do, to Moab. Balak does not seem to have expected any attack from Israel either. He said to the elders of Midian, "This horde will now lick up all that is around us, as the ox licks up the grass of the field" (Num. 22:4). Moab did not like the thought of having God's people as their neighbours, and they wanted to get rid of them.
Moab was not a stranger to Israel. Moab came from Lot, and Lot was Abraham's relative.
Moab could have claimed kinship with Israel. Abraham and Lot were relatives, and Abraham rescued Lot out of his position in Sodom. But the likeness stopped there. Abraham's sons in the line of faith began with Isaac, who was born to him by a miracle. They were all men of faith and men of power with God. Lot's descendants, Moab and Ammon, were the persistent enemies of Israel. They proved it at every moment of Israel's testimony.
Balak saw a crowd out of Egypt and nothing more. He never reckoned with the God who brought them out. Rahab heard the same news and drew the opposite conclusion.
Balak and his people had little idea that their hostility toward God's people was hostility against God Himself. Balak only thought of "a people come out of Egypt"; but the faith of Rahab said, "we have heard how the LORD dried up the water of the Red Sea before you when you came out of Egypt" (Joshua 2:10). Forty years had passed since that great event, but Rahab still had not forgotten the mighty power of Israel's God.
Balak's fear sent him looking for help somewhere else.
Balak saw, feared, and hated this people. He was aware that a power greater than his own was leading them, and he lost all confidence in his own might. He seemed to know that no merely human arm could destroy this people. So he does not march out as Amalek, Sihon, and Og did with their armies… But is there not a power on his side? Yes — and he calls on Baal-Peor through Balaam his prophet.
Fereday also reads Moab as a picture of a type of person alive today.
Moab pictures the comfortable, self-satisfied man of the world — "at ease from his youth and settled on his dregs" (Jer. 48:11), and proud and arrogant as a result (Isa. 16:6). God's saints today need not envy such people, for they have a better and more lasting portion.
Israel knew nothing of the plot, and did not need to.
How little did Israel know or imagine what was going on between the Lord and the enemy. It may be that they were grumbling in their tents at that very moment. Meanwhile God was setting out their perfection through the tongue of the covetous prophet. Balak would gladly have Israel cursed; but, blessed be God, He will not allow anyone to curse His people. He may have to deal with them Himself, in secret, about many things. But He will not allow another to move his tongue against them.
- Sight. Balak looked at Israel's numbers and their victories. What Moses sang at the Red Sea about Moab's trembling came true word for word.
- Fear. The dread had no real basis. God was not giving Moab's land to Israel, and Israel threatened no attack. Moab just did not want them as neighbours.
- Blindness. Balak saw only "a people come out of Egypt". Rahab heard the same news and saw the Lord behind it.
- Hatred. Balak's fear turned into hatred. Instead of marching out with an army, he called on Baal-Peor through Balaam.
- Safety. Israel never knew the plot was happening. God will deal with His people Himself, but He lets no other tongue curse them.
And Moab said to the elders of Midian, Now will this company lick up all that is round about us, as an ox licks up the green herb of the field. Now Balak the son of Zippor was king of Moab at that time.
Israel had just crushed the Amorites, and now camped on Moab's border. Moab's king pictured the threat as an ox eating a field down to bare ground — but was there anything to fear at all?
One writer notes that God had already placed Moab's land outside Israel's inheritance.
There was really no need for Moab to fear Israel. God was not giving Israel the inheritance of Esau's descendants or of Lot's descendants (Deut. 2:5, 9, 19). The enmity towards God's people was not because of anything that Israel had done, or threatened to do, to Moab. Nor does it appear that Balak expected any attack from Israel... Moab did not like the thought of having God's people as their neighbours, and they wanted to get rid of them.
The fear did have a trigger. Israel was vast, and it had just beaten three armies. Moab's dread fulfilled a song Israel sang forty years earlier at the Red Sea.
When Moses and the children of Israel sang their song of triumph on the shores of the Red Sea, they said, "The peoples have heard; they tremble … the leaders of Moab, trembling seizes them … Terror and dread fall upon them" (Ex. 15:14-16). This came true to the letter when the king of Moab and his people saw the Lord's pilgrim host camped on their borders forty years later. In Israel's camp there were 601,730 men able to carry arms. With women and children there were probably at least three million people — a huge company. Balak was alarmed, all the more because Israel had recently destroyed three military powers that had dared to oppose their march.
The same writer points to what Balak never thought of doing.
When people are in trouble, the right thing is to turn to God in prayer. God cares about the affairs of nations as truly as He cares about the troubles and sorrows of individual men and women. But Balak knew nothing of God.
The verse closes by naming the king: Balak the son of Zippor. The two names pull in opposite directions.
"Balak" seems to mean "waster." The name looks like a deliberate contrast with his family line, since he was only ben-Zippor, "son of a sparrow." What grand titles men take to cover their real insignificance! And they glory far more in the power to destroy — in being a Caesar or a Napoleon — than in the angels' message of peace and goodwill!
Balak would not face Israel alone. One writer sees in his alliance a pattern that still repeats.
He was terrified. The fate of the Egyptians and the Amorites seemed to foretell his own. So his heart filled with fear and hatred, and he wanted to oppose and curse Israel. He allied himself with the elders of Midian. It is nothing less than the history of anti-Semitism in a nutshell. Non-Jewish nations, Christian in name, still hate and fear this people. No Pharaoh and no fortune-teller could overcome them. They are disobedient, judged and suffering, yet always conquering.
Moab's hostility is stranger than it first looks, because Moab and Israel shared a family tree.
Moab, as we know, was a blood relation of Israel. He was descended from Lot, who was a relative of Abraham. So the Moabites were the natural kinsmen of the Israelites. Lot's tie to Abraham was largely a natural, fleshly one. In his descendants' case it was entirely fleshly. Israel had no more bitter and relentless enemies than these Moabites and Ammonites — their own relatives.
Balak thought he was dealing with a border problem. By hiring Balaam to curse Israel, he was doing something far more serious.
Balak and his people had no idea that their hostility towards God's people was enmity against their God. By sending for Balaam to curse God's people, Balak challenged the mighty God of Jacob. God was not slow to accept that challenge. There is no word in Balak's message to Balaam of any evil purpose against him... Balak did not, as Rahab did, connect Israel's coming out of Egypt with the Name of the Lord.
Rahab, who spoke with Israel's spies, heard the same reports and believed. Faith and fear read the same facts in opposite ways.
- Fear — Moab's terror had no basis. God had ruled Moab's land out of Israel's inheritance, and Israel never attacked or threatened Moab.
- Blindness — Balak saw a people out of Egypt and heard of great victories. He never saw the God behind them. Rahab heard the same news and believed.
- Alliance — Moab could not face Israel alone, so it joined Midian and sent for a curse.
- Kinship — Israel's most bitter enemy was a relative. Descent from Lot gave Moab no friendship with Israel, only relentless hostility.
- Challenge — Hostility to God's people is hostility to God Himself. Balak's move against Israel was a challenge God was not slow to take up.
And he sent messengers to Balaam the son of Beor, to Pethor, which is on the river in the land of the children of his people, to call him, saying, Behold, a people is come out from Egypt; behold, they cover the face of the land, and they abide over against me.
Balak, king of Moab, has watched Israel destroy the armies in front of him. Now he sends messengers to a distant land to hire one man. Two questions follow: why does a frightened king hire a soothsayer instead of praying, and what does it mean that Israel never knew about the plot?
One writer counts the camp, then weighs Balak's fear against what he should have done with it:
The King of Moab and his people saw Jehovah's travelling host camped on their border. In the camp of Israel there were 601,730 men able to carry arms. With women and children there were probably at least three million people. Balak was alarmed. He was all the more alarmed because Israel had just destroyed three military powers that dared to oppose their march: the King of Arad, Sihon King of Heshbon, and Og King of Bashan. Sihon had earlier fought a successful war with Moab and taken some of her land. How then could Balak hope to stand against a nation which had destroyed his powerful neighbour? When men are in trouble, the proper thing is to turn to God in prayer. He cares about the affairs of nations as much as He cares about the troubles and sorrows of individual men and women. But Balak knew nothing of God.
Balak did not look for help nearby. He sent to Mesopotamia, and one writer explains the thinking behind it:
He was not satisfied that military power would be enough to withstand the conquerors of Sihon and Og. So he sent messengers to a well-known soothsayer — Balaam the son of Beor, who lived in Mesopotamia. Outsiders were already crediting Israel's victories to divine power... In sending for Balaam, Balak sought to oppose the supernatural by the supernatural. People said this Mesopotamian prophet had influence with the invisible world.
The names in this verse carry meaning. One writer sets Balak's name against his parentage, and Balaam's against his trade:
"Balak" seems to mean "waster." The name looks like a deliberate contrast with his family line, since he is only ben-Zippor, "son of a sparrow." What grand titles men take to cover how small they are! Balaam the son of Beor matches this Balak in every way. He is a "devourer of the people," son of the "consumer." Men sought him out for his skill in cursing, and he was ready to take a bribe and destroy a whole nation. No doubt he claims loyalty to Jehovah, but he has no real knowledge of Him, as his actions show. In his efforts to destroy the people of God, you cannot even say he hates them. He would destroy them in cold blood, for money.
Balak's message never names Israel. He describes them by where they came from and how many they are. One writer sees the same fear and hatred repeating long after Balak:
He knew that the people had come out of Egypt. He was very afraid. The fate of the Egyptians and Amorites seemed to foretell his own. So fear and hatred fill his heart, and he wanted to oppose and curse Israel. It is nothing less than the history of anti-Semitism in a nutshell. Nations that call themselves Christian still hate and fear this people, whom no Pharaoh and no soothsayer could overcome — a people disobedient, judged and suffering, yet always conquering.
Balaam did not send a quick refusal. One writer explains the delay:
If Balaam's heart had been right with God, he would have dealt with Balak's message at once. It would not have cost him a moment's thought to send a reply. But Balaam's heart was all wrong... His heart was set on going, because it was set on the silver and gold. But at the same time he made some reference to God — an appearance of religion put on as a cloak to cover his greed. He longed for the money; but he wanted to get hold of it in a religious way.
Israel knew nothing about any of this. One writer draws out what that silence means:
The people of Jehovah were now in grave danger. They had been ungrateful and disobedient all through their wilderness journey. They did not know about the danger, so they did not pray to God about it. But Jehovah Himself took the matter up, and there we are reminded of His unchanging favour. He loved the people, despite all that they were, and He would not allow the enemy to harm them.
- Fear sends. Balak watched Israel destroy three kingdoms. Trouble should drive a man to prayer. Balak knew nothing of God, so he sent for a man.
- Fear buys. Armies had not stopped Israel, so Balak fought the supernatural with the supernatural. He hired a far-off soothsayer said to have influence with the invisible world.
- Fear hates. His message names no nation, only "a people has come out of Egypt" — the fear and hatred one writer calls anti-Semitism in a nutshell.
- The hireling. Balaam's heart was set on the silver and gold. He wrapped that greed in religion, wanting the money in a religious way.
- The unseen defence. Israel never learned of the danger and never prayed. God took the matter up Himself, because He loved them.
And now come, I pray thee, curse me this people; for they are mightier than I perhaps I may be able to smite them, and drive them out of the land; for I know that he whom thou blessest is blessed, and he whom thou cursest is cursed.
Balak, king of Moab, watches a nation camped on his border. He reaches for the one weapon he thinks can stop them: a hired curse from a famous prophet in Mesopotamia. His words treat blessing and cursing as goods a man can sell. But can anyone curse a people God has already blessed?
Moab's terror was real. The danger was not. Israel had no orders to touch Moab at all.
There was no need for Moab to fear Israel. God was not giving Israel the inheritance of the children of Esau or that of the children of Lot (Deut. 2:5, 9, 19). The hostility toward God's people was not because of anything Israel had done, or threatened to do, to Moab. Balak does not seem to have expected any attack from Israel. He said to the elders of Midian, "This horde will lick up all that is around us, as the ox licks up the grass of the field" (Num. 22:4). Moab did not like the thought of having God's people as their neighbours, and they wanted to get rid of them.
Balak could not stand their presence, not any threat they made. Commentators trace that reaction back to its source.
We see the hostility of the world against the people of God brought out, and especially against the power of the people of God. God's power was with His people, and this drew out the hostility of Satan. … When that happens, Satan seeks to force others into open opposition to the people of God. Their presence becomes unbearable to their enemies.
Israel had already conquered Sihon and Og. Balak knew his army was not enough, so he changed weapons.
He was not satisfied that military power would be enough to withstand the conquerors of Sihon and Og. So he sent messengers to a well-known soothsayer — Balaam the son of Beor, who lived in Mesopotamia. Outsiders were already crediting Israel's victories to divine power… In sending for Balaam, Balak sought to oppose the supernatural by the supernatural. People believed the Mesopotamian prophet had influence with the invisible world.
Balak's own rule about blessing and cursing pointed the wrong way for him. God had already said who is blessed and who is cursed.
Balak is in complete and all-distorting darkness. First Israel was forbidden to touch Moab. Next he says, "He whom you bless is blessed, and he whom you curse is cursed." He was seeking to bring the curse on Israel when God had said, "Blessed are those who bless you, and cursed are those who curse you." So he was simply bringing it on himself.
Balak's confidence rested on Balaam's name among people. God's verdict on him was the opposite.
Balaam clearly had a great name among men. Balak had said, "I know that he whom you bless is blessed, and he whom you curse is cursed." But before God he was perverse, self-willed, covetous, and an enemy of His people. There was great religious pretence — the claim to be a servant of the true God — but he was a wicked and foolish man… The same features are not hard to see in some people today. They appear great in the eyes of men, yet they are still perverse, rebellious and foolish.
Balak's request is not finally about Moab's border. The real test comes at the end of Israel's journey, just before they enter the land.
Balak sends for Balaam. The great question in this moving scene is this: "Can Satan succeed in cursing the people of God, so as to stop their entrance into the land of promise?" It is not merely a question of redemption and of the joy of redemption at the beginning of their course. The question comes at the end, when all their unfaithfulness has come out — their unfaithfulness even after the Lord has brought them to Himself. Can Satan succeed then? No.
Moses later explained to Israel why the hired curse came to nothing.
Moses told the people about the danger that had threatened them. He said: "They hired against you Balaam the son of Beor from Pethor of Mesopotamia, to curse you. But the LORD your God would not listen to Balaam; instead the LORD your God turned the curse into a blessing for you, because the LORD your God loved you" (Deut. 23:4-5). Precious words — "because the LORD your God loved you!"
- Fear. Moab dreaded a people who had no orders to harm them. The world resents God's people for their presence and their power, not for any harm they do.
- Hire. Balak could not win by force, so he tried to buy the invisible world and fight the supernatural with the supernatural.
- Boomerang. His own rule about blessing and cursing turned on him. God had already said that whoever curses His people is cursed.
- Reputation. Balaam was great in the eyes of men and perverse in the sight of God. A big name proves nothing.
- Love. God turned the curse into a blessing, and He did it because He loved His people.
And the elders of Moab and the elders of Midian departed, having the rewards of divination in their hand. And they came to Balaam, and spoke to him the words of Balak.
Balak, king of Moab, is afraid of Israel camped on his border. He does not raise an army — he hires a prophet. The men who leave in this verse carry the fee in their hands, and the whole episode asks one question: can anything bought prevail against a people God has blessed?
Balak did not send for an army. He sent for a man in touch with unseen powers, and the fee in the messengers' hands gave the errand away.
Balak imagined that he could enlist the aid of Balaam, an agent of Satan, to overcome them. He did not realise that poor Israel could never have been delivered out of Egypt, or brought through their forty years in the wilderness, without their God. It is clear that Balak knew he was sending his princes to one who was in touch with the forces of evil, for they had "the rewards of divination in their hand".
The instinct is older than Moab. Trouble sends people searching everywhere but to God.
Ever since man was driven out of Eden, he has been restless. He is never more restless than when he is in trouble, or when he thinks he sees trouble approaching. He searches north, south, east, and west for help, or for a way of escape. So Balak took alarm when the people of Israel came close to his borders. He sent messengers to neighbouring kingdoms seeking alliances. He also sent messengers to Mesopotamia to bring the famous diviner Balaam. He would have done better to get down before God, who never turns aside the requests of those who feel their need of Him.
The verse calls the travellers "elders" — a title that was not Israel's alone.
In Numbers 22:7 we read of the elders of Moab and the elders of Midian, so the term was not confined to Israel. The word is saqen, which implies "aged man"; they were no doubt also men of repute.
The two peoples travelled together for a reason.
Balaam no doubt was a Midianite, and there was an intimate connection between the Moabites and the Midianites. At the first Balak consulted the elders of Midian, and the elders of both Moab and Midian went together to seek the aid of Balaam and his sorceries.
The ESV calls the payment "the fees for divination"; older wording says "rewards of divination". Balak had studied his man, and sent the fee ahead of his request.
Balak's messengers went to Mesopotamia "with the rewards of divination in their hands". Balak knew that the false prophet "loved the wages of unrighteousness" (2 Peter 2:15), so he sought to make sure of him by sending "cash in advance!" But the treacherous deceiver brought Jehovah's name into it. He lodged the messengers for the night, pretending to seek the mind of God.
Balaam did not refuse God outright. He kept consulting Him with his mind already made up.
If Balaam's heart had been right with God, he would have made very short work of Balak's message. A reply would not have cost him a moment's thought. But Balaam's heart was all wrong, and we see him in chapter 22 in the sad condition of a man pulled by conflicting feelings. His heart was bent on going, because it was bent on the silver and gold. Yet at the same time he still made some reference to God. It was an appearance of religion put on as a cloak to cover his greedy practices. He longed for the money, but he wanted to get hold of it in a religious way.
Every coin was wasted. The prophet himself would later admit it.
Balaam, who used enchantments, had to confess, "Surely there is no enchantment against Jacob, neither is there any divination against Israel." Balak sent the elders of Moab and Midian to him "with the rewards of divination in their hand". And when Balaam claimed to go and meet Jehovah, he went "to seek for enchantments" (Num. 24:1). No natural power could overcome the people of God. No power of Satan could prevail against them either.
Others have walked the same road since.
They have followed the way of Balaam. There is nothing original about their performances. They follow a well-beaten track first trodden by Balaam of infamous memory, who sold his prophetic gifts for money. He was not the first person to prophesy for money; that has always been a custom in religions that worship idols. But he appears to have been the first to offer to prophesy for money in the name of the Lord. With Balaam the supreme question was "Will it pay?"
- Fear hires. Balak's fear sent him searching abroad for help. He should have got down before God, who turns no one away.
- Fear pays. The fee in their hands shows Balak knew the kind of man he was hiring. He paid in advance.
- Fear allies. Moab and Midian were closely tied. Both sent their elders, respected older men, on one errand.
- Fear dresses up. Balaam wanted the silver, and wanted it in a religious way. He consulted God about a matter his heart had settled.
- Fear fails. No enchantment stands against Jacob. The money bought nothing. "Will it pay?" still marks the prophet who is for sale.
And he said to them, Lodge here this night, and I will bring you word again, according as Jehovah shall speak unto me. And the princes of Moab abode with Balaam.
Balak's messengers have arrived with payment in hand. They want a famous prophet to curse Israel, and Balaam answers with the name of the LORD on his lips. Is that reverence, or a cover for a heart already sold?
Balaam's words place him on God's side. He speaks as if he takes no step without hearing from the LORD.
But Balaam claimed to be a servant of the LORD. He said to Balak's messengers, "Lodge here tonight, and I will bring back word to you, as the LORD speaks to me." This false claim made Balaam's position even more serious, as it does with every false servant of the Lord. It is a very serious matter to pretend to be the servant of God while really being an instrument of Satan.
His real trade lay elsewhere. The language of this verse is the wrapping around it.
He sought for Balaam, who had a great reputation as a man who wielded "enchantments." This we see if we turn to Numbers 24:1. If we glance at verses 8 and 18 of Numbers 22, we discover that this man managed to cover his enchantments, which were of course of the devil, with the appearance of reverencing Jehovah as his God. Balak hoped to bring a curse on the people of God by enlisting the help of this professed prophet of God, who was really a servant of Satan.
Balaam promised a night of waiting on God. But payment had already arrived.
Balak knew that the false prophet loved the wages of unrighteousness (2 Peter 2:15), so he made sure of him by sending cash in advance. But the treacherous deceiver brought the LORD's name into the matter, and lodged the messengers for the night while pretending to seek the mind of God. The business in hand was hugely important, for he was asked to ruin a whole nation. Did he then spend the night in prayer to God? Nothing was further from Balaam's thoughts. He just went to bed. God was watching every move with the deepest interest, and He came to Balaam with the challenge, "Who are these men with you?"
after_note: DELETE
He was reaching for the source he normally used, not for the LORD he named.
He could use the Lord's name like this, even though he had no intention of seeking the Lord's guidance. He wanted an answer from the occult power he was used to. Chapter 24:1 tells us this: he was looking for enchantments as a sorcerer.
Inviting the men to stay was itself a decision.
"Lodge here tonight," said Balaam to the men who brought the reward of divination in their hand. Giving a bed to men who came to curse the people of the Lord showed the wicked leaning of his heart. Only God's direct action holds him back.
Israel was camped on the plains of Moab, with no idea that Balak was arranging its destruction.
The people of the LORD were now in great danger. They had been ungrateful and disobedient all through their journey in the wilderness. They did not know about the danger, so they did not pray to God. But the LORD Himself took the matter up, and that reminds us of His unchanging favour. He loved the people, in spite of all that they were, and He would not let the enemy harm them.
Balaam's talk of consulting the LORD did not fool God.
Balaam talks about consulting the LORD in his hypocritical way. This has always been so. Those who have least to do with God often talk about Him most lightly… Balaam was not alarmed, because he was used to an evil spirit. For all he knew, the power that came to him was the same familiar spirit as always. God caught the crafty man in his own net.
The same move comes again when a second group of messengers arrives. Balaam asks for another night, though God had already spoken.
The LORD had already stated His mind. There was nothing left to consult Him about. But Balaam was set on going, and he knew enough of God not to want open conflict with Him… Let us take care never to come before God with our minds already made up. It is a serious insult to God's majesty!
Writers turn this into a warning for ordinary decisions, not just for prophets.
Sometimes we seek God's will about how to act in a situation where His only will is that we should not be there at all. If our conscience were truly awake, its first effect would be to make us leave. Our own will put us there, and still we would like the comfort of God guiding us in a path we chose ourselves.
- Words — "As the LORD speaks to me" claims to be God's servant. Commentators call it a false claim from a man whose trade was enchantments.
- Night — Balaam spent the night set aside for seeking God in bed. God came to him; he never went to God.
- Guests — giving Balak's men a bed showed where his heart leaned. Only God held him back.
- Guard — Israel knew nothing of the danger and never prayed about it. God took the case up Himself, out of unchanging love.
- Warning — asking God about a road you have already chosen is not guidance. It is self-will. One more night becomes the habit of a man set on going.
And God came to Balaam, and said, Who are these men with thee?
Balak's messengers slept in Balaam's house, waiting to hear if he would curse Israel. God came to Balaam that night — so why speak to a fortune-teller for hire, and why ask about men He already knew?
Balaam had told the messengers he would consult the LORD. He was used to hearing a voice, but not this one.
But God did not leave this a matter of demons and deceptions. Balak dared to bring in a power higher than man to ruin the future of God's people. That at once brought out the true God. Balaam in his hypocritical way talks about consulting Jehovah. This has always happened. Those who have least to do with God often speak of Him in the most casual way. It was so then, and it is so now. "God," it is written, "came to Balaam and said, Who are these men with you?" He was not alarmed, because he was used to an evil spirit. For all he knew, the power that came to him was the old spirit he was used to. God caught the crafty in his own net.
God made the first move. Balaam was not seeking Him at all.
Balak's messengers went to Mesopotamia "with the fees for divination in their hand" (Num. 22:7). Balak knew that the false prophet "loved gain from wrongdoing" (2 Peter 2:15), so he made sure of him by sending cash in advance. But the treacherous deceiver brought Jehovah's name into the matter. He put the messengers up for the night, pretending to seek the mind of God. The business in hand was hugely important. He was asked to bring about the ruin of a whole nation. Did he then spend the night in prayer to God? Nothing was further from Balaam's thoughts. He just went to bed. God was watching every move with the deepest interest, and He came to Balaam with the challenge: "Who are these men with you?"
God did not ask because He needed to know. One writer ties this question to the way God opened His talk with Satan about Job.
The great principle of the Balaam story is that God guarded and blessed His people without being asked. He is active for them out of His own grace, and nothing escapes Him. "Who are these men with you?" says God to Balaam. God began as He did with Satan in Job's case, "Have you considered my servant Job?"
Balaam hid nothing in his reply. The same writer asks why he used the LORD's name at all.
Balaam did not get in touch with the spirit he usually consulted. Instead he met the God of Israel, who "came to Balaam and said, 'Who are these men with you?'" Balaam knew exactly why Balak had sent his princes to him. He knew he stood in the presence of God, so he hid nothing of what Balak had told him. You might well wonder why he pretended to serve Jehovah when he had no link with Him at all. No doubt he had heard of all that Jehovah had done for His people, and he sought his own advancement by attaching the Name of Israel's God to his evil work.
In Israel's camp nothing was stirring that night. No one prayed about the danger, because no one knew.
The people of Jehovah had been ungrateful and disobedient all through their desert journey. Now they were in grave danger. They were not aware of it and therefore did not make supplication to God. But Jehovah Himself took the matter up. That reminds us of His unchanging favour. He loved the people, despite all that they were, and He would not allow the enemy to harm them. Oh, the comfort of this thought for ourselves!
Balaam asked whether he should go, and God's clear answer changed his position.
The first time Balaam asked the Lord, "Shall I go?", God answered a clear No. He made the reason for the refusal just as clear. It seems He gave this answer for one of two reasons. Perhaps the fortune-teller was asking Him for advice for the first time. Or perhaps he was not sure it would be wrong to accept Balak's invitation. But once the Lord had told him he must not go, and that Israel was blessed, Balaam's position was no longer the same. He now knew the will of God. Without the possibility of a doubt, it would be evil to go into Moab.
- God moves first. Israel knew nothing of the plot against them. God took it up before anyone asked Him.
- God intercepts. A man waiting for his usual spirit met the God of Israel instead. God caught the crafty man in his own net.
- God exposes. God did not ask for facts. The question pulled into the open what Balaam's religious talk was covering.
- God protects. He loved a people who had been ungrateful the whole way, and He would not let the enemy touch them.
- God settles it. Once God answered, Balaam's doubt was over. What came after was deliberate disobedience, not confusion.
And Balaam said to God, Balak the son of Zippor, king of Moab, hath sent unto me,
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
Behold, a people is come out of Egypt, and it covers the face of the land. Now come, curse me them perhaps I may be able to fight against them, and drive them out.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And God said to Balaam, Thou shalt not go with them; thou shalt not curse the people; for they are blessed.
Balak, king of Moab, has sent messengers to hire Balaam to curse Israel, and Balaam keeps them overnight while he asks God about it. God's answer is a flat refusal with a reason attached, and that reason says more about His people than about Balaam.
Israel is camped nearby and knows nothing about this deal. No prayer of theirs brings God into the story; He speaks first.
The great principle of the Balaam history is that God guarded and blessed His people without being asked. The plots of enemies go on, and Israel knows nothing about them. So Israel asks nothing from God. But He is active for His people out of His own grace to them, and nothing escapes Him. "Who are these men that come to you?" says God to Balaam.
Balaam worked with spirits, and his offer to seek the Lord's mind was cover. What came to him in the night was not what he expected.
Balaam in his hypocritical way talks about consulting the LORD. This has always been so. Those who have least to do with God often talk about Him most lightly... He was not alarmed, because he was used to an evil spirit. For all he knew, the power that came to him was the spirit he always dealt with. God caught the crafty man in his own net. This is just where the mighty power of God shows what He is against every enemy who dares to oppose His people.
Neither Balak nor Balaam speaks Israel's name. They call them only a people who came out of Egypt.
Neither Balak nor Balaam used the people's name "Israel," because they were probably afraid of that name, which means "a prince with God."
God settles the matter in private. Later Balaam has to say the same thing out loud on the hilltops.
When Balak's delegation came to Balaam, God had said to him, "You shall not curse the people, for they are blessed." What God told him there in secret he must now speak in public... How many have tried to curse Jacob and denounce Israel? They have never succeeded. Isaiah's vision has come true in every generation: "No weapon that is fashioned against you shall succeed, and you shall refute every tongue that rises against you in judgment." No magic, no voice, no power, no tongue can undo the decree of God.
In the morning Balaam tells the princes only that the Lord will not let him go. He keeps back the reason God gave.
Balaam could have no doubt about God's thoughts of His people, or about what God expected from him. Yet he does not tell the princes of Balak what God's word to him meant. His own words imply that the only reason he did not go with them was, "The LORD has refused to let me go with you." He would have been glad to go and carry out the evil mission Balak wanted. But having just come from God's presence, he knew he could not.
His edited answer left Balak room to try again.
Had Balaam given Balak's princes the word he received from God, it is not likely that he would have been tempted again. He could have told Balak that these were the people of the living God. He could have repeated God's words to him: "You shall not curse the people, for they are blessed." That would have settled the matter as far as Balaam was concerned.
Later God tells Balaam he may go, and that change puzzles many readers. Commentators answer that verse 12 had already closed the question.
Verses 12 and 13 show that God had first of all forbidden Balaam to go. Balaam clearly wanted Balak's reward, despite his high talk in verse 18. It was wrong of Balaam to ask again. Yet when he did, God used his going as a witness of divine grace to Israel, and of Balaam's own perverseness.
Darby turns from what Balaam did to what he felt.
The blessing of the people never comes into his mind. He is a complete stranger to the generosity of grace. The thought that they were blessed of God does not move him, and he finds no delight in His blessing on His people.
- God speaks first. Israel never asked for protection. God moved first and questioned Balaam before Balaam could act.
- God gives a reason. God does not just refuse. He says why: the people are blessed.
- The secret becomes public. What God said in the night, Balaam later had to announce on the hills. No magic and no tongue can reverse it.
- Man edits the message. Balaam reported the refusal but not the blessing. That half-answer invited a second attempt.
- Self-will gets its way. Asking again after a clear word was wrong. God let him go, and used even that to show His grace to Israel and expose Balaam.
And Balaam rose up in the morning, and said to the princes of Balak, Go into your land; for Jehovah refuses to give me leave to go with you.
God has just told Balaam plainly: do not go with Balak's men, and do not curse Israel, for Israel is blessed. Verse 13 is his answer the next morning. It sounds obedient. Yet it leaves out half of what God said, and it leaves the door open for a second offer.
The words look like submission. One writer hears something else in them — the tone of a man who wanted the trip and lost it.
His words to his visitors next morning carry a trace of disappointment: "The LORD has refused to let me go with you." His heart was not in communion with God about His people. He would gladly have brought them to ruin for the sake of reward; but he was conscious of divine restraint.
God had said two things: don't go, and don't curse, for they are blessed. Balaam passes on the first and buries the second.
Balak's first delegation fails: the LORD refuses, as he tells the messengers, to give him leave to go. He makes no secret that he himself is willing enough. But he hides what God has shown him — that the people are blessed.
Balaam did name the LORD. By the time his words reached Balak, even that had dropped out.
Balaam did say that the LORD refused to give him leave to go with the princes. But the Name of the LORD made no impression on them. When they went back to their master, they only said, "Balaam refuses to come with us." There was no word of the command of God, no word that he was not to curse, and that the people were blessed.
Balak heard only that a prophet had declined, so the temptation came back a second time. The whole word from God would have closed the subject.
Had Balaam given Balak's princes the word he received from God, it is not likely that he would have been tempted again. Suppose he had told Balak two things: that the people Balak wanted cursed were the people of the living God, and that God had met him with the words, "You shall not curse the people, for they are blessed." That would have settled the matter as far as Balaam's part in it went.
Balaam's first question to God may have come from real uncertainty. God's answer ended that.
When Balaam asked the LORD the first time, "Shall I go?" God replied clearly No; and just as clearly pointed out the ground of the refusal. It seems He gave this answer for one of two reasons. The fortune-teller may have been asking Him for the first time. Or he may not have been sure that accepting Balak's invitation was wrong. But once the LORD had told him he must not go, and that Israel was blessed, Balaam's position was no longer the same. He now knew the will of God. Beyond any possible doubt, going into Moab would now be evil.
So why did Balaam consult God at all? One writer answers by pointing to what his heart was set on.
His heart was bent on going, because it was bent on the silver and gold; but at the same time there was a sort of reference to God — an appearance of religiousness put on as a cloak to cover his covetous practices. He longed for the money; but he wanted to get hold of it in a religious way.
The refusal was not Balaam's doing. Behind it stood God, who turned the whole plot to His own end.
As we go on we shall see how wonderful God's way was. He turned Satan's own effort against him. He made this most wicked man Balaam work against all his own interests without meaning to. Held in the mighty hand of God, Balaam became the instrument for sealing God's blessing on His people, as far as a man could do it!
- Restraint, not refusal. Balaam does not say no; he reports that he is not allowed. The barrier is outside him, not inside him.
- Half the word. He passes on the ban and hides the blessing — his own willingness is no secret, God's verdict on Israel is.
- Half invites more. Balak hears only "Balaam refuses," so the pressure comes back; the full word from God would have ended the business.
- Already settled. After the first clear No, the question was closed; any further move toward Moab was not uncertainty but a heart bent on its own way.
- God alone the guard. God's own hand held this man back — and the same hand turned the enemy's plan into a sealing of Israel's blessing.
And the princes of Moab rose up; and they went to Balak, and said, Balaam has refused to come with us.
Balak's messengers come back empty-handed. Their report is short: Balaam will not come. What they say is true as far as it goes. But the reason for the refusal has dropped out of the message, and that gap shapes everything that follows.
Balaam had told these men that the LORD refused to let him go. What reached Balak was something much smaller.
Balaam did say that the LORD refused to let him go with the princes. But the name of the LORD made no impression on them. When they returned to their master they only said, "Balaam refuses to come with us." There was no word of the command of God, no word that he was not to curse, and that the people were blessed.
The same writer weighs what would have happened if Balaam had passed the whole message on.
If Balaam had given Balak's princes the word he received from God, the temptation would most likely never have come back. Suppose he had told Balak the truth. The people he wanted cursed were the people of the living God, and God had met him with the words, "You shall not curse the people, for they are blessed." That would have settled the matter, as far as Balaam's part in it went.
One writer sets the part Balaam passed on next to the part he hid, and shows what Balak made of it.
Balak's first group of messengers fails: the LORD refuses, as Balaam tells them, to let him go. He makes no secret that his own will is good enough, while he hides what God has shown him — that the people are blessed. Balak has reason to think that more pressure will bring him. Everyone knew that the gods of the nations could be made to give in. So he sends more and more honourable representatives: Balaam must let nothing stop him from coming, for Balak will raise him to very great honour.
Balaam sent the messengers home, but not because he wanted to. The tone of his farewell gives him away.
His words to his visitors the next morning have a hint of disappointment in them: "The LORD has refused to let me go with you." His heart was not in fellowship with God about His people. For the sake of reward he would have been glad to bring ruin on them. But he knew God was holding him back.
The scheme Balak kept pushing did not end where he wanted it to.
As the story goes on, we shall see how wonderful God's way was. He turned Satan's own effort against him, and made this most wicked man Balaam work, without meaning to, against all his interests. Balaam was held in the mighty hand of God, and became the instrument for sealing God's blessing on His people, as far as that could be done by a man.
The decision behind that refusal was made where Israel could not see it.
How little Israel knew or imagined what was going on between the LORD and the enemy! They may have been complaining in their tents at the very moment when God was setting out their perfection through the tongue of this greedy prophet. Balak would have been glad to have Israel cursed; but, blessed be God, He will not let anyone curse His people. He may have to deal with them Himself, in secret, about many things; but He will not let another move his tongue against them. He may have to expose them to themselves; but He will not allow a stranger to expose them.
- Refused. The messengers' one word to Balak is true and still misleading. Balaam declined — but they never say who stopped him.
- Withheld. God's full word was that no one may curse Israel, because the people are blessed. Balaam kept that half back. Only the half about himself travelled home.
- Willing. Balak did hear that Balaam's own will was on his side. So he read the refusal as a price, and sent greater men with a bigger offer.
- Wanted. Balaam's own tone gives him away. He would have gone gladly, and writers note the disappointment in his words. Only God's restraint held him.
- Withstood. The real refusal was never Balaam's. God may deal with His people Himself about many things, but He lets no other tongue speak against them — and He turned the enemy's own scheming into blessing.
Then sent Balak yet again princes, more, and more honourable than they.
Balak's first messengers came home with a refusal, so he tries again with a larger and grander delegation. The question here is not Balaam's price, but what a man does when God has already spoken and the offer comes back sweeter.
Balak did not treat the first refusal as final.
Balak's first embassy is unsuccessful: the Lord refuses, as Balaam tells the messengers, to give him leave to go. He makes no secret that his own will is willing enough, while he hides the fact that God has shown him the people are blessed. Balak has reason to suppose that with more pressure Balaam will come, for it was well known that the gods of the nations could be made to give way. He sends more and more honourable representatives.
Balaam had told the first messengers that the Lord would not let him go. He did not tell them why. That silence is what left the door open.
Had Balaam given Balak's princes the word he received from God, it is not likely that he would have been tempted again.
The messengers reported only that Balaam declined:
Balaam did say truly that the Lord refused to give him leave to go with the princes. But the Name of the Lord made no impression on them. On returning to their master they said only, "Balaam refuses to come with us." There was no word of the command of God, no word that he was not to curse, and that the people were blessed.
The second group outranks the first, and the king raises his offer with them.
Balak sent a second group of messengers, princes of higher rank than the elders who went the first time. The king offered more tempting bait: he would raise Balaam to high honour, and he would do whatever Balaam asked.
The bait worked because it matched something already in the man:
His heart was set on going, because it was set on the silver and gold. At the same time there was some reference to God — an appearance of religion put on as a cloak to cover his covetous practices. He longed for the money, but he wanted to get hold of it in a religious way. Miserable man!
Each part of God's first answer closed a door.
The answer of God was in three short sentences. (1) "You shall not go with them." This should have been enough to close the matter completely. A man who really knew God would never raise the question again. (2) "You shall not curse the people." So however much his covetous heart might want Balak's silver and gold, he must not try to do what Balak wanted. (3) "They are blessed." A man who knew God would be sure that God would never go back on this.
He claimed the Lord's will bound him, and he still wanted to go.
Balaam protests that he is strictly bound by the Lord's will. Yet he wants his own way, and God leaves him to it, only making him understand that in the end he must speak His word alone. And Balaam goes.
The same test comes to us when new pressure meets a settled answer.
Whenever God has made His will known to us, we are not to allow any later influence to call it into question. That holds even if the influence takes the form of the word of God. If we were closer to the Lord in heart, we would feel that the only true and right position is to follow what He told us at first.
God does not always stop the man who ignores His first word:
How little Balaam knew what the consequences would be of not bowing to God's first word to him! Suppose God has expressed His will, and we still want our own way. God may well allow us to have our way, so that we may learn by experience the folly of our own self-will.
While this bargaining went on, Israel was unaware of the danger.
The people of the Lord, who had been ungrateful and disobedient all through their wilderness journey, were now in grave danger. They were not aware of it and so did not pray about it. But the Lord Himself took the matter up, and there we are reminded of His unchanging favour. He loved the people, despite all that they were, and He would not allow the enemy to harm them.
- Pressure — Balak judged God by the gods he knew, gods that could be bought. So he met a refusal by raising his offer.
- Silence — Balaam passed on only that he could not come, not that the people were blessed. That half-told answer brought the second delegation.
- Bait — higher-ranking princes, promised honour, and a promise to do whatever he asked. Balaam's heart was already set on silver and gold.
- Settled — "You shall not go," "You shall not curse," "They are blessed." A man who really knew God would never reopen a question God had closed.
- Guarded — Israel never knew the danger and never prayed about it. God took the matter up Himself, and He would not let the enemy harm them.
And they came to Balaam, and said to him, Thus says Balak the son of Zippor Suffer not thyself, I pray thee, to be restrained from coming to me;
Balak's first delegation went home empty-handed. So the king of Moab sends a bigger and grander one. Its message is built to remove every reason Balaam might have for staying home. The words "let nothing hinder you" show how Balak read the situation. He assumed the obstacle was price, not God.
This second group is not a repeat of the first. Balak has raised both the rank of the men and the size of the offer.
Balak sent a second group of princes, of higher rank than the elders who went the first time. The king offered more tempting baits. He would promote Balaam to high honour, and he would do whatever he asked.
Balak had a reason to try again, and it came from inside himself.
Balak judges by the thing every man knows best — his own heart and experience. So he sends princes more honourable than the ones who came to Balaam the first time.
But the deeper problem was not Balak's offer. It was the man receiving it.
It was clear that he loved money — a love that is all too common in our own day too. Balak's gold and silver proved a very tempting bait to the wretched man — a bait he could not resist. Satan knew his man, and the price he could be bought for.
Balaam's first reply named God, but the message that reached Balak did not. The messengers never passed on the real reason for the refusal, so the door stayed open.
Balaam did say that Jehovah refused to let him go with the princes. But the name of Jehovah made no impression on them. When they went back to their master they only said, "Balaam refuses to come with us." There was no word of the command of God, no word that he was not to curse, and that the people were blessed.
When the second group arrives, nothing has changed on God's side. God had already settled the matter, so one sentence would have ended it.
Balak had one desire: the cursing of the people of God. And Balaam had already received God's command, "You shall not curse … for they are blessed." So there was no room for discussion or evasion. Balaam should have given the second group of princes the same answer he should have given the first. If he had told them the whole message God had given him, he would have spared himself and Balak a great deal of trouble and sorrow.
Instead, the reply he gave exposed what he was still hoping for.
Balaam did not simply refuse to go and tell them that God had forbidden it. Instead he says, "Though Balak were to give me his house full of silver and gold, I could not go beyond the command of the LORD my God to do less or more." Does this not show what lay in Balaam's heart — the desire for silver and gold in abundance?
Raising the price makes sense only if God can be bought. Balak's idea of God came from his own religion.
In Balak we see how completely people had lost the knowledge of God. The world by its wisdom did not know Him. Balak's ignorance was no darker than the world's wisdom… His words to Balaam make clear what he thought God was like. He thought God was altogether like himself, or like what he imagined his own god to be.
The same assumption lies behind the pressure itself.
Balak has reason to think that more pressure will bring him; for everyone knew that the gods of the nations could be made to give way.
Israel had no idea that men were bargaining over them. The outcome never rested on Balaam's honesty.
Balak would gladly have had Israel cursed; but, blessed be God, He will not allow anyone to curse His people. He may have to deal with them Himself, in secret, about many things. But He will not let anyone else speak against them. He may have to expose them to themselves; but He will not allow a stranger to expose them.
- Pressure. Balak meets a refusal by raising the offer: nobler princes, high honour, whatever Balaam asks. He judges Balaam by his own heart.
- Price. The tactic works on a man who loved money; the enemy knew Balaam, and knew the price at which he could be bought.
- Silence. The first messengers reported only that Balaam refused. They never said God had forbidden the cursing. That half-told answer invited the second delegation.
- Plainness. There was no room for discussion. If Balaam had repeated God's full word, he would have spared both men much trouble and sorrow.
- Powerlessness. Balak imagined God was like himself, open to a bribe. But God will not let anyone curse His people, whatever the price.
for very highly will I honour thee, and whatever thou shalt say to me will I do; come therefore, I pray thee, curse me this people.
God has refused Balak once already, so the king raises his price: grander messengers, very great honour, and a blank cheque. Two questions follow — what did Balak think God was like, and why did Balaam not give him a plain no?
The king treats the first refusal as an opening bid, not a verdict. One writer explains why:
Balak has reason to think that more pressure will bring him, for everyone knew that the gods of the nations would give way to pressure. He sends still more honourable messengers: Balaam must let nothing stop him from coming, for Balak will promote him to very great honour.
A second writer points to the standard Balak used:
Balak judges by what every man knows so well: his own heart and his own experience. So he sends princes more honourable than the first ones who came to Balaam.
The offer is not random. It hits exactly where Balaam was weak.
There is something especially dreadful about the case of Balaam. He clearly loved money — sadly, a common enough love in our own day. Balak's gold and silver were a very tempting bait to the wretched man — a bait he could not resist. Satan knew his man, and he knew the price that would buy him.
His greed did more than ruin him. It set a pattern others followed:
He was a greedy religious man (Numbers 22-24). His error was that he used his knowledge of the truth of God to advance the work of Satan, if he could, and to collect a reward for it. The false teachers Jude writes about rushed greedily after the same wrong.
Balak's message invites a deal. But Balaam had his answer long before these princes arrived.
Balak had one desire: the cursing of the people of God. And Balaam had already received God's command, "You shall not curse… for they are blessed." So there was no room for discussion, and none for dodging the question. Balaam should have given the princes who came the second time the same answer he should have given the first ones. A plain statement of the whole message God had given him would have spared himself and Balak a great deal of trouble and sorrow.
Instead of closing the door, Balaam asks the men to stay the night while he consults God again:
This sounds well; but he added, "Stay here tonight as well, so that I may know what more the LORD will say to me." Such an attitude was sheer wickedness. The LORD had already made His mind plain, so there was nothing more to ask Him about. But Balaam was set on going. He knew enough of God not to want open conflict with Him. If he could, he would bend the LORD to his own will.
Balak's whole appeal rests on the honour he promises. By the end of the story he throws that honour back in Balaam's face.
The intended curse had become a threefold blessing. Unhappy Balaam would gladly have secured the wages of unrighteousness and the honour of this world. Now he receives Balak's cutting taunt, as the king tells him to run off home: "The LORD has held you back from honour."
Neither the king nor the prophet is running this:
Later we shall see how wonderful God's way was. He turned the enemy's own effort against him. He made Balaam, a thoroughly wicked man, work against all the enemy's interests without meaning to. Held in the mighty hand of God, Balaam became the instrument that sealed, as far as a man could, the blessing of God upon His people.
- Offer — Refused once, Balak just bids higher. He sends grander messengers, because he assumes pressure will make a god give way.
- Man — The bait fits the buyer. Balaam loved money, and Satan knew both the man and his price.
- Word — God had already said the people are blessed. The only honest reply was to say so again, and it would have spared everyone the trouble that followed.
- Delay — Asking God again, when He has already made His mind plain, is not learning His will. It is trying to bend Him to ours.
- Hand — The honour Balak dangled was never his to give. God kept Balaam from it. He turned the enemy's whole effort into a sealed blessing on His people.
And Balaam answered and said to the servants of Balak, If Balak give me his house full of silver and gold, I could not go beyond the commandment of Jehovah my God, to do less or more.
Balak's messengers offer Balaam silver and gold, and he answers with words that sound like pure devotion. Yet the same chapter shows him asking them to stay the night — so is this faith speaking, or a bargain dressed up in God's name?
Balaam does not merely mention God; he claims Him as his own. Commentators read that phrase as the mark of a man who had real knowledge of God but no heart for Him.
The history of Balaam is very solemn. While it brings out the sovereign grace of God, it also reveals the elements of religious corruption that prevail in the last days. Satan cannot defeat the saints of God by open attack, so he corrupts instead. In Balaam we have the character of that which corrupts. There was a knowledge of God. He had this — he even says "the LORD my God." He called Israel's God his God, but his heart was busy with covetous practices. He "loved the wages of unrighteousness." Peter describes Judas the same way. Thirty pieces of silver were the reward of wickedness for the man who greeted Jesus as Master. Both men show a feature of religious apostasy that at last perishes in its own corruption.
Balaam cannot give Balak what he wants. So he turns his refusal into a show of devotion.
Balaam sends word to Balak: "Though Balak were to give me his house full of silver and gold, I could not go beyond the command of the LORD my God." How pious he has become now! If he might have gone, he would. Though he cannot do what he would like to do for Balak, he still keeps up his credit as a prophet of the LORD. Just as if he had the secret of the LORD, he says, "I will know what more the LORD will say to me."
Balaam names the silver and gold in the very act of refusing it. His delay says more than his words.
If Balaam's heart had been right with God, he would have dealt with Balak's message at once. It would not have cost him a moment's thought to send a reply. But Balaam's heart was all wrong, and in chapter 22 we see him in the sad condition of a man pulled by conflicting feelings. His heart was set on going, because it was set on the silver and gold. At the same time there was some reference to God: an appearance of religion put on as a cloak to cover his covetous practices. He longed for the money, but he would gladly get hold of it in a religious way.
Still, what he said was true. He could not cross the line, however much he wanted to.
The greedy prophet replied that if the king gave him a house full of silver and gold, he still could not come without God's consent. His covetous nature showed how strong the restraint on him was.
But his fine answer does not end there. What he adds next undoes it.
Balaam's answer sounds well. But he added, "Stay here tonight too, that I may know what more the LORD will say to me." Such an attitude was sheer wickedness. The LORD had already stated His mind clearly, so there was nothing left to consult Him about. But Balaam was set on going. He knew enough of God not to want open conflict with Him. He would bend the LORD to his self-will if he could!
God did let Balaam go with the men. That permission was not approval.
This was not the course of His holy will. It was God dealing with the stubborn according to his stubbornness. He does this when there is no faith in a man's mind, and no honest, undivided purpose with it. He allows a man to follow his own blind schemes... Where He sees integrity, He graciously meets the trembling heart and the hesitating mind. But there was no hesitation with Balaam. There was self-will, and this in the face of the glorious expression of God's will. At bottom he makes nothing of God or His word.
- Profession. Balaam calls the LORD "my God" and speaks of His command. Knowing about God is not the same as belonging to Him.
- Price. His heart was set on the very silver and gold he claimed to refuse. Religion was the cloak over his greed.
- Restraint. His words were true. He could not go beyond God's word, and his greed shows how strong that hold on him was.
- Pressure. He asked God again about a matter God had already settled. That is not obedience; it is trying to bend God.
- Permission. God let the stubborn man have his way. He meets the honest, hesitating heart with grace. The difference lies in the will, not the words.
And now, I pray you, abide ye also here this night, and I shall know what Jehovah will say to me further.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
Then God came to Balaam at night, and said to him, If the men have come to call thee, rise up, [and] go with them; but only what I shall say unto thee shalt thou do.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And Balaam rose up in the morning, and saddled his ass, and went with the princes of Moab.
God had already forbidden Balaam to go. He asked a second time, and God let him go on one condition. Here he saddles up at first light. That raises the hardest question in the chapter: why does God let a man take a road He has already refused him?
God's answer that night sounds like a green light. It was not approval.
Not that this was the course of His holy will; it was God dealing with the stubborn according to his stubbornness. He does this when a man has no faith and no single eye. He lets him follow his own blind schemes. This is righteous, and this is how God deals with Balaam. Where He sees integrity, He graciously meets the trembling heart and the hesitating mind. But there was no hesitation with Balaam. There was self-will, and this in the face of the glorious expression of God's will. At bottom he makes nothing of God or His word. The true moral could not be plainer. We are told that when Balaam rises in the morning, saddles his donkey, and goes with the princes of Moab, "God's anger was kindled."
God's leave came with a condition: he could go if the men came to call him. Balaam did not wait.
Balaam's heart was filled with hatred of God's people, and covetousness raged inside him. This was no ordinary task, and it would carry no ordinary reward. He did not wait for the men to call him. He rose up in the morning, saddled his donkey, and went with the princes of Moab.
Balaam was not the only one to do this. Others also asked God about a choice they had already made.
God would now deal with the fool according to his folly. He should go as he wished. But God was determined to put him to shame, and to bring great blessing for His own people out of these schemes of Satan. The man's wicked attitude toward God here calls to mind the Jewish captains in Jeremiah's day, who were afraid of the Babylonians. They asked the prophet to pray for them, so that God would guide their path. But they had already made up their minds to go with their whole company to Egypt (Jer. 42). Let us beware of going before God at any time with our minds already made up.
He had wanted to go long before he saddled up. His religion was a cover.
Balaam's heart was all wrong, and we see him in chapter 22 in the sad condition of a man pulled by conflicting feelings. His heart was bent on going, because it was bent on the silver and gold. But at the same time he made some show of turning to God — an appearance of religion put on as a cloak to cover his covetous practices. He longed for the money; but he wanted to get hold of it in a religious way.
Balaam set out eagerly, with no idea how the journey would end.
Balaam had permission from Jehovah. He got up eagerly in the morning, saddled his donkey, and set out with Balak's messengers. He was not walking in the light... Balaam walked in darkness. He hoped to have his own way and to reap a rich reward for his villainy. What a journey!... Never was Satan more determined to curse; never was God more determined to bless!
God had His own purposes in Balaam's journey. That did not make Balaam's heart any less wrong.
On one side, Balaam's presence with the king of Moab would serve certain purposes. That did not change in the least the state of soul that provoked God's anger. Balaam needs a warning. God deals with him much as He had dealt with Moses forty years earlier. Only now He uses the donkey — less senseless than Balaam himself — to save and rebuke him.
Balaam's wrong step did not become God's plan, but God bent it toward His people's good.
Verses 12 and 13 show that God had first of all forbidden Balaam to go. Balaam coveted Balak's reward, despite the high profession in verse 18. It was wrong of Balaam to ask again. Yet when he did, God used his going as a witness of divine grace to Israel, as well as of his own perverseness.
- Asked — God had already closed the matter. Balaam asked again anyway, because he coveted the reward behind his high words.
- Allowed — The leave was not God's holy will. It was God dealing with the stubborn according to his stubbornness, letting a man without a single eye follow his own blind schemes.
- Rushed — He was to go only if the men called him. He saddled up first, and the eagerness of that morning exposed a covetous heart.
- Withstood — God's anger burned at his going. The donkey became a warning meant to save him, not just to stop him.
- Overruled — Satan was never more determined to curse, and God never more determined to bless. The journey became a witness of God's grace to Israel, and of Balaam's own perverseness.
And God's anger was kindled because he went; and the Angel of Jehovah set himself in the way to withstand him. Now he was riding upon his ass, and his two young men were with him.
God had just told Balaam he could go with Balak's men. Now, on the road, God's anger burns against him, and the angel of the LORD stands in his way as an opponent.
God's first answer to Balaam had been a flat refusal. The second answer sounded different, and the difference turns on one small word.
The first time, God had clearly forbidden Balaam to go with Balak's princes. Balaam himself had said, "The LORD refuses to let me go with you." The second time, the LORD did not refuse to let Balaam go with them. But He did not command him to go. There was an "if", which indicated that there was divine permission with a condition attached, but not a divine command.
Why would God say go at all?
This was not the course of His holy will. It was God dealing with a stubborn man according to his stubbornness. He does this when a man has no faith in his mind, and no single, undivided purpose with it. He lets that man follow his own blind schemes. This is righteous, and this is how God deals with Balaam. Where He sees integrity, He graciously meets the trembling heart and the hesitating mind. But it was no question of hesitation with Balaam.
The pattern is not unique to Balaam.
How little Balaam knew what the consequences would be of not bowing to God's first word to him! Suppose God has made His will known, and we still want our own way. He may well allow us to have it, so that we learn by experience how foolish our self-will is.
The anger was not over a technicality of travel. It was over what Balaam was riding toward.
So we picture the prophet setting out from Mesopotamia for Moab, with Balak's silver and gold filling his soul's vision. He was heartless about the devastation and sorrow he was going to try to bring on a people who had done nothing to him, all to get his reward. He was willing to blast a whole nation — men, women, and children. Nothing more horrible could well be imagined.
The word for "adversary" in this verse is also the name Scripture gives to the devil.
Satan is a name for the devil, the great enemy of God and man. The name is the same in Hebrew, Greek, and English, and means "adversary." Several other passages translate the same word that way, where other adversaries are meant: compare Numbers 22:22; 1 Kings 11:14, 23, 25.
Here the opponent is on God's side. Commentators identify Him with a messenger seen elsewhere in Scripture.
A heavenly being stood in the way with a drawn sword in his hand. He is called "the angel of the LORD." This was no mere servant. It is the same messenger who appeared to the wife of Manoah in Judges 13. He told her His name was "Wonderful." To her and to Balaam alike, He spoke with divine authority. He told Balaam that He had come out to oppose him because his way was perverse before Him, and that Balaam could speak only the word God gave him. The speaker was none other than He whom we know as the Lord Jesus Christ.
Two angers appear in this scene.
Balaam was so blinded by the god of this world that he saw less than his donkey. She "saw the angel of the LORD standing in the way". Balaam's anger was kindled against the donkey, and he struck her with his staff because she refused to carry him forward to destruction. His anger was unrighteous. By contrast, it brought out the righteous anger of God. God sent His angel to be an adversary to the man who would curse His people whom He had blessed.
A blocked road is not always something to push through. Sometimes it is mercy.
Sometimes we are doing our own will, or we are careless in how we walk. Then God in His mercy may warn us by a hindrance. It stops us, if we pay attention to it, while "the simple pass on and are punished."
- Permission. God's "go" came with an "if" attached — divine permission, never a divine command, and Balaam treated the two as the same thing.
- Abandonment. When a man will not be warned, God may justly leave him to his own blind schemes. Getting your way can be the judgment, not the blessing.
- Motive. God's anger reached the heart: a man riding toward money, willing to destroy a whole nation that had never wronged him.
- Adversary. The word used for the angel is the word for an opponent. Commentators identify this figure, standing in the road with a drawn sword, with the Lord Jesus Christ.
- Mercy. The blocked road was kindness. God still warns the careless by hindrances, and the wise stop while the simple push on and pay for it.
And the ass saw the Angel of Jehovah standing in the way, and his sword drawn in his hand; and the ass turned aside out of the way, and went into the field, and Balaam smote the ass to turn her into the way.
Balaam is riding out to curse Israel, and God is angry that he goes; ahead of him stands an angel with a drawn sword that only the donkey can see. She swerves aside and takes a beating for it, which raises the question running through the whole episode: why is a prophet blinder than the animal he rides?
The angel meets Balaam as an obstacle, not an escort. Commentators see nothing surprising in that. (Where the ESV says "the LORD," some writers use the older name "Jehovah.")
God's anger burns because he goes. The angel of Jehovah takes his stand in the way as an adversary against him. There is no great need for wonder here... Balaam needs a warning. God deals with him much as He had dealt with Moses forty years before. Only now, instead of Zipporah and the stone of circumcision, He uses the donkey — less senseless than Balaam himself — to save and rebuke him.
The same drawn sword appears at other points in Israel's story. Its meaning changes with who stands in front of it. Here it faces the man on his way to curse the nation.
Three times in the course of the people's history, the Angel of Jehovah steps in with the drawn sword in His hand. The first time it is to preserve them from threatened dangers, when Balaam, on his way to curse Israel, meets the messenger who blocks his road (Num. 22:23). The second time... it is to fight with them and win the victory for them. The third time, it is sad to say, it is to judge the people who had sinned in the person of their king. (1 Chron. 21:16)
Balaam later describes himself as a man whose eyes are open. The road exposes the claim. Every move the animal makes is a rescue he does not recognise.
He boasted that his eyes were open. Yet he did not see what the donkey was given to see. He did not know why she turned aside from the sword drawn in the angel's hand. He did not know why she pressed against the wall, sparing his head and costing him at most a crushed foot. And he did not know why she fell down where there was no other way for her or her master to escape destruction.
The comparison does not stop with Balaam. Commentators point out that God once made it against a whole nation.
The donkey saw the Angel, and turned aside from the threatening sword. Sad, that the beast should have more perception than a man made in the image of God! "The ox knows its owner, and the donkey its master's crib, but Israel does not know, my people do not understand" (Isa. 1:3). That was Jehovah's complaint about the moral dullness of a people He had treated better than any other. The very cattle could put them to shame!
Balaam's blindness had a cause, and the cause was in his own heart.
The blind unbeliever rushes onto the sword of the Lord and is destroyed. God keeps the believer safe despite himself. But when his eyes open, he finds that the Lord has been standing against him... Covetousness was the human element in this man's opposition to God. It was the screen behind which he found himself rushing to destruction.
The angel blocked the road, but the block was for Balaam's good.
How gracious of God to make a man who was hurrying on to destruction pause and think, if anything could rouse him! But no, he was committed to wicked ways.
The lesson goes beyond Balaam. It applies to anyone set on his own way.
Sometimes we are doing our own will, or we are careless in how we live. Then God in His mercy may warn us with a hindrance. It stops us if we pay attention to it, while "the simple pass on and are punished."
- Cause. Covetousness was the screen Balaam hid behind; it did not stop him seeing money, only God.
- Sword. One drawn sword: it blocks Balaam here, fights for Israel later, and later still judges them.
- Blindness. The man who claimed open eyes missed what an animal saw at once.
- Rescue. Every swerve and every fall was the donkey saving the life of the man beating her.
- Mercy. A hindrance in the road is God giving you room to stop; push past it and you keep running at the sword.
And the Angel of Jehovah stood in a hollow of the vineyards, a wall being on this side, and a wall on that side.
Balaam is on the road to Moab, hired to curse Israel, and the angel of the LORD has already blocked him once in an open field. Now the road narrows: the same drawn sword waits in a walled lane, the donkey has nowhere to turn, and the man on its back still sees nothing.
The first block left the donkey room to step aside into a field. This one leaves none, and the cost lands on Balaam's own body.
Balaam needed a sharper lesson. In a path through the vineyards, with a wall on either side, the angel with a drawn sword appeared again, still unseen by Balaam but seen by the donkey. The animal turned to one side and crushed Balaam's foot against the wall. Balaam angrily struck the beast a second time. Still Balaam failed to see that the Lord was standing against him in his self-will (vv. 24-25).
The journey itself was the problem. God had already said no, and Balaam went back a second time hoping for a different answer.
Here again he falls into the trap of his own covetousness. God came to Balaam at night and said to him, "If the men come to call you, rise up and go with them." This was not the course of His holy will. It was God dealing with the stubborn according to their stubbornness. He does this when a man has no faith in his mind and no single eye along with it. He permits that man to follow his own blind devices. This is righteous, and God accordingly deals with Balaam this way. Where He sees integrity, He graciously meets the trembling heart and the hesitating mind. But there was no hesitation with Balaam. There was self-will, and this in the face of the glorious expression of God's will. Deep down he makes nothing of God or His word. He had been clearly told that he was not to curse the people but to bless them. Yet he waits with no other aim than to curse, if he could, those whom God told him to bless.
Balaam had a reputation as a man who heard from God. In the walled lane, the only one who saw anything was the animal he was beating.
Balaam was so blinded by the god of this world that he had less perception than his donkey. The donkey "saw the angel of Jehovah standing in the way." Balaam's anger burned against her, and he struck her with his staff because she refused to carry him forward to destruction. His anger was unrighteous. Yet see how it brought out by contrast the righteous anger of God. He sent His angel to stand against the man who would curse His people whom He had blessed — a man who in self-will opposed His commandment and set his face firmly on a course that would bring him to ruin.
The figure in the vineyard path is no ordinary messenger. One writer traces him to an earlier appearance in the Old Testament, and then names him.
A heavenly being stood in the way with a drawn sword in his hand. He is called "the angel of Jehovah." This was no mere servant. It is the same messenger who appeared to the wife of Manoah in Judges 13. He told her his name was "Wonderful." He spoke with divine authority both to her and to Balaam. The speaker was none other than He whom we know as the Lord Jesus Christ.
Balaam had money in view, and no barrier turned him.
Balaam shows what a man can be when his heart is covetous. He sold himself to Satan for temporary rewards. He disregarded every divine warning that held him back on a path leading to destruction.
The same principle reaches anyone moving in their own will today.
When we are doing our own will, or are careless about our walk, God in His mercy may warn us through an obstacle. It stops us if we pay attention to it, while "the simple pass on and are punished." (Prov. 27:12.)
- Second asking. God said no once. Balaam asked again. God let him go — dealing with the stubborn according to their stubbornness, letting a man follow his own blind devices.
- Narrowing. The first block left an open field to turn into. This one leaves walls on both sides and a crushed foot. God's warnings tighten when they are ignored.
- Blindness. The animal saw the drawn sword; the famous prophet did not. Covetousness blinded him so thoroughly that a beast had more perception than he did.
- Mercy. The obstacle in the road was mercy, not cruelty. It stops the person who heeds the warning; "the simple pass on and are punished."
- Ruin. Every warning disregarded, Balaam kept going for the reward. Selling yourself for temporary gain does not remove the barriers; it just means you hit them.
And the ass saw the Angel of Jehovah, and she pressed herself against the wall, and crushed Balaam's foot against the wall; and he smote her again.
Balaam rides on with his heart set on reward, and the road is closing in on him: no field to swerve into this time, just a wall on each side. Why did the animal see the angel while the man riding her did not?
The angel had already blocked the road once, and Balaam missed it. Now the ground narrows, and so does the discipline.
Balaam did not see the angel, but God allowed the donkey to see him. The animal, naturally afraid, turned out of the way into the field. Balaam needed a sharper lesson. In a path through the vineyards, with a wall on either side, the angel with a drawn sword appeared again, still unseen by Balaam but seen by the donkey. The animal turned to one side and crushed Balaam's foot against the wall. Balaam struck the beast a second time in anger. Still Balaam failed to see that the Lord was standing against him in his self-will.
The animal was not being stubborn. Caught between a drawn sword and a stone wall, she chose the wall. Balaam took the smallest injury on offer that day.
He who boasted of having his eyes open did not see what the donkey was given to see. He did not know why she turned aside from the sword drawn in the angel's hand. He did not know why she pressed herself against the wall, so that Balaam might not have his head struck but at most his foot crushed. And he did not know why she lay down where there was no other way for her or her master to escape destruction.
The reason the warnings bounced off him lies further back. He had asked God about a journey his heart had already chosen.
If Balaam's heart had been right with God, he would have dealt with Balak's message in a moment. But his heart was bent on going, because it was bent on the silver and gold. But at the same time there was a sort of reference to God — an appearance of religiousness put on as a cloak to cover his covetous practices. He longed for the money, but he wanted to lay hold of it in a religious way.
The same blindness settles on anyone who keeps moving under the push of his own will. The outcome, though, is not the same for everyone.
The wall, the pain, the balking animal — none of it was chance.
How gracious of God to make a man who was hurrying to destruction pause and think, if anything could rouse him! But no, he was committed to wicked ways. Lawlessness must pursue its miserable course to an end no less miserable.
The same principle reaches into ordinary life. A blocked plan can be a message, not just a nuisance.
When we are doing our own will, or are careless in our walk, God in His mercy may warn us with a hindrance. That hindrance stops us if we pay attention to it, while "the simple go on and suffer for it."
- Wall. God narrows the road before He blocks it. The field allowed a detour, the vineyard path allowed none. Each stage was a sharper call to a man set on his own way.
- Shield. The crushed foot was mercy in disguise. The donkey pressed to the wall, so Balaam had his foot crushed instead of his head struck.
- Screen. Love of silver and gold, dressed up as consulting God, was the screen. Behind it Balaam ran toward ruin and never saw the drawn sword.
- Sight. Follow your own will, and you lose the ability to read God's mind. The unbeliever runs onto the sword. The believer is spared, then opens his eyes and finds the Lord was the one blocking him.
- Warning. A hindrance in the road can be God's kindness, making us pause and think. Ignore it, and Scripture's verdict stands: "the simple go on and suffer for it."
Then the Angel of Jehovah went still further, and stood in a narrow place, where was no way to turn either to the right hand or to the left.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And the ass saw the Angel of Jehovah, and lay down under Balaam; and Balaam's anger was kindled, and he smote the ass with his staff.
Balaam is riding out to curse Israel for a fee. Three times his donkey has turned aside from an armed angel that the prophet cannot see. The third time she lies down under him, and the man who claims to speak for God answers the rescue with a beating.
The donkey refused to move because she could see. Balaam's rage fell on the one creature on the road that knew the danger.
Balaam was so blinded by the god of this world that he saw less than his donkey, which "saw the angel of the LORD standing in the road." Balaam's anger flared against the donkey. He struck her with his staff because she refused to carry him forward to destruction. His anger was unrighteous. But see how it brought out the righteous anger of God. God sent His angel to oppose him. Balaam would curse the people God had blessed. He set his own will against God's commandment and fixed his face on a course that would bring him to ruin.
The creature without reason sees the danger. The man made in God's image sees nothing.
The donkey saw the Angel and turned aside from the threatening sword. How sad that the beast should have more perception than a man made in the image of God! "The ox knows its owner, and the donkey its master's crib, but Israel does not know, my people do not understand" (Isa. 1:3). That was the LORD's complaint: His people were morally dull, though He had treated them more kindly than any other. The very cattle could put them to shame!
The blows are not a small detail in the story.
Balaam struck his donkey three times. The Angel rebuked him for it, for every act of cruelty to animals is noted by God.
How a person treats a helpless animal measures his character. Balaam is the worked example.
A man of righteous character cares about the welfare of his animals. Even the kindness of wicked men, by comparison, is cruelty (Proverbs 12:10). Balaam proved this when he lost his temper with his donkey, which was submitting to the angel of the Lord.
Balaam next wishes for a sword to kill the donkey. A drawn sword is already waiting for him, and his own words convict him.
Balaam said to his donkey, "Because you have made a fool of me. I wish I had a sword in my hand, for then I would kill you." Those words justified God in sending His angel with a drawn sword in his hand to oppose him. They also justified the angel when he said, "I have come out to oppose you because your way is perverse before me … if she had not turned aside from me, surely just now I would have killed you and let her live."
God had purposes to fulfil through Balaam. Even so, the angel and the donkey were not about the journey. They were about the man.
Of course there is a miracle here… Its strangeness was all the more likely to work on a heart hardened to ordinary appeals. It humbled him by making him realise how far he had sunk below the beast — an animal whose actions his divinations claimed the power to interpret. And the mercy of God broke through the natural boundary lines to convict and save him. It should have broken down with them every barrier of sin and unbelief. The extraordinary means used here show what state of soul they suited. They also show the infinite pity of God. He could not use even a man like this as a mere machine to do His purposes without labouring after his soul.
The miracle did not shake him. Why did he argue with a talking animal instead of falling silent before it?
Balaam was so carried away by his greed that this miracle did not terrify him. He replied just as if he had been speaking to a man. God did not change the nature of the donkey into that of a rational being. He made it say whatever He pleased, to restrain Balaam's madness.
- Sight — The donkey saw the angel; Balaam, blinded by the god of this world, had less perception than the animal he rode.
- Struck — He beat the one creature that was saving him. God noted every blow, and He measures a man by how he treats his beast.
- Spared — The angel's verdict: had she not turned aside, Balaam would have died and the donkey would have lived.
- Spoken to — God gave a voice to an animal and broke through natural boundaries. His pity would not use a man as a machine without labouring after his soul.
- Unmoved — Greed had so numbed him that a speaking donkey drew argument, not wonder.
And Jehovah opened the mouth of the ass, and she said to Balaam, What have I done to thee, that thou hast smitten me these three times?
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And Balaam said to the ass, Because thou hast mocked me I would there were a sword in my hand, for now would I kill thee!
Balaam is riding to Moab to curse Israel for pay, and three times his donkey has swerved away from an angel he cannot see. God now gives the animal a voice, and Balaam answers it with rage instead of wonder.
God had been warning Balaam all along that road. One writer shows how the last warning landed:
Then God put words into the mouth of the donkey, asking Balaam why he had struck her these three times. Even this amazing miracle had no effect on Balaam. He replied in anger to the donkey that he wished he had a sword to kill her! God had given Balaam several chances to see that He Himself was stepping in to wake him up to his own folly. Balaam felt none of it. That would not have been the case if he were a true prophet of God.
Why does Balaam argue with his donkey instead of stopping in shock? One commentator answers that question:
Unbelief and higher criticism scoff at the incident of the speaking donkey. One of their arguments runs like this: Balaam held a conversation with the beast and showed no astonishment at all, so the story cannot be true. Augustine answered this well: "Balaam was so carried away by his greed that this miracle did not terrify him. He replied just as if he had been speaking to a man. God did not change the nature of the donkey into that of a rational being. Yet He made it say whatever He pleased, to restrain Balaam's madness."
The donkey turned aside three times, and each move had a reason. Balaam saw none of them:
He boasted that his eyes were open, yet he did not see what the donkey was given to see. He did not know why she turned aside from the sword drawn in the angel's hand. He did not know why she pushed herself against the wall, so that Balaam's head might not be struck but at most his foot crushed. And he did not know why she fell down where there was no other way for her or her master to escape destruction.
Balaam wished for a weapon he did not have. A weapon was already drawn — pointed at him:
Balaam's anger was unrighteous, but it brought out the righteous anger of God against a man who would curse the people He had blessed… What Balaam said to his donkey — "Because you have made a fool of me. I wish I had a sword in my hand, for then I would kill you" — justified God in sending His angel with a drawn sword in his hand to stand against him. And his words justified the angel. The angel said, "I have come out to oppose you, because your way is perverse before me… If she had not turned aside from me, surely just now I would have killed you and let her live."
Did any of this really happen? One writer answers the ridicule, then names what had gone blind in Balaam:
The story of Balaam's donkey has drawn much unbelieving protest and even ridicule, yet Peter vouches for it. If Satan could speak through a serpent with words of deceit, God can, if He chooses, speak words of warning through a donkey. His greed and his dealings with demons had blinded the eyes of Balaam's heart, and now we see that the eyes of his head were as blind as the eyes of his heart. The eyes of his head were opened, so that at last he saw the angel as clearly as his donkey had done. But the veil over the eyes of his heart remained.
The humbling was not cruelty. One writer reads the miracle as mercy aimed at a hard heart:
The strangeness of it was all the more likely to work on a heart hardened against ordinary appeals. It humbled him by making him see how far he had sunk below the beast… Meanwhile the mercy of God broke through the natural boundary lines to convict and save him, and with those lines every barrier of sin and unbelief in him should have fallen too. The extraordinary means used here testify to the state of soul that called for them. They testify also to the infinite pity of God, who could not use even a man like this as a mere machine to carry out His purposes. He had to labour over his soul.
- Blindness. The donkey sees the angel; the man who boasted of open eyes sees nothing. Eyes can be open while the heart stays veiled.
- Greed. Greed had swallowed him whole. It was so strong that a talking donkey did not even startle him.
- Temper. His answer is pure rage — he wants a sword for the creature that had three times saved his life.
- Reversal. The sword he wished for was already drawn, and aimed at him; his own words condemned him out of his own mouth.
- Mercy. God broke the natural order to reach one hard heart — proof that He labours over a soul instead of just using it.
And the ass said to Balaam, Am not I thine ass, upon which thou hast ridden ever since I was thine to this day? was I ever wont to do so to thee? And he said, No.
Balaam is riding to curse Israel for money. He has just beaten his donkey three times for stopping in the road. Now the donkey speaks. It points to a lifetime of faithful service and asks its master one question about his own conduct — and he answers with a single honest word.
The donkey asks its owner to think back over years of ordinary service. Balaam has to admit that nothing like this had ever happened before. One writer walks through what follows:
The donkey asked whether it had ever been in the habit of acting like this. The prophet admitted it had not. Then God opened Balaam's eyes to see the angel with the drawn sword in his hand. At the terrifying sight he bowed his head and fell flat on his face. The angel then told Balaam that he owed his life to the donkey three times. Balaam admitted that he had sinned, and said he was ready to go back (vv. 30-34).
Balaam's own "No" convicts him: there was no cause for the beating. Another writer weighs how a man should treat his animals:
A righteous man cares about the welfare of his animals. Even the kindness of wicked men, by comparison, is cruelty. Balaam proved this when he lost his temper with his donkey after the donkey submitted to the angel of the Lord. The Lord reproved Balaam for the cruelty of whipping his donkey (Numbers 22:24-33).
The donkey's question is reasonable; the man's rage is not. The animal saw what the prophet could not:
The donkey saw the Angel and turned aside from the threatening sword. What a thing, that the beast should have more perception than a man made in the image of God! "The ox knows its owner, and the donkey its master's crib, but Israel does not know, my people do not understand" (Isaiah 1:3). That was the Lord's complaint about His own people. They were morally dull, though He had been kinder to them than to anyone else. The very cattle could put them to shame!
The choice was deliberate. God picked the messenger that would humble this prophet most:
I grant you it is not a usual thing for God to make a dumb donkey speak; but were these circumstances usual? Was there not something deeply humiliating in having such an animal rebuke the guilty prophet? But this very fact was most significant. A donkey rebuked a man who did not lack natural intelligence. He soon became the vessel of the most beautiful declarations on God's part. Yet first the animal he rode warned him of his folly and sin.
Balaam answers the donkey as if talking with a donkey were normal — no wonder, no fear. One writer traces that calm to his greed:
Balaam was so carried away by his greed that this miracle did not terrify him. He replied just as if he had been speaking to a man. God did not change the nature of the donkey into that of a rational being. He simply made it say whatever He pleased, to restrain Balaam's madness.
Yet the strange method was itself mercy. Ordinary appeals had stopped reaching this man:
The strangeness of it was all the more likely to work on a heart hardened to ordinary appeals. It humbled him by making him realise how far he had sunk below the animal — the very animal whose actions his divinations claimed the power to interpret. And the mercy of God broke through the natural boundary lines to convict and save him. In breaking them, it should have broken down every barrier of sin and unbelief in him as well. … the infinite pity of God could not use even a man like this as a mere machine to carry out His purposes. He had to labour after his soul.
A man can be shaken without being changed. Balaam admitted the facts, saw the angel, confessed his sin — and went on:
Greed and his dealings with demons had blinded the eyes of Balaam's heart. Now we see that the eyes of his head were as blind as the eyes of his heart. At last the eyes of his head opened, and he saw the angel just as his donkey had. But the veil over the eyes of his heart remained.
- Blindness — the prophet could not see what his animal saw. The beast had more perception than a man made in God's image.
- Cruelty — Balaam's own "No" admitted the beating had no cause. The Lord reproved him for it.
- Rebuke — God chose the most humbling messenger possible. The creature he rode warned him of his folly.
- Mercy — the miracle broke through the normal order to convict and save him. God would not use him as a mere machine; He laboured after his soul.
- Hardness — his eyes opened and he saw the angel. But the veil over his heart stayed, and he went on.
Then Jehovah opened the eyes of Balaam, and he saw the Angel of Jehovah standing in the way, and his sword drawn in his hand; and he bowed and prostrated himself on his face.
Balaam is riding to Moab, hired to curse Israel, and three times his donkey has seen the angel of the LORD blocking the road with a drawn sword. Verse 31 is where God opens the prophet's own eyes — so why did he need that, and why did the sight change his posture and not his path?
The donkey needed no miracle to see the danger; the man riding it did.
Finally the Lord opened Balaam's eyes so that he saw the Angel standing in the way with a drawn sword in His hand (v. 31). In shocked terror Balaam fell on his face. The Angel then rebuked Balaam for the bad temper he showed in striking his donkey. He told him that if the donkey had not turned aside, He would have killed Balaam and spared the donkey (vv. 32-33). What a lesson this is, that an unbeliever is more ignorant of God than a beast!
The figure blocking the way is no ordinary messenger.
A heavenly being stood in the way with a drawn sword in His hand. He is called "the angel of Jehovah." This was no mere servant. It is the same messenger who appeared to Manoah's wife in Judges 13 and said His name was "Wonderful." He spoke with divine authority to her and to Balaam. To Balaam He said: "Behold, I have come out to oppose you because your way is perverse before me… Go with the men, but speak only the word that I tell you." The speaker was none other than the One we know as the Lord Jesus Christ.
A drawn sword across the road is not a subtle message. Yet Balaam missed it, and a sword ends his story.
The angel that confronted him held a drawn sword in his hand. You would think its meaning could hardly be missed, especially as the sword blocked his way. Yet Balaam was blind to it, and he went forward to his doom, as the end proved. He never returned to his native land. The wealth and honour, if he ever got them, he never lived to enjoy. He fell by the sword. It was not the sword of the angel, who barred his way to Moab at the start. It was the sword of the very people he tried to curse against the purpose of God, as recorded in Numbers 31:8.
His failure to see was itself a symptom, and the warning in it reaches past him.
This was not in itself a sin. It was the consequence of sin, and it showed the moral blindness that sin always produces. In an unbeliever it is fatal. But take a believer who follows the impulse of his own will, even in the smallest degree. How can he discern the mind of the Lord? The blind unbeliever rushes onto the sword of the Lord and is destroyed. God preserves the believer despite himself. But when his eyes are opened, he finds that the Lord has been standing against him… Covetousness was the human element of this man's opposition to God. It was the screen through which he found himself rushing to destruction.
He falls flat, says he has sinned, and offers to go home. The wording of that offer gives him away.
Balaam saw that the powers of evil and his own cunning were no match for God. So this wilful man offers to return, confessing that he has sinned. But it is clear that the desire of his heart is still the same. He does not say he will go back because he has sinned. He says, "if it is evil in your sight, I will turn back". Why does he say "if"? Was it not perfectly clear that his going displeased God? Yet there was the lingering desire in his heart to go on in order to get the coveted reward.
Seeing something is not the same as being changed by it, and that danger reaches past Balaam to us.
Is it not possible for us to "see" in an intellectual way? Is it not possible to speak of the precious things of God without our own hearts being moved by them? As we read God's Word and come to understand it, let us exercise our hearts and consciences. Then the truth gets a firm hold of us and shapes our lives. "The eyes of your heart being enlightened" is the true rendering of Ephesians 1:18.
- Blind — Balaam's blindness was moral, not physical; commentators name covetousness as the screen he was rushing through.
- Opened — Balaam saw only because the LORD gave him sight, and what he saw was the Lord standing against him.
- Warned — The drawn sword blocked his road as a plain warning; he read no meaning in it, and by Numbers 31:8 he died by a sword.
- Bowed — Falling on his face and saying "I have sinned" is not repentance when the offer to turn back still hangs on an "if".
- Unchanged — Balaam's legacy is opened eyes with an untouched heart; our need is that the eyes of the heart be enlightened.
And the Angel of Jehovah said to him, Wherefore hast thou smitten thine ass these three times? behold, it was I who came forth to withstand thee, for the way [thou walkest in] is for ruin before me.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And the ass saw me, and turned from me these three times; had she not turned from me, I had now certainly slain thee, and saved her alive.
Balaam, a prophet hired to curse Israel, is riding toward Moab, and three times he has beaten his donkey for swerving off the road. Now God opens his eyes: the animal he wanted to kill was the only thing keeping him alive.
The figure in the road is no ordinary messenger. One commentator names Him, and quotes what He said to Balaam:
A heavenly being stood in the way with a drawn sword in His hand. Scripture calls Him "the angel of the LORD." This was no mere servant. It is the same messenger who appeared to the wife of Manoah in Judges 13 and who said His name was "Wonderful." Both to her and to Balaam He spoke with divine authority. To Balaam He said: "I have come out to oppose you, because your way is perverse before Me… Go with the men, but speak only the word that I tell you." The speaker was none other than He whom we know as the Lord Jesus Christ.
The Angel called Balaam's way perverse. What Balaam was riding to do explains God's anger:
So we picture the prophet setting out from Mesopotamia for Moab, with Balak's silver and gold filling his soul's vision. He had no pity at all for the devastation and sorrow he was going to try to bring on a people who had done nothing to him. He did it all for his reward. The people of Israel had done him no wrong, yet he was willing to blast a whole nation — men, women, and children. Nothing more horrible could well be imagined. No wonder we read that "God's anger was kindled because he went" (Num. 22:22).
Balaam was rushing toward that sword and could not see it. One writer shows where such blindness ends:
The blind unbeliever rushes onto the sword of the Lord and is destroyed. The believer is preserved despite himself. But when his eyes are opened, he finds that the Lord has been standing against him. We may take warning even from a wicked Balaam. Satan often turns the tendencies of our own hearts into a thick veil. Then we fail to see the Lord's mind.
Three times the donkey saw what the prophet could not. One writer explains why God let Balaam ride on at all, and what the animal exposed:
God intended him to go, so that he might pronounce a blessing on His people instead of a curse. Morally, for Balaam himself, going was the most wicked act. Yet God brings out all His purposes through it. He is nothing more than a rod in God's hand. He goes, and the Lord meets him by an angel. He rebukes man's ways and man's wisdom by putting more sense into the mouth of a dumb animal than a man has. Though man has a mind, he uses it against God, which an animal cannot do. Man, in one sense, is more blind than Satan, because Satan believes and trembles. God could reveal Himself to an animal's eye as well as to a man's, whenever He pleased.
Every blocked step was a kindness. The Angel explains why only after the donkey has saved Balaam's life:
God then let the prophet know why all these obstacles stood in his way. He heard it in the fullest possible way, from the angel of the LORD Himself. How gracious of God, to make a man who was hurrying on to destruction stop and think, if anything could rouse him! But no, he was committed to wicked ways. Lawlessness must run its miserable course to an end no less miserable.
Balaam's reply in the next verse admits sin and offers to turn back — but the wording gives him away:
Realising that the powers of evil and his own cunning were no match for God, the wilful Balaam offers to return, confessing that he has sinned. But his heart's desire has not changed. He does not say he will go back because he has sinned. He says, "if it is evil in Your sight, I will turn back." Why does he say "if"? Was it not obvious that his going displeased God? Yet there was still the lingering desire in his heart to go on and get the reward he coveted.
- The Sword. An armed Angel stood in the road. Fereday identifies Him as the Lord Jesus Himself. The charge was against Balaam's heart, not his route: his way was perverse.
- The Greed. He was travelling for silver and gold. He was willing to ruin a whole nation that had never wronged him. That is what kindled God's anger.
- The Donkey. God gave sight to the animal and withheld it from the prophet — a rebuke to human wisdom. Balaam himself was only a rod in God's hand: God meant him to bless Israel, not curse them.
- The Mercy. Three blocked steps were three rescues. God stopped a man hurrying to destruction and made him think. Grace came disguised as an obstacle.
- The Waste. Balaam said "I have sinned," then added "if it is evil in Your sight." That is a confession with an escape clause. He rode on for his fee.
And Balaam said to the Angel of Jehovah, I have sinned; for I knew not that thou stoodest in the way against me; and now, if it be evil in thine eyes, I will get me back again.
The angel of the LORD has just blocked Balaam's road, and his own donkey saw what the prophet could not. His answer sounds like repentance: he admits sin and offers to turn back. But his wording carries a condition, an excuse, and a desire he has not given up.
Everything turns on one small word: if.
Realising that the powers of evil and his own guile were no match for God, the wilful Balaam offers to return, confessing that he has sinned. But it is clear that the desire of his heart is still the same, for he does not say he will go back because he has sinned, but "if it is evil in your sight, I will turn back". Why does he say "if"? Was it not obvious that his going displeased God? Yet there was the lingering desire in his heart to go on and get the reward he wanted.
The sin Balaam admits is not the sin he committed.
Balaam acknowledged that he had sinned (v.34), but let himself down easily by pleading that he did not know the Angel was standing in the way. But he knew God had forbidden him to curse Israel, so his way was perverse before the Lord. He still did not decide to bless Israel, but offered to turn back if God was displeased. He had already been told of God's displeasure against any cursing of Israel, but he had no desire to take God's viewpoint himself.
One writer sees a warning in this for believers too:
His thought was only that he had failed to see the angel in the road. This was not in itself a sin, but it was the consequence of sin. As such it showed the moral blindness that sin always produces, and in an unbeliever that blindness is fatal. But what about a believer who follows the push of his own will, in any degree, however small? How can he discern the mind of the Lord? The blind unbeliever runs onto the sword of the Lord and is destroyed. The believer is kept safe in spite of himself, but when his eyes are opened he finds that the Lord has been standing against him... Satan often turns the special tendencies of our own hearts into a thick veil, so that we fail to see the Lord's mind.
after_note: DELETE_NOT_APPLICABLE
Other men in Scripture said the same three words.
Had Balaam any heart-knowledge of God he would have refused to go a step further after his experience with the Angel. His words "I have sinned" no more came from a conscience convicted by God than the same words from the lips of self-willed Saul in 1 Samuel 15:24.
One writer compares the habit to a child owning up:
It is not always a good sign when a man is quick to confess his sin. Have you not seen it in your children? It is a matter of common observation that the child who is always ready to confess his wrong never feels much about it... The quick and hasty owning, "I have sinned," is always suspicious; and it may be found in men even worse than Saul. Judas said the same thing. The readiness to own wrong, at least in general terms, may exist even where the conscience is seared and the state is utterly bad.
God gave Balaam sight, but only of one kind.
The eyes of Balaam's heart were blinded by his greed and his dealings with demons, and now we see that the eyes of his head were as blind as the eyes of his heart. The eyes of his head were opened so that at last he saw the angel as clearly as his donkey had done. But the veil over the eyes of his heart remained.
Every obstacle on the road was meant to stop him.
The angel of the Lord Himself then told the prophet, as fully as possible, why all these obstructions were put in his way. How gracious of God to make a man who was hurrying to destruction pause and think, if anything could rouse him! But no, he was committed to wicked ways. Lawlessness must pursue its miserable course to an end no less miserable.
- Self-will first. Balaam's road was already crooked before the angel blocked it. He had God's word about Israel and no wish to share God's view of them.
- Blindness follows. Not seeing the angel was not the sin; it was what sin produced. A believer who follows even a little of his own will loses the ability to read the Lord's mind.
- Half-confession next. "If it is evil in your sight" is the giveaway: he admits fault but keeps his option open, because the reward still holds his heart.
- Words are cheap. Saul and Judas said the same three words. A quick, general admission of wrong can sit beside a hardened conscience.
- Mercy refused, ruin reached. God blocked the road and explained Himself fully — kindness meant to make a man pause. But a will set on its own way runs to a miserable end.
And the Angel of Jehovah said to Balaam, Go with the men, but only the word that I shall speak unto thee, that shalt thou speak. And Balaam went with the princes of Balak.
Balaam is on his way to curse Israel for a reward. The angel of the LORD has just stopped him on the road — and now tells him to carry on, with one restriction on his mouth. Why would God send a man forward on a journey He had already forbidden? Does permission mean approval?
God's "go" is not a change of mind. Commentators read it as God handing a determined man over to the choice he had already made.
This was not the course of His holy will. It was God dealing with the stubborn according to their stubbornness. He does this when a man has no faith in his mind and no single eye with it. He lets that man follow his own blind schemes. This is righteous, and God deals with Balaam in this way. Where He sees integrity, He graciously meets the trembling heart and the hesitating mind. But it was no question of hesitation with Balaam.
God had already told Balaam plainly not to go. So what happened to that first command?
The conditional permission to go with Balak's servants did not set aside the definite command to Balaam not to go to Balak. We see this in God's anger burning when Balaam went. The thoughts of the false prophet were completely at odds with the thoughts of God, and he knew this very well. But he had made up his mind to get the reward that Balak promised, if he possibly could. He would take it even if it meant cursing those whom God had blessed.
Balaam asked God a second time about a matter God had already closed. We can fall into the same habit.
We may be tempted to wonder at this, but we must remember that God does not change His purpose. If we know this and still persist like Balaam, God may change His dealings with us, as He did with Balaam. He may permit us to go, so that in His discipline we reap the bitter result of our own way. Even so, as with Balaam, He will give us ample warning of what lies before us.
The same trap catches people who pray about a decision they have already settled:
Let us beware of going before God at any time with our minds already made up. It is a serious affront to the Divine Majesty!
The verse calls the speaker "the angel of the LORD." Yet the words He orders Balaam to say are His own.
The Angel of the Lord told him to go, however, with the absolute command that he speak only what the Angel spoke to him (v. 35). Notice what this shows. In the Old Testament the title "The Angel of the Lord" refers to the Lord Himself, and Balaam must speak His words.
Balaam could go where he liked. He could not say what he liked. He admitted this himself before he ever spoke in front of Balak.
He loved, as we know, "the wages of unrighteousness," and, if he could, would have said what Balak wanted. But a power he could not resist held sway over him. He was for the time being the mouthpiece of God, and spoke, however unwillingly, the words of God. He was so sure that inspiration was real, down to the words themselves, that he said so at his first meeting with Balak. Before he spoke one prediction about Israel, he told him, "Have I now any power to say anything? The word that God puts in my mouth, that shall I speak" (Num. 22:38).
Letting Balaam travel was not God losing control of the situation. It was God bringing the plot into the open and turning it inside out.
God knows what is in Balaam's heart. So He allows him to go forward, to expose him fully, and to turn his evil desire against His people into blessing for them. Balaam shows no real desire to turn back. Nor does it seem that God will let him go back. God has His own purpose: to make Balaam the unwilling vessel who speaks out His thoughts about His people.
A drawn sword, a talking donkey and a direct rebuke should have ended the trip. Balaam heard all of it and kept riding.
Had Balaam any heart-knowledge of God he would have refused to go a step further after his experience with the Angel. True, the Angel said, "Go with the men; but only the word that I shall speak to you, that you shall speak." But He also said, "Behold, I went out to withstand you, because the way you walk in is for ruin before me." After hearing all this, Balaam was clearly proceeding to his doom.
- Permitted, not approved. God's "go" answered Balaam's will, not His own; He lets a man with no single eye follow his own blind schemes.
- Permitted, but still guilty. The permission never cancelled the first refusal. God's anger burned as soon as Balaam saddled up.
- Permitted, and warned. God may let us have our way so we reap its bitter result, yet He gives ample warning of what lies ahead first.
- Permitted, and muzzled. He could choose his road, but not his message. A man who loved the wages of unrighteousness became the mouthpiece of God against his own will.
- Permitted, and overruled. God let him ride on to expose his heart. Then He turned the curse Balaam intended into blessing for the very people he came to curse.
And when Balak heard that Balaam came, he went out to meet him, to the city of Moab, which is on the border of the Arnon, which is at the extremity of the border.
A frightened king of Moab has sent for a famous fortune-teller, and the man has now arrived. Balak goes out to the very edge of his own land to meet him, hoping that together they can curse Israel.
Each man came to this meeting with a grievance:
Balak met Balaam at the frontier of his kingdom. Neither the king nor the prophet was in a good mood. Balak was offended, because Balaam had not been quick to do what he asked. Balaam felt that he was under restraint, and that things would not turn out as he and Balak wanted. Balak took his visitor to the town of Kirjath Huzoth, and there he offered oxen and sheep in front of Balaam and the princes who had fetched him from Mesopotamia. We are not told who Balak offered his sacrifices to. The one true God certainly had no place in his esteem.
Balak's choice of hired help shows what he thought he was up against:
He was not convinced that military power would be enough to stand against the conquerors of Sihon and Og. So he sent messengers to a well-known fortune-teller — Balaam the son of Beor, who lived in Mesopotamia. Outsiders were already crediting Israel's victories to divine power... In sending for Balaam, Balak sought to oppose the supernatural by the supernatural. The Mesopotamian prophet had a reputation for influence with the invisible world.
At that border the world's power and the world's religion joined forces:
Two things stand out in Satan's attempt. The first is the dismay that filled Balak's mind when he saw the hosts of Israel. The second is the covetousness that ruled Balaam's soul. Balak sends for Balaam. At this early date we see the power of the world uniting with the religion of the world against what is of God... Here the secular asks help from the religious. Since then the religious has often called on the secular. But whichever one asked, the other always answered. They set aside every difference and jealousy between them to make common cause against the people of God.
God did not stop Balaam from reaching Moab, and one writer explains why:
God knows what is in Balaam's heart. He allows him to go forward, to expose him completely, and to turn his evil desire against His people into blessing for them. Balaam shows no real desire to turn back. Nor does it seem that God will let him go back. God has His own purpose: to make Balaam the unwilling vessel for declaring His thoughts about His people.
Another writer looks ahead to how the attack ends:
Later we shall see how wonderful God's way was. He turned Satan's own effort against him. He made this most wicked wretch Balaam work against all his own interests without meaning to. Held in the mighty hand of God, Balaam became the instrument for sealing the blessing of God upon His people, as far as a man could do it!
The contest was over Israel, yet Israel took no part in it:
How little did Israel know or imagine what was going on between Jehovah and the enemy. Perhaps they were murmuring in their tents at the very moment when God was declaring their perfection through the mouth of the covetous prophet. Balak would gladly have Israel cursed; but, blessed be God, He will not allow anyone to curse His people. He may have to deal with them Himself, in secret, about many things. But He will not allow anyone else to speak a word against them.
- Fear summons. Israel had defeated Sihon and Og. Balak decided armies were not enough, so he hired a man said to have power in the unseen world.
- Fear travels. Balak does not wait at home. He meets the hired prophet at the very edge of his own kingdom.
- Fear allies. At that border the world's power and the world's religion join hands. The two have kept calling on each other ever since.
- God permits. God lets Balaam arrive. The journey exposes the man completely and makes him an unwilling mouthpiece for God's thoughts about Israel.
- God reverses. The attempt to curse ends in blessing. Israel knew nothing about it, and God let no other tongue accuse them.
And Balak said to Balaam, Did I not earnestly send to thee to call thee? why didst thou not come to me? am I not surely able to honour thee?
Balak has sent messengers to bring Balaam to Moab. The two men meet at last on the border. The king's first words are a complaint dressed as a question. Two assumptions sit behind the hurt pride. Honour is Balak's to give, he thinks. And a prophet — along with a prophet's God — can be bought with it.
The question is a reproach, and the bad feeling runs both ways.
Balak met Balaam at the frontier of his kingdom. Neither king nor prophet was in a good mood. Balak took offence because Balaam had not come quickly when he asked. Balaam, for his part, felt he was under restraint. He sensed that things would not turn out as he and Balak wanted.
Balak's question is a reminder of terms already offered. Honour, gold and silver were on the table, and the offer found a willing heart.
There is something especially awful in the case of Balaam. He clearly loved money — no uncommon love, sadly, in our own day. Balak's gold and silver proved a very tempting bait to the wretched man — a bait too tempting to be resisted. Satan knew his man, and the price at which he could be bought.
"Am I not able to honor you?" is the question of a man who cannot picture a power he is unable to bargain with. How he handles Balaam, and where he takes him, follow from the God he imagines.
In Balak we see how completely the knowledge of God was lost… God is known only by revelation, and Balak's ignorance is less surprising than that of the world with all its wisdom… His words to Balaam show what he thought God was like. He thought God was just like himself, or like the god he imagined for himself… In his mind, both gods and men could be swayed by circumstances and place.
This meeting is an alliance. A king joins with a prophet, and each brings his own reason for being there.
Satan's attempt rests on two main things. One is the dismay that filled Balak's mind when he saw the armies of Israel. The other is the greed that ruled Balaam's soul. Balak sends for Balaam. At this early date we see the power of the world uniting with the religion of the world against what is of God. Here worldly power asks religion for help, and religion has often since called on worldly power in return. Whichever one asked, the other always answered. They set aside every difference and jealousy, and made common cause against the people of God.
Balak's question assumes the outcome is still open. He thinks the right fee will buy the right words. It was settled before the two men ever met.
How little Israel knew what was going on between the LORD and the enemy. They may well have been grumbling in their tents at the very moment when God was setting out their perfection through the mouth of the covetous prophet. Balak would gladly have had Israel cursed. But, blessed be God, He will not allow anyone to curse His people. He may have to deal with them Himself, in secret, about many things. But He will not let anyone else speak a word against them. He may have to expose them to themselves; but He will not allow a stranger to expose them.
Balak began by asking whether he was not able to honour Balaam. By the end of the episode he answers his own question, and the answer is not the one he expected.
God does not change. Through Balaam's mouth He pronounced the blessings we have looked at so far. They sound the death-knell of the world in its opposition to God and His people. Balak struck his hands together. The curse he intended had been turned into a threefold blessing. Unhappy Balaam would gladly have secured the wages of unrighteousness and the honour of this world. Instead he gets Balak's withering taunt, and is told to flee to his place: "the LORD has held you back from honor."
- Summons. Balak complains that Balaam did not come at once. Neither man is pleased: the king feels slighted, and the prophet already feels held back.
- Bait. The honour Balak dangles was the lure from the start. Money and rank were the price at which this man could be bought.
- Misjudgement. "Am I not able to honor you?" comes from a king who pictured God as being like himself. He thought God could be persuaded, and swayed by place and circumstance.
- Alliance. Worldly power and worldly religion join hands here against God's people. Balak's fear and Balaam's greed drive them both.
- Withheld. God will not let anyone curse His people. So the promised honour never arrives. Balak's own parting taunt is that the LORD held Balaam back from it.
And Balaam said to Balak, Lo, I am come to thee; but shall I now be able at all to say anything? the word that God puts in my mouth, that shall I speak.
Balak has promised Balaam great honour if he will curse Israel. But the prophet's first words to the king admit that his mouth is not his own — so can a man speak God's true word while his heart is set on money?
Notice who is speaking here. This is a man who wanted the reward, and who has to say these words anyway.
On coming to Balak, despite the honour promised, Balaam has to confess, "Behold, I have come to you! Have I now any power of my own to speak anything? The word that God puts in my mouth, that must I speak." He would gladly have accepted the rewards. But he is conscious that God has intervened against him on behalf of His people, and he seems quite uncertain of what lies ahead.
His words are not modesty. They tell us how a prophet received the word he spoke.
He was for the time being the mouthpiece of God, and spoke, however unwillingly, the words of God. He was sure that inspiration was real, and that it reached even to the words themselves. So at his first meeting with Balak, before he spoke one prediction about Israel, he told him, "Have I now any power of my own to speak anything? The word that God puts in my mouth, that must I speak."
So why did Balaam come to Balak at all? His heart, not his mouth, was the real problem.
His heart was bent on going, because it was bent on the silver and gold. At the same time there was a kind of reference to God — an appearance of religiousness put on as a cloak to cover his covetous practices. He longed for the money, but he would like to lay hold of it in a religious fashion.
Balaam used enchantments, yet these are the words he brings to Balak. His answer also exposes the muddle in the king's request.
We know that he knew and used enchantments. Yet when he comes to Balak he says, "Have I now any power of my own to speak anything? The word that God puts in my mouth, that must I speak." Balak was looking for the power of evil against the children of Israel, God's people, and yet looking for it from God. In some way he was looking to the power and intervention of God, although God was not known, and so everything was confusion.
If God can fill this man's mouth, then the ability to speak for God settles nothing about the speaker. Balaam stands with two others who prove the same point.
Balaam the prophet prophesied while loving the wages of unrighteousness. Caiaphas the priest prophesied while he was thirsting for innocent blood. Judas the apostle worked miracles while he carried the heart of a traitor... But all this tells us that it is not gifts that make us what we should be, and that nothing will do if the heart is not with God.
Why hold this man's tongue at all? Moses later gave Israel the answer, and it had nothing to do with Balaam.
Moses told the people about the danger that had threatened them. He said: "But the LORD your God would not listen to Balaam; instead the LORD your God turned the curse into a blessing for you, because the LORD your God loved you." Precious words — "because the LORD your God loved you!"
- Mouth — Balaam admits he has no power of his own. He can only speak the word God puts there.
- Motive — he makes the admission against his will. He would have taken Balak's reward if God had let him.
- Mask — his talk about God was a cloak for covetousness, a religious way of reaching for silver and gold.
- Measure — with Caiaphas and Judas, he proves that a gift used for God is no evidence of a heart with God.
- Mercy — God held that mouth for one reason: He loved His people, and turned the curse into a blessing for them.
And Balaam went with Balak, and they came to Kirjath-huzoth.
Balaam has argued with God, and his own donkey has rebuked him. Yet here he is, walking beside the king who hired him to curse Israel, down to a Moabite town called Kiriath-huzoth. Why did God let him arrive at all? And what did the journey expose about the man?
Balaam knew Israel was blessed, and he set out anyway. One writer shows how God dealt with him — not by blocking the road, but by exposing his folly and letting him walk on:
He had no sympathy at all with the thoughts of God's heart, and none with God Himself. Fear of the consequences ruled him. Otherwise he would have been so happy in the blessing of the people that he would have shuddered at the idea of cursing what God had blessed. God, however, will use him to give a glorious testimony on behalf of His people. At the same time He condemns the crooked ways of the prophet, for they were indeed crooked. He shows him his crookedness and his folly, and that he was more stupid than the donkey he was riding. But at the same time He makes him go on his way.
God's permission was no favour. One writer draws out the danger of pressing God for an answer you have already decided on:
He was led by his covetousness to try and serve the bad king of Moab by cursing the people of God. When God gave him an answer, he goes to God a second time, because his heart wanted its own way. And it is solemn to learn that if God gives you up you may get what you want. Balaam afterwards falls into even worse evil. He was indeed a man whose heart was not with God. He said some true things, but his spirit was not in them. He goes on step by step, until he lends himself to become the corrupter of even God's chosen people throughout the world.
The verse puts king and prophet side by side, and the mood between them was already sour. The name Kiriath-huzoth means "city of streets: city of broad ways" (J. B. Jackson). What happened there was a state reception:
Balak met Balaam at the frontier of his kingdom. Neither king nor prophet were in good humour. Balak was offended because Balaam had not come quickly when he called. And Balaam felt he was being held back, and that things would not turn out as he and Balak wanted. Balak first took his visitor to Kiriath-huzoth. There he offered oxen and sheep in front of Balaam and the princes who had brought him from Mesopotamia. We may regard this as an official welcome.
He walked on with the reward still in view, and with no idea what was coming:
He would gladly have accepted the rewards, but he knows that God has intervened against him on behalf of His people, and he seems quite uncertain of what lies ahead.
Balaam claimed Jehovah as his God, yet he took his share of Balak's sacrifices:
We can be certain that Balak did not offer these oxen and sheep to Jehovah, the God of Israel. He offered them to the gods the Moabites worshipped, and he sent portions from them to Balaam and the princes of Moab. Balaam claimed to serve Jehovah. Yet he would not hesitate to share in the worship of the false gods of Moab, or to accept anything the king of Moab chose to give him.
Israel knew nothing of this journey, and the plot had no hope:
How little did Israel know or imagine what was going on between Jehovah and the enemy. They may have been complaining in their tents at the very moment when God was declaring their perfection through the mouth of the greedy prophet. Balak would gladly have Israel cursed; but, blessed be God, He will not allow anyone to curse His people. He may have to deal with them Himself, in secret, about many things; but He will not allow another to move his tongue against them. He may have to expose them to themselves; but He will not allow a stranger to expose them.
- Went — Balaam's arrival with Balak is not God's approval. God showed him his own folly and still let him go on his way.
- Wanted — He had asked twice about a matter God had already settled; if God gives a man up, he may get what he wanted.
- Welcomed — At Kiriath-huzoth Balak killed oxen and sheep for gods that were not the God Balaam claimed to serve, and Balaam took his share.
- Words — He said true things, but his spirit was not in them. He still wanted the reward, and he did not know what was coming.
- Worthless — The errand failed before it began. God may chasten His people Himself, but He will not let a stranger curse them.
And Balak offered oxen and small cattle, and sent to Balaam and to the princes that were with him.
Balak meets Balaam at his border, and before a word of cursing is spoken he holds a feast of sacrificed animals. Two questions press on this short verse: who were the animals killed for, and why does a prophet who has just said he can only speak God's words share in them?
The oxen and sheep here look less like worship than like a state dinner. The king stages it in front of the officials who had travelled to fetch the prophet.
Balak met Balaam at the border of his kingdom. Neither the king nor the prophet was in a good mood. Balak was offended that Balaam had not come as soon as he asked. Balaam felt held back, and sensed that things would not turn out as he and Balak wanted. Balak first took his visitor to Kirjath Huzoth, and there he offered oxen and sheep in front of Balaam and the princes who had brought him from Mesopotamia. We may see this as a kind of official welcome. We are not told who Balak offered his sacrifices to; but the one true God certainly had no place in Balak's esteem.
Commentators differ on how far the text lets us go. One says only that we are not told who received the sacrifices. Another has no doubt they went to Moab's gods, and points out that portions from them reached Balaam's own plate.
We can be certain that the oxen and sheep Balak offered, and from which he sent portions to Balaam and the princes of Moab, were not offered to Jehovah, the God of Israel, but to the gods the Moabites worshipped. Balaam claimed to serve Jehovah, yet he would not hesitate to share fellowship with the false gods of Moab, or to accept anything the king of Moab chose to give him.
Balaam has just told the king he cannot say anything except what God gives him. So Balak aims his gift higher than the prophet.
Balaam answered that he had no power even to speak but must receive his words from God. He needed a supernatural power by which to speak, and he called this power "God," though he did not know the true God. Balak responded by offering oxen and sheep (v.40), likely as a bribe to get Balaam's god on his side.
Balaam's readiness to sit at Balak's table fits what we already know of him. God's answer was never unclear to him. His heart was the problem.
If Balaam's heart had been right with God, he would have dealt with Balak's message very quickly. It would not have cost him a moment's thought to send a reply. But Balaam's heart was all wrong. In chapter 22 we see him in the sad state of a man pulled two ways by conflicting feelings. His heart was set on going, because it was set on the silver and gold. At the same time there was some reference to God — a show of religion put on like a cloak to cover his greedy ways. He longed for the money, but he wanted to get hold of it in a religious way. Miserable man! Most miserable!
Nothing here escapes God's hand. He lets the journey, the welcome and the feast go ahead. His purpose in them is not Balak's.
Knowing what was in Balaam's heart, God lets him go forward — to expose him fully, and to turn his evil desire against His people into blessing for them. Balaam shows no real desire to turn back. Nor does it seem that God will let him go back. God has His own purpose: to make Balaam the unwilling instrument who announces His thoughts about His people.
Israel knew nothing about this feast, or about the plan to curse them.
How little Israel knew or imagined what was going on between Jehovah and the enemy! Perhaps they were complaining in their tents at the very moment when God was declaring their perfection through the mouth of the greedy prophet. Balak would have been glad to have Israel cursed. But, blessed be God, He will not allow anyone to curse His people.
- Welcome. The oxen and sheep were a royal reception for Balaam and the princes who fetched him.
- Wrong altar. The true God had no place in Balak's thinking. The offerings went to Moab's gods, and Balaam took his portion anyway.
- Bribe. Told that Balaam can only speak what God gives him, Balak tries to buy the God behind the prophet.
- Cloak. Balaam wanted the silver and gold, and wanted to reach it in a religious way. His religion was a cover for greed.
- Overruled. God let it all go ahead to expose Balaam, and to turn his evil desire into blessing for a people who never even heard of the plot.
And it came to pass on the morrow, that Balak took Balaam, and brought him up to the high places of Baal, and he saw from thence the extremity of the people.
In the morning the king of Moab takes Balaam up to Bamoth-baal — the high places of Baal — and lets him see only the far edge of Israel's camp. Balak chose the hill, and Balak chose how much of Israel his prophet would see.
The hill carries the name of a god whose worship would later cost Israel the land.
This is the first mention of Baal in the Word of God. Baal was the chief male god of the Phoenicians and the Canaanites, and Ashtoreth was the chief female god. This form of idolatry gained a footing in Israel in the days of the judges. It was cast out in the time of Samuel. It became firmly established in the kingdom of the ten tribes in the reign of Ahab. Then Jezebel's daughter Athaliah introduced it into the kingdom of Judah. This great evil was one of the causes of the expulsion of all twelve tribes from the land of promise.
Why choose that particular hill? One writer reads it as home advantage — Balak picking the ground where his own god should be strongest.
Balak's aim in taking Balaam to the high places of Baal was probably this: a stronghold of his false worship would help the work in hand. Surely at such a spot Baal would help him! But he reckoned without God, and in a short time he was forced to listen to the gospel of God from the devil's own platform! What a defeat!
The next chapter opens with Balaam calling for seven altars. Where he stood puts that request in a new light.
The last verse of chapter 22 sheds light on the evil power that drove Moab and Balak their king. They had among them the "high places of Baal." So in the first verse of our chapter we read that Balaam said, "Build me here seven altars." We see at once that this man, who claimed to be a prophet of the Lord, was really in league with the powers of darkness.
Balaam is shown the outermost section of Israel, not the whole. Commentators read this as deliberate management of the prophet's impressions.
Chapter 22:41 tells us that Balak brought Balaam to the high places of Baal in order to prophesy against Israel. Here he saw only "a portion of the people," for Balak wanted to give Balaam the impression that Israel was not a large nation, so that he might more safely curse them.
The plan backfired at the first word out of Balaam's mouth.
Balak's first effort is to make them look small in Balaam's eyes — he would not have him see too much. This gives force to what Balaam says: "Who can count the dust of Jacob, and number the fourth part of Israel?" The end camp was just the fourth part. The partial view does not make the people seem smaller. It moves him to say, "If only the end is so much, what must the whole be?"
This hill is the first of three lookout points.
He speaks these prophecies from three points, all mountain tops. The first from the high places of Baal, the second from the summit of Pisgah, and the last from Peor. Each of the three points is nearer to the camp, and each gives a fuller view.
The people in the camp below knew nothing of the exchange going on above them.
It is gripping to watch the scene played out on the high places of Baal. We see the great question at stake. We listen to the speakers. We get to look behind the scenes at such an important moment. How little Israel knew or imagined what was going on between Jehovah and the enemy. They may have been grumbling in their tents at that very moment. Meanwhile God was declaring their perfection through the mouth of the greedy prophet.
And the answer God gives the accuser is not measured by the people's behaviour.
So the moment any enemy or accuser comes on the scene, Jehovah places Himself in front to receive and answer the accusation. His answer is never based on what His people are in themselves. It is based on what He has made them through the perfection of His own work.
One writer presses the phrase itself — the outskirts are the vulnerable side of a camp.
Would it be possible to curse part of them? "You shall see only the outermost part of them," says Balak, "and shall not see them all." The "outermost part" is a place exposed to danger. It was there that the fire of the Lord burned at Taberah. Nearness is always a safe place, while being at a distance leaves us open to attack. Could the power of the enemy prevail there?
- Place. Balak picked the high places of Baal. It is the first mention of Baal in the Bible, and it was the stronghold of his own worship.
- Platform. The choice backfired. Balak had to hear the gospel of God from the devil's own platform. The seven altars showed whose side the prophet was on.
- Portion. Balak showed Balaam only the outer edge, to shrink Israel in his eyes.
- Proportion. It produced the opposite: if the fourth part is beyond counting, what must the whole be?
- Protection. Israel's conduct did not settle the matter. God answered the accuser on the ground of His own work, while the people sat unaware in their tents.
And Balaam said to Balak, Build me here seven altars, and prepare me here seven bullocks and seven rams.
Balak, king of Moab, has hired Balaam to curse Israel. He brings him up to the high places of Baal, above the camp. Balaam's first move is not to speak: he calls for seven altars, seven bulls and seven rams. What was all this religious machinery for? And what could it do against a people God had already blessed?
The place where the altars stood tells you who Balaam was really serving.
The last verse of chapter 22 shed light upon the evil power that animated Moab and Balak their king. They had among them the "high places of Baal." So when in the first verse of our chapter we read that Balaam said, "Build for me here seven altars," we at once see that this man, who claimed to be a prophet of the Lord, was really in league with the powers of darkness. When in conflict with Baal, Elijah repaired the one altar of the Lord that was broken down, and he prevailed. In contrast with that, we are now to see that the seven altars of Baal can achieve nothing against the blessing of God.
The number itself gives him away.
Balaam exposed his idolatrous character immediately by asking Balak to build seven altars, offering on each one a bull and a ram. God allowed only one altar of burnt offering (Ex. 27:1; Heb. 13:10), for the altar speaks of Christ, the only way of approach to God. But Balaam believed in "many gods and many lords" (1 Cor. 8:4-5).
Balaam knew God's word could not be beaten. What he never grasped was who God is.
He evidently had no sense of the supreme power and glory of Jehovah, while he knew that no power could prevail against His word. To him Jehovah was only the First among many, and not the supreme and only God.
Balaam's own words sound godly. The next chapter gives him away.
Balaam pretended that the sacrifices were to Jehovah, for he said to Balak, "Stand by your burnt offering, and I will go; perhaps the Lord will come to meet me." We learn in the first verse of the next chapter what Balaam really sought: "When Balaam saw that it pleased the Lord to bless Israel, he did not go, as at other times, to look for omens." This is the key that unlocks the puzzle for us. It was not Jehovah's presence he sought, but enchantments; that is, he sought the spirit or spirits he was familiar with, and his sacrifices were for them.
Where did Balaam get the number seven, and what did he hope to gain by it?
It would seem that not only the name "Jehovah" but the use of the number "seven" was borrowed from Israel by the nations outside. For on the high places Balaam had seven altars prepared, with a bull and a ram on each; and to make himself acceptable to God he says, "I have arranged seven altars, and I have offered on every altar a bull and a ram." This is how man — the flesh — tries to win God over; is there anything more offensive to Him?
Balak chose Baal's ground on purpose. It backfired on him.
Balak's plan in taking Balaam up to the high places of Baal was probably that such a stronghold of his false worship would help the business in hand. Surely at such a spot Baal would help him! But he reckoned without God, and in a short time he had to listen to the good news of God from the Devil's own platform! ... But whatever the oxen and rams on the altars meant to Balaam, they suggested Christ to God; and when Christ is before Him in the perfection of His great sacrificial work, what can He do but bless His people? Balaam understood nothing of this. He was as blind as the wicked men who put the blessed Son of God upon the cross of Calvary. There was an aspect to that cross of which they knew nothing. Little did they imagine that God would bring vast blessing out of their appalling deed!
Who was Balaam really up against?
The whole question now was between God and His enemy, and it took place up at the top of the hill, the people knowing nothing at all about it. What could Balaam do with God about the people? Nothing.
- Altars. Seven altars on Baal's high ground expose the man who ordered them. God gave Israel one altar, "for the altar speaks of Christ, the only way of approach to God."
- Intent. His godly-sounding words were cover. The next chapter shows he was hunting enchantments, and his sacrifices went to the spirits he knew.
- Offence. Here is the flesh trying to win God over with offerings. Nothing is more offensive to Him.
- Reversal. The bulls and rams meant one thing to Balaam and another to God. He saw Christ in them and could only bless.
- Outcome. No pile of altars changes God's mind. God settled the matter with His enemy on the hilltop, while Israel below knew nothing about it.
And Balak did as Balaam had said; and Balak and Balaam offered up a bullock and a ram on [each] altar.
Balak has brought the hired prophet Balaam up to the high places of Baal. The first move is not a curse but a religious ceremony: seven altars, seven bulls, seven rams. The king obeys the prophet to the letter. It all looks like worship. But whose altars are these? What were the offerings for? And what did God make of them?
The place matters. One writer reads the seven altars in light of where Balak had taken Balaam.
The last verse of chapter 22 shed light upon the evil power that animated Moab and Balak their king. They had among them the "high places of Baal." So in the first verse of our chapter we read that Balaam said, "Build me here seven altars." We see at once that this man, who claimed to be a prophet of the Lord, was really in league with the powers of darkness. When in conflict with Baal, Elijah repaired the one broken-down altar of the Lord, and he prevailed. In contrast with that, we are now to see that the seven altars of Baal can achieve nothing against the blessing of God.
Balak chose that hill himself. One writer points out what he expected from it — and what he got.
Balak probably thought that such a stronghold of his false worship would be a good place for the business in hand. Surely Baal would help him there! But he had not reckoned with God, and in a short time he was forced to listen to the good news of God from the Devil's own platform. What a defeat!
The number itself is the giveaway. God's own arrangement for Israel had no room for a row of altars.
Balaam exposed his idolatrous character at once. He asked Balak to build seven altars, and offered a bull and a ram on each one. God allowed only one altar of burnt offering (Ex. 27:1; Heb. 13:10), for the altar speaks of Christ, the only way of approach to God. But Balaam believed in "many gods and many lords" (1 Cor. 8:4-5).
Commentators differ on Balaam's motive. Was he trying to bribe God, or was something darker going on?
It might be hard to work out why Balaam told Balak to build his seven altars and prepare his seven oxen and seven rams. He may have wanted to appease God by sacrifice, trying to turn Him from His purpose to bless Israel; but the sacrifices were more likely offered to the demons that lie behind all idolatrous worship, as Paul writes, "What pagans sacrifice they offer to demons and not to God" (1 Cor. 10:20).
Notice how Balaam speaks about the offerings once they are burning.
Balaam, however, as verse 3 shows, treated the offerings burned on the seven altars as Balak's. He himself went off to a lonely place, in case the Lord might meet him and instruct him there. He clearly had no sense of the supreme power and glory of Jehovah, though he knew that no power could prevail against His word. To him Jehovah was only the First among many, and not the supreme and only God.
Where did the number seven come from? And what was Balaam doing with it?
It seems that the surrounding nations borrowed from Israel not only the name "Jehovah" but also the use of the number "seven." On the high places Balaam had seven altars prepared, with a bull and a ram on each. To make himself acceptable to God he says, "I have arranged the seven altars, and I have offered on each altar a bull and a ram." This is how man — the flesh — tries to win God over. Is there anything more offensive to Him?
Here is the turn that makes the chapter good news. The animals meant one thing to the men who killed them, and something else to God.
But whatever the oxen and rams on the altars meant to Balaam, they spoke of Christ to God. When Christ is before Him in the perfection of His great sacrificial work, what can He do but bless His people? Balaam understood nothing of this. He was as blind as the wicked men who put the blessed Son of God on the cross of Calvary. There was a side to that cross of which they knew nothing. Little did they imagine that God would bring vast blessing out of their appalling deed!
- Altar — counterfeit. Seven altars rise on a high place of Baal. God had appointed one altar only, for the altar speaks of Christ, the only way to God.
- Altar — borrowed. Balaam borrows Israel's number and Israel's sacrifices and offers them as a bribe. This is the flesh trying to make itself acceptable to God.
- Altar — disowned. He calls the offerings Balak's when he leaves. Then he claims them as his own before God. He handles holy things without knowing who God is.
- Altar — unmoved. No amount of sacrifice turns God from His purpose to bless Israel. Seven altars of Baal achieve nothing against His blessing.
- Altar — overruled. Two men meant a bribe. God saw a picture of Christ and answered with blessing — the same reversal He later worked at the cross.
And Balaam said to Balak, Stand by thy burnt-offering, and I will go; perhaps Jehovah will come to meet me; and whatever he shews me I will tell thee. And he went to a hill.
Seven altars were smoking on the high places of Baal. Balaam left the king of Moab beside them and walked off alone to a bare hilltop. The word "perhaps" raises the whole question of the scene: who was he hoping to meet, and who met him?
Balaam does not stand at the altar himself. He assigns the offerings to Balak and walks away. One writer reads that as a clue to how small Balaam's God was to him.
As verse 3 shows, Balaam treated the offerings burned on the seven altars as Balak's. He himself went off to a lonely place, in case the Lord would meet him there and instruct him. He clearly had no sense of the supreme power and glory of Jehovah. Yet he knew that no power could prevail against His word.
The altars themselves tell the same story. Why seven?
Balaam exposed his idolatrous character at once. He asked Balak to build seven altars, offering a bull and a ram on each one. God allowed only one altar of burnt offering (Ex. 27:1; Heb. 13:10), for the altar speaks of Christ, the only way of approach to God. But Balaam believed in "many gods and many lords" (1 Cor. 8:4-5).
The hesitation gives the man away. Why would a prophet be unsure whether God would come?
Such a speech was an exposure of the man. Why the word "perhaps"? Did God ever refuse to meet any soul that sincerely sought Him? Why this language of uncertainty? It was pious cant. When he turned aside to "a bare height" Balaam had no wish whatever to meet Jehovah. His one desire was that Jehovah would let him alone, so that he could do what Balak wished, and so earn his reward. But God met Balaam, and put a word in his mouth, and told him to go back to Balak and speak it.
One writer finds the answer in the next chapter.
Balaam pretended that the sacrifices were for Jehovah. The first verse of the next chapter shows what he really wanted: "When Balaam saw that it pleased the LORD to bless Israel, he did not go, as at other times, to look for omens" (older translations: "to seek for enchantments"). This is the key that unlocks the puzzle. It was not Jehovah's presence he sought, but enchantments. That is, he sought the spirit or spirits he knew well, and his sacrifices were for them. This is not surprising, for Satan desires the worship that is due to God alone.
The same writer sees a double meaning in that "perhaps."
When the princes of Moab came to him in Syria, he went to seek enchantments, but each time God met him, and he probably feared the same would happen again. His words might have been a claim to be Jehovah's servant, or a sign that he feared Jehovah would step in as He had in Syria. He probably wanted Balak to think he was Jehovah's servant. It seems he succeeded in this deception, for Balak later said to him, "the LORD has held you back from honor" (Num. 24:11).
Balaam meant nothing good by the bulls and rams. But they carried a meaning he never intended.
But whatever the oxen and rams on the altars meant to Balaam, they spoke of Christ to God. And when Christ is before Him in the perfection of His great sacrificial work, what can He do but bless His people? Balaam understood nothing of this. He was as blind as the wicked men who put the blessed Son of God upon the cross of Calvary. There was an aspect to that cross of which they knew nothing.
God met Balaam, and the meeting was no favour to the prophet. It was God taking His place in front of His people.
The moment any enemy or accuser enters the scene, Jehovah places Himself in front to receive and answer the accusation. His answer is never founded on what His people are in themselves. It is founded on what He has made them through the perfection of His own work. His glory is linked with them, and in vindicating them He maintains His own glory. He places Himself between them and every accusing tongue.
- Seven altars. God appointed one altar, because the altar speaks of Christ, the only way to God. Seven altars belong to a world of many gods.
- One "perhaps." His word of doubt was pious cant. God never refuses a soul that truly seeks Him, so the doubt lay in the seeker, not in God.
- One bare height. He climbed it hoping to reach his familiar spirits, and hoping God would leave him alone. What he called seeking the Lord was seeking enchantments.
- One meaning missed. The animals meant one thing to Balaam and another to God. They spoke of Christ, and with Christ before Him God can only bless His people.
- One defender. God met Balaam. He stands between His people and every accusing tongue, and answers by what He has made them, not by what they are.
And God met Balaam; and [Balaam] said to him, I have disposed seven altars, and have offered up a bullock and a ram upon [each] altar.
Numbers 23:4 records a private meeting on a bare hilltop: God comes to a hired prophet, and the prophet answers with a list of altars. Who sought whom here, and what were those seven altars for?
The verse says God met Balaam. One writer asks what Balaam himself went up the hill to find.
When he turned aside to "a bare height" Balaam had no wish whatever to meet Jehovah. His one desire was that Jehovah would let him alone, so that he might do what Balak wished and so earn his reward. Numbers 24:1 tells us clearly that he went "to seek for enchantments." He was trying to reach the demons he was used to dealing with. But "God met Balaam" — to his dismay, we have no doubt! He told God of his altars and sacrifices. Did God not have eyes to see for Himself?
So the meeting was an interception. God stepped in front of the demons Balaam was reaching for.
The number itself gives the man away. One writer traces that count back to what Balaam believed about God.
Balaam exposed his idolatrous character at once. He asked Balak to build seven altars, and offered on each one a bull and a ram. God allowed only one altar of burnt offering (Ex. 27:1; Heb. 13:10), for the altar speaks of Christ, the only way of approach to God. But Balaam believed in "many gods and many lords" (1 Cor. 8:4-5).
Balaam's first words to God are an inventory of his own religious effort. Another writer traces the number seven itself back to Israel.
It seems that the nations outside Israel borrowed not only the name "Jehovah" but also the use of the number "seven." On the high places Balaam had seven altars prepared, with a bull and a ram on each. Then, trying to make himself acceptable to God, he says, "I have arranged the seven altars and I have offered on each altar a bull and a ram." This is how man — the flesh — tries to win God over. Is there anything more offensive to Him?
Notice what God does not say in verse 4. He gives no verdict on the altars. He just speaks.
When Balaam went to the hill, God met him. Balaam spoke to God as if the offerings had been for Him. He could deceive Balak, but he could not deceive God. God takes no notice of his sacrifices. Instead He puts a word in his mouth and commands him to "return to Balak, and this is what you shall speak." Satan may have lured his willing dupe with tempting silver and gold. But God had determined that Balaam would be the unwilling instrument to declare His thoughts about His people.
One writer asks about Balaam's motive first, then about what God saw in the same animals.
He knew that burnt offerings were acceptable to Him. But did he really imagine that sacrifices from a man like himself would please Jehovah so much that He would let him have his own way and curse the people? Whatever the oxen and rams on the altars meant to Balaam, they suggested Christ to God. And when Christ is before Him in the perfection of His great sacrificial work, what can He do but bless His people? Balaam understood nothing of this. He was as blind as the wicked men who put the blessed Son of God on the cross of Calvary. There was an aspect to that cross of which they knew nothing. Little did they imagine that God would bring vast blessing out of their appalling deed!
Israel knew nothing of this hilltop conversation. That, for one writer, is the whole comfort of the scene: when an accuser appears, God does the answering.
The moment any enemy or accuser enters the scene, Jehovah places Himself in front to receive and answer the accusation. His answer is always founded, not on what His people are in themselves, but on what He has made them through the perfection of His own work. His glory is linked with them, and in vindicating them He maintains His own glory. He places Himself between them and every accusing tongue. If the enemy comes to curse and accuse, Jehovah answers by pouring out the rich flow of His everlasting delight in those He has chosen for Himself. He has made them fit to be in His presence for ever.
- Met, not found — Balaam went out for enchantments; God crossed his path instead. The verse records God's initiative, not a prophet's success.
- Met with altars — seven altars betray a man who thinks God is one among many. God appointed one altar, and it speaks of Christ.
- Met with a boast — "I have arranged... I have offered." God takes no notice of the inventory; He puts His own word in the man's mouth.
- Met by Christ — whatever the animals meant to Balaam, they spoke to God of His Son. With Christ before Him, God can only bless.
- Met on Israel's behalf — God defended a people who never knew it. He stands between His own and every accusing tongue, answering out of His work, not theirs.
And Jehovah put a word in Balaam's mouth, and said, Return to Balak, and thus shalt thou speak.
Balak, king of Moab, has hired Balaam to curse Israel, and the sacrifices are already burning. Balaam walks off alone to see what he can get out of God — and at that moment the initiative leaves his hands.
Why the word "perhaps"? Did God ever refuse to meet any soul that sincerely sought Him? Why this language of uncertainty? It was religious pretence. When he turned aside to "a bare height" Balaam had no wish at all to meet the Lord. His one desire was that the Lord would leave him alone, so that he might do what Balak wished and earn his reward. Numbers 24:1 tells us plainly that he went "to seek for enchantments," which means he tried to get through to the demons he was used to dealing with. But "God met Balaam" — to his dismay, we have no doubt!
Balaam's first words to God are a report on his sacrifices. God's reply says nothing about them at all.
When Balaam went to the hill, God met him. Balaam spoke to God as if the offerings had been for Him. He could deceive Balak, but he could not deceive God. God takes no notice of his sacrifices. Instead He puts a word in his mouth and commands him to "return to Balak, and thus you shall speak." Satan had lured his willing victim with tempting silver and gold. But God was determined that Balaam would be the unwilling instrument to declare His thoughts about His people.
The wording here — a word put in his mouth — is what Scripture says of its true prophets.
People heard these prophets speak in a completely natural way, as one man might speak to another. But the words they spoke were the words of God, put into their mouths by the Holy Spirit... So whether we turn to Balaam or to Jeremiah there is no difference. The historian said of Balaam, the son of Beor, that "the LORD put a word in Balaam's mouth." The Lord Himself said the same of Jeremiah: "I have put my words in your mouth." So these Old Testament prophets spoke by nothing less than verbal inspiration. What they spoke were the words of the living God.
Balak and Balaam were alone on the hill, and Israel knew nothing of it. So how did the account ever reach the page?
The unwilling prophet is forced to say what the Lord put into his mouth. Here is a hint about inspiration... How did Moses find out what Balaam said? Balak would certainly not report the words to Moses, and Balaam did not tell him either. Israel did not know what happened at the different places where Balak and Balaam stood. The Holy Spirit gave the correct report to Moses of all that took place and all that was said.
God's hold on Balaam went further than his speech.
Here we see the way Balaam was brought to see the deep things of God, and to testify to His good pleasure in the people of His choice. Eyes, ears and lips were brought under the mighty power of God. He was obliged to see "the vision of the Almighty," and to hear "the words of God," and to speak what the Lord put in his mouth.
God did more than block a curse. He stepped in front of His people and answered for them Himself.
The moment any enemy or accuser comes on the scene, the Lord places Himself in front to receive the accusation and answer it. His answer never rests on what His people are in themselves. It rests on what He has made them through the perfection of His own work. His glory is linked with them, and in vindicating them He maintains His own glory. He places Himself between them and every accusing tongue.
Moses later named the reason, and one writer draws the line straight from it to the believer today.
In His righteous government He may discipline us, just as He disciplined Israel long ago. But He will never abandon His purposes of grace... Listen to Moses in Deuteronomy 23:5: "But the LORD your God would not listen to Balaam; instead the LORD your God turned the curse into a blessing for you, because the LORD your God loved you."
- Met. Balaam went looking for spirits and got God instead; the meeting he dreaded was the one he could not escape.
- Ignored. God said nothing about the altars. The sacrifices bought Him nothing, and the man who fooled Balak could not fool God.
- Filled. God refused what was in Balaam's hands but filled his mouth. Scripture uses the same wording of Jeremiah — verbal inspiration, God's own words.
- Controlled. Eyes, ears and lips came under God's power. A greedy man became the unwilling witness to God's pleasure in His people.
- Loved. God steps between His people and every accusing tongue. He answers not by what they are, but by what He has made them — because He loved them.
And he returned to him, and behold, he was standing by his burnt-offering, he, and all the princes of Moab.
Balaam has come back from the "bare height" where God met him, and Balak waits at the altar with all the princes of Moab. The burnt offering the king stands beside, not the price he paid, will decide what happens.
Balak has not come alone. The nobility of his whole kingdom stands with him at the altars.
A distinguished gathering awaited Balaam. The King stood by the altars, surrounded by all the princes of his realm. Surely there was never a more important occasion in the history of Moab! Balak had taken much trouble, and gone to considerable expense to get Balaam's help... Balaam returned from the "bare height" where God stepped in and spoke to him. Balak and his princes were full of expectation. What would he say? Would he pour out curses to destroy the power of the people they dreaded? Then the armies of Moab and her allies could easily destroy them.
The verse fixes Balak in one place — beside his burnt offering. The attack on Israel was launched from that spot, and that is where it failed.
The attack begins with an elaborate set of mysterious rites and sacrifices by the king and Balaam. They then look at the unsuspecting Israelites from the top of the hills. They prepare to call up the mysterious power and evil craft of the demonic realms against them. But Balaam stood too near to the burnt sacrifice (Num. 23:6) to be able to do this. The savour of what represented the work of Christ rose up to the God who never fails to honour that sacrifice. So the curse becomes a blessing.
The men at the altar had no idea what they had put in front of God.
But whatever the oxen and rams on the altars meant to Balaam, they suggested Christ to God. When Christ is before Him in the perfection of His great sacrificial work, what can He do but bless His people? Balaam understood nothing of this. He was as blind as the wicked men who put the blessed Son of God upon the cross of Calvary. There was a side to that cross of which they knew nothing.
Balaam's words to Balak sounded like reverence for the Lord. One line in the next chapter shows what he was really doing.
Balaam pretended that the sacrifices were to Jehovah. He said to Balak, "Stand by your burnt offering, and I will go: perhaps the Lord will come to meet me." The first verse of the next chapter shows what Balaam really sought: "When Balaam saw that it pleased the Lord to bless Israel, he did not go, as at other times, to seek for enchantments." This is the key that unlocks the puzzle. It was not Jehovah's presence he sought, but enchantments.
Balaam comes back down with a word, but not the one he went looking for.
Balaam spoke to God as if the offerings had been for Him. He could deceive Balak, but he could not deceive God. God takes no notice of his sacrifices. Instead He puts a word in his mouth and commands him to "return to Balak, and this is what you shall speak" (Num. 23:5). Satan lured his willing dupe with tempting silver and gold. But God had determined that Balaam would be His unwilling instrument, to declare His thoughts of His people.
The verse names Balak and his princes. It says nothing about the people they are discussing.
What a remarkable scene this is! And Israel is completely unaware of how they were being presented to Balak, their enemy, by the word of God... There was nothing of Israel's weaknesses or sins unknown to God, but He had not cursed them. They were loved as the chosen people of God. This was not because of what they were in themselves, but because of the promises made to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and because of God's sovereign choice and sovereign love.
Balak's attempt to curse Israel is what drew out this description of them.
Humanly speaking, we never should have had such a glorious view of Israel... had not Balak sought to curse them... Balak and Balaam with "all the princes of Moab" may gather to hear Israel cursed and defied; they may "build seven altars"... but not all the powers of earth and hell, men and devils combined, in their dark and terrible array, can produce a single breath of curse or accusation against the Israel of God.
- The altar decides. Balak stands beside a burnt offering he did not understand. That sacrifice, not his money or his princes, settles the outcome.
- The savour rises. Whatever the oxen and rams meant to Balaam, to God they suggested Christ. He never fails to honour that sacrifice.
- The pretence fails. Balaam's talk of meeting the Lord covered a search for enchantments. God took no notice of his sacrifices.
- The mouth is commandeered. The man hired to curse became God's unwilling instrument. He declared God's own thoughts about His people.
- The blessing is sovereign. Israel knew nothing of the plot and was far from faultless. God loved them for His promises and His choice, so the curse could only turn into blessing.
And he took up his parable, and said, Balak the king of Moab hath brought me from Aram, from the mountains of the east Come, curse me Jacob, and come, denounce Israel!
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
How shall I curse whom God hath not cursed? or how shall I denounce whom Jehovah doth not denounce?
Balak hired a prophet to curse Israel, and paid for altars and sacrifices to get it done. What came back was a question that handed the whole matter over to God.
Balaam is not saying the job is too hard for him. He is saying God has already settled it, and God told him so before he ever left home. One writer notes that two different names for God sit in the two halves of the line. What God said in private, Balaam must now say in public:
Balaam first states Balak's summons and his wish that he should curse Jacob and denounce Israel. Then he states that to curse and to denounce is impossible. God has not cursed him; He has not denounced him. In the original the name El, God, goes with Jacob, and Jehovah, the covenant-keeping God, goes with Israel. When Balak's messengers came to Balaam, God had said to him, "You shall not curse the people, for they are blessed." What God told him there in secret he must now speak here in public.
Balak's plan does not just fail. It produces the very thing he was trying to prevent. The curse he paid for turns into a blessing said out loud:
Balaam stated clearly what Balak expected. Then he had to say, "How can I curse whom God has not cursed? How can I denounce whom the LORD has not denounced?" This should have been enough to break up the meeting. No success was possible. What followed proved it: the more the enemies of God's people tried to draw out a curse against them, the fuller and richer the blessing flowed.
Israel knew nothing about the plot against them. They asked for nothing and prayed for nothing, and God guarded them anyway. Balak's own words fell back on him:
The great principle of the Balaam history is that God was the unasked Guardian and Blesser of His people. The schemes of enemies go on, unknown to Israel, who therefore seeks nothing from God. But He is active for His people out of His own grace to them, and nothing escapes Him… Balak said, "He whom you bless is blessed, and he whom you curse is cursed." He was trying to bring the curse on Israel when God had said, "Blessed are those who bless you, and cursed are those who curse you." So he was just bringing it on himself.
Balaam was standing high up, looking down on the camp. That physical position pictures something: he is not seeing Israel as their neighbours saw them, but as God sees them — and that is the only reason a blessing is possible at all.
Here we get the answer to the great question: how can God bless a people who in themselves are stiff-necked and rebellious? He can bless them only as He views them from His own standpoint, from the point of His purpose, and with the work of His blessed Son in view. That work is the righteous ground on which He can bless man in a way that agrees with His attributes.
Timing explains Balaam's failure. He came too late: the evil state that a curse could fasten on had already been dealt with. One writer draws a line from that to where the believer stands today:
This also shows us why Balaam could not curse the people. He came after the evil state that the curse belonged to had, as a picture, been removed in death. He also came after the song of the springing well had been sung, and that song speaks of the Spirit. So Romans raises the same challenge: "Who shall bring any charge against God's elect?" For those who are in Christ Jesus there can be no condemnation (verse 1), no accusation (verse 33), and no separation (verse 39).
What was true for a nation camped in the plains of Moab is applied by more than one writer to Christians now. The identity of the people has widened; the principle has not moved:
So Balaam was forced to say, "How shall I curse whom God has not cursed? And how shall I denounce whom the Lord has not denounced?" If this is true of Israel, it is certainly true also of those who today are redeemed by the precious blood of Christ. God will not allow them to be cursed.
- Settled — Balaam cannot curse, because God has not cursed. He can only say in public what God told him in private.
- Unasked — Israel never prayed about Balaam, because Israel never knew. God guarded them out of His own grace, unasked.
- Standpoint — God blesses a stiff-necked people only as He sees them from His own side. The righteous ground is the work of His Son.
- Backfire — Every new try to force a curse drew out a fuller blessing. The curse fell back on the man who paid for it.
- Yours — No prophet could reverse God's word over Israel. No accuser can reverse it for those in Christ Jesus: no condemnation, no accusation, no separation.
For from the top of the rocks I see him, and from the hills I behold him Lo, [it is] a people that shall dwell alone and shall not be reckoned among the nations.
Balak hired Balaam to curse Israel. Instead, looking down on the camp from a height, Balaam blessed them. He saw a people God had set apart for Himself. Two questions follow: what does it mean to "dwell alone," and why could no curse touch this people?
(The quotes below say "the top of the rocks." That is an older wording for "the top of the crags.")
Balaam's problem was not lack of will but lack of permission.
Even from the enemy's standpoint you can see that the people of God are different from other people. The curse he wanted to hurl dies unspoken on Balaam's lips. Jacob, the supplanter, cannot be cursed; and Israel, God's prince, cannot be defied. El, the Mighty One, has not cursed! Jehovah — the truth-keeping covenant God — has not defied!
Balaam sees Israel from a height, and where he stands changes what he sees.
Here we get the solution to the great question: how can God bless a people who in themselves are stubborn and rebellious? He can do it only as He views them from His own standpoint, from the point of His purpose. He also has the work of His blessed Son in view. That work is the righteous ground on which He can bless man in a way that matches His own character.
That same view changes how we treat one another.
If I look at the people of God "from the top of the rocks," I shall see them as God sees them. I shall see them clothed with all the beauty of Christ — complete in Him, accepted in the Beloved. This is what will enable me to get on with them, to work with them, to have fellowship with them. It lifts me above their points and angles, their blots and blemishes, their failures and weaknesses. If I do not look at them from this high, divine ground, I shall be sure to fix my eye on some little flaw. That will spoil my communion and cool my affection.
So what does "dwell alone" mean?
He states in the plainest way the great and certainly basic privilege of Israel. They were a nation called out to be alone with Jehovah and for Him. This is the basis of all their blessing. They were unlike all the rest of the world in this: they were set apart to be with Jehovah, the true God.
Does this make Israel better than everyone else?
Here we have Israel singled out and set apart to be a separate and distinct people. According to God's thought about them, they were never to be mixed in with the nations or counted among them — not at any time, on any ground, or for any purpose whatever. This is true of Abraham's literal descendants, and true of all believers now. God's people are to be separated to Him. Not because they are better than others, but because of what God is, and of what He would always have His people to be.
Being uncounted by the world sounds like loss. One writer answers that the emptiness is filled by a Guest.
If they are content to "dwell alone," and content not to be "counted among the nations," God Himself will come and live among them. What a wonderful word that is: "Judah became His sanctuary!" Here was a place where the Creator could find rest. All around, the waves of sin rolled over everything. And this is the positive side of separation.
Balaam spoke the truth under compulsion. What he later advised shows he understood exactly what he had said.
Under the compelling power of God, this evil man speaks of the people dwelling alone. But when he had the chance, he advised Israel's enemies to mingle with them. He knew full well what would happen if Israel were drawn into sinful ties with the nations around. Their witness to their God would weaken.
Centuries later, the words still hold.
Other races have merged, and their national identity has been lost. Israel remains distinct still, not counted among the nations, just as Balaam said.
- Alone by God's choice. God set Israel apart to be with Him and for Him. That standing is His gift and the basis of all their blessing, not a reward for being better than others.
- Alone, so no curse lands. Because God had not cursed them, Balaam could not; the verdict was already spoken from above.
- Alone, seen from above. God views His people from His own standpoint and purpose, with the work of His Son as the ground of blessing.
- Alone, so God moves in. Not counted among the nations, they have God Himself living among them. That is separation's positive side.
- Alone, and still standing. Balaam knew mixing would break the witness, and advised it. Nations have merged and vanished; Israel remains uncounted among them.
Who can count the dust of Jacob, and the number of the fourth part of Israel? Let my soul die the death of the righteous, and let my end be like his!
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And Balak said to Balaam, What hast thou done to me? I took thee to curse mine enemies, and behold, thou hast blessed them altogether.
Balak paid for a curse and got a blessing. His protest here is the cry of a man learning that a prophet's words are not for sale. It raises the question the Balaam story exists to answer: who decides whether God's people are blessed or cursed?
Balak is angry and stunned. Stranger still, he does not send the failed prophet home. He asks for a second try from another hilltop.
Balak was astounded and indignant at what Balaam said concerning Israel. Balaam could only reply that he was in the hands of Jehovah. Do we wonder that Balak did not at once drive the prophet out of his territory? Sadly, flesh is always foolish and stubborn toward God (Rom. 1:22; Eph. 4:18). The king suggested that they go to another place and try again.
The new location came with a smaller view of Israel, as if seeing less of the people would make them easier to curse.
Was he so foolish as to think that if they took a more limited view of God's people that would make any difference? How very little these two men really knew of God!
"What have you done to me?" Balak asks, as if the outcome had been the prophet's choice. It was not. Balaam had every reason to want to curse Israel, and no power to do it.
God had committed Himself to bless Israel. So Balaam said, "Behold, I received a command to bless: He has blessed, and I cannot revoke it." Israel's blessing came from God, and Balaam had to announce it. If Balaam had the power to reverse God's blessing, he would gladly have done it. Balak's silver and gold were worth more in his eyes than the people God had blessed.
The bargaining on the hilltop happened out of Israel's sight and hearing. They never asked for protection; they never knew they needed it.
How little did Israel know or imagine what was going on between Jehovah and the enemy. They may have been complaining in their tents at the very moment when God was displaying their perfection through the mouth of the greedy prophet. Balak would gladly have Israel cursed; but, blessed be God, He will not allow anyone to curse His people. He may have to deal with them Himself, in secret, about many things. But He will not let anyone else speak a word against them.
Balak calls Israel "my enemies" — but Israel had been forbidden to attack Moab. He aimed his hired curse at a people God had promised to bless. The words fell back on him.
The great principle of the Balaam story is that God was the uninvited Guardian and Blesser of His people. The schemes of enemies go on, and Israel knows nothing of them. So Israel asks nothing from God. But He is active for His people out of His own grace to them, and nothing escapes Him... First Israel was forbidden to touch Moab. Next Balak says, "The one you bless is blessed, and the one you curse is cursed." He was seeking to bring the curse on Israel, though God had said, "Blessed is he who blesses you, and cursed is he who curses you." So he was just bringing it on himself.
The altars on the hilltop were built to buy a curse. The reason it never came lies in what those sacrifices represented.
But Balaam stood too near to the burnt sacrifice (Num. 23:6) to be able to curse them. The fragrance of what that sacrifice represented — the work of Christ — went up to God, who never fails to honour it. So the curse is changed into a blessing.
Balak would not quit. His stubbornness is the very reason each blessing came out richer than the last.
Hatred and unbelief think of circumstances... His persistence in seeking the curse enlarged the blessing; it is always so. He does not know God. And God could not just repeat the blessing already given, so He kept unfolding it further.
Commentators say the same protection covers more than Israel.
If this is true of Israel, it is certainly true also of those who today are redeemed by the precious blood of Christ. God will not allow them to be cursed.
- Hired — Balak paid for a curse. The prophet was greedy enough to deliver it, but the words were never his.
- Unasked — God guarded a people who never asked Him to. They may have been complaining in their tents at that very hour.
- Unbreakable — the man hired to undo God's blessing could not take back one word of it.
- Rebounding — the curse aimed at God's people fell on the one who paid for it.
- Enlarged — each new try at cursing drew out fuller blessing. That same protection covers all who are redeemed by the blood of Christ.
And he answered and said, Must I not take heed to speak that which Jehovah puts in my mouth?
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And Balak said to him, Come, I pray thee, with me to another place, from whence thou wilt see them; thou shalt see only the extremity of them and shalt not see them all, and curse me them from thence.
Balak hired Balaam to curse Israel and heard him bless them instead. So he tries a new tactic: not a new prophet, but a new viewpoint. Can moving the prophet change what God has already decided?
One writer sees a calculation behind Balak's choice of viewpoint:
Chapter 22:41 tells us that Balak brought Balaam to the high places of Baal to prophesy against Israel. Here he saw only "a portion of the people" (NASB). Balak wanted Balaam to think that Israel was not a large nation, so that he might curse them more safely.
That plan backfired:
Balak's first effort is to diminish them in Balaam's eyes — he would not have him see too much. This gives force to what Balaam says: "Who can count the dust of Jacob, and the number of the fourth part of Israel?" The end camp was only the fourth part. The partial view did not diminish the greatness of the people. It only moved him to say, "If only the end is so much, what must be the whole?"
Commentators differ on what the new place was meant to show. Some read Balak as narrowing the view further. Others say the Hebrew points the other way, and that older English translations have misled readers:
In Hebrew, future and present are the same tense. With Keil, we need only read the present instead of the future: "you see only the outermost part of them," instead of "you shall see." From where he had been standing, he had seen only the outermost part of them. Now Balak is going to show him all. He thinks he made a mistake before, and that this was perhaps why he had not succeeded. Divination depended on what was before the eyes.
On this reading, the wider view makes the coming verdict unanswerable:
What force this gives to the announcement! Balaam is looking over the whole camp, from one end to the other: "God has not beheld iniquity in Jacob"! ... Balak might have said, "Balaam, you may see no spot there, but there are plenty elsewhere." Now it is impossible to say so. Look where you will: those whom God has justified cannot be condemned.
Behind the request lies a small idea of God, as if His mind depended on geography. One writer compares a later enemy of Israel who made the same mistake:
What low and contemptible thoughts both King and prophet had of their Creator! They imagined that such tricks and changes of position could completely change His mind about His people. The King of Syria and his advisers were just as stupid when they were at war with Israel in the days of Ahab. They said that the Lord was God of the hills, but not of the valleys. So if the Syrians fought on the lower ground, the victory would be theirs (1 Kings 20).
God had already told Balaam plainly that these people could not be cursed. That he moved on to a new hilltop anyway shows where his heart was:
Balak seems to have imagined that the huge numbers of Israel were the reason Balaam was afraid to curse them. Should Balaam not have said to him: "I cannot go on with this. The Lord has told me clearly, both in Syria and here, that the people cannot be cursed, for He has blessed them"? Balaam stayed with Balak and went where Balak wanted. That shows clearly that he would gladly have cursed God's people if it had been in his power.
Balak kept changing the conditions. He assumed the blessing depended on something in Israel itself. It did not:
At first Balak had evidently thought that if Balaam saw only a small number, he would count them as unimportant, and so curse them. Now he has to change his mind... Balak did not know why God blessed Israel. It was not because they were worthy of blessing. It was because they were His people, chosen by sovereign grace, and redeemed from sin and slavery by the Passover and the crossing of the Red Sea.
The next hilltop carried a fitting name:
The place of the second prophecy is the field of Zophim on the top of Pisgah. "Zophim" means "watchers," and Pisgah, with its wide view, was just the right place for them. It suits the purpose of God all the more to bring out His thoughts about His people.
- Move — Balak answers a failed curse with a change of scenery, not a change of heart. He assumes the verdict depends on the viewpoint.
- View — he first tried to shrink Israel in the prophet's eyes. The small part Balaam saw only made him wonder at the size of the whole.
- God — a new hilltop cannot change the mind of the Creator, any more than fighting in the valleys could.
- Ground — the blessing rested on God's choice and redemption, not on anything Balaam could see or count.
- Result — even with the whole camp in view, the verdict stands: those whom God has justified cannot be condemned.
And he took him to the watchmen's field, to the top of Pisgah, and built seven altars, and offered up a bullock and a ram on [each] altar.
From the high places of Baal, Balak heard Israel blessed instead of cursed. So he tries again: a new hill, fresh altars, the same paid prophet. The verse raises the question the chapter answers. Can a new view, or more sacrifices, change what God has said about His people?
Balak blamed the first failure on where they stood. So he moved the prophet and rebuilt everything.
Balak now took Balaam "into the field of Zophim, to the top of Pisgah," and there he built seven fresh altars and offered a bull and a ram on each one. What low and shameful thoughts both king and prophet had of their Creator! They imagined that such schemes and changes of position could change His mind about His people. The king of Syria and his advisers were just as stupid when they were at war with Israel in the days of Ahab. They suggested that the Lord was God of the hills, but not of the valleys. So if the Syrians fought on the lower ground, victory would be theirs (1 Kings 20).
The mistake behind the move was not geography. It was the king's idea of God.
Balak still hoped that Balaam might be allowed to curse Israel. He had no idea of the faithful, unchanging nature of the living God.
The name of the field is not decoration. It marks a spot chosen for seeing.
"Zophim" means "watchers," for whom Pisgah, with its width of view, was just the right place. Balak knew all about this place, of course; and many a keen and jealous eye, no doubt, had watched the camp from there. All the more, this suits God's purpose of bringing out His thoughts about His people.
From the high places of Baal, Balaam had seen only the edge of Israel. Balak now corrects that, and in doing so hands God a wider stage than he intended.
From the place where he had been standing, he had seen but the outermost part of them; now Balak is going to show him all. He thinks he made a mistake before, and that this was perhaps why he had not succeeded. Divination depended on what was before the eyes. Balaam is now looking over the whole camp, from one end to the other. Think what force that gives to the announcement: "God has not beheld iniquity in Jacob"! How it would spoil this to suppose that Balaam had here only got a partial view! Balak might have said, "Balaam, you may see no spot there, but there are plenty elsewhere." Now it is impossible to say so. Look where you will: those whom God has justified cannot be condemned.
Balak's first calculation had failed. His second rested on a mistake about why God blesses at all.
At first Balak had clearly thought that if Balaam saw only a small number, he would think of them as insignificant, and so curse them. Now he has to change his mind. If a small number could be blessed, perhaps Balaam would decide that a large number was less likely to deserve blessing. Balak did not know why God blessed Israel. It was not because they were worthy of blessing. It was because they were His people, chosen by sovereign grace, and redeemed from sin and slavery by the Passover and the crossing of the Red Sea.
The sacrifices repeat the first set: seven altars, a bull and a ram on each. Writers see human religion at work here.
This is how man — the flesh — would try to propitiate God. Is there anything more offensive to Him?
The number of altars is the giveaway, and it points to what Balaam believed.
God allowed only one altar of burnt offering (Ex. 27:1; Heb. 13:10), for the altar speaks of Christ, the only way of approach to God. But Balaam believed in "many gods and many lords" (1 Cor. 8:4-5).
Israel had no idea any of this was happening. That is exactly the comfort of the scene.
The moment any enemy or accuser enters the scene, the Lord places Himself in front to receive and answer the accusation. His answer never rests on what His people are in themselves. It rests on what He has made them through the perfection of His own work. His glory is linked with them, and in vindicating them He maintains His own glory. He places Himself between them and every accusing tongue.
- Move. Balak shifts Balaam to Zophim on Pisgah, imagining a change of position could change God's mind about Israel.
- Motive. The move exposes a man with no idea of God's unchanging faithfulness, or why God blessed Israel — by sovereign grace, not merit.
- Machinery. Seven altars and fresh sacrifices are human religion at work. God's own way of approach was a single altar, pointing to Christ.
- Magnitude. The wider view backfires. With the whole camp in sight, the verdict "God has not beheld iniquity in Jacob" covers every part of it. Those God has justified cannot be condemned.
- Mediator. Behind the scenes, God steps in front of His accused people. He answers on the ground of His own work in them, not their record.
And [Balaam] said to Balak, Stand here by thy burnt-offering, and I will go to meet yonder.
Balak's first try to have Israel cursed has failed, so he moves the prophet to a new hilltop and builds fresh altars. Two questions follow: can a change of place change God's mind, and whom was Balaam going out to meet?
Moving the ritual to the top of Pisgah was Balak's idea of a fix. One writer calls this a low view of God, and compares it to a later enemy who thought God's power stopped at the hills:
Balak now took Balaam "into the field of Zophim, to the top of Pisgah." There seven fresh altars were built, and a bull and a ram were offered on each one. What low and shameful thoughts both king and prophet had of their Creator! They imagined that such schemes and changes of position could completely change His mind about His people. The king of Syria and his advisers were just as stupid when they were at war with Israel in the days of Ahab. They suggested that Jehovah was God of the hills, but not of the valleys. So if the Syrians fought on the lower ground, victory would be theirs (1 Kings 20).
Balak moved Balaam to a spot with a fuller view of the camp. There his sentence breaks off. English versions, including the ESV above, add "the LORD," but the Hebrew does not:
It seems Balak tried to make Israel look fewer and weaker in Balaam's eyes. He first took him to a place where he could see only a part of them, the outermost part, a fourth of the people. When that plan failed, Balak took Balaam to Pisgah, where the view was more complete. Here Balaam tells Balak to stand by the burnt offering while, he says, "I go to meet." The King James Version says "the Lord," but that word does not appear in the original. In Hebrew it reads, "I will go to meet — over there."
Another writer hears in this the speech of a man who has lost his bearings:
He tells Balak, "Stand here by your burnt offering, while I go and meet — over there." He does not seem to know whom he was going to meet. It is all the most thorough and perfect confusion.
Balaam was not looking for the LORD at all. One writer draws comfort from what happened next:
The words "the Lord" should not have been put into the King James Version of Numbers 23:15. Balaam said to Balak, "stand here by your burnt offering while I meet over there." He did not go to meet Jehovah; he did not wish Him to cross his path again. Numbers 24:1 says plainly that he went "to look for omens"; but Jehovah, in His love to His people (though they were unworthy), would not allow this. So He stepped in a second time, and met Balaam... It is immense comfort to our souls to note these divine activities. The God with whom we have to do delights to "stand between us and the foe."
The name of the place Balak chose works against him:
The place of the second prophecy is the field of Zophim on the top of Pisgah. "Zophim" means "watchers," and Pisgah, with its wide view, was just the right place for them. Balak knew all about this place, of course, and no doubt many a keen and jealous eye had watched the camp from there. All the more, as we have seen, it suits the purpose of God to bring out His thoughts about His people.
Balak waited by his burnt offering for a better answer. He did not get one:
Whatever Balaam's purpose was in raising his altars, he had to learn one thing. No amount of sacrifice could make God change His mind. "God is not man, that he should lie, or a son of man, that he should change his mind" (Numbers 23:19). God could count Israel as His chosen people, quite apart from what they were in themselves. So "He has not beheld misfortune in Jacob, nor has he seen trouble in Israel." God viewed them in the light of His purpose. Not all the altars and sacrifices — whether to Jehovah or to the spirit Balaam consulted — could change God's purpose to bless those He had chosen.
- New place. Balak disliked the blessing, so he tried a new hilltop and more altars — as if a change of scenery could change God's mind.
- Vague word. Balaam says only that he will go and meet "over there." The name "the LORD" is not in the original. One writer calls the whole scene perfect confusion.
- Wrong appointment. He was not seeking Jehovah at all but omens, and had no wish for Jehovah to cross his path again.
- God intercepted. In love for an unworthy people, God met him anyway and put His own word in his mouth — He delights to stand between His people and the foe.
- Fixed blessing. From the field of "watchers," with the camp in full view, God brought out His own thoughts about Israel. No altar and no sacrifice could move His purpose to bless.
And Jehovah met Balaam, and put a word in his mouth, and said, Return to Balak, and thus shalt thou speak.
Balak has moved Balaam to a new lookout on the top of Pisgah and built seven fresh altars. He hopes a change of place will change God's mind about Israel. Instead, God meets the prophet a second time and hands him words he never wanted to speak.
Before he withdrew, Balaam told Balak he would go and meet "yonder," naming no one. (The ESV supplies "the LORD" here; commentators note those words were added by translators.) One writer reads that vagueness as evasion:
He does not claim to be going to meet Jehovah; he only says, "I will go to meet yonder." The prophet would have been glad to meet his familiar spirits at the meeting place, but instead, "The LORD met Balaam." Balaam had chosen to ignore the plain command of Jehovah about His people. Now he must be the unwilling instrument for announcing His thoughts about them.
Balaam had no wish to meet God again. God stepped in anyway, and one writer explains why:
He did not go to meet Jehovah; he did not want Him to cross his path again. Numbers 24:1 says plainly that he went "to look for omens"; but Jehovah, in His love for His people (unworthy as they were), would not allow this. So He stepped in a second time and met Balaam. He put a fresh word in his mouth and said, "Go again to Balak and speak thus." It is a great comfort to our souls to notice these actions of God. The God we deal with delights to "stand between us and the foe."
A word "put in the mouth" leaves the speaker no say in what he says. Balaam had once reported only part of what God told him. This time he could not hold anything back:
Back with Balak, Balaam has to speak the word that God had put in his mouth. This time God will not let him keep anything back. He had told only part of the truth to the leaders of Moab, when God commanded him not to go with them and not to curse His people. Now he must speak all that God has given him. What he says takes the form of a parable or proverb. It is a revelation from God, and it points forward as prophecy.
The message Balaam carries back corrects Balak's idea of God. Balak thought God could be talked round:
Balak had no proper idea of who God is. So Balaam told him, "God is not man, that He should lie, or a son of man, that He should change His mind." This was a lesson both Balak and Balaam needed. Because they could change their minds to suit themselves, they thought God was the same kind of being as they were.
That is why the second try fails just as the first did. One writer carries the comfort further:
Now it is impossible for God to lie, as Titus 1:2 tells us. His word stands: when He speaks, He makes it good. God's blessing rested on Israel, and no power of the adversary that Balaam could use could reverse it. The blessings given to the church are far higher than those given to Israel. So as we think about the spiritual and heavenly blessings that are ours in Christ, let us rejoice in the assurance these verses give.
The word God gives is not about how Israel was behaving in the camp below. It shows Israel as God Himself sees them:
Here we find ourselves on truly high ground, and on ground as solid as it is high. This is, in truth, "the top of the rocks" — the pure air and wide view of "the hills," where the people of God are seen only in "the vision of the Almighty." They are seen as He sees them, without spot or wrinkle or anything like that. All their flaws are hidden from view, and all His beauty is seen upon them.
- Met. Balaam went out hoping for a familiar spirit, not for God. God met him instead and stopped the second try as He stopped the first.
- Guarded. God stepped in because He loves His people. He "delights to stand between us and the foe," so the door Balaam wanted was shut.
- Compelled. A word put in the mouth leaves nothing to the speaker. Balaam had once held part of the truth back. Now he must deliver all of it.
- Unchanging. God is not a man who lies or changes His mind. So the blessing He has already spoken cannot be reversed.
- Seen. From the heights, God describes Israel as He sees them, not as they were behaving. Writers apply the same assurance to believers blessed in Christ.
And he came to him, and behold, he was standing by his burnt-offering, and the princes of Moab with him; and Balak said to him, What has Jehovah spoken?
Balaam has just met God a second time on Pisgah, where the king of Moab waits beside fresh altars with his princes around him. The king's question sounds reverent, but he had wanted this prophet to curse Israel.
Balak stands by his burnt offering again, but on new ground.
Balak now took Balaam "to the field of Zophim, to the top of Pisgah," and there they built seven fresh altars and offered a bull and a ram on each one. What low and shameful thoughts both the king and the prophet had of their Creator! They imagined that such tricks and changes of place could completely change His mind about His people. The king of Syria and his advisers were just as foolish in Ahab's day. They said Jehovah was God of the hills but not of the valleys, so the Syrians expected victory if they fought on lower ground (1 Kings 20).
Before this verse, Balaam told Balak to wait while he went off alone. What happened out of sight explains the message he brings back.
The words "the Lord" do not belong in the older English translation of Numbers 23:15. Balaam said to Balak, "Stand here by your burnt offering while I meet over there." He was not going out to meet Jehovah. He did not want Him to cross his path again. Numbers 24:1 says directly that he went "to look for omens." But Jehovah loved His people, unworthy as they were, and He would not allow this. So He stepped in a second time, and met Balaam. He put a fresh word in his mouth and said, "Go again to Balak and speak this way." It is an immense comfort to our souls to notice these divine activities. The God with whom we have to do delights to "stand between us and the foe."
So Balaam comes back to Balak carrying words he did not choose.
The place-name carries its own message, and Balak was not hearing the answer alone.
There, at the "Watchman's field," Jehovah was indeed watching over His beloved people. He put a word in Balaam's mouth, and Balaam had to speak it to the man who wanted him to curse God's people. Balak was not alone; his princes were with him as witnesses to what the God of Israel thought of His people. Balaam claimed to be the Lord's servant, and Balak asked him what the Lord had spoken. So he had no excuse. He himself admitted that the message through Balaam came from Jehovah, the God of Israel.
Balak names the LORD, yet he is not waiting on God — he is hoping for better news. One writer sets him beside Cornelius, a man who invited Peter to Caesarea and then listened.
Balak's question when Balaam returned to him was remarkable: "What has Jehovah spoken?" But we know he was not willing to accept whatever Jehovah might choose to say. His hope was that the second message would be more favourable to Moab than the first. What a delightful contrast is the attitude of Cornelius and his friends! Peter went to them in Caesarea at their invitation, and they told him: "You have been kind enough to come. Now therefore we are all here in the presence of God to hear all that you have been commanded by the Lord." (Acts 10:33) Such an attitude of soul brings blessing.
A person can ask what God has said and still be no better for the answer.
Balaam's reply is not another excuse about being unable to curse. It is a statement about who God is.
He returns to Balak, but this time he does more than confess that he cannot curse. There is a commanding power in his reply: "God is not man, that He should lie." The word Balaam uses here — "El" — expresses absolute Deity. This sets man in sharp contrast with God in His essential Being. Blessing — our blessing through grace — depends on what He is.
One writer draws out the difference between God and people:
Men lie to one another, but God is altogether different. Men may change their minds, because they do not know where their own commitments will lead; but God knows the end from the beginning and has no need to change His mind. What He had said to Balaam and through Balaam, He would carry out; He would accomplish every word.
- Position. Balak changed the place, the altars and the view. He imagined new scenery could change God's mind about His people.
- Protection. Balaam went off hoping to find omens. God met him instead, because He delights to stand between His people and their enemy.
- Publicity. The princes of Moab stood there as witnesses. Balak's own question admitted the message came from the God of Israel, so he had no excuse.
- Posture. Asking what God has said is not the same as accepting it. Balak wanted a better answer; Cornelius wanted the answer.
- Permanence. The reply moved from Balaam's weakness to God's nature. God does not lie and does not change His mind, so He will carry out every word He has spoken.
Then he took up his parable and said, Rise up, Balak, and hear! hearken unto me, son of Zippor!
Balak's first attempt to get Israel cursed has failed. He moves Balaam to a new spot and asks again what the LORD has said. The answer opens with a command, not a curse: the king must stand up and listen.
Older translations render this phrase "took up his parable." That wording can mislead a reader today.
The Old Testament often uses the word "parable" for figurative language where no actual parable is told. So Balaam "took up his parable," Numbers 23:7, 18, and Job "continued his parable," Job 27:1; 29:1.
The reason a second discourse exists is that Balak thought a different view of Israel would produce a different verdict.
This setback did not stop Balak. He suggested they go to another place to see the armies of Israel: "You shall see only a fraction of them and shall not see them all. Then curse them for me from there." Was he so foolish as to think a more limited view of God's people would make any difference? How very little these two men really knew of God!
The summons names the king himself. Other men heard it too.
Balak was not alone; his princes were with him as witnesses to what the God of Israel thought of His people. Balaam claimed to be the Lord's servant, and Balak asked him what the Lord had spoken. This left him without excuse. He had admitted that the message through Balaam came from the LORD, the God of Israel.
Balak had asked his question expecting a softer answer the second time. He got a rebuke instead.
What an awful rebuke this was to unbelieving Balak. He had surely expected a change in the mind of that God whose aid and help Balaam was to call upon. Maybe he thought that God would give way after a second asking. Maybe He would let Balaam speak a kinder word, as He did when Balak's princes first came to him. Instead, Balaam shouts to Balak to rise and listen, with an awful commanding voice — for so it must have been. Now Balak hears that God's promises to Israel are unchangeable. Nothing can ever reverse them.
Balaam has more to say this time than he did the first time.
Balaam continued: "Behold, I received a command to bless: He has blessed, and I cannot revoke it." This is a step beyond his first message. "God has not cursed"; now he passes from the negative to the positive. "He has blessed" — but his added words were venomous: "and I cannot revoke it." He would gladly have done so for reward. But how delightful to our souls to hear the enemy of God's people confess in public that he cannot reverse God's grace towards His chosen.
Balak is commanded to listen, and he does listen — and gains nothing. The difference between his posture and a believing one is set out plainly.
Balak's question when Balaam returned was remarkable: "What has the LORD spoken?" Yet from what we know of him, he was not willing to accept whatever the LORD chose to say. His hope was that the second message would be more favourable to Moab than the first. What a delightful contrast was the attitude of Cornelius and his friends! They had invited Peter to Caesarea, and when he came they said: "You have done well to come. So now we are all here in the presence of God to hear all that you have been commanded by the Lord" (Acts 10:33). Such an attitude of soul brings blessing.
- Rise — the man Balak hired orders the king to his feet; the king who paid for a curse becomes the audience for a blessing.
- Hear — "taking up a parable" means figurative speech, not a story with a hidden meaning; Balaam speaks only what God commands him to say.
- Named — "son of Zippor" makes it personal, and his princes stand by as witnesses, so he has no excuse.
- Unchanged — a new place and a narrower view of Israel change nothing. Balak hoped a second asking would soften God's mind. Instead he hears that nothing can reverse the promise.
- Unmoved — Balak hears and gains nothing. Cornelius and his friends gathered to hear all that God commanded. The command to hear blesses only those willing to accept the answer.
God is not a man, that he should lie; neither a son of man, that he should repent. Shall he say and not do? and shall he speak and not make it good?
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
Behold, I have received [mission] to bless; and he hath blessed, and I cannot reverse it.
Balak paid Balaam to curse Israel, but the prophet must bless instead — and that blessing cannot be taken back. So what does a people's blessing rest on, if not on how they behave? (Older translations, quoted by the writers below, read "I cannot reverse it.")
This is Balaam's second try, and his words go further than the first time.
Here Balaam goes further than he did in his first message. Then it was "God has not cursed"; now he moves from the negative to the positive: "He has blessed." But his added words carry poison: "and I cannot reverse it." He would gladly have reversed it for a reward. What a delight to our souls, to hear the enemy of God's people confess in public that he has no power to reverse God's grace towards His chosen ones.
The verse before it says God is not a man that He should lie. That is the ground on which this one stands.
In this majestic message, Israel's blessing and safety do not rest on Israel at all. They rest on the truth and faithfulness of Jehovah. "God is not a man, that He should lie, nor a son of man, that He should change His mind." This puts Israel on safe ground. God must be true to Himself. Is there any power that can stop Him from keeping His word and His oath? No. "He has blessed; and I cannot reverse it." God will not reverse the blessing, and Satan cannot.
Balak keeps moving Balaam to new viewpoints. One writer sees a bigger dispute behind the scene on the hills of Moab.
Balak may take Balaam from place to place to look the people over, but God lets the prophet speak from only one point of view — what they are in the eyes of God. Remember, God is answering the enemy. What is happening on the high places of Moab is a dispute between Himself and the useless power of Satan. He has His own way of speaking to His people, and His own way of speaking about them in front of the enemy. It is a sweet and precious privilege that His people get to hear how He speaks of them. Such is our God. Our blessing depends on what He is.
This second message does more than shield Israel. It shows how God accounts for a people with a bad record.
Balaam said he had received a command to bless, for God had blessed Israel and Balaam could not reverse it, much as he wanted to. More than this: "He has not observed iniquity in Jacob, nor has He seen wickedness in Israel." God had disciplined Israel severely for their disobedience and rebellion. Yet He tells Israel's enemies that He had not seen iniquity in Israel. Why? Because God saw them as sheltered by the blood of sacrifice… The first prophecy sees Israel as sanctified; the second adds that they are justified.
The two names he uses matter as well.
Notice too that he used the natural name Jacob ("Supplanter") as well as the name of grace, Israel ("prince with God"). This shows God's grace in justifying the ungodly.
Why was the curse never allowed to land? Moses later gives the answer, and writers apply it to believers now.
But can our failures change God's purposes of grace toward us? Will He stop loving us, erase our names from the book of life, and throw us back where He found us? Blessed be His holy name, NO! He chose us in Christ before the world was made… He has washed, sanctified, and justified us, and has sealed and anointed us with the Holy Spirit. All this must stand for ever, for God is faithful, whatever His people may be. In His righteous government He may discipline us, just as He disciplined Israel long ago, but He will never abandon His purposes of grace. "The gifts and calling of God are irrevocable" (Rom. 11:29). Listen to Moses in Deut. 23:5: "the LORD your God would not listen to Balaam; instead the LORD your God turned the curse into a blessing for you, because the LORD your God loved you."
- Commanded — Balaam is not offering an opinion; he is under orders. The blessing came from the heart of God, not from the prophet. Neither Balak's money nor Balaam's greed could bend it.
- Grounded — the blessing holds because God does not lie and does not change His mind. Israel's safety rests on His character, not on their record.
- Positive — the first message said God has not cursed; this one says He has blessed. First sanctification, then justification: God sees no iniquity in Jacob, because He sees them sheltered by the blood of sacrifice.
- Public — God says this in front of the enemy. The very man hired to curse them announces what God thinks of His people.
- Irreversible — God will not reverse it and Satan cannot. The reason lies further back still: He turned the curse into a blessing because He loved them.
He hath not beheld iniquity in Jacob, neither hath he seen wrong in Israel; Jehovah his God is with him, and the shout of a king is in his midst.
Balaam came to curse Israel. Instead God made him say what He Himself sees when He looks at His people, at a time when they were at their worst. How can a holy God look at a sinful people and say He sees no iniquity in them?
(The writers below use an older English translation. It reads "iniquity" and "perverseness" where the ESV has "misfortune" and "trouble.")
God is not speaking to Israel here. He is speaking about Israel, to someone who wanted them destroyed.
We must remember that God is answering the enemy. What is taking place on the high places of Moab is a controversy between Himself and the futile power of Satan. He has His own way of speaking to His people, and He has His way of speaking of them in the face of the enemy. What a sweet and precious privilege, that His people may hear how He speaks of them!
This is not a claim that Israel behaved well. It is about where God's eye rests.
Only on the ground of the grace that justifies could God call them what they were not. He saw them even now as what He would make them through the Saviour. This is what is before His mind. Clearly, God cannot justify sinners unless He blots out what they are and brings in what they are not. How can this be? Justification comes through another alone. Only in this way has God "not beheld iniquity in Jacob." It is not that He denies it; nor that there was no iniquity on their part, for indeed there was. "Neither has He seen perverseness in Israel." It is a question of what He looks at.
Something stood between God's eye and the people's sin. It also explains how He could discipline the very people He refused to condemn.
God compels Balaam to say, "He has not beheld iniquity in Jacob, neither has He seen perverseness in Israel." Balaam says it at a time when they were as perverse as they could possibly be in themselves. But the blood was on the mercy seat. God's eye rested on that blood, which spoke to Him of a perfect sacrifice for sin. So He would not allow the enemy to curse His people, or even to accuse them. He still disciplined them for their faults, as a people who ought to have been as holy in their ways as in their standing before God. All this was a picture, and imperfect under the law. But now it is completely and eternally true that God does not charge sin to those who are under the shelter of the blood of Christ.
In the first oracle Balaam could only say God had not cursed them. Here he says God has blessed them — and no one can argue God back into looking at what He has removed.
It is not merely that they are a separated people dwelling alone; they are a justified people, having the Lord their God with them, and the shout of a king among them. "He has not beheld iniquity in Jacob, neither has He seen perverseness in Israel." The enemy may say, "There is iniquity and perverseness there all the while." Yes, but who can make Jehovah behold it, when He Himself has been pleased to blot it all out as a thick cloud for His name's sake? If He has cast it behind His back, who can bring it before His face?
Being cleared of charges is not the whole story. God clears His people so that He can live among them.
"The LORD their God is with them, and the shout of a king is among them." The distinguishing mark of the people of God is that He is in them and among them. Wherever this is not the case, the saints show utter feebleness. It is a blessed truth that God has forever saved and justified His children. But He did it so that He may "dwell among them."
One writer reads the word the ESV gives as "trouble" as "labour," and finds its answer in the sound at the end of the verse.
When Balaam's unwilling lips said that God "has not beheld labour in Israel," the word used is "labour" — what perverseness produces — and not "perverseness" itself. Balaam then shows how this comes about, when he says that not only is "the LORD their God with them," but also "the shout of a king is among them." That ringing shout of loyalty which welcomes the King is indeed the jubilee cry which proclaims liberty to the worn-out worker. No rest but in "the shout of a King!" Would that our hearts knew it better, and echoed it with the joyous songs that fit it! A King! our King!
This truth does not make sin a small thing. It tells the believer where he stands while the Spirit still judges the evil within.
When we apply this to ourselves, we must clearly separate two things. One is the judgment of the Spirit of God within us about the evil of the flesh. The other is the testimony of the Spirit about what we are before Him in Christ. We often find the soul judging itself rightly, yet forgetting the ground on which it stands before God. That resting place of faith is what He has done for us in the Lord Jesus.
- Blessed — God would not let the enemy curse His people, so the hired curse never had a chance. He spoke these words to the enemy, not to Israel.
- Blotted — He does not deny the iniquity. He blots it out, and He will not even let the enemy accuse the people He has justified.
- Blood — His eye rests on the sacrifice on the mercy seat. That never stops Him disciplining the people He refuses to condemn.
- Beside them — God justifies His people so that He can live among them. Where He is not among them, His people are weak.
- Blast — the shout of a King in the camp is the cry of liberty and loyalty, the mark of a people who know who reigns over them.
God brought him out of Egypt; he hath as it were the strength of a buffalo.
Balak sent for Balaam to curse Israel. Instead, Balaam could only say what God had done for them and what God had made them: the verse points away from Israel to the God who brought them out and to the strength He gives them. (Where older translations read "unicorn," the ESV has "the horns of the wild ox.")
Balak had spoken of Israel as a people who came out of Egypt. The reply corrects him: someone brought them out.
These words are repeated to stress that Israel was under the care and protection of God. They had not come out of slavery under Pharaoh by their own strength. When Balak sent for Balaam, he had said to him, "Behold, a people has come out of Egypt" (22:11). God wanted Balak to understand that they came out of Egypt by His all-powerful arm.
Their story began in slavery and fear.
What were they, this famous people? Where did they come from? "Your father was an Amorite and your mother a Hittite" (Ezek. 16). And later, what were they? A nation of slaves! Their first steps out of Egypt were a flight, and fear marked them until their enemies drowned in the sea. "God brought them out of Egypt." But now they have the strength of a unicorn.
The word behind "unicorn" points to a real animal, not a mythical one.
The Hebrew word is reem. The Greek translation rendered it with a word meaning "one-horned," and from that the older English versions took "unicorn." Nothing in Scripture suggests the animal had only one horn. In fact Deuteronomy 33:17 speaks of "the horns of a unicorn," and it must have been an animal the Israelites knew. Its great strength, and the fact that it cannot be tamed, are its main features: unlike the tame ox, it cannot be put to work on a farm… Most likely it was a species of wild ox, the Bos primigenius.
The strength was borrowed, and the same image returns in Psalm 22.
The mighty strength of the wild ox was not their own. Their God gave it to them. The power of the wild ox, or buffalo, stands for what is most powerful. In Psalm 22:21 the Lord Jesus met the full force of the power of death, and God answered Him from the horns of the wild oxen — from the place where death, at the height of its power, had spent all its energy against Him. Here Israel had strength that no nation could overcome, given by God Who lived among them.
Even so strong an image has its limit.
He had brought them out of Egypt, and His strength is compared to that of the aurochs, or wild ox. No man can resist such strength. Yet this is only a picture, for God's strength is far greater than any picture can show.
The verse has two halves, and the next two verses take them up in turn.
There are two parts in Numbers 23:22. The first presents Israel as the objects of God's care; the second, as the instruments of God's vengeance on the nations. Verse 23 answers to the first part, verse 24 to the second. "God brought them out of Egypt." It is the pledge that He never stops watching over them. When God begins to bless, He never stops… It is the assurance of His power always working for them, a power that would keep them safe from the world itself, and from the malice and hidden scheming of Satan.
Balaam explains why he dare not touch them — and he says it when Israel looked weakest.
"God brought them out of Egypt; he has, as it were, the strength of a wild ox." I dare not meddle with them, Balaam says. I understand far too well what they are. They are connected with God, with His strength and power. "According to this time it shall be said of Jacob and of Israel, What has God done!" According to what time? The time when Israel was faint and weak, worn down by the long journey, with none of their enemies beyond the Jordan yet beaten.
One writer applies these words to the believer.
For the believer it is said, "according to this time" — not what men have done, but "what God has done" (Num. 23:21-23).
- Brought: Balak saw a people who came out of Egypt. God says He brought them out. The rescue was His arm, not their escape.
- Given: The strength of the wild ox was never Israel's own. God gave it to them, and He lived among them.
- Untamable: The reem is likely a wild ox — strong, and impossible to tame or put to work. Even that image falls short of God's power.
- Two-sided: The first half shows Israel as the objects of God's care. The second sends them out as His instrument against the nations.
- Wrought: Israel was weak and their enemies unbeaten when Balaam spoke. The verdict still stands: not what man has done, but what God has done.
For there is no enchantment against Jacob, neither is there any divination against Israel. At this time it shall be said of Jacob and of Israel, What hath God wrought!
Israel camped on the border of Moab. Its king, Balak, hired the prophet Balaam to curse them. Instead, the hired mouth says that no spell or omen can touch them. The verse then turns from magic to a coming announcement about this people. The surprise is who gets the credit.
A bigger question lies behind Balak's fee. It comes at the end of Israel's journey, after all their failures are on record.
The great question in this moving scene is this: "Can Satan succeed in cursing the people of God, and so keep them out of the promised land?" This is not only a question about redemption, and about the joy of redemption at the start of their journey. It is a question at the end, when they have shown all their unfaithfulness — unfaithfulness even after the Lord had brought them to Himself. Can Satan succeed then? No.
Both words in the first half of the verse name Balaam's own trade.
Balaam, who used enchantments, had to admit that "there is no enchantment against Jacob, no divination against Israel." When the elders of Moab and Midian came from Balak, they were sent "with the fees for divination in their hand" (Num. 22:7); and when Balaam claimed to go and meet the LORD, he went "to look for omens" (Num. 24:1). No natural power could overcome the people of God, and no devilish power could prevail against them either.
An accuser has to work on legal ground. Commentators trace the failure of the curse to a ransom already given.
In His own dealings with the people He will see everything and take notice of everything. But with the accuser it is a question of righteousness. God sees only this: according to the purposes of His grace, He has given a ransom, and the sins of His people are atoned for. He could not in justice see those sins. So the accuser's mouth is forced to confess that there are none. The enemy has no power against Jacob. And the ground is clearly taught. The words are said of Jacob and Israel, not of God; and they say not what Israel has wrought, but what God has wrought. Israel had the place, but the work was God's work.
Older translations read here, "according to this time it shall be said." One writer asks which moment that is. The answer lies in how unimpressive Israel looked just then.
According to what time? The time when Israel was faint and weak. They were discouraged by the long road, and they had not yet conquered any of their enemies across the Jordan. Their enemies were much mightier than they (Deut. 7:1, etc.), and yet he says, "What has God wrought!" The moment he sees them under the eye of God he says that.
God's wisdom picked the speaker with care.
In God's wisdom he was just the man to declare even to the enemy that it is entirely a question of what He has wrought, not in any way of Israel's doings or deserts.
The verse names the people twice, and neither name weakens the point.
God delights to speak of Jacob and of Israel. When we see Jacob in all his weaknesses and failures, God's mercy and grace shine out in His dealings with him. When we see Israel, the prince with God, we see the one whom God has enabled to be an overcomer. Whether in Jacob or in Israel, God's greatness stands out.
Writers apply the verse in two directions. For life now, it removes fear without removing watchfulness:
We need to be sober and watchful. We need to be strong in the Lord, wearing the breastplate of righteousness and the belt of truth. But we have no need for alarm and dread. We may walk through this evil world with a calm mind. We know the Lord's hand protects us, and we know the enemy has no power.
The same holds for what is still ahead. One writer points back to Egypt to show why.
Egypt could hold Israel for centuries, but Egypt's wickedness ripened. When the hour came, no power in the air or on the earth could stop God's judgments on Egypt and His mercies on Israel. No enchantment and no divination will ever frustrate God's plan in the future.
- Wrought. The verse's key word is God's work, not Israel's record — "entirely a question of what He has wrought, not in any way of Israel's doings or deserts."
- Ransom. The curse fails on legal ground. God has given a ransom, the sins are atoned for, and the accuser has nothing left to say.
- Timing. The words come when Israel is weak, worn out by the road, with every enemy still unbeaten. The credit belongs to God right then.
- Reach. No natural power and no dark power can touch what God has done. Balaam's own trade of divination was useless against it.
- Result. Watchfulness stays and alarm goes. What God has done stands, and no spell will ever undo His plan.
Lo, the people will rise up as a lioness, and lift himself up as a lion. He shall not lie down until he have eaten the prey and drunk the blood of the slain.
Balak hired Balaam to curse Israel. Instead God made him bless them, and his words end with a lion rising to hunt. Two questions follow. What made a weary, wandering nation look like this? And when does the picture come true?
The lion of verse 24 is the answer to the exclamation just before it. One writer points out who is speaking here, and where the whole force of the words lies.
We have the bold announcement made through the lips of a man who was a complete outsider, in race and in heart. It is all the more glorious for that, because the man who states its great principle could see how deeply blessed it was, without ever knowing its comfort in his own soul. In God's wisdom he was just the man to declare, even to the enemy, that everything turns on what He has wrought. It has nothing to do with what Israel did or deserved.
The striking thing is the timing. Balaam is not describing a nation already crowned with victories.
According to what time? It was the time when Israel was faint and weak. They were discouraged by the long journey, and they had not yet conquered a single enemy on the other side of the Jordan. Their enemies were much mightier than they… and yet he says, "What has God wrought! Behold, a people! As a lioness it rises up…" The moment he sees them under the eye of God he says that.
Balaam himself drew the practical conclusion: "I dare not meddle with them… they are connected with God, with His strength and power."
The verses just before this show God shielding Israel. Verse 24 puts them on the attack.
God not only acts for His people, He also uses them to defeat those who rise up against them, just as it is written here.
One note on wording: where the ESV has "a lioness" and "a lion," the older translation these writers quote reads "a great lion" and "a young lion."
The phrase sets a limit on when rest may come.
This was a solemn warning for the king of Moab. God's people would show all the mighty strength of the great lion and the unstoppable energy of the young lion as they fought the people living in Canaan. Victory for them was not in question; it was already assured by their God. The time for them to lie down in peace would come, but not before their foes had been overcome and devoured.
The following parable completes the picture. There the same lion appears in a different posture:
Israel is again seen as a lion. But now he is not rising up, as in chapter 23, verse 24; he is lying down… After defeating all his foes, Israel would be able to rest in the land God had marked out for them. No one would dare disturb a nation so majestic and strong.
Part of this has already happened. The rest has not.
This was prophecy when Balaam spoke it, but it is now history. Even so, the prophecy has not been completely fulfilled. Because of their failure, Israel lost the land God gave them. They became a prey to their enemies, who carried them off as captives. Yet the day is coming when this word will have its final fulfilment, and Moab will be among the enemies subdued, as Isaiah 11:14 says.
The lion figure points beyond Israel. Baines ties it to a title that belongs to Christ:
The lion is a picture of unstoppable strength. It may act lawlessly, or, as here, carry out God's judgments in righteousness… These prophecies are still unfulfilled. The One who holds God's mighty power, pictured by the lion, has not yet appeared in this character. He has been on earth as a lamb led to the slaughter, but not as "the Lion of the tribe of Judah."
- Source. The lion's strength is not Israel's doing. Balaam has to say what God has wrought — it has "nothing to do with what Israel did or deserved."
- Timing. God calls them a lion while they are still "faint and weak" and have "not yet conquered a single enemy on the other side of the Jordan."
- Direction. Protection turns into advance: God "also uses them to defeat those who rise up against them."
- Limit. The lion "does not lie down" until it has taken the prey. Rest is real, but it comes after the fighting, as the next parable shows.
- Fulfilment. Part history, part still ahead. The strength pictured belongs to Christ. He came as the Lamb, but has not yet appeared as "the Lion of the tribe of Judah."
And Balak said to Balaam, Neither curse them at all, nor bless them at all.
Balak had brought Balaam to a second lookout hoping for a curse, and heard a second blessing instead. So he asks for silence instead: if Balaam cannot curse Israel, let him say nothing at all.
Balak's words are not repentance. They are the reaction of a man who has calculated that no word is safer than a good word.
Balak, deeply frustrated, told Balaam neither to curse nor bless Israel. Balaam's prophecy spoke of positive blessing for Israel, and Balak decided it would be better to say nothing. Balaam could only answer that he must speak as the Lord commanded, which was true, for he was only a tool in the hand of God.
Balaam's answer points past himself. He did not compose these words, so he cannot take them back.
Such revelations should have brought both Balak and Balaam down in repentance before God. They should have sought His mercy, for both knew well that they were dealing with the God of Israel. Confused and ashamed, Balak said, "Do not curse them at all, and do not bless them at all." Balaam only answered, "Did I not tell you, 'All that the LORD says, that I must do'?" The blessing was not from the heart of Balaam, but from the heart of God. Neither Balak nor Balaam could stop Israel being blessed.
The verse reads like a man giving up. The next verse shows he has not.
We have learned something of how stubborn the flesh is. Otherwise it would amaze us that Balak and Balaam tried yet again to bring disaster on Israel. Balak was very angry at what he had to listen to. He said to Balaam, "Do not curse them at all, and do not bless them at all." Yet almost at once he added, "Come now, I will take you to another place. Perhaps it will please God that you may curse them for me from there." This was sheer wickedness. The LORD had already thwarted his plans twice. Yet he still meant to try again, and Balaam did not object.
Balak believed Balaam held real power over blessing and cursing. He never noticed that a far older word had already settled which way any curse would travel.
Balak is in complete and all-distorting darkness. First Israel was forbidden to touch Moab. Next he says, "He whom you bless is blessed, and he whom you curse is cursed." He was trying to bring the curse on Israel when God had said, "Blessed are those who bless you, and cursed are those who curse you." So he was only bringing it on himself.
Balak wanted the speaking to stop because each round of it left Israel better off, not worse.
The enemy's attempt did not just make God repeat the same blessing. It drew out His activity, as it were, to bring out all the riches of His blessings. He carries out His own purposes according to His own will and thoughts.
Israel camps in the valley through all of this, and knows nothing of the bargaining on the hill. Our own case is much the same.
So it is with us, dear friends. We are taken up with our own (often) foolish thoughts. The accuser is speaking against us. Yet nothing can succeed, because God works for us.
The curse failed, but the threat did not end. The next chapter shows where the real damage came from.
Balaam knew enough of God to be sure that if the people of Israel could be tempted into sin, the LORD's hand would come down on them in judgement. So we read in Numbers 25:1-2: "While Israel lived in Shittim, the people began to whore with the daughters of Moab. These invited the people to the sacrifices of their gods, and the people ate and bowed down to their gods."
- Frustration. Two tries to buy a curse produced two blessings. So Balak asked for silence — the wish of a man who cannot control the outcome.
- Source. Balaam could not agree, because the words were not his. The blessing came from the heart of God, and neither man could stop it.
- Backfire. By seeking a curse on the people God had blessed, Balak was only bringing the curse down on himself.
- Overflow. Each fresh attack did not just repeat the old blessing. It drew out more, until God had brought out all the riches of His blessings.
- Warning. Hatred failed on the hilltops, and temptation followed in the valley. God defeats the accuser over our heads, but sin we welcome in still brings judgement.
And Balaam answered and said to Balak, Did I not tell thee, saying, All that Jehovah shall speak, that will I do?
Balak has heard Balaam bless Israel twice, and in frustration he tells the prophet to say nothing at all. Balaam's answer admits that he has no freedom here — so why is a man who knows God's word so well still so far from God Himself?
Balak's words sound like surrender. In the same breath he suggests another place to try again.
We have learned something of the stubbornness of the flesh. Without that, we would be amazed that Balak and Balaam should try yet again to bring disaster on Israel. Balak was very angry at what he had to listen to. He said to Balaam, "Neither curse them at all, nor bless them at all." Yet at once he added, "Come, please, I will bring you to another place; perhaps it will please God that you may curse them for me from there." This was plainly sheer wickedness. The Lord had already thwarted his plans twice. Still he meant to make another effort, and Balaam did not object.
Balak moved from place to place because of a wrong idea of who God is.
Balak no doubt believed in many gods, each with his own areas or high places. He saw the Lord as only another of these. So he thought a change of place might produce the cursing he wanted. But again the Lord met Balaam and put in his mouth the words he had to speak.
Balaam says he must speak what the LORD says. So the blessings Balak has been hearing did not start with the prophet.
Such revelations should have brought both Balak and Balaam down in repentance before God, and they should have sought His mercy. Both knew well that they were dealing with the God of Israel. The blessing was not from the heart of Balaam, but from the heart of God; and neither Balak nor Balaam could stop Israel being blessed.
Balaam does what God says, but he shares nothing of what God feels.
He had no sympathy at all with the thoughts of the heart of God, none with God Himself. The fear of consequences ruled him. If it were otherwise, the blessing of the people would have made him so happy that he would have shuddered at the idea of cursing what God had blessed. God, however, will use him to give a glorious testimony on behalf of His people. At the same time He condemns the crooked ways of the prophet, for they were indeed crooked.
Commentators describe his role in different ways — some stress that he was compelled, others that God was exposing his heart. On his position in the scene, one writer puts it simply:
Balaam could only answer that he must speak as the Lord commanded, which was true, for he was only a tool in the hand of God.
All of this happened out of Israel's sight and hearing.
How little did Israel know or imagine what was going on between the Lord and the enemy. God was setting out their perfection through the tongue of the covetous prophet. At that very moment they may have been grumbling in their tents. Balak would gladly have Israel cursed; but, blessed be God, He will not allow anyone to curse His people. He may have to deal with them Himself, in secret, about many things; but He will not allow another to move his tongue against them.
Balaam cannot curse Israel, because of what God has already done for them.
So the moment any enemy or accuser comes on the scene, the Lord places Himself in front to receive and answer the accusation. His answer is never founded on what His people are in themselves. It always rests on what He has made them through the perfection of His own work. His glory is bound up with them, and in defending them He maintains His own glory. He places Himself between them and every accusing tongue.
A man can say, "All that the LORD says, that I must do," and still serve someone else.
Balaam shows what a man can become when his heart is covetous. He sold himself to Satan for rewards in this life. He ignored every warning from God that stood in his way on a path leading to destruction. He professed to be the servant of God, but in reality he served Satan, to get the rewards his heart was set on. He was willing to curse the people God had blessed, and to give advice that would bring God's judgment on them.
- Must — not may. Balaam's reply is not devotion but limitation: he can only say what God gives him to say.
- Must, because the blessing is God's. The words came from God's heart, not the prophet's. Neither the king nor the hired prophet could stop Israel being blessed.
- Must, even through an enemy. God turned a hired curser into a witness for His people. He used the man's mouth and condemned his crooked ways.
- Must, because God answers accusers Himself. He stands in front of His people, and His reply rests on what He has made them, not on what they are in themselves.
- Must without love is not obedience. Balaam feared consequences but shared nothing of God's heart. A man can claim to serve God while greed owns him.
And Balak said to Balaam, Come, I pray thee, I will bring thee to another place; perhaps it will be right in the sight of God that thou curse me them from thence.
Balak has now heard Israel blessed twice instead of cursed. His answer is to move Balaam to a third hilltop. Everything turns on one word: "perhaps." Can a new place, or a new angle, change what God has already said?
God had just declared through Balaam that He does not lie or change His mind. Balak's reply shows he had not taken any of it in.
It is amazing to see Balak keep trying to curse God's people after all that God had said to him through the lips of Balaam. God had just said, "God is not man… that He should change His mind." Yet Balak said to Balaam, "Come now, I will take you to another place. Perhaps it will please God that you may curse them for me from there." This is man in his self-will and ignorance of God, bringing God's just judgment on himself by opposing His will. To get what he wanted, Balak takes Balaam to the top of Peor, named after his god, Baal-Peor.
Balak's "perhaps" reveals the God he imagined — a god that a better location might sway, or a smaller view of the enemy.
In Balak we see how completely the knowledge of God was lost… He thought God was just like himself, or like the god he imagined for himself… To him, circumstances and place could influence gods and men alike. So, judging the LORD as he would judge Baal, he says, "You shall see only a fraction of them, and shall not see them all; and curse them for me from there." But God is not man, that He should lie, or a son of man, that He should change His mind. He had spoken, and He would make it good.
No third site could help Balak. Israel's blessing never rested on Israel.
In this magnificent parable, Israel's blessing and security do not depend on themselves. They depend on the truth and faithfulness of the LORD. "God is not man, that He should lie, or a son of man, that He should change His mind." This places Israel on safe ground. God must be true to Himself. Is there any power that can possibly prevent Him from fulfilling His word and oath? Surely not. "He has blessed; and I cannot reverse it." God will not, and Satan cannot, reverse the blessing.
Balak meant the third site to produce a curse. But opposition never stalls God's purpose.
The enemy's attempt did not make God merely repeat the same blessing. It drew out His activity, so to speak, to bring out all the riches of His blessings. He carries out His own purposes according to His own will and thoughts.
God described Israel in glowing terms while they were still in the desert. The New Testament speaks of believers in the same way.
The new viewpoint was "the top of Peor, that looks towards Jeshimon" (Jeshimon means "the waste"). This time Balaam was forced to give a truly delightful description of the people as God saw them. But the people were not yet in Canaan, resting in possession of every promised blessing. They were still in the desert wastes. Look at the New Testament letters. There we find wonderful descriptions of God's saints — not only as they will be in heavenly glory for ever, but as they are today, while in this evil world!
Cursing had failed three times. The enemy's real strength lay elsewhere.
Balaam could not succeed in enchantment against Israel… The effort was to get the LORD to curse His people. Balaam could not do it, and had to bless instead. There is no possibility of using Satan's power against the people of God… He has no power as an adversary. It is as a tempter he has power. When the enemy could not bring a curse on the people, he tried to seduce them into wickedness.
- Perhaps. Balak's whole third try rests on a word God had already ruled out. Pushing on after God has spoken plainly is self-will, not hope.
- Place. He thought a new location might move God. He judged God by himself — a god bound by circumstances and place.
- Ground. No site could work. Israel's security rested on God's faithfulness to Himself, not on Israel.
- Overflow. Every fresh attack drew out richer blessing. From the third hilltop came a delightful description of the people as God saw them.
- Seduction. Unable to curse, the enemy turned to tempt. He has no power as an adversary, but real power as a seducer.
And Balak brought Balaam to the top of Peor, which looks over the surface of the waste.
Balak has already heard Israel blessed twice. Instead of giving up, he moves the prophet a third time — now to the top of Peor, a hill facing the wasteland where Israel camped. If God has spoken twice, what can a change of scenery achieve?
God had just spoken through Balaam, and His word stood. Balak's reply was to suggest one more vantage point.
It is amazing to see Balak still trying to curse God's people after all that God had said to him through the lips of Balaam. God had just said, "God is not man… that He should change His mind." Yet Balak said to Balaam, "Please come to another place; perhaps it will please God that you may curse them for me from there." Such is man in his self-will and ignorance of God. By opposing God's will, he brings God's just judgment on himself. To get what he wanted, Balak takes Balaam to the top of Peor, named after his god, Baal-Peor.
Moving the prophet only makes sense if a god's power stops at the edge of his own land.
Yet again Balak picks another place (v. 27). He does not know the God of heaven and earth. To his dark idolatrous soul, was the Jehovah of Israel any more than the local god of one people, or of one small area? There He might be supreme, while in another place another god would rule. The idolatry of every land and age never went beyond this. Each nation had its own god… Long afterwards the Syrians said the God of Israel was the god of the hills, and not of the valleys.
Balaam now looked out over a region whose name described where Israel still stood.
The new point of view was "the top of Peor, that looks towards Jeshimon" (meaning, "the waste"). This time Balaam was forced to give a truly delightful description of the people as God saw them. But the people were not yet in Canaan, resting in possession of every promised blessing. They were still in the desert wastes. In the New Testament letters we find wonderful descriptions of God's saints. They show us not only how they will be in heavenly glory forever, but how they are today, in this evil world! God sees His saints as "in Christ," and faith says with joy, "as He is, so we are in this world" (1 John 4:17).
Balak's three viewpoints were not the same distance from Israel.
But now he comes nearer still. From the top of Peor, Balaam sees the people staying in their tents, tribe by tribe. The nearer he gets, the deeper the impression made on him. Now he says, "How lovely are your tents, O Jacob!" The nearer vision you have of the people of God, the more fully you will realise the wonder of their blessing.
Balak's motive for shifting ground was fear of what he had seen. The outcome was the opposite of what he wanted.
Hatred and unbelief think of circumstances. The sight of Israel had frightened Balak, and in the folly of unbelief he tries to draw Balaam away from the influence of what he dreaded himself. Unbelief never thinks of the thoughts of the Lord, and the people were not hidden from Him. His persistence in seeking the curse enlarged the blessing; it is always so. He does not know God. And God could not simply repeat the blessing already given, so it grows fuller each time.
The curse failed on that hilltop. Two chapters later, the same name reappears — this time as the scene of Israel's fall.
The effort was to get Jehovah to curse Israel, but they could not. God held Balaam's lips and forced him to speak blessings instead of curses, despite himself. "Resist the devil, and he will flee from you." When the devil comes as an adversary, he has no power. The secret of his power lies in coming in as a tempter and seducer. Satan could not get Jehovah to curse Israel. So he seduced them into wickedness, leading them "to eat things sacrificed to idols, and to commit sexual immorality." Then how could the holy God bring them in? (See Numbers 25.)
- Place. Balak's third move assumed God's favour changes with the scenery. That is how a man thinks who knows only local gods.
- Peor. The hill carried the name of Balak's own god. It faced Jeshimon, "the waste" — God's people seen as He sees them, still in the desert.
- Nearer. Each new viewpoint brought Balaam closer to the camp. The closer he looked at God's people, the greater the blessing he had to speak.
- Enlarged. Pressing for a curse never repeated the old blessing — it drew out a fuller one. Opposition to God's people develops what God has to say about them.
- Tempter. As an accuser the enemy achieved nothing at Peor; as a seducer he later succeeded there. The danger to guard against is not the curse but the bait.
And Balaam said to Balak, Build me here seven altars, and prepare me here seven bullocks and seven rams.
Balak paid for a curse and got two blessings. Now he moves Balaam to a third hilltop and repeats the same order: seven altars, seven bulls, seven rams. Can religion, repeated often enough and from a better angle, make God say what He has not said?
Two failures have taught Balak nothing.
Balak and Balaam tried yet again to bring disaster upon Israel. That would amaze us, if we had not learned something of the wilfulness of the flesh. Balak was very angry at what he had been forced to listen to. He told Balaam not to curse them at all and not to bless them at all. Yet almost at once he added, "Please come, I will take you to another place. Perhaps it will please God that you may curse them for me from there." This was sheer wickedness. The LORD had already thwarted his plans twice. Still he was determined to make another effort, and Balaam did not object. The enemies of God's people were never more persistent in their hatred than at this time.
The number itself is the giveaway.
Balaam exposed his idolatrous character at once by asking Balak to build seven altars, offering on each one a bull and a ram. God allowed only one altar of burnt offering (Ex. 27:1; Heb. 13:10), for the altar speaks of Christ, the only way of approach to God. But Balaam believed in "many gods and many lords" (1 Cor. 8:4-5).
Baal was Balak's own god.
In the first verse of our chapter Balaam says, "Build for me here seven altars." We see at once what this man was. He claimed to be a prophet of the LORD, but he was in league with the powers of darkness. When Elijah was in conflict with Baal, he repaired the LORD's one broken-down altar, and he prevailed. In contrast to that, we are now to see that the seven altars of Baal can achieve nothing against the blessing of God.
A fresh hilltop only helps if scenery can change God.
Balak's words to Balaam make his idea of God clear. He thought God was just like himself, or like what he imagined his own god to be. At his highest, he could not imagine anything beyond nature. He might picture a monster with every attribute nature could suggest. His god Baal was only the expression of his own imagination. He might think that the LORD was a more powerful God than Baal, and so he did not tell Balaam to consult the god of Moab. But to him, gods and men alike were not beyond the influence of circumstances and place.
Who were these offerings meant for? Commentators differ — some say Balaam hoped to win God over, others that he was courting the spirits he consulted. Either way they failed.
Whatever Balaam's purpose was in raising his altars, he had to learn one thing. No amount of sacrifice could make God change His mind. "God is not man, that he should lie, or a son of man, that he should change his mind" (Num. 23:19). God could treat Israel as His chosen people, quite apart from what they were in themselves. God viewed them in the light of His purpose. The altars and sacrifices could not alter God's purpose to bless those He had chosen — whether they were offered to the LORD or to the spirit Balaam consulted.
The bulls and rams meant one thing to Balaam and something else to God.
Whatever the oxen and rams on the altars meant to Balaam, they suggested Christ to God. When Christ is before Him in the perfection of His great sacrificial work, what can He do but bless His people? Balaam understood nothing of this. He was as blind as the wicked men who put the blessed Son of God on the cross of Calvary. There was a side to that cross of which they knew nothing. They never imagined that God would bring vast blessing out of their appalling deed.
This third set of altars is the last.
By now Balaam had at least learned that the LORD had the unchangeable purpose of blessing Israel. So this time he knew it was useless to seek enchantments from evil spirits. Instead he set his face toward the wilderness, where Israel was camped as God had ordered (Num. 24:1). Then the Spirit of God took possession of him to convey another wonderful prophecy.
- Persistence. Two defeats did not stop Balak. His third round of altars shows how persistent the enemies of God's people can be.
- Seven, not one. Seven altars exposed Balaam as a man of many gods. God allowed one altar only, because the altar speaks of Christ, the only way to God.
- Wrong god. Changing place only helps if place can change God. Balak imagined a God like himself.
- Unmoved. No amount of sacrifice could shift God's purpose. He saw Israel in the light of that purpose, not their record.
- Blessing. Those bulls and rams spoke of Christ to God. With Christ before Him He could only bless. The third hilltop ends in blessing, not a curse.
And Balak did as Balaam had said, and offered up a bullock and a ram on each altar.
Balak has already heard Israel blessed twice. Still he obeys Balaam and builds a third set of altars on Peor, hoping that more religious acts will bend the purpose of God.
Two failures have not stopped either man. One writer points out how little this should surprise anyone who knows the human heart:
We have already learned something of the wilfulness of the flesh. Without that, we would be amazed that Balak and Balaam should try yet again to bring disaster on Israel. Balak was very angry that he had to listen to such words. He said to Balaam, "Do not curse them at all, and do not bless them at all." Yet almost at once he added, "Come, please, I will bring you to another place; perhaps it will please God that you may curse them for me from there." This was plain, sheer wickedness. The Lord had already blocked his plans twice. Yet he still wanted another try, and Balaam did not object.
Balak's plan rests on the idea that a change of scenery might move God:
God had said in plain words that He means exactly what He says. Even so, Balak hoped that a new location might change His mind! There, on the top of Peor, Balaam asks again for seven altars with a bull and a ram offered on each. Balaam himself had not yet learned there is only one God.
The number itself is a confession. God's own arrangement for Israel allowed a single altar, and that limit carried meaning:
Balaam exposed his idolatrous character immediately by asking Balak to build seven altars, offering on each one a bull and a ram. God allowed only one altar of burnt offering (Ex. 27:1; Heb. 13:10), for the altar speaks of Christ, the only way of approach to God. But Balaam believed in "many gods and many lords" (1 Cor. 8:4-5).
Commentators differ on who Balaam thought he was sacrificing to. One suggests the offerings were aimed lower than heaven:
It is hard to say why Balaam told Balak to build his seven altars and prepare his seven oxen and seven rams. He may have wanted to appease God by sacrifice, trying to turn Him from His purpose to bless Israel. But the sacrifices were more likely offered to the demons that lie behind all idolatrous worship. Paul writes, "What pagans sacrifice they offer to demons and not to God" (1 Cor. 10:20).
One writer sees the flesh at work in Balaam's counting of altars and animals:
On the high places Balaam had seven altars prepared, with a bull and a ram on each. To make himself acceptable to God he says, "I have arranged seven altars, and I have offered on each altar a bull and a ram." So man — the flesh — would try to propitiate God. Is there anything more offensive to Him?
The animals on the altar have another side. God saw in them something Balaam never intended:
Whatever the oxen and rams on the altars meant to Balaam, they suggested Christ to God. When Christ is before Him in the perfection of His great sacrificial work, what can He do but bless His people? Balaam understood nothing of this. He was as blind as the wicked men who put the blessed Son of God on the cross of Calvary. There was an aspect to that cross of which they knew nothing.
Each new altar-site produced not a curse but a fuller blessing, and that is no accident:
Hatred and unbelief think of circumstances. The sight of Israel had frightened Balak, and in the folly of unbelief he tries to draw Balaam away from the influence of what he dreaded himself. Unbelief never thinks of the thoughts of the Lord, and the people were surely not hidden from Him. His persistence in seeking the curse enlarged the blessing; it is always so. He does not know God. And God could not merely repeat the blessing already given, so He unfolds it further each time.
- Place. Balak moves to Peor expecting a new view to change God's mind, but God means exactly what He says.
- Altars. The seven altars show a man who had not yet learned there is only one God, and his sacrifices were more likely aimed at demons than at God.
- Motive. Balaam offered bulls and rams to make himself acceptable to God. One writer asks whether anything offends God more.
- Christ. The animals on the altar spoke to God of Christ. With Christ before Him, God can only bless His people.
- Result. Every fresh try at a curse only drew out a larger blessing.
And Balaam saw that it was good in the sight of Jehovah to bless Israel, and he went not, as at other times, to seek for enchantments, but he set his face toward the wilderness.
Balaam was hired to curse Israel, and the curses kept coming out as blessing. Now he stops hunting for omens, turns toward the wilderness, and looks down at the camp.
Balaam kept telling Balak to wait by the altar while he went off to meet God. This verse says what he was really going out to find. One writer treats it as the solution to a puzzle:
Balaam pretended that the sacrifices were to Jehovah. He said to Balak, "Stand by your burnt offering, and I will go; perhaps the LORD will come to meet me." We learn in the first verse of the next chapter what Balaam really sought. This is the key that unlocks the puzzle for us. He was not seeking Jehovah's presence, but enchantments. That is, he sought the spirit or spirits he was familiar with, and his sacrifices were for them.
(The ESV says "omens." The older wording these writers use is "enchantments.")
Balaam's danger was not open paganism. He wrapped dealings with demons in the name of the God of Israel. His own wording exposed him:
Why the word "perhaps"? Did God ever refuse to meet a soul that sincerely sought Him? Why this language of uncertainty? It was pious cant. When he turned aside to "a bare height" Balaam had no wish whatever to meet Jehovah. His one desire was that Jehovah would let him alone, so that he could do what Balak wished and earn his reward. Numbers 24:1 tells us definitely that he went "to seek for enchantments," which means he was trying to get through to the demons he was used to dealing with.
He stopped because nothing had worked. The reason lay outside his skill:
Balaam used enchantments himself. Yet he had to confess, "Surely there is no enchantment against Jacob, neither is there any divination against Israel."... If there was no natural power to overcome the people of God, neither was there any diabolical power that could prevail against them.
But giving up the practice is not the same as repenting of it:
Balaam was now fully convinced that it was useless to turn aside any more to seek enchantments. He had proved by experience that the power of Hell is of no use against the power of God, and that nothing could turn His heart away from the people of His choice. This should have produced in him a broken and contrite spirit, but sadly it produced no such effect!
Balaam tried again, and God blocked him. The same writer draws comfort from that:
He did not go to meet Jehovah; he did not wish Him to cross his path again. Numbers 24:1 says plainly that he went "to seek for enchantments." But Jehovah, in His love for His people (although they were unworthy), would not allow this... It is an immense comfort to our souls to notice these divine activities. The God we have to do with delights to "stand between us and the foe."
Two things change at once — what he stops doing, and where he looks:
Balaam sees at last that God is set on blessing. He yields to the power of God, no longer goes out after enchantments, and the Spirit of God comes upon him... Notice here that this is not a look ahead to Canaan, nor Israel in their permanent homes. Balaam turns his face towards the wilderness and sees Israel living in their tents. There the Spirit sees them, and declares the beauty and the order of the people in the eyes of God.
Another writer raises the obvious objection:
It is not what will be true in the future Canaan that he is speaking of, but what is true of the people of God here and now, in the wilderness... He says, What! with all their miserable sins, sorrows, and quarrels? Yes, for God sees the things that are not, as He had already refused to see the things that were — their iniquity and perverseness. Let anyone stumble at it who will: we glory in it!
God does not stop at clearing His people of sin:
When we have any matter completely cleared before God from all question of sin, it is not His way to stop there. As we know, freedom follows for the Christian, quite apart from what he once was. He is free to enter into the positive enjoyment of two things: the place of blessing in which he stands, and God Himself, now truly known in Christ.
- Exposed. This verse is the key to everything before it. What Balaam called "meeting the LORD" was really a hunt for omens.
- Disguised. He hid dealings with demons under pious talk about the LORD.
- Defeated. He stopped because he had failed, not because he repented. No power of hell can prevail against God's people.
- Guarded. Israel lived in their tents while God stood between them and the foe.
- Beautiful. With sin cleared, the Spirit describes the people as they are now, in the wilderness — and they are lovely to God.
And Balaam lifted up his eyes and saw Israel dwelling [in tents] according to his tribes; and the Spirit of God came upon him.
Balaam set out to curse Israel and found he could not. Here he turns toward the wilderness, looks down on Israel camped tribe by tribe, and the Spirit of God comes on a man who never wanted to bless them.
Balaam is not walking among the people when he sees them. He is up on the hilltop, looking down.
But Balaam set his face "toward the wilderness" — why? Because the children of Israel were still in the wilderness. The wilderness was not Canaan, but Israel was there. The world is not heaven nor the glory, but the church is there now. While the church is in the wilderness, the Spirit of God can take up the parable and show what the church is in God's eye. So here, Balaam is not walking through the tents of Israel, or he would have heard the murmurings and discontent of Israel. He is not in the camp. He has gone up to the top of the hill. Looking at them with God's eye, what does he see? Israel abiding in their tents according to their tribes.
The Spirit coming on Balaam is not a sign that Balaam was right with God. Commentators return to this again and again as one of the most sobering facts in the chapter.
Notice how remarkably the Spirit of God works here. Balaam is not regenerate, and he is linked with the enemies of God, and yet the Spirit puts a word in his mouth and compels its utterance. That word is as true as any that inspiration ever uttered — blessedly true — and yet spoken by the unwilling lips of a wicked man! What an illustration of the mighty, irresistible power of that Spirit, and what a joy to know that the power is for us and not against us. Alas, poor Balaam! He may speak by the Spirit, but be a stranger to the Spirit.
The same danger reaches past Balaam. We can speak about holy things and stay cold toward them.
We must pause here and put a question to our own hearts. Is it not possible for us to "see" in an intellectual way, and even to speak of the precious things of God, without our own hearts being moved by them? As we read God's Word and come to understand its teaching, let us exercise our hearts and consciences. Then the truth may get a firm hold of us, and shape and influence our lives.
The phrase describing how Israel camped is not a throwaway detail. Their positions were assigned, not chosen.
What order! Balaam saw Israel abiding in tents "according to their tribes." Our God is a God of order. When the Lord Jesus fed the five thousand, He did not let them drop down on the grass as they pleased. He said, "Have them sit down in groups of about fifty each" (Luke 9:14). Jehovah Himself planned Israel's camp in the wilderness. He arranged the tribes around the Tabernacle in four groups of three, each under its own banner (Num. 2). In the same way, God has placed every member in the body of Christ. He supplies each one from the endless resources of the Head in heaven, giving all that is needed for the blessing and growth of the whole. "God arranged the members in the body, each one of them, as He chose" (1 Cor. 12:18).
Where the ESV has Israel "camping," older translations read that Israel was "abiding in his tents." The word for tents carries the sense of covering, and that is where one writer finds the reason the curse failed.
Why could Balaam not curse God's people? The secret is found in Numbers 24:2, where Balaam "saw Israel abiding in his tents [covered] according to their tribes." Again, "How lovely are your tents [covered], O Jacob" (v. 5). The people were stubborn and rebellious, but in the picture they were covered. So Balaam, the false prophet, had to speak truth against his own will, because he had received a command to bless.
Balaam's opinion of Israel had nothing to do with the outcome, and neither did Israel's opinion of themselves.
The great question is not so much what the enemy may think of God's people, or what they may think about themselves, or what they may think of one another. The real, all-important question is: what does God think about them? … God sees us, thinks of us, speaks about us, and acts towards us according to what He Himself has made us and has done for us. He deals with us according to the perfection of His own work. "Onlookers may find many faults"; but as regards our standing, our God sees us only in the comeliness of Christ; we are perfect in Him.
- Sight — From the hilltop Balaam sees what God sees. Inside the camp he would have heard only murmuring.
- Spirit — The Spirit came on him with irresistible power, yet he stayed a stranger to the Spirit. Speaking by the Spirit is not the same as knowing Him.
- Order — God arranged the camp Himself, tribe by tribe. He places each member in the body of Christ the same way.
- Covering — The tents speak of a covering. No curse could touch the people, because in the picture they were covered.
- Verdict — The enemy's view settles nothing, and neither does the people's view of themselves. God sees them in the perfection of His own work.
And he took up his parable, and said, Balaam the son of Beor saith, and the man of opened eye saith,
Balaam has tried twice to curse Israel, and both times God made him bless them. On his third try he starts by describing himself, not Israel. The titles he uses raise the question this scene turns on: can a man see what God sees and still be lost?
This time Balaam changes his method. One writer reads the change as a move to keep his distance from God:
Balaam knew God's will better than Balak did. Yet greed blinded him, so he too kept on in his own self-will, clearly imagining that Balak's purpose could still be reached. Knowing that God was determined to bless Israel, he did not go "as at other times, to look for omens, but set his face toward the wilderness." This is the plainest statement of Balaam's evil intention: he tried to avoid getting into God's presence, because he knew God would not let him curse His people.
The Spirit of God came on Balaam before he spoke. That settled what came out of his mouth:
From this high place God would make Balaam speak out His thoughts about His people, and to this end "the Spirit of God came upon him." Balaam would gladly have spoken to curse Israel, under the influence of his familiar spirit or out of the depths of his own wicked heart. But under the compelling power of God's Spirit he must only speak what God determines.
The title Balaam gives himself sounds like a boast. One writer weighs how much it really proves:
In saying that his eyes were now opened, he confessed that they had been shut, and so he had been in the dark. It does not follow that his opened eye meant he had turned to God. Indeed his later history proves he had not. But his opening words assure us that he did speak as a prophet, and the words he spoke were the words of God.
Balaam goes on to call himself a man who falls down. One writer refuses to soften that:
The man knew that God had opened his eyes, and that he was looking at things his heart had no interest in. While he described the blessing and final triumph of the people he hated, he knew himself to be a fallen man. Not "fallen into a trance," as the older translation says, but truly fallen. This privileged but wilful man has gone down to eternal ruin.
This condition is not rare. One writer finds the same thing in the Gospels:
He was like the Pharisees of John 9, who asked the Lord, "Are we also blind?" The Lord answered them with these solemn words: "If you were blind, you would have no guilt; but now that you say, 'We see,' your guilt remains" (John 9:41). This is the state of religious men, who claim to be enlightened with the knowledge of God, but in reality are blind guides of the blind.
Commentators differ on why he faced the wilderness. Another writer sees it simply as the place where Israel was:
But Balaam set his face "toward the wilderness" — why? Because the children of Israel were still in the wilderness. The wilderness was not Canaan, but Israel was there. The world is not heaven or the glory, but the church is there now. While the church is in the wilderness, the Spirit of God can take up the parable and show what the church is in God's eye. So Balaam is not walking through the tents of Israel, or he would have heard their murmuring and discontent. He is not in the camp. He has gone up to the top of the hill, and looks at them with God's eye.
All the effort to curse Israel could not produce one word against them. One writer shows what it takes to see God's people as He does:
Not all the powers of earth and hell, men and devils combined, can draw out a single breath of curse or accusation against the Israel of God… They shine in all the beauty which He has put upon them. To see them like this, we only have to climb to the top of the rocks and have our eyes open, looking at them from His point of view, so that we may see them in "the vision of the Almighty."
One writer points out that the same three things belong to Christians now:
The Spirit of God came upon Balaam, his eyes were open and he heard the words of God — three advantages which we have. We are responsible to use them. Because we have the Holy Spirit our eyes have been opened, but we must want to understand the truth.
- Sight given. Balaam's opening words confess that his eyes had been shut. God opened them, and he said so before anything else.
- Sight compelled. The Spirit of God came upon him, so a man who wanted to curse could only speak what God determined.
- Sight without heart. Open eyes are not a changed heart. He praised a people he hated, and his later history proves he never turned to God.
- Sight and judgment. He was falling even while he saw. To claim sight and not obey it is the state of religious men who say "We see" and keep their guilt.
- Sight to use. From the top of the rocks he saw God's people as God sees them. The same Spirit, open eyes and words of God are ours.
He saith, who heareth the words of God, who seeth the vision of the Almighty, who falleth down, and who hath his eyes open
Balaam was hired to curse Israel, yet he opens this oracle by describing himself, not the people. His own words tell us where his message came from, and they raise a hard question: how can a man receive so much from God and still be lost?
Balaam's opening words claim prophetic authority. One writer also hears in them an admission of what he had been before.
As Balaam opened his lips for the third time he spoke of himself in a remarkable way. In saying that now his eyes were opened he confessed that they had been shut, and therefore he had been in the dark. The Spirit of God had come upon him, and he was saying what the Spirit forced him to say. So his opened eye does not mean that he had turned to God. His later history proves that he had not. But his opening words assure us of this: he really did speak as a prophet, and the words he spoke were the words of God.
Balaam heard God's words and saw God's vision. Both came to a man who knew he was fighting God.
In the opening words of this oracle, Balaam tells us that his eyes were open. He was not ignorant of the evil of his way. He knew full well that he stood in deadly opposition to the will of God when he sought to curse His people, and now he has to proclaim his own guilt. He had "heard the words of God," and he had seen "the vision of the Almighty." In other words, God had shown him His mind and will about His people. God even let him see the people as God Himself saw them.
Where Balaam stood shaped what he saw. One writer applies the same view to God's people today.
The world is not heaven or the glory, but the church is there now. While the church is in the wilderness, the Spirit of God can take up the oracle and show what the church is in God's eye. So Balaam is not walking through the tents of Israel, or he would have heard the murmuring and discontent of Israel. He is not in the camp, he is gone up to the top of the hill, and, looking at them with God's eye, what does he see? Israel resting in their tents according to their tribes.
This verse calls God "the Almighty." One writer explains what that title guarantees.
The word Balaam uses for God — "El" — is the expression of absolute Deity. Blessing — our blessing through grace — rests on what He is… This title of God is put into Balaam's lips, and it speaks of the absolute character of the blessings pronounced. "Has He said, and will He not do it?" So a further title is used (Num. 24:4), "Almighty" — the Accomplisher of all that He has spoken.
Commentators differ over the words "falling down with his eyes uncovered." Some read them as a physical collapse before the vision.
When he saw the visions of God, Balaam had to fall down, just as he did before the angel (ch. 22:31). Yet his eyes were so opened that he saw Israel from God's viewpoint. How sad that this had no lasting effect on his heart!
Another writer rejects the older "trance" wording. He hears in the word a verdict on the man.
The man knew that God had opened his eyes, and that he was looking at things his heart cared nothing for. Even while he described the blessing and the final triumph of the people he hated, he knew he was a fallen man. Not "fallen into a trance," as the Authorised Version puts it, but truly fallen. This privileged but wilful man has gone down to eternal ruin.
The beauty of these words makes the man's end even more solemn.
Where can we find nobler or more glowing words than what Balaam said in Num. 24:4 and the verses that follow? Yet what can be more appalling than the terrible history of his later life, and of his end? "Balaam also, the son of Beor, they killed with the sword" (Num. 31:8). Part of his prophecy came true in his own shameful death and beyond — "I see him, but not now; I behold him, but not near." No, wretched Balaam! no, indeed!
- Opened. Balaam says his eyes are open. That admits they had been shut, and that God opened them.
- Given. God gave him two things: His words in Balaam's mouth, and a sight of His people as He Himself sees them.
- Almighty. This title marks God as the One who carries out all He has spoken. That is why a hired curse could never land.
- Fallen. He fell down before the vision. Commentators read the word two ways: bowed low by God's power, or ruined as a man.
- Lost. The noblest of words came from a man who died under judgment. Sight and gift are no proof of a changed heart.
How goodly are thy tents, Jacob, and thy tabernacles, Israel!
Balak hired Balaam to curse Israel, but from the heights above the camp the prophet blessed them instead. What did he see from up there, and why is God's view of His people so unlike the view at ground level?
The man who said these words was not a believer. The quotes below follow an older translation, which reads "goodly" where the ESV reads "lovely," and "tabernacles" where it reads "encampments." One writer uses him as a warning that the Spirit can work through someone who is still lost:
A person may share in the Holy Spirit — that is, take part in His workings — without necessarily having received the Holy Spirit who lives in the saints. In them He is the seal of their faith and redemption. It was by the Holy Spirit that Balaam looked down from the heights on the beauty of the camp of Israel. He rejoiced and exclaimed, "How goodly are your tents, O Jacob, and your tabernacles, O Israel!" — and yet what followed shows that he was not a child of God.
Where Balaam stood decided what he saw. Ground level would have given him a very different report:
Balaam is not walking through the tents of Israel, or he would have heard the grumbling and discontent of Israel. He is not in the camp; he has gone up to the top of the hill, and, looking at them with God's eye, what does he see? Israel settled in their tents according to their tribes.
Balaam's blessing opens with the tents, not with the people living in them. One writer traces those coverings back to the tabernacle itself:
Read his whole third parable carefully and you will see that Balaam begins with the coverings of the people before he speaks of the people themselves. In Exodus 26 the instructions for the tabernacle and its fittings describe its layers by three names: the tabernacle (v. 6), the tent (v. 12), and the coverings (v. 14). All these things spoke to God of Christ, whose personal perfections cover His people and secure every blessing for them. How suggestive, then, are Balaam's words: "How goodly are your tents, O Jacob, and your tabernacles, O Israel!" Sadly, the unhappy man was incapable of appreciating the sweetness of what he said.
Human eyes saw shabby desert dwellings. God saw something else — and learning to see as He sees changes how you treat other believers:
Suppose one had gone down to examine those tents and dwellings. In the sight of man they might have looked "black as the tents of Kedar." But looked at in the vision of the Almighty they were "goodly," and whoever did not see them that way needed to have "his eyes opened." If I look at the people of God "from the top of the rocks," I will see them as God sees them: clothed with all the loveliness of Christ — complete in Him, accepted in the Beloved. This is what will enable me to get on with them, to work with them, to have fellowship with them, to rise above their rough points and angles, their blots and blemishes, their failures and weaknesses.
God's holiness and His verdict never clash. The same writer holds both together:
In the very next chapter Israel fell into terrible evil. Did that change God's verdict? Surely not. He judged and disciplined them for their evil. He is holy, and He can never approve in His people anything contrary to His nature. But He could never reverse His verdict about them... the moment an enemy comes out to curse or accuse, He stands in front of His people and says, "I see no iniquity" — "How goodly are their tents."
Balaam saw a camp gathered around the God who lived among them. One writer carries that straight over to today:
God had deep pleasure in viewing His people gathered around Himself, as He dwelt in their midst. It is the same today. God dwells among His people; they are a "dwelling place for God by the Spirit" (Ephesians 2:22); and it is with deep delight that He views His own as gathered around the Lord in the assembly.
One objection remains, and the writer meets it head-on:
Do you think that such views of God's grace will feed a spirit of lawlessness? Far from it! We may be sure we are never further from that terrible evil than when we are breathing the pure and holy air of "the top of the rocks"... And the only true and effective way to raise the standard of moral conduct is to keep resting in this most precious and calming truth, that God sees us perfect in Christ.
- Height — Balaam speaks from the hilltop, not from inside the camp. At ground level he would have heard only grumbling.
- Covering — He praises the tents before the people. Those coverings picture the perfections of Christ, which cover His people and secure their blessing.
- Verdict — What man calls black, God calls lovely. The difference is not in the tents but in whose eyes are open.
- Defence — God disciplines His people for their sin. But the moment an accuser appears, He stands in front of them and says He sees no iniquity.
- Effect — Living in that verdict does not loosen conduct; it lifts it. It also teaches you to bear with the faults of other believers.
Like valleys are they spread forth, like gardens by the river side, Like aloe-trees which Jehovah hath planted, like cedars beside the waters.
From the heights, Balaam looked down on a camp of tents pitched on bare desert sand. What he spoke was a picture of watered valleys, planted gardens, fragrant trees and cedars.
The scene in front of the prophet and the words he spoke do not match. One writer explains why.
Balaam spoke not only of the order of the children of Israel, but also of their beauty and fruitfulness... Balaam set his face towards the wilderness. What he would in fact have seen was many tents pitched round a tabernacle in the middle of the bare sand of the desert. That was a dreary enough sight in itself. What Balaam saw, however, was no mirage of the desert; it was the vision of the Almighty. The trees planted by the river spoke of refreshment, fruitfulness and beauty.
Each image says something of its own about the people camped below. Older translations open the verse with valleys spread out rather than palm groves, and the writers quoted here follow that wording.
They are spread out low, as the valleys are. But all the streams of the hills water them. That is the law of nature, and God's own ordering: the streams serve what lies low. The next picture brings out this thought more fully. They are "like gardens beside a river" — yes, gardens planted by the LORD Himself, with aloes, rare and sweet-smelling plants from far lands, or with cedars, which Scripture elsewhere calls the grandest things in nature, with a leaf that never fades.
In a desert, water is the last thing anyone expects to find.
I believe all the glories of Christ are connected with the rivers of living waters. Everyone who believes can say, in one sense, "God has made us like the aloes and cedar trees beside the waters." Every stone might be baking hot, with not a drop of water to cool it. But there is one place in the wilderness where there was not only a drop, but rivers of living waters.
God had already said He saw no iniquity in Jacob. This picture goes further.
What a blessed picture this is! And could we be happy to see them stunted, dishonouring the Lord? The glory of Christ is at stake, for His character should show in us. Paul says to the saints at Corinth (not, you ought to be, but), "You are a letter from Christ, written with the Spirit of the living God." No, I must grieve when I find in them what is contrary to their beauty in Christ. They are "like aloes," and like "cedar trees." It is not merely that God has not seen iniquity in them — He has seen beauty.
Balaam spoke from the top of the rocks. One writer makes that height the test of how we treat God's people.
If I am looking at the people of God "from the top of the rocks," I shall see them as God sees them. That is, clothed with all the beauty of Christ — complete in Him — accepted in Christ, the Beloved. This is what will let me get on with them, work with them and have fellowship with them. It lifts me above their points and angles, blots and blemishes, failures and weaknesses. If I do not look at them from this high, divine ground, I shall surely fix my eye on some little flaw. And that flaw will completely spoil my communion and cool my affections.
Commentators press the verse in two directions. One holds that it shows what grace does for believers now:
Balaam does not speak of what they were to become in Canaan. He speaks of what God saw them to be while they were still in the wilderness. So it is a lovely picture of what grace does for the Christian and the church now. No doubt it is a vision only for faith. But it is a vision for open eyes, not shut ones, as it says here. It is no illusion, no heated human imagination of what they are going to be. It is what God sees, and delights to let us see by faith, in His people here below.
Another holds the words open for a literal fulfilment still ahead:
This has not yet come true. Israel is still living in miserable huts, far from being like gardens by the riverside, or aloe trees and cedars beside the waters. But the prophetic eye sees it all done. Balaam's vision leaps over centuries to the time of the end, when Israel's unbelief has ended.
- Position — Balaam spoke from the top of the rocks. From the ground the same camp is only tents on sand. Where you stand decides what you see.
- Planting — the gardens, aloes and cedars are the Lord's own planting, not Israel's work. Streams water what lies low.
- Provision — cedars stay green because they stand beside water. In the desert God gives not a drop, but rivers.
- Portrait — God does more than find no fault. He sees real beauty: the character of Christ in His people.
- Practice — look at other believers from that height and you can work with them. Look from below and one flaw spoils everything.
Water shall flow out of his buckets, and his seed shall be in great waters, And his king shall be higher than Agag, and his kingdom shall be exalted.
Balak paid Balaam to curse Israel, and Balaam instead described a nation overflowing with water and a king above the strongest ruler of the day. The verse looks past the tents in the wilderness to a throne, and asks when such words come true, and in whom.
The picture is of a container so full it spills. That fullness is not meant to stay with the one who holds it.
Those who are drawing on the infinite resources of God have something to give to others. They take in more than they can hold. So Balaam says, "Water shall flow from his buckets, and his seed shall be in many waters." If Balak had understood what he was hearing, he would have had no fear of Israel. The people were meant to be a blessing to all the nations. They were to spread the knowledge of the one true God, and to share His wonderful grace with others. Israel has never yet risen to this.
The blessing is Israel's own as well, not only something they pass on.
Material prosperity and spiritual blessing await Israel. They will also be the means of blessing to others, and with no stingy hand. "Water shall flow from his buckets" is a figure that shows the lavish abundance of the blessing. Wherever the Israelite goes, he carries blessing.
The second clause widens the map. The waters stand for peoples, so the promise spreads outward.
"Water shall flow from his buckets" (v.7) reminds us of the "rivers of living water" that flow from within a believer (John 7:38), for the blessing of others too. So Israel will be a source of refreshment for all the nations in the Millennium. "His seed shall be in many waters." The waters speak of the Gentile nations (Rev. 17:15). So the descendants of Israel will spread an influence of great blessing over the whole world.
The verse measures Israel's king against Agag. So who was he?
Agag was the title of the kings of Amalek, probably a general title, like the title Pharaoh, king of Egypt. (1 Sam. 15:9, 32; Num. 24:7)... Amalek descended from Esau, through Eliphaz. (Gen. 36:12, 16)
The name itself carries a claim to height, which is exactly what the comparison overturns.
In this picture of fullest blessing, we cannot miss Israel's supremacy over Amalek. We have seen what Amalek stands for (Ex. 17). In the earlier prophecy, the meek King of Israel meets the restlessness of the flesh, and His rest-giving yoke conquers it. Now, as the direct result, Amalek's king comes down. Simonis gives the meaning of his name as "very high," which seems to fit the sense best. Israel's King is higher than the highest. And is not self-exaltation the very thing that gives free rein to the lusts of the flesh?
Israel's later kings answer the words in part, but not to the full height of them.
Israel had no king, and would not have one for many years to come. Even so, it could be foretold that "his king shall be higher than Agag, and his kingdom shall be exalted." The Spirit of God who had come on Balaam was looking forward to the coming of Messiah. He would not only be higher than Agag, the king of Amalek, "the first among the nations." He would be King of kings and Lord of lords. There was a partial fulfilment of this prophecy in David and Solomon, but the Lord Jesus is the One the Spirit of God has in view.
Notice the change of tense. Balaam speaks of the camp as it is now, and of the throne as still to come.
Then, besides this, there is strength. "His king shall be higher than Agag, and his kingdom shall be exalted."... Notice the difference: the tents "are" lovely now, but the king "shall be" higher than Agag. The people did not yet have a king. Their visible blessing in power had not yet come. Their exaltation was to be a future thing in the land.
Yet the beauty was real while they were still camped in the desert, and that is where the lesson turns personal.
Balaam is not speaking of what they would become in Canaan. He speaks of what God saw them to be — indeed, what God let him see them to be while they were still in the wilderness. It is therefore a wonderfully lovely picture of what grace does for the Christian and the church now... No doubt it is a vision only for faith; but it is a vision not for closed eyes, but for open eyes, as it says here.
- Source. The water is not Israel's own. They draw on the infinite resources of God.
- Overflow. The buckets spill on purpose — the figure speaks of lavish abundance, not a careful ration.
- Reach. "Many waters" points to the nations; the blessing travels outward until the whole world feels it.
- King. Agag was the royal title of Amalek, and the name means "very high." Israel's King is higher than the highest — seen in part in David and Solomon, in full in Christ.
- Kingdom. The tents were lovely already, but the throne was still to come. God shows His people what He sees now, and what the world will see later.
God brought him out of Egypt; he hath as it were the strength of a buffalo. He shall consume the nations his enemies, and break their bones, and with his arrows shall smite [them] in pieces.
Balak sent for Balaam to curse Israel. Instead the prophet traces the whole strength of the nation back to the God who brought them out of Egypt. If their power is not their own but His, who can stand against it?
The verse opens by naming where Israel came from. One writer calls this a refrain the prophecy keeps coming back to, because the name Israel only carries power if it rests on that foundation.
Yet "Israel" is a name of power; but to make that power real, we must come back again to the foundation. So here the refrain of redemption comes back, with its results.
Glory is coming to this nation. At that very moment, God reminds them of what they once were.
While this glory is coming, God reminds the people where they came from. The same words come back from the second prophecy (23:22), where they go with God not looking on iniquity, and with Israel kept safe from every spell — there too with power against their enemies. But here, in this third prophecy, there is not only victory over the enemy in battle, but the complete conquest of the "nations his enemies." God would not have them forget that He brought them out of Egypt. However high they rise in glory and power, they were once a nation of slaves. God is the source of all good, clothing with beauty and endowing with power.
Balak had told Balaam that a people had come out of Egypt. He never said who brought them. This verse repeats the fact and names God as the one who did it.
The repetition surely stresses that Israel were under the care and protection of God. They had not come out of Pharaoh's bondage by their own strength. When Balak sent for Balaam he had said to him, "Behold, a people has come out of Egypt" (22:11). God wanted Balak to understand that His all-powerful arm had brought them from Egypt. He had freed them from the bondage of Pharaoh, and had cared for them all through their wilderness journey.
Older translations call this animal a "unicorn"; the ESV has "wild ox". It was not a fanciful creature but an animal Israel knew, and two things about it mattered.
Nothing in Scripture shows that the animal had only one horn. In fact Deut. 33:17 speaks of "the horns of a unicorn" (see margin), and it must have been some animal the Israelites knew well. Its great strength and wildness are its main features: no one can put it to farm work, as they could the tame ox.
Balak was listening to all this. To take on Israel meant taking on something no man handles alone.
It was hopeless for Balak to oppose Israel, for he had, as it were, the supreme power and strength of the buffalo; God had given him strength like that of this very powerful animal. By repeating this, God left Balak in no doubt: he could no more hope to defeat the people of God than he could meet the charge of the buffalo single-handed.
The second half of the verse looks forward. It promises victory over enemies still ahead, and one writer sees it reaching far beyond Balaam's day.
Balaam's final parable is about the victorious power of the people of God, when Christ takes His place at their head… Balaam paints a vivid picture of the power of God as it acts for His chosen people, and in them… For the second time he points back to the great deliverance from Egypt. The God who broke the power of the enemy at that time will break the power of even mightier foes in the coming day (Micah 5:8).
Balaam drew the conclusion himself. Standing in front of the king who had sent for him, he said why he would not touch Israel.
I dare not meddle with them, Balaam says; I have too much understanding of what they are, to do so; they are connected with God, with His strength and power.
- Foundation. One act holds up everything else: God brought Israel out of Egypt. Every promise of power in the verse rests on that.
- Gift. The strength is not their own. God's arm brought them out of Pharaoh's bondage. He clothes them with beauty and gives them power.
- Picture. The "wild ox" (older versions say "unicorn") stands for strength and wildness. No one can harness it for work, and no king could meet its charge alone.
- Reach. The same power that broke Egypt will break mightier foes in the coming day. That is when Christ takes His place at the head of His people.
- Result. Balaam's own verdict: I dare not meddle with them — they are connected with God, with His strength and His power.
He stooped, he lay down like a lion, and like a lioness who will stir him up? Blessed is he that blesseth thee, and cursed is he that curseth thee.
Balaam was paid to curse Israel. Instead his third speech pictures a nation like a lion that has eaten and lain down, and it warns anyone who would disturb that lion. Where did these words come from, since the speaker never wanted to say them? And how far does the blessing and cursing reach?
Balak thought a hired prophet could hand out blessing and cursing at will. He never saw that the rule already ran the other way.
First Israel was forbidden to touch Moab. Next Balak says, "He whom you bless is blessed, and he whom you curse is cursed." And he was seeking to bring the curse on Israel when God had said, "Blessed are those who bless you, and cursed are those who curse you." So he was just bringing it on himself.
Nothing here came from Balaam's own heart. He was a tool in God's hand.
We must remember that in all this Balaam could no more resist the power of God working on him and through him than his donkey could stay silent earlier. We must not suppose that there was the smallest measure of real sympathy with what God was doing. The whole event was God's power at work, despite all that could be done against His people. He acted so because He would confound the enemy who turned to Satan's power to bring a curse on Israel.
Neither half of the verse is new. Balaam is repeating two much older promises.
In Numbers 24:9 Balaam was forced to repeat two ancient prophecies about Israel. Jacob said of Judah in Genesis 49:9: "Judah is a lion's cub; from the prey, my son, you have gone up. He stooped down; he crouched as a lion and as a lioness; who dares rouse him?" The LORD said to Abram in Genesis 12:3, "I will bless those who bless you, and him who dishonors you I will curse." So the God of Israel confirmed His word through the lips of a determined enemy!
A crouching lion is not a tired lion. This picture reaches to the end of history.
After devouring the prey the lion lies down. God brings rest to Israel after the defeat of all their enemies. So He promises, "Jacob shall return and have quiet and ease, and none shall make him afraid" (Jer. 30:10). No nation will want to stir up Israel's anger all through the thousand years of peace. Even at the end of that time, nations will come together in hostility against Israel. Israel will have no need to fear, because God will destroy their enemies with fire from heaven (Rev. 20:7-10).
The lion picture does not stop with the nation. It reaches a Person: the Lion of Judah, who opens the book of God's purposes.
David's throne is to be lifted up from the dust, and Judah's long-delayed hope is to open into fulfilment. It is strange that critics and commentators can see, in the Lion of Judah opening the book of God's purposes, only the general truth of Christ on the throne ruling the course of events. The clear reference ties Judah's Lion to Judah taking the prey, and then crouching with a strength that no one will dare to provoke.
The last clause has a track record. Nations have tested it.
In attempting to curse the people of God, both were judged by God. It has been the same all through Israel's uneven history. Nations that have interfered with God's people have not done it without cost. God may have used nations, like Assyria, as the rod of His anger to discipline His people, but in imagining they could act as they pleased in this, they brought God's judgment down on themselves.
Looking forward, the same principle sorts the nations at the end.
The blessing of all nations, as we have seen, is bound up with the blessing of Israel because they are the LORD's people. So Balaam closes his parable with the words of God to Abraham. Matthew 25 gives the fulfilment. There the Son of Man sits on the throne of His glory. He separates the nations one from another by how they treated one of the least of His brothers, the children of Israel.
- Compelled. Balaam had no sympathy with his own words. God's power overruled an enemy hired against His people.
- Confirmed. Both halves of the verse repeat older words: Jacob's blessing on Judah, and God's promise to Abram. A hostile mouth sealed them.
- Couched. The lion has eaten and lain down. That pictures rest after every enemy falls, with no one left willing to disturb it.
- Crowned. The same lion language runs on to the Lion of the tribe of Judah. He takes the prey, then settles in a strength none will provoke.
- Counted. Blessing and cursing are not idle words. Nations that touched Israel have paid, and the Son of Man sorts the nations by how they treated His people.
Then Balak's anger was kindled against Balaam, and he smote his hands together; and Balak said to Balaam, I called thee to curse mine enemies, and behold, thou hast altogether blessed [them] these three times!
Balak has moved Balaam from hilltop to hilltop, hoping for a curse on Israel, and each time the prophet has blessed instead. Here the king's patience snaps, and his angry complaint becomes an exact summary of what God had been doing.
Balak's fury follows the third and richest description of the people he wanted destroyed.
Balak was greatly disappointed with the first and second parables; but after he heard the third, where the people he hated were described as not only sanctified and justified, but positively lovely in the eyes of the LORD, he was furious… He now wished to get rid of his visitor.
Balak counts three blessings, and he counts correctly.
In a word, we see the separation of the people from the world. We see their justification. We see their order and their beauty, as planted by God near the everlasting sources of the river of God. And then we see the coming of Christ. The prophecy is perfectly beautiful. Notice too that the prophecies, in the renewed effort to bring a curse on them, are not repetitions. Each such effort brings out something more of what God had in His mind for His people — for blessing.
The irony is that the world owes these words to a plot against God's people.
Israel's tents are seen as beautiful in the eyes of the LORD. And more than that, the people themselves are presented to us as holding fast to those ancient sources of grace and living ministry found in God… And only to think that we owe these magnificent words to the godless partnership between Balak and Balaam!
It would be easy to read the blessings as the prophet's change of heart. Commentators are careful to shut that reading down.
In the earlier vision of Numbers 24, Balaam uses still stronger terms about the power God would give them. Those words bring Balak's anger to a head… We must remember this: in all of it, Balaam could no more resist the power of God working on him and through him than his donkey could stay silent earlier. We must not suppose that there was the smallest measure of real sympathy with what God was doing. The whole transaction was one of God's power, in spite of all that could be done against His people.
Balak shouts at Balaam, but the target of his anger is higher up.
Three times the enemy has tried and three times failed. Now Satan, in the person of Balak, appears in more open opposition. He acts as though he would take revenge on his helpless servant. For Balak here is only the mouthpiece of Satan. In anger and disappointment he tells Balaam to flee to his place… It is against the LORD that Balak speaks. The king now declares himself openly against His will.
What settled the matter was not Israel's behaviour but God's own answer to every accuser.
The moment any enemy or accuser comes on the scene, the LORD places Himself in front to receive and answer the accusation. His answer is always based, not on what His people are in themselves, but on what He has made them through the perfection of His own work. His glory is bound up with them, and in defending them He maintains His own glory. He places Himself between them and every accusing tongue.
The same question presses on believers today: can our failures undo God's grace toward us?
But can our shortcomings affect God's counsels of grace concerning us? Will He stop loving us, erase our names from the book of life, and throw us back to where He found us? Blessed be His holy name, NO!… "For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable" (Rom. 11:29). Listen to Moses in Deut. 23:5: "the LORD your God turned the curse into a blessing for you, because the LORD your God loved you." In the same way, the risen Christ secures all our blessings.
Balak orders Balaam away. He does not get to end the meeting.
The king, as we would judge, might easily have walked away after dismissing Balaam. But the LORD held him to the spot. There is no other explanation of his staying there another minute… The enemy of the people of God had raised a very serious question about them. The LORD would give His answer in full, and Balak had to hear all of it.
- Attack. Balak hired a curse; what he got was blessing, and his rage is the admission that his plan has collapsed.
- Advance. The three blessings were not repeats. Every fresh try drew out more of what God had in mind: separation, justification, beauty, and then Christ.
- Agency. Balaam blessed under God's power, not from sympathy. He could no more resist it than his donkey could stay silent.
- Aim. Balak's anger lands on Balaam, but he speaks against the LORD, whose people he cannot touch.
- Anchor. The curse failed because God answers accusers by what He has made His people. Moses gave the reason: "the LORD your God loved you."
And now flee thou to thy place; I said I would very highly honour thee, and behold, Jehovah has kept thee back from honour.
Balak has heard Israel blessed three times over, and his patience snaps. He sends the prophet home with a jab that blames God for the unpaid fee. Two questions follow. Why is a pagan king so clear about who blocked the deal? And what did Balaam gain by chasing honour he never received?
The dismissal sounds like a quarrel between a king and his hired prophet. One writer sees a greater enemy behind the failed scheme, and hears Balak's complaint name the real obstacle:
Three times the enemy has tried and three times failed. Now Satan, in the person of Balak, appears in more open opposition. He acts as if he wants revenge on his helpless servant. For Balak here is only the mouthpiece of Satan. He had his rewards for the prophet, but they were offered in vain. In anger and disappointment he tells Balaam to flee to his place. … It is against Jehovah that Balak speaks. It was against His will that the king now openly declares himself.
Balak's words contain a true confession. That makes his reaction all the more telling:
But Balaam's message greatly stirred Balak's anger (v.10). Why did he not bow to the Word of God? Simply because of a stubborn will! He knew that the Lord had kept Balak from honouring Balaam. But he had no intention of listening to the Lord, despite the three testimonies to the blessing of Israel. He gave up all hope of having Israel cursed, and only wanted Balaam to get away, without payment for his services.
The honour now withdrawn was the very thing that drew Balaam to Balak in the first place:
There is something especially dreadful in the case of Balaam. He clearly loved money — no rare love, sadly, in our own day. Balak's gold and silver proved a very tempting bait to the wretched man — a bait too tempting to resist. Satan knew his man, and the price at which he could be bought.
So the taunt cuts both ways. Balaam agreed with it, and regretted it:
To all this Balaam's poor covetous heart would say a regretful "Amen." … So if the result of this extraordinary business disappointed Balak, it disappointed Balaam just as keenly.
The restraint was not bad luck or a bad mood in the king. It was a lesson in who is stronger:
The Lord had indeed kept Balaam back from Balak's honour. This taught Balaam that God's power is greater than the power of Satan whom he served. It also taught him that God will not let anyone interfere with the people He has chosen for Himself.
Balaam's reply reaches back to the warning he gave Balak's messengers at the start. One commentator notices what has dropped out of his vocabulary:
The false prophet reminds the king of Moab of his warning to the messengers. Not all the wealth of Balak could make him say anything beyond God's commandment. It was true that he had said this. He had even spoken of "the word of the Lord my God." Now the evil man stood fully exposed. Both God and the king of Moab rebuked him. And he no longer speaks of the Lord as his God.
The king says "go" — and nobody goes. God still has something to say, and Balak must stay and hear it:
However, Balaam did not leave then, as Balak told him to. For God required Balaam to speak one more prophecy. Balak could not help listening, even though Balaam announced Israel's conquest of Moab in the latter days. Balak had challenged God without knowing it when he set out to have God's people cursed. So God gave him four messages that he could not avoid hearing — much as he might have wished to silence at least the fourth!
Balaam had earlier wished to die the death of the righteous. A writer sets that wish against the road he took:
But he did not care to live the life of the righteous. How could he expect to die the death of the righteous? Reward glittered before his eye. He went his way to hell for the sake of what he could pick up on the road. Yet he must leave it all at the edge of the grave. He and his sins alone could pass through the gates of eternity.
- Bait. Honour and money were the hook that drew Balaam to Moab; the enemy knew his man and the price he could be bought for.
- Blessing. Three times the curse came out as blessing. God will not let anyone interfere with the people He has chosen.
- Restraint. The king's own taunt admits it: the Lord held Balaam back, proving His power greater than the power Balaam served.
- Exposure. Rebuked by God and by a pagan king, the prophet who once said "the Lord my God" stops saying it.
- End. Balak keeps his gold, Balaam keeps his covetous heart, and Balaam must leave the glittering reward at the edge of the grave.
And Balaam said to Balak, Did I not also speak to thy messengers whom thou sentest to me, saying,
Balak, the king of Moab, has just exploded in anger: the prophet he hired to curse Israel, Balaam, has blessed them three times instead. Balaam answers that he warned Balak's men from the start: his mouth was not his to sell — and yet he wanted the bribe with all his heart.
Balaam's defence is true to fact. He had told Balak's messengers exactly this. One commentator adds a remark in brackets that exposes the man behind the words:
If Balak would give me his house full of silver and gold [the very thing his poor heart craved intensely], I cannot go beyond the commandment of the Lord, to do either good or bad of my own mind. But what the Lord says, that will I speak.
Balaam's point is about his words, not his willingness. He is saying God put those sentences in his mouth. One writer shows how far that went:
He loved "the wages of unrighteousness," and, if he could, would have uttered what Balak desired. But a power that he could not resist held sway over him. He was for the time being the mouthpiece of God, and spoke, however unwillingly, the words of God. He knew that inspiration was real, and real word by word. So at his first meeting with Balak, before he spoke one prediction about Israel, he told him, "Have I now any power to say anything? The word that God puts in my mouth, that shall I speak."
What held him back was not conviction. With a different source feeding him, the same tongue would have cursed:
Balaam could only respond as before, that he must speak what he was given to speak. If an evil spirit had given him a message of cursing, he would have been glad to speak it. But God stepped in and gave a message that He forced Balaam to speak. A house full of gold and silver could not change that, as Balaam knew.
Balak had told Balaam that the LORD kept him from honour. He was right about the cause, but he missed what it meant:
The Lord had indeed kept Balaam back from Balak's honour. He was teaching him that His power is greater than the power of Satan, whom Balaam served. He was teaching him too that He will not let anyone interfere with the people He has chosen for Himself.
The same grip was on the king. He had dismissed Balaam; he should have walked off. He did not:
The King, we would think, could have walked away once he had dismissed Balaam. But Jehovah held him to the spot. There is no other explanation of his remaining there another minute. And how else can we explain his silence when Balaam spoke plainly of disaster to his own nation? The enemy of God's people had raised a very serious question about them. Jehovah would give His answer in full, and Balak had to hear it.
Balaam points the king back to what he told the messengers. But his earlier words had two more in them:
The false prophet reminds the king of Moab that he had warned his messengers: not all the wealth of Balak could make him say anything beyond God's commandment. It was true that he had said this. He had even spoken of "the word of the Lord my God." Now God and the king of Moab had both exposed and rebuked the evil man, and he no longer speaks of the Lord being his God.
- Restraint, not reverence. Balaam's boast that money could not move him was true of his mouth only. A power he could not resist held him, and he spoke God's words unwillingly.
- Restraint on the prophet. The LORD kept him back from Balak's honour. God's power is greater than the power of the one Balaam served, and God will not let anyone touch the people He has chosen.
- Restraint on the king. Balak had dismissed his hired man. Yet the LORD held him to the spot and made him hear His full answer to the charge against His people.
- Restraint exposes. That same hand uncovered the man. God and Balak both rebuked him, and he drops the words "my God" for good.
- Restraint is not salvation. A tongue used by God is no proof of a heart that belongs to Him. With a different source, Balaam would gladly have cursed what God had blessed.
If Balak gave me his house full of silver and gold, I could not go beyond the commandment of Jehovah to do good or bad out of my heart what Jehovah shall say, that will I speak?
Balak hired Balaam to curse Israel. Instead Balaam blessed them, and the king has just sent him away in anger. Balaam's answer is not a new defence. He simply repeats the terms he set at the start — terms that confess God's power and expose his own heart at the same time.
Balaam's reply sounds consistent. He says he warned Balak's messengers from the start. But one writer notices that he does not repeat himself exactly. Something has dropped out.
The false prophet reminds the king of Moab that he had warned his messengers: not all of Balak's wealth could make him say anything beyond God's commandment. He had indeed said this. He had even spoken of "the word of the Lord my God." Now God and the king of Moab had completely exposed this evil man and rebuked him. And he no longer speaks of the Lord as his God.
On the surface, money cannot buy this man and threats cannot move him. One commentator reads the scene that way:
But the prophet seems neither won by desire for his bribes, nor afraid of the king's power.
Others look past the surface to what Balaam would have done if he had been free to choose. He was not turning the money down. God was stopping him from earning it.
Balaam could only respond as before, that he must speak what he was given to speak. If an evil spirit had given him a message of cursing he would have been glad to speak that, but God intervened to give a message that He compelled Balaam to speak. A house full of gold and silver could not change that, as Balaam knew (v.13).
The heart of the verse is the limit Balaam admits. He cannot produce good or bad out of himself. He can only pass on what God puts in his mouth. One writer presents Balaam as proof of how far God's control over a speaker's words can reach, even when the speaker is unwilling.
We know he loved "the wages of unrighteousness," and he would have said what Balak wanted if he could. But a power he could not resist ruled him. For the time being he was the mouthpiece of God, and he spoke the words of God, unwilling as he was. He was so aware that this was real inspiration, down to each word, that at his first meeting with Balak, before he made one prediction about Israel, he told him, "Have I now any power of my own to speak anything? The word that God puts in my mouth, that must I speak."
The control was not limited to his tongue. Another writer follows it through his eyes and ears too. The result was not just silence about cursing. Balaam had to speak of God's delight in the people He had chosen.
Here we see the way God brought Balaam to see the deep things of God, and to testify to His good pleasure in the people of His choice. God's mighty power took hold of his eyes, ears and lips. He had to see "the vision of the Almighty," to hear "the words of God," and to speak what the Lord put in his mouth.
Both men were ready to walk away from each other. God was not finished.
Balak did not want to hear any more, and Balaam did not want to say any more. But the power of Hell had been called up against His chosen people, so Jehovah had taken the matter up, though no one asked Him, and He would see it through to the end. What is more, it had to end in His time and in His way. God's power held Balak there, and he had to listen to a remarkable prediction of earth's final military catastrophe.
That prediction reaches far past anything Balak had in mind. One writer sums up its range:
It really embraces the end of this age.
- Price. Balaam names the highest bid he can imagine, a house full of silver and gold, and it still buys nothing. The word of the Lord is not for sale.
- Limit. Balaam admits he has no range of his own. He cannot produce good or bad from himself. He can only repeat what God gives him.
- Mouthpiece. He spoke God's words against his own will. Commentators say he would have cursed Israel if he could. He is a witness to how God controls a man's words, not an example of faith.
- Exposure. Repeating his old pledge, he drops the words "my God." Once the profit was gone, so was the claimed relationship.
- Reach. Neither king nor prophet wanted the meeting to go on. God carried it on, into a prophecy that reaches the end of the age.
And now behold, I go to my people come, I will admonish thee what this people will do to thy people at the end of days.
Balak paid Balaam to curse Israel and got three blessings instead. He has just sent the prophet away in anger, and Balaam answers with one last word: a preview of what Israel will do to Moab at the end of history.
Balak wanted the prophet gone. Neither man wanted to hear or say another word, yet this was not over.
Balak had no wish to hear more, and Balaam had no wish to say more. But the power of Hell had been called up against His chosen people, so the LORD had taken the matter up, though no one asked Him to, and He would see it through to the finish. What is more, it must finish in His time and in His way. God's power held Balak there, and he had to listen to a remarkable prediction of earth's final military disaster.
So the king who hired a curse ended up with a forecast of his own defeat.
Balak was left with the statement that to curse Israel was to bring a curse on the head of the person who spoke it. This made him angry, and he wanted to send Balaam away on the spot. But the Lord was about to speak again through Balaam's lips, and Balak had to listen... So Balak had to hear not only Israel's present blessing but also their victorious destiny.
The phrase is not vague. The same words run right through the Old Testament, and they always point to the same stretch of time.
"The last," or "latter days," is an expression with a clear prophetic meaning. It occurs just 14 times (Gen. 49:1; Num. 24:14; Deut. 4:30; Deut. 31:29; Isa. 2:2; Jer. 23:20; Jer. 30:24; Jer. 48:47; Jer. 49:39; Ezek. 38:16; Dan. 2:28; 10:14; Hosea 3:5; Micah 4:1). In every one of these the reference is to the closing scenes of Jacob's time of trouble and the setting up of the Millennial kingdom, as a study of the context of these passages will show.
Balaam promises news about what one people will do to another. Three verses later he speaks of Messiah's scepter.
Balaam had said, "I will let you know what this people will do to your people in the latter days" (verse 14). As soon as the prophet speaks of Messiah's scepter, he says that He "shall crush the forehead of Moab and break down all the sons of Sheth." This points to God's dealings with Moab in the "latter days," at the time when the millennium begins. Israel is to deal with Moab, according to verse 14, but it is Messiah too, according to verse 17.
Balaam announces his departure. It did not turn out to be a homecoming.
With his words finished, Balaam went off "to his place." This does not mean that he returned to his own land... later we find that when Moab and the Midianites were destroyed, he died among them.
The man who described Israel's future stayed on the losing side of it.
When the five kings of the Midianites were killed in battle, Balaam died with them (Num. 31:8). He was a long way from home at that tragic moment. But death found him among the bitter, long-standing enemies of the people of God, still trying to harm Israel.
Balaam saw the blessing and spoke about it. He never stood inside it.
His greed led him to try to serve the wicked king of Moab by cursing the people of God. When God gave him an answer, he goes to God a second time, because his heart wanted its own way. It is a solemn thing to learn that if God gives you up, you may get what you want... He was indeed a man whose heart was not with God. He said some true things, but his spirit was not in them. He always speaks from the outside, as a miserable man, far off from the blessing that he saw. "I see him, but not now; I behold him, but not near," and so on. He goes on step by step, until he lends himself to corrupt even God's chosen people through the world.
Balaam tells Balak what is coming. The Bible tells us what is coming, and it has a purpose in doing so.
Most of the Bible deals with the great crisis that is now coming, when God will bring the Man of His choice out into full view, and put all things under His rule... "Horns" and "beasts" may be very interesting, and may give plenty of material for discussion. But the aim of the Spirit of God in showing us the future is to separate us from man's hopelessly evil order of things, and to fix our minds on Christ.
- Last word. Balaam wanted to stop, and Balak wanted him gone. God kept the last word, and He made Balak hear it.
- Last days. "The latter days" is a settled phrase, pointing to Israel's time of trouble and the kingdom that follows it.
- Last enemy. What Israel does to Moab is also what Messiah does — the Scepter strikes through His people.
- Last journey. He said he was going to his people; he died among Israel's enemies instead.
- Last aim. Prophecy is not there to fuel debate about symbols. It loosens our grip on this world order and fixes us on Christ.
And he took up his parable, and said, Balaam the son of Beor saith, and the man of opened eye saith,
Balak wanted Israel cursed, and Balaam could not do it. This fourth oracle opens with a portrait of Balaam himself: a man who sees God and is still lost.
What changed in the way Balaam received these prophecies?
How were these prophecies given? When Balaam found he could not turn God aside from His purpose of blessing the people, he stopped looking for enchantments.
The phrase "whose eye is opened" sounds like conversion. It is not. Commentators distinguish between accurate knowledge about God and living knowledge of Him.
Balaam begins this prophecy in much the same way as his third. He speaks as the man whose eyes were opened, who hears the words of God and has knowledge of the Most High. How sad that this knowledge came only from evidence. It was not the living knowledge of a believer. Yet it was accurate, for he did see the vision of the Almighty, subdued before God, falling down with his eyes open. So what he prophesied is absolute truth, and he could know it only because God revealed it.
Balaam's words pile up hearing, knowing and seeing, and they name God three ways. One writer draws a lesson from each.
Ungodly as he was, for a fourth time Balaam was forced to speak inspired words, and verse 16 is instructive about what inspiration involves. He not only "saw" and "knew," but also "heard the words of God." So the very words he spoke were given to him. What is more, he used three names. There is "God." There is "the Most High," a name that seems tied in a special way to His supremacy in the millennial age. And there is "the Almighty," the name by which He revealed Himself to Abraham, from whom Israel came. If Balaam had really known God for himself in the way these names suggest, he would have been stopped in his evil course. He gives us a solemn example of the good things a man may say while he himself remains in "the bond of iniquity," like Simon the sorcerer in Acts 8.
Balaam presents himself as a man who sees and speaks. Neither was under his own control.
Here we see the way Balaam was brought to see the deep things of God, and to testify to His good pleasure in the people of His choice. Eyes, ears and lips were brought under the mighty power of God. He was obliged to see "the vision of the Almighty," and to hear "the words of God," and to speak what the Lord put in his mouth (see Numbers 22:38; 23:5, 12, 16, 26; 24:13).
The oracle goes on to speak of Balaam falling down with his eyes open. One writer takes the falling at face value: the man is going down, and he can see it happening.
Balaam declares that he is falling — falling down to ruin, "but having his eyes open." He was like the Pharisees of John 9, who said to the Lord, "Are we also blind?" The Lord answered them with these solemn words: "If you were blind, you would have no guilt; but now that you say, 'We see,' your guilt remains" (John 9:41). This is the condition of religious men who claim to be enlightened with the knowledge of God, but are really "blind leaders of the blind."
The opened eye has a second side. What Balaam had to see is what God's people most need to see — and Balak's attack is what drew it out.
To speak in human terms, we would never have had such a glorious view of Israel if Balak had not tried to curse them. It is the view seen in "the vision of the Almighty," "from the top of the rocks," by one "having his eyes open"… They shine in all the beauty He has put on them. To see them this way, all that is needed is to climb to "the top of the rocks" — to have "the eyes open" and look at them from His point of view, so that we may see them in "the vision of the Almighty."
- Sight — Balaam's eye is open. What he sees is real, and his words are true, because they come from God and not from him.
- Without life — the sight comes from evidence, not from life. He knows about the Most High; he does not know Him, or God would have stopped him in his course.
- Under compulsion — eyes, ears and lips are all commandeered. The enchantments have stopped; only what God gives him comes out.
- Falling — the same oracle in which he boasts of open eyes records him going down. Knowing and seeing saved nobody; claiming to see while walking in self-will is the guilt of John 9.
- Reversed — what condemned Balaam is what believers should want: the opened eye that sees God's people from God's point of view.
He saith, who heareth the words of God, who knoweth the knowledge of the Most High, Who seeth the vision of the Almighty, who falleth down, and who hath his eyes open
Balaam was hired to curse Israel, yet he opens this oracle by describing himself — a man who hears from God and sees what the Almighty shows him. How could someone with that much access to God still end up lost?
Balaam is describing himself, and the description gives him away. One writer notes what a man admits when he says his eyes are now open:
As Balaam opened his lips for the third time he spoke of himself in a remarkable way. In saying that now his eyes were opened he confessed that they had been shut, and so he had been in the dark. The Spirit of God had come upon him, and he was saying what the Spirit forced him to say. It does not follow that his opened eye meant he had turned to God. His later history proves that he had not. But his opening words are meant to assure us that he really did speak as a prophet, and the words he spoke were the words of God.
What kind of man was he? One writer answers from how he lived and how he died:
That Balaam was a man of God, no one, I think, would dare to claim... He "loved the wages of unrighteousness." He put himself among the open enemies of the Lord. He agreed, for money, to curse the people of God — though God turned the curse into a blessing. And you know how he died, set against the armies of the Lord, despite his prayer, "Let me die the death of the righteous"... He was never a converted man. Still — and this is very solemn to consider — God could use him as a vessel to express His thoughts of His people.
Balaam claims to know the Most High — the language of a saint. One writer separates two kinds of knowing:
Balaam begins this much as he began his third prophecy: the man whose eyes were opened, who hears the words of God and has knowledge of the Most High. How sad that this knowledge was only a knowledge from evidence, not the living knowledge of a believer. Yet it was accurate, for he really did see the vision of the Almighty, subdued before God, falling down with his eyes open. So what he prophesied is absolute truth, which he could only know by God's revelation.
Can a person know God like that and still be unconverted? Another writer points to Romans:
It is clear from Rom. 1:21, etc., that a certain knowledge of God may exist apart from conversion or the working of divine life in the soul.
The verse names God three ways, and each name carries its own weight:
The word Balaam uses here — "El" — is the expression of absolute Deity... It is put into Balaam's lips, and speaks of the absolute character of the blessings pronounced. "Has He spoken, and shall He not make it good?" So a further title is used (Num. 24:4), "Almighty" — the One who accomplishes all that He has spoken. He is also in relationship with those He blesses — "Jehovah his God is with him." And when the rising of the Star out of Jacob is predicted, then the title "Most High" is brought in (Num. 24:16). For the Sceptre of universal rule arises out of Israel, and Jehovah their God is then Most High over all the earth. It is His millennial title.
That same title links this oracle to a wider line running through the Bible:
Melchizedek, the priest of the Most High God, met Abram returning from the slaughter of the kings and blessed him in the name of the Most High God, possessor of heaven and earth (Gen. 14:18-20). This event appears to prefigure the millennial day when the saints of the Most High shall take the kingdom and possess it for ever (Dan. 7). Again, Balaam, through "the knowledge of the Most High," prophesied of the same time (Num. 24:16).
The verse ends with Balaam describing himself as falling down. One writer takes that fall as more than a physical collapse:
Balaam knew that God had opened his eyes, and that he was looking at things his heart cared nothing for. While he described the blessing and the final triumph of the people he hated, he knew himself to be a fallen man. Not "fallen into a trance," as an older translation puts it, but really fallen. This privileged but stubborn man has gone down to eternal ruin.
The ESV says nothing about a trance here. It reads "falling down with his eyes uncovered."
One writer turns Balaam's story on the reader:
Let none of us be content with mere externals, however good they may be. The essential thing is heart-faith in the Son of God. Even the smallest true faith in Him is worth infinitely more than stores of Bible knowledge and church privileges. Balaam's case was all the more serious because light shone across his path but never entered his soul.
- Light. Opened eyes admit they were once shut. Balaam confessed he had been in the dark, and the Spirit forced true words out of him.
- Light without life. He knew about the Most High, but the knowledge was not living — real facts about God, no divine life in the soul.
- Light still true. The messenger's state did not spoil the message. What he spoke was absolute truth, and only God's revelation could give it.
- Light on the kingdom. "Almighty" means He accomplishes all He has said. "Most High" is His title for the day when rule rises out of Israel and He is Most High over all the earth.
- Light that condemns. Balaam fell with his eyes wide open. Without heart-faith in the Son of God, privilege only deepens the loss.
I shall see him, but not now; I shall behold him, but not nigh There cometh a Star out of Jacob, and a Sceptre shall rise out of Israel, and he shall cut in pieces the corners of Moab, and destroy all the sons of tumult.
Balaam came to curse Israel, but standing over their camp he described a Person still far off — a Star out of Jacob, a Sceptre out of Israel. Three questions follow: who is this coming One, when does He come, and why did the man who saw Him gain nothing?
The whole scene is a failed attack. One writer sets the two wills side by side:
Never was Satan more determined to curse; never was God more determined to bless! Satan never had a more willing servant. And no man was ever more powerless than Balaam once the Almighty took hold of him!
What came out instead reached far beyond the moment on the hilltop:
So the curse Balaam intended became the most magnificent statement of blessing ever pronounced on the people of God. It reaches down to the last days, when Israel will be exalted under the Most High God, the possessor of heaven and earth.
The Star and the Sceptre are not decoration. Each carries its own idea:
The star is for watchers. We must be up early in the morning if we wish to see the early star. The sceptre speaks of authority and rule.
Another writer names each one in a word: "The Star speaks of hope, and the Sceptre speaks of rule and government. Where is our hope? We answer, In the Lord Jesus Christ" (F. B. Hole).
Balaam's earlier speeches looked at the whole nation. This one narrows to one Person:
We recall his first parable. From the top of the rocks he said in the same way, "I see him and from the hills I behold him." There it was the nation; here it is a person — the King of Israel whose shout he had heard before among the wonderful people. The description of this coming King is glorious. He sees Him first as a star coming out of Jacob. Then he calls Him a sceptre risen out of Israel, striking through the sides of Moab and turning all the sons of tumult against each other.
Commentators differ over how much of this has already happened. One writer sees it fulfilled twice — once in David, and once still to come: "As a fulfilled prophecy, this star is David; and, as a prophecy yet to be fulfilled, this star is Christ, David's Son" (H. L. Rossier). Others place the whole weight in the future. Gaebelein calls it "a very pronounced Messianic prophecy relating to the time when the kingdom is to be restored to Israel." He says many teachers have made a mistake by applying it to Christ's first coming. Kelly, weighing nation after nation, reaches the same conclusion:
So it does not matter whether the powers are western or eastern. It does not matter whether the enemies are many or few, what resources they have, or where they come from… It is the day of Immanuel, not of David or the Maccabees.
Some read the phrase "sons of Sheth" as a description rather than a family line:
Instead of "children of Sheth," it is better to read "sons of tumult"; that is, "tumultuous war will be destroyed."
The verse opens with a confession that condemns the speaker. Older translations put its first words in the future — "I shall see him, but not now":
But at the start he is made to speak of his own tragic position: "I shall see Him, but not now; I shall behold Him, but not near." … Balaam's fate will be that of all unbelievers. Believers see the Lord Jesus now by faith. But Balaam had no intention of bowing his heart to Him at the time. So in the future he will see Him, but not near. It will be only in awesome judgment, when he sees Him at the Great White Throne.
Seeing was never the problem. "He thus beheld in vision a glorious Person to whom he could never come near. Distance must be his portion for ever" (W. W. Fereday).
The wording here stops short of something the New Testament adds:
He had been predicted as coming "a Star out of Jacob," without any reference to the morning. As the bright Morning Star, Jesus presents Himself as the One who runs ahead of the coming day and guarantees it. Now Israel does not know Him like this, for it has rejected Him and treated Him as an impostor. The Church, and the Church alone, knows Him in this character.
- Curse — Balaam came to curse. God made the same mouth speak the greatest blessing ever pronounced over His people, reaching to the last days.
- Star — the Star is for watchers, seen by those awake before dawn. It speaks of hope, and our hope is Christ.
- Sceptre — the Sceptre means authority: tumult ended, a King on the throne — "the day of Immanuel," not of David or the Maccabees.
- Person — the earlier oracles looked at the nation; this one narrows to one Man, the King of Israel Himself.
- Distance — Balaam saw Him and stayed far off. Sight without surrender leaves a man watching the glory from outside it.
And Edom shall be a possession, and Seir a possession, -- they, his enemies; but Israel will do valiantly.
Balaam was hired to curse Israel. Instead, his last prophecy describes the day when the Star out of Jacob rises and Israel's enemies lose their land. The verse raises two questions: why name Edom and Seir, and when does this happen?
Edom is not a random target. Edom had already refused to let Israel pass through its land. Commentators tie that refusal to the judgment announced here. (The quote below uses an older translation; the ESV says, "Edom shall be dispossessed.")
And as Balaam foretold long ago, Edom — which in the days of Moses refused to let Israel pass through his border (Num. 20:21) — "will be a possession, Seir also will be a possession for his enemies; and Israel shall do valiantly."
Seir is named next to Edom for a simple reason. It was the land Esau settled in.
Esau had made Seir his home (Gen. 33:16), so it lies close to Edom and Moab. These will be fully brought under Israel's rule.
The previous verse names a Star out of Jacob and a Sceptre out of Israel. This verse tells us what follows, and who wins the victory.
First he sees Him as a star coming out of Jacob. Then he calls Him a sceptre risen out of Israel… Because of this, Edom becomes His possession, and Seir as well. All His enemies are conquered, and Israel stands with the King and does valiantly. It is a very clear prophecy about the Messiah. It points to the time when the kingdom will be restored to Israel. Many teachers of God's Word have made a mistake in applying this prophecy to the first coming of the Lord Jesus Christ.
Scripture describes some future victories as God's act alone, with no human army. This one is different.
Israel (that is, the spared remnant) is destined to play an important part in defeating the enemies of God and His people… The destruction of the Western armies described in Revelation 19:19-21, and the overthrow of the armies of Russia and her allies in Ezekiel 39, will happen with no human help at all. But against other foes, God intends to use a delivered Israel.
Yet the strength Israel shows is not Israel's own.
He is the Star out of Jacob, the Sceptre out of Israel. "Israel shall do valiantly" but by His power. Christ alone is before God, as He always was and is.
Some writers also read Edom as a picture of something in us. Esau was Jacob's brother, and that family tie is the point.
The judgment passes on to Edom, the typical enemy of Israel, who… pictures for us the world of the old man — the natural fallen man. He is the most real enemy we have as Christians. He is no less an enemy for being related to us all by nature, just as Edom was the brother of Israel who acted like no brother. His enmity is described here as revenge. He had a quarrel from the beginning — the loss of his birthright-blessing, which he sold for a bowl of stew and has since forgotten.
That raises a question about the coming kingdom: will the old nature be gone by then?
Edom speaks of the flesh, and the flesh then will be put in the place of nothingness. For Israel in the Millennium will not be in the perfect state: the flesh will still be in them, but put under control.
The promise comes at the end of a hard road, not instead of one.
It is not for the false prophet to speak of God's discipline of His people. God would only allow someone who was set on cursing them to speak of their blessing. Yet we know that God had to discipline His beloved people. They will still have to pass through times of dreadful judgment because of their sins. But in the end, they will "do valiantly."
- Curse reversed. Balaam was hired to curse Israel. God let him announce only Israel's blessing.
- King first. Edom and Seir change hands only because the Sceptre has risen; the possession is His before it is Israel's.
- Then the nation. Other enemies fall by God's hand alone. Here God uses the spared remnant, and its courage comes from His power.
- Then the flesh. Edom, the brother who acted like no brother, pictures the old nature. God will hold it under control, not make friends with it.
- Then the end. Discipline comes first, blessing last. Commentators place this prophecy in the coming kingdom, not at Christ's first coming.
And one out of Jacob shall have dominion, and will destroy out of the city what remaineth.
Balaam's last message ends not with a curse but with a coming Ruler. Commentators press two questions here: who is this Ruler, and how will He rule?
Balaam took money to curse Israel. The opposite came out of his mouth, and one writer explains why.
God used the false prophet Balaam to declare His mind. He also forced the High Priest of Israel, who was plotting the death of Jesus, to say that He would die for the nation (John 11:51). Balaam would gladly have cursed Israel, but twice over God made him speak the word He put in his mouth. The third time, when Balaam tried to escape God, "The Spirit of God came upon him" and made him bless. In his fourth parable, Balaam prophesies about Christ's coming as "a star out of Jacob, and a scepter … out of Israel."
In an earlier speech Balaam described the nation. Here he sees one person, and one writer warns against placing the fulfilment too early.
After this introduction he says again that he sees Him and looks on Him. But not now, and not near. We remember that in the first parable he said, from the top of the rocks, "I see him and from the hills I behold him." There it was the nation. Here it is a person: the King of Israel, whose shout he had heard before among that wonderful people… This is a very clear prophecy about the Messiah. It points to the time when God will restore the kingdom to Israel. Many teachers of God's Word have made a mistake here. They apply this prophecy to the first coming of the Lord Jesus Christ… Balaam says, "Out of Jacob one has dominion and destroys what is left from the city." These words refer to His reign and rule in the coming age.
One writer tests the word "dominion" against the idea that Christ's kingdom is only inward and spiritual.
That this points to the rule of Christ is obvious. But in what sense does His first coming, or the Church, fulfil it? If words have any meaning, the dominion here spoken of is not spiritual but earthly — not brought in by persuasion, but by power.
Commentators differ on what "the city" means. One takes it as human society organised for its own strength.
Whatever city this means, the large fellowship it stands for will be destroyed. People want their cities to find strength in unity. But corruption thrives in men's cities, and the Lord Jesus will destroy all this.
Another links it to Cain's city, and sets a very different city against it.
"For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet" (1 Cor. 15:25). Cain built his city after he murdered his brother, and after he "went out from the presence of Jehovah." But destruction will fall on "him that remains of the city." Yet there is another city, not built by man. Abraham, the friend of God, looked for it — "the city that has foundations, whose designer and builder is God" (Heb. 11:10).
The Ruler comes out of Jacob, and Jacob does not just watch. One writer separates the victories God wins alone from those He wins through His people.
Rev. 19:19-21 describes the destruction of the Western armies, and Ezek. 39 the overthrow of the hordes of Russia and her allies. God will do both without any human help. But against other enemies He intends to use a delivered Israel… "out of Jacob shall come He that shall have dominion, and shall destroy him that remains of the city." Israel's armies will be unstoppable, led on by Christ, who will then indeed be "a man of war" (Ex. 15:3; Ps. 45:3-5).
Verse 19 sounds like a closing line. Three short additions follow, and the first one looks at Amalek.
Balaam's words in Num. 24:19 seem to be final. What more could be added to the statement that "out of Jacob shall come He that shall have dominion," and destroy even the remnants of His people's enemies? But the Spirit of God had still more to say in three short additions… "Amalek was the first of the nations, but in the end he will perish forever." Ancient fame may look wonderful to men, but it will count for nothing when God arises in His might.
- Compelled — the man paid to curse ends up announcing the King. God can make even an unwilling mouth serve His purpose.
- Person — the earlier speech saw the nation; this one sees a Man, the King of Israel, "not now" and "not near."
- Power — the dominion promised is earthly and enforced, not a rule brought in by persuasion.
- City — what man builds for himself falls, whether that means human society or Cain's city. The city with foundations is God's.
- People — the delivered nation shares in the victory, but only when led by the One who comes out of Jacob.
And he saw Amalek, and took up his parable, and said, Amalek is the first of the nations, but his latter end shall be for destruction.
Balaam's last words turn from Israel's future to the nations nearby. The first he names is Amalek. The title he gives them sounds like a compliment. The sentence that follows is total ruin.
What does that title mean? One writer reads it as a matter of timing — who struck first at God's people after they left Egypt:
Here we read of Amalek's unprovoked attack on Israel, just as they had escaped from the power of Pharaoh. Through Samuel we learn what Moses did not tell us in Exodus 17: that "he lay in wait for him," like a serpent lurking in the road. For this cowardly attempt to destroy His people, the LORD swore that He would have war with Amalek "from generation to generation." Balaam, in his prophecy, calls them "the first among the nations." That probably means they were the first of the desert tribes to attack the people of God as they traveled to the land of promise. But their end, he says, is utter destruction.
Balaam does not explain the judgment; earlier Scripture does. The charge rests on how Amalek chose its targets.
The reason for this severe judgment lies in Exodus 17, where the LORD says, "I will utterly blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven," and in Deuteronomy 25, where Moses says, "Remember what Amalek did to you… how he attacked you on the way when you were faint and weary, and cut off your tail, those who were lagging behind you, and he did not fear God." Exalted as the first among the nations, Amalek now faces the sentence of utter destruction, and it seems God has already carried it out.
Amalek was an old and famous name. Balaam's verdict says what that is worth:
When Balaam looked on Amalek, "he took up his discourse and said, 'Amalek was the first among the nations, but its end is utter destruction.'" Ancient prestige, however wonderful it may be in the eyes of men, will count for nothing when God arises in His might.
The verses just after this one name other enemies. Being first or last on the list makes no difference:
So it makes no difference whether the powers are western or eastern, whether the enemies are many or few, what resources they have, or where they come from. Amalek may be the first of the nations, and Asshur may look like the last; yet trouble comes to Asshur and Eber, and "he too shall come to utter destruction." It is the day of Immanuel, not of David or the Maccabees. The LORD alone shall be exalted in that day.
One writer traces the sentence through Israel's history to what may be its end:
Moses charged Israel, "When the LORD your God has given you rest… you shall blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven; you shall not forget" (verse 19). Samuel recalled the word of God and the charge of Moses, and sent Saul to destroy Amalek… For failing in his mission, through disobedience, Saul lost his kingdom. David, in recovering his wives, whom the Amalekites had taken captive at Ziklag, helped on the destruction of Amalek. This destruction, it would seem, was almost complete when, in the days of Hezekiah, some of the sons of Simeon "struck down the remnant of the Amalekites who had escaped." It may be that Haman and his sons were the last of Amalek.
Commentators differ here. The words quoted earlier put this judgment in "the day of Immanuel," not in the days of David.
Amalek's judgment is heavier than Moab's or Edom's. One writer gives the reason:
However, Israel will bring Moab and Edom under its rule, but Amalek will suffer a more solemn judgment. Though Amalek was first among the nations, he will totally perish, as Exodus 17:14 affirms, "I will utterly blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven." For Amalek symbolizes the lusts of the flesh, which God will not spare.
Read that way, the verse shapes how believers treat the flesh now — and promises its end:
The flesh and its lusts were never to be seen as anything but enemies. There is to be, not constant conflict, but absolute hostility between the people of God and the lusts of the flesh. The time is coming, thank God, when the very name of the flesh, with all its wretched meaning, will be blotted out for the beloved people of God. It will be only a memory of what we once were, and of a grace that has delivered us completely.
- First — Amalek's title points to who struck first at God's people, right after they escaped Egypt.
- Cause — Amalek attacked the faint and weary at the rear, and did not fear God.
- Doom — an ancient name counts for nothing when God arises. Amalek's end is utter destruction.
- Reach — first nation or last empire, east or west, no enemy escapes; the LORD alone is exalted in that day.
- Picture — Amalek stands for the lusts of the flesh: no truce with them now, and one day their very name will be gone for God's people.
And he saw the Kenites, and took up his parable, and said, Firm is thy dwelling-place, and thy nest fixed in the rock;
Balaam's last words turn from Israel to the nations camped nearby, naming each one's future in a line or two. He pays the Kenites a compliment — a home set high in the rock — and then cancels it. What is any stronghold worth when God acts?
These were not enemies. One writer traces their family line, their friendship with Israel, and the sin at their heart:
They appear to be a branch of the Midianites, and therefore descendants of Abraham. Midian was a son of Abraham (Gen. 25:2). Jethro, the father-in-law of Moses, was priest of Midian. In Judges 1:16 we read of the children of the Kenite, Moses' father-in-law. The record of the Kenites shows friendship. Not a few lived among the Israelites, though most remained with the Midianites. And there were those who boasted of their strong dwelling places and put their nest in a rock. They thought themselves secure from Him who must reign over all. They thought the land given to Abraham (Gen. 15:19) could never be made good to his children. The sin of the Kenites was self-confidence; they boasted in their strongholds. Nevertheless they would be wasted until Asshur carried them away captive.
The word for "nest" sounds like the tribe's own name. One writer reads their whole character out of that pun:
They settle among the people of God, but they never unite themselves with them. Balaam's prophecy views them as separate to the last. The play upon the name there — "you put your nest (ken) in the rock" — shows plainly what it means. They are Midianites, men of the world, but not at war with Israel as others of their race were. Instead, they make a nest for themselves among them. It is for the nest that they are there… All this describes only too well the state of many others. In every age they attach themselves to the people of God, yet are not of them.
Two things could not keep the Kenites alive — the rock fortress, and their place beside God's people:
The dwelling place of the Kenites was strong. They could rest in comfort and security in their rock fortress. But without the help and blessing of the God of Israel they could not continue as a nation. Even leaving their natural security and joining God's people would not save them… They were not like Amalek, though they lived among them. Israel had no hostility from them to rebuke, as it had from Moab. But they were not the chosen of God, and He did not preserve them from the forces that consume nations.
One writer widens the point to every defence a nation can build:
Great fortifications, strong natural frontiers, and every possible build-up of military force will be worthless when the day of the Lord opens. He is wiser and stronger than men. Everything will collapse before Him.
Balaam does not stop with the Kenites. Asshur (Assyria), the conqueror, gets a verdict too:
But what about victorious Asshur? "And he took up his discourse and said, Alas, who shall live when God does this! And ships shall come from the coast of Chittim, and shall afflict Asshur." So it does not matter whether the power is western or eastern. It does not matter whether the adversaries are many or few, what resources they have, or where they come from. Amalek may be the first of nations, and Asshur seems set to be the last. Yet affliction comes to Asshur and Eber… It is the day of Immanuel.
Only two peoples in this prophecy have their fault named. One writer sees the same pair at the end of the age:
Only two have their evil recorded… Amalek is foremost in his hatred of God. The Kenites are strong in self-confidence, putting their trust in nature — in man. These are common traits of the natural man. When the Lord Jesus appears to take the kingdom, these two characteristics will be most prominent… Along with this will come extreme confidence in man and his boasted progress. Like the Kenites of old, they will put their trust in the rocks.
Commentators differ on how far this reaches. Some read the captivity as history under Assyria. Others place it among the judgments at the end of the age.
- Nest — The Kenites came for the nest, not for the God of Israel. The pun on their name says it all. They stayed separate to the last.
- Neighbours — Jethro's people were friendly to Israel and related to them. Closeness to God's people is not the same as belonging to them.
- Nevertheless — The rock fortress was strong. It was not strong against God. One word overturns the whole compliment.
- Nations — Assyria carries them off. Then ships from Chittim afflict Assyria. Every power in the chain meets the same end, first or last.
- Now — The Kenite sin is trust in man, not hatred of God. Both are common traits of the natural man, and both reach their height at the end.
But the Kenite shall be consumed, until Asshur shall carry thee away captive.
Balaam looks past Israel to the nations around it, and his eye stops on a people who were no enemy of Israel at all. The Kenite had a strong home and a record of kindness, yet the word over him is burning and captivity — so why is he judged?
The Kenites were not strangers to Israel. They were relatives by blood and by marriage.
He looks on the Kenites and again takes up his parable. They will be laid waste. They appear to be a branch of the Midianites, and therefore descendants of Abraham. Midian was a son of Abraham (Gen. 25:2). Jethro, the father-in-law of Moses, was priest of Midian. In Judges 1:16 we read of the children of the Kenite, Moses' father-in-law. The record of the Kenites shows friendship. Not a few lived among the Israelites, though the greater part stayed with the Midianites.
So why did they settle among God's people at all? Their own name answers it.
They never unite themselves with the people of God, though they settle among them, and Balaam's prophecy views them as separate to the last. The play upon the name there — "you put your nest (ken) in the rock" — clearly shows the meaning of it. They are Midianites, men of the world, but not at war with Israel as others of their race were. Instead, they make a nest for themselves among them, and it is for the nest that they are there... All this describes only too well the condition of many who attach themselves, in every age, to the people of God, yet are not of them.
Being near God's people is not the same as belonging to God. The Kenites were nothing like Israel's open enemies.
The dwelling place of the Kenites was strong. They could rest in comfort and security in their rock fortress. But without the help and blessing of the God of Israel they could not continue as a nation. Even if they left their natural security and joined themselves to God's people, that would not save them. The time would come when they would go into captivity, and until then their numbers would shrink. They were not like Amalek, though they lived among them, and there was no hostility against Israel to be rebuked, as there was in Moab. But they were not the chosen of God, and He did not keep them safe from all the different forces that destroy nations.
Their kindness to Israel is on record. But kindness is not the final test.
The prophecy then describes the Kenites as having a lasting dwelling place, established in the rock (v. 21), but "Kain (the Kenites) shall be burned and Asshur carry him away captive." The Kenites had shown kindness to Israel when they came out of Egypt (1 Sam. 15:6), but clearly at the last their character of disobedience to God will call for their judgment too. What appears to be good, if it does not have Christ as its Object, will be proved at the last to be only "enmity against God" (Rom. 8:7). Asshur (Assyria) will take them captive at the time of the end.
The word translated "nevertheless" turns the whole sentence. The Kenite's defences are real, and they still fail.
Great fortifications, strong natural frontiers, and every possible build-up of military force will be worthless when the day of the Lord opens. He is wiser and stronger than men. Everything will collapse before Him.
The fault was not hostility. It was trust in the wrong place.
Some of them boasted of their strong dwelling places and put their nest in a rock. They thought they were safe from Him who must reign over all. They thought God could never make good His gift of the land to Abraham (Gen. 15:19) for his children. The sin of the Kenites was self-confidence; they boasted in their strongholds.
Asshur carries the Kenite off. Balaam's next words turn on Asshur himself.
But what about victorious Asshur? "And he took up his parable, and said, Alas, who shall live when God does this! And ships shall come from the coast of Chittim, and shall afflict Asshur." So it does not matter whether the powers are western or eastern, whether the enemies are many or few, with what resources or from what direction... It is the day of Immanuel.
- Nest — The Kenite's name carries the word for nest. He built a safe, comfortable place among God's people without ever becoming one of them.
- Near — He was related to Moses by marriage and lived among Israel. The prophecy still views him as separate to the last.
- Nevertheless — Rock walls, natural borders and armies hold firm. Then the day of the Lord opens, and they collapse.
- Not Christ — Real kindness stands on his record. But what looks good without Christ as its Object proves at the last to be enmity against God.
- No exception — Asshur carries the Kenite away, then ships from Chittim afflict Asshur. No power escapes; it is the day of Immanuel.
And he took up his parable, and said, Alas! Who shall live when God doeth this?
Balaam has just seen a Star rise out of Jacob and a Sceptre crush Israel's enemies — Moab, Edom, Amalek, the Kenite. Now the prophet stops predicting and cries out: if God does this, who is left alive?
The words are wrung out of a man forced to describe a glory he does not want. Balak hated Israel, but Balaam has had to announce Israel's coming King. The sound he makes is not praise.
In prophetic vision he saw Christ. But the Lord Jesus could not say of him what He said to the Jews about Abraham: "Your father Abraham rejoiced that he would see my day. He saw it and was glad" (John 8:56). It gave Balaam no joy to see Christ. It gave him no joy to be forced to describe the great day. On that day He will lift up the people Balak hated and destroy all their enemies, Moab included. Indeed he said, "Alas, who shall live when God does this?" This sounds like a wail of disappointment and despair.
The same future that drew this groan from Balaam draws songs from others.
The Spirit led David to describe the blessedness of that time in Psalm 72, and carried him far beyond himself into overflowing worship and praise. Faith looks at the future and breaks out: "Blessed be the Lord, the God of Israel." The enemy on the outside can only say with sadness, "Alas, who shall live when God does this?" (Psalm 72:18; Numbers 24:23).
Balaam's question is not just panic. It points to a day that is still to come.
There shall come a day, connected with the bringing in of the sceptre and dominion of the promised ruler. It will be a day so great and terrible that it puts the lives of all the sons of men in apparent danger. Who shall live when God does this? The flood had gone over the earth. God had promised, seven times over, that all flesh would never again die in a flood of waters. But here comes another judgment, and it looks universal — or nearly so.
Another writer sets this cry beside the Lord's own words about the end times.
In Matthew 24 we have a description of these end times: "And if those days had not been cut short, no human being would be saved. But for the sake of the elect those days will be cut short" (24:22). Just compare this verse with Numbers 24:23: "Alas, who shall live when God does this!" It is clearly the same period of time. After these terrible days, Christ will appear and set up His Kingdom, and peace will be the result.
But what about victorious Asshur?… It does not matter whether the powers are western or eastern. It does not matter whether the enemies are many or few, what resources they have, or where they come from. Amalek may be the first of nations, and Asshur may seem to be the last. Yet affliction comes to Asshur and Eber; "and he also shall perish for ever." It is the day of Immanuel, not of David or the Maccabees. The Lord alone shall be exalted in that day.
Another writer asks who is acting here, and who gets drawn in.
Neither the pride of power nor the strong dwelling place can stop the one from perishing for ever, or the other from being wasted in captivity. For Balaam's parable does not here speak of Israel accomplishing these things, but, "Alas, who shall live when God does this?" Then in a few words the parable brings the three families of Noah on the scene. Kittim was a descendant of Japheth, Asshur of Ham, and Eber of Shem. All of them will take part in the final conflicts of the last days.
Balaam asks his question and moves on. One writer sets out what God is doing, and who is still standing at the end.
That day also clears the ground for the reign that follows.
God's intervention will sweep the earth clear of all that fills men with pride and vain glory.
- Alas — the cry is a groan, not worship; Balaam sees Christ's day and finds no gladness in it.
- Scale — the judgment is so wide that survival itself is the question; the Lord said those days must be cut short, or no one would be saved.
- Reach — east or west, many or few, first nation or last: no power escapes.
- Agent — the parable does not credit Israel with the blow; it is God doing this, and the Lord alone is exalted in that day.
- Answer — those who live are those God in mercy spares, and beyond the terror stands the reign of the King.
And ships shall come from the coast of Chittim, and afflict Asshur, and afflict Eber, and he also shall be for destruction.
Balaam's last prophecy looks past his own day and out to sea, where ships sail from the west to strike a great eastern power. Three questions follow: where is Kittim, who are Asshur and Eber, and who is the "he" that comes to utter destruction?
The name is tied throughout the Old Testament to ships. One writer sets out the geography and the persons together, reading the verse as a picture of the last conflict.
In a few words Balaam spoke of "Armageddon," where the last terrible clash of the nations will take place (Rev. 16:13-16)... "Chittim," strictly speaking, means the island of Cyprus. But Scripture uses it as a general term for the West (Jer. 2:10), seen from the Holy Land as God's centre. In Dan. 11:30 Chittim clearly means the Roman Empire. Asshur stands for the cruel Assyrian of Isaiah and Micah, the King of the North of Dan. 11:40. He wins at first in the world's last crisis. He overthrows many countries (Dan. 11:41)... But God has appointed both the Assyrian and the Roman to destruction. The "he" of Num. 24:24 is the last head of the Roman Empire (compare Dan. 7:8).
Ships from Chittim appear by name in only one other place: Daniel 11. That link shapes how commentators read this verse.
Daniel gives a similar prophecy about the king of the north. Ships from Chittim come against him, so he is discouraged, turns back, and rages against the holy covenant (Dan. 11:30). The king of the north here was the king of Syria, yet the Spirit of God seems to identify him with the Assyrian of the last days. The ships of Rome came against Antiochus Epiphanes. But they were a foreshadowing of Balaam's prophecy being fulfilled. In the last days it seems the navies of the western powers will come against the king of the north, the revived Assyrian.
Balaam names one nation after another, and judgment falls on each in turn.
Amalek may be the first of nations, and Asshur seemed set to be the last. Yet affliction comes on Asshur and Eber, and "he too shall come to utter destruction." It is the day of Immanuel, not of David or the Maccabees. Jehovah alone will be exalted in that day. So it does not matter whether the powers are western or eastern, whether the enemies are many or few, what resources they have, or where they come from.
Eber is the ancestor whose name lies behind the word "Hebrew." One writer reads it as a cut-down title for the Jewish people, used at a time when God does not own them as His people.
Asshur, or Assyria, was the power that carried Israel captive, and now Asshur's turn to feel God's judgment comes. The ships of Chittim afflict Eber as well as Asshur. The Western powers become the instrument of God's anger against Eber — that is, Israel, or the Jew. But not as Israel: they are "Lo-ammi" and are no more than the children of Eber, Hebrews. God does not acknowledge them, and for a time their title and name of power is lost. But when the Star out of Jacob comes, and the Sceptre from Israel, they will receive this name of power again, and "Lo-ammi" will be reversed for ever.
Not everyone agrees. Another writer maps the names onto the four world empires of Daniel's visions instead.
There is no doubt that Asshur stands for the first of the Gentile empires, that is, Babylon. Eber probably stands for the other, the Medo-Persian. Kittim, the isles of the west, stands for the Greek and Roman rule.
The conqueror does not outlive his own conquest.
We see the final judgment of the ships of Chittim — that is, of the west, north of the Mediterranean. We see the judgment of their chief as well, after he has afflicted Asshur and Eber. It will be the terrible judgment of God at the end of this age.
Balaam's cry, "Alas, who shall live when God does this!", is not the last word. The verse sits under the promise of the Star and the Sceptre a few lines earlier.
The verse looks at the great conflict still to come, since nothing in the past quite fits it all... West and East and Israel will clash and suffer. But the word just before it stands: Israel acts bravely, and one from Jacob will rule. Eber surely stands here as a figure for the Jews. The prophets declare that they rise to the first place on earth, when God destroys the destroyers of the earth and Messiah reigns.
- West — Kittim means Cyprus, but Scripture uses it for the West, seen from the Holy Land as God's centre. In Daniel 11:30 it means Rome.
- East — Those ships strike Asshur, the Assyrian, the King of the North. He wins at first in the world's last crisis.
- Israel — Eber is the name behind "Hebrew." Some read it as the Jewish people, stripped of their title for a time. Others read it as the Medo-Persian empire.
- The victor — He too "shall come to utter destruction." The western chief goes down with those he afflicted. Numbers, resources and direction of attack save no one.
- The King — The day belongs to Immanuel. When God destroys the destroyers of the earth, the Star out of Jacob reigns and Israel gets its lost name back.
And Balaam rose up, and went and returned to his place; and Balak also went his way.
Numbers 24 ends not with a battle but with two men walking away from each other. The curse Balak paid for never came, yet one chapter later 24,000 Israelites lie dead — so what passed between these two men before they parted?
The parting is the failure of a partnership. Commentators trace the collapse of the plot to one thing neither man had reckoned with.
God was above all, and nothing changes His affection. Whom He loves, and as He loves, He loves to the end. So the alliance between these two, who picture the "beast and false prophet," proved fruitless. God blessed Israel, and no one could curse them.
Both men had heard God speak. Neither was better for it.
Balaam then went home. His heart was unchanged by the truth he was forced to announce. Balak left too, a much sadder man, though we might wish we could say a wiser man as well. But we fear the knowledge he gained did not make him wiser.
The phrase sounds like a man heading home for good. The rest of his story rules that out.
His utterances finished, Balaam departed "to his place." This does not mean that he returned to his own land... later we find that he died among the Moabites and Midianites when they were destroyed.
The place where he died shows where he had chosen to belong.
When the five kings of the Midianites were killed in battle, Balaam died with them (Num. 31:8). He was a long way from home at that tragic moment. But death found him among the sworn enemies of God's people, still seeking Israel's harm.
Something passed between the two men here that Numbers does not record.
But before the fortune-teller left his disappointed employer, it seems he made a vile suggestion to him. If Jehovah could not be turned away from His people, perhaps the people could be turned away from Jehovah! Balaam knew enough of God to be sure of one thing. If the people of Israel could be tempted into sin, Jehovah's hand would fall on them in judgment... Satan first tries to destroy. When he finds that impossible, he tries to corrupt, because a pure testimony for God on earth is hateful to him.
Money, not conviction, had held Balaam to this alliance from the start.
For money he would curse the people of God. "He loved the wages of unrighteousness" (2 Peter 2:15)... The prophet and the king went their separate ways (Num. 24:25). But the trick succeeded... So Balaam was even more guilty than the king. Under Satan he was the real instigator of Israel's fall, which brought the striking judgment on 24,000 of the people (Num. 25:9).
Balaam's own words in this chapter describe a man who saw clearly. That is what makes his exit so serious.
He was not acting in ignorance. He was a man "whose eye is opened," who "hears the words of God, and knows the knowledge of the Most High," and who "sees the vision of the Almighty." Despite the divine knowledge he had gained, and the things he had seen and heard from God, this wicked man went his own way in defiance of God's expressed will.
Balaam leaves the story here. The New Testament returns to him under three headings:
"The way of Balaam" in 2 Peter 2:15. "The error of Balaam" in Jude 11. "The doctrine of Balaam" in Rev. 2:14.
One writer defines the middle one, and traces it through the centuries since.
"The error of Balaam" was the corruption of ministry for the sake of personal gain. Balaam has had no lack of successors down the centuries. Many who serve only for pay have pushed themselves forward, caring nothing for the glory of God or the blessing of others. Their own advantage has been uppermost in their thoughts.
- The alliance — king and prophet joined against Israel and gained nothing. God's affection for His people does not change.
- The parting — both men leave with knowledge of God. Neither leaves changed. Balak goes away sadder, but no wiser.
- The plot — what curses could not do, corruption did. Balaam's parting advice produced the fall of chapter 25.
- The place — "his place" was not his homeland. Balaam died among Israel's enemies, still seeking their harm.
- The name — Scripture keeps him as a warning: the way, the error, and the doctrine of Balaam. His error was ministry twisted for personal gain.