And Korah, the son of Izhar, the son of Kohath, the son of Levi, made bold, and [with him] Dathan and Abiram, the sons of Eliab, and On, the son of Peleth, the sons of Reuben;
Numbers 16 opens with a list of names and a family line. That detail matters. The men behind this revolt were insiders, holding some of the highest privileges in Israel. So the verse raises the question the chapter goes on to answer. Why does a man who already stands near God reach for a place God never gave him?
Earlier chapters record grumbling and unbelief. This chapter records something organised, dressed in words no one could object to.
After such comforting thoughts as these, something still more terrible than ever comes out in Numbers 16. It is not complaint now, or murmuring. It is not just unbelief because the wilderness was hard. It is not even a bad report about God's gift and choice in the land. There is a conspiracy under the fairest pretensions possible. This does not make matters better. The basest things sometimes put on the most religious guise. The sound of it should fool no one. Some of these men belonged to the class that served the sanctuary; others were chief men in the congregation — what people today would call leading men in church and state.
The verse traces Korah's line in full: Izhar, Kohath, Levi. Dathan and Abiram come from another tribe, with a grievance of their own.
Korah was a Kohathite. That put him in the most distinguished group of the Levites, short of being a priest. Dathan and Abiram came from Reuben, the eldest son of Jacob. Reuben's sin cost him the leadership that belonged by nature to the firstborn. So these men no doubt felt they had a grievance.
Reuben's loss is not just family history. It follows a pattern that runs through Scripture.
Dathan and Abiram belonged to the tribe of Reuben. As the firstborn, Reuben would naturally have had the leadership. But here, as so often in Scripture, the natural — the firstborn — must give place to the spiritual, the new-born.
Korah's place was a gift from God. That gift became the ground of his discontent.
Unbelief shows itself constantly in this very form. If God puts an honour on a man, and the man does not receive it as coming from Him, the honour only becomes a stepping stone. He uses it to despise the God who gave it, while grasping after what He has never given. Nothing produces such dissatisfaction as a heart that fails to value what God has given it.
The verse names men from two tribes. Commentators point out that the two groups wanted different things.
Numbers 16 contains the open rebellion of Dathan and Abiram against Moses. Above all it contains the claim of the ministry in Israel to take priesthood to itself... Korah drew others in by flattering them, but his aim was to take hold of official priesthood. What Dathan and Abiram raised was a side question: the authority of Moses, and the word of God through him. Their judgment was a thing apart.
God called Moses and Aaron to the places they held.
Korah and his company, therefore, were quarrelling with God and not with Moses and Aaron. God had called these two to hold a certain position and to do a certain work, and it would be terrible for them if they refused... This is always the way with those who promote division or discontent. Their real object is to make themselves somebody. They talk loudly and very convincingly about the common rights and privileges of God's people. But in reality they are aiming at a position they are in no way qualified for.
One writer reads this old story as a live warning for anyone who claims a priestly place above other believers.
It is a solemn thing for ministers who profess Christ and claim a priestly place to weigh the warning of Jude 11, in case they perish in the rebellion of Korah. His sin, so ruinous to himself and his followers, was proud discontent with Levite service and an irreverent claim to the priesthood... Christian ministry is the exercise of a gift from the Lord, given to some for the good of all. But all saints are priests, made free equally of the true sanctuary. Some seize this nearness to God beyond, and in denial of, what grace has given to all the saints. Without knowing it, they misunderstand and cancel a prime blessing of Christianity.
- Place given. Korah held the highest Levite service short of priesthood. Dathan and Abiram came from the tribe that lost the firstborn's leadership. Every man named in this verse starts from a place God assigned.
- Place despised. An honour from God became a stepping stone for despising the Giver. The rebels grasped instead at what He never gave.
- Place disguised. The revolt came with the fairest excuses possible. The basest things sometimes put on the most religious dress.
- Place seized. The heart of the sin was ministry reaching for priesthood. Dathan and Abiram's attack on Moses' authority was a separate matter, judged on its own.
- Place still contested. Jude 11 makes this a warning to anyone who claims priestly nearness above others. All saints alike are priests in the true sanctuary.
and they rose up against Moses, with two hundred and fifty men of the children of Israel, princes of the assembly, summoned to the council, men of renown;
Numbers 16:2 shows a revolt gathering weight: Korah does not act alone, but brings 250 recognised leaders with him. Why would men this respected rise up against Moses and Aaron, when it was God who gave them their place?
These were not fringe figures. They came from Israel's most honoured circles.
There is a conspiracy here under the fairest pretensions possible. The basest things sometimes put on the most pious disguise. No one should be deceived by the sound of things. The men who did this were by no means the sort we would have expected to rebel against Jehovah. Korah belonged to the most honourable group among those who had the direct service of the sanctuary. Dathan, Abiram and On came from Reuben. So some of them belonged to the ministering class, and others were chief men in the congregation — the sort people today would call leading men in church and state.
Two of the ringleaders had a family reason to feel slighted.
Dathan and Abiram came from Reuben, Jacob's eldest son. Reuben lost the leadership that belonged naturally to the firstborn, because of his sin. So they doubtless felt they had a grievance.
The verse piles titles on these men — chiefs, chosen from the assembly, well known. That weight of reputation made the moment dangerous.
The rebellion is attributed to Korah, since he was the religious leader in it. He seems to have had enough influence to gather a large number of influential men around him — "princes, famous men, and men of renown." In short, this was a very formidable and serious rebellion. We shall do well to look at its source and moral features closely.
Their rank is what emboldened them. Their claims reached even to the censer, the pan used to burn incense before God.
They were princes, great men, and so they had rights that Jehovah should not dispute — at least, that is what they dreamed. And great men in the world do claim, in astonishing ways, rights even to the censer — rights that in reality belong only to the Great High Priest in heaven.
The 250 did not invent this grievance. One restless leader shaped discontent that was already there.
Every assembly holds material that can be worked on. It only takes some restless master spirit to rise up, work on that material, and fan the fire smouldering in secret into a devouring flame. Once the flag of revolt is raised, hundreds and thousands are ready to flock around it — people who have neither the vigour nor the courage to raise it themselves.
Korah already held a high place from God. That was the problem.
Unbelief shows itself constantly in this very form. Suppose God puts an honour on a man, and the man does not receive it as from Him. Then the honour becomes only a stepping stone for despising the God who gave it, while he grasps after what God has never given. Nothing causes such dissatisfaction as a heart that fails to value what God has given us.
Moses and Aaron had not applied for their posts. So the attack passed straight through them.
Korah and his company, therefore, were quarrelling with God and not with Moses and Aaron. God had called these two to take a certain place and do a certain work, and woe to them if they refused. They had not aimed at the position or taken up the work themselves. God ordained them. That should have settled the question. It would have settled it for everyone except restless, self-absorbed rebels, who wanted to undermine God's true servants and so exalt themselves.
This rebellion is not only Israel's history.
- Appointed: Moses and Aaron never sought their places. God ordained them, so opposing them meant opposing God.
- Appointment despised: Korah held the highest place of service at the sanctuary. He used that honour as a stepping stone towards what God never gave him.
- Appointment envied: Dathan and Abiram came from Reuben. He was the firstborn who lost his leading place through sin, so they nursed a grievance.
- Appointment outvoted: 250 well-known chiefs made the revolt look respectable. Reputation stood massed against God's choice.
- Appointment final: the censer belongs to the Great High Priest alone. Jude names this rebellion as the path that ends in ruin.
and they gathered themselves together against Moses and against Aaron, and said to them, It is enough; for all the assembly, all of them are holy, and Jehovah is among them; and why do ye lift up yourselves above the congregation of Jehovah?
Korah and his company confront Moses and Aaron with a charge that sounds like a defence of the whole people. Their words are religious and the men are respected. So the question is whether the charge is true, and what these men really wanted.
This uprising is not like the earlier grumbling in the wilderness. Its language is polished, and the men behind it hold high place.
There is a conspiracy under the fairest pretensions possible. The basest things sometimes put on the most pious appearance. No one should be deceived by the sound of words. The Christian is meant to judge things according to God. The men who did this were not at all the sort we would have thought most likely to join themselves rebelliously against the Lord. Korah came from Levi — the most honourable portion among those who had the direct service of the sanctuary. Dathan, Abiram, and On came from Reuben. So there were those who belonged to the ministering class, and those who were chief men in the congregation — what people today would call leading men in church and state.
Every word about the people's holiness and God's presence was true. The error was in the conclusion they drew from it.
It was quite true that all the people were "holy". That is, they were a people that God had set apart for Himself. Yet in practice they were constantly denying that fact. It was true that the Lord was among them, as the people were very quickly to see in the judgment that followed. They did not realise that in challenging the leaders whom God had chosen, they were challenging God, who had chosen them.
The accusation of self-promotion collapses the moment Moses' own record is examined.
"You take too much upon you." Such was their charge against "the meekest man in all the earth." But what had Moses taken upon him? The briefest glance back over the history of that dear and honoured servant would convince any impartial person otherwise. Far from taking dignity and responsibility upon himself, he had shown himself only too ready to shrink from these things when they were offered. When they were laid on him, he sank under them.
One protest was made, but commentators see two different aims inside it.
Numbers 16 contains the open rebellion of Dathan and Abiram against Moses. Even more, it contains the claim of the ministry in Israel to take the priesthood for itself. The New Testament calls it the rebellion of Korah. He is the first man Moses addresses. The main point of the sin, as Moses presses it, was this taking too much upon them by the sons of Levi. Dathan and Abiram raised a side question about Moses' authority; Korah's claim of priesthood was bound up with open rebellion against God.
Levelling everyone to the same nearness sounds generous, yet Moses fell on his face at it.
With this "fair show" of piety, were they not claiming equal priestly privileges for all, and was not this right? But it filled Moses with horror, and he fell on his face. He saw that it was not only a refusal of Aaron. It also denied that, as a sinful people, they could stand before God only through the priest who offered the sacrifice.
Korah already had a place of honour near the sanctuary. That is what made his reach for more so serious.
Unbelief constantly shows itself in this very form. If God puts an honour on a man, and he does not receive it as from Him, that honour becomes only a stepping stone. The man despises the God who gave it, while grasping after what He has never given. Nothing produces such dissatisfaction as a heart that fails to value what God has allotted to us.
Commentators apply the argument in two directions. The first runs toward a teaching heard widely today.
Since all are holy, all are His congregation, and therefore all may approach Him; why then one high priest? ... Many pulpits and platforms teach that all men are holy in themselves. So, they say, all have the right to draw near to God with no need of the One High Priest, Christ Jesus. Yet only through Him, and only through His propitiation, is that access obtained.
The other runs the opposite way — toward a separate priestly class.
Let the reader note this carefully. To aim at any form of priesthood other than the Christian priesthood is, in principle, the sin of Korah. So is taking up any other priestly function. So is setting up a priestly class — men who act on behalf of their fellows, or carry out priestly service for them before God.
- Sound: The plea sounded pious and came from respected men — yet the sound of words proves nothing.
- Truth: Every statement in it was accurate; the people were set apart and the Lord was among them.
- Twist: The true words were bent into a challenge of the leaders God had chosen, which is a challenge to God.
- Aim: Behind the talk of shared holiness lay Korah's reach for the priesthood. It denied the one ground on which sinful people can stand before God.
- Root: Honour taken from God's hand keeps a man content. Honour he fails to value becomes a stepping stone to grasping at what God never gave.
When Moses heard this, he fell on his face.
Numbers 16 opens with a rebellion dressed in religious language. Korah and his company accuse Moses and Aaron of lifting themselves above a people who are all holy. Verse 4 gives the whole of Moses' first answer — he says nothing, and goes face down on the ground.
Moses answered the rebels without a word. One writer explains why a servant of God can afford to stay quiet when attacked.
Moses was the man they had gathered against. When he heard their rebellious words, "he fell on his face." This was a very good way to meet rebels. We have seen this beloved servant of God on his face when he ought to have been on his feet (Ex. 14). But here it was about the best and safest thing he could do. There is never much use in arguing with restless and discontented people. It is far better to leave them in the Lord's hands, for their quarrel is really with Him. If God sets a man in a certain position and gives him a certain work to do, his fellows may think it right to quarrel with him simply because he is doing that work and filling that position. Then their quarrel is really with God. He knows how to settle it, and will do it in His own way.
The same writer says the right way to meet such attacks is "to take the place of complete lowliness and nothingness, and let the wave of discontent roll over you."
Korah's slogan sounded generous — everyone is holy, so everyone may come near. Moses fell down because he heard what lay underneath it.
Korah and his company had disowned Aaron as the priest of God by claiming equal holiness and nearness for all Israel: "You have gone too far! For all in the congregation are holy, every one of them, and the LORD is among them. Why then do you exalt yourselves above the assembly of the LORD?" With this fine show of piety, were they not claiming equal priestly privileges for all? Was this not right? But it filled Moses with horror, and he fell on his face. He saw that this refused not only Aaron. It also refused the truth that a sinful people could have no standing before God at all, except through the priest who offered the sacrifice.
What Moses says next hands the whole dispute to a court he does not control.
This was placing the matter in the proper hands. Moses gives great prominence to the sovereign rights of Jehovah. "The LORD will show" and "the LORD will choose." There is not a syllable about himself or Aaron. The whole question hinges on the Lord's choice and the Lord's appointment... Obviously it would have been no use for Moses and Aaron to try to give judgment. They were the defendants in the case.
Another writer sees here a pattern for our own troubles.
But in the face of such opposition we see the beautiful faith and dependence of Moses. "He fell on his face" (v. 4). Should we not do the same when trouble arises? Instead of arguing he prays. So God at once gives him the insight to know what to do.
One writer traces the pride behind the revolt to its source, and shows what it produced in Moses.
It is a good thing when the haughtiness that Satan knows so well how to stir up brings out nothing but lowliness and humbling of our souls before God. Haughtiness tends to provoke haughtiness, and flesh to irritate flesh; but it was not so with Moses.
Moses could have asked for judgment on the spot. He set the test a day away.
As at so many other times, he falls on his face (while Korah exalts himself) and leaves the decision to God, saying, "Tomorrow morning the LORD will show... whom He chooses" (v. 5). On the one hand, Moses relies on God's decision to confirm the position He has given to each one. On the other hand, he waits until "tomorrow." Serious as the situation is, he does not want to rush. He would rather allow Korah and those with him enough time to repent.
- Attack. Korah's protest sounded like a plea for everyone's rights. It was really a refusal of the priest — the only way a sinful people could come to God.
- Prostration. Moses met the charge by going down on his face. That takes the servant out of the argument and lets the wave of discontent roll over him.
- Silence. Arguing with discontented people achieves little. Their quarrel is with the God who gave the position, not with the man who fills it.
- Referral. His reply says not a syllable about himself. He hands the case to God: "the LORD will show" and "the LORD will choose." In that court Moses is a defendant, not the judge.
- Delay. Setting the test for tomorrow, with the crisis at its height, left the rebels a night in which to repent.
And he spoke to Korah and to all his band, saying, Even to-morrow will Jehovah make known who is his, and who is holy; and he will cause him to come near to him; and him whom he has chosen, him will he cause to come near to him.
Korah, a Levite, gathered 250 leaders against Moses and Aaron. Their claim was that the whole congregation was holy, so no one had the right to stand above it. Moses does not argue. He sets an appointment. In the morning God Himself will settle who belongs to Him, who is holy, and who may come near.
Before Moses says a word, he drops to the ground. One writer links his prayer to the answer that follows:
In the face of such opposition we see the faith and dependence of Moses. "He fell on his face" (v.4). Should we not do the same when trouble arises? Instead of arguing he prays. So God at once gives him the insight to know what to do. He calmly tells the hostile company, "Tomorrow morning the Lord will show who is His and who is holy" (v.5). It is precious to wait on the Lord!
Another writer points out that such a quarrel is not really aimed at the servant at all:
Suppose God sets a man in a certain position and gives him a certain work to do. Suppose others quarrel with him simply because he does that work and fills that position. Their quarrel is really with God, who knows how to settle it, and will do it in His own way. Being sure of this gives the Lord's servant a holy calm, and lifts him above envious and restless spirits when they rise up against him.
Notice whose name is missing from the answer. Moses, the accused, refuses to be the judge:
This put the matter into the right hands. Moses gives great prominence to the sovereign rights of the Lord. "The Lord will show" and "The Lord will choose." There is not a word about himself or Aaron. The whole question hangs on the Lord's choice and the Lord's appointment. The 250 rebels are set face to face with the living God, so that the whole matter may be gone into and settled before a court from which there is no appeal. It would have been no use for Moses and Aaron to give the judgement, since they were the defendants in the case.
Some translations render "in the morning" here as "tomorrow." The delay is deliberate, and one writer sees mercy in it:
On the one hand, Moses leaves it to God to confirm the position He has given to each one. On the other hand, he waits until "tomorrow." He does not want to act in haste, even though the situation is serious. He would rather give Korah and those with him enough time to repent.
Being His, being holy, being brought near — all three depend on God's choice. God had already given Korah a place, which is what makes his grasping so strange:
Unbelief shows itself again and again in this very form. God gives a man an honour. The man does not receive it as from God, so it becomes only a stepping stone for despising the God who gave it, while he grasps after what God has never given him. Nothing breeds dissatisfaction like a heart that fails to value what God has given it. His will alone secures real joy and strength, and good results for the glory of the Lord. These men were not satisfied with their position, either as leaders of the congregation or as Levites. They wanted to be like Aaron and Moses.
Korah's public argument was about everyone's rights. Moses' reply exposes a private ambition underneath it:
At first glance it might not look as though Korah was seeking anything for himself. He seemed to be standing up for the rights of the whole assembly. But Moses, by the Spirit of God, unmasks him. Under the fine-sounding excuse of defending the common rights of the congregation, he was boldly seeking the priesthood for himself. Loud talkers about the liberties, rights, and privileges of God's people are usually seeking their own advancement and advantage. This is not always obvious, but God is sure to bring it to light sooner or later.
One writer sees this verse behind Paul's words to Timothy:
The two-part seal of 2 Timothy 2:19 is almost certainly a reference to Numbers 16:5, 26, and we would do well to read that incident here as an illustration. The two principles are clear and distinct. First, God is sovereign in His mercy and His actions, so He always knows and finally rescues those who are His. Second, man is still responsible, so everyone who acknowledges the Lord with his lips is under a solemn obligation to depart from iniquity. The Christian must never share in evil of any kind, from the least to the greatest.
- Chosen — everything turns on the Lord's choice. Moses says nothing about himself or Aaron.
- Given — nearness and holiness are honours God gives. To despise His gift and grab at what He never gave is unbelief.
- Unmasked — loud talk about everyone's rights can hide a man seeking a place for himself. God brings it to light sooner or later.
- Waited for — Moses falls on his face and prays instead of arguing. He sets the test for the morning, leaving room for repentance.
- Sealed — one writer reads verses 5 and 26 in the seal of 2 Timothy 2:19. The Lord knows His own, and everyone who names His name must depart from iniquity.
This do take you censers, Korah, and all his band,
Korah and 250 leaders had challenged Moses and Aaron over who may serve God as priest. Moses answers not with an argument but with a test: the men who want priestly work must bring censers before the Lord, who will settle who is holy.
Moses names no judge but the Lord, and leaves himself out of the verdict:
This was placing the matter in the proper hands. Moses gives great prominence to the sovereign rights of the Lord. "The Lord will show" and "The Lord will choose." There is not a syllable about himself or Aaron. The two hundred and fifty rebels are brought face to face with the living God. They are summoned into His presence, with their censers in their hands. There the whole matter can be fully gone into and settled, before that great court from which there can be no appeal. It would have been no use for Moses and Aaron to try to give judgment, since they were defendants in the case.
That calm instruction came out of prayer rather than debate. Moses had first fallen on his face:
But in the face of such opposition we see the faith and dependence of Moses. "He fell on his face" (v.4). Should we not do the same when trouble arises? Instead of arguing he prays. So God at once gives him the insight to know what to do.
The Lord's test uses the priest's own equipment:
A small vessel made of metal, to hold burning coals from the altar, on which incense was sprinkled by the priest, so that a cloud of incense might rise from it. The same word is used when Korah, Dathan, Abiram and their company were put to the test; those censers were probably made in a hurry, since 250 were needed.
Moses hands them the very thing they were reaching for. Commentators see wisdom in that:
It is always well, when people are seeking a place, to let them have it, to their heart's content; for most certainly the very place they have foolishly aspired to will be the scene of their clear defeat and terrible confusion. You may sometimes see men envying others in a certain sphere of service, and longing to occupy that sphere themselves. Let them try it; and they are sure, in the end, to break down and retire covered with shame.
The Lord's choice, not Korah's claim, decides who is holy. Priestly honour comes only by call:
As to the appointment of the earthly priest, "No one takes this honour for himself, but only when he is called by God, just as Aaron was." Here again there is a likeness to the priesthood of Christ. No one can truly take the place of priest, in any sense of the word, who is not called of God. Ignoring this great truth is deadly serious. The judgment that fell on Korah and those with him shows it. They sought to establish themselves in the priesthood without being called by God.
Korah already had God-given work. The priesthood was the one line he could not cross:
Korah did not aim at being a minister, for that he was. He aimed at being a priest, which he could not be. God gave the priesthood to Aaron and his family. Anyone else who tried to offer sacrifice, or do any other priestly work, was boldly seizing what was not his. Now Aaron was a type of our great High Priest who has passed into the heavens — Jesus the Son of God... There is no such thing as a priest on earth now, except in the sense in which all believers are priests.
Jude names three failures from the past, and Korah's is the last:
In the letter of Jude the beginning, the way, and the end are perfectly set before us. "The way of Cain" is the great departure at the beginning of this world's moral history. There brother killed brother, jealous of his acceptance with God... "The error of Balaam" is turning the name of God into a means of earthly honour and gain. The last one we have here is "Korah's rebellion," and here those who depart from God perish. This is not merely the selfish twisting of the truth into a way of getting ahead, bad as that was. It is open, deliberate rebellion against the rights of Christ Himself.
- Chosen, not self-appointed. The verse turns on the Lord's choice: no one takes the honour for himself.
- Chosen, so Moses steps aside. Since the choice is God's, Moses prays instead of arguing and leaves the verdict to Him.
- Chosen, so the test is granted. Moses hands over the censers. The place a man grasps at without a call becomes the place of his defeat.
- Chosen for service, not for everything. Korah had real God-given work. His ruin was reaching past it for a priesthood he was never given.
- Chosen — and the choice fell on Christ. Aaron pictures the High Priest now in heaven. Every believer is a priest, but no one on earth holds Aaron's place; Jude points back to Korah's rebellion as the warning.
and put fire therein, and lay incense thereon before Jehovah to-morrow; and it shall be that the man whom Jehovah doth choose, he shall be holy. It is enough, ye sons of Levi!
Korah, a Levite, and 250 leaders rose up against Moses and Aaron, reaching for the priesthood. Moses did not argue back. He set a test for the next day: take censers, and let God Himself show who is holy.
Moses names no defender of his own. His answer turns on what God will do.
This was placing the matter in the proper hands. Moses gives great prominence to the sovereign rights of Jehovah. "The Lord will show" and "The Lord will choose." There is not a syllable about himself or Aaron. The whole question hinges upon the Lord's choice and the Lord's appointment. The two hundred and fifty rebels are brought face to face with the living God. Of course, it would have been useless for Moses and Aaron to judge the case, since they were the defendants. But Moses was glad to have all parties summoned into God's presence, so their case could be judged and settled there.
The test was not a vote or a debate. The men had to do in public the one thing only a priest could do.
For the second time, as verse 4 tells us, Moses met the situation by falling on his face — standing aside for God to act. Yet he knew what God would do, as we see in verses 5-7. Korah and his company would get their answer from God Himself the next day. They were to take censers with fire and incense, and present themselves at the door of the tabernacle, as though they were priests.
The verse does not say the holy man will be chosen; it says the chosen man will be holy. Priesthood is a call received, never a rank seized.
Further, he says, "No one takes this honor for himself, but only when he is called by God, just as Aaron was." God called Aaron. Korah rebelled with his company. He lifted himself up against Moses, and against Aaron the priest. What was the result? They were summoned before the sanctuary, every man with his censer. These men wanted to push their way into the high priest's office. As they drew near, fire from God's holy presence comes out and destroys them. Korah and his companions are witnesses that no one could force a way into the priestly office — only those whom God called.
The rebuke names them "sons of Levi". These men already held an honour from God, and that very honour fed their reaching for more.
Unbelief shows itself constantly in this very form. God may put an honour on a man, and the man may not receive it as from Him. Then the honour becomes a stepping stone for despising the God who gave it, while he grasps after what God has never given. Nothing breeds dissatisfaction like a heart that fails to value what God has allotted to us. Whatever is His will alone secures real joy and strength, and happy results to the glory of the Lord.
Korah's own duties were anything but small, which is what makes the trade so ruinous.
How much better it would have been for Korah had he rested content with his Levite service, which was of the very highest order. His work as a Kohathite was to carry some of the most precious vessels of the sanctuary, but he aimed at the priesthood, and fell into the pit.
Three names mark one downward road, and Korah's is the last.
"The way of Cain" is the great departure at the start of this world's moral history. There brother killed brother, jealous of his acceptance with God. "The error of Balaam" is the evil of turning the name of God into a means of earthly honour and gain, not without hypocrisy. The last is "the rebellion of Korah," and here those who depart from God perish. This is not just the selfish twisting of truth into a way of getting ahead, bad as that was. It is open, deliberate rebellion against the rights of Christ Himself. Moses was the apostle of the Jewish faith, as Aaron was its high priest. Christ is the apostle and high priest of the faith we confess.
Paul seems to look back at this day when he writes to Timothy.
It seems that the Apostle Paul refers to this incident in 2 Timothy 2:19. In our chapter Moses says, "The LORD will show who is His, and who is holy," and of Dathan and Abiram, "Depart from the tents of these wicked men." These two statements clearly point forward to the instruction the apostles give us, for the times when we meet error face to face. Such error attacks the foundations of our faith, and it overthrows the faith of those who fall under its influence. We are neither sovereign nor all-knowing. God is both, and in due season He will make clear who are His. We are, however, responsible to act in line with His word, and avoid all part in the error and evil.
- Show — the verb is God's, not Moses'. Moses says nothing in his own defence and leaves the case to the Lord's choice.
- Chosen — God gives nearness and holiness; no one claims them. No one takes the honour of priesthood for himself. God called Aaron.
- Censer — the test made the claim public. Men who wanted priesthood had to act as priests before God, and the outcome was His to give.
- Content — Korah already held a place God gave him. A heart that fails to value what God allots starts reaching for what He never gave.
- Depart — God will make clear who are His. Our part is to keep clear of the error meanwhile.
And Moses said to Korah, Hear, I pray you, ye sons of Levi!
Moses turns from the crowd to the men behind the rebellion — his own tribe. His single question, "Hear now, you sons of Levi," opens an appeal that runs to verse 11. It exposes what the rebellion really wanted.
Moses gives the rebels room to think again. One writer reads verses 8 to 11 as that kind of opening:
His words in verses 8 to 11 are a further appeal to their consciences. If they would listen, this gave them a chance to think again about their rebellion and to take back their foolish demands. Moses reminds Korah that he had been given a position of honour above the congregation, along with the other sons of Levi. Then he asks whether he now wants the priesthood as well… Korah's complaint was against Aaron, because he wanted Aaron's position.
Everything turns on who Korah already was, and on what he aimed at next:
What then was Korah? He was a Levite. As a Levite he had the right to minister and to teach: "They shall teach Jacob your rules and Israel your law." "The God of Israel has separated you… to bring you near to Himself, to do service in the tabernacle of the LORD and to stand before the congregation to minister to them." That is what Korah was, and that was his work. What did he aim at? At the priesthood.
Korah thought little of the place God had already given him. One writer calls this the usual form of unbelief:
Unbelief shows itself constantly in this very form. Suppose God puts an honour on a man, and the man does not receive it as from Him. Then the honour becomes only a stepping stone: he despises the God who gave it, and grasps after what God has never given. Nothing makes a heart so dissatisfied as failing to put the right value on what God has allotted to us. His will alone secures real joy and strength, and happy results to the glory of the Lord.
Korah's case sounded selfless. Moses answers the man behind it:
To a casual observer it might not have appeared that Korah was seeking anything for himself. He seemed to be contending for the rights of the whole assembly. But Moses, by the Spirit of God, unmasks the man. His excuse looked good: he was standing up for the common rights of the congregation. Behind that excuse he was brazenly seeking the priesthood for himself… You will usually find that loud talkers about the liberties, rights, and privileges of God's people are really seeking their own exaltation and advantage. Not content with doing their proper work, they are seeking an improper place.
Korah's reach for the priesthood was not a quarrel with a man. One writer names what it really was:
The sin was this: it was the ministers of God seeking also to usurp the priesthood. There was only one high priest in Israel, a picture of our one and only great High Priest, who has passed into the heavens. Rebellion against Aaron was sin against the Lord.
Another writer traces this chapter forward to Christ and to us:
What makes this chapter so solemn is that the Spirit of God applies it to the future course of Christianity… Jude points to "Korah's rebellion," and here those who depart from God perish. This was not just twisting the truth into a means of personal gain, bad as that was. It was open, deliberate revolt against the rights of Christ Himself. Moses was the apostle of the Jewish faith, as Aaron was its high priest. Christ is the apostle and the high priest of the faith we confess. So when a man claims and exercises a priesthood today, he invades a work that Jesus Christ alone can carry out, at the right hand of God.
The lesson for us is contentment with the place God gives:
Oh, to walk humbly with our God! To be content with His will! To be glad to fill a very small place and to do the most unassuming work! This is true dignity and true happiness… If Korah and his company had learnt this, their piercing cry would never have terrified the hearts of their brothers. But no; they wanted to be something when they were nothing.
- Brought near. God set the Levites apart and brought them near Himself to serve. Korah already had that honour.
- Counted small. Korah held that honour cheaply and grasped at what God never gave him. That is the root sin Moses exposes.
- Unmasked. Talk of everyone's rights hid a private ambition. Loud defenders of the people's rights usually want a place for themselves.
- Against the Lord. Reaching for the priesthood was not rivalry with Aaron. It was sin against the Lord, and today it invades the work of the one High Priest in heaven.
- Content. The cure is the opposite of Korah. Fill the place God gives you, do the work He gives you, and stay humble.
Is it too little for you, that the God of Israel has separated you from the assembly of Israel, to bring you near to himself to do the work of the tabernacle of Jehovah, and to stand before the assembly to minister to them?
Korah was a Levite. He led a revolt against Moses and Aaron, and Moses answered him with a question. It asks Korah to weigh what God had already given him.
Moses meets the charge by naming a gift. One commentator traces Korah's discontent back to unbelief.
Unbelief shows itself constantly in this very form. Suppose God puts an honour on a man, and the man does not receive it from Him. Then it is only a stepping stone. He despises the God who gave it, and grasps after what He has never given. Nothing produces such dissatisfaction as a heart that puts a wrong value on what God has given us. His will alone secures real joy and strength, and happy results to the glory of the Lord.
The verse names two directions in one calling. God brought the Levite near to Himself, then set him before the people to serve them. That place carried the right to teach.
What then was Korah? He was a Levite. As such he had the right to minister and to teach: "They shall teach Jacob your rules, and Israel your law." That was Korah, and that was his sphere of work. At what did he aim? At the priesthood. "Do you seek the priesthood also?"
Korah spoke as though he were defending everyone's rights. Moses' question strips that away. It names what Korah wanted for himself.
To a casual observer it might not have appeared that Korah was seeking anything for himself. He seemed to be contending for the rights of the whole assembly. But Moses, by the Spirit of God, unmasks the man. Korah made a plausible show of standing up for the common rights of the congregation. Behind it, he was boldly seeking the priesthood for himself. Note this well. Loud talkers about the liberties, rights, and privileges of God's people are usually seeking their own exaltation and advantage. Not content with doing their proper work, they are seeking an improper place.
The service Korah reached for was not mere routine. What it pictured decides the weight of his sin.
Korah called the "flesh" holy, and so wanted to bring it into the sanctuary. This is not idolatry, but "flesh" seeking to handle the things of Christ. What is the service of the tabernacle? What are the sacrifices, the incense, everything within the consecrated place? They are all pictures of the coming Christ. So Korah's sin brings down a heavier judgment than the worship of the golden calf. God was more jealous for the honour of Christ — even when the matter was only shadows and symbols — than for His own name when Aaron joined it with idolatry.
One writer places this chapter in a line of warnings that Scripture traces from the start of human history.
This chapter is so solemn because the Spirit of God applies it to the coming course of Christendom. We all need its warning. The letter of Jude sets the beginning, the way and the end before us. "The way of Cain" is the great departure at the start of this world's moral history, where brother killed brother… "The error of Balaam" is the evil of turning the name of God into a means of earthly honour and gain, not without hypocrisy. The last is the one before us here, "Korah's rebellion," and here those who depart from God perish. This is not merely the selfish twisting of the truth into a means of advancement, driven by a covetous heart, bad as that was. It is open, deliberate insurrection against the rights of Christ Himself. Moses was the sent one of the Jewish faith, as Aaron was its high priest. Christ is the apostle and high priest of the faith we confess.
The answer to Korah's sin is simple. Each person has a place from God, and the work that goes with it.
Has God given a man his place to fill — his work to do? Who will question this? Well then, let each one know his place and fill it — know his work and do it. Nothing in the world is more senseless than trying to take another's post or do another's work… Korah had his work; Moses had his. Why should one envy another?
- Given nearness. God separated the Levites and brought them near to Himself. Moses points Korah to a gift already in his hands.
- Despised nearness. An honour not received as from God becomes a stepping stone. The man despises the Giver and grasps after what He never gave.
- Disguised nearness. Korah's talk of everyone's rights covered a private aim: he wanted the priesthood for himself.
- Invaded nearness. The tabernacle service pictured the coming Christ. To seize it was open insurrection against His rights — what Jude calls Korah's rebellion.
- Kept nearness. The safe path is to know your place and fill it, your work and do it, without envying another's.
-- that he has brought thee near, and all thy brethren the sons of Levi with thee; and seek ye now the priesthood also?
Korah and his followers have just told Moses that the whole congregation is holy, and that the leaders have taken too much on themselves. Moses turns the argument around: God had already brought the sons of Levi near to Himself, so the real demand was for the priesthood.
Commentators point out that the Levites had a real, God-given work. Moses' question shows where Korah stepped outside it.
What then was Korah? He was a Levite. As such he had the right to minister and to teach: "They shall teach Jacob your rules and Israel your law." "The God of Israel has brought you near to Himself, to do the service of the tabernacle of the Lord, and to stand before the congregation to minister to them." Such was Korah, and such his sphere of work. At what did he aim? At the priesthood.
Korah was not overlooked. God had given him something, and he treated it as small.
Unbelief shows itself constantly in this very form. If God puts an honour on a man, and the man does not receive it as from Him, that honour becomes only a stepping stone. He despises the God who gave it, and grasps after what God has never given. Nothing produces such dissatisfaction as a heart that fails to value what God has allotted to us. Whatever is His will alone secures real joy and strength, and happy results to the glory of the Lord.
Korah's public case sounded generous: the holiness of the whole assembly. Moses' question strips off the disguise.
To a casual observer, Korah might not have looked like a man seeking anything for himself. He seemed to be fighting for the rights of the whole assembly. But Moses, by the Spirit of God, unmasks him. Behind the convincing excuse of defending the rights of the congregation, he was boldly seeking the priesthood for himself. In most cases, loud talkers about the liberties, rights, and privileges of God's people are really seeking their own exaltation and advantage. Not content with doing their proper work, they are seeking an improper place.
Another writer asks whether Korah's concern for everyone was sincere:
Did Korah really care for all the congregation? No! He wanted to be the high priest himself. He accused Moses and Aaron of exalting themselves when it was plainly God who had exalted them. But Korah wanted to exalt himself, using his followers to this end.
Korah wanted a place God had given to Aaron alone. Commentators read that place as a picture of Christ, so reaching for it means refusing Him.
As a Levite he had special privileges connected with the tabernacle and the holy vessels. He envied Aaron and wanted to push his way into the priesthood. As a picture, it matches the refusal of Christ's sacrificial work and of His exclusive place of nearness to God. He is the only One through whom anyone can come to God. This was not rebellion against man. It was rebellion against the authority of God, and against the merciful provision by which He had spared the guilty nation.
One writer sees the same mistake repeated long after the wilderness:
They were Levites, but desired the priesthood for themselves. This was a terrible mistake, and the Christian world has repeated it. People who should have been doing Levite service have interfered with the rights of Christ. They have set themselves up as a special class of "priests," as mediators between believers and God.
The answer to Korah's sin is not to stop serving. It is to fill your own place instead of grabbing someone else's.
Has God given a man his place to fill — his work to do? Then let each one know his place and fill it, know his work and do it. Nothing in the world is more senseless than trying to take another's post or do another's work. Korah had his work; Moses had his. Why should one envy another?
- Brought near. God had already set the Levites apart and given them service near Himself. Moses' question points to a gift received, not a wrong suffered.
- Counted small. Korah's sin started in a heart that thought little of God's gift. That heart then reached for what God had never given.
- Masked. Talk of everyone's rights hid one man's bid for promotion. Commentators say this pattern repeats.
- Christ's alone. Aaron's priesthood pictures Christ's own place of nearness to God. Pushing into it is not a quarrel with men. It refuses God's mercy.
- Your own post. The remedy is not silence but contentment: know the work given you, do it, and leave another's place alone.
For which cause thou and all thy band are banded together against Jehovah; and Aaron, who is he that ye murmur against him?
Moses names the protest for what it is: a group banded together against God, with Aaron as the excuse. The quarrel is not about two men, but about the One who gave them their places.
Moses does not defend himself or his brother. He points out who really chose them, which means the rebels have picked a fight far above their heads.
Korah and his companions, then, were quarrelling with God and not with Moses and Aaron. God had called these two to fill a certain position and to do a certain work. It would have gone badly for them if they had refused. They had not aimed at the position or taken up the work themselves. God appointed them. This should have settled the question. It would have settled it for everyone except restless, self-occupied rebels, who sought to undermine the true servants of God so they could lift themselves up.
Korah made his case sound generous. He spoke for the rights of the whole assembly, not for himself — or so it looked.
To a casual observer it might not have looked as if Korah was seeking anything for himself. He seemed to be contending for the rights of the whole assembly. But Moses, by the Spirit of God, unmasks the man. Under the plausible excuse of standing up for the common rights of the congregation, he was boldly seeking the priesthood for himself. Loud talkers about the liberties, rights, and privileges of God's people are usually seeking their own promotion and advantage. Not content with doing their proper work, they are seeking an improper place.
Korah already held an honour from God. The quarrel shows what unbelief does with a gift.
Unbelief shows itself constantly in this very form. Suppose God puts an honour on a man, and the man does not take it as from Him. Then it only becomes a stepping stone for despising the God who gave it, while he grasps after what God has never given. Nothing produces such dissatisfaction as a heart that fails to value what God has given us.
The closing question answers itself. Aaron had nothing of his own to be envied; he held a place God had given, and given in mercy.
As a Levite, Korah had special privileges at the tabernacle and with its holy vessels. He envied Aaron and wanted to force his way into the priesthood. As a picture, that is the refusal of Christ's sacrificial work and of His exclusive place of nearness to God — the only One through whom anyone can come to Him. It was not rebellion against man. "What is Aaron that you grumble against him?" (Numbers 16:11). It was the authority of God, and the merciful provision by which He had spared the guilty nation.
Korah was not the last to assume that importance gives a right to holy things. A censer was the pan used for burning incense before God.
Great men in the world do claim, in extraordinary fashion, rights even to the censer. Those rights in reality belong only to the Great High Priest in heaven. "What is Aaron that you grumble against him?" He is God's high priest, and beside him there is no other.
This chapter is not only old history. It is aimed at Christendom — the whole professing Christian world.
What makes this so solemn a chapter is that the Spirit of God applies it directly to the coming course of Christendom. We all need its warning. In the letter of Jude, the beginning, the way, and the end are all set before us. The last of the three is here — Korah's rebellion — and those who depart from God perish. This is not merely the selfish twisting of truth into a means of personal gain, bad as that was. It is open, deliberate insurrection against the rights of Christ Himself. Moses was the apostle of the faith Israel professed, and Aaron was its high priest. Christ is the apostle and high priest of the faith we profess. To claim a priesthood for man now, and to exercise it, directly invades what only Jesus Christ can carry out at the right hand of God.
- Place given. Moses and Aaron never grabbed their places. God appointed them, and refusing Him would have gone badly.
- Place despised. Korah already held a privileged place among the Levites. An honour not taken as from God becomes a stepping stone for despising the God who gave it.
- Place coveted. The talk of everyone's rights was cover. Moses unmasks a man not content with his proper work and reaching for an improper place.
- Place defended by God. Aaron was nothing in himself — a man holding a place God gave in mercy. To grumble at him was to band together against the LORD.
- Place filled by Christ. Korah's sin points forward. Only one High Priest stands at God's right hand. To claim that place for man invades what is His alone.
And Moses sent to call Dathan and Abiram, the sons of Eliab; but they said, We will not come up!
Korah's revolt has two fronts, and verse 12 opens the second. Moses sends for Dathan and Abiram. They send back a flat refusal — the only reply they will give to the man God set over them.
Moses does not ignore these men; he calls them. Their answer is not an argument but a snub, and charges against Moses follow.
It seems Moses had a message for Dathan and Abiram too, so he sent to call them. But their reply was proud: "We will not come up." They accuse Moses of taking them from a land flowing with milk and honey to kill them in the wilderness. At the same time they accuse him of acting as a prince over them (vv. 12-14).
These two cared about rule, not about priesthood. Their family history gave them a reason.
Dathan and Abiram were princes of Reuben, and their tents stood near those of the Kohathites. They joined the religious party, but they cared little for Aaron's honours. They cared a great deal about Moses' rule. They had descended from Jacob's firstborn, and others had taken their place.
Their names, and their father's name, fit the case they were making.
Their names are Dathan, "laws, decrees," and Abiram, "my father is exalted." These are the sons of Eliab, "My God is Father." These meanings are not evil in themselves. Yet they suit well the claims they support. Those claims would have levelled the priesthood and the Levites' ministry, under the plea that all the people are holy. So Dathan could appeal to "laws" of ancient right, like the right of the firstborn, which the new restrictions had set aside. Abiram could point to his own father as exalted by this natural right. Their shared father's name might suggest the higher claim they do make: an equal relationship to God on every side.
Korah wanted Aaron's place; these men wanted Moses out of his. Commentators read the pair together as one picture.
Korah had his own special aim in the rebellion, though he was the instigator of it in others. In Dathan and Abiram we see the secular side, as in the rebellious Levite we see the religious. So Korah's words aim mainly at Aaron, while Dathan and Abiram speak against Moses. Both together picture the uprising of the world against Christ as Priest and King... The hour is coming when the religious and the secular powers will unite in bolder opposition to the rights of Christ, and unsparing judgment will follow, as it did in the wilderness on Korah, Dathan and Abiram.
The name they use belongs to Canaan. They give it to Egypt instead.
Notice how twisted men are. All God's care to keep them remembering Him seems to count for nothing. Their rebellion is a greater sin than any before it... They call Egypt a land flowing with milk and honey; in their words Egypt was as good as Canaan. They accuse Moses of deceit for not bringing them into the promised land. But God had brought them to it, and their own unbelief had shut them out. But Moses wanted to be a prince! — the man who said, "Blot me out!" rather than have Israel destroyed. They were willfully blind to the mercy that was leading them through the wilderness, and they hated the mediator.
Korah's group at least talked religion. These two drop that language and complain only about a broken promise.
The words of Dathan and Abiram match their position. They say nothing about the congregation being holy, only that Moses had not kept his promise. It was a charge against God.
He neither forces them nor drops the position God gave him. He hands the case to God and waits.
What will Moses do? As at many other times, he falls on his face, while Korah exalts himself. He leaves the decision to God: in the morning the LORD will show whom He chooses (v. 5). On the one hand, Moses relies on God's decision to confirm the position He has given to each one. On the other hand, he waits until the next morning. The situation is serious, but he does not want to rush. He would rather allow Korah and those with him enough time to repent.
- Refusal. Moses sends them a call. They answer with a flat no, and never hear what he had to say.
- Reversal. Egypt becomes the good land and Moses becomes the tyrant. Their own unbelief shut them out of Canaan, yet they blame him for it.
- Rejection. Korah's words aim at Aaron the priest, Dathan's and Abiram's at Moses' rule. Together they picture the world rising against Christ as Priest and King.
- Root. They say nothing about holiness, only that Moses broke his promise. That was a charge against God.
- Restraint. Moses does not force the issue. He falls on his face, leaves the verdict to God, and leaves them time to repent.
Is it a small thing that thou hast brought us up out of a land flowing with milk and honey, to kill us in the wilderness, that thou must make thyself altogether a ruler over us?
Korah's revolt has two fronts, and this verse is the voice of the second. Moses calls Dathan and Abiram; they refuse to come, and they hand Egypt the name that belongs to Canaan — a land flowing with milk and honey.
Korah and these two men rebel together, but they do not aim at the same target. This verse attacks Moses and his right to lead, not Aaron and the priesthood.
Korah had his own special aim in the rebellion, though he stirred it up in others. In Dathan and Abiram we see the secular side, as in the rebellious Levite we see the religious side. So Korah's words strike more at Aaron, while Dathan and Abiram speak against Moses. Both together picture the uprising of the world against Christ as Priest and King.
The name "a land flowing with milk and honey" belonged to Canaan. Here they pin it on Egypt, the house of slavery.
Notice how twisted men can be. All God's care to keep them mindful of Him seems lost. Their rebellion is a greater sin than any before; the ribbon was to remind them that Egypt was a land of bondage and that God had brought them out. They call it a land flowing with milk and honey; Egypt was as good as Canaan. They accuse Moses of deceit for not bringing them into the promised land. They ignore two facts: God had brought them to it, and their own unbelief had shut them out.
Their memory keeps Egypt's food and drops Egypt's whip. One writer finds the same drift in us:
The people sigh after the land of Egypt, and cast longing looks back at its fruits and its cooking pots. They say nothing about the whip of the slave-driver and the hard labour at the brick kilns. They remember nothing now except the things by which Egypt fed the appetites of nature. How often this is the case with us! The heart can lose its freshness in the divine life. Heavenly things can start to lose their taste. First love can decline. Christ can stop being a satisfying and altogether precious portion for the soul. The word of God and prayer can lose their charm and turn dull and mechanical. When that happens, the eye wanders back toward the world, the heart follows the eye, and the feet follow the heart.
They blame Moses for their dying in the wilderness. Yet they were the ones who had refused to go into the land.
Moses clearly had a message for Dathan and Abiram too. He sent to call them, but they answered with pride: "We will not come up." Of course these accusations were totally unfair. They had conveniently forgotten their own rebellion against entering the land of milk and honey. So in effect they are blaming Moses for their own glaring evils.
Their charge that Moses made himself a prince meets a plain answer. Look at what he had already done on the mountain, where none of them could see.
How ignorant they had been of everything that passed between the Lord and Moses on the top of Mount Horeb! They had been on the very edge of a terrible cliff. The intercession of Moses had saved them — the very man they had accused of taking too much upon him. How they had mistaken and misjudged him! They had accused this very man of self-seeking, and of wanting to make himself altogether a prince over them. Yet he had refused a God-given opportunity to become the head of a greater and mightier nation than they were. And this same man had begged that, if God would not forgive them and bring them into the land, his own name might be blotted out of the book.
This refusal is not just old history. Jude points back to it as a warning.
The rebellion of Korah and a large company with him points to a dreadful revolt against Christ as both Lord and High Priest of His people. It also points to the awesome judgment of God that follows. Jude 11 shows this: "Woe to them! For they walked in the way of Cain and abandoned themselves for the sake of gain to Balaam's error and perished in Korah's rebellion." What a comment this is on the wickedness of man's heart! God has given many great proofs of His kindness and many warnings of His judgment against evil. Still men will reject His authority with pride, because they themselves want to rule.
- Want to rule. One desire sits under the whole speech. They reject the authority God gave Moses, because they want the place themselves.
- Rename the past. That desire rewrites history. Egypt becomes the land of milk and honey, and the slave-driver's whip drops out of the story.
- Reassign the blame. Once they rewrite the past, the wilderness becomes Moses' crime. In truth it grew out of their own refusal to enter the land.
- Reverse the truth. The man they charged with making himself a prince had turned down a nation of his own. He asked God to blot out his own name instead.
- Reap the end. Dathan and Abiram strike at the ruler; Korah strikes at the priest. Together they picture the world rising against Christ as King and Priest — and it ends in judgment.
Moreover, thou hast not brought us into a land flowing with milk and honey, or given us inheritance of fields and vineyards wilt thou put out the eyes of these men? we will not come up!
Moses summoned Dathan and Abiram. They refused to come, and sent back a list of grievances instead: no promised land, no fields, no vineyards, and a leader they accused of blinding them. Their charge raises the real question: who was to blame for the years in the desert?
Moses sent for these two men. Their answer came back as an accusation.
Moses clearly had a message for Dathan and Abiram too, so he sent to call them. They answered him proudly: "We will not come up." They accuse Moses of taking them out of a land flowing with milk and honey to kill them in the wilderness, and of acting as a prince over them at the same time (vs.12-14). These accusations were completely unfair. They had forgotten their own refusal to enter the land of milk and honey, so they are really blaming Moses for their own obvious evils.
Notice which land they call good. They give Canaan's description to the country where they were slaves, and they blame Moses for the land they never reached.
Their rebellion is a greater sin than any before... They call Egypt a land flowing with milk and honey; Egypt was as good as Canaan. They accuse Moses of deceiving them by not bringing them into the promised land. They ignore the facts: God had brought them to it, and their own unbelief had shut them out. But Moses wanted to be a prince! — the man who said, "Blot me out!" rather than have Israel destroyed.
Their last question accuses Moses of blinding them. One writer ties it to the promises Moses had made.
Dathan and Abiram wanted nothing to do with the religious test. "We will not come up," they said. "You have brought us up out of the true land of milk and honey, Egypt, to kill us in the wilderness, and for what reason — unless you are making yourself a prince over us?" The milk and honey, the fields and vineyards Moses had promised were shadows — his promises, dust thrown in men's eyes.
The charge fits them better than it fits Moses:
They were deliberately blind to the mercy that was leading them through the wilderness, and they hated the mediator.
These two men demanded fields and vineyards. They came from Reuben, the first-born tribe, and their names match the claim they made.
His first allies are the sons of Reuben, the rejected first-born. That gave them a natural reason to join the revolt against the leaders God had appointed. Their names are Dathan, "laws, decrees," and Abiram, "my father is exalted."... So Dathan could speak of the "laws" of ancient right, such as the right of the first-born, set aside in favour of the new rules. Abiram could point to his own father as exalted by that natural right.
Korah and these two men wanted different things, so their words hit different targets.
Korah had his own special aim in the rebellion, though he stirred it up in others. In Dathan and Abiram we see the secular side; in the rebellious Levite, the religious side. So Korah's words are aimed against Aaron, while Dathan and Abiram speak against Moses. Both together picture the uprising of the world against Christ as Priest and King.
These men wanted their fields and vineyards at once, in the desert. The lesson runs the other way: look ahead to the inheritance while you cross the desert.
Finally, through all the testing, the trials, the conflicts, and even the mercies and privileges of the wilderness, we must keep our eyes fixed on what lies ahead... The green fields and vine-covered hills of the heavenly Canaan, the pearl gates and golden streets of the New Jerusalem are to fill the vision of our souls... When the sand of the desert wears us down, let the thought of Canaan cheer us.
- Refusal. Moses sent for them, and they answered with a proud "We will not come up."
- Reversal. Unbelief swapped the labels. Egypt became the land of milk and honey; Canaan became a promise Moses had failed to keep.
- Redirection. The charge was unfair. They had forgotten their own refusal to enter, so they blamed Moses for their own evils.
- Rejection. They said Moses was throwing dust in their eyes. In fact they were blind to the mercy leading them through the wilderness, and they hated the mediator.
- Reach. Korah's words struck at Aaron, these men's at Moses. Together they picture the world rising against Christ as Priest and King.
Then Moses was very wroth, and said to Jehovah, Have no regard to their oblation not one ass have I taken from them, neither have I hurt one of them.
In Numbers 16, Korah and his allies rise against Moses and Aaron. Here Moses reacts: he is angry, he asks God to refuse their offering, and he points to his own clean record as a leader.
Moses' anger has a cause: the message Dathan and Abiram sent back when he called for them. They refused to come. They charged him with deceit, and with wanting to be a prince over them. One writer shows how far that was from the truth.
They accuse Moses of deceit in not bringing them into the promised land, ignoring the facts that God had brought them to it, and that their own unbelief had shut them out. But Moses wanted to be a prince! — the man who said, "Blot me out!" rather than that Israel should be consumed. What a terrible advance in evil!... They were deliberately blind to the mercy that was leading them through the wilderness, and they hated the mediator.
The heart of Moses' reply is a claim about money and property. He had never enriched himself at Israel's expense, not by so much as a single animal. One writer names others with the same record, and makes it a test for all who serve God.
No one could charge Moses, Nehemiah or Paul with greed (Num. 16:15; Neh. 5:14-19; Acts 20:33-35). They served God for the honour of such a privilege. No one could fault their ministry for greed, gluttony or selfishness. They kept themselves pure... Honesty in handling what you are trusted with matters greatly — in your own affairs, in business, and with the church's funds.
Moses speaks to the Lord instead of arguing back. The rebels were aiming at more than a man.
It was true that the Lord was among them, as the people were very quickly to see in the judgment that followed. They challenged the leaders God had chosen. They did not realize they were challenging God, who had chosen them.
Korah claimed to speak for the rights of the whole people. One writer says that claim was a cover, and that it usually is.
To a casual observer it might not have appeared that Korah was seeking anything for himself. He seemed to be contending for the rights of the whole assembly. But Moses, by the Spirit of God, unmasks him. Under the believable cover of defending the common rights of the congregation, he was boldly seeking the priesthood for himself... You will usually find that loud talkers about the liberties, rights, and privileges of God's people are really seeking their own promotion and advantage... Nothing is more worthless than seeking a place for yourself. It is sure to end in disappointment and confusion. The great thing for each one is to fill his appointed place and do his appointed work — the more humbly and quietly, the better.
Commentators differ here. One defends the anger: the insult hit a message that was not Moses' own.
This bitter insult made Moses very angry, for the word he had given them was only the Lord's word.
Another writer says Moses did not need to ask this at all.
Moses was right to be angry at this bitter hostility. Yet he did not need to ask God to refuse their offering. God knew that Moses had never oppressed the people, and God would act in perfect righteousness.
Moses could have walked away from a people who insulted him and questioned his motives. He did not.
The ingratitude and rebellion Moses met might have made him walk away and leave the people to their fate. But he stays, aware of the responsibility of the place God gave him. He keeps his position of authority without losing his spirit of grace and humility.
- Charge. Dathan and Abiram blamed Moses for a wilderness their own unbelief had made. They also said he wanted to be a prince.
- Clean hands. Moses answers with facts: not one donkey taken, no one harmed. Nehemiah and Paul could say the same.
- Cover. Korah shouted for everyone's rights while seeking his own. Loud talkers often do the same.
- Contest. To reject the leaders God chose was to reject God. So Moses took the matter to Him.
- Caution. Commentators differ on the prayer. One defends the anger. Another says Moses never needed to ask: God knew he was innocent and would act in perfect righteousness.
And Moses said to Korah, Be thou and all thy band before Jehovah, thou, and they, and Aaron, to-morrow.
Korah's rebellion has drawn in two hundred and fifty leading men, and Moses answers it with a summons rather than an argument. Who settles a dispute about spiritual position, and why did Moses stand as one of the accused instead of as the judge?
Moses gives no verdict of his own. He fixes a time and a place, then leaves the outcome with God:
This was placing the matter in the proper hands. Moses puts the whole weight on the sovereign rights of the Lord. "The Lord will show" and "The Lord will choose." There is not a syllable about himself or Aaron. The whole question hinges upon the Lord's choice and the Lord's appointment. The two hundred and fifty rebels are brought face to face with the living God. They are summoned into His presence, with their censers in their hands. There the whole matter can be examined and settled for good, before a court from which there is no appeal. It would have been useless for Moses and Aaron to give the judgement, since they were defendants in the case.
The hearing is set for the next day, not for this one. One writer sees mercy in that gap:
As he has done so often, he falls on his face and leaves the decision to God, while Korah lifts himself up. He says that in the morning the LORD will show whom He chooses (v.5). Moses relies on God's decision to confirm the position God has given to each one. Yet he also waits until the next day. He does not want to act in haste, however grave the situation is. He would rather allow Korah and those with him enough time to repent.
The verse names Aaron alongside the rebels. His own standing goes on trial too:
They persuade two hundred and fifty princes, who do not appear to belong to the tribe of Levi, to join them in the priestly function. Why not, if all the congregation are "holy?" Moses rebukes their presumption and warns them: tomorrow the Lord will show who are His and who is holy. And each man takes his censer and dares to meet the judgment of God. Aaron must be there too, so that God may confirm in public the position He gave him.
Korah's company wanted the priest's place, so Moses tells them to do the priest's work:
But it is Moses who gives instructions to Korah as to what he is to do. Let him and his company, as well as Aaron, bring their censers before the Lord (vs.16-17). Korah was determined to push ahead boldly, despite clear warnings about such folly. He and his large company dared to act as priests at the door of the tabernacle (vs.18-19).
The office Korah wanted was never open to volunteers:
As to the appointment of the earthly priest, no one takes this honour for himself; God calls him, as God called Aaron. Here again we are reminded of a parallel to the priesthood of Christ. No one can truly take the place of priest, in any sense of the word, whom God has not called. See how serious it is to neglect this great truth: judgment fell on Korah and those with him, who tried to make themselves priests without God's call. Jude warns us that many in Christendom will appoint themselves priests in the same way, without God's call, and will perish in Korah's rebellion.
Another writer points to the one Priest who holds that place now:
There is only one great High Priest, who has passed into the heavens. What, then, will be the judgment on those who usurp His place as priests on earth?
The same writer draws a lesson for anyone whose place is envied:
It is always well, when people are seeking a place, to let them have it, to their heart's content; for certainly, the very place they have foolishly aspired to will become the scene of their plain defeat and sad confusion. … Those who find themselves the target of envious attack should simply fall on their faces before God, and let Him settle the question with the complainers.
- Summons, not argument. Moses stops defending himself and sets a hearing. The whole question hangs on the Lord's choice, not on his own name or Aaron's.
- Delay is mercy. The gap until "tomorrow" leaves Korah's company room to repent before the verdict lands.
- Aaron included. Aaron stands among the accused, so that God, not Moses, confirms in public the position He gave him.
- The test fits the claim. Men who demanded the priest's place must bring the priest's censer — and they walk in despite the warnings.
- No one takes the honour. Priesthood comes by God's call. One great High Priest is in heaven, and those who seize His place meet Korah's end.
And take each his censer, and put incense thereon, and present before Jehovah every man his censer, two hundred and fifty censers; and thou, and Aaron, each his censer.
Korah's company had claimed the priest's place, so Moses hands them a priest's tools: 250 censers, with fire and incense in them. The order turns a quarrel into a trial, and Aaron must bring his censer too.
Moses does not argue the case for himself. He arranges a hearing before the only authority that can end the dispute.
Moses gives great prominence to the sovereign rights of Jehovah. "The Lord will show" and "The Lord will choose." There is not a syllable about himself or Aaron. The whole question hinges upon the Lord's choice and the Lord's appointment. This brings the two hundred and fifty rebels face to face with the living God. God calls them into His presence, with their censers in their hands. There the whole matter can be gone into fully and settled before that great court, and from that court there is no appeal.
The censer each man had to carry was a priest's tool, made for one job.
A small metal vessel, made to hold burning coals from the altar. The priest sprinkled incense on the coals, so that a cloud of incense rose from it. The same word appears when Korah, Dathan, Abiram and their company were put to the test. Their censers were probably made in a hurry, since 250 were needed.
The instruction sounds like a concession. It is really a test, and it puts them in the very role they claimed.
They want to be priests, so Moses tells them to take priestly censers with fire and incense. They must bring them before the Lord the next day. The test would show whether or not they were priests.
The grasping starts earlier than the rebellion. It starts with how a man rates the place God has already given him.
God may put an honour on a man. If that man does not take it as from God, the honour becomes only a stepping stone. He despises the God who gave it, and grasps after what God has never given. Nothing makes a heart so discontented as failing to value what God has given us.
The public case sounded generous. Moses names the private aim behind it.
To a casual observer it might not have appeared that Korah was seeking anything for himself. He seemed to be contending for the rights of the whole assembly. But Moses, by the Spirit of God, unmasks him. Under the plausible excuse of standing up for the common rights of the people, he was making a bold grab at the priesthood for himself.
If every man's censer counts as much as Aaron's, Israel needs no priest at all. Moses saw what the claim would destroy.
Korah and his company had disowned Aaron as the priest of God. They claimed equal holiness and nearness for all Israel… It was a fine show of godliness. Were they not claiming equal priestly privileges for all? And was this not right? But it filled Moses with horror, and he fell on his face. He saw that they were refusing more than Aaron. They were refusing this truth: as a sinful people, they could have no standing before God at all, except through the priest who offered the sacrifice.
The censer test asks a question that outlives Israel: who gave you this place?
No one can truly take the place of a priest, in any sense of the word, unless God calls him. See how serious it is to neglect this great truth. Judgment overtook Korah and those with him. They tried to set themselves up as priests without God's call.
What Korah tried to seize now belongs to every believer as a gift.
There is no such thing as a priest on earth now, except in the sense that all believers are priests… Every Christian is a priest in that sense. The very weakest saint in the church of God is as much a priest as Paul was. It is not a question of capacity or spiritual power, but simply of position.
- Chosen, not claimed. The test settles one thing only — whom the Lord chooses. Moses says nothing in his own defence and lets God decide.
- Chosen place despised. A heart that undervalues what God has given starts grasping at what God never gave.
- Chosen cover story. The appeal to the rights of all the people masked a private ambition, and Moses exposed it.
- Chosen priest refused. Their claim rejected more than Aaron. A sinful people can stand before God only through the priest who offers the sacrifice.
- Chosen by God alone. No one takes the priestly honour for himself. Yet in Christ the weakest believer holds the very place Korah died trying to seize.
And they took each his censer, and put fire on them, and laid incense thereon, and stood before the entrance to the tent of meeting, as well as Moses and Aaron.
Two hundred and fifty men, led by Korah, obey Moses to the letter: they take fire and incense and stand at the tent door beside Moses and Aaron. God is about to show whom He has chosen — so what happens to every other man holding a censer?
The object each man carried was a priest's tool, not an ornament. One reference work describes it, and how these particular ones were made:
A small metal vessel. It held burning coals from the altar, and the priest sprinkled incense on them, so that a cloud of incense rose from it. The same word appears when the company of Korah, Dathan, and Abiram were put to the test. Their censers were probably made in haste, since 250 were needed.
Moses did not settle the dispute himself, and could not have. He summoned both sides to a court above his own:
Moses gives great prominence to the sovereign rights of the Lord. "The Lord will show" and "The Lord will choose." There is not a syllable about himself or Aaron. The whole question hinges on the Lord's choice and the Lord's appointment. The two hundred and fifty rebels are brought face to face with the living God. They come into His presence with their censers in their hands. There the whole matter will be gone into in full and settled, before a tribunal from which there can be no appeal. It would clearly have been useless for Moses and Aaron to judge the case. They were the defendants in it.
Korah already knew the warnings. He went ahead anyway:
Korah was determined to push ahead in defiance, despite the warnings about such folly. He and his large company presumed to act as priests at the door of the tabernacle.
Korah was a Kohathite — a Levite, not a priest. Standing next to Aaron at the door did not close that gap:
Each time the camp moved, there was the reminder. The priest had a place and a service at the tabernacle which no mere Levite could ever reach. There was a great gulf between the two, and nothing could bridge it. Some of the Kohathites, led by Korah, presumed to put themselves on a level with the priests, and God dealt with them in judgment. Their censers were turned into beaten plates to cover the altar. They served as a memorial for all time, that no one outside the family of Aaron was to draw near to burn incense before the Lord.
They aimed their complaint at two men. It landed somewhere else:
It was quite true that all the people were "holy." That is, they were a people God had set apart for Himself. Yet they denied that fact again and again by the way they lived. It was true that the Lord was among them, as the people were very quickly to see in the judgment that followed. They did not realise that in challenging the leaders whom God had chosen, they were challenging God, who had chosen them.
Aaron takes a censer too. The contrast shows what these 250 were holding and never understood:
There stands Aaron, God's high priest, between the dead and the living. From his censer a cloud of incense goes up before God. He is a moving picture of One greater than Aaron. That One made a full and perfect atonement for the sins of His people, and He is always before God in all the fragrance of His Person and work. Priesthood alone could bring the people through the wilderness.
Korah's act was more than a grab for gain. One writer says what it really attacked:
This is more than twisting the truth into a means of self-advancement, to feed the covetousness of the heart. Bad as that was, this is open, deliberate insurrection against the rights of Christ Himself. Moses was the apostle of the Jewish faith, as Aaron was its high priest. Christ is the apostle and the high priest of our faith. To claim and exercise a priesthood now for man invades what only Jesus Christ can carry out, at the right hand of God.
- Censer — a metal pan for altar coals and incense. The men made 250 in haste, because 250 of them wanted a priest's place.
- Choice — Moses refused to judge his own case. He put the question where it belonged: the Lord will show, the Lord will choose.
- Gulf — a Levite's service was real, but it never reached the altar. Standing beside Aaron changed nothing about whom God had chosen.
- Target — the men thought they were arguing with two leaders. They were arguing with the God who chose them.
- Contrast — the 250 censers brought judgment. Aaron's censer stood between the dead and the living, picturing the One whose fragrance is always before God.
And Korah gathered the whole assembly against them to the entrance of the tent of meeting. And the glory of Jehovah appeared to all the assembly.
Korah brings the whole assembly to the tent of meeting, as if sheer numbers could settle who may come near to God. God answers by showing His glory, and the real question stands out: can a majority claim holiness and priesthood, or does God alone give them?
By this verse the revolt is no longer a faction. One writer shows how far the support had spread, and how dangerous the moment was:
Korah and his company would get their answer from God Himself the next day. They were to take censers with fire and incense, and present themselves at the door of the tabernacle, as though they were priests. Dathan and Abiram refused to come up, and were content to hurl insults and false accusations at Moses. Verse 19 shows that nearly all the people supported Korah in particular. The situation was one of extreme danger.
The crowd was no accident. Korah used the language of everyone's holiness to serve a private aim:
Their argument rested on this: "all in the congregation are holy, every one of them, and the LORD is among them." But did Korah care about the whole congregation? No! He wanted to be the high priest himself (vs. 10-11). He accused Moses and Aaron of exalting themselves (v. 3) when it was plainly God who had exalted them. But Korah wanted to exalt himself, using his followers to this end.
The rebels aimed their complaint at two men. One writer shows who they were really fighting:
Korah and his company, therefore, were quarrelling with God and not with Moses and Aaron. God had called these two to occupy a certain position and to do a certain work, and woe to them if they refused. They had not aimed at the position or taken up the work themselves; God ordained them. This ought to have settled the question. It would have settled it for everyone except restless, self-occupied rebels, who sought to undermine the true servants of God to exalt themselves.
The glory did not appear as a mere display. God stepped into the dispute in person:
This fresh rebellion, like that in chapter 14, was not against God's servants, but against the Lord Himself. They were calling His glory into question. They were challenging His right to choose whom He would. So the Lord came down Himself, displaying His glory, to meet the challenge of Korah and his company. How very solemn for Korah, and for Dathan and Abiram, was the presence of the divine glory they had despised.
The claim sounded generous — why should one man stand nearer to God than the rest? One writer explains why it horrified Moses:
Korah and his company had disowned Aaron as the priest of God, by claiming equal holiness and nearness for all Israel (Num. 16:3). With this fine show of piety, were they not claiming equal priestly privileges for all, and was not this right? But it filled Moses with horror, and he fell upon his face. He saw that it was not only a refusal of Aaron (ver. 11), but a refusal of this: as a sinful people, they could have no possible standing before God except through the priest who offered the sacrifice.
Faced with the whole camp against him, Moses does not argue. He hands the verdict back to God and waits:
The double rebellion grows to the point of involving the whole assembly (v. 19). What will Moses do? As at so many other times, he falls on his face (whereas Korah exalts himself) and leaves the decision to God, saying, "In the morning the LORD will show … whom He chooses" (v. 5). On the one hand, Moses relies on God's decision to confirm the position He has given to each one. On the other hand, he waits until "tomorrow." He does not want to rush, despite how serious the situation is. He would rather allow Korah and those with him enough time to repent.
Jude names this event as the last stage of a road that ends in ruin:
In the letter of Jude the beginning, the way, and the end are set before us perfectly. The last of them is "the rebellion of Korah," and here those who depart from God perish. This is not just the selfish twisting of truth into a means of self-advancement, driven by a covetous heart — bad as that was. It is open, deliberate insurrection against the rights of Christ Himself. Moses was the apostle of the Jewish profession, as Aaron was its high priest. Christ is the apostle and the high priest of our profession.
- Pretext: The revolt claimed to defend everyone's holiness. Its leader wanted the high priest's place for himself.
- Crowd: Almost the whole camp swung behind Korah. Numbers settle nothing before God.
- Target: Moses and Aaron had not chosen their posts; God appointed them, so the quarrel was with God.
- Glory: The issue was God's right to choose whom He will. He came down in person to answer it.
- Warning: Jude reads this as open insurrection against the rights of Christ Himself — our apostle and high priest.
And Jehovah spoke to Moses and to Aaron, saying,
Korah has gathered the whole assembly against Moses and Aaron at the tent of meeting, and the glory of the Lord has appeared for all to see. God's first words go not to the crowd but to the two men it has been accusing — and they carry a sentence of destruction on the rest.
This was not a quarrel between rival leaders. It reached past Moses and Aaron to the One who had chosen them.
This new rebellion, like the one in chapter 14, was not against God's servants. It was against the Lord Himself. They were calling His glory in question. They were challenging His right to choose whom He would. So the Lord came down Himself, in the display of His glory, to meet the challenge of Korah and his company. For Korah, and for Dathan and Abiram, the presence of the divine glory they had despised was very solemn indeed.
One writer looks at what usually lies under this kind of protest:
You will usually find that loud talkers about the liberties, rights, and privileges of God's people are really seeking their own exaltation and advantage. They are not content to do their proper work, so they reach for a place that is not theirs.
The Lord speaks to Moses and Aaron alone. What follows shows what they did with that word.
Then the Lord stepped in. But He spoke first to Moses and Aaron, telling them to separate from the company of evil doers and leave God free to consume the congregation (vs.20-21). Yet Moses and Aaron were ready at once to plead for the congregation. They asked God not to consume them all, but to make a difference between the guilty leaders and those they had led (v.22).
Prayer did not cancel the call to separate. It moved that call onto the people, who had to break with the men who started the revolt.
Because the case is so serious, God cannot show mercy. A simple exclusion from the assembly is no longer possible for these men. One must depart from them and leave them to their fate.
The men accused of grabbing power pray for their accusers. Their prayer separates the ringleader from the crowd he swayed.
Again, the man they falsely accused of self-seeking intercedes for the people. "O God, the God of the spirits of all flesh, shall one man sin [this clearly points to Korah, the ringleader] and will you be angry with all the congregation?" God hears his cry, and the congregation is warned to separate from the "dwelling of Korah, Dathan and Abiram."
Nothing in the people's behaviour gave ground for hope. So faith appealed to who God is.
There is great force and beauty in this title, which faith gave to God at a time when nothing but faith could have counted on His interest in these men and His care for them — men who had made their stubbornness and self-will all too clear. And we do well to remember that He is "the God of the spirits of all flesh" (see Num. 16:22). He is never indifferent to what His power has formed.
The same title carries authority as well as care:
It means that God is not only Creator but also He has authority over His creatures and over all humanity. All the spirits of men are subject to this sovereign God.
The day taught Israel two things: who kept them alive, and what happens to those who will not turn back.
So the whole people had to learn that only the intercession of Moses — a picture of Christ — could keep them from destruction. They also had to learn that God's judgment does not spare guilty people who will not repent.
- Challenge. The rebellion aimed past Moses and Aaron at the Lord's right to choose whom He will. So the glory came down to answer it in person.
- Command. God's word to the two accused men was to step clear of the assembly, leaving Him free to consume it.
- Intercession. Instead of stepping clear, they prayed. They asked God to make a difference between the one man who sinned and the crowd he had drawn in.
- Name. Their whole appeal rested on "the God of the spirits of all flesh". He is never indifferent to what His own power has formed, and every spirit is subject to Him.
- Outcome. The people lived because Moses prayed for them — a picture of Christ. God's judgment did not spare the leaders who would not repent, and safety lay in separating from their tents.
Separate yourselves from the midst of this assembly, and I will consume them in a moment.
The glory of the Lord has just appeared over the tent of meeting, with Korah's entire gathering assembled against Moses and Aaron. God's first word is not to the rebels but to His two servants: step out of the crowd, because He is about to consume the whole congregation.
Korah aimed his protest at two men. The glory that appeared answered something deeper.
Again, in Numbers 16, "Korah gathered all the congregation against" Moses and Aaron "to the door of the tabernacle of the congregation." Then the glory of the Lord "appeared to all the congregation" (verse 19). This fresh rebellion, like that in chapter 14, was not against God's servants, but against the Lord Himself. They called His glory in question. They challenged His right to choose whom He would. And the Lord had come down Himself, displaying His glory, to meet the challenge of Korah and his company.
The sentence falls on "this congregation," not on the ringleaders alone. The reason lies in how far the revolt had spread.
Verse 19 shows that nearly all the people supported Korah in particular. The danger was extreme.
God tells the two men to withdraw so He is free to act. Their answer runs the opposite way.
Then the Lord stepped in. But He spoke first to Moses and Aaron, telling them to separate from the company of evildoers and leave God free to consume the congregation (vv. 20-21). Yet, beautifully, Moses and Aaron were ready to intercede for the congregation at once. They pleaded with God not to consume them all, but to make a difference between the guilty leaders and those they had led (v. 22).
Moses does not argue with the rebels or defend his own place. One writer explains why leaving them to God is the wisest response.
There is never much use in arguing with restless, discontented people. Far better to leave them in the Lord's hands, for their real quarrel is with Him. Suppose God sets a man in a certain position and gives him a certain work to do. If his fellows choose to quarrel with him simply because he does that work and fills that position, then their quarrel is really with God. And God knows how to settle it, and will do it in His own way.
Moses answers the threat by addressing God as "the God of the spirits of all flesh" — a title only faith could have used at such a moment.
There is great force and beauty in the title faith gives to God here. It comes at a time when nothing but faith could have counted on His interest in, and His care for, men who had made their stubbornness and self-will all too plain. And we do well to remember that He is "the God of the spirits of all flesh" (see Num. 16:22), and is never indifferent to what His power has formed.
Jude points to "Korah's rebellion" as the last stage of a road that ends in ruin. One writer traces the same offence forward to anyone who takes up the priesthood that belongs to Christ alone.
"Korah's rebellion" — and here those who depart from God perish. This is not merely the selfish twisting of the truth into a means of self-advancement, driven by a covetous heart, bad as that was. It is open, deliberate insurrection against the rights of Christ Himself. Moses was the apostle of the Jewish profession, as Aaron was its high priest. Christ is the apostle and the high priest of our profession. For a man to claim and exercise a priesthood now is a direct invasion of what only Jesus Christ can carry out, at the right hand of God.
- Challenged. The revolt looked like a quarrel with two leaders. What it really challenged was God's right to choose whom He would.
- Threatened. Nearly the whole camp had sided with Korah, so the sentence named the whole congregation. The danger was extreme.
- Separated. God told Moses and Aaron to withdraw so He would be free to consume the rest in a moment.
- Interceded. Instead of stepping aside, they pleaded with God to distinguish the guilty leaders from those they had led.
- Appealed. Faith called Him the God of the spirits of all flesh — the One who is never indifferent to what His own power has formed.
And they fell on their faces, and said, O God, the God of the spirits of all flesh! shall *one* man sin, and wilt thou be wroth with the whole assembly?
Korah's revolt has grown from a few leaders into a crowd behind them, and God is ready to consume the whole assembly in a moment. Moses and Aaron fall on their faces and pray, and their plea asks one question: will God treat a whole crowd as guilty for one man's sin?
God's first word to them was to stand clear, so that judgment could fall. Instead they asked Him to sort the crowd, not sweep it away.
Then the Lord stepped in. But He spoke first to Moses and Aaron, telling them to separate from the company of evil doers and leave God free to consume the congregation (vs.20-21). Yet Moses and Aaron were ready to intercede for the congregation at once. They pleaded with God not to consume them all, but to make a difference between the guilty leaders and those they had led (v.22).
The prayer names a single sinner. It points to the man who started the revolt. And the man praying is the one the crowd had accused of grabbing power for himself.
Again, the man they had falsely accused of self-seeking intercedes for the people. "O God, the God of the spirits of all flesh, shall one man sin, and will You be angry with all the congregation?" The one man clearly points to Korah, who started it all. God hears his cry, and He warns the congregation to separate themselves from the "dwelling of Korah, Dathan and Abiram."
Faith chooses the name it prays by. Nothing in the people's behaviour that day gave any reason to expect God to care. The title itself supplied that reason.
There is great force and beauty in the title faith gives God here. At that moment nothing but faith could have counted on His interest in, and care for, men who had shown their stubbornness and self-will all too plainly. And we do well to remember that He is "the God of the spirits of all flesh" (see Num. 16:22), and He is never indifferent to what His power has formed.
The two halves of the title are worth taking apart. "Spirit" marks the part of a person that can know God, and "all flesh" is a phrase Scripture reserves for human beings.
He is also the "God of the spirits of all flesh" (Num. 16:22), because the spirit is the only thing by which we know God, or in that sense have a God at all. It is what lets us know a person's own thoughts (1 Cor. 2:11), and several passages translate the same word as "mind" or "understanding," which is clearly its true sense. Scripture never uses it of an animal. In Scripture "all flesh" usually means people only: as where God promises to pour out the Spirit on all flesh (Acts 2:17), or where all flesh is to see the salvation of God (Luke 3:6).
after
The title says more than that God cares. It also says who holds the rights over every person in that camp.
The Old Testament already says that God is the God of the spirits of all men. In Numbers 16:22 we read that "God is the God of the spirits of all flesh". This means God is not only Creator; He also has authority over His creatures and over all humanity. All the spirits of men are subject to this sovereign God.
God did divide the camp. The rest of the chapter shows both sides of that answer: the people kept alive, and the ringleaders judged.
So the whole people had to learn that only the intercession of Moses — a picture of Christ — could keep them from destruction. They also had to learn that God's judgment does not spare guilty people who refuse to repent.
The people did not trust how far that mercy reached. When the ground opened, they ran.
Fear overtook Israel and they fled from the site of the opened earth. They need not have done this, for God had limited His judgment to the guilty.
- Posture. God told Moses and Aaron to stand clear so that He could consume the assembly. They fell on their faces instead, and asked Him to make a difference between the guilty leaders and those they had led.
- Plea. The "one man" is Korah, who started the revolt. The man pleading for the crowd is the same man they had falsely accused of self-seeking.
- Name. They prayed to "the God of the spirits of all flesh". He formed every human spirit, and He is never indifferent to what His power has made.
- Reach. "Spirit" is the part of a person that knows God, and Scripture never uses the word of animals. "All flesh" means all people, and every human spirit is under His authority.
- Result. God answered by dividing the camp. Intercession kept the people alive, and God judged the unrepentant leaders. Israel still fled in fear, though God had limited the judgment to the guilty.
And Jehovah spoke to Moses, saying,
Verse 23 is God's answer to a prayer. Moses and Aaron had just begged God not to punish the whole nation for one man's sin (v. 22), and His reply sends the people away from three men's tents.
God's reply was not destruction. It was a way out, open to everyone willing to take it:
The Lord answered their faith by telling them to warn the people to separate from the guilty leaders, Korah, Dathan and Abiram (vv. 23–24). Moses at once gave the message to the congregation, and they were concerned enough to obey God's word. Korah, Dathan and Abiram came out to stand at the door of their tents, with the wives, their sons and children (v. 27).
The same writer traces what came just before. God told these two men to stand clear of the crowd; they answered by praying for it:
Then the Lord stepped in. But He spoke first to Moses and Aaron. He told them to separate from the company of evildoers and leave God free to consume the congregation (vv. 20–21). Yet here is something beautiful: Moses and Aaron were ready to intercede at once for the congregation. They pleaded with God not to consume them all, but to make a difference between the guilty leaders and the people they had led (v. 22).
Korah's argument sounded fair: the whole congregation is holy, so why do two men stand above it? Part of it was true, and that made it dangerous:
It was quite true that all the people were "holy." That is, they were a people God had set apart for Himself. Yet it was a fact they kept denying by the way they lived. It was true that the Lord was among them, as the people were very quickly to see in the judgment that followed. They did not see the real issue. In challenging the leaders God had chosen, they were challenging God, who had chosen them.
This revolt has a lasting shape. One writer names what it attacks:
Korah's rebellion is a revolt against the authority of Christ and against the distinctive character of His priesthood. It is a revolt stirred up by a man who holds the position of a minister but pretends that he is a priest. In doing so he sets aside the only true heavenly priesthood of Christ.
The word God gives Moses is not the first word of that day. It joins the challenge given in verse 5:
The Lord's message on that occasion had two parts: "Tomorrow the Lord will show who are His" (v. 5), and "Depart, please, from the tents of these wicked men" (v. 26).
Why not simply put the rebels out of the camp? One writer explains why nothing less would do:
Because the case is so serious, God cannot show mercy. A simple exclusion from the assembly is no longer possible for these men. One must depart from them and leave them to their fate.
Once the word went out, every Israelite had to choose a side. One writer pictures the moment:
God hears his cry, and the warning goes out to the congregation: separate yourselves from the dwelling of Korah, Dathan and Abiram. What a scene now appears! There stand Korah and his company with their censers, proud and presumptuous, daring the judgment of God. At the door of their tents stand Dathan and Abiram with their wives, their sons, and their little children. What a moment of expectation for the assembled thousands of Israel!
One family was not swallowed up that day. One writer traces what happened to them:
How terrible is sin in the sight of the Lord! "Depart, please, from the tents of these wicked men and touch nothing of theirs, lest you be swept away with all their sins. So they got away from the dwelling of Korah, Dathan, and Abiram on every side." Now notice: in the next clause Korah is left out. In verse 25 nothing is said about the sons of Korah going down with their father. But in Numbers 26:11 we read, "Nevertheless, the sons of Korah did not die." Yes, in the riches of sovereign grace they were saved from going down alive into the pit.
- Prayer — Moses and Aaron pleaded that one man's sin should not fall on the whole congregation. Verse 23 is the Lord's answer to their faith.
- Distinction — they asked God to separate the guilty leaders from the people they had led. His next word does just that.
- Warning — the message has two halves. The Lord will show who are His. His people must leave the tents of these men.
- Decision — the warning puts every Israelite on the spot. Some stood their ground with their censers. Others got up and moved.
- Grace — the sons of Korah did not die; sovereign grace saved them from going down alive into the pit.
Speak unto the assembly, saying, Get you up from about the habitation of Korah, Dathan, and Abiram.
Numbers 16:24 is God's reply to the prayer of Moses and Aaron, who begged Him not to destroy the whole nation for the sin of a few. So God draws a line through the camp and tells the people which side to stand on.
God answered the prayer with an order, and the people had to act on it.
The Lord answered their faith by telling them to warn the people to separate from the guilty leaders, Korah, Dathan and Abiram (vs.23-24). Moses at once gave the message to the congregation, who were concerned enough to obey God's word.
Korah and his followers were not outsiders. They already had a place of service, and they wanted the priesthood as well.
The sin was this: it was the ministers of God seeking also to take over the priesthood. There was only one high priest in Israel, a picture of our only one great High Priest, who has passed into the heavens. Rebellion against Aaron was sin against the Lord.
Moses passed the warning to the camp, and thousands stood waiting.
What a scene now presents itself! There stand Korah and his company with their censers in proud presumption, daring God's judgment. In the door of their tents see Dathan and Abiram with their wives, their sons, and their little children. What a moment of expectation for the assembled thousands of Israel! One word more — not only a warning, a call to separate from the guilty leaders, but the sentence of death.
The New Testament letter of Jude points back to this rebellion, and places it at the end of a path with three stages.
First, "the way of Cain," which was a way of self-will in approaching God: he ignored God's way and came in his own way. Second, "Balaam's error" for reward. This was self-seeking under cover of religion. Third, "Korah's rebellion," which was self-assertion in the things of God. Jude shows that those who reach this third stage will perish.
Moses had said the Lord would show who were His. He also told the people to move away and touch nothing of theirs. One writer ties both sentences to what the apostles later taught.
These two statements plainly foreshadow the instruction the apostles give us for the times when we meet error face to face. Such error challenges the foundations of our faith, and it overthrows the faith of those who fall under its influence. We are neither sovereign nor all-knowing. God is both, and in due season He will make clear who are His. We are, however, responsible to act in keeping with His word, and to avoid all sharing in the error and evil.
Some feel such a command belongs to an older and harsher order of things. One writer answers that objection from the New Testament.
He says, "Depart; do not touch a thing; get out of their tents." But you say, "That is the command of the law. Whoever says that is harsh and unchristian." Is it? Listen to what John, the beloved disciple, says: "Everyone who goes on ahead and does not abide in the teaching of Christ, does not have God. Whoever abides in the teaching (the Cross and all that goes with it) has both the Father and the Son. If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, do not receive him into your house or give him any greeting." That is the same thing Moses said. Whether it is in the Law or in the Gospel, God does not change His demands when it comes to believing on Himself and His Word.
Some who were very close to the danger came out of it alive.
Now notice that in the next clause Korah is left out. There is no statement that the sons of Korah went down with their father. In Numbers 26:11 we read, "But the sons of Korah did not die." Yes, in the riches of sovereign grace they were saved from going down alive into the pit.
- Prayer first. The order to move away came as God's answer to Moses and Aaron pleading for the crowd — mercy shaped as a warning.
- Warning second. God told the people what was coming before it came, so anyone willing to move could escape.
- Separation third. The danger was nearness to the rebels, not just agreement with them. The cure was distance, and touching nothing of theirs.
- Responsibility fourth. God alone knows who are truly His; our part is to obey His word and avoid sharing in the evil.
- Survival last. The sons of Korah did not die. Sovereign grace saved them from going down into the pit.
And Moses rose up and went to Dathan and Abiram; and the elders of Israel followed him.
In Numbers 16:25 Moses walks down to the rebels' tents himself, with Israel's elders behind him. The ground is about to open — so why does he go, and what is he doing there before judgment falls?
The men Moses walks toward are not fringe troublemakers. One writer notes who led this conspiracy, and warns that a pious appearance proves nothing:
There is a conspiracy under the fairest pretensions possible. This does not mend matters. The basest things sometimes put on the most pious appearance. No one should be fooled by how something sounds… Some of them belonged to the ministering class. Others were chief men in the congregation. On the whole they represented what people today would call leading men in church and state.
Where did all this pride leave Moses himself?
It is a good thing when the pride that Satan knows so well how to stir up brings out nothing but lowliness and humbling of our souls before God. Pride tends to provoke pride, and flesh to irritate flesh. But it was not so with Moses.
Moses does not rise to go until he has first asked God to spare the crowd that followed these men:
Then the Lord stepped in. He spoke first to Moses and Aaron, telling them to separate from the company of evil doers and leave God free to consume the congregation (vs.20-21). Yet Moses and Aaron were ready to intercede at once for the congregation. They pleaded with God not to consume everyone, but to make a difference between the guilty leaders and those who followed them (v.22).
Moses walks down to call the ordinary people away from the leaders before judgment falls. One writer sees his two sayings here as a pattern for us when error attacks the faith:
In our chapter Moses answers Korah and his company, "the LORD will show who is His, and who is holy." To Dathan and Abiram he had to say, "Depart, please, from the tents of these wicked men and touch nothing of theirs." These two sayings clearly point forward to the instruction the apostles give us. We need it when we come face to face with error that attacks the foundations of our faith… We are neither sovereign nor all-knowing. God is both, and in due season He will make clear who are His. We are however responsible to act in line with His word, and avoid all sharing in the error and evil.
Israel now sees two groups of rebels at once, and hears of a sign only God could give:
There stand Korah and his company with their censers, in proud presumption daring the judgment of God. At the door of their tents, see Dathan and Abiram with their wives, their sons, and their little children. What a moment of waiting for the assembled thousands of Israel! Then one word more. It is not only a warning, a call to separate from the guilty leaders. It is the sentence of death — and not a common death, but a death unheard of before. "But if the LORD creates something new, and the ground opens its mouth and swallows them up with all that belongs to them, and they go down alive into Sheol, then you shall know that these men have despised the LORD."
The ground opened. Yet a later note in Numbers changes the picture:
How terrible sin is in the sight of the Lord!… Yet in Num. 26:11 we read, "But the sons of Korah did not die." Yes, in the riches of sovereign grace He saved them from going down alive into the pit. And that was not all. As part of the family of Kohath they received the cities of refuge, and Hebron is named first (1 Chr. 6:54-67). Oh, how our God delights in mercy!
- Pretension. The revolt wore a pious face and had respected leaders. That is what made it dangerous.
- Patience. Moses met pride by humbling himself before God, not by matching it.
- Prayer. He prayed before he walked. He asked God to tell the misled crowd apart from the guilty leaders.
- Parting. His walk was a rescue call. Step away from the evil. God alone knows His own; our part is to keep clear of what is wrong.
- Preservation. Judgment fell, yet Korah's sons lived. Later they received cities of refuge. Mercy stood inside the scene of ruin.
And he spoke to the assembly, saying, Depart, I pray you, from the tents of these wicked men, and touch nothing of theirs, lest ye perish in all their sins.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And they got up from the habitation of Koran, Dathan, and Abiram, on every side. And Dathan and Abiram came out, and stood in the entrance of their tents, and their wives, and their sons, and their little ones.
Numbers 16 is one warning away from judgment: God has told the whole camp to pull back from the tents of the three rebel leaders. This verse records two very different answers to that warning — one saved lives, the other cost them.
Before judgment fell, God gave a way out, and the people took it:
The Lord answered their faith by telling them to warn the people to separate from the guilty leaders, Korah, Dathan and Abiram. Moses at once gave the message to the congregation, who were concerned enough to obey God's word.
The warning was not just to leave. Moses told them to leave everything behind, even family ties:
He says, "Leave. Do not touch a thing. Get out of their tents and out of their villages, even if it is a brother or sister. Get away from them." But you say, "That is the command of the law. Whoever says that is harsh and that is unchristian." Is it? … Whether it is in the Law or in the Gospel, God does not change His demands when it comes to believing on Himself and His Word.
The rebels saw the whole camp back away from them. They did not take it as a last call to repent:
These men learn nothing from the situation. On the contrary, they stand in the entrance of their tents with their wives, their sons and their little ones. They defy the entire assembly.
Two groups now stood in view at once, each in the place it had chosen:
There stand Korah and his company with their incense burners, in proud presumption daring the judgment of God. In the door of their tents, see Dathan and Abiram with their wives, their sons, and their little children. What a moment of expectation for the assembled thousands of Israel! … They had spoken wickedly against the man the Lord had chosen, and defiantly they stood. Their judgment came suddenly, and there was no remedy.
The revolt came from two directions at once:
Dathan and Abiram seem to have pressed their claim again to the rights of the firstborn, and their rebellion was mainly against Moses as leader. But Moses and Aaron cannot be separated here, for Christ, whom they both pictured, is both King and Priest. So we find Korah, of the tribe of Levi, joined with the sons of Reuben, and Korah's rebellion was chiefly against the priesthood of Aaron. … As a picture, it answers to the refusal of Christ's sacrificial work and of His unique place of nearness to God — the only One through whom anyone can come to God. It was not rebellion against man. "What is Aaron that you grumble against him?" They rebelled against the authority of God, and against the mercy by which He had spared the guilty nation.
Whole households went down, not the men alone. Years later Moses retold the story, and his choice of names was deliberate:
How the judgment on Dathan and Abiram and their households humbles the soul! How awful the thought of the earth opening its mouth and swallowing them up! And for what? For their rebellion against what God had appointed. In the history given in Numbers, Korah, the Levite, is the prominent character; but here Moses leaves him out and names the two Reubenites instead — two members of the congregation. He is seeking to act on the whole body of the people by setting before them the terrible result of self-will in two of their own number. They were two ordinary members, as we should say, and not just a privileged Levite.
The judgment had one exception, and it fell where nobody would expect:
The children of Dathan, Abiram, and the rest were all swallowed up. But, wonderful to say, there was one exception. Where was it? Some unusually faithful person, who had the misfortune of being closely tied to them? Not at all. The exception of grace was in the household of the very worst of them. The people who, as man would have thought, deserved least of all to be spared were exactly the ones God kept this special grace for — the sons of Korah! Korah led and organised the whole rebellion, and his position as well as his conduct made him the most guilty of all. … Is not this the true grace of God? … Grace is no new thing with Him.
- Warning — God moved the crowd out before He moved the ground. The call to separate was mercy arriving ahead of judgment.
- Choice — the same warning saved the congregation but taught the leaders nothing. They heard it and stood in their doorways instead of stepping out.
- Target — the quarrel looked personal, aimed at Moses and Aaron. It struck at the authority of God, who had appointed them both.
- Cost — self-will does not stay private. Wives and little ones stood in those doorways, and Moses later held up two ordinary men as a warning to everyone.
- Grace — the one household spared was the ringleader's own. The sons of Korah lived, by a mercy no one had earned.
And Moses said, Hereby ye shall know that Jehovah has sent me to do all these deeds, for they are not out of my own heart
Korah's company had accused Moses and Aaron of grabbing authority for themselves. The whole camp was watching to see who was right. Moses answers by pointing to a sign only God could give. Everything he has done stands or falls on what God does next.
The charge Moses answers is that he invented his own role. One writer shows how far the rebels had misread it:
How little they understood that Moses had not wanted to be Israel's leader (Ex. 3:10-11; 4:1-13), but God absolutely required him to be. Their argument rests on this: "all in the congregation are holy, every one of them, and the LORD is among them." Did Korah really care for all the congregation? No! He wanted to be the high priest himself (vs. 10-11). He accused Moses and Aaron of exalting themselves (v. 3) when it was plainly God who had exalted them. But Korah wanted to exalt himself, using his followers to this end.
If Moses did not appoint himself, then the complaint has to travel past him to the One who did appoint him:
Korah and his company, therefore, were quarrelling with God and not with Moses and Aaron. God had called these men to hold a certain position and to do a certain work, and woe to them if they refused. They had not aimed at the position or taken up the work themselves; God appointed them. This ought to have settled the question. It would have settled it for everyone except restless, self-occupied rebels, who tried to undermine the true servants of God and exalt themselves. This is always the way with those who promote division or discontent. Their real object is to make themselves somebody.
Moses does not defend himself. He hands the whole dispute to God:
Moses, in these words, makes it a question simply between the Lord and the rebels. He can appeal to God, and leave everything in His hands. This is the true secret of moral power. A man who has nothing of his own to seek — no aim or object but the divine glory — can wait with confidence to see how things turn out. But for this, the eye must be undivided, the heart upright, the purpose pure. It will not do to assume or pretend anything.
He had done the same earlier in the chapter, waiting instead of acting:
Moses relies on God's decision to confirm the position He has given to each one. At the same time, he waits until "tomorrow." He does not want to rush, serious as the situation is. He prefers to give Korah and those with him enough time to repent.
The sign is something no natural force could produce:
"A new thing." This, then, was not a mere earthquake. Whatever causes earthquakes now, this one had no natural cause. It was the direct act of God in a marked and special judgment. Nothing is as terrifying as an earthquake. This one carries a mark: it came when men first attacked the rights of Christ as King, in the person of Moses.
The rebels were not just challenging a leader. They were challenging the priesthood God Himself had appointed:
With these men it was a rebellion about religious office: they "contended against the LORD" in His appointed priesthood. The whole rebellion was a picture of opposition to the kingship and priesthood of Christ.
One writer has just described the Christian priesthood. He then warns that Korah's sin is not only old history:
And let the reader note this carefully. To aim at any other form of priesthood than this is, in principle, the sin of Korah. So is taking up any other priestly function. So is setting up a special priestly class — a group of men who act on behalf of their fellows, or who carry out priestly service for them before God. We only speak of the principle, not of persons. The seed of the sin is as clear as possible. In time there will be the full-grown fruit.
- Sent, not self-made. Moses never asked for the job. God required it of him, so nothing he did came from himself.
- Sent means the quarrel is with God. Attacking a man God has placed somewhere is really a dispute with the One who placed him.
- Sent men can stay silent. Moses defends nothing and leaves the verdict with God. He even delays the test, giving the rebels time to repent.
- Sent, and God proves it. The sign is not a natural event but the direct act of God.
- Sent points to Christ. Moses and Aaron stand for the kingship and priesthood of Christ. Grasping at what belongs to Him is Korah's sin in seed form.
if these men die as all men die, and are visited with the visitation of all men, Jehovah has not sent me;
Korah and his followers had accused Moses of setting himself above the people. Here Moses stakes his whole claim on one public test: if these men die an ordinary death, God never sent him.
Moses does not argue his case. He names two possible endings and lets the result give the verdict.
Then Moses spoke as a prophet, and with great seriousness. He showed Israel that he had not acted by his own will in what he did, but as God directed him. He tells them that if these men died merely natural deaths, God had not spoken through Moses. But if the Lord created a new thing, making the earth open and swallow them up, then it would be clear that these men had rejected the Lord Himself.
The test only works because Moses has nothing of his own to gain by it.
Moses, in these words, makes it simply a question between the Lord and the rebels. He can appeal to God and leave everything in His hands. This is the true secret of moral power. A man who has nothing of his own to seek — no aim or object but the divine glory — can confidently wait for how things turn out. But for this, the eye must be single, the heart upright, the purpose pure. It will not do to assume or pretend anything. If God is going to judge, He will most certainly expose all pretence and play-acting. Such pretending has no place when the earth is opening its mouth and the fire of the Lord is burning up everything around. It is easy to swagger and boast and speak big words while all is at rest. But when God steps into the scene in terrible judgment, the look of things changes fast.
after_note: DELETE
Commentators read the rebellion as an attack on two offices at once.
The sin of Korah was twofold. On one side, he openly rebelled against Moses and Aaron. He said, "You have gone too far… why then do you exalt yourselves above the assembly of the LORD?" On the other side, he was not content with his own position. He seized the place of priestly intercession that belonged to Aaron alone. He sought to pull Moses and Aaron down to the level of the congregation, and to lift himself up to the level of Aaron.
Everyone dies, so an ordinary death would settle nothing. Moses asks for something no one had seen — and no one believed it could happen.
That judgment was no new thing; the earth opening and swallowing them up was both new and unexpected. Moses had warned them, saying, "if the LORD creates something new." But those standing around Dathan and his company did not seem to believe it was possible. Neither did the men who died. So terror gripped the surrounding crowd. They fled at the cry of those who went down alive into the pit, saying, "Lest the earth swallow us up too." But it worked no change in them.
Korah's end is sobering because he already held a high place.
Truly, "It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God." How much better it would have been for Korah to rest content with his Levite service! That service was of the very highest order. As a Kohathite, his work was to carry some of the most precious vessels of the sanctuary. But he aimed at the priesthood, and fell into the pit.
Commentators carry the question Moses raised — sent by God, or self-appointed? — over to every claim to priestly office.
About the appointment of the priest on earth: "No one takes this honour for himself, but only when called by God, just as Aaron was." Here again we see an analogy to the priesthood of Christ. No one can truly take the place of priest, in any sense of the word, who is not called by God. Neglecting this great truth is a deeply serious thing. We see it in the judgment that overtook Korah and those with him. They tried to establish themselves in the priesthood without a call from God.
- Sent, not self-made. Moses' entire defence rests on one claim: he did not act on his own initiative, and God alone can prove it.
- Nothing to defend. A man with no private aim can hand the case to God and wait, because pretence is exactly what judgment exposes.
- Ordinary proves nothing. A normal death would have proved the rebels right. Only something never seen before could answer Moses.
- The target was office. Korah pulled Moses and Aaron down to the level of the congregation, and pushed himself up to Aaron's place.
- Called, or condemned. No one takes the honour of priesthood for himself. Korah already held a high service, and lost everything by reaching past it.
but if Jehovah make a new thing, and the ground open its mouth, and swallow them up, and all that they have, and they go down alive into Sheol, then ye shall know that these men have despised Jehovah.
Korah and his followers have challenged Moses, and Moses stakes his whole commission on one test. If these men die an ordinary death, he was never sent; if God does something never seen before, everyone will know the quarrel was with the Lord, not with Moses.
Moses hands the dispute over to God and waits. One writer finds there the root of real spiritual strength:
Moses, in these words, makes it a question simply between the Lord and the rebels. He can appeal to God, and leave everything in His hands. This is the true secret of moral power. A man who has nothing of his own to seek can confidently wait for the outcome. He has no aim or object but the divine glory. But for this, the eye must be single, the heart upright, the purpose pure. It will not do to assume or pretend anything.
The charge is not that the rebels disliked Moses, but that they had "despised the LORD." Their demand had two halves, one aimed down, one aimed up:
The sin of Korah was twofold. On one hand, he openly rebelled against Moses and Aaron: "You have gone too far… why then do you exalt yourselves above the assembly of the LORD?" On the other hand, he was not content with his own position. He seized the place of priestly intercession that belonged to Aaron alone (Num. 16:3, 9-10). He sought to drag Moses and Aaron down to the level of the congregation, and to lift himself up to the level of Aaron.
Fire from God had struck before, so death by fire would prove nothing new:
They had seen Nadab and Abihu perish by fire from the LORD; but here are two hundred and fifty princes, men of renown, who are consumed in a moment. That judgment was no new thing; the earth opening and swallowing them up was both new and unexpected. Moses had warned them, saying, "if the LORD creates something new." Yet those who stood around Dathan and his company did not seem to believe it possible, any more than those who did perish. So the surrounding crowd was terrified.
Older translations read "down quick into the pit." That word "quick" is often misread:
We may add that the word "quick" does not refer to the suddenness of the act, but means they went down living into sheol.
The word behind "pit" is Sheol, and it does not always carry the same sense:
Now in the following passages… Num. 16:30, 33… Sheol cannot well mean anything but "the grave"… while elsewhere its general reference is mostly to the place of departed spirits.
The households went down with the rebels. But one line was spared, and it bore fruit long after:
It must be noted that the sons of Korah did not perish. A careful reading of verses 27-33 brings out this fact. Chapter 26:11 settles it beyond doubt: "But the sons of Korah did not die." Sovereign grace saved them from the terrible fate of their father. They were saved from the pit. Mercy was remembered in wrath… And more than that, the Holy Spirit inspired them to write some of the beautiful Psalms. Read Psalm 84.
One writer, after describing the priesthood that belongs to every Christian, draws the line:
To aim at any other form of priesthood than this is, in principle, the sin of Korah. So is taking up any other priestly function. So is setting up a priestly class — a group of men to act on behalf of their fellows, or to carry out priestly service for them before God. We only speak of the principle, not of persons. The seed of the sin is as clear as possible. In time there will be the full-grown fruit.
Another writer follows that fruit to its end:
In Korah, of the tribe of Levi, we see men given a place of nearness in ministry pushing into privileges that belonged to the high priest alone… So too, in the coming day, God will have the Antichrist cast into the lake of fire. He is the false prophet who would take Christ's place.
- Provocation. This was no personality clash. Korah pulled God's servants down to the crowd's level and pushed himself up to the high priest's level.
- Patience. Moses seeks nothing for himself. He makes it a question between God and the rebels, and waits.
- Proof. Death by fire had happened before. The ground swallowing men alive had not, and that was the sign the crowd needed.
- Pit. "Quick" means alive, not sudden. They went down living into Sheol — here the grave, though elsewhere the word points to the place of departed spirits.
- Pardon. The children of Korah did not die. Rescued from the pit, they later wrote psalms — mercy remembered inside wrath, while the same judgment points ahead to the Antichrist's end.
And it came to pass when he had ended speaking all these words, that the ground clave apart that was under them.
Moses had just staked his whole standing on a sign. An ordinary death for the rebels would prove him a fraud; a new act of God would settle the matter — and the last word had barely left his mouth when the earth split.
Moses was not improvising. He named the outcome in advance, so that the event itself would settle who had sent him.
Then Moses spoke solemnly as a prophet, to show Israel that he had not acted by his own will, but as God directed him. He tells them that if these men died natural deaths, God had not spoken by Moses. But if the Lord created a new thing, making the earth open and swallow them up, then one thing would be clear: these men had rejected the Lord Himself.
Moses could leave the result to God because he wanted nothing for himself.
Moses, in these words, makes it a question simply between the Lord and the rebels. He can appeal to God, and leave everything in His hands. This is the true secret of moral power. A man who has nothing of his own to seek — no aim or object but the divine glory — can confidently wait for how things turn out. But for this, the eye must be single, the heart upright, the purpose pure. It will not do to assume or pretend anything.
One writer weighs which part of this judgment was new, and what the watching crowd did with it.
That judgment by fire was no new thing. The earth opening and swallowing them up was both new and unexpected. Moses had warned them, saying, "If the Lord makes a new thing." But those who stood around Dathan and his company seemed to believe it no more than the men who perished did. That explains the terror of the surrounding crowd. They fled at the cry of those who went down alive into the pit, saying, "Lest the earth swallow us up too." But it produced no change in them.
Korah was not a man God had passed over. The trouble began with what he did with the honour he already had.
Unbelief constantly shows itself in this very form. If God puts an honour on a man, and the man does not receive it as from Him, that honour becomes only a stepping stone. The man despises the God who gave it, while grasping after what God has never given him. Nothing produces such dissatisfaction as a heart that fails to put the right value on what God has given us.
The irony of verse 31 is that the man who wanted to go higher is the one who went down.
How much better it would have been for Korah if he had been content with his Levite service, which was of the very highest order. His work as a Kohathite was to carry some of the most precious vessels of the sanctuary, but he aimed at the priesthood, and fell into the pit.
This was never only a dispute about leadership. One writer places it last in a line of departures from God, and names what Korah's demand really attacked.
The last case before us is the rebellion of Korah, and here those who depart from God perish. This was not just the selfish twisting of truth into a means of self-advancement, bad as that was. It was open, deliberate revolt against the rights of Christ Himself. Moses was the apostle of the faith Israel confessed, and Aaron was its high priest. Christ is the apostle and the high priest of the faith we confess. For a man to claim and exercise a priesthood now is a direct invasion of what only Jesus Christ can do at the right hand of God.
Korah's line was not wiped out. A later note in Numbers records the exception, and Israel's songbook still carries the family name.
In Numbers 26:11 we meet the exception that sovereign mercy made: "Nevertheless, the sons of Korah did not die." Notice this in connection with the Psalms — the eleven Psalms "for the sons of Korah."
The chapter is not only a warning about rebellion; it is an argument for contentment with a small place.
If God gives us a crossing to sweep, let us sweep it, under His eye and to His praise. The great and all-essential point is this: be found doing the very work He gives us to do, and filling the very post He appoints us to. Had Korah and his company learnt this, their piercing cry would never have terrified the hearts of their brothers. But no; they would be something when they were nothing, and so they went down into the pit. If we are governed by the rule of God's kingdom, we shall find that the only way to get up is to go down.
- Grasping — Korah already held a high honour. Discontent with the place God gave him turned that honour into a weapon against God.
- Staking — Moses named the sign in advance and left the outcome with God. He could wait without fear, because he had nothing of his own to gain.
- Splitting — death by fire had happened before; the opening ground had not. The sign was unmistakable, yet the onlookers fled in terror without repenting.
- Sparing — the sons of Korah did not die. Eleven Psalms carry their name. Judgment fell, but mercy drew a line through it.
- Stooping — the man who reached upward went down alive. In God's kingdom the only way up is down.
And the earth opened its mouth, and swallowed them up, and their households, and all the men that belonged to Korah, and all their property.
The ground splits open under Korah's tents. It is one of the most shocking scenes in Israel's forty years in the wilderness, and it answers a demand for a place God had not given. Why did a quarrel over religious position end in a death no one had seen before, and did anyone in that camp escape?
Korah was a Levite, already separated to serve at the tabernacle. Commentators trace his ruin to discontent with the very gift God had handed him.
Unbelief constantly shows itself in this very form. If God puts an honour on a man, and he does not receive it as from Him, that honour only becomes a stepping stone. He despises the God who gave it, while grasping after what He has never given. Nothing produces such dissatisfaction as a heart that puts the wrong value on what God has given us.
His daily work already put him in touch with the holiest things in Israel.
How much better it would have been for Korah if he had been content with his Levite service. It was of the very highest order. As a Kohathite, his work was to carry some of the most precious vessels of the sanctuary. But he aimed at the priesthood, and fell into the pit.
God first warned the people to move away from the rebels. What came next was no ordinary death.
One word more. It was not only a warning, a call to separate from the guilty leaders. It was the sentence of death — and not a common death, but a death unheard of before... At once the earth opens. They go down alive into the pit. They perish from among the congregation... They had spoken wickedly against the Lord's anointed, and they stood there in defiance. Their judgment came suddenly, and there was no remedy.
The wording of this verse is careful. Set it beside other passages and a difference appears.
Numbers 26:10 seems to say that the earth swallowed up Korah. But Numbers 16:32 speaks only of "the people who belonged to Korah". And in Deuteronomy 11:6 and Psalm 106:17-18 only Dathan and Abiram are named as swallowed up. There was an exception in the case of Korah: his children were not included in the punishment. Several psalms carry the names of his sons or descendants, who took part in the service of song.
That distinction fits the two forms the judgment took in the chapter.
In the case of Korah the judgment came straight from the hand of God in His dwelling-place. In the case of the others it came through God's ordering of the forces of nature.
Everything belonging to these households went down. The one exception is the surprise of the whole chapter.
The exception of grace was in the household of the very worst of them. As man would have thought, the people who deserved it least were the very ones for whom God reserved this special grace — the sons of Korah! ... Where can you find a finer sample of grace's power, and of how it rises above every circumstance? Look at the grace that singled out and saved the children of Korah — the most infamous of those who had conspired against Moses and Aaron, the two men who pictured Christ as king and priest.
This rebellion is not left in the past. Jude uses Korah's name for the last stage of a road that ends in ruin.
Jude sets before us the beginning, the way, and the end... The last stage is Korah's rebellion, and here those who depart from God perish. This is not just the selfish twisting of truth into a means of self-advancement, driven by the greed of the heart — bad as that is. It is open, planned rebellion against the rights of Christ Himself. Moses was the apostle of the Jewish faith, as Aaron was its high priest. Christ is the apostle and the high priest of the faith we confess. To claim and exercise a priesthood for man today is a direct invasion of work that Jesus Christ alone can carry out at the right hand of God.
Some also read the scene as a preview of a judgment still to come.
In Korah, of the tribe of Levi, we see men who had been given a place of nearness in ministry pushing into the rights that belong to the high priest alone. This is a complete denial of the necessity of the priesthood of Christ... So too, in the day that is coming, God will have the Antichrist cast into the lake of fire — the false prophet who would seize the place of Christ.
- Place given. Korah held one of the highest services in Israel. His sin began when that place stopped being enough.
- Place seized. Reaching for the priesthood was open rebellion against the rights of Moses and Aaron — and so against Christ, whom the two men pictured.
- Place opened. The death was unlike any Israel had seen, and it came suddenly and without remedy.
- Place spared. The households went down, yet Korah's own sons lived. Grace rested on the family least likely to receive it.
- Place warned. Jude points back to Korah as the pattern of the end for all who invade what belongs to Christ alone.
And they went down, they and all that they had, alive into Sheol, and the earth covered them; and they perished from among the congregation.
The ground opened under Korah, Dathan and Abiram and swallowed them alive, along with their households and everything they owned. Older translations read "the pit" where the ESV has "Sheol," and both the death itself and that word have drawn close study.
One writer explains why no one could blame this death on bad luck or geology.
"A new thing." This then was not a mere earthquake. Whatever causes earthquakes now, there was no natural cause for this one. It was the direct act of God in marked and special judgment. Nothing is so terrifying as an earthquake. This one bears the mark of its timing: it came when men first openly attacked the rights of Christ as King, in the person of Moses.
Moses set out the test in advance and let God answer it:
Moses tells them that if these men died ordinary deaths, God had not spoken through him. But if the Lord created a new thing, making the earth open and swallow them up, then it would be clear that these men had rejected the Lord Himself.
The old wording "went down quick into the pit" sounds as if they died suddenly. One writer corrects that, and argues the phrase describes a state, not only a burial plot:
As to the word "into," we can speak of an individual going into death, who may never be in the grave at all. The moment a man dies he is in death. The body usually waits hours or days before burial. "In" or "into" can apply to a condition just as much as to a place. We may add that the word "quick" does not refer to the suddenness of the act, but means they went down living into sheol.
Commentators differ on how wide the word reaches. Another writer treats it as covering both the burial place and the state of the departed:
The mistake starts with a wrong idea of what the term sheol covers. It really includes the grave, as well as the region where spirits, still without their bodies, wait for their resurrection... The congregation of Dathan and Abiram went down alive into the pit (sheol)... People understood sheol as what we might call the whole underworld. They thought of both body and soul as entering it.
Korah was not an outsider. He already held a high place, and that is what makes his end so pointed:
How much better it would have been for Korah to stay content with his Levite service. It was of the very highest order. His work as a Kohathite was to carry some of the most precious vessels of the sanctuary. But he aimed at the priesthood, and fell into the pit.
Others read the same sin as an attack on a truth, not just on a man:
Moses saw that this was not only a refusal of Aaron. It was a refusal of this truth: as a sinful people, they could have no standing before God except through the priest who offered the sacrifice.
The pit did not take everyone in Korah's family. One writer follows what became of those spared:
Sovereign grace saved the sons of Korah from the awful fate of the father. They were saved from the pit. Mercy was remembered in wrath... And more than that, the Holy Spirit inspired them to write some of the beautiful Psalms. Read Psalm 84, "How lovely is your dwelling place, O LORD of hosts."
One writer sets this rebellion at the end of a path with clear stages:
Korah's rebellion is the last stage in this wilderness history. Jude sees it as the last form of the evil in the Christian world, an evil already at work in his own day... He shows how that evil develops. First comes "the way of Cain" — that is, self-righteousness, which has no need of the atoning sacrifice. Then comes the spirit of Balaam, leading others astray for pay. Finally comes what we have here, the rebellion of Korah, the height of their wickedness, in which they perish. The final step is open opposition to God, and to Him whom "God has made both Lord and Christ": so their doom is assured.
One writer turns the same warning on anyone claiming priestly office today:
It was a fearful thing to sin against Aaron. Is it then a light matter to sin now against Christ, by taking over the work of the priesthood? We earnestly urge you to repent before the terrible judgment, now so near at hand, overtakes you.
- Cause — Korah already carried the holiest vessels. He wanted the priesthood as well, and lost everything.
- Sign — The ground opening was something new, with no natural cause behind it. It proved that God, not Moses, had spoken.
- Word — "Alive" does not mean "suddenly." They went down living into Sheol — a word for a condition, not just a burial plot.
- Mercy — Grace spared the sons of Korah. The judgment that swallowed the father left his sons alive, and they later wrote psalms.
- Warning — Jude puts Korah at the end of a road: first self-righteousness, then greed for pay, then open opposition to Christ.
And all Israel that were round about them fled at their cry; for they said, Lest the earth swallow us up!
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And there came out a fire from Jehovah, and consumed the two hundred and fifty men that had presented incense.
Earlier in Numbers 16 the ground opened and swallowed the ringleaders of Korah's rebellion. Here 250 more men die at the tabernacle door, holding censers full of incense — so why did an act of worship end in death?
The 250 had a case, and it sounded pious. One writer shows what horrified Moses about it:
Korah and his company had disowned Aaron as the priest of God. They claimed equal holiness and nearness for all Israel: "all in the congregation are holy, every one of them, and the LORD is among them. Why then do you exalt yourselves above the assembly of the LORD?" (Num. 16:3). They made a fine show of piety. Were they not claiming equal priestly privileges for all? Was this not right? But it filled Moses with horror, and he fell on his face. He saw that it was not only a refusal of Aaron (v. 11). It was also a refusal of this: as a sinful people, they could have no possible standing before God except through the priest who offered the sacrifice.
The men brought fire in their censers; God answered with fire of His own. One writer names who else this judgment warns:
These princes brought the fire of their own censers. In answer, the judgment fire of the LORD came out, and they perished at the entrance of the tabernacle. Their presumption became a warning to Israel for all time. Their sin is just as much a warning to all censer-bearers who would be priests without God's call. They are really enemies of the altar of Christ's cross.
Another writer states the rule that the fire enforced:
Further, he says, "no one takes this honor for himself, but only when he is called by God, just as Aaron was." Aaron was called by God. Korah and his company rebelled, and he exalted himself against Moses and against Aaron the priest. What was the result? Each man had to come before the sanctuary with his censer. As these men who would force their way into the high priest's office drew near, fire from God's holy presence came out and destroyed them.
One commentator looks at the scene and at what it exposes in man:
The ground had only just closed over the rebels when "fire came out from the LORD and consumed the 250 men offering the incense." It was a terrifying scene altogether — a clear and soul-subduing display of divine judgment on human pride and pretension. It is useless for man to exalt himself against God, for He opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble. What complete folly for worms of the dust to lift themselves up against the almighty God! Poor man! He is far more foolish than the moth that rushes into the blaze that burns it up.
The lesson did not die with the men. God had their censers beaten into plates to cover the bronze altar. One writer explains what that covering was meant to do:
God pressed this lesson home by making the bronze censers into plates to cover the bronze altar. That kept the certainty of judgment before their eyes — judgment on anyone who despises the sacrifice and priest of God. But He linked it with the altar. He would not merely give warning. He would also turn the eye to the effective shelter from that judgment, which He must carry out on those who refuse His grace.
Korah's sin has a modern form. One writer answers it two ways — against those who claim a priestly rank, and for the nearness that belongs to all believers:
Korah's sin ruined himself and his followers. It was proud discontent with the service of the Levites, and an ungodly claim to the priesthood. It was rebellion against Moses and Aaron, types of Christ in this. Christian ministry is the exercise of a gift from the Lord. He gives some and sends them, for the good of all. But all saints are priests, with equal freedom to enter the true sanctuary. Some seize this nearness to God beyond what grace has given to all the saints, and in denial of it. Without realising it, they misunderstand and cancel a chief blessing of Christianity.
- Claim. The rebellion began with a religious argument: everyone is holy, so everyone may approach. In fact it refused the priest who gave a sinful people their only standing before God.
- Approach. The 250 drew near with fire of their own choosing. But no one takes this honour for himself; God must call him, as He called Aaron.
- Fire. God answered their fire with His own. The judgment fell on human pride: He opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble.
- Sign. God turned the censers into a covering for the altar, so the certainty of judgment stayed in view.
- Shelter. The warning sat on the altar itself, turning the eye from judgment to the one shelter from it.
And Jehovah spoke to Moses, saying,
Judgment has just fallen on Korah, and fire has consumed the men who offered incense. Now God speaks again, and what He says concerns the metal incense pans left in the ashes.
God's first word separates the objects from the offenders. Men with no right to the censers had handled them, yet God calls the censers holy:
The Lord spoke again to Moses. He told him to tell Eleazar the son of Aaron to pick up the censers out of the ashes. The reason was that the censers were holy, even though the men who dared to use them were unholy (vs.36-37). Then the censers were to be hammered into plates as a covering for the altar (v.38). They were copper censers, so they covered the copper altar outside the tabernacle door. This covering was a constant reminder to Israel: no one outside Aaron's line could offer incense before the Lord. Anyone who dared to would suffer a fate like that of Korah and his followers (v.40).
The judgment had already settled the question. The plates keep the answer in sight, and the man who gathers them is himself a son of Aaron:
First, this one priesthood must be fenced off from every intrusion. Judgment has already shown this in the destruction of the men who offered incense. But a memorial of it must be kept. Eleazar — notice how quickly we come to Eleazar — is told to take the censers out of the burning, and plates are to be made from them to cover the altar. They stand as a warning against anyone not of Aaron's family pushing into the priest's place.
God attached the plates to the altar of sacrifice. That choice carries its own message — the same object that warns also points to the way of escape:
This lesson is pressed home by making the copper censers into plates to cover the copper altar. The plates kept before their eyes the certain judgment on anyone who despises the sacrifice and the priest of God. But God linked them with the altar. He would not only give warning; He would also turn the eye to the real shelter from the judgment He must carry out on those who refuse His grace.
The same writer sees such a warning as love, not only severity. He quotes verse 38 in an older translation, which calls these men "sinners against their own souls":
But these terrible judgments that fell on the leaders and on the "sinners against their own souls" (Num. 16:38) were meant to turn the people away from such madness and folly. It is divine love that pulls back the curtain on the future and warns people to "flee from the wrath to come" (Matt. 3:7).
Why did this sin bring such heavy judgment? One writer sets it beside Israel's earlier worship of the golden calf, and finds the answer in what the tabernacle pictured:
Korah in calling the "flesh" holy, wanted to bring it into the sanctuary. This is not idolatry, but "flesh" trying to manage the things of Christ. What is the service of the tabernacle? What are the sacrifices, the incense, everything inside the holy place? They are all pictures of the Christ who was coming. Korah's sin brings down a heavier judgment than the worship of the calf. God was more jealous for the honour of Christ — even though this was only a matter of shadows and symbols — than for His own Name of Jehovah when Aaron joined it with idolatry.
The warning reaches beyond Israel's history. Anyone who takes the place of priest without God's call repeats Korah's error:
As to the appointment of the priest on earth, "no one takes this honor for himself, but only when called by God, just as Aaron was." Here again we are reminded of a parallel with the priesthood of Christ. No one whom God has not called can truly take the place of priest, in any sense of the word. We see how serious it is to ignore this great truth in the judgment that fell on Korah and those with him, who tried to set themselves up as priests without God's call. Jude warns that many will appoint themselves priests in the same way, without God's call, and will perish in Korah's rebellion (Jude 11).
- Spoken — after the fire, God speaks again. His first word is about the vessels the rebels misused.
- Holy — God calls the censers holy, even though the men who used them were unholy.
- Hammered — the pans are beaten into plates and fixed to the copper altar. The tools of rebellion become a public notice.
- Memorial — the notice reads one way. No one outside Aaron's line may burn incense, and no one may take the honour of priest unless God calls him.
- Mercy — the sign hangs on the altar of sacrifice. The eye that sees the warning also sees the shelter. Love, not only severity, shows people what is coming.
Speak to Eleazar the son of Aaron the priest, that he take up the censers out of the burning; and scatter the fire afar; for they are hallowed,
Korah and 250 other men burned incense at the tabernacle door, claiming a right that belonged to the priests. Fire from the Lord consumed them, and now God calls their censers holy — how can that be?
The command draws a line between the censers and the men who carried them:
The Lord spoke again to Moses, telling him to tell Eleazar the son of Aaron to pick up the censers out of the ashes. He was to do so because the censers were holy, though the men who dared to use them were unholy. Then the censers were to be hammered into plates as a covering for the altar. They were copper censers, so they covered the copper altar outside the tabernacle door.
Moses is told to speak to a priest about this, not to any Levite. The point of the whole episode was who may come near, and the memorial is entrusted to the priestly line itself:
First, this one priesthood is to be fenced off from all intrusion. Judgment has already shown this in the destruction of the men who offered incense. But the memorial of it is to be kept. Eleazar — notice how at once we come to Eleazar — is told to take up the censers out of the burning. Out of them, plates are to be made to cover the altar. They are a warning against anyone not of the seed of Aaron pushing into the priestly place.
The censers were copper, not gold — and one writer reads the metal itself as part of the message, alongside the outcome of the men who held them:
All are quickly made to see the blasphemy of these "sinners against their own souls." They take copper censers — not gold, but the metal that speaks of judgment — and offer incense. How all this repeats the eternal truth — none but Christ, none but Christ.
God attached the reminder of judgment to the very altar where sacrifice was offered:
The copper censers were made into plates to cover the copper altar. This pressed the lesson home. It kept before their eyes the certainty of judgment for anyone who despises the sacrifice and priest of God. But the plates were linked with the altar. It was as though God would not only give warning, but also turn the eye to the effective shelter from that judgment which He must carry out on those who refuse His grace.
Commentators differ on how to read that covering. One takes the plates over the altar as a barrier, not an invitation:
The instructions the Lord gave Moses in verses 36-40 show how serious the sin of Korah and his company was. Their sin was to have a lasting reminder. Their censers were made into broad plates that covered the altar. While the altar was covered in this way, no sacrifice for sin could be offered. Korah's rebellion was sin of a most deliberate kind, and it had clearly put him beyond the reach of a sin offering.
These judgments were aimed at those still living:
These awful judgments fell on the leaders and on "sinners against their own souls." They were meant to turn the people from such madness and folly. It is divine love which draws back the veil from the future, and warns men to "flee from the wrath to come."
The sign was set up because ministry had reached for the priesthood. One writer names the sin and carries it forward:
The sin was this: it was the ministers of God seeking also to usurp the priesthood. There was only one high priest in Israel. He is a picture of our only one great High Priest, who has passed into the heavens. Rebellion against Aaron was sin against the Lord.
- Holy — The censers were holy; the men who dared to lift them were not. So the vessels were lifted out of the ashes and kept.
- Hammered — Fire consumed the men. Their censers were beaten into plates and fastened over the copper altar — copper for copper, the metal that speaks of judgment.
- Fenced — The plates fenced the priesthood off from all intrusion. No one outside Aaron's line could come near to offer incense.
- Fixed — The warning sat on the altar itself. The eye that saw the certainty of judgment also saw the shelter from it. Commentators differ here: one reads the covered altar as sin beyond the reach of a sin offering.
- Love — Divine love put judgment on display to turn the living back before wrath came. The lesson still stands: there is only one great High Priest.
the censers of these sinners who have forfeited their life; and they shall make them into broad plates for the covering of the altar; for they presented them before Jehovah, therefore they are hallowed; and they shall be a sign unto the children of Israel.
Fire from the Lord had just destroyed Korah and 250 leaders. They had claimed a priestly place God never gave them. Now the Lord gives orders about what they left behind — the censers they had carried. Those orders turn the judgment into a lasting sign fastened to the altar.
The verse calls the censers holy even while calling their owners men who sinned at the cost of their lives. One writer explains both halves, and notes that the metal decided where the plates went:
The Lord spoke again to Moses, telling him to tell Eleazar the son of Aaron to pick up the censers out of the ashes, because the censers were holy, though the men who dared to use them were unholy (vv. 36-37). Then the censers were to be hammered into plates as a covering for the altar (v. 38). They were copper censers. So they covered the copper altar outside the tabernacle door. This covering was to be a constant reminder to Israel: God would let no one outside Aaron's line offer incense before the Lord. Anyone who dared to try would meet a fate like that of Korah and his followers (v. 40).
The verse gives the reason: the men had brought the censers before the Lord. What is brought before Him becomes holy, whatever the heart of the one who brings it.
The fire from the Lord had already settled the question. The plates keep the answer visible after the ashes cool:
First, this one priesthood is to be fenced off from all intrusion. Judgment has already shown this in the destruction of the men who offered incense. But the memorial of it is to be kept. Eleazar is told to take up the censers out of the burning. From them, plates are to be made to cover the altar. They warn against anyone not descended from Aaron pushing into the priestly place.
The verse says these men sinned at the cost of their lives. The damage fell on themselves. One writer notes the metal they carried, and the truth this scene keeps repeating:
God quickly makes everyone see the blasphemy of these "sinners against their own souls" (vv. 38, 39). They take bronze censers. The metal matters: not gold, but the metal that speaks of judgment. Then they offer incense: "And fire came out from the LORD and consumed the 250 men offering the incense" (v. 35). How all this repeats the eternal truth — none but Christ, none but Christ.
Note: the older translation reads "sinners against their own souls" where the ESV has "these men who have sinned at the cost of their lives."
Commentators differ on what the covering meant. One sees mercy in where the warning stands — on the altar itself, the place of sacrifice:
Making the bronze censers into plates to cover the bronze altar presses this lesson home. It keeps before their eyes the certainty of judgment for anyone who despises the sacrifice and priest of God. But the warning was linked with the altar. It is as though God would not only warn them, but would also turn their eye to the real shelter from that judgment — the judgment He must carry out on those who refuse His grace.
Another reads the covered altar the opposite way. It marks how far these men had put themselves out of reach:
The instructions the Lord gave Moses in verses 36-40 show how serious the sin of Korah and his company was. Their censers were beaten into broad plates to cover the altar, as a permanent reminder of their sin. While the altar stayed covered this way, no sacrifice for sin could be offered. Korah's defiance was sin of a most wilful kind, and it clearly put him beyond the reach of a sin offering.
The verse says the plates were to be a sign to the people of Israel. One writer applies that sign to anyone who approaches God on terms of their own choosing:
Look at those censers, beaten into broad plates to cover the bronze altar. Think of the end of the men who dared to come into God's presence in any way other than His appointed way. Never weaken the truth that the one and only Sacrifice is absolutely necessary — the Sacrifice that has fully met God's claims.
- Sin. Korah's company claimed a nearness God never gave them. The verse names the cost: they sinned against themselves.
- Sign. Their censers were holy, because they had come before the Lord. So God had them hammered flat and fixed to the altar as a lasting sign.
- Fence. The plates fenced the priesthood off from all intrusion. No one outside Aaron's line was to offer incense.
- Shelter. Commentators differ on the covering. One sees a warning set at the altar, turning the eye to shelter. Another sees an altar closed to a sin offering.
- Christ. The whole scene repeats one lesson — none but Christ, and no approach to God except the way He appoints.
And Eleazar the priest took the copper censers, which they that were burnt had presented; and they were made broad plates for a covering of the altar
Eleazar's task comes after the fire. He collects the bronze censers of the men God had just consumed. Hammered flat, they become a covering for the altar. Why keep anything belonging to rebels, and why fasten it to the altar itself?
The censers were spared, though the men who held them were not. Bronze censers went to cover the bronze altar, which stood outside the tabernacle door.
The Lord spoke again to Moses. He told him to tell Eleazar the son of Aaron to pick up the censers out of the ashes. The censers were holy, though the men who dared to use them were unholy. The censers were then to be hammered into plates as a covering for the altar. They were copper censers, therefore to cover the copper altar outside the tabernacle door. This covering was to be a constant reminder to Israel. No one outside Aaron's line could be allowed to offer incense before the Lord. Anyone who dared to do so would suffer a fate like that of Korah and his followers.
The material of these censers is not an accident. Bronze runs through the tabernacle's outer court as the metal of judgment, and the men who carried these pans met exactly that.
Everyone is quickly made to see the blasphemy of these "sinners against their own souls" (verses 38, 39). They take bronze censers — not gold, but the metal that speaks of judgment — and offer incense. "And fire came out from the Lord and consumed the 250 men offering the incense." How all this repeats the eternal truth — none but Christ, none but Christ.
The fire had already settled who may approach God. The plates keep that verdict in view.
First, this one priesthood is to be fenced off from all intrusion. Judgment has already shown this in the destruction of the men who offered incense. But the memorial of it is to be preserved. Eleazar is told to take up the censers out of the burning. From them, plates are to be made for the covering of the altar. They stand as a warning against any intrusion into the priest's place by one who is not of the seed of Aaron.
Eleazar was Aaron's third son. One writer reads his work here as a picture of Christ's priesthood.
As the third son of Aaron, and in his ministry here, Eleazar typifies the priesthood of Christ. This ministry of Eleazar confirms the priesthood God appointed, and its power. So does Aaron stopping the plague with the censer of incense, when the whole congregation revolted. The preservation of the sinning, murmuring people depended on the exercise of the priesthood.
Commentators differ on what the covered altar meant. One reading finds mercy in the warning, since God tied the sign to the place of sacrifice.
God showed there could be no standing or acceptance before Him at all, except on the ground of sacrifice, through the priest He appointed. The bronze censers were made into plates to cover the bronze altar. This pressed the lesson home and kept the certainty of judgment before their eyes — judgment for any who despise the sacrifice and priest of God. But the sign was linked with the altar. It is as though God would not only warn, but also point the eye to the effective shelter from that judgment, which He must carry out on those who refuse His grace.
Another reading takes the covering as a barrier, and measures how far Korah's sin had gone.
Their censers were to be made into broad plates covering the altar, as a lasting reminder of their sin. For as long as the altar was covered in this way, no sacrifice for sin could be offered. Korah's rebellion was sin of a most deliberate kind, and it had clearly placed him beyond the reach of a sin offering.
The plates were made for Israel, but the writers apply them further. The claim to a priestly place God has not given is the same claim in any age.
The princes brought the fire of their censers. In answer, the judgment fire of the Lord came out, and they died at the entrance of the tabernacle. Their presumption became a warning to Israel for all time. Their sin warns just as much all who take up the censer and would be priests, but are not called by God. Such men are in truth enemies of the altar of Christ's cross.
- Sin — the 250 grasped at a priestly place that was not theirs; they were "sinners against their own souls."
- Fire — their censers were bronze, not gold, and bronze speaks of judgment; judgment is what fell on them.
- Salvage — the vessels were holy though the men were not, so a priest, Eleazar, lifted them out of the ashes.
- Sign — hammered flat onto the altar, they fenced the priesthood off from all intrusion, in plain sight of all Israel.
- Shelter — God fastened the warning to the altar itself. Some read this as God pointing the eye to refuge. Others read the covered altar as a closed door for deliberate sin.
as a memorial to the children of Israel, that no stranger who is not of the seed of Aaron come near to burn incense before Jehovah, that he be not as Korah, and as his band, -- as Jehovah had said to him through Moses.
Korah's rebellion does not end with the fire that destroyed the men who offered incense. It ends with a piece of metalwork. Their censers were hammered flat and fixed to the altar, where all Israel could see them. Why would God keep the property of rebels as something holy? And what was Israel meant to remember at every sacrifice?
God's first order after the judgment concerned the metal left in the ashes.
The Lord spoke again to Moses. He told Moses to tell Eleazar the son of Aaron to pick up the censers out of the ashes. The censers were holy, though the men who dared to use them were unholy. Then the censers were to be hammered into plates as a covering for the altar. They were copper censers, so they covered the copper altar outside the tabernacle door.
The judgment had already made God's mind clear. The plates made that judgment permanent.
First, this one priesthood is to be fenced off from all intrusion. Judgment has already shown this in the destruction of the men who offered incense. But the memorial of it is to be kept. Eleazar is told to take up the censers out of the burning. From them, plates are to be made to cover the altar. They are a warning: no one who is not of the seed of Aaron may intrude into the priest's place.
Korah was a Levite — a member of the tribe set apart to carry and care for the tabernacle. His sin was to treat that service as if it qualified him for the priest's work.
The Kohathites carried the sacred vessels, among them the bronze altar. Yet they could never serve at it...
Commentators differ on why the sign went on the altar of sacrifice. One sees mercy inside the warning:
Korah and his company despised Aaron, the priest of God, on the plea that the whole congregation was holy. Their destruction showed the solemn and certain result of coming to God in any other way than through the priest and sacrifice He appointed. God made plain that there could be no standing or acceptance before Him except on the ground of sacrifice, through the priest He appointed. This lesson is pressed home by making the bronze censers into plates to cover the bronze altar. It keeps before their eyes the certainty of judgment for any who despise the sacrifice and priest of God. But the sign was linked with the altar. God would not only give warning. He would also turn the eye to the effective shelter from that judgment — the judgment He must carry out on those who refuse His grace.
Another reads the covering as a closed door:
Their censers were made into broad plates to cover the altar. This was to be a lasting reminder of their sin. As long as the altar was covered in this way, no sacrifice for sin could be offered. The rebellion of Korah was sin of a most wilful kind, and it had clearly put him beyond the reach of a sin offering.
The plates said something about God, not only about Korah. He is approached on His terms alone — and people still take Korah's road.
The censers beaten into broad plates, placed as a covering on the altar, were always the solemn sign that God could only be approached in the way of His own ordering. There are multitudes today who perish "in the gainsaying of Core [Korah]" (Jude 11).
Note: the ESV renders Jude 11 "perished in Korah's rebellion."
The sign was given so that no one would "become like Korah" — and writers press that on the present day.
The sin was this: it was the ministers of God seeking also to take over the priesthood. There was only one high priest in Israel, a picture of our one and only great High Priest, who has passed into heaven. Rebellion against Aaron was sin against the Lord... If it was so terrible to sin against Aaron, is it a light thing now to sin against Christ by taking over the priest's work?
- Sign. The rebels' censers became plates on the altar — a sign fixed where Israel could not miss it.
- Sign against intrusion. Its message was a fence: no one outside Aaron's line may come near to offer incense.
- Sign over the sacrifice. The warning stood on the altar, where the sacrifices were offered. One writer sees shelter there; another sees the altar closed to wilful sin.
- Sign of one priest. Korah was a Levite who wanted the priest's place. Carrying holy things never bridged that gulf.
- Sign for us. "Lest he become like Korah" still warns against coming to God in any way but His own.
And the whole assembly of the children of Israel murmured on the morrow against Moses and against Aaron, saying, Ye have killed the people of Jehovah.
Korah's rebellion had just ended in fire and an opened earth. The whole camp watched it happen. One day later that same camp accused Moses and Aaron of murder. What does such a quick turn reveal about the human heart? And what held back God's hand a second time?
The timing is the first shock. Judgment on that scale should have settled the camp for good. It did not.
The closing paragraph of our chapter illustrates, in a most striking way, the incurable evil of the natural heart. One might hope that after the impressive scenes acted out in front of the congregation, deep and lasting lessons would be learned. They had seen the earth open her mouth. They had heard the heart-rending cry of the rebels as they went down into the pit. They had seen the fire of the Lord come out and consume, in a moment, two hundred and fifty princes of the congregation. After such a display of divine power and majesty, one might suppose that the people would from now on walk softly and humbly, with no more sounds of discontent and rebellion in their tents.
The accusation names Moses and Aaron. But who had really done the killing?
Only the next day the congregation was foolish enough to accuse Moses and Aaron outright of killing the people of the LORD (v.41). Moses and Aaron had not done this. It was God, not Moses, who stepped in with dreadful judgment that Moses could never have carried out. But people are often blinded by self-centredness. In this catastrophic judgment they saw nothing but the work of the authorities. And people are always ready to challenge any authority.
Push the charge one step further. If the dead were righteous men, then God was unrighteous to kill them.
The people would still insist, as if in defiance of God, that the princes had the right to offer incense. They insisted too that Moses had killed righteous men. They refused to see that the LORD Himself had destroyed them by direct and immediate judgment. So the congregation ignored the sin and in reality charged God with unrighteousness. It is a solemn thing to doubt God's mercy. But to say that God is unrighteous in His judgment is the height of wickedness, and it brings further judgment on them. The LORD suddenly appears. While the people gather against Moses and Aaron, the cloud covers the tabernacle... and the plague destroys fourteen thousand seven hundred more of the people.
Notice the name the crowd gives the dead rebels.
But the spirit of rebellion had taken hold of the whole assembly. On the next day they murmur against Moses and Aaron, saying, "You have killed the people of the LORD." The name was a convenient way to make themselves great.
One writer finds the same pattern in Christian confidence.
A person may think and reason about the ground of Christian confidence and Christian privilege, just as these Israelites reasoned that God owned them. Theirs was a carnal confidence. They took up general principles of truth about God's dealings with His people, and then went on in the presumption of the flesh. This brought them to murmur and rebel.
The office the people had just attacked is the one that keeps them alive.
Nothing but priesthood could be of any use to a rebellious and stiff-necked people. That is very clear here, and it was the very priesthood they had so despised... There stands Aaron, God's high priest, between the dead and the living. From his censer a cloud of incense goes up before God. He is a striking picture of One greater than Aaron. That One made a full and perfect atonement for the sins of His people, and He is always before God in all the fragrance of His Person and work... Intercession saved the people from the just consequences of their rebellious murmurings.
God's answer to this murmuring came in the next chapter, and it was grace.
After the murmurs of the people of Israel (Num. 16:41) God took the rod from the hands of Aaron, whose election showed grace (Num. 17:5), to lead the people Himself across the desert... The love of God is greater than the sin of the people: without that they would never have been able to cross the desert. The rod of Aaron is therefore the full display of the grace of God.
- Next day. One day after Israel's most terrifying judgment, the whole camp murmured again. Fear alone cannot cure the natural heart.
- Misblame. God had acted, but the people saw only their leaders. Self-centredness is always quick to blame the authority in front of it.
- Slander. Calling the rebels "the people of the LORD" charged God Himself with an unrighteous judgment. That is worse than doubting His mercy, and it cost the camp another plague.
- Presumption. Their confidence was real but carnal. It took true principles about God's people and ran on presumption, and it ended in rebellion.
- Rescue. The despised priesthood alone stood between the dead and the living. It pictures Christ, and it shows that God's love is greater than His people's sin.
And it came to pass, when the assembly was gathered together against Moses and against Aaron, that they looked toward the tent of meeting, and behold, the cloud covered it, and the glory of Jehovah appeared.
One day after Korah's rebellion was judged, the whole assembly blamed Moses and Aaron for the deaths. As the crowd gathered, God's glory appeared over the tent — had it come to save the people, or to judge them?
One writer points to the timing. The dreadful judgments of the day before changed nothing.
Man is not to be taught this way. The flesh is utterly incurable. God's book teaches this truth in every section and on every page. We see it in the closing lines of Numbers 16. "But on the next day." Think of that! It was not a year, or a month, or even a week after the dreadful scenes we have been considering.
The crowd's charge was that Moses and Aaron had killed the Lord's people. That claim had to deny what everyone had watched happen, and it pointed higher than Moses.
The people still insisted, as if in defiance of God, that the princes had the right to offer incense. They insisted that Moses had killed righteous men. They chose to ignore that Jehovah had destroyed them by direct and immediate judgment. So the congregation ignored the sin and in effect charged God with unrighteousness. It is a solemn thing to doubt God's mercy. But to say that God is unrighteous in His judgment is the worst wickedness of all. And it brings further judgment on them. Jehovah suddenly appears.
This was not the first time the cloud spoke against the people camped under it. One writer lists the other times the glory answered Israel.
Israel provokes the holiness of the Lord in the day of the manna, in the day of the spies, in the matter of Korah, and at the water of Meribah (Exodus 16; Numbers 14, 16, 20). Each time the Lord resents it. The glory appears in the cloud, expressing this resentment, a witness against the camp.
The same glory that had appeared in chapter 16 when Korah gathered the assembly appeared again the next day:
All Israel had witnessed the glory of the Lord that had come to deal with Korah's rebellion, and had seen the divine judgment poured out on those who had rebelled, yet the very next day "all the congregation of the children of Israel murmured against Moses and against Aaron, saying, 'You have killed the people of the LORD'" (Num. 16:41). We may well wonder at the boldness of Israel in challenging so soon — after seeing what happened to Korah — the God who had shown His displeasure and His power against the sinners.
Moses said nothing to the crowd. The glory took the dispute out of his hands. What followed was no relief for the complainers.
Moses did not have to answer the people at all. For God intervened suddenly. The cloud covered the tabernacle and the glory of the Lord appeared (v.42). Moses and Aaron came there and heard the Lord's command: "Get away from the midst of this congregation, that I may consume them in a moment." So their complaining helped nothing. It only led to further death among the people.
The crowd had attacked the priesthood. That priesthood was now the only thing between them and death.
This passage makes it very clear: nothing but priesthood could help a rebellious and stubborn people — and it was the very priesthood they had despised. There is something in this closing paragraph that is blessed beyond words. There stands Aaron, God's high priest, between the dead and the living. From his censer a cloud of incense goes up before God. He is a striking picture of One greater than Aaron. That greater One made a full and perfect atonement for the sins of His people, and He is always before God in all the fragrance of His Person and work.
The worst sin of the chapter did not have the last word.
But what a God is ours! Truly we say that His ways of mercy rise above His righteous judgment. His goodness and His wrath (as we see here) have brought out still greater sin. Yet God makes the greater sin an occasion for showing still greater mercy. He met Israel's need at that time, and He uses it to reveal to His church now a truth of the highest and most blessed importance. For now the high work of priesthood in intercession stands out most clearly, and grace shows still more of its resources.
- Provocation. Judgment on Korah taught the people nothing. The very next day the whole assembly murmured. The flesh is incurable.
- Accusation. The crowd blamed Moses for deaths God Himself had caused. So they ignored their own sin and charged God with unrighteousness.
- Appearing. The glory in the cloud is a witness against the camp. God answered the same way at the manna, at the spies, and at Meribah.
- Intercession. God announces judgment, but the despised priesthood stands between the dead and the living. Aaron pictures One greater than himself, always before God in the fragrance of His work.
- Abounding. The greater sin became the occasion for greater mercy. God's ways of mercy rise above His righteous judgment.
And Moses and Aaron went before the tent of meeting.
The people's charge was worse than unfair to Moses and Aaron. It rewrote what they had all watched happen the day before:
They still insisted, as if defying God, that the princes had the right to offer incense. They claimed Moses had killed righteous men. They chose to ignore that the Lord had destroyed them by direct and immediate judgment. So the congregation ignored the sin and in reality charged God with unrighteousness. It is a solemn thing to doubt God's mercy. But to say that God is unrighteous in His judgment is the height of wickedness. It brings further judgment upon them.
Moses made no defence before the crowd. He and Aaron went to where the glory had appeared:
Moses did not have to answer the people at all. For God intervened suddenly. The cloud covered the tabernacle and the glory of the Lord appeared (v.42). Moses and Aaron came there. They heard the Lord's command: "Get away from among this congregation, that I may consume them in a moment." In other words, their complaining, rather than helping anything, only led to further death among the people.
Writers note how quickly all this followed the previous day's events, and read the returning glory as God taking up the quarrel Himself:
All Israel had witnessed the glory of the Lord that had come to deal with Korah's rebellion, and had seen the divine judgment poured out on those who had rebelled, yet the very next day "all the congregation of the children of Israel murmured against Moses and against Aaron, saying, You have killed the people of the Lord." We may well wonder at the boldness of Israel in challenging, so soon after seeing what happened to Korah, the God who had shown His displeasure and His power against the sinners.
At the tent, Moses had every reason to step aside:
One would have thought that this judgment would leave a deep impression on all the people. However, on the morning of the very next day the people complain, "You have killed the people of the Lord." As they identify themselves with Korah and the 250 men, they deserve the same judgment. God's instructions to Moses were, "Get up from the midst of this assembly, and I will consume them in a moment." They are very similar indeed to the instructions He gave before the earth opened and swallowed up Korah and his companions (v. 26: "Depart"). So the only understandable reaction of Moses would have been to "depart" and wait for God to judge the people.
Instead, Aaron went out among the people with his censer. The office the rebels had attacked became their only hope:
This makes one thing very clear. Nothing but priesthood — the very priesthood that had been so despised — could be of any use to a rebellious and stubborn people. There stands Aaron, God's high priest, between the dead and the living. From his censer a cloud of incense goes up before God. He is a striking picture of One greater than Aaron. That One made a full and perfect atonement for the sins of His people, and He is always before God in all the fragrance of His Person and work. Priesthood alone could bring the people through the wilderness. It was the rich and fitting provision of divine grace.
Aaron carried no new sacrifice into the crowd. What he did carry was enough:
The lighted censer was a picture of the sweet savour of the merits of Christ, brought out in all their perfection by His death. Fire from the bronze altar had kindled it. The whole scene illustrated the Lord's intercession, which is always effective and always must be. For notice that Aaron offered no fresh sacrifice, but stood with his lighted censer. That was enough. God understood the deep meaning of that according to His thoughts, and He showed mercy at once.
So what should we do when God's people are in the wrong?
We should not criticise God's people lightly, or wait for God to judge them. Instead we should bring in the "censer": bringing the merits of Christ and His work before God, and asking Him to have mercy upon His people on this basis.
- Accusation — Blaming Moses and Aaron for the deaths denied that God had judged at all. It charged God Himself with injustice.
- Appearing — The glory at the tent answered the charge. Moses argued with nobody. He went where God speaks, and heard the sentence.
- Alternative — God told Moses to get clear of the assembly. Moses could have stepped aside and watched the people die. Aaron stood among them with a lit censer instead.
- Atonement — Aaron brought no new victim, only a censer lit from the altar. That was enough for God, and He showed mercy at once.
- Application — The office the rebels despised was the only thing that carried Israel through. So plead the merits of Christ over failing people. Do not stand back and watch them fall.
And Jehovah spoke to Moses, saying,
The day after the ground swallowed Korah and his followers, the whole congregation turned on Moses and Aaron and blamed them for killing the Lord's people. God's words here open a sentence of death, and the chapter asks what Moses will do when he hears it.
One writer points to how fast the people turned, and reads it as proof that the flesh cannot be cured.
Man is not to be taught this way. The flesh is utterly incurable. This truth is taught in every section and on every page of the volume of God. It is illustrated in the closing lines of Numbers 16. "But on the next day." Think of that! It was not in a year, or a month, or even a week after the appalling scenes we have been dwelling on.
The words God speaks here are not new. They repeat what He had said just before the ground opened, and by siding with Korah the people had placed themselves under the same verdict.
One would have thought that this judgment would leave a deep impression upon all the people. However, on the morning of the very next day the people complain, "You have killed the people of the LORD." As they identify themselves with Korah and the 250 men, they merit the same judgment. God's instructions to Moses, "Get away from the midst of this assembly, and I will consume them in a moment," are very similar indeed to the instructions He had given before the earth opened and swallowed up Korah and his companions (v. 26: "Depart"). Therefore, the only understandable reaction of Moses would have been for him to "depart" and wait for the people to be judged.
Moses treats God's word as something to be answered, not merely obeyed. He falls on his face, and then acts at once.
Here are three special judgments in two days. The last one came because the people had seen the first two and still did not repent. In heart they were committing the same sin that brought the judgment on Korah and his company. The LORD speaks to Moses, "Get away from the midst of this congregation, that I may consume them in a moment." Moses knew that wrath had gone out from the LORD, and his taught heart knew the right way to turn it back. He tells Aaron to take the censer, put fire from the altar in it, and add incense. Aaron is to go quickly to the congregation and make atonement. And Aaron stands between the dead and the living, and the plague stops.
The rebellion had been aimed at Aaron's priesthood. That is exactly what saves the survivors.
This makes it very clear that nothing but priesthood — even that very priesthood which had been so despised — could help a rebellious and stubborn people. There stands Aaron, God's high priest, between the dead and the living. From his censer a cloud of incense goes up before God. He is a striking picture of One greater than Aaron. That One made a full and perfect atonement for the sins of His people, and He is always before God in all the fragrance of His Person and work. Priesthood alone could bring the people through the wilderness.
No animal is killed here, yet the text calls it making atonement. One explanation looks at what the word itself means.
If it is asked, why, then, is it called "making atonement"? We have seen that, according to the Old Testament, atonement could be made over and over again, and with the same blood. On the day of atonement the blood is put on the mercy-seat and on the altar alike, and in each case atonement is said to be made with it. This becomes simpler when we consider that the word "to make atonement" is the intensified form of the verb "to cover", so it would naturally take in the thought of the effect of atonement, as well as the making of it. Thus the intercession of the risen Priest, as effectually covering the sin of His redeemed, might in this sense be said to make atonement for it. Its power to do this does not set aside, but affirms, the value of His precious death.
Justice alone would have ended the story here. Mackintosh explains what God's own name required instead.
This is the language of pure and inflexible justice. Immediate destruction is the work of justice. Keeping them safe to the very end is the glorious and vital work of divine grace — grace reigning through righteousness. If God had dealt with the people in justice alone, He would never have made His name known, for there is far more in His name than justice. There is love, mercy, goodness, kindness, long-suffering, deep and unfailing compassion. But no one would have seen any of this if the people had been consumed in a moment. "For my name's sake I defer my anger; for the sake of my praise I restrain it for you, that I may not cut you off... For my own sake, for my own sake, I do it, for how should my name be profaned? My glory I will not give to another." (Isaiah 48:9, 11)
- Sentence — In heart the people shared Korah's sin, so the same judgment was theirs by right.
- Standing — A taught heart knows what to do with such a word: Moses sent Aaron into the plague with the censer.
- Between — Aaron stood with his censer between the dead and the living. He pictures the great High Priest who is always before God in the fragrance of His Person and work.
- Covering — "To make atonement" is the strengthened form of "to cover". The risen Priest's intercession covers His people's sin, and that power affirms the value of His death.
- Name — Instant destruction would have shown God's justice alone. God spares them so that His whole name can be known: love, mercy, and unfailing compassion.
Get you up from the midst of this assembly, and I will consume them in a moment. And they fell on their faces.
God has just judged Korah's rebellion. The very next day the whole community turns on Moses and Aaron and blames them for the deaths. God's glory appears at the tent. He tells Moses to stand clear so that He can destroy the whole assembly. What will a mediator do with an offer like that?
The people had seen the earth swallow Korah and his companions. Their complaint the next morning was not a slip of memory. It was a verdict on God's justice.
The people still insisted, as if defying God, that the princes had the right to offer incense. They claimed Moses had killed righteous men. They chose to ignore the fact that the Lord had destroyed those men by direct and immediate judgment. So the congregation ignored the sin and in reality charged God with unrighteousness. It is a serious thing to doubt God's mercy. But to call God unrighteous in His judgment is the height of wickedness, and it brings further judgment on them.
Judgment had been on public display, and it changed nothing.
"But on the next day." Think of that! It was not a year after the terrible scenes we have been considering. It was not a month, or even a week. "But on the next day all the congregation" — no longer just a few daring spirits — "grumbled against Moses and against Aaron."
Earlier in the chapter God told the people to move away from Korah's tents. Then destruction fell. The wording here is almost the same.
As they identify themselves with Korah and the 250 men, they deserve the same judgment. God's instructions to Moses, "Get away from the midst of this congregation, that I may consume them in a moment," are much like the instructions He had given before the earth opened and swallowed up Korah and his companions. Then too He had said, "Depart" (v. 26). So the only understandable reaction of Moses would have been to "depart" and wait for God to judge the people.
Instead of withdrawing, Moses and Aaron fall to the ground.
Moses, you know, did this first. When the congregation gathered to grumble, how good to see Moses and Aaron leave them and go to the door of the tabernacle. And they fell on their faces before God. This is what we deeply need — that spirit of intercession. How I wish we all had it.
The whole quarrel had been about who may serve as priest. The answer comes as a rescue, and the men accused of murder carry it out.
Here is another opportunity for Moses. The whole congregation is again threatened with immediate destruction. All seems hopeless… But now it appears that the only hope for the people lies in the very priesthood the rebels had despised. The very men they had charged with killing the Lord's people were God's instruments in saving their lives.
What follows is unusual. Aaron makes atonement with fire and incense, not with blood.
At first sight the action is strange. Atonement, according to Leviticus, is by blood. Here there is none, no sacrifice of any kind, and yet atonement is made… For resurrection marks the priesthood we have come to. Death, then, has been gone through, and this means atonement in that sense has been made. Once made, it cannot be repeated, and it never needs to be… Christ is in heaven. He has completely finished the work for sin, although He has not finished the work of intercession for His people. That intercession is just what the offering of incense pictures.
The censer itself carries the contrast.
The censers of Korah and his company had been rejected outright. Now the one censer God appointed, in the hands of Aaron, is enough to stay the plague between the dead and the living.
Aaron's place between the dead and the living drew a line.
Those who had died were beyond recovery; for them no atonement was possible. Aaron could step in only for the living… In him the merits of Christ presented to God were displayed in type.
The scene closes with one picture.
There stands Aaron, God's high priest, between the dead and the living. From his censer a cloud of incense goes up before God. He is a striking picture of One greater than Aaron, who made a full and perfect atonement for the sins of His people, and who is always before God in all the fragrance of His Person and work.
- Charge. The people did not just grumble. By calling the dead rebels God's own people, they called His judgment unrighteous. That charge brought the plague.
- Command. "Get away" matched the earlier word "Depart," so the expected move was for Moses to step clear and let judgment fall.
- Choice. Moses fell on his face instead, and the priesthood the rebels had despised became the people's only hope.
- Censer. Rejected in Korah's hands, the appointed censer now stops death. Atonement comes by incense here, because what remains is intercession.
- Christ. Aaron between the dead and the living pictures a greater Priest, always before God in the fragrance of His Person and work. Yet his shelter reached the living only.
And Moses said to Aaron, Take the censer, and put fire thereon from off the altar, and lay on incense, and carry it quickly to the assembly, and make atonement for them; for there is wrath gone out from Jehovah the plague is begun.
Numbers 16 has just seen the ground swallow the leaders of a rebellion against Moses and Aaron. Now the whole camp blames the two men for those deaths, a plague breaks out, and Moses names a strange remedy: a censer carried at a run into a dying crowd.
The people had accused Aaron of destroying them. Moses' order puts that accusation to the test.
The whole congregation is again threatened with immediate destruction. All seems hopeless. God's patience seems at an end, and the sword of judgment is about to fall on the whole assembly. But now it turns out that the only hope for the people lies in the very priesthood the rebels had despised. The very men they had accused of killing the Lord's people were God's instruments in saving their lives.
The earlier judgment showed God defending His own order; here mercy makes the same point.
Moses had said that the Lord would show who were holy and whom He had appointed to come near. Terrible judgment had already shown it. Now His mercy and compassion would declare the same thing... The difference is that the first lies outside priesthood. There God maintains His own order against rebellious man. The priest stands still, and God takes vengeance. But when the plague came, the priest had permission — indeed a command — to step in with mercy and stop the ravages of judicial death.
Two things go into the censer, and each carries its own meaning.
Fire is taken from the altar — this tells of divine judgment, for where there is sin, there must also be judgment... The incense is the sweet fragrance of Christ Himself, going up to God. It is the preciousness of the One who bore the judgment, so that God might righteously stop the power of death. When Aaron puts incense on the fire, the priest is interceding. He pleads the merits of the one sacrifice, as if to remind God of it.
The word "atonement" raises a problem here: no animal dies, and no blood is shed. One writer answers by pointing to a priesthood that begins after death has been passed through.
Death, then, has already been passed through, and that means atonement in this sense has been made. Once made, it cannot be repeated, and never needs to be. Put in Christian terms, Christ is in heaven. He has completely finished the work for sin, but He has not finished the work of intercession for His people. The offering of incense pictures that very intercession, so everything here is in place.
The word itself allows this:
The word "to make atonement" is the intensified form of the verb "to cover"... So in this sense we may say that the risen Priest's intercession makes atonement for the sin of His redeemed, since it effectively covers it. Its power to do this does not set aside the value of His precious death, but affirms it.
The word "quickly" is not decoration. The running shows the urgency, and also the limit of what the act could do.
In a moment, without any warning, the plague began. Only one thing could stem the tide of judgment and shield the survivors from the death that threatened them: the high priest stepping in with a censer full of burning incense, lit from the fire of the altar. At Moses' suggestion Aaron ran, for the matter was urgent... Those who had died were beyond recovery; for them no atonement was possible. Only for the living could Aaron step in.
Aaron's service had a limit, and that limit points to what has replaced it.
The offering of incense was only occasional, and it might be interrupted. Its fragrance was not always before God. The plague had begun among the people. Destructive judgment had come out. Then Moses told Aaron to take a censer, put fire in it from the altar, and lay incense on it. Aaron had to do all this before he could run into the congregation and stand between the dead and the living... But now the ministry of incense is unbroken: "He always lives to make intercession for us." So He is able to save right through, from beginning to end.
The scene also points ahead:
Aaron stood between the dead and the living and stopped the plague from passing over to the living. This is a beautiful prophetic picture of the last days, when Christ will step in for the ancient people of God. As High Priest He will hold back the arm of the Avenger. The living remnant will become a great nation, restored to favour and blessing through One greater than Aaron.
- Rebellion. The people rejected the priesthood, then blamed it for their deaths. The plague showed where that road ends.
- Rescue. Rescue came through the very office they despised. Priesthood, not punishment, was their only hope.
- Censer. Fire from the altar speaks of judgment already borne. The incense is the fragrance of the One who bore it, pleaded before God.
- Covering. No animal died here. "Make atonement" carries the sense of covering — the finished work applied by a living Priest.
- Continuing. Aaron's service could stop. The intercession it pictures never does, and it reaches on to a future rescue of Israel.
And Aaron took as Moses had said, and ran into the midst of the congregation; and behold, the plague had begun among the people; and he put on incense, and made atonement for the people.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And he stood between the dead and the living; and the plague was stayed.
God had just judged Korah's rebellion. The very next day the whole camp blamed Moses and Aaron for the deaths, and a plague broke out. Aaron ran into that scene with a censer of burning incense. The verse turns on one act: a man stands between the dying and the rest while death spreads around him.
The people had just accused Aaron's priesthood of killing them. What saved them was the very thing they had attacked.
This makes one thing very clear. Nothing but priesthood — even that very priesthood they had so despised — could help a rebellious and stubborn people. There stands Aaron, God's high priest, between the dead and the living, and from his censer a cloud of incense goes up before God. He is a striking picture of One greater than Aaron. That One has made a full and perfect atonement for the sins of His people, and He is always before God in all the fragrance of His Person and work. Priesthood alone could bring the people through the wilderness. It was the rich and suited provision of divine grace.
Verse 47 says Aaron "made atonement," yet he killed no animal. That detail shapes what commentators say about a believer who fails.
There is no ground here for the error that a failing believer must begin again as though his pardon could be cancelled. "Make atonement" gives no support to a teaching so contrary to the plain teaching of the word. It is true that "without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins." But Aaron shed no blood here. There was no atonement in that sense. There was the pleading before God of the value of the offering once made. It is in this way that "atonement" is made for believers now when they fail. It is the Advocate above, Jesus Christ the righteous, who by His presence there avails for us.
The speed of the answer is part of the lesson. Aaron brought nothing new — only what was already burning.
The lighted censer was a picture of the sweet fragrance of the merits of Christ, brought out in all their perfection by His death. It pictured them because its fire came from the bronze altar. The whole scene illustrated the Lord's intercession, which is effective and must always be. For notice that Aaron offered no fresh sacrifice, but stood with his lighted censer. That was enough. God understood the deep meaning of that according to His own thoughts, and showed mercy at once.
The man mattered and so did what he carried. Neither alone explains why the dying stopped.
Intercession is the teaching here, and both the incense and Aaron together are a picture of Christ; the incense of His worth, Aaron of His office. Aaron might run among the people: what would that have achieved? There was no worth in him; the power that stayed the plague was (in the picture) in the incense. It needs both the incense and the priest to be a fitting picture of Him who is both Offering and Priest.
The plague stopped, but the dead stayed dead.
Only one thing could stop the flood of judgment and shield the survivors from the death that threatened them. That was the high priest stepping in with a censer full of burning incense, lit from the fire of the altar. At Moses' suggestion Aaron ran, for the matter was urgent, and so atonement was made for the congregation. … Those who had died were beyond recovery; for them no atonement was possible.
The picture splits the camp in two, and the believer knows which side he stands on.
Precious teaching for us, who know many failures of our own. Our failures deserve righteous judgment, and would surely meet it. But by faith we are sprinkled with blood, and the sweet incense of Christ is always before God. Our High Priest never stops burning the incense lit by His death, a sweet-smelling fragrance to God. … We are on the living side of the Priest, and the angel of death cannot pass. "I give them eternal life, and they will never perish, and no one will snatch them out of my hand." (John 10)
Commentators also read the scene as a picture of something still to come.
Aaron stands between the dead and the living, stopping the plague so that it does not pass over to the living. This is a beautiful prophetic picture of the last days, when Christ will step in for the ancient people of God. As High Priest He will hold back the arm of the Avenger. Those left alive will become a great nation, restored to favour and blessing through One greater than Aaron.
- Despised. The priesthood Israel attacked the day before was the only thing that could save them.
- Kindled. The fire came from the altar — the incense was lit by a sacrifice already offered, not a new one.
- Enough. Aaron shed no blood; he pleaded the value of an offering already made, and mercy came at once.
- Urgent. He ran, because his censer could only reach the living; the dead were beyond recovery.
- Standing. Christ our High Priest stands where Aaron stood, and we are on the living side of Him.
Now they that died in the plague were fourteen thousand seven hundred, besides them that had died because of the matter of Korah.
A plague broke out after Korah's rebellion, and nearly fifteen thousand people died. This verse counts the cost of a second revolt and marks where God's judgment stopped — at a line held by one man with a censer.
The people had just seen God judge Korah's company. Then they blamed Moses and Aaron for those deaths, and a plague began. Notice what the verse counts: only the dead from the plague. It lists those who died with Korah separately. One writer reads the new toll as the plain arithmetic of rebellion:
God had rejected the censers of Korah and his company outright. Now He appoints one censer in Aaron's hands, and that one censer is enough to stop the plague between the dead and the living. We are not told whether the 14,700 who died were ringleaders in the evil. Sin is lawlessness — rebellion against God. And the wages of sin is death. The whole incident emphasizes this.
Where Aaron stood mattered. He had two groups in front of him, and he could still help only one. One writer sets him beside Phinehas, another man who stepped in for the living:
In the wilderness the plague stopped when Aaron stood between the dead and the living with his lighted censer. Those who had died were beyond recovery; for them no atonement was possible. Phinehas and Aaron could step in only for the living, since both were concerned only with God's government of His people. Phinehas showed zeal for God; Aaron pictured the merits of Christ set before God. So the people did not reap the fruits of their own ways.
The rebels had despised the priesthood. Their rescue came through the very thing they had attacked:
Here it is made very clear: nothing but priesthood could be of any use to a rebellious and stubborn people. And it was that very priesthood they had despised. There is something wonderfully blessed in this closing paragraph. There stands Aaron, God's high priest, between the dead and the living. From his censer a cloud of incense goes up before God. He is a striking picture of One greater than Aaron. That One made a full and perfect atonement for the sins of His people, and He is always before God in all the fragrance of His Person and work. Priesthood alone could bring the people through the wilderness.
Two things went into Aaron's censer: fire and incense. Each carried its own meaning.
Fire is taken from the altar — this speaks of divine judgment, for where there is sin, there must also be judgment. No one ever sinned without judgment following, measured by the majesty and holiness of God. For the believer, Christ has borne that judgment. And the incense is the sweet fragrance of Himself, which went up to God. It is the preciousness of Him who bore the judgment, so that God could righteously stop the power of death. Aaron putting incense on the fire is the priest's act of intercession. He pleads the merits of the one sacrifice, as if to remind God of it.
No animal died here, yet Aaron made atonement for the living. One writer traces this back to a death already past:
Death, therefore, has been gone through. This implies that atonement in that sense has been made. Once made, it cannot be repeated, and it never needs to be. Read according to Christian truth, we should say that Christ is in heaven. He has finished the work for sin completely. But He has not finished the work of intercession for His people. The offering of incense pictures that very intercession, and so everything here is perfectly in place.
Some read the scene forward as well as backward — a small picture of a national deliverance still to come:
Aaron stands between the dead and the living and stops the plague, so that it does not pass over to the living. This is a beautiful prophetic picture of the last days, when Christ will step in for the ancient people of God. As High Priest He will hold back the arm of the Avenger. The living remnant will become a great nation, restored to favour and blessing through a greater than Aaron.
- Rebellion counted. The 14,700 measure what it costs to rebel again after God's judgment has already fallen.
- Wrath answered. The fire came from the altar, the place where sin had already been judged. That is why it could stop death instead of spreading it.
- Priesthood delivered. The office the people tried to pull down was the only thing that saved them from destruction.
- Position held. Aaron between the dead and the living pictures intercession: he pleads a finished sacrifice for everyone who can still be reached.
- Pattern repeated. Commentators see the same figure ahead: a greater Priest holding back judgment so a living remnant survives.