And in Jerusalem dwelt some of the children of Judah and of the children of Benjamin. Of the children of Judah Athaiah the son of Uzziah, the son of Zechariah, the son of Amariah, the son of Shephatiah, the son of Mahalaleel, of the children of Pherez;
Nehemiah 11 turns from the rebuilt walls to the people who would live inside them. Verse 4 opens the list of settlers from Judah and Benjamin, and it raises two questions: why did the city need filling, and why record these family lines?
The verse names two tribes and no others. That detail carries weight:
Of Judah there were in the holy city "four hundred and sixty-eight valiant men" — all "sons of Perez" or Pharez. They are traced back to the son of Judah, as evidence that they could show their genealogy. Of Benjamin there were nine hundred and twenty-eight… We find strong confirmation here that only the two tribes, Judah and Benjamin, or representatives of these, were brought back from Babylon, apart from the priests and Levites.
That leaves ten tribes unaccounted for:
As tribes, Judah and Benjamin only were restored, and so the remaining ten tribes are "lost" to this day, hidden, in the ways of God, among the peoples of the earth. But the time is fast approaching when they will be brought out of their hiding place, and set in security and blessing in their own land under the peaceful rule of their glorious Messiah.
Settling in Jerusalem was not a promotion. It cost the settler the very things God had given him to enjoy:
This assembling in the holy city required much self-forgetfulness and devotion. The godly Israelite had to abandon the very inheritance he valued above all else. He had to leave those close to him, his vine and his fig tree. He had to exile himself willingly from things he had every reason to hold on to, since God had given them to him. He had to do so with no other purpose than to re-populate Jerusalem. But he was encouraged by a very high motive for this self-denial. He had understood that Zion was "the holy city," the city of God's free choice, the city which He loved more than any of the dwellings of Jacob.
The city itself was not a safe place:
It must be explained that Jerusalem was not then a very desirable place to live. The city's enemies were always at work, trying to destroy the fortifications and harm the people living there. There was much danger for anyone who lived in the city itself.
Athaiah's line ends at a name much older than Nehemiah's day. Perez is also spelled Pharez:
Son of Judah and Tamar, his daughter-in-law, through whom David descended. Gen. 38:29; Ruth 4:18; Matt. 1:3; Luke 3:33… The Hebrew is the same as PEREZ in 1 Chr. 27:3; Neh. 11:4, 6.
The name itself means a breaking out, and the line matched it:
Pharez, the "breaker forth," breaks out into abundant fruit, which fills up all the later history of Judah. From this line come her kings, and her great King.
Exile could have erased these records. It did not:
The record of their genealogy shows that they had not forgotten the land of their birth, and had not lost their identity among the nations. They had continued to prize their descent from Abraham as their greatest heritage, because it had placed them among a people favoured by Jehovah, among whom He Himself had dwelt. These, then, were not like Esau, who despised his birthright. They clung to it, through all their trouble and disgrace, as their God-given title to all their national expectations and hopes… The Jew kept this record by guarding the written proof of his descent. The Christian can only do so by walking in obedience, in the power of a Spirit he has not grieved.
Verse 4 places only certain men of Judah and Benjamin in Jerusalem. The rest of the chapter puts their brothers in the outlying towns. That balance guards against a wrong use of the walls:
This distribution shows that the walls were not built to confine the people of God, or to shut them out. Children of Judah and Benjamin, priests and Levites lived outside the walls as well as inside. That was right, according to the ordering of God.
Everything depends on how the walls are used:
Rightly used, the walls maintain the holiness of God's house. In this way they secure the privileges of God's house for all the people of God. If abused, they simply become the badge of a party and the security of a sect.
- Named. Verse 4 opens a register of the settlers, family by family — names Scripture takes the trouble to record.
- Costly. A place inside Jerusalem meant leaving vine and fig tree for a city still in danger. It was devotion, not advantage.
- Traced. Athaiah's line runs back to Perez — the family of Judah's kings, and of her great King.
- Kept. Exile had not made these families forget who they were. They held their birthright as their title to hope.
- Shared. Some lived inside the walls and some outside. The walls guarded God's house for all His people, not a privileged few.
and Maaseiah the son of Baruch, the son of Col-hozeh, the son of Hazaiah, the son of Adaiah, the son of Joiarib, the son of Zechariah, the son of Shiloni.
Nehemiah 11 records who settled in the rebuilt capital, and verse 5 names Maaseiah of Judah with a long line of ancestors behind him. Why does a book about walls and gates stop to list a family tree?
The men named in this chapter were not moving into a prize location. The city was still half-ruined and open to attack. Moving in meant taking a risk most returned exiles avoided.
These two verses give a fine example of self-sacrifice. Certain men willingly offered themselves to live in Jerusalem, and the people blessed them for the willing sacrifice. We should explain that Jerusalem was not then a very desirable place to live. The enemies of the city were constantly active, trying to destroy the fortifications and harm the inhabitants. There was much danger for those who lived inside the city itself. For this reason the great majority of the returned captives preferred to live outside the walls of Jerusalem.
Maaseiah's name stands among them.
Verse 5 sits in a short list of Judah's settlers, with a matching list for Benjamin beside it. The numbers point to a larger fact about the return from exile.
In the holy city there were "four hundred and sixty-eight valiant men" of Judah. All were "sons of Perez"; that is, their line goes back to that son of Judah, as evidence that they could show their genealogy. Of Benjamin there were nine hundred and twenty-eight… Here we find plenty of confirmation of one fact. Apart from the priests and Levites, only the two tribes, Judah and Benjamin, or representatives of them, returned from Babylon.
The last words of the verse point to a family, and behind that family is another of Judah's sons.
Descendants of Shelah, son of Judah. Numbers 26:20. Apparently called Shilonites in 1 Chronicles 9:5.
So Judah is represented in the city by two branches: the sons of Perez, and Maaseiah from the line of Shelah. One reference work reads the name as a man's, and notes a different rendering in an older English translation:
Father of Zechariah. Nehemiah 11:5. But the passage may be read "Zechariah, the son of the Shilonite," as in the Revised Version.
A list of fathers looks like filler until you remember where these families had just come from. Seventy years in a foreign land could have erased their identity.
It would have been no wonder if they had settled down in the country where they had been exiled. In the daily business of their lives they might have forgotten the land of their birth — they, or at least their children born in Babylon. They might have stopped remembering Jerusalem above their greatest joy, and lost their nationality by mixing with the Gentiles. The record of their genealogy shows that they had not done so… It is a great thing for saints at any time to keep the record of their genealogy. The Jew did it by guarding the written proof of his descent. The Christian can only do so by walking in obedience, in the power of an ungrieved Spirit. He alone can enable us to cry "Abba, Father," and He Himself bears witness with our spirit that we are the children of God.
The written line also had a practical use at the gate of the city.
Presenting their title was necessary (see Ezra 2:59, 62) for their claim to live in the holy city to be accepted. And as in Ezra, so here: the responsibility for producing the title rested on those who made the claim.
One name in Maaseiah's line has appeared earlier in this same book. Col-hozeh had another son on the building crew:
Son of Col-hozeh: he helped to build the wall of Jerusalem. Nehemiah 3:15.
The household that repaired a section of the wall also supplied a man to live inside it.
The chapter does not stop at names. It also records the work each settler did.
Notice again that despite the devastation of Jerusalem, everyone who came to live in it finds a place to occupy. Here we have those who "did the work of the house" (v. 12) and those who were "over the outward work of the house of God" (v. 16). There are those who sing thanksgiving in prayer (v. 17), those who keep watch at the gates (v. 19), and the singers (v. 22). In a word, each one of them fulfils his functions as though everything were in order and, for His part, God takes account of this.
- Cost. Living in Jerusalem meant real danger from active enemies. Most of the returned exiles chose the country towns instead.
- Choice. The people blessed those who volunteered for their willing sacrifice. Maaseiah's name stands among the settlers who went in.
- Line. "Son of the Shilonite" ties him to Shelah, son of Judah — a second branch of Judah alongside the sons of Perez.
- Proof. Their written line was both their title to live in the holy city and proof that Babylon had not erased their identity. The Christian keeps his by obedience, in the power of an ungrieved Spirit.
- Place. The register gives every settler work — the house, the gates, the singing — and God takes account of it.
All the children of Pherez that dwelt in Jerusalem were four hundred and sixty-eight valiant men.
Nehemiah 11 records who settled in Jerusalem once the walls were rebuilt. This verse counts the men of one family, ties them to Judah's son Perez, and calls them valiant — and each of those three details carries weight.
These men are not just counted. They are traced to one ancestor.
In the holy city, Judah had "468 valiant men" — all "sons of Perez." That is, they are traced back to the son of Judah, as evidence that they could show their genealogy. Here we find plenty of confirmation that, apart from the priests and Levites, only the two tribes, Judah and Benjamin, or representatives of these, were brought back from Babylon. As tribes, only Judah and Benjamin were restored. So the remaining ten tribes are "lost" to this day, hidden, in the ways of God, among the peoples of the earth. But the time is fast approaching when they will be brought out of their hiding place, and set in security and blessing in their own land under the peaceful rule of their glorious Messiah.
The name Perez carries its own meaning.
Perez, the "breaker forth," breaks out into a huge family, which fills all the later history of Judah. From him come her kings, and her great King.
A man could not simply claim a place inside the walls.
The record of their genealogy shows… that they had kept on prizing their descent from Abraham as their greatest heritage. It had put them among a people favoured by God, a people among whom He Himself had dwelt… What is more, they had to present their title before their claim to live in the holy city could be admitted. As in Ezra, so here — and we would stress this: the responsibility of producing the title rested on those who made the claim. It is well to remember this in a day of profession. All alike, on the ground of that profession, assert their rights to the most blessed privileges of Christianity. They treat it as a proof of narrowness and lack of love if their demands are not recognized at once.
Living in Jerusalem was the dangerous choice, not the safe one.
The opening of this chapter gives a splendid example of self-sacrifice. Certain men willingly offered themselves to live in Jerusalem, and the people blessed them for the willing sacrifice. Jerusalem was not then a very desirable place to live. The enemies of the city were constantly active, seeking to destroy the walls and harm the people inside. So most of the returned captives preferred to live outside the walls. It was decided that every tenth man should live in Jerusalem, and the decision was made by lot. But then these volunteers came forward and showed self-denial and courage.
Filling the city by lot said something about the size of the remnant.
The need for such a method made clear how few had returned to God's Land. We have already learned that "the city was wide and large, but the people within it were few" (7:4). And yet, if their numbers were small their zeal for the house of God was great.
Living inside the walls was not the only right place to be.
This distribution shows that the walls were not built to fence God's people in, or to shut them out. Children of Judah and Benjamin, priests and Levites lived outside the walls as well as within. That was right, because God had ordered it so.
Lists of names like this can look like dead weight.
The rest of the chapter records the names of those who did live there. It also gives some details of their positions and the work they did. Their names may mean little to us, but they may matter in the coming day of Israel's restoration and blessing.
- Traced — The 468 stand under one name, Perez, as proof that they could show their descent from Judah. As tribes, only Judah and Benjamin came back.
- Titled — No one entered the holy city without proof of descent. The burden of proving it lay on the man who made the claim.
- Costly — Jerusalem lived under constant threat, so most chose the towns outside. That is why the men who settled in the city are called valiant.
- Few — The lot and the low totals expose real weakness, yet the zeal of these few for God's house was great.
- Kept — Their names carry little weight with us, but they stand on record for the day of Israel's restoration.
And these are the children of Benjamin Sallu the son of Meshullam, the son of Joed, the son of Pedaiah, the son of Kolaiah, the son of Maaseiah, the son of Ithiel, the son of Isaiah;
Nehemiah and the people had rebuilt the wall, but the city stood nearly empty. Nehemiah 11 answers the obvious question: who would live inside? Verse 7 opens the Benjamin part of the list, tracing one man, Sallu, back through seven fathers.
The chapter sorts the people group by group, and each group came in a different size.
The subject of Chapter 11 is the distribution of the people in the city and the province. This distribution gave Jerusalem a certain number of the children of Judah (4-6), and of Benjamin (7-9); a good number of priests (10-14); some Levites (15-18); and the gatekeepers (19).
Moving inside the walls cost something, and most people avoided it.
Here is a splendid example of self-sacrifice. Certain men willingly offered themselves to live in Jerusalem, and the people blessed them for the willing sacrifice. Jerusalem was not then a very desirable place to live. The enemies of the city were always at work, trying to destroy its defences and harm the people in it. There was much danger for those who lived in the city itself. So most of the returned captives preferred to live outside the walls of Jerusalem.
So what drew them in? Not the sight of the place.
While Jerusalem lay in ruins, she could attract the people of God in only one way. They had to see her with the eyes of faith, from the viewpoint of her future glory. Going to Jerusalem meant leaving everything else behind. That took a decision which faith alone could give and hope alone could sustain. It could be nothing but an act of love and willing devotion for the city of the great King. It was a self-denial that not everyone shared, and that God did not demand of them.
The pairing of these two tribes in the register is itself evidence about who came back from Babylon — Benjamin being the small tribe settled next to Judah.
In the holy city Judah had "468 valiant men" — all "sons of Perez." The record traces them back to the son of Judah, as evidence that they could show their genealogy. Benjamin had 928… Here we find plenty of confirmation that, apart from the priests and Levites, only the two tribes, Judah and Benjamin, or representatives of these, were brought back from Babylon… As tribes, only Judah and Benjamin were restored. So the remaining ten tribes are "lost" to this day, hidden, in the ways of God, among the peoples of the earth. But the time is fast approaching — perhaps not until Christ appears — when God will bring them out of their hiding place and set them in security and blessing in their own land, under the peaceful rule of their glorious Messiah.
Why list seven fathers? Because seventy years in Babylon could have erased a people's memory of home.
For seventy years they had been in Babylon. We know ourselves how strongly such a place shapes people. It would have been no wonder if they had settled down in the land of their exile. It would have been no wonder if the work and business of daily life had made them — or at least their children born in Babylon — forget the land of their birth. They could have stopped remembering Jerusalem above their chief joy. They could have lost their nationality by mixing with the Gentiles. The record of their genealogy shows that they had not done so… It is a great thing for saints at any time to keep the record of their genealogy. The Jew did it by guarding the written testimony to his descent. The Christian can only do so by walking in obedience.
The wall named in these lists was never a line dividing better people from worse.
Children of Judah and Benjamin, priests and Levites lived outside the walls as well as inside. That was right, according to the ordering of God. Remember that a whole nation went into captivity, not only the citizens of Jerusalem. And it was a remnant of this nation that returned.
Nehemiah's list is not the only record of these names.
Here is another register of names recorded in God's book, and not forgotten by Him. Some day the Lord will be their Rewarder for their faithful service, as He will be the Rewarder of all His people.
- Named in place — verse 7 opens the Benjamin list, set beside Judah: the two tribes that came home from Babylon.
- Named at cost — enemies pressed the city, so most preferred life outside the walls; those who moved in gave something up.
- Named by faith — the ruined city held no attraction; only faith in her future glory and love for the great King could move a man there.
- Named by descent — seven fathers behind one man show a people who kept their record through seventy years in Babylon.
- Named by God — the register stands in His book, and He will reward the service it represents.
and after him, Gabbai, Sallai, nine hundred and twenty-eight
Nehemiah 11:8 is one line in a list of names: 928 men of Benjamin settled in Jerusalem after Sallu. Why record a bare number? Because moving into the rebuilt city cost these men a great deal.
(The English Standard Version calls these men "men of valor." Older translations read the two words as names: "Gabbai, Sallai." The writers quoted below follow the older reading.)
The chapter divides the returned people between the capital and the country towns. One writer reads the totals and says which tribes they prove came back:
In the holy city there were "four hundred and sixty-eight valiant men" of Judah. They were all "sons of Perez"; that is, they are traced back to the son of Judah. This was evidence that they could show their genealogy. Of Benjamin there were nine hundred and twenty-eight. We find here plenty of confirmation that, apart from the priests and Levites, only the two tribes, Judah and Benjamin, or representatives of these, were brought back from Babylon.
A city with new walls sounds like a prize. The chapter's opening verses show it was not:
These two verses give a splendid example of self-sacrifice. Some men freely offered to live in Jerusalem, and the people blessed them for their willing sacrifice. Jerusalem was not then a very desirable place to live. Its enemies never stopped trying to destroy the fortifications and harm the people inside. Living in the city itself was dangerous. So most of those who came back from exile preferred to live outside the walls.
Each man counted here left land of his own behind. One writer names what the move cost and the motive that made it worth it:
This assembling in the holy city required much self-forgetfulness and devotion. The devoted Israelite had to abandon the very heritage he valued above all else. He had to leave those close to him, his vine and his fig tree. He had to exile himself by choice from things he had every reason to hold on to, since God had given them to him. And he had to do it with no other purpose than to re-populate Jerusalem. But the very high motive for this self-denial encouraged him. He had understood that Zion was "the holy city" (vv. 1, 18). It was the city of God's free choice, the city which He loved more than any of the dwellings of Jacob.
Lists of names like this look like dead weight. One writer reads them as God's own record:
Here is another register of names recorded in God's book, and not forgotten by Him. The list names the children of Judah and the children of Benjamin. It names the priests who acted as temple officials, the Levites, the Nethinim, and those with special callings. Some day the Lord will be their Rewarder for their faithful service, as He will be the Rewarder of all His people.
The same chapter also lists families settled in the country towns. One writer warns against a misuse of the rebuilt walls:
The walls and gates were not put up so that a few inside might claim an exclusive right to the house of the Lord. They were not put up to shut out those outside from coming to the house. If those inside had made such a claim, it would have been the height of presumption. It would also have been the worst possible abuse of the walls and gates. It would have meant using them to exalt themselves, to shut many of the Lord's people out of their privileges, and to deny the rights of the Lord.
The chapter goes on to name the jobs people held. Nobody moved in to be idle:
Notice again that despite the devastation of Jerusalem, everyone who came to live in it finds a place to fill. Here we have those who "did the work of the house" (v. 12) and those who were "over the outward work of the house of God" (v. 16). There are those who sing thanksgiving in prayer (v. 17), those who keep watch at the gates (v. 19), and the singers (v. 22). In a word, each one carries out his duties as though everything were in order. And for His part, God takes account of this.
- Cost — Jerusalem was dangerous, so most people chose the country towns. The 928 men of Benjamin accepted the risk.
- Choice — the move meant leaving inherited land and family. One thing made the loss worth it: God had chosen this city.
- Count — the numbers show that, apart from priests and Levites, Judah and Benjamin were the tribes brought back from exile.
- Reach — God's people lived inside the walls and outside them. Using the walls to shut others out would have been an abuse of them.
- Reward — every name stands in God's book, every settler had work to do, and the Lord Himself will be their Rewarder.
and Joel the son of Zicri was their overseer, and Judah the son of Senuah was second over the city.
The list of Benjamin's settlers in Jerusalem ends with two men put in charge — one over the Benjaminites, one second over the city. Why does Scripture record the officers of a half-empty town, and what does oversight mean when God's people are so few?
The verse names two otherwise unknown men, and a reference work fixes each in his post. Of the first:
Joel. Son of Zichri, and overseer of the Benjaminites in Jerusalem. Nehemiah 11:9.
The verse closes one block of an ordered census. One writer lays out the arrangement:
Chapter 11 is about how the people settled in the city and the province. This distribution puts in Jerusalem a certain number of the children of Judah (4-6), and of Benjamin (7-9); a large number of priests (10-14); some Levites (15-18); and the gatekeepers (19).
These officers are Benjaminites, and the list sets them beside Judah. That points to who came back from exile in Babylon:
Naming overseers over so small a population may look like paperwork. One writer reads it as the mark of a people who still respected God's arrangements:
Everything was to be done in a fitting and orderly way. Each man was to do the work God appointed him, and each had his own proper place.
The ruins did not shrink anyone's place:
Notice again that despite the devastation of Jerusalem, everyone who came to live in it finds a place to fill. … In a word, each one carries out his duties as though everything were in order — and for His part, God takes account of this. All this happens, without doubt, in a time of misery and ruin. But is it a small thing in God's eyes that they recognised the order He had set up, and carried it out despite the ruin, looking on to a time of perfection still to come? This poor remnant in Jerusalem has the noble and valuable task of linking the time of Solomon's past glory with the time of the Messiah's coming glory — and they do it during days of humiliation and shame!
It is easy to skim these names. One writer suggests they matter less for us than for a day still ahead:
The rest of the chapter records the names of those who did live there. It also gives some details of their positions and the service they gave. Their names may mean little to us, but they may be important in the coming day of Israel's restoration and blessing.
Does this pattern of appointed officers carry over to the church? One writer draws a contrast, not a parallel:
It was all well organized. We do not find such appointments in the New Testament. But we do find the Spirit of God present. He can arrange everything in a better and more orderly way than any scheme of appointing people to each sort of service.
Another writer, reading the same chapter, presses the warning that separation can be misused — walls rightly kept guard the holiness of God's house, but abused they "simply become the badge of a party, and the security of a sect."
- Place. Every settler had a post, down to the two officers who close the Benjamin list. No one was spare in a half-built city.
- Proof. The men of Judah in the holy city traced their line back to Perez, Judah's son. They could show their genealogy.
- Remnant. These officers show who came back: Judah and Benjamin, with the priests and Levites. The other ten tribes stay hidden, still to be brought home.
- Order. Keeping God's order in a time of ruin is no small thing in His sight. They served as though all were well, and He took account of it.
- Record. God writes down names that mean little to us. They may matter in the coming day of Israel's restoration and blessing.
Of the priests Jedaiah [the son of] Joiarib, Jachin,
Nehemiah had finished the walls, but the city inside them stood half empty, so people had to move in. This verse opens the list of priests who did — names only, and we may ask why God recorded them.
The chapter is a list of who settled where, and verse 10 opens one of its groups.
The subject of Chapter 11 is the distribution of the people in the city and the province. This distribution filled Jerusalem with a certain number of the children of Judah (4-6) and of Benjamin (7-9). It also brought in a large number of priests (10-14), some Levites (15-18), and the gatekeepers (19).
Being on this list was no promotion. It put a man where the danger was.
These two verses give a splendid example of self-sacrifice. Certain men offered themselves of their own accord to live in Jerusalem, and the people blessed them for the willing sacrifice. It should be explained that Jerusalem was not then a desirable place to live. The enemies of the city never stopped working to destroy its defences and harm the people in it. There was much danger for those who lived in the city itself. So most of the returned captives preferred to live outside the walls of Jerusalem. One man in ten was to live in Jerusalem, and the lot decided which men. But then these volunteers came forward and showed self-denial and courage.
What made anyone choose it was not what the eye could see.
In the middle of her present ruin, Jerusalem could attract the people of God only if they looked at her with the eyes of faith, from the viewpoint of her future glory. To go there and leave everything else took a decision that faith alone could give and hope alone could sustain. It could only be an act of love and free devotion to the city of the great King. Such self-denial was not everyone's portion, and God did not require it of them.
"Jedaiah the son of Joiarib" — the chapter keeps naming fathers. The years in exile explain why that care mattered.
For seventy years they had been in Babylon. It would have been no wonder if they had settled down in the country of their exile. They, or at least their children born in Babylon, could have forgotten the land of their birth and lost their nationality by mixing with the Gentiles. The record of their genealogy shows that they had not done so. They had gone on prizing their descent from Abraham as their chief heritage. It had put them among a people favoured by Jehovah, a people among whom He Himself had dwelt. So these were not like Esau, who despised his birthright. They clung to it through all their trouble and reproach, as their God-given title to all their national expectations and hopes.
The priests' names run on to verse 14, where the chapter counts them and says what they did.
From verse 10 to verse 14, we have the account of the priests... Altogether they numbered 1,152. Of these Seraiah was "the ruler of the house of God," while no fewer than 822 did the work of the house. This was a blessed privilege for both, whatever the responsibilities that went with the offices God had given them in His grace.
Nothing about the setting was impressive. Yet every person on the list took up a real post.
Notice again that despite the devastation of Jerusalem, everyone who came to live in it finds a place to fill... In a word, each one does his work as though everything were in order, and God, on His side, takes account of this. All this happens in a time of misery and ruin. But in God's eyes, is it a small thing that they recognise the order He set up, and keep to that order despite the ruin, looking on to a time of perfection still to come? This poor remnant of Jerusalem has a noble and valuable mission: it links the past glory of Solomon with the coming glory of the Messiah. And it does this in days of humiliation and shame.
Priests appear on both sides of this chapter — some in the city, others out in the towns. That balance guards against a wrong use of the walls.
Rightly used, the walls maintain the holiness of God's house and so secure the privileges of God's house for all the people of God. If abused, they simply become the badge of a party and the security of a sect.
- Place — The chapter sorts out who lives where. Verse 10 opens the block of priests who settled inside Jerusalem.
- Price — The city was dangerous, so most stayed outside. Those who moved in were volunteers, and the people blessed them.
- Pedigree — The chapter names fathers because exile never erased these families' descent. They held it as their God-given title to every promised hope.
- Purpose — One man ruled the house of God and 822 did its work. God gave both the office and the plain service in grace, and both were a privilege.
- Pattern — In a ruined city each man still filled the post God gave him, and God took account of it. They linked past glory to the glory still coming.
Seraiah the son of Hilkijah, the son of Meshullam, the son of Zadok, the son of Meraioth, the son of Ahitub, the ruler of the house of God.
A list of the priests who settled in Jerusalem after the exile stops on one man. It traces his family line back six generations to Ahitub and names his office over the house of God. So why does God record a chain of names, and what does it mean to rule His house? (The ESV says "chief officer of the house of God." The older wording quoted below is "ruler of the house of God.")
A priest's right to serve rested on his family line. The list was his proof.
The priesthood belonged only to the sons of Aaron, so they had to keep their family records. When the people came back from the exile, some could not show that they descended from Aaron, and they lost their place in the priesthood. Ezra 2:62.
Seventy years in Babylon could have erased a family's memory of who they were.
The record of their genealogy shows that they had not forgotten who they were. They still prized their descent from Abraham as their greatest heritage, because it had placed them among a people favoured by the LORD, a people among whom He Himself had lived. So they were not like Esau, who despised his birthright. They held on to it through all their trouble and shame... It is a great thing for God's people at any time to keep the record of their family line. The Jew did it by guarding the written proof of his descent. The Christian can only do it by walking in obedience, in the power of a Spirit he has not grieved. Only that Spirit enables us to cry "Abba, Father," and He Himself bears witness with our spirit that we are the children of God.
The verse gives Seraiah a post. The next verse gives his fellow priests a task. Both are gifts of grace.
Among them Seraiah was "the ruler of the house of God," while as many as eight hundred and twenty-two were busy with the work of the house. Both had a rich privilege, whatever responsibilities came with the offices God's grace had given them. There are still "rulers" of the house of God. But no one can fill the post properly without the necessary qualifications. (See, for example, 1 Tim. 3:1-7.) All may now help with the work of the house, if they are living in their priestly place in the holiest.
The chapter also lists Levites, who handled the outside work.
Only the priests could serve at the altar or in the holy places. Yet the Levites also had a rich place of service... Today believers are both priests and Levites. When they are in the holiest, offering God the sacrifice of praise through Christ, or when they do good and share with others, they act as priests (Heb. 13:15-16). When they are busy for the Lord in other kinds of service, they show the character of the Levite. The same distinction runs through the Church of God. Bishops — that is, the men described in the letters (1 Tim. 3; Titus 1) — are rulers in the house of God, matching Seraiah in verse 11. Deacons (see Acts 6) are like these Levites, busy with the "outward business" of the assembly.
Long lists of unfamiliar names can look like filler.
There is little to say here except that the Lord takes pleasure in recording even the names of His servants... He has not only been a dwelling place for His own in every generation; He also honours those who honour Him. He records their names in His word now, and He will glorify them in the great day that is coming fast.
Jerusalem was still in ruins, yet every family that moved in took up a post.
Notice again that despite the devastation of Jerusalem, everyone who came to live there finds a place to fill. Here are those who "did the work of the house" (v. 12) and those "over the outward work of the house of God" (v. 16). Here too are those who sing thanksgiving in prayer (v. 17), those who keep watch at the gates (v. 19), and the singers (v. 22). In short, each one carries out his duties as though everything were in order, and God, for His part, takes note of it... This poor remnant in Jerusalem has a noble and valuable mission: to link the past glory of Solomon's day with the coming glory of the Messiah. And they do it in days of humiliation and shame!
- Descent — only Aaron's sons could serve as priests. The family record was the proof, and anyone who could not produce one lost the place.
- Devotion — after seventy years in Babylon these families still prized their birthright, unlike Esau. A believer keeps the same record by walking in obedience in the Spirit.
- Office — Seraiah ruled God's house. The post still stands today, but only for those who meet the qualifications of 1 Timothy 3.
- Work — 822 priests did the work of the house. Service is open to everyone living in their priestly place, not to office-holders only.
- Record — the Lord takes pleasure in writing down His servants' names. One day He will glorify the people behind the names.
And their brethren that did the work of the house, eight hundred and twenty-two; and Adaiah the son of Jeroham, the son of Pelaliah, the son of Amzi, the son of Zechariah, the son of Pashhur, the son of Malchijah;
Nehemiah 11 lists who settled in the rebuilt city, and verse 12 falls inside the list of priests. It counts 822 men by the work they did, then traces Adaiah's line back six generations — so why record either detail?
Verses 10 to 14 list the priestly families living in Jerusalem. One commentator gives the totals and marks out two kinds of place — one man set over the house, and hundreds at work in it:
From verse 10 to verse 14 we have the account of the priests, with the ancestry of their chief carefully set out. Altogether they numbered 1,152. Of these Seraiah was "the ruler of the house of God," while no fewer than 822 were occupied in the work of the house. This was a blessed privilege, whether for the one or for the others, whatever the responsibilities tied to the offices assigned to them in the grace of God. There are "rulers" of the house of God still, but none can rightly fill the post unless they have the necessary qualifications.
Verse 12 gives no names for the 822. It marks them by their work, and the same writer ties that work to priestly standing:
All may now help in doing the work of the house, if they are living according to their priestly place in the holiest. For the work in this case was the work that belonged to them as priests. Only those who are filling their priestly office can rightly take part in priestly service.
The pattern of verse 12 repeats down the chapter: each group is named by its task. One writer lists them, and notes that God kept account of it all in a ruined city:
Notice again that, despite the devastation of Jerusalem, everyone who came to live there finds a place to occupy. Here we have those who "did the work of the house" (v. 12). There are those who were "over the outside work of the house of God" (v. 16), those who sing thanksgiving in prayer (v. 17), those who keep watch at the gates (v. 19), and the singers (v. 22). In a word, each one of them carries out his functions as though everything were in order, and God, for His part, takes account of this.
The same writer sees this small, struggling group holding together two eras — glory past and glory promised:
This poor remnant of Jerusalem has a noble and valuable mission. They link the time of Solomon's past glory with the time of the Messiah's coming glory, and they do it during days of humiliation and shame!
Verse 12 names Adaiah's father, grandfather, and four names beyond. One commentator explains what such records proved about a people who could have melted into the nations around them:
The record of their genealogy shows that they had not lost their nationality by mixing in with the Gentiles. They had gone on valuing their descent from Abraham as their greatest inheritance, because it placed them among a people favoured by the LORD, and He Himself had dwelt among them. These, then, were not like Esau, who despised his birthright. They clung to it, through all their trouble and disgrace, as their God-given title to all their national expectations and hopes.
The Jew could point to a written line back to Abraham. The same writer says what the proof is now:
It is a great thing for believers at any time to preserve the record of their genealogy. The Jew did it by guarding the written testimony to his descent. The Christian can only do so by walking in obedience, in the power of a Spirit he has not grieved. That Spirit alone can enable us to cry "Abba, Father," and He Himself bears witness with our spirit that we are the children of God.
822 sounds like many, but the remnant as a whole was small. One writer looks at how the rest of the people filled the city:
If their numbers were small, their zeal for the house of God was great. So those outside the city — "the rest of the people" — wanted to support the house and the city. They cast lots, and in self-denial gave up every tenth man to live inside the walls. They also showed their goodwill by blessing those "who willingly offered to live in Jerusalem."
- Counted. The priests in Jerusalem totalled 1,152, and 822 of them worked at the house — a number God thought worth recording.
- Qualified. The work of the house was priestly work. It belongs to those living in their priestly place, not to anyone who only holds a title.
- Placed. Every settler found a task — work, oversight, thanksgiving, watching, singing — and God took account of each one.
- Rooted. Adaiah's line shows a people who, unlike Esau, refused to despise their birthright. A Christian keeps that record by walking in obedience.
- Few but willing. The lot showed how few they were. Their zeal for God's house, and their blessing on the volunteers, showed how much they cared.
and his brethren, chief fathers, two hundred and forty-two; and Amassai the son of Azareel, the son of Ahzai, the son of Meshillemoth, the son of Immer;
This verse sits inside a roll call of priests who settled in Jerusalem after the exile: 242 heads of families, then Amashsai, whose ancestors are listed four names deep, back to Immer. Why does Scripture keep such a list, and what did it cost these men to be on it?
Verses 10 to 14 form one block. One writer adds up the priests and draws out what their service meant.
From verse 10 to verse 14 we have the account of the priests, and the family line of their chief is carefully stated. Altogether they numbered 1,152. Of these, Seraiah was "the ruler of the house of God," while as many as 822 were busy in the work of the house. This was a blessed privilege for both, whatever the responsibilities that came with the offices God's grace had given them. There are "rulers" of the house of God still. But no one can rightly fill the post unless he has the necessary qualifications. (See, for example, 1 Tim. 3:1-7.) All may now help with the work of the house, if they are living according to their priestly place in the holiest place. For this work belonged to them as priests, and only those who are filling their priestly office can rightly share in priestly service.
Living in Jerusalem was not the safe or easy choice. One writer explains why, and what some men did about it.
These two verses give a splendid example of self-sacrifice. Certain men willingly offered themselves to live in Jerusalem, and the people blessed them for their willing sacrifice. It should be explained that Jerusalem was not a desirable place to live at that time. The enemies of the city were constantly at work, trying to destroy its defences and harm the people living there. There was much danger for those who lived in the city itself. So most of the returned captives preferred to live outside the walls of Jerusalem. It was decided that every tenth man should live in Jerusalem, and the decision was made by lot. But then these volunteers came forward and showed self-denial and courage.
Not every priest in the land is on this Jerusalem list. One writer reads that spread of the people alongside the walls.
The way the people were spread through the land matters when you look at it together with the walls and the gates, the great subject of the book of Nehemiah. This spread clearly shows that the walls were not built to shut the people of God in, or to shut anyone out. Children of Judah and Benjamin, priests and Levites lived outside the walls as well as inside, and rightly so, according to God's ordering.
Amashsai is not just named. His descent is spelled out, father by father, and one writer shows what such a record was worth.
The record of their family line shows that they had not forgotten who they were. They went on prizing their descent from Abraham as their greatest inheritance, because it placed them among a people favoured by the Lord, a people He Himself had lived among. So they were not like Esau, who despised his birthright. They held on to it, through all their trouble and shame, as their God-given title to everything their nation expected and hoped for. It is a great thing for believers at any time to keep the record of their family line. The Jew did it by guarding the written proof of his descent. The Christian can only do it by walking in obedience, in the power of an ungrieved Spirit, who alone can enable us to cry "Abba, Father."
This chapter reads like an office register. One writer points to who is really keeping it.
Here is another register of names recorded in God's book, and not forgotten by Him. The children of Judah, the children of Benjamin, the priests who acted as temple officials, the Levites, the Nethinim (the temple servants), and those with special callings are all named. Some day the Lord will be their Rewarder for their faithful service, as He will be the Rewarder of all His people.
The figure 242 closes one family, and Amashsai opens another. One writer asked whether the verse break falls in the right place.
Are not the verses divided in the wrong place here? This verse should end at "two" in the third line, and verse 13 should also end at "two," and then run on to "great men" at the end of verse 14. However, that is how it stands in the Hebrew.
- Named. This verse belongs to the priestly roll of verses 10-14: 1,152 men in all. They range from the ruler of God's house down to those doing its daily work.
- Costly. Enemies pressed on Jerusalem, so most preferred to live outside. The people blessed those who volunteered to settle there.
- Free. The walls never marked off a favoured few. Priests and Levites lived inside and outside, and God ordered both.
- Rooted. Amashsai's line back to Immer shows a family that never let exile erase who they belonged to.
- Remembered. The register is God's own; every name in it waits for the Rewarder, and so does every unnoticed service today.
and their brethren, mighty men of valour, a hundred and twenty-eight and their overseer was Zabdiel the son of Gedolim.
Nehemiah 11:14 closes the list of priests who settled in the rebuilt city, and it closes with a surprise: it calls these temple men fighting men under a named overseer. Why are priests called warriors, and why does Scripture bother to record 128 of them and the man set over them?
The list begins back in verse 10. One commentator sets out who these men were and what their positions meant:
From verse 10 to verse 14 we have the account of the priests. The genealogy of their chief men is also carefully stated. Altogether they numbered 1,152. Of these Seraiah was "the ruler of the house of God," while no fewer than 822 were busy in the work of the house. This was a blessed privilege for the one and for the others alike, whatever responsibilities came with the offices God assigned to them in His grace.
The same writer applies this to believers. The work here belonged to men in priestly office, and "all may now assist in doing the work of the house, if they are living according to their priestly place in the holiest."
The words used of these 128 men are military words. A matching list in 1 Chronicles calls the priests able men for the work of serving God's house. One commentator explains why that fits men who served in the sanctuary, not on the battlefield:
In verse 13 the text calls the priests "able men for the work of the service of the house of God." Serving the house of God needs the same strength as combat does. The two duties are very different, but both call for the same spiritual energy.
Scripture describes the lowliest temple workers, the doorkeepers, the same way:
Of one doorkeeper's sons it is said that they were rulers in their father's house, that they were mighty men of valour, able men in strength for the service. We do not think often enough that the doorkeepers' service, like that of the priests, required these qualities. It is not enough to say that this humble task needs humility, dependence, zeal, and self-forgetfulness. Strength and valour are needed too.
Zabdiel is one of several men in this chapter set over a company. That ordering runs through the whole chapter, and one writer states the principle behind it:
All things were to be done in decency and order; each was to do the work divinely appointed, and each had his due place.
Commentators differ over how far these appointments carry across to the church. Dennett writes that "there are 'rulers' of the house of God still; but none can rightly fill the post unless they have the necessary qualifications (see, for example, 1 Timothy 3:1-7)." Another writer sees the arrangement as belonging to that time:
All was well organized. We do not find such appointments in the New Testament. But we do find the Spirit of God present. He can order everything in a better and more orderly way than appointing people to each kind of service could.
The list traces every man through his fathers, and that care had a reason. These families had spent seventy years in Babylon and could have let their descent slip away:
It is a great thing for saints at any time to preserve the record of their genealogy. The Jew did it by guarding the written record of his descent. The Christian can only do it by walking in obedience, in the power of an ungrieved Spirit. That Spirit alone enables us to cry "Abba, Father," and He Himself bears witness with our spirit that we are the children of God.
A hundred and twenty-eight is not an army. The whole chapter counts a city with few people in it. One commentator looks past the numbers:
And yet, if their numbers were small their zeal for the house of God was great.
He turns that weakness into encouragement:
It is well for us if we recognise and accept circumstances of outward weakness. Then we will not be turned aside from the path of separation because those who take it are few… Does it not encourage and hearten us to remember that what we maintain in weakness will be displayed in glory?
- Counted — The priests in Jerusalem numbered 1,152. One man ruled the house and 822 worked in it. Both the ruler and the workers held a privilege given in grace.
- Strong — Scripture uses soldiers' words for priests, because serving God's house calls for the same spiritual energy as combat. So does the lowliest task, like keeping a door.
- Ordered — Each company had its overseer, so every man did the work appointed and had his own place. Commentators differ on whether such appointments continue today.
- Named — The genealogies show these families never let go of their descent. The Christian keeps that record by obedience in the power of an ungrieved Spirit.
- Few — Small numbers did not cool their zeal for God's house. What we hold on to in weakness now will be displayed in glory later.
And of the Levites Shemaiah the son of Hasshub, the son of Azrikam, the son of Hashabiah, the son of Bunni;
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
and Shabbethai and Jozabad, of the chiefs of the Levites, [who were] over the outward work of the house of God;
Nehemiah names two Levites living in Jerusalem, and their work was management, not altar service. Does practical, material work for God count as real service?
The list keeps priests and Levites apart, because their work was not the same. Where the ESV says "the outside work of the house of God," older translations say "the outward business." One writer sets out what the Levites could and could not do, and why their place was still a good one.
Some of these Levites "had the oversight of the outward business of the house of God." Only the priests could serve at the altar or in the holy places. Still, the Levites had a blessed place of service. God first gave them to Aaron (a picture of Christ) for the service of the tabernacle (Num. 3), for all the work of the house of God outside the priestly office.
One writer links this outside work to the men in Acts 6 who served tables. He puts them in the same line as the Levites of Israel.
In Israel there were different orders of Levites, each with its own duties. In the same way, those who had to serve tables (Acts 6:1–4) were doing true Levitical service. All of them served God's people, whether they taught or only cared for the needs of the poor. The Master calls these servants, and they take up the service gladly, not because they are forced to.
The verse calls Shabbethai and Jozabad "chiefs of the Levites." The care of material things went to leading men. One writer explains why handling the practical side of God's house is never a lower-grade job.
We might be tempted to think less of practical service, which deals with material things in the Lord's work. But the Lord judges it quite differently. At the start of Christianity, men were chosen to "serve tables," and they had to be "of good repute, full of the Spirit and of wisdom" (Acts 6:2, 3). In 1 Timothy 3 Paul describes what a deacon must be. Study that list, and you see that even practical service for the Lord needs spiritual qualifications.
These two men worked outside the house, over its business. One writer points to the prophet Elijah to show that serving outside and worshipping inside belong together.
Some prize above everything else the privilege of standing in God's presence as worshippers. Others count it the highest favour to be allowed to serve. But the Christian life is complete only when the two go together. Elijah is one example. "As the Lord of hosts lives, before whom I stand," he says. He lived inside, and so he was ready to serve outside. So the one who most enjoys his priestly privilege will be the best fitted for his Master's service.
Both roles now meet in the same believer.
Believers today are both priests and Levites. When they are in the holiest place, offering God the sacrifice of praise through Christ, or when they "do good" and "share what they have," they are acting as priests (Heb. 13:15–16). When they are busy for the Lord in other kinds of service, they show the Levitical character instead.
One of the two men named here had a guilty past. One writer follows him from that guilt to this post.
Shabbethai the Levite was more guilty than the others, both because of his position and because he joined himself to Meshullam. Yet we have the joy of seeing him later helping the people to understand the law, and then set over the outward business of the house of God (Neh. 8:7; Neh. 11:16).
The detail that closes the wider passage is order — nothing here is random or self-chosen.
All things were to be done in decency and order; each was to do the work divinely appointed, and each had his due place.
- Place. Only priests served at the altar. The Levites still had a good place: all the work of God's house outside the priestly office.
- Pattern. That outside work carries over. Those who served tables in Acts 6 were doing true Levitical service. The Master called them, and they took it up gladly.
- Prerequisite. Practical work is not lower work. Men handling material things had to be of good repute, full of the Spirit and of wisdom.
- Power. Worship and service belong together. The one who most enjoys being in God's presence is the best qualified to serve outside it.
- Proof. Shabbethai was more guilty than others, yet later he helped the people understand the law and oversaw this work. Failure did not end his usefulness.
and Mattaniah the son of Mica, the son of Zabdi, the son of Asaph, [who was] the principal to begin the thanksgiving in prayer; and Bakbukiah, the second among his brethren; and Abda the son of Shammua, the son of Galal, the son of Jeduthun
One man in this list of settlers in Jerusalem stands out for a task, not for rank or wealth: he led the thanksgiving. His family line runs back to Asaph, and a second man stands with him — so what was this office, and who leads praise now?
Mattaniah appears in the short block of Levites listed after the priests — only 284 of them in the whole city. One writer explains what a Levite was for, and why the role still matters:
Only the priests could serve at the altar or in the holy places. Still, the Levites had a blessed place of service. They were first given to Aaron (a picture of Christ) for the service of the tabernacle, for all the work of God's house outside the priestly office. At present believers are both priests and Levites. When they are in the holiest, offering the sacrifice of praise to God through Christ, or when they "do good" and "share what you have," they are acting as priests. When they are busy for the Lord in other kinds of service, they show more of the Levitical character.
The genealogy is not decoration. It reaches back past Mica and Zabdi to Asaph, and that name carries the whole history of the office. (Older translations render his role as "the chief to begin the thanksgiving in prayer.")
One man is specially mentioned, though others were associated with him, who was "the chief to begin the thanksgiving in prayer." There is nothing like this in the service of the Levites in the wilderness, for the wilderness was not a place of song or praise. This office dates from the time of David, who "appointed some of the Levites as ministers before the ark of the LORD, to invoke, to thank, and to praise the LORD, the God of Israel." That explains why the record traces Mattaniah's line back to Asaph. It also shows the care taken to restore the service of praise "according to the directions of David king of Israel."
Few people had come back, yet the chapter lists them all: leaders, priests, Levites, gatekeepers, temple servants, and the villages outside. One writer draws the point out of such a careful roll:
All things were to be done in decency and order; each was to do the work divinely appointed, and each had his due place.
The same instinct runs through the whole record of names. Every office restored was a step back toward God's own arrangement:
All these details are given to show how complete for the moment was the restoration of divine order in the holy things of Jehovah's house among these children of the captivity. Man's will had worked long enough, and now, once more back in the land of their fathers, the land of promise and hope, their one desire is that Jehovah alone should govern — that everything should be in accordance with His word.
Mattaniah held an appointed post. One writer marks the change from that arrangement to worship now:
All this fitted the order that God had then set up. But now the hour has come when the true worshippers worship the Father in spirit and truth. Only those whom the Holy Spirit leads can "begin the thanksgiving in prayer."
Another asks the question directly:
In the Church of God praise should stand out, and it should overflow even more than in Judaism. We praise the Lord as the One who has accomplished a full redemption for us through the sufferings of the cross, and who has been raised in glory to the right hand of God. Do we need appointments to offer such praise? Certainly not. The Spirit of God draws out the praise and thanksgiving of our hearts in voluntary worship.
If no man now holds Mattaniah's office, the office itself has not been abolished — it has been filled by Someone greater, and that changes how a gathering handles even the choice of a hymn:
Never forget that the Lord Himself is the Leader of our praises. As He said, "in the midst of the congregation I will sing your praise." So it is a serious matter to give out a hymn that is to carry the praises of the saints at that moment, since the Lord Himself is the great song-leader.
- Named. Mattaniah is listed for a task, not for status: he began the thanksgiving. Bakbukiah stood with him, so praise was never one man's alone.
- Rooted. His line runs back to Asaph because the office runs back to David. They did not invent a song service; they restored the one already given.
- Ordered. In a poor, half-empty city, every name had its due place, and each man did the work God appointed.
- Released. What was once a Levite's appointed post now belongs to anyone the Spirit leads. Thanksgiving needs no appointment, only a heart drawn out.
- Led. The man who began the thanksgiving points beyond himself. The Lord Himself sings in the midst of His people, and He leads the praise they start.
all the Levites in the holy city were two hundred and eighty-four.
Nehemiah 11 lists who settled where after the people rebuilt the wall. The count of Levites in Jerusalem closes that list, and the number is small.
The verse gives Jerusalem a title its appearance did not support. Writers note that faith, not sight, supplied the name:
At this time it was little more than a desolate heap of ruins, so most of the people had no way to make a living there. But it had always been the seat of authority, and it was still "the holy city." So the rulers, who would also be men of means, would settle inside its sacred walls. If they were men of faith, they would see it not as it stood before their eyes, but as it would be in a future day — as "the city of the great King," and so "the perfection of beauty, the joy of the whole earth."
The number is small for the service of God's house in His chosen city. One writer sees the same gap between a large city and few people in our own day:
The city was "large and great, but the people were few therein." It reminds us that they were still very weak in outward circumstances, however bright the zeal of the remnant and whatever revival in their moral condition had come. God had opened a door of escape from captivity, but "few" had taken up God's goodness. God's city is "large and great," though few of God's people value its greatness. And as it was in the day of Nehemiah so it is in our day.
These Levites had real work, though not the work done at the altar. One writer traces the Levite and the priest into Christian service today:
The Levites follow the priests (vv. 15-18), but in all they numbered only two hundred and eighty-four. Among them were some who "had the oversight of the outward business of the house of God." Only the priests could serve at the altar or in the holy places. Still, the Levites had a blessed place of service. They were first given to Aaron, who pictures Christ, for the service of the tabernacle (Num. 3) — for all the work of the house of God outside the priestly office... Today believers are both priests and Levites. When they are in the holiest, offering the sacrifice of praise to God through Christ, or when they "do good" and "share what they have," they are acting as priests (Heb. 13:15-16). When they are busy for the Lord in other kinds of service, they show the Levitical character instead.
The verse counts only the Levites inside the city, so others of their tribe lived outside it. One writer reads the walls in that light:
The walls and the gates are the great subject of the book of Nehemiah. How the people were spread through the land matters when we set it beside them. That spread shows that the walls were not built to shut the people of God in, or to shut them out. There were children of Judah and Benjamin, priests and Levites living outside the walls as well as inside, and rightly so according to the ordering of God.
The list gives every man a place to fill. One writer asks what God makes of such order in a day of ruin:
Notice again that despite the devastation of Jerusalem, everyone who came to live in it finds a place there to fill... In a word, each one of them carries out his duties as though everything were in order, and on His side God takes account of this. All of this happens, no doubt, in a time of misery and ruin. But is it a small thing in God's eyes that they should recognize the order He had set up? Is it a small thing that they should carry out this order, despite the ruin, looking on to a time of perfection still to come? This poor remnant of Jerusalem has the noble and valuable mission of linking Solomon's past glory with the Messiah's coming glory. And they do it during days of humiliation and shame!
- Holy by faith. The city lay in ruins, yet still carried the name "holy." Faith saw it not as it looked, but as it would be — "the city of the great King."
- Holy but few. Only 284 Levites lived there. God's city stays large and great, while the people who value its greatness stay few — then and now.
- Holy service outside the altar. These Levites had charge of "the outward business of the house of God." The altar belonged to the priests alone, yet their place of service was a blessed one.
- Holy ground on both sides of the wall. Levites lived inside the walls and outside them. Both were right according to God's ordering, for the wall was built neither to shut people in nor to shut them out.
- Holy order in a ruined day. Each man filled his post as though everything were in order, and God took account of it. This small remnant linked Solomon's past glory to the Messiah's coming glory.
And the doorkeepers, Akkub, Talmon, and their brethren, that kept watch at the gates, were a hundred and seventy-two.
This chapter lists who settled in Jerusalem after the exile, and it ends with 172 men who guarded the gates. Akkub and Talmon are easy names to skim past, yet commentators treat this verse as the point where a rebuilt wall becomes a working city.
Their title names a job with fixed limits.
The gatekeepers had charge of the gates. Their responsibility was to admit only those who had the proper qualifications to enter the city and approach the house, and to refuse all others.
The work cut two ways, and a gatekeeper could fail at either. Commentators describe the post a little differently: Hamilton Smith speaks of the city and the house, Henri Rossier of all the gates of the temple.
The doorkeepers had charge of all the gates of the temple. They had to be able to drive back any attempt against the house of God. They had to watch with constant energy, so that no defiled person entered the courts of the Lord. But they also had to keep the doors open, so that they never shut out a priest who had the right to enter the temple.
The chapter also records who lived outside Jerusalem, not only who lived inside.
This spread of the people shows plainly that the walls were not built to shut the people of God in, or to shut them out. Children of Judah and Benjamin, priests and Levites lived outside the walls as well as inside, and rightly so, in keeping with God's ordering.
Why station 172 men at doorways? Because of what stood inside the city.
Without the walls, no one could keep the house in the holiness that suits God's house for ever. Without the house, the walls would only have fenced in a select group lifting themselves up by keeping others out. Used rightly, the walls guard the holiness of God's house and so secure its privileges for all the people of God. Abused, they become nothing but the badge of a party and the security of a sect.
The chapter turns next to the singers. Who gets in decides who sings.
The singers gave the Lord His portion. Only the redeemed can sing the songs of Zion. So the gatekeepers must carry out their responsibilities faithfully, if the Lord is to have His portion. To let in those without divine qualifications is to admit people who cannot sing. Slackness in the gatekeepers means loss to the singers. Where the gatekeepers are slack, worship is lost.
The task calls for men who can tell a real claim from a false one. So who gives them that task today?
Gatekeepers are mentioned first, and the work carries serious responsibility. They must let in everyone who should be in and keep out everyone who should be out. So they need to tell the difference between those who made false claims and those who were true. The Church of God today needs such gatekeepers, but the Church has no authority to appoint them. Instead, since the Spirit of God lives in the Church, He will move godly men to do this needed work willingly, with no appointment at all.
A head count of doorkeepers can look like filler. Read with the rest of the chapter, it is evidence of something recovered.
We need not go into every detail. All of them are recorded to show how complete, for the moment, the restoration of divine order was in the holy things of Jehovah's house among these people back from captivity. Man's will had worked long enough. Now they are once more in the land of their fathers, the land of promise and hope, and their one desire is that Jehovah alone should govern, and that everything should match His word.
- Gate — 172 men had one task: let in those qualified for the city and the house, and refuse all others.
- Two hinges — the same trust drives off what would defile and holds the doors open to everyone with a right to enter. Fail either way and the trust is broken.
- House — the wall guards the holiness of God's house. Without the house it only fences in a self-important group, and becomes the badge of a party.
- Song — the singers depend on the gatekeepers. Let in people who cannot sing, and worship is what you lose.
- Order — these names and numbers record a people done with their own will. They wanted God alone to govern, and everything to match His word.
And the residue of Israel, the priests, [and] the Levites, were in all the cities of Judah, every one in his inheritance.
The chapter has just named Jerusalem's residents one by one. This verse turns to the rest of Israel, out in the towns of Judah — did living away from the holy city leave them out?
This chapter's names belong almost entirely to two tribes, and the other ten have a future still ahead of them.
Here we find plenty of confirmation of one fact. Apart from the priests and Levites, only two tribes were brought back from Babylon: Judah and Benjamin, or representatives of them. Individual members of other tribes may have been there. Anna, for example, was "of the tribe of Asher" (Luke 2:36). That does not affect the statement at all. As tribes, only Judah and Benjamin were restored. So the remaining ten tribes are "lost" to this day, hidden among the peoples of the earth in the ways of God. But the time is fast approaching when they will be brought out of their hiding place. That may not happen until our great God and Saviour Jesus Christ appears. Then they will be set in safety and blessing in their own land, under the peaceful rule of their glorious Messiah.
The closing phrase is the point of the whole list. Nobody was left floating; each family sat on the ground God had given it, and the same principle ran through every task in the city.
Everything was to be done decently and in order; each was to do the work God appointed, and each had his own proper place.
That arrangement was not cosmetic. The careful naming of who lived where, and who oversaw what, is read as evidence of something recovered after seventy years away.
All these details show one thing. For the moment, God's order was fully restored in the holy things of the Lord's house among these people who came back from captivity. Human will had been at work long enough. Now they were back in the land of their fathers, the land of promise and hope. Their one desire is that the Lord alone should govern — that everything should be according to His word.
This verse settles what the rebuilt wall was for. God's people lived on both sides of it.
Where the people settled across the land matters, and it matters in connection with the walls and the gates. These are the great subject of the book of Nehemiah. This spread of the people shows plainly that the walls were not built to fence the people of God in, or to shut them out. Children of Judah and Benjamin, priests and Levites lived outside the walls as well as inside. That was right, and it followed God's own ordering. Remember that a whole nation went into captivity, not only the citizens of Jerusalem, and it was a remnant of that nation that returned.
Everything depends on what the walls are for.
God brought the people back to the land to build the house. Once the house was built, the walls became necessary to keep it holy. Without the walls the house could not be kept in the holiness that suits God's house for ever. Without the house the walls would only have fenced in a select group seeking their own exaltation by shutting others out. Used rightly, the walls keep God's house holy, and so secure the privileges of God's house for all the people of God. Abused, they become the badge of a party and the security of a sect.
The new arrangement was not perfect in every detail.
Here too the order is not perfect. Judah even goes a little beyond its limits at Beersheba. Yet alongside these defects there was a real desire in each one to occupy the place God assigned to him.
The list of towns is more than geography. Because God recorded who settled where, commentators press the matter onto ordinary decisions today.
This shows us that God has a deep concern about where people live, and takes full account of it. Too often the people of God think only about what suits themselves when they decide where to live. They weigh whether a job there promises a high salary. They ask whether the place is near friends or relatives, or whether the neighbourhood seems pleasant. If such things pull at us too hard, should we not stop and consider that the Lord has a vital interest in this matter? Do we put His interests first? What about living near a gathering of believers where we can be a blessing to others?
- Remnant. As tribes, only Judah and Benjamin returned from Babylon. Each family that came back sat on land God had given it, not on land it grabbed.
- Order. Those assigned places mark a real recovery. Human will had been at work long enough; now God's word was to govern again.
- Reach. The wall did not define God's people. Priests, Levites, Judah and Benjamin all lived outside it, by God's own arrangement.
- Warning. Used rightly, walls guard holiness for all God's people. Abused, they become the badge of a party.
- Result. God keeps a record of where His people settle, so the question of where we live is His concern before it is ours.
And the Nethinim dwelt in Ophel; and Ziha and Gispa were over the Nethinim.
A long list of families and officials holds one short line about the temple servants. It says where they lived and who was over them. Why does Scripture name Ziha and Gishpa at all, and why record the address of this one group?
The older name for these workers is Nethinim. One reference work gathers what the Old Testament says about them, and where they may have come from:
The name means "given, devoted ones." It was used of those who helped the Levites in the service of the tabernacle and the temple. The Gibeonites were made "cutters of wood and drawers of water for the congregation and for the altar" (Joshua 9:27). They are not mentioned after 2 Samuel, so they and their descendants may have been the Nethinim. It does not seem that God appointed them, as He did the Levites. Instead, "David and the princes" appointed them "for the service of the Levites" (Ezra 8:20). Some of the Midianite captives were also given to the Levites (Numbers 31:46-47). Along with the priests and Levites, they paid no tribute, custom or toll (Ezra 7:24). After the return from exile the Nethinim are called the "servants of this house of God."
One thing stands out: a group with no natural claim to Israel's privileges answered the call to return, while those with every claim hung back:
There were still less than forty Levites, while there were two hundred and twenty Nethinim. In the self-indulgent ease of Babylon, the nation's hopes and privileges had lost all practical power over their minds. This is one more proof of it. Beside the laziness of the Levites, it is beautiful to see how many Nethinim (probably of a foreign race) obeyed Ezra's summons.
These helpers have a counterpart today:
In our day they would perhaps match those who do many services behind the scenes. Many things are necessary and have to be done week by week. People may often take them for granted, but someone has to do them.
The verse also records where these servants lived. One writer sees a heart behind that address:
There again the order is not perfect. But along with these defects goes a real desire in each one to take the place God assigned him. So the Nethinim live in Ophel, part of the city of David. It lay outside the new wall, but close to the temple, which they reached through the water gate.
The verse names the two men set over these servants. One writer reads all such details in the chapter together:
All these details show how complete, for the moment, the restoration of divine order was in the holy things of Jehovah's house among these people who had come back from captivity. Man's will had worked long enough. Now they are back in the land of their fathers, the land of promise and hope. Their one desire is that Jehovah alone should govern, and that everything should be in line with His word. But in the middle of this beautiful revival, there are reminders of their sad condition compared with the past. Gentile authority appears even in connection with the house of God.
Lists like this can look like filler. One writer sees the opposite:
These modest duties are very valuable in the eyes of the Lord. See how gladly God registers all the names of their fathers. It is the same today. It may be serving tables, passing the bread and the cup, or taking care of the "upper room." The Lord forgets none of it. He registers the names of those who have kept the charge of this service just as deservedly as any others.
- Given. The name Nethinim means "given, devoted ones" — helpers given for the service of the Levites, later called servants of God's house.
- Given outsiders. They were likely of foreign descent. Still, they returned in far greater numbers than the Levites, who had higher privileges and were slower to answer.
- Given a place. Ophel lay outside the new wall but close to the temple. The arrangement was imperfect. Even so, each one wanted the place God assigned him.
- Given oversight. Ziha and Gishpa supervised the temple servants. Details like this show divine order restored, so that everything matched God's word.
- Given a record. The Lord registers the tasks no one notices — serving tables, passing the bread and the cup, keeping the room ready.
And the overseer of the Levites at Jerusalem was Uzzi the son of Bani, the son of Hashabiah, the son of Mattaniah, the son of Mica, of the sons of Asaph, the singers, for the work of the house of God.
Nehemiah 11 lists who settled where after the wall was finished. Why does the list stop to name Uzzi, the man set over the Levites, and trace his family four generations back to Asaph the singer?
One writer reads the list of gatekeepers, singers and Levites as proof of something recovered:
All these details show how complete the restoration of divine order was, for the moment, in the holy things of the Lord's house among these people returned from captivity. Human will had worked long enough. Now, back in the land of promise and hope, their one desire is that the Lord alone should govern — that everything should be according to His word.
Uzzi oversaw Levites, not priests. Dennett sets out the difference in their duties:
Only the priests could serve at the altar or in the holy places. Still, the Levites had a blessed place of service. At the first they were given to Aaron (Christ) for the service of the tabernacle (Numbers 3), for all the work of the house of God outside the priestly office. Today believers are both priests and Levites. When they stand in the holiest and offer the sacrifice of praise to God through Christ, or when they "do good" and "share what they have," they are acting as priests (Hebrews 13:15-16). When they are busy for the Lord in other kinds of service, they show the Levitical character instead.
Uzzi belonged to the singers. Hamilton Smith links their song to the porters — the gatekeepers named a few verses earlier:
The singers gave the Lord His portion. Only the redeemed can sing the songs of Zion. So the porters must carry out their responsibilities faithfully, if the Lord is to have His portion. To let in those without divine qualifications is to admit those who cannot sing. Laxity on the part of the porters will mean loss to the singers. Worship is lost where the porters are lax.
The verse spends most of its words on ancestry — Bani, Hashabiah, Mattaniah, Mica, Asaph. One writer asks why the singers received such care:
There is no such care shown for any other branch of Levitical service. Why such particular care about the singers? Because none must be allowed to sing except those who have the right. And who now has the right to sing? Redemption gives the right. Should there be songs for slaves? Whether to a willing or a groaning slave, deliverance must come first, and with it comes the appointment to sing.
The genealogy also points back to where the service of song began:
The Levites in the wilderness had no such service of song, for the wilderness was not a place of song or praise. This office dates from the time of David, who appointed Levites to thank and praise the Lord before the ark. That explains why the genealogy is traced back to Asaph, and it shows the care taken to restore the service of praise as David king of Israel had directed.
The verse ends with these men over the work of God's house. For the singers, that work never stopped:
This was the occupation of the singers: praising the Lord "day and night" (1 Chronicles 9:33). It is a shadow of the endless occupation of the redeemed in heaven (Revelation 5). It is a blessed service — if service is the right word for it — and the church has the privilege of tasting it here on earth while waiting for the return of our blessed Lord.
Jerusalem was still poor and half empty. Yet someone fills every post in the chapter, and Rossier makes that the point of the whole list:
Here we have those who "did the work of the house," those who were "over the outward work of the house of God," those who sing thanksgiving in prayer, those who keep watch at the gates, and the singers (v. 22). In a word, each one fulfils his function as though everything were in order, and God, on His side, takes account of this... This poor remnant of Jerusalem has the noble and valuable mission of linking Solomon's past glory with the Messiah's coming glory.
These posts were named and appointed. One writer notes what has changed since:
All was well organised. We do not find such appointments in the New Testament. But we do find the Spirit of God present. He can set everything in better order than appointing people to each kind of service could. The singers picture the kind of ministry that encourages the joy of the saints of God.
- Order. The list of overseers, singers and gatekeepers has one point: divine order was back in God's house. His word governed, not human will.
- Oversight. Uzzi's post was Levitical, not priestly. It covered the work of God's house outside the priestly office, the work believers share when they serve the Lord.
- Portion. The singers gave the Lord His portion. Slack gatekeepers cost the singers, because worship is lost where the gate is kept loosely.
- Right. The family line back to Asaph guards who may sing. Redemption gives the right.
- Ruins. A ruined city did not cancel the order. This remnant filled every post as though all were well. That linked Solomon's past glory to the Messiah's coming glory.
For it was the king's commandment concerning them, and there was a settled portion for the singers, due for each day.
Nehemiah 11 lists who lived in the rebuilt city, and it pauses over the singers — Levites whose whole work was praise. Their daily food came from a Persian king's standing order, not from Israel's own gifts, and that small line exposes where the returned people stood.
Scripture calls these men "over the work of the house of God." Other passages fill in what that work was.
We learn their work from another passage. "These are the men whom David put in charge of the service of song in the house of the LORD after the ark rested there. They ministered with song before the tabernacle of the tent of meeting until Solomon built the house of the LORD in Jerusalem, and they performed their service according to their order" (1 Chronicles 6:31-32). The Psalmist refers to these when he says, "Blessed are those who dwell in your house, ever singing your praise!" (Psalm 84:4). This was the singers' occupation — praising the Lord "day and night" (1 Chronicles 9:33). It is a shadow of the unending work of the redeemed in heaven (Revelation 5).
The careful lists of this chapter show something recovered. They also show something lost.
All these details show how complete, for the moment, the restoration of divine order was in the holy things of Jehovah's house among these children of the captivity. Man's will had worked long enough. Now they are back in the land of their fathers, the land of promise and hope, and their one desire is that Jehovah alone should govern — that everything should match His word. But in the middle of this beautiful revival, there are reminders of how sad their condition is compared with the past. Gentile authority shows up even in connection with the house of God.
The law had arranged the singers' support in a very different way.
It was sad beyond all words that the singers in the temple of the Lord should depend for support on a Gentile monarch. They were Levites, and the willing-hearted gifts of the people were to support them (see Deuteronomy 12:11-12; Deuteronomy 26:12-13). They had no part or inheritance with their brothers among the children of Israel. But the people who had returned from Babylon were few in number... they were servants in the land God had given to their fathers, and altogether in great distress (Nehemiah 9:36-37). So they could not provide for these singers. God in His mercy had given them some reviving in their bondage. Still, He would have them remember that their present condition was the fruit of their past ways. His chastening hand had placed them under Gentile authority, and owning that rule was part of their obedience to His will.
The same writer then adds a caution. Other verses in the book do show Israel giving to the singers.
See, however, Nehemiah 10:37 and Nehemiah 12:44-47. Still, the remarks above must stand, since the verse points straight to the king's commandment. Probably the people failed in this as in everything else.
This is where the recovery stopped.
They acknowledge the promise made to Abraham, the bringing of the people into Canaan because of that promise, and their later failure. Yet they place themselves again under the obligations of the law, while confessing the goodness of God who had spared them. They do not see beyond a conditional and Mosaic restoration. Neither the Messiah nor the new covenant has any place as the foundation of their joy or their hope. They are, and they continue to be, in bondage to the Gentiles.
The daily allowance is the plain proof:
It is this position that the Book of Nehemiah definitely brought out. It is the king's commandment that provides for the maintenance of the singers. A Jew was at the king's hand in all matters concerning the people (Nehemiah 11:23-24).
Here praise runs on a royal order and a measured daily ration.
Singers were also appointed in Jerusalem, those who by singing expressed praise to the God of Israel. Surely in the Church of God praise should be prominent, and even more overflowing than in Judaism. We praise the Lord as the One who has won a full redemption for us through the sufferings of the cross. God has raised Him in glory to His right hand. Do we need appointments to offer such praise? Not at all.
- Praise — the singers' one job was to praise the Lord day and night, a shadow of what the redeemed will do forever in heaven.
- Provision — God's law meant the people's willing gifts to support the singers, since they had no inheritance of their own.
- Pressure — the returned people were few, poor and servants in their own land, so a foreign king's standing order paid instead.
- Position — one line marks the limit of the recovery: order back in the house, the nation still in bondage, no Messiah and no new covenant in view.
- Progress — the answer is not a better royal grant but a finished redemption. Praise since the cross needs no appointment and no daily ration.
And Pethahiah the son of Meshezabeel, of the children of Zerah the son of Judah, was at the king's hand in all matters concerning the people.
Nehemiah 11 lists who settled in Jerusalem and who stayed in the country towns. It closes with Pethahiah, whose post was not in the temple but at the foreign king's court — so why did a restored nation still need a man at a pagan throne?
The chapter is a picture of order restored. Yet near its end the foreign king appears twice — once paying the singers, once with this man at his side.
Without going into every detail, we can say that all of this shows one thing. For the moment, divine order was fully restored in the holy things of the Lord's house among these people back from captivity. Man's will had worked long enough. Now they were once more in the land of their fathers, the land of promise and hope. Their one desire is that the Lord alone should govern — that everything should follow His word. But in the middle of this beautiful revival come reminders of their sad condition, so unlike the past. Gentile authority appears even in connection with the house of God.
Two things stand out — Pethahiah's own family line, and the court he served in:
Son of Meshezabel, a descendant of Judah: he was at the king of Persia's hand "in all matters concerning the people."
The temple singers were Levites, set apart for God's service, and Israel's own gifts should have kept them. A foreign treasury paid them instead.
It was sad beyond words that the singers in the temple of the Lord had to depend for support on a Gentile king. They were Levites, and the willing gifts of the people were meant to support them... But the people who had returned from Babylon were few. They and their cattle were at the mercy of foreign rulers. They were servants in the land God had given to their fathers, and they were in great distress.
Dennett goes on to ask what that dependence was meant to teach them:
God in His mercy had given them some reviving in the middle of their bondage. Still, He would have them remember that their present condition was the fruit of their past ways. It was the chastening of His hand that had put them under Gentile authority. So owning that authority was part of their obedience to His will.
Commentators differ in what they draw from this. Darby takes the same detail as a measure of how limited the restoration was:
They see nothing beyond a restoration that is conditional and under the law of Moses. Neither the Messiah nor the new covenant has any place as the foundation of their joy or their hope. They are, and they go on being, in bondage to the Gentiles... It is the king's commandment that provides support for the singers. A Jew was at the king's hand in all matters concerning the people (Neh. 11:23-24).
The office existed because of where the people now stood. Dennett traces it further:
God's mercy had restored the people, but only with the permission of the Gentile authority, and they were still under it. That position made it necessary for the king to know all the matters that concerned them. Pethahiah was at his hand to give him the information he needed. He was, as it were, the representative of his people. It is a shadow, however faint, of Him who is at the right hand of God, gone into heaven to appear in the presence of God for us. How blessed for us to remember that there is One at the right hand of God in all matters concerning the people He has redeemed!
Pethahiah held an appointed office. Grant sets that beside the way the same care works now:
Pethahiah was appointed to care for the details of the people's needs. In the Church of God, shepherds (or pastors) should do such work. They need no appointment at all. They serve gladly, out of real love for the Lord and real concern for the souls of believers.
- Cause. Their own past put them under foreign rule. Even the king's money for the singers was "the fruit of their past ways."
- Acceptance. The arrangement came from God's chastening hand, so owning it was obedience, not a compromise to resent.
- Ceiling. Law could carry the restoration only so far. No Messiah and no new covenant shaped their hope, so the bondage stayed.
- Representative. One man stood at the king's side for all. In that faint outline stands Christ at God's right hand, "in all matters concerning the people He has redeemed."
- Order. The same care goes on today. It comes not by appointment but from those who serve out of love for the Lord and His people.
And as to the hamlets in their fields, [some] of the children of Judah dwelt in Kirjath-Arba and its dependent villages, and in Dibon and its dependent villages, and in Jekabzeel and its dependent villages,
The register now leaves Jerusalem and turns to the countryside — the villages and their fields, starting with Kiriath-arba. So what was the standing of God's people who lived far from the walled city, out among the farms?
Much of this book is about building Jerusalem's wall. So a list of country villages raises a question about what that wall was for.
The spread of the people throughout the Land is important. You have to see it alongside the walls and the gates, which are the great subject of the Book of Nehemiah. That spread shows plainly that the walls were not built to fence the people of God in, or to shut them out. Children of Judah and Benjamin, priests and Levites lived outside the walls as well as within. This was right, and it was God's own ordering. We must remember that it was a nation that went into captivity, not only the citizens of Jerusalem, and it was a remnant of this nation that returned.
The same writer ties the walls to the house of God inside them:
Without the house, the walls would only have enclosed a select company seeking their own exaltation by shutting others out. Used rightly, the walls keep the holiness of God's house, and so they secure the privileges of God's house for all the people of God. Abused, they simply become the badge of a party and the safety of a sect.
The list of Judah's villages opens with Kiriath-arba. The name is older than Israel itself:
The Canaanite name, meaning 'city of Arba', of the city later called Hebron.
Under its later name, the town has a history. One writer links Caleb's faith to what Hebron means:
In answer to the faith of Caleb, Joshua blessed him and gave him Hebron as an inheritance. Hebron means "communion", so Caleb pictures a man blessed with the special sweetness of communion with the One he was devoted to.
City and countryside together read like a plain administrative list. One writer draws a principle out of that:
Everything was to be done in a fitting and orderly way; each was to do the work God appointed, and each had his due place.
The same writer applies this to believers today:
It is not otherwise now, if we heed the word of the Lord. Those who bear His name are scattered and in an unusual state, and that makes the difficulty great. But the presence of the Holy Spirit removes all excuse for lack of power. And the written word remains the standard and test of obedience.
Why does Scripture spend whole verses on small village names? One writer answers by looking forward:
The rest of the chapter states where the children of Judah settled, in the different cities and villages, and where the children of Benjamin settled. These notices mean little to us. But the Jews of a later day will no doubt read them with intense interest.
The restored city was large but thinly peopled. That weakness is not where the story ends:
How different it will be in the coming day of Jerusalem's glory. Then indeed the city will still be "large and great," but no longer will the people be few. In that day the Land will be too narrow because of the number of people living in it. Of the city they will say, "The place is too narrow for me; make room for me to dwell in" (Isa. 49:14-21). This reminds us that reformation, restoration and revivals, however bright and blessed, fall far short of the glory that is to come. Does it not encourage us to remember that what we maintain in weakness will be displayed in glory?
after_note: DELETE
- Placed — Judah's families lived in the villages and fields outside the wall. God ordered it that way; the wall never shut them out.
- Named — The list opens with Kiriath-arba, the old Canaanite name of the town later called Hebron, Caleb received it for his faith, and Hebron means communion.
- Ordered — City and countryside show one principle. Each had his appointed work and his due place, and the written word is still the test of obedience.
- Recorded — These village names mean little to us now. Jews of a later day will read them with keen interest.
- Enlarged — The few of Nehemiah's day point on to a Jerusalem too small to hold its people. Every restoration falls short of that coming glory.
and in Jeshua, and in Moladah, and in Beth-phelet,
Nehemiah's record moves out from Jerusalem into the countryside, and here it names three small towns in the south. Why keep a list like this, and what does it say about people who lived far from the rebuilt city?
The places named are not new settlements. Moladah, the second name, was a city in the south with a record going back to Joshua:
Moladah. A city in the south of Judah. People lived in it again when they returned from exile. Joshua 15:26; Joshua 19:2; 1 Chronicles 4:28; Nehemiah 11:26.
The third name is spelled more than one way. The ESV has Beth-pelet; the older record in Joshua uses another form:
Beth-palet. A town in the south of Judah, Joshua 15:27. It is called Beth-phelet in Nehemiah 11:26.
This verse sits inside a careful scheme. The chapter first settles Jerusalem, then turns to the surrounding land:
The subject of chapter 11 is how the people were distributed in the city and in the province. As a result, Jerusalem has some of the children of Judah (4-6) and of Benjamin (7-9). It also has a good number of priests (10-14), some Levites (15-18), and the gatekeepers (19). Then in the province we find the rest of Israel: priests, Levites and Nethinim (20, 21); the children of Judah (25-30); and Benjamin (31-35).
Nehemiah's great work was the wall of Jerusalem. This verse names people who lived far from it. That guards us against misreading what the wall was for:
How the people were spread through the land matters, and we should look at it together with the walls and the gates. These are the great subject of the book of Nehemiah. The spread of the people shows plainly that the walls were not built to shut God's people in, nor to shut them out. Children of Judah and Benjamin, priests and Levites lived outside the walls as well as inside. That was right, for God had ordered it so.
The same writer names both the need and the danger:
Without the walls, the house could not be kept in the holiness that is fitting for God's house for ever. Without the house, the walls would only have fenced in a chosen few who sought their own honour by shutting others out. Used rightly, the walls keep God's house holy, and so they secure the privileges of God's house for all the people of God. Misused, they become nothing more than the badge of a party and the safety of a sect.
The list is not tidy. Some towns lie beyond the old tribal borders, and one writer weighs that against the heart behind the move:
Verses 25 to 36 list the cities of Judah and Benjamin where those who returned from Babylon lived. Here again the order is not perfect. Judah even reaches a little beyond their limits at Beer-sheba. But alongside these faults there is a real desire in each one to take the place God assigned to him.
Another writer draws the lesson forward. Disorder among God's people does not lower the standard:
It is no different now, if we heed the word of the Lord. Those who bear His name are scattered and out of order, and that makes the difficulty great. But the presence of the Holy Spirit cuts off every excuse for lack of power. And the written word remains the standard and test of obedience.
A reader today may find these towns dry. Commentators differ on how much such lists give us. One holds that their main value lies with later readers:
The rest of the chapter states where the children of Judah lived, in the different cities and villages, and where the children of Benjamin lived... These notes mean little to us, but Jews of a later day will surely read them with intense interest.
- Assigned place. Behind every name in this list is one desire: to occupy the place God assigned. The order was not perfect; the desire was real.
- Old place recovered. Moladah and Beth-pelet were old towns in the south of Judah, named back in Joshua. People home from exile settled them again.
- Place in the province. The chapter settles Jerusalem first, then the province. Judah, Benjamin, priests and Levites each get a recorded place.
- Place outside the wall. Some of God's people lived outside the walls, and God ordered it so. Walls guard the holiness of His house; they do not fence off a favoured few.
- Place on record. Nothing in the list is wasted. Names that look dry to us wait for readers of a later day.
and in Hazar-Shual, and in Beer-sheba and its dependent villages,
Nehemiah 11 records where the returned exiles settled, and verse 27 names two villages in the far south of Judah. Why would God preserve a bare list of place names, and what does it say about His people who lived far from the rebuilt city?
The whole book has been about Jerusalem's wall, and verse 27 places God's people far outside it. One writer reads that as God's own arrangement, not a failure.
Where the people settled throughout the land matters, because the walls and the gates are the great subject of the Book of Nehemiah. This spread of the people shows that the walls were not built to shut the people of God in, or to shut them out. Children of Judah and Benjamin, priests and Levites lived outside the walls as well as inside, and rightly so, according to the ordering of God. We must remember that a whole nation went into captivity, not only the citizens of Jerusalem. It was a remnant of that nation that returned.
He also names the opposite danger.
Without the house the walls would only have fenced in a select group who wanted to lift themselves up by shutting others out. Used rightly, the walls keep God's house holy, and so they secure the privileges of God's house for all the people of God. If people abuse them, they simply become the badge of a party and the safety of a sect.
Beersheba was no new settlement. Its name goes back to Abraham, and it marked the southern edge of the land.
This name means well of the oath. It belongs to the place where Abraham and Abimelech made an agreement not to trouble each other, and confirmed it with an oath. Later Abraham lived there, and so did Isaac, who also dug a well there, and a city came to bear the same name. It became part of Simeon's share of the land. After the land was settled, Scripture speaks of it again and again as the most southern part of the land they held. Dan stands for the most northern. So "from Dan to Beersheba" was the common expression for the whole territory, even in the days of Solomon… When the exiles returned, some of them lived at Beersheba, and from there northward to the valley of Hinnom.
The same dictionary adds a warning about places like this.
The prophet Amos warns the people not to trust in any place of fame or of past blessing, such as Bethel, Gilgal, or Beersheba. The glory of all of them had faded. They must seek the Lord, and then they would live.
The new settlement did not match the old tribal borders exactly. One commentator admits the flaw and still finds something good in it.
Verses 25 to 36 list the cities of Judah and Benjamin where those who returned from Babylon lived. Here again the order is not perfect. Judah even spreads a little beyond its limits at Beersheba. But along with these defects goes a real desire in each one to take the place God assigned to him.
The same writer gives this small company a mission.
Each one fulfills his duties as though everything were in order, and God, for His part, takes account of this… This poor remnant of Jerusalem has a noble and valuable mission. They link the time of Solomon's past glory with the time of the Messiah's coming glory. And they do this during days of humiliation and shame!
One commentator expects these names to matter most to readers still future.
The rest of the chapter states where the children of Judah lived in the different cities and villages, and also the children of Benjamin… These notices mean little to us, but the Jews of a later day will surely read them with intense interest.
The list has a practical edge.
Verses 25-36 list the cities outside of Jerusalem with their nearby villages… But this shows us that God cares deeply about where people live, and takes full account of it. Too often God's people think only of their own advantage when deciding where to live: a job that pays well, a place near friends or relatives, a pleasant neighbourhood… Do we consider His interests first? What about being near a gathering of believers where we can be a blessing to others?
- Place. Hazar-shual and Beersheba were real homes of real families. Living outside the wall was God's ordering, not exile from Him.
- Promise. Beersheba means "well of the oath" — Abraham's ground, and the marker of the southern edge of the land they had lost and now held again.
- Flaw. Judah spread past its old limits, yet each person still wanted the place God gave him.
- Record. God kept the names of small villages, and one writer expects a later generation to read them with great interest.
- Choice. Where you live is not neutral. God takes account of it, so His interests should outweigh salary and comfort.
and in Ziklag, and in Meconah and its dependent villages;
Nehemiah 11 records where the returning exiles settled, and this verse names two small towns in the south, Ziklag and Meconah. Why would God write down who lived where?
The chapter divides the people between the capital and the countryside, and this verse belongs to the second half of that arrangement.
The subject of Chapter 11 is the distribution of the people in the city and the province. As a result of this distribution Jerusalem is peopled by a certain number of the children of Judah (4-6), and of Benjamin (7-9); a considerable number of priests (10-14); some Levites (15-18); and the porters (19). Then in the province we find the residue of Israel, composed of priests, Levites and Nethinim (20, 21); the children of Judah (25-30); and Benjamin (31-35).
Much of Nehemiah is about building walls and hanging gates. Yet God Himself placed many of His people in towns like Ziklag, well beyond any wall.
Where the people settled across the land matters. We must set it beside the walls and the gates, the great subject of the book of Nehemiah. This pattern shows plainly that the walls did not exist to fence God's people in, or to lock them out. Children of Judah and Benjamin, priests and Levites lived outside the walls as well as inside, and rightly so, because God ordered it that way.
The same writer weighs the right use of walls against their abuse.
Used rightly, the walls keep God's house holy and so secure the privileges of God's house for all God's people. Abused, they become no more than the badge of a party and the safety of a sect.
Ziklag is more than a name on a list. David lived there during the years the nation had no use for him.
A city in the south of Judah, which Achish, one of the Philistine kings, gave to David. The Amalekites burned it down and carried off the people living there while David was away, but the captives and the plunder were recovered. Later it belonged again to the tribe of Judah. Scripture lists the warriors who came to David at Ziklag while Saul was still alive, and so while the nation rejected David. 1 Chr. 12:1-22. Amasai, chief of the captains, said, "We are yours, O David, and with you, O son of Jesse! Peace, peace to you, and peace to your helpers! For your God helps you." Cheering words to a man in that position! They seem to picture those who follow the Lord Jesus now, while the world at large still rejects Him.
Mekonah, its companion in this verse, has no story attached at all — only a note that it was lived in again after the exile.
City inhabited on the return from exile. Neh. 11:28. Identified by some with ruins at el Mekenna.
Read closely, the settlement pattern is untidy. Judah spreads past its proper southern boundary. One writer holds both facts together — the flaw and the faith.
Verses 25 to 36 enumerate the cities of Judah and Benjamin inhabited by those who returned from Babylon. There again the order is not perfect; Judah even goes out a little distance from their limits at Beer-sheba. But these defects are accompanied by a real desire on the part of each one to occupy the place assigned to him by God.
If God troubled to record that certain families settled in Ziklag and Mekonah, then the choice of an address is not a neutral matter.
Verses 25-36 list the cities outside Jerusalem with their nearby villages. Some lie in the area of Judah and some in Benjamin (vv. 25, 36), because Jerusalem sat almost on the border of these two tribes. But here God shows us that He cares deeply about where people live, and takes full account of it. Too often God's people weigh only their own advantage in deciding where to live. They ask whether the work there pays well, whether the place is near friends or relatives, or whether the neighbourhood looks pleasant.
Commentators differ on how much these village names yield to us now. One suggests their value is still ahead of them.
The rest of the chapter comprises a statement of the location of the children of Judah in the different cities and villages, and also of the children of Benjamin. The former dwelt from Beersheba to the valley of Hinnom; the latter in the several places named; and of the Levites were divisions in Judah and in Benjamin. These notices, of little significance to us, will doubtless be consulted with intense interest by the Jews of a later day.
- Place — After Jerusalem was filled, the record moves out to the towns of Judah and Benjamin. This verse names two of them.
- Placed outside — Families, priests and Levites lived beyond the walls as well as inside. God ordered it that way, so it was not second best.
- Placed in Ziklag — David found a home there while the nation rejected him. His men picture those who stand with the Lord Jesus while the world still refuses Him.
- Placed imperfectly — Judah's borders spilled past Beersheba. Even so, each family wanted the place God assigned. Flawed order and real desire stood side by side.
- Placed on record — God writes down where His people live. So where we settle is His concern, and these names wait for readers still to come.
and in En-Rimmon, and in Zorah, and in Jarmuth,
Nehemiah 11:29 names three small towns in the south of Judah. The verse belongs to a list of villages settled outside Jerusalem, and it raises a plain question: why does God's record keep such small details?
The chapter divides between those chosen to live inside the city and those spread across the countryside. This verse falls in the second group.
The subject of Chapter 11 is the distribution of the people in the city and the province. As a result of this distribution Jerusalem is peopled by a certain number of the children of Judah (4-6), and of Benjamin (7-9); a considerable number of priests (10-14); some Levites (15-18); and the porters (19). Then in the province we find the residue of Israel, composed of priests, Levites and Nethinim (20, 21); the children of Judah (25-30); and Benjamin (31-35).
The first name in the verse, En-rimmon, joins two older names: Ain and Rimmon. One writer quotes Keil on how the two came together.
"Ain and Rimmon," says Keil, "count as towns of the tribe of Simeon. Scripture writes them without the joining word 'and,' so Joshua 19:7 and 1 Chronicles 4:32 treat them as one name... But after the captivity people also called them 'En-Rimmon,' and Nehemiah 11:29 gives them as one single place. They were probably so close together that in time they grew into one."
The third town in the verse had been an enemy stronghold when Israel first entered the land. Its name and the name of its king were read as a picture.
The third city that armed against Gibeon was Jarmuth, which means "elevation." Its king was Piram, a name that means "the wild donkey." False religion likes to raise itself high. But does a wild donkey belong in a high place? The wild donkey pictures man in his rebellious, independent state, yet Piram held the high place. Such pride must be taken down.
Nehemiah's great work was a wall around Jerusalem. So why does the record name villages far to the south?
The spread of the people through the Land matters when you look at it together with the walls and the gates. They form the great subject of the Book of Nehemiah. This spread shows that the walls were not built to shut the people of God in, or to shut them out. Children of Judah and Benjamin, priests and Levites lived outside the walls as well as within, and they were right to do so, in keeping with God's ordering.
The same writer shows what the walls were for, and what they become when people misuse them.
The people were brought back to the Land to build the house. Once the house was built, the walls became necessary to keep it holy. Without the house, the walls would only have enclosed a select company who sought their own exaltation by shutting others out. Used rightly, the walls keep God's house holy, and so they secure the privileges of God's house for all the people of God. If people abuse them, they simply become the badge of a party and the safety of a sect.
The list of villages is not a random scatter. One writer draws out the principle behind it.
Everything was to be done in a decent and orderly way. Each man was to do the work God appointed him, and each had his own proper place.
The chapter takes care to record who these settlers were. One writer explains why that record mattered so much after the exile.
For seventy years they had been in Babylon. It would have been no wonder if they had settled down in the country of their exile, and if they, or at least their children born in Babylon, had forgotten the land of their birth, stopped setting Jerusalem above their chief joy, and lost their nationality by mixing with the Gentiles. The record of their genealogy shows that they had not done so. They had continued to prize their descent from Abraham as their greatest heritage, because it had put them among a people favoured by the Lord, and in the middle of whom He Himself had dwelt. So these people were not like Esau, who despised his birthright. They clung to theirs through all their trouble and shame, as their God-given title to everything their nation expected and hoped for.
The same writer adds that the list is not finished with its readers.
These notes mean little to us. No doubt the Jews of a later day will read them with intense interest.
- Place. The verse belongs to the list of villages outside Jerusalem where Judah settled, once the city itself had its residents.
- Names. En-rimmon was likely two neighbouring towns that grew into one. Jarmuth means "elevation," and its king bore a name that means "the wild donkey."
- Reach. The wall was never built to shut people in or to keep people out. Families lived outside it as well as inside, and rightly so.
- Order. Each household had its appointed spot. God's work is to be done in a decent and orderly way, every person in his own place.
- Record. These small villages stayed on record because the exiles held on to their birthright instead of despising it. A later generation will read the list with keen interest.
Zanoah, Adullam, and their hamlets, in Lachish and its fields, in Azekah and its dependent villages and they encamped from Beer-sheba unto the valley of Hinnom.
Nehemiah 11 closes with a long list of towns and villages. Verse 30 marks its far edge: Judah's settlers spread from Beersheba in the far south up to the valley at Jerusalem's edge. Why did God record where ordinary families slept? And why did most of His people live outside the walls Nehemiah had just built?
Beersheba is the southern end of that line. A survey of the town joins a warning from the prophet Amos to the plain fact that returning exiles settled there:
The prophet Amos warns the people not to trust in any places of renown or of former blessing, such as Bethel, Gilgal, or Beersheba; the glory of all had faded: they must seek the LORD, and they would live. When the exiles returned, some of them lived at Beersheba, and from there northward to the valley of Hinnom.
The towns listed were not blank ground. Lachish in particular had been a prize of war, and the memory of its fall was carved in stone by the empire that took it:
It was a fortified city on the route running north to south. It was garrisoned by Rehoboam when the kingdom divided. It was taken by Sennacherib, and among the slabs discovered at Nineveh is one showing the king sitting on his throne, with captives from Lachish kneeling before him, while his troops, passing in review, display the spoils they have taken. The inscription reads, "Sennacherib, king of multitudes, king of Assyria, sits upon a lofty throne, and the spoil of the city of Lachish passes before him."
One writer sums up the whole list in a single principle:
All things were to be done in decency and order; each was to do the work divinely appointed, and each had his due place.
Another commentator notes that the arrangement was not perfect:
Verses 25 to 36 list the cities of Judah and Benjamin where those who returned from Babylon lived. Here again the order is not perfect; Judah even goes out a little beyond their limits at Beersheba. But these defects go together with a real desire on the part of each one to occupy the place God assigned to him.
Most of Judah, including everyone in verse 30, lived far from the city Nehemiah had just walled. One writer explains why that was right:
The distribution of the people throughout the land matters when we view it alongside the walls and the gates. These are the great subject of the book of Nehemiah. This distribution shows that the walls were not built to fence the people of God in, or to shut them out. Children of Judah and Benjamin, priests and Levites all lived outside the walls as well as inside. That was right, according to God's ordering.
The same writer contrasts walls used rightly with walls abused:
Rightly used, the walls maintain the holiness of God's house and so secure the privileges of God's house for all the people of God. If abused, they simply become the badge of a party and the security of a sect.
Why preserve these addresses at all? One writer points forward to readers who will care:
The rest of the chapter states where the children of Judah settled in the different cities and villages. It does the same for the children of Benjamin. The former lived from Beersheba to the valley of Hinnom (v. 30). The latter lived in the several places named. And of the Levites there were divisions in Judah and in Benjamin. These notes mean little to us. But the Jews of a later day will no doubt read them with intense interest.
(Older translations say "dwelt"; the ESV says "encamped".)
All of this happened in a time of ruin. That is where its value lies:
Each one of them fulfils his function as though everything were in order, and God, on His side, takes account of this. All this happens, no doubt, in a time of wretchedness and ruin. But is it a small thing in God's eyes that they recognised the order He had set up, and carried it out despite the ruin, looking on to a time of perfection still future? This poor remnant of Jerusalem has the noble and valuable mission of linking Solomon's past glory with the Messiah's coming glory. They do it during days of humiliation and shame.
- Place given. Every family in the list had its due place, and God appointed the work each one did.
- Place taken. The order was imperfect. Judah even spread a little past its limits. Yet each one really wanted to occupy the place God assigned.
- Place outside. Living outside the walls was right, according to God's ordering. The walls were never built to fence people in or shut people out.
- Place abused. Used rightly, walls guard the holiness of God's house and secure its privileges for all His people. Abused, they become the badge of a party.
- Place remembered. Names that mean little to us will be read with intense interest by the Jews of a later day: a poor remnant linking Solomon's past glory to the Messiah's coming glory.
And the children of Benjamin from Geba [dwelt] in Michmash and Aija and Bethel, and their dependent villages,
Nehemiah 11 tells how the exiles who returned were settled, some in Jerusalem and the rest out in the province. This verse opens the list of Benjamin's towns. A bare list of names raises a fair question: why does Scripture record who lived where, and what does that teach us now?
The chapter moves from the city out to the countryside, and this verse opens its last section.
Chapter 11 is about how the people were spread between the city and the province. … Then in the province we find the rest of Israel: priests, Levites and temple servants (20, 21); the children of Judah (25-30); and Benjamin (31-35).
Nehemiah's great work was the wall and the gates of Jerusalem. Yet these towns of Benjamin lie outside them, and one writer sees God's hand in that.
How the people were spread through the land matters when you look at it alongside the walls and the gates, the great subject of the Book of Nehemiah. This spread shows plainly that the walls were not built to shut the people of God in, or to shut them out. Children of Judah and Benjamin, priests and Levites lived outside the walls as well as inside, and rightly so, because God ordered it that way.
Another writer draws a lesson from the whole list of villages, this verse included.
Everything was to be done properly and in order. Each person was to do the work God appointed, and each had his own place.
The same writer applies it to Christians now:
It is no different now, if we pay attention to the word of the Lord. Those who bear His name are scattered and out of order, and that makes it hard. But the presence of the Holy Spirit leaves us no excuse for having no power, and the written word remains the standard and test of obedience.
Benjamin had a history of loss before the exile.
When the kingdom divided, Benjamin stayed with Judah, but Israel took a large part of its land. At times the tribe seems to drop out of sight. Ahijah said that God had kept one tribe for the house of David, as if Benjamin were counted as cut off in judgement (1 Kings 11:36). People spoke of the two tribes as 'Judah,' whereas the ten tribes were called 'Israel.' On the return from the captivity, Benjamin had its share of blessing with Judah. Ezra 1:5; Ezra 10:9; Neh. 11:4-36.
"Aija" is probably the town Joshua once burned to the ground.
Joshua took it by a trick, after Israel was driven back the first time because of Achan sin. The city was burned and left a 'heap.' … It stood near Bethel, in Benjamin's portion, and it seems to have been rebuilt, since Ezra 2:28 and Nehemiah 7:32 mention it. The Aiath of Isaiah 10:28 and the Aija of Nehemiah 11:31 are probably the same place as Ai.
Bethel's record is darker still:
When the kingdom divided, Bethel fell to Israel, and Jeroboam set up one of the golden calves there, to stop the Israelites going to Jerusalem to worship. An altar was set up and sacrifices offered to the idol, but a man of God condemned it, and the altar was torn apart. 1 Kings 12:29-33 … no one destroyed that idol altar until the days of Josiah. 2 Kings 23:4, 15, 17, 19. Among those who returned from exile were men of Bethel, and people lived in the place again. Ezra 2:28; Neh. 7:32; Neh. 11:31.
Commentators differ on how much the list itself gives a reader today. One is frank:
The rest of the chapter states where the children of Judah lived in the different cities and villages, and where the children of Benjamin lived. … These notes mean little to us, but Jews of a later day will surely read them with intense interest.
One writer adds a warning about the truth of separation:
We should indeed realize that without separation from evil it is impossible to maintain the holiness of God's house. But we should also realize the grave danger of abusing that undoubted truth of separation. It can be used to form a select company which shuts out many of the people of God, denies the Lord His rights, and in the end loses the very truth of the house of God which a true separation from evil would maintain.
- Place assigned. This verse opens the last part of the chapter — Benjamin's towns out in the province, not in the city.
- Place outside. Judah, Benjamin, priests and Levites lived outside the wall as well as inside. God ordered it that way.
- Place restored. Benjamin lost much of its land before the exile. On the return it shared Judah's blessing, living again in Bethel, where the golden calf had stood, and in Aija, the heap Joshua burned.
- Place honoured. Everything was done in order, and each person had the work God gave him. Today, with Christians scattered, the written word is still the test of obedience.
- Place abused. Walls that guard holiness can become the badge of a select company. Then the very truth they should keep is lost.
in Anathoth, Nob, Ananiah,
This verse names three small towns of Benjamin in a long list of places where the returned exiles made their homes. Behind the bare names lie a ruined priestly city, a prophet's field, and a question: why does God record where ordinary families lived?
Chapter 11 splits the people between the capital and the countryside. Verse 32 sits in the Benjamin part of that country list. Where the people settled says something about the walls Nehemiah had just built.
Where the people settled across the land matters, and it must be seen together with the walls and the gates, which are the great subject of the Book of Nehemiah. This spread of the people shows that the walls were not built to shut the people of God in, or to shut them out. Children of Judah and Benjamin, priests and Levites, lived outside the walls as well as inside, and that was right, because God had ordered it so. We must remember that it was a nation that went into captivity, not only the citizens of Jerusalem, and it was a remnant of this nation that returned.
Anathoth is the best known of the three names. It lay a few miles from Jerusalem, it belonged to the priests, and one of its sons was the prophet Jeremiah.
The second name carries a darker memory. Nob held the tabernacle — Israel's tent of worship — and its priests, and it became the scene of a massacre.
A city in the tribe of Benjamin, where Ahimelech the priest lived with the tabernacle of the Lord. David came there when he fled from Saul, and he and his men ate the holy bread. The priest also gave him the sword of Goliath. Then Doeg betrayed them, and this led to the death of Ahimelech, his father's house, and everyone living in the city of Nob.
A town whose every inhabitant had been killed is here inhabited again.
Anathoth comes up once more in Scripture. Years before this list, God told Jeremiah to buy a field there, just as Babylon was about to sweep the people away.
Yet at such a moment Jeremiah's uncle asked him to buy a field. What! When they were all about to be swept out of the land and carried into captivity! Should he then buy a field? What reason could there be for such a deal? But it was Jehovah who told him to do it. That buying was a testimony of the greatest value. It showed that despite the ruin, despite the destruction of the city, Jeremiah believed the Jews would return to their property, and that people would still farm the land and build houses there.
Nehemiah 11:32 is the receipt for that field. Anathoth is lived in again.
The towns come in ordered blocks: Judah's in one, Benjamin's in another. That order was not an accident.
All things were to be done in a fitting and orderly way. Each was to do the work God appointed, and each had his due place (vv. 20-36).
Modern readers skim lists like this. One writer admits it, and points to readers who will care about it far more than we do.
The rest of the chapter tells where the children of Judah settled in the different cities and villages, and where the children of Benjamin settled. The first group lived from Beersheba to the Valley of Hinnom (v. 30). The second lived in the various places named. Of the Levites, some divisions lived in Judah and some in Benjamin. These notes mean little to us, but the Jews of a later day will surely read them with intense interest.
- Ruin. Nob was the town where Doeg killed Ahimelech, his father's house, and every inhabitant. Its name on this list means the place did not stay dead.
- Pledge. Jeremiah bought a field at Anathoth as the city fell, sure that people would farm the land and build on it again.
- Return. Anathoth belonged to Aaron's descendants and was Jeremiah's home. 128 of its own people came back from captivity and settled it again.
- Place. Everything was done in order: each had his appointed work and his due place, inside the walls or outside them.
- Purpose. The walls were never meant to fence God's people in or to shut them out. And a list that looks dry to us will grip a later generation.
Hazor, Ramah, Gittaim,
Nehemiah 11 closes with a bare roll-call of towns. The three named here belonged to Benjamin, in the country outside Jerusalem. Why does God keep such a list, and what does it say about where His people live?
The chapter's business is settlement. The returned exiles had to spread out between the capital and the country. This verse sits in the last part of that list.
The subject of Chapter 11 is the distribution of the people in the city and the province. Some of the children of Judah and of Benjamin settled in Jerusalem, with a good number of priests, some Levites, and the gatekeepers. Then in the province we find the rest of Israel: priests, Levites and Nethinim (20, 21); the children of Judah (25-30); and Benjamin (31-35).
One writer admits these names mean little now. Then he looks ahead to readers who will study them closely.
These notices seem of little importance to us. Yet the Jews of a later day will no doubt study them with intense interest.
The list is not a random scatter. Another writer names the principle behind it.
All things were to be done in decency and order; each was to do the work divinely appointed, and each had his due place.
Each name here has its own past. Hazor is known only as a resettlement site:
Place where the Benjamites resided after the return from exile. Neh. 11:33.
Ramah, by contrast, carries centuries of history — a border town fought over by rival kings, and a name that reappears in the New Testament.
City of Benjamin. It stood on the border between Judah and Israel. Baasha, king of Israel, tried to build up the place as a fort against Asa, king of Judah. Asa stopped him: he asked the king of Syria to attack Israel, and sent him a rich present of gold and silver. Joshua 18:25; 1 Kings 15:17-22; Jer. 31:15; Jer. 40:1. Called RAMA in Matt. 2:18.
The wall and its gates dominate Nehemiah's book. Here God's people live in villages well away from Jerusalem. That settles what the walls were for.
The spread of the people throughout the Land matters when we look at it together with the walls and the gates. These form the great subject of the Book of Nehemiah. For this spread shows that the walls were not put up to confine the people of God on the one hand, or to shut them out on the other. Children of Judah and Benjamin, priests and Levites lived outside the walls as well as within, and rightly so, according to the ordering of God. We must remember that it was a nation that went into captivity, and not only the citizens of Jerusalem. It was a remnant of this nation that returned.
The families out in the villages were not second-class. The city could not feed itself.
The measures of discipline applied to everyone who had returned to God's Land, and not only to those living in Jerusalem. So they take for granted that the interest of every Israelite is tied to the prosperity of God's house. They also take for granted that those living in the province are as necessary for the upkeep of that house as those who lived inside the city. The priests and Levites within the walls may have more to do with the service of the house. But the story makes it very clear that those within the walls depended on those outside for their daily food.
The same writer adds a warning. Walls exist for the house inside them.
Without the walls the house could not be kept in the holiness that suits God's house for ever. Without the house the walls would only have enclosed a select company seeking to lift themselves up by shutting others out. Rightly used, the walls maintain the holiness of God's house and so secure the privileges of God's house for all the people of God. If abused, they simply become the badge of a party and the security of a sect.
- Named. These three towns of Benjamin lay out in the province. God records where ordinary families lived, not only where leaders lived.
- Placed. The distribution follows an order in which each had his due place and his appointed work.
- Outside. Families lived beyond the wall by God's own ordering. So the wall was never built to shut God's people in or lock them out.
- Needed. Those inside the city depended on those outside for daily food. The province upheld God's house as much as the city did.
- Warned. A wall that stops serving the house becomes the badge of a party, not a guard of holiness.
Hadid, Zeboim, Neballat,
These three place names sit in a register of villages where Benjamin's families settled after the exile. A list like this looks like filler. Yet it answers the question the book closes with: who lived where, and why God put it on record.
The chapter is a survey of settlement. This verse falls in its final block:
The subject of Chapter 11 is the distribution of the people in the city and the province... In the province we find the rest of Israel: priests, Levites and temple servants (20, 21); the children of Judah (25-30); and Benjamin (31-35).
These are not symbols. A reference work pins Neballat to a place still on the map today:
City occupied by Benjamites on the return from exile. Neh. 11:34. Identified with Beit Nabala, 31° 59' N, 34° 57' E.
Some of these names have survived. Writing about Lydda, a town in the New Testament, one commentator finds the same cluster of villages still there:
Lydda in the New Testament is none other than the Lod of 1 Chr. 8:12; Ezra 2:33; Neh. 7:37 and Neh. 11:35, called Ludd or Lidi to this day... Ono, Hadid, and Neballat, linked with Lod long ago, can still be clearly recognised under their modern names.
The walls and gates are the great subject of this book. So why does it end by spreading families out into villages like these?
How the people were spread through the Land matters when you look at it alongside the walls and the gates, which are the great subject of the Book of Nehemiah. This spread of the people shows plainly that the walls were not built to shut the people of God in, or to shut them out. Children of Judah and Benjamin, priests and Levites, lived outside the walls as well as inside, and they were right to do so, because God had ordered it. We must remember that it was a nation that went into captivity, not only the citizens of Jerusalem, and it was a remnant of this nation that returned.
The same walls can be abused. Everything hangs on their link to the house:
So let us see this clearly. God brought the people back to the Land to build the house. Once the house was built, the walls became necessary to keep it holy. Without the walls, the house could not be kept in the holiness that suits God's house for ever. Without the house, the walls would only have fenced in a favoured group who wanted to raise themselves up by shutting others out. Used rightly, the walls keep God's house holy, and so they secure the privileges of God's house for all the people of God. Abused, they simply become the badge of a party and the safety of a sect.
One writer reads the whole list of villages and draws a single conclusion:
Everything was to be done properly and in order. Each person was to do the work God appointed, and each had his own place.
These names mean little to most readers today. One writer points to readers who will value them far more:
The rest of the chapter states where the children of Judah lived in the different cities and villages, and where the children of Benjamin lived... These records mean little to us, but no doubt the Jews of a later day will study them with intense interest.
Compared with what God promises, the whole resettlement looks small:
How different it will be in the coming day of Jerusalem's glory! The city will still be wide and large, but the people will no longer be few. In that day the Land will be too small for all who live in it, and of the city they will say, "The place is too narrow for me; make room for me to dwell in" (Isa. 49:14-21)... There had been reformation in the days of the kings. There had been restoration in the days of Ezra and Nehemiah, and these restored saints had enjoyed their revivals. But whether reformation, restoration or revival, it always came in outward weakness. It is no different today... Though the house of God takes in all His people, it will always be only a "few" who are ready to walk by its principles and so enjoy its privileges.
- Placed. These three names sit in the Benjamin part of the settlement list, verses 31–35. The chapter records who lived in the city and who lived in the province.
- Real. These are real towns, linked with Lod and Ono long ago. Several can still be recognised under later names.
- Outside. The wall was not built to shut God's people in or to shut anyone out. Families in villages like these lived where God ordered them to live.
- Guarded. Walls exist for the sake of the house. Keep that link and they guard holiness for everyone. Lose it and they become the badge of a party.
- Few. Restoration always came in outward weakness. The small numbers here point on to a day when the city will be too small for its crowds.
Lod, and Ono, the valley of craftsmen.
This verse closes a long list of Benjamin's towns, all of them lying outside the wall Nehemiah had just finished. So why does God record dusty village names, and does living outside the wall mean living outside the blessing?
The whole point of Nehemiah's labour was a wall and gates. So it matters that this chapter ends by settling God's people in towns the wall does not touch.
The way the people were spread through the land is important. You have to see it alongside the walls and the gates, which are the great subject of the book of Nehemiah. This spread of the people makes it plain that the walls were not put up to shut God's people in, or to shut them out. Children of Judah and Benjamin, priests and Levites all lived outside the walls as well as inside, and that was right, since God had ordered it so. Remember that a whole nation went into captivity, not only the citizens of Jerusalem, and it was a remnant of that nation that returned.
The wall still had a purpose. That purpose hung on the house of God inside it — and the wall could be turned into its opposite.
Without the walls the house could not stay in the holiness that fits God's house for ever. Without the house the walls would only have fenced in a chosen few, who sought their own greatness by shutting others out. Used rightly, the walls guard the holiness of God's house. So they secure the privileges of that house for all the people of God. Misused, they just become the badge of a party and the safety of a sect.
Ono appears once before in this book. Nehemiah's enemies asked Nehemiah to come down and meet them in the plain of Ono. One writer reads that invitation in the light of this verse.
It is as if they said, Do not be so narrow and exclusive. Do come down from your sacred enclosure to "one of the villages in the plain of Ono." "Let us meet together." Come down, and give us your approval. Do you ask what this plain of Ono was? Turn to Nehemiah 11:35, "Lod and Ono, the valley of craftsmen." Leave the one centre of worship inside the walls of Jerusalem, and come down to one of the villages of "the craftsmen." They knew well what would happen if the true worship of God was set up inside that divine enclosure. They would feel as the Ephesians did later on: their trade was in danger. "Men," said the men of Ephesus, "you know that from this business we have our wealth."
These are not vanished places. One of them appears again in the New Testament under a different name.
Some may like to know that the Lydda of the New Testament is none other than the Lod of 1 Chronicles 8:12, Ezra 2:33, Nehemiah 7:37 and Nehemiah 11:35. It is called Ludd or Lidi to this day... Ono, Hadid and Neballat, long linked with Lod, can still be recognised clearly enough under their modern names.
The list of towns in these closing verses is not tidy. One writer admits the flaw, but he first says what this small returned remnant was carrying.
This poor remnant in Jerusalem has the noble and valuable mission of linking the time of Solomon's past glory with the time of the Messiah's coming glory, and they do it in days of humiliation and shame! ... Verses 25 to 36 list the cities of Judah and Benjamin where those who returned from Babylon settled. Here again the order is not perfect. Judah even goes a little beyond its limits at Beer-sheba. Yet alongside these faults runs a real desire in each one to take the place God assigned to him.
A reader today may feel nothing at names like Neballat and Ono. One writer says the same, and then looks ahead.
The rest of the chapter states where the children of Judah settled in the different cities and villages, and where the children of Benjamin settled too... These notes mean little to us, but the Jews of a later day will no doubt read them with intense interest.
- Place. The towns named here were real places of Benjamin, outside the wall. Lod is the Lydda of the New Testament, and it can still be found today.
- Purpose. The wall was never built to pen God's people in, or to shut them out. Judah, Benjamin, priests and Levites all lived beyond it, as God ordered.
- Peril. A wall with no house inside it fences in a proud few. Used rightly, it guards holiness and keeps the house open to all God's people.
- Pressure. Ono was the plain where enemies urged Nehemiah to come down and be less strict. There the craftsmen's trade had most to lose from true worship.
- Providence. The order here is not perfect, yet each person took the place God gave him. These names mean little to us, but Scripture keeps them for readers who will one day prize them.
And of the Levites there were divisions of Judah [dwelling] in Benjamin.
The chapter's long list of towns ends with a quiet piece of record-keeping: some Levite groups once counted with Judah now belong with Benjamin. It looks like filing — so why does Scripture keep such details, and what do they say about how God places His people?
Lists of names and places can look like dead weight in the Bible. One commentator points forward instead.
Judah lived from Beersheba to the valley of Hinnom. Benjamin lived in the various places named. And of the Levites there were divisions in Judah and in Benjamin. These notes mean little to us. But the Jews of a later day will no doubt read them with intense interest.
The chapter does not simply record where people ended up. It records an arrangement.
Everything was to be done in decency and order. Each was to do the work God appointed, and each had his due place.
This verse places Levite divisions with a tribe that was not their own. That arrangement has a history behind it.
Once the inheritance had been described, the Levites received their portion. As a tribe they have no territory, so God allotted them forty-two cities scattered throughout Israel. This shows the unbending judgment of God — "I will divide them in Jacob and scatter them in Israel." It also shows His grace, which rejoices over judgment and turns it into a means of blessing. Scattered through the land, yet linked with God's centre at the tabernacle, the Levites would answer to the meaning of their name. And as "joined" to all the tribes, they would unite them into one whole.
A book about walls could make the villagers outside look like second-class citizens. The opposite is true.
Where the people lived across the land is important, and we should view it together with the walls and the gates. These form the great subject of the book of Nehemiah. This spread of the people shows that the walls were not put up to confine the people of God, nor to shut them out. Children of Judah and Benjamin, priests and Levites lived outside the walls as well as inside — and rightly so, by God's own ordering. We must remember that a whole nation went into captivity, not only the citizens of Jerusalem, and a remnant of that nation returned.
The same writer adds a warning for anyone who prizes separation from evil.
We should indeed realise that without separation from evil we cannot maintain the holiness of God's house. But we should also realise a grave danger. Separation is an undoubted truth, yet people abuse it to form a select company. Such a company shuts out many of the people of God, denies the Lord His rights, and in the end loses the very truth of the house of God that a true separation from evil would maintain.
This verse moves Levite families across a tribal line. Choices about where to live are never only ours.
Verses 25-36 list the cities outside Jerusalem with their nearby villages. Some lie in the area of Judah and some in Benjamin (vv. 25, 36), for Jerusalem sat almost on the border of these two tribes. But this shows us that God has a vital concern about where people live, and takes full account of it. Too often the people of God weigh only the advantages to themselves when they decide where to live — whether work in a certain place promises a high salary, whether a location is near friends or relatives, or whether the neighbourhood seems pleasant. If such things attract us too strongly, should we not stop and consider that the Lord has a vital interest in this matter? Do we consider His interests first?
- Placed. Everyone in the chapter has a due place, and God appoints the work each one does.
- Joined. The Levites own no territory, so they are joined to others. Judgment scattered them; grace made that scattering a bond between the tribes.
- Not fenced. Priests, Levites, Judah and Benjamin lived outside the walls as well as inside, by God's own arrangement. Walls never existed to confine or to shut out.
- Warned. Separation from evil is necessary. But abuse it into a select circle, and it shuts out God's people and loses the truth it claimed to guard.
- Recorded. God keeps account of where His people live, and these dull place-names still wait for readers who will prize them.