And Jehovah spoke to Moses in the wilderness of Sinai in the tent of meeting, on the first of the second month, in the second year after their departure from the land of Egypt, saying,
The book of Numbers opens with a date, a place, and a voice: God speaking to Moses in the tent of meeting, in the second year after Israel left Egypt. That one verse sets up the whole book — where these people are, whose they are, and why God counts them.
The atmosphere changes the moment this book begins. One writer walks back through the earlier books to show where this one starts:
Here we find ourselves at once "in the wilderness," where the only ones counted are those "able to go to war." In Genesis the descendants of Israel were not yet born; they were still in their father Abraham. In Exodus they were in the brickyards of Egypt. In Leviticus they were gathered round the tent of meeting. In Numbers we see them in the wilderness… And as soon as we open the book of Numbers, we read of men of war, of armies, of standards, of camps, and of trumpets sounding the alarm.
The change of place brings a change of subject:
In the book of Numbers the Spirit of God has the desert before Him, rather than the sanctuary. We will still find the sanctuary, of course. But the question here is not about drawing near to God, so far as that was possible then. It is about how the people of God walk on the earth.
One small word changes between the two books. A writer follows it forward to how God speaks now, quoting an older translation of Hebrews 1:2 that reads "in His Son":
In Leviticus 1:1 we read of God speaking out of the tabernacle, and in Numbers 1:1 of His speaking in it. But in these last days He has not only spoken to us by His Son but "in His Son" (Hebrews 1:2). The Son of God has spoken "the truth" to us, but He is Himself the truth.
The verse names a place and an exit:
Notice these two little words — in the wilderness, out of Egypt. There is no wilderness in Egypt, and we cannot have Egypt in the wilderness. It is pointless to talk about being in the wilderness unless we are out of Egypt in heart… The wilderness is a place where there is no path, and the desert is a place where there is no provision. Scripture uses both terms of the wilderness of Sinai, and they show us that we depend on God alone.
This date is not the earliest one in the book. Chapter 9 carries an earlier one, and the order matters:
God gave Moses the instructions about the Passover, which fill the first half of chapter 9, at the beginning of the first month of the second year. That is about a month before the date we have been looking at… The Passover marked the basis on which the redemption of the people rested. That came first, and the numbering of the people followed. So the picture makes one fact stand out: God only numbers and counts as His those who have been redeemed.
A census can spring from pride. This one springs from ownership:
This was an expression of His rights as Lord of Israel. He had the right to take their number, for they were all His own. If He had no right to them, and no prospects in them, He would not have counted them. The same divine right is spoken of in another part of His dominions: "He determines the number of the stars; He gives to all of them their names." That is the expression of His sovereignty among the heavenly hosts (Psalm 147:4).
Being counted for heaven is easy to treasure. Being counted for the road is what this opening presses:
We can all understand the sweetness of being numbered for heaven, and that is where the heart of most people turns. But even those who take the greatest comfort in the counsels of God that secure them for eternity easily forget something else. The Lord takes a present interest in all our movements, ways, conflicts, and trials. This is the first thing with which the book opens.
Those counted had to prove their family line. There was a reason for that:
They had to show their family line because of the mixed crowd of people who had joined themselves to the people of God… So only those who could prove by their family line that they belonged among the people of God were counted, and only they could go to war. Our family line, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God.
One writer takes that warfare wider: "all of His saints are fitted for spiritual warfare, women and young and old too" (Leslie M. Grant).
- Place — The verse sets us in the wilderness. The book that follows is not about coming near to God, but about how His people walk on the earth.
- Voice — God speaks in the tent, not just out of it. The last word is a Son who is Himself the truth He speaks.
- Order — The Passover a month earlier, the census after. God counts as His only those who have been redeemed.
- Title — He numbers Israel as He numbers the stars, because they belong to Him — and He gives each one its name.
- Present care — Being counted for heaven comforts us. This opening adds that He takes an interest in every step, conflict and trial on the way.
Take the sum of the whole assembly of the children of Israel, after their families, according to their fathers' houses, by the number of the names, every male, according to their polls;
God has brought Israel out of Egypt, given them the law, and taught them how to worship. Now He tells Moses to count them — which raises real questions: who has the right to take such a count, and why are people listed by family, by name, and one head at a time?
The count opens a book set in the wilderness. One writer lines up the books of Moses. Each one finds Israel in a different place, and the mood changes as soon as Numbers begins:
Here we find ourselves at once "in the wilderness," where the only ones counted are those "able to go to war." The difference stands out. In Genesis the seed of Israel was still unborn, in their father Abraham. In Exodus they were making bricks in Egypt. In Leviticus they gathered around the tent of meeting. In Numbers we see them in the wilderness... But as soon as we open the book of Numbers, we read of men of war, of armies, of standards, of camps, and trumpets sounding the alarm.
A census is an owner's act. So why may God take this one? Because of who Israel belong to:
This showed His rights as Lord of Israel. He had the right to count them, because they were all His own. If He had no right to them, and no purposes for them, He would not have counted their total. The same is said of His divine title in another part of His realm: "He determines the number of the stars; He gives to all of them their names." That is how He shows His sovereignty among the armies of heaven. (Psalm 147:4.)
The same act, done by the wrong man for the wrong reason, brought disaster:
After Israel left Egypt, over a year passed before this census took place. When David decided to number the people (2 Sam. 24:2-10), his motive was pride in ruling a great nation, and 70,000 people died as a result. But God's census in Numbers shows His own deep interest in each one of His people Israel — an interest that is just as real for His saints today.
Nobody made the list just by standing in the camp. Each man had to show where he came from, and Israel's history explains why:
They had to show their family line, and only those who could do it had a place in this muster and could be soldiers. They needed that proof because of the mixed multitude of outsiders who had joined themselves to the people of God. "A mixed multitude also went up with them" (Exod. 12:38)... Our own family line, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God.
Older translations render "head by head" as "by their polls." The word behind it is plain:
The skull or head, but used to mean a person. Num. 1:2-22.
The count reaches every man, one at a time. That carries a comfort we are slow to take:
We can all understand how sweet it is to be counted for heaven, and that is where most hearts turn. But even those who take the greatest comfort in God's purposes, which secure them for eternity, easily forget the interest the Lord takes right now in all our movements, ways, conflicts, and trials. This is the first thing the book opens with.
God had counted Israel before, and each count had its own purpose. One writer sets the first two side by side:
The aim of the first numbering (Ex. 38:25-27) was to collect the silver... so that count was made for the Lord, with the worship of Him in view. The second numbering (Num. 1:2-3) came when Israel was about to fight the enemy, and its aim was to find how many men were able to go to war. This was according to God. Every Israelite from twenty years old and upward needed to understand his own responsibility in the battles of the Lord.
Only the men were counted. One writer carries the point across to today:
The difference is that in Israel only the males over 20 years of age were numbered... Today all of His saints are fitted for spiritual warfare, women and young and old too.
- Owned. God counts Israel because Israel is His. The census is a claim of ownership, like the God who numbers the stars and names every one.
- Named. What He owns He knows one by one — "head by head," each man a person, not a statistic.
- Placed. Each name sits inside a clan and a father's house. Belonging to the crowd is not enough.
- Armed. The list is an army roll. This book opens with armies and trumpets, not with worship at the sanctuary.
- Accountable. Being counted meant personal responsibility in the Lord's battles. A count taken out of pride, as David's was, brought judgment instead.
from twenty years and upward, all that go forth to military service in Israel ye shall number them according to their hosts, thou and Aaron.
This command counts Israel's fighting men and sets the tone for the whole book. The road ahead is a march that is also a campaign. Why did God want only men from twenty upward, and why does a book of journeys open with a muster roll?
Scripture records more than one counting of Israel, and each one had a different purpose. One writer sets this census beside the others to show what makes it distinct:
The first numbering (Exodus 38:25-27) was to gather the silver, a bekah per man. That silver was meant to form the bases of the pillars of the tabernacle. So that numbering was done for the Lord and with a view to worshipping Him. The second numbering (Num. 1:2-3) came when Israel was about to fight the enemy. It was meant to count the men able to go to war. This was according to God. Every Israelite from twenty years old and upward needed to understand his own responsibility in the battles of the Lord.
The tone of the whole book changes at this point, and the change is deliberate.
Here we find ourselves at once "in the wilderness." Only those who are "able to go to war" are counted. This stands out clearly. In Genesis the seed of Israel were in the loins of their father Abraham. In Exodus they were in the brick-kilns of Egypt. In Leviticus they were gathered round the tent of meeting. In Numbers they are seen in the wilderness... But as soon as we open the book of Numbers, we read of men of war, armies, standards, camps, and trumpets sounding the alarm.
God's plan for the road ahead is why they had to be ready:
We must remember that God's plan was to carry them straight into the land of promise. But the route was not "by way of the land of the Philistines, although that was near" (Ex. 13:17). The people had seen no war from their very beginning. They were not to face it within a few days of their rescue, yet they had to be ready for it. Indeed Amalek attacked them within a couple of months and came under God's undying curse for doing so.
Twenty marked the point at which a man was counted grown:
The Israelites were numbered from twenty years old and upwards. That was the age at which they were able to go out to war. It was also the age at which they were regarded as having grown up to manhood and fit for the service of life (Num. 1:3; 14:29; Lev. 27:3).
Verse 2 tells Moses to register the men by clan and family line. That rule had a reason:
They had to declare their family line. Only those who could do that had a place in this muster and could be warriors. Showing their family line was necessary because of the mixed multitude that had joined themselves to the people of God... What gives us a place among the people of God is the new birth, by which we become children of God. Our calling is to a spiritual war. It is not against flesh and blood, but against the devil and his schemes and the wicked spirits (Eph. 6:11-12).
Who orders a count, and why, makes all the difference.
In David's time, when he decided to number the people (2 Sam. 24:2-10), his motives were pride in reigning over a great nation, and this resulted in the death of 70,000 people. But God's census in Numbers shows His own deep interest in each one of His people Israel. That interest is just as true of His saints today.
That interest runs wider than the battlefield.
The main object in the early chapters is a count of the males who were fit for war. But the numbering goes beyond this. There are other aims than war and warlike purposes. Whatever the aim may be in different parts of the book, God impresses one thing on us: the care and interest He takes in everyone who belongs to Him.
The list held only men fit to fight. What does that ask of us?
Surely the lesson is that we are to long to be men. Of course it is not now a question of sex in this matter; a sister may be a man of God (2 John 10). And in Romans 16, where we get a list of God's mighty men (corresponding to the mighty men of David's army, 2 Sam. 23), we find that a large number of them are women. So it is not a matter of sex, but of spiritual strength and growth. Every child of God should desire to grow and be strong for the Lord, for it is written, "Be watchful, stand firm in the faith, act like men, be strong."
- Counted — God orders this census Himself. Unlike David's proud count, it shows His interest in every person who belongs to Him.
- Named — Each man had to name his family and father's house. That marked off true Israelites from the mixed crowd who came out of Egypt with them.
- Aged — Twenty was the mark of full growth, the point at which a man was fit for war and for the service of life.
- Armed — Numbers opens with armies, standards and trumpets. God meant to bring Israel into the land, and they had to be ready to fight.
- Answerable — Each man had to grasp his own responsibility in the Lord's battles. Today the test is not gender but spiritual strength and growth.
And with you there shall be a man for every tribe, a man who is the head of his father's house.
Numbers opens with God ordering a count of Israel. Before the count begins, He appoints twelve men — one from each tribe — to stand with Moses. Two questions follow. Why does God count His people at all? And why must each tribe have its own head in the work?
The count is not paperwork. It is God claiming what belongs to Him.
The book opens with His command to Moses to number the tribes, and it is done with great exactness and care... This was an expression of His rights as Lord of Israel. He had title to take their number, for they were all His own. If He had no right to them, and no prospects in them, He would not have counted their sum. The same is said of His divine title in another part of His realm: "He determines the number of the stars; He gives to all of them their names." This is the expression of His sovereignty over the armies of heaven. (Psalm 147:4)
The same interest holds today, and it comes with a call to fight:
But God's census in Numbers shows His own vital interest in each one of His people Israel, and that interest is just as real for His saints today... Today all of His saints are fitted for spiritual warfare — women too, and the young and the old — though some are less active than others because of age. Yet the lesson is also clear for us. To take part in practical conflict we need maturity, or full age, which comes through knowing and growing in the word of God.
Verse 4 puts a man from each tribe beside Moses. Who picked them?
Our chapter records that first of all God selected a "head" or prince for each tribe. The choice was not left to the people, or even to Moses. The word to him was, "These are the names of the men who shall assist you…" God chose His own leader for each tribe, and this reminds us that God today chooses His own servants and leaders. He does not put the matter to a popular vote.
The verse ties each man to "the house of his fathers." That family order shaped the whole army:
In this muster the organization used is the natural one, by families or "fathers' houses"... The difference between the two is this: the word for "family" implies being under authority, while "father's house" shows that this authority rests on the natural relationship. Such is God's relationship to His people, and the father is the picture of it. Here rule should be easy, and obedience a joy. So they were linked together in family groups in God's army, brother fighting beside brother — an army so closely joined that you would think it could not be beaten.
So why record twelve names and nothing else about the men?
Of these men nothing is recorded but their own names and their fathers' names. For that very reason, if there could be any doubt otherwise, we can be sure their names are meant to speak to us. All these Bible names should speak, and their link with the tribes they represent must matter. There must be a reason why Elizur, and not Shelumiel or Nahshon, is prince of Reuben. We find that reason by looking into Reuben's history.
Reuben shows how that works:
The leader of the tribe of Reuben was Elizur the son of Shedeur. Elizur means "God is a Rock." What a contrast to his forefather Reuben, of whom we read, "Unstable as water, you shall not have preeminence" (Gen. 49:4). Reuben in the flesh was utter weakness, just as the flesh proves to be in all of us. But the strength and stability of God belong to the new nature.
The count demanded proof of descent. Not everyone in the camp could give it:
They had to declare their descent, family by family. Only those who could do that had a place in this muster and could be warriors. They had to show their descent because of the mixed crowd that had joined itself to the people of God... Our own line of descent, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God. And our calling is to a spiritual warfare — not against flesh and blood, but against the devil and his schemes and the wicked spirits (Eph. 6:11-12).
- Ownership — God counts Israel because Israel is His. He numbers what belongs to Him and names it, as He names the stars.
- Appointment — God names the twelve heads who stand with Moses. The people do not vote, and Moses does not choose.
- Family — God ranks each man inside his father's house, so brother fights beside brother in one closely joined army.
- Names — God leaves us only these men's names and their fathers'. So the names themselves teach: Elizur, "God is a Rock," answers unstable Reuben.
- Pedigree — God admits no one to the muster without proof of descent. Commentators see the same today in the new birth, which gives a place among His people and a call to spiritual warfare.
And these are the names of the men that shall stand with you for Reuben, Elizur the son of Shedeur;
In Numbers 1 God orders a census of Israel at Sinai, and verse 5 names the first of twelve tribal leaders who stand with Moses and Aaron for the count. Of Reuben's leader we are told only his name and his father's name.
The census was not a head count for its own sake. One writer explains why God wanted the count at all:
He was careful in this way to assert His title and survey His possessions. He would have the exact number of Israel brought to Him, for they were all His own. He called them by their names, and knew their numbers.
The count also had a purpose. Israel was becoming God's army, and every man had his place in it:
The people are to face the dangers of the way, and the first requirement for this is to be in subjection to their Leader — not Moses, but the Lord Himself. So first of all comes this mustering and marshalling of what is to be the host of God. For a soldier, keeping rank is an absolute necessity, and here a wisdom that cannot fail appoints for everyone his place and his companions.
Scripture records nothing about these leaders except their names and their fathers' names. Commentators read that silence as a clue, not a gap:
Under Moses and Aaron there are certain princes of the people. Each belongs to his own tribe, and in time becomes its head. Scripture gives us nothing about them but their own names and their fathers' names. For that very reason — if there could be any doubt — we may be sure their names are meant to speak to us. All these Bible names should speak, and their link with the tribes they represent must matter. There must be a reason why Elizur, rather than Shelumiel or Nahshon, should be prince of Reuben. We find that reason by looking into Reuben's history.
The force of the name shows once you set it beside what Jacob said about Reuben:
Reuben stands first here, as in Genesis, and Reuben's prince is Elizur the son of Shedeur. The meaning of the first name is beyond question, and it is beautiful — "God is a Rock." That becomes plain as soon as you set it beside the character Jacob gives his firstborn: "Unstable as water, you shall not have preeminence." What a contrast between the rock-like stability of God and the instability of Reuben! And it is learning this, and learning how to build on it, that gives stability to the unstable. In ourselves there is never strength. The way of strength is to know this: "when I am weak, then I am strong."
The match is not accidental. The captain given to the unstable tribe carries in his name the answer to its instability:
So it is plain why Elizur is Reuben's prince and leader. He is one of God's royal family of overcomers, and he overcomes the evil that is native to the tribe he represents. In him, faith has found refuge from himself, and found it in God. He is then the fitting captain for the men fit for war in the tribe of the firstborn.
Another writer starts from God's own choice of these men, then reads the father's name:
God Himself chose the leaders of each of these tribes, and He had good spiritual reasons. We must learn those reasons from the names given, since that is all Scripture supplies. Shedeur means "the Almighty is fire," which adds the thought of God's consuming holiness judging the flesh and all its works. To know the strength and steadying energy of God as we should, we must be "partakers of His holiness." That is what the fire speaks of — holiness that must judge Reuben's sin. So it is fitting that the lessons Shedeur teaches come first in preparing us for spiritual conflict.
The same writer draws the line from Israel's muster to believers now:
God's census in Numbers shows His own deep interest in each one of His people Israel. That interest is no less true of His saints today. The difference is that in Israel only males over twenty were numbered… Today all His saints are fitted for spiritual warfare, women and young and old too… Yet the lesson is clear for us. To engage in real conflict we need maturity or full age, such as comes through knowledge and growth in the word of God.
- Counted — the census asserts God's title to His people; He called them by their names and knew their numbers.
- Named — Scripture records only names here, so the names themselves must speak.
- Matched — Elizur, "God is a Rock," leads the tribe Jacob called unstable as water. The name answers the tribe's weakness.
- Purified — Shedeur, "the Almighty is fire," comes first. Holiness judges the flesh, then God's strength steadies us.
- Mustered — God forms an army with every man in his rank. For conflict today we need growth in God's word.
for Simeon, Shelumiel the son of Zurishaddai;
Numbers 1 hands each tribe to one named man. Simeon's man appears here with nothing but his own name and his father's — no deeds, no history, no record of his work.
The census did not start with the people. God named the men who would stand beside Moses, and the tribes had no say.
Our chapter records that, first of all, a "head" or prince of each tribe was chosen. The choice was not left to the people, or even to Moses. The word to him was, "These are the names of the men who shall stand with you…" God chose His own leader for each tribe. This reminds us that God still chooses His own servants and leaders today. He does not put the matter to a popular vote.
Scripture tells us nothing else about Shelumiel. So the names are the message, and it matters which man was joined to which tribe.
We are told nothing about these men except their own names and their fathers' names. For that very reason, if there could be any doubt otherwise, we can be sure their names are meant to speak to us. All these Bible names should speak, and their link with the tribes they represent must matter. There must be a reason why Elizur, and not Shelumiel or Nahshon, is prince of Reuben; and we find it by looking into Reuben's history.
Simeon's family record was violent. His father Jacob described that character in Genesis 49, which makes the name of Simeon's prince a reversal.
In order of birth the tribe of Simeon comes next, and the prince of Simeon was Shelumiel (v.6), which means "at peace with God." That is a striking contrast to Simeon's character as his father Jacob described it in Genesis 49:5-7. Simeon, along with Levi, was guilty of cruel and vicious hatred in the murder of the men of Shechem (Gen. 34:25-26). Only the grace of God could make any difference in so terrible a case. Is the flesh in us any better than in Simeon and Levi? Not at all. Yet God has in pure grace reconciled all believers to Himself (2 Cor. 5:18), and we are "at peace with God," as Romans 5:1 declares.
The son's name rests on the father's. Peace is not a mood in the man; it stands on something outside him, and the possessive pronoun makes it personal.
Shelumiel was the son Zurishaddai, meaning "My rock is the Almighty." This reminds us that peace with God depends on the stability of God Himself, the Almighty; and in this case not only is God the Rock, by "my rock." How good it is for us if we appropriate to ourselves this living truth! This is a wonderful sustenance in warfare.
Simeon's old strength was a partnership with his brother, and it ended in violence. His prince's name points to a different bond.
Simeon's very alliance with his brother is a confession of weakness — a weakness he would cure by turning to what so many turn to today: banding together with others. And he does find strength there, but only to use it cruelly and to walk apart from God. So on his part it ends in division and scattering. That has to happen if he is to be saved from himself. Having found where natural strength leads a man, he may turn to the One in whom there is all-sufficiency and with whom is holiness. This is now the Simeonite prince's alliance, and such a bond never needs to be broken up again. So Shelumiel, that true peace with God which comes from communion with Him, springs from Zurishaddai, the known and enjoyed strength of the Almighty.
Shelumiel does not stand alone. His place is next to Reuben's prince, and the two names echo each other.
If Reuben's prince is Elizur ("God is a rock"), the father of Simeon's prince is Zurishaddai — "my rock is the Almighty." So they are well-matched companions. But the communion that Simeon stands for must follow Reuben's lead of holding to God and submitting to Him. Only then can it stand up under the warfare of the desert. That is how he fills his own place here.
Behind the whole roll call stands a question of ownership.
This was an expression of His rights as Lord of Israel. He had the right to count them, for they were all His own. If He had no claim on them, and nothing to look for in them, He would not have counted them up. The same is said of His divine right in another part of His dominions: "He tells the number of the stars; He calls them all by their names."
- Counted — God numbered Israel because they were His own; He calls them by name, as He does the stars.
- Chosen — God appointed the man who stood for Simeon; the tribe did not elect him.
- Named — no deeds are recorded, so the two names carry the lesson: Shelumiel, "at peace with God," son of Zurishaddai, "my rock is the Almighty."
- Reversed — Simeon's family name stood for cruelty. Only grace turns that record into peace with God.
- Ready — that peace rests on the Almighty as my rock. It holds a man in the desert warfare, in his place beside Reuben.
for Judah, Nahshon the son of Amminadab;
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
for Issachar, Nethaneel the son of Zuar;
Numbers 1 opens with God ordering a census of Israel's fighting men. He names one man from each tribe to stand with Moses and Aaron and do the counting. Verse 8 names the man for Issachar. Scripture tells us nothing else about him, so the question is what a bare name and a father's name are doing in the record at all.
The tribal heads were not picked by the people or even by Moses. Commenting on how the list is introduced, one writer draws out who did the choosing.
Our chapter records that as a preliminary a "head" or prince of each tribe was selected. The choice was not left to the people, or even to Moses. The word to him was, "These are the names of the men that shall stand with you…" God chose His own leader for each tribe, and this may usefully remind us that God today chooses His own servants and leaders, and does not submit the matter to a popular vote.
Because the record gives us nothing about these men except their names, the names themselves carry the weight.
Of these we have nothing noted but their own and their fathers' names, but just for that reason, if there could otherwise be doubt, we may be sure that their names are intended to speak to us. All these Bible names should speak and their connection with the several tribes which they represent must be of importance.
Nethanel belongs to a cluster of names in this list built on the Hebrew word for God. Another writer counts them and reads something into the pattern.
It may be that the Spirit of God was stirring the hearts of many in Israel at this time, and turning them to the God of their fathers. If we read the names of those who were "the renowned of the congregation" in Numbers and remember that "El" means "God," we cannot but be struck with the number of names of which this forms a part. For example, Numbers 1:5, Elizur means "God is my rock"; verse 6, Shelumiel means "Friend of God"; verse 8, Nathaneel means "Given of God"; verse 9, Eliab means "My God is Father."
Issachar's own name means "hire," and Jacob's words over him in Genesis 49 picture a strong donkey that bows its shoulder and becomes a servant at forced labour. Against that background, a prince named "gift of God" is pointed.
Issachar's prince comes fourth in the list, Nathaniel, the "gift of God" — again exactly suited to him whose name speaks of hire, and whose tendency is to stoop his shoulder to foreign yokes, and to pay his tribute from the love of ease. The spirit of legality takes up readily with such strange service, since it is self which it really serves, and a bribe will turn it from its true Master… the hireling spirit in the people of God themselves would turn His grace into legal compensation, and a true overcomer is this Nathaniel who has learnt that the "gift of God" cannot be purchased.
The father's name is not filler. Zuar means "little," and commentators tie the two names together as cause and effect.
Nethanel was the son of Zuar, meaning "little." How true it is that when we receive every blessing simply as a gift of God our pride will be brought low, no longer to think highly of ourselves, but like Paul, whose name means "little," to consider ourselves "less than the least of all saints" (Eph. 3:8).
Nethanel does not stand alone. In the camp order that follows, Issachar takes his place beside Judah, whose name means "praise."
The last thought connects with Issachar, who, with Zebulon, fights under Judah's banner, with his captain Nathaniel, "the gift of God." They are both under the best of leadership evidently. The one will not seek his own, nor the other stray off to the world, while Judah leads.
Later, this tribe became known for something more than numbers.
Some of Issachar came to David at Ziklag, and of them it is said that they "had understanding of the times, to know what Israel ought to do" (1 Chr. 12:32).
Behind the whole roll call is God's claim on the people He redeemed.
He was careful thus to assert His title, and survey His possessions. He would have the number of Israel exactly brought to Him, for they were all His own. He called them by their names, and knew their numbers.
- Chosen — God Himself named the man who stood for Issachar. The tribe did not vote him in, and Moses did not pick him.
- Named — Scripture records no deeds for him, only a name. Writers take that silence as the point: the name is the message. Nethanel means "gift of God."
- Gift — a tribe whose name means "hire" gets a leader whose name means gift, and the gift of God cannot be bought or earned.
- Little — his father's name, Zuar, means "little." Receiving everything as a gift brings pride down to size.
- Ranked — the gift-of-God man marches under Judah's banner, and his tribe later gave David men who understood the times and knew what Israel should do.
for Zebulun, Eliab the son of Helon;
This verse is one line in a list. Eliab stands for Zebulun in the census at Sinai, named with his father. Two questions sit behind that short entry. Why did God pick these men? And why does Scripture keep their names?
The men on this list did not put themselves forward:
Our chapter records that as a first step a "head" or prince of each tribe was selected. The choice was not left to the people, or even to Moses. The word to him was, "these are the names of the men who shall assist you…" God chose His own leader for each tribe. This is a useful reminder that God today chooses His own servants and leaders. He does not put the matter to a popular vote.
Eliab's job was to count his tribe. The count had a purpose tied to the journey ahead:
The whole people are counted tribe by tribe and family by family. A prince of each tribe is chosen, and he oversees the count of that tribe. Only the men of war are to be counted, because the census is taken with the dangers and trials of the journey in view. So right at the start we see the thought of order stressed. No Israelite warrior is left out. Each one takes his place under his tribal prince, and all of them are arranged, as we shall see later, with reference to the tabernacle.
Counting someone assumes a claim on them. That claim is God's, and it reaches beyond Israel:
This was an expression of His rights as Lord of Israel. He had title to take their number, for they were all His own. If He had no right to them, and no prospects in them, He would not have counted their number. The same divine title is spoken of in another part of His dominions: "He determines the number of the stars; He gives to all of them their names." That is the expression of His sovereignty among the heavenly hosts. (Psalm 147:4)
The list gives no deeds and no stories, only names. That silence is itself the clue:
Under Moses and Aaron there are certain princes of the people. Each one belongs to his own tribe, and in time becomes its head. Nothing is recorded about them except their own names and their fathers' names. For that very reason, if there could be any doubt otherwise, we can be sure that their names are meant to speak to us.
Many of these names are built on the same syllable:
Read the names of those who were "the renowned of the congregation" in Numbers, and remember that "El" means "God". The number of names built on it must strike us. For example, in Numbers 1:5, Elizur means "God is my rock". In verse 6, Shelumiel means "Friend of God". In verse 8, Nathaneel means "Given of God". In verse 9, Eliab means "My God is Father". And so we might go on.
Zebulun's name means dwelling. The name of the man who leads him carries both a warning and a comfort:
God is the Father of His believing people. But if they mix with the world and forget whose they are, they force Him, as it were, to forget their special relation to Himself. He cannot be a Father to them as He would be. How terrible this loss is, little as many think of it! And what a strong witness Zebulun's captain gives us here — Eliab, "God is a Father!" May it speak to His people's hearts with all its solemnity and all its precious encouragement! So Zebulun, "dwelling," gets its right meaning.
Zebulun does not camp alone. He stands under Judah's banner with Issachar, and the three tribes carry one message together:
Taken as a whole, then, the camp of Judah expresses the spirit of righteousness. The standard he gathers under is righteousness. It is a spirit to which God's statutes are songs, and so it is free from legality. It keeps the enjoyment of relationship to God as Father, where Issachar and Zebulun add the thoughts that complete it.
- Chosen — Eliab did not volunteer and was not voted in; God named the man who would stand with Moses for each tribe.
- Counted — the census listed the men able to fight, because the journey ahead held danger. Every warrior took his place under his tribal prince.
- Owned — God numbers Israel as He numbers the stars, because those He counts belong to Him.
- Named — nothing is told of these men but their names, and that alone signals the names are meant to speak.
- Fathered — Eliab means "My God is Father", and Zebulun means dwelling. The family bond is what gives dwelling with God its meaning.
for the children of Joseph for Ephraim, Elishama the son of Ammihud; for Manasseh, Gamaliel the son of Pedahzur;
Numbers 1:10 lists two men where you would expect one: Joseph's family supplies a prince for Ephraim and a prince for Manasseh. Why does one son of Jacob hold two places in the list? And why record the names of these men and their fathers at all?
Joseph is not listed as a tribe here. His two sons stand in his place, and commentators trace this back to Jacob giving Joseph an extra place through his two sons:
Jacob had 12 sons at the time, the exact number that speaks of complete order. So why should he give Joseph an extra place among the tribes by naming tribes after his two sons? The wisdom of God was in this. Later we find that Levi received no inheritance of its own among the tribes (Num. 1:47-53), because God set that tribe apart to serve Him in the tabernacle and among all the tribes.
The order inside the verse is also deliberate. Ephraim, the younger, comes before Manasseh:
Levi is left out between Simeon and Judah, since he is not to be counted. Asher and Gad swap places. Ephraim and Manasseh take Joseph's place. According to Jacob's prophecy (Gen. 48:14-22), Ephraim takes precedence over Manasseh.
Elishama and Gamaliel did not campaign for their positions. The list came from God:
Our chapter records that God first chose a "head," or prince, for each tribe. The choice was not left to the people, or even to Moses. The word to him was, "These are the names of the men who shall assist you…" God chose His own leader for each tribe. This reminds us that God still chooses His own servants and leaders today. He does not put the matter to a vote.
Several writers treat the names of these princes as messages in themselves. Ephraim's name carries the idea of fruitfulness. His prince's name supplies what fruitfulness needs:
Ephraim's prince is Elishama, which means "God has heard." The "fruitfulness" that Ephraim's own name speaks of can become a trap for us. It is safe only when we trace it back to the One who hears His people's prayer. The second name, Ammihud, "the people of Majesty," may point to a known relationship with the infinite Greatness. That relationship is what gives prayer its right and its drive. All these names breathe a spirit of dependence and of nearness — of lowliness, yet of intimacy — things that necessarily go together.
The other name in the verse looks ahead to reward, and this is a chapter about men fit to fight:
Manasseh's prince was Gamaliel, meaning "God is a Rewarder." In a time of conflict this is a wonderful encouragement. We have no reason to look for men's approval or rewards. If we fight only to please God, we will be content to wait for God's time of reward. Gamaliel's father, Pedahzur, means "the rock has redeemed." That reminds us never to take pride in the rewards of service. We are only sinners redeemed by Him who is the one stable Rock.
Behind the roll of princes lies the reason for the census itself:
The early chapters set out one main object: a count of the males who were fit for war. But we will find that the numbering goes beyond this… Whatever the aim of each part of the book, God presses this on us — the care and the interest He takes in everyone who belongs to Him. It is a very simple truth, but it is full of comfort to the soul.
That is why descent mattered so much in this chapter. Elishama son of Ammihud, Gamaliel son of Pedahzur — each man's father is named:
They had to show their family line. Only those who could do that had a place in this count and could serve as soldiers. They needed this proof because a mixed crowd of outsiders had attached itself to the people of God… What gives us our place among the people of God is the new birth. By it we become children of God. And we are called to a spiritual war. It is not against flesh and blood, but against the devil and his schemes and the evil spirits (Eph. 6:11-12).
- Counted — the census counted the men fit for war. Its deeper message is the care God takes in everyone who belongs to Him.
- Claimed — Joseph gets two places through his sons Ephraim and Manasseh. That keeps the tribes at twelve once Levi is set apart to serve at the tabernacle.
- Chosen — no tribe voted for its prince. God named the men who were to assist Moses, and He still chooses His own servants and leaders.
- Heard — Elishama means "God has heard." Fruitfulness turns into a snare unless we trace it back to the God who hears.
- Rewarded — Gamaliel means "God is a Rewarder," so no soldier needs human applause. Pedahzur, "the rock has redeemed," keeps that reward from feeding pride.
for Benjamin, Abidan the son of Gideoni;
Numbers 1:11 is one line in a roll call. God counts Israel's fighting men, and Abidan son of Gideoni stands with Moses and Aaron to represent Benjamin. Why does God record the name of one man's father in a military register, and what did commentators find in it?
Behind this count stands an owner taking stock of what is His.
He was careful to assert His title and survey His possessions. He would have the number of Israel brought to Him exactly, for they were all His own. He called them by their names, and knew their numbers.
Verse 11 sits inside a list of twelve names. Writers find the meaning of each Hebrew name worth study.
Moses and Aaron were called to lead in numbering the people by their armies. As we saw in Exodus, both Moses and Aaron are pictures of Christ. He knows His people and His watchful eye rests on each one. Associated with Moses and Aaron were the princes of the tribes mentioned in verses 5–16. The names of these princes are of deep interest when we translate them into English.
The name of Benjamin's leader points to judgment. The tribe he leads has a fierce reputation.
Abidan was the prince of Benjamin, his name meaning "My father is judge" (v.11). In Genesis 49:27 Benjamin is called "a ravenous wolf." In other words he was naturally a warrior. But the Lord does not need natural fighters. Peter learned this when he used a sword to cut off the ear of the high priest's servant (John 18:10-11). The Lord rebuked him and healed the man's ear. "For the weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh but have divine power to destroy strongholds" (2 Cor. 10:4). So let us remember the lesson of Abidan, "my Father is judge." God as a Father judges according to each person's work (1 Peter 1:17). It is He who judges the value of our warfare, with perfect spiritual discernment.
Another writer puts the warning to anyone who fights evil.
What warning could be more needed in the struggle against evil than this — that we ourselves are under our Father's holy eye! How can we fight evil elsewhere while we ignore its power over our own hearts and ways? In the dark days after Israel took the land, the judge was also the deliverer. His office was twofold: he judged Israel, and he went out to war.
The verse also names Abidan's father. The same writer explains that name, and what must come before any self-judgment.
But Abidan is also the son of Gideoni — "the cutter down." All true later judgment flows from one thing: accepting that first judgment at the cross. There the tree of humanity had to be cut down to build the ark of salvation. Christ crucified is our deliverance. But Christ crucified is also the judgment of the flesh: "our old self was crucified with him." Christ died to sin, so we are to count ourselves dead to sin. To count it so is power over it. If shoots come up from the stump, the knife and the axe still have their place. But for intelligent faith, Gideoni has done his woodman's work well. Gideoni is the father of Abidan.
The chapter counts every tribe for war. Even so, writers find in Benjamin one particular kind of fighting.
As already said, people may be in the conflict who are not warriors. There are also different kinds of warfare — defensive as well as offensive, in the fort and in the field. Benjamin is the picture of the aggressive soldier. He is not the shield-bearer but the swordsman or the slinger, like those in Benjamin at another time: "seven hundred chosen men… every one could sling a stone at a hair and not miss" (Judges 20:16). God wants this in His people too: not just holding the fort, but going out to war — when there is land to win, or fellow believers to rescue.
- Counted — God counts people who are already His own. He knows their names and their numbers.
- Named — each Hebrew name teaches something. Moses and Aaron are a picture of Christ, whose eye rests on each person.
- Judged — Abidan means "my father is judge," and it is God who assesses the worth of the fight, not the fighter.
- Cut down — Abidan is son of Gideoni, "the cutter down." Self-judgment grows out of the judgment of the flesh at the cross.
- Sent out — Benjamin stands for the soldier who advances, not only defends. But the weapons are not of the flesh.
for Dan, Ahiezer the son of Ammishaddai;
Numbers 1:12 gives just two names — the man chosen to represent Dan in the census, and his father. Yet both names carry meaning. Together they turn one short line into a picture of how God chooses and uses people.
The heads named in this list did not rise by popularity. The instruction came to Moses with the men already selected.
Our chapter records that, first of all, God chose a "head" or prince for each tribe. The choice was not left to the people, or even to Moses. The word to him was, "These are the names of the men that shall stand with you…" God chose His own leader for each tribe. This is a useful reminder that God still chooses His own servants and leaders today. He does not put the matter to a popular vote.
The record gives Ahiezer no story. It gives only his name and his father's name.
Under Moses and Aaron there are certain princes of the people. Each one belongs to his own tribe, and in time becomes its head. We are told nothing about them except their own names and their fathers' names. For that very reason, if there could be any doubt, we can be sure their names are meant to speak to us. All these Bible names should speak. Their link with the tribes they represent must matter.
Dan opens the group descended from Jacob's servant wives. Its prince carries a name that runs against what Jacob once said about this tribe.
Now come the sons of Jacob's servant wives, and Dan is named first. The prince of Dan was Ahiezer, which means "brother of help." What a contrast to the character of Dan described in Genesis 49:17: "Dan shall be a serpent in the way." Instead of giving a brother's help, he would give harm from Satan. Again, God makes a wonderful change by His pure grace, so that Dan would be a help in conflict. Ahiezer was the son of Ammishaddai, which means "the people of the Almighty." Once the people are settled in their relationship to the Almighty, a brother relationship is what we should expect.
Dan's own name means judgment. In human hands, rule turns inward and serves the ruler.
The first of these is Dan, "judgment" — the spirit of rule. As Dan's origin shows, rule is really service. Yet how quickly man turns it into something else! "Man does not remain in his honour." Instead of using his position to bless those entrusted to his care, he uses it for himself. He feeds his own ambition or greed with it. He becomes a rebel against the One who gave him his authority… But for this, as for everything else, God has a remedy. Dan stands here in his place with his captain Ahiezer — "brother of help," the son of Ammishaddai — "the people of the Almighty." Let those names be made real, and the ruler becomes what God designed: the "helping brother" of the people he is set over.
Read together with the tribes camped alongside Dan, these three names form one set of qualities for a people about to travel and fight.
Dan, "judge," his prince Ahiezer, "the brother of help," the son of Ammishaddai, "the people of the Almighty": these names combine the thoughts suggested of alertness, power and helpfulness… Thus the camp is duly ordered and prepared for the march. The tabernacle, whether the people are at rest or on their journey, is surrounded by these men of war, all in due order.
Dan stands in full honour here. Its later history took a dark turn. Yet God still holds a place for it.
Very early in the land this tribe set up the idolatry that lasted until the people went into captivity. Judges 18:30-31. Jacob's picture of the snake that bites the horse's heels recalls the serpent that would bruise the heel of the woman's offspring. Genesis 3:15. This seems to suggest that the Antichrist will arise out of the tribe of Dan, and this has been the judgement of Christians from the earliest times. Two omissions confirm the thought. Dan's name is missing from 1 Chronicles 2 – 8, the book that records much of grace and blessing. Dan is also left out of the list of tribes from which twelve thousand each will be sealed in a future day. Revelation 7:3-8. Still, God will keep His promises to the twelve tribes. Dan will have its portion in the land, as Ezekiel 48:1-2, 32 foretells.
Commentators differ on how much weight to give Jacob's words here. Not all treat the link with the antichrist as settled.
Some have thought that Jacob's prophetic words about Dan in Genesis 49:16-18 may throw light on this. If the "serpent in the way" and the "adder in the path" point to the antichrist, driven by Satan and rising out of the tribe of Dan, then it may.
- Chosen — the head over Dan was not voted in; God named the man who would stand with Moses.
- Named — with no story attached to Ahiezer, his name and his father's name are what God means us to hear.
- Helped — Ahiezer is "brother of help," son of "the people of the Almighty." Help between brothers flows from a people settled with God.
- Serving — Dan means judgment. In God's design, rule is service, and the helping brother is the ruler God intended.
- Kept — Dan's later idolatry cost the tribe its place in some lists, yet its portion in the land still stands.
for Asher, Pagiel the son of Ocran;
Numbers 1:13 is one line in a long roll call. It names the man who stood for the tribe of Asher when Israel was counted at Sinai. Why does Scripture record twelve princes and their fathers by name?
Before the counting began, each tribe needed a head. That choice did not come from the people.
Our chapter records that as a first step a "head" or prince of each tribe was selected. The choice was not left to the people, or even to Moses. The word to him was, "These are the names of the men who shall assist you…" God chose His own leader for each tribe. This is a good reminder that God today chooses His own servants and leaders. He does not put the matter to a popular vote.
Scripture tells us nothing about Pagiel except his father's name and his tribe. One writer treats that silence as a reason to look closer.
Under Moses and Aaron there are certain princes of the people, each identified with his own tribe, and in due time coming to be head over it. We have nothing about them except their own names and their fathers' names. For that very reason, if there could otherwise be doubt, we may be sure that their names are meant to speak to us. All these Bible names should speak. Their link with the tribes they represent must be important.
Read the three names together and they pull in opposite directions. Asher's own name promises gladness; the prince and his father speak of God's dealings and of pain.
Asher's prince was Pagiel (v.13). His name means "event of God." His father's name, Ocran, means "afflicted." Genesis 49:20 tells us, "Asher's food shall be rich, and he shall yield royal delicacies." Asher means "happy." But even the blessing of Asher has to be tempered with God's dealings — events of God — to bring affliction. For true happiness always comes through suffering, little as we might at first appreciate this. How well Paul understood this when he wrote, "For the sake of Christ, then, I am content with weaknesses, insults, hardships, persecutions, and calamities. For when I am weak, then I am strong" (2 Cor. 12:10).
The census had a military purpose, and the princes existed to give it order.
The census counts all the people, tribe by tribe and family by family. Each tribe has a prince who presides over the counting of that tribe. The count includes only the men of war, because the census looks ahead to the dangers and trials of the journey. So right from the start we see the stress on order. Not one Israelite warrior is left out. Each man finds his place in subjection to his tribal prince, and all take their place around the tabernacle.
Scripture names Pagiel as "the son of Ochran," because descent decided who could be enrolled at all.
They had to declare their pedigrees, family by family. Only those who could do that had a place in this muster and could be warriors. They had to show their pedigree because a mixed multitude had joined themselves to the people of God. "A mixed multitude also went up with them" (Ex. 12:38)… So only those who could show by their pedigree that they belonged among the people of God joined the muster and could go to war. Our pedigree, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God. And our calling is to a spiritual warfare. It is not against flesh and blood, but against the devil and his schemes and the wicked spirits (Eph. 6:11-12).
Asher's story runs far beyond the wilderness.
When counted at Sinai, Asher had 41,500 men able to go out to war. Near the promised land the number was 53,400. But when the rulers of the tribes are listed in the time of David, Asher is left out. Num. 1:41; Num. 26:47; 1 Chr. 27:16-22… In Rev. 7:6, twelve thousand of Asher will be sealed, and in Luke 2:36, Anna a prophetess, of the tribe of Asher, gave thanks in the temple at the birth of the Saviour. Asher is one of the tribes still to come into blessing, and to have a portion in the land. Ezek. 48:2-3.
- Chosen — the prince over Asher was named by God, not elected by the tribe or picked by Moses.
- Named — Scripture gives only Pagiel's name and his father's, so the names themselves are meant to teach.
- Afflicted — "event of God," son of "afflicted," heads the tribe called "happy": real joy comes by way of suffering.
- Counted — every man of war took his place under his prince, around the tabernacle. No one was left out.
- Kept — Asher grew from 41,500 to 53,400, then vanished from David's list. Yet Anna of Asher gave thanks in the temple, and 12,000 of Asher are sealed in Revelation.
for Gad, Eliasaph the son of Deuel;
At Sinai, God told Moses to count Israel, and He picked one man from each tribe to help. This verse names the man from Gad, and even one line of a name list raises real questions: who chose him, why record his father's name, and why count fighting men at all?
The census did not begin with numbers. It began with names that God gave to Moses.
Our chapter records that as a first step God selected a "head" or prince for each tribe. The choice did not rest with the people, or even with Moses. God's word to Moses was, "These are the names of the men that shall stand with you…" God chose His own leader for each tribe, and this may remind us that God today chooses His own servants and leaders. He does not put the matter to a popular vote.
The list gives only their names and their fathers' names. One writer treats that silence as the clue.
Under Moses and Aaron there are certain princes of the people. Each one belongs to his own tribe, and in time he becomes its head. The record notes nothing about them except their own names and their fathers' names. For that very reason, if there could be any doubt otherwise, we can be sure their names are meant to speak to us. All these Bible names should speak, and the link between each name and the tribe it represents must matter.
The two names in this verse fall in an order: closeness with God first, growth after it.
And now we have Gad, whose prince is Eliasaph — "God has added"; he is the son of Deuel — "known of God." What a good thing it is to be known by God! This does not mean the general knowledge God has of everything. It means the knowledge we have of someone we are close to, and it implies approval. And this is the real secret of the spiritual increase that Eliasaph's name speaks of… Do we need to be told to expect growth in a child of God? Or when growth is missing, is that not sad proof that closeness with God is lacking?
Another writer ties the same two names to Gad's future and to the fight ahead.
The blessing spoken over Gad is a prophecy of recovery and triumph, so Eliasaph's name shows that this triumph will come by God giving the increase. His father's name, Deuel, means "known of God." The sense of God's knowing us thus leads to spiritual increase in practical life. This too is connected with preparation for conflict. But God is the source of all.
One chapter later the same man is called Reuel. A Bible dictionary explains the difference as a copying slip, not two men.
Father of Eliasaph, "prince" of Gad. Num. 1:14; Num. 7:42, 47; Num. 10:20. In Num. 2:14 he is called REUEL. This is clearly a case where someone mistook the letter ד (D) for the letter ר (R).
Gad's own name and blessing suit a chapter about men able to go to war.
Gad means "a troop," which shows a warrior character. That will be clearest in Israel when God restores them to their inheritance. God "enlarges Gad," because those who join the good fight of faith to take hold of what is theirs are the ones He enlarges in this way.
No man joined the count unless he could show his family line.
Each man had to declare his family line. Only those who could do so had a place in this count and could be warriors. They needed to show their family line because of the mixed crowd of outsiders who had joined the people of God… So only those who could prove their rightful place among the people of God were counted and could go to war.
Behind the exactness of the whole list stands a claim of ownership.
This was an expression of His rights as Lord of Israel. He had the right to count them, because they were all His own. If He had no claim on them, and nothing to look for in them, He would not have counted them at all. Scripture says the same of His divine title in another part of His realm: "He determines the number of the stars; He gives to all of them their names."
- Chosen — no vote made Eliasaph a leader; God named the head of each tribe Himself.
- Known — his father's name, Deuel, means "known of God," and closeness with God comes before growth.
- Increased — Eliasaph means "God has added"; we should expect growth in a child of God, and God gives it.
- Enlisted — only men who could prove their family line joined the count, because this was a list of men ready for war.
- Owned — God counted Israel because Israel was His, just as He counts the stars and names each one.
for Naphtali, Ahira the son of Enan.
Numbers 1:15 ends the list of twelve tribal leaders who stand with Moses and Aaron for the counting of Israel's fighting men. Ahira son of Enan comes last. Like the eleven before him, he gets only his own name and his father's name. So why record him at all?
The record gives no deeds and no speeches for any of them. One writer takes that silence as the point.
Under Moses and Aaron there are certain princes of the people, each identified with his own tribe, and in due time coming to be head over it. Of these men we are told nothing but their own names and their fathers' names. For that very reason, if there could be any doubt otherwise, we may be sure their names are meant to speak to us. All these Bible names should speak. Their link with the tribes they represent must matter. There must be a reason why Elizur, rather than Shelumiel or Nahshon, is prince of Reuben, and we should find it by exploring Reuben's history.
One writer looks first at the two men in charge of the count.
Moses and Aaron were called to be the leaders in numbering the people by their armies. As we saw in Exodus, both Moses and Aaron are pictures of Christ. He knows His people and His watchful eye rests upon each. The names of these princes are of deep interest when we translate them into English.
Ahira's name is the hardest of the twelve. On its own it sounds like an insult. Set beside Jacob's words about Naphtali, it reads differently.
Naphtali's prince (v.15), Ahira, "brother of evil," is the most difficult as regards interpretation. Genesis 49:21 reads, "Naphtali is a doe let loose that bears beautiful fawns." [An older translation ends: "he uses beautiful words."] "Brother of evil" can then be understood only in the sense of "brother of trouble," and could refer to the sympathetic character of the believer in bearing the burden of others. This would be in some contrast to the deer let loose, but would remind us of Paul's words, "For though I am free from all, I have made myself a servant to all" (1 Cor. 9:19). Ahira's father was Enan, meaning "having eyes," and may speak of the concern that looks on the sorrows of others.
Commentators differ over what the father's name adds. One reads the open eyes as eyes that take in the sorrow around them.
May it be that in Ahira we find one whose eyes have affected his heart, like another Jeremiah (Lam. 3:51), and made him a man of sorrows in sympathy with the sorrow around? One would expect such a spirit to find expression among these leaders of Israel. Then the "brother of evil" becomes the "brother born for adversity" that Proverbs speaks of (Prov. 17:17). And this would fit well with the character of Naphtali. His own name is a memorial of "struggling," and his "pleasant words" are noted in that prophecy of Jacob which seems to be in view all through.
Another writer keeps the same phrase but turns the eyes outward, toward the enemy.
Naphtali is "the wrestler," another militant name. His prince Ahira is "brother for evil," the son of Enan, "open-eyed." This suggests that "brother born for adversity," whose eyes are always watchful against the enemy.
Every fighting man in Israel takes his place under these twelve. One writer points to what fitted them to lead.
These, then, are Israel's princes. They can gather the hosts of the redeemed and lead them to victory, because they are themselves overcomers of their surroundings and of the tendencies to failure among which they live. In the constant battlefield which this world is for us, we must indeed be overcomers or be overcome. All the men fit for war must take their place under these leaders. In the messages to the seven churches of Revelation, too, the promises are all for overcomers. Here is the test for us, and we cannot excuse ourselves from it. Blessed be God: if we have the spirit of the overcomer, the evil around us can never master us, any more than the darkness of night can keep the stars from shining. The darkness is their opportunity to shine!
- Named — The record gives only these twelve names and their fathers' names. That silence is why the names themselves must speak.
- Known — In the count, God takes account of His own. He knows His people, and His watchful eye rests on each one.
- Ahira — "Brother of evil" is best read as "brother of trouble." He carries the burdens of others, like Paul, who made himself a servant to all.
- Enan — Commentators differ over "having eyes." It may mean eyes moved by the sorrows of others, or eyes watchful against the enemy.
- Overcomers — These princes could lead Israel's armies because they had first overcome in their own surroundings. The same test stands for us, and the darkness is only the chance for the stars to shine.
These were those summoned of the assembly, princes of the tribes of their fathers, the heads of the thousands of Israel.
Numbers 1:16 closes the list of twelve men who stood beside Moses and Aaron when God took a census of Israel at Sinai. It describes them in three short phrases. Each one says something about how God chooses and uses people.
An older English translation calls them "the renowned of the congregation." That sounds like men who had made a name for themselves. One writer points to what the word means:
Not "renowned," but summoned of the assembly, charged to take care of its affairs.
Verse 16 gathers the twelve into one group. But who put them there?
Our chapter records that as a preliminary a "head" or prince of each tribe was selected. The choice was not left to the people, or even to Moses. The word to him was, "These are the names of the men that shall stand with you…" God chose His own leader for each tribe. This may well remind us that God today chooses His own servants and leaders. He does not put the matter to a popular vote.
Scripture tells us almost nothing about these men beyond their names and their fathers' names. One commentator argues that the silence itself is the clue:
Under Moses and Aaron there are certain princes of the people, each identified with his own tribe, and in time coming to be head over it. About these men we are told nothing but their own names and their fathers' names. For that very reason, if there could be any doubt, we can be sure that their names are meant to speak to us. All these Bible names should speak, and their link with the tribes they represent must matter. There must be a reason why Elizur, and not Shelumiel or Nahshon, is prince of Reuben. We should find it by looking into Reuben's history.
Read together, the names carry a pattern. Another writer notices how often one short syllable turns up in them:
Read the names of those who were "the renowned of the congregation" in Numbers, and remember that "El" means "God". You cannot help noticing how many of these names are built on it. For example, Numbers 1:5, Elizur means "God is my rock"; Verse 6, Shelumiel means "Friend of God"; Verse 8, Nathaneel means "Given of God". Verse 9, Eliab means "My God is Father".
These twelve were called to help count Israel. Why did God want a count at all?
In His wisdom God saw that the census of the children of Israel had to be taken. The first purpose set before us in the early chapters is a count of the men fit for war. But we shall find that the numbering goes beyond this. There are other aims in view besides war. In short, whatever the particular aim may be in different parts of the book, God presses this on us: the care and the interest He takes in everyone who belongs to Him. It is a very simple truth, but full of comfort to the soul.
Another writer adds a second reason for the count:
In this way He was careful to assert His ownership and survey what was His. He would have the number of Israel exactly brought to Him, for they were all His own. He called them by their names, and knew their numbers.
A place given by God can still be turned against Him. One writer shows how fast that happens:
If God puts an honour on a man, and the man does not receive it as from Him, that honour becomes only a stepping stone. He uses it to despise the God who gave it, while grasping after what God has never given him. Nothing produces such discontent as a heart that does not rightly value what God has given us.
- Called — they were summoned and given a charge, not celebrated. Their place came from God, not from their fame.
- Chosen — Moses did not pick them, and the people did not vote. God still chooses His own servants and leaders.
- Named — Scripture records only their names and their fathers'. Many of those names are built on "El," which means God: "God is my rock," "Given of God," "My God is Father."
- Counted — the census they helped take shows God's care for every person who belongs to Him. He was claiming what was already His own.
- Cautioned — an honour from God turns dangerous the moment a man forgets who gave it and reaches for what God never gave.
And Moses and Aaron took these men who are expressed by their names,
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
and gathered the whole assembly together on the first of the second month. And they declared their pedigrees after their families, according to their fathers' houses, by the number of the names, from twenty years old and upward, according to their polls.
On a set day the whole congregation gathers, and every man registers himself — not as a crowd, but family by family, name by name. The verse turns a headcount into a question for each man: can I show where I belong?
The census begins with God, not with Moses. He counts what is His own, and He counts with care.
He was careful to assert His title this way, and to survey His possessions. He wanted the number of Israel brought to Him exactly, for they were all His own. He called them by their names, and knew their numbers.
That interest is not only about the future. It reaches into the ordinary hardships of the road ahead.
We can all understand the sweetness of being numbered for heaven. Most people's hearts turn to that. But some take the greatest comfort in looking at God's purposes securing them for eternity. Even they are apt to forget the present interest the Lord takes in all our movements, ways, conflicts and trials.
The older translation says they "declared their pedigrees" — each man produced his line. This mattered because a crowd of outsiders had attached itself to Israel when they left Egypt.
Those to be numbered were all from twenty years old and upward, able to go to war. They had to declare their pedigrees after their families. Only those who could do that had a place in this mustering and could be warriors. They had to show their pedigree because of the mixed multitude that had joined the people of God. "A mixed multitude also went up with them" (Exod. 12:38). That mixed multitude among them fell to craving (Num. 11:4).
The two terms in the verse are not padding. One speaks of order, the other of the natural bond behind it.
In this muster the organisation is the natural one, by families or "fathers' houses." The two terms appear to cover the same ground, though that is not the usual thought. The word for "family" implies subjection to authority. The father's house shows that this authority rests on the natural relation. Such is God's relationship to His people, of which the father is the image. In family groups they were linked together in God's host, brother fighting alongside brother. It was an army so compacted that one might suppose it invincible.
Commentators read the register as a picture. Birth still decides who is counted — but a different birth. Nicodemus, named below, was a respected Jewish teacher.
All had to be enrolled, when "they declared their pedigrees after their families." So every man counted was without a doubt a genuine child of Israel. The test today is not natural descent but spiritual. Even Nicodemus had a natural pedigree that could not be faulted. But he had to discover that the necessary spiritual pedigree would only be his as he was "born of the Spirit." To be "in Christ" is the pedigree of supreme value.
An Israelite at the muster could not shrug. Commentators set the Christian's line beside Israel's, and press for the same certainty.
How different it is with the Christian! His pedigree is heavenly. His family tree has its roots in the new creation, and death can never break the line, because it is formed in resurrection. This first chapter of Numbers shows how essential it was that every Israelite could declare his pedigree. Uncertainty on this point would have proved disastrous; it would have produced hopeless confusion. It is hard to imagine an Israelite, called to declare his pedigree, speaking in the doubtful way many Christians speak today. We cannot picture him saying, "I am not quite sure. Sometimes I hope I am of the stock of Israel, but at other times I fear I do not belong to the congregation of the Lord at all."
Knowing your line settled where a man stood in the camp, under his own standard, or banner.
If a man did not know his pedigree, he could not recognise his standard. Everything would then fall into hopeless confusion. Instead of keeping rank and making steady progress, they would have been in each other's way, treading on one another. Each had his pedigree, and each had his post; and neither was according to their own ideas — all was of God. He gave the pedigree, and He assigned the standard. There was no need to compare one with another, and no ground for jealousy. Each had his place to fill and his work to do. There was work enough and room enough for all.
- Counted — God calls for the number Himself, because the people are His own. The census shows His interest in each one now, not just His purposes for eternity.
- Cleared — declaring the pedigree sorted the true Israelite from the mixed multitude that had come out of Egypt with them.
- Claimed — God traced the line by families and fathers' houses, so men stood in His army beside their own brothers.
- Confirmed — the test today is spiritual birth, not natural descent. To be "in Christ" is the pedigree of supreme value, and death cannot break that line.
- Commissioned — a man sure of his pedigree could take his standard and his post. Doubt about the first leaves no order in the second.
As Jehovah had commanded Moses, so he numbered them in the wilderness of Sinai.
This verse gives no total. It gives a reason — "as the LORD commanded Moses" — and a place: the desert of Sinai.
The census begins with a command from God, and that command carries a claim. The careful, repeated totals say who Israel belongs to.
This was an expression of His rights as Lord of Israel. He had title to take their number, for they were all His own. If He had no right to them, and no prospects in them, He would not have counted their sum. Scripture says the same of His divine title in another part of His dominions: "He determines the number of the stars; He gives to all of them their names." This is how He expresses His sovereignty among the heavenly hosts (Psalm 147:4).
That is why the same act can later be a sin. When David numbered Israel, the count itself was not the problem; the counter was.
It was an offence against this peculiar right of the Lord that David was guilty of. He claimed something of the divine glory when he sought to number Israel, as though they had been his own people… It was a trespass on the divine rights. It was an insult to the majesty of Him who was Lord and King of Israel. He could number Israel, because they were His own special treasure.
The order matters. The Passover — the meal that marked Israel's rescue from Egypt — came before this count.
The Passover commemorated the basis on which the redemption of the people rested. That came first, and the numbering of the people followed. So the picture makes one fact clear: God numbers and counts as His only those who have been redeemed.
The place named in this verse sets the tone for the whole book. Those counted are men of fighting age, and the ground under their feet is desert.
Here we find ourselves at once "in the wilderness." Only those "able to go to war" are counted. This stands out clearly. In Genesis the descendants of Israel were still unborn, in their father Abraham. In Exodus they were in the brick-kilns of Egypt. In Leviticus they were gathered round the tent of meeting. In Numbers they are seen in the wilderness.
The count also carries a comfort most readers miss. God numbers His people for the journey, not only for the destination.
We can all understand the sweetness of being numbered for heaven, and the heart of most people turns to that. But even those who take the greatest comfort in the counsels of God that secure them for eternity are apt to forget something. The Lord takes a present interest in all our movements, ways, conflicts, and trials. This is the first thing with which the book opens.
No one joined the list by claim alone. Each man had to state his family line. A large crowd of outsiders had attached itself to Israel on the way out of Egypt.
They had to declare their family line, and only those who could do that had a place in this mustering and could be warriors. They needed that proof because of the mixed crowd of outsiders who had joined themselves to the people of God… Our pedigree, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God. And we are called to a spiritual war. It is not against flesh and blood, but against the devil, his schemes, and the wicked spirits (Ephesians 6:11-12).
Obedience is what the record praises here. One writer treats the phrase as a test that still applies.
Everything was done in obedience — "as the LORD commanded Moses." Eight times we read that everything was done according to the instructions he had received… As Samuel said to Saul, "To obey is better than sacrifice, and to listen than the fat of rams"… There never was a time of greater energy and activity. Never did larger crowds gather for what they call worship. But measure these things by the test in the words "as the LORD commanded Moses," and you discover that man's will, and not the Lord's, is often the main spring of it all.
- Right. God counts Israel because Israel is His. He has the right to number what belongs to Him, just as He numbers and names the stars.
- Rescue. The Passover came first and the census followed — God counts as His those who have been redeemed.
- Roll. Each man had to declare his family line; the mixed multitude that came out of Egypt had no place on the list.
- Road. They are counted in the wilderness, as men able to go to war. God takes a present interest in every movement, conflict and trial — not only in the destination.
- Rule. One phrase measures the whole muster: it was done as the LORD commanded. Energy and crowds prove nothing where man's will, not God's word, drives the work.
And the sons of Reuben, Israel's eldest son, their generations, after their families, according to their fathers' houses, by the number of the names, according to their polls, every male from twenty years old and upward, all that went forth to military service
Numbers 1:20 opens the tribe-by-tribe count of Israel's fighting men, and Reuben, Jacob's oldest son, comes first. The verse raises the questions the chapter turns on: why God counts His people, why only men fit for war, and why each man must prove his line.
This count is not bookkeeping.
He was careful to assert His title and survey His possessions. He would have the number of Israel brought to Him exactly, for they were all His own. He called them by their names, and knew their numbers.
The Lord's interest is not only in where His people end up.
We can all understand how sweet it is to be counted for heaven, and that is where most hearts turn. But even those who take the greatest comfort in God's purposes securing them for eternity easily forget one thing. The Lord takes a present interest in all our movements, ways, conflicts, and trials. This is the first thing the book opens with.
The setting explains the list. Only fighting men appear on it.
Here we find ourselves at once "in the wilderness," where the list takes in only those "able to go to war." In the book of Genesis the seed of Israel were in the loins of their father Abraham. In the book of Exodus they were in the brick-kilns of Egypt. In Leviticus they gathered round the tent of meeting. In Numbers we see them in the wilderness... But as soon as we open the book of Numbers we read of men of war, of armies, of standards, of camps, and trumpets sounding the alarm.
Each man had to show his descent. That requirement had a practical cause: a mixed crowd had left Egypt alongside Israel, and not everyone in the camp belonged to the nation.
Each man had to declare his pedigree after his family. Only those who could do that had a place in this mustering and could be warriors. They had to show their pedigree because of the mixed multitude which had joined itself to the people of God. Our pedigree, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God. And our calling is to a spiritual warfare, not with flesh and blood, but against the devil and his schemes and the wicked spirits (Eph. 6:11-12).
Nothing in wilderness life worked without that certainty.
It is impossible for anyone to recognise and rally round the proper "standard" unless he can declare his "pedigree"... How could an Israelite of old have taken his place in the assembly, or stood in the ranks? How could he make any progress through the wilderness, if he could not plainly declare his pedigree? Impossible.
The age limit marks when a man counted as grown and fit for service.
The Israelites were numbered from twenty years old and upward. That was the age when they could go out to war, and when they reached manhood and were fit for the service of life (Num. 1:3; 14:29; Lev. 27:3). Each man had to bring a bekah, or half shekel, to make atonement for his soul, so that "there be no plague among them." (Ex. 30:12.)
The age limit falls differently today.
Today all of His saints are fitted for spiritual warfare — women, young and old too — though some are less active because of age. Yet the lesson is also clear for us. To take part in real conflict we need maturity, or full age, which comes through knowledge and growth in the word of God.
The firstborn heads the list, but his place in the line does not guarantee his future.
Reuben (Num. 1:20; Num. 26:5) heads the list. He is the firstborn, and so entitled by nature to the leadership. But because of sin he was not to have the first place. In these forty years of wandering his numbers dwindle; at the close we see him weaker than at the beginning. Looking at his history for a reason, we come to the rebellion of Dathan and Abiram, who were of this tribe (Num. 16:1). They wanted to be leaders. Pretending to claim the people's rights, they rebel against God's authority in Moses, turn back in heart to Egypt, and grumble at the trials of the way.
- Counted — God takes the number exactly because the people are His own; He calls them by name and knows their sum.
- Claimed — The census shows His interest in every movement, conflict and trial of the road, not just in a secured eternity.
- Certified — Each man declared his descent. The mixed crowd from Egypt had no place in the ranks, and neither did anyone unsure of his line.
- Conscripted — Twenty was the age of manhood and fitness for service. From then on, every man counted as a soldier.
- Cautioned — Reuben stands first by birth, yet sin costs him the first place. Rebellion in his tribe leaves him weaker at the end than at the start.
those that were numbered of them, of the tribe of Reuben, were forty-six thousand five hundred.
Reuben's tribe gives the first tribal total of the chapter: 46,500 men. Behind that figure lie three questions. Why does God count His people? Why is Reuben's name first? And what can one total teach us now?
This is a call-up for war, not a head count of the nation. Only one kind of man appears in the total, and that sets the tone for the whole book.
Here we find ourselves at once "in the wilderness," where the count includes only those who are "able to go to war." This stands out clearly. In Genesis Israel's descendants were still unborn, in their father Abraham. In Exodus they were in the brick-kilns of Egypt. In Leviticus they gathered round the tent of meeting. In Numbers we see them in the wilderness… As soon as we open the book of Numbers we read of men of war, of armies, of standards, of camps, and trumpets sounding alarm.
Scripture records more than one counting of Israel, and each had a different purpose.
The first numbering mentioned (Ex. 38:25-27) gathered the silver for the bases of the tabernacle pillars. So that counting was for the Lord, with a view to worshipping Him. The second numbering (Num. 1:2-3) came when Israel was about to fight the enemy. Its purpose was to find the number of men able to go to war. This was according to God. Every Israelite from twenty years old and upward needed to understand his own responsibility in the battles of the Lord.
A total like 46,500 is exact, and the same care runs tribe by tribe through two chapters.
This was an expression of His rights as Lord of Israel. He had title to take their number, for they were all His own. Had He not had a right to them, had He nothing to expect from them, He would not have counted their sum. Scripture says the same of His divine title in another part of His realm: "He determines the number of the stars; He gives to all of them their names." That is the expression of His sovereignty among the heavenly hosts (Psalm 147:4).
Two things could keep a man out of the total: being too young, or being unable to prove his descent. That second test mattered, because people outside Israel had left Egypt with them.
They had to declare their pedigrees after their families, and only those who could do that had a place in this mustering and could be warriors. They had to show their pedigree because of the mixed multitude that had joined the people of God. "A mixed multitude also went up with them" (Exod. 12:38)… Our pedigree, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God. And our calling is to a spiritual warfare, not with flesh and blood, but against the devil and his schemes and the wicked spirits (Eph. 6:11-12).
Another leader once counted Israel, and it went badly wrong.
In David's time, when he decided to number the people (2 Sam. 24:2-10), his motives were pride in reigning over a great nation, and 70,000 people died as a result. But God's census in Numbers shows His own vital interest in each one of His people Israel, and that interest is no less true of His saints today. The difference is that in Israel only the males over 20 years of age were numbered… Today all of His saints are fitted for spiritual warfare — women, and young and old too — though some are less active than others because of age. Yet the lesson is also clear for us. To take part in real conflict we need maturity or full age. That comes through knowledge and growth in the word of God.
Reuben's tribe comes first in the count. Birth put him at the head of the list, but birth is not the whole story.
Reuben (Num. 1:20; Num. 26:5) heads the list — the firstborn, and therefore entitled, according to nature, to the leadership; but because of sin he was not to have the excellency. In these forty years of wandering his numbers dwindle; at the close we see him weaker than at the beginning. Looking at his history for a reason for this, we come to the rebellion of Dathan and Abiram, who were of this tribe (Num. 16:1).
The figure means more when set beside the second census.
His numbers shrink from 46,500 at the beginning to 43,730 at the close. From that we may learn the loss that fleshly reasoning and self-important claims bring into our lives.
- Counted. The exact totals are God's claim of ownership — He counts what is His own, as He counts and names the stars.
- Qualified. No man entered the total without proving his descent. Today that place comes by the new birth.
- Aged. Twenty years and upward means conflict calls for maturity, which comes by growth in God's word.
- Armed. The census counted men for war, so each man had to grasp his own responsibility in the Lord's battles.
- Diminished. Reuben led the list by birth but ended the journey weaker, and the falling number shows what fleshly reasoning costs.
Of the sons of Simeon their generations, after their families, according to their fathers' houses, those that were numbered of them, by the number of the names, according to their polls, every male from twenty years old and upward, all that went forth to military service
Numbers 1 records God's own count of Israel in the wilderness of Sinai, tribe by tribe, and verse 22 gives Simeon's turn in the roll call. Why did God want such a register, and why does Simeon's entry repay a closer look?
The census was not paperwork. Its purpose runs through the whole book.
God's wisdom made the census of the children of Israel necessary. The first thing the early chapters set before us is a count of the males who were fit for war. But the numbering goes beyond this, as we shall find. It has other purposes than war. In short, whatever the aim of a given part of the book, God impresses this on us. He shows the care and the interest He takes in everyone who belongs to Him. It is a very simple truth, but it is full of comfort to the soul.
The counting is also an act of ownership.
He was careful in this way to assert His title and survey His possessions. He would have the number of Israel exactly brought to Him, for they were all His own. He called them by their names, and knew their numbers.
Scripture records more than one numbering, and each had its own purpose.
The purpose of the first numbering mentioned (Ex. 38:25-27) was to gather the silver, a bekah per man, for the bases of the pillars of the tabernacle. So that numbering took place for the Lord, with a view to worshipping Him. The second numbering (Num. 1:2-3) came when Israel was about to fight the enemy. Its purpose was to find the number of men able to go to war. This was according to God. Every Israelite from twenty years old and upward needed to understand his personal responsibility in the battles of the Lord.
The age limit of twenty carries its own lesson for today.
In Israel only the males over 20 years of age were numbered... Today all of His saints are fit for spiritual warfare — women, and young and old too — though some are less active than others because of age. Yet the lesson is also clear for us. Real conflict needs maturity, or full age, and that comes through knowledge and growth in the word of God.
A man of Simeon could not be counted until he showed where he came from.
They had to declare their pedigrees after their families, and only those who could do that had a place in this mustering and could be warriors. They needed to show their pedigree because of the mixed multitude that had joined itself to the people of God: "A mixed multitude also went up with them" (Ex. 12:38)... Our pedigree, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God.
One writer turns the same detail into a question for the reader.
First, it raises this important question for the reader: "Can I declare my pedigree?" There is real reason to fear that hundreds, if not thousands, of professing Christians are completely unable to do so. They cannot say with clearness and decision, "we are God's children now" (1 John 3:2), or "The Spirit himself bears witness with our spirit that we are children of God" (Rom. 8:16).
Simeon carried a dark family history. Yet the tribe's prince bore a name that answered it.
The prince of Simeon was Shelumiel (v. 6), meaning "at peace with God." This is a striking contrast to Simeon's character, as his father Jacob described it in Genesis 49:5-7. Simeon, with Levi, was guilty of cruel and vicious hatred in the murder of the men of Shechem (Gen. 34:25-26). Only the grace of God could make any difference in this dreadful case. Is the flesh in us any better than in Simeon and Levi? Not at all: "the mind that is set on the flesh is hostile to God" (Rom. 8:7). Yet God has in pure grace reconciled all believers to Himself (2 Cor. 5:18), and we are "at peace with God," as Romans 5:1 declares.
Simeon's number did not hold. A later count shows what happened in between.
But the tribe of Simeon dropped drastically in numbers during the wilderness journey, from 59,300 (ch. 1:23) to 22,200. What is the reason for this? Likely it is seen in Numbers 25:14. Zimri was a leader of a father's house among the Simeonites and became a leader in the corrupting mixture of Israel with the Midianites. Think of the rebellion seen in Reuben, with Dathan and Abiram. Even that did not have effects on the people of God as devastating as being yoked together with unbelievers or with principles of unrighteousness... Too often we do not suspect the harm in unholy associations until we are trapped by them.
- Counted — the register is God's own. He surveys what belongs to Him and knows each name.
- Qualified — every man had to declare his pedigree, because a mixed multitude had joined Israel. The believer's pedigree is the new birth.
- Aged — twenty years and upward points to maturity, which grows through God's word and which real conflict needs.
- Armed — the count was for war, and every man from twenty up had to own his part in the Lord's battles.
- Warned — Simeon's 59,300 fell to 22,200 after mixing with Midian. Mixture cost this tribe more than rebellion cost Reuben.
those that were numbered of them, of the tribe of Simeon, were fifty-nine thousand three hundred.
Simeon's total puts the tribe third in strength at the start of the wilderness journey, yet the same tribe would finish that journey the weakest of all. Why does God count His people at all, and what makes a number like this rise or fall?
This count is more than record-keeping. God is claiming what is His, and He wants the number exact.
He was careful to assert His title and survey His possessions. He would have the number of Israel brought to Him exactly, for they were all His own. He called them by their names, and He knew their numbers.
The same care runs through the whole book, whatever the aim of each part.
In the early chapters the main object is a count of the males fit for war. But we will find that the numbering goes beyond this. It has other aims than war. Whatever the particular aim in different parts of the book, God impresses this on us: the care and the interest He takes in everyone who belongs to Him. It is a very simple truth, but certainly full of comfort to the soul.
The 59,300 are not just all the men of Simeon. They are the men who could prove their descent and were fit to fight.
The numbering was "by clans, by fathers' houses." Those to be numbered were "from twenty years old and upward, all in Israel who are able to go to war." They had to declare their descent by their families. Only those who could do that had a place in this mustering and could be warriors. They had to show their descent because of the mixed multitude that had joined the people of God. "A mixed multitude also went up with them" (Exodus 12:38). This mixed multitude among them fell to craving (Numbers 11:4). … Our descent, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God. And our calling is to a spiritual warfare. It is not with flesh and blood, but against the devil and his schemes and the wicked spirits (Ephesians 6:11-12).
Set beside the count taken at the end of the journey, this figure is Simeon's peak. One writer traces the tribe's decline to the company it kept.
Association is the trouble all through: a spirit of dependence that seeks help from man and not from God. It may give them a brief look of prosperity, but in the end it proves disastrous. At the beginning of their wilderness history they are 59,300 strong, third among all the tribes. At the end they are only 22,200, absolutely the weakest of all. Nor do they ever afterwards come into prominence: no name of note occurs among them.
Commentators trace the loss to one episode: the mixing of Israel with Midian at Baal-peor, where a Simeonite leader took the lead in sin.
But the tribe of Simeon dropped drastically in numbers during the wilderness journey, from 59,300 (ch. 1:23) to 22,200. What is the reason for this? It is likely seen in Numbers 25:14. Zimri was a leader of a father's house among the Simeonites and became a leader in the corrupting mixture of Israel with the Midianites. How true it is that even rebellion (as seen in Reuben, with Dathan and Abiram) does not damage the people of God as much as being yoked together with unbelievers or with principles of unrighteousness… Too often we do not suspect the harm in unholy associations until they trap us.
Simeon was not the only tribe whose number changed by the end.
In the numbering of the children of Israel at the close of their journey, we find that some of the tribes had grown much larger, and some had shrunk. Some had barely held their own. Some had made just a little progress, others had lost a little… Take the tribe of Simeon. It had lost nearly half its number, and the reason is not hard to find: God's judgment fell on them for the corruption at Baal-peor.
The decline is not the last word. Grace speaks in the family names of Simeon, and in his own name, which means hearing.
God's grace stands in such great contrast with their history, and the names of the tribal families seem to speak of it in a remarkable way… Here, indeed, Simeon's own name is fulfilled: a hearing God has heard! Blessed be He — we know Him well.
- Counted — the census asserts God's title to a people who are all His own; He calls them by name and knows their number.
- Qualified — the count took only men who could prove their descent and were fit to fight; our descent is new birth, and our warfare is spiritual.
- Peak — 59,300 is Simeon's high point; by the end of the journey the tribe is the weakest of all, and no name of note ever comes from it.
- Collapse — Baal-peor, led by a Simeonite, cost the tribe more than half its strength. Unholy ties damage God's people more than open rebellion does.
- Grace — the numbers rise and fall, but Simeon's name still stands in the second list: the God who hears had heard.
Of the sons of Gad their generations, after their families, according to their fathers' houses, by the number of the names, from twenty years old and upward, all that went forth to military service
Numbers 1:24 gives Gad's turn in the count taken at Sinai, and the wording repeats what was said of every tribe. Behind that repetition sit real questions: why God counts His people, what the age limit means, and what marks out this tribe.
The count opens the book, and the reason lies deeper than military planning.
It was necessary in God's wisdom that the census of the children of Israel should be taken. The main purpose set before us in these early chapters is a reckoning of the males fit for war. But the numbering goes beyond this. It has other aims than warlike ones. Different parts of the book have different aims. But God impresses one thing on us throughout: the care and the interest He takes in everyone who belongs to Him.
When a man took a count of the same people, it meant something very different.
In David's time, when he decided to number the people (2 Sam. 24:2-10), his motives were pride in reigning over a great nation, and this resulted in the death of 70,000 people. But God's census in Numbers shows His own vital interest in each one of His people Israel. That interest is just as true of His saints today.
Each man had to show where he came from. That mattered, because others had left Egypt alongside Israel.
They had to declare their family line, and only those who could do so had a place in this mustering and could be warriors. They had to show their line because a mixed multitude had joined itself to the people of God. "And a mixed multitude went up also with them" (Ex. 12:38)... Our family line, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth. By it we become children of God. And our calling is to a spiritual warfare. We fight not flesh and blood, but the devil and his schemes and the wicked spirits (Eph. 6:11-12).
This was not Israel's only numbering.
The second numbering (Num. 1:2-3) came when Israel was about to fight the enemy. Its aim was to count the men able to go to war. This was according to God. Every Israelite from twenty years and upward needed to understand his own responsibility in the battles of the Lord.
The age is not arbitrary. It marks the point at which a man could stand in the line.
The earlier chapter in Exodus does not tell us why the age was fixed at "twenty years old and above," but Numbers 1 does. It adds, "all that are able to go forth to war in Israel." So these were the only ones counted or taken account of. If a man is not able to stand before the enemy, he is at present of no account. He is not yet on the ground of God's full age in the experience of his soul.
(The ESV renders the older "able to go forth to war" as "able to go to war.")
The same writer applies this to believers now.
Today all of His saints are fitted for spiritual warfare — women, and young and old too. Yet to engage in practical conflict we need maturity, or full age, such as comes through knowledge and growth in the word of God.
The name Gad carries a meaning that fits both halves of this verse — a people multiplied, and a people armed.
Gad lies next to Reuben: Gad, the type of spiritual increase, and of a militant condition too. Leah's exclamation, "A troop is coming," holds both ideas. Spiritual increase rarely comes without conflict in a world like this. In David's time we find the men of Gad standing out as warriors (1 Chron. 12:8-14).
The name of Gad's captain points to the source of that increase.
Gad means "increase." His captain Eliasaph, "God has added," son of Reuel, "known of God," shows the principle of true increase: "The Lord knows those who are His," and "The Lord added daily to the church."
The number did not hold. A second census came later, on the plains of Moab.
Gad's numbers were decreased also, from 45,650 (Num. 1:25) to 40,500 (v. 18), though we cannot point to any incident that might have caused this. Perhaps they sympathised with the rebellion of Dathan and Abiram, or shared in the corruption of Peor. Neither of these, it seems, stayed within one tribe.
- Counted — God numbers His people because He cares about each one who belongs to Him. David's later count came from pride, and cost 70,000 lives.
- Claimed — every man had to show his family line, which kept the mixed multitude out of the ranks. For the believer, that line is the new birth.
- Called — the census counted the fighting men. Each Israelite of twenty and upward had to grasp his own part in the Lord's battles.
- Capable — the age marks full growth. A man not able to stand before the enemy is not yet counted, and practical conflict still needs maturity today.
- Contested — Gad means increase, and his captain's name means "God has added." Yet increase brings conflict, and Gad's number later fell by over five thousand.
those that were numbered of them, of the tribe of Gad, were forty-five thousand six hundred and fifty.
Numbers 1:25 gives the result for one tribe in God's count of Israel: 45,650 men of Gad. One line of numbers raises real questions. Why does God count His people? What qualified a man for the list, and why does this figure matter later?
The first purpose of the count was military. It was not the only one.
In God's wisdom it was necessary to count the people of Israel. The main purpose set before us in the early chapters is a count of the men fit for war. But we will find that the numbering goes beyond this... God presses this on us — the care and the interest He takes in everyone who belongs to Him. It is a very simple truth, but it is full of comfort to the soul.
The order of events in the book shows who gets counted. The Passover, when God rescued Israel out of Egypt, came first.
The Passover marked the basis on which the redemption of the people rested. That came first, and the numbering of the people followed. So the picture makes the point that God numbers and counts as His only those He has redeemed.
King David counted Israel later too, and that count ended very differently.
In David's time, when he decided to number the people (2 Sam.24:2-10), his motives were pride in reigning over a great nation, and this resulted in the death of 70,000 people. But God's census in Numbers shows His own vital interest in each one of His people Israel, an interest that is no less true of His saints today.
Gad's 45,650 were not simply all its men. Each man had to prove his family line and be fit for battle.
Those to be counted were "from twenty years old and upward, all in Israel who are able to go to war." They had to state their family line, and only those who could do that had a place in this count and could be soldiers. They had to show their family line because a mixed crowd of outsiders had joined the people of God... Our family line, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God. And our calling is to a spiritual warfare — not with flesh and blood, but against the devil and his schemes and the wicked spirits (Eph. 6:11-12).
Israel's list stopped at an age limit. Today the reach is wider.
Today all of His saints are fitted for spiritual warfare — women too, and young and old — though because of age some are less active than others. Yet the lesson is clear for us as well. To take part in real conflict we need maturity, the full growth that comes through knowing the word of God and growing in it.
Gad's name and story suit a tribe on a war list.
From both his name and his history, Gad seems to be a warrior-tribe... In Jacob's prophecy he is overcome before he overcomes, and so he knows how to turn defeat into victory. When Leah named him, his name was a prophecy of increase, and his seven sons all survive in families.
The name of Gad's leader points to who supplies that growth.
Eliasaph, meaning "God has added," was the leader of Gad... so his name shows that God will give the increase that brings the triumph. His father's name, Deuel, means "known of God." Knowing that God knows us leads to spiritual increase in daily life. This too has to do with getting ready for conflict. But God is the source of all.
The figure was not left as a statistic. It fixed Gad's position in the marching camp around the tabernacle.
The tribe of Reuben was in the middle on the south side, and under his standard were also the tribes of Simeon and Gad on either side (vs.10-16), the total number of men in the three tribes 151,450. These under Reuben's standard followed those under Judah's standard when they broke camp.
At the second census, years later, Gad's number had fallen. Commentators differ on the cause, because Scripture names none.
Gad's numbers were decreased also, from 45,650 (Num.1:25) to 40,500 (v.18), though we cannot point to any incident that might have caused this. It is possible they sympathized with the rebellion of Dathan and Abiram or were involved in the corruption of Peor.
Another writer looks at Gad's neighbours in the camp for the reason.
Gad also shows a weakening at the end. His outward history shows no reason for this, unless his close link with Reuben and Simeon (Num. 2:10-16) made him a sharer in their sin and judgment. Keeping company with those who do evil weakens a person, even when outwardly he takes no part in it... Many of God's people are growing weaker through church, business, social, or family ties with people who drag them into worldliness.
- Redeemed first. The Passover came before the census — God counts as His only those He has already rescued.
- Counted personally. Behind the tribal total stands God's care and interest in every single one who belongs to Him.
- Qualified by birth. Each man had to show his descent; the pedigree that gives a place among God's people today is the new birth.
- Increase from God. Gad's name is a prophecy of increase, and his leader Eliasaph — "God has added" — points to who supplies it.
- Weakened by association. By the second census the 45,650 had fallen to 40,500. Writers point to shared rebellion, or just close company with failing neighbours.
Of the sons of Judah their generations, after their families, according to their fathers' houses, by the number of the names, from twenty years old and upward, all that went forth to military service
The roll call at Sinai reaches Judah. The wording is the same for every tribe: family, father's house, names, age, fitness for war. So why does God count people at all? Who qualifies? And why does this tribe lead the army?
Why does God count anyone at all? The event just before the census answers that.
The Passover commemorated the basis on which the redemption of the people rested. That came first, and the numbering of the people followed. In this way the picture made the point: God numbers and counts as His only those whom He has redeemed.
Judah's total is not national statistics. The care in the record says something about who owns these people.
This was an expression of His rights as Lord of Israel. He had title to take their number, for they were all His own. If He had no right to them, and no prospects in them, He would not have counted their total. The same is said of His divine title in another part of His dominions: "He determines the number of the stars; he gives to all of them their names." This is the expression of His sovereignty among the heavenly hosts. (Psalm 147:4)
The same act done from a different heart brought disaster later in Israel's history.
In David's time, when he decided to number the people (2 Sam. 24:2-10), his motives were pride in reigning over a great nation, and the result was the death of 70,000 people. But God's census in Numbers shows His own vital interest in each one of His people Israel, an interest that is no less true of His saints today.
Judah's men are listed "by their clans, by their fathers' houses." That rule filtered people out, because Israel had not left Egypt alone.
They had to declare their pedigrees after their families, and only those who could do that had a place in this mustering and could be warriors. This showing of their pedigree was necessary because of the mixed multitude that had joined the people of God. "A mixed multitude also went up with them" (Ex. 12:38). Our pedigree, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God.
Why does the count start at twenty? The last phrase of the verse gives the reason.
This chapter in Exodus does not give us the reason why those who were numbered had to be "twenty years old and above," but Numbers 1 does. It adds, "every man able to go to war." These, therefore, were the only ones to be numbered or taken account of. If a man is not able to stand before the enemy, he is at present of no account. He has not yet reached God's full age in the experience of his soul. So he is not one of the "perfect" named in 1 Corinthians 2. The Corinthians had fallen under the power of the enemy — the seductions of the world — and the apostle could not address them as "perfect," or full grown.
Who counts as fit to fight today reaches wider than the muster roll at Sinai.
The difference is that in Israel only the males over 20 years of age were numbered... Today all of His saints are fitted for spiritual warfare — women, young and old too — though some are less active by reason of age. Yet the lesson is also clear for us: to engage in practical conflict we need maturity, or full age. That comes through knowledge and growth in the word of God. To be "a good soldier of Christ Jesus" also calls for undivided devotion, and for not being tangled up in the affairs of this life (2 Tim. 2:3-4). We have been called to the exclusive service of our Lord, and so should please Him.
Judah comes fourth in the list of tribes, but not fourth in rank.
But why is Judah foremost, the leader of all Israel in this way? His name and what we have seen of his history account for it... We have read his motto in the words of Jacob: "The spirit of praise is the spirit of power." Judah is foremost here for the same reason that Jehoshaphat in a later day put his singers and trumpeters at the front of the battle against the enemy. When they began to sing and praise, the Lord went out against the foe and struck them down. (2 Chron. 20)
Judah's total of 74,600 is worth setting beside the count taken at the end of the wilderness years.
Judah, however, is in happy contrast to the earlier decline, for it increased from 74,600 (Num. 1:27) to 76,500 (v. 22). This testifies that we need not be weakened by the trials of the wilderness journey, but may be strengthened. It depends on the reality and consistency of our faith in the living God. Judah's name (meaning "praise") may remind us that the spirit of praise increases fruitfulness.
- Redeemed first. Passover comes before the census; God numbers as His only those He has redeemed.
- Owned, therefore counted. The exact record shows His title over people already His own. He counts out of interest in each one; David later counted out of pride.
- Registered by pedigree. Only those who could show their descent took a place in the ranks. The mixed multitude could not.
- Aged for war. Twenty and upward marks full growth. Anyone who cannot stand before the enemy is not yet fighting strength.
- Praise leads out. Judah goes at the head, and Judah came out of the wilderness larger than it went in. The spirit of praise is the spirit of power, and it increases fruitfulness.
those that were numbered of them, of the tribe of Judah, were seventy-four thousand six hundred.
Numbers 1 records a head count of Israel, tribe by tribe, and the figure for Judah comes to 74,600. Behind that bare number lie two questions: why God wanted His people counted at all, and why this tribe stands at the front.
The count was a claim of ownership, made with care over what belonged to Him.
The book opens with His command to Moses to take the number of the tribes, and Moses does it with great exactness and care. Numbers 1 and Numbers 2 set down the number of each tribe, except Levi, again and again... This was an expression of His rights as Lord of Israel. He had the right to take their number, for they were all His own. If He had no right to them, and no future purposes in them, He would not have counted their total. Scripture says the same of His title over another part of His dominion: "He determines the number of the stars; He gives to all of them their names."
Counting Israel was not always right. One writer sets this count beside a later one taken by David.
In David's time, when he decided to number the people (2 Sam. 24:2-10), his motives were pride in reigning over a great nation, and this resulted in the death of 70,000 people. But God's census in Numbers shows His own vital interest in each one of His people Israel, an interest that is just as true of His saints today.
The men counted were those from twenty years old and upward who could go out to war. That one qualification sets the tone of the whole book.
Here we find ourselves at once "in the wilderness," where the only people counted are those "able to go to war." The point stands out sharply... But as soon as we open the book of Numbers, we read of fighting men, armies, standards, camps, and trumpets sounding the alarm.
The age limit carries a lesson for readers who are not Israelite soldiers. Fitness for battle came with years.
The difference is that Israel counted only the males over 20 years of age. There would be a cut-off age too, since this involved only those who were fit for military service. Today all of His saints are fit for spiritual warfare — women, young and old as well — though because of age some are less active than others. Yet the lesson is clear for us too. To take part in practical conflict we need maturity, or full age, and that comes through knowledge and growth in the word of God.
The name of the tribe explains the place it holds among the twelve.
Judah means praise. It was the leading tribe of Israel. It marched at the front through the wilderness (Num. 10:14), and it led the fighting in Canaan (Judges 1:1-2). The kingship belonged to this tribe — to the family of David — and Jerusalem, the city of the great King, was on its border... Praise, flowing from a satisfied heart, occupied with the glories of God — this is His sceptre! What a rule, where joy holds sway instead of force, and the only constraint is love.
Why should the tribe named praise lead the whole camp? One writer answers from a later battle in Israel's history.
But why Judah foremost, the leader of all Israel in this way? His name and what we have seen of his history account for this... We have also read his motto in the words of Jacob: "The spirit of praise is the spirit of power." Judah is first here for the same reason that Jehoshaphat, in a later day, placed his singers and trumpeters at the front of the battle against the enemy. When they began to sing and praise, the Lord went out against the foe and struck them down. (2 Chron. 20.) And so it is here.
Numbers 26 records a second count at the end of the desert years. Others had declined. Judah had not.
Judah, however, is in happy contrast to the previous decline, for it increased from 74,600 (Num.1:27) to 76,500 (v.22). This shows that the trials of the wilderness journey need not weaken us. They may strengthen us instead. It depends on how real and consistent our faith in the living God is. Judah's name (meaning "praise") may remind us that the spirit of praise increases fruitfulness.
- Counted — God had every tribe counted because they were all His own. The census states His title over His people.
- For war — the list named only men of twenty and older who could fight. The book opens with armies, standards and alarm trumpets because it opens in the wilderness.
- Matured — the age limit teaches that practical conflict calls for growth through the word of God, not just willingness.
- Praise first — Judah means praise. This tribe marched at the head of Israel and led the battles in Canaan, just as Jehoshaphat later sent his singers ahead of his army.
- Increased — Judah grew from 74,600 here to 76,500 by the end of the journey. The wilderness need not weaken those whose faith in the living God stays real and steady.
Of the sons of Issachar their generations, after their families, according to their fathers' houses, by the number of the names, from twenty years old and upward, all that went forth to military service
Numbers 1:28 is Issachar's turn in a roll call that repeats the same formula for every tribe. Why does God count His people at all, why does He count them by family, and why is the test fitness for battle?
One writer explains why God wanted the exact number of Israel brought to Him.
He was careful in this way to assert His title, and survey His possessions. He would have the number of Israel exactly brought to Him, for they were all His own. He called them by their names, and knew their numbers.
The Passover, the feast that remembers Israel's rescue from Egypt, is described in chapter 9. But God gave those instructions about a month before the census of chapter 1.
The Passover commemorated the basis on which the redemption of the people rested. That came first, and the numbering of the people followed. This picture stresses the fact that God only numbers and counts as His those who have been redeemed.
Every man had to show where he came from. A large group of non-Israelites had left Egypt with Israel, so descent mattered.
They had to declare their pedigree by their families, and only those who could do that had a place in this muster and could be warriors. They needed to show their pedigree because a mixed crowd of outsiders had joined the people of God... Our pedigree, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God. And our calling is to a spiritual warfare, not with flesh and blood, but against the devil and his schemes and the wicked spirits (Eph. 6:11-12).
Another writer turns that same certainty into a test for Christians.
It is impossible for anyone to recognise and rally round the proper "standard" unless he can declare his "pedigree."... How could an Israelite of old have taken his place in the assembly? How could he have stood in the ranks? How could he expect to make any progress through the wilderness, if he could not clearly declare his pedigree? Impossible. It is the same with Christians now. Progress in wilderness life, and success in spiritual warfare, are out of the question if there is any uncertainty about the spiritual pedigree.
The age limit narrows the list to those fit for service. One writer notes that this limit does not carry over to today.
God's census in Numbers shows His own vital interest in each one of His people Israel, and that interest is just as true for His saints today. The difference is that in Israel only the males over 20 years of age were counted... Today all of His saints are fit for spiritual warfare — women, young and old too — though age makes some less active than others. Yet the lesson is also clear for us: to take part in real conflict we need maturity, or full age, which comes through knowledge and growth in the word of God.
Another writer sets this count beside the other two numberings and gives each its own purpose.
The first numbering (Ex. 38:25-27) collected the silver that formed the bases of the tabernacle pillars; that count was made for the Lord and for worshipping Him. The second numbering (Num. 1:2-3) came when Israel was about to fight the enemy. Its purpose was to count the men able to go to war. This was according to God. Every Israelite from twenty years and upward needed to understand his own responsibility in the battles of the Lord. The Word mentions a third numbering (Num. 26:2, 52-65) of those fit for military service, and this one looked ahead to dividing up the land.
The tribe's old character and the name of its leader in verse 8 pull in opposite directions.
The prince of Issachar was Nethanel (v.8), meaning "the gift of God." That name stands in contrast to Issachar's character in Genesis 49:14-15: a donkey brought under bondage for hire. In the same way Israel under law served for hire, instead of receiving every blessing as a gift from God.
Issachar's number here was not the tribe's final one.
At the first numbering there were of Issachar 54,400 fit for war, and at the second 64,300. They are described as "valiant men of might," and they furnished 36,000 men of war. 1 Chr. 7:4-5.
- Redeemed first. The Passover came before the census; God numbers as His only those He has already rescued.
- Owned next. The exact figure is a claim of ownership — He counts what belongs to Him, and calls them by name.
- Named after that. Outsiders had joined Israel, so each man had to declare his descent. Certainty about where you belong is what lets you stand in the ranks.
- Grown then. Twenty years and upward means maturity. Maturity comes through knowing and growing in God's word.
- Armed last. The count measures fitness for battle. Every man from twenty upward had to grasp his own responsibility in the Lord's wars.
those that were numbered of them, of the tribe of Issachar, were fifty-four thousand four hundred.
This verse records the count of one tribe: Issachar, 54,400 men. Why would God have His people counted tribe by tribe, and what does one tribe's total have to do with us?
This counting is God laying claim to what belongs to Him. One writer sets it beside the way God numbers the stars:
They open with His commandment to Moses to take the number of the tribes, and this is done with great exactness and care... This was an expression of His rights as Lord of Israel. He had title to take their number, for they were all His own. If He had no right to them, and no prospects in them, He would not have counted their sum. Scripture says the same of His divine title in another part of His kingdom: "He determines the number of the stars; He gives to all of them their names."
The war lists are not the whole purpose of the count:
In the early chapters the main purpose is a count of the males who were fit for war. But we shall find that the counting goes beyond this. It has other aims besides war. Whatever the particular aim in various parts of the book, God impresses this on us: the care and the interest He takes in everyone who belongs to Him. It is a very simple truth, but certainly full of comfort to the soul.
Commentators contrast this count with the one David later ordered:
After Israel left Egypt, over a year passed before we read of this census being taken. In David's time, when he decided to number the people (2 Sam. 24:2-10), his motives were pride in reigning over a great nation, and this resulted in the death of 70,000 people. But God's census in Numbers shows His own vital interest in each one of His people Israel, an interest that is no less true of His saints today.
Issachar's 54,400 are fighting men, and that sets the tone of the whole book:
Here we find ourselves at once "in the wilderness," where only those who are "able to go to war" are counted... In Genesis we listen to the call of God in election. In Exodus we look at the blood of the Lamb in redemption. In Leviticus we are taken up almost entirely with the worship and service of the sanctuary. But no sooner have we opened the book of Numbers than we read of men of war, of armies, of standards, of camps, and trumpets sounding alarm.
No man entered Issachar's total without proving where he came from. That requirement had a practical cause — and a personal application:
They had to declare their family descent, family by family. Only those who could do that had a place in this count and could be warriors. Proof of descent was needed because of the mixed multitude that had joined itself to the people of God. "A mixed multitude also went up with them" (Exod. 12:38)... So only those who could show by their descent their rightful place among the people of God were counted and could go to war. Our own descent, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God. And our calling is to a spiritual warfare, not with flesh and blood, but against the devil and his schemes and the wicked spirits (Eph. 6:11-12).
The number here is not the end of Issachar's story. Set beside the later count, this tribe gained more than the famous ones did:
Issachar's increase was greater still, from 54,400 (Num. 1:29) to 64,300 (v. 25). This teaches at least one very valuable lesson. Someone who is not prominent in any public way may gain far more for the Lord than more prominent people do. The judgment seat of Christ will no doubt give us some surprises along this line.
One writer insists these totals are not filler. He puts the burden on the reader, not on the text:
We should be fully confident that there is spiritual significance in all these numbers. The reason is that "all Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable" (2 Tim. 3:16). If we cannot see the significance of these things, the fault is our own ignorance. The total number of men over 20 in the twelve tribes was 603,550.
- Counted because owned. God numbers Israel to assert His title; He counts them as He counts the stars, because they are all His own.
- Counted, then known. The census shows the care and interest God takes in everyone who belongs to Him — a simple truth, but full of comfort.
- Counted for conflict. God counted only men able to go to war. Numbers opens with armies, standards, camps and alarm trumpets.
- Counted by descent. No one entered the total without proving his family line. For the believer, that line is the new birth.
- Counted, then increased. Issachar's 54,400 later grew to 64,300. Those with no public prominence may gain the most, which hints at surprises at the judgment seat of Christ.
Of the sons of Zebulun their generations, after their families, according to their fathers' houses, by the number of the names, from twenty years old and upward, all that went forth to military service
Numbers 1:30 is Zebulun's line in a roll call. Every tribe gets the same wording: family, father's house, names, age, fitness for war. Two questions come out of that wording. Why does God count His people at all? And why count them as soldiers?
The census belongs to a sequence. God gave the Passover instructions about a month before this numbering. The Passover remembered Israel's rescue out of Egypt.
The Passover commemorated the basis on which the redemption of the people rested. That came first, and the numbering of the people followed. So this picture makes the point: God only numbers and counts as His those who have been redeemed.
A list of names can look like cold paperwork. The writers read it as the opposite.
In God's wisdom the census of the children of Israel had to be taken. The main object in the early chapters is a count of the males fit for war. But we shall find that the numbering goes beyond this. There are other concerns and purposes than war. In short, the aim may differ in various parts of the book. But God impresses this on us — the care and the interest He takes in everyone who belongs to Him. It is a very simple truth, but certainly full of comfort to the soul.
"By their generations, after their families" is not filler. Each man had to prove where he came from, and there was a reason.
They had to declare their pedigrees after their families, and only those who could do that had a place in this mustering and could be warriors. They had to show their pedigree because of the mixed multitude that had joined the people of God. "A mixed multitude also went up with them" (Exodus 12:38)... So only those who could show by their pedigree their rightful place among the people of God were mustered and could go to war. Our pedigree, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God. And our calling is to a spiritual warfare — not with flesh and blood, but against the devil and his schemes and the wicked spirits (Ephesians 6:11-12).
A man had to settle his descent before he could stand in the ranks. The same question presses on anyone unsure of his standing with God.
There must be the witness of the Spirit that you are a child of God, and this witness always goes with simple faith in the Lord Jesus Christ... We believe there are hundreds of the true spiritual Israel who are not able to declare their pedigree. But we ask, are such able to go out to war? Are they vigorous military men? Far from it. They cannot even know what true conflict is. Instead, people like this mistake their doubts and fears, their dark and cloudy seasons, for real Christian conflict.
The age limit decided who was counted in Israel. It also shows what fits a person for battle now.
The difference is that in Israel only the males over twenty years of age were numbered... Today all of His saints are fitted for spiritual warfare, women and young and old too, though because of age some are less active than others. Yet the lesson is also clear for us. To take part in practical conflict we need maturity, or full age. That comes through knowledge and growth in the word of God.
Zebulun's history had a weak spot in it. The name of the prince who led the tribe answers that weakness.
Listed next is the prince of Zebulun, Eliab. His name means "God is a Father." In Genesis 49:13 Zebulun pictures Israel living close to the other nations, a haven for ships, and so giving up her proper separation to God. In beautiful contrast, the name "God is a Father" reminds us of 2 Corinthians 6:14-18. There believers are urged to come out from unholy ties. In doing so God assures them, "I will be a father to you, and you shall be sons and daughters to me."
Zebulun does not stand alone here. He is grouped with Issachar under Judah.
The last thought connects with Issachar. He and Zebulun fight under Judah's banner, and Issachar's captain is Nathaniel, whose name means "the gift of God." It is clear that they are both under the best of leadership. The one will not seek his own, nor the other stray off to the world, while Judah leads.
- Redeemed first. The Passover came before the census: God numbers as His only those He has already redeemed.
- Named next. The repeated wording is not bookkeeping but care. God takes personal interest in everyone who belongs to Him.
- Proved then. Each man had to prove his descent, because a mixed multitude had joined Israel. The believer's pedigree is the new birth.
- Matured then. Twenty years and upward points to maturity — the growth through the word of God that real conflict needs.
- Led last. Zebulun's pull toward the nations meets two answers: the name "God is a Father," and a place under Judah, where he will not stray off to the world.
those that were numbered of them, of the tribe of Zebulun, were fifty-seven thousand four hundred.
Numbers 1:31 is one line in a long roll call: the tribe of Zebulun turns out 57,400 men fit to fight. Why would God want a headcount at all? And what does that number say about how He sees each person in the crowd?
Scripture records each tribe's total with care. That care says something about ownership. One writer reads the whole census as God's public claim on a people who already belonged to Him.
These chapters open with His command to Moses to take the number of the tribes. Moses does this with great exactness and care. The number of each tribe, except Levi, appears again and again in Numbers 1 and Numbers 2, and Levi's in the same way in Numbers 3 and Numbers 4. This was an expression of His rights as Lord of Israel. He had the right to take their number, for they were all His own. If He had no claim on them, and no purpose ahead for them, He would not have counted them at all.
The order of events matters. God gave the Passover — the night He spared Israel in Egypt through the blood of a lamb — before this count. The order is deliberate.
The Passover commemorated the basis on which the redemption of the people rested. That came first, and the numbering of the people followed. So the picture makes the point that God only numbers and counts as His those who have been redeemed.
Zebulun's 57,400 are not the whole tribe. They are the men twenty years old and upward who could take the field, and that limit carries meaning.
This chapter does not tell us why the age of those counted was set at "twenty years old and upward," but Numbers 1 does. It adds, "all in Israel who are able to go to war." So these were the only ones counted or taken into account. If a man is not able to stand before the enemy, he is at present of no account.
Another writer applies that limit to Christians today, and says what fitness for conflict costs.
Today God fits all of His saints for spiritual warfare, women and young and old too, though because of age some are less active than others. Yet the lesson is also clear for us. To take part in practical conflict we need maturity, or full age. That comes through knowledge and growth in the word of God. To be "a good soldier of Jesus Christ" also calls for undivided devotion. It means not getting entangled with the affairs of this life (2 Tim. 2:3-4).
The man over these 57,400 was Eliab. His name answers something in the tribe's own history.
Listed next is the prince of Zebulun, Eliab. His name means "God is a Father." In Genesis 49:13 Zebulun pictures Israel living close to the Gentile nations. The tribe is a haven for ships, and so compromises her proper separation to God. In beautiful contrast to this, "God is a Father" reminds us of 2 Corinthians 6:14-18. There believers are urged to come out from unholy associations. As they do, God assures them, "I will be a father to you, and you shall be sons and daughters to me."
Counting is not the end of it. The next chapter gives each tribe a place, and sets Zebulun beside Judah.
The standard of Judah included two other tribes, Issachar and Zebulun (vv. 5-7), one camped on each side of Judah. All of this pictures God maintaining spiritual order in the church. It is not a precise physical order, but an order that glorifies His name through the submissive obedience of His saints in unity and devotion to His name.
Nearly forty years later, at the second census on the edge of the land, Zebulun's total is read again.
Zebulun likewise showed an increase, from 57,400 (Num. 1:31) to 60,500 (Num. 26:27) — not as great as Issachar's, but more than Judah's. Zebulun too was not as prominent as Judah was, or Reuben.
The second count says something about God, not just about Zebulun.
God took account of every one of His people when they entered the wilderness. The same grace shows that His love had not weakened, and that His personal interest in them was the same to the end. There was everything that could have turned Him aside, had that been possible. He loves to convince His people of His unwavering love, in spite of their failure.
- Claimed. The exact totals are God asserting His title; He counted Israel because they were His own.
- Redeemed. The Passover came before the census — God numbers as His only those He has redeemed.
- Equipped. God counted only men of twenty and upward who could go to war. Strength for conflict is what makes a person of account here.
- Placed. Zebulun was not just counted. God gave the tribe a place beside Judah, under Judah's standard — order that honours His name.
- Increased. 57,400 became 60,500 by the second census, proof that His interest in each one was unchanged to the end.
Of the sons of Joseph of the children of Ephraim their generations, after their families, according to their fathers' houses, by the number of the names, from twenty years old and upward, all that went forth to military service
Ephraim's tribe appears here under the name of Joseph — one father's name filling two places in the register. Behind that small detail lie a lost birthright, a reversed birth order, and God's own reckoning of who was fit to fight.
The verse ties Ephraim back to his father Joseph. That link points to an inheritance that moved out of the eldest son's hands.
1 Chronicles 5:2 tells us, concerning Israel, that "the birthright belonged to Joseph," and verse 1 tells us that Reuben's (the eldest son) birthright "was given to the sons of Joseph the son of Israel." We can see why Joseph had two sons and only two: so that he might have the double portion of the firstborn. So when the land was shared out, each of Israel's sons (Levi excluded for obvious reasons) had a single portion — one tribe each. Joseph had the double portion, two tribes: Ephraim and Manasseh.
One tribe had already dropped out of this military census. Splitting Joseph in two kept the count at twelve.
A little more than a year after the Exodus, the Lord told Moses to number the people who could bear arms, from twenty years old and upward. Levi was exempt from military service, so Moses numbered that tribe separately. But dividing Joseph into Ephraim and Manasseh made up the complete number, twelve.
Ephraim was the younger son, yet in this muster for war his name comes first. One writer contrasts two ways of listing the brothers — by birth, and by God's choice:
In the other list Manasseh again takes his place in relation to Ephraim according to the order of birth. But for combat Ephraim occupies his place according to the election of grace.
Jacob had already set that order when he blessed the two boys, and one writer follows it forward to Christ:
His name means "double fruitfulness." Think of the fruitfulness of the true Ephraim — the Christ of God. Ephraim was the younger of the two. Jacob knew what he was doing when he laid his hands on those two boys — his right hand on Ephraim, his left on Manasseh. He did it with spiritual understanding, for he says "I know it, I know it, my son." He understood that the second man was to have preference over the first. This world is content to go on with the first man, but our eyes have been opened to see the blessedness of the Second Man, the Christ from heaven.
Every man counted here had to show where he came from. There was a practical reason for that, and a lesson in it for us.
They had to declare their pedigrees, family by family. Only those who could do that had a place in this count, and only they could be warriors. They had to show it because a mixed multitude had joined itself to the people of God: "A mixed multitude also went up with them" (Exod. 12:38)... So only the men who could prove their rightful place among the people of God were counted, and only they could go to war. Our pedigree, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God. And our calling is to a spiritual warfare. It is not with flesh and blood, but against the devil and his schemes and the wicked spirits (Eph. 6:11-12).
The age limit of twenty carries its own point for readers today:
Today all of His saints are fit for spiritual warfare — women too, and young and old — though because of age some are less active than others. Yet the lesson is also clear for us. To take part in practical conflict we need maturity, or full age, such as comes through knowledge and growth in the word of God.
The census was not mere record-keeping. It was an act of ownership.
These chapters open with His commandment to Moses to take the number of the tribes, and Moses does it with great exactness and care... This was an expression of His rights as Lord of Israel. He had title to take their number, for they were all His own. If He had no right to them, and no prospects in them, He would not have counted them. The same divine title is expressed in another part of His realm: "He tells the number of the stars; He calls them all by their names."
- Birthright. Ephraim is counted under Joseph's name because Reuben lost the firstborn's double portion. It passed to Joseph, so Joseph fills two places instead of one.
- Grace. Here the younger son is counted ahead of the elder — the order of grace, not the order of birth.
- Fruitfulness. "Ephraim" means double fruitfulness. Preferring the second son to the first points forward to Christ, the Second Man from heaven.
- Pedigree. Only men who could declare their descent were counted for war. Our descent is the new birth, and our warfare is spiritual.
- Ownership. God counts His people because they are His own. He would not count them if He had no right to them.
those that were numbered of them, of the tribe of Ephraim, were forty thousand five hundred.
Numbers 1 records God's muster of Israel in the wilderness of Sinai, tribe by tribe, of every man fit to fight. Ephraim's total of 40,500 sits in that list. Why does a grandson of Jacob head a tribe at all, and what did God intend by counting these men one by one?
Ephraim appears in this census because Joseph's portion was split in two. With Levi set aside from military service, the arithmetic still reached twelve.
A little more than a year after the Exodus, the LORD commanded Moses to number the people. He was to count those able to bear arms, from twenty years old and upward. The tribe of Levi was exempt from military service, so Moses counted it separately. But the division of Joseph into Ephraim and Manasseh made up the complete number, twelve.
The double portion reached Joseph because Jacob's firstborn lost it.
Scripture confirms this. For instance, 1 Chronicles 5:2 tells us, concerning Israel, "the birthright was Joseph's." Verse 1 tells us that the birthright of Reuben, the eldest son, "was given to the sons of Joseph the son of Israel." We can see why Joseph had two sons and only two: so that he might have the double portion of the firstborn. So when the land was divided, each of Israel's sons had a single portion, that is one tribe each. Levi is left out, for obvious reasons. But Joseph had the double portion — two tribes, Ephraim and Manasseh.
This chapter puts Ephraim ahead of Manasseh, though Manasseh was the elder. The names of the two brothers explain why.
Manasseh means "forgetting" and Ephraim means "fruitful." The reason is that Joseph was made to forget the natural blessings of his father's house, and then became fruitful in Egypt. But forgetting is negative: fruitfulness is positive, and the positive must take the first place.
Elsewhere the two brothers appear in the other order, and one writer explains the difference.
This is like the numbering for combat, with one difference. Here Manasseh again takes his place in relation to Ephraim according to the order of birth. For combat, Ephraim occupies his place according to the election of grace.
The 40,500 were not every Ephraimite man. They were men of twenty and upward who could prove their descent, and that requirement had a reason.
The numbering was "after their clans, by their fathers' houses." Those to be numbered were all "from twenty years old and upward, all in Israel who are able to go to war." They had to declare their pedigrees after their families. Only those who could do that had a place in this mustering and could be warriors. They had to show their pedigree because a mixed crowd of outsiders had joined themselves to the people of God... So only a man who could show by his pedigree his rightful place among the people of God was mustered and could go to war. Our pedigree, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God.
The war list is not the whole reason for the count.
In God's wisdom the census of the children of Israel had to be taken. The early chapters present it first as a reckoning of the males who were fit for war. But we shall find that the numbering goes beyond this. There are other considerations and aims than war and warlike purposes. In short, whatever the particular aim might be in various parts of the book, God impresses this upon us — the care and the interest He takes in everyone who belongs to Him. It is a very simple truth, but certainly full of comfort to the soul.
A second count came later, and Ephraim's total had fallen.
Ephraim, however, whose name means "fruitfulness," stands in sad contrast to Manasseh, for this tribe decreased from 40,500 (Num. 1:33) to 32,500 (v. 37). This may teach us that the fruit itself will be greatly depleted if we depend on our reputation for bearing fruit. The reason is that self has become our object rather than Christ. Self-complacency is one of the most damaging attitudes we can adopt.
Another writer draws out what this means for anyone who carries a God-given name:
Fruitful Ephraim seems to contradict his name, losing eight thousand men. It is one thing to have a name by grace, quite another to prove it in our walk.
- Name given. Ephraim means "fruitful." Reuben's birthright passed to Joseph, so Joseph's double portion became two tribes.
- Place given. This war census lists the younger brother before the elder. His place rests on God's choice, not on birth order.
- Muster taken. God counted only men of twenty and upward who could show their descent. Pedigree, not mere presence in the camp, qualified a man for war.
- Care shown. The count reaches past military need. God takes personal interest in everyone who belongs to Him.
- Walk tested. By the second count the fruitful tribe had lost eight thousand men. A name given by grace still has to be proved in daily life.
Of the children of Manasseh their generations, after their families, according to their fathers' houses, by the number of the names, from twenty years old and upward, all that went forth to military service
Numbers 1:34 is Manasseh's line in a roll call God Himself ordered: every tribe counted family by family, name by name, for the men old enough to fight. The wording is the same for every tribe. So why did God want such a register at all? And why does Manasseh, Joseph's older son, come after his younger brother Ephraim?
The count served the war, but commentators find a larger purpose behind it.
The main object presented to us in the early chapters is a count of the males fit for war. But we shall find that the numbering goes beyond this. There are other considerations and objects than war and warlike purposes. In short, whatever the particular aim in various parts of the book, God impresses this on us: He cares about everyone who belongs to Him, and takes an interest in them. It is a very simple truth, but certainly full of comfort to the soul.
The order of events matters. Israel kept the Passover before the count began.
The Passover commemorated the basis on which the redemption of the people rested. That came first, and the numbering of the people followed. So this picture stressed the fact that God only numbers and counts as His those whom He has redeemed.
The list counts Manasseh's men under one heading: able to go to war. That single phrase sets the tone of the whole book.
Here we find ourselves at once "in the wilderness," where the count includes only those who are "able to go forth to war." This stands out clearly. In Genesis the descendants of Israel were still unborn, in their father Abraham. In Exodus they were in the brick-kilns of Egypt. In Leviticus they were gathered round the tent of meeting. In Numbers we see them in the wilderness... But no sooner have we opened the book of Numbers than we read of men of war, of armies, of standards, of camps, and trumpets sounding alarm.
"Their generations, by their clans, by their fathers' houses" — a man could not simply volunteer. He had to show where he came from, because outsiders had attached themselves to Israel.
They had to declare their family line. Only those who could do that had a place in this muster and could be warriors. They had to show this because of the mixed crowd of outsiders who had joined themselves to the people of God... Our family line, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God. And our calling is to a spiritual warfare, not with flesh and blood, but against the devil and his schemes and the wicked spirits (Ephesians 6:11-12).
Mackintosh turns this into a question of assurance. No Israelite would have spoken about his descent the way many Christians speak about themselves.
We can hardly imagine an Israelite, when called on to declare his family line, speaking in the doubtful way many Christians use today. We cannot conceive him saying, "Well, I am not quite sure. Sometimes I cherish the hope that I am of the stock of Israel, but at other times I am full of fear that I do not belong to the congregation of the Lord at all."
Joseph's two sons each head a tribe here, and the older brother comes second. Commentators trace that order back to Jacob's prophecy.
Manasseh comes naturally under Ephraim's headship, according to Jacob's prophecy. Manasseh — "forgetfulness" — is only negative on its own. As a means to an end, it must be connected with that end and governed by it. Only then does it have its proper character.
Rossier sets this count beside another numbering of the tribes. There Manasseh's place follows his birth; in the count for war, Ephraim's place follows God's choice.
This other numbering is like the numbering for combat, except that Manasseh here again takes his place in relation to Ephraim according to the order of birth, whereas for combat Ephraim occupies his place according to the election of grace.
The figure recorded for Manasseh here was not the end of his story. Grant sets it beside the later count.
But Manasseh increased amazingly from 32,200 (Num. 1:35) to 52,700. Manasseh means "forgetting." It may impress on us Paul's words in Philippians 3:13-14: "Forgetting what lies behind and straining forward to what lies ahead, I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus." If we have Paul's attitude of forgetting past achievements and making Christ the object of living, we shall increase more and more in fruitfulness for God.
- Redeemed — the Passover came before the census; God counts as His those He has already rescued.
- Named — the register shows the care and interest God takes in everyone who belongs to Him.
- Proved — no one entered the muster without showing his descent, because a mixed crowd had joined the people of God.
- Armed — only men able to go to war were counted, and war is the keynote of the whole wilderness book.
- Growing — Manasseh means "forgetting," and his tribe nearly doubled; letting the past go makes room for increase.
those that were numbered of them, of the tribe of Manasseh, were thirty-two thousand two hundred.
This number is one line in a long roll call of every tribe's men old enough to fight. So why did God want the count, and why does Scripture keep a figure like 32,200?
Scripture records more than one national count, and they are not all alike. One writer sets this census beside the one David ordered much later.
In David's time, when he decided to number the people (2 Sam. 24:2-10), his motives were pride in reigning over a great nation, and this resulted in the death of 70,000 people. But God's census in Numbers shows His own vital interest in each one of His people Israel, an interest that is no less true of His saints today. In Israel only the males over twenty years old were numbered, since this involved only those fit for military service. The lesson is clear for us too: to engage in practical conflict we need maturity, the full age that comes through knowledge and growth in the word of God.
The chapter opens in the second year after Egypt, and the timing matters. Instructions about the Passover — the meal that marked Israel's rescue — were given shortly before this count.
The Passover commemorated the basis on which the redemption of the people rested. That came first, and the numbering of the people followed. So the picture makes one fact clear: God numbers and counts as His only those He has redeemed.
Every man counted had to state his descent. A mixed crowd had attached itself to Israel, and this rule sorted out who belonged.
They had to declare their pedigree family by family, and only those who could do that had a place in this muster and could be warriors. They needed this proof because of the mixed crowd that had joined the people of God. Our pedigree, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God. And our calling is to a spiritual warfare, not with flesh and blood, but against the devil and his schemes and the wicked spirits (Eph. 6:11-12).
Manasseh was not a son of Jacob but a son of Joseph. His name appears here because Levi served the tabernacle and stood outside the count of fighting men. One writer explains how the arrangement of the tribes fills that gap.
The tribe of Levi, set apart to the service of the tabernacle, is not included in this allotment. Its place is made up by the dividing of the tribe of Joseph into Ephraim and Manasseh.
Manasseh's number follows Ephraim's, even though Manasseh was the elder. One writer sets out how this list is arranged, and where Ephraim and Manasseh stand in it.
Levi is omitted between Simeon and Judah, as not to be numbered. Asher and Gad are transposed. Ephraim and Manasseh replace Joseph. According to Jacob's prophecy (Gen. 48:14-22), Ephraim takes precedence over Manasseh.
The 32,200 recorded here is not the end of the story. A later count shows how the tribe fared.
But Manasseh increased amazingly from 32,200 (Num. 1:35) to 52,700. Manasseh means "forgetting." The name may impress on us Paul's words in Philippians 3:13-14: "Forgetting what lies behind and straining forward to what lies ahead, I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus." If we have Paul's attitude of forgetting past achievements and making Christ the object of living, we shall increase more and more in fruitfulness for God.
- Redeemed first. The Passover came before the count. God numbers as His own only those He has already redeemed.
- Counted personally. David's census sprang from pride. God's count here shows His interest in each person among His people, and that interest is just as real for His saints now.
- Armed next. A man joined the muster only if he could state his descent. Our pedigree is the new birth, and our warfare is against spiritual powers, not flesh and blood.
- Placed by grace. Manasseh counts as a tribe because Levi served the tabernacle and Joseph's portion became two. The elder brother comes after the younger, as Jacob said in Genesis 48.
- Grown at the end. 32,200 became 52,700 by the second count. Manasseh means "forgetting." Forget what lies behind, press on toward Christ, and fruitfulness follows.
Of the sons of Benjamin their generations, after their families, according to their fathers' houses, by the number of the names, from twenty years old and upward, all that went forth to military service
Numbers 1:36 is one line in a long roll call: the men of Benjamin, registered by family and counted for war. Three questions sit behind it — why God counts His people, who qualifies to be counted, and what this tribe's name means.
The count was God's own idea. Its purpose goes further than drawing up army lists.
It was necessary in God's wisdom that the children of Israel should be counted. The first thing set before us in the early chapters is a count of the males fit for war. But we will find that the numbering goes beyond this. There are other concerns and aims here than war. In short, whatever the aim in a given part of the book, God impresses this on us — the care and the interest He takes in everyone who belongs to Him. It is a very simple truth, but certainly full of comfort to the soul.
The place matters. Numbers finds Israel in the wilderness, and that setting fills the book with the sound of war.
Here we find ourselves at once "in the wilderness," where God takes account only of those who are "able to go to war." This is clearly marked. In Genesis the seed of Israel were still unborn, in their father Abraham. In Exodus they were in the brick-kilns of Egypt. In Leviticus they gathered round the tent of meeting. In Numbers we see them in the wilderness. ... But as soon as we open the book of Numbers we read of men of war, of armies, of standards, of camps, and trumpets sounding alarm.
The age limit carries a lesson for readers today:
God's census in Numbers shows His own vital interest in each one of His people Israel, and that interest is no less true of His saints today. The difference is that in Israel only the males over 20 years of age were counted. ... Today all of His saints are fit for spiritual warfare — women too, and young and old, though some are less active than others because of age. Yet the lesson is also clear for us. To take part in practical conflict we need maturity or full age, which comes through knowing the word of God and growing in it.
The verse names clans and fathers' houses before it gives any number. Descent had to be proved, because not everyone travelling with Israel belonged to Israel.
They had to declare their family line by their clans. Only those who could do that had a place in this count and could be warriors. They had to show their family line because a mixed multitude had joined the people of God. "A mixed multitude also went up with them" (Ex. 12:38). ... Our family line, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God. And our calling is to a spiritual warfare, not with flesh and blood, but against the devil and his schemes and the wicked spirits (Eph. 6:11-12).
Benjamin received his name twice: once from his dying mother, once from his father.
The youngest son of Jacob by his beloved wife Rachel. She died at his birth and named him BEN-ONI, meaning "son of my sorrow," but his father named him BENJAMIN, "son of the right hand." Gen. 35:18, 24. He is a picture of Christ in both names: exalted at God's right hand (Benjamin), and, as rejected, the cause of Israel's tribulation in the last days (Ben-oni). Rachel here is a picture of Israel (Micah 5).
Benjamin's total in this first census was among the lowest, and Scripture elsewhere calls the tribe little. Held together with its name, that smallness becomes instruction rather than embarrassment — though note that older translations read "little Benjamin" in Psalm 68:27, where the ESV has "Benjamin, the least of them."
In Psalm 68 the Spirit of the Lord calls Benjamin "little Benjamin" (v.27), because he was the smallest tribe. Keep these two names in mind: "son of my right hand," a place of power, and "little Benjamin," the place of weakness. How can these two opposites come together, a place of power and a place of weakness? Both are essential for any servant of the Lord who wants to be faithful in his testimony. He needs a sense of his own weakness, and a sense of the power of God that can work in that weakness.
- Counted — God ordered the census, and its message is the care He takes in everyone who belongs to Him.
- Qualified — Only men who could show their family line were counted. A mixed multitude had joined Israel, so birth decided who belonged.
- Armed — In the wilderness, only men able to go to war were listed. Maturity from God's word is what fits a believer for conflict.
- Named — Benjamin has two names: son of sorrow and son of the right hand. They picture Christ rejected and Christ exalted.
- Little — The smallest tribe bears the name of power. Every servant needs both: a sense of his own weakness, and a sense of God's power.
those that were numbered of them, of the tribe of Benjamin, were thirty-five thousand four hundred.
Numbers 1:37 gives the fighting strength of Benjamin: 35,400 men. It is one line in a long roll call of Israel's tribes. Two questions sit behind the figure. Why did God want His people counted at all? And why was Benjamin's army one of the smallest?
The census was not just paperwork. Commentators read it as God taking stock of the people who belong to Him.
The first thing set before us in the early chapters is a count of the males fit for war. But we shall find that the numbering goes beyond this. There are other considerations and aims here than warfare. In short, whatever the particular aim may be in various parts of the book, God impresses one thing on us: the care and the interest He takes in everyone who belongs to Him. It is a very simple truth, but certainly full of comfort to the soul.
God's right to count them rested on ownership.
He was careful to assert His title this way, and to survey what was His. He would have the number of Israel brought to Him exactly, for they were all His own. He called them by their names, and He knew their numbers.
The 35,400 were not every grown man in the tribe. Each one first had to prove his descent.
Those to be numbered were all the men from twenty years old and upward who were able to go to war in Israel. They had to declare their pedigrees after their families. Only those who could do that had a place in this mustering and could be warriors. This showing of their pedigree was necessary because of the mixed multitude that had joined themselves to the people of God... Our pedigree, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God. And our calling is to a spiritual warfare — not with flesh and blood, but against the devil and his schemes and the wicked spirits.
Set beside the other tribes, this figure is low, and Scripture returns to it more than once.
Benjamin was the smallest of the tribes except Manasseh in the numbering of Numbers 1:37 and Numbers 2:22-23. In Psalm 68:27 it is called "little Benjamin"; but in the numbering before entering the land Benjamin exceeded four of the other tribes, Numbers 26:41. In Deuteronomy 33:12, where Moses prophesied of the tribes, he said of Benjamin: "The beloved of the LORD dwells in safety. The High God surrounds him all day long, and dwells between his shoulders."
The tribe's name works against its size. The man behind it carried two names, and both matter for anyone who serves God.
There are two things to be said about the name Benjamin. When he was born, his mother, as she was dying, gave him the name Ben-oni, that is, "son of my sorrow," but Jacob changed his name to Benjamin, "son of my right hand"... It is important to keep these two names in mind: "son of my right hand," a place of power, and "little Benjamin," the place of weakness. How can these two opposites be brought together, a place of power and a place of weakness? They are absolutely essential for any servant of the Lord who wants to be faithful in his testimony. He needs a sense of his own weakness, and a sense of the power of God that can work in that weakness.
Abidan led these 35,400. His name cuts across the tribe's reputation as fighters.
Abidan was the prince of Benjamin, his name meaning "My father is judge." In Genesis 49:27 Benjamin is called a ravenous wolf. In other words he was naturally a warrior. But it is not natural fighters the Lord needs. Peter found this out when he used a sword to cut off the ear of the high priest's servant. The Lord rebuked him, and healed the man's ear... So let us remember the lesson of Abidan, "my Father is judge." It is He who judges the value of our warfare, with perfect spiritual discernment.
A later count of the tribes shows what became of Benjamin.
Benjamin showed a lovely increase, to 45,600 (Numbers 26:41). Naphtali, in contrast, fell badly, from 53,400 to 45,400. Whatever the reasons for all of these, at least they tell us this: in glory some will be commended for their increase in spiritual fruit. Others will have to bow to the sad fact that they did not produce as they might have.
- Owned. God had title to count Israel because they were all His own — He called them by their names and knew their numbers.
- Enrolled. Only men who could declare their pedigree joined the muster. The believer's pedigree is the new birth, and the calling is a spiritual warfare.
- Little. Benjamin's 35,400 made it the smallest tribe but one — the "little Benjamin" of Psalm 68:27, yet the tribe Moses called the beloved of the LORD, kept in safety.
- Strong. The same name means "son of my right hand." A sense of your own weakness and a sense of God's power belong together in anyone who serves.
- Grown. By the later count Benjamin had risen to 45,600 — a picture of the growth in spiritual fruit that God will commend in glory.
Of the sons of Dan their generations, after their families, according to their fathers' houses, by the number of the names, from twenty years old and upward, all that went forth to military service
Numbers 1:38 gives the tribe of Dan its turn in the muster roll, in the same words used for every tribe before it. The repetition raises two questions. Why does God count His people at all? And why is Dan here in the ranks, when the tribe's later record fell so short?
One writer reads the careful, repeated counting of every tribe as God pressing a claim.
These chapters open with His commandment to Moses to take the number of the tribes, and Moses does it with great exactness and care. Numbers 1 and Numbers 2 set down the number of each tribe except Levi, again and again, and Numbers 3 and Numbers 4 do the same for Levi. This was an expression of His rights as Lord of Israel. He had title to take their number, for they were all His own. Had He not had a right to them, had He no prospects in them, He would not have counted their sum.
Before a Danite made the list, he had to show where he came from. There was a reason for the strictness — outsiders had attached themselves to Israel on the way out of Egypt.
They had to declare their family line, and only those who could do that had a place in this mustering and could be warriors. This was necessary because of the mixed multitude which had joined itself to the people of God... Our pedigree, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God. And our calling is to a spiritual warfare, not with flesh and blood, but against the devil and his schemes and the wicked spirits (Eph. 6:11-12).
The order of events in the book matters. The Passover came first — the night the blood of a lamb spared Israel in Egypt. The head-count followed.
The Passover commemorated the basis on which the redemption of the people rested. That came first, and the numbering of the people followed. So the picture stresses one fact: God only numbers and counts as His those He has redeemed.
The age limit and the words about going to war show what this list was for.
The second numbering (Num. 1:2-3) came when Israel was about to enter conflict with the enemy. Its purpose was to find the number of men able to go to war. This was according to God. Every Israelite from twenty years old and upward needed to understand his own responsibility in the battles of the Lord.
The cut-off at twenty carries a lesson forward to God's people today.
Today all of His saints are fitted for spiritual warfare — women, young and old too — though because of age some are less active than others. Yet the lesson is also clear for us: to take part in real conflict we need maturity, the full growth that comes through knowing the word of God and growing in it. To be "a good soldier of Jesus Christ" also calls for undivided devotion, not being entangled with the affairs of this life (2 Tim. 2:3-4).
Dan's name carries the idea of judging. One writer shows what that rule was meant to be, and how easily people twist it.
Dan means "judgment": the spirit of rule, which, as Dan's origin points out, is really service. Yet how easily people turn it away from this! Instead of using his place to bless those in his care, a man uses it for himself... and becomes a rebel against the One who gave him his authority. But for this, as for everything else, God has a remedy. Dan is here in his place with his captain Ahiezer — "brother of help" — the son of Ammishaddai, "the people of the Almighty."
Dan came to this muster as one of Israel's strongest tribes. What happened later tells a different story.
Dan was the fifth son of Jacob, and the first son of Bilhah, Rachel's servant... The tribe of Dan was large. At the Exodus it had 62,700 fighting men, more than every tribe except Judah, and by the second numbering they had grown to 64,400... Yet once they were in the land, the Amorites forced the children of Dan into the hill country. The Amorites would not let them come down to the valley (Judges 1:34). This showed a great lack of faith.
- Counted because owned. God counts each tribe with care to press His own title. He numbers Israel because they are His.
- Counted after redemption. Passover came first, then the census — God registers as His only those He has redeemed.
- Counted by pedigree. Only a man who could show his descent made the list. Today the new birth gives that place.
- Counted for war. Twenty years old and upward marks maturity. Every man had to grasp his own responsibility in the Lord's battles.
- Counted despite the future. Dan's name speaks of rule that is really service, and his captain's name means "brother of help." A strong tribe still given its place, though its later history fell short.
those that were numbered of them, of the tribe of Dan, were sixty-two thousand seven hundred.
This verse gives one tribe's result in a national count. Dan produced 62,700 fighting men, more than any tribe except Judah. A single number raises large questions. Why did God count His people? Who qualified? And what did such a number guarantee?
The numbers are written down with great care. Commentators read that care as a claim of ownership:
Numbers 1 and Numbers 2 set down the number of each tribe except Levi again and again, and Numbers 3 and Numbers 4 do the same for Levi. This was an expression of His rights as Lord of Israel. He had title to take their number, for they were all His own. If He had no right to them, and no purposes in them, He would not have counted their total.
Dan's 62,700 were not everyone who showed up. Each man had to prove his family line, and there was a reason for that:
They had to declare their pedigree, family by family. Only those who could do that had a place in this count, and only they could be warriors. They had to show their pedigree because a mixed multitude had joined itself to the people of God. "A mixed multitude also went up with them" (Exodus 12:38). This mixed multitude that was among them fell to craving (Numbers 11:4). So only those whose pedigree showed their rightful place among the people of God were counted and could go to war. Our pedigree, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God.
The count began at twenty years old. It marked the men fit to fight, and commentators carry that over to spiritual conflict:
The difference is that in Israel only the males over 20 years of age were numbered. There would be a cut-off age also, for this involved only those who were fit for military service. Today all of His saints are fitted for spiritual warfare — women, young and old too — though some are less active than others because of age. Yet the lesson is also clear for us. To take part in real conflict we need maturity, or full age. That comes through knowing and growing in the word of God.
This was not the first time Israel had been counted. One writer sets the two counts side by side:
The purpose of the first numbering mentioned (Exodus 38:25-27) was to gather the silver that formed the bases of the pillars of the tabernacle. That count took place for the Lord and with a view to worshipping Him. The second numbering (Numbers 1:2-3) came when Israel was about to fight the enemy. Its purpose was to count the men able to go to war. This was according to God. Every Israelite from twenty years old and upward needed to understand his personal responsibility in the battles of the Lord.
Dan's tribe heads the list of the sons of Jacob's servant wives. The name of the man who led these 62,700 stands against what Genesis says of Dan:
The list now comes to the sons of Jacob's servant wives, and Dan is mentioned first. The prince of Dan was Ahiezer, meaning "brother of help." What a contrast that is to the character of Dan given in Genesis 49:17: "Dan shall be a serpent in the way." Instead of giving a brother's help, he would give satanic harm. Again, God makes a wonderful change by His pure grace, so that Dan would be a help in conflict. Ahiezer was the son of Ammishaddai, meaning "the people of the Almighty." When the people's relationship to the Almighty is settled, a brother relationship follows.
The size recorded here did not turn into courage once Israel reached the land:
The tribe of Dan was large: when Israel left Egypt there were 62,700 fighting men, more than all the tribes except Judah (Numbers 1:39). Yet in the land the Amorites forced the people of Dan into the hill country. They would not let them come down to the valley (Judges 1:34). This showed a great lack of faith in the people of Dan. Deborah said in her song, "Dan, why did he stay with the ships?" — while the Lord's enemies were being destroyed.
Forty years later God counted the tribes again. The two lists work like a report card:
Dan, already large, showed some increase, from 62,700 (Numbers 1:39) to 64,400 (v.43). Naphtali, in contrast, fell badly, from 53,400 to 45,400 (v.50). Whatever the reasons for all of these, at least they tell us this. In glory some will be commended for their increase in spiritual fruit. Others will have to bow to the sad fact that they did not produce as they might have (1 Corinthians 3:12-15).
- Counted — God numbered Israel because Israel was His. An owner counts what belongs to Him.
- Qualified — every man had to show his family line, because a mixed multitude had joined the nation.
- Equipped — the list held only men of twenty and over, fit to fight. Maturity for conflict comes through growth in the word of God.
- Helped — Genesis calls Dan a serpent, yet his prince is Ahiezer, "brother of help," son of Ammishaddai, "the people of the Almighty."
- Tested — 62,700 men, second only to Judah, still ended up pushed into the hills and missing from the battle. Numbers are not faith.
Of the sons of Asher their generations, after their families, according to their fathers' houses, by the number of the names, from twenty years old and upward, all that went forth to military service
The census reaches Asher, and the wording does not change: clan, father's house, names counted, age, and fitness for war. So why count at all, why only fighting men, and why such care over one tribe among twelve?
The words "able to go to war" set the tone of the whole book.
Here we find ourselves, at once, "in the wilderness," where the only ones counted are those "able to go to war." This stands out clearly... But as soon as we open the book of Numbers, we read of men of war, of armies, of standards, of camps, and trumpets sounding the alarm.
Before a man of Asher could join the count, he had to show which clan and father's house he belonged to. That rule had a practical cause in the crowd that had left Egypt alongside Israel.
The numbering was "by their clans, by their fathers' houses." And those to be counted were "from twenty years old and upward, all in Israel who are able to go to war." They had to declare their family line, and only those who could do that had a place in this muster and could be warriors. They had to show their family line because of the mixed crowd that had joined the people of God. "A mixed multitude also went up with them" (Exod. 12:38)... Our family line, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God. And our calling is to a spiritual war, not with flesh and blood, but against the devil and his schemes and the wicked spirits (Eph. 6:11-12).
The age limit is not random. One writer compares this count with a later one that went badly wrong.
In David's time, when he decided to number the people (2 Sam. 24:2-10), his motives were pride in reigning over a great nation, and this led to the death of 70,000 people. But God's census in Numbers shows His own deep interest in each one of His people Israel, an interest that is just as true of His saints today... Yet the lesson is also clear for us. To take part in real conflict we need maturity, or full age, and that comes through knowing and growing in the word of God.
Why record the totals tribe by tribe with such care? Because counting is what an owner does.
These chapters open with His command to Moses to take the number of the tribes, and it is done with great exactness and care. The number of each tribe, except Levi, is set down again and again in Numbers 1 and Numbers 2... This was an expression of His rights as Lord of Israel. He had the right to take their number, for they were all His own.
Asher's own name and the name of his prince carry one lesson together.
Asher's prince was Pagiel (v.13), which means "event of God," and his father's name, Ocran, means "afflicted."... Asher means "happy." But even the blessing of Asher has to be tempered by God's dealings — events of God — that bring affliction. For true happiness always comes through suffering, even though we may not see it at first.
Asher's total is not the end of the story. The tribe went through two counts, and its history runs far past the wilderness.
When they were counted at Sinai there were 41,500 able to go to war, and when they were near the promised land there were 53,400... In Rev. 7:6, twelve thousand of Asher will be sealed, and in Luke 2:36, Anna, a prophetess of the tribe of Asher, gave thanks in the temple at the birth of the Saviour. Asher is one of the tribes still to come into blessing and to have a portion in the land. Ezek. 48:2-3.
One writer sees more than numbers here. The tribes moved in different directions over the same forty years.
Asher grew a great deal, from 41,500 (Num. 1:41) to 53,400 (v.47). Naphtali, in contrast, fell sharply from 53,400 (Num. 1:43) to 45,400 (v.50). Whatever the reasons for all of these, at least they tell us this: in glory some will receive praise for their growth in spiritual fruit, while others will have to bow to the sad fact that they did not produce as they might have.
- Pedigree first. No man joined the count until he could name his clan and father's house. The mixed crowd from Egypt had no place in the ranks.
- Maturity next. Twenty years old and upward marks the age fit for war — a reminder that conflict calls for growth in the word of God.
- Muster then. Every man in the list was a soldier. Numbers opens with armies, standards, camps and trumpets.
- Ownership behind it all. God took the number Himself because Israel were all His own. David's count sprang from pride and cost 70,000 lives.
- Happiness at the end. Asher means "happy," yet his prince Pagiel was the son of Ocran, "afflicted." Happiness comes through God's dealings. Asher's 41,500 became 53,400 by the borders of the land.
those that were numbered of them, of the tribe of Asher, were forty-one thousand five hundred.
Numbers 1 records a count of Israel, tribe by tribe, and Asher's fighting men come to 41,500. Why would God want a head-count at all? And why does a tribe whose name means "happy" appear here as an army?
One writer reads this careful counting as God claiming His rights over what belongs to Him:
They open with His commandment to Moses to take the number of the tribes. The counting is done with great exactness and care. This was an expression of His rights as Lord of Israel. He had title to take their number, for they were all His own. If He had no right to them, if He had no prospects in them, He would not have counted their sum. Scripture says the same of His divine title in another part of His dominions: "He determines the number of the stars; He gives to all of them their names." This is the expression of His sovereignty among the heavenly hosts. (Psalm 147:4) So the Lord says of His saints, "They shall be Mine… in the day when I make up My treasured possession." (Mal. 3) He may make up — that is, number, and hide, and secure them — because they are His own.
Asher's 41,500 are not the whole tribe. They are the men fit to fight. The motive behind this count also sets it apart from a later census in Israel:
In David's time, when he decided to number the people (2 Sam. 24:2-10), his motives were pride in reigning over a great nation, and this resulted in the death of 70,000 people. But God's census in Numbers shows His own vital interest in each one of His people Israel, an interest that is no less true of His saints today. The difference is that in Israel only the males over 20 years of age were numbered. There would be a cut-off age as well, since this involved only those fit for military service. Today all of His saints are fitted for spiritual warfare — women, and young and old too, though some are less active than others because of age. Yet the lesson is also clear for us. To engage in practical conflict we need maturity or full age. That comes through knowledge and growth in the word of God.
Before a man of Asher could be counted, he had to prove where he came from:
The numbering was "according to their clans, by their fathers' houses." Those counted were "from twenty years old and upward, all who are able to go to war in Israel." Each man had to declare his pedigree after his family. Only those who could do that had a place in this mustering and could be warriors. This showing of their pedigree was necessary because of the mixed multitude which had joined itself to the people of God. "A mixed multitude also went up with them" (Ex. 12:38). This mixed multitude among them gave in to craving (Num. 11:4). Our pedigree, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God. And our calling is to a spiritual warfare, not with flesh and blood, but against the devil and his schemes and the wicked spirits (Eph. 6:11-12).
The names around Asher pull in two directions at once:
Asher's prince was Pagiel (v. 13), which means "event of God." His father's name, Ocran, means "afflicted." Genesis 49:20 tells us, "Asher's food shall be rich, and he shall yield royal delicacies." Asher means "happy." But even the blessing of Asher has to be tempered by God's dealings — events of God — to bring affliction. For true happiness always comes through suffering, little as we might appreciate this at first. How well Paul understood this when he wrote, "For the sake of Christ, then, I am content with weaknesses, insults, hardships, persecutions, and calamities. For when I am weak, then I am strong" (2 Cor. 12:10).
Asher's 41,500 was not the tribe's final figure. A later count records the change:
Benjamin showed a lovely increase from 35,000 (Num. 1:37) to 45,600 (v. 41). Dan, already large, showed some increase, from 62,700 (Num. 1:39) to 64,400 (v. 43). Asher was greatly increased, from 41,500 (Num. 1:41) to 53,400 (v. 47). Naphtali, in contrast, fell badly from 53,400 (Num. 1:43) to 45,400 (v. 50). Whatever the reasons for all of these, they tell us at least this much. In glory some will be commended for their increase in spiritual fruit. Others will have to bow to the sad fact that they did not produce as they might have (1 Cor. 3:12-15).
- Counted — God's exact count of each tribe is the language of ownership. He numbers Israel as He numbers and names the stars, because they are His own.
- Enlisted — David's later count came from pride. This one musters the men fit to fight, and shows God's vital interest in each one who belongs to Him.
- Qualified — Only a man who could declare his pedigree had a place in the army. The mixed multitude did not. Our pedigree is the new birth.
- Tested — Asher means "happy." Yet his prince's name means "event of God" and his father's means "afflicted." True happiness comes through suffering.
- Increased — Asher's 41,500 grew to 53,400 by the later count. Growth, or the lack of it, comes under review in glory.
Of the sons of Naphtali their generations, after their families, according to their fathers' houses, by the number of the names, from twenty years old and upward, all that went forth to military service
Numbers 1 ends its roll call with Naphtali, the last of the twelve tribes God counts at Sinai. Naphtali gets the same words as every other tribe — clan, father's house, name, age, fitness for battle. So why did God want this count at all?
The count could look like paperwork. One writer says God has more than war in view.
In the early chapters the main object put before us is a count of the males who were fit for war. But the numbering goes beyond this. There are other considerations and aims than war and warlike purposes. Whatever the particular aim in various parts of the book, God impresses this truth on us — the care and the interest He takes in everyone who belongs to Him. It is a very simple truth, but certainly full of comfort to the soul.
Each man had to show his line — "by their clans, by their fathers' houses." One writer explains why that mattered here.
They had to declare their pedigrees after their families. Only those who could do that had a place in this mustering and could be warriors. They had to show their pedigree because of the mixed crowd who had joined themselves to the people of God… Our pedigree, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth. By it we become children of God.
Another writer contrasts that new birth with the family line every person is born into.
The believer traces his pedigree directly up to a risen Christ in glory. This is Christian genealogy. As far as our natural pedigree goes, if we trace it back to its source and then declare it honestly, we must admit that we come from a ruined stock. Ours is a fallen family.
God set the bar at twenty years old. One writer draws out what that means for believers now.
God's census in Numbers shows His own vital interest in each one of His people Israel. That interest is no less true of His saints today. The difference is that in Israel God counted only the males over 20 years of age… Today all of His saints are fit for spiritual warfare, women and young and old too… Yet the lesson is also clear for us. To take part in real conflict we need maturity or full age, such as comes through knowledge and growth in the word of God.
The name Naphtali carries a meaning of its own. One writer takes it as a picture of the new place a person now stands in.
Naphtali means "my wrestling" — not so much the idea of the struggle going on, but of its reaching a conclusion in victory, bringing freedom. It expresses the blessing of the new place in which a person now stands. Moses says of Naphtali, "satisfied with favor, and full of the blessing of the LORD," so that he becomes "a doe let loose" — all fear removed, and the tongue loosed to give beautiful words.
The chapter earlier names Ahira as the leader of this tribe. One writer asks whether his name points to a man who felt the sorrow around him.
This is perhaps the most difficult name to interpret of all we have had… Could it be that in Ahira we find a man whose eyes have affected his heart, like another Jeremiah? A man of sorrows, in sympathy with the sorrow around him? …and so the "brother of evil" would become the "brother born for adversity" that Proverbs speaks of.
God counted Israel again years later. One writer sets Naphtali's two totals side by side.
Asher was greatly increased, from 41,500 to 53,400. Naphtali, in contrast, fell badly from 53,400 to 45,400. Whatever the reasons, these numbers at least tell us this: in glory some will be commended for their increase in spiritual fruit, while others will have to bow to the sad fact that they did not produce as they might have.
- Counted. Down to the last tribe, the same words repeat. God cares about each person who belongs to Him.
- Claimed. Each man had to declare his pedigree; the believer's pedigree is the new birth, traced up to a risen Christ.
- Capable. God counted men of twenty and over. Real conflict needs maturity, and that grows through the word of God.
- Carried. Naphtali means "my wrestling" — a struggle that ends in victory, freedom, and a loosed tongue giving beautiful words.
- Compared. By the second count Naphtali had dropped from 53,400 to 45,400. In glory some are commended for increase; others are not.
those that were numbered of them, of the tribe of Naphtali, were fifty-three thousand four hundred.
The verse closes the roll of Naphtali — the last tribe counted in the first census — with a figure of 53,400 men. Why did God count His people at all, who qualified to be counted, and what became of this number later?
The opening chapters list names and totals. One writer reads the whole count as God's way of showing where His attention rests.
In God's wisdom the census of the children of Israel had to be taken. The first purpose shown to us in the early chapters is a count of the males who were fit for war. But we will find that the numbering goes beyond this... In short, whatever the particular aim in various parts of the book, God impresses this upon us — the care and the interest He takes in everyone who belongs to Him. It is a very simple truth, but certainly full of comfort to the soul.
That care is easier to trust for eternity than for today:
We can all understand the sweetness of being numbered for heaven, and that is where the heart of most people turns. But even those who take the greatest comfort in God's purposes securing them for eternity are apt to forget the present interest the Lord takes in all our movements, ways, conflicts, and trials.
Naphtali's 53,400 were men of a set age and fitness. One writer sets this count beside David's later one, which brought disaster.
In David's time, when he decided to number the people, his motive was pride in reigning over a great nation, and it led to the death of 70,000 people. But God's census in Numbers shows His own vital interest in each one of His people Israel, and that interest is just as real for His saints today... Yet the lesson is also clear for us. To take part in practical conflict we need maturity or full age, such as comes through knowledge and growth in the word of God.
The setting explains the standard:
Here we find ourselves at once "in the wilderness," where the only ones counted are those "able to go to war."... But as soon as we open the book of Numbers, we read of men of war, of armies, of standards, of camps, and trumpets sounding the alarm.
Each man had to declare which family he came from.
They had to declare their pedigrees by their families. Only those who could do that had a place in this muster and could be warriors. They had to show their pedigree because a mixed multitude had joined itself to the people of God... Our pedigree, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God. And our calling is to a spiritual warfare.
Another writer turns that requirement into a question for the reader:
It suggests this important question to the reader: "Can I declare my pedigree?" There is much reason to fear that hundreds, if not thousands, of professing Christians are completely unable to do so.
Naphtali's name itself carries a history of struggle, and the leader given to him matches it. His place in the camp fits that character:
Naphtali is "the wrestler," another militant name, marked by his prince Ahira, "brother for evil," the son of Enan, "open-eyed," suggesting that "Brother born for adversity," whose eyes are ever watchful against the foe. So the camp is properly ordered and prepared for the march.
At a second numbering the total had changed, and this figure becomes the measuring line:
Asher increased greatly, from 41,500 to 53,400. Naphtali, in contrast, dropped sharply from 53,400 (Num. 1:43) to 45,400. Whatever the reasons for all of these, they at least tell us this. In glory some will be commended for their increase in spiritual fruit, while others will have to bow to the sad fact that they did not produce as they might have.
Yet the words spoken over Naphtali look beyond any head count:
When Jacob prophetically announced to the tribes what would happen to them in the last days, he said, "Naphtali is a hind let loose: he gives goodly words." This is the remnant of Israel as the vessel of testimony. Moses said, "O Naphtali, satisfied with favour, and full with the blessing of the Lord." It is the full blessing of the remnant as Jehovah's people.
(These lines come from an older translation. The ESV reads "a doe let loose that bears beautiful fawns" and "sated with favor, and full of the blessing of the LORD.")
- Counted — the census shows God's care for everyone who belongs to Him: not only for eternity, but for today's movements, conflicts and trials.
- Qualified — only men of full age and fit for war were listed. Spiritual conflict also needs maturity, which comes by growth in God's word.
- Certified — each man declared his pedigree, because a mixed multitude had joined Israel. For the believer, that pedigree is the new birth.
- Named — Naphtali means "the wrestler," and his prince Ahira is a "brother born for adversity," watchful against the foe.
- Measured — 53,400 here became 45,400 at the second count. In glory some are commended for increase in fruit; others must own that they did not produce as they might have.
These are those that were numbered, whom Moses and Aaron numbered, and the princes of Israel, the twelve men each one was for the house of his fathers.
This line closes the census. Moses and Aaron did the counting, and twelve men helped them, one for each tribe. So why does God count people at all, and why through chosen representatives?
The census opens the book of Numbers. Commentators read it as God stating His own claim over the people.
This was an expression of His rights as Lord of Israel. He had the right to count them, because they were all His own. If He had no right to them, and nothing to expect from them, He would not have counted their total. Scripture says the same about His divine right in another part of His realm: "He determines the number of the stars; He gives to all of them their names."
A large national total can feel impersonal. Yet the count had more than one purpose.
The first object set before us in the early chapters is a count of the males who were fit for war. But we shall find that the numbering goes beyond this. There are other aims here besides war and warlike purposes. In short, whatever the particular aim may be in various parts of the book, God presses this upon us — the care and the interest that He takes in everyone that belongs to Him.
The verse names two men above the twelve. One of them rules the people; the other serves as priest.
The people able to do the work of numbering are, first of all, Moses and Aaron, a double picture of Christ as King and Priest. He is indeed the One who knows those who are His, and His servants live under His eye: the Lord who rules, and the One who intercedes for them and sustains them. How good it is to be under an eye like this!
Each tribe had one leader working alongside Moses. How he got that role carries a lesson for today.
Our chapter records that as a preliminary a "head" or prince of each tribe was selected. The choice was not left to the people, or even to Moses. The word to him was, "These are the names of the men who shall assist you…" God chose His own leader for each tribe, and this is a helpful reminder that God today chooses His own servants and leaders, and does not submit the matter to a popular vote.
The count also had a shape, and a reason tied to the journey ahead.
A prince from each tribe is chosen, and he oversees the counting of that tribe. The count includes only the men of war, because it looks ahead to the dangers and trials of the journey. So right at the very start we meet the thought of order. Not one Israelite warrior is left out. Each one finds his place under his tribal prince, and all of them, as we shall see later, are arranged in relation to the tabernacle.
The phrase points to family line. Not everyone travelling with Israel truly belonged to Israel.
They had to declare their family line, and only those who could do that had a place in this count and could be warriors. They had to show their family line because of the mixed crowd of outsiders who had joined themselves to the people of God… So only those who could prove by their descent that they had a rightful place among the people of God were counted and could go to war. Our pedigree, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God.
The same act can spring from a very different motive.
When David decided to number the people (2 Sam. 24:2-10), his motive was pride in reigning over a great nation, and 70,000 people died as a result. But God's census in Numbers shows His own deep interest in each one of His people Israel. That interest is just as real for His saints today… Yet the lesson is also clear for us. To take part in real conflict we need maturity, or full age, which comes through knowing and growing in the word of God.
- His people. God counts Israel because Israel is His; the census is a claim of ownership, like His counting of the stars.
- His eye. Moses and Aaron head the count — ruler and priest together — a picture of Christ, who knows those who are His.
- His choice. God named the twelve who worked with them. The tribes did not elect them.
- His family. Only a man who could declare his descent had a place in the count. Today the new birth gives that place.
- His army. Those counted were the men fit to fight. That points to maturity, which grows from knowing God's word — not to pride in numbers, the motive that ruined David's census.
And all those that were numbered of the children of Israel, according to their fathers' houses, from twenty years old and upward, all that went forth to military service in Israel,
This verse closes the roll call of Numbers 1. It raises two questions. Why did God want a headcount of His own people? And why is readiness for battle the one qualification named?
Numbers opens in a different setting from the books before it.
Here we find ourselves, at once, "in the wilderness," where the only ones counted are those "able to go to war." This is clearly marked. In Genesis the seed of Israel was still in their father Abraham. In Exodus they were making bricks in Egypt. In Leviticus they were gathered round the tent of meeting. In Numbers they are seen in the wilderness... But as soon as we open the book of Numbers we read of men of war, of armies, of standards, of camps, and trumpets sounding alarm.
The care taken over the figures says something about the One who ordered the count.
The book opens with His command to Moses to take the number of the tribes, and it is done with great exactness and care... This was an expression of His rights as Lord of Israel. He had title to take their number, for they were all His own. If He had no right to them, and no prospects in them, He would not have counted them. His divine title is spoken of the same way in another part of His dominions: "He determines the number of the stars; He gives to all of them their names."
Being counted for heaven is easy to love. The present side of it is easy to forget.
We can all understand the sweetness of being numbered for heaven, and that is where most hearts turn. But even those who take the greatest comfort in the counsels of God that secure them for eternity are apt to forget the present interest the Lord takes in all our movements, ways, conflicts, and trials. This is the first thing with which the book opens.
This count was not the first thing God gave them.
The Passover marked the basis on which the people's redemption rested. That came first, and the numbering of the people followed. So this picture stresses the fact that God numbers and counts as His only those He has redeemed.
Being on this list came at a price: half a shekel of silver from each man.
Every one is numbered, for the Lord has a personal interest in each. That is the Lord's side of it. On the people's side there had to be an acknowledgment: only on the ground of atonement could anyone be counted among His people. Here there is no difference between rich and poor. All stand on the same ground. Each man acknowledges by his half shekel that only on the ground of ransom is he a living soul among the people of God.
Every man had to show where he came from, family by family. Others had attached themselves to the people along the way.
They had to declare their family line, family by family. Only those who could do that had a place in this count and could be warriors. They had to show their family line because of the mixed crowd who had joined themselves to the people of God... Our family line, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God. And our calling is to a spiritual warfare, not with flesh and blood, but against the devil and his wiles and the wicked spirits (Eph. 6:11-12).
Certainty about that family line was what made a man steady in the ranks.
Not one man in that great host, camped "facing the tent of meeting," would have understood a single doubt, or the shadow of a doubt, about his own family line... Each of the six hundred thousand knew well where he had come from, and so where he was to take his stand. And just so with God's militant host now. Each member of it needs the clearest confidence about his relationship, or he will not be able to stand in the battle.
The census counted only men of twenty and over. That age line still teaches something about who fights today.
Today all of His saints are fit for spiritual warfare — women too, and young and old, though some are less active than others because of age. Yet the lesson is clear for us as well. Real conflict needs maturity, or full age, which comes through knowledge and growth in the word of God. To be "a good soldier of Christ Jesus" also calls for undivided devotion, and not getting tangled up in the affairs of this life (2 Tim. 2:3-4).
The figure that follows this verse lets us estimate the whole camp.
The total that were numbered amounted to 603,550, as we are told in verse 46... In this census the mixed multitude were eliminated and we have more detailed and accurate figures. Since all males under twenty and all females were omitted, we are safe in assuming that the host must have numbered over two millions.
- Redeemed — the Passover came before the census. God counts as His only those He has already ransomed, and every man's half shekel said so.
- Recognised — the exact count is a statement of ownership. He has title to number them because they are His own, as He numbers and names the stars.
- Registered — each man was entered by family. Only a man who could show where he came from joined the ranks. That kept the mixed crowd out.
- Ready — from twenty years old and upward, able to go to war. The age bar pictures maturity that comes by growth in God's word, plus undivided devotion.
- Right now — this count is not only about being safe for heaven. It shows God's present interest in every movement, conflict and trial of the road.
all they that were numbered were six hundred and three thousand five hundred and fifty.
The verse closes the first census with one figure. Every man in Israel aged twenty and over, fit for war, came to 603,550. Two questions sit under it. Why did God want His people counted? And what does the total say about the camp He led into the desert?
This is not a population survey. It is a muster roll, and it sets the tone for the whole book.
Here we find ourselves at once "in the wilderness," where the only ones counted are those "able to go forth to war." This stands out clearly. In Genesis the offspring of Israel were still unborn, in their father Abraham. In Exodus they were in the brick-kilns of Egypt. In Leviticus they gathered round the tent of meeting. In Numbers we see them in the wilderness... But as soon as we open the book of Numbers, we read of men of war, of armies, of standards, of camps, and trumpets sounding the alarm.
Not everyone travelling with Israel was inside this figure. There was a test to pass first.
They had to declare their family line, and only those who could do that had a place in this mustering and could be warriors. This was necessary because of the mixed multitude who had joined themselves to the people of God. "A mixed multitude also went up with them" (Exod. 12:38)... Our family line, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God. And our calling is to a spiritual warfare, not with flesh and blood, but against the devil and his schemes and the wicked spirits (Eph. 6:11-12).
So how many people were in the camp altogether?
Exodus 12:37-38 told us that about 600,000 men besides children left Egypt, and a "mixed multitude" went with them too... Since the count left out all males under twenty and all females, we can safely assume the whole company numbered over two million.
The count came with a payment attached, and one tribe stayed outside it.
At least 603,550 Israelite males, twenty years old and upward, paid the atonement money collected from the children of Israel in the wilderness, when God numbered His people. This number did not include the tribe of Levi (see Num. 1:46-47), which was set apart for the service of the tabernacle.
The money was not a tax. It answered a danger inside the counting itself.
The numbering gave flesh a chance to boast — about their numbers as a whole, and about each person being noticed. But they had to acknowledge this: the Lord could take account of them only on the ground of redemption. They had to be reminded that they belonged to God (Deut. 7:6), and each one had to pay a ransom for himself.
An owner counts what belongs to him. That is the reason behind this census.
This was an expression of His rights as Lord of Israel. He had the right to count them, for they were all His own. If He had no right to them, and no future purpose in them, He would not have counted them. Scripture says the same of His divine title in another part of His dominions: "He determines the number of the stars; He gives to all of them their names." This is the expression of His sovereignty among the heavenly hosts. (Psalm 147:4) So the Lord says of His saints, "They shall be Mine... in the day when I make up My treasured possession." (Mal. 3) He may make up, that is, number, and hide, and secure them, because they are His own.
The figure returns at the end of the journey — and the second count exposes what happened in between.
In it we have the record of the second numbering of the people, as they were about to enter upon the promised land. How sad to think that only two of the six hundred thousand men of war counted at the first census remain — Joshua and Caleb! All the rest lay in the dust, buried beneath the sand of the desert, all passed away. The two men of simple faith remained to have their faith rewarded. As for the men of unbelief, the inspired apostle tells us "their bodies fell in the wilderness."
- Counted — 603,550 men aged twenty and over were fit for war. Add women, children and younger males, and the camp likely passed two million.
- Claimed — God counted them because they were His own. He numbers what belongs to Him, just as He numbers and names the stars.
- Ransomed — that same total had paid the atonement money. No one entered the register except on the ground of redemption.
- Enlisted — every man counted had to declare his family line. That kept the mixed multitude out. This was a call-up for war, not a headcount.
- Tested — of that whole army, only Joshua and Caleb reached the land. The rest fell in the desert through unbelief.
But the Levites after the tribe of their fathers were not numbered among them.
The census in Numbers 1 ends with a total of 603,550 fighting men. Then one tribe is left out of the count. This was not an oversight. God commanded it. So why should one family in Israel stand outside the army list?
Levi was held back for other work.
The tribe of Levi is not included. The end of this chapter gives the reason. They were not to be among the warriors, but appointed over the tabernacle of testimony, over all the vessels, and what belonged to it. They were to bear it and their place was round about the tabernacle.
The choice of this tribe is startling once you know its record. The words spoken over Levi were a curse, not a blessing.
But why the Levites? Why was this tribe specially marked off from all the others, and set apart for so holy and elevated a service? Was there any special sanctity or goodness about them to account for their being so distinguished? Not by nature, and not by practice either. We can see this in the following words: "Simeon and Levi are brothers; weapons of violence are their swords… Cursed be their anger, for it is fierce, and their wrath, for it is cruel! I will divide them in Jacob and scatter them in Israel." Such was Levi by nature and by practice — self-willed, fierce, and cruel. How remarkable that such a one should be singled out and brought into a place of such high and holy privilege! Surely we may say it was grace from first to last. It is the way of grace to take up the very worst cases. It stoops to the lowest depths and gathers its brightest trophies from there.
Levi's place did not begin with their work. It began with being rescued.
They were redeemed by blood, and counted emphatically to belong to the Lord. In place of Israel's firstborn He accepted the Levites. "They shall be mine."… So the Levites were identified with mercy — the great mercy that rescued Israel from the doom of Egypt and set them apart. That fitted them all the better for the service of the sanctuary. How can anyone take up the service of God without knowing that God has accepted him on the ground of redemption? Salvation precedes ministry.
Levi was not just skipped. The later count of this tribe followed different rules — a different starting age, and no land of its own.
The Levites were counted apart from the other tribes, because they had no property of their own as an inheritance. Also they were not required to go to war, but to serve the Lord. Therefore their census did not begin with those of the age of twenty years, but with one month old boys. Training in the things of God is to begin almost from birth. Training for physical warfare needs the strength of a grown man.
It is easy to read the numbered tribes and the uncounted Levites as two different groups of people. Commentators warn against that.
The very same persons are pictured in one aspect by the numbered tribes of Israel. In another aspect they are Levites, not numbered as yet, because they belong to God and to Him alone. This then is the double aspect… The natural mind is always prone to set the two things in opposition. It argues that the Levites were contrasted with the other tribes of Israel, so what each represents must hold a wholly different position now. This does not follow, and the reverse is true in fact; the types indicate different relations of the same persons.
Levi's place was at the centre of the camp, around the sanctuary. That position carries its own lesson.
In the centre of the camp stands the tent of meeting, with its Levite guard. The Levites were devoted to the sanctuary and surrounded it. They present the thought of consecration, and this is at the heart of all successful warfare. There is little said about Levi here: it is his glory to be overshadowed by the glory of God. And this is the moral character of all true consecration: what boasts of itself is not consecration at all.
- Grace chooses. Levi carried a curse for fierceness and cruelty, yet God singled out this tribe — proof that grace "takes up the very worst cases."
- Redemption qualifies. The Levites stood in place of the firstborn spared in Egypt. They belonged to God by blood before they ever touched a sacred vessel. Salvation comes before service.
- Separation shapes. No inheritance, no place in the army, counted from a month old instead of twenty. Training for God's things starts at the beginning of life, not at the age of strength.
- Nearness follows. Left out of the ranks, Levi camped at the centre, around the tent. Their consecration is what makes the camp's warfare succeed.
- Both are yours. The numbered soldier and the uncounted Levite are not two kinds of people. They are two relationships of the same believer: counted by God for the march, and His alone for the sanctuary.
For Jehovah had spoken to Moses, saying,
Numbers 1 has just counted Israel's fighting men, tribe by tribe. Then God speaks again, and this fresh word pulls one whole tribe out of the count — so why is Levi left off an army list?
This count measured fighting strength. Leaving Levi out points to a different calling:
God left the tribe of Levi out of this numbering altogether. Numbers 3 gives the reason. This whole tribe was to be set apart for the service of God, and the family chosen for the priesthood came from among them. This comes out in the closing verses of the first chapter. They were to serve the tabernacle. The rest of Israel camped at a set distance from it, while the Levites camped close around it, since it was in their charge.
Levi was not left uncounted. God numbered the tribe later, by a different rule:
God then numbered the Levites separately from the other tribes. This count included not only males twenty years old and over, but every male from one month old and up. This was not for military service but for service to God. They did not begin sanctuary service until thirty, and they served until fifty. Even so, they were trained with that service in view. This reminds us that the Lord Jesus Himself did not begin His public service until He was about thirty years of age (Luke 3:23). His earlier years were an important preparation for it.
Nothing in this tribe's own record explains the honour:
But why the Levites? Was there any special holiness or goodness in them to explain why God marked off this tribe from all the others for such a holy and high service? Not by nature, and not by practice either, as these words show: "Cursed be their anger, for it is fierce, and their wrath, for it is cruel! I will divide them in Jacob and scatter them in Israel" (Genesis 49). That was Levi by nature and by practice — self-willed, fierce, and cruel. How remarkable that God should single out such a tribe and bring it into a place of such high and holy privilege! Surely we may say it was grace from first to last. It is the way of grace to take up the very worst cases.
Two chapters later God gives the reason, and it reaches back to Egypt:
Numbers 3:12 uncovers the secret behind the special place of the Levites. God had chosen them "instead of all the firstborn." In Egypt, God had spared the firstborn of the Israelites on the basis of the blood of the Passover lamb. This was the price by which the firstborn had been redeemed. As a result they belonged to God. Now, this is the place God gave the Levites: He chose them instead of all the firstborn. A Levite would therefore regard himself as redeemed by God and so as God's possession.
It would be easy to read the two groups as two classes of people. One commentator says the opposite. The soldier and the servant are the same person, seen twice:
The very same people who in one aspect are pictured by the numbered tribes of Israel are in another aspect Levites. They are not numbered as yet, because they belong to God and to Him alone... The natural mind is always prone to set the two things against each other. It concludes that, since the Levites were contrasted with the other tribes of Israel, what each of them stands for must hold a wholly different position now... The types show different relations of the same people. It does not matter whether we take the numbering of Israel or the absence of numbering of the Levites. Both are true of the Christian — not in the same aspect, of course, but equally true in distinct relationships.
Levi was left out of the land too. That called for a particular kind of trust:
God gave the Levites no inheritance in the land. The offerings made by fire to the LORD, the God of Israel — yes, the LORD Himself — were their inheritance, just as He told them. The Lord's workmen stood on different ground from the rest of His people. He called them to a special confidence in His provision for them and in His word about them. If they failed in this, could they wonder that their words had little power?
- Grace chose. Levi's record was violence and self-will. God gave this tribe its place near the sanctuary; it never earned it.
- Blood claimed. God took them instead of the firstborn He spared in Egypt. A Levite counted himself already bought, and already God's.
- Service replaced soldiering. God left them off the war census and gave them the tabernacle. Their count and training began at one month old, not at twenty years.
- Nearness cost possession. They received no share of the land. The Lord Himself was their portion, and that called for unusual trust in Him.
- Both rolls, one believer. Commentators apply both rolls to every Christian: counted among the fighters, and set apart as one who belongs wholly to God.
Only thou shalt not number the tribe of Levi, neither take the sum of them among the children of Israel.
Numbers 1 counts every man in Israel who could go out to war — and then God stops the count at one tribe. God Himself makes the exception. Why leave out the tribe that camped nearest to Him?
The reason is a calling that left Levi no place in the fighting ranks.
Also the tribe of Levi was completely excluded from this numbering. In Numbers 3 we get the reason for this. As a tribe they were to be set apart entirely for God's service. The family chosen for the priesthood came from among them. This fact indeed comes out in the closing verses of the first chapter. They were to serve the tabernacle. The rest of Israel pitched their tents at a set distance from it, while the Levites pitched theirs close around it, since it was in their charge.
They were counted later, and by a different rule.
The Levites were counted separately from the other tribes, because they had no property of their own as an inheritance. Also they were not required to go to war, but to serve the Lord. Therefore their census did not begin with those of the age of twenty years, but with one month old boys. Training in the things of God is to begin almost from birth. Training for physical warfare needs the strength of a grown man.
A census measures fighting power. It cannot measure work done for the sanctuary.
We are not only God's own people, each one of us counted by Himself as someone He relies on... but we also have to do with serving Him, and above all with the sanctuary. From this point of view, counting them like an army would be out of place. The aim is to give this service a character that is not of this earth.
Their place around the sanctuary carries a lesson, and so does the chapter's silence about them.
The Levites were devoted to the sanctuary and camped around it. They present the thought of consecration, and this is at the heart of all successful warfare. The account says little about Levi here: it is his glory to be overshadowed by the glory of God. This is the character of all true consecration: anything that boasts of itself is not consecration at all.
Does this split God's people into two classes, soldiers and servants? Kelly says no.
In one aspect the very same people are pictured by the numbered tribes of Israel. In another aspect they are Levites, not numbered as yet, because they belong to God alone. This then is the double aspect... The natural mind is always ready to set the two things against each other. It sees that the Levites were contrasted with the other tribes of Israel, and concludes that what each one pictures must hold a wholly different position now. That does not follow. In fact the opposite is true: the types show different relations of the same people.
Nothing in Levi's record earned the place.
Was there any special holiness or goodness in them to explain why God marked them out? Not by nature, certainly, nor yet by practice... Such was Levi by nature and by practice — self-willed, fierce, and cruel. How remarkable that God should single out such a man and bring him into a place of such high and holy privilege! Surely we may say it was grace from first to last. It is the way of grace to take up the very worst cases.
Grace did not leave Levi where it found him.
He could take him out of his home, which held instruments of cruelty, and bring him into the tabernacle to handle the holy instruments and vessels there. This was grace — free, sovereign grace. Here is where we must look for the basis of all Levi's blessed and high service.
Levi's separation goes back to Egypt, where God spared Israel's firstborn and then took this tribe in their place.
They were redeemed by blood, and counted as belonging in a special way to the Lord... The Levites were identified in this way with mercy — the great mercy that marked Israel out and rescued them from the doom of Egypt. That fitted them all the better for the service of the sanctuary. Who dares to take up the service of God without knowing that God has accepted him on the ground of redemption? Salvation precedes ministry.
- Grace chooses. Levi's history was self-will, fierceness and cruelty. God chose this tribe anyway, so the whole arrangement displays grace, not reward.
- Grace redeems. God took the Levites in place of the firstborn He spared in Egypt. Redemption came first, then service.
- Grace reassigns. Hands that once held instruments of cruelty now carried the vessels of the sanctuary.
- Grace hides. The chapter says little about Levi. His glory is to be overshadowed by God's glory, and real consecration never boasts of itself.
- Grace covers both. Soldier and servant are not two classes of people. They are two relationships of the same believer: counted for the march, uncounted because he belongs wholly to God.
But thou, appoint the Levites over the tabernacle of testimony, and over all the vessels thereof, and over all things that belong to it they shall bear the tabernacle, and all its vessels; and they shall serve it, and round about the tabernacle shall they encamp;
Israel has just numbered its men for war. Then God leaves one tribe off the list, not because they matter less, but because He has other work for them. The command gives Levi a charge, a load to carry, and a place to camp.
The census counted fighting men. Levi is passed over because their business lies in a different direction, and one writer notes that this changes the whole character of what they do.
We are not only God's own people, every one of us counted by Himself as those on whom He reckons. That holds whatever the march may be, and whoever we may have to fight while passing through the wilderness. But we also have to do with serving Him, and above all in reference to the sanctuary. From that point of view, counting them like an army would be out of place. The object is to stamp service with an unearthly character.
The numbered tribes and the uncounted Levites look like two classes of people. The same writer says otherwise: both pictures describe the same believer in two relationships.
In one aspect the numbered tribes of Israel picture these very same people. In another aspect they are Levites, not numbered as yet, because they belong to God simply and only. This is the double aspect... It does not matter whether it is the numbering of Israel or the missing count of the Levites. Both are true of the Christian — not in the same aspect, of course, but just as true in distinct relationships.
Nothing in Levi earned this. His record was self-will, fierceness and cruelty, and one commentator calls the change pure grace.
God's eyes are too pure to look at evil, and He cannot look on wrongdoing. God could not come into Levi's secret, or be joined to his assembly. That was impossible... But He could bring Levi into His secret and unite him to His assembly. He could take him out of his home, which held instruments of cruelty, and bring him into the tabernacle to handle the holy instruments and vessels there. This was grace — free, sovereign grace. Here is where we must look for the basis of all Levi's blessed and elevated service.
"Over all its furnishings, and over all that belongs to it" is a charge, not a title. What those furnishings stand for explains why the charge is weighty.
A weighty service, for which they need to depend on the Priest. Indeed, they are wholly given to the service of the priests, for ministry belongs to those who worship. Its first and most pressing duty is to guard and care for the holy things they handle. We know that the tabernacle vessels set forth the truth of what Christ is in all His offices; and all ministry must watch over and preserve this.
"They are to carry the tabernacle" makes the work a journey. One writer draws out what God entrusts to His people in it.
This service is the carrying of the holy things through the wilderness. For us it pictures presenting Christ and the heavenly truths of Christianity in the world as we pass through it. It is true that these things are seen in travelling clothes, and only faith can know them as they really are, in their innermost reality. Yet this testimony is of the highest possible value, and God counts it so. If it pleases Him to go through the world in this way, He trusts Himself to the loving obedience of His people to carry Him through.
The last clause fixes where they live. Their tents ring the tabernacle, and that nearness shapes what comes first for them.
The Levites had to camp in the middle of the people's camp, right next to the tabernacle (Num. 2:17). Does this not show that the Levites were to have a special and constant sense of the presence of God? And their service for God came first, ahead of other concerns. If their service had to do with the tabernacle, they would live close to it.
Set among the armed tribes, this quiet circle of tents makes its own point:
The Levites are devoted to the sanctuary and surround it. They present the thought of consecration, and this is at the heart of all successful warfare. Little is said about Levi here: it is his glory to be overshadowed by the glory of God.
- Grace first — Levi's record was self-will and cruelty. The move from instruments of cruelty to the vessels of the sanctuary was sovereign grace, and all his service rests on it.
- Then a charge — guarding the tabernacle and its vessels means guarding what pictures Christ. It is weighty work, and it needs dependence on the Priest.
- Then a place — camping around the tabernacle keeps the servant near God and puts that service ahead of other claims.
- Then a journey — carrying the holy things through the wilderness is God trusting His people's loving obedience to bear Him through the world.
- Both at once — the same believer is the counted soldier and the uncounted Levite. The missing number stamps service with an unearthly character.
and when the tabernacle setteth forward, the Levites shall take it down; and when the tabernacle encampeth, the Levites shall set it up; and the stranger that cometh near shall be put to death.
Numbers 1:51 gives one job to one tribe: only the Levites may take down and set up the tabernacle, God's dwelling place, as Israel travels. Anyone else who comes near dies, which raises a hard question — why does God guard His own service so closely?
One writer links this job to the reason Levi was missing from the census earlier in the chapter.
The numbering did not include the tribe of Levi. The Lord had already told Moses that the Levites would be appointed to care for the tabernacle and its furnishings, both while it stayed in one place and while it was on the move. They were to take the tabernacle down when it was time to move, and set it up again at each destination (v.51). No one else was allowed any part in this work, under penalty of death.
The other tribes were counted; Levi was not, because Levi belonged to God.
The very same persons who in one aspect are pictured by the numbered tribes of Israel are in another aspect Levites. They are not numbered as yet, because they belong to God simply and only. When we think of a Christian, we have to remember the words of the Spirit of God in the New Testament: "All things are yours." Whether it is the numbering of Israel or the absence of numbering of the Levites, both are true of the Christian — not in the same aspect, but equally true in distinct relationships.
Nothing in Levi's past earned this place. One writer sets the tribe's character beside the honour it received.
Such was Levi by nature and by practice — self-willed, fierce, and cruel. How remarkable that such a one should be singled out and brought into a place of such high and holy privilege! Surely we may say it was grace from first to last. It is the way of grace to take up the very worst cases. It stoops to the lowest depths and gathers up its brightest trophies from there.
The same writer sums up the change in one line.
And oh what a marvellous contrast between Levi's position by nature and his position by grace! Between the instruments of cruelty and the vessels of the sanctuary!
The "outsider" here is not a foreigner. It is anyone outside the appointed circle, including an Israelite. God drew the line at more than one level.
The Levites are separated from among the people to be the special servants of the sanctuary. From among them the house of Aaron is separated in the same way, to be the only priesthood of that sanctuary. Israel was not to reach after the services of the Levites, nor were the Levites to reach after the priesthood of the family of Aaron. God was to be sanctified in those who drew near to Him, and to be approached in His holiness in the due and appointed order.
So the penalty falls on the intrusion itself, not on how the work is done.
All ministry in the house of God, whether in Old or New Testament times, is of divine appointment. There is no such thing recognised in Scripture as human authority in appointing to the ministry. Neither is there such a thing as a self-appointed ministry. None but God can make or appoint a minister of any sort or description.
The death penalty kept ordinary Israelites at a distance from God's dwelling.
Priests and Levites pitched their tents around the tabernacle. The people had to stay on the fringe of things, because there was always fear of wrath coming on them, as stated in verse 53 of Numbers 1. The whole system was evidently designed to show that "the way into the holy places is not yet opened" (Heb. 9:8).
Commentators carry the Levite pattern into Christian service.
If He took them to be His servants, He left it to no one, not even to Moses, to suggest what their work was to be. And the same principle is seen in God's arrangement in the Church of God. "God has appointed in the church first apostles, second prophets, third teachers…" The Spirit, we read, apportions to each one individually as He wills (1 Cor. 12:11, 28). Would that this were more remembered.
One writer brings both roles together in the believer.
In one very real sense all believers today are priests and all are Levites. As priests they present acceptable sacrifices to God. As Levites they serve the needs of people. As the priests are worshippers, so the Levites have the privilege of ministry, but the two functions are distinct.
- Chosen, not counted. Levi was left out of the count because the tribe belonged to God alone — and both sides, numbered and unnumbered, are true of the believer.
- Grace, not merit. Levi was self-willed, fierce and cruel; grace moved those hands from instruments of cruelty to the vessels of the sanctuary.
- Assigned, not chosen. God Himself fixed the Levites' duties, leaving even Moses no say — and the same principle governs service in the church.
- Called, not self-appointed. The outsider dies for stepping into a place God never gave him, not for doing the work poorly.
- Guarded, not yet open. Priests and Levites camped round the tabernacle to show that the way into the holy places was not yet opened.
And the children of Israel shall encamp every man in his camp, and every man by his own standard, according to their hosts;
Numbers 1 closes with God telling Israel how to camp around His tent. Every family had a fixed spot and a known flag — so why would God care so much where each man pitched his tent?
The camp ran on two things a man had to know: who his family was, and which flag he belonged under. Lose either, and the whole march stalls.
Each had to know his post and keep it — to know his standard and stay by it. That is how they moved on together. That is how they made progress, did their work, and carried on their warfare. The Benjaminite had his post, and the Ephraimite had his. Neither was to interfere with the other or cross his path. So it was with all the tribes. Each had his pedigree, and each had his post; and neither was according to their own thoughts. All was of God. He gave the pedigree, and He assigned the standard. There was no need to compare one with another, and no ground for jealousy. Each had his place to fill and his work to do, and there was work enough and room enough for all. There was the greatest possible variety, and yet the most perfect unity.
Pollock presses the same point on each Israelite. His blessing hung on two things: the tent at the centre, and the spot God gave him.
As a nation they were the people of God. Their gathering centre in the wilderness was the tabernacle, God's dwelling place. The blessing of each Israelite lay in keeping in touch with the tabernacle, and in taking his appointed place among his own tribe. God appointed that place — east, west, north, or south of the tabernacle. He was not left to follow his own choice or inclination.
The verse arranges Israel by companies — an army in camp. Such a camp could have been chaos. Look instead at its shape, and at the hand behind it.
Nothing could be arranged more beautifully. Four camps of three tribes each formed a perfect square, and each side of the square showed its own standard… The God of the armies of Israel knew how to set His troops in order. It would be a great mistake to suppose that God's warriors were not ordered by the most perfect system of military tactics… We can be sure that the camp of Israel was ordered and supplied in the most perfect way. The reason is the simplest and most conclusive of all: the hand of God ordered and supplied it.
The counting of chapter 1 was not paperwork. It set up a home with God in the middle.
The first thing that catches our attention as we read the book is sweet and precious beyond all words. God has His people numbered and gathered around Himself. He dwelt in the camp — "in the midst of which I dwell." Could love do more? Impossible! The twelve tribes guarded the tabernacle of the Lord… But one thing gave the camp in the wilderness its unity, strength, and glory: the presence of God in His tabernacle, at the centre of His chosen people. A blessed picture of good things to come — of Christ as the centre, life, and glory of His Church now!
The next verse gives Levi a different place. The other tribes camp under their own standards, while the Levites camp in a ring around the tabernacle. Everyone else stayed outside that ring.
Priests and Levites pitched their tents around the tabernacle. The people had to stay on the fringe of things, because they always had to fear wrath coming upon them, as verse 53 of Numbers 1 states. The whole system had one clear design: to show that "the way into the holy places is not yet opened" (Hebrews 9:8).
Mackintosh carries the same rule into Christian service today.
We as Christians are very apt to jostle one another. In fact we are sure to do it, unless each of us pursues his own divinely appointed line of work. We say "divinely appointed," and would press the word. We have no right to choose our own work… God has His quarrymen, His stone-squarers, and His masons. The work progresses by each man attending diligently to his own work. If all were quarrymen, where would the stone-squarers be?
- Centre. God's tent stood in the middle. The camp's unity, strength and glory all came from His presence there.
- Standard. Around that centre, God gave each man a flag and a post he did not pick for himself.
- Order. The square of four camps was no rough improvisation. God's own hand arranged it.
- Distance. Levi ringed the tent while the people stayed on the fringe, a standing sign that the way in was not yet open.
- Contentment. God gives the place and He gives the work. So comparison and jealousy have nothing to feed on — there is room and work enough for all.
but the Levites shall encamp round about the tabernacle of testimony, that there come not wrath upon the assembly of the children of Israel; and the Levites shall keep the charge of the tabernacle of testimony.
Israel camped in rings, with the tent that housed the testimony at the centre. Levi formed the innermost ring around it, and the verse gives the reason: so that wrath would not fall on the people.
The camp had a centre, and the centre was God Himself. Every tent faced Him.
The first thing that catches our attention in reading the book is sweet and precious to the heart beyond all words. God has His people numbered and gathered around Himself. He dwelt in the camp — "in the midst of which I dwell." Could love do more? Impossible! The twelve tribes guarded the tabernacle of the Lord. The Levites camped right around the court. Moses, Aaron, and the priests guarded the entrance by which people came to God. The camp was arranged in this way, all facing the tabernacle, and people think it measured at least twelve miles around.
The tent is named here by what lay in its innermost room.
For the time being, a tent was all He would use. But that tent was the tent of meeting — not only where Israel was to meet, but where God was to meet them. It was also called the tabernacle of testimony. In its innermost room lay the ark, and the ark held the tables that bore witness to what God required from man.
The Levites stood between the people and the tent. One writer sets their post beside the work of the priests.
They are to be the bodyguard of the divine King. The priests go in to God to perform their intercessory service on behalf of the people. In the same way, the Levites keep the people from the wrath that would follow if a stranger forced his way into the tabernacle of God. They carry its holy things through the desert on all their journeys. They are in this way the distinct types of the ministry that goes from God to man, as priesthood goes from man to God.
Notice the timing of the command. It came before anyone had trespassed, not as a penalty announced after a tragedy.
All the people were redeemed, and the firstborn were God's in a special way. But He chose the Levites and gave them to Aaron and to his sons, to do the service of the children of Israel in the sanctuary. This was so that God would not have to deal with the people in judgment because any of them came near the tabernacle of the congregation. So on no plea or pretext were any of Israel, apart from the tribe of Levi, to come near to the tabernacle. Now this instruction did not come after someone had tried it and a terrible disaster had followed. God gave it, and Moses announced it, as the provision the Lord made to avoid the very thing that must otherwise have happened.
The arrangement that protected Israel also kept ordinary Israelites at a distance.
Priests and Levites pitched their tents around the tabernacle. The people had to remain on the fringe of things, because there was always the fear of wrath coming upon them, as stated in verse 53 of Numbers 1. The whole system was designed to show that "the way into the holy places is not yet opened" (Heb. 9:8).
The tribe given this holy post had a violent record behind it.
God could not come into Levi's secret, or be joined to his assembly. That was impossible. God could have nothing to do with self-will, fierceness, and cruelty. But He could bring Levi into His secret, and unite him to His assembly. He could take him out of his home, which held instruments of cruelty, and bring him into the tabernacle to handle the holy instruments and vessels there. This was grace — free, sovereign grace. Here is where we must look for the basis of all Levi's blessed and elevated service.
The Levites' work points to three callings of God's people now.
As men of war, we are called to fight. As priests, we have the privilege of worship. But as Levites, we are responsible to serve. Our service is to carry through this dreary desert what the tabernacle stood for, and the tabernacle stood for Christ.
- Centre. God's tent stood in the middle of the camp, with every tribe ranged around it. Nearness was the point.
- Testimony. The tent carries that name because the ark inside held the tables witnessing to what God required of man.
- Guard. The Levites ringed the tent as the King's bodyguard. They kept the people from the wrath that trespass would bring.
- Grace. The tribe given this holy station had a record of self-will and cruelty; God brought them near on grace alone.
- Limit. The guard protected Israel, but it also kept them on the fringe. It was a standing sign that the way into the holy places was not yet opened.
And the children of Israel did so; according to all that Jehovah had commanded Moses, so did they.
Numbers 1 ends not with a command but with a report: Israel carried out everything the Lord had ordered through Moses — the census, the setting apart of Levi, the placing of the tents. Two questions follow. What did Israel obey, and why does Scripture record that they did it?
The chapter's lists were not paperwork. They set every family and tribe in its place around the tent where God dwelt.
Notice first that God numbers His people exactly. Then, having recognised them in this way, He arranges them around His tabernacle. What a sweet thought — to be recognised like this and placed around God Himself! But here this had nothing to do with a call by faith. It had to do with families, households and tribes. That order was carefully kept whether they were camped at rest or on the march.
The order came from God, not from Moses. So the people carried none of the weight of planning their own march.
The people are to face the dangers of the way. The first thing they need is to be subject to their Leader — not Moses, but the Lord Himself. So first of all comes this mustering and marshalling of what is to be the host of God. For a soldier, keeping rank is an absolute necessity. Here a wisdom that cannot fail appoints for everyone his place and his company. In this way God's foresight can work for them, and they are free from uncertainty and anxiety. They have only to obey, and by obeying to cast all the responsibility of the future on Him. He has tied His own glory to the keeping of His promises to them.
That short report of obedience covers something costly. Nobody in the camp chose his own neighbours or his own distance from the centre.
Each Israelite's blessing lay in keeping in touch with the tabernacle. It lay in taking his appointed place among the tribe he belonged to — east, west, north or south of the tabernacle. He was not left to follow his own choice or inclination.
One of those commands kept Levi out of the count and put that tribe in a ring around the tent, so that no wrath would fall on the people. Note the timing: God gave that instruction before anyone had trespassed, not after.
God had a special claim on the firstborn of Israel. He took the Levites in their place, "to do the service of the people of Israel at the tent of meeting and to make atonement for the people of Israel, that there may be no plague among the people of Israel when the people of Israel come near the sanctuary." What care on God's part this showed for the welfare of His ransomed but stiff-necked people, and for keeping them clear of judgment! … Now God did not give this instruction after someone had tried to come near and disaster had followed. He gave it, and Moses announced it, as the provision the Lord made to prevent what would otherwise have happened.
Israel is not praised here for understanding the plan. The record says only that they did it — no reasons given, no questions asked.
Obedience is due from us to God's word, simply because it is His word. To raise a question, when He has spoken, is blasphemy. We are in the place of the creature. He is the Creator; He may therefore justly claim obedience from us. The unbeliever may call this "blind obedience," but the Christian calls it intelligent obedience. It rests on knowing that the word he obeys is God's word.
This clean note of obedience opens a book that soon fills with complaint.
In the history of the people of God in Numbers we see how God answered their murmurings time after time. Each time they murmured, God answered it by showing His glory; the people murmured, and the glory of God appeared. Look at the murmuring and the breakdown, the sorrow and the failure around us today. We may be sure that God has the answer to it all in Christ.
- Counted. God numbered His people exactly, then arranged them around His own dwelling. He counts, and He places.
- Placed. God appointed every position; no one chose his own. An Israelite's wellbeing lay in taking his place and staying near the tabernacle.
- Guarded. God kept the Levites out of the census and set them in a ring around the tent so that wrath would not fall. He gave that protection before anyone trespassed, not after.
- Freed. A wisdom that cannot fail assigned every place. Obedience freed Israel from planning their own future and laid that weight on God.
- Done. The chapter closes on the plainest possible report — they did it. We owe obedience to God's word because it is His word. That holds even in a book where the murmuring soon starts.
And Jehovah spoke to Moses and to Aaron, saying,
God speaks to Moses and Aaron, and a map follows: where each tribe was to camp around the tabernacle. Why would God fix every tribe's place, and what does that show about how He orders His people now?
The orders come from God, not from the people:
The camp is now divinely arranged and put in order. They decided nothing for themselves. The LORD spoke and gave the instructions: every man of the people of Israel was to pitch his tent by his own standard, with the ensign of their father's house, facing the tabernacle and around it. The tabernacle where the LORD dwelt was in the middle.
The camp had a centre, and God Himself lived there:
The first thing that attracts our attention, in reading the book, is sweet and precious to the heart beyond all expression — God has His people numbered and gathered around Himself. He dwelt in the camp — "in the midst of which I dwell." Could love do more? Impossible! ... But one thing gave the camp in the wilderness its unity, strength, and glory: the presence of God in His tabernacle, at the centre of His chosen people.
Israel camped by two kinds of marker, one for the tribe and one for the family:
Each tribe had its own standard, degel, and each family its own ensign, oth. In the camp the twelve tribes stood three on each side. One of each three gave its name to that side, or camp. So the standard of Judah is called the standard of the camp of Judah, which was on the east. The camp of Reuben was on the south, the camp of Ephraim on the west, and the camp of Dan on the north.
One writer carries this over to God's people today, where the many standards become one:
His New Testament people are also put in order by Him, and He is in the middle of them. They do not gather around different standards. There is only one standard, and it is Christ.
God gave each man his family line and his post. One writer draws out what that settled in the camp:
Each had to know his post and keep it — to know his standard and stay by it. In this way they moved on together, made progress, did the work and carried on the warfare. The Benjaminite had his post, and the Ephraimite had his, and neither was to interfere with, or cross the path of, the other... Each had his family line, and each had his post; and neither the one nor the other was according to their own thoughts; all was of God. He gave the family line, and He assigned the standard. There was no need to compare one with another, and no ground for jealousy. Each had his place to fill and his work to do. There was work enough and room enough for all. There was the greatest possible variety, and yet the most perfect unity.
Judah is named first, and the meaning of his name fits his place:
The LORD now tells Moses where each tribe is to camp and in what order the tribes are to march. Judah is mentioned first, his name fittingly meaning "praise." His tribe camped directly in front of the tabernacle, on the east side. It stood back far enough to leave full room for the sons of Aaron near the tabernacle entrance.
The four sides face outward, and one writer reads the layout as a battle formation:
The four camps lie toward the four quarters — east, south, west, and north. The outside influences come from those quarters, and in a world like this any of them may be hostile. The people of God must meet them in the power of Him who is among them. They must not depend on circumstances. In this sense they carry their resources inside themselves. The whole arrangement has reference to these outside influences... the entire wilderness journey being a warfare, and the people's dwelling-place a camp.
Israel could see the cloud over the tent. One writer applies the same centre to God's people now:
The tabernacle, where the cloud showed the presence of God, stood at the centre of everything... The presence of God among His people today is not visible. Still, if the church of God is gathered, and the indwelling Holy Spirit is acting without hindrance in power, an unbeliever coming in would have to confess, "God is really among you" (1 Cor. 14:25).
- God speaks. God tells Moses and Aaron how the camp is to stand; Israel chose none of it.
- God centres. The tent where He dwelt stood in the middle, and His presence there gave the camp its unity, strength and glory.
- God places. Every man had a standard to camp by and a post to keep — assigned, not chosen — which left no room for comparing or envy. His people today gather under one standard only: Christ.
- God defends. The four camps faced the four quarters, so the whole nation was a war camp that carried its resources inside itself.
- God is praised. Judah, whose name means praise, camped right in front of the tabernacle, on the east.
The children of Israel shall encamp every one by his standard, with the ensign of their father's house; round about the tent of meeting, afar off, opposite to it shall they encamp.
Numbers 2 turns a counted people into an ordered one. Every tribe camps in a fixed place, under its own banner, facing the tent of meeting. Why does God fix the spot? What did the banners mean? And why the distance?
Everything in the camp points inward. The tribes are not just neighbours. Each tent stands in relation to one dwelling place.
The first thing that catches our attention as we read the book is sweeter and more precious to the heart than words can say. God has His people numbered and gathered around Himself. He dwelt in the camp — "in the midst of which I dwell." Could love do more? Impossible! ... But one thing gave the camp in the wilderness its unity, strength and glory: the presence of God in His tabernacle, as the centre of His chosen people. A blessed picture of the good things to come — of Christ as the centre, life, and glory of His Church now!
The camp looked attractive, and no Israelite picked his own spot.
There was something very attractive about the camp of Israel. Clearly the tents stood in perfect order, and none was out of place. As you read, you picture rows of tents evenly placed. They could not camp where they liked, God ordered the arrangement for their benefit. With thousands of people involved, the order had to be strict. Everything was set in relation to the centre: the tabernacle where God dwelt.
Knowing your family line and knowing your banner belong together. Without both, order collapses. With both, there is no reason to compare yourself with anyone.
If a man did not know his family line, he could not recognise his standard. Then everything would have fallen into hopeless confusion. Instead of keeping rank and making steady progress, they would have been in each other's way, treading on one another. Each had to know his post and keep it — to know his standard and stay by it... He gave the family line, and He assigned the standard. So there was no need to compare one man with another, and no ground for jealousy. Each had his own place to fill and his own work to do. There was work enough and room enough for all. There was the greatest possible variety, and yet the most perfect unity.
The verse names two different markers, and the Hebrew keeps them distinct.
Each tribe had its own standard, degel, and each family its own ensign, oth. In the camp the twelve tribes camped three to a side. One tribe out of each three gave its name to that side, or camp. So the standard of Judah is called the standard of the camp of Judah, and that camp lay on the east. The camp of Reuben lay on the south, the camp of Ephraim on the west, and the camp of Dan on the north.
No one records what the banners looked like. Writers mark where tradition takes over from the text.
Scripture does not state the form of the standards and ensigns. The Rabbis say that the standard of Judah looked like a lion (cf. Gen. 49:9; Rev. 5:5); of Reuben a man; of Ephraim an ox (cf. Deut. 33:17); and of Dan an eagle... For the Christian, CHRIST is the only standard, and His banner (degel) is LOVE.
Some translations render the last clause "far off about the tabernacle." Israel's closeness to God was real, but limited.
Notice the words "far off" in verse 2. It is true that in Ephesians we read of Gentiles being "far off," in contrast to Jews, who were "near." But Israel's nearness was only relative. They were near only compared with the distance where the Gentiles lived. Priests and Levites pitched their tents around the tabernacle, and the people had to stay on the edge of things. There was always the fear of wrath falling on them... The whole system was clearly designed to show that "the way into the holy places is not yet opened" (Heb. 9:8).
Two things show God still in the middle of His people: the effect on an outsider, and a promise from Christ.
The presence of God among His people today is not visible. Still, if the church of God is called together, and the indwelling Holy Spirit is acting freely in power, an unbeliever coming in would have to confess, "God is really among you" (1 Cor. 14:25). We also have that great word of our Lord: "Where two or three are gathered in My name, there am I among them" (Matt. 18:20).
- Centre. God dwelt in the middle of the camp. That presence gave Israel its unity, strength and glory.
- Position. No Israelite chose his own ground. God set every tent in relation to the centre, for the people's benefit.
- Banner. Each tribe had its standard and each family its ensign. Knowing your place ended confusion and jealousy alike, for every man had work and room of his own.
- Distance. Camping "far off" showed that Israel's nearness was only relative. The way into the holy places was not yet opened.
- Nearness. What the camp pictured is now real: Christ is the centre, and He is among those gathered to His name.
And [for] those encamping eastward toward the sun-rising [there shall be] the standard of the camp of Judah according to their hosts; and the prince of the sons of Judah shall be Nahshon the son of Amminadab;
Numbers 2 gives every tribe its place in the camp, and the first place named is the front: Judah, on the east, under Nahshon. Why does Judah lead the whole nation, and why does the text tell us which way that camp faced?
One fixed point sets every position in the chapter. Each tribe camps in relation to the tent where God lived among His people.
The tabernacle has a central place: the tribes are all arranged in relation to it... God always insists on His own order.
Knowing that place mattered — both for the camp's order and for how each man saw his neighbour.
If a man did not know his family line, he could not recognise his standard, and everything would have fallen into hopeless confusion... Each man had his family line, and each had his post. Neither of these came from their own thoughts; all was of God. He gave the family line, and He assigned the standard. There was no need to compare one man with another, and no ground for jealousy. Each had his place to fill and his work to do, and there was work enough and room enough for all. There was the greatest possible variety, and yet the most perfect unity.
Judah's place at the front was not random. One writer links it to a later battle, where singers marched ahead of the soldiers.
The standard of Judah was always in the lead when the tribes set out to march, for the spirit of praise to God is of first importance in travel or in warfare. When Jehoshaphat's army went out with singers praising the Lord, the victory was soon gained (2 Chron. 20:21-22).
Why does praise come first? One writer connects the praising heart to a soldier's readiness to obey.
The spirit of praise is also the spirit of obedience, and so Judah is qualified to be the lawgiver (Ps. 60:7). Wherever the heart is filled with God, His throne will be in that heart. And what an irresistible power there is in this spirit of obedience to the all-wise "Captain of salvation"! Who or what can defeat the King's army, so long as it obeys orders?
The verse gives the direction twice over — east, and toward the rising sun. The Hebrew carries two different ideas, and Judah's camp met both.
The camp of Judah was stationed in the front, toward the east. There are two words for the east — "that which opposes," and "sun-rising." They picture what meets us on our wilderness journey: the opposition in the world, and the blessed hope of the coming day, the morning without clouds.
Another writer looks the same way, past the desert to the goal, and then asks what holds God's people together now.
The Lord arranged the camp, with Judah facing toward the sunrise. This shows the promised goal. It also reminds us of the rising of the Sun of Righteousness, the coming of the Lord, when the wanderings of His people will end. And the Lord was in the midst of His people to guide and protect them, to supply their needs. He is still the same. His New Testament people are also put in order by Him, and He is in the midst. However, His people do not gather around many different standards. There is only One, and that is Christ.
The verse names the leader. His family ties run two ways — back to Aaron by marriage, and forward to Rahab and Boaz.
Nahshon was brother-in-law of Aaron (Ex. 6:23), and prince or head of the tribe of Judah (Num. 1:7; Num. 2:3; 1 Chron. 2:10). Salmon, son of Nahshon, married Rahab the prostitute, and was the father of Boaz (Matt. 1:5).
The same writer traces praise back to its source, and then to the One who came from Judah.
The spirit of praise must be first — praise that comes from knowing all the grace God has shown and will keep showing... From Judah, too, He has come who is our Lord Jesus, the leader of our praises, the captain of the Lord's host. Truly, we are "the people of the willing giver," who has given us His blessed Son.
- Centre. God put the tabernacle in the middle, and every tribe camped in relation to it. The order was His, not theirs.
- Post. God gave each man his place and his standard. Variety never became rivalry, because there was room and work enough for all.
- Front. Judah's standard led every march, because the spirit of praise comes first — as Jehoshaphat later sent singers ahead of his army.
- Obedience. Praise and obedience belong together. A heart full of God takes His orders, and no one can defeat that army.
- Sunrise. Judah faced the opposition of the world and the hope of the coming day. The Leader who came from that tribe is now the one standard His people gather to.
and his host, even those that were numbered of them, were seventy-four thousand six hundred.
Numbers 2 gives each tribe its own place in the camp, and Judah's place is at the front. This verse counts Judah's strength there: 74,600 fighting men.
God asked for this count Himself. He was taking stock of what belonged to Him.
He was careful to assert His title this way, and to survey His possessions. He wanted the number of Israel brought to Him exactly, for they were all His own. He called them by their names, and He knew their numbers.
The verse counts a company listed for war. Not everyone in Judah was counted.
God's census in Numbers shows His own vital interest in each one of His people Israel, an interest that is just as true of His saints today. The difference is that in Israel only the males over 20 years of age were counted. There would be an upper age limit too, since this involved only those fit for military service. Today all of His saints are fitted for spiritual warfare — women, and young and old too... Yet the lesson is clear for us as well: to take part in real conflict we need the maturity that comes through knowledge and growth in the word of God.
Judah leads all twelve tribes. One writer explains this from Judah's name and history, and from a later king who sent his singers ahead of his army.
But why is Judah foremost, the leader of all Israel? His name and his history account for it... Judah is foremost here for the same reason that Jehoshaphat later put his singers and trumpeters at the front of the battle against the enemy. When they began to sing and praise, the Lord went out against the foe and struck them down.
Another writer sees in Judah's front rank a picture of praise leading God's people, and traces the tribe forward to Christ.
Here then we have a picture of the power that meets the opposition in the world. It leads God's people on to victory and the coming day. The spirit of praise must be first. This is praise that comes from knowing all the grace God has shown and will go on showing. Here, as always, the singers are to be at the front of the battle... From Judah, too, has come our Lord Jesus, the leader of our praises, the captain of the Lord's host.
Judah camps on the east side. Hebrew has two words for east, and they do not carry the same sense.
In a sense the two expressions are in contrast. Both speak of the east, where the sun rises. But sunrise always carries the idea of joy and blessing that comes with the returning day, while the other word implies the opposite. This word is qedem, "what faces" or "confronts you"... Judah's position, then, has two opposite things in view. One is the world as a place of hostile influence. The other is the rising of the Sun of Righteousness, which for us brings that to an end.
Judah's 74,600 did not choose their ground. Neither did anyone else. God set every man's place.
Each had to know his post and keep it — to know his standard and stand by it. That is how they moved on together... Each had his pedigree, and each had his post; and neither the one nor the other was according to their own thoughts. All was of God. He gave the pedigree, and He assigned the standard. There was no need to compare, and no ground for jealousy. Each had his place to fill and his work to do, and there was work enough and room enough for all.
Every tribe had its own banner. The same writer names the one banner God's army marches under today.
What is the standard of God's fighting host? Let us hear it and remember. It is Christ. This is God's only standard, and the only standard of that band of warriors who muster in this wilderness world to wage war with the hosts of evil and fight the battles of the Lord.
God counts Israel again at the end of the wilderness years. Other tribes had declined. Judah had grown.
Judah, however, is in happy contrast to the earlier decline, for it increased from 74,600 to 76,500. This shows that we need not be weakened by the trials of the wilderness journey; we may be strengthened instead. That depends on how real and steady our faith in the living God is. Judah's name, meaning "praise," may remind us that the spirit of praise increases fruitfulness.
- Counted — the census was God asserting His title to His own; He knew their names and their numbers.
- Enlisted — the count took only men fit for war, so Judah's 74,600 is an army list, not a headcount of the tribe.
- Praise first — Judah means praise, and praise leads the march. From Judah came Christ, the leader of our praises.
- Placed — no one picked his own post. God assigned it, and the one standard He gives His army is Christ.
- Increased — Judah came out of the wilderness larger than it went in, 74,600 becoming 76,500. A praising people grows.
And those that encamp next unto him shall be the tribe of Issachar; and the prince of the sons of Issachar shall be Nethaneel the son of Zuar;
Numbers 2:5 gives Issachar its address in the wilderness: beside Judah on the east, with Nethanel son of Zuar at its head. God fixed every detail, so why this place, this neighbour, this leader?
Nothing about the camp was left to the tribes' own preference:
The second chapter lays down the arrangement of the camp... The tabernacle has a central place, and all the tribes are arranged in relation to it... God insists always on His own order.
One writer traces the same order into the body of Christ:
Our God is a God of order... Jehovah Himself planned Israel's camp in the wilderness. He arranged the tribes around the tabernacle in four groups of three, each under its own standard (Num. 2). In the same way, God has placed every member in the body of Christ. He supplies each one from the infinite resources of the Head in heaven with all that is needed for the blessing and growth of the whole: "God arranged the members in the body, each one of them, as he chose" (1 Cor. 12:18).
Issachar camps next to Judah, so Judah's place shapes its own. One writer ties Judah's lead to his name and to praise:
But why is Judah foremost, the leader of all Israel in this way? His name and what we have seen of his history account for this... We have read his motto in the words of Jacob: the spirit of praise is the spirit of power. Judah is foremost here for the same reason that Jehoshaphat in a later day put his singers and trumpeters in the front of the battle against the enemy. When they began to sing and praise, the Lord went out against the foe and struck them down. (2 Chron. 20.)
The camp's east side is named twice over — eastward, and toward the sunrise. One writer says the two words pull in opposite directions:
They both speak of the east, where of course the sun rises. But the sunrise always carries the idea of joy and blessing that comes with the new day, while the other word suggests the opposite. That word is qedem, "what faces you" or "confronts you"... Judah's position, then, takes in two opposite things: the world as the place of hostile influence, and the rising of the Sun of Righteousness, which for us brings that influence to an end.
Issachar's name speaks of hire. The leader God gave this tribe answers that pull exactly:
Issachar's prince comes fourth in the list: Nathaniel, "the gift of God." The name fits him exactly. Issachar's name speaks of hire, and his tendency is to bend his shoulder to foreign yokes and pay his tribute out of love of ease... a true overcomer is this Nathaniel, who has learned that the "gift of God" cannot be purchased. Here too the family line shows plainly how grace is received: he is the son of Zuar, that is, "Little." The man who thinks of wages is bound to value himself too highly. The man who counts himself truly "little" is ready to appreciate the gift of God.
Another writer draws the same names into a lesson about faithfulness:
Linked with the spirit of praise is the sense of responsibility suggested by Issachar, "hire," reward for faithfulness. Yet his captain also shows what is to control the thought of reward. He is Nethaneel, "the gift of God," the son of Zuar, "little." There must always be the sense of our littleness, and the sense that the very grace that makes us faithful is God's gift.
None of this cancels reward; it purifies the motive behind it.
Yet there is a right thought of recompense — a reward of "mercy" (2 Tim. 1:18) that love insists on giving, and that is really only the gift of God. To the soul this can never become mere wages, the motive for service. The reason is that it is the reward of true devotedness alone, not of self-seeking. To work for the reward is to lose it.
Judah's lead keeps Issachar and its neighbour on course:
The one will not seek his own, nor the other stray off to the world, while Judah leads.
- Placed. Issachar did not pick its spot. God planned the camp around the tabernacle, and He insists on His own order.
- Led. Its place was next to Judah, whose motto is that the spirit of praise is the spirit of power. Praise in front wins the battle.
- Named. Issachar means hire, the instinct to serve for what can be got out of it.
- Given. Against that instinct God set Nethanel, "the gift of God," son of Zuar, "little." Grace comes to those who count themselves small.
- Rewarded. Reward remains real, but it is mercy and gift, never wages: work for it and you lose it.
and his host, even those that were numbered thereof, fifty-four thousand four hundred.
God gave Issachar his place in the camp. He was to pitch beside Judah on the east, and his company numbered 54,400. Two questions sit behind that number: why does this tribe stand where it stands, and why count it at all?
No tribe picked its own ground. One writer notes how far God's instruction reached:
Three tribes pitched their tents on each side of the tabernacle, and the group under Judah faced the entrance into the court. God commanded the order in which the tribes were to march when they set out, just as He commanded the order of their tents when they rested. The arrangements were not left to their own choice or wishes. If they had disobeyed, thinking they knew a better order, they would only have produced disorder.
That assignment was also a recognition:
Each tribe had its own place and its own interest before the Lord. This is a picture of God's people: He acknowledges them, and He appoints each one a place in relation to His testimony.
Issachar camps on the east under Judah's standard. Two Hebrew words cover that direction:
The two expressions are in a sense in contrast. They both speak of the east, where the sun rises. But sunrise always carries the idea of joy and blessing with the returning day, while the other word suggests the opposite. That word is qedem, "what faces you" or "confronts you" — close to our word adversity, what comes toward you, only in a hostile way. So Judah's position looks at two opposite things: the world as the place of hostile influence, and the rising of the Sun of Righteousness, which for us brings that to an end. "The night is far gone; the day is at hand." Blessed be God, we who believe in Him are children of the day. So, says the apostle, "let us cast off the works of darkness and put on the armor of light."
Issachar does not march alone or first. The same writer looks at who leads him, and at what that prevents:
Issachar, with Zebulun, fights under Judah's banner, and his captain is Nethanel, "the gift of God." Both are clearly under the best of leadership. The one will not seek his own, nor the other stray off to the world, while Judah leads.
The names in this verse pull in two directions:
Along with the spirit of praise comes the sense of responsibility that Issachar suggests: "hire," reward for faithfulness. Yet his captain points to what must keep that thought of reward in check. He is Nethanel, "the gift of God," the son of Zuar, "little." We must always feel our own littleness, and know that the very grace that makes us faithful is God's gift. So Paul could say, "To me, though I am the very least of all the saints, this grace was given."
One writer traces the yoke from slavery to willing service:
From Jacob's prophecy we see that Issachar stands for yoke-bearing. But there it is a slavery that speaks of indulging the flesh, and of the empty reward of sin's pleasure for a season. Here we are to think instead of deliverance by grace from that servitude. We come to the One whose loving voice calls us to hear Him and find true rest. So we come under His yoke and learn from Him. He is the gentle and humble One who stooped to bear our burden and carry our sorrows, even to death, the death of the cross. Then we enter a new service, set apart by the word of truth we have heard and received, and in this way we find the true reward. Issachar means, "There is reward."
This number is not the end of Issachar's story:
Issachar increased greatly, from 54,400 to 64,300. This may at least teach a most valuable lesson: someone who is not prominent in any public way may gain far more for the Lord than more prominent people do. The judgment seat of Christ will no doubt give us some sharp surprises along this line. Zebulun also showed an increase, from 57,400 to 60,500 — not as great as Issachar, but more than Judah.
- Placed — Issachar did not choose his ground. God set every tribe in its place, and a better idea of their own would only have made disorder.
- Led — Under Judah's banner, Issachar will not seek his own and Zebulun will not stray off to the world.
- Given — His captain is Nethanel, "the gift of God," son of Zuar, "little." Reward has its place, but the grace that makes us faithful is God's gift.
- Yoked — The old yoke was slavery. Grace frees us for a new service, learned from the One who carried our sorrows to the cross.
- Rewarded — The 54,400 counted here had grown to 64,300 by the second census. The least prominent may gain the most for the Lord.
[With them shall be] the tribe of Zebulun; and the prince of the sons of Zebulun shall be Eliab the son of Helon;
The verse names the last of the three tribes camped on the east side of the tabernacle, and the man set over it. Two questions sit behind that short line. Why does God record where each tribe camped? And why is a tribe named "dwelling" placed under the banner of praise?
Zebulun has no standard of its own. It joins the camp named after its leading tribe, and the arrangement is deliberate.
Judah is mentioned first, and his name fittingly means "praise." His tribe stood directly in front of the tabernacle, toward the east. The standard of Judah included two other tribes, Issachar and Zebulon (vv. 5-7), one camped on each side of Judah. All of this pictures how God keeps spiritual order in the church. It is not a precise physical order. It is an order that glorifies His name through the submissive obedience of His saints, united and devoted to His name.
The name goes back to Leah, and to what she said when she named him.
And now we come to Zebulon, whose meaning is plain from his name and from the way Leah uses it. She called him Zebulon (dwelling), saying, "This time my husband will dwell with me." The spiritual thought tied to Zebulon is dwelling in the relationship God has given us to Himself. That is the only true idea of consecration.
Judah, whose name means praise, leads this camp. Zebulun comes third, and its place names what keeps that praise alive.
In the same way Zebulon, "dwelling," speaks of abiding communion with God. That communion must be there if the spirit of true praise is to continue, and if the sense of responsibility is to keep its rightful place. His captain is Eliab, "God is Father," the son of Helon, "the mighty one." That name speaks of the Spirit of adoption, which is both the power and the pledge of an abiding communion. "I will be a father to you, and you shall be sons and daughters to me, says the Lord Almighty."
Elsewhere in Scripture Zebulun looks less happy. The tribe lies by the sea, close to the nations around it. Against that background the leader's name stands out.
Listed next is the prince of Zebulon, who was Eliab, his name meaning "God is a Father." In Genesis 49:13 Zebulon pictures Israel living close to the Gentiles, a haven for ships, and so compromising her proper separation to God. In beautiful contrast, the words "God is a Father" remind us of 2 Corinthians 6:14-18. There believers are called to come out from unholy associations. In doing so they have God's own assurance: "I will be a father to you, and you shall be sons and daughters to me." Such godly separation from evil is another thing required if we are to be "good soldiers of Jesus Christ." Eliab was the son of Helon, but the meaning of that name is so doubtful that we cannot be certain of its significance.
Commentators differ on Helon. Ridout takes it as "the mighty one"; Grant finds the meaning too doubtful to build on.
The warning is not for ancient Israel alone. One writer names what such mixing costs God's people.
God is the Father of His believing people. But if they mix with the world and forget whose they are, they force Him, as it were, to forget their special relationship to Himself. He cannot be to them a Father as He would. How terrible this loss is, and how little many think of it! And how powerfully Zebulon's captain speaks to us in this way — Eliab, "God is a Father!"
With Zebulun named, Judah's camp is complete. One writer draws its three tribes into a single picture.
Taken as a whole, then, the camp of Judah expresses the spirit of righteousness. The standard under which Judah gathers is that of righteousness. It is a spirit to which God's statutes are songs, and so it is free from legality. And it keeps the enjoyment of relationship to God as Father, where Issachar and Zebulon give the complementary thoughts.
- Placed — Zebulun gets no banner of its own. It stands beside Judah, in an order that honours God through the submissive obedience of His people.
- Dwelling — The name means dwelling. It comes from Leah's words when she named him, and it stands for staying in the relationship God has given us to Himself.
- Sustaining — Abiding communion keeps praise going and keeps responsibility in its place. So Zebulun completes what Judah begins.
- Fathered — Eliab means "God is a Father." The name is the pledge of that communion, and it points to God's promise to those who come out from unholy ties.
- Forfeited — Mixing with the world does not end the relationship. It dims it, so that God cannot be a Father to His people as He would.
and his host, even those that were numbered thereof, fifty-seven thousand four hundred.
This verse closes the east side of the camp: Zebulun, last of the three tribes under Judah's standard, 57,400 men strong. The count looks like a bare statistic, yet it belongs to a larger picture: God numbered every man and gave every tribe its place.
Nobody in Israel picked his own spot. His family line and his post both came from God, and that left no ground for rivalry.
Each had to know his post and keep it — to know his standard and stay by it. That is how they moved on together; that is how they made progress, did the work and carried on the warfare. Each had his family line, and each had his post, and neither was according to their own thoughts; all was of God. He gave the family line, and He assigned the standard. There was no need to compare one with another, and no ground for jealousy between them. Each had his place to fill and his work to do, and there was work enough and room enough for all.
Zebulun camped on the east side, and two different words lie behind that direction.
The camp of Judah stood in the front, toward the east. There are two words for the east — "that which opposes," and "sun-rising." They picture what meets us on our wilderness journey: the opposition in the world, and the blessed hope of the coming day of the morning without clouds.
Zebulun's 57,400 did not lead the east camp; they marched behind Judah. One writer asks why Judah goes first, and answers from a later battle.
But why is Judah foremost, the leader of all Israel in this way? His name and what we have seen of his history account for this… We have also read his motto in the words of Jacob: "The spirit of praise is the spirit of power." Judah is foremost here for the same reason that Jehoshaphat later put his singers and trumpeters at the front of the battle against the enemy. When they began to sing and praise, the Lord went out against the foe and struck them down.
Zebulun and Issachar both march under that banner, and Judah's lead keeps each from a different wrong turn.
Issachar, with Zebulun, fights under Judah's banner… It is plain that they are both under the best of leadership. The one will not seek his own, nor the other stray off to the world, while Judah leads.
Praise at the front needs something steady behind it. One writer finds it in the meaning of Zebulun's own name.
In the same way, Zebulun, "dwelling," speaks of abiding communion with God. That communion must be present if the spirit of true praise is to continue and the sense of responsibility is to stay in its rightful place. His captain, Eliab, "God is Father," the son of Helon, "the mighty one," speaks of that Spirit of adoption. That Spirit is at once the power and the pledge of an abiding communion. "I will be a father to you, and you shall be sons and daughters to me, says the Lord Almighty."
Zebulun's picture in Genesis has a shadow in it. One writer sets that shadow against the name of Zebulun's prince, Eliab, "God is a Father."
In Genesis 49:13 Zebulun pictures Israel living close to the Gentiles. The tribe is a haven for ships, and so compromises her proper separation to God. In beautiful contrast to this, the expression "God is a Father" reminds us of 2 Corinthians 6:14-18. There God calls believers to come out from unholy associations. In doing so they have His promise: "I will be a father to you, and you shall be sons and daughters to me."
Commentators differ on the name Helon. Ridout takes it as "the mighty one." Leslie Grant says the meaning is too doubtful to build on.
The camp had four standards. One writer asks what that arrangement means for God's people now.
The Lord arranged the camp, with Judah facing towards the sunrise. This points to the promised goal. It also reminds us of the rising of the Sun of Righteousness, the coming of the Lord, when the wanderings of His people will end. And the Lord was in the midst of His people to guide and protect them, to supply their needs. He is still the same. His New Testament people are also put in order by Him, and He is in the midst. However, His people do not gather around different standards. There is only One, and that is Christ.
- Counted — God numbered Zebulun's 57,400. Each man's family line and post came from Him, not from his own choosing.
- Placed — the east camp faced the opposition ahead and the sunrise at once. One place held both the conflict and the hope.
- Led — praise went first. Judah at the head kept Zebulun from straying off to the world.
- Dwelling — Zebulun's name speaks of abiding communion with God. His captain Eliab, "God is Father," speaks of the adoption behind it.
- Gathered — four standards stood in the camp. God's people now have one standard, Christ, with the Lord Himself in the midst.
All that were numbered of the camp of Judah were a hundred and eighty-six thousand four hundred, according to their hosts. They shall set forth first.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
The standard of the camp of Reuben shall be southward according to their hosts; and the prince of the sons of Reuben shall be Elizur the son of Shedeur;
The south side of the camp belongs to Reuben, Jacob's oldest son, and Elizur the son of Shedeur leads it. Two questions follow. Why does the firstborn camp second? And why does a man named "God is a rock" lead the tribe of one whom Scripture calls "unstable as water"?
Nobody in the camp chose his own position. God gave each man his place, and that left nothing to compete over.
Each had to know his post and keep it — to know his standard and stay by it. So they moved on together; so progress was made, work done and warfare carried on... Each had his family line, and each had his post; and neither the one nor the other was according to their own thoughts. All was of God. He gave the family line, and He assigned the standard. There was no need to compare one with another, and no ground for jealousy of one another. Each had his place to fill and his work to do, and there was work enough and room enough for all.
Losing the first place did not leave Reuben without honour.
The next camp is that of Reuben, in which the rejected firstborn humbly takes the second place... His place is on the south. The south literally means "the right hand," the place of power and dignity, though held in dependence. How completely this marks the position of Reuben — again the child's place (Reuben means "see, a son!").
Reuben's loss was his own doing, and it pictures something bigger than one man.
Reuben was Jacob's firstborn. He pictured Jacob's might and strength, first in dignity and power. But he failed badly in self-control, and so he lost all claim to the rights of the firstborn. He stands for the boasted strength of man in the flesh. In the end that strength turns out to be pathetic weakness, as it did with King Saul... The flesh is as unstable and uncontrolled as the water of the seas.
The two names over this camp answer the tribe's weakness point by point.
Elizur means "God is a Rock." What a contrast to his father Reuben, of whom we read, "Unstable as water, you shall not have preeminence" (Gen. 49:4). Reuben in the flesh was utter weakness, just as the flesh proves in all of us. But the strength and stability of God is the portion of the new nature. That is what all believers are "in Christ Jesus." Shedeur means "the Almighty is fire," which adds the thought of God's consuming holiness judging the flesh and all its works. We cannot truly know the strength and steadying energy of God unless we "share His holiness," of which the fire speaks — holiness which must judge Reuben's sin.
Note: the older translation reads "you shall not excel"; the ESV has "you shall not have preeminence."
Reuben's honoured place carries a danger with it.
But he needs this place, for the influences of the south are relaxing ones. How good that he has to lean only on Another — that the place of his strength is beyond the reach of any possible attack! The power of faith shows itself most clearly when it resists the relaxing influences of what men count prosperity... Though the influences of the south are pleasant for a season, they end in fierce, furnace heat. Before it the fruits of the earth dry up and perish. How many have found the hot breath of worldly prosperity to be the destruction of spiritual fruit!
Verse 10 opens a group of three tribes.
The tribe of Reuben was in the middle on the south side. The tribes of Simeon and Gad camped on either side under his standard (vv. 10-16). The three tribes together numbered 151,450 men. These under Reuben's standard followed those under Judah's standard when they broke camp.
Those neighbours were not random. Commentators read the grouping as a single lesson carried by three related names.
Simeon too has learned dependence on the God who hears prayer, and has the peace of a mind conformed to God's... If Reuben's prince is Elizur ("God is a rock"), the father of Simeon's prince is Zurishaddai — "my rock is the Almighty." So they are well suited companions... Gad is in the same line of dependence, with his captain Eliasaph — "God has added" — growth through faith. So Reuben's camp is finished and furnished. On his standard we may read "faith."
- Assigned, not chosen. Position and family line both came from God. That left no room for comparison or jealousy.
- Deposed, not discarded. The rejected firstborn takes second place. Yet the south is "the right hand" — dignity held in dependence.
- Rock against water. Reuben was unstable as water. His captain's name, Elizur, confessed that God is a rock.
- Fire behind the rock. Shedeur, "the Almighty is fire," teaches that only those who share His holiness know the strength of God.
- Faith on the standard. Simeon and Gad name the same rock. So the whole south side marches under one lesson: strength borrowed from God, tested by easy times.
and his host, even those that were numbered thereof, forty-six thousand five hundred.
This verse is just a number: 46,500 fighting men counted in the camp of Reuben. Why does God count His people and write down the totals? And what does Reuben's place on the south side say about a tribe that had lost the leadership?
The totals in these chapters repeat again and again. One writer reads the count as God's claim on a people who are His own:
They open with His command to Moses to take the number of the tribes, and Moses does it with great exactness and care. The number of each tribe, except Levi, appears again and again in Numbers 1 and Numbers 2... This showed His rights as Lord of Israel. He had the right to take their number, for they were all His own. If He had no right to them, and no prospects in them, He would not have counted their total. Scripture says the same of His right over another part of His realm: "He determines the number of the stars; He gives to all of them their names." That shows His sovereignty over the heavenly hosts (Psalm 147:4).
The 46,500 were not the whole tribe. They were the men who qualified for the muster, and qualifying meant proving who you were:
Those to be counted were "all from twenty years old and upward, all who are able to go to war in Israel." They had to state their family line, family by family, and only those who could do that had a place in this count and could be warriors. They had to show their family line because a mixed crowd of outsiders had joined the people of God... So only those who could show their rightful place among the people of God had a place in the count and could go to war. Our family line, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God. And our calling is to a spiritual war, not with flesh and blood, but against the devil and his tricks and the wicked spirits (Eph. 6:11-12).
Reuben leads the second camp, not the first, though the leadership had once been his. One commentator sees his dignity restored on another footing:
Reuben — "See, a Son" — leads the camp stationed on the south, "the right hand." He was displaced from the leadership because he was unstable (see Gen. 49:4). Yet here he keeps the place of dignity and responsibility, held not by a strength of his own, which fails, but by divine stability through true sonship.
Reuben's 46,500 was one part of a larger group, and that group had a fixed turn on the march:
The tribe of Reuben was in the middle on the south side, and under his standard were also the tribes of Simeon and Gad on either side (vs. 10-16). The total number of men in the three tribes was 151,450. These under Reuben's standard followed those under Judah's standard when they broke camp.
Each man also had to know his standard — the banner of his own tribe. Both things went together, and neither was his own choice:
If a man did not know his family line, he could not recognise his standard, and everything would have fallen into hopeless confusion. Instead of keeping rank and making steady progress, they would have been in each other's way, treading on one another. Each had to know his post and keep it — to know his standard and stay by it... Each had his family line, and each had his post. Neither of them came from their own choice; all was of God. He gave the family line, and He assigned the standard. There was no need to compare one man with another, and no ground for jealousy. Each had his place to fill and his work to do, and there was work enough and room enough for all.
Forty years later the same tribe was counted again, and the number had gone down:
At the Exodus the tribe numbered 46,500 men fit to go to war; and at the close of the wanderings they had decreased to 43,730.
Commentators differ on the cause. Some link the drop to the rebellion of Dathan and Abiram, two Reubenites; another draws a wider moral:
In the drop in his numbers — from 46,500 at the beginning to 43,730 at the close — we may learn what we lose in our lives through self-confident reasoning and empty claims.
- Counted — God had each tribe counted because the people were His own. Counting is what an owner does. The same God numbers and names the stars.
- Qualified — the 46,500 were men over twenty who could go to war. Only those who could prove their family line took a place in the ranks. The birth that gives a place among God's people now is the new birth.
- Placed — Reuben lost the leadership, yet still holds a place of dignity. He leads the southern camp with Simeon and Gad, 151,450 men, marching second behind Judah.
- Ranked — family line and standard belonged together, and God gave both. That left no room for confusion, comparison or jealousy.
- Diminished — by the end Reuben had fallen to 43,730. One writer reads that loss as the cost of self-confident reasoning.
And those that encamp by him shall be the tribe of Simeon; and the prince of the sons of Simeon shall be Shelumiel the son of Zurishaddai;
Numbers 2:12 gives Simeon a fixed address in the wilderness: beside Reuben, on the south side of the tabernacle. Two questions follow. Why does God assign each tribe a place? And why does a tribe with Simeon's record get a prince whose name means "at peace with God"?
Nothing about where Simeon stood was left to Simeon. The whole layout came from God, and commentators see the same principle running into the church, where believers are described as members of one body.
Our God is a God of order. Jehovah Himself planned Israel's camp in the wilderness. The tribes camped around the Tabernacle in four groups of three, each under its own standard (Num. 2). In the same way, God has placed every member in the body of Christ. From the endless resources of the Head in heaven, He supplies each one with all that is needed for the blessing and growth of the whole: "God arranged the members in the body, each one of them, as He chose" (1 Cor. 12:18).
Simeon does not head a camp. He stands beside Reuben, with Gad on the other side, and the three move out together as the second company.
Reuben — "See, a Son" — leads the camp stationed on the south, "the right hand." He had been displaced from the leadership because of his instability (see Gen. 49:4). Yet here his place of dignity and responsibility is beautifully kept — not by an energy of the flesh that fails, but by divine stability through true sonship. With Reuben are Simeon, "obedience," and Gad, "increase." Simeon's prince Shelumiel, "at peace with God," the son of Zurishaddai, "my rock is the Almighty," emphasises the same truth. So the camp on the south, which sets out second, is established. It supplies stability and the assurance of increase, joined to the spirit of obedience.
Commentators differ on Simeon's own name: some read it as "obedience," others as "hearing."
The prince's name cuts against his tribe's past.
His paths had not been peace, nor with Him who is "the God of peace." So Simeon could not know peace with God — the deep, sweet rest of a mind shaped to His mind. Now with the Simeonite prince all this is changed. As to Simeon's special evil he too is an overcomer, and his also is the victory of faith. There is no evil which faith cannot overcome, because He to whom faith links itself is the Almighty.
The change had to come from outside Simeon, and the same is true of anyone reading the verse today.
Only the grace of God could make any difference in this dreadful case. Is the flesh in us any better than in Simeon and Levi? Not at all: "the mind that is set on the flesh is hostile to God" (Rom. 8:7). Yet God has in pure grace reconciled all believers to Himself (2 Cor. 5:18), and we "have peace with God," as Romans 5:1 declares.
The verse names the prince's father too: Zurishaddai. That name says what the peace stands on.
Shelumiel was the son of Zurishaddai, meaning "My rock is the Almighty." This reminds us that peace with God depends on the stability of God Himself, the Almighty. And in this case He is not only the Rock, but "my rock." How good it is for us if we take this living truth as our own! This is a wonderful support in warfare.
Jacob had sentenced Simeon and Levi to be divided and scattered.
Notice how the thought of agreement — confederacy — runs through what Jacob says. Their doom is to be disunited, "divided," "scattered"; and that doom, as with Reuben, works for blessing. To be brought into loneliness, individuality, weakness would be both the rebuke and the cure for that "strength" which comes of "union," and which shows itself again and again in deeds of violence. The doom is here the remedy. It brings Simeon and Levi back to the true meaning of their names: Simeon — "hearing," to find the answer God gives to human prayer; and Levi — "joined," to own only the ties that have divine origin and sanction.
- Placed — Simeon did not pick his ground. God designed the camp around the tabernacle, and the same God still sets each member in the body as He chooses.
- Pardoned — the tribe marked by violence is led by "at peace with God," a name only grace could hang over Simeon's tent.
- Rooted — that peace is the son of Zurishaddai: it stands on the Almighty as "my rock," not on the tribe's improvement.
- Supported — a rock you can call "my rock" is what carries a fighting man through the desert.
- Restored — the scattering Jacob pronounced was a cure. It drove Simeon back to the meaning of his own name: the God who hears prayer.
and his host, even those that were numbered of them, fifty-nine thousand three hundred.
Numbers 2:13 gives Simeon's fighting strength: 59,300 men, camped second on the south side under Reuben's standard. Behind that plain number lie three questions: why God counted His people, why Simeon stood here, and what became of this total later.
No Israelite picked his own spot. Each man had a pedigree — his family line — and a standard, the banner his group camped under. Commentators find one lesson in the pair: know who you are, and know where you belong.
If a man did not know his pedigree, he could not recognise his standard. Everything would have fallen into hopeless confusion. Instead of keeping rank and moving steadily forward, they would have been in each other's way, treading on one another. Each had to know his post and keep it — to know his standard and stay by it... Each had his pedigree, and each had his post; and neither the one nor the other was according to their own thoughts; all was of God. He gave the pedigree, and He assigned the standard. No one needed to compare himself with another. No one had any ground for jealousy. Each had his place to fill and his work to do, and there was work enough and room enough for all.
A number like 59,300 can look like bare statistics. Commentators compare two counts of Israel, taken from two very different motives.
In David's time he decided to number the people out of pride in reigning over a great nation, and 70,000 people died as a result. But God's census in Numbers shows His own vital interest in each one of His people Israel, an interest that is no less true of His saints today. The difference is that in Israel only the males over 20 years of age were numbered. There would be an upper age limit too, for this involved only men fit for military service. Today all of His saints are fitted for spiritual warfare, women and young and old too, though some are less active than others because of age. Yet the lesson is clear for us too: to take part in real conflict we need maturity, or full age. That comes through knowing and growing in the word of God.
Reuben's standard leads the south side, and Simeon camps under it. Commentators read the south as the direction of warmth and ease.
Reuben needs this place, for the influences of the south are relaxing ones... It is in resisting the relaxing influences of what men count prosperity that the power of faith is most clearly shown. Moses is a beautiful example. When he was grown up, he "refused to be called the son of Pharaoh's daughter, choosing rather to be mistreated with the people of God than to enjoy the fleeting pleasures of sin." ... How many have found the hot breath of worldly prosperity to be the destruction of spiritual fruit!
Commentators also hear the names of this camp's leaders echoing one another:
Simeon too has learned dependence on the prayer-hearing God, and has the peace of a mind conformed to God's. Reuben's prince is Elizur, which means "God is a rock." The father of Simeon's prince is Zurishaddai — "my rock is the Almighty." So they are well-suited companions. But the communion that Simeon stands for must follow Reuben's lead: a will that clings to God and submits to Him. Only then can it stand the desert warfare.
Simeon's prince is named in the verse just before: Shelumiel. His name cuts against his tribe's history.
The prince of Simeon was Shelumiel, meaning "at peace with God." This is a striking contrast to Simeon's own character. His father Jacob describes it in Genesis 49:5-7: together with Levi, Simeon was guilty of cruel, vicious hatred in the murder of the men of Shechem. Only the grace of God could make any difference in such an atrocious case. Is the flesh in us any better than in Simeon and Levi? Not at all... Yet God has in pure grace reconciled all believers to Himself, and we "have peace with God," as Romans 5:1 declares.
Commentators trace the loss that followed to one leader from this tribe.
The tribe of Simeon fell sharply in numbers during the wilderness journey, from 59,300 to 22,200. What is the reason for this? Likely it is seen in Numbers 25:14. Zimri was a leader of a father's house among the Simeonites. He became a leader in the corrupting mixture of Israel with the Midianites. How true it is that even rebellion — as seen in Reuben, with Dathan and Abiram — does not damage the people of God as badly as being yoked together with unbelievers... Too often we do not suspect the harm in unholy associations until we are trapped by them.
- Counted. God takes a vital interest in each of His people. David counted for pride, and 70,000 died.
- Placed. No one chose his own ground. God gave the pedigree and the standard, so no tribe had reason for jealousy.
- Posted. Simeon camps on the south, where the pull is prosperity. Faith shows its power by resisting comfort.
- Paired. Simeon camps under Reuben and leans on the same rock — "my rock is the Almighty," the name of his prince's father.
- Lost. By the second census these 59,300 had fallen to 22,200. Commentators blame mixing with the Midianites: what open rebellion did not do, bad company did.
And [with them shall be] the tribe of Gad; and the prince of the sons of Gad shall be Eliasaph the son of Reuel;
Numbers 2 gives every tribe its place around the tent of meeting. Verse 14 names the last tribe of the southern camp, with its leader and his father. Three questions follow: why Gad camps where he does, what the names mean, and what God teaches by recording them.
Gad does not camp alone. He is one of three tribes gathered under one banner, and God sets his place beside the leading tribe of that group.
Reuben's tribe was in the middle on the south side. The tribes of Simeon and Gad camped on either side of him, under his standard (vs. 10-16). The three tribes had 151,450 men in all. When they broke camp, those under Reuben's standard followed those under Judah's standard.
No tribe picked its own spot, and no family either:
The second chapter sets out the arrangement of the camp, and here another important principle comes before us. The tabernacle has the central place, and all the tribes are positioned in relation to it. "The people of Israel shall camp each by his own standard, with the banners of their fathers' houses."… God always insists on His own order.
The same care that placed Gad beside Reuben shows in how God places His people now.
Our God is a God of order… The Lord Himself planned Israel's camp in the wilderness. He arranged the tribes around the tabernacle in four groups of three, each under its own standard (Num. 2). In the same way, God has placed every member in the body of Christ. He has supplied each one from the endless resources of the Head in heaven with everything needed for the blessing and growth of the whole: "God arranged the members in the body, each one of them, as He chose" (1 Cor. 12:18).
The name carries two ideas at once:
Gad lies next to Reuben. Gad is the picture of spiritual increase, and of a fighting condition too. Leah's cry holds both ideas: "A troop is coming." In a world like this, spiritual increase can hardly come without conflict. In David's time we find the men of Gad standing out as warriors. (1 Chron. 12:8-14.)
Older translations read "a troop" in Genesis 30:11 and 49:19; the ESV has "Good fortune has come!" and "Raiders shall raid Gad." Jacob's dying words over Gad set the pattern: first loss, then victory.
It goes on: "Gad, a troop, shall overcome him, but he shall overcome at the last." That is the unavoidable character of the new order of things — conflict, defeat at first, but victory in the end. So Christ says, "The one who conquers, I will grant him to sit with Me on My throne, as I also conquered and sat down with My Father on His throne."
The leader named here has a name that answers how a tribe called "increase" ever grows.
Eliasaph, meaning "God has added," was the prince of Gad… Genesis 49:19 is a prophecy of recovery and triumph, so Eliasaph's name shows that the triumph will come through God's giving the increase. His father's name, Deuel, means "known of God." The sense that God knows us leads to spiritual increase in daily life. This is also connected with preparation for conflict. But God is the source of it all.
This verse spells the father's name Reuel. Numbers 1:14 and other places spell it Deuel. Two Hebrew letters explain the difference:
Father of Eliasaph, 'prince' of Gad. Num. 1:14; Num. 7:42, 47; Num. 10:20. In Num. 2:14 he is called REUEL. This is clearly a case where the letter ד (D) has been mistaken for the letter ר (R).
Being known by God means more than God knowing all things:
How good a thing it is to be known by God! This does not simply mean the knowledge God has of everything. It means the knowledge we have of someone we are close to, and it implies approval. This is the real secret of the spiritual increase that Eliasaph's name speaks of… Do we need to be told that increase should be looked for in a child of God? Or how sad a proof it is of a lack of closeness with God when it is missing? Yet some are so stagnant that they seem to have no thought of it. If they are safe, that is enough for them. They do not "grow in grace"; they remain babies.
- Known — the father's name means "known of God." That closeness carries God's approval, and this verse begins there.
- Added — next comes the son's name, "God has added." The growth is a gift, not an achievement.
- Increase — "Gad" means both a troop and increase. Growth like that seldom comes without conflict.
- Placed — God set Gad beside Reuben on the south side. The same hand places every member in the body of Christ.
- Overcome — Jacob's prophecy over Gad runs from defeat to victory at the last. Christ promises the same to the one who conquers.
and his host, even those that were numbered of them, forty-five thousand six hundred and fifty.
Numbers 2:15 closes the roll of the southern camp: 45,650 fighting men from Gad, led by Eliasaph, camped beside Reuben and Simeon. One total in a long list raises real questions — why God counts at all, why Gad stands here, and what the number was for.
Gad is the third tribe in the camp on the south side. One writer adds up that camp as it sets out:
Behind them you would see the standard of the camp of Reuben, setting out according to their companies. The company of the tribe of Simeon joined Reuben, and so did that of the tribe of Gad. Together they numbered 151,450 men who could go out to war.
These repeated totals are not bookkeeping. They rest on a claim about who Israel belongs to:
These chapters open with His command to Moses to take the number of the tribes. Moses does this with great exactness and care… This was an expression of His rights as Lord of Israel. He had title to take their number, for they were all His own. If He had no right to them, and no prospects in them, He would not have counted their sum. Scripture says the same of His divine title in another part of His dominions: "He determines the number of the stars; He gives to all of them their names." This is the expression of His sovereignty among the heavenly hosts. (Psalm 147:4)
Gad's leader is Eliasaph. His name, and his father's, explain where a number like 45,650 comes from:
Eliasaph, meaning "God has added," was the prince of Gad. Genesis 49:19 says, "Gad, a troop shall tramp upon him, but he shall triumph at last." This is a prophecy of recovery and triumph. So Eliasaph's name shows that God brings the triumph by giving the increase. His father's name, Deuel, means "known of God." Knowing that God knows us leads to spiritual increase in practical life. This too has to do with preparing for conflict. But God is the source of all.
(The writer uses an older translation here. The ESV reads: "Raiders shall raid Gad, but he shall raid at their heels.")
Gad stands for two things at once:
Gad is the picture of spiritual increase, and of a fighting condition too… Spiritual increase can hardly happen without conflict in a world like this. In David's time we find the men of Gad outstanding as warriors. (1 Chron. 12:8-14)
Every figure in the chapter counts men fit to fight, and each man had to prove he belonged:
Those to be numbered were "all in Israel from twenty years old and upward who are able to go to war." They had to declare their ancestry by their families. Only those who could do that had a place in this muster and could be warriors… Our ancestry, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God. And our calling is to a spiritual warfare. It is not with flesh and blood, but against the devil and his schemes and the wicked spirits (Eph. 6:11-12).
Gad camps on the south side. One writer reads the south as a picture of ease and prosperity:
The influences of the south are relaxing ones… Faith shows its power most clearly when it resists the relaxing influences of what people count prosperity… The influences of the south are pleasant for a time. But they end in fierce, furnace heat, and that heat dries up the fruits of the earth and they perish. How many have found the hot breath of worldly prosperity to be the destruction of spiritual fruit!
- Known — God counts Israel because Israel is His. The exact figure 45,650 is a claim of ownership, like His naming of every star.
- Added — Eliasaph means "God has added," so the number is not Gad's achievement but God's gift of increase.
- Growing — increase and conflict travel together. Gad pictures both, and his descendants became noted fighters.
- Armed — everyone counted was of age, of proven descent, and fit to fight. Our descent now is the new birth, and our war is a spiritual one.
- Placed — Gad camps on the south, the side of relaxing ease. There faith must resist prosperity, not hardship.
All that were numbered of the camp of Reuben were a hundred and fifty-one thousand four hundred and fifty, according to their hosts. And they shall set forth second.
Israel camped and marched under standards, each tribe in a place God assigned. This verse totals the camp led by Reuben and sets it second in the march — an odd spot for the tribe of Jacob's firstborn.
Reuben did not camp alone, and he did not march first.
The tribe of Reuben was in the middle on the south side, and under his standard were also the tribes of Simeon and Gad on either side (vs.10-16), the total number of men in the three tribes 151,450. These under Reuben's standard followed those under Judah's standard when they broke camp.
Reuben was Jacob's firstborn, yet he moves second. Commentators find no loss of dignity in that lower place.
The next camp is Reuben's, where the rejected firstborn humbly takes the second place. The will of man is now brought under. It shows itself in him as a dependent holding fast to God, and that is true "strength" and stability. "God is a rock" — the meaning of the name Elizur — is the principle that now leads him on in victory. His place is on the south, which literally means "the right hand." That is the place of power and dignity, yet held in dependence. How completely this marks Reuben's position: again the child's place (Reuben means "see, a son!").
The names of Reuben's neighbours and their leaders carry meanings of their own.
Reuben keeps his place of dignity and responsibility here, not by a strength of his own, which fails, but by the stability God gives through true sonship... With Reuben are Simeon, "obedience," whose prince Shelumiel means "at peace with God," son of Zurishaddai, "my rock is the Almighty," and he stresses the same truth; and Gad, "increase," whose captain Eliasaph means "God has added," son of Reuel, "known of God," and he shows the principle of true increase... So the camp on the south, which sets out second, is settled. It supplies stability and the assurance of increase, joined to the spirit of obedience.
The south brought its own danger, and it was a soft one.
But he needs this place, for the influences of the south are relaxing ones. How good that he has only Another to lean on! How good that the place of his strength is beyond the reach of any attack! Faith shows its power most plainly when it resists the relaxing pull of what men count as prosperity. What a beautiful example Moses is! When he was grown up, he refused to be called the son of Pharaoh's daughter, choosing rather to be mistreated with the people of God than to enjoy the fleeting pleasures of sin. He considered the reproach of Christ greater wealth than the treasures of Egypt... How many have found that the hot breath of worldly prosperity destroys spiritual fruit!
The column held together because each tribe kept the place given it.
Each had to know his post and keep it — to know his standard and stay with it. So they moved on together; so they made progress, did the work and carried on the warfare... Each had his family line, and each had his post. Neither of them was according to their own thoughts; all was of God. He gave the family line, and He assigned the standard. There was no need to compare one man with another, and no ground for jealousy. Each had his place to fill and his work to do, and there was work enough and room enough for all. There was the greatest possible variety, and yet the most perfect unity.
God's care for order did not stay in the wilderness.
But this shows the care of God in providing the best order possible. In the Church of God today He surely uses no less wisdom in providing a spiritual order that will glorify His name, and He expects His people to honour that order when the assembly gathers, as 1 Corinthians 14:40 shows: "But all things should be done decently and in order."
- Counted — 151,450 covers Reuben, Simeon and Gad: Reuben in the middle of the south side, the other two on either hand.
- Placed — God gave the family line and God assigned the standard. No one had ground to compare or to envy.
- Second — The firstborn who lost the lead takes second place humbly. He still holds a place of dignity, kept by dependence on God, not by strength of his own.
- Tested — The south stands for the softening pull of prosperity. Faith shows its power most plainly by resisting it.
- Moving — The same God who ordered a marching nation still orders His people, so all things should be done decently and in order.
And the tent of meeting shall set forth, the camp of the Levites in the midst of the camps; as they encamp, so shall they set forth, every man in his place, according to their standards.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
The standard of the camp of Ephraim according to their hosts shall be westward; and the prince of the sons of Ephraim shall be Elishama the son of Ammihud;
Numbers 2:18 puts Ephraim's banner on the west side of the tabernacle, under Elishama the son of Ammihud. It reads like camp paperwork. Yet the writers find in it a picture of fruitfulness — where it stands next to God's dwelling, and who leads it.
Ephraim's camp stood on the side closest to the holy place. One commentator ties that to a line in Psalm 80 about God shining out.
The tribe of Levi had been separated from the rest. Even so, the splitting of Joseph's tribe into two kept the number at twelve. So three tribes pitched their tents on each side of the tabernacle. The group under Judah faced the entrance into the court. The one under Ephraim was on the west side, and so nearest to the holy place with the cloud of the Divine Presence. This explains the reference in Psalm 80 to God shining out "before Ephraim and Benjamin and Manasseh."
Scripture names the standard but never describes it. One source passes on a Jewish tradition about the four banners.
Scripture does not state the form of the standards and ensigns. The Rabbis say that Judah's standard looked like a lion (compare Genesis 49:9; Revelation 5:5). Reuben's was a man. Ephraim's was an ox (compare Deuteronomy 33:17). Dan's was an eagle. If that is so, the same figures appear in the faces of the living creatures in Ezekiel 1:10 and in Revelation 4:4-7. For the Christian, CHRIST is the only standard, and His banner is LOVE.
Ephraim camps with Manasseh and Benjamin, all descendants of Rachel. One writer reads the direction, the tribe names and the leaders' names together.
Westward stand Ephraim, Manasseh and Benjamin, the children of Rachel. The west, the opposite of the east, is "toward the sea," the place of storm, but also of refreshing showers from it. Here Ephraim, "fruitfulness," has his place. His captain marks it out: Elishama, "God has heard," the son of Ammihud, "the people of majesty." Fruitfulness comes from God. Manasseh means "forgetting." His prince is Gamaliel, "God is a rewarder," the son of Pedahzur, "the rock has redeemed." These names urge us to forget the things that are behind, and to seek our fruitfulness from the Rock who has redeemed us.
The pairing of Ephraim with Elishama is not treated as accidental. Fruit can be dangerous to the person carrying it.
Joseph claims his double portion in his two sons. Of these, Ephraim comes first, because Jacob's prophetic word gave this place to the younger born. Ephraim's prince is Elishama, "God has heard." The "fruitfulness" that Ephraim's own name speaks of may be a snare to us. It becomes one when we fail to credit it, with reverence, to the One who hears His people's prayer. The second name, Ammihud, means "the people of Majesty." It may hint at a conscious relationship with the infinite Greatness. That relationship gives successful prayer both its ground and its drive. All these names breathe a spirit of dependence and nearness — of lowliness, yet of closeness. The two always go together.
Another writer counts the three western tribes and sets them in the line of march.
The armies of these three totalled 108,100. These followed the Levites when travelling.
Each man's standard told him his post. One writer shows how that produced order without sameness.
Each had to know his post and keep it — to know his standard and stay by it. That is how they moved on together. That is how they made progress, did the work and carried on the warfare. The man of Benjamin had his post, and the man of Ephraim had his. Neither was to interfere with the other, or cross his path... Each had his place to fill and his work to do, and there was work enough and room enough for all. There was the greatest possible variety, and yet the most perfect unity.
A name can outlast the thing it describes. Ephraim's later numbers tell a sad story.
Ephraim's name means "fruitfulness." Yet Ephraim stands in sad contrast to Manasseh, for this tribe fell from 40,500 to 32,500. The lesson may be this: if we depend on our reputation for bearing fruit, the fruit itself will shrink badly, because self has become our object instead of Christ. Self-satisfaction is one of the most damaging attitudes we can adopt.
- Place. Ephraim camped on the west, nearest the holy place. The presence at the centre fixed his position.
- Name. Ephraim means fruitfulness. His place is "toward the sea" — the side of storms and of refreshing showers alike.
- Source. His captain is Elishama, "God has heard," son of Ammihud, "the people of majesty." Fruit comes from the God who answers prayer.
- Order. 108,100 men marched behind the Levites under one banner. Each man knew his own standard, so variety never became confusion.
- Warning. A fruitful name still has to be lived out. Ephraim later shrank, which shows what happens when reputation replaces Christ as our object.
and his host, even those that were numbered of them, forty thousand five hundred.
The number here, 40,500, is Ephraim's fighting strength. Ephraim's standard gathered the west side of Israel's camp. A bare total raises two questions. Why does God count His people at all? And why does He decide where each tribe camps, instead of leaving it to Israel?
Ephraim's 40,500 is part of a larger sum. Three tribes camped and marched under one standard:
The standard of the camp of Ephraim was on the west side, and with Ephraim were Manasseh and Benjamin (verses 18-23). The armies of these three totalled 108,100. These followed the Levites in travelling.
Another writer sets Ephraim in the marching column, where the two largest groups took the two ends:
The next standard to appear was Ephraim's, joined by the tribes of Manasseh and Benjamin — 108,100 men able for war in all. Behind them came the rear guard: the standard of the camp of Dan, with the armies of Asher and Naphtali... The rear guard amounted to 157,600 fighting men. So of the two largest hosts, one led the way and the other brought up the rear.
This count is not statistics for its own sake. It is God taking stock of what belongs to Him:
He was careful to assert His title this way, and to survey His possessions. He would have the number of Israel exactly brought to Him, for they were all His own. He called them by their names, and He knew their numbers.
Another writer looks at the census as a whole and finds the same care behind it:
God's wisdom required that the children of Israel be counted. In the early chapters the main purpose set before us is a count of the males who were fit for war. But we shall find that the numbering goes beyond this. There are other concerns and aims here than war and warlike purposes. In short, whatever the particular aim might be in various parts of the book, God impresses this upon us — the care and the interest that He takes in everyone who belongs to Him. It is a very simple truth, but certainly full of comfort to the soul.
The names in this camp carry meaning. Writers read the west side as a picture of spiritual increase:
Westward, Ephraim, accompanied by Manasseh and Benjamin, the children of Rachel, are grouped... Here Ephraim, "fruitfulness," has his place. His character shows in his captain, Elishama, "God has heard," the son of Ammihud, "the people of majesty" — fruitfulness comes from God. Manasseh means "forgetting." His prince is Gamaliel, "God is a rewarder," the son of Pedahzur, "the rock has redeemed." Manasseh encourages us to forget the things that are behind and to seek our fruitfulness from the Rock who has redeemed us... This is the true spirit of fruitfulness, which can gather material for spiritual increase out of the very trials of the way.
The west side was not a random allotment. It put these three tribes nearest the holy place, and a psalm later looks back to that:
The tribe of Levi had been set apart from the rest. But the split of the tribe of Joseph into two kept the number at twelve. So three tribes pitched their tents on each side of the tabernacle. The group under Judah faced the entrance into the court. The group under Ephraim was on the west side. So it was nearest to the holy place with the cloud of the Divine Presence. This explains the reference in Psalm 80 to God shining out "before Ephraim and Benjamin and Manasseh."
God gave each man his family line and his post, so no one had grounds to envy another:
Each had to know his post and keep it — to know his standard and stay by it. So they moved on together; so they made progress, did the work and carried on the warfare. The Benjaminite had his post, and the Ephraimite had his. Neither was to interfere with the other or cross the other's path... Each had his family line, and each had his post. Neither of them came from their own thoughts; all was of God. He gave the family line, and He assigned the standard. There was no need to compare one with another, and no ground for jealousy. Each had his place to fill and his work to do. There was work enough and room enough for all.
- Counted. The exact figure is God surveying what is His own; He knew their names as well as their numbers.
- Placed. Counting leads straight to placing. Ephraim heads the west side with Manasseh and Benjamin — 108,100 men in all.
- Fruitful. Ephraim means fruitfulness. The names around him point to its source: fruitfulness comes from God, drawn even out of the trials of the way.
- Near. The west camp lay closest to the holy place, the side Psalm 80 names when it speaks of God shining out.
- Content. No tribe picked its own spot; God gave each its post, so there was no room for jealousy and work enough for all.
And by him shall be the tribe of Manasseh; and the prince of the sons of Manasseh shall be Gamaliel the son of Pedahzur;
Numbers 2 gives every tribe a fixed place around the tabernacle, and verse 20 puts Manasseh on the west side beside Ephraim. Why does the older brother camp beside the younger, and why does God record a prince's name at all?
Manasseh camps on the west side, in one of four groups of three tribes. One writer explains what that side of the square meant:
The tribe of Levi had been separated from the rest. But the tribe of Joseph was divided into two, and that kept their number at twelve. So on each side of the tabernacle three tribes pitched their tents. The group under Judah faced the entrance into the court. The group under Ephraim was on the west side. That put it nearest to the holy place, with the cloud of the Divine Presence. This explains the reference in Psalm 80 to God shining out "before Ephraim and Benjamin and Manasseh."
In every other group the younger tribe follows the elder. Manasseh is the single exception, and the reason goes back to Jacob's blessing:
In the grouping of the tribes into four great camps we may observe a plan. The four leaders were Judah, Reuben, Ephraim, and Dan. The tribes attached to each moved after their standards, and in each case, except Manasseh, the younger followed the elder. No one could justly complain about this one exception. Jacob had settled that Ephraim came before Manasseh when he blessed them, guiding his hands on purpose, as we read.
Commentators read that crossing of hands as a statement about how God gives blessing:
When we come to Jacob's sons, we find Reuben, the eldest, set aside. Judah, the lawgiver, is not chosen either. Joseph is chosen for the birthright. That double portion appears in two tribes, Ephraim and Manasseh. And Ephraim, the younger, gets a greater blessing than Manasseh, the elder. Jacob's crossed hands proclaimed the sovereignty of God.
The name Joseph gave his son turns into a picture of the Christian life:
And now we come to Manasseh. "Manasseh" means "forgetting." "God has made me forget," says Joseph, "all my relatives and my father's house." Translated into Christian experience, it is the spirit of the runner. He no longer looks at what is behind him as he presses on toward the prize ahead. And Manasseh's prince supplies this last thought. His name is Gamaliel — "God is a rewarder." As it is said of Moses, "He looked to the reward."
Gamaliel's name promises reward. His father's name guards against pride:
Manasseh's prince was Gamaliel, meaning "God is a Rewarder." In a time of conflict this is a wonderful encouragement. There is no reason to look for men's approval or rewards. If we fight with the simple desire to please God, we shall be content to wait for God's time of rewarding. Gamaliel's father, Pedahzur, means "the rock has redeemed." That reminds us that the rewards of service must not become occasions of pride. We are only sinners redeemed by Him who is the one stable Rock.
No tribe chose its own ground, and no man chose his own place in it:
Each man had to know his post and keep it — to know his standard and stay by it. That is how they moved on together, made progress, did the work and carried on the warfare. The Benjaminite had his post, and the Ephraimite had his, and neither was to interfere with the other or cross his path. So it was with all the tribes throughout the camp of the Israel of God. Each had his family line, and each had his post, and neither was according to their own ideas; all was of God. He gave the family line, and He assigned the standard. There was no need to compare one with another, and no ground for jealousy. Each had his place to fill and his work to do. There was work enough and room enough for all.
God fixed the marching order too, not only the camping ground:
God commanded the order in which the tribes were to march when they set out on their journeys, just as He commanded the order of their tents when they rested. He did not leave the arrangements to their own choice or desires. If they had disobeyed, thinking they knew some better order, they would simply have produced disorder.
- Placed — Manasseh camps beside Ephraim on the west, the side nearest the holy place. Psalm 80 names these three tribes together.
- Humbled — here alone the elder follows the younger. Jacob crossed his hands on purpose, so God's choice, not birth order, fixed the rank.
- Forgetting — the name means letting go of what is behind, like a runner pressing toward the prize.
- Rewarded — Gamaliel, "God is a rewarder," means no need to chase human approval. A soldier can wait for God's time.
- Redeemed — Pedahzur, "the rock has redeemed," keeps reward from turning into pride. Every man in the camp stands there as a sinner redeemed, in a post God assigned.
and his host, even those that were numbered of them, thirty-two thousand two hundred.
The verse records Manasseh's total: 32,200 men, camped beside Ephraim on the west side of the tabernacle. Three questions sit behind that plain number: where Manasseh camps, why he follows his younger brother, and why God counts a tribe this small at all.
Manasseh camps under Ephraim's standard, so the group's place decides his. One writer explains how the twelve tribes were arranged, and what stood nearest the west side:
The tribe of Levi stood apart from the rest. But the tribe of Joseph was split in two, which kept the number at twelve. So three tribes pitched their tents on each side of the tabernacle. The group under Judah faced the entrance into the court. The group under Ephraim was on the west side. That put it nearest to the holy place, with the cloud of the Divine Presence. This explains the reference in Psalm 80 to God shining out "before Ephraim and Benjamin and Manasseh."
Manasseh was Joseph's firstborn, yet the list puts him second, under Ephraim's standard. One writer treats this as the only exception in the whole arrangement:
The tribes attached to each leader moved behind their standards. In every case except Manasseh, the younger followed the elder. No one could justly complain about this one exception. Jacob had settled Ephraim's place ahead of Manasseh when he blessed them, guiding his hands knowingly, we read... No tribe, then, could complain of its place in the order of march. It could not have made anyone jealous.
Joseph gave Manasseh his name out of what he had lived through in Egypt:
During the seven years of plenty Asenath bore Joseph two sons. He named the first Manasseh, which means "forgetting." As he says, "God has made me forget all my hardship and all my father's house." This is typical of the truth of Christianity: it makes us forget the first creation with its natural relationships and its wearing trials. But that is because it brought in something better, the new creation, of which Christ is the Head... Manasseh therefore stands for the negative side of the truth, Ephraim the positive.
The other names on the west side point the same way, including the prince of Manasseh named in the verse before:
Here Ephraim, "fruitfulness," has his place, marked by his captain, Elishama, "God has heard," the son of Ammihud, "the people of majesty" — fruitfulness comes from God. Manasseh means "forgetting." His prince is Gamaliel, "God is a rewarder," the son of Pedahzur, "the rock has redeemed." These names encourage us to forget the things that are behind and to look for our fruitfulness from the Rock who has redeemed us... This is the true spirit of fruitfulness, which can gather material for spiritual increase out of the very trials of the way.
How does 32,200 compare with the rest of the camp?
Benjamin was the smallest of the tribes except Manasseh in the numbering of Numbers 1:37 and Numbers 2:22-23.
A small tribe gets the same careful count. One writer reads that repeated count as God claiming what is His:
The book opens with His commandment to Moses to take the number of the tribes. The count is made with great exactness and care. Numbers 1 and Numbers 2 set down the total of each tribe, except Levi, again and again... This was an expression of His rights as Lord of Israel. He had the title to take their number, for they were all His own. Had He not had a right to them, had He no prospects in them, He would not have counted their sum.
Every man in these lists had a standard to camp by:
Each had to know his post and keep it — to know his standard and stay by it. So they moved on together. So they made progress, did the work, and carried on the warfare. The man of Benjamin had his post, and the man of Ephraim had his. Neither was to interfere with the other or cross his path... Each had his place to fill and his work to do, and there was work enough and room enough for all. There was the greatest possible variety, and yet the most perfect unity.
- Counted — God numbers even the smallest tribe to the last man. He would not count a people He had no claim on.
- Placed — on the west side, Manasseh's group camped nearest the holy place. Psalm 80 recalls that position.
- Ranked — Manasseh followed his younger brother and lost nothing by it. Jacob's blessing had settled the order long before, so no tribe had grounds for jealousy.
- Named — Manasseh means forgetting. That is the negative side of the truth; Ephraim, fruitfulness, is the positive.
- Kept — every man knew his standard and stayed by it; variety of posts, one camp, and room enough for all.
And [with them shall be] the tribe of Benjamin; and the prince of the sons of Benjamin shall be Abidan the son of Gideoni;
Numbers 2:22 is one line in a camp plan drawn up by God Himself. Benjamin takes third place on the west side, under Ephraim's standard, led by a man named Abidan. The short verse carries a name, a position and a leader — and God chose all three.
God fixed Benjamin's place on the west side, near His own dwelling place. One writer explains why that side matters, and why Israel had no say in it:
The group under Ephraim was on the west side, and so it was nearest to the holy place with the cloud of God's presence. This explains why Psalm 80 speaks of God shining forth "before Ephraim and Benjamin and Manasseh." Notice that God commanded the order in which the tribes were to march when they set out, just as He commanded the order of their tents when they rested. The arrangements were not left to their own choice or wishes. If they had disobeyed, thinking they knew a better order, they would have produced only disorder.
A dying mother named him once; his father named him again. One writer sees Christ in both names:
The youngest son of Jacob by his beloved wife Rachel. She died at his birth and named him BEN-ONI, meaning "son of my sorrow," but his father named him BENJAMIN, "son of the right hand." Gen. 35:18, 24. He is a picture of Christ in both names: as exalted at God's right hand (Benjamin), and as rejected — the cause of Israel's suffering in the last days (Ben-oni). Rachel pictures Israel (Micah 5).
Psalm 68 calls the tribe "Benjamin, the least of them." One writer uses the older wording, "little Benjamin," and sets that title beside the name his father gave:
In Psalm 68 the Spirit of the Lord refers to Benjamin as "little Benjamin" (v. 27); this was because he was the smallest tribe. It is important to keep these two names in mind: "Son of my right hand," a place of power, and "little Benjamin," the place of weakness. How can these two opposites be brought together? Both are essential for any servant of the Lord who wants to be faithful in his testimony: he needs a sense of his own weakness, and a sense of the power of God that can work in that weakness.
The leader's name carries a lesson. Set beside the description of Benjamin as a wolf, it corrects what a fighting tribe might assume about itself:
Abidan was the prince of Benjamin, his name meaning "My father is judge." In Genesis 49:27 Benjamin is called "a ravenous wolf." In other words, he was a warrior by nature. But the Lord does not need natural fighters. Peter found that out when he used a sword to cut off the ear of the high priest's servant (John 18:10-11), and the Lord rebuked him and healed the man's ear. "For the weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh but have divine power to destroy strongholds" (2 Cor. 10:4). So let us remember the lesson of Abidan, "my father is judge." God as a Father judges according to every person's work (1 Peter 1:17). It is He who judges the value of our warfare, with perfect spiritual discernment.
Benjamin does not head its own camp. God places the fighting tribe under Ephraim, and one writer says that pairing shapes the spirit of its warfare:
Benjamin would also lack the true spirit if it were not found under Ephraim. The spirit of controversy, without an eager desire for fruit for God, would be nothing but the spirit of Ishmael — warfare for its own sake — a spirit to be hated. How different it is when a burning zeal for Christ and for His glory drives a person, and, as we have seen, Abidan is the captain of the army!
Why count people at all? One writer answers from God's own right over Israel:
This was an expression of His rights as Lord of Israel. He had the right to take their number, for they were all His own. If He had no right to them, and no prospects in them, He would not have counted their sum. The same divine right is claimed in another part of His dominions: "He determines the number of the stars; He gives to all of them their names." That is the expression of His sovereignty among the heavenly hosts (Psalm 147:4). So the Lord says of His saints, "They shall be Mine … in the day when I make up My treasured possession" (Malachi 3:17). He may make up — that is, number, hide and keep them safe — because they are His own.
- Counted — God numbers Benjamin because Benjamin is His. He counts, hides and keeps safe what belongs to Him.
- Named — "Son of my sorrow" became "son of the right hand" — a picture of Christ rejected and Christ exalted.
- Placed — the west side put Benjamin nearest God's dwelling place. God commanded the spot; Israel did not choose it.
- Led — Abidan, "my father is judge," reminds a fighting tribe that God, not the fighter, weighs the value of the warfare.
- Little — the smallest tribe marches under Ephraim. Weakness needs God's power, and zeal needs fruit.
and his host, even those that were numbered of them, thirty-five thousand four hundred.
This verse closes Benjamin's entry in the wilderness camp with one figure: 35,400 fighting men, placed under Ephraim's standard on the west side. It reads like bare arithmetic. Yet it raises the two questions behind the whole chapter. Why does God count His people at all? And why does He give each tribe its own side of the camp?
This figure belongs to the camp on the west side.
The standard of the camp of Ephraim was on the west side, and with Ephraim were Manasseh and Benjamin (vv. 18-23). The armies of these three totalled 108,100. These followed the Levites in travelling.
That position was not a matter of convenience.
Each tribe had its own standard, and each family its own flag. In the camp the twelve tribes were set three on each side, and one of each three gave its name to that side or camp. So the standard of Judah is called the standard of the camp of Judah, which was on the east. The camp of Reuben was on the south, the camp of Ephraim on the west, and the camp of Dan on the north.
The three tribes on the west all came from Rachel. One writer reads the meaning of their names as one lesson.
Westward, Ephraim is grouped with Manasseh and Benjamin, the children of Rachel. The west, the opposite of the east, is "toward the sea," the place of storm, but also of refreshing showers from it. Here Ephraim, "fruitfulness," has his place... Manasseh, "forgetting"... encourages us to forget the things that are behind and to seek our fruitfulness from the Rock who has redeemed us. Benjamin, "the son of my right hand," tells of the dignity of our position... This is the true spirit of fruitfulness, which can gather out of the very trials of the way material for spiritual increase.
35,400 was one of the lowest totals in the camp — and that smallness did not stay fixed.
In the numbering of Num. 1:37 and Num. 2:22-23, Benjamin was the smallest of the tribes except Manasseh. Ps. 68:27 calls it "little Benjamin." But in the numbering before Israel entered the land, Benjamin was larger than four of the other tribes... In Ps. 80:2, where God is asked to save them, Benjamin is named with Ephraim and Manasseh, the three tribes which followed the ark.
The chapter keeps repeating totals. One writer traces the counting back to ownership.
He was careful in this way to assert His title, and survey His possessions. He would have the number of Israel exactly brought to Him, for they were all His own. He called them by their names, and knew their numbers.
That interest did not stop with this first count.
Later there is a fresh numbering of the men of Israel, in view of going to war. They were now on the borders of the holy land. The same grace of God which took account of every one of His people when they entered the wilderness shows that His love had not lessened, and that His personal interest was the same to the end. There was everything that could have turned Him aside, if that had been possible.
The order of the camp reached down to each single man.
Each had to know his post and keep it — to know his standard and stay by it... The Benjaminite had his post, and the Ephraimite had his. Neither was to interfere with the other, or cross the other's path... Each had his family line, and each had his post. Neither of them was according to their own thoughts; all was of God. He gave the family line, and He assigned the standard. There was no need to compare one man with another, and no ground for jealousy. Each had his place to fill and his work to do, and there was work enough and room enough for all.
Commentators read the name over this camp as pointing forward.
Benjamin was the youngest son of Jacob by his beloved wife Rachel. She died at his birth and named him Ben-oni, which means "son of my sorrow," but his father named him Benjamin, "son of the right hand." He is a picture of Christ in both names: as exalted at God's right hand (Benjamin), and, as rejected, as the occasion of Israel's tribulation in the last days (Ben-oni). Rachel is a picture of Israel.
- Counted — God claimed these 35,400 as His own. He knew their names and He knew their number.
- Placed — the count led to a place. Benjamin camped on the west, under Ephraim's standard, in a group of 108,100.
- Posted — the place led to a post. Each man kept his own standard, and no tribe crossed another's path.
- Small — and still counted in full. Later, "little Benjamin" grew larger than four other tribes.
- Named — the name over that small camp means "son of the right hand." Commentators read it as a picture of Christ exalted.
All that were numbered of the camp of Ephraim were a hundred and eight thousand one hundred, according to their hosts. And they shall set forth third.
This verse closes the description of the western camp: three tribes, one standard, one total, and a set place in the line of march. It reads like bookkeeping. Yet God chose every part of it — the side they faced, the names on the banner, the count, and the turn they took.
The position given here is not a rank the tribes negotiated. The same God who told them where to pitch told them when to move.
We notice that God commanded the order in which the tribes were to march when they set out on their journeys, just as He commanded the order of their tents when they rested. Arrangements were not left to their discretion or desires. If they had disobeyed, thinking they knew a better order, they would only have produced disorder.
Ephraim's camp lay on the west, nearest the ark. Centuries later a psalm prayed on the strength of that position.
The whole opening of Psalm 80 rests on the position of the tribes. In the last days of Israel's desolation, the psalmist asks God to lead them and to show His power as He did when He led them through the wilderness... Ephraim, Benjamin, and Manasseh were the three tribes nearest the ark in the camp of Israel. That is why verse 2 of the Psalm says, "before Ephraim, Benjamin, and Manasseh."
The three tribes here are Rachel's line. Their names spell out where fruitfulness comes from.
Westward, Ephraim accompanied by Manasseh and Benjamin, the children of Rachel, are grouped. The west, the opposite of the east, is "toward the sea," the place of storm, but also of refreshing showers from it. Here Ephraim, "fruitfulness," has his place. His character is shown by his captain, Elishama, "God has heard," the son of Ammihud, "the people of majesty" — fruitfulness comes from God. Manasseh means "forgetting." His prince is Gamaliel, "God is a rewarder," the son of Pedahzur, "the rock has redeemed." Manasseh encourages us to forget the things that are behind and to seek our fruitfulness from the Rock who has redeemed us. Benjamin, "the son of my right hand," tells of the dignity of our position. That position is to be marked by the prince Abidan, "my father is judge," the son of Gideoni, "the one who cuts down" — giving us the sense of adoption, and the godly fear that removes pride from us. This is the true spirit of fruitfulness, which can gather out of the very trials of the way material for spiritual increase.
Ephraim, not Manasseh, gives this camp its name. One writer explains why:
We find the law of spiritual increase in Joseph, shown by the name of his son "Ephraim" — "fruitfulness." But the way to fruitfulness runs through "Manasseh" — "forgetfulness," as with the apostle: "Forgetting what lies behind, I press on." The end is greater than the means. So Ephraim is, in the mind of God, greater than Manasseh.
The placing of the four camps was deliberate.
The next standard on display was Ephraim's, joined by the tribes of Manasseh and Benjamin, numbering in all 108,100 men able for war. Behind them, forming the rear guard, flew the standard of the camp of the children of Dan... So of the two largest hosts, one led the way and the other brought up the rear.
The practical lesson: no one had to work out his own place, and no one had cause to envy another's.
Each had to know his post and keep it — to know his standard and stay by it. So they moved on together. So they made progress, did the work, and carried on the warfare. The Benjaminite had his post, and the Ephraimite had his. Neither was to interfere with the other or cross his path... He gave the pedigree, and He assigned the standard. There was no need to compare one with another, and no ground for jealousy. Each had his place to fill and his work to do. There was work enough and room enough for all.
- Assigned, not chosen. God set both the camping order and the marching order. Choosing a "better" arrangement would only have made confusion.
- Placed near. This camp stood on the west, nearest the ark — a nearness a later psalm appeals to when praying for God to act again.
- Named for growth. Ephraim is "fruitfulness," Manasseh "forgetting," Benjamin "son of my right hand" — and fruitfulness comes from God.
- Ranked for a reason. Forgetting is the road. Fruitfulness is the goal, which is why Ephraim's name heads the standard.
- Kept in post. Third place was still an appointed place — enough work and enough room for all, with no ground for comparison.
The standard of the camp of Dan shall be northward according to their hosts; and the prince of the sons of Dan shall be Ahiezer the son of Ammishaddai;
The camp order closes on the north side, where Dan's standard flies with Ahiezer at its head. Dan was a servant woman's son, yet God gave his tribe the last side of the camp and one of its two largest commands — why there, and what for?
Every Israelite knew two things: his family line and the flag he belonged under. One writer draws out what that settled:
Each had to know his post and keep it — to know his standard and stay by it. So they moved on together. So they made progress, did the work and carried on the fight. The Benjaminite had his post, and the Ephraimite had his, and neither was to interfere with the other, or cross his path... Each had his family line, and each had his post. Neither came from their own thoughts. All was of God. He gave the family line, and He assigned the standard. There was no need to compare one with another, and no ground for jealousy. Each had his place to fill and his work to do. There was work enough and room enough for all.
Asher and Naphtali pitch under Dan's banner, and the grouping is not random:
Dan, the chief of the last camp, had Asher and Naphtali attached to his standard. All three were children of the servant women. But Dan was the eldest of the three, so it was fitting that he had the first place here. No tribe, then, could complain of its place in the order of march. No jealousy over it could have risen in anyone's heart.
When the camp moved, the north side became the back of the column. The names in this camp fit that job:
Last of all, on the north, forming the rear guard on the march, we have the camp of Dan. With him are the tribes of Asher and Naphtali. Some of these names have a military ring, fitting the place they occupy. Those who bring up the rear must guard against stragglers. They must also guard against sudden attacks like that of Amalek, who inflicted loss on the rear of the children of Israel.
The rear was no place for a small force:
The rear guard amounted to 157,600 fighting men. So of the two largest hosts, one led the way and the other brought up the rear.
One writer sets the captain's name against Dan's character in Genesis 49:
The prince of Dan was Ahiezer, meaning "brother of help." The character of Dan in Genesis 49:17 is a sharp contrast: "Dan shall be a serpent in the way." Instead of giving brotherly help, he would give satanic harm. Again, God makes a wonderful change by His pure grace, so that Dan would be a help in conflict. Ahiezer was the son of Ammishaddai, meaning "the people of the Almighty." When the people know their relationship to the Almighty, you would expect a brother relationship among them.
Dan's name means judgment, and one writer draws a lesson about rule from his origin:
The first of the servant women's sons is Dan, "judgment," the spirit of rule. Dan's origin shows that rule is really service. Yet how quickly man's hand turns it away from this!... Instead of using his place to bless those in his care, he uses it for himself. He feeds his ambition or his greed with it in some form. He becomes a rebel against the One who gave him his authority... But for this, as for everything else, there is a remedy with God. Dan is here in his place with his captain Ahiezer — "brother of help," the son of Ammishaddai — "the people of the Almighty." Let that relationship be real, and the ruler becomes what God designed: the "helping brother" of those in his charge.
Dan's camp sits on the north, and one writer presses the meaning of that direction:
The north (tsaphon) means "what is hidden." For those living in the northern half of the world, the sun travels through the southern sky, so the north side of anything is the dark side. The north itself would be thought of as the home of darkness, the place of gloom and mystery.
- Placed — Dan did not pick the north. God gave the family line and God assigned the standard. No tribe had grounds for jealousy.
- Helped — Dan, once likened to a serpent in the way, now marches behind Ahiezer, "brother of help," son of Ammishaddai, "the people of the Almighty." Grace alone makes that change, and brotherly help grows where a people know the Almighty.
- Serving — Dan means judgment, and rule is really service. Forget that, and the ruler becomes a rebel against the One who gave him his authority.
- Guarding — the north side became the rear on the march. There one of the two largest hosts held the place where stragglers are lost and where Amalek struck.
and his host, even those that were numbered of them, sixty-two thousand seven hundred.
Numbers 2 sets out where each tribe camped around the tabernacle. This verse records the fighting strength of the camp on the north: 62,700 men under the standard of Dan. Why does God count them at all, and why does this particular group hold the last place in the line of march?
The repeated totals in these chapters are not bookkeeping. One writer reads the careful reckoning of each tribe as God asserting a claim.
They open with His commandment to Moses to take the number of the tribes. Moses does this with great exactness and care. Numbers 1 and Numbers 2 set down the number of each tribe, except Levi, again and again... This was an expression of His rights as Lord of Israel. He had title to take their number, for they were all His own. If He had no right to them, and no prospects in them, He would not have counted their sum. Scripture says the same of His divine title in another part of His dominions: "He determines the number of the stars; He gives to all of them their names."
The figure itself is striking when set beside the other tribes.
The tribe of Dan was large. At the exodus there were 62,700 fighting men, more than any tribe except Judah. At the second numbering they had increased to 64,400.
Describing the order of march, one writer notes where the two largest divisions marched:
Behind them, forming the rear guard, flew the standard of the camp of the children of Dan. With it were the host of Asher and that of Naphtali, which closed the long procession. The rear guard amounted to 157,600 fighting men. So of the two largest hosts, one led the way and the other brought up the rear.
Commentators who look for meaning in the four quarters point out what the north stood for.
It lies to the north. Just as the other quarters of the sky have meaningful names, so does this one. The north (tsaphon) means "what is hidden." It carries that name because, for those living in the northern hemisphere, the sun travels through the southern sky, so the north side of anything is the dark side. People would naturally think of the north itself as the seat of darkness, the home of gloom and mystery.
The rear is the exposed end of a marching column, and the men numbered here were the ones who had to cover it.
Last, on the north, and forming the rear guard on the march, we have the camp of Dan. Associated with him are the tribes of Asher and Naphtali. There is a military ring about some of these names, fitting the place they occupy. Those who bring up the rear must guard against stragglers. They must also guard against sudden assaults such as that of Amalek, who inflicted loss on the rear of the children of Israel.
Commentators read the names of the leaders in this camp as a picture of what rear-guard duty asks for.
Dan means "judge." His prince is Ahiezer, "the brother of help," the son of Ammishaddai, "the people of the Almighty." These names combine the thoughts of alertness, power and helpfulness. Associated with him is Asher, "happy," whose prince is Pagiel, "the event of God," son of Ocran, "afflicted." These names show us the paradox which grace alone can explain. Affliction under the stroke of God produces a happiness which is not that of the world. That happiness is a fitting safeguard against assaults from the rear. With him is Naphtali, "the wrestler," another militant name.
Another writer takes Dan as standing for judgment, and finds him fully in place in this camp.
Born to a servant as he is, he represents the spirit of rule or judgment... Here, however, all is different: he is in his place in every way.
From this arrangement one writer draws a lesson for the church today.
On the north side the tribe of Dan bore the standard that included also Asher and Naphtali. Their armies together came to 157,600 men, and travelled last... this shows the care of God in providing the best order possible. Certainly in the Church of God today He uses no less wisdom in providing a spiritual order that will glorify His name. And in the gatherings of the assembly He expects a fitting recognition of His order, as 1 Corinthians 14:40 shows: "But all things should be done decently and in order."
- Counted — the exact total is God asserting ownership; He numbers what is His own, as He numbers and names the stars.
- Strong — 62,700 men, more than any tribe but Judah; of the two largest divisions, one led the march and the other closed it.
- Placed — on the north, whose name means "what is hidden," the dark side, long thought of as the home of gloom and mystery.
- Last — that strength closed the column and guarded stragglers against attacks from behind, like Amalek's.
- Ordered — God counted every camp, set its place, and set its turn to march. Commentators apply the same pattern to the church, where all things should be done decently and in order.
And those that encamp by him shall be the tribe of Asher; and the prince of the sons of Asher shall be Pagiel the son of Ocran;
Numbers 2:27 places Asher beside Dan on the north side of the camp, with Pagiel son of Ochran named as its leader. One line of a camp list raises a real question. Why does Scripture record who camped next to whom, and why keep these men's names?
No tribe picked its own ground. God told Asher where to pitch, and next to whom.
Each had to know his post and keep it — to know his standard and stay by it. That is how they moved on together; that is how progress was made, work done and warfare carried on... Each had his pedigree, and each had his post; and neither the one nor the other was according to their own thoughts; all was of God. He gave the pedigree, and He assigned the standard. There was no need to compare one with another, and no ground for jealousy. Each had his place to fill and his work to do. There was work enough and room enough for all. There was the greatest possible variety, and yet the most perfect unity.
Where a tribe camped also fixed where it marched. Asher's side moved last.
Lastly, on the north, and forming the rearguard on the march, we have the camp of Dan; associated with him are the tribes of Asher and Naphtali. There is a military ring about some of these names, suited to the place they occupy. Those who bring up the rear must guard against stragglers, and against sudden attacks. Amalek made one such attack, and it inflicted loss on the rear of the children of Israel.
The verse gives two names, and commentators who read Hebrew names for their meaning find a deliberate pairing in them. Asher's name and his leader's family name pull in opposite directions.
Asher's prince was Pagiel, which means "event of God." His father's name, Ocran, means "afflicted." Genesis 49:20 tells us, "Asher's food shall be rich, and he shall yield royal delicacies." Asher means "happy." But even the blessing of Asher has to be tempered by God's dealings — events of God — that bring affliction. For true happiness always comes through suffering, little as we might at first appreciate this. Paul understood this well. He wrote, "For the sake of Christ, then, I am content with weaknesses, insults, hardships, persecutions, and calamities. For when I am weak, then I am strong" (2 Cor. 12:10).
Another writer reads the same names as fitting Asher's post at the back of the column.
These names show us the paradox that grace alone can explain. Affliction under the stroke of God produces a happiness that is not the world's. It is a fitting safeguard against attacks from the rear.
Asher does not camp alone. He is set under the banner of Dan, and the names of Dan's leaders give that camp its character.
Dan, "judge," his prince Ahiezer, "the brother of help," the son of Ammishaddai, "the people of the Almighty": these names bring together the thoughts of alertness, power and helpfulness.
One writer ties Asher's happiness to the awakened conscience that Dan's standard stands for.
Dan's standard, then, is truly that of exercise. Under him and next to him comes Asher, the "happy." For happiness clearly depends on this awakened conscience. It is found in the way of the brotherly helpfulness that Ahiezer speaks of: "If you know these things, blessed are you if you do them" (John 13:17). We have seen that Asher's captain shows how God keeps us happy through the ministry of a chastening sorrow. That is enough to explain why Asher is under the standard of "exercise."
Older translations render John 13:17 as "happy are you" — the same word as Asher's name.
Asher's name points to happiness, and one writer takes the tribe as a picture of Christian character.
Asher means "happy." That surely implies that in our present inheritance "in the heavenly places in Christ" we have every reason for rejoicing. So this is another lovely feature of Christian character, as illustrated by the tribes of Israel. Paul tells us in Philippians 4:4, "Rejoice in the Lord always; again I will say, rejoice." Joy is not to be an object, for it is "in the Lord." That plainly makes the Lord the Object. But joy will be the spontaneous result of contemplating Him.
- Assigned. God gave Asher his post and his neighbour. Place and pedigree alike were "not according to their own thoughts."
- Exposed. The north side marched last, so Asher's ground was the rearguard. That is where the sudden attack from behind lands, as Amalek's raid showed.
- Afflicted. The names in the verse hold the paradox: Pagiel, "event of God," son of Ocran, "afflicted" — God's dealings temper the blessing.
- Happy. Asher means happy. The chastening produces that happiness; it does not spoil it. Weakness is where strength appears.
- Guarded. This joy is itself the defence at the weakest point in the line. It rests on the Lord, not on circumstances.
and his host, even those that were numbered of them, forty-one thousand five hundred.
This verse counts Asher's fighting men: 41,500. The tribe camps on the north side, under the standard of Dan. Why does God record a number for every tribe? And why does "happy" Asher march at the back of the host?
The north camp marched at the back of Israel, and that place came with its own duty.
Last of all, on the north side, the camp of Dan forms the rearguard on the march. With him are the tribes of Asher and Naphtali. Some of these names have a military sound that suits the place they hold. Those who bring up the rear must watch for stragglers and for sudden attacks. Amalek, for instance, attacked the rear of the children of Israel and caused them loss.
Asher's 41,500 join Dan and Naphtali to form one large camp. One writer sees God's care in the whole arrangement.
On the north side the tribe of Dan carried the standard, and Asher and Naphtali were under it too (vs.25-30). Their armies came to 157,600 men in all, and they travelled last. All the men counted came to 603,550... The whole congregation must have been between two and three million. But this shows the care of God in providing the best possible order. In the Church of God today He surely uses no less wisdom in providing a spiritual order that will glorify His name. And when His people gather, He expects them to honour that order, as 1 Corinthians 14:40 shows: "But all things should be done decently and in order."
A head count can be an act of pride or an act of love, and Scripture records both kinds.
In David's time he decided to count the people (2 Sam.24:2-10). His motive was pride in ruling over a great nation, and the result was the death of 70,000 people. But God's census in Numbers shows His own deep interest in every one of His people Israel. He has that same interest in His saints today. The difference is that in Israel He counted only the males over 20 years of age... Today all of His saints are fit for spiritual warfare — women too, and young and old — though age makes some less active than others.
Asher's name means "happy." The names of his prince and of his prince's father sound nothing like it.
Asher follows Dan. His prince is Pagiel — "event of God" — the son of Ocran — "afflicted." These are strange names to find with Asher, the "happy" one, whose portion in Jacob's prophecy matches his name. Yet "for those who love God all things work together for good," and sorrow in His hands is turned into joy. Real happiness here seems to need some thread of sorrow mixed into it, both to keep it true and to guard it from its own dangers. Sorrow is something in which the soul has to submit itself to God — to say it is the Lord, "the event is of God." The apostle received his thorn in the flesh after the joy of the third heaven. That may tell us the same about even the most spiritual joys.
Why is the happy tribe placed under Dan's standard at all? One writer ties happiness to a conscience that is awake and to help given to others.
Dan's standard, then, is truly the standard of exercise. Next to him, and under him, comes Asher, the "happy" one. Happiness depends on this awakened conscience. It is found in the kind of help to one another that Ahiezer speaks of: "If you know these things, blessed are you if you do them" (John 13:17). We have seen how Asher's captain shows that God keeps us happy through the work of a sorrow that corrects us. That is enough to explain why Asher stands under the standard of "exercise."
(Older translations read "happy are you" in John 13:17 — the link to Asher's name.)
Every tribe was given a number, but no tribe was told to measure itself against a neighbour.
Each man had to know his post and keep it — to know his standard and stay by it. So they moved on together. So they made progress, did the work, and carried on the warfare... Each man had his family line, and each had his post. Neither of them came from his own thoughts. All of it came from God. He gave the family line, and He assigned the standard. No one needed to compare himself with another, and no one had any ground for jealousy. Each had his place to fill and his work to do, and there was work enough and room enough for all.
- Counted — God's census shows His interest in every one of His people. David's count sprang from pride instead.
- Placed — Asher's 41,500 stood on the north with Dan and Naphtali, 157,600 in all. They were the rearguard, watching for stragglers and sudden attacks.
- Named — Pagiel ("event of God"), son of Ocran ("afflicted"), led "happy" Asher. Sorrow in God's hands turns into joy.
- Exercised — Happiness grows where the conscience is awake and where people help one another: blessed are you if you do these things.
- Content — God gave each man his family line and his post, so no one had ground for jealousy. Writers see the same order when God's people gather today.
And [with them shall be] the tribe of Naphtali; and the prince of the sons of Naphtali shall be Ahira the son of Enan;
Numbers 2:29 closes the roll call of the camp: Naphtali comes last, under Dan's standard on the north side, led by Ahira the son of Enan. Why name a leader we never hear speak, and why does the wrestler's tribe come last?
The north side was also the back of the column when Israel moved. That position carried its own danger, and the tribes there needed a certain character:
Last, on the north, and forming the rearguard on the march, we have the camp of Dan. With him are the tribes of Asher and Naphtali. There is a military ring about some of these names, suited to the place they occupy. Those who bring up the rear must guard against stragglers. They must also guard against sudden attacks, like the attack of Amalek, who inflicted loss on the rear of the children of Israel.
The same writer reads the three names in this verse together:
With him is Naphtali, "the wrestler," another military name, marked by his prince Ahira, "brother for evil," the son of Enan, "open-eyed." This suggests the "brother born for adversity," whose eyes are always watchful against the foe. So the camp is properly ordered and ready for the march.
Rachel gave her son this name after a struggle, and commentators read it as the mark of one who comes through:
Naphtali follows Asher in the sixth place. "With divine wrestlings" — wrestlings given strength by God? — says Rachel at his birth, "I have wrestled with my sister and have prevailed." So his name is Naphtali, "my wrestling," and in the sixth place here it speaks clearly of the overcomer.
The wrestler's strength is not his own:
Naphtali means "a wrestler." In a spiritual sense he is no longer a wrestler of the flesh, trusting his own power. He is a mighty wrestler for God. That is what he is in the mind of God, and in the sense of his sonship as belonging to God. He represents that spirit of power of man with God, the weak with the mighty One.
Writers read Ahira's name in more than one way. A second reading points to shared trouble rather than watchfulness:
This is perhaps the most difficult of all the names we have had to interpret, the words also being open to other meanings, though these are the simplest. May it be that in Ahira we find one whose eyes have affected his heart, like another Jeremiah, and made him a man of sorrows in sympathy with the sorrow around him? Such a spirit one would suppose to be needed among these leaders of Israel, and so the "brother of evil" would become the "brother born for adversity," of which Proverbs speaks.
Set beside Jacob's picture of this tribe as a deer let loose, that reading turns a hard name into a description of service:
Ahira, "brother of evil," is the hardest name to interpret. "Brother of evil" can be understood only in the sense of "brother of trouble." It could refer to the sympathetic character of the believer, who bears the burden of others. This would be in some contrast to the deer let loose. But it would remind us of Paul's words: "For though I am free from all, I have made myself a servant to all." Ahira's father was Enan, meaning "having eyes," and this may speak of the concern that looks on the sorrows of others.
The Hebrew word for north carries the idea of what cannot be seen:
The camp of Dan lies to the north. The other quarters of the sky have meaningful names, and so does this one. The north (tsaphon) means "what is hidden." Why is it called this? For those living in the northern hemisphere the sun travels through the southern sky, so the north side of anything is the dark side. So it was natural to think of the north itself as the seat of darkness, the home of gloom and mystery.
Naphtali did not pick the north, and Ahira did not appoint himself:
Each had his pedigree, and each had his post. Neither came from their own thoughts. All was of God. He gave the pedigree, and He assigned the standard. There was no need to compare one with another, and no ground for jealousy. Each had his place to fill and his work to do. There was work enough and room enough for all.
That is also why the names in the verse are worth reading at all:
About these men we are told nothing but their own names and their fathers' names. For that very reason, if there could otherwise be doubt, we may be sure their names are meant to speak to us.
- Named — God records Ahira and Enan and nothing else. That silence is the reason to expect their names to teach us something.
- Assigned — God gave Naphtali its side of the square and Ahira his post. No one chose his own place, so no one had ground to compare or envy.
- Exposed — the north is the dark side, the quarter of mystery, and this camp also brings up the rear, open to stragglers and sudden attack.
- Burdened — Ahira, "brother of evil," reads as the brother born for adversity, and Enan's "eyes" speak of concern for the sorrows of others.
- Overcoming — Naphtali means "my wrestling." The wrestler prevails not by his own strength, but as the weak one joined to the mighty One. His name completes the camp.
and his host, even those that were numbered of them, fifty-three thousand four hundred.
This closing line of the census counts Naphtali last. Its 53,400 fighting men camped on the north side under Dan's standard, at the very end of the marching order. Why does God record the exact size of the tribe that marched at the back?
The number closes out the fourth and final group in the census. One writer ties these verses together and draws out what the arrangement teaches:
On the north side the tribe of Dan bore the standard that included also Asher and Naphtali (vv. 25-30). Their armies together came to a total of 157,600 men, and were the last to travel. All the numbered men therefore came to 603,550. This did not include the Levites, nor women and children... But this illustrates the care of God in providing the best order possible. Certainly in the Church of God today He shows no less wisdom in providing a spiritual order that will glorify His name. And He expects the gatherings of the assembly to give fitting recognition to His order, as 1 Corinthians 14:40 says: "All things should be done decently and in order."
Naphtali's men closed the whole marching column. That position was not a demotion but an assignment, and the size of the force fits the danger it faced:
Last of all, on the north, and forming the rearguard on the march, we have the camp of Dan. Associated with him are the tribes of Asher and Naphtali. Some of these names have a military ring, suited to the place they occupy. Those who bring up the rear must guard against stragglers, and against sudden attacks like that of Amalek, who inflicted loss on the rear of the children of Israel.
Another writer points out where the two largest divisions stood:
The standard of the camp of the children of Dan flew behind them, forming the rear guard. Grouped with it were the host of Asher and that of Naphtali, and Naphtali closed the long procession. The rear guard amounted to 157,600 fighting men. So of the two largest hosts, one led the way and the other brought up the rear.
Naphtali's name comes from wrestling. One writer notes that it points past the struggle itself:
Naphtali means "my wrestling," not so much with the idea of the struggle going on, but of its having reached a conclusion in victory, bringing freedom.
Another writer sets two kinds of strength side by side in that name:
Naphtali means a wrestler. In a spiritual sense he is no longer a wrestler of the flesh, trusting in his own power, but a mighty wrestler for God... He stands for that spirit of the power of man with God, the weak man with the mighty One. Yet here again the sad story of failure is told. The weak one has forgotten his weakness, and so he has forgotten God, the source of his strength.
A total like 53,400 exists because the One who ordered the count owned the people He was counting:
This was an expression of His rights as Lord of Israel. He had title to take their number, for they were all His own. If He had no right to them, and no prospects in them, He would not have counted their sum. Scripture says the same of His divine title in another part of His dominions: "He determines the number of the stars; He gives to all of them their names."
Israel counted only the men over twenty. One writer asks who is fit to fight today:
God's census in Numbers shows His own vital interest in each one of His people Israel, an interest that is no less true of His saints today. The difference is that in Israel only the males over 20 years of age were numbered... Today all of His saints are fit for spiritual warfare — women, young and old too, though age makes some less active than others. Yet the lesson is also clear for us. To take part in practical conflict we need maturity, or full age, and that comes through knowledge and growth in the word of God.
Naphtali's figure sits beside eleven others, and the list invites no ranking:
Each had his pedigree, and each had his post. Neither the one nor the other was according to their own thoughts; all was of God. He gave the pedigree, and He assigned the standard. There was no need to compare one with another, and no ground for jealousy. Each had his place to fill and his work to do, and there was work enough and room enough for all. There was the greatest possible variety, and yet the most perfect unity.
- Counted — the number exists because God owned them; He had title to take their sum, as He names the stars.
- Placed — every man had a post he did not choose, which removed both uncertainty and jealousy.
- Last — Naphtali closed the column, and God put one of His two heaviest forces at the rear.
- Guarded — the back of a marching people is where stragglers fall behind and sudden attacks land.
- Wrestling — the name of the tribe in that spot means a struggle that ends in victory, won in God's strength, not our own.
All that were numbered of the camp of Dan were a hundred and fifty-seven thousand six hundred. They shall set forth last according to their standards.
Numbers 2 closes with the last camp. Dan, Asher and Naphtali camp on the north, count 157,600 men, and set out last of all. Why put a tribe at the back, and what do the north side and Dan's name teach?
This number completes the full count of Israel's fighting men. One writer draws a lesson from the whole arrangement.
On the north side the tribe of Dan carried the standard that also covered Asher and Naphtali. Their armies came to 157,600 men, and they traveled last. So all the men counted came to 603,550... But this shows God's care in giving the best order possible. In the Church of God today He shows no less wisdom in giving a spiritual order that will glorify His name.
The verse links setting out with the standards. One writer shows what that order ruled out.
Each had to know his post and keep it — to know his standard and stay with it. That is how they moved on together. That is how they made progress, got the work done and carried on the fight... There was no need to compare one man with another, and no ground for jealousy. Each had his place to fill and his work to do, and there was work enough and room enough for all.
Going last was an assignment, not a demotion.
Last, on the north, forming the rear guard on the march, we have the camp of Dan. With him are the tribes of Asher and Naphtali. Some of these names have a military ring that suits the place they hold. Those who bring up the rear must guard against stragglers, and against sudden attacks like that of Amalek, who struck the rear of the children of Israel and caused loss there.
The same writer finds a further danger at the back of the march.
The lusts of the flesh have no power over those who press forward and forget the things behind. But they have special power over those who lag, who forget that they are pilgrims and become stragglers, following far behind. It was when Peter followed at a distance that he gave in to cowardice, which is one of the marks of the flesh.
One writer traces the Hebrew word for north and what that direction stood for.
It lies to the north. We have found that the other points of the compass have meaningful names, and it is the same here. The north (tsaphon) means "what is hidden." It is called that because, for those living in the northern half of the world, the sun travels through the southern sky. So the north side of anything is the dark side. The north would then be thought of as the seat of darkness, the home of gloom and mystery... Here still, as with Moses on the mountain, it is impossible to see God's face.
The same writer reads Dan's name as judgment, and sees him set in his place.
Son of a servant woman though he is, he stands for the spirit of rule or judgment... Here, however, everything is different. He is in his place in every way, and his prince is Ahiezer, "brother of help."... The mind on its own is left puzzled and beaten, and guesswork leads us into error, or into that pride which is the most deadly error of all. But the spirit of self-judgment comes through without effort, finding safe footing where the other falls.
Set against Dan's later reputation, the name of his leader reads as a reversal.
The prince of Dan was Ahiezer, meaning "brother of help." What a contrast to the character of Dan described in Genesis 49:17: "Dan shall be a serpent in the way." Instead of giving brotherly help, he would give satanic harm. Again, God makes a wonderful change by His pure grace, so that Dan would be a help in conflict.
Two more tribes camp under Dan's standard, and their names also fit the rear.
With him is Asher, "happy," whose prince is Pagiel, "the event of God," son of Ocran, "afflicted." These names show a paradox that only grace can explain. Affliction under God's hand produces a happiness that is not the world's, and it guards well against attacks from the rear. With him is Naphtali, "the wrestler," another fighting name. His prince is Ahira, "brother for evil," son of Enan, "open-eyed" — the brother born for hard times, whose eyes always watch for the enemy.
- Placed — the numbers and the positions were God's arrangement. It shows "God's care in giving the best order possible," with room and work enough for every tribe.
- Last — the rear was an appointed post. Those at the back "must guard against stragglers" and sudden attacks like Amalek's.
- Exposed — the rear is where danger falls. The flesh has "special power" over those who lag and follow far behind.
- Dark — the north is "the dark side," the place of gloom and mystery, where no one can see God's face.
- Helped — into that darkness God puts Dan, "judgment," led by Ahiezer, "brother of help." Self-judgment keeps its footing where reasoning falls, and grace turns a future serpent into a help in battle.
These are those that were numbered of the children of Israel, according to their fathers' houses all those that were numbered of the camps, according to their hosts, were six hundred and three thousand five hundred and fifty.
The long roll of tribes and standards ends in one figure: 603,550 men, counted camp by camp. Two questions follow. Why does God count His people at all? And what did that number teach them in the wilderness?
God ordered this count Himself. One writer asks what gave Him the right to take it.
They open with His commandment to Moses to take the number of the tribes, and this is done with great exactness and care. This was an expression of His rights as Lord of Israel. He had title to take their number, for they were all His own. If He had no right to them, and no prospects in them, He would not have counted their sum. The same is said of His divine title in another part of His realm: "He determines the number of the stars; He gives to all of them their names." This shows His sovereignty among the heavenly hosts. (Psalm 147:4)
Not every Israelite was on this roll. Two things decided who was: age and ancestry.
The count was made "by clans, by fathers' houses." Those counted were "from twenty years old and upward, all in Israel who are able to go to war." Each man had to prove his family line. Only those who could do that had a place in this muster, and only they could be warriors. This proof of family line was needed because a mixed crowd of outsiders had joined itself to the people of God... Our family line, which gives us a place among the people of God, is the new birth, by which we become children of God. And our calling is to a spiritual warfare, not with flesh and blood, but against the devil and his wiles and the wicked spirits (Eph. 6:11-12).
This figure had already appeared in the accounts of the tabernacle, the tent where God lived among His people.
Verse 26 [of the tabernacle accounts] refers to the half shekel of silver that each person in Israel over 20 paid as atonement money. The number of people was 603,550. The 100 talents of silver were used for the sockets under each of the boards of the sanctuary and under the pillars for the veil.
Knowing your family line was only half of it. Each man also had to know his standard.
Each had to know his post and keep it — to know his standard and stay by it. So they moved on together. So they made progress, did the work, and carried on the warfare. Each had his family line, and each had his post. Neither the one nor the other was according to their own thoughts; all was of God. He gave the pedigree, and He assigned the standard. There was no need to compare one with another, and no ground for jealousy. Each had his place to fill and his work to do. There was work enough and room enough for all. There was the greatest possible variety, and yet the most perfect unity.
The 603,550 were only the fighting men. The whole camp was far larger.
All the numbered men therefore totaled 603,550, as chapter 1:46 reported, and chapter 2:32 confirms. Again, this did not include the Levites (v.33), nor of course women and children. The total of the congregation must have been between two and three million. What a company for Moses to lead through the wilderness! But this illustrates the care of God in providing the best order possible. In the Church of God today He shows no less wisdom in providing a spiritual order that will glorify His name. And He expects the assembly to recognise His order in its gatherings, as 1 Corinthians 14:40 shows. "All things should be done decently and in order."
One thing stood at the centre of all four camps.
The first thing that attracts our attention, in reading the book, is sweet and precious to the heart beyond all expression — God has His people numbered and gathered around Himself. He dwelt in the camp — "in the midst of which I dwell." Could love do more? Impossible!... The camp, arranged in this way with everyone facing the tabernacle, is thought to have measured at least twelve miles around. But one thing gave the camp its unity, strength, and glory in the wilderness: the presence of God in His tabernacle, at the centre of His chosen people.
- Counted because owned. God ordered the count because Israel was His own. The same right lets Him name every star.
- Counted as ransomed. The same total appears in the tabernacle accounts. There each man's half shekel of atonement money became the silver sockets of the sanctuary.
- Counted as soldiers. The roll took men able to go to war who could show their family line. Our family line is the new birth. It gives a place among God's people and a call to spiritual warfare.
- Counted into a place. Family line and standard both came from God. So each man had his post, with work enough and room enough — great variety, perfect unity, no jealousy.
- Counted around Himself. The strength of a camp twelve miles around was not its 603,550 fighting men but the God who dwelt at its centre.
But the Levites were not numbered among the children of Israel; as Jehovah had commanded Moses.
Chapter 2 ends with a total: every fighting man in Israel counted and placed under his standard. Then comes one exception: a whole tribe kept off the register at God's own command.
The reason for leaving Levi out comes at the end of chapter 1. One writer sums up the duties given instead:
The tribe of Levi is not included. The end of this chapter gives the reason. They were not to be among the warriors. They were appointed instead over the tabernacle of testimony, over all its vessels, and over what belonged to it. They were to carry it, and their place was all around the tabernacle.
The count in chapters 1 and 2 was a count of men able to fight. Levi's work lay elsewhere, and leaving the tribe out of the count says something about that work:
In one case the census counts those whom God has put in the place of trial and provocation... Still, there are conflicts in the wilderness for the people of God, and patience is always tested. But there is another truth we also need to grasp, and it brings just as much comfort to our souls. We are not only God's own people, every one of us counted by Himself as those He counts on, whatever the march may be and whoever we have to fight on the way through the wilderness. We also have to do with serving Him, and above all in what concerns the sanctuary. Seen that way, counting men like an army would be out of place. The aim is to stamp service with a character that is not of this earth.
It would be easy to read the two groups as two classes of people: soldiers here, servants there. One writer warns against that reading:
So the very same people pictured in one aspect by the numbered tribes of Israel are in another aspect Levites, not numbered yet, because they belong to God simply and only. This is the double aspect... the natural mind is always ready to set the two things against each other... The truth is that when we think of a Christian, we must remember the words of the Spirit of God in the New Testament: "All things are yours." It makes no difference whether it is the numbering of Israel or the leaving of the Levites out of the count. Both are true of the Christian — not in the same aspect, of course, but equally true in distinct relationships.
Another writer lines up three relationships and what each one means for us:
As men of war, we are called to fight. As priests, we have the privilege of worship. But as Levites, we are responsible to serve. Our service is to carry through this dreary desert what the tabernacle stood for, and that tabernacle was a figure of Christ. This is our distinct line of service. God calls us to it and sets us apart for it.
Nothing in Levi's record earned this position. One commentator goes back to Jacob's words over his sons to make the point:
But why the Levites? Why did God mark this tribe off from all the others and set it apart for such a holy and high service? Was there any special holiness or goodness in them to explain the honour? Not by nature, and certainly not by practice: "Simeon and Levi are brothers; weapons of violence are their swords... Cursed be their anger, for it is fierce, and their wrath, for it is cruel" (Genesis 49). That was Levi by nature and by practice — self-willed, fierce, and cruel. How remarkable that God should pick out such a tribe and bring it into a place of such high and holy privilege! Surely we may say it was grace from first to last. It is the way of grace to take up the very worst cases.
The older Bible he quotes reads "instruments of cruelty are in their habitations" where the ESV has "weapons of violence are their swords."
Levi stands outside Israel's count because God had already claimed the tribe. It stood in the place of Israel's firstborn sons:
God chose the Levites as a redemption for all the firstborn of Israel, whom He claimed for Himself. So they became wholly His. He gave them to Aaron to serve in everything connected with the tabernacle, except the priesthood, which He kept for Aaron and his descendants.
- Claimed — God kept Levi out of the count because He had already taken the tribe for Himself, in place of Israel's firstborn. They became wholly His.
- Grace — nothing in Levi deserved this. Grace takes up the worst cases, and it took a tribe known for fierce anger and self-will into a holy service.
- Set apart — a head count of fighting men had no place here. Leaving Levi uncounted stamps service with a character that is not of this earth.
- Both — the counted soldier and the uncounted servant are not two groups of people. They are two relationships, both true of the same believer.
- Carry — service is the result. We fight as men of war, worship as priests, and as Levites carry Christ through the desert.
And the children of Israel did according to all that Jehovah had commanded Moses so they encamped according to their standards, and so they journeyed, every one according to their families, according to their fathers' houses.
Chapter 2 ends with a record of obedience: Israel camped and moved just as God had told them. He had set every detail, so the closing line raises a real question — why did the place of each tent matter so much to Him, and what does His order mean for His people now?
Where each tribe camped was not a matter of taste. God fixed both the resting order and the marching order, and Israel was not free to improve on either.
Notice that God commanded the order in which the tribes were to march when they set out on their journeys, just as He commanded the order of their tents when they rested. The arrangements were not left to their own choice or wishes. If they had disobeyed, thinking they knew a better order, they would only have produced disorder.
Two things held the camp together: each man knew his family line, and he knew which standard he stood under. Neither was his own choice, and that left no room for rivalry.
Each had to know his post and keep it — to know his standard and stay by it. That is how they moved on together; that is how they made progress, did the work and carried on the warfare... Neither his family line nor his post was according to his own thoughts; all was of God. He gave the family line, and He assigned the standard. There was no need to compare one with another, and no ground for jealousy of one another. Each had his place to fill and his work to do, and there was work enough and room enough for all. There was the greatest possible variety, and yet the most perfect unity.
The tribes were placed in relation to the tent at the centre, where the cloud marked God's presence. Commentators draw a line from that camp to the church today.
Notice first that the tabernacle, where the cloud showed the presence of God, stood at the centre of everything. So much so that when Israel gathered together at rest, the token of God's presence was truly in the midst of them. It was visible, as suited that stage of God's dealings... The presence of God among His people today is not visible. Still, if the church of God is called together, and the Holy Spirit who lives in it is acting freely in power, an unbeliever coming in would have to confess, "God is really among you" (1 Cor. 14:25). We also have that great word of our Lord, "Where two or three are gathered in My name, there am I among them" (Matt. 18:20).
The four camps faced the four points of the compass. That shape says something about where the pressure on God's people comes from.
The four camps lie toward the four quarters: east, south, west, and north. The outside influences come from those quarters, and in a world like this any of them may be hostile. The people of God must meet them in the power of Him who is among them. They must be independent of circumstances, carrying their resources, in this sense, within themselves. The whole order has to do with these outside influences, as we shall soon see, since the entire wilderness journey is a warfare, and the people's dwelling-place a camp.
The order also decided who went first. The same tribe always led the march, and commentators see a reason for it.
The standard of Judah was always in the lead when the tribes set out to march, for the spirit of praise to God is of first importance in travel or in warfare. When Jehoshaphat's army went out with singers praising the Lord, the victory was soon gained (2 Chron. 20:21-22).
The size of the camp is what makes this order remarkable. Writers apply the lesson straight to the church today.
The total of the congregation must have been between two and three million. What a company for Moses to lead through the wilderness! But this illustrates the care of God in providing the best order possible. In the Church of God today He certainly shows no less wisdom. He provides a spiritual order that will glorify His name, and when the assembly gathers He expects a fitting recognition of that order, as 1 Corinthians 14:40 shows. "All things should be done decently and in order."
- Order commanded. God fixed the shape of the camp. Israel did not design it, and trying to improve on it would only have made disorder.
- Order assigned. God gave each man his family line and his standard, so every man had a post, real work, and no reason for jealousy.
- Order centred. The tent where God's presence was seen stood at the centre of everything the camp did.
- Order outward. Four camps faced four quarters. The pressure came from outside, and the strength came from the God in their midst.
- Order today. The same wisdom that arranged millions in the wilderness orders God's people now, and He expects His people to recognise it.
And these are the generations of Aaron and Moses in the day that Jehovah spoke with Moses on mount Sinai.
Numbers 3 turns from the fighting men counted in the first two chapters to the one tribe left out of that count. It opens with a family record dated to the time God spoke with Moses at Sinai. Two questions follow. Why does the priest's family stand at the head of a chapter about service? And why is Aaron named before Moses?
The chapter is about the Levites and their duties, yet it begins with the priests. One writer draws out the principle. God calls the men who draw near before He calls the men who serve.
God gives His call to them clearly here, although there have been hints of it before this. As we already see, He must have called the priests first, because the call of the Levites depends on the call of the priests. Communion and worship must come first and lead into service, if that service is to be real and effective.
Everywhere else the pair is "Moses and Aaron." Here Aaron comes first, and that switch means something.
This chapter mentions the generations of Aaron and Moses first. Elsewhere we read of Moses and Aaron, but here Aaron's name stands first. His name comes first because he pictures Christ as Priest. Everything depends on His intercession.
The verse promises the generations of two men. But the names that follow are Aaron's sons alone.
It begins with the "generations of Aaron and Moses," the spiritual heads of the tribe. Yet it gives only the name of Moses, since his children take their place as ordinary Levites. This makes it all the plainer that they come in here as heads of the tribe. In type, we see Christ as Priest and King in relation to ministry, as its source and its director. Aaron is first, because ministry depends above all on mediation, and is the fruit of it.
Moses' line took a different position, which later history fills in.
The sons of Moses "the man of God" could not serve as priests, as their relatives the sons of Aaron did. They were counted in the tribe of Levi (1 Chronicles 23:14-17). During David's reign, "Shebuel the son of Gershom," Moses' eldest son, was "ruler of the treasures." Shelomith came from Moses' second son. He and his relatives kept "all the treasures of the dedicated things," which were given for the upkeep of the house of the LORD (1 Chronicles 26:24-28).
"Generations" means natural descent. This family shows what natural descent cannot secure. The next verse names four sons. Two of them were already dead.
Aaron was the high priest. Israel passed the priesthood down by natural descent, which is not true in the Church of God today. In fact, a special priesthood is not scriptural now, for all true believers are priests (1 Peter 2:5), not by natural birth, but by spiritual birth. Aaron had four sons, Nadab, Abihu, Eleazar and Ithamar (v.2), all consecrated as priests. But their service showed the weakness of natural succession at the very start. Nadab and Abihu disobeyed the Lord, offered forbidden incense, and died for this sin (Leviticus 10:1-2).
After naming the priest's family, the chapter sets the Levites before Aaron. That order carries a warning.
The first and chief point to grasp in the type is the link between the service and the High Priest — Christ Himself. Separate ministry in any form. Cut off the service of the saints from Christ Himself in the presence of God. Then you falsify and degrade it. One false principle has ruined service here on earth: people have tied it to the church, instead of to Christ.
- Priest first. The chapter on service opens with the priest's family. "Communion and worship must come first and lead into service." The Levites' call depends on Aaron's.
- Named first. Aaron is placed ahead of Moses because he pictures Christ as Priest, "on whose intercession everything depends."
- Listed first. Only Aaron's sons appear under the heading. Moses' children "take their place as ordinary Levites," and later kept the treasures in David's day.
- Failing first. The line by natural birth broke down at once with Nadab and Abihu. Commentators note that no priesthood by descent exists now, since all believers are priests by spiritual birth.
- Serving last. Everything begins at the priest. So service cut off from Christ is "falsified and degraded."
And these are the names of the sons of Aaron Nadab the firstborn, and Abihu, Eleazar and Ithamar.
Numbers 3 opens the record of the tribe of Levi, and it starts with Aaron's four sons, listed in birth order. Two of the four were cut off within days of being made priests.
The chapter names Aaron before Moses, reversing the usual order. The reason lies in who Aaron pictures.
This chapter mentions the generations of Aaron and Moses first. Elsewhere we read of Moses and Aaron, but here Aaron's name stands first. His name is put first because he is a picture of Christ as Priest, and everything depends on Christ's intercession.
Another writer ties that order to ministry itself.
As a picture, Christ as Priest and King is seen here in relation to ministry: He is its source and its director. Aaron comes first, because ministry depends above all on mediation and is the fruit of it. Aaron is also the head of that priestly family which is a picture of our own.
These four sons held the highest place among the Levites.
So the third chapter sets before us the names of the sons of Aaron, who had the highest place among the Levites... Then it records the death of the first two, Nadab and Abihu, leaving Eleazar and Ithamar to serve in the sight of Aaron their father.
The verse pairs the two older sons, then the two younger. One writer asks whether that pairing pointed ahead.
The reader may notice how the two older sons are paired together, and then the two younger. Was this God's way of pointing ahead to what would happen to those first two? They were cut off by God's judgment on the eighth day of Aaron's consecration. That left the two younger sons to carry out the duties of priests through the whole wilderness journey.
All four sons were set apart as priests at the same time.
Aaron had four sons: Nadab, Abihu, Eleazar and Ithamar. Leviticus 8 and 9 give us a very interesting and very solemn account of the consecration of Aaron and his four sons. They were brought nearer to God than anyone else in Israel. No other young men had the privileges given to them.
In Israel the priesthood passed from father to son. That is not how it works for believers now, and the family line failed at once.
Aaron was the high priest, and in Israel the priesthood passed down the family line. That is not true in the Church of God today. In fact, a special priesthood is not scriptural now, for all true believers are priests (1 Peter 2:5), not by natural birth, but by spiritual birth. However, Aaron had four sons, Nadab, Abihu, Eleazar and Ithamar (v. 2), all consecrated as priests. But this principle of natural succession showed its weakness at the very start of their service. Nadab and Abihu disobeyed the Lord, offered forbidden incense, and died for this sin (Lev. 10:1-2).
The two who fell were among the most privileged men in Israel.
The two who died under judgment, almost as soon as they were consecrated as priests, had no excuse for their sin. They fell despite great privilege. It is often the way that failure is greatest in those who are most highly privileged.
One writer finds God's answer to the failure in the meanings of the two surviving names.
Here we find terrible failure and the judgment of God. The first two sons are cut off. The third, Eleazar, whose name means "help of God," speaks in this way of the resurrection-power by which God acts when all human power has come to an end. Ithamar, whose name means "where the palm tree is," follows Eleazar. His name seems to stand for the uprightness and fruitfulness that Scripture always links with the palm tree; the righteous flourish like the palm tree (Ps. 92:12). This is the true order here. The history bears it out: when Ithamar's descendants are raised above Eleazar's, as in Eli, the result is sad failure and collapse.
The chapter goes on to call the Levites to their service. The priests' call comes first, and that order matters.
As we see already, the call of the priests must have taken place first, since the calling of the Levites depends on the calling of the priests. Communion and worship must come before service and introduce it, if service is to be real and effective.
- Priest first. Aaron's name comes before Moses', because everything here depends on the priest.
- Privilege first. The four sons were consecrated together into the nearest place to God that anyone in Israel held.
- Failure first. Nadab and Abihu fell despite that privilege — failure is sharpest where privilege is greatest.
- Grace last. Eleazar, "help of God," speaks of God acting when human power is finished; Ithamar follows in his order, not above it.
- Service last. The priests are called before the Levites. Worship comes first, or service is not real.
These are the names of the sons of Aaron, the anointed priests, who were consecrated to exercise the priesthood.
Numbers 3 opens with the names of Aaron's sons. Two acts define them: an anointing, and an ordaining to serve as priests. Their whole standing before God rests on those two acts — which raises the question of who may draw near to God, and on what basis.
The chapter turns from the ordering of the whole nation to the family and tribe set apart for the sanctuary. One writer notes that this is where the book of Numbers finds its own subject, and that the believer stands in every one of these positions at once:
In the book of Numbers, where the walk on earth is set out, service has its chief place. What is true of Levite service is exactly true of priesthood: the Christian, who from one point of view is of Israel and from another a Levite, is no less a priest. But priesthood sets out drawing near to God Himself in the heavenly sanctuary — no longer the figure, but the true reality. Levitical service, on the other hand, has to do with the service of the sanctuary while the people of God are passing through.
The office was never theirs to claim:
Aaron and his sons had not earned this privilege. It came to them by pure grace. Hebrews 5:4 says it plainly: "no one takes this honor for himself, but only when called by God, just as Aaron was." So priestly standing and service come by divine appointment.
The verse names them "the sons of Aaron." Birth, not ability, was the qualification — and it still is:
Aaron's sons were priests by birth — priests as sons of Aaron. Any son born to Aaron automatically became a priest at a certain age. No one else in Israel could be a priest. No influence, talent, wealth, or anything else could gain the office. These alone were priests. These alone were recognised by God. They had to be Aaron's sons. So now no one is a priest who is not born of God. Everyone who is born of God is a priest. Every believer is this through grace, for he is born of the Spirit. He is a child of God. He is in everlasting relationship with Jesus the great High Priest.
The verse calls all of them "the anointed priests." Who did that anointing cover?
The anointed priest seems to mean all the sons, the descendants of Aaron. Some have thought the anointing was distinctive of Aaron or the high priest. But compare Exodus 29:7, Leviticus 8:12 and 21:10 with Exodus 29:21 and Leviticus 8:30. It appears that pouring oil on the head was distinctive of the high priest, while all priests were anointed by sprinkling.
One writer draws out what the oil pictured, and what it rules out:
They were anointed with oil, an unmistakable type of our being anointed with the Holy Spirit. One inspired apostle writes: "it is God who establishes us with you in Christ, and has anointed us." Another apostle writes: "the anointing that you received from Him abides in you." This is our power for service. It makes the character of priesthood now spiritual and holy — not merely human or educational, still less successional.
The word "consecrated" here has a literal sense:
The word consecrate here means to fill their hands. Aaron and his sons were a company whose hands were filled with the excellencies of Christ. They entered into the delight of God in Him. The sweet savour of Christ to God filled their hands.
Being named among the priests was the highest privilege in Israel — and it was immediately a job:
One of the blessed places in which we are set, as children of God, is that of being made "priests" to Him. But we are apt, and rightly so, to think of this as a position of highest privilege. In practice we too often forget that it is one of constant service. Set in blessed nearness to God, the priests in Israel became, by that very nearness, simply servants of all the people.
- Called — no one took this honour for himself; the office came by God's appointment and pure grace.
- Born — the only qualification was being Aaron's son, which answers to being born of God.
- Anointed — the oil pictures the Holy Spirit. Priesthood now is spiritual, not passed down by human succession.
- Filled — consecration washed them, clothed them, and filled their hands with the excellence of Christ.
- Sent — nearness to God is not a resting place; those set closest became servants of all the people.
And Nadab and Abihu died before Jehovah when they offered strange fire before Jehovah in the wilderness of Sinai, and they had no sons; and Eleazar and Ithamar exercised the priesthood in the presence of Aaron their father.
Numbers 3 names Aaron's four sons as it begins to order the tribe of Levi. Two of them were already dead, struck down for offering "unauthorized fire" — called "strange fire" in older translations.
The chapter first sets the four sons in order, then immediately records what became of the two eldest.
The third chapter accordingly brings before us the names of the sons of Aaron, who had the highest place among the Levites — "Nadab the firstborn, and Abihu, Eleazar, and Ithamar." "These are the names of the sons of Aaron, the priests who were anointed, whom he consecrated to minister in the priest's office." Then the death of the two former, Nadab and Abihu, is mentioned, Eleazar and Ithamar remaining to minister in the sight of Aaron their father.
The offering itself was not the problem. The source of the flame was.
Before the day closed, the two elder sons of Aaron broke away from under his direction and offered incense on "strange fire" before the Lord. The incense was right but the fire was wrong. As far as we know, the only instruction given in this matter is found in Exodus 30:7-8, where the fire is connected with the lighting of the lamps in the holy place. They may have thought that if the incense was right, any fire would do to bring out its fragrance. But no, the fire must be God's fire and not man's. Learn from this: right words in worship are still wrong if the energy behind them comes from the flesh. Worship must be by the Spirit of God.
Another writer weighs the exact wording of the charge against them.
Notice that it is not said the Lord commanded that they should not do what they did, but He had not commanded them to do it. This is most serious where worship of the Lord is concerned. Only what He has indicated is acceptable to Him. If we add any humanly conceived notions to this, God will consider it "strange fire."
The verse says twice that this happened before the LORD. One writer asks who these men were, and where the fire that killed them came from.
Here we see men who look like they are getting ready to worship God. There is the fire, the incense, the censer, and the priest. And note: they were not false or fake priests. They were true sons of Aaron, part of the priestly house God had set apart, wearing the priestly robes God Himself appointed. Yet despite all this, they were struck dead — and by whom? By Him whom we call our God and Father! How solemn! The fact is more solemn still when we remember where the fire that consumed these false worshippers came from. It did not come from the top of Mount Sinai. It came out "from before the Lord," who was dwelling "between the cherubim above the mercy-seat."
The timing is part of the lesson. The priesthood had barely begun.
Lastly, we have what, sadly, is always the case with man. On its very first day, the priesthood falls short of the glory of God. Nadab and Abihu offer strange fire. They deal with God as natural men, and they do not base their service on the altar of sacrifice. So they die.
One writer turns it into a rule that reaches beyond this one story.
It is often the way that failure is most pronounced in those who are most highly privileged.
The verse ends by noting that these two left no children.
In Israel a natural succession was practised, as is not true in the Church of God today. In fact, a special priesthood is not scriptural now, for all true believers are priests (1 Peter 2:5), not by natural birth, but by spiritual birth. However, Aaron had four sons, Nadab, Abihu, Eleazar and Ithamar (v.2), all consecrated as priests. But the weakness of the principle of natural succession was shown at the very beginning of their service.
The two names left standing carry meaning of their own, and their order matters.
Here we find terrible failure and the judgment of God. The first two sons are cut off. The third, Eleazar (whose name means "help of God"), speaks in this way of the resurrection-power by which God acts when all human power has ended. Ithamar ("where the palm-tree is") follows Eleazar, and this seems to point to the uprightness and fruitfulness that Scripture always ties to the palm-tree. Together and in the right order, Eleazar and Ithamar serve as priests in their father's presence.
The broken record of Aaron's house is not the end of the matter.
God said, "The priesthood has failed, but I will raise up another priest" — none other than the Lord Jesus Christ.
- Fire. The incense was right; the fire was wrong. Worship can fail at its source while the surface looks correct.
- Silence. Their sin was not something God forbade but something He never asked for. What He has not indicated is not acceptable.
- Mercy-seat. The fire did not come from Sinai. It came from the mercy-seat, and it fell on genuine, anointed, robed priests.
- Childless. Two of the four sons died leaving no children. A priesthood carried by natural birth is weak from the start.
- Another. Eleazar ("help of God") and Ithamar carry on before their father. And God promised to raise up another Priest — the Lord Jesus Christ.
And Jehovah spoke to Moses, saying,
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
Bring the tribe of Levi near, and present them before Aaron the priest, that they may minister unto him;
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
and they shall keep his charge, and the charge of the whole assembly, before the tent of meeting, to do the service of the tabernacle.
Numbers 3:7 sets out the working life of the tribe of Levi. At the tent of meeting they had a charge to keep: Aaron's, the people's, and the service of the tabernacle. What does keeping a charge involve? And does work assigned this closely by God still shape how believers serve today?
The verse names more than one party the Levites answered to, and the order matters. One writer traces it outward, from Aaron to the people (his wording follows an older translation):
So the Levites were commanded to "keep the charge of Aaron" — this was the primary consideration — and to keep "the charge of the whole congregation before the tabernacle of the congregation, to do the service of the tabernacle" (Num. 3:7). Christian service is for Christ, but it is carried out for the benefit of God's people and for the sake of the testimony for God.
A "charge" is not just a task to do. It is a trust to protect. God gave the tabernacle vessels into the Levites' keeping:
The Levites are now to be brought near and given to Aaron and his sons, to serve him and to keep the charge of the vessels of the tabernacle. It is a weighty service, and for it they must depend on the Priest. They are given wholly to the service of the priests. Ministry belongs to those who worship, and its first and most urgent duty is to guard and care for the holy things they handle. The tabernacle vessels, we know, set forth the truth of what Christ is in all His offices; and all ministry must watch over and preserve this.
No Levite chose his own post. One writer calls that a mercy, though not every heart feels it as one:
The priest appointed each Levite's service. Self-will had no more room among the Levites than it had among the men of war. God settled it all, and this was a marked mercy to everyone whose heart was in a right condition. A man whose will was unbroken might feel it a hardship, a tiresome task, to have to stay in the same place and do exactly the same work… But where the will was subdued and the heart adjusted, each one would say, "My path is perfectly plain; I have only to obey."
The same point is pressed on the question of who does the choosing:
It was no question at all of picking out those who might seem best for carrying the boards and the curtains, or the vessels of the sanctuary. God arranged it all, taking it completely out of man's hands: He chose suited men Himself.
The tabernacle filled a Levite's whole working life. One writer turns that into a test for the Christian:
It is just the same for Christians now. Their exclusive business — their one great work — their absorbing service, is Christ and His belongings… A true Levite of old could say, "To me to live is the tabernacle;" and a true Christian now can say, "To me to live is Christ." In everything that comes before the Christian, the great question is this: "Can I connect Christ with it?" If not, I have nothing whatsoever to do with it.
One writer asks who the Levites are today, and counts practical help as real service:
The Levites now, as then, are to minister to the priests, that is, the church. Who are the Levites? They are the ones who watch over the saints and care for the flock of God: they teach, explain the word, do pastoral work, rebuke, and warn against the evil around them. In Israel there were different orders of Levites, each with its own duties. In the same way, those who had to serve tables (Acts 6:1-4) were doing true Levitical service. All, whether teachers or simply caring for the wants of the poor, ministered to the saints of God. These servants are called by the Master, and they take up the service willingly, not under compulsion… The Lord distributes to each according to his ability.
The priests and the Levites picture two sides of the Christian's place, and many prize one and neglect the other:
If Aaron and his sons represent the Church as a holy priesthood offering up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God through Jesus Christ, then the Levites picture the saints as set apart to God for His will and service… Some prize the privilege of being in God's presence as worshippers above everything else. Others count it the highest favour that they are allowed to serve. But the perfection of the Christian life lies in the combination of the two, as seen, for instance, in Elijah. "As the Lord of hosts lives," he says, "before whom I stand." He lived within, and so he was ready to serve without. The one who most enjoys his priestly privilege will be the best qualified for his Master's service.
- Charge, not career. God handed the Levite a trust to keep: Aaron's charge first, then the people's, then the tabernacle service.
- Keep means guard. The charge covered the holy vessels, so the first duty was to watch over and preserve them.
- Assigned, not chosen. God fixed each man's post; self-will had no room, and a subdued heart finds that a mercy.
- One thing only. The tabernacle was the Levite's whole business, as Christ is the Christian's.
- Inside, then outside. Standing before God as a worshipper is what equips anyone to keep the charge for others.
And they shall keep all the utensils of the tent of meeting, and the charge of the children of Israel, to do the service of the tabernacle.
God set the Levites apart from the rest of Israel and placed them around the tabernacle. This verse hands them two charges — the furnishings of the tent of meeting, and the people of Israel — and both raise one question: what does God want from those He calls to serve Him?
The duty here points two ways. The Levites served Aaron the priest, but their work also met the needs of the whole camp.
As well as serving Aaron, the Levites attended to the needs of the whole congregation of Israel (v.7). Those needs centered on the tabernacle and its service. They had to care for all the furnishing of the tabernacle (v.8). Today the answer to this is the ministry God has provided for the Church of God. Are we concerned to minister what will be of real help and blessing to the people? Every believer should have such a concern.
The order matters. One commentator puts the priest first and the people second:
So the Levites were commanded to "keep guard over" Aaron — this was the primary consideration — and to keep guard "over the whole congregation before the tent of meeting, as they minister at the tabernacle" (Num. 3:7). Christian service is for Christ, but we carry it out for the benefit of God's people and for the sake of the testimony for God.
The verse tells the Levites to guard. Commentators read the tabernacle's vessels as pictures of Christ, so guarding them comes first for anyone who serves.
God now commands that the Levites be brought near and given to Aaron and his sons, to serve him and to keep the charge of the vessels of the tabernacle. It is a weighty service, and for it they must depend on the Priest. They are given wholly to the service of the priests. Ministry belongs to those who worship, and its first and most urgent duty is to guard and care for the holy things they handle. We know that the tabernacle vessels set forth the truth of what Christ is in all His offices, and all ministry must watch over and preserve this.
God left nothing here to the servant's preference. The priest directed the work, and each Levite kept the place given to him.
All who would be true Levites — proper workmen, intelligent servants — need to weigh this point with all seriousness. The priest's appointment regulated Levite service. Self-will had no more room in the service of the Levites than it had in the position of the men of war. God settled it all, and this was a clear mercy to everyone whose heart was in a right condition.
The same point is drawn from God's choosing of the men themselves:
It was no question at all of picking out those who might seem best for carrying the boards and the curtains, or the vessels of the sanctuary. God arranged it all, taking it completely out of man's hands: He chose suited men Himself. Where is there any happiness except in simply carrying out the will of God?
Their service also had a boundary. The tabernacle and its belongings were their whole occupation.
Their service had to do only with the tabernacle and its belongings. They had nothing else to do. If a Levite had turned his hand to anything else, he would have denied his calling, abandoned the work God gave him, and defied God's commandments… A true Levite of old could say, "To me to live is the tabernacle." A true Christian today can say, "To me to live is Christ."
Behind the duty stands an earlier fact: God had already taken the Levites for Himself.
Verse 12 of Numbers 3 reveals the secret behind the special place of the Levites: God had chosen them "instead of all the firstborn". In Egypt, God had spared the firstborn of the Israelites on the basis of the blood of the Passover lamb. This was the price that redeemed the firstborn. So they belonged to God. A Levite would therefore regard himself as redeemed by God and so as God's possession.
- Redeemed. God took the Levites for Himself in place of the firstborn He had spared. They served as men who already belonged to Him.
- Given. God then gave them to Aaron. Commentators apply this to service done for Christ, and wholly for Him.
- Guarding. Their first duty was to watch over the holy vessels. These picture what Christ is in all His offices, so ministry guards the truth about Him.
- Reaching. The charge reached the whole congregation. Work done for the priest brought real help to the people.
- Assigned. No Levite chose his own place or load. God settled it, and happiness lay in simply obeying.
And thou shalt give the Levites to Aaron and to his sons they are wholly given to him out of the children of Israel.
Numbers 3 sets the tribe of Levi apart for service. Verse 9 settles who they belong to, and commentators read that handover as a picture of every servant of Christ. The word that carries the weight is "wholly."
The order matters. God claims the Levites as His own first, and only then do they pass into the priest's hands.
Notice too, on the passage just quoted, that the Levites are first declared to be God's property. Only then are they "WHOLLY GIVEN TO AARON." So we read: "Yours they were, and you gave them to me, and they have kept your word" (John 17:6).
Levites and priests are not the same thing. One group pictures believers serving; the other pictures them coming near to God.
In Numbers 3 we have the Levites set apart, according to the thoughts of God, for service. They are a figure of the church, or rather of the members of the church in their service. The priests are the figure of Christians drawing near to the throne of God. Both are a shadow, not a perfect image.
Commentators read Aaron as a picture of Christ. That changes how a Christian sees his own life: God does not only rescue him; He gives him away.
The Levites were given as a gift to Aaron and to his sons, for service in the tent of meeting. Seen in this light, the Levites picture all believers as servants. So we learn that the Church is given to Christ for His service on the earth. We were given to Him for salvation, as every believer is. But we must also remember that we are a gift to Him for His absolute disposal. Our only proper attitude, therefore, is that of Saul of Tarsus, who said, "Lord, what do you want me to do?"
A total gift leaves nothing for a second owner. One writer traces what that means for a servant: how God separates him, how plainly his call must show, and whom he stands for.
They were separated "from among the people of Israel, and the Levites shall be Mine." It is no light thing, then, to enter on the Lord's service... They were marked out for their work by the Lord Himself. So every true servant must be marked out by God, and so plainly that his call will be clear to God's people. They were wholly the Lord's. He claimed them completely, for they were His through redemption. In the same way now the servant must recognise that he is not his own, that he is wholly devoted to the Lord's will. He must never allow any other claim to come between him and the Lord. In their service they stood for the whole congregation.
The Levites also had the tabernacle's furniture in their care. One writer takes those objects as standing for Christ Himself, which makes the job far bigger than carrying equipment.
The Levites are now told to be brought near, and to be given to Aaron and his sons. They are to minister to him and keep charge of the vessels of the tabernacle. It is a weighty service, and for it they need to depend on the Priest. Indeed, they are wholly given to the service of the priests. Ministry belongs to those who worship. Its first and most urgent duty is to guard and care for the holy things they handle. The tabernacle vessels, as we know, set out the truth of what Christ is in all His offices. All ministry must watch over and preserve this.
Levi's character earned him nothing. Something had to change first — and the place he was given is not the fighter's or the worshipper's.
What a place for the self-willed, fierce and cruel Levi! What a triumph of grace! What an illustration of the power of the blood of atonement and the water of purification! By nature and by practice they were far off from God. But the "blood" of atonement, the "water" of cleansing and the "razor" of self-judgment had done their blessed work. So the Levites were now fit to be presented as a gift to Aaron and to his sons, and to be joined with them in the holy services of the tent of meeting. In all this the Levites were a striking picture of God's people now... As men of war, we are called to fight; as priests, we are privileged to worship; but as Levites, we are responsible to serve.
- Owned. The Levites are God's property before they are Aaron's. Verse 9 hands on what God already owned.
- Given. God hands what He owns to the priest — the Church given to Christ for His service on earth, at His absolute disposal.
- Wholly. A total gift leaves no room for a second claim. The servant is not his own, and God marks out his call plainly enough for others to see.
- Guarding. The gift comes with a charge: care for the holy things, which show what Christ is. That weighty task keeps the servant leaning on the Priest.
- Grace. Blood, water and self-judgment made fierce, self-willed Levi fit to serve. The whole arrangement is a triumph of grace, not a reward.
And Aaron and his sons shalt thou appoint that they may attend to their priest's office; and the stranger that cometh near shall be put to death.
The chapter has just given the Levites to Aaron as helpers for the tabernacle, and this verse draws the line where their work stops. Only Aaron and his sons may serve as priests, and anyone else who steps in faces death — so why did God guard the way to Himself so closely?
The death sentence here has a positive truth behind it: God gave the priesthood, and no man could take it. One writer ties that rule to Christ, and to men who ignored it.
As to the appointment of the earthly priest, "no one takes this honor for himself, but only when called by God, just as Aaron was." Here again there is an analogy to the priesthood of Christ. No one can truly take the place of priest, in any sense of the word, who is not called of God. The judgment that overtook Korah and those with him shows how serious it is to neglect this great truth. They sought to establish themselves in the priesthood without being called of God.
The threat was not idle. One writer points to a king who tested it.
Aaron's family had a great privilege. It was forbidden — under penalty of death — for an outsider to take up the priest's office (see Numbers 3:10, 38). When king Uzziah presumed to claim this office and tried to burn incense, he was struck with leprosy. He remained a leper until the day of his death (see 2 Chronicles 26:18-21).
Verse 10 follows straight after God gives the Levites to Aaron, and the two halves belong together. Writers draw a lasting principle from that link.
The ministry of the tabernacle depended at its root on the priesthood of Aaron; apart from that it had no place and no right to exist. The value and acceptance of the outward service hung entirely on the inner worship... All real service flows from the Lord, and so it depends on Him in the sanctuary and refers to Him there. Otherwise it becomes false — when its source becomes human, or its motives worldly.
Another writer draws out where ministry should lead, and what happened to the intruder.
Verse 9 insists again that the Levites were to be given to Aaron and his sons, reminding us that all true ministry is subject to the more important function of worship. Ministry done right will lead the hearers to worship the Lord. But if a man who was not a priest or Levite dared to come near, as though he had some place there, he would suffer the penalty of death (v. 10).
Verse 10 shuts one door. The verses around it show how the Levites came to be inside at all.
Jehovah took them in a very special way as the formal substitute for the firstborn of Israel, who were spared when the destroying angel struck Egypt. They were redeemed by blood, and counted in the fullest sense as belonging to Jehovah... So the Levites, tied in this way to mercy — the great distinguishing mercy that rescued Israel from the doom of Egypt — were all the better fitted to do the service of the sanctuary. Who can presume to undertake the service of God without knowing that God has accepted him on the ground of redemption? Salvation precedes ministry.
The barrier still stands, but the line has moved. One writer says who may now come near to worship.
First, it is evident that worship is the privilege only of the children of God. Worship is offered "in spirit and truth," and it is offered to Him who cannot admit sin into His presence. So only those who are washed in the blood of the Lamb, and who have received the Spirit, can draw near to God to adore Him. If a man who is not converted thinks he can draw near to God, that only proves he does not know what he is in himself, or who the God is whom he means to serve.
No one could install himself among Aaron's sons. One writer applies that to the practice of ordaining a separate class of priests today.
Forgetful or ignorant of the truth that all true believers, and no others, are priests (1 Peter 2), they have devised a way of making priests — of filling their "holy" offices by a human ordination. And such, when appointed this way, claim for themselves the exclusive right of approach to God... God alone makes priests, and everyone who is washed with water (born again) is brought under the value of the one sacrifice of Christ... and is set apart by Him for this office.
- Called — Priesthood was never taken; it was given. "No one takes this honor for himself, but only when called by God, just as Aaron was."
- Redeemed — The Levites stood in for the firstborn spared in Egypt. Salvation comes before service; no one serves God who has not first been accepted on the ground of redemption.
- Given — Handed to Aaron, their work had no meaning apart from him. Service cut loose from Christ in the sanctuary becomes false.
- Guarded — The outsider who pushed in died. Uzziah's leprosy and Korah's judgment show the warning was carried out.
- Opened — Now every believer is a priest, and no human ordination can make one. The line now runs between those brought near by the blood of Christ and those still outside.
And Jehovah spoke to Moses, saying,
The Lord speaks to Moses again, and what follows is startling: God takes a whole tribe for Himself in place of every firstborn son in Israel. The verses that follow explain why God had any claim on those sons, and what it cost when the Levites came up short of the number.
God's claim on the firstborn was not new. It went back to the night of the Passover in Egypt.
The Lord spoke to Moses again (v.11). He insisted that He Himself had set the Levites apart from among the people of Israel to stand in place of every firstborn in Israel. God had declared the firstborn His from the time of the Passover in Egypt, when the firstborn of Egypt were killed. The blood sprinkled on the doorposts and crossbars of their homes had in effect redeemed them. It is good for us too to recognise that God's rights come first.
The Levites did not simply volunteer. The Lord took them in place of sons He had already spared, and that shaped the service they gave.
The Lord took them in a very special way as the formal substitute for the firstborn of Israel. Those firstborn were spared when the destroying angel visited Egypt. They were redeemed by blood, and counted without question as belonging to the Lord. In place of Israel's firstborn He accepted the Levites: "They shall be mine." So they stand as a lasting witness that the firstborn are the Lord's due, from people and animals alike. The grace of God had spared those whom they replaced at the time of judgment. So the Levites were identified with mercy — the great mercy that set Israel apart and rescued them from the doom of Egypt. That fitted them all the better for the service of the sanctuary. Who can presume to take up the service of God without knowing that God has accepted him on the ground of redemption? Salvation comes before ministry.
The two counts did not match. God did not round the figure off or waive the difference.
At the census, the firstborn in Israel outnumbered the Levites by 273. God claimed these 273 just as much as the 22,000 who each had a Levite as a substitute. So five shekels each had to be paid for them as redemption money. According to Exodus 13 the firstborn were to be redeemed at their birth. Our chapter stresses again the principle that redemption comes before the service of God.
The Levites did not serve on their own terms. God gave them to the priest, and one writer reads that as a picture of service now.
The Levites were given to Aaron the high priest, and to him alone. The service of the church, or of its members, depends completely on Christ in the presence of God. It has no other object than what concerns Him. It is tied to the place and service He Himself renders to God in the true tabernacle, and it flows from that... The service of God's people has no value — in fact it is sin — except as it is joined to the priesthood. That is, joined to Christ on high, in the presence of God for us.
Standing in the firstborn's place marked the Levites out. One writer draws the line from there to the church.
The Levites pictured the Church — or the individual Christian — in service, just as the priests pictured the Church in worship. Taking them for the service of the Lord in place of the firstborn gave them a very special character. They were firstfruits to the Lord. So it is that the Church is as the firstfruits, holy to the Lord — "the church of the firstborn ones."
The same picture comes with an appeal.
The Levites were in a special way a redeemed company. So they are clearly typical of Christians, both in our redemption and in the claim God has on us for service as redeemed. "I appeal to you therefore, brothers, by the mercies of God" — redemption-mercies here — "to present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship."
- Claim. God owns the firstborn because He spared them under the blood in Egypt; His rights come first.
- Substitute. Levi is taken in their place, so the whole tribe stands as a living reminder of that night of mercy.
- Price. Five shekels redeem each of the 273 firstborn beyond Levi's number. God counts the shortfall.
- Priest. The redeemed tribe is then given to Aaron; service that is not joined to the high priest has no value.
- Possession. Redemption comes first, then service — salvation before ministry, ownership before work.
And I, behold, I have taken the Levites from among the children of Israel instead of every firstborn that breaketh open the womb among the children of Israel, and the Levites shall be mine;
On the night He spared Israel's firstborn in Egypt, God claimed them as His own. Here He takes a whole tribe in their place, and the verse asks what it means to belong to God.
The phrase "instead of" reaches back to the night in Egypt when the blood of a lamb kept Israel's eldest sons alive.
Verse 12 reveals the secret behind the special place of the Levites: God chose them "instead of all the firstborn." In Egypt, God had spared Israel's firstborn because of the blood of the Passover lamb. This was the price by which the firstborn had been redeemed. As a result they belonged to God. Now, this is the place God gave the Levites: He chose them instead of all the firstborn. A Levite would therefore regard himself as redeemed by God and so as God's possession.
Levi did not earn this place. What fitted the tribe for holy service was its link with mercy.
In a very special way Jehovah took them as the formal substitute for the firstborn of Israel, the ones spared when the destroying angel struck Egypt. They were redeemed by blood, and counted beyond question as belonging to Jehovah... God's grace had spared the very ones they stood for when judgment fell. So the Levites were identified with mercy — the great mercy that set Israel apart and rescued it from the doom of Egypt. That fitted them all the better for the service of the sanctuary. Who can take up the service of God without knowing that God has accepted him on the ground of redemption? Salvation precedes ministry...
Notice the order. God says whose they are before He says what they must do.
The service of the Levites flowed entirely from their being the Lord's. "The Levites shall be mine." For as it is written, "You are not your own, for you were bought with a price" (1 Corinthians 6:20). It is blessed to say, "My beloved is mine," but it is greater progress and a deeper joy to say, "I am His."
The exchange was not vague. God counted it person by person, and where the tribe fell short, silver made up the difference.
The history of the firstborn was this: God had His tabernacle, with its many and varied services. Performing them took a huge number of men. This service belonged to the firstborn, but their places were taken by the tribe of Levi. Each Levite represented a firstborn man in Israel. The eldest sons who outnumbered that tribe were redeemed at five shekels of silver each (Numbers 3:46-48, and 8). So the Levites were in a special way a redeemed company. Clearly they are in this way a picture of Christians, both in our redemption and in the claim God has upon us for service as redeemed... Looked at this way, the firstborn has, so to speak, a double history from his redemption, and so have we. First he dies in his substitute; then he lives as a servant in the Levite.
Belonging to God did not leave the tribe free to run itself. God handed them over to Aaron the priest as a gift.
The Levites were given as a gift to Aaron and to his sons, for service in the tent of meeting. Viewed in this way, the Levites picture all believers as servants. So we learn that God gives the Church to Christ for His service on the earth. We were given to Him for salvation, as every believer is. We must also remember that we are a gift to Him, for Him to use as He pleases. Our only proper attitude, therefore, is that of Saul of Tarsus, who said, "Lord, what will you have me to do?"
God's care for the firstborn did not stop with Egypt. One writer follows that line forward, carefully, to the church.
God in His grace has always had the firstborn before His mind. So as soon as He had sheltered His people from judgment in Egypt by the blood of the Passover lamb, He claimed all their firstborn, and the firstborn of their cattle too... Later God took the Levites instead of the firstborn and gave them to Aaron and his sons, to do the service of the people of Israel in the tent of meeting. In this way they stood for the firstborn of Israel. They were joined to Aaron, who was himself a firstborn. So they became a shadow, if not a type, of the church of the firstborn.
- Blood first. The claim began in Egypt. Israel's firstborn lived because a lamb died, and what blood saves belongs to God.
- "Mine" next. Before any duty in the tent, God says, "The Levites shall be mine."
- Substitutes counted. The exchange was exact, man for man, with five shekels paid for every firstborn the tribe could not cover.
- Given away. Those who were God's were handed to Aaron as a gift, which points to the servant's proper question: "Lord, what will you have me to do?"
- Then service. Salvation comes first. No one can serve God without knowing He has accepted him on the ground of redemption.
for every firstborn is mine. On the day that I smote all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, I hallowed unto me all the firstborn in Israel, both of man and beast; mine shall they be I am Jehovah.
God's reason for taking the Levites reaches back to one night in Egypt. That night He spared Israel's firstborn and struck down Egypt's. The verse tells us what that night created: a permanent divine claim, and a tribe set apart to answer it.
The firstborn who lived through that night did not simply escape death. Commentators point out that the same act which spared them also claimed them.
If we follow the history of the firstborn further, it is full of interest and instruction. The blood at the passover saved the firstborn of Israel. But those redeemed in this way were God's in a special and particular way. "Consecrate to me all the firstborn... is mine." So the firstborn was not only redeemed from death. He was bought for God — "you were bought with a price, so glorify God in your body."
The tribe of Levi did not earn its position. God accepted them in exchange for men who owed their lives to blood already shed.
The LORD took them in a very special way as the formal substitute for the firstborn of Israel. Those firstborn were spared when the destroying angel struck Egypt. They were redeemed by blood, and counted emphatically to belong to the LORD. In place of Israel's firstborn He accepted the Levites. "They shall be mine." So God made them the standing witness of the firstborn owed to Him from man as well as beast. The grace of God had exempted those they answered for in the time of judgment.
God counted the exchange man for man. Where the numbers did not match, silver made up the difference.
God had His tabernacle, with its many varied services. Performing them required a huge number of men. This service belonged to the firstborn, but the tribe of Levi took their places. Each Levite represented a firstborn man in Israel. Five shekels of silver redeemed each of the eldest children beyond that number.
Writers turn God's claim into a question about who may serve Him at all.
Who can dare to take up the service of God without knowing that God has accepted him on the ground of redemption? Salvation comes before ministry. That is clear if we listen to God and take seriously the solemn warning of the Lord and His apostle.
The redemption money paid for the extra firstborn makes the same point.
The redemption money went to Aaron for the service of God. This showed that it met His claims on the redeemed. Let us never forget that as redeemed people we belong to God. On this fact rests the life of service to His name, to which we are committed.
Several writers read the tribe of Levi as a shadow of believers set apart for work. They are careful to call it a shadow, not an exact image.
The Levites were firstfruits offered to God, for they stood in place of the firstborn in whom God had taken Israel to Himself, when He struck down the firstborn of the Egyptians... The number of the firstborn being greater than that of the Levites, those left over were redeemed, as a sign that they belonged to God, and the Levites became God's possession for His service (verses 12, 13). It is the same with the church: it belongs wholly to God to serve Him down here.
Being God's did not leave the Levites free. God then handed them over to the high priest.
The Levites were a separated people — God's special possession. They took the place of all the firstborn in Israel — those whom the blood of the lamb saved from the sword of the destroyer. In type they were a dead and risen people, set apart to God. God then presented them as a gift to Aaron the high priest, to do the service of the tabernacle.
That double ownership settles who chooses the servant's work.
God gave us to Christ for salvation, as He does every believer. We must also remember that we are a gift to Christ, for Him to use as He pleases. Our only right attitude, then, is that of Saul of Tarsus, who asked, "Lord, what will You have me to do?" How precious to remember that we are wholly the Lord's! As His, there is no room at all for self-will or for pleasing people.
- Spared — Israel's firstborn lived through the night Egypt's firstborn died. The blood of the lamb was the only reason.
- Owned — being spared made them God's property: not merely rescued from death, but bought for Him.
- Exchanged — God took the Levites man for man in their place, and silver paid for the extra. The whole tribe stood as a redeemed company.
- Qualified — redemption, not merit, fits anyone for the service of the sanctuary. Salvation comes before ministry.
- Given — God handed His own possession to Aaron for the work of the tabernacle. Writers see there a picture of believers given to Christ, with no room left for self-will.
And Jehovah spoke to Moses in the wilderness of Sinai, saying,
God speaks to Moses in the wilderness of Sinai and orders a second count — this time of one tribe only. Why does God count Levi apart from Israel, and why from one month old, when chapter 1 counted men fit to fight?
This separate count goes back to something that happened earlier, in Egypt. God had spared Israel's firstborn sons when the blood of the Passover lamb was on the door, and He then took Levi in their place:
Verse 12 of Numbers 3 unveils the secret behind the special place of the Levites: they had been chosen by God "instead of all the firstborn". In Egypt, God had spared the firstborn of the Israelites on the basis of the blood of the Passover lamb. This was the price by which the firstborn had been redeemed. As a result they belonged to God. Now, this is the place God gave the Levites: He chose them instead of all the firstborn. A Levite would therefore see himself as redeemed by God and so as God's possession.
Another writer ties this ownership to joy rather than loss.
Those whom He delivers He claims, and only in being His can deliverance be known. This is the joy of salvation, that we then belong to Him, and that He gains in us what He has been seeking.
The order matters for anyone who wants to serve God:
Who can take up the service of God without knowing that God has accepted him on the ground of redemption? Salvation comes before ministry.
Chapter 1 counted men of twenty and upward who could go to war. Here the line drops to one month old, because this roll served a different purpose.
The Levites were then numbered separately from the other tribes of Israel. Yet not only the males twenty years old and above were numbered, but all males from one month old and over. For this was not for military service, but for service to God. They were not to serve in the sanctuary until they were thirty, and their service ended at fifty. Even so, they were plainly trained with that service in view. This reminds us that the Lord Jesus Himself did not begin His public service until He was about thirty years of age (Luke 3:23). His earlier years were an important preparation for it.
An infant of one month has no strength to serve. Yet he is on the roll.
Here they are numbered — apart from Israel, but still numbered — from infants of days, marked out for service long before it could begin. (Compare Galatians 1:15.) Strength is given before service is claimed; but from their earliest days they are counted apart according to the grace and intentions of God.
F. W. Grant asks what it would suggest if only strong men were worth counting:
They are numbered from a month old and upward, as the firstborn are, and for the same reason. If only men in their strength were to be redeemed or numbered, would it not look as if God took "pleasure in the legs of a man"? (Psalm 147:10.) But it is the soul He values, and the soul of an infant is precious in His sight: His "delight" is "in the sons of men."
Levi is counted family by family. Picture what that looked like in the wilderness:
It must have been beautiful to watch God's workers in the wilderness. Each one was at his post, and each moved in the sphere God had appointed him. So the moment the cloud was lifted up and the order came to move, every man knew what he had to do, and he gave himself to that and to nothing else. No man had any right to think for himself. The Lord thought for all.
Darby draws out three principles for our own service:
So, as regards our service, we have these three principles. First, we are redeemed, delivered from the judgments under which the enemies of God lie, and taken out from among those enemies. Second, as a result of this first fact, we belong entirely to God. Bought with a price, we are no longer our own, but God's, to glorify Him in our bodies, which are His. Third, we are entirely given to Christ, who is the Head of the house of God, the Priest, for the service of His tabernacle.
- Redeemed. The blood of the Passover lamb spared Israel's firstborn, and Levi's separate count rests on that rescue.
- Claimed. Those God delivers, He claims. He took Levi "instead of all the firstborn", and the tribe became His own possession.
- Counted early. God puts month-old infants on the roll. He values the soul, not a man's strength, and He marks out His servants long before their work begins.
- Trained. This roll is for service to God, not for battle. The years before thirty were preparation, as they were for the Lord Jesus.
- Assigned. God appointed each man his place. The question is not what he prefers, but what the Lord has given him to do.
Number the sons of Levi according to their fathers' houses, after their families; every male from a month old and upward shalt thou number them.
God tells Moses to count Levi on a different basis from every other tribe: not fighting men of twenty, but every male from a month old, listed by household. Two questions follow — why does God count babies, and why does He count them by household?
Moses counted the other tribes from twenty years old and up. He counted Levi from a month old, and the reason lies in the place this tribe now filled.
Notice the difference between the numbering of the tribe of Levi and the other tribes. In the previous chapter the count took in those who were twenty years old and over. The count of the Levites took in "every male from a month old and upward." The difference is that the Levites stood in the place of the firstborn — and the firstborn were either redeemed or given up at that tender age of weakness and helplessness (18:16).
That substitution is no bookkeeping detail. It settles who the Levites belong to, and who may serve God at all.
Jehovah took them in a very special way as the formal substitute for the firstborn of Israel, who were spared when the destroying angel visited Egypt. Blood had redeemed them, and they were counted as clearly belonging to Jehovah. Instead of Israel's firstborn He accepted the Levites. "They shall be mine." ... Who dares take up the service of God without knowing that God has accepted him on the ground of redemption? Salvation comes before ministry, if we listen to God and take seriously the solemn warning of the Lord and His apostle. (Matt. 7:22; 1 Cor. 9:27)
Counting one-month-old boys makes no military sense. One writer draws out why: God does not count by strength.
The count takes them from a month old and upward, as it takes the firstborn, and for the same reason. If God redeemed or counted only men in their strength, would it not look as if He took "pleasure in the legs of a man"? (Ps. 147:10.) But it is the soul He values, and the soul of an infant is precious in His sight: His "delight" is "in the sons of men."
A baby of one month can do nothing at the sanctuary. Yet his name is already on the roll.
Here the count includes them (apart from Israel, but still counted) from babies whose age is still measured in days. God marks them out for service long before that service can begin. (Compare Gal. 1:15) He gives strength before He claims service. Yet from their earliest days He counts them as a people apart, according to His own grace and purpose.
Another writer asks how early God's eye rests on a servant.
With the Levites, an exception was made. Everyone was counted, almost from birth (from a month old – Num. 3:15). Does this detail not show that God takes notice of everyone He intends to use in His service, even from the earliest age? Paul tells us that God had 'separated him', and not only from the time of his conversion but 'from his mother's womb' (compare Jer. 1:5).
The gap between the count at one month and the work at thirty is not wasted time. One writer reads those years as training.
This count was not for military service, but for the service of God. The Levites did not take up sanctuary service until they were between 30 and 50, yet clearly they were trained with that service in view. This reminds us that the Lord Jesus Himself did not begin His public service until He was about 30 years old (Lk. 3:23). His earlier years were an important preparation for it.
The second half of the command matters as much as the age. Each Levite is listed under his father's house, and that listing fixes the work he will do.
The Levites were arranged by their families, and each one's service was clearly assigned. The servant always has his own particular service from God, to be carried out under responsibility to the Lord. He is never left to choose his service for himself.
The servant's part is to find that work and hold to it.
Nothing is more important in practice than that each servant of God should know the work He has given him to do, and should stick to it once he knows it. It also matters never to interfere with another's service. The Lord is sovereign in this: He divides the work according to His own will.
- Redeemed. Levi was counted from a month old because Levi replaced Israel's firstborn. Blood spared those sons in Egypt, so they belonged to God.
- Owned. Redemption comes before work. No one takes up God's service before knowing that God has accepted him.
- Valued. God counts infants because He values the soul, not the strength — He takes no pleasure in the legs of a man.
- Marked. God marks a servant out long before he can serve. He gives strength before He claims service.
- Placed. Each Levite is counted inside his own family. With the family comes his own work, and the Lord, not the servant, divides it.
And Moses numbered them, according to the commandment of Jehovah, -- as he had been commanded.
Numbers 3 sets one tribe apart from the rest of Israel, and verse 16 records that Moses counted them just as God told him. Two questions follow: why does the way of this census matter, and why does the list start with babies a month old?
God set the whole arrangement of this tribe. He gave each family its work and its place around the tabernacle, Israel's tent of worship. No part of it came from human preference.
In Numbers 3 we get the details of God's order for the tribe of Levi. God took this tribe for the service of His house, working under the priests, in place of all the firstborn from every tribe, whom He had claimed for Himself. Levi had three sons, Gershon, Kohath and Merari, and each of them became the head of a section of the tribe. God gave each section its own special service at the tabernacle, and each pitched its tents in a set position around the tabernacle. They decided nothing for themselves.
In Israel's other tribes, the count began at twenty years old. Levi's count began much earlier, because Levi's work was different.
God counted the Levites separately from the other tribes, because they had no land of their own as an inheritance. They were also not called to go to war, but to serve the Lord. So their census did not start with men of twenty years old, but with boys one month old. Training in the things of God is to start almost from birth, while training for physical war needs the strength of a grown man.
The starting age also shows what God values in a person.
They are counted from a month old and up, just as the firstborn are, and for the same reason. Suppose God redeemed or counted only men in their strength. Would it not look as if He took "pleasure in the legs of a man"? But it is the soul He values, and the soul of an infant is precious in His sight: His "delight" is "in the sons of men."
The list holds the names of children who could not yet carry a thing. Their names still stood on it.
Now we come to their special numbering, which marks out the place given to each family. Here they are counted — apart from Israel, but still counted — from infants only days old, marked out for service long before that service could begin. God gives strength before He asks for service. But from their earliest days He sets them apart, according to His own grace and purpose.
Each Levite family had its own work. The family you were born into settled which work was yours.
So not every Levite had the same area of work — and none of them could choose his own service. If you were born a Merarite, you could not take care of the vessels of the sanctuary; that charge belonged to the Kohathites. It is the same with Christian service: God gives different types of service to different believers.
God had already given the orders, so the Levites had nothing left to organise.
Each man had his own specific work. There could be no misunderstanding about it. How strange it would have been if these 22,000 Levites had formed committees and sub-committees to divide up the work and direct it! All that would have brought in disorder. All they had to do was the work the Lord had called them into. They had all the instructions already. Obeying them, and carrying the work out faithfully, were the essential things.
The reason this tribe is counted at all is that its men stand in place of Israel's firstborn sons, whom God had claimed for Himself. When the totals did not match, money made up the difference.
When they took the census, the firstborn in Israel outnumbered the Levites by 273. God claimed these 273 just as much as the 22,000 who each had a Levite standing in for them, so five shekels each had to be paid for them as redemption money. In this chapter we again see the principle that redemption comes first, before the service of God.
- Claimed — the Levites stand in place of Israel's firstborn, whom God claimed. His claim comes first, and redemption opens the door into service.
- Counted — the list starts at one month old. God does not measure muscle. He values the soul, and an infant's soul is precious to Him.
- Called — God writes infants onto a service list years before they can serve. He gives strength first and asks for the work later.
- Assigned — every family receives its own charge, so no one chooses his own service and no one has to guess.
- Obeyed — Moses counts by God's word alone. Nothing in the whole arrangement comes from human choice, and that still holds wherever God's work goes on.
And these are the sons of Levi by their names Gershon, and Kohath, and Merari.
Three names look like a simple family record. But everything that follows in the chapter — who camps where, who carries what, who serves whom — runs along these three lines.
The verse is a heading. The chapter then takes each name in turn and gives that family its own load to carry.
Levi had three sons: Gershon, Kohath, and Merari (Num. 3:17). Their families and descendants formed three different groups, each with different tasks. The Gershonites looked after the tabernacle, the tent and the coverings (v. 25). God entrusted the instruments of the sanctuary to the Kohathites (v. 32). The Merarites took care of the boards, the bars, the pillars and sockets of the tabernacle (v. 37).
Levi's family did not earn this position. It rests on what God did in one night in Egypt.
The Levites were firstfruits offered to God. They stood in place of the firstborn, in whom God had taken Israel to Himself when He struck down the firstborn of the Egyptians.
A Levite knew whose he was before he knew what he carried. That belonging goes back to a price paid in Egypt.
In Egypt, God had spared the firstborn of the Israelites on the basis of the blood of the Passover lamb. This was the price by which the firstborn had been redeemed. So they belonged to God. Now, this is the place God gave the Levites: He chose them instead of all the firstborn. A Levite would therefore see himself as redeemed by God, and so as God's possession.
Commentators note that each name matches the load that family carried. Gershon means "stranger," and his family carried the coverings.
This is what makes the saint "a stranger" in the world — which is what the name Gershon means. If we walk showing the character of the Lord Jesus, and so realise that our place is the wilderness, we can be sure of the result. It will plainly mark us out as strangers in the world.
The middle family carried the ark, and their name matches that charge.
"Kohath," all are agreed, means "assembly." He does indeed have the ark in his charge, the centre of gathering. God reveals Himself to us in Christ, and as the fruit of His work. So to lift up Christ is to draw people to Him, just as He promised.
Merari's family handled the frame — the boards, bars, pillars and sockets that held the tabernacle up. Their name matches that work too.
So Merari's service has to do with the house of God... with supporting, strengthening and steadying what is His witness in the world. He stands for the workman, as Gershon stands for the "stranger" and pilgrim, and Kohath for the one occupied with Christ. His name — Merari, "bitterness" — speaks of how painful this service is, and self-love will break down under it.
The split into three families was never a ranking.
Although the whole tribe of Levi stood "joined with Aaron," for service they fell into different classes. "They did not all have the same office"... Paying careful attention to this important point would save us from much of that "unwise" comparing of ourselves and our service with other people and their service. Such comparing is most unholy, and as a result most unhealthy.
Birth decided which of the three families a man belonged to, and with it his work. He did not apply for it.
So not every Levite had the same area of work – and none of them could choose his own service. If you were born a Merarite, you could not look after the vessels of the sanctuary, which God had entrusted to the Kohathites. So it is with Christian service: God gives different types of service to different believers.
One mind lay behind all three assignments.
God puts the families of the tribe into their different places. He is sovereign in appointing them, so of course everything stands in its place, perfectly ordered — Kohath with his precious vessels, Gershon with his fine linen, Merari with his boards and pillars. Service is a gift, and so the gift is what appoints a man to his service, since the Giver can make no mistake.
- Redeemed first. God took the Levites in place of the firstborn He spared in Egypt. They belonged to Him before they carried anything.
- Named for the work. Gershon means "stranger," and his family carried the coverings. Kohath means "assembly," and his family carried the ark. Merari means "bitterness," and his family carried the frame.
- One standing, three offices. All alike stood joined with Aaron, yet they did not all have the same job. So there is no ground for comparing yourself with others.
- Assigned, not chosen. A Merarite could not take a Kohathite's job. The Giver makes no mistake, so the place He gives is the right one.
- Bitterness included. Merari's name means "bitterness": holding up God's witness is painful work, and self-love breaks down under it.
And these are the names of the sons of Gershon according to their families Libni and Shimei.
Numbers 3 sets the tribe of Levi apart for the work of the tabernacle. The chapter moves by names: Levi's three sons, then the sons under each of them. Verse 18 names Gershon's two sons, and with the name comes a family line and a load to carry.
The Levite count did not start at working age. It started in infancy. Kelly notes how early it began, and what that shows about God's grace.
Here they are counted — apart from Israel, but still counted — from infants only days old, marked out for service long before it could begin. (Compare Gal. 1:15) God gives strength before He asks for service; but from their earliest days He sets them apart, according to His grace and His purposes.
Libni and Shimei did not step forward to claim a role. Kelly points to who did the choosing.
It was not at all a question of picking out the men who seemed best suited to carry the boards and the curtains, or the vessels of the sanctuary. God arranged it all, taking it completely out of man's hands: He chose suited men Himself.
Birth decided the branch, and the branch decided the task, with no crossing over:
So not every Levite had the same area of work – and none of them could choose his own service. If you were born a Merarite, you could not take care of the vessels of the sanctuary; God entrusted those to the Kohathites. So it is with Christian service: God gives different types of service to different believers.
One writer reads the names themselves, joining the two sons to their father.
"Gershon" means "exile." His two sons are Libni, "white," and Shimei, "my report" — names that are not hard to join into one meaning. A true exile is someone who feels his exile from the home of his heart, even if it lasts only a while. Out of that spirit of being a stranger comes power for purity and freedom from defilement. And the last name may well speak of what has the greatest value for him here: the "report" of things he cannot yet see.
after-check: meaning kept
Later in the chapter these two families receive the tent and its coverings to carry. Mackintosh asks what those coverings stood for.
There was little to attract anyone in the rams' skins and badgers' skins. But little as there was, it was the Gershonite's high privilege to take them all up and carry them gladly on his shoulders across the trackless sands. So what are we to understand by the covering of the tabernacle? I believe that, in a word, it pictured the character of the Lord Jesus Christ. It was the part that met the eye.
Mackintosh ties that carrying back to the name Gershon itself:
This is what makes the believer "a stranger" in the world — which is what the name Gershon means. If we walk showing the character of the Lord Jesus, and in doing so know our place is in the wilderness, we can be sure it will give our character a very clear mark of the stranger in this world.
Gershon's load was not Kohath's or Merari's. Mackintosh shows how the separate loads still leaned on each other.
The boards and sockets were no use without the curtains, and the curtains were no use without the boards and sockets. And the pins looked so small — yet who could measure how much they did to hold things together and keep the visible unity of the whole? So everything worked to one common end, and each man reached that end by attending to his own special line.
- Named — God counted the Levites while they were still infants, marking them out for service "long before it could begin," because He gives strength before He asks for service.
- Placed — Libni and Shimei did not apply for a post; God "chose suited men Himself," and no Levite could swap branches.
- Burdened — the Gershonites carried the tent and its coverings, which Mackintosh reads as a picture of "the character of the Lord Jesus Christ" — the part that met the eye.
- Strangers — carrying curtains instead of settling in a house stamped the family with the meaning of their father's name, "exile."
- Joined — curtains needed boards, boards needed curtains, and even the pins held the whole together. Different tasks, one end.
And the sons of Kohath according to their families Amram and Izhar, Hebron and Uzziel.
This verse lists four names: Amram, Izhar, Hebron and Uzziel — the families of Kohath. Commentators read the list as a picture of how God hands out work, and of the limits He sets on it.
These families had a fixed place in the camp and a fixed set of holy things in their care.
Kohath (which means assembly), with the Amramites, Izharites, Hebronites and Uzzielites, numbered 8,600 people. Their place was on the south side, and they had charge of the ark, the table, the lampstand, the altars, the screen, and all the service that went with them.
What they carried points beyond itself.
The things the Kohathites carried are all pictures of the objective truths of Christianity — not the subjective ones, as we have seen in Gershon. For all this furniture speaks of Christ and His perfect work. So Kohath stands for the ministry of the glory of the Lord Jesus, set out in unique excellence, far above and apart from any human understanding or appreciation of it. It is absolute, living and real. John's Gospel presents this beautifully, and so does Hebrews 1.
Read in the order the verse gives them, the meanings of the four names fit together.
Kohath's first son is Amram, "people of the Exalted One." It is a beautiful name, if we link it with that gathering to Christ which Kohath's own name seems to speak of. The next is Izhar, "oil," the undoubted type of the Spirit as the Anointer. Then we have Hebron, "union," as some put it, or "communion," as we have taken it elsewhere. Either way, it is the effect of the Spirit's work. Last comes Uzziel, "the power of God," the father of Elizaphan. Plainly these names run together in the most natural way, and they harmonize in a blessed picture of what Kohathite ministry produces.
The count of these families did not start with grown men.
They are counted from one month old and upward, just as the firstborn are, and for the same reason. If God redeemed or counted only strong men, would it not look as if He took "pleasure in the legs of a man"? But it is the soul He values, and the soul of an infant is precious in His sight: His "delight" is "in the sons of men."
This family received nothing from the princes' offering. What they carried explains why.
The sons of Kohath had the privilege of carrying all that was most precious among the instruments and furniture of the sanctuary. So they received no part of the princes' offering. It was their high and holy service to carry these things on their own shoulders, and not to use wagons or oxen. The more closely we look at the things put in the charge of the Kohathites, the more we shall see that they set forth, in type, the deeper and fuller ways God has shown Himself in Christ.
Each family of Levi had its own work, and no one was to take up another's.
Korah came from Izhar, the second name in this verse.
Korah was the son of Izhar, a son of Kohath. With Dathan and Abiram he led the rebellion against Moses and Aaron, saying that they took too much on themselves, when all the people were holy.
The tragedy was not that Korah had too little, but that he would not stay with what he had.
How much better it would have been for Korah if he had stayed content with his Levite service, which was of the very highest order. His work as a Kohathite was to carry some of the most precious vessels of the sanctuary, but he aimed at the priesthood, and fell into the pit.
- Named — Amram, Izhar, Hebron and Uzziel head the four families of Kohath. They camped on the south side, with the ark, table, lampstand and altars in their charge.
- Counted — the count starts at one month old. God values the soul, not a man's strength, and the soul of an infant is precious to Him.
- Meaning — in order, the names make one picture: a people of the Exalted One, anointed by the Spirit, brought into communion, and held by the power of God.
- Carried — this family used no wagons and no oxen. What they carried spoke of Christ, and it went on their own shoulders.
- Kept — each family had its own load and was not to reach for another's. Korah, of Izhar's line, refused that limit, aimed at the priesthood, and fell.
And the sons of Merari according to their families Mahli and Mushi. These are the families of the Levites according to their fathers' houses.
Numbers 3 counts the tribe of Levi family by family. This verse closes the list with Levi's third son, Merari, and his two sons, Mahli and Mushi. The list looks like plain record-keeping. But commentators see God giving names, places and work to the people He had taken for Himself.
God chose the Levites in place of Israel's firstborn. That choice had a price behind it:
In Egypt, God had spared the firstborn of the Israelites on the basis of the blood of the Passover lamb. This was the price by which the firstborn had been redeemed. So they belonged to God. Now this is the place God gave the Levites: He chose them instead of all the firstborn. A Levite would therefore regard himself as redeemed by God and so as God's possession.
The names are strange for a tribe set apart to serve. One writer ties their meaning to the work these families were given:
The last of Levi's three sons is Merari, "bitter," with his two sons, Mahli, "sick," and Mushi, "yielding." These are the strangest names of all for sons of Levi. These families have charge of the boards of the tabernacle and its bars, its pillars and sockets, and those of the court and the pegs and cords. Here it is clear that Merari is taken up not so much with Christ Himself as with the people of the Lord... His work is mainly what we may call church work. And who has ever done this work without finding the bitterness that Merari's name expresses?
Each of Levi's three sons led a group with its own charge. Merari's group got the framework, not the furniture or the coverings:
The Gershonites looked after the tabernacle, the tent and the coverings (v. 25). The Kohathites were trusted with the vessels of the sanctuary (v. 32). The Merarites had the care of the boards, the bars, the pillars and sockets of the tabernacle (v. 37).
Those parts held the whole structure together. One writer sees a picture in that:
Merari had charge with his sons of the boards, the sockets, pins and cords. These held the building together... In the framework of the tabernacle, bars of acacia wood join the boards. This is a picture of the building Ephesians speaks of, "the whole structure, being joined together" — the church. The work of Merari suggests the thought of union.
The verse groups these men by clan and father's house. Nobody chose his own role, one writer notes:
Merari, with the Mahlite and Mushite families, numbered 6,200, and their place was on the north side, opposite Dan... Each had his specific work given, and there could be no misunderstanding about it. How strange it would have been if these 22,000 Levites had formed committees and sub-committees to divide the work and direct it! ... God had given all the instructions. Obeying them and doing the work faithfully were the essential things. The same is true in connection with the church. Every member in the body of Christ has a service to render. The Lord Himself puts each member in place, and He gives each one his service. He did the same for these sons of Levi and their families, giving them their specific work in and around the tabernacle.
Merari's portion was the boards, sockets, pegs and cords — the plainest load in the camp. One writer ties that to the meaning of his name:
His name — Merari, "bitterness" — speaks of how painful such service is. Self-love breaks down under it, or runs off into some odd path that is easier on flesh and blood... Who cares for these boards and bars, and pillars and pins and cords? Who thinks of God's plan and pattern, and all the small details of divine appointment? Who wants work of this menial kind, costing so much and bringing in so little? ... It calls only for steady accuracy and careful obedience.
Yet one writer makes the smallest item in Merari's charge a test of whose taste the work serves:
Putting one "pin" in its true place may mean giving up your own will to God. It means willingly taking up what is little, and not counting it little. It means listening carefully to God's words, which is sweeter to Him than much that people think a costlier sacrifice. Service about God's house must own Him as Master, and that He may have things to His taste, not we to ours.
- Redeemed. God took Levi in place of the firstborn He spared by the blood of the Passover lamb. Every man in this list belonged to God before he ever served Him.
- Named. Merari, Mahli and Mushi mean "bitter," "sick," "yielding." They are strange names for a serving tribe, and commentators tie them to the work these families were given.
- Assigned. Merari's families carried the boards, bars, pillars, sockets, pegs and cords. These parts held everything together — a picture of the church joined together.
- Ordered. God gave the work; nobody chose it, and no committees divided it. The Lord Himself still places each member of the body of Christ.
- Costly. Self-love runs from this service: plain, unnoticed, detailed. Yet putting one pin in its true place is obedience God values above showier offerings.
Of Gershon, the family of the Libnites, and the family of the Shimites these are the families of the Gershonites.
This verse takes Gershon, the first of Levi's three sons, and names his two clans. Behind that dry roll-call lies a question the rest of the chapter answers: why does God count a family at all, and who decides what each branch of it will do?
The census reaches down to babies one month old, long before any of them could lift a curtain.
Here they are counted — apart from Israel, but still counted — from babies only days old. They are marked out for service long before that service could begin. God gives strength before He claims service. But from their earliest days He sets them apart according to His grace and His intentions.
Another writer asks why the count did not start with grown men.
The count runs from a month old and upward, as it does for the firstborn, and for the same reason. If God redeemed or counted only men in their strength, would it not look as if He took "pleasure in the legs of a man"? (Ps. 147:10.) But it is the soul He values, and the soul of an infant is precious in His sight.
The three names form one picture, each feeding the next.
"Gershon" means "exile"; his two sons are Libni, "white," and Shimei, "my report": these names are not hard to join into one meaning. A true exile is someone who feels his exile, even if it lasts only a while, from the home of his heart. Out of that spirit of being a stranger comes power for purity and freedom from defilement. The last name may point to what has the fullest value for him in this case: the "report" of things not now seen.
The Gershonites carried the outside of the tabernacle, not its treasures. That load was no small honour.
Here was Gershon's work, to carry through the waste and howling wilderness the tabernacle and its coverings. There was little that was attractive about the rams' skins and badgers' skins. Yet it was still the high privilege of the Gershonite to take them all up. He was glad to carry them on his shoulders across the trackless sands. What, then, are we to understand by the covering of the tabernacle? I believe it pictured the character of the Lord Jesus Christ. It was what would meet the eye.
One commentator reads the same charge forward into Christian service and names the ministry it stands for.
The Gershonites were responsible for the coverings of the tabernacle, the hangings for the entrance of the tabernacle, all the hangings of the court, its entrance hangings and cords, and so on. These all speak of the practical moral character of the Lord Jesus or of His saints. Gershon would therefore stand for the ministry that insists on the moral perfection of the Lord Jesus. It also insists on the practical righteousness that should mark all believers, as a witness to our faith in the perfect one.
The tent they carried matched the name they bore.
This is what makes the believer "a stranger" (as the name Gershon means) in the world. Suppose we walk in the display of the character of the Lord Jesus. Suppose that, in doing so, we realise that our place is in the wilderness. Then we may be sure it will give our character in the world the clear tone of a stranger. The curtain pictured another feature of the stranger character: looking ahead. This was most blessed. God dwelling in curtains made it clear that neither He nor the ark of His strength had found a resting place. Both were still travelling on towards "a rest that remained."
Splitting Levi into named clans was not bookkeeping; it fixed who did what.
So not every Levite had the same sphere of activity – and none of them could choose his own service. If you were born a Merarite, you could not look after the vessels of the sanctuary. Those were the Kohathites' charge. So it is with Christian service: God gives different types of service to different believers.
The clan lines divided the work without dividing the tribe.
In standing, the whole tribe of Levi was "joined with Aaron." In service, they fell into different classes. "All had not the same office." I know of nothing in the walk and service of the Christian that demands more attention than this. Proper attention to it would save us from much of that "unwise" comparing of ourselves and our service with other people and their services.
- Counted — God counted Gershon's clans from a month old. He marked them out for service long before they had strength for it. He values the soul, not the legs.
- Named — Gershon is "exile," Libni "white," Shimei "my report." The sense of exile produces purity, and purity lives on the report of what is not now seen.
- Charged — they carried the coverings and hangings, the outside that meets the eye. It pictures the character of Christ and the practical righteousness expected in His people.
- Strangers — they carried a tent, not a house. Neither God nor the ark had found a resting place, so they kept moving toward a rest still ahead.
- Assigned — no Levite chose his own work, and in standing they were all one. That leaves no room for comparing your service with anyone else's.
Those that were numbered of them, according to the number of all the males, from a month old and upward, those that were numbered of them were seven thousand five hundred.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
The families of the Gershonites encamped behind the tabernacle westward.
Numbers 3 gives each Levite family its own station around God's tent, and verse 23 puts the Gershonites at the back, on the west. Why did God fix where each family camped, and what did that spot have to do with their work?
Each Levite house received its own line of service from God. One writer draws out what that means for anyone who serves:
There were three principal houses — Gershon, Kohath, and Merari. They, with their sons, each have a line of service given into their hands in Numbers 4... In practice, nothing is more important than this: each servant of God should know the work He has given him to do. And once he knows it, he should stick to it. It also matters greatly never to interfere with another's service. The Lord is sovereign in this. He divides according to His own will.
God placed each family; none of them chose. Another writer ties that placing to the gift behind it:
In the first part of this section God puts the families of the tribe into their different places. He is sovereign in appointing them. So everything is of course in its place and perfectly ordered — Kohath with his precious vessels, Gershon with his fine linen, Merari with his boards and pillars. Service is gift, and therefore gift is the appointment to service, since the Giver can make no mistake.
Set the Levite positions side by side and a square appears:
It should be noted that Merari's camping north of the tabernacle is significant. Kohath camps to the south, Gershon to the west, while Moses, Aaron, and his sons camp toward the east. So they fill Judah's place in the inner circle.
Moses and Aaron camped on the east, at the entrance the priests guarded. Gershon lay at the far end, behind the tent, with Ephraim camped further out on the same side:
Gershon (exile) with his sons, Libni and Shimei, were 7,500 souls. Their place was on the west side of the tabernacle, opposite Ephraim... They had charge of the tabernacle, the tent, the coverings and the hangings of the door of the tabernacle.
The reason for all this ordering was the One in the middle of it:
God has His people numbered and gathered around Himself. He dwelt in the camp — "in the midst of which I dwell." Could love do more? Impossible! The twelve tribes guarded the tabernacle of the Lord. The Levites camped right around the court. Moses, Aaron, and the priests guarded the entrance through which people came to God... But what gave the camp in the wilderness its unity, strength, and glory was the presence of God in His tabernacle, at the centre of His chosen people.
The name Gershon carries its own lesson:
First, his name — "exile" — speaks plainly of separation from the place he belongs to. For us that place is heaven. Gershon belongs by birth to Canaan, and his life afterward in Egypt fits his name. Is this not to be our character too — "strangers," because we belong to heaven, "partakers of the heavenly calling"?
What they carried matched the name they bore:
Notice too that the curtains, coverings, and hangings that Gershon handles are in fact all lines of separation. They define the tabernacle itself, or they mark off the court and separate it from the wilderness around. So they speak easily and naturally of the boundary lines of God's special enclosure — which is what the Church is in the world.
One writer applies this to the Church:
If we walk showing the character of the Lord Jesus, and in doing so realise that our place is in the wilderness, we can be sure of the result. It will mark us out clearly as strangers in the world... The Church has laid down the rams' skins and badgers' skins, and with them the Gershonite character. In other words, the Church has stopped walking in the footsteps of her rejected Lord and Master. So she is no longer the weary, worn stranger she should be, walking the dry and barren desert with the burden on her shoulders. She has settled down in the green places of the world and made herself at home.
- Centre. God dwelt in the middle of the camp. Every tent, Levite or tribal, took its place from Him.
- Assigned. God gave Gershon the west side. No family chose its own ground.
- Named. Gershon means exile — a family whose very name marked them as people away from home.
- Matched. Their charge was the curtains and hangings, the lines that separated God's enclosure from the wilderness around it.
- Kept. Do not lay the burden down. Carrying it is what keeps a believer a stranger instead of a settler.
And the prince of the father's house of the Gershonites was Eliasaph the son of Lael.
Numbers 3 sets the tribe of Levi around the tabernacle — Israel's tent sanctuary — family by family, and this verse names the man put over the Gershonite branch. God chose this leader; the people did not. And both his name and his father's fit the work his family carried.
The whole arrangement of Levite service came from God, down to who would head each family.
It was not at all a matter of picking out those who might seem best for carrying the boards and the curtains, or the vessels of the sanctuary. God arranged it all, taking it completely out of man's hands: He chose suitable men Himself. Where is there any happiness except in simply doing the will of God? Nothing else is so sweet.
The verse calls Eliasaph chief of his father's house — head of one branch of the family. Older translations call him its prince. Both his name and his father's point past the man himself.
His prince is Eliasaph, "God has added" — a name we met before in the leader of the tribe of Gad, and close in meaning to Joseph. "Increase" fits the practical line of Gershon's work. The reminder that increase comes from God is a good one for those on this path. They may be in danger of self-occupation, and that always means self-confidence. He is the son of Lael, "of God," or "belonging to God." The name seems to well up out of the deep joy of a soul that has found here the secret of its strength and progress.
The most honoured load — the holy vessels — did not go to the eldest line.
Here the principle of election was displayed. Gershon was the eldest son of Levi, so his descendants might have expected the task of carrying the sacred vessels on their shoulders. Instead God gave that work to the descendants of Kohath, Levi's second son. How often we see in Scripture that blessing and privilege do not run in the order of nature.
Their load looked plain — skins and cloth. One writer reads the outer covering as a picture of what people saw in Christ.
Here was Gershon's work: to carry the tabernacle and its coverings through the barren, howling wilderness. This was true Levite service, and most blessed service. There was little that was attractive in the rams' skins and the badgers' skins. Yet it was the high privilege of the Gershonite to take them all up and carry them cheerfully on his shoulders across the trackless sands. What, then, are we to understand by the covering of the tabernacle? I believe, in a word, it pictured the character of the Lord Jesus Christ. It was the part the eye would see.
Carrying that covering marked the man who carried it. One writer applies this to the church of today.
This is what makes the believer a stranger in the world — and "stranger" is what the name Gershon means. Suppose we walk in the character of the Lord Jesus and, in doing so, realise that our place is the wilderness. Then we may be sure it will give us the clear mark of a stranger in the world… The Church has laid down the rams' skins and badgers' skins, and with them the Gershonite character. She has stopped walking in the footsteps of her rejected Lord and Master. She should be the tired and worn stranger, treading the dry and barren desert with the burden on her shoulders. Instead she has settled down in the green places of the world and made herself at home.
Naming a head over the Gershonites drew a line around their work. Neighbouring families depended on them but could not do their job for them.
Gershon had nothing to do with the boards and the pins, and Merari had nothing to do with the curtains or the coverings. Yet they were closely connected and depended on each other. The boards and sockets would not do without the curtains, and the curtains would not do without them… Suppose a Gershonite took it into his head to leave the curtains and turn to the pins. He would leave his own work undone and interfere with the work of the Merarite. That would never do.
- Chosen — God appointed the head of the Gershonites. No one picked the man who seemed best suited.
- Named — Eliasaph means "God has added," Lael "belonging to God." Increase comes from God, which leaves no room for self-confidence.
- Passed over — Gershon was the eldest, yet the holy vessels went to Kohath's line. In Scripture, privilege often ignores the order of nature.
- Loaded — the coverings they carried had little to attract the eye. They pictured the character of the Lord Jesus as people saw Him.
- Distinct — the curtains were Gershon's, the pins Merari's. Leave your own charge to take up another's, and both jobs suffer.
And the charge of the sons of Gershon in the tent of meeting was the tabernacle and the tent, its covering, and the curtain of the entrance to the tent of meeting.
God handed one Levite family the soft parts of the tabernacle: its curtains, its coverings, and the screen at the door. Why this family, and what does a job made of cloth and cords teach about serving God?
Gershon was Levi's firstborn son. The most honoured job might have gone to his line. It did not:
God appointed the duties of the Levites as it pleased Him. So each Levitical family could set to work, and no one was to interfere with them. They were responsible to God, and from Him they had received authority for their service. Here the principle of election showed itself. Gershon was the eldest son of Levi. His descendants might have expected to be chosen to carry the sacred vessels on their shoulders. But God entrusted that work to the descendants of Kohath, Levi's second son. How often we see in Scripture that blessing and privilege do not run in the order of nature.
The verse names fabrics and skins, not gold. Each material carries meaning:
These curtains are made of goats' hair or fine twined linen. The coverings are rams' skins and badgers' skins. From Revelation 19:8 we are clear that the "fine linen" is "righteousness" — practical righteousness. The curtains that form the tabernacle itself represent this righteousness in Christ. In His flesh the divine Word "tabernacled," as John 1:14 puts it. The hangings for the court represent the righteousness of saints, shown outside the sanctuary in the world. The hangings for the "door" and "gate" again represent Christ, the only way of access.
All these pieces have one thing in common. They are edges:
The curtains, coverings, and hangings that Gershon has to do with are in fact all lines of separation. They define the tabernacle itself, or mark off and separate the court from the wilderness around. They speak, then, easily and naturally, of the boundary lines of God's special enclosure — which the Church is in the world.
The outer covering was the plainest part of the structure, and the part everyone saw:
Here was Gershon's work: to carry the tabernacle and its coverings through the waste and howling wilderness. There could be little attractiveness in the rams' skins and badgers' skins. Yet even so, it was the high privilege of the Gershonite to take them all up and carry them cheerfully on his shoulders across the trackless sands. What, then, are we to understand by the covering of the tabernacle? I believe, in a word, it pictured the character of the Lord Jesus Christ. It was what would meet the eye.
The family's name fits the job:
Gershon and his sons had charge of the coverings and the fine linen. Gershon means exile, a stranger. His service shows us that we are separated ones and strangers in the world. This separation must show itself in practical righteousness.
Curtains also said something about God: He had no settled house yet. That brings a warning:
The Church has laid down the rams' skins and badgers' skins, and with them the Gershonite character. In other words, the Church has stopped walking in the footsteps of her rejected Lord and Master. She should be a tired and worn stranger, crossing the parched and barren desert with the burden on her shoulders. Instead she has settled down in the green places of the world and made herself at home. But there was another feature of the stranger character pictured in the curtain — anticipation. God dwelling in curtains showed plainly that neither God nor the ark of His strength had found a resting-place. They were journeying on toward "a rest that remained."
Each family had its own job, and that was the point:
Gershon had nothing to do with the boards and pins, and Merari had nothing to do with the curtains or the coverings. Yet the two depended on each other. "The boards and sockets" would not do without "the curtains," and the curtains would not do without the boards and sockets. Suppose a Gershonite had decided to abandon "the curtains" and turn his hand to "the pins." He would have left his own work undone and interfered with the work of the Merarite.
This removed all competition over which task was grander:
Seen in this light, it would be a matter of complete indifference whether a man had to carry a pin, a curtain, or a golden lampstand. The great question for each and for all was simply, "Is this my work? Is this what the Lord has given me to do?"
- Chosen — God assigned each family's work. Being firstborn won Gershon nothing; privilege in Scripture often runs against the order of nature.
- Covering — this family carried the outer fabric and skins: a picture of the character of Christ, the part that met the eye.
- Boundary — curtains, hangings and screens are all lines of separation. They mark off God's enclosure from the wilderness around.
- Stranger — the name Gershon means exile or stranger, and the work fitted the name. A people carrying curtains has not settled down.
- Content — God assigns every task, so pin and curtain and lampstand rank alike. One question is left: is this the work He gave me?
And the hangings of the court, and the curtain of the entrance to the court, which surrounds the tabernacle and the altar, and the cords thereof for all its service.
Numbers 3 gives each Levite family its share of the tabernacle, and Gershon's share ends here: the linen wall of the courtyard, the curtain at its gate, and the ropes. Why would God spell out ropes and curtains by name, and what did this humble charge teach the people who carried it?
No Levite picked his own job. One writer draws out what that means for every servant of God:
Nothing is more important in practice than this: every servant of God should know the work He has given him to do, and once he knows it he should stick to it. It also matters greatly never to interfere with another's service. The Lord is sovereign in this. He divides according to His own will.
A fixed task feels different depending on the heart:
To someone whose will was unbroken, it might seem a hardship and a very tiresome task to have to keep the same position, or to do exactly the same line of work. Such a person might long for something fresh — some variety in his work. But where the will was subdued and the heart adjusted, each one would say, "My path is perfectly plain; I have only to obey."
One writer reads the fine linen of these hangings as a picture of righteousness — first in Christ, then in His people:
Revelation 19:8 makes it clear that the "fine linen" is "righteousness" — practical righteousness. The curtains that make up the tabernacle itself represent this righteousness in Christ. In His flesh the divine Word "tabernacled," as John 1:14 puts it. The hangings for the court represent the righteousness of saints, shown outside the sanctuary in the world.
One writer sums up what this family's work stood for:
Gershon would therefore stand for the ministry that insists on the moral perfection of the Lord Jesus. It also insists on the practical righteousness that should mark all believers, as a witness to our faith in the perfect One.
Notice what all of Gershon's items have in common: they mark edges.
Notice that the curtains, coverings and hangings Gershon deals with are all lines of separation. They define the tabernacle itself, or they mark the court off from the wilderness around it. So they speak, easily and without strain, of the boundary lines of God's special enclosure — and the Church is such an enclosure in the world.
That boundary is no theory. Linen means conduct:
Gershon's separation is not imaginary. It is not a line drawn in the air. Practical righteousness keeps it up, as these linen hangings suggest. How much depends on it! If God cannot walk with the world, then my walking with Him needs one thing first: separation from it.
The verse names the screen for the entrance apart from the hangings around the court:
Here, then, was the entrance to the court. There was only one. To see inside, people had to come to that many-coloured hanging. The white curtains on the other three sides were five cubits high, about seven and a half feet — only a giant could look over them.
The plain linen speaks of the character of God's people. The curtains at the door and gate speak of someone else — they "represent Christ, as the only way of access" (Frederick W. Grant).
The verse ends with cords. One writer imagines dropping the man whose whole job is pins and cords:
Why not let this sad-faced Merarite go, with his pins and cords of the tabernacle always getting tangled, and be content with Kohath and Gershon? But if we are to set up the Lord's tabernacle in the wilderness, we must have the pins and cords.
Which is why the size of the task was never the point:
Seen in this light, no one would care whether a man had to carry a pin, a curtain, or a golden lampstand. The great question for each and for all was simply: "Is this my work? Is this what the Lord has given me to do?"
- Assigned. God handed out the work, family by family. Know your own task and leave other people's alone — that is the first mark of a real servant.
- Linen. Gershon carried fine linen — a picture of righteousness: perfect in Christ, then seen in the daily conduct of His people.
- Boundary. Those hangings drew the line between God's enclosure and the wilderness outside. Practical righteousness keeps that line up, not talk.
- Door. The wall had one entrance only. Commentators read the curtain at that gate as Christ, the one way in.
- Cords. The ropes look like nothing, but the tent will not stand without them. The only question is this: did the Lord give you this work?
And of Kohath, the family of the Amramites, and the family of the Izharites, and the family of the Hebronites, and the family of the Uzzielites these are the families of the Kohathites.
The verse lists four families that came out of Kohath — Amram, Izhar, Hebron and Uzziel. Why does God name and count households like this, and what did it mean to belong to this branch of Levi?
The list is not filler. One writer sees in it God's care to leave no guesswork in His service.
Their number is given, and they were to camp on the south side of the tabernacle. Everything was set out with the greatest possible care. God would avoid confusion in the service of the tabernacle, and also room for human will. He would make it the humblest thing on earth — a matter of simple obedience.
Kohath's line is where the priests came from. So this short list of families stands close to the ark and the priesthood.
Out of Kohath came Aaron and the priestly family, and the sons of Kohath had special charge of the ark and the other vessels of the sanctuary.
Kohath was not Levi's eldest son. Yet his families carried the holiest things, and one writer sees a pattern in that.
Whilst Gershon was the eldest son of Levi, and so his descendants might have expected that they would be selected to carry the sacred vessels on their shoulders, that work was entrusted to the descendants of Kohath, who was Levi's second son. How often do we see in Scripture that blessing and privilege do not run in the order of nature.
The Kohathites got no cart to help them. That was an honour, not a hardship.
Gershon and Merari might need wagons and oxen to carry the boards, but not Kohath. His charge was too precious to hand over to anyone or anything but himself. So it was his high and honoured place to carry it all on his shoulders. What a privilege it was to carry the ark, the table, or the golden lampstand! Would it not show he could not value his high calling at all, if he had looked for oxen to help him in his holy service?
One writer finds these names hard to read, then draws out what the leader's name says about this service.
Kohath comes next with his four sons, whose names (with his own) are much harder to read. His charge was the ark, the table, the lampstand, the altars, and the utensils belonging to all this. As a picture, the Kohathite service looks outward: he is occupied with what is outside himself, in Christ. Fittingly, his prince is Elizaphan, "whom God has hidden." Here, in the presence of God and taken up with Christ, self is lost. He is the son of Uzziel, the "power of God."
Korah was one of these Kohathites. The highest privilege did not keep him from wanting more.
How much better it would have been for Korah if he had stayed content with his Levite service. It was of the very highest order. His work as a Kohathite was to carry some of the most precious vessels of the sanctuary. But he aimed at the priesthood, and fell into the pit.
Birth settled what each Levite handled. One writer carries that over to Christian service today.
Not every Levite had the same area of work — and none of them could choose his own service. If you were born a Merarite, you could not care for the vessels of the sanctuary. God had entrusted those to the Kohathites. So it is with Christian service: God gives different types of service to different believers.
- Named — God names four families, leaving no room for confusion or human will in His service.
- Chosen — Kohath was not the eldest, yet his families got the holiest charge. Privilege does not follow the order of nature.
- Carried — No wagon spared them. They bore the most precious vessels on their own shoulders, and that was their honour.
- Hidden — Their leader's name points to a service where, in the presence of God, self is lost.
- Content — Korah held this very charge and still reached for the priesthood. The greatest privilege is wasted on a heart that wants someone else's place.
According to the number of all the males, from a month old and upward, there were eight thousand six hundred, who kept the charge of the sanctuary.
The count of Kohath's families ends with more than a number. It gives 8,600 males, counted from babyhood, and a job: "keeping guard over the sanctuary." Two questions follow. Why does God count babies among His servants? And what does it mean for a whole family to stand guard over holy things?
God counted Levi from the nursery, long before any of them could serve. One writer draws out what that says about God's timing:
Here they are counted — apart from Israel, but still counted — from infants only days old, marked out for service long before that service could begin. God gives strength before He claims service. But from their earliest days He sets them apart according to His own grace and intentions.
Another writer gives the reason God did not wait for strength:
They are numbered from a month old and upward, as the firstborn are, and for the same reason. If God redeemed or counted only men in their strength, would it not look as if He took "pleasure in the legs of a man"? But it is the soul He values, and the soul of an infant is precious in His sight.
The guard had a King to protect. One writer sets the Levites' work beside the priests' work:
They are to be the bodyguard of the divine King. The priests go in to God to perform their intercessory service on behalf of the people. In the same way, the Levites keep the people from the wrath that would follow if a stranger intruded into the tabernacle of God. And they carry the holy things of that tabernacle through the desert on all their journeys.
These 8,600 men were not priests. One writer shows where the line fell:
The priests were given the ministry of the sanctuary. There they acted as worshippers and intercessors. The work of the Levites as given in this chapter, and the one that follows, was of a more outward nature. They had to guard the tabernacle. They put it up and took it down. They carried its different parts. The LORD ordered every detail of this work.
The 8,600 did not pick their post. One writer reads the care behind that as the lesson:
God laid it all down with the greatest possible care. He would avoid confusion in the service of the tabernacle, and He would leave no room for human will. He would make it the humblest thing on earth — a matter of simple obedience. Their charge, we gather, was to be a most honourable service: the ark, the table, the lampstand, the altars, the vessels of the sanctuary that they minister with, and the screen, and all its service.
The limits went further than the choice of job:
They could not choose their burden. They were not even allowed to touch the holy vessels. First the priests covered them in the ordered way and put them on bars or poles. Only then did the Kohathites come forward, each to receive his appointed service and learn what his duty was.
The family name itself points to what this guard duty was for:
"Kohath," all are agreed, means "assembly." He has indeed in his charge the ark, the centre of gathering. In Christ, and as the fruit of His work, God reveals Himself to us. To lift Christ up in that way is to draw men to Him, just as He promised.
Another writer warns what follows when the Church stops carrying them:
The Church grew weary of the curtains and the boards, and laid aside her Gershonite and Merarite character. In the same way she has laid aside her Kohathite character, because she has stopped carrying the ark and the table on her shoulder.
No Kohathite carried alone. The load itself set the rule:
They must walk together. No vessel of the sanctuary could be carried without a bar, which supposes at the very least two bearers. They had to set aside every personal consideration. One might be stronger than another, or able to walk faster. But neither the strong nor the weak could decide the pace or the time. That depended on the cloud alone, which directed every movement of the camp.
- Redeemed — God counted the Levites like the firstborn, and for the same reason: they were His own before they were His workers.
- Counted — the count starts at one month old. God values the soul, and He marks out His servants long before they can lift anything.
- Assigned — no Kohathite chose his burden. God fixed every detail, leaving no room for human will, only obedience.
- Guarding — they stood as a bodyguard around the King's tent. They kept the stranger out, and so kept the wrath away.
- Carried together — every holy vessel needed two bearers on one bar. The cloud set the pace, not the strongest man in the pair.
The families of the sons of Kohath encamped on the side of the tabernacle southward.
Numbers 3 gives each Levite family its own place around the tabernacle, the tent where God lived among His people. Kohath's descendants get the ground to the south. One line about a compass direction raises real questions. Who chose the spot? What came with it? Why record it at all?
The families do not select their ground. One writer sees a purpose behind such exact instructions:
Their number is given; and these were to be on the side of the tabernacle southward. Everything was laid down with the greatest possible care. God would avoid confusion in the service of the tabernacle, and also room for human will. He would make it to be the humblest thing on earth — a matter of simple obedience.
The south side was not a neutral address. The priests came from this branch of Levi, and its charge was the holy furniture itself:
Out of Kohath came Aaron and the priestly family, and the sons of Kohath had special charge of the ark and the other vessels of the sanctuary. Kohath was to pitch tent on the south side of the sanctuary. Aaron and the priests, along with Moses, had to dwell on the east side, facing the entrance to the court. They kept charge there, and no stranger could come near, on pain of death.
Wagons and oxen could carry the loads of other Levite families. Not Kohath's. One commentator treats that as an honour, not a hardship:
Gershon and Merari might need wagons and oxen to carry the boards, and so on, but not Kohath. His charge was too precious to trust to anyone or anything but himself. So it was his high and honoured place to carry it all upon his shoulders. What a privilege, for example, to be allowed to carry the ark, the table, or the golden lampstand! And would it not have shown a complete failure to appreciate his high calling if he had looked for the help of oxen in his holy service?
The name Kohath also carries meaning. One writer links it to what the family carried:
"Kohath," all are agreed, means "assembly." He has indeed in his charge the ark, the centre of gathering. To lift up Christ as the One in whom, and as the fruit of His work, God reveals Himself to us, is to draw men, according to His assurance, to Him.
The names of Kohath's own sons are read the same way — Amram as "people of the Exalted One," Izhar as "oil," Hebron as "union" or "communion" — and the leader named in the next verse fits the pattern too: "His prince is beautifully Elitzaphan, 'whom God has hidden,' for here it is indeed in the presence of God, and in occupation with Christ, that self is lost."
One writer draws a lesson for teaching today from what they carried:
Everything the Kohathites carried pictures the truths of Christianity as they are in themselves. They are not truths about our own experience, which is what we saw with Gershon. For all this furniture speaks of Christ and His perfect work. So Kohath stands for the ministry that sets out the glory of the Lord Jesus in unique excellence. That glory is far above and apart from anything we can understand or appreciate of it.
The south side had another occupant. Reuben's tribe camped on that same side. One writer sees grievances growing out of that closeness:
Turn to Numbers 2, which gives the order in which the tribes were to encamp around the tabernacle. Then turn to Numbers 3, which gives similar details about the Levites. We find that both the tribe of Reuben and the Kohathites had their place on the south side. As a result they were close together to discuss and stir up their imagined grievances.
Korah was a Kohathite. He held the privilege this verse describes, and reached past it:
How much better it would have been for Korah had he rested content with his Levite service, which was of the very highest order. His work as a Kohathite was to carry some of the most precious vessels of the sanctuary. But he aimed at the priesthood, and fell into the pit.
- Place — God chose the south side; Kohath did not. He ordered the camp so there was no confusion and no room for human will.
- Charge — That place came with the ark, the table, the lampstand and the other vessels of the sanctuary, held by the family that gave Israel its priests.
- Shoulder — No wagons for Kohath. The most precious load rode on men's shoulders.
- Assembly — Kohath means "assembly." He carried the ark, the centre of gathering. Lifting up Christ draws people to Him.
- Contentment — Korah held this very honour and reached past it. The highest service becomes ruin the moment it stops being enough.
And the prince of the father's house of the families of the Kohathites was Elizaphan the son of Uzziel.
Numbers 3 gives every branch of the tribe of Levi its place in camp, its leader, and its exact work at the tabernacle — the tent where God lived among Israel. Verse 30 names the leader of the Kohathites: Elizaphan son of Uzziel, set over the families who carried the holiest furniture of all.
God fixed every detail here. He chose which side of the tent each family slept on, and who led them. One writer draws out why God left nothing loose:
Their number is given; and these were to be on the side of the tabernacle southward. Everything was laid down with the greatest possible care. God would avoid confusion in the service of the tabernacle, and also leave no room for human will. He would make it the humblest thing on earth — a matter of simple obedience.
A dictionary entry gathers what else is recorded about him:
Son of Uzziel, and a 'chief' of the Kohathites. Numbers 3:30; 1 Chronicles 15:8. He is called ELZAPHAN in Exodus 6:22; Leviticus 10:4. With Mishael he had the painful duty of removing the dead bodies of Nadab and Abihu.
The man who once carried out those dead bodies is now the head of the families who carry the holy things.
after-note: DELETE
The Kohathite charge was the ark, the table, the lampstand, the altars. This was the one load no cart could carry:
Gershon and Merari might need wagons and oxen to carry the boards and so on, but not Kohath. His charge was too precious to hand to anyone or anything but himself. So it was his high and honoured place to carry it all on his shoulders. What a privilege, for example, to be allowed to carry the ark, the table, or the golden lampstand!
And the men under Elizaphan handled these things without ever looking at them:
Whenever Israel travelled, the Kohathites carried these things, though they did not see them. Before they could carry them, the priests had to cover them with the right coverings and insert the carrying poles.
Some commentators read the Hebrew names as part of the picture:
His charge was the ark, the table, the lampstand, the altars, and the utensils belonging to all this... So it is easy to see that, in the picture, the Kohathite ministry looks outward. His occupation is with what is outside himself in Christ... His prince is fittingly Elizaphan, which means "whom God has hidden." For here it is indeed in the presence of God, and in occupation with Christ, that self is lost. He is the son of Uzziel, the "power of God."
Mackintosh draws a lesson for Christians out of the family name:
Nothing shows higher character in the world than the gathering spirit expressed in the name of Kohath. Should not Christians rebuke man's often-repeated attempts at forming associations, by a real union in everything? And how can they do that? Only by gathering more closely around their common centre, Christ, in all the blessed fullness and variety of that Name.
Elizaphan did not campaign for the post. God placed him, as God placed each family of the tribe:
In the first part of this section God puts the families of the tribe into their several places. He is sovereign in His appointment here, and so of course everything is perfectly ordered in its place — Kohath with his precious vessels, Gershon with his fine linen, Merari with his boards and pillars. Service is gift, and therefore gift is the appointment to service, since the Giver can make no mistake.
Another writer imagines what would have happened had the Levites organised themselves instead:
Each had his specific work given. There could be no misunderstanding about it. How strange it would have been if these 22,000 Levites had formed committees and sub-committees to divide the work and direct it! All this would have brought in disorder. All they needed to do was the work into which the Lord had called them.
- Placed — the south side, the named chief, the listed vessels. God fixed each family's position, leaving no confusion and no room for human will.
- Given — Elizaphan's headship was appointment, not ambition. Service is gift, and the Giver makes no mistake in handing it out.
- Honoured — the men he led carried the ark and the table on their shoulders. No cart, no oxen: the charge was too precious for that.
- Hidden — his name means "whom God has hidden," son of "the power of God": in occupation with Christ, self is lost.
- Enough — the Levites needed no committees to divide the work. Knowing the task God gave, and doing it, was the whole of their obedience.
And their charge was the ark, and the table, and the candlestick, and the altars, and the utensils of the sanctuary with which they ministered, and the curtain, and all that belongs to its service.
Numbers 3:31 gives the Kohathites, one family of the tribe of Levi, the most valuable load in the camp. Why did God hand the holiest things to men who were not even allowed to touch them, and what did carrying such a load do to those men?
The charge is a specific inventory, not a general duty, and the priests had to prepare each piece before a Kohathite could touch it.
They were responsible for the care of the ark, the table, the lampstand, the two altars together with the utensils and the veil, with all that related to these things. Whenever Israel travelled the Kohathites carried these things, though they did not see them, for before they were allowed to carry them, the priests were required to cover them with their appropriate coverings and insert the carrying poles.
These were not just expensive furnishings. One writer explains what the tabernacle vessels stood for, and how carefully they reached a Kohathite's shoulder.
The special service of the Kohathites had to do with the vessels of the tabernacle, the dwelling-place of God among His people. Those vessels each set forth a different aspect of Christ's glory. When the camp moved on — and travelling was the mark of the wilderness — their duty was to carry the holy vessels. They could not choose their burden. They were not even allowed to touch the holy vessels. But after the priests had covered them in the appointed way and put them on bars or poles, the Kohathites came forward. Each one received his appointed service and learned what his duty was.
Another writer goes through the same list and asks what such a charge does to the man himself. He finds the same lesson in the leader's name from the previous verse.
His charge was the ark, the table, the lamp-stand, the altars, and the utensils belonging to all this. With them went the one linen item, which speaks, as we know well, of the humanity of Christ. So it is easy to see that the Kohathite ministry, as a picture, looks outward. The man is occupied with what is outside himself, in Christ… His leader is beautifully named Elizaphan, "whom God has hidden," for here it is indeed in the presence of God, and in occupation with Christ, that self is lost.
The other Levite families could use wagons. Kohath got none, and one writer calls that an honour, not a hardship.
Gershon and Merari might need wagons and oxen to carry the boards and so on, but not Kohath. His charge was too precious to trust to anyone or anything but himself. So it was his high and honoured place to carry it all on his shoulders. What a privilege, for example, to be allowed to carry the ark, the table, or the golden lampstand!
But an outsider saw none of that honour. The coverings hid everything.
From the outside, no one could tell what these vessels were, though each Kohathite might know his own appointed charge. Nothing in the service itself, or in what could be seen of it, brought glory to the men doing it. To an onlooker, the Kohathites simply looked like the men picked out for the hardest labour.
God handed out the duties in this chapter. One writer takes that straight over to Christian service today.
Not every Levite had the same area of work — and none of them could choose his own service. If you were born a Merarite, you could not take care of the vessels of the sanctuary; those were entrusted to the Kohathites. So it is with Christian service: God gives different types of service to different believers.
God assigned the work. So the size of the load in a man's hands stopped being the point.
Seen in this light, it made no difference at all whether a man carried a pin, a curtain, or a golden lampstand. The great question for each and for all was simply, "Is this my work? Is this what the Lord has given me to do?"
The poles needed more than one man. The timing was never theirs to set.
They had no choice in the matter. Their service was one of simple obedience, yet it kept them very near to God, and if their heart was in it, it was a delight like no other. And notice too, they had to walk together. No vessel of the sanctuary could travel without a pole, and a pole needs at least two bearers… Neither the strong nor the weak could decide the pace or the time. That depended only on the cloud, which directed every movement of the camp.
One writer warns what follows when Christians stop carrying this load.
If we knew more of Christ in these blessed aspects of His character, we would not be what we are — a proverb and a byword because of our deep divisions. The Church grew tired of the curtains and the boards, and laid aside her Gershonite and Merarite character. In the same way she has laid aside her Kohathite character, because she has stopped carrying the ark and the table upon her shoulder.
- Charge given. God assigned Kohath's load: the ark, table, lampstand, altars, utensils and screen. No Levite picked his own work, and Christian service runs the same way.
- Charge covered. The priests covered each vessel and fitted the poles first. Only then did a Kohathite step forward to receive his load.
- Charge shouldered. No wagons carried these things. The most precious load went on a man's own shoulders, and its honour stayed hidden from every onlooker.
- Charge shared. Every pole needed at least two bearers, and the cloud set the pace — the work forced them to walk together and to look up.
- Charge kept. What Kohath carried was a picture of Christ. When His people stop carrying the ark and the table, they lose that character and fall into division.
And the prince of princes of the Levites was Eleazar the son of Aaron the priest he had the oversight of them that kept the charge of the sanctuary.
Numbers 3 gives each family of the Levites its own place around the tabernacle, God's tent, and its own work. At the end of that list one man stands over them all: Eleazar, son of Aaron the priest. Who decides what a servant of God does, and who is he answerable to?
Chapter 3 fixes every detail. Preference and strong personalities decide nothing.
God laid down everything with the greatest possible care. God would avoid confusion in the service of the tabernacle, and would leave no room for human will. He would make it the humblest thing on earth — a matter of simple obedience. Their charge, we gather, was to be a most honourable service.
The Levite families did not all do the same work. God chose who did what.
The order of the service of the Levites, on the other hand, was according to the sovereignty of God, who put each one in his place. So in the service of the church you find the greatest differences, and God gives each one his own place.
The verse sets Eleazar over men who were leaders in their own right.
Verse 32 tells us that Eleazar the priest, son of Aaron, was chief over the leaders of the Levites. He appointed them to the particular work they had to do.
Eleazar oversaw the work as a priest. One writer carries that forward to today.
All of this happened under the priestly supervision of Eleazar, son of Aaron (verse 32) — just as Christ directs Christian service.
Because the priest appointed the work, the Levite's part was obedience. The same rule met two kinds of heart in opposite ways.
The priest's appointment regulated the Levite's service. The Levites had no more room for self-will than the fighting men had. God settled it all, and this was a clear mercy to everyone whose heart was right. To someone whose will was unbroken, it might seem a hardship to be kept in the same position. It might seem a most tiresome task to do the very same line of work. Such a person might long for something fresh — some variety in his work. But where the will was subdued and the heart adjusted, each one would say, "My path is perfectly plain; I have only to obey."
Eleazar was a priest, not only a Levite. His name and his later history point beyond him.
The priest did have a nearer place than the servant, the Levite — a place of enjoyment of the Lord's presence... Eleazar's name means "God is Helper," and he succeeded Aaron in the high priesthood when Aaron died (Numbers 20:23-28). He is therefore a picture of Christ as High Priest in resurrection.
Eleazar's oversight fell on the Kohathites, the family that carried the sanctuary furniture. What they carried shows what their ministry means.
These things the Kohathites carried all picture the objective truths of Christianity — truth that stands outside us, not our inward experience. All this furniture speaks of Christ and His perfect work. So Kohath stands for the ministry of the glory of the Lord Jesus. That glory is shown in unique excellence, far above and apart from anything we can understand or value in it. It is absolute, living and real... May we prize such ministry, and seek grace to present it faithfully.
- Appointed, not chosen. God's sovereignty set the order of Levite service: He "put each one in his place." The same variety marks service in the church.
- Assigned by the priest. Eleazar was chief over the leaders, and "appointed them to the particular work they had to do."
- Answerable to Christ. That priestly supervision pictures how Christ Himself directs Christian service.
- Obeyed without self-will. Where the will is subdued, the servant answers, "My path is perfectly plain; I have only to obey."
- Helped by a living High Priest. Eleazar's name means "God is Helper." He pictures Christ as High Priest in resurrection, so this oversight helps the servant rather than burdens him.
Of Merari was the family of the Mahlites, and the family of the Mushites these are the families of Merari.
Numbers 3 gives each branch of the tribe of Levi a place around the tabernacle and a share of the work. This verse names Merari's two clans, the Mahlites and Mushites — the men who carried the heaviest and least admired load, and whose names speak of bitterness, weakness and yielding.
God took the whole tribe of Levi for Himself. Then He split the work among Levi's three sons.
In Numbers 3 we get the details of God's order for the tribe of Levi. God took this tribe for the service of His house, under the hand of the priests, in place of all the firstborn in the other tribes, whom He had claimed for Himself. Levi had three sons, Gershon, Kohath and Merari, and each of them became the head of a section of the tribe. God gave each section its own service at the tabernacle, and each camped in its own set place around it. Nothing was left for them to arrange.
The Mahlites and Mushites carried the frame of the tabernacle. One writer reads that frame as a picture of believers held up and held together.
before-note-none
They camped on the north side of the tabernacle. They were given the work of caring for the boards of the tabernacle, its bars, pillars and sockets, the pillars of the court, their sockets, pegs and cords. The boards of the tabernacle speak of the basic facts of what believers are "in Christ," and as united in one building, the Church of God. They were of acacia wood overlaid with gold, standing upright on sockets of silver — that is, believers upheld on the basis of redemption, covered with Christ (the gold) and united together with bars of the same materials… Merari therefore emphasizes the ministry that unites believers to Christ and to one another as dependent on the redemption that is in Christ Jesus.
The names in this verse are unexpected. One writer reads them as a description of how such work feels to the person doing it.
Last of Levi's three sons we find Merari, "bitter," with his two sons, Mahli, "sick," and Mushi, "yielding." These are the strangest words of all to find attached to Levi's sons… Here it is clear that Merari is occupied not so much with Christ Himself as with the people of the Lord… His work is mainly what we may call church work; and who has done this work without finding the bitterness that Merari's name expresses? Anyone who could not feel it would be poorly fitted for ministry.
The two clan names split the load between them: the strain of the work, and the temper it takes to bear it. Their leader's name answers both.
Mahli may express the faintness that comes from too much labour, while Mushi may point to that spirit of patience and gentleness which, where the truth allows, can give way in everything else. How necessary that spirit is in just such a relation to the Church of God as is hinted at here! The lack of it may be as common a cause of trouble among believers as any. Merari's captain stands in striking, comforting contrast to these names: Zuriel, "my rock is God," the son of Abihail, "the father of valor."
Setting up the sockets of silver was Merari's work. One writer applies it to taking a stand for Christ in the world, and asks why so few do.
Let anyone take a firm, clear stand for Christ in the world… and there let him begin to set up "the sockets of silver." Be sure of this: he will find that such a course brings much sorrow and bitterness of soul. In a word, he will find it a path where the cross has to be taken up "daily," and not only taken up, but carried… There are very few of the hard-working Merarite character to be found. Why is this? Because showing such a character will always bring much labour and sorrow to nature, and nature loves ease… nothing will make us true Merarites but deep fellowship with Him who was "THE MAN OF SORROWS."
Pins and cords attract no attention. The point is that God specified them, and the servant's job is accuracy, not improvement.
Merari represents the workman, as Gershon does the stranger and pilgrim, and Kohath the one occupied with Christ. Who cares for these boards and bars, and pillars and pins and cords? Who thinks of God's plan and pattern, and all the details of divine appointment? Who desires work of this menial kind, costing so much and bringing in so little? The pattern is old, and will not adapt itself to the fashion of changed times. It gives no room for human invention to display itself in. It requires only plodding accuracy and diligent obedience.
Naming the clans one by one means the work was distributed before anyone volunteered or argued.
Their service consisted in handling the boards of the tabernacle, pillars, sockets, pins and cords. Each had his specific work given. There could be no misunderstanding about it. How strange it would have been if these 22,000 Levites had formed committees and sub-committees to divide the work and direct in it! All this would have brought in disorder. All they needed to do was to do the work into which the Lord had called them.
- Named. God lists Merari's two clans, the Mahlites and Mushites, one by one. He assigns service family by family and leaves nothing for them to arrange.
- Given. Their charge was the framework: boards, bars, pillars, sockets, pegs and cords. Writers read it as a picture of believers upheld by redemption and joined to Christ and to each other.
- Costly. The names carry the tone of the work: Merari "bitter," Mahli "sick," Mushi "yielding." The job costs bitterness and spent strength, and it asks for gentleness that gives way where truth allows.
- Steadied. Against those three names stands their leader Zuriel, "my rock is God," son of Abihail, "the father of valour."
- Fitted. Few take up this work. It demands plodding accuracy and obedience to an old pattern, and only deep fellowship with the Man of Sorrows makes anyone fit for it.
And those that were numbered of them, according to the number of all the males, from a month old and upward, were six thousand two hundred.
The census of Numbers 3 stops at the family of Merari and records a plain figure: 6,200 males, counted from a month old. That number raises two questions — why God counts babies, and why He tracks one branch of one tribe so closely.
The chapter before counted Israel's men from twenty years old and up. The Levite count works differently, and one writer links the change to whom the Levites replace:
Notice the difference between the numbering of the tribe of Levi and the numbering of the other tribes. In the previous chapter the count took those who were twenty years and over. The count of the Levites took "all the males from a month old and upward." The reason for the difference is that they stood in place of the firstborn. At that tender age of weakness and helplessness, the firstborn were either redeemed or given up.
The starting age also says something about what God values. One writer asks what a count of grown men only would suggest:
God numbers them from a month old and upward, as He numbers the firstborn, and for the same reason. If He redeemed or numbered only men in their strength, would it not look as if He took "pleasure in the legs of a man"? But He values the soul, and the soul of an infant is precious in His sight.
This list records men who already belonged to God, and one writer explains how they came to be His:
Verse 12 of Numbers 3 uncovers the secret behind the special place of the Levites. God had chosen them "instead of all the firstborn." In Egypt, God had spared the firstborn of the Israelites because of the blood of the Passover lamb. That blood was the price that redeemed the firstborn. So they belonged to God. Now this is the place God gave the Levites: He chose them instead of all the firstborn. A Levite would therefore regard himself as redeemed by God and so as God's possession.
The figure belongs to the last of Levi's three sons. One writer weighs the family names against the work these men carried:
Last of Levi's three sons we find Merari, "bitter," with his two sons, Mahli, "sick," and Mushi, "yielding." These are the strangest words of all to find among Levi's sons. These families have charge of the boards of the tabernacle and its bars, its pillars and sockets, and those of the court and the pegs and cords… Merari's work is mainly what we may call church work. And who that has taken up this work has not found the bitterness that his name expresses?
Merari's share of the tabernacle was the timber and metal — the heavy freight. One writer notes how God treated the families with the heaviest loads:
If God called people to do His work, He will provide all that is needed to carry it on. The Gershonites and the Merarites had clear proof of this… Moses gave the Gershonites two wagons and four oxen, and the Merarites four wagons and eight oxen. These came from the offering of the princes of the twelve tribes when the Tabernacle was set up. God took thought for both of these great families, and the one which had the heaviest burden had the greatest help… Carrying burdens took strength, and God would not overtax the strength of anyone called to work for Him. So no Levite was called to carry burdens before he was thirty, nor asked to continue after fifty.
Levi's three families — Kohath, Gershon and Merari — each had their own total and their own charge. That division guards against a temptation:
Each family had a particular work to do… The family of Merari carried the boards of the tabernacle and the bars, also the pillars around the court and their sockets and pins and cords. It was also their work to set up the tabernacle when they moved to a new site… Each had his own work to do. They were not to covet the work of another. The man who carried the tent-pegs was not to envy the Kohathites, who carried the furniture of pure gold.
- Counted early. The Levite roll begins at one month, not twenty years. These men stood in place of the firstborn, so God records a life before it can do anything for Him.
- Counted as redeemed. Blood spared the firstborn in Egypt. God then took the Levites in their place, so every name on the list marked someone who already belonged to Him.
- Counted as Merari. The 6,200 belong to a family whose name means "bitter." Their load — boards, bars, pillars, sockets — has often proved bitter to those who take it up.
- Counted and supplied. The family with the heaviest load received the most wagons and oxen. A call from God arrives with the means to carry it.
- Counted separately. Each family had its own total and its own charge, so the man carrying pegs had no cause to envy the man carrying gold.
And the prince of the father's house of the families of Merari was Zuriel the son of Abihail. They encamped on the side of the tabernacle northward.
Israel camped in rings around God's tent, with the three Levite families closest to it. This verse sets the last of them in place: Merari camps on the north side under Zuriel son of Abihail, and the names, the direction, and the family's load all carry meaning.
Each Levite family had one side of the tabernacle. One writer notes how deliberate the arrangement is:
It is significant that Merari camps north of the tabernacle, Kohath to the south, and Gershon to the west. Moses, Aaron, and his sons camp toward the east, filling Judah's place in the inner circle.
Merari carried the frame and fastenings of the tabernacle. One commentator reads a picture of believers in it:
Their work was caring for the boards of the tabernacle, its bars, pillars and sockets... The boards of the tabernacle speak of the basic facts of what believers are "in Christ," and as united in one building, the Church of God. They were of acacia wood overlaid with gold, standing upright on sockets of silver. That is, believers are upheld on the basis of redemption, covered with Christ (the gold) and united together with bars of the same materials... So Merari highlights the ministry that unites believers to Christ and to one another, a ministry that depends on the redemption that is in Christ Jesus.
The names in this branch of Levi are dark. One writer reads them as describing the work itself:
Last of Levi's three sons we find Merari, "bitter," with his two sons, Mahli, "sick," and Mushi, "yielding." These are the strangest words of all to find among Levi's sons... Here it is clear that Merari is taken up not so much with Christ Himself as with the people of the Lord. His work is mainly what we may call church work. Who that has done this work has not found the bitterness which expresses itself in Merari's name? Anyone who could not feel it would be poorly fitted for ministry.
The two names in this verse say something different:
Merari's leader stands in striking, comforting contrast to these names: Zuriel, "my rock is God," the son of Abihail, "the father of valour."
One writer carries Merari's work over into Christian life, and counts its cost:
Let anyone take his stand firmly and decisively in the world for Christ. Let him go into those places where "the world" is seen in its full strength. Let him set himself, firm as a rock, against the deep and rapid tide of worldliness. Let him begin there to set up "the sockets of silver," and be sure of it: such a course brings much sorrow and bitterness of soul... There are very few of the hard-working Merarite character to be found. Why is this? Because showing such a character always costs nature much labour and sorrow, and nature loves ease. Nothing will make us true Merarites but close fellowship with Him who was "THE MAN OF SORROWS."
The verse names a leader, a family and a place. That precision is the lesson:
Merari (bitter) with the family of Mahlites and Mushites numbered 6,200, and their place was on the north side, opposite Dan... Each had his specific work given. There could be no misunderstanding about it. How strange it would have been if these 22,000 Levites had formed committees and sub-committees to divide the work and direct it! All that would have brought in disorder. All they needed to do was the work the Lord had called them into.
The Lord did not leave that labour unpaid:
If the Gershonite and the Merarite had to take a place where they endured much of the burden and heat of the day, the Lord graciously met them in that with a very rich reward... If they had to labour and toil among their brothers, they were richly served by their brothers in return: "Two wagons and four oxen he gave to the sons of Gershon, according to their service. And four wagons and eight oxen he gave to the sons of Merari according to their service."
- Placed. God gave Merari one side of the tabernacle: the north. Kohath had the south, Gershon the west, the priests the east.
- Named. Merari means "bitter," his sons "sick" and "yielding." Anyone fit to serve God's people tastes that bitterness.
- Strengthened. Over that bitterness God set Zuriel, "my rock is God," son of Abihail, "father of valour." The leader's name answers the family's name.
- Loaded. Merari carried the framework: boards, bars, pillars and sockets. One writer reads it as believers upheld by redemption and joined to one another.
- Supplied. The heaviest service drew the largest gift — four wagons and eight oxen, double what Gershon received.
And the charge of the sons of Merari consisted in the oversight of the boards of the tabernacle, and its bars, and its pillars, and its bases, and all its furniture, and all that belongs to its service,
God gives Merari's family the heavy, structural part of the tabernacle: the frames, bars, pillars and bases that hold the whole tent up. Every item on that list pictures something. So the writers ask what this plain, heavy work says about the workers God chooses. (Older translations, which they quote, call these the "boards," "sockets," "pins" and "cords.")
This work belongs to Merari and to nobody else. One writer shows how the jobs never overlapped, yet each one needed the others:
All this was clear and distinct. Gershon had nothing to do with the boards and pins, and Merari had nothing to do with the curtains or the coverings. Yet they were closely connected, for each depended on the other. "The boards and sockets" would not do without "the curtains," and the curtains would not do without the boards and sockets. And what about "the pins"? They look so unimportant. Yet who could measure their value in holding things together and keeping the whole visibly one?
Each frame stood upright in bases of silver. One writer reads the materials as a picture of believers:
The boards of the tabernacle speak of the basic facts of what believers are "in Christ," and of their union in one building, the Church of God. They were made of acacia wood overlaid with gold, standing upright on bases of silver. That is, believers are upheld on the basis of redemption, covered with Christ (the gold), and joined together with bars of the same materials. … So Merari's work stands for the ministry that unites believers to Christ and to one another, and that ministry rests on the redemption that is in Christ Jesus. Such ministry matters greatly in our own day.
The bars ran through golden rings to lock the separate frames into one wall. A second writer draws out what the ring adds:
The bars of acacia wood, covered with the same gold and fitted into golden rings on the boards, speak of special gifts given to hold everything in place. But those gifts need a matching openness in each believer before they can be used: the "bar" was of no use without the "ring."
Merari also cared for the pillars around the courtyard, with the pegs and ropes that held them steady. One writer reads them as a picture of public witness:
The pillars of the court rest on bronze bases, and their tops are covered with silver, while the fine linen curtains hang from them on silver hooks. So grace enables us to hold up the character of Christ before the world, and divine strength is what we rest on while we do it. The pins and cords come in as well, bracing everything against opposing forces that are too strong for us on our own.
A tent peg is the smallest thing on Merari's list. Yet the writers refuse to rank the items by size:
In the whole world there was nothing to compare with that boarded tent and all its symbolic furnishings. It was a holy dignity and privilege to touch the smallest pin of that wonderful tabernacle in the wilderness. It was far more glorious to be a Merarite looking after the pins of the tabernacle than to sit on the throne of Egypt or Assyria.
Merari means "bitterness" or "sorrow." Both writers tie the name to the work itself. One pictures the contrast between what Merari carried and where he set it up:
Could anything be more unlike than silver and barren sand? But Merari must not shrink back from all this. No — when he reached a spot in the desert where the cloud stopped, he said, "I have come to set up the patterns of things in heaven right in the middle of all the desolation and misery of the wilderness around." All this was very hard work. No doubt it gave Merari's character a tone of sadness or sorrow, and his very name expressed it, for it means "sorrow."
The other writer says why this work is rare, and what it asks of the worker:
His name — Merari, "bitterness" — speaks of the painful character of such service. Self-love breaks down under it, or runs off into some odd path that is easier on flesh and blood… Who cares for these boards and bars, and pillars and pins and cords? Who thinks of God's plan and pattern, and all the small details He has appointed?… It leaves no room for human invention to show itself. It calls only for plodding accuracy and diligent obedience.
- Redemption holds. Each frame stood upright in bases of silver: believers are "upheld on the basis of redemption."
- Gold holds. The wood was overlaid with gold: those same believers are "covered with Christ."
- Bars hold. Gifts lock the separate frames into one building, but a bar needs a ring — the gift needs a readiness to receive it.
- Pins hold. The smallest peg braces the whole against forces too strong for us alone. To touch it was a greater dignity than a throne.
- Sorrow is the cost of holding. Merari's name means bitterness. Setting up silver in barren sand gives self-love nothing. It calls only for "plodding accuracy and diligent obedience."
and the pillars of the court round about, and their bases, and their pegs, and their cords.
This verse ends the list of what Merari's family carried — no golden vessels, no curtains, just the fence around the court and the hardware that held it up. Why would God name tent pegs and ropes at all, and why give one family that work for life?
The tabernacle was God's tent at the centre of Israel's camp, and the Levites were the tribe who carried it. Merari's share was all structure: frames, bars, pillars, bases, pegs, cords. One writer sees a picture of the church in that framework.
Merari had charge with his sons of the boards, the sockets, pins and cords. These held the building together... The framework of the tabernacle joins the boards with bars of acacia wood. It is a picture of the building we read about in Ephesians — "the whole structure, being joined together" — the church. The work of Merari suggests the thought of union.
The court was the outer fence around God's tent, and the bases are the sockets its pillars stood in. Pegs in the ground held the cords that steadied them. One writer reads each material here as a picture of the Christian life.
The pillars of the court stand on copper sockets and carry silver tops. The fine linen curtains hang from them by silver hooks. So grace enables us to hold up before the world the character of Christ, and divine strength is what we rest on while we do it. The pins and cords come in further to brace it all against opposing forces that are too much for our unaided strength.
Commentators differ on who the pillars stand for. Another writer sees Christ in them.
The pillars of the court were made of copper and rested on copper sockets. They speak of Christ as the One who holds His people up. The hooks that held up the curtains were silver, the picture of redemption. So in holding His people up, He also unites them together. Merari's work therefore highlights the ministry that unites believers to Christ and to one another, resting on the redemption that is in Christ Jesus.
Merari's job began the moment the camp stopped. He had to set up God's dwelling on open desert ground. One writer applies that to anyone who takes a stand for Christ in the world.
Let anyone take his stand firmly in the world for Christ. Let him go into the places where "the world" is seen in its full force. Let him set himself, firm as a rock, against the deep and rapid tide of worldliness, and there let him begin to set up "the sockets of silver." Be sure of it: he will find such a course brings very much sorrow and bitterness of soul. He will find it a path where the cross is to be taken up "daily," and not only taken up, but carried... There are very few of the hard-working Merarite character to be found. Why is this? Simply because showing such a character will always cost nature very much labour and sorrow, and nature loves ease. So human nature never could be a Merarite. Nothing will make us true Merarites but deep communion with Him who was the Man of Sorrows.
A peg is the least impressive object in the whole list. What raises it is not the peg but what it belongs to.
Doing what we are told always has moral worth. But there was also a special dignity in the work of a Merarite, even though that work was only looking after a few "pins" or "sockets." Everything connected with the tabernacle was of the deepest interest and highest value... To touch the smallest pin of that wonderful tent in the wilderness was a holy dignity and privilege. It was far more glorious to be a Merarite looking after the pins than to hold the sceptre of Egypt or Assyria.
No Levite picked his own load. God handed each family its task.
Nothing is more important in practice than that each servant of God should know the work He has given him to do. And when he knows it, he should stick to it. Be sure of this too: it is of no small importance never to interfere with another's service. The Lord is sovereign in this. He divides according to His own will.
It is tempting to admire the sacred vessels and the curtains and write off the thankless part of the work. One writer imagines letting Merari's family go and keeping the other two.
Why not let this sad-faced Merarite go, with his pins and cords of the tabernacle always getting tangled, and be content with Kohath and Gershon? But if the Lord's tabernacle is to be set up in the wilderness, we must have the pins and cords.
- Union. Merari's frames, bars, pegs and cords held the building together — a picture of the church joined into one.
- Bracing. The pegs and cords existed to steady the pillars against forces stronger than they were on their own.
- Cost. Setting up God's dwelling out in the world is sorrowful, daily, cross-carrying work. That is why so few take it up.
- Dignity. The smallest peg belonged to God's own tent. Handling it outranked holding the sceptre of Egypt.
- Assignment. No Levite chose his load; know the work given you, stick to it, and never interfere with another's.
And those who encamped before the tabernacle eastward, before the tent of meeting toward the sunrising, were Moses, and Aaron and his sons, who kept the charge of the sanctuary for the charge of the children of Israel; and the stranger that cometh near shall be put to death.
Numbers 3 gives each Levite family its post around God's tent. This verse fills the last side of that inner square — Moses, Aaron and his sons at the front, facing the entrance — and it raises two questions: why the east, and why an outsider who came near had to die.
The camp formed rings. Twelve tribes made the outer square. The Levite families closed three sides of an inner square, and this verse supplies the fourth.
To complete the inner circle of residents around the tabernacle, Moses, Aaron and his sons take the east side (v.38). That is the front. They guard, as it were, the entrance of the court, keeping charge of the sanctuary. Any outsider who trespassed on what belonged to the priests was to be put to death.
They did not choose their spot. It faced the one way in to God.
Three tribes on each side of the court kept the tabernacle of Jehovah. Levi alone was the exception, to be consecrated to the service of God. So the tribe of Levi camped by families right around the court. Moses, Aaron, and the priests took the place facing the entrance, the way of approach to God.
God fixed each family's place and each family's work.
Levi had three sons, Gershon, Kohath and Merari, and each of them became the head of a section of the tribe. God gave each section a special service connected with the tabernacle, and each pitched its tents in a set position round the tabernacle. They arranged nothing for themselves.
The care behind these details had a purpose.
All was laid down with the greatest possible care. God would rule out confusion in the service of the tabernacle, and rule out any room for human will. He would make it the humblest thing on earth — a matter of simple obedience.
Their front position set the priests beside one particular tribe.
At the front are Moses and the priestly family of Aaron, so they stand in direct relationship with the tribe of Judah. Priesthood and praise go together. Levi takes the place of the firstborn of all the tribes spared in Egypt. They are "joined" to the priesthood as a connecting link between worship and warfare.
Later builders copied this east-facing layout.
In putting up their religious buildings (cathedrals and the like) men have copied the position. But true priestly instincts will always hold the sunrise in their affections (Numbers 3:38).
Where a tent stood in that camp said something about it.
Facing the east, the tents of Moses and Aaron guard the entrance to the court of the tabernacle. (Num. 3:38.) … Here, again, the eastward position is that of honour.
Later, Israel said that anyone who came near the tabernacle would die. One writer shows what that fear cost them.
They said that anyone who came near the tabernacle would die, and the result is that they are forbidden to come near. From then on the people of Israel must not "come near the tent of meeting, lest they bear sin and die" (Numbers 18:22). Their unbelief and mistrust of God does more damage to their standing before God than their earlier presumption did. They are brought down to the level of the outsider. "Any outsider who came near was to be put to death." Now Israel can come no nearer than the outsider; that privilege is lost.
These men stood in for Israel's firstborn, who were spared in Egypt on the night of judgment.
The grace of God had exempted those whom the Levites answered for in the time of judgment. So the Levites were identified with mercy — the great distinguishing mercy that rescued Israel from the doom of Egypt. That fitted them all the better for the service of the sanctuary. Who can dare to take up the service of God without knowing that God has accepted him on the ground of redemption? Salvation precedes ministry.
- Redeemed. Mercy spared Israel's firstborn in Egypt, and the Levites stood in their place — salvation comes before service.
- Assigned. Every family's tent and task was fixed by God, leaving no room for human will and making the work "a matter of simple obedience."
- Front. Moses, Aaron and his sons filled the east side, facing the one way of approach to God.
- Guarded. Their charge protected the way in; an outsider who pushed past it forfeited his life.
- Facing the dawn. The place of honour looked toward the sunrise, and true priestly instinct still keeps that direction in view.
All that were numbered of the Levites, whom Moses and Aaron numbered at the commandment of Jehovah, according to their families, all the males from a month old and upward, were twenty-two thousand.
Numbers 3 ends its count of Levi with one figure: 22,000 males. That is the size of the company God took for Himself in place of Israel's firstborn — and, as the next verses show, it falls short.
Levi stands apart in the count because God claimed this tribe for Himself. The reason goes back to a night in Egypt:
Verse 12 of Numbers 3 unveils the secret behind the special place of the Levites: God chose them "instead of all the firstborn." In Egypt, God had spared the firstborn of the Israelites because of the blood of the Passover lamb. This was the price by which the firstborn had been redeemed. As a result they belonged to God. Now, this is the place God gave the Levites: He chose them instead of all the firstborn. A Levite would therefore regard himself as redeemed by God and so as God's possession.
Chapter 1 counted fighting men from twenty years old. For Levi the line falls at one month, and the substitution explains why:
The difference between the numbering of the tribe of Levi and the other tribes must be noted. The previous chapter counted men who were twenty years old and over. The count of Levi took in "every male from a month old and upward." This difference was because they stood in the place of the firstborn. The firstborn were either redeemed or given up at that tender age of weakness and helplessness.
Infants could carry nothing. That is part of the point:
They are numbered from a month old and upward, as the firstborn are, and for the same reason. If only men in their strength were to be redeemed or numbered, would it not look as if God took "pleasure in the legs of a man"? But it is the soul He values, and the soul of an infant is precious in His sight: His "delight" is "in the sons of men."
Add up the three clan figures earlier in the chapter and the sums do not agree. Commentators admit it:
The number of the Levites is given as 22,000. If we add the number of the Gershonites, Kohathites and Merarites — 7,500, 8,600 and 6,200 — we get 22,300. Here is a difficulty which seems to remain unsolved. The total in verse 39 must be correct. Verse 46 tells us that the firstborn outnumbered the Levites by 273.
The Levites were counted to replace the firstborn. The two numbers did not match:
Then the day came to count the Levites (remember, they were replacing the firstborn). As it turned out, there were 22,000 Levites, but there were 22,273 firstborn. In other words, the Levites were short of 273 people. A coincidence? A negligible difference? Hardly. God notes the difference and commands a ransom to be paid for the 273 missing Levites.
Silver covered the gap, and the silver carries a lesson:
To make up this difference, the Lord said the 273 would be redeemed by paying five shekels of silver for each person. It is not likely that 273 people each had to give five shekels. More likely the tribes shared the cost of redeeming the 273. This was to be given to the priests, Aaron and his sons, since the Levites were also given to them. Silver was used in such cases to illustrate the truth of redemption. But we must always remember that today "you were ransomed… not with perishable things such as silver or gold… but with the precious blood of Christ" (1 Peter 1:18-19).
The shortage never went away:
Over the course of history, the lack of Levites became more pronounced. In the time of Ezra and Nehemiah, Levites were scarce. We find just 74 in Ezra 2, and when, in chapter 8, Ezra sends eleven men to search for Levites, they find only 38. Today, there is still a search for Levites: people willing to carry the burden that goes with God's testimony.
Commentators read the Levites as a picture of service, and the priests as a picture of drawing near to God:
In Numbers 3 we have the Levites set apart, according to the thoughts of God, for service. They are a figure of the church — or rather of the members of the church in their service. In the same way, the priests are the figure of Christians drawing near to the throne of God. Both are a shadow, not a perfect image.
- Redeemed — the Levites stand where the firstborn stood. The blood of the lamb spared those firstborn in Egypt, so they belonged to God.
- Counted — from a month old, not twenty, because God values the soul, not the strength of a man's legs.
- Short — 22,000 Levites against 22,273 firstborn. God notices the 273 and asks a ransom of five shekels each, shared by the tribes.
- Unsolved — the clan totals add up to 22,300. Commentators admit the gap with verse 39 is still a difficulty.
- Wanted — few then, fewer in Ezra's day, and still sought now: those willing to carry the burden of God's testimony.
And Jehovah said to Moses, Number all the first-born males of the children of Israel from a month old and upward, and take the number of their names.
Moses has just counted the tribe of Levi; now God has him count the firstborn sons of every other tribe, name by name, from a month old. Why does God count people at all, and why does He want one tribe standing in for the eldest sons of the rest?
A census is an act of ownership.
He had the right to take their number, for they were all His own. If He had no right to them, if He had nothing to look for in them, He would not have counted their total. Scripture says the same about His divine title in another part of His realm: "He determines the number of the stars; He gives to all of them their names." This is the expression of His sovereignty among the heavenly hosts. (Psalm 147:4.)
God has a specific reason for this count. He is making a swap, and He wants exact numbers on both sides.
The Levites were to be dedicated to the Lord in place of the firstborn in Israel. So it was necessary to find out how closely the number of the Levites matched the number of the firstborn. That is why the Lord told Moses to number all the firstborn males, from one month and above, just as Moses had numbered the Levite males (v.40).
God's claim on the firstborn did not come out of nowhere. It rests on a rescue He paid for.
If God redeems through sacrifice and judgment, He claims those whom He redeems... So every firstborn son in Israel was bought with a price — the price of the blood of the Passover Lamb, a picture of the precious blood of Christ.
The Levites stood in for people God had already spared. One writer asks what that means for anyone who wants to serve God.
God's grace had spared the firstborn whom the Levites stood for when judgment fell. This tied the Levites to mercy — the great, distinguishing mercy that rescued Israel from the doom of Egypt. It fitted them all the better for the service of the sanctuary. Who dares to take up the service of God without knowing that God has accepted him on the ground of redemption? Salvation comes before ministry, if we listen to God and fear the solemn warning of the Lord and His apostle.
Moses counted Israel's fighting men from twenty years upward. Here the line falls at one month.
In the previous chapter Moses numbered those who were twenty years old and over. But the Levites were numbered "every male from a month old and upward." The difference was that they stood in the place of the firstborn. At that tender age of weakness and helplessness, the firstborn were either redeemed or given up.
The same age limit shows what God values in those He counts.
They are numbered from a month old and upward, as the firstborn are, and for the same reason. If only men in their strength were to be redeemed or numbered, would it not look as if God took "pleasure in the legs of a man"? (Ps. 147:10.) But it is the soul He values, and the soul of an infant is precious in His sight.
The two figures did not match. The gap was small enough to ignore.
As it turned out, there were 22,000 Levites, but there were 22,273 firstborn (Num. 3:39-42). In other words, the Levites were short by 273 people. A coincidence? A negligible difference? Hardly. God notes the difference and commands a ransom to be paid for the 273 missing Levites (v. 46, 47).
The shortage did not stop there. It became a pattern in Israel's later history.
Over the course of history, the shortage of Levites grew worse. In the time of Ezra and Nehemiah, Levites were scarce... Today the search for Levites goes on: people willing to carry the burden that goes with God's testimony.
- Claimed. God's claim on the firstborn dates from the night in Egypt; those He redeems by blood, He owns.
- Counted. He numbers what is His own — the count itself is the proof of the title, as He numbers and names the stars.
- Valued. God counts from a month old, not from fighting age. He is not measuring strength; He values the soul.
- Substituted. The Levites are taken in place of the firstborn, and the swap is exact to the last 273, who are redeemed by a price.
- Serving. Mercy is what fits a person for service — salvation first, ministry after. And the search for willing Levites has never closed.
And thou shalt take the Levites for me (I am Jehovah) instead of all the firstborn among the children of Israel; and the cattle of the Levites, instead of all the firstlings among the cattle of the children of Israel.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And Moses numbered, as Jehovah had commanded him, all the firstborn among the children of Israel.
Numbers 3 ends with an unusual census: not soldiers, but the firstborn son of every family in Israel, counted one by one against the tribe of Levi. Why does God claim these sons, and what happens when the numbers do not match?
The claim goes back to the night Israel left Egypt. Death passed over every house marked with the blood of a lamb.
Verse 12 of Numbers 3 reveals the secret behind the special place of the Levites: God chose them "instead of all the firstborn." In Egypt, God had spared the firstborn of the Israelites because of the blood of the Passover lamb. That blood was the price that redeemed them. So they belonged to God.
So the claim does not rest on being a creature. It rests on being sheltered — and one writer carries that on to Christians today.
Of course, every creature ought to serve God. But He made this claim only on those whom He had sheltered from judgment. Generation after generation were to learn that claim and the ground it rests on (Exodus 13:14-16)... Christians, as we learn in Hebrews 12:23, are the assembly of firstborn ones... sheltered from divine judgment, like the firstborn males of Israel, we should accept His claim on us to serve Him. It is His claim, and there is no doubt about that. Yet seen in another light, we can and should call it a privilege — the privilege of serving our God, as the Levites did.
The count exists because God is making a swap. He takes the whole tribe of Levi in place of the firstborn sons of the other tribes.
Jehovah took them instead of the firstborn sons of the whole nation. The blood in Egypt had sheltered those firstborn sons from judgment, and Jehovah claimed them as His own. But He took the tribe of Levi instead of them for special service in His house and for His Name. They were a privileged people, called to give themselves to God's interests, and He gave them special care (Numbers 3:40-51 tells us all about this).
The line here falls at a month old, so babies are in the list. That choice carries its own message.
They are numbered from a month old and upward, as the firstborn are, and for the same reason. If only men in their strength were to be redeemed or numbered, would it not appear as if God took "pleasure in the legs of a man"? (Ps. 147:10.) But it is the soul He values, and the soul of an infant is precious in His sight: His "delight" is "in the sons of men."
A census can look like cold bookkeeping. In Numbers it says something about who owns the people being counted.
This was an expression of His rights as Lord of Israel. He had title to take their number, for they were all His own. If He had no right to them, and no plans for them, He would not have counted their total. The same is said of His divine title in another part of His realm: "He determines the number of the stars; He gives to all of them their names."
Moses' total came to 273 more firstborn sons than there were Levites. God did not waive the extra ones.
When the census was taken, the number of the firstborn in Israel exceeded the number of the Levites by 273. God claimed these 273 just as much as the 22,000 who had a Levite as a substitute. So five shekels each had to be paid for them as redemption money... Our chapter again stresses the principle that redemption comes before the service of God.
That silver carries a meaning, but it is only a picture.
It is not likely that 273 people each had to give five shekels. More likely the tribes shared the cost of redeeming the 273... Silver in such cases pictures the truth of redemption. But we must always remember that today we are "ransomed... not with perishable things such as silver or gold, but with the precious blood of Christ" (1 Peter 1:18-19).
- Blood — God's claim goes back to the night He sheltered them from judgment in Egypt. Blood was the price, so they were His.
- Exchange — He took the tribe of Levi instead of those sons, for the work of His house. They were a privileged people, called to His interests and cared for by Him.
- Every soul — The count starts at a month old, because it is the soul God values, and the soul of an infant is precious to Him.
- Title — He numbers because He owns; the God who counts the stars and names them counts His people too.
- Shortfall — God still claimed the 273 who had no Levite substitute. Silver redeemed them — a picture of the precious blood of Christ. Redemption always comes before service.
And all the firstborn males, by the number of the names, from a month old and upward, according to their numbering, were twenty-two thousand two hundred and seventy-three.
God ordered this census for one purpose. He was taking the tribe of Levi in place of the firstborn sons of Israel, and the two lists had to match man for man. The totals do not quite match, and what God does about that small gap is where the meaning lies.
The two lists almost matched. One commentator works through the numbers and the gap:
The count of Levite males came to 22,000 (v.39). Now the number of the firstborn was very close to the same, but 273 larger than the number of the Levites (v.43). To make up this difference, the Lord set a redemption price of five shekels of silver for each of the 273 (vv.46-47). It is not likely that 273 people were each required to give five shekels, but rather that the tribes should share the cost of redeeming the 273. The money went to the priests, Aaron and his sons, since God had given the Levites to them too. In such cases silver illustrated the truth of redemption. But we must always remember that today we are not ransomed "with perishable things such as silver or gold, but with the precious blood of Christ" (1 Peter 1:18-19).
God counted the firstborn "from a month old and upward" — the same age as the Levites. One writer sees a reason for counting infants:
They are numbered from a month old and upward, as the firstborn are, and for the same reason. If only men in their strength were to be redeemed or numbered, would it not appear as if God took "pleasure in the legs of a man"? (Ps. 147:10.) But it is the soul He values, and the soul of an infant is precious in His sight.
Another writer sees God's eye on a servant long before the service begins:
When counting the people, the normal threshold was 20 years (Num. 1:3). The Levites were an exception. Everyone was counted, almost from birth (from a month old – Num. 3:15). Does this detail not show that God takes notice of everyone He intends to use in His service, even from the earliest age? Paul tells us that God had "separated him", and not only from the time of his conversion but "from his mother's womb".
No Levite could be found for the extra 273. God claimed them all the same:
When the census was taken, the number of the firstborn in Israel exceeded the number of the Levites by 273. These God claimed equally with the 22,000 for whom a Levite was found as a substitute, and so five shekels apiece had to be paid for these as redemption money. According to Exodus 13 the firstborn were to be redeemed at their birth. Our chapter again stresses the principle that redemption comes before the service of God. Did the Levites during Israel's history realize that God brought them into His service only as redeemed people? That may be open to question. But we should not miss the fact pictured here.
The claim goes back to the night in Egypt. One writer names the price paid then, and what it means for us now:
All the firstborn among the children of Israel were bought with a price, the price of the blood of the Passover Lamb, a picture of the precious blood of Christ. The basis of the Lord's claim upon the Levites was the destruction of the firstborn of Egypt. If God redeems through sacrifice and judgment, He claims those whom He redeems. Now all these things were pictures, written for our instruction. They show that we belong to the Lord, on the ground of redemption, as completely as the Levites did. We are not speaking here of gifts, or of those called out for service in a special and extraordinary way, but of all Christians. All alike have been redeemed, bought with a price, and are therefore the Lord's servants.
The shortfall is small — barely one percent — yet the record preserves it. One writer refuses to treat it as a rounding error:
As it turned out, there were 22,000 Levites, but there were 22,273 firstborn (Num. 3:39-42). In other words, the Levites were short of 273 people. A coincidence? A negligible difference? Hardly. God notes the difference and commands a ransom be paid for the 273 missing Levites.
The same writer traces that shortage forward into Israel's later history, where those willing to serve grew fewer still:
Over the course of history, the lack of Levites became more pronounced. In the time of Ezra and Nehemiah, Levites were scarce. We find just 74 in Ezra 2, and when, in chapter 8, Ezra sends 11 men to search for Levites, they find only 38. Today, Levites are still being looked for: those who are willing to bear the burden connected with God's testimony.
- Claimed. The firstborn belonged to God. The Passover blood had spared them in Egypt, and God claims those He redeems.
- Counted. God counted them from a month old, not from fighting age. He values the soul, and He notices His servants from the earliest age.
- Short. The Levites fell 273 people short of the firstborn, and God refused to let that small gap pass unnoticed.
- Ransomed. Five shekels each covered the gap, paid to the priests. Redemption always comes before service.
- Wanted. Levites grew scarcer through Israel's history. The search for those willing to carry God's work has never ended.
And Jehovah spoke to Moses, saying,
The count is finished, and the numbers do not match: Israel has more firstborn sons than Levites to stand in their place. God speaks to Moses again to settle it, and He shows both why He claims Israel's firstborn and what it costs to make that claim exact.
The exchange God commands here is not a matter of convenience. It reaches back to the night in Egypt. Blood spared Israel's firstborn, and God kept what He had saved.
The Lord took them in a very special way as the formal substitute for the firstborn of Israel, who were spared when the destroying angel struck Egypt. They were redeemed by blood, and they plainly belonged to the Lord. In place of Israel's firstborn He accepted the Levites. "They shall be Mine." ... So the Levites were linked with mercy — the great mercy that marked Israel out and rescued them from the doom of Egypt. That link fitted them all the better to serve in the sanctuary.
God does not accept a rough match. The tribe of Levi covers the firstborn as far as it goes. Every man past that number must still be redeemed.
The substitution was made so solemnly and so exactly that the 273 firstborn of Israel who were more than the number of the Levites all had to be redeemed. The price was God's own estimate of their value. Now all these things were pictures, and they are written to teach us that we belong to the Lord, on the ground of redemption, as fully as the Levites did.
Silver covers the shortfall, at a fixed rate, and it goes to the priests. One writer thinks the tribes carried that cost, not the 273 men themselves.
To make up this difference, the Lord commanded that the 273 be redeemed at five shekels of silver each. Probably the 273 men did not each pay five shekels themselves. Instead, the tribes shared the cost of redeeming them. The money went to the priests, Aaron and his sons, because the Levites were also given to them. The total came to 1,365 shekels.
Money could settle this case. But silver was only a picture of a better price.
Their fathers had been redeemed with silver and gold. That was a picture of redemption, carried out under Jewish law. Sometimes actual money was paid, as in Exodus 30:11-16 and Numbers 3:44-51. Sometimes it was by sacrifice, as in Exodus 13:13-15. Even then silver and gold came into it, because money was needed to buy the animal for the sacrifice. Silver and gold are the least corruptible of metals, yet they are corruptible. The price of our redemption was incorruptible and precious.
The order matters, and one writer presses it home as a question.
Who can dare to take up the service of God without knowing that God has accepted him on the ground of redemption? Salvation comes before ministry, if we listen to God and take to heart the solemn warning of the Lord and His apostle (Matthew 7:22; 1 Corinthians 9:27).
Commentators see the Levites as a picture of believers today: claimed by God, then given over to serve.
The Levites were to be offered to God in place of the firstborn. God took all the firstborn to Himself when He struck down the firstborn of the Egyptians. The firstborn outnumbered the Levites, so the rest were redeemed. This is a picture of the saints seen as firstborn ones, and as redeemed. They are wholly claimed as God's, and given to Aaron (that is, to Christ), to serve in God's house. He is set as Lord over that house.
The writer quoted earlier is careful about who this covers.
In saying this, we are not speaking of "gifts," or of those called out for service in a special and extraordinary way. We are speaking of all Christians. All alike have been redeemed, bought with a price, and are therefore the Lord's servants.
One writer follows that shortfall of 273 forward, and finds the shortage never ended.
God notices the difference and commands that a ransom be paid for the 273 missing Levites. ... As history went on, the lack of Levites grew worse. In the days of Ezra and Nehemiah, Levites were scarce. Only 74 are listed in Ezra 2, and when Ezra sends eleven men to look for Levites in chapter 8, they find only 38. Today, Levites are still being looked for: those willing to bear the burden connected with God's testimony.
- Claimed. God's right to the firstborn dates from the night He spared them in Egypt; the blood that saved them also bought them.
- Counted. The swap is exact — one Levite for one firstborn, and every extra man is written down.
- Covered. The 273 left over cost five shekels each — 1,365 shekels, paid to Aaron and his sons.
- Costly. Silver settled the picture; the real price behind it cannot decay.
- Consecrated. Redemption comes first, service follows — the Levites belonged to God before they served, and so do His people.
Take the Levites instead of all the firstborn among the children of Israel, and the cattle of the Levites instead of their cattle; and the Levites shall be mine I am Jehovah.
On the night God passed through Egypt, He claimed every firstborn son of Israel, and here He names the exchange that settles the claim: a whole tribe taken in their place, animals and all. Why does God accept a substitute, and what does it mean to belong to Him?
The claim behind this verse reaches back to the night the destroying angel passed through Egypt.
The LORD took them in a very special way as the formal substitute for Israel's firstborn, who were spared when the destroying angel struck Egypt. Blood had redeemed them, and they were counted, beyond all doubt, as belonging to the LORD. In place of Israel's firstborn He accepted the Levites. "They shall be mine." So they stand as the lasting witness that the firstborn belong to the LORD, from man as well as from beast. In the day of judgment God's grace had spared the very ones they match. The Levites are therefore tied to mercy — the great mercy that set Israel apart and rescued them from the doom of Egypt. That fitted them all the better to serve in the sanctuary.
The exchange is not symbolic or approximate. It is counted out, and it includes the animals.
Since the Levites were to be dedicated to the Lord in place of the firstborn in Israel, it was necessary to ask how closely the number of the Levites matched the number of the firstborn. So the Lord told Moses to number all the firstborn males, from one month old and upward, as the Levite males had been numbered (v. 40). Verse 41 also notes that the livestock of the Levites would take the place of the firstborn livestock of the other tribes, though we are not told that the livestock were numbered.
Normally a firstborn son was bought back with money. What happens here stands outside that pattern.
The normal method, and the one that was to hold good for all time, was a money payment of five shekels to the priest (Num. 18:16). There was one exception, and only on one occasion. It is the one before us now. We call it an exception because this transaction was never repeated, though it held good for ever. The tribe of Levi was taken instead of the firstborn males of the twelve tribes, as far as man could be exchanged for man. The extra firstborn among the people of Israel were then redeemed by five shekels each, according to the shekel of the sanctuary, which was fixed at twenty gerahs.
It is easy to read this exchange as though the Levites absorbed a punishment.
The redemption we are speaking of here was in no sense a redemption from judgment. People have too often confused the two. There is a redemption from divine judgment, and every child of God shares in it. That is provided by the blood of Christ (Eph. 1:7; Col. 1:14). Now the redemption of the firstborn males was in no way like that. This will be clear to the simplest reader if he notices two things. The clean animal could not be redeemed at all. And the males of Israel were redeemed at the outset, when the Levites were taken in their place, as far as that could be done. Were the Levites chosen to bear divine punishment instead of the firstborn males of the twelve tribes? No. They were taken to minister to Aaron.
The count did not come out even.
When the census was taken, the number of the firstborn in Israel was 273 more than the number of the Levites. God claimed these 273 just as much as the 22,000 who each had a Levite as a substitute. So five shekels had to be paid for each of them as redemption money. According to Exodus 13 the firstborn were to be redeemed at their birth. Our chapter stresses again the principle that redemption comes before the service of God.
What made the Levites servants was whose they were.
Here is the true character of service — "first gave themselves to God," then God employs them… The service of the Levites was entirely the result of their being the Lord's. "The Levites shall be mine." For as it is written, "you are not your own, for you were bought with a price." It is a blessed thing to say, "My beloved is mine." But it is greater progress and a deeper joy to say, "I am His."
The firstborn son and the Levite who replaced him together sketch two sides of one life.
The firstborn, seen this way, has a double history from his redemption onward, and so do we. First he dies in his substitute, then he lives as a servant in the Levite… So the Israelite father might say, "My son has died in that lamb." That history ends there. But even so, "I live." Now we have a new life — "Christ who lives in me." At this point we have the Levite before us: saved from death, but devoted to God.
- Mine by blood. God's claim goes back to the night He spared Israel's firstborn. Blood redeemed them, and He counted them as His.
- Mine by exchange. God takes a whole tribe, man for man and cattle for cattle — a transaction never repeated, yet holding good for ever.
- Mine, down to the last 273. God overlooks no one. Five shekels are paid for each of the 273 extra, because redemption comes before service.
- Mine, but not punished. This is not redemption out of judgment. The Levites were taken to serve Aaron, not to bear a penalty.
- Mine, therefore Yours to use. Service follows ownership. The firstborn died in his substitute and lived on in the Levite, and the redeemed can say, "I am His."
And for those that are to be ransomed, the two hundred and seventy-three of the firstborn of the children of Israel, which are in excess over the Levites,
In this chapter God counts the tribe of Levi alongside the firstborn sons of Israel, man for man. The firstborn outnumber the Levites by 273. This verse deals with that surplus. Why did God claim the firstborn at all? And what does a payment of silver settle that a substitute could not?
Why did God own these firstborn sons at all? It goes back to Egypt, where the blood of the Passover lamb spared their lives.
First, notice that the basis of the Lord's claim on the Levites was the destruction of the firstborn of Egypt. If God redeems through sacrifice and judgment, He claims those He redeems... So all the firstborn among the children of Israel were bought with a price — the price of the blood of the Passover Lamb, a picture of the precious blood of Christ.
Paying five shekels for a firstborn son was the standing rule in Israel. What happens here is different — a swap of one whole tribe for a nation's firstborn, done once and never repeated.
The normal method, as we would call it, and the one that was to hold good for all time, was a money payment of five shekels to the priest (Num. 18:16). There was one exception to this, and only on one occasion. That is what we are looking at now. We call it an exception because it was a transaction that was never repeated, though it held good for ever. The tribe of Levi was taken instead of the firstborn males of the twelve tribes, as far as man for man such an exchange could be made.
273 out of more than twenty-two thousand is a rounding error by any human accounting. God stops and legislates for it.
As it turned out, there were 22,000 Levites, but there were 22,273 firstborn (Num. 3:39-42). In other words, the Levites were short of 273 people. A coincidence? A negligible difference? Hardly. God notes the difference and commands a ransom be paid for the 273 missing Levites.
Who paid the money is worth asking.
It is not likely that 273 people each had to give five shekels. More likely the tribes shared the cost of redeeming the 273. The money went to the priests, Aaron and his sons, since the Levites were given to them too. The total came to 1365 shekels.
The next verse fixes the price "according to the shekel of the sanctuary," twenty gerahs to the shekel — God's own weight, not the market's.
The word comes from a root meaning to weigh — at first, perhaps, to balance. It is what forms a true estimate of the value of things. The shekel of the sanctuary, or sacred shekel, may have been heavier than the usual one... One thing we know: the shekel of the King of kings would be just and unchanging.
It is easy to read this payment as buying a child out of condemnation. One writer argues that it is not that at all.
So the redemption we are speaking of here was in no sense redemption from judgment, though the two have too often been confused. There is a redemption from divine judgment, and every child of God shares in it. The blood of Christ provides that... This will be clear to the simplest reader if he notices two things: the clean animal could not be redeemed at all, and the males of Israel were redeemed at the outset when the Levites were taken in their place... Were the Levites chosen to bear divine punishment instead of the firstborn males of the twelve tribes? No. They were taken to serve Aaron.
The silver went to the priests, and where it went carries the lesson.
The redemption money was handed to Aaron for the service of God, showing that it met His claims on the redeemed. Let us never forget that as redeemed people we belong to God. On that fact rests the life of service to His Name, to which we are committed.
Commentators read the Levites as a picture of Christians for this reason.
Each Levite stood for a firstborn man in Israel. The eldest sons who were more than the number of that tribe were redeemed for five shekels of silver each. So the Levites were, in a special way, a redeemed company. Clearly they picture Christians, both in our redemption and in the claim God has on us for service as redeemed people.
- Claimed — God owned Israel's firstborn because the blood of the lamb spared them in Egypt. Redemption is what creates His claim.
- Exchanged — God took the Levites in their place, man for man. The swap was never repeated, yet it held good for ever.
- Counted — The extra 273 were too few for a statistician to notice, and too many for God to ignore. Each cost five shekels.
- Weighed — The sanctuary shekel set the price, twenty gerahs — God's estimate of value, not the market's.
- Given — The money went to Aaron and his sons. The redeemed belong to God, and they are redeemed into His service. Commentators add that this payment was not a ransom from judgment. That redemption comes by the blood of Christ, not by silver.
thou shalt take five shekels apiece by the poll, according to the shekel of the sanctuary shalt thou take them, -- twenty gerahs the shekel;
Numbers 3 ends with an arithmetic problem that God Himself solves. God had taken the tribe of Levi in place of Israel's firstborn sons, but 273 firstborn were left over. This verse sets their price: five shekels each, weighed by the sanctuary standard of twenty gerahs.
The count left a shortfall, and silver settled it. One writer walks through the figures and names who paid and who received.
The count of the Levite males came to 22,000 (v. 39). Now the number of the firstborn was very close to the same, but 273 larger than the number of the Levites (v. 43). To make up this difference, the Lord told them to redeem the 273 by paying five shekels of silver for each person (vv. 46-47). It is not likely that each of the 273 paid five shekels himself; more likely the tribes shared the cost of redeeming them. The money went to the priests, Aaron and his sons, since the Levites were also given to them. The total amounted to 1,365 shekels.
A gap of 273 could look too small to bother with. God did not treat it that way.
When the Levites were counted, there were 22,000 of them, but there were 22,273 firstborn (Num. 3:39-42). In other words, the Levites were short of 273 people. A coincidence? A negligible difference? Hardly. God notes the difference and commands a ransom be paid for the 273 missing Levites (v. 46, 47).
The same writer traces that shortage forward through Israel's history.
Over the course of history, the lack of Levites became more pronounced. In the time of Ezra and Nehemiah, Levites were scarce. We find just 74 in Ezra 2, and when, in chapter 8, Ezra sends 11 men to search for Levites, they find only 38. Today, there is still a search for Levites: those who are willing to bear the burden connected with God's testimony.
The verse names which shekel to use, and defines it. Everyday trade in Israel may have used another weight.
The Old Testament mentions two shekels. One goes by "the king's weight," and was probably the standard shekel used for all ordinary business (Ex. 38:29; Joshua 7:21; 2 Sam. 14:26; Amos 8:5). The other is called the "shekel of the sanctuary," and of it we read, "the shekel is 20 gerahs" (Ex. 30:13; Lev. 27:25; Num. 3:47; Num. 18:16). This implies perhaps that the common shekel was different.
Convenience had no say in the matter. The standard came from God's house.
One more law held firm through all these dealings. "And all your valuations shall be according to the shekel of the sanctuary: twenty gerahs shall be the shekel." Israel might wish to pay with whatever coin was most convenient in their dealings with the nations. But as in relation to the temple service and their redemption price, so here they must make their payments "according to the shekel of the sanctuary."
The payment is not an afterthought tacked onto a census.
God claimed these 273 extra firstborn just as much as the 22,000 for whom a Levite stood in as a substitute, and so the people had to pay five shekels apiece for them as redemption money. According to Exodus 13 the firstborn were to be redeemed at their birth. Our chapter again stresses the principle that redemption comes first and service follows.
One writer presses a careful distinction here about what this money did and did not buy.
The redemption we are speaking of here was in no way redemption from judgment, though people have too often confused the two. There is a redemption from divine judgment, and every child of God shares in it. That is provided by the blood of Christ (Eph. 1:7; Col. 1:14). The redemption of the firstborn males was nothing like that. … Were the Levites chosen to bear divine punishment instead of the firstborn males of the twelve tribes? No. They were taken to minister to Aaron.
Silver was a picture, and pictures have limits.
They knew, and so do we, that we are redeemed with the precious blood of Christ. Their fathers had been redeemed with silver and gold — a redemption under Jewish law that pictured something greater. Sometimes they paid actual money, as in Exodus 30:11-16 and Numbers 3:44-51. … Silver and gold are the least corruptible of metals, yet they are corruptible. The price of our redemption was incorruptible and precious.
- Counted — 22,000 Levites stood in for 22,273 firstborn. God counted the 273 short rather than passing over them.
- Ransomed — five shekels covered each of the 273 left over, 1,365 shekels in all, paid to Aaron and his sons. The tribes likely shared the cost.
- Weighed — the price used the sanctuary shekel of twenty gerahs, not whatever coin was handiest in trade.
- Claimed — redemption came first, service after. The Levites were taken to minister to Aaron, not to bear punishment.
- Surpassed — silver pictured redemption, but silver corrupts. The price paid for believers was incorruptible and precious.
and thou shalt give the money unto Aaron and unto his sons for those in excess among them who are to be ransomed.
The count of Levi came up 273 short of the firstborn sons of Israel, and God required a payment for every extra son. This verse names the price and the hands it went into, raising three questions: why silver, why Aaron, and what the arrangement says about belonging to God.
Levi had been taken in exchange for the firstborn of the whole nation, man for man, as far as the numbers would stretch. They did not stretch far enough.
The Levite males numbered 22,000 (v.39). The number of the firstborn was very close to the same, but 273 larger than the number of the Levites (v.43). To make up this difference, the Lord instructed that the 273 be redeemed by paying five shekels of silver for each one (vs.46-47). It is not likely that 273 men each had to give five shekels. More likely the tribes shared the cost of redeeming the 273. This money went to the priests, Aaron and his sons, since the Levites too were given to them.
The money is weighed out "according to the shekel of the sanctuary." One writer explains what that standard was.
The word comes from a root meaning to weigh, and perhaps at first to balance. It is what forms a true estimate of the value of things. The shekel of the sanctuary, or sacred shekel, may have weighed more than the usual one... One thing we know: the shekel of the King of kings would be just and never changing, for "unequal weights and unequal measures are both alike an abomination to the LORD" (Prov. 20:10). This shekel was divided into twenty gerahs.
A five-shekel payment was the standing rule for firstborn sons. The exchange with Levi was the one-off exception:
The normal method, as we would call it, and the one that was to hold good for all time, was a money payment of five shekels to the priest (Num. 18:16). To this there was an exception, but only on one occasion... We call it an exception because it was a transaction that was never repeated, though it held good forever. The tribe of Levi was taken instead of the firstborn males of the twelve tribes, as far as man for man there could be such an exchange.
The silver went to the priest. Where it went says something about who the redeemed now belong to.
Aaron received the redemption money for the service of God, which showed that it met His claims on the redeemed. Let us never forget that as redeemed people we belong to God. That fact is the basis of the life of service to His Name that we are committed to.
It is easy to read "redemption price" as a payment that turns away punishment. One writer says this is not what happens here, and gives two reasons from the text.
The redemption we are speaking of here was in no sense redemption from judgment, though people have too often confused the two. There is a redemption from divine judgment, and every child of God shares in it. The blood of Christ provides that (Eph. 1:7; Col. 1:14). The redemption of the firstborn males was nothing like that. This will be clear to the simplest reader if he notes two things. The clean animal could not be redeemed at all. And the males of Israel were redeemed at the start by the Levites being taken in their place, as far as that could be done. Were the Levites chosen to bear divine punishment instead of the firstborn males of the twelve tribes? No. They were taken to serve Aaron.
One writer reads Aaron here as standing for Christ, and the whole arrangement as a picture of believers.
The Levites were to be offered to God in place of the firstborn, all of whom God took to Himself when He struck the firstborn of the Egyptians. Since the firstborn outnumbered the Levites, the rest were redeemed. This is a picture of the saints seen as firstborn ones and as redeemed. They are wholly claimed as God's and given to Aaron (that is, to Christ), to serve in God's house, over which He is set as Lord.
Silver could settle the account for 273 boys in the desert. It could never settle more than that.
They knew, and so do we, that we are redeemed with the precious blood of Christ. Their fathers had been redeemed with silver and gold — a redemption in picture form, carried out under Jewish law. Sometimes actual money was given as in Exodus 30:11-16; Numbers 3:44-51... Silver and gold are the least corruptible of metals, yet they are corruptible. The price of our redemption was incorruptible and precious.
- Counted — Levi fell 273 short of the firstborn, and God required a price for every extra son.
- Priced — five shekels each, weighed by the sanctuary standard. God fixed that measure, not the payer.
- Handed over — the silver went to Aaron, showing that God's claim on the redeemed was met.
- Owned — redemption is what makes a person God's, and being God's is the ground of a life of service.
- Surpassed — silver is the least corruptible metal, yet it still corrupts. The price that redeems us is the precious blood of Christ.
And Moses took the ransom-money from them that were over and above those who were ransomed by the Levites;
Numbers 3 ends with an exchange: God takes the tribe of Levi in place of Israel's firstborn sons, man for man — but the firstborn outnumber the Levites by 273. Verse 49 records Moses collecting silver for that surplus, which raises two questions: why did God claim these sons, and why did 273 matter?
The claim goes back to the night God struck the firstborn of Egypt, when the blood of the Passover lamb marked Israel's homes. From that night the firstborn sons of Israel belonged to God.
All the firstborn among the children of Israel were bought with a price, the price of the blood of the Passover Lamb... From chapters 3 and 4 we learn that afterwards all the Levites were taken instead of the firstborn of the children of Israel. The transaction that made the substitution was so solemn and exact that the 273 firstborn of the children of Israel, who were more than the number of the Levites, all had to be redeemed according to God's estimate of their value.
The chapter's arithmetic is what creates verse 49. One writer works through the totals and shows who carried the cost.
The count of Levite males came to 22,000. The number of the firstborn was very close to the same, but 273 larger than the number of the Levites. To make up this difference, the Lord told them to redeem the 273 by paying five shekels of silver for each one. It is not likely that 273 people each had to give five shekels. More likely the tribes shared the cost of redeeming the 273. This was to be given to the priests, Aaron and his sons, since the Levites were also given to them.
The shortfall looks small enough to ignore.
The Levites were short of 273 people. A coincidence? A negligible difference? Hardly. God notes the difference and commands a ransom be paid for the 273 missing Levites.
God fixed the price, and He weighed it against His own standard. The word shekel itself points to weighing.
The word comes from a root meaning to weigh — at first, perhaps, to balance. It is that which forms a true estimate of the value of things. The shekel of the sanctuary, or sacred shekel, may have been heavier than the usual one... One thing we know: the shekel of the King of kings would be just and unvarying, for "unequal weights and unequal measures are both alike an abomination to the LORD" (Proverbs 20:10).
The five-shekel payment was not invented for this moment. It was the permanent price for a firstborn son — what made this occasion unusual was the swap of a whole tribe.
The normal method, as we would call it, and the one that was to hold good for all time, was a payment of five shekels to the priest (Numbers 18:16). To this there was an exception, but only on one occasion... It was a transaction that was never repeated, though it held good for ever. The tribe of Levi was taken instead of the firstborn males of the twelve tribes, as far as man for man such an exchange could be made. The surplus of the children of Israel were then redeemed by five shekels each.
What kind of redemption is this? One writer answers with a sharp distinction.
The redemption we are speaking of here was in no sense redemption from judgment. People have too often confused the two. There is a redemption from divine judgment, and every child of God shares in it. That is provided by the blood of Christ. Now the redemption of the firstborn males was in no sense like that... Were the Levites chosen to bear divine punishment instead of the firstborn males of the twelve tribes? No. They were taken to serve Aaron.
Moses did not keep the silver or give it back. It went to Aaron the priest.
The redemption money was handed to Aaron for the service of God, showing that it met His claims on the redeemed. Let us never forget that as redeemed people we belong to God. The life of service to His Name that we are committed to rests on that fact.
- Claimed — the Passover blood spared Israel's firstborn on the night Egypt's firstborn died. They were bought with a price, so they were God's.
- Substituted — a whole tribe was accepted in their place, man for man, as far as the numbers of Levi could stretch.
- Counted — 273 had no Levite to stand for them, and God refused to treat the shortfall as too small to matter.
- Priced — five shekels each, by the sanctuary standard: the just and unvarying measure of the King of kings.
- Serving — the silver passed to Aaron for the service of God. What met God's claim also became the ground of a life given to Him.
of the firstborn of the children of Israel he took the money, a thousand three hundred and sixty-five [shekels], according to the shekel of the sanctuary.
The 1,365 shekels here were a redemption price for the firstborn sons of Israel who had no Levite to stand in their place. Two questions sit behind the number: why did God claim these children, and what could silver buy?
The number comes from subtracting one census from another:
The count of Levite males came to 22,000 (v.39). The number of the firstborn was very close to the same, but 273 larger than the number of the Levites (v.43). To make up this difference, the Lord required five shekels of silver to redeem each of the 273 (vv.46-47). Most likely the 273 did not each give five shekels themselves. Instead the tribes shared the cost of redeeming them. The money went to the priests, Aaron and his sons, since the Levites too were given to them. The total came to 1,365 shekels.
God's claim on these children goes back to the night Israel left Egypt:
The basis of the Lord's claim on the Levites was the destruction of the firstborn of Egypt. If God redeems through sacrifice and judgment, He claims those whom He redeems. So all the firstborn among the children of Israel were bought with a price — the price of the blood of the Passover Lamb, a picture of the precious blood of Christ. From chapters 3 and 4 we learn that afterwards God took all the Levites instead of the firstborn of the children of Israel. The substitution was so solemn and exact that the 273 firstborn beyond the number of the Levites all had to be redeemed according to God's own estimate of their value.
The verse names a price and also the standard that weighs it. Israel traded with other nations and could have paid in their coin:
One law applied without exception throughout these transactions. "And every valuation shall be according to the shekel of the sanctuary: twenty gerahs shall make a shekel." Israel might wish to pay with whatever coin was most convenient in their dealings with the nations. But as with the temple service and their redemption price, so here they had to make their payments "according to the shekel of the sanctuary." ... We are under grace, not law. But what a serious error to think that we as Christians are left to our own will or wisdom! We are bought with an infinite price, and we are in no way our own.
The law treated three cases differently, and that difference shows what this payment was not:
God required redemption for the males of Israel. For the firstborn male of a donkey it was optional, and depended on the owner's will. For the firstborn male of a clean animal it was impossible. That went onto God's altar. So the redemption we are speaking of here was in no sense redemption from judgment, though people have often confused the two. There is a redemption from God's judgment, and every child of God shares in it. The blood of Christ provides it. But the redemption of the firstborn males was nothing like that. Even the simplest reader can see it. The clean animal could not be redeemed at all. And God redeemed the males of Israel at the start by taking the Levites in their place, as far as that could be done. Did God choose the Levites to bear His punishment instead of the firstborn males of the twelve tribes? No. He took them to serve Aaron.
The chapter sets an order the Levites themselves may not have grasped:
Our chapter again emphasises the principle that redemption comes before the service of God. Did the Levites through Israel's history realise that they came into God's service only as a redeemed people? That may be open to question. But we should not miss this fact, which is set out here in picture form.
Silver settled the account for these 273. It could never settle the deeper one, and the payment was only a picture:
Their fathers had been redeemed with silver and gold — a redemption in picture form, carried out under Jewish law. Sometimes they gave actual money, as in Exodus 30:11-16 and Numbers 3:44-51... Silver and gold are the least corruptible of metals, yet they are corruptible. The price of our redemption was incorruptible and precious.
- Counted. The census left 273 firstborn with no Levite to stand for them, and God required a price for each one.
- Claimed. The firstborn were His because blood had spared them in Egypt — bought first, then counted.
- Weighed. God fixed the price by the sanctuary shekel, twenty gerahs — His estimate of their value, not the market's.
- Commissioned. God took the Levites to serve Aaron, not to bear punishment. Redemption came first, service followed.
- Surpassed. Silver and gold are the least corruptible metals, yet they still corrupt. The price of our redemption was incorruptible and precious.
And Moses gave the money of them that were ransomed to Aaron and to his sons, according to the commandment of Jehovah, -- as Jehovah had commanded Moses.
Israel's firstborn sons outnumbered the Levites who stood in their place, so silver had to cover the gap. Here Moses hands that silver over — and commentators ask what it bought, who took it, and what it pictures for us.
The sum in this verse comes from a gap in the numbers. One writer shows how the count worked out and who paid:
The count of Levite males came to 22,000 (v.39). The number of the firstborn was very close to that, but 273 larger (v.43). To make up this difference, the Lord told them to redeem the 273 by paying five shekels of silver for each person (vs.46-47). Probably the 273 did not each pay five shekels themselves. Instead the tribes shared the cost of redeeming them. The money went to the priests, Aaron and his sons, since the Levites were also given to them. The total amounted to 1365 shekels.
God claimed the extra 273 as fully as the rest, and someone had to pay for each of them:
When they took the census, the firstborn in Israel outnumbered the Levites by 273. God claimed these 273 just as He claimed the 22,000, who each had a Levite as a substitute. So five shekels of redemption money had to be paid for each of them. According to Exodus 13 the firstborn were to be redeemed at their birth. Our chapter again stresses the principle: redemption comes first, before the service of God.
The silver went to Aaron, and where it went carries the point of the verse:
The redemption money was handed to Aaron for the service of God, showing that it met His claims upon the redeemed. Let us never forget that as redeemed people we belong to God. On this fact rests the life of service to His Name, the life we are committed to.
Writers read Aaron here as a picture of Christ, and the redeemed as those handed over to Him for His use:
The Levites were to be offered to God in place of the firstborn, all of whom God took to Himself when He struck down the firstborn of the Egyptians. The firstborn outnumbered the Levites, so the rest were redeemed. This is a picture of the saints, seen as firstborn ones and as redeemed. They are wholly claimed as God's, and given to Aaron (that is, to Christ). They serve in God's house, and He is set as Lord over it.
It is easy to read the five shekels as a payment that saved these sons from punishment. One writer warns against that reading, and argues from the animals in the same law:
So the redemption we speak of here was in no sense redemption from judgment. People have too often confused the two. There is a redemption from divine judgment, and in that every child of God shares. That is provided by the blood of Christ (Ephesians 1:7; Colossians 1:14). Now the redemption of the firstborn males was in no sense like that. Even the simplest reader will see this clearly. Notice that the clean animal could not be redeemed at all. Notice too that the Levites were taken in place of the males of Israel at the outset, and so redeemed them as far as that could be done. Were the Levites chosen to bear divine punishment instead of the firstborn males of the twelve tribes? No. They were taken to minister to Aaron.
One writer sets a payment like this one beside the price that redeems us:
They knew, and so do we, that we are redeemed with the precious blood of Christ. Their fathers had been redeemed with silver and gold. That redemption under Jewish law was a picture of something greater. Sometimes actual money was given, as in Exodus 30:11-16 and Numbers 3:44-51. Sometimes it was by sacrifice, as in Exodus 13:13-15. Even then silver and gold came into it, since they bought the animal used for sacrifice. Silver and gold are the least corruptible of metals, yet they are corruptible. The price of our redemption was incorruptible and precious.
- Counted — The firstborn outnumbered the Levites by 273, and God claimed every one of them.
- Bought — Five shekels each, 1,365 shekels in all, and the tribes carried the cost, not the 273 alone.
- Given — The silver went to Aaron, meeting God's claim on the redeemed and marking them out as His.
- Different — This was not a ransom from judgment. The Levites served the priest; they did not bear punishment.
- Surpassed — Silver wears away. The price here points past itself to the precious blood of Christ.