Numbers 14:1–35

Numbers 14:1 · Darby

And the whole assembly lifted up their voice, and cried; and the people wept that night.

A whole nation spent the night in tears, right on the edge of the land God had promised them. Commentators press one question on the scene: what were they looking at that made them cry?

What Filled Their Eyes That Night

The weeping was not random. It came from what the ten spies put before the people's eyes — and from what they left out.

Is it any wonder? What else could you expect from a people who had nothing before their eyes but mighty giants, lofty walls, and great cities? What but tears and sighs could come from a congregation who saw themselves as grasshoppers, faced with difficulties too great to overcome? They had no sense of the divine power that could carry them right through it all. … They were occupied with themselves and their difficulties instead of with God and His resources.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Tears That Were Not Repentance

Crying can look like sorrow over sin. Here it was not. One writer separates the two, and shows how far their doubt reached.

But they were tears of unbelief, not of sorrow… They had no faith about the glory ahead of them, pictured by the land of Canaan. They had just as little faith about Egypt, which they had left, and about the wilderness they were walking through.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

How Fear Spread Through a Whole Camp

Fear did not stop with the ten men who started it. And it left the people unable to reason.

The discouraging words of the ten spies infected the whole congregation of Israel, as discouragement too often does among God's people. They wept that night, then began with bitter complaints — not just against Moses and Aaron, but directly against the Lord. Why had God not let them die in Egypt or in the wilderness, instead of exposing them to the danger of dying in battle against the Canaanites? How inconsistent their arguments are. If they really wanted to die, why be afraid of their enemies? They also never considered that they might survive and take the land, while their enemies died. But fear is a terrible disease that robs a believer of his proper senses.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Song Turned Upside Down

Earlier in their journey these same people sang instead of weeping. Set that song beside this night and you see an exact reversal — with one cause behind it.

What a contrast between this and the opening of Exodus 15! There their eyes were only on Jehovah, and so they could sing the song of victory. That song said the nations would hear and be afraid, and that sorrow would take hold of the people of Philistia. Instead, it was Israel that was afraid, and sorrow took hold of them. The sorrow, the trembling and the fear fall on Israel rather than on their enemies. And why? Because the One who filled their vision in Exodus 15 is completely shut out in Numbers 14. This makes all the difference. In the one case faith is on top; in the other, unbelief.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

From Weeping to Blaming God

The tears soon harden into an accusation. Earlier failures had blamed Moses; this one blames God — and that turn reaches into ordinary Christian life.

When they first set out and their sin showed itself, bad as it was, they did not blame God. They blamed Moses, the man who brought them up out of the land of Egypt. But the moment this unbelief takes hold of their hearts, the desert becomes painful beyond bearing… See what a wicked state of unbelief they had fallen into, blaming Jehovah Himself for their trials and difficulties. Even Christians can fall into this snare… If Canaan had been on the hearts of the children of Israel, they would have said, Thank God that we have come this far on our way to Canaan.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What the Night of Weeping Cost

That night cost them forty years. The reason was not the size of the giants but where they were looking.

But what kept them back? Just that hateful thing which, day after day and hour after hour, robs us of the precious privilege of walking the highest stages of the divine life. And what is that? Unbelief! "So we see that they could not enter in because of unbelief" (Heb. 3:19). This caused Israel to wander in the desert for 40 tedious years. Instead of looking at Jehovah's power to bring them into the land, they looked at the enemy's power to keep them out of it.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Look — the tears came from what filled their eyes: giants, walls and their own smallness, with God shut out.

- Weep — these were tears of unbelief, not of sorrow over sin; grief can be loud and still be faithless.

- Spread — the discouragement of ten men infected a nation, and fear robbed them of clear thinking.

- Blame — unbelief moved from tears to charging God with their troubles. Christians fall into the same snare when trials come.

- Lose — they watched the enemy's power to keep them out, not God's power to bring them in. So they could not enter.

Numbers 14:2 · Darby

And all the children of Israel murmured against Moses and against Aaron; and the whole assembly said to them, Would that we had died in the land of Egypt! or in this wilderness would that we had died!

Israel stands at the edge of Canaan, and the report of the ten spies has done its work. The whole nation turns on its leaders and wishes itself dead — and the rest of the chapter shows God answering that wish.

Tears without sorrow

Their weeping sounds like grief. But once Israel judged the enemy too strong, God had already dropped out of their thinking.

All their thoughts were — "God is not." His own people plainly gave in to what is so sadly true of the unbeliever. "They are stronger than we." And where then was God? ... "The congregation lifted up their voice again and cried, and the people wept that night." But they were tears of unbelief, not of sorrow... Their unbelief covered everything: the glory in front of them in the land of Canaan, the Egypt they had left, and the wilderness they were crossing.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Blame that reaches past Moses

The complaint names Moses and Aaron, but the blame reaches past them. Their earlier sins had never gone this far.

When, in the first freshness of their setting out, their sin had shown itself (bad as it was), they did not lay the blame on God... But the moment this unbelief takes hold of their hearts, the desert becomes unbearably painful to them... See what a wretched, wicked state of unbelief they had fallen into. They blamed the Lord Himself for their trials and difficulties. Even Christians can fall into this snare. We know it is the Lord who brought us up out of bondage. So when trials come, our hearts are apt to say, this comes of my being a Christian — the Lord has brought me into these difficulties.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Fear also makes their reasoning collapse on itself.

They wept that night. Then came bitter complaints — not just against Moses and Aaron, but directly against the Lord!... How inconsistent their arguments are. If they really wanted to die, why be afraid of their enemies? They also never considered that they might live and take the land, while their enemies died. But fear is a terrible disease that robs a believer of his proper senses.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the difficulties grew so large

The giants were not the real problem. The problem was what filled their eyes.

Are not we, too, like Israel? We are prone to look at the difficulties around us, rather than at that blessed One. He has undertaken to carry us right through them all, and to bring us safely into His own everlasting kingdom. Why are we sometimes cast down? Why do we go mourning? Why do we sound discontented and impatient, instead of singing praise and thanksgiving? Simply because we let circumstances shut God out. We should have God instead as a perfect covering for our eyes and a perfect object for our hearts.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Wishing away the promise

To wish for death in Egypt is to want nothing to do with the land ahead. The same drift catches believers who never doubt the promise at all.

Suppose a friend had given me something as a great treasure, and I was sure it was mine. Yet I looked at it only seldom, and cared to think of it only seldom. This would prove one thing: not that I doubted it was mine, but that I despised it and put no real value on it. This is very often the way we treat the heavenly glory that belongs to us.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Once God is out of view, only two options are left.

In Israel's case God was lost sight of. It was either a calf or a captain; either death in the wilderness, or return into Egypt. Caleb stands in bright contrast to all this. For him there was no death in the wilderness and no return to Egypt. There was an abundant entrance into the promised land, behind the Lord's impenetrable shield.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The wish God granted

God's sentence later in the chapter is the people's own wish handed back to them.

God's answer was this: you say you wish you had died in the wilderness — you shall die in the wilderness... God says, you will have to die, only it will take you forty years to do it.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Unbelief weeps. The night of crying was not repentance. The tears came from unbelief, not from sorrow.

- Unbelief blames. They spoke to Moses and Aaron, but they charged the Lord who had brought them out.

- Unbelief magnifies. Difficulties only look overwhelming when we let them shut God out of sight.

- Unbelief despises. You can stop valuing the promised land without ever doubting that it is yours.

- Unbelief reaps. They asked to die in the wilderness, and God gave them their wish — spread over forty years.

Numbers 14:3 · Darby

And why is Jehovah bringing us to this land that we may fall by the sword, that our wives and our little ones may become a prey? Is it not better for us to return to Egypt?

At Kadesh the people stand at the border of the promised land, and they answer the spies' report by charging God Himself with leading them out to die. Their remedy — go back to Egypt — raises the question this chapter turns on: what does unbelief do to the way we see God?

The complaint aimed at God

Earlier failures in the wilderness blamed Moses. This charge goes higher, and it changes how the desert itself feels to them.

When their sin first showed itself, at the fresh start of their journey, they did not lay the blame on God. They said, "This Moses, the man who brought us up out of the land of Egypt." But the moment this unbelief takes hold of their hearts, the desert becomes unbearably painful to them... See what a miserable, wicked state of unbelief they had fallen into: they blamed Jehovah Himself for their trials and difficulties. Even Christians face this trap. We know it is the Lord who has brought us up out of slavery. So when trials come, our hearts are apt to say, This comes of my being a Christian — the Lord has brought me into these difficulties. If Canaan had been on the hearts of the children of Israel, they would have said, Thank God that we are this far on our way to Canaan.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Fear that cannot reason

Read as an argument, their complaint falls apart. One writer lays out the contradictions in it.

Why did God not let them die in Egypt or in the wilderness, instead of exposing them to the danger of dying in battle against the Canaanites? How inconsistent their arguments are. If they really wanted to die, why be afraid of their enemies? They also never considered that they might survive and take the land, while their enemies died. But fear is a terrible disease that robs a believer of his proper senses.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The road back

The verse ends with a wish to turn back, and that wish has a cause.

This is the sure result. The heart that refuses to go on with God goes back to Egypt in its desires.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Set beside the calf at Horeb, the two failures make a pair.

There are two sad forms of unbelief in Israel's history in the wilderness: one at Horeb, the other at Kadesh. At Horeb they made a calf... At Kadesh they proposed to make a captain to lead them back into Egypt. The first is the superstition of unbelief. The second is the wilful independence of unbelief. We need not wonder that those who thought a calf had brought them out of Egypt should look for a captain to lead them back... In Israel's case they lost sight of God. It was either a calf or a captain; either death in the wilderness, or return to Egypt.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The children held up as the reason

They made their wives and children the strongest argument for turning back. Pharaoh had once warned them that evil lay ahead for these little ones; older translations read his words as "evil is before you."

This was terrible. As far as they were able, they were confirming Pharaoh's crafty prediction about these very little ones: "Look, you have some evil purpose in mind." Unbelief always justifies Satan and makes God a liar. Faith always justifies God and proves Satan a liar.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

God's reply turned their fear around. The children they feared would be taken were the ones He brought in.

Unbelief had fastened on the little ones, as if it were pointless to expect that children like these could cross the desert safely and enter the land against the enemy. The very people who gave way to such unbelieving doubt of the Lord's care reaped the consequences themselves. The children, who they thought could never survive the horrors of the wilderness, were the only ones brought in, together with the two men who vindicated God and held fast to His word, Caleb and Joshua.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The cost of the moment

Their choice at the border did not end with that day.

We now come to the decisive point in the history of the wilderness: the people refused to enter the land after coming to its very borders. By this they incur the penalty of forty years of wandering, and the death of the whole generation (except two people) in the wilderness. For them, the whole character of life changes. They are no longer pilgrims but wanderers. They are not aimless, but their only aim is to stay alive for these forty years.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Unbelief accuses. Earlier complaints blamed Moses. Here the charge lands on God, as if the One who rescued them had led them into danger.

- Unbelief contradicts. Wishing to be dead while dreading death is not reasoning. It is fear, and fear strips a believer of his senses.

- Unbelief retreats. A heart that will not go forward with God already wants Egypt back — a calf to follow out, or a captain to lead it back in.

- Unbelief reaps. God took them at their word. The generation that feared for their children died in the desert, and the children went in.

- Unbelief costs. One refusal at the border turned pilgrims into wanderers. For forty years their only aim was to stay alive.

Numbers 14:4 · Darby

And they said one to another, Let us make a captain, and let us return to Egypt.

Israel stands at the edge of the land God promised them. After the spies' fearful report, the people plan to appoint a new leader — older translations say "captain" — and march back to Egypt.

Calf, Captain, And Caleb

Israel had already invented a substitute god at Horeb. Now they want a substitute leader. One man among them wants neither.

There are two sad phases of unbelief shown in Israel's history in the wilderness; one at Horeb, the other at Kadesh. At Horeb they made a calf, and said, "These are your gods, O Israel, who brought you up out of the land of Egypt." At Kadesh they proposed to make a captain to lead them back into Egypt. The first of these is the superstition of unbelief; the second, the wilful independence of unbelief. No wonder that people who thought a calf had brought them out of Egypt would look for a captain to lead them back. The poor human mind is tossed like a ball from one to the other of these terrible evils. There is no resource except what faith finds in the living God. Israel had lost sight of God. It was either a calf or a captain; either death in the wilderness or a return to Egypt. Caleb stands in bright contrast with all this. For him it was neither death in the wilderness nor a return to Egypt, but a full entrance into the promised land, behind the unbreakable shield of the LORD.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Replacing The Leader God Gave

Replacing Moses was not just a change of leadership. It struck at the One who had appointed him.

In Exodus 32:4, we read of the making of the calf, which they imagined had brought them up out of Egypt. Now they wish to make a captain to take them back. Both these evils are brought together very strikingly in Nehemiah 9:17-18, but there the order of them is reversed. It looks as if the provocation in this later case was as great as in the former. To reject a servant whom God has appointed as captain is the same as rejecting God Himself, though rejecting Him by making a golden calf was a cruder act.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The Craving For Something Visible

Why a captain at all? Both the calf and the captain answer the same appetite — for a support you can see and lean on instead of God.

When you think about it, what a terrible revelation of the heart of man is in that scene at Mount Sinai. Then they said, "Make us gods;" and later they say, "Let us make a captain" (Num. 14:4). In all our hearts is the tendency to look for someone we can lean on, someone who can lead and guide us. That is, a person who will take us off the ground of simple faith in God.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Unbelief Does Not Reason

Their plan was not only wrong, it was unworkable. Nobody had asked whether Egypt still wanted them.

Israel's discouragement from unbelief went so deep that they even urged the people to appoint another leader instead of Moses and go back to Egypt. Having left an ungodly world, can believers return to it and be welcome? By this time Egypt would have grown used to Israel being gone, and would not be likely to take them back. But unbelief cannot reason straight.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Backwards Is The Only Other Direction

There is no neutral standing still at Kadesh. Refusing to advance is itself a decision about where you are heading.

The result was judgment; and no wonder. For they say, "Let us make a captain, and let us return to Egypt." This is the sure outcome. The heart that refuses to go on with God goes back to Egypt in its desires.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

God Takes Them At Their Word

They had wished aloud that they had died in the wilderness. God's reply granted the wish they never meant.

Let us go back, they say. Oh, could you imagine it after all the grace shown to them? But, friends, we know what our own hearts are. Have we never wished to turn back?... God's answer was this: You say you wish you had died in the wilderness — you shall die in the wilderness... Says God, You will have to die, only it will take you forty years to do it.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The Root, Named Later

Generations later, Israel confessed this episode in prayer. Their confession named what lay under the words.

In this long prayer of confession they reviewed the history of their nation. Twice they admitted one of the great root causes of their sin: their forefathers had "dealt proudly" (verses 16 and 29). Out of this spirit of pride... came the self-assertion and disobedience that marked their whole history. In their early days it came to a head when they "appointed a captain to return to their bondage" (verse 17).

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Root — Pride came first. Centuries later Israel confessed it: pride produced the self-assertion behind the plan for a captain.

- Craving — Under the pride sits the appetite for something visible to lean on. It had already produced a calf; now it demands a captain.

- Rejection — Setting aside the leader God appointed is setting aside God Himself. It is subtler than the golden calf, not smaller.

- Direction — There is no standing still. A heart that refuses to go on with God goes back to Egypt in its desires — and never asks whether Egypt would take it back.

- Result — God gave them the wish they had shouted in self-pity. They died in the wilderness, and it took forty years — while faith, in Caleb, entered the land.

Numbers 14:5 · Darby

Then Moses and Aaron fell upon their faces before the whole congregation of the assembly of the children of Israel.

Israel stands at the border of the land God promised them. Instead of going in, the people plan to pick a new leader and march back to Egypt — and the two men God set over them drop face-down in front of the whole crowd.

The revolt behind the gesture

The people's plan was more than a change of leadership. One writer ties it back to the golden calf, the other great act of rejection in Israel's story.

In Exodus 32:4 we read that they made the calf, which they imagined had brought them up out of Egypt. Now they wish to make a captain to take them back. Nehemiah 9:17-18 brings both these evils together very strikingly, but there they come in reverse order. It looks as if this later provocation was as great as the earlier one. To reject a servant whom God has appointed as captain is to reject God Himself, though rejecting Him by making a golden calf was a cruder act.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Falling down as stepping aside

The posture matters. Moses and Aaron could have stood tall and defended their position. Instead they went face-down in front of the men accusing them.

No crisis since the days of the calf had been as serious as this one. It brought four men of faith into clear view. Aaron's faith was not as strong as the faith of Moses, but he still fell on his face with Moses before the congregation. He shared here in the meekness of Moses. When a man falls on his face before his opponents, he all but wipes himself out. In fact they could not have done a more serious thing. If they had stood up to their full height before the people, they would have claimed their authority and taken the challenge on themselves. But instead they put themselves out of the matter and left God to take up the challenge.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Face down is prayer

Their fall was not despair. It was prayer. Four faithful men faced hundreds of thousands, and one writer sees Moses pleading for them as a picture of Christ.

Moses, Aaron, Joshua and Caleb stand alone among hundreds of thousands of grumbling, rebellious Israelites and the mixed crowd with them. They fell on their faces, no doubt in the attitude of prayer and worship, to tell the Lord... Beautiful is the scene of Moses' intercession. He stands out as a striking type of our great Mediator, the Lord Jesus Christ. God offered Moses a fresh start: He would destroy the rebels and make Moses into a nation even greater than Israel. Moses turned the offer down. He does not want glory for himself, but he is jealous for the Lord's name and glory.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Two kinds of faithfulness in one scene

Two men went down; two others spoke out. One writer sets all four side by side.

A wonderful sight indeed! Four men confronted this host of rebels. Two of them were old and heartbroken, on their faces before the God whom the people had offended. Two of them were young, brave and faithful — men for the crisis. They risked their lives for the sake of the truth, and pleaded with their fellow Israelites with an energy that only love could produce... in Moses and Aaron we see complete dependence on God; in Joshua and Caleb we may see the self-forgetting devotion of love.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

That same passage draws the practical line for anyone outnumbered:

Better to side with God and four men, or even alone, than to have the company of 600,000 in a path of sin. If alone with God, you have His grace, even though you may face many kinds of trial. If crowds of unfaithful men surround you, you lack the one source of power — you do not have God.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

God takes up the challenge

Because the servants stepped aside, God stepped in. His glory appeared, and His answer reached far past that day's crisis.

Three times over in the Book of Numbers the glory of the Lord appeared in times of crisis... On the first occasion, the rebellion made Moses and Aaron fall on their faces before all the assembly. The people had said to one another, "Let us make a captain, and let us return into Egypt." God spoke of disinheriting Israel. Moses interceded and God spared them, but the Lord answered, "As I live, all the earth shall be filled with the glory of the Lord."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. The people wanted a new leader to take them back to Egypt. To reject the leader God appointed is to reject God Himself.

- Posture. Falling on your face before your opponents wipes you out of the picture. If Moses and Aaron had stood up, they would have taken the challenge on themselves.

- Prayer. They went to the ground to pray, not to despair. Moses then pleaded for the people, a picture of Christ the Mediator.

- Company. Two lay down in dependence; two stood up in love. Better to be with God and four men than with 600,000 in a path of sin.

- Result. God's glory appeared. Moses' pleading spared the people, and the promise stood: the whole earth will be filled with the glory of the Lord.

Numbers 14:6 · Darby

And Joshua the son of Nun, and Caleb the son of Jephunneh, of them that searched out the land, rent their garments.

Israel had just decided to appoint a new leader and march back to Egypt. The whole camp wept and complained. Then two of the twelve men who had walked the land tore their clothes in front of everyone. Their torn clothes raise a question. What do you do when the crowd has turned against God, and what does it cost?

Four men of faith

Commentators weigh how serious this moment was, and how faith answered it.

Since the days of the calf no crisis had been this serious. It brought four men of faith into clear view. Moses and Aaron fell on their faces before the congregation, putting themselves out of the matter and leaving God to take up the challenge. Joshua and Caleb tore their clothes — the sign of distress and rejection — and boldly testified to the faithfulness and power of God. God was before their hearts and not the children of Anak. All the same, it came to nothing. The people were completely bankrupt when it came to faith.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Same land, opposite verdict

The verse calls these two men part of the group who "had spied out the land." They saw everything the other ten saw. The difference was not information.

Caleb says, "Let us go up at once and occupy it, for we are well able to overcome it." He is like an evangelist who commends the gospel by the joy that fills his own heart. But the next thing is that ten men assert, "We are not able to go up." For one man who will commend Christ, I find ten men who will give you a reason for doubting. These men bring a bad report. If a man comes and tells you that you cannot take Christ for yourself, he is like one of the ten bad spies.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Taking a side

Their torn clothes put clear distance between them and the ten men they had travelled with. The break was moral, not just physical.

Joshua and Caleb were God's chosen instruments to stem this flood of unbelief and to testify against it. They were horrified at the sin of the people, so they tore their clothes. Raising their voices above the noise and confusion in the congregation, they courageously repeated their declaration that the land they had searched out was "an exceedingly good land." They boldly contradicted the bad report of their fellow spies. In doing so they separated themselves morally from their company and took their stand on the Lord's side.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

It matters that there were two of them, and not one.

TWO stands for distinctness, and so for adequate testimony, and for fellowship when the two agree. Two witnesses are needed. Deuteronomy 19:15; 2 Corinthians 13:1. Caleb and Joshua witnessed for the land. Numbers 14:6-9.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

What it cost them

The people's answer was a call to stone them.

And for what were they to be stoned? Was it for telling lies? Was it for blasphemy or evil-doing? No; it was for their bold and earnest testimony to the truth. They had been sent to spy out the land and to bring back a true report about it. This they did; and for this "all the congregation said to stone them with stones." The people did not like the truth then any more than now. Truth is never popular. There is no place for it in this world, or in the human heart. People will accept lies, and error in every shape; but never truth. Joshua and Caleb met in their day what all true witnesses in every age have met, and what all must expect: the opposition and hatred of most of their fellows. Six hundred thousand voices rose against two men who simply told the truth and trusted God.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The debt of a good report

Commentators turn the scene on the reader: a debt we owe, and a rebuke to our fear.

The people say, "Let us choose a leader and go back to Egypt." The heart that refuses to go on with God goes back to Egypt in its desires. Let us not forget what Joshua and Caleb said. We owe it to our God to give a good report of the land which lies before us.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

May we not learn a lesson in these days from the loyalty of these devoted men of God? Does not their simple yet mighty appeal rebuke the fears and faint-heartedness of many at the present time? "The land is an exceedingly good land" was faith's simple reply then to all Satan's hindrances — and is it any different today? The spirit of Numbers 14 is sadly at work at this moment.

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

Summary

- Same land. All twelve men saw the same land. Only two brought back a report shaped by faith in God. The difference was never the evidence.

- Torn clothes. The tearing was a public sign of distress and refusal. It set these two apart from the men they had travelled with, on the Lord's side.

- Two witnesses. God did not leave His land without testimony. Two men who agreed were enough to stand against six hundred thousand voices.

- Truth's price. Their honest report almost got them stoned. Truth has never been popular, and every true witness should expect the same.

- Our debt. We owe God a good report of what lies before us. The fears that silenced Israel still silence people today.

Numbers 14:7 · Darby

And they spoke to the whole assembly of the children of Israel, saying, The land, which we passed through to search it out, is a very, very good land.

Twelve men explored Canaan, and ten came back afraid. Now two of them say the opposite, and the question is whose report Israel will believe — and what it costs to be one of the two.

The Report We Owe to God

Ten men walked the same ground and came back afraid. Joshua and Caleb call the land good, and one writer turns that into a duty for us:

Let us not forget this. We owe it to our God to give a good report of the land which lies before us.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A bad report is not just pessimism. One writer points to the Hebrew behind the phrase used of the ten spies:

They could not deny that the Lord's promise was true. They carried the evidences of it upon their shoulders while they carried unbelief in their hearts... The Hebrew for "bringing up an evil report" is translated in Proverbs 10:18 as "uttering a slander." Unbelief slanders God; it is an insult to the Lord.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Torn Clothes and a Chosen Side

Tearing your clothes showed grief and horror. Here it was also a public break with the crowd:

Joshua and Caleb were God's chosen instruments to hold back this flood of unbelief and to testify against it. They tore their clothes to show their horror at the sin of the people. Raising their voices above the noise and confusion in the congregation, they bravely repeated their declaration that the land they had searched out was "an exceedingly good land." So they boldly contradicted the "evil report" of their fellows. In doing so, they separated themselves morally from their company and took their stand on the Lord's side.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

With God About the Land

Confidence like this is not natural optimism. The two men could speak so plainly because of where they had done their looking:

Caleb and Joshua had not only been in the land, but they had been with God about the land. They had looked at it all from faith's point of view. They knew the land was theirs, in the purpose of God. They knew it was worth having, as the gift of God. And they knew they would yet have it by the power of God. They were men full of faith, full of courage, full of power.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Their case does not rest on Israel's strength. It rests on God's delight in His people:

They also stated plainly the conditions of possessing the land. First, "If the Lord delights in us," they said, "He will bring us into this land." In this they showed that they agreed with the Lord's mind. He did delight in His people, and they knew it. So everything depended on what He was, and on His power — not on what the people were, or could do.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

What the Good Land Stands For

Does the good land stand for heaven? One writer says no, and explains what it does picture:

One reason why Canaan cannot mean heaven is that Israel could be driven out of the land. This is not possible with heaven. Canaan is the type of the heavenly position and possession which the believer has in Christ Jesus. It matches what Ephesians calls "in heavenly places," or better translated, "in the heavenly." It is the heavenly sphere, the heavenly, spiritual blessings given to us in Christ Jesus.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Read that way, the two reports become two ways of speaking about Christ:

Caleb is like an evangelist who commends the gospel by the joy that fills his own heart... For one man who will commend Christ, I find ten men who will give you a reason for doubting. These men bring an evil report. Ah, if a man comes and tells you that you cannot claim Christ for yourself, he is like one of the ten evil spies. They slander the land, while Joshua and Caleb say, "The land, which we passed through to spy it out, is an exceedingly good land."

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The Price of a True Report

The congregation answered by reaching for stones. One writer asks what the two men had done to deserve it:

And for what were they to be stoned? Was it for telling lies? Was it for blasphemy or doing evil? No; it was for their bold and earnest testimony to the truth... The people did not like the truth then any more than now. Truth is never popular... There were six hundred thousand voices raised against two men who simply told the truth, and trusted in God.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Report. Two men saw what ten men saw and called the land exceedingly good. We owe God a good report of what lies before us.

- Slander. A bad report is not caution but slander. The spies carried the proof of God's promise on their shoulders and still insulted Him.

- Source. Joshua and Caleb had been in the land, and they had been with God about the land. They spoke from faith's point of view.

- Security. Their confidence rested on "if the Lord delights in us" — on what He is and can do, not on what the people were or could do.

- Stones. Truth is never popular. Six hundred thousand voices rose against two men who told the truth and trusted God.

Numbers 14:8 · Darby

If Jehovah delight in us, he will bring us into this land, and give it us, a land that flows with milk and honey;

Ten of the twelve scouts had just told Israel they could not take the land. The people were already talking of going back to Egypt. Into that panic Joshua and Caleb speak one condition. It is not whether Israel is strong enough. It is whether the Lord delights in them.

Where the "if" really rests

It is easy to be taken up with what we get from God. The verse points to God's own pleasure in His people.

One of Satan's most plausible traps is to keep us occupied with the good we receive from the work of Christ. It keeps our eyes off Christ Himself, and off His delight and interest in us. We enter too little into the divine side of redemption. That is why joy and strength are so often missing. Of Israel, His earthly people, it was said, "If the LORD delights in us, He will bring us into this land." Faith could see that all their blessing rested, not on what they were, but on the Lord delighting in them... We have the same thought in Proverbs 8:31: "delighting in the children of man." He rests in His love and so should we.

Modernised from Andrew MillerOriginal wording

Joshua and Caleb laid out conditions. Their confidence rested on what they knew about God, not on what they knew about Israel.

They stated plainly the conditions of possessing the land. First, "If the LORD delights in us," they said, "He will bring us into this land." In this they showed that they were in communion with the Lord's mind. He did delight in His people, and they knew it. So they knew that everything depended on what He was and on His power. It did not depend on what the people were, or could do. Secondly, they said, "Only do not rebel against the LORD ... and do not fear the people of the land." And, lastly, they declared that the Lord was with them, so fear of the enemy was needless.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Who the enemy is really facing

The ten scouts had measured the giants against themselves. Joshua and Caleb changed the terms of the comparison.

This is full of instruction. By their unbelief they had shut God out. So it obviously became a question between Israel and the Canaanites. Faith would have made it a question between God and the Canaanites. This was exactly how Joshua and Caleb saw the matter.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Speaking well of the land

Both men had walked the same ground as the other scouts. Their good report was not optimism. It was a debt they owed.

Joshua and Caleb were "the two who had brought the good report." They said that the land they had passed through to search it was "an exceedingly good land." Let us not forget this. We owe it to our God to give a good report of the land that lies before us.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Milk and honey

The description is not decoration. The two words carry the character of what God was offering.

Salvation is not complete until the land of promise is their own... The land is a good land and a large one, flowing with milk and honey. It is not a land of narrowness, as Egypt is — and heaven is not limited by the needs and struggles of earth... There is all "fatness," which the word for milk literally means, and all sweetness, as the honey implies. Salvation for us must result in satisfaction, or it is not salvation.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Whose joy is greater

The verse sounds like Israel hoping that God is pleased with them. The deeper delight runs the other way.

Suppose a poor sinner now thinks what happiness it would be to have the heavenly Canaan. There is a deeper joy than his — the Lord's delight to have him there. (See Luke 15.) But we may say that the Lord was then robbed of His delight, except in the two men of faith. So the people are turned back into the desert to bear their sins.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The purpose that survived the refusal

That generation never entered. Yet the refusal did not cancel what God had settled to do.

God delights in His saints and He delights to bless them in Christ. But Israel despised the land. They were set aside, unable to get in. He tells them He would treat them as they had said He would. They would wander forty years in the desert, a year for each day they had spent searching the land, until they all died. But in spite of all this, the very next chapter begins, "When you come into the land." Despite all their sin, Scripture speaks of them as though they were already there.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Delight is the cause. Israel's entry hung on God's pleasure in them, not on their strength. All their blessing rested on what He was, not on what they were.

- Delight is known. Joshua and Caleb were in communion with the Lord's mind. They knew He delighted in His people, so they could say it.

- Delight reframes the enemy. Unbelief shut God out and left Israel facing the Canaanites alone. Faith made it God against the Canaanites.

- Delight has a destination. Milk means fatness and honey means sweetness. Salvation ends in satisfaction, not in narrowness.

- Delight outlasts refusal. That generation fell in the desert. Yet the next chapter still says, "When you come into the land." His purpose stood.

Numbers 14:9 · Darby

only rebel not against Jehovah; and fear not the people of the land; for they shall be our food. Their defence is departed from them, and Jehovah is with us fear them not.

Israel stood at the border of the promised land. Ten of the twelve men sent to explore it came back saying the enemy was too strong. Two men answered them. Every phrase of their reply turns on the one thing the other ten had left out: God.

Faith Measures the Enemy Against God

The ten spies were not lying about the giants. They measured themselves against the giants, and the answer came out the only way it could.

What unbelief does is to compare ourselves and our own strength with circumstances. What faith does is to compare God with circumstances. Take the case of the spies; Numbers 13, 14. They said, "All the people of the land are men of great height; and we saw the giants there, the sons of Anak... and in our own eyes we seemed like grasshoppers, and so we seemed to them." If the Israelites were going to measure their own height against the sons of Anak, they had no business being there. What did Caleb and Joshua say? They quieted the people, saying, "They are bread for us. Their protection is removed from them, and the LORD is with us; do not fear them." That is, they compared these sons of Anak with God; what does it matter then whether they were giants or grasshoppers?

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Whose Fight It Really Is

The ten had already settled who the fight was between.

They, by their unbelief, had shut out God; and therefore it was obviously a question between Israel and the Canaanites. Faith would have made it a question between God and the Canaanites.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

"Their Protection Is Removed"

Joshua and Caleb said the enemy's protection was already gone. Nothing they could see backed that up, then or later.

"They are stronger than we are," say the spies, but in truth their strength had gone from them. The cities were walled, and they saw the giants too. When they at last reached Canaan, the walls were just as high, and the children of Anak were still there. Not one of unbelief's difficulties had gone. Only, when they go forward with God, difficulty is no difficulty.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

"They Are Bread for Us"

Calling the enemy food is a strange way to speak. Joshua and Caleb said it to men who had just magnified the enemy's strength.

When the men of Israel magnified the strength of the nations of Canaan, Joshua and Caleb, true men of faith, said, "They are bread for us... the LORD is with us; do not fear them" (Num. 14:9). Bread indeed! For every difficulty that faith in God overcomes gives strength and nourishment to the soul.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Another writer applies the same words to the difficulties Christians meet now:

Difficulties only help us realise more of what He is for us. Israel had to fight giants to take the promised land, and Joshua and Caleb said of them, "They are bread for us" (Num. 14:9). Faith grows stronger through the very demands that expose the weakness of unbelief.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Three Things They Told the People

The speech has a structure: what God is like, what Israel must not do, and why fear is pointless.

First, "If the LORD delights in us," they said, "He will bring us into this land." In this they showed that they shared the LORD's mind. He did delight in His people, and they knew it. So everything depended on what He was and on His power, not on what the people were or could do. Second, they said, "Only do not rebel against the LORD... and do not fear the people of the land." The people of Israel had only to follow their divine Leader. Last, they declared — and this was the source of all their strength — that the LORD was with them, so fear of the enemy was needless.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

What It Cost to Say It

The congregation's answer to this speech was to call for stones. The offence was the report itself.

And why were they to be stoned? For telling lies? For blasphemy or wrongdoing? No; it was for their bold and earnest testimony to the truth... The people did not like the truth then any more than now. Truth is never popular... There were six hundred thousand voices raised against two men who simply told the truth, and trusted in God.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Compare — unbelief measures itself against the difficulty; faith measures the difficulty against God. That single change of measurement is the whole difference between the ten and the two.

- Shift — leave God out and it is Israel against Canaan; bring Him in and it is God against Canaan.

- Stripped — the enemy's covering is gone before a single blow falls. Nothing outward changed. Going forward with God is what makes a difficulty stop being one.

- Fed — what terrifies unbelief nourishes faith. Every obstacle carried through by trusting God returns as strength.

- Costly — two men stood against six hundred thousand. The reward for telling the truth was a call to stone them.

Numbers 14:10 · Darby

And the whole assembly said that they should be stoned with stones. And the glory of Jehovah appeared in the tent of meeting to all the children of Israel.

Two spies have just told Israel that the land is good and that the LORD is with them. The whole assembly answers by calling for their death. At that exact moment God's glory breaks out at the tent of meeting. The verse holds two things side by side: a people at their worst, and a God who will not let His witnesses stand alone.

Stoned for telling the truth

Ask what crime Joshua and Caleb had committed.

And why were they to be stoned? Was it for telling lies? Was it for blasphemy or evil-doing? No; it was for their bold and earnest testimony to the truth. Their orders were to spy out the land and bring back a true report about it. This they did; and for this "all the congregation bade stone them with stones." The people did not like the truth then any more than now. Truth is never popular. There is no place for it in this world, or in the human heart. People will receive lies, and error in every shape; but never truth. In their day Joshua and Caleb faced what all true witnesses in every age have faced. All must expect it — the opposition and hatred of most of their fellows. Six hundred thousand voices rose against two men who simply told the truth and trusted God.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The turn was immediate:

Those words should have cheered the people. Instead, the moment they came out, they brought open hostility.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

God answers for His servants

Argument had run out. The crowd that called for stones would see what came next.

In vain Joshua and Caleb step in: unbelief is unreason itself. The crowd only answers, "Stone them with stones." Then God must answer for Himself, and the glory of the LORD breaks out in the tent of meeting before the eyes of the rebellious people.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

The same appearing carries two opposite messages, depending on who is looking at it.

The congregation was so enraged with Joshua and Caleb that they said, "Stone them with stones." The men who listened to Stephen were cut to the heart and filled with hatred. This crowd was the same: they would gladly have murdered the faithful witnesses. But the glory of the LORD appeared, to vindicate His servants and to punish His stiff-necked and rebellious people. What a contrast, as always, between the LORD's estimate and man's! His favour rested on the very men the children of Israel would have stoned.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The timing of the glory

Notice the timing. The glory did not wait for the danger to pass.

Chapter 14 shows an outbreak of murmuring and revolt against the LORD. They wanted a leader to take them back to Egypt! Many today want to leave the path of faith for the ground of nature and the activity of deceiving spirits. Joshua and Caleb pleaded with the people, and Moses pleaded with the merciful and patient LORD for pardon… reason

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

A pattern running through Numbers

This is not an isolated flash of light; the book records it repeatedly, always at a breaking point.

Three times in the book of Numbers the glory of the LORD appeared at a moment of crisis. First, when the people refused the good news about the land of promise and were about to stone Moses, Joshua and Caleb (Num. 14:10). Then at the rebellion of Korah (Num. 16:19). Then when the people quarrelled with Moses because there was no water (Num. 20:6). On the first occasion the rebellion made Moses and Aaron fall on their faces before the whole assembly… God spoke of disinheriting Israel, but Moses interceded and they were spared. Yet the LORD answered, "As I live, all the earth shall be filled with the glory of the LORD" (verse 21). This will certainly be fulfilled under the reign of Christ.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

What the two men had

Their courage was not natural nerve. It came from where they had been.

Caleb and Joshua had not only been in the land, they had been with God about the land. They had looked at it all from faith's point of view. They knew the land was theirs in the purpose of God. They knew it was worth having as the gift of God. And they knew they would yet have it by the power of God. They were men full of faith, full of courage, full of power.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause: the crowd reached for stones because the report was true. Truth draws hostility, and faithful witnesses should expect it.

- Odds: six hundred thousand voices against two men who simply told the truth and trusted God.

- Answer: when argument failed, God answered for Himself. The glory vindicated His servants and dealt with the rebellion.

- Timing: the glory came just as the stones were about to fly. His thoughts toward His people had not changed.

- Reach: the same chapter that judged unbelief also promised that the glory of the LORD will fill all the earth.

Numbers 14:11 · Darby

And Jehovah said to Moses, How long will this people despise me? and how long will they not believe me, for all the signs which I have done among them?

At Kadesh, a whole nation has just voted to go back to Egypt instead of entering the land God promised them. God puts His question to Moses, not to Israel: how long will this contempt last, and how much proof does a heart need before it trusts?

The Charge: Unbelief

The people's crime here is not immorality but refusal to take God at His word.

"A hopeless case," we might say. The charge against the people was unbelief, because God had told them that He was going to give them the land and that it was a good land. So there was no need to send spies at all. Even after the spies gave their reports, the people should have trusted God to help them conquer the land as promised.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Signs Without Faith

God's question points to the signs He had done among them. They did not produce faith. One writer explains why.

They do admit that God had worked miracles for them. But they said, in effect, "He has given us water, can He give us bread?" Men speak against God when there are no miracles, and ask "Why does He not intervene?" They forget that when God worked miracles before the eyes of men, they spoke against God. Miracles and signs do not change the heart of man. Miracles or no miracles, the natural man is unbelieving.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Why Distrust Is Called Wickedness

If unbelief were only a mental gap, God's tone here would be hard to explain. But look at who they refused to trust.

So it was with Israel; so it is with Christendom. No wonder that it is denounced as "a wicked heart" of unbelief. For what else is or can be distrust of such a God? The more He reveals His love, the more He exposes the wickedness of a heart that refuses His grace, or — worse still — gives it up. Nothing is more false than to treat faith as a mere process of the mind, with nothing moral in it. Faith rests on the deep principle of submission to God's word.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Limit of "How Long"

God asks "how long" twice. It is the sound of patience reaching its limit.

The Lord addressed Moses because of the rebellion of Israel. God had shown wonderful patience with them, but how can patience continue in the face of organised rebellion?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Offer That Tested Moses

God's next words put a startling offer to Moses: start again, with Moses as the new line.

God was willing to begin again — to make a fresh start. As with Abraham, so He would take Moses as a fresh stock to work from. He was willing to make him such a name as Moses otherwise could not hope for. The heart of Moses answered to the heart of God. He would not hear of it. The offer was to bring out the love that held to what God can afford to be to His people. What He might do for Moses he would not now think of.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Mercy and Judgment Together

The chapter does not end with either destruction or a clean slate. Both mercy and government follow, and God's name is upheld in each.

Again we see the glory of Moses. The blessing of the people depends on his mediation, and in this he is a picture of the great Mediator. As Moses pleads, God had in fact tied His glory to the salvation of His people and to bringing them into the land. In the wilderness He had declared Himself the One who forgave iniquity, transgression and sin, even while He did not clear the guilty. The generation that had now tempted Him to the limit of His forbearance would perish in the wilderness. Caleb, on the other hand, as following Him fully, would enter into the land. So the Lord is sanctified in judgment and in mercy.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Summary

- Charge — The sin at Kadesh was not scandal but unbelief. God had already promised the land, so sending spies was needless and doubting the report was contempt.

- Evidence — The signs changed nothing. Miracles do not alter the human heart: with them or without them, it does not believe.

- Root — To distrust a God who has shown such love is a wicked heart, because faith is submission to His word, not an exercise of the mind.

- Limit — The twice-repeated "how long" shows patience at its limit. It cannot continue in the face of organised rebellion.

- Mediator — God offered Moses a great nation of his own. Moses refused and pleaded for the people. That generation still died in the wilderness, and the Lord showed Himself holy in both mercy and judgment.

Numbers 14:12 · Darby

I will smite them with the pestilence, and destroy them, and will make of thee a nation greater and mightier than they.

Israel refuses to enter Canaan, and God's glory appears at the tent of meeting. His first words to Moses are not about the people but about Moses himself. God offers to wipe Israel out and build a greater nation from him. Everything turns on what Moses does with that offer.

The charge God brings

One writer names the sin behind this threat, and traces it back to the decision to send spies.

The charge against the people was unbelief. God had told them that He was going to give them the land, and that it was a good land. So there was no need to send spies at all. Even after the spies had given their reports, the people should have trusted God to enable them to conquer the land as promised.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

What the judgment would have cost

Death by plague was no more than the sin deserved. One commentator also asks whether a fresh start through Moses would have turned out any better.

They had provoked the Lord. They broke His law, they rejected His captain, and they refused to believe Him despite all the signs He had shown among them. The wages of sin is death, which would have reached them by a plague. Suppose God had cut them all off, and kept a posterity for Abraham according to His promise by starting again through Moses. In principle He would have been doing what He did at the flood. He destroyed mankind, and yet He preserved a posterity for Adam through Noah. But would such a line through Moses have proved any better than the line through Noah? Or better than the line through Abraham so far? The answer, which the New Testament gives, is NO.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why God made the offer

God was not just announcing a plan. He was speaking in a way that would show what was in Moses' heart.

God was willing to begin again — to make a fresh start. As with Abraham, so He would take Moses as a fresh stock to work from. He was willing to make him a name such as Moses could not otherwise hope for. The heart of Moses answered to the heart of God. He would not hear of it. The offer was to bring out the love that held to what God can afford to be to His people.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The pull of the offer

For natural ambition, this was the chance of a lifetime. And the offer came from God Himself.

Here was what nature might well regard as a golden opportunity for him. Never before and never since have we any case in which a mere man had such a door open before him. The enemy and his own heart might say, "Now's your time. You have here an offer of becoming the head and founder of a great and mighty nation. The Lord Himself is offering it to you. You have not sought it. The living God puts it before you, and it would be the height of folly on your part to reject it."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Why Moses turned it down

His answer never mentions himself. It goes straight to what the nations would say about God's name.

Suppose all this personal glory and greatness could only be bought by giving up a single ray of divine glory. What then? Away with it all. Let the name of Moses be blotted out for ever. … The thought of being made great at God's expense was more than the heart of this blessed man of God could bear. He could not endure the thought of the nations blaspheming the name he loved so well. He could not bear anyone ever saying, "The Lord was not able."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The shape of his prayer

Moses guards God's honour first. Then he asks pardon on that same ground, and asks God to show His power in an unexpected way.

There is, first and above all, a jealous care for the Lord's glory. … But then it is on this very ground — the keeping of the divine glory — that Moses seeks pardon for the people. … "Let the power of my Lord be great." To what end? Judgment and destruction? No — "The Lord is longsuffering." What a thought! The power of God in longsuffering and pardon! How unspeakably precious!

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What the intercession achieved

The threatened blow never fell, but the generation still lost what it had despised.

This incident had two consequences. In response to Moses' intercession, the Lord pardons the iniquity of the people (v. 20). At the same time, God announces how He will now deal with the people. Everyone aged 20 or more would have to die in the wilderness instead of entering the land. The journey would also stretch out by 40 years (v. 34).

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. The sin punished here is unbelief — refusing a land God had already promised and described as good.

- Offer. God offered to begin again with Moses, as He once began with Abraham. The offer came to draw out the love in Moses' heart.

- Test. No man ever had a more attractive door open to him. Moses' greatness shows in his refusal to walk through it.

- Plea. He argued from God's reputation among the nations. No personal honour was worth dimming one ray of God's glory.

- Result. Pardon came at his word. Still, the unbelieving generation lost the land, and forty more years in the desert followed.

Numbers 14:13 · Darby

And Moses said to Jehovah, Then the Egyptians will hear it; for in thy might thou broughtest up this people from the midst of them;

Israel has refused to enter the land. God offers to strike the people with plague, disinherit them, and start again with Moses as a greater nation. Verse 13 is the first word of Moses' reply. Instead of taking the offer, he turns God's attention to what Egypt will say.

The offer that tested Moses

God's offer was real, and it put Moses' own future on the table. One writer shows what the offer was testing:

God was willing to begin again — to make a fresh start. As with Abraham, He would make Moses the root of a new family line. He was willing to give him a name Moses could never have hoped for otherwise. The heart of Moses answered to the heart of God. He would not hear of it. The offer was to bring out the love that held to what God can afford to be to His people.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer weighs that offered future against the one thing Moses would not risk:

What if he did become a head and a founder? What if millions in the future looked back to him as their famous ancestor? If he could only buy all this personal glory and greatness by giving up a single ray of divine glory — what then? Away with it all. Let the name of Moses be blotted out for ever… He could not bear the nations speaking against the name he loved so well, or anyone ever saying, "The LORD was not able."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Why Egypt's opinion counts

Moses points back to what God had already done. He brought this people out by His own power, and Egypt watched it happen. That act tied God's glory to Israel's future:

Moses' intercession rests on the testimony the LORD had given about Himself… The principle behind it is this: the LORD is perfectly identified with His people. Moses presses on the LORD that His own glory is bound up with the keeping and blessing of His people. It cannot be separated from them.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Because of that link, outsiders would read Israel's destruction as God's failure:

He protests that the Egyptians would hear of Israel's destruction. So would other nations who had heard that God was with Israel. They would all dishonour God by saying He was unable to keep His promise of bringing Israel into the land.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The strongest ground of appeal

Notice what Moses does not plead. He does not plead Israel's need, and he does not plead their repentance. One writer draws out what this teaches about asking God for forgiveness:

Here is the true ground of appeal for mercy and forgiveness. It is not our need, great as it may be. It is not even repentance, heartfelt and true. It is the glory of God, the honour of His name, the written pledge of His faithfulness to those who are under the blood… When we pray, we make our requests known and ask a Father's forgiveness. But do we fully enter into the meaning of "for the sake of" or "in the name of Jesus Christ"? Is it merely a closing formula in our minds? Yet God our Father hears it in its full and blessed meaning, and answers our prayers accordingly. Otherwise He could not answer at all and still be righteous… God hears the prayer and passes over the people's sin. Here is a wonderful combination: God maintains the honour of His Name, and shows mercy to Israel.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Holding God to His own words

Moses then quotes back to God what God had said about Himself (verses 17–18):

Moses could not bear to see the LORD's character damaged. So he holds Him firmly, as it were, to His own word… He clings to the word of God and to His ways. He clings to the love God had proved so often, even to this faithless people He had known so well from the first. If He had borne with them before, He would not turn from them now.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What Moses asks God's power to do is startling. The writer quotes Moses' prayer from an older translation:

"Let the power of my Lord be great." To what end? Judgement and destruction? No — "The LORD is long-suffering." What a thought! The power of God in long-suffering and pardon!

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

A picture of a greater Intercessor

One writer sees in this scene a picture of someone greater:

Again, in this wonderful instance, Moses gives a beautiful picture of the interceding grace of the Lord Jesus. That grace keeps and sustains His people despite their waywardness.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Name first. Offered a nation of his own, Moses would not buy greatness at the cost of a single ray of God's glory.

- Name watched. God brought Israel out in the sight of Egypt, so His glory is bound up with what becomes of them.

- Name pleaded. Moses pleads not Israel's need or repentance, but the honour of God's name. That is the true ground of appeal for mercy.

- Name quoted. He holds God to God's own words, and asks Him to show His power in long-suffering and pardon.

- Name ours. Praying "in the name of Jesus Christ" makes the same plea. His intercession, not our worth, keeps His people.

Numbers 14:14 · Darby

and they will tell it to the inhabitants of this land, [who] have heard that thou, Jehovah, art in the midst of this people, that thou, Jehovah, lettest thyself be seen eye to eye, and that thy cloud standeth over them, and that thou goest before them, in a pillar of cloud by day, and in a pillar of fire by night;

God offers Moses a fresh start — a nation of his own. Moses turns it down. He points instead to what Egypt and Canaan already know: the Lord lives among this people and goes ahead of them in cloud and fire. His whole case rests on one point. God's name is now tied to the people He redeemed.

What the nations had heard

Israel's neighbours knew something no other nation could claim. God Himself lived in the middle of this camp.

The Lord was with them and among them in a symbolic presence. This was the glory of Israel's position among the nations of the earth. It was also the guarantee their hope of the promised inheritance rested on.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The pillar of cloud and fire

Moses points to the cloud that stands over them and goes before them. It gave both shelter and direction.

This pillar of cloud stood for the divine presence. It protected them from the burning heat by day, and from the countless dangers and terrors of the darkness by night. It guided these vast crowds of wayward and ignorant people through the empty, howling wilderness, home to the promised land. But to do this, the movements of the cloud had to guide the people on every stage of their journey. Here we have the two great essential principles: protection and subjection.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Why Moses argues this way

His plea is not sentiment about Israel. He takes hold of what God has revealed about Himself. In the eyes of the world, God and this people now stand or fall together.

The intercession of Moses comes in, based on the testimony the Lord had given of Himself. (Compare Ex. 34:6-7.) The principle of it is this: the perfect identification of the Lord with His people. He presses on the Lord that His own glory is tied to the keeping and blessing of His people, and cannot be separated from them.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

An offer refused

God had just offered to make Moses into a greater and mightier nation. The offer drew out what filled his heart.

The heart of Moses answered to the heart of God. He would not hear of it. The offer was to bring out the love that held to what God can afford to be to His people. What He might do for Moses, he would not now think of.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One thing he could not bear was that the nations should ever say God had failed.

What if all this personal glory and greatness could only be bought by giving up a single ray of God's glory? Then away with it all. Let the name of Moses be blotted out for ever… He could not bear the thought of the nations blaspheming God's name, which he loved so well, or of anyone ever saying, "The Lord was not able."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The problem this creates for God

Moses' plea raises a hard question. How can God refuse to excuse sin and still refuse to give up the people He redeemed?

Still, God cannot allow sin. Neither could He give the people up; for had He not redeemed them? as Moses pleaded with Him (Num. 14:13-16)… He cannot give them up; He cannot allow sin; and therefore He brings in priestly grace to meet the difficulty.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The answer given

Moses ends by holding God to His own description of Himself. God answers.

So Moses could not bear to see the Lord's character compromised. He holds Him fast, as it were, to His own word… He clings to the word of God and to His ways. He clings to the love God had so often proved, even towards the unbelieving people He had known so well from the first. If He had borne with them before, surely He would not turn from them now. "And the Lord said, I have pardoned according to your word: but as truly as I live, all the earth shall be filled with the glory of the Lord."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Presence — The nations knew one thing about Israel. God lived among them, face to face, with His cloud over the camp. That nearness was their standing in the world.

- Guidance — The cloud by day and the fire by night gave protection and called for subjection. Israel moved only when the cloud moved.

- Identification — God had tied His name to this people. If He destroyed them, Egypt and Canaan would call it His failure.

- Selflessness — God offered Moses a nation of his own. Moses set himself aside. He would sooner lose his own name than let anyone say, "The Lord was not able."

- Pardon — Moses held God to His own revealed character. God met the difficulty with priestly grace and answered, "I have pardoned" — and promised that His glory will fill the whole earth.

Numbers 14:15 · Darby

if thou now slayest this people as one man, then the nations that have heard thy fame will speak, saying,

Israel has just refused to enter the land God promised them. God offers Moses a personal future: destroy this people, and make Moses into a greater nation. Moses looks past himself. He asks what the watching nations would say if the LORD killed this people as one man.

Moses refuses greatness bought at God's expense

The offer tested what Moses valued most.

Here Moses takes the very highest ground. He is completely taken up with the Lord's glory. He cannot bear the thought of that glory losing its brightness in the eyes of the nations. What if he became a founder and a head? What if millions in the future looked back to him as their famous ancestor? If all this personal glory and greatness could only be bought by sacrificing a single ray of divine glory — what then? Away with it all. Let the name of Moses be blotted out for ever... He could not bear to hear the nations speak against the name he loved so well. He could not bear anyone to say, "The Lord was not able."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

God's glory is tied to His people

The plea works because of something God has done. He has tied His own name to this nation.

The intercession of Moses rests on what the LORD had said about Himself. (Compare Ex. 34:6-7.) The principle is this: the LORD identifies Himself completely with His people. Moses urges on Him that His own glory is bound up with keeping and blessing His people, and cannot be separated from them.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same principle reaches past Israel to believers in Christ.

God must accomplish His purposes to His glory, but in grace He has tied them to us... This marks faith: not just believing that God is glorious, but connecting His glory with the blessing of His people. So Moses says, "What will You do to Your great name?" and "The Egyptians will hear of it." He pleads with God this way all through. What a source of security and ground for praise, that God should have joined His glory to our blessing and to His promises to us in Christ!

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The ground on which forgiveness is asked

Moses does not argue that Israel deserves to be spared, or even that they are sorry.

The sin was deep, and God had threatened to disinherit them. How instructive, then, to learn the true ground of appeal for mercy and forgiveness. It is not our need, great as it may be. It is not even repentance, heartfelt and true. It is the glory of God, the honour of His name, the written pledge of His faithfulness to those who are under the blood... We pray, we make our requests known, we ask a Father's forgiveness. But do we fully grasp the meaning of "for the sake of" or "in the name of Jesus Christ"? Is it merely a closing formula in our minds?

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Holding God to His own words

Moses then holds God to God's own words about Himself.

So Moses could not bear to see the LORD's character compromised. He holds Him tightly, as it were, to His own word... He clings to the word of God and to His ways. He clings to the love God had so often shown, even to this faithless people He had known from the first. If He had borne with them before, surely He would not turn from them now. "Then the LORD said, 'I have pardoned, according to your word'" (verse 20). And He goes on to promise that all the earth will be filled with the glory of the LORD (verse 21).

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

God answers the prayer, and two things stand together in it.

God hears the prayer and passes over the people's sin. What a combination! God keeps the honour of His name and shows mercy to Israel, while His judgment upholds His righteousness. This is the glory that will fill the earth.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A picture of Christ's intercession

Moses standing between God and a guilty people points beyond himself.

Moses protests that the Egyptians would hear of Israel's destruction. So would other nations who had heard that God was with Israel. They would all dishonour God by saying He was unable to keep His promise of bringing Israel into the land (vv. 13-16)... Again, in this wonderful instance, Moses gives a beautiful picture of the interceding grace of the Lord Jesus. That grace keeps and sustains His people despite their wayward ways.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Name at stake. Moses' whole case rests on one sentence he cannot allow the nations to say: "The Lord was not able."

- Name over fame. Offered a nation of his own, he would rather have his own name erased than see one ray of God's glory dimmed.

- Name links God to us. God has tied His glory to the blessing of His people. Their ruin would look like His failure. That is the believer's security too, not Israel's alone.

- Name as our plea. Forgiveness rests on the honour of His name, not on our need or even our repentance. That is the real weight behind praying "in the name of Jesus Christ."

- Name answered. God answers, "I have pardoned, according to your word." He promises that His glory will fill the whole earth. The same interceding grace keeps His people today.

Numbers 14:16 · Darby

Because Jehovah was not able to bring this people into the land that he had sworn unto them, he has therefore slain them in the wilderness.

Israel has just refused the land, and God has offered to destroy the nation and start again with Moses alone. Moses refuses. He asks what Egypt and the nations nearby would say if the whole nation died in the desert: that Israel's God promised more than He could deliver.

The offer that tested Moses

God's offer to make Moses into a great nation was real. It was also a test, and one writer shows what it drew out of Moses' heart.

God was willing to begin again — to make a fresh start. As with Abraham, He would start a new family line from Moses. He was willing to make him such a name as Moses otherwise could not hope for. The heart of Moses answered to the heart of God. He would not hear of it. The offer was meant to bring out the love that held on to what God is willing to be to His people. What He might do for Moses he would not now think of.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What Moses could not bear to hear said

The words he dreads are a verdict on God's power, spoken by outsiders. Moses would sooner lose everything God promised him than hear them said.

What if he did become a head and a founder? What if future millions looked back to him as their famous ancestor? If all this personal glory and greatness could only be bought by giving up a single ray of God's glory — what then? Away with it all. Let the name of Moses be wiped out for ever… He could not bear to have the name he loved so well insulted among the nations. He could not bear that anyone should ever say, "The Lord was not able."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Two things were at stake for him at once.

Look at the love he has for Israel on the one hand, and the care for God's character on the other. He says, Lord, I do not want to be made much of, but I do want something for others.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Why the plea worked

Moses does not argue that Israel deserves rescue. He appeals to God's own name and God's own promise.

The sin was deep, and God threatened to disinherit them. How instructive, then, to be shown the true ground of appeal for mercy and forgiveness. It is not our need, great as it may be. It is not even repentance, heartfelt and true. It is the glory of God, the honour of His name, the written pledge of His faithfulness to those who are under The Blood… When we pray, we make our requests known and ask a Father's forgiveness. But do we enter into the full meaning of "for the sake" or "in the name of Jesus Christ"? Is it just a closing formula in our minds?

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The problem the plea created

Spare them, and their rebellion goes unanswered. Destroy them, and His redeeming work looks like failure. One writer shows how God met that problem.

Still, God cannot allow sin. Neither could He give the people up; for had He not redeemed them? as Moses pleaded with Him. He cannot give them up; He cannot allow sin; and therefore He brings in priestly grace to meet the difficulty. To take away their murmurings, He does not use the rod of Moses, but that of Aaron. The rod of Moses could only judge them for their sin… But Aaron's does it by priestly grace.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Pardon granted, judgment kept

God pardoned Israel, and still that generation died in the desert. Both stand together, because Moses had held God to words God Himself had spoken.

Notice this. Even as the Lord pronounces judgment, He acts according to the very word to which Moses had tied Him in faith… He would hold fast His mercy, but He would by no means clear the guilty. There was pardon, or Israel would never have entered the land. Yet He would "by no means clear the guilty", and so that generation fell. So God kept His character intact, and His hand made good what His mouth had spoken.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Writers also see in this scene a picture of a greater intercession.

Again, in this wonderful case, Moses pictures the interceding grace of the Lord Jesus. That grace keeps and sustains His people despite their waywardness.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Offer — God proposed a nation built on Moses. The offer drew out a heart that cared more for God than for promotion.

- Refusal — Moses would sooner lose his own name than let anyone say, "The Lord was not able."

- Ground — the plea that wins is not our need, or even our repentance. It is the honour of God's name. That is what praying "in the name of Jesus Christ" means.

- Tension — God would not excuse the sin, and He would not abandon the people He had redeemed. Priestly grace, not the rod of judgment, met the need.

- Answer — God pardoned, and that generation still fell. He kept both His mercy and His word. Moses pleading here pictures the Lord Jesus interceding for His own.

Numbers 14:17 · Darby

And now, I beseech thee, let the power of the Lord be great, according as thou hast spoken, saying,

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Numbers 14:18 · Darby

Jehovah is slow to anger, and abundant in goodness, forgiving iniquity and transgression, but by no means clearing [the guilty], visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, upon the third and fourth [generation].

Israel has just refused the land, and God offers to strike the nation and start again with Moses alone. Moses answers by quoting back God's own words about Himself, first spoken on the mountain, and asking Him to act in character.

Pleading God's Own Words

Moses does not invent an argument. He takes the description God had given of Himself and treats it as binding.

Moses could not bear to see Jehovah's character compromised, so he holds Him firmly to His own word... He holds fast to the word of God and to His ways. He holds fast to the love God had shown so often, even to this unfaithful people He had known so well from the start. If He had been patient with them before, surely He would not turn from them now.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

(The ESV reads "slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love." Older translations quoted here say "longsuffering, and of great mercy.")

The Glory Tied to the People

The plea rests on more than pity. Moses ties God's own glory to what becomes of Israel.

Moses steps in to plead for the people, and he builds his plea on the testimony Jehovah had given about Himself... The principle behind it is this: Jehovah completely identifies Himself with His people. He presses on Jehovah that His own glory is tied up with keeping and blessing His people. It cannot be separated from them.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Word "Forgiving"

The word behind "forgiving" carries a picture. It means to lift a weight up and carry it away.

nasa, 'to bear,' take away [guilt]: used by Joseph's brothers when they asked him to forgive them, Gen. 50:17; and used of God as "forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin." Ex. 34:7; Num. 14:18; and in describing the blessedness of the man "whose transgression is forgiven, whose sin is covered." Ps. 32:1.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Power Shown in Patience

Moses asks for the power of the Lord to be great — and then defines what that power should do.

"Let the power of my Lord be great." To what end? Judgement and destruction? No; "The Lord is long-suffering." What a thought! The power of God in long-suffering and pardon! How precious beyond words! How close Moses was to the very heart and mind of God, that he could speak like this!

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Clause That Limits the Mercy

Moses quotes the hard half of the sentence too. Commentators warn against stopping at the kind words.

It is a great mistake to think that the proclamation of divine goodness in this scene is the gospel. People are badly wrong when they quote "Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity, transgression, and sin" in this sense and stop there... There is no doubt that this is the goodness and mercy of God, but God is showing it to a people still under the government of the law... Without this mixture of law and mercy the guilty people never could have been spared. They would have been wiped out completely. It was because of this that a new generation of Israel entered the land at all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Set beside the gospel, the difference is sharp:

This is clearly not pure law, and it is not pure grace either. It is the goodness of God in government, and under that government God will by no means clear the guilty. Under grace, God can justify the ungodly.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Fathers and Children

The line about consequences reaching to later generations troubles many readers. Commentators place it in God's dealings on earth, not in His final verdict.

Here God is showing how He deals with people on earth in His holy government. When it comes to His judgment for eternity, He judges the dead "according to what they had done" (Rev. 20:12-13), and no child bears the sin of his father there... In the working out of God's government in this world, a father's iniquity harms his children. That fact is too obvious for any of us to overlook.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The Answer Given

God's reply comes in two statements.

Note these two statements carefully. They are absolute and unqualified. "I have pardoned." And, "All the earth shall be filled with the glory of the Lord." Nothing could, by any possibility, touch these grand facts. The pardon is secured; and the glory will yet shine out over all the earth.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- The Name spoken. God had used these very words about Himself before. Moses is not guessing at God's character; he is repeating it.

- The Name pleaded. Moses argues that God's own glory is tied up with keeping and blessing His people.

- The Name limited. "But he will by no means clear the guilty" keeps this from being the gospel. It is goodness at work inside God's government, where guilt still brings consequences on earth.

- The Name answered. The reply came back: "I have pardoned." That is power at work in patience, not destruction.

- The Name enlarged. What government could not do, grace does. God justifies the ungodly, and the whole earth will still be filled with His glory.

Numbers 14:19 · Darby

Pardon, I beseech thee, the iniquity of this people according to the greatness of thy loving-kindness, and as thou hast forgiven this people, from Egypt even until now.

Israel has just refused the land, and God has offered to destroy them and start again with Moses. Verse 19 is his reply — a plea for pardon based on nothing in the people, only on the greatness of God's love and His record of forgiving them.

Holding God to His own word

Moses does not invent a new argument. He points to what God has said about Himself, and to every past forgiveness, as proof of what God is.

Moses could not bear the Lord's character to be compromised, so he holds Him tightly, as it were, to His own word... He clings to the word of God and to His ways — to the love God had shown so often, even to the faithless people He knew so well from the first. If He had borne with them before, surely He would not turn from them now.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Glory first, then pardon

Moses does not ask for pardon on its own. He asks on one ground above all: God's glory must not suffer.

There is, first and above all, a jealous care for the Lord's glory. That glory must be guarded on every side. But it is on this very ground — mainly, to maintain the divine glory — that he asks pardon for the people. This intercession links the two together in the most blessed way. "Let the power of my Lord be great." To what end? Judgement and destruction? No — "The LORD is slow to anger." What a thought! The power of God shown in patience and pardon!

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Nothing asked for himself

The prayer asks nothing for Moses. One writer shows what he was ready to lose to keep God's glory safe.

If all this personal glory and greatness could only be bought at the cost of a single ray of divine glory — what then? Away with it all. Let the name of Moses be blotted out for ever.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Another writer weighs what Moses wanted for himself against what he wanted for Israel.

Look at the love he has for Israel on the one hand, and his care for God's character on the other. He says, Lord, I do not want to be made much of, but I do want something for others... The mercy of God is a deep sea that never changes, and it is infinitely precious.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Pardoned, but still disciplined

God answers the prayer in the next verse, then sets a limit. Pardon here does not mean the people escape every consequence.

God answered the prayer of this one man on behalf of all Israel, telling him He has pardoned Israel: He would not destroy them. Yet, while God shows grace in this way, He will not relax His government... Israel would feel the results of their disobedience in a painful way.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

How can God forgive and still punish? One writer answers by saying what forgiveness itself means.

God may discipline us in His government for our good, or even as a testimony, as in David's case and Numbers 14:20. Yet, between Him and the guilty, He forgives. He does not charge the sin against them. He no longer holds them guilty.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What the pardon secures

God's answer holds two statements, and neither one carries a condition.

Note these two statements carefully. They are absolute and unqualified. "I have pardoned." And, "all the earth shall be filled with the glory of the LORD." Nothing could possibly touch these grand facts. The pardon is secured, and the glory shall yet shine out over all the earth.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

A picture of Christ's prayers

One writer sets this prayer beside another famous prayer in Scripture.

How close Moses was to the very heart and mind of God when he could speak like this! Compare him with the prophet Elijah on Mount Horeb, who prayed against Israel. There can be little question which of these two honoured men was more in tune with the mind and spirit of Christ.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

One man's prayer kept a whole nation alive. Another writer sees in it a preview of someone greater.

Again, in this wonderful instance, Moses beautifully pictures the interceding grace of the Lord Jesus. That grace keeps and sustains His people, despite their waywardness.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Ground — Moses claims nothing for Israel. He holds God to His own word, and to every pardon given since Egypt.

- Glory — Moses asks pardon on one ground: God's own glory. Mercy and glory rise or fall together.

- Gift — "I have pardoned" is absolute. God spares the nation and shows His power in patience, not destruction.

- Government — pardon does not cancel consequences. God still disciplines the people He has forgiven, and Israel felt that painfully.

- Goal — the same answer promises that the whole earth will be filled with God's glory. Nothing can touch that.

Numbers 14:20 · Darby

And Jehovah said, I have pardoned according to thy word.

Israel had just refused the land. They even talked of choosing a leader to take them back to Egypt. Moses prayed for them, and this verse is God's answer — a pardon, but one given on terms that shaped the next forty years.

The plea that won the pardon

Moses did not argue that the people deserved better. He appealed to God's own glory, and asked for pardon on that ground.

This is remarkably fine. The order, the tone, and the spirit of this whole appeal are beautiful. First and above all, there is a jealous care for the Lord's glory. That glory must be guarded on every side. Yet it is mainly on this ground — the keeping up of God's glory — that he asks pardon for the people... "Let the power of my Lord be great." To what end? Judgement and destruction? No; "The Lord is long-suffering." What a thought! The power of God in long-suffering and pardon!... Such words were pleasing to the ear of Jehovah, who delights in giving pardon.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

"According to your word"

Moses had quoted God's own proclamation back to Him: the Lord is slow to anger and rich in mercy, yet will by no means clear the guilty. God kept both halves of it.

Notice that at the very moment Jehovah pronounces judgment, He acts according to the word to which Moses had tied Him in his faith. Even if his faith did not reach as high as Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and their absolute, unconditional promises, it did fall back on the pledge Jehovah had given for His government of the people — and Jehovah holds to that pledge. So He dealt with that generation and swept it away, on the terms of His own proclamation. He would hold fast His mercy, but He would by no means clear the guilty. There was pardon, or Israel would never have entered the land. But He would "by no means clear the guilty", and so that generation fell.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Pardoned — and still under God's government

The pardon was real, but it had limits. God spared the nation, yet the people who rebelled still lost the land.

His main thought was not of himself at all but of God and His glory. The people had rebelled first against God, and only after that against Moses himself. Even so, his one concern was how the Egyptians and the surrounding nations would read such a drastic judgment. With that in mind, and with God's declared patience and mercy in mind, he asked boldly for pardon. His plea prevailed, and God granted pardon as far as the death penalty was concerned.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Sin can be forgiven while its consequences still run their course. Darby points to this verse as an example.

In His government God may chasten us for our good, or even as a testimony, as in David's case and in Numbers 14:20. Yet between Himself and the guilty person He may forgive, and not count the sin against him — no longer hold him guilty.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Two statements nothing can touch

God attaches no conditions to the pardon, or to the promise that follows it in the next verse.

Let the reader carefully note these two statements. They are absolute and unqualified. "I have pardoned." And, "All the earth shall be filled with the glory of the Lord." Nothing could possibly touch these grand facts. The pardon stands secure, and the glory will yet shine out over all the earth. No power of earth or hell, men or devils, can ever interfere with the divine integrity of these two precious statements.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

One man's prayer for a whole people

A nation survived because one man stood between it and judgment. Commentators see a larger picture in that.

Moses appeals to the power of God to overcome obstacles, even the obstacle of Israel's stubbornness. He also appeals to what the Lord had told him: that He is "longsuffering and abundant in mercy, forgiving iniquity and transgression"... On this ground Moses pleaded with God to pardon the iniquity of Israel, as He had done all through the wilderness journey. Once again, in this wonderful instance, Moses gives a beautiful picture of the interceding grace of the Lord Jesus, which keeps and sustains His people despite their waywardness.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Plea. Moses thought of God's glory and not of himself, and asked for pardon on that ground.

- Pardon. The answer carries no conditions — "I have pardoned" — and nothing can touch it. God spared the nation, and it would still reach the land.

- Word. "According to your word" means God kept the exact terms He had proclaimed. He held fast His mercy, and He did not clear the guilty.

- Government. The pardon lifted the death sentence on the nation, not the consequences. God may forgive and still chasten us for our good.

- Picture. One man's prayer saved a rebellious people. It pictures the interceding grace by which the Lord Jesus keeps His own.

Numbers 14:21 · Darby

But as surely as I live, all the earth shall be filled with the glory of Jehovah!

Israel had just refused the land God promised, and Moses had begged God to pardon the nation. God grants the pardon — then swears that His glory will fill the whole earth, a promise that seems strange in a scene of total failure.

The plea that won the pardon

Moses does not ask for the people's sake alone. Commentators note the order of his appeal. God's honour comes first, and Moses asks pardon on that very ground.

There is, first and above all, a jealous care for the Lord's glory. His glory must be guarded on every side. But then it is on this very ground, mainly, the maintaining of the divine glory, that pardon is sought for the people. The two things are linked together in the most blessed way in this intercession. "Let the power of the Lord be great." To what end? Judgment and destruction? No; "The Lord is slow to anger." What a thought! The power of God shown in patience and pardon!

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Two things that cannot be shaken

The pardon and the promise stand side by side. Neither carries a condition.

Let the reader carefully note these two statements. They are absolute and unqualified. "I have pardoned." And, "all the earth shall be filled with the glory of the LORD." Nothing could possibly touch these grand facts. No power of earth or hell, men or devils, can ever interfere with the divine integrity of these two precious statements.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Pardoned, yet still under God's hand

The words that open the verse are not a figure of speech. They are the wording God uses when He binds Himself by oath — and here the same oath carries a sentence on that generation.

Yet this grievous sin brought penalties under the government of God. Verse 21 begins, "But truly, as I live…" which is the formula of an oath. The letter to the Hebrews records the unchangeable oath made to Abraham. It also records how He swore in His wrath, "They shall not enter My rest." The men who brought a bad report of the land would never enter it. What is more, the very next day the people were to begin a fresh journey. It led not into the land but away from it. So began a weary pilgrimage of no less than forty years.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Pardon and government are two different things, and this chapter keeps them apart. Grace forgives; government still turns the people back toward the Red Sea, sparing only Caleb, who "had another spirit with him."

Why the promise appears here

The verse can feel out of place until you see why God chose Israel.

I often wondered why that verse about the whole earth being filled with the glory of the Lord (Num. 14) comes in just where it does. Then I saw that God took up Israel as a people who were to know Him, and from whom His glory should flow out into all the earth. But they had no knowledge of it, and in their hearts turned back again to Egypt. Then God says, as it were, Though Israel has failed, I will have My purpose fully carried out. They have not known My ways; they shall fall in the wilderness. But I will yet have a people (their children) who will answer to the desires of My heart, and the earth shall yet be filled with My glory.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

How the earth gets filled

Read on into the verses that follow, and see how God says the earth will be filled.

That, of course, is judgment; and the filling of the earth with God's glory here has nothing to do with the gospel. The Lord will have the whole earth full of His glory, but He does not use the gospel for that purpose. He does send the gospel, and presses it on men with infinite patience and goodness; but they reject it; and then comes judgment.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The one who will do it

Three passages in Scripture promise this worldwide glory. One pattern runs through all three.

So the question is not whether the earth is to be filled with the knowledge of the LORD's glory. All believers long for that, whether they understand it clearly or not. The question is how such a blessed outcome is to be reached. The prediction occurs in substance in Num. 14:21, Isa. 11:9, and Hab. 2:14. In all of them it goes with the carrying out of divine judgments. It never comes (as has been hastily and wrongly assumed) by the preaching of the gospel, the action of the church, or the dealings of providence, ordinary or extraordinary. It is an honour reserved for the Lord Jesus; and He alone is worthy.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Failure. Israel refused the land God swore to give them. Moses asked pardon on the ground of God's honour, not the people's record.

- Pardon. God gave two statements with no conditions: "I have pardoned," and His glory will fill the earth. Nothing in heaven or hell can touch either.

- Government. Pardon is not the same as escaping consequences. The same oath keeps that generation out of the land and sends them back for forty years.

- Purpose. God chose Israel so His glory could flow from them to the whole earth. They failed, and He carried His purpose forward to their children.

- Glory. The same promise appears in Isaiah 11:9 and Habakkuk 2:14. In each, judgment fills the earth with glory — an honour kept for the Lord Jesus.

Numbers 14:22 · Darby

for all those men who have seen my glory, and my signs, which I did in Egypt and in the wilderness, and have tempted me these ten times, and have not hearkened to my voice,

Moses has pleaded for the people, and God has pardoned them. Yet this verse says why that same generation will never enter Canaan: they had seen everything and trusted nothing.

Seeing Is Not Believing

These men were eyewitnesses. They saw everything God did in Egypt and in the desert, and their hearts stayed unchanged:

They gained nothing from a testimony passed on to them by their fathers, nor from miracles worked before their own eyes. They tempted God by speaking against Him. God had provided streams to quench their thirst in a miraculous way. Even so their unbelief said, "Can God furnish a table in the wilderness?" They admit that God had worked wonders for them, but they said, in effect, "He has given us water — can He give us bread?" Men speak against God when there are no miracles, and ask, "Why does He not step in?" They forget that when God did work miracles before the eyes of men, they spoke against God. Miracles and signs do not change the heart of man. Miracles or no miracles, the natural man is unbelieving.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

What "Tempting" God Actually Was

The word does not mean they lured God into evil. It means they put Him on trial — repeatedly demanding fresh proof that He was there at all.

To tempt was to doubt His presence and action on their behalf, as Israel did, not only "ten times" (Num. 14), but also just before the Lord sent fiery serpents to cut them off.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same doubt shows up in ordinary grumbling about hardship:

It shows how serious the sin of murmuring and complaining about the trials of the wilderness is. At the same time it teaches us that the heart of all such complaint is doubting whether the Lord is with us. These are common traps of Satan. He often entangles the feet of the Lord's people with them and robs them of their peace and joy, even when he does not bring about their fall. The antidote to all these tendencies is a firm, unwavering grip on the truth that the Lord is among us.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

A Tally God Kept

"These ten times" is not a figure of speech thrown out in anger. It is a record. God had been keeping account of every occasion, and each correction along the way had made no lasting difference:

The complaint God makes in this verse is striking: they "have put me to the test these ten times and have not obeyed my voice." God punished the grumbling people again and again, but none of it seemed to do any good. The people died a miserable death in the desert. So a new generation entered the land of promise, apart from Joshua and Caleb. Man in the flesh, tested by the law, could not please God and had to be born again.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

Pardoned, and Still Turned Back

God has just said, "I have pardoned." He still says these men will not see the land. Commentators explain this by naming two different things God does:

But there is such a thing as government, as well as grace. This must never be forgotten, and these things must never be confused. The whole book of God shows the difference between grace and government. Perhaps no part of it shows this more strongly than the section now open before us. Grace will pardon. Grace will fill the earth with the blessed beams of divine glory. But notice the terrible movement of the wheels of government in these burning words.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Forgiveness was real. So were the consequences. The generation kept the pardon and lost the land.

The Warning Still Stands

A warning only works on a live conscience. Where it is brushed aside, the loss is real:

It is this warning that stops the living in their tracks. The dead — those whose consciences are not touched, who do not say, "To whom shall we go? you have the words of eternal life" — treat the warning with contempt and perish. This is what happened to Israel in the wilderness, and God swore to them that they should not enter into His rest (Num. 14:21-23). And why? They had given up their confidence in Him. They had heard reports of the beauty and excellence of the land. Even so, their unbelief robbed them of the promised rest.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Seen — They saw God's power in Egypt and in the desert. Signs did not change their hearts.

- Tested — To test God was to doubt His presence and His help. Every murmur asks the same question: is the Lord with us?

- Counted — "Ten times" is a record God kept. Punishment came again and again and changed nothing, so a new generation entered the land.

- Sentenced — Grace pardons; government still moves. God forgave them, and they still lost the land.

- Warned — The same warning stands today. Israel heard how good the land was, gave up their confidence in God, and lost His rest.

Numbers 14:23 · Darby

shall in no wise see the land which I did swear unto their fathers none of them that despised me shall see it.

God pardons Israel at Moses' prayer, then shuts that whole generation out of the land He promised them. Two questions follow: how can pardon and exclusion sit together, and what is the sin He calls despising Him?

Pardon and Government Together

This sentence comes straight after God says He has pardoned. Commentators separate two things here: God forgiving a people, and God governing them.

But there is such a thing as government, as well as grace. This must never be forgotten, and the two must never be confused. The whole book of God shows the difference between grace and government. Perhaps no part of it shows this more strongly than the section now open before us. Grace will pardon, and grace will fill the earth with the blessed beams of divine glory. But notice the terrible movement of the wheels of government in these burning words.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Unbelief, Not Circumstances

Nothing outside Israel blocked the way. The barrier was inside them, and the New Testament names it.

It is very important to notice that unbelief kept Israel out of Canaan here. The inspired commentary in Hebrews 3 settles the question: "So we see that they were unable to enter because of unbelief." It might be said that the time for Israel to enter Canaan had not come, since the sin of the Amorites had not yet reached its peak. But that is not the reason Israel refused to cross the Jordan. They knew nothing and thought nothing about the sin of the Amorites... They ought to have entered. They were responsible to do so, and they were judged for not doing so. The way was open.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Meaning of "Despised Me"

Their refusal looked sensible. Checking a hostile country before invading it sounds wise. One writer shows where the sin lay, and what Scripture calls it.

Here at the border of the land there is nothing riotous or openly shameful — no idol, no feasting and playing. On the contrary, the respectable world condemns the filth of idol worship, yet approves the wisdom that guided Israel then. Before entering a hostile country, was it not praiseworthy caution to weigh the chances of victory and the enemy's power to resist? The sin here is independence from God. They would test the fruitfulness of the land and the strength of its inhabitants. Little did they think that God was testing them... Hebrews 3 refers to this very time... and the Holy Spirit uses another word — provocation — to show how exceedingly wicked their sin was... This despising of the land was the provocation.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Glory Filling the Earth Through Judgment

This verse hangs on the oath just before it: the whole earth will be filled with God's glory. One writer explains how that glory will come.

"But truly, as I live, and as all the earth shall be filled with the glory of the LORD... none of those who despised me shall see it." That, of course, is judgment; and the filling of the earth with God's glory here has nothing to do with the gospel. The Lord will have the whole earth full of His glory, but He does not use the gospel for that purpose. He does send the gospel, and He presses it on men with endless patience and goodness. But they reject it, and then judgment comes.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

From Pilgrims to Wanderers

Refusing the land changed the whole character of the years that followed. One writer traces where it led.

This is the decisive point in the history of the wilderness: the people refused to enter the land when they were brought right to its borders. For this they pay the penalty of forty years of wandering, and the whole generation dies, except two people... They are not pilgrims any more, but wanderers; not aimless, but with self-preservation as their only aim for these forty years... Progress stopped does not stop decline; on the contrary, it ripens into the rebellion of Korah and his company, the crowning sin of all... Circumcision stops too, so they lose the very sign of their covenant with the LORD. Grace alone carries them at last through the Jordan, and gives them the land they turn back from here.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

The Warning Carried Forward

One writer turns the same warning on us. What keeps a person out of God's rest?

We are all dull and slow to understand, even as such a favour is set before us. But a dull heart and a slow mind will not stop us sharing in it in the coming day. What will hinder — and hinder fatally and finally, if it is left to work out its bitter results — is the sin of unbelief... Unbelief lost their fathers the land. Their dead bodies fell in the wilderness. Unbelief would keep anyone who keeps giving way to it from ever being a companion of Christ, and from entering the rest that remains.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Pardoned, yet governed. God forgave in full, and still passed sentence. Grace and God's government are not the same thing.

- Unbelief, not obstacles. Nothing outside Israel blocked the road. Hebrews says they were unable to enter because of unbelief.

- Despising, not caution. Their careful survey of the land was independence from God. Scripture calls it provocation.

- Pilgrims, then wanderers. Shut out of the land, they lived only to stay alive. Stalled progress ripened into open rebellion.

- Judged, yet glory certain. The same oath that shut them out promised that God's glory will fill the whole earth. Their failure did not cancel His purpose.

Numbers 14:24 · Darby

But my servant Caleb, because he hath another spirit in him, and hath followed me fully, him will I bring into the land whereinto he came; and his seed shall possess it.

God has just sentenced a whole generation to die in the desert for refusing to enter the land. Then He names one man and promises him what everyone else has lost, and the reason He gives is a "different spirit."

Grace and government

In this same chapter God pardons the people, and still turns them back toward the wilderness. Commentators see two different things at work here, and warn against mixing them up.

But then there is such a thing as government, as well as grace. This must never be forgotten, and we must never confuse the two. The whole book of God shows the difference between grace and government. Perhaps no part of it shows that difference more powerfully than the section now open before us. Grace will pardon, and grace will fill the earth with the blessed beams of divine glory. But look at the terrible movement of the wheels of government.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

A different spirit

What set Caleb apart was where his thinking started. He faced the same difficulties as the other spies.

This is how faith always reasons. Faith reasons from God to the difficulties: it begins with Him. Unbelief, on the contrary, reasons from the difficulties to God: it begins with them. This makes all the difference... Faith looks the difficulties straight in the face. It is not ignorant — not indifferent — not reckless; but what? IT BRINGS IN THE LIVING GOD... Caleb showed this precious faith when he said, "Let us go up at once and possess it; for we are well able to overcome it."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Behind that spirit lay one desire.

Caleb's faith lifted him out of the murmurs of Israel, their cowardice and their reproaches of the Lord. He trusted in God, held on to Him and left in His hands difficulties and giants; one thing only he sought — the Lord's delight in him.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Two sides of following fully

To follow fully sounds like always pressing forward. But the same loyalty that made Caleb urge an advance also made him turn back when God said turn back.

Caleb's soul rested entirely on the grace and power of God. That same grace and power had made them triumph at the Red Sea, and had kept the spies while they searched the land... The very same principle of fully following the Lord made him encourage the people to go up. But it would also stop him from trying once the Lord had said, "Tomorrow turn back toward the Red Sea." This was because the Lord had no delight in the people.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

What the commendation reveals

The wording is God's own verdict, and it tells us as much about Him as about Caleb.

This reveals how welcome to the Lord's heart Caleb's faithful testimony had been... He also showed the spirit of devoted discipleship in an evil day. He followed fully, and this became his distinguishing mark — a mark Caleb himself delighted to accept and recall.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Later he repeats the phrase about himself, which strikes some readers as boasting:

Do you know what Caleb said? "I wholly followed the LORD my God" (Joshua 14:8). Oh, you say, he was conceited. No, no, he was consecrated, not conceited.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

From promise to possession

God promises to bring him in, but that took forty more years of desert. Something had to keep Caleb walking.

But the forty years of desert life still lie ahead. He walks them with courage right to the end, because he carries in his heart the memory of the riches and the treasure of Canaan. To him the difficulties of the desert are nothing. He pays no attention to the burning sands, the scorching sun, weariness, or thirst... A hope keeps his courage alive. And the believer's hope is not just Canaan, that is, heaven in a general way. It is Christ.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

And the promise held. A new count of Israel at the end of the wilderness years shows the result:

These males of twenty years and over numbered just over 600,000. Not one of them was left alive from the earlier census, except Caleb and Joshua... we see with what absolute exactness God fulfils the word He has spoken. A solemn fact for the unbeliever, but one in which we who believe can heartily rejoice.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Spirit — Caleb began with God and then looked at the giants. Unbelief began with the giants and then looked for God.

- Sought — That spirit had a single aim: the Lord's delight in him.

- Followed — Following fully meant going up when God said go, and turning back when God said turn. Both were obedience to the same Lord.

- Spoken — God's own commendation shows how welcome faithful testimony is to Him.

- Secured — The promise took forty desert years to arrive. The later census proves God keeps His word with absolute exactness.

Numbers 14:25 · Darby

(Now the Amalekites and the Canaanites dwell in the valley.) To-morrow turn you, and take your journey into the wilderness, on the way to the Red sea.

Israel stands at the edge of the promised land. God answers their refusal with a command to walk away from it. He names two enemies and sends the nation back toward the sea they crossed when they left Egypt. Why mention those enemies? And what was the long road back meant to teach?

The Enemies in the Valley

The two nations named measure what Israel had just thrown away.

Verse 25 reminds them that the Amalekites and Canaanites dwelt in the valley. They were formidable enemies indeed if God was not leading Israel against them. Israel had lost all claim to God's support. So God told them to turn back into the wilderness by way of the Red Sea. They had more to learn from wilderness experience.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the Turn Back

The reversal was not random. It matched the choice the people had already made.

So the people had to turn back into the wilderness and wander there for forty years. There was nothing else for it. They would not go up into the land with God, in simple faith. And He would not go up with them in their self-will and self-confidence. So they simply had to accept the consequence of their disobedience. If they would not enter the land, they must fall in the wilderness.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Direction: Toward the Red Sea

God named the one road that ran back toward their rescue out of Egypt. One writer reads the Red Sea as a picture of the cross, and this command as a call to learn that lesson again.

From Kadesh-barnea Israel had to almost retrace their steps, going back toward the Red Sea. Believers today find similar experiences because of lack of faith. Instead of moving forward in obedience to God, we must go back and learn again what the Red Sea deliverance means. It speaks of the judgment of sin in the flesh through the cross of Christ. If we do not learn it well as we begin our wilderness history, we will have to backtrack to understand it better. That is wandering instead of going steadily forward. Too many believers take almost their whole life to learn this lesson.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Pilgrims Turned Wanderers

Before this verse Israel was travelling toward something. After it, the whole character of the journey changes.

We now come to the decisive point in the history of the wilderness. The people refused to enter the land when God brought them to its very borders. By this they incur the penalty of forty years of wandering, and the death of the whole generation in the wilderness, except two people. For these, therefore, the whole character of their life is altered. They are not pilgrims any more, but wanderers. They do not wander without aim, yet their only aim for these forty years is to keep themselves alive.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

God Turns Back With Them

The command sends the people backwards — and God moves with them.

Jehovah refused to go with Israel into the mountain of the Amorites. But He was ready to turn round, in patient grace, and go with them through all their desert wanderings. If Israel would not enter Canaan with Jehovah, He would go back into the wilderness with Israel. Nothing can exceed the grace that shines in this. If God had dealt with them as they deserved, He might at least have left them to wander alone through the desert.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Grace goes further still. The sentence of wandering does not cancel the promise.

Notice how beautiful this is. At the very moment God sent them back from the land for their unbelief, He gives directions about what to do in the land. His promise and purpose are as sure as His word and His nature, despite man's folly and failure.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Refusing the Route

Israel would not take this road. They tried to go up without God instead.

We are just like wayward children. How well we can understand Israel's reply, "Here we are. We will go up," to the announcement that they must turn and set out for the wilderness by the way to the Red Sea. They could not bear to lose so much ground, and to cross the wilderness afresh. They would go up from where they were, but it cannot prosper; it was not the Lord's way, nor was He with them. Their attempt failed, and ended in defeat and deeper disgrace. The Lord will have us back to the cross so that we may start afresh with Him. We allow that we have sinned, but desire to go on as though we had not. This is not obedience but presumption.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. Unbelief at the border turned the nation around, not the strength of Amalek or Canaan. Without God leading them, those enemies were too strong.

- Route. The road back runs toward the Red Sea. They must learn the meaning of their rescue from Egypt the long way.

- Cost. They stop being pilgrims and become wanderers. Their aim shrinks to staying alive.

- Grace. God will not go up with them in self-will. But He turns back and walks the desert with them. He even gives instructions for life in the land as He sends them away from it.

- Response. The hardest obedience is taking the road our own failure has made necessary. Israel refused it, and that is presumption, not faith.

Numbers 14:26 · Darby

And Jehovah spoke to Moses and to Aaron, saying,

Moses has pleaded for the nation, and God has answered, "I have pardoned, according to your word." Now God speaks again, this time to Moses and Aaron together. His word raises the hardest question in the chapter: how can God forgive a people and still leave them to die in the desert?

A separate word, spoken after the pardon

The forty years come as a fresh word, not as part of what went before. One writer notes the reversal inside it: the children their parents had given up for lost are the ones who enter.

God announces the forty years in a separate message. In them, those who had wanted to die in the wilderness would die there. But God would bring their little ones into the land — the very ones their parents had mourned over as about to fall as prey to the enemy. In the meantime those children would bear the consequences of their fathers' sin, as was needful for the children of such fathers: a year in the wilderness for each day of fruitless searching. Yet because God Himself appointed these years, we cannot call them fruitless. Divine love could inflict no useless pain, just as it cannot withhold the pain that profits.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

The real target of grumbling

Complaint looks like it is aimed at people. One writer names its real target.

Such grumbling was a dreadful evil. It judged God as untrustworthy when He had assured them that He would enable them to conquer the land. Let the believer remember that all mere complaint is, in its essence, against God. Is He not caring rightly for His people and all their interests?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Pardon and government

The pardon was real, and the punishment still came. One writer gives the two names that keep this from being a contradiction.

But there is such a thing as government, as well as grace. This must never be forgotten; nor must these things ever be confused. The whole book of God shows the difference between grace and government. Perhaps no part of it shows this more strongly than the section now open before us. Grace will pardon. Grace will fill the earth with the blessed beams of divine glory. But notice the terrible turning of the wheels of government.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Taken at their own word

Earlier the people had cried that they wished they had died in the wilderness. God's reply hands them that wish.

Then God says, "I have pardoned, according to your word." But He adds, yet I will discipline them. And to the people He says, "as you have spoken in My hearing, so I will do to you." You will get the thing your wretched flesh desired, for you will die in this wilderness.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What shut them out

Maybe the timing was wrong and it was not yet the moment to enter. One writer tests that excuse against Scripture.

Hebrews 3 puts this beyond question: "So we see that they were unable to enter because of unbelief." Someone might say that the time had not come for Israel to enter the land of Canaan. The iniquity of the Amorites had not yet reached its peak. But this is not the reason why Israel refused to cross the Jordan. They knew nothing and thought nothing about the iniquity of the Amorites. Scripture is as plain as possible. They were unable to enter — not because of the iniquity of the Amorites, and not because the time had not come, but "because of unbelief." They ought to have entered. They were responsible to do so, and God judged them for not doing so. The way was open. The judgment of faith spoken by faithful Caleb was clear and without hesitation: "Let us go up at once and occupy it, for we are well able to overcome it." They were as able at that moment as they could ever be, because the One who had given them the land was the source of their power to enter it and possess it.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The plan the sentence could not cancel

Right after the sentence falls, God talks to these same people about the land He is giving them.

God goes on in His purpose as calmly and quietly as if there had never been the despising of the land. For He says, "When you come into the land you are to inhabit, which I am giving you." His purpose is as settled as if there had been no rebellion at all. He speaks in the calmness of His own purpose. After telling them of discipline, He says: You shall come into the land. It is settled with Me. I go on in the steadfastness of My own purposes.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Heard. Complaints aimed at leaders land on God. To complain is to call Him untrustworthy.

- Answered. God takes them at their word — what they said in His hearing becomes the shape of their future.

- Distinguished. Grace pardons; government still acts. Forgiveness of the sin did not erase its consequence.

- Diagnosed. Nothing outside them barred the door. The way was open, and unbelief alone kept them out.

- Unbroken. The land they refused is still given — to their children. Rebellion could not unsettle God's purpose.

Numbers 14:27 · Darby

How long [shall I bear] with this evil assembly, which murmur against me? I have heard the murmurings of the children of Israel, which they murmur against me.

Israel had heard the spies' report, wept all night, and talked of choosing a new leader to take them back to Egypt. God now speaks to Moses and Aaron, and twice He says where the complaining had landed: on Him.

The word behind "grumblings"

The complaint recorded here is not a one-off. One writer looks at the word itself, and at how often Israel used it:

The first word to look at is "murmurings." It translates a Greek word pronounced something like "gongusmos." You can almost hear the grumbling and muttering in the sound of it. The children of Israel murmured very often. It was one of their chief sins. They murmured at the Red Sea, at Marah, in the wilderness of Sin, at Rephidim, at the return of the spies, and against Aaron.

Modernised from G. C. WillisOriginal wording

The target of the complaint

Grumbling looks like it is about hard circumstances, or about the people in charge. One writer says it is neither:

Nothing is easier than for a murmuring spirit to get into the heart of a believer, or into an assembly. Think of the harm one murmuring believer does! That is why the command is so solemn: "nor grumble, as some of them did and were destroyed by the Destroyer" (1 Cor. 10:10)... When we examine it honestly, every bit of murmuring is not against the circumstances, nor against other believers. It always comes out of sheer unbelief towards God. That is the point.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Blaming God for the hardship

Israel now blamed God Himself for where they were. One writer sees the same trap set for believers today:

See what a wretched, wicked state of unbelief they had fallen into. They blamed the Lord Himself for their trials and difficulties. Even Christians can fall into this trap. We know it is the Lord who brought us up out of Egypt. So when trials come, our hearts are apt to say, "This comes of my being a Christian; the Lord has brought me into these difficulties." But if Canaan had been on their hearts, the children of Israel would have said, "Thank God that we are this far on our way to Canaan."

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Why they never entered

So why did that generation never get in? One writer rules out every reason but one:

It is very important to note that unbelief is what kept Israel out of Canaan... Scripture is as plain as possible: "they were unable to enter because of unbelief." It was not because of the iniquity of the Amorites. It was not because the time had not come. They ought to have entered. They were responsible to do so, and God judged them for not doing so. The way was open. Faithful Caleb spoke the judgment of faith, clear and without hesitation: "Let us go up at once and occupy it, for we are well able to overcome it." They were as able at that moment as they could ever be, since the One who had given them the land was the source of their strength to enter it and take it.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The limit of God's patience

God is not asking for information. He is naming a limit reached after long patience:

The Lord spoke to Moses because of Israel's rebellion: "How long will this people despise Me? And how long will they not believe in Me, in spite of all the signs that I have done among them?" God had been wonderfully patient with them. But how can patience continue in the face of united rebellion?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

God pardons this people, and still sentences them. Mackintosh keeps the two apart:

But there is such a thing as government, as well as grace. We must never forget this, and we must never confuse the two. The whole book of God shows the difference between grace and government. Perhaps no part of it shows it more strongly than the section now open before us. Grace will pardon, and grace will fill the earth with the blessed light of divine glory. But look at the terrible movement of the wheels of government.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What silences a murmur

God's answer to grumbling comes later in the same book, when Aaron's rod buds:

God says one striking thing about the budding of Aaron's rod: "I will completely take away from before Me the murmurings of the children of Israel." Let us think about what that means to God and to us. Because we have a great high priest, we can go through wilderness circumstances without a murmur on our lips. Instead of murmuring there can be thanksgiving and praise to God.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Heard. God says twice that He has heard, and twice that the grumbling was against Him. Complaint always travels past the people who hear it.

- Aimed. They blamed the Lord for the hardships He was leading them through. Faith would have thanked Him for how far the road had already come.

- Rooted. The grumbling was not a mood but unbelief, and unbelief, not the enemy, is why that generation never entered the land.

- Judged. God's patience reached its limit. He pardoned them, yet His government still ran its course, for grace and government are not the same thing.

- Cured. A great high priest takes the murmurings away, so that thanksgiving, not grumbling, becomes the sound of the wilderness road.

Numbers 14:28 · Darby

Say unto them, As surely as I live, saith Jehovah, if I do not do unto you as ye have spoken in mine ears!

Israel had just refused to enter the promised land. They told each other they would rather have died in the wilderness. God's reply here is not a new punishment invented for them — it is their own sentence, spoken back.

The oath behind the sentence

God's answer opens with "As I live." That is not temper. He swears by His own life, and one writer shows that this is the language of a binding oath. The New Testament records that oath too:

Yet this grievous sin brought penalties in the government of God. Verse 21 begins, "But as truly as I live …" which is the formula of an oath. The letter to the Hebrews records the unchangeable oath made to Abraham. It also records how He swore in His wrath, "They shall not enter my rest." The men who brought a bad report of the land would never enter it.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Their own words become their sentence

Earlier the people had cried that they wished they had died in the wilderness. God grants that wish, and stretches it over forty years:

God's answer was this: You say you wish you had died in the wilderness — you will die in the wilderness. "As for you, your dead bodies will fall in this wilderness, and your children will wander in the wilderness forty years..." God says, You will have to die, only it will take you forty years to do it.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Unbelief harvests what it plants

A settled principle is at work here, and it runs both ways. Faith and unbelief each reap what they sow:

Unbelief always justifies Satan and makes God a liar. Faith always justifies God and proves Satan a liar. It is always true that it will be done to you according to your faith. On the other hand, unbelief reaps as it sows. So it was with Israel: unhappy, because unbelieving.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Nothing but unbelief kept them out

Someone might argue that the timing was wrong, or the enemy too strong. Scripture removes every other explanation:

Scripture is as plain as possible. "They could not enter in" — not because of the sin of the Amorites, and not because the time had not come. It was simply "because of unbelief." They should have entered. They were responsible to do so, and God judged them for not doing so. The way was open... They were as able at that moment as they could ever be. The One who had given them the land was the source of their ability to enter it and take it.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Chastening that never cancels His purpose

God had already granted Moses' plea for pardon. Yet the sentence still fell. Forgiveness and government are two different things. The next chapter shows that the sentence did not touch God's plan:

God says, "I have pardoned according to your word," but I will still chastise them. And to the people He says, "what you have said in My hearing I will do to you." You will get the thing your wretched flesh desired, for you will die in this wilderness... The Lord does chastise in the way of government. But it is blessed to see that He never gives up His purpose, though He deals with the heart according to its unbelief. His purpose is as settled as if there had been no rebellion at all. He speaks in the calmness of His own purpose. After telling them of chastisement, He says: You will come into the land. It is settled with Me. I go on in the steadfastness of My own purposes.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The children they feared for are the ones brought in

The parents had said their children would become plunder. God turns that fear on its head:

God pronounced His sentence: "Your dead bodies will fall in this wilderness." Then He added, "But your little ones, who you said would become plunder, I will bring in, and they will know the land that you have rejected."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Fulfilled to the last man

Forty years later there is a second census. Its result shows that God's word is exact:

These males of twenty years and over numbered just over 600,000. Not one man from the earlier census was still alive, except Caleb and Joshua. We turn back to Numbers 14, read verses 20-32 again, and see how exactly God fulfils the word He has spoken. A solemn fact for the unbeliever, but one in which we who believe can heartily rejoice.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Sworn. "As I live" is an oath formula — what follows is not a mood but a settled word God binds Himself to.

- Spoken. They said they would rather die in the wilderness. God gave them what they asked for. Their own complaint became the wording of their sentence.

- Sown. Faith receives according to what it believes. Unbelief reaps just as surely what it sows.

- Spared. God brought their children into the land. These were the very children they said would be taken as plunder.

- Standing. The chastening ran its course for forty years. But God's purpose never moved. He deals with the heart and still keeps His plan.

Numbers 14:29 · Darby

In this wilderness shall your carcases fall; and all that were numbered of you, according to your whole number from twenty years old and upwards, who have murmured against me,

Israel stands at the edge of the land God promised them, and instead of going in they weep to go back. This verse is God's answer: every adult who complained against Him will die in the desert — forgiven, and still under discipline.

The Sentence Is Their Own Words Returned

Israel had said they wished they had died in the wilderness. God takes that sentence from their mouths and makes it their history. The children they claimed to be protecting are the ones He will bring in.

They despised their hope, and God takes it away. Not one above twenty should enter the land, except Caleb and Joshua. The little ones, for whom they pretended to care, God would bring in. In forty years that generation would waste away in the wilderness... They had charged God with bringing them to the land to die by the sword (verse 3). Their own fearful words now come back on them as judgment.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Death does not come at once. It comes slowly, on a measured timetable.

God's answer was this: You say you wish you had died in the wilderness — you shall die in the wilderness... Says God, You will have to die, only it will take you forty years to do it. You searched the land for forty days, and you will bear your guilt for a year for each of those days (Num. 14:34). They must know death.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

What "Numbered From Twenty Years Old" Means

The age is not picked at random. It was the line of adult responsibility, and the line at which a man was counted as a soldier.

The Israelites were numbered from twenty years old and upwards. That was the age at which they were able to go out to war, and were regarded as having grown up to manhood, and fit for the service of life (Num. 1:3; 14:29; Lev. 27:3).

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

So the register of soldiers becomes a register of graves. One writer traces the road that led there:

The whole sad story can be summed up like this. They rejected their unseen God by making a calf. They rejected their visible leader when they proposed to elect a captain. And as a result their bodies fell outside the land of promise.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Unbelief, Not Circumstances

Nothing outside them blocked the way. The obstacle was inside.

They ought to have entered. They were responsible to do so; and they were judged for not doing so. The way was open. Faithful Caleb spoke the judgment of faith clearly and without hesitation: "Let us go up at once and occupy it, for we are well able to overcome it." They were as able at that moment as they could ever be. The One who had given them the land was the source of their power to enter it and take it.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Pardoned, Yet Still Under Discipline

Earlier in this same chapter God had already forgiven them. Then comes this sentence. One writer holds the two together by separating forgiveness from God's dealings as ruler:

God may chasten us under His government for our good, or even as a testimony, as in David's case and Numbers 14:20. Yet between Himself and the guilty He may still forgive, and not impute the sin — He no longer holds him guilty.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Pilgrims Become Wanderers

The refusal did not just delay them. It changed the whole character of their life in the desert, and worse followed.

They are not pilgrims any more, but wanderers. They still have an aim, but it is only to stay alive for these forty years. It is so much so that the record of those years is not given to us: we have only a few chosen incidents, and they show a state of things that matches this beginning. Progress stopped does not stop decline. Decline ripens instead into the rebellion of Korah and his followers, which is the crowning sin of all.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Why This Verse Is Quoted To Us

Scripture later turns this moment into a warning for Christ's people.

One thing will hinder, and hinder fatally and for ever if it works out its bitter results: the sin of unbelief. So the letter to the Hebrews keeps this warning from Israel's history before its readers. Unbelief lost their fathers the land. Their bodies fell in the wilderness. Anyone who keeps giving way to unbelief will be shut out for ever from being a fellow or companion of Christ, and from entering the rest that remains.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Words — What they said in complaint became what God decreed; their own charge against Him came back on them.

- Counted — Those counted "from twenty years old" were the grown men, fit to go to war. The army list became the death list.

- Cause — Nothing outside stopped them. The way was open, and the One who gave the land was their strength to take it. Unbelief alone shut the door.

- Pardon — Forgiveness and discipline are not rivals. God may forgive the guilt and still discipline the guilty.

- Wandering — Refusing to go forward does not hold a people still. It turns pilgrims into wanderers, and decline ripens into open rebellion.

Numbers 14:30 · Darby

shall in no wise come into the land, concerning which I have lifted up my hand to make you dwell in it; save Caleb the son of Jephunneh, and Joshua the son of Nun.

Israel stands at the edge of the land God swore to give them. Then the sentence falls: the generation that refused to go in will not go in. Only two men are spared. Why them — and what happened to God's promise?

Unbelief, not circumstances

Commentators point to one cause. Nothing outside Israel closed the land to them. Their own refusal did.

It is of the greatest importance to note here that it was unbelief that kept Israel out of Canaan on this occasion. The inspired commentary in Hebrews 3 puts this beyond all question: "So we see that they were unable to enter because of unbelief." Some might say that the time had not come for Israel to enter the land of Canaan. But that is not why Israel refused to cross the Jordan. They knew nothing and thought nothing about such reasons. Scripture is as plain as possible: they were unable to enter — simply "because of unbelief." They ought to have entered. They were responsible to do so, and they were judged for not doing so. The way was open. Faithful Caleb spoke the judgment of faith, clear and certain: "Let us go up at once and occupy it, for we are well able to overcome it." They were as able at that moment as they could ever be. The One who had given them the land was the source of their strength to enter it and take it.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Pardoned, yet still governed

Moses had already won pardon for the nation. Yet the God who pardons also governs.

Notice how, at the very moment when the Lord pronounces judgment, He acts according to the exact word to which Moses had tied Him in his faith. Even if his faith did not rise to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and their absolute, unconditional promises, it went back to the governmental pledge of the Lord. To this pledge the Lord holds. So that generation was dealt with and purged away according to the terms of His own proclamation. He would hold fast His mercy, but He would by no means clear the guilty. There was pardon, otherwise Israel would never have gone into the land. Yet He would not clear the guilty, and so that generation fell. In this way God kept His character intact, and His hand made good what His mouth had spoken.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why Caleb's name is spoken

God Himself gives the reason for the two exceptions.

"My servant Caleb," said the Lord, "because he has a different spirit and has followed me fully, I will bring into the land into which he went, and his descendants shall possess it." This shows how welcome Caleb's faithful testimony was to the Lord's heart. He also showed the spirit of devoted discipleship in an evil day. He followed fully, and this became his mark — a mark Caleb himself was glad to accept and recall.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The children they gave up for lost

The people had argued that going in would cost them their little ones. God's answer turns their fear inside out.

In this evil state of things Israel had taunted their children — or rather taunted God about them — as if they faced certain death. Unbelief had fastened on the little ones. Could children like these cross the desert safely and enter the land against such enemies? Unbelief said no. The very people who gave way to such unbelieving doubt of the Lord's care reaped the consequences themselves. The children they thought could never survive the desert were the only ones God brought in. With them went the two men who defended God and held fast to His word: Caleb and Joshua.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

God's plan carries on regardless

The sentence closes the door on a generation, but not on God's purpose. The next chapter shows it.

If you go to Numbers 15, you get the security of God's purpose beautifully set out. In Numbers 14 He says their bodies will fall in the wilderness. He pronounces judgment on the whole nation, apart from two people. Then chapter 15: "The Lord spoke to Moses, saying, Speak to the people of Israel and say to them, When you come into the land," do this and that, and He goes on with His own intentions just as calmly as if nothing in chapter 14 had happened.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Checked at the later census

The nation was counted again later. That count shows whether God's word held.

One striking fact emerges. Among all these men of twenty and over, numbering just over 600,000, not one was left alive who had been in the earlier census, except Caleb and Joshua. We turn back to Numbers 14 and read verses 20-32 again, and we see with what complete exactness God fulfils the word He has spoken. A solemn fact for the unbeliever, but one in which we who believe can heartily rejoice.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. Unbelief alone shut them out. The way was open, and God held them responsible for refusing it.

- Sentence. Mercy pardoned the nation, but government ran its course. God holds fast His mercy and yet by no means clears the guilty.

- Exception. Two names survive the sentence because one spirit marked them — following the Lord fully.

- Reversal. The little ones they claimed to protect were the very ones God brought in. Unbelief lost what it tried to keep safe.

- Outcome. God's purpose never wavered. The next chapter says "when you come into the land" as if nothing had happened — and the later count proved His word exact.

Numbers 14:31 · Darby

But your little ones, of whom ye said they should be a prey, them will I bring in, and they shall know the land that ye have despised.

God answers the spies' report in two parts. He sentences the older generation to die in the desert, and He promises to bring in the very children they had given up for lost.

Taken at their own word

God answers the people in their own words. Unbelief gets what it expects:

Unbelief always justifies Satan and makes God a liar. Faith always justifies God and proves Satan a liar. It is always true that according to your faith it will be done to you. And unbelief, on the other hand, reaps as it sows. That is how it was with Israel — unhappy, because unbelieving.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The sentence was not arbitrary. It gave them what they had asked for:

But now God Himself steps in. They will be dealt with according to their faith; they shall perish in the wilderness, according to their wish.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The children they thought could not survive

They were sure the weak and the small could never survive the journey. God overturned that fear:

Unbelief had fastened on the little ones. It seemed pointless to expect that such as they could pass safely through the desert and enter the land in the face of the enemy. The very people who gave way to such unbelieving doubt of the Lord's care reaped the consequences themselves. And the children, who they thought could never survive the horrors of the wilderness, were the only ones brought in, along with the two men who defended God and held fast to His word — Caleb and Joshua.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Concern that was not love

Israel spoke as though they were shielding their families. One writer weighs what that concern was worth:

Therefore, their concern for their little ones was not love at all. The best way we can love our children is by giving them a good example by obeying the Lord. God cared far more for the children than they did.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What "despised" actually means

The land was never in doubt — God had promised it. To despise it is to hold a sure gift cheaply, and the same thing happens with the glory set before believers now:

Suppose a friend gave me something as a great treasure. I am sure it is mine, yet I seldom look at it and seldom care to think about it. That would prove something. Not that I doubted it was mine, but that I despised the thing and placed no value on it. This is very often how we treat the heavenly glory that belongs to us. We do not question the truth of the promises. But when our souls are not dwelling on the glory before us and delighting in it, there is a "despising of the pleasant land."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Counting on God to bring children in, not just out

One writer makes this a test for parents today. Words are not enough; conduct shows what we really believe:

Suppose I say I am counting on God to bring my children to Canaan, while all the time I am educating them for Egypt. That is a deadly delusion. My conduct proves my profession to be a lie. And I should not be surprised if God, in His righteous dealings, lets me be filled with the fruit of my own doings.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Still, the children paid a price for their parents' unbelief. They were brought in, but "not without undergoing, in their march, the consequences of the unbelief of the mass" (J. N. Darby).

The word carried out to the letter

A later count of the people put this sentence to the test:

These males of twenty years and over numbered just over 600,000. Of all who had been counted in the earlier census, not one was left alive except Caleb and Joshua. Turn back to Numbers 14 and read verses 20-32 again. There you see with what absolute exactness God fulfils the word He has spoken. It is a solemn fact for the unbeliever, but one in which we who believe can rejoice with all our hearts.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Words: What they spoke in unbelief became their sentence — unbelief reaps what it sows.

- Fear: The children they called defenceless were the very ones God kept safe and brought in.

- Love: Talk is not love. We love our children by obeying God — He cared for them more than their parents did.

- Despising: A gift you are sure of, but seldom think about, is a gift you despise — the land then, the coming glory now.

- Fulfilment: Every word came true. The God who kept this sentence to the letter keeps His promises the same way.

Numbers 14:32 · Darby

And as to you, your carcases shall fall in this wilderness.

At Kadesh God sentences the very people He rescued from Egypt: the generation that refused to enter Canaan will die in the desert. The words single them out — "as for you" — and commentators ask what closed the land, why the children fared differently, and what these graves warn.

Their Own Words Returned to Them

The people had said they wished they had died in the wilderness. One writer notes that God grants the wish — over forty years:

God's answer was this: You say you wish you had died in the wilderness — you shall die in the wilderness… God says, You will have to die, only it will take you forty years to do it… They had to know death.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The One Cause

It is tempting to blame the timing rather than the people. One commentator rules that out:

It is of the greatest importance to note here that it was unbelief that kept Israel out of Canaan on this occasion… Someone might say that the time for Israel to enter Canaan had not yet come. The iniquity of the Amorites had not yet reached its height. But this is not the reason why Israel refused to cross the Jordan. They knew nothing and thought nothing about the iniquity of the Amorites. Scripture is as plain as possible: "they were unable to enter" — not because of the iniquity of the Amorites, not because the time had not come — but simply "because of unbelief." They ought to have entered. They were responsible to do so, and they were judged for not doing so. The way was open.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Not Backsliding, but No Faith at All

The distinction matters for how the story is applied. According to one writer, these were not people who had faith and then lost their blessing:

Psalm 95 refers to this moment, and Hebrews 3 and 4 quote that psalm. They press the point home: unbelief lay at the root of it all. "So we see that they were unable to enter because of unbelief." We need to note this. It shows their case was not a loss of blessing through backsliding. They had entered, by profession only, into a calling they never had faith for at all. This is the point of the solemn warnings that have so large a place in the Epistle to the Hebrews.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The Children Go In

The sentence does not fall on everyone. One writer notes that the children still had to live through the effects of their parents' unbelief:

God will deal with them according to their faith. They will die in the wilderness, just as they wished. Only the faithful and the children will enter the land. Even they must bear, as they march, the consequences of the unbelief of the mass. However, other hopes and other consolations will be their portion.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Carried Out to the Letter

Years later, Israel is counted again. One writer reads the result as proof that God does what He says:

One striking fact emerges at the end of the chapter. These males of twenty years and over numbered just over 600,000. Among them, not one man from the earlier census was still alive, except Caleb and Joshua. Turn back to Numbers 14, read verses 20-32 again, and you see how exactly God fulfils the word He has spoken. A solemn fact for the unbeliever, but one in which we who believe can heartily rejoice.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A Warning to the Professing

One writer turns these graves into a warning for anyone who only professes:

Take care: many profess, and many fall by the way and never get in at all. Israel all came out of Egypt, but they fell in the wilderness, and never reached the goal. There is no question raised here about a true soul going in. "We who have believed enter that rest" — no doubt about that; but you should remember Israel. They heard the report from the spies — the gospel of the rest of Canaan in their day — and never got in. The word preached by the spies did not profit them, because it lacked the divine mixture of faith: "it was not mixed with faith in them that heard it." "They were unable to enter because of unbelief."

Modernised from F G PattersonOriginal wording

Summary

- Wish granted — They said they wished they had died in the desert. God takes them at their word and gives them forty years to do it.

- One cause — Neither God's timing nor the state of the Amorites shut them out. Unbelief did. The way was open, and they were responsible to take it.

- Not a lapse — They did not lose a blessing once held by faith. They professed a calling they never believed. Hebrews makes that a warning.

- Next generation — Only the faithful and the children enter the land. First they must live out the consequences of their parents' unbelief.

- Word kept — The later census leaves no one of that generation alive but Caleb and Joshua. God keeps His word exactly: solemn for the unbeliever, a joy for faith.

Numbers 14:33 · Darby

And your children shall wander in the wilderness forty years, and bear your whoredoms, until your carcases be wasted in the wilderness.

A generation stood at the edge of the land they had been promised, refused to go in, and God sent them back. Verse 33 spells out the cost. Their own lives were forfeit. Their sons and daughters would also spend forty years in the desert, carrying the weight of a choice that was never theirs.

A sentence in their own words

The people had cried that it would have been better to die in the wilderness. God's answer takes that complaint and hands it back to them as a verdict.

God's answer was this: You say you wish you had died in the wilderness — you shall die in the wilderness. "As for you, your dead bodies shall fall in this wilderness, and your children shall be shepherds in the wilderness forty years and shall suffer for your faithlessness." God says: you will have to die, only it will take you forty years to do it. They must know death.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Older translations read that the children would "wander in the wilderness" and "bear your whoredoms." The ESV has them "be shepherds in the wilderness" and "suffer for your faithlessness."

Unbelief, not circumstances

Some might say the timing was wrong, or that the Amorites' guilt was not yet full. One commentator rejects that.

It is of the greatest importance to note here that it was unbelief that kept Israel out of Canaan... They knew nothing and thought nothing about the iniquity of the Amorites. Scripture is as plain as possible: "They could not enter in" — not because of the iniquity of the Amorites; not because the time had not come — but simply "because of unbelief." They ought to have entered. They were responsible to do so; and they were judged for not doing so. The way was open.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The same writer traces the collapse to its root: they lost sight of the land itself. Instead of going on "in simple dependence upon His omnipotent arm, they provoked Him by their unbelief, despised the pleasant land, and were compelled to turn back again into that great and terrible wilderness."

What "bear" means here

What does it mean to "bear" a sin? The law uses the word with one settled sense.

If you want to see the connection of bearing sin in Isaiah 53:12 with the punishment due to it, you have only to compare Leviticus 5:1, 17; ch. 17:16; ch. 20:19; ch. 24:15; Numbers 5:31; ch. 9:13; ch. 14:34; ch. 30:15. In all of them you will see it means coming under all the consequences of the sin committed, and being answerable for it before God. So it is spoken of particular sins, as idolatry, Numbers 14:33.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The cost to the children

The parents had said their little ones would become plunder. Those same children are the ones God keeps, though the forty years fall on them too.

In them, those who had wanted to die in the wilderness would die there. Their little ones, whom they had mourned over as certain to fall to the enemy, would be brought into the land. Meanwhile those children would bear the consequences of their fathers' sin, as was needful for the children of such fathers: for each day of fruitless search, a year in the wilderness. Thank God, however: because He Himself appointed these years, we cannot call them fruitless. Shall we say that of any of the Lord's ways with us here? No — the more painful, the more profitable. Divine love could inflict no useless pain, just as it cannot withhold the pain that profits.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The believing few did not escape the march.

God will deal with them according to their faith. They shall perish in the wilderness, just as they wished. He will bring only the faithful ones and the children into the land. Even those must undergo, on their march, the consequences of the unbelief of the mass. However, other hopes and other consolations will be their portion.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

God in the wilderness with them

The forty years were self-inflicted. God did not respond by withdrawing.

If Israel brings a pilgrimage of forty years upon themselves, the Lord will be in the wilderness with them for forty years... The God of the camp is the Guide and Companion of the camp. He may be grieved, and He may have to show His displeasure, but He never leaves them. His arm is not shortened, nor is His ear heavy.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — Unbelief kept them out, not God's timing and not the Amorites. The way was open, and God judged them for refusing it.

- Sentence — They had said they wished to die in the wilderness. God made their own words the terms of their punishment.

- Bearing — To "bear" a sin means coming under all its consequences. It means answering for it before God.

- Reach — The cost spread past the guilty. Their children and the faithful few marched the same desert.

- Result — God appointed the years, so none of them were wasted. He stayed in the wilderness the whole forty with them.

Numbers 14:34 · Darby

After the number of the days in which ye have searched out the land, forty days, each day for a year shall ye bear your iniquities forty years, and ye shall know mine estrangement [from you].

Israel stood at the border of Canaan, searched the land for forty days, then refused to go in. God's sentence matches the sin — a year of wandering for each day of searching — and it ends with a hard word: they will know His displeasure.

Taken at Their Own Word

The forty years were not an arbitrary number. The people had said aloud that they wished they had died in the desert, and God simply granted the request — slowly.

God's answer was this: You say you wish you had died in the wilderness — you shall die in the wilderness... Says God, You will have to die, only it will take you forty years to do it. They must know death.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

God then deals with them by the measure of their own faith.

But now God Himself steps in. They will be dealt with according to their faith; they shall perish in the wilderness, according to their wish. Only the faithful and the children will be brought into the land. But on their march they must still go through the consequences of the unbelief of the crowd.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A Year for Every Day

The wandering was measured out, a year for each day. One writer then asks a harder question: were those years wasted?

The children they had mourned over, as certain to fall to the enemy, would be brought into the land. Meanwhile they would bear the consequences of their fathers' sin, as was needful for the children of such fathers: for each day of fruitless search, a year in the wilderness. Thank God, however, that because God appointed these years, we cannot call them fruitless. Shall we say so at last of any of the Lord's ways with us here? No — the more painful, the more profitable. Divine love could inflict no useless pain, just as it cannot withhold the pain that profits.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

"You Shall Know My Displeasure"

Older translations render the closing phrase "you shall know my breach of promise." One writer explains what that phrase means.

"My breach of promise": "alienation" or withdrawal from something; hence, figuratively, "enmity."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

They had already accused God of doing that very thing. Their charge now comes back on them as the sentence.

They despised their hope, and it is taken away. Not one over twenty would enter the land, except Caleb and Joshua. The little ones, whom they pretended to care about, God would bring in. In forty years that generation would waste away in the wilderness. So they would know God's breach of promise. They had charged God with bringing them to the land to die by the sword (v. 3). Now their own dreadful words come back on them as judgment.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Long Road for the Faithful

Caleb and Joshua had not shared the unbelief. They still shared the forty years.

Caleb and Joshua had to go the long way round too. They had not joined the people in the evil. But the unbelief of the others had made the march painful and hard, and they had to go along with the people and bear part of it. This is what we must make up our minds to. If the Church has failed, we must make up our minds to accompany it in its course of sorrow, though not in its course of sin.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

A Day for a Year in Prophecy

Commentators differ over whether this verse sets a rule for reading prophetic time. Some treat it as a precedent in Scripture for counting a prophetic day as a year.

But allow a year to pass for each day; that is, 483 years from the command to rebuild Jerusalem... For this plan of allowing a year for a day we have a precedent in Scripture. (See Numbers 14:34.)

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Others think this one case cannot carry that much weight.

God dealt with Israel in the desert to repay their sin. That is plainly a weak basis for interpreting symbolic prophecies given many centuries later.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Not the Last Word

The sentence ends a chapter, but not the story.

But even after all this, the very next chapter begins, "When you come into the land." All their sin does not change it: they are looked at as if they were already there.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Their word. They said they wished to die in the desert; God gave them just that, stretched over forty years.

- Their measure. Forty days of faithless searching set the scale: a year of wandering for each day.

- Their charge. They accused God of leading them out to die. His words "you shall know my displeasure" hand that accusation back as judgment.

- Their company. Caleb and Joshua bore the long march too — sharing the sorrow of failure without sharing the sin.

- Their God. God appointed the wandering in love, not as useless pain, and the next chapter still says, "When you come into the land."

Numbers 14:35 · Darby

I Jehovah have spoken; I will surely do it unto all this evil assembly which have gathered together against me! in this wilderness they shall be consumed, and there they shall die.

At Kadesh the people refused to go into the land, and said they wished they had died in the desert. Verse 35 is God's answer — a sworn sentence, spoken in His own name, that the whole assembly will die in that wilderness, just as they had said.

The charge: gathered against God

The verse does not say the people gathered against Moses or against the spies. One commentator fixes on that detail as the reason for the sentence, and on God's own word as the guarantee that it would happen.

Verse 35 stresses God's displeasure. He speaks of Israel gathering together against Him. For that reason He would bring on them the terrible discipline of dying in the wilderness. He had spoken, and He would carry out this unsparing sentence.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Unbelief, not bad timing

Some say the time was not right for Israel to enter. Scripture gives a different reason, and one the people had to answer for.

Someone might say the time had not come for Israel to enter the land of Canaan. The sin of the Amorites had not yet reached its highest point. But that is not why Israel refused to cross the Jordan... Scripture is as plain as possible. They "were unable to enter" — not because of the sin of the Amorites, and not because the time had not come, but simply "because of unbelief." They ought to have entered. It was their responsibility, and God judged them for not doing it.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Taken at their word

Earlier in the chapter the people had wished aloud that they had died in the desert. The sentence hands them the very thing they asked for, stretched out over forty years.

God's answer was this: You say you wish you had died in the wilderness — you will die in the wilderness... God says, You will have to die. Only it will take you forty years to do it: "According to the number of the days in which you spied out the land, forty days, a year for each day, you shall bear your iniquity forty years" (Num. 14:34). They must know death.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Pardoned, yet still judged

Pardon and consequences are not the same thing. One commentator shows how God can forgive a sin and still let His government run its course.

Grace can pardon — freely, fully, and forever. But the wheels of God's government roll on, with crushing power and awful seriousness. Grace pardoned Adam's sin. Government still drove him out of Eden, to earn a living by the sweat of his brow, among the thorns and thistles of a cursed earth. Grace pardoned David's sin; but the sword of government hung over his house to the end.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Pilgrims turned into wanderers

The forty years were not just a delay. They changed what the nation's life in the desert meant.

They are not pilgrims any more, but wanderers. They are not without an aim, yet their aim is only to keep themselves alive for these forty years. So much so, that we are not given the record of them... Stopping their progress does not stop their decline. Instead the decline ripens into the rebellion of Korah and his company, the crowning sin of all.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

The long road for Caleb and Joshua

The sentence spared Caleb and Joshua. The long detour did not. That has a practical edge for anyone who stands apart from a failure they did not cause.

Caleb and Joshua must go the long way round, too. They had not joined the people in their evil. But the march was painful and hard, and the unbelief of the others had caused it. They still have to go along with the people, and bear their share of it. This is what we must make up our minds to. If the Church has failed, we must make up our minds to accompany it in its course of sorrow, though not in its course of sin.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The promise still stands

The chapter ends in death, but the next chapter opens as though the refusal had never happened.

In Numbers 14 He says their dead bodies shall fall in the wilderness. He pronounces judgment on the whole nation, except two persons... Then in chapter 15 we read, "The LORD spoke to Moses, saying, Speak to the people of Israel and say to them, When you come into the land," and so on. God goes on with His own intentions, as calmly as if nothing in chapter 14 had happened.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — Unbelief shut that generation out, not bad timing. They were responsible to go up, and God judged them for refusing.

- Charge — God calls them an assembly gathered against Himself, and that is the ground He gives for the sentence.

- Consequence — They get the very death they had wished for, one year for each day the spies searched the land.

- Cost — Pardon is real, yet God's government still runs its course. Pilgrims became wanderers, and even the two believers walked the long road.

- Continuity — The sentence fell on one generation, not on the promise. God moves straight on to "when you come into the land."