The words of Nehemiah the son of Hachaliah. And it came to pass in the month Chislev, in the twentieth year, as I was in Shushan the fortress,
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
that Hanani, one of my brethren, came, he and [certain] men of Judah. And I asked them concerning the Jews that had escaped, who were left of the captivity, and concerning Jerusalem.
A man serving in a Persian palace receives visitors from Judah, and his first question is about the survivors and about Jerusalem. What he asked shows where his heart already was, long before the news reached him.
The book opens by showing the man before the work. His job was secular and his surroundings were comfortable.
The opening chapter describes the secret exercises by which God prepares the vessel for the special work in hand. Ezra, the instrument of a former revival, was not only a priest but a scribe — a student well versed in the word of God. Nehemiah was more a practical man of affairs. He held a responsible secular position as the cup-bearer to the king in the palace of Shushan. But the easy life of the palace, the well-paid position he held, and the king's favour did not lessen his interest in the people of God and the city of Jerusalem.
One writer spells out the case Nehemiah could have made for minding his own business.
Personally, he was surrounded by every kind of comfort. As far as that went, it was a sorry exchange to leave the court of the great king and to go into all the desolations of the land and of Jerusalem. He might well have reasoned to himself: "Why should I trouble myself about Judea? It was because of our sins that we were driven out, and it is obvious that the people who are there are utterly unworthy. They are behaving without a thought or care for the glory of God. Why should I trouble myself about it? … It is no good to think of the people of God. It is only a question of the soul individually. All I have to do is to serve the Lord where I am."
Nehemiah's question has two halves. Each half names a different group.
His question shows that his heart took in all the people of the land. He asked about "the Jews who escaped, who had survived the exile" — that is, about those left behind when so many went into captivity in Babylon. He also asked "concerning Jerusalem," meaning the remnant that had gone up, with the permission of Cyrus, to build the Lord's house. So he was in fellowship with the heart of God, taken up as he was with His people and His interests. … They never dreamed of isolating themselves from the whole nation, nor of seeking the welfare of a single tribe only.
The visit came at a datable moment, to a man born in exile.
Nehemiah was a young man, born in captivity. It was in the month of Chislev, in the twentieth year (445 B.C.), that Hanani his brother visited him with certain men out of Judah. The question he asked them shows at once the deep interest he had in God's people. Though he had never seen Jerusalem, the city of his fathers, he loved it and felt like all godly captives. One of the Psalms puts that feeling well — "If I forget you, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget its skill! Let my tongue stick to the roof of my mouth, if I do not remember you, if I do not set Jerusalem above my highest joy!" (Psalm 137:5-6). Though he lived in prosperity, his heart was with his people.
Nehemiah's address was Shushan. His heart lived somewhere else.
In his circumstances, Nehemiah was not on divine territory. He was in Shushan, Persian territory. But he was there under the governmental ordering of God, and his heart was not there. … Here we see a man whom providence placed in Shushan, the palace. Faith took him out of it, and brought him, in exercise of heart under the hand of God, back to divine territory.
Hanani does not disappear after this verse. He has a part in what follows.
Hanani, whom Nehemiah calls "my brother," is mentioned again once the wall is finished. He was the one who brought the first news of the sad state of the city and of the Jews, as told in Nehemiah 1:2. He is linked here with Hananiah, a ruler in the city — "a more faithful and God-fearing man than many." … To have such men identify themselves with him in his service must have been an encouragement, granted to him by God.
- Place. Nehemiah held a comfortable, well-paid post in a Persian palace. None of it lessened his interest in God's people or His city.
- Question. His question showed where his heart already lived. He asked about those left behind and about the remnant that had returned.
- Fellowship. He cared about the whole people, not one favoured corner of it. That is fellowship with the heart of God.
- Faith. Providence placed him in Shushan; faith took him out of it. His heart was never there.
- Preparation. God prepares the man before He gives him the work. Even the messenger who brought the bad news became a fellow worker.
And they said to me, Those who remain, that are left of the captivity there in the province, are in great affliction and reproach; and the wall of Jerusalem is in ruins, and its gates are burned with fire.
Word reaches Nehemiah in the Persian palace about the Jews who went back to Judah, and the news is bleak. Commentators see more than a news bulletin here: the report describes a moral condition as well as a ruined city.
The single word "province" carries the humiliation.
Israel was no longer a nation settled in their own land, as they had been under Joshua and the Judges. They were no longer a kingdom with one of their own sons on the throne — the kind of throne that the glory could accompany, as under David and David's sons. The people were now subjects of the Gentile. They depended on the Gentile's permission to live in the land of their fathers, and to keep the laws and do the service of their God.
Being looked down on is not always a bad sign. Commentators separate reproach earned for God's name from reproach earned by inconsistent living.
They were in great affliction. It came out of their own moral condition, and out of the activity and hatred of the enemies who surrounded them. They were also in reproach. It is a blessing when God's people suffer reproach because they are His people, or because of the name of their God (compare 1 Peter 4:14). But nothing is sadder than when the world reproaches the Lord's people, or when they become a reproach to the world, through their inconsistent walk and ways. It would seem, from the end of the book of Ezra, that the reproach in this case was of the second kind. They claimed to be what they really were — God's people — but they denied it by their alliances with the nations around them and by forgetting the claims of their God.
The damage was real history — Nebuchadnezzar's army had done it. But commentators also read the ruins as a picture of what had collapsed inside the community.
That was the plain fact, and Nebuchadnezzar had been the instrument, through his army, that did it. But there is another meaning as well. The wall is the symbol of separation, and, as we have seen, the wall of separation between Israel and the nations around them had been broken down. The gate was the place of judgment, and so the emblem of it. This teaches us that no one was giving justice and fair judgment any more.
Commentators describe the gate a little differently. One reads it as the place of justice, another as the place where God's people watch who comes in.
The wall stands for keeping separate from evil. The gate stands for godly care in receiving people and in discipline. In any age, careless associations and slack discipline among the people of God are sure signs of a low moral condition.
Set this verse beside the book that follows Nehemiah, and the contrast is startling.
The next book, Esther, tells us what happened to the much larger number of Jews who did not care about God's interests in His temple, but chose to stay in the land of their captivity... The people who, despite their faults, had cared for God's interests and rebuilt His temple are marked by affliction and reproach. Meanwhile those who did not care, and stayed in their comfort, have "feasting", "gladness", and "a good day".
Nehemiah had every excuse to write them off. His attachment did not depend on how the remnant was doing.
Nehemiah loved the people of God at the very time when they had lost their rightful claim — when God was disciplining them for their serious faults and sins against Him — at a time when giving them up seemed the most reasonable thing to do. Had not God given them up? Why, then, should Nehemiah feel so much about them?... He knew that only the remnant of that people was left on earth — deeply guilty, and punished with full justice — but still the people of God, the people with whom God's plans of blessing and grace for the earth are bound up.
The news did not move Nehemiah to comment. It moved him to mourning and prayer.
If Nehemiah was so moved by the earthly state of Jerusalem and the affliction of the remnant, how much more should believers mourn and weep over the spiritual state of God's people. Yet how little of this sorrowing spirit do we see today! We need it if we are to humble ourselves and pray effectively.
- Province — Judah was a district of a foreign empire. It served its own God only by a Gentile king's permission.
- Reproach — To be despised for God's name is a blessing. To be despised for inconsistent living is a sorrow.
- Wall — Broken walls picture separation from evil given up. Burned gates picture justice and godly care no longer at work.
- Comfort — Those who cared for God's interests suffered. Those who ignored them feasted. Ease is no measure of God's approval.
- Tears — Nehemiah's love held when the people had lost every claim. The news moved him to mourning and prayer.
And it came to pass, when I heard these words, that I sat and wept, and mourned for days, and fasted, and prayed before the God of the heavens,
News of the ruined state of God's people reached Nehemiah in the Persian court, and he could not put it down. What follows is not a plan or a protest but a man sitting down to weep — and the commentators treat that as the point where God begins His work.
A report can be heard and set aside. One writer shows what this one did to Nehemiah, and where he turned with it.
He made the sorrowful state of the people his own. He felt it according to God. In their affliction he was afflicted. But he knew to whom to turn. He wept, mourned, fasted, and prayed. "Is anyone among you suffering?" says James. "Let him pray." And the sorrow and affliction of Nehemiah, expressed in his tears, mourning, and fasting, found an outlet in his prayer. This was a true mark of a mighty action of the Spirit of God upon his soul.
The verse piles up four actions, and each carries its own weight. One writer reads them one by one, and notes where God chose to start.
The time had come when God was about to grant a revival, and the way God does it is worth noting. God begins a great work through one man — and that man a broken-hearted man on his knees... His tears were the outward sign of a broken heart. His mourning showed how truly he entered into the affliction of God's people. His fasting proved that the sorrow had cut so deep into his soul that he forgot and gave up the comforts of life.
His grief ran on for days beside his ordinary duties. One commentator notes that, then weighs the exact title Nehemiah prays to.
His daily work likely interrupted this weeping and prayer, but it was certainly the most important matter on his mind. Notice his mention of "praying before the God of heaven." He does not say "the God of heaven and earth" (v. 4). Israel's earthly possession had been left in ruins, and little clear evidence remained that God was caring for His people. Yet God was still in heaven. His power could be trusted to bring some blessing to Israel, despite the low spiritual state that had caused their distress.
Grief over other people can stop there. One writer turns the question back on the people doing the grieving.
It is blessed, dear friends, when the Spirit raises this question in our hearts: "Is there among us anything that suits the heart of God?" It is even better when that heart-searching sends us to our knees, hating what we find in ourselves before God... If the condition of the remnant in Israel was to be raised, individual self-judgment was the way. And if we as a whole are to be revived, we must begin at home.
The sitting down was not the end of the story. One writer shows what those days of prayer and fasting prepared him for.
By prayer and fasting, Nehemiah learned the will of the Lord for His people. So when the opportunity came, in front of king Artaxerxes, he seized it. It is possible to know a great deal about evil and still not know the will of the Lord — and so still be "unwise."
Weeping fit that hour, and only that hour. One writer sets this moment beside what came later.
In chapter 1 it was right for him to sit and weep, but now it is a time to "arise."
- Burden received. Nehemiah made the ruined state of his people his own. He felt it according to God: in their affliction he was afflicted.
- Burden expressed. The tears showed a broken heart. The mourning showed he had entered their affliction. The fasting showed he had given up the comforts of life.
- Burden carried upward. All of it found its outlet in prayer to the God of heaven. Israel's land lay in ruins, but God was still in heaven, and His power could still bring them blessing.
- Burden turned inward. Revival began with self-judgment, not with blame: if the whole is to be raised, we must begin at home.
- Burden turned into action. Through prayer and fasting he learned God's will, so that when the moment came before the king he was ready. There is a time to sit and weep, and then a time to arise.
and said, I beseech thee, Jehovah, God of the heavens, the great and terrible God, that keepeth covenant and mercy for them that love him and keep his commandments.
Bad news about Jerusalem has reached Nehemiah, and he prays. Before he asks for anything, he spends a whole verse on who God is. The titles he picks show where Israel stood in history.
This title is not a general name for God. It belongs to one stretch of history.
God gave up Judah, which had turned away from Him, to the Gentiles, as He had given up Israel before. He passed the sentence of Lo-ammi — "not My people." He stopped acting as God of the earth, the Jehovah of His people. As "God of the heavens" He gave world empire for a time to four Gentile powers, one after another.
The same phrase runs through the books written during and after the exile. It replaced an older one.
When the ark took its place in the Jordan to lead Israel into the land, they heard the words: "Behold, the ark of the covenant of the Lord of all the earth passes over before you" (Joshua 3:11). Now, in the books of Ezra, Nehemiah, Daniel, and the last chapter of Chronicles, God has left the throne of His kingdom in Israel. In the mouths of His people He has become someone far off — "the God of heaven."
The Hebrew behind this verse stacks three names for God together. Each one does its own work.
In verse 5 Nehemiah uses three names of God, and they are of special importance. In Hebrew they are these. "Jehovah" is His covenant name with Israel. "Elohim" is His supremacy in the universe. "El" speaks of the might that God has ready to carry out every detail of His will. It is the "Mighty God".
Nehemiah did not invent fresh language. His opening sentence draws on books he knew well.
He reveals in the opening words of his prayer familiarity with the Word of God: "I beg you, O LORD God of heaven, the great and awesome God (Deuteronomy 7:21; 10:17; Daniel 9:4) who keeps covenant and mercy with those who love Him and keep His commandments (Deuteronomy 7:9; 1 Kings 8:23)." These are the words of Scripture. They show his confidence in the power and faithfulness of God. After them, Nehemiah confessed his sin and the sins of his people.
The order of the prayer matters. Verse 5 declares God faithful; only then does verse 6 admit the failure.
First, Nehemiah defends the character and ways of God. Jehovah is the "God of heaven, the great and awesome God." He is also the faithful God who "keeps covenant and mercy for those who love Him and observe His commandments" (5). Second, he confesses the sins of the children of Israel. In doing so he identifies himself with them — "We have sinned against You: both I and my father's house have sinned."
The covenant Nehemiah names comes with terms. Israel had not met them. (Where the ESV reads "steadfast love," older translations read "mercy.")
In prayer Nehemiah appealed to the God of heaven as "the great and awesome God," and as the One who keeps His covenant and mercy — though Israel had broken that covenant badly. He adds the words "and mercy," for Israel was in desperate need of mercy. Those who do not love Him and observe His commandments have forfeited all claim to His covenant, and can hardly expect His mercy. Nehemiah does not go so far as to say "keep His commandments," but "observe." He had no doubt learned that keeping all God's commandments is too hard for man, but that man must still respect and honour them.
The condition in the verse, and the way Nehemiah addresses God, point in the same direction.
"He keeps covenant and mercy for those who love Him and observe His commandments." This, together with the way he addresses God, brings out in a marked way the contrast between law and grace. Nehemiah was devoted and God-fearing, yet you cannot help sensing distance in the terms he uses — "O Lord God of heaven, the great and awesome God." The age he lived under made that distance necessary. How different from the place the Lord gave His disciples after His resurrection, in His words: "I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God."
- Distance. "God of heaven" marks the age when God had left His throne in Jerusalem and given world rule to the Gentiles. His people spoke of Him as far off.
- Names. Nehemiah packs three names into one sentence: His covenant name, His supremacy over the universe, and His might to carry out every detail of His will.
- Scripture. Nehemiah drew his opening words from Deuteronomy, Kings and Daniel. He prayed the Scriptures back to God.
- Order. He clears God's character first, then confesses sin, and includes himself in it: "we have sinned."
- Mercy. The covenant carries a condition Israel had broken, so Nehemiah adds "mercy." It is the only ground left, and his whole appeal rests on it.
Let thine ear now be attentive, and thine eyes open, to hear the prayer of thy servant, which I pray before thee at this time, day and night, for the children of Israel thy servants, confessing the sins of the children of Israel, which we have sinned against thee both I and my father's house have sinned.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
We have acted very perversely against thee, and have not kept the commandments, nor the statutes, nor the ordinances that thou commandedst thy servant Moses.
Nehemiah has just heard that Jerusalem lies in ruins and its survivors are in trouble. He does not blame the wreck on other people. He calls the sin his own — and that raises a hard question. How does a good man confess a failure he did not commit, and what can he ask for once obedience is gone?
Nehemiah folds himself and his family into the guilt of the whole nation. One writer ties that "we" to Nehemiah's constant prayer, and calls it a rare privilege.
Day and night he was praying for them, and that is how he had the power to confess their sins. No higher privilege could be given to a servant than the one granted to Nehemiah. That privilege was the power to identify himself with Israel so fully that he could take up and confess their sins as his own. "I," he says, "and my father's house have sinned." This is a true sign of spiritual power. Many can lament the condition of God's people; but there are few who can identify themselves with it. It is only such people who can truly intercede for them in the presence of God.
The confession is not vague regret. Nehemiah names what the people did, and one writer finds that surprising in a man like him.
In verse 6 we read, "We have sinned against You," but Nehemiah adds, "Both I and my father's house have sinned." "We have acted very corruptly against You." We might have thought it was the other way round with a man like Nehemiah. But that is what he says to God. "And have not kept the commandments, the statutes, and the rules that You commanded Your servant Moses." They had been downright disobedient to the things of God. That is where trouble always begins.
Nehemiah measures the nation by the law God gave through Moses. One writer points to this verse to show what place that law still held for the people who came back from exile.
These books describe the effort of the Jewish leaders to restore the temple and the worship as they had been before the captivity, and the law of Moses is the standard by which everything was to be done. Ezra (7:21) speaks of "the law of the God of heaven." Nehemiah (1:7) confesses the breaking of "the commandments, the statutes, and the rules that God commanded Moses."
God's mercy was for those who love Him and keep His commandments. Nehemiah admits Israel had done the opposite. That leaves them no claim on God at all.
He confesses the sins of the children of Israel, and in doing so he identifies himself with them — "We have sinned against You: both I and my father's house have sinned." They should have loved Jehovah and kept His commandments. Instead, he says, "We have acted very corruptly against You and have not kept the commandments, the statutes, and the rules that You commanded Your servant Moses." So they had forfeited all claim to the mercy of God on the ground of obedience. … The first plea is God's faithfulness to His own word. He has just owned that they have not kept the commandments God gave through Moses. But there was something else God gave through Moses. Besides the rules of the law there were the promises of the law.
Taking up another person's sin as your own is not natural. One writer says only those in communion with God can do it, and points to One who did it perfectly.
It is easy enough to feel for God's people when their sinful conduct dishonours them in the eyes of the world. But some are in communion with the mind of God through the power of the Holy Spirit. They share His affections for His own, and so, first and foremost, they are filled with zeal to guard His glory. Only they can measure the sin as it touches the holy Name they bear. Only they can go down, take up the sin, make it their own, and tell it all out before God. Moses, Nehemiah, and Daniel are examples of this in their various measures, and so is Ezra. But all of them are only faint shadows of Him who so identified Himself with His people that in confessing their sins He said, "O God, you know my folly; the wrongs I have done are not hidden from you."
- Pray. Nehemiah prayed for his people day and night, and that prayer gave him the power to confess their sins.
- Own. He said "we," not "they," and made the nation's sin his own. Few can do that, and only they can truly intercede.
- Name. He names the sin instead of softening it. Israel did not keep the commandments, statutes and rules given through Moses, and that disobedience is where trouble begins.
- Forfeit. By that confession he gives up every claim on God based on obedience — nothing is left to bargain with.
- Plead. Empty-handed, he turns to the promises God also gave through Moses. His way of bearing another's sin is only a faint shadow of Christ.
Remember, I beseech thee, the word that thou commandedst thy servant Moses, saying, If ye act unfaithfully, I will scatter you among the peoples;
Nehemiah has just admitted that his people broke the commandments God gave through Moses. Now he asks God to remember another word Moses received. Why would a man with no claim left reach for a text that starts with a threat?
Nehemiah can no longer point to Israel's obedience. He needs other ground for his prayer.
God is always faithful to those who love Him and keep His commandments. But sadly, they had not kept His commandments, His statutes, or His judgments. Nehemiah confesses all of this. Now he turns to a promise. On that promise he can base his prayer, and count on God stepping in for him.
The word Nehemiah asks God to remember came through Moses. So did the commandments he has just admitted breaking. One writer shows what faith found there.
He has just admitted that they have not kept the commandments God gave through Moses. But there was something else God gave through Moses. Besides the precepts of the law there were the promises of the law. Nehemiah asks God to remember this word of promise, given through Moses. In it God had said that if the people acted unfaithfully He would scatter them. But if they repented He would gather them, and bring them to the place He had chosen to set His name.
The same writer counts this as the first of four pleas: God's word, God's people, God's work of redemption, and God's mercy.
Nehemiah does not name a chapter. Commentators trace his words to Leviticus 26:
But in one way he went further. He pleaded the word of the Lord written in Leviticus 26. God had warned Israel that disobedience to the law would scatter them. But even then, if they turned to God and obeyed His word, He would gather them from distant lands. He would restore them to the place of His name. On this written word he based his plea.
Nehemiah was pleading something already written down, not a private impression.
The threat half of the sentence was not theory when Nehemiah prayed it. Israel's condition proved that God does what He says. One writer describes it while commenting on Leviticus 26:
But Israel failed completely. Verses 14-33 of this chapter set a solemn and terrible picture before their eyes. Even so, they abandoned the Lord and served other gods. So they brought on themselves the severe judgments threatened here. Under the heavy weight of these judgments they are suffering at this very hour. Scattered and stripped, wasted and cast out, they are the monuments of the Lord's unbending truth and justice.
That is the strange strength of the plea. God had proved exact about the scattering, so Nehemiah could trust Him to be exact about the gathering.
The promise comes with conditions attached. One writer argues that Nehemiah's faith reached past them.
There is no doubt this refers to Leviticus 26, and it looks forward to the final restoration of Israel. Here lay Nehemiah's spiritual understanding, as led by the Spirit. Turn to that chapter and you will see that this restoration will be a work of pure grace. It rests on God's absolute and unconditional covenant with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. So while Nehemiah confessed the sins of his people, he threw himself on the mercy and unconditional promises of God. He rose in this way above law, and reached, in his faith, the source of all blessing — the heart of God Himself.
Not everyone reads the prayer that highly. Another writer holds that Nehemiah stayed inside what Moses had already foretold:
But he does not rise in his own prayer beyond Moses in his predictions; he does not plead the promises to the fathers.
- Remember — the empty hand. Nehemiah confesses that Israel kept nothing. So he stops arguing from their record and turns to a promise.
- Remember — the other word of Moses. The law had promises as well as commands. Moses carried both: the commands, and the pledge to gather a repentant people back.
- Remember — the threat already kept. Israel scattered was visible proof of God's unbending truth and justice. That is why Nehemiah could trust the promise attached to it.
- Remember — written, not felt. The plea rested on a written word. Commentators point to Leviticus 26: Nehemiah quoted Scripture back to God.
- Remember — the heart behind the covenant. Commentators differ on how far Nehemiah reached. One sees him rising above law to God's unconditional covenant with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Another sees him staying inside what Moses foretold.
but if ye return to me, and keep my commandments and do them, though there were of you cast out unto the uttermost part of the heavens, yet will I gather them from thence, and will bring them unto the place that I have chosen to set my name there.
Nehemiah is far from Jerusalem, serving in a foreign palace. News of the ruined city has driven him to his knees. In verse 9 he reminds God of God's own words. The promise he quotes back turns on one small word — but.
Nehemiah has already admitted that Israel failed to keep what Moses commanded. He then reaches for something else that came through Moses.
The first plea is God's faithfulness to His own word. He has just owned that they have not kept the commandments given by God through Moses, but there was something else given by God through Moses. The law had promises in it as well as commands. Nehemiah asks God to remember this word of promise, given through Moses. God had said that if the people were unfaithful He would scatter them; but if they repented He would gather them.
This is only the first of four pleas Smith counts in the prayer. The others are God's people, God's work of redemption, and God's mercy.
The verse sounds conditional — return, keep, do. Yet Edward Dennett sees Nehemiah's faith reaching past the terms of the law to what lies behind them.
This reference is undoubtedly to Leviticus 26, and looks on to the final restoration of Israel. This restoration will be a work of pure grace, founded on God's absolute and unconditional covenant with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. So while Nehemiah confessed the sins of his people, he threw himself on the mercy and unconditional promises of God. He rose in this way above law, and reached, in his faith, the source of all blessing — the heart of God Himself.
Commentators differ on where the promise Nehemiah cites was first recorded. Dennett traces it to Leviticus 26. Leslie Grant points to Moses' words in Deuteronomy, and reads the gathering as partial.
Nehemiah then asked God to remember the words He had spoken to Moses. If Israel was unfaithful, He would scatter them among the nations. But if they returned to Him and kept His commandments, God would still gather them back — at least some of them — and bring them to the place where He had set His name. God spoke all this to Moses in Deuteronomy 4:25-31.
Both agree on the method. Nehemiah did not invent his plea; he found it already written down.
God had warned Israel that disobeying the law would bring scattering on them. But even then, if they turned to God in obedience to His word, He would gather them from distant lands. He would restore them to the place of His name. Nehemiah based his plea on this written word.
The phrase about the farthest horizon is not decoration. It sets the limit of the promise — and then removes it.
"If your outcasts are in the uttermost parts of heaven" — as far as they could go — "from there the LORD your God will gather you, and from there he will take you. And the LORD your God will bring you into the land that your fathers possessed, that you may possess it. And he will make you more prosperous and numerous than your fathers."
Nehemiah is not the first to pray this way. Solomon had asked God for the same things long before, and God answered him.
In his appeal to God in verse 6, his desire is, "Let Your ear now be attentive, and Your eyes open". In verse 9 he reminds God of His promise "to set My name there". He mentions God's ear, God's eyes and God's Name. In 2 Chronicles 7:15 we have God's answer to Solomon's prayer: "Now My eyes shall be open, and My ears attentive to the prayer that is made in this place. For now I have chosen and set apart this house, so that My name may be there for ever. My eyes and My heart will always be there." Nehemiah comes to God and reminds Him of this wonderful promise. He asks God to keep it in his own day.
God did not only promise to bring the scattered home. He named the destination Himself.
God would allow only His own choice as a place of worship for Israel. Later history shows that Jerusalem was that centre. Its name means "the foundation of peace." In the New Testament the centre for the Church of God is not a physical place. Christ in resurrection is the Centre. He Himself declares, "For where two or three are gathered in my name, there am I among them."
- Word. Nehemiah's plea was not his own idea. He found the promise already written, and built on it.
- Grace. Behind the "if" stood an unconditional covenant. Nehemiah's faith reached through the one to the other.
- Reach. The promise names the farthest distance only to cancel it. From there God gathers.
- Name. God, not the returning people, chose the destination. He set His name there, and Nehemiah reminds Him of it.
- Answer. Solomon once asked for God's open eyes and attentive ears in that place, and God granted it. Nehemiah asks Him to honour that promise again.
And they are thy servants and thy people, whom thou hast redeemed by thy great power and by thy strong hand.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
O Lord, I beseech thee, let now thine ear be attentive to the prayer of thy servant, and to the prayer of thy servants who delight to fear thy name; and prosper, I pray thee, thy servant this day, and grant him mercy in the sight of this man. Now I was the king's cupbearer.
Nehemiah ends a long confession with one request for one day: favour with the king. Then he names his job — he served the wine to the most powerful man on earth.
Before he asks for anything, Nehemiah confesses the people's sin and rests his plea on what God had written:
He too identified himself with the sin of the people, saying, "we have sinned." But in one way he went further. He pleaded the word of the Lord written in Leviticus 26. God had warned Israel that disobedience to the law would scatter them. Yet even then, if they turned to God in obedience to His word, He would gather them from distant lands and restore them to the place of His name. On this written word he based his plea.
Nehemiah asks God to hear "the prayer of your servant" — and then "the prayer of your servants." He is not praying alone:
Notice that Nehemiah associated others with him in his prayer. It was continually so with the apostle Paul too. The fact is this. When the Spirit of God leads us, we cannot help joining to ourselves all in whose hearts He is also working — whether in service, in thanksgiving, or in prayer. The people of God are so much one that isolation in spirit is impossible. So Nehemiah bows before God, grieving over the state of Israel and longing for their deliverance and blessing. He is sure that every godly Israelite stands with him in what he asks.
One writer notes the name for God used here, and the delight in the phrase itself:
Nehemiah uses a fourth name in verse 11, "Adonai." It means "the Lord in blessing." It is beautiful to see how he leaves that name until verse 11. First he owns God's rights. Then he owns God's power to uphold those rights. Last he appeals to God as the source of all blessing for His people. In that verse he can speak of those "who delight to fear Your name." It is one thing to call on God to help us. It is far more blessed to be open with God and tell Him we delight in the way we know Him. Nehemiah does both.
Artaxerxes ruled an empire. In this prayer he shrinks to a man:
Nehemiah intended to act. He would not only pray and leave it there. He did not pray that God would send someone to Jerusalem to help the suffering remnant. Since he knew and felt the sorrow of their condition, he considered that he was the man to go. He did ask for the approval and help of others, but he simply asked God to give him favour "in the sight of this man" (v. 11). Though Artaxerxes was king, Nehemiah regarded him simply as a man in whose heart God could work as easily as in any man.
That low view of the king had a source:
He laid hold first of all on the greatness of God and the power of God. As a result, he had only a small view of the power that is in the hands of men.
The last line of the verse explains his problem:
Then Nehemiah adds the explanation — "Now I was cupbearer to the king" — to show that, in human terms, he was entirely under the king's authority and dependent on him. Nehemiah has poured out his heart before the Lord and made his request known. Now he must wait, and wait many days, for the answer to his cries. A prayer may be entirely according to the will of God, and the fruit of communion with His mind, and yet God may not answer it at once. We need to understand this, or the soul may sink into distress and unbelief for no reason.
The answer came through the very thing that looked dangerous — the grief on his face:
God answered his prayer (Neh. 1:11) after he had "mourned for days" — about four months. Fasting and sorrow had left their mark on his face; and no one could appear before the king with a sad face. But God used this very thing to put words into the king's mouth that would give Nehemiah an opening for his request. Such miracles, in answer to our prayers, are so much a part of the daily circumstances of our Christian life that we hardly notice them.
- Ground it. Nehemiah's confidence rests on what God had written, not on the people's record. Anyone can plead that.
- Widen it. He prays as one of many servants. Every godly Israelite is asking the same thing, because among God's people isolation in spirit is impossible.
- Delight in it. He waits until the end to call God "Lord in blessing." He describes himself and the others not as needy only, but as delighting to fear His name.
- Shrink it. He took hold of God's greatness first, so the emperor is only "this man." And he goes himself instead of asking God to send someone else.
- Wait for it. Four months passed, and the answer came through his own sad face. A prayer fully in God's will may still wait for God's moment.
And it came to pass in the month Nisan, in the twentieth year of Artaxerxes the king, [that] wine was before him, and I took up the wine and gave it to the king. Now, I had never been sad in his presence.
Four months after the news of Jerusalem's ruin reached him, Nehemiah is doing his usual job: handing the king his wine. The verse looks routine, but it raises two questions the whole book turns on: why did God make him wait, and why did his grief show now?
The dates in chapter 1 and chapter 2 are not decoration. They mark a long gap between prayer and answer. One writer reads that gap as God's training.
Four months had passed since he offered the prayer recorded in Nehemiah 1. He is careful to give us the dates. In the month Chislev (our November) he had prayed; and in the month Nisan (our March) the answer came. Through that whole period, man of faith though he was, he must have waited on God in daily expectation. He could not foresee how the answer would come; but he knew that God could step in when and how He would... It is in this way God both tests and strengthens the faith of His people. He waits while they wait. But if He waits, it is only to bring His people into fuller dependence on Himself, and so to prepare their hearts for the blessing He is about to give.
Another writer looks at what filled those months.
Hanani had visited his brother Nehemiah in the month Chislev, the ninth month. Nisan is the first month of the Jewish year. How many prayers he must have offered up during those months! How patiently he waited for the Lord's time!
We might expect prayer to lift the burden. Here it did the opposite.
Suppose Nehemiah's sorrow had been only for outward misfortunes — the loss of possessions or any natural thing here below. Then his tears and gloom would all have disappeared in the presence of the Lord. But the presence of the Lord deepened them. The more he went before God and weighed the state of the Jews in Jerusalem, the more grieved he was... Nehemiah was in no way delivered from sadness by his prayer... There was confidence in going to God, and at the same time there was still the deep sense of the ruin.
Nehemiah adds that he had never looked like this before the king. His job was to serve pleasure; his face was serving something else.
The chapter opens with Nehemiah busy in the duties of his office as the king's cup-bearer. He "took up the wine and gave it to the king." But his heart was on other things. It was weighed down by the unspeakable sorrow of his people's condition. Wine and sadness do not go together. Scripture tells us that wine makes a man's heart merry. So the king could not bear it when his cup-bearer wore a sorrowful face at such a moment. It spoiled his own pleasure.
The office itself explains the king's suspicion.
The king's cup-bearer of those days had to be a man of integrity. He had to make sure that nothing undesirable or poisonous got into the king's wine. The news he had just received had affected him so deeply that his sorrow showed in his face. Noticing it, the king was of course suspicious and asked what had made him sorrowful.
Nothing miraculous appears in the verse. A writer argues that this is exactly how God usually answers.
Fasting and sorrow had left their mark on his face. No one was allowed to appear before the king with a sad face... but God used this very thing to put words into the king's mouth that would give Nehemiah an opening for his request. God answers our prayers with miracles like this. They are so much a part of daily Christian life that we hardly notice them. Looking carefully, everything is a miracle in God's ways toward us. He turns aside certain dangers. He arranges certain meetings and prevents others. He gives us certain opportunities and closes certain paths to us.
The twentieth year of Artaxerxes is more than a background detail. One writer makes it the starting point of a prophetic count.
We can fix the date of the command to rebuild Jerusalem exactly. Nehemiah 2:1 states it clearly: the month of Nisan in the twentieth year of the reign of king Artaxerxes. Count four hundred and eighty-three years from then. A prophetic year is three hundred and sixty days, its established length. That makes 173,880 days. The count brings us to the tenth of the month Nisan... the very time when Christ entered Jerusalem riding on a donkey's colt.
- Burden. News of a ruined city settled on Nehemiah's heart and stayed there for four months, from Chislev to Nisan.
- Waiting. God waits while His people wait. The delay tests and strengthens faith.
- Deepening. Prayer did not remove the sorrow; going before God made the sense of ruin deeper, not lighter.
- Opening. The face he could not hide became the very thing God used to put the question into the king's mouth.
- Landmark. That ordinary day at the wine cup fixes a date: 483 prophetic years later, Christ rode into Jerusalem.
And the king said to me, Why is thy face sad, seeing thou art not sick? this is nothing else but sadness of heart. And I was very sore afraid.
Four months after Nehemiah prayed about Jerusalem's ruined walls, his grief shows on his face at work. The king sees it, and his question turns private sorrow into open danger — and into the answer to that prayer.
The gap between the prayer of chapter 1 and this scene was not empty time. One writer explains what the delay was doing in Nehemiah:
Four months had passed since he had offered the prayer recorded in Nehemiah 1... He could not foresee how the answer would come; but he knew that God could step in when and how He would... It is in this way God both tries and strengthens the faith of His people. He waits while they wait. But if He waits, it is only to bring His people into fuller dependence on Himself. That prepares their hearts more fully for the blessing He is about to give. And when He steps in, it is often as quiet and unseen as it was here. Only the eye of faith can detect His presence.
You might expect prayer about Jerusalem to lift Nehemiah's mood. One writer reads it the other way round:
If his grief had been only about outward troubles — the loss of possessions, or anything else in this life — his tears and gloom would all have disappeared in the presence of the Lord. Instead, the presence of the Lord deepened them. The more he went before God and weighed the state of the Jews in Jerusalem, the more grieved he was... Nehemiah was in no way delivered from sadness by his prayer. There was confidence in going to God, but at the same time there was still the deep sense of the ruin.
Nehemiah was on duty, handing the king his wine. His face did not fit the occasion.
He took up the wine and gave it to the king, but his mind was on other things. The terrible sorrow of his people's condition weighed his heart down. But wine and sadness do not go together. Scripture tells us that wine makes a man's heart glad. So the king could not bear his cup-bearer wearing a sad face at such a time. It destroyed his own pleasure.
The king rules out illness first. One writer traces the sadness back to its source:
Nehemiah's attitude came from a heart drawn out toward the condition of what was precious to God. The king could see that this was something deeper than a physical problem, for he says, "You are not sick." It went much deeper. What Nehemiah had heard about the interests of God in Jerusalem had burdened and troubled his spirit.
Nehemiah records his fear honestly. One writer names what a suspicious king could have made of a servant's gloom:
Nehemiah tells us honestly how afraid he was, for it might have cost him his life. The king might have suspected treason. He might have suspected some dark plot, and that Nehemiah's conscience was at work. All sorts of things might have come into his mind as he tried to explain the unusual gloom on his servant's face.
One writer points to the king's mood, and to what it could have led to:
The king was angry... Nehemiah might well have been afraid, for in such a mood Artaxerxes, the Persian king, could have had him executed on the spot. But though he was afraid, God kept his presence of mind.
The danger of this moment throws light on something better by contrast. Where an earthly ruler demanded that everyone match his mood, God invites the opposite:
He gives our hearts liberty to decide the character of our communion with Him. Let it be, He says, according to your condition. "Is anyone among you suffering? Let him pray. Is anyone cheerful? Let him sing praise." This is not the way of a master or a patron. The patron's pleasure or mood must set the tone of the scene around him. It was dangerous to spoil the presence of the Persian king with sadness. There was danger of death if one had a heavy face there... But God's presence gives room to the heart and its conditions, whatever they may be.
- Wait. God let four months pass after Nehemiah's prayer. The delay was not neglect but training in dependence on Him alone.
- Burden. His grief was not for himself but for a ruined city. Going to God about it made the sorrow deeper, not lighter.
- Exposure. The burden showed at the wine table, where it was least welcome. The king saw straight through it: not sickness, but sorrow of heart.
- Fear. His fear made sense. A king with absolute power could have read gloom as treason and ordered his death.
- Welcome. A royal court banned sadness from its presence. God's presence makes room for the heart in any condition.
And I said to the king, Let the king live for ever! Why should not my countenance be sad, when the city, the place of my fathers' sepulchres, lies waste, and its gates are consumed with fire?
Nehemiah serves wine to King Artaxerxes, months after he began mourning over the ruin of Jerusalem. The king notices his sad face, and Nehemiah answers by naming the city for its graves.
Nehemiah had already fasted and prayed. Yet he still stood before the king with a sad face.
Suppose his trouble had been only outward: the loss of property, or any other natural thing here below. Then his tears and gloom would have all disappeared in the presence of the Lord. But the presence of the Lord deepened them. The more he went before God and weighed the state of the Jews in Jerusalem, the more grieved he was... Nehemiah was in no way delivered from sadness by his prayer. There was confidence in going to God, but at the same time there was still the deep sense of the ruin.
A cup-bearer served the king's pleasure, and a sad servant spoiled it. Speaking the truth here was dangerous.
Wine and sadness do not go together. Scripture tells us that wine makes a man's heart merry. The king could not bear to have his cup-bearer wear a sad face at such a time. It destroyed his own pleasure... The king therefore was angry... "Then," says Nehemiah, "I was very much afraid." And well he might have been. In such a mood, Artaxerxes might have sent him out to be executed at once. But though he was afraid, God kept him calm. Out of the fullness of his heart, God led him to tell the plain truth about why he was sad.
Nehemiah could have named Jerusalem in many ways. The words he chooses show what ties him to it.
He emphasises "the place of my fathers' graves"; he does not say the place of my fathers' achievements. One generation had followed another on God's own land. Nehemiah seems to say that this is the place where he ought to be, keeping up what they kept up when they were there.
The same phrase reads as warmth rather than argument. It is how a man speaks of home he has never seen.
Along with this exercise of his spirit towards God, Nehemiah's heart was alive to his brothers. In deep affection, and in that eloquence that comes fresh from the heart and its promptings, he calls Jerusalem "the city of his fathers' tombs." All this presents to us a very attractive person.
Nehemiah names two ruins: the waste city and the burnt gates. The second is not a small detail, and the enemy knew it.
Our work does not consist only in raising up the wall: we must also work on the gates. The enemy knew very well what he was doing when he burned the gates of Jerusalem with fire. The gates of a city are just as important as the wall, and even more so. Gates can open to let the people of the city come and go. They can also shut out anything foreign, sinful, contagious or criminal that tries to settle inside the city.
The face Nehemiah was not allowed to wear opened the door. It answered the prayer he had prayed months before.
Nehemiah's prayer was answered after he had mourned for days — that is, about four months. Fasting and sorrow had left their mark on his face. No one was allowed to appear before the king with a sad face. But God used this very thing to put words into the king's mouth, and those words gave Nehemiah his chance to ask. Such miracles come in answer to our prayers. They are so much a part of daily Christian life that we hardly notice them.
Nehemiah could have enjoyed the palace and forgotten the ruin. One writer turns that choice on us.
Suppose we satisfy ourselves only with the mercies the Lord shows us. That would be just like Nehemiah blessing God for what he enjoyed in the great king's palace. He would be content without a thought, without a care, without a tear and without a prayer for the people of God. But not so. Of everything on earth, his whole heart was set on them. He grieved because that people of God was now falling short of what was due to His glory here below.
- Prayer deepened it. Prayer did not lift Nehemiah's sadness. He grieved over the ruin of God's people, not over personal loss, so time with God only deepened it.
- Sadness cost him. A sad face in that court could have cost him his life. He told the plain truth anyway, and God kept him calm.
- Graves, not glory. He names Jerusalem by his fathers' graves, not their achievements. That is a man saying where he belongs and what he must keep up.
- Gates, not only walls. The enemy knew what he was doing when he burned the gates. A gate lets the city's own people come and go, and shuts out what would corrupt them.
- The face opened the door. The sad face the court forbade became God's way of putting words into the king's mouth. Such answers look so ordinary that we hardly notice the miracle.
And the king said to me, For what dost thou make request? So I prayed to the God of the heavens.
Nehemiah is cupbearer to the Persian king, and the king has just asked him to name what he wants. In the moment before he answers, he speaks to heaven first.
The king's question demanded an answer on the spot. One writer draws out where Nehemiah turned first:
Here is what I want to show — how truly it is a question of faith. "Then the king said to me, 'What are you requesting?'" What does he do? Does he make a request to the king? No, he makes his request to God. "So I prayed to the God of heaven." It is not that he does not tell the king. But even at that moment, in the presence of the king himself, his heart was toward the Lord. No wonder he got his request. No wonder God listened and heard, and he could take it as from Him. Why? Because he prayed to the Lord first.
Another writer follows that order in Nehemiah's own record.
The record is, first, "So I prayed to the God of heaven," and then, "I said to the king…" God first, and the king second. This silent prayer must have shot up to heaven in two or three seconds, quite unknown to the king or anybody else. Heaven answered it just as fast, so the request he made was the right one, and it met with a favourable answer.
The king was waiting, so the prayer had to fit a gap no one noticed.
Here we have a prayer offered in the interval between the king's question and Nehemiah's reply. It must have been brief. Eastern kings were not in the habit of waiting long for their cupbearers to answer them. But there was time enough for the prayer to rise and for help to come. The case was urgent and the relief was instant.
There is a reason the answer did not come straight away.
When the king asks, "What are you requesting?", Nehemiah does not reply at once. He first lifts his heart to God, and God puts into his heart what he should say to the king. That is like what the Lord said: "And when they bring you before the synagogues and the rulers and the authorities, do not be anxious about how you should defend yourself or what you should say, for the Holy Spirit will teach you in that very hour what you ought to say" (Luke 12:11-12).
A prayer that quick shows what a man does when no one is watching.
Most would have hurried to answer the king. They would have concluded that since he had stooped to ask the question, he was bound to grant the favour. Not so Nehemiah, and this brings out a special trait in him. … Before he answered his master he cast himself upon his God. He acknowledges that he depends on God for wisdom to say the right thing. He shows the special mark that another has called "a heart that habitually turned to God." We might well seek the same grace… When this is the case, the presence of God will be more real to us than the presence of men.
The title Nehemiah uses fits his moment in history. One writer explains what had changed.
God gave up Judah to the Gentiles for turning away from Him, as He had given up Israel before. He pronounced the sentence of Lo-ammi (not my people). He then stopped acting as God of the earth, the Jehovah of His people. As "God of the heavens" He granted world rule for a time to the four Gentile empires that followed.
Standing before the most powerful man on earth, Nehemiah reaches for the name that says who is really in charge.
We have little idea today of the splendour and greatness of that monarchy, but it was not this visible greatness that filled Nehemiah's mind — it was the God of heaven. He recognised that however great and important the circumstances around him were, it was the heavens that rule, and he was in conscious touch with the God of heaven.
The king agreed. Nehemiah credits none of it to himself.
At once Nehemiah recognises that the king's ready agreement was the result of the good hand of God. … We may remember to turn to God in our difficulties and forget to acknowledge His goodness when they are met. It is well to enter a difficulty in a spirit of prayer, and to come out of it in a spirit of praise.
- Order. Nehemiah prayed before he answered — God first, the king second. He got what he asked because he prayed to the Lord first.
- Speed. The prayer filled the gap between question and answer. There was time enough for it to rise and for help to come.
- Supply. Nehemiah did not answer out of his own wisdom; God put into his heart what to say to the king.
- Habit. A prayer that fast comes from a heart that habitually turns to God — and then God's presence is more real to us than the presence of men.
- Praise. He entered the difficulty praying and came out praising — turning to God in trouble, and thanking Him when it is over.
And I said to the king, If it please the king, and if thy servant have found favour in thy sight, that thou wouldest send me to Judah, to the city of my fathers' sepulchres, that I may build it.
Nehemiah has carried a burden for four months. Now the Persian king asks him what he wants, and everything hangs on the reply. The pause before he answers, and the words he chooses, are the heart of this verse.
Nehemiah does answer the king. But he speaks to God first, and one commentator makes that order the whole point.
"The king said to me, 'What are you requesting?'" What does he do? Does he make his request to the king? No, he makes his request to God. "So I prayed to the God of heaven." It is not that he fails to tell the king. But even at that very moment, standing before the king himself, his heart was toward the Lord. No wonder he got his request. No wonder God listened and heard, and he could take it as from Him. Why? Because he prayed to the Lord first.
Nehemiah could not step away to pray. As the king's cupbearer he had to answer at once, and that is what makes the moment instructive.
Here we have a prayer offered in the interval between the king's question and Nehemiah's reply. The interval must have been brief. Eastern kings were not in the habit of waiting long for their cupbearers to answer them. But there was time enough for the prayer to ascend and for help to come. The case was urgent and the relief was instantaneous.
He could have simply named Jerusalem. He described it instead by its graves — not by anything his fathers had achieved there.
He emphasizes "the place of my fathers' tombs"; he does not say the place of my fathers' achievements. Generation had followed generation on divine territory. Nehemiah seems to say that this is the place where he ought to be, keeping up what they kept up when they were there.
The description also differs from the language he had used in private. Alone with God he had confessed the family failure; in front of Artaxerxes he speaks of the land God had given.
He did not say to the king, the place where my fathers have sinned. Before the king he speaks of divine territory; before God he says, "Both I and my father's house have sinned."
His request is short and plain. Months of carrying it had made it clear.
The city was clearly before Nehemiah. He had carried this burden for months. Is it not interesting and challenging that, when challenged about it, he could speak of it so clearly? He knew exactly what he wanted. He was not vague about the concern he carried. He could put four months of that concern into one sentence and say what he desired.
His request also settles who should go, and it shows how he weighed up the king he was asking.
Nehemiah intended to act. He would not only pray and leave it there. He did not pray that God would send someone to Jerusalem to help the suffering remnant. Since he knew and felt the sorrow of their condition, he considered he was the man to go. Though Artaxerxes was king, Nehemiah considered him simply a man in whose heart God could work as easily as in any man.
The permission Nehemiah asked for here was not only a personal favour. One commentator dates the start of a prophetic period — the seventy weeks of Daniel — from the king's word here.
This decree applied to the building of the city and its defences (B.C. 445). In the twentieth year of his reign, Artaxerxes gave letters, or warrants, to Nehemiah, allowing him to build the city of his "fathers' tombs." In this "word" of the Persian king lay the appointed sign that the seventy weeks of Daniel were beginning.
The king agreed readily. Nehemiah credits that answer to God, not to his own skill with words.
At once Nehemiah recognises that the ready compliance of the king was the result of the good hand of God. Before he asked, Nehemiah had turned to God. Now that the king has granted his request, he acknowledges the good hand of God. We may remember to turn to God in our difficulties and forget to acknowledge the goodness of God when they are met. It is well to enter a difficulty in a spirit of prayer, and to come out of it in a spirit of praise.
- Prayer first. The king asked; Nehemiah asked God before he asked the man in front of him. That order is why he could take the answer as from God.
- Prayer brief. The whole prayer fitted into the seconds between a question and its reply; urgent case, instant relief.
- Request definite. Four months of burden came out in one clear sentence: send me, to that city, to build it — no vagueness.
- Sender sent. He did not ask God to send someone else; feeling the sorrow himself, he counted himself the man to go.
- Praise last. The king's ready agreement was the good hand of God; enter the difficulty praying, come out of it praising.
And the king said to me -- the queen also sitting by him, -- For how long shall thy journey be, and when wilt thou return? And it pleased the king to send me; and I set him a time.
The king answers with the queen seated beside him. His reply turns Nehemiah's request into a settled plan with a date attached. Behind this short exchange lie four months of waiting and a prayer offered in the king's own presence. The leave he agreed to here would one day run out.
Nehemiah had prayed in Chislev; the king speaks in Nisan. Writers note that the gap was not wasted time but training.
Four months had passed since he had offered the prayer recorded in Nehemiah 1. He is careful to give us the dates. In the month Chislev, which is our November, he had prayed. In the month Nisan, our March, the answer came. During this period, man of faith as he was, he must have waited in daily expectation upon God. He could not foresee how the answer would come; but he knew that God could intervene when and how He would... It is in this way God both tries and strengthens the faith of His people. He waits while they wait. But if He waits, it is only to shut His people up to fuller dependence on Himself. So He prepares their hearts for the blessing He is about to give. And when He steps in, it is often, as in this case, in such a quiet and unseen way — unseen by all but the eye of faith — that it takes faith to detect His presence.
Asked what he wanted, Nehemiah turned to God before he answered the king. Writers trace the granted request back to that order.
What does he do? Does he make a request to the king? No, he makes request to God. "So I prayed to the God of heaven." He does tell the king. But at that very moment, in the king's own presence, his heart was toward the Lord. No wonder he got his request. No wonder that God listened and heard, and he could take it as from Him. Why? Because he prayed to the Lord first.
Why did the king agree? The record never tells us what was in his mind, and one writer treats that silence as the point.
What moved the king's mind is hidden from us. It is hidden so that we may see more clearly that, whatever it was, the power of God controlled him, in answer to Nehemiah's brief and sudden prayer.
The king's yes opened a door. Nehemiah walked through it with an exact list of what he needed.
The queen was sitting with the king at that moment. The king asked how long Nehemiah planned to be away, and then granted his request at once. Nehemiah saw his opportunity — the opportunity God had given him. Strengthened by his faith, he grew bolder and dared to ask for royal letters... His aims were exact and clear: to restore the fortress that protected the temple, to rebuild the city walls, and to build a house fit for his own office.
The king wanted his servant back, and Nehemiah named a date. What that date was, the book never tells us.
The king made no objection. But he asked how long Nehemiah would need for the work, because he wanted him back. Nehemiah set him a time. We are not told what it was, and Nehemiah records nothing about his later return to Shushan. The wall was rebuilt in the short space of 52 days, however (ch. 6:15).
The agreed limit held. At the end of the book, evil crept into the temple rooms while Nehemiah was away with the king and not there to stop it.
Nehemiah had to return to put an end to this misuse of holy things. While these things were going on, he was with the king at Shushan, because his leave of absence had expired. But when he returned, a situation like this could not escape him. Although everyone else tolerated it, Nehemiah could not.
Nehemiah prayed his way into this meeting. He came out of it with a date and letters, and gave God the credit.
At once Nehemiah recognises that the ready compliance of the king was the result of the good hand of God... We may remember to turn to God in our difficulties and forget to acknowledge the goodness of God when He meets them. It is well to enter a difficulty in a spirit of prayer, and to come out of it in a spirit of praise.
- Waited — Four months lie between the prayer of chapter 1 and this answer. God waits while His people wait, to deepen their dependence before He gives the blessing.
- Prayed — Nehemiah spoke to the God of heaven before he spoke to the king. That order explains the answer he got.
- Granted — The reasons in the king's mind stay hidden on purpose. That silence points us to the power of God behind his decision.
- Timed — Nehemiah took a leave with an end date. When it ran out he went back, and it was his absence that let evil creep into the temple rooms.
- Praised — He went into the difficulty praying and came out of it owning the good hand of God. That second half is the part we forget once the answer comes.
And I said to the king, If it please the king, let letters be given me to the governors beyond the river, that they may set me forward till I come into Judah;
The king of Persia has asked Nehemiah what he wants. Nehemiah prays a quick prayer, asks leave to go, and then asks for something practical: written permission to cross the provinces on the way.
Nehemiah asks for letters to the governors "Beyond the River". Which river, and why did those officials matter?
The king invited Nehemiah to make a request, and he asked respectfully to be allowed to go to Jerusalem with the king's authority to rebuild it. That authority would come in letters — one to Asaph, the keeper of the king's forest, and others to the governors beyond the river. The river here is almost certainly the Euphrates, so these governors ruled the lands toward Palestine. We are not told what moved the king's mind. That silence lets us see more clearly that, whatever the reasons were, it was the power of God that controlled him, in answer to Nehemiah's short and sudden prayer.
Nehemiah asked for one thing, then saw his chance and asked for more.
Nehemiah saw his opportunity — the opportunity God had given him — and his faith made him bolder. He dared to ask for royal letters "to the governors of the province Beyond the River, that they may let me pass through until I come to Judah"… His aims were exact and clearly defined: to restore the fortress that protected the temple, to rebuild the city walls, and to build a house suitable for himself as he carried out his duties.
Everything Nehemiah asked for was in the king's power to give. But was the asking itself right?
The answer to this question comes at the end of verse eight: "And the king granted me what I asked, for the good hand of my God was upon me." The request was in line with God's wisdom. The resources were in the king's hand, but God was behind it all.
Commentators differ over this request. Years earlier Ezra made the same journey and refused an armed escort. Some writers read Nehemiah's letters as a step down from that.
When Nehemiah made the same journey some years later, captains of the army and horsemen went with him. His faith was not as active, though his heart was truly set on the Lord's interests. How much better to trust in the Lord than in a strength you can see!
Others weigh the same difference and reach the opposite conclusion.
Notice an important difference between Ezra and Nehemiah, one that still puts no blame on Nehemiah. In Ezra, faith alone is at work. He was "ashamed to ask the king for a band of soldiers and horsemen to protect us against the enemy on our way" (Ezra 8:22). Nehemiah, by contrast, puts himself under the protection of the governors on the other side of the river… He leans on the power he serves, not because he lacks faith, but because in such low times faith no longer shows itself with the same simplicity… Nehemiah was alone, and his mission would not begin until he reached Jerusalem. Until then he had to recognise and accept that he depended on the Gentile power.
Later, enemies mocked the work and accused Nehemiah of rebellion. He had the king's letters in hand. Watch what he reaches for instead.
When "Sanballat the Horonite, and Tobiah the servant, the Ammonite, and Geshem the Arabian" said with scorn, "What is this thing that you are doing? Are you rebelling against the king?", the striking thing is that Nehemiah does not fall back on the king's authority. He falls back on God Himself. He could have said, "See these letters I have from the king." Instead he said, "The God of heaven will make us prosper, and we His servants will arise and build."
- Pray, then plan. The quick prayer came first. The detailed request followed, and grew bolder as God opened the door.
- Plan in detail. Nehemiah knew exactly what he needed — safe passage, timber, walls, a house — not just a vague wish for help.
- Permission is God's work. The letters lay in the king's power to give, but God was behind it all, controlling the king's mind.
- Protection divides opinion. Some writers see weaker faith here than in Ezra, who refused an escort. Others see a man accepting the dependence his position forced on him.
- Point to God, not paperwork. Nehemiah held royal letters, but he answered his enemies with God.
and a letter to Asaph the keeper of the king's forest, that he may give me timber to make beams for the gates of the palace which [appertains] to the house, and for the wall of the city, and for the house that I shall enter into. And the king granted me, according to the good hand of my God upon me.
The Persian king has just asked Nehemiah what he wants. Instead of a small favour, he asks for state letters, safe passage, and timber from the royal forest. The verse ends by tracing the whole success of that request to a source outside the palace entirely.
Nehemiah had prayed before he answered the king. When the king agreed to send him, he asked for more. One writer traces his growing courage and the exactness of what he asked for.
Nehemiah saw his opportunity — the opportunity God had given him. Strengthened by his faith, he grew bolder, and dared to ask for royal letters to the governors beyond the river... and a letter to Asaph the keeper of the king's forest. His aims were precise and clear: to restore the fortress that protected the temple, to rebuild the walls of the city, and to build a house fit for himself in his office... Before God he had poured out the desires of his heart — desires which God Himself had produced. He had looked to God for guidance and strength while he stood in front of the king. Now God showed that He had taken up His servant's cause.
The building named in the verse is not a royal home. The same writer explains the word and where the structure stood.
It seems that the more exact translation of this word would be "fortress". This may have been the well-known fortress connected with the temple. Under Roman rule it was later called the tower of Antonia.
Commentators differ over the building. These writers use an older translation, which reads "palace" where the ESV has "the fortress of the temple". One writer takes the three things Nehemiah names as public life, worship, and the protection of both.
The palace would perhaps refer to what we would call the Town Hall. The house, of course, was the place of worship. The walls would safeguard both.
The first use he names for the timber is gates. That priority has a precedent.
In verse 8 Nehemiah says, "That he may give me timber to make beams for the gates of the palace". David lived in a very different day from this. When he was collecting material for the house of God, the first thing he had in mind was the doors. "Nails for the doors of the house". It seems to be an important point that the gates, or doors, should be set up in their right position.
The forest and the letters were the king's. Nehemiah's closing words look past all of that.
There is much detail between the two statements "I prayed to the God of heaven" and "The king granted me, according to the good hand of my God upon me". Nehemiah recognized where his resources were. He also recognized that God, in His sovereignty, used the secular power to give them to him. Nehemiah did not ask for them from the secular power, he asked of God, and he recognized that they came from God.
That acknowledgement after the fact is as telling as the prayer before it.
Before he asked, Nehemiah had turned to God. Now that the king has granted his request, he acknowledges the good hand of God. We may remember to turn to God in our difficulties, and forget to acknowledge the goodness of God once He has met them. It is well to enter a difficulty in a spirit of prayer, and to come out of it in a spirit of praise.
One writer draws a wider principle from the way this door opened.
If He puts within our hearts a desire for any service — a service for His glory — He will surely open the way to it before us. If our minds are really set on His work, He will enable us to do it in His own way and time. The door may seem closed and barred; but if we wait on Him "who opens and no one shuts," we will find that it suddenly opens to us.
Ezra the priest and Nehemiah the court official were not equal in understanding. Yet the phrase at the end of this verse belongs to both men.
Nehemiah was an official in the king's court. He clearly did not have the spiritual education and understanding that Ezra had as a priest, devoted to the law of his God. Yet both could speak in the same way of "the good hand of my God upon me." If the heart is right, God will guide and support His servant, whatever the measure of his intelligence and faith.
- Prayed: Nehemiah asked God before he asked the king; the desires he poured out were desires God had first produced in him.
- Precise: He knew what he wanted — the fortress guarding the temple, the city wall, a house for his office — and asked for the timber to build it.
- Granted: The forest and the letters were the king's. Nehemiah did not ask the secular power for them. He asked God, and traced them back to God.
- Opened: Where God puts a desire for His work in a heart, He opens the barred door in His own way and time.
- Shared: Ezra had greater understanding, Nehemiah less, yet both could say the same thing — the good hand of my God was upon me.
And I came to the governors beyond the river, and gave them the king's letters. Now the king had sent captains of a force and horsemen with me.
Nehemiah leaves the king's court with his letters and hands them to the governors of the province he must cross on the way to Jerusalem. What stands out is the armed escort, because Ezra had made the same journey earlier and refused one.
The verse sends Nehemiah to the governors "Beyond the River". Which river is that, and why did the king agree at all?
The 'river' here is almost certainly the Euphrates, so the governors were the ones who ruled in the direction of Palestine. What moved the king's mind is hidden from us. That way we see more clearly that, whatever it was, it was the power of God that controlled him, in answer to Nehemiah's brief and sudden prayer.
The verse is careful about who supplied the soldiers.
The text tells us plainly that the king sent the captains and the horsemen. It does not say that Nehemiah asked for them. Nehemiah was travelling as the king's cup-bearer, and the king was probably thinking more of his dignity than of Nehemiah's safety. Even so, God can use the dignity of a king and the demands of royal custom to provide for the welfare of His servants. The situation clearly called for some such protection, because we are told at once about the enemies of God's people, who were deeply upset that a man had come to seek the welfare of God's people.
Commentators differ over what the escort says about Nehemiah. Some see it as a step down from the ground Ezra took on the same road.
Ezra would not ask the king for any military escort. He had already told the king that he trusted God (Ezra 8:22), and God fully proved that trust right by guarding him and his companions "from the hand of the enemy and from ambushes by the way." Nehemiah did not have the same simple faith. He was a godly and devoted man, but he travelled with the show and ceremony of one of the king's governors. That way was more likely to win him the respect of the world and the help of the king's servants.
Others answer that the two men carried very different responsibilities.
He accepts the support of the power that protects him and that he serves. This is not from any lack of faith. In these low times, faith does not show itself with the same simplicity. When the temple was finished, Ezra only had to carry gifts to the house of the Lord. The greater the treasure trusted to him, the more he needed to show the world that faith turned to God to guard what belonged to Him. Nothing like this was true of Nehemiah. He was alone, and his mission would not begin until he reached Jerusalem. Until then he had to acknowledge and accept that he depended on the Gentile power.
Another writer points to what Nehemiah never asked for:
Nehemiah was given this escort without asking for it, so it would have been out of place for him to refuse it. No doubt he saw it as tied to the Lord's promise to protect him.
Whichever view you take, God's hand was on both men. That leaves a lesson for anyone whose faith feels small.
Nehemiah was an official in the king's court. He clearly did not have the spiritual training and understanding that Ezra had as a priest devoted to the law of his God. Yet both alike could speak of 'the good hand of my God upon me.' If the heart is right, God will guide and support His servant, whatever the measure of his understanding and faith. This should encourage us today. Our faith and understanding may be small, but let us make sure our hearts are marked by real devotion to Christ and His present interests. Understanding will grow as the fruit of devotion.
Israel under a foreign ruler was a humbling position. There was a right way to feel it.
It was a humbling state of things when a foreign power ruled over Israel — an extreme punishment for the nation's sin. It was right to feel that, while still looking up to God above, Who heard Nehemiah and turned the king's heart. The other option was the rebellious pride we see later in the Pharisees, the strict religious leaders of Jesus' day.
- Prayer moves kings. The letters and the escort trace back to one brief, sudden prayer. The king's motives stay hidden so that God's hand stands out.
- Given, not grabbed. The captains and horsemen were the king's idea. God can use royal custom to protect His servant. Refusing a gift he never asked for would have been out of place.
- Two roads, one Lord. Ezra crossed the same ground with no soldiers; commentators differ on whether Nehemiah's escort marks weaker faith or simply a different errand.
- Heart over measure. Both men could say the good hand of God was on them. God guides the devoted heart, whatever its measure of understanding. And understanding grows out of devotion.
- Opposition starts at the border. The escort came none too soon. As soon as Nehemiah arrived, enemies were upset that anyone had come to seek the good of God's people.
And when Sanballat the Horonite, and Tobijah the servant, the Ammonite, heard [of it], it grieved them exceedingly that there had come a man to seek the welfare of the children of Israel.
Nehemiah has just reached Jerusalem with the king's letters. What follows is not a welcome. Two officials nearby are deeply upset that anyone has come to help God's people, and their grief begins a pattern of opposition that runs through the whole book.
The moment there is real movement toward God's purpose, resistance shows up. Commentators note that these two men were, by descent, relatives of the people they now opposed.
But as soon as there is action, as the result of devotion and some understanding, opposition is sure to appear... Sanballat was a Horonite; that is, we understand, an inhabitant of Horonaim, a town of Moab; while Tobiah was an Ammonite. So here we have representatives of the two sons of Lot, who were born under shameful circumstances, as Genesis 19 records. These men set themselves against what God was doing. A man had come "to seek the welfare of the people of Israel", which God had in view at that moment, and therefore the adversary was against it... It has often been the case, sad to say, that those closely related to the saints of God have led the opposition against them.
Their hostility was not invented that day. It reached back to how Moab and Ammon had treated Israel centuries earlier.
They came from Moab and Ammon, blood-relations of Israel... The Moabite and Ammonite were never to come into the congregation of God; the curse rested upon them. They did not meet Israel with bread and water when they came out of Egypt. They hated the people of God, and had hired Balaam the son of Beor to curse Israel (Deut. 23:3-6). They were the bitter enemies of Israel. That explains why Sanballat and Tobiah were displeased when Nehemiah came with the king's credentials.
Two men being upset looks like nothing. Writers see a larger hand behind it, and a resistance that would keep pace with Nehemiah all the way.
But as soon as he arrived, there was the sign of opposition to his mission. That opposition grew and confronted him at every step. In fact, it was Satan's opposition to the work of God. At first it seemed a very small thing.
The enemy's grief had one cause: a man had come to do God's people good. One writer names what they wanted instead.
These enemies of God were anxious to keep Israel in a state of misery, just as Satan desires to keep believers from enjoying the blessing of the Lord.
Why grief, and not an open attack? One writer answers that the enemy poses as a friend while God's people drift with the world.
Satan's aim is reached when God's people are corrupted. As long as they live in forgetfulness of their true place and character, joining themselves to the world and taking up its manners and customs, Satan poses as a friend. But the moment a man of God appears on the scene and seeks to call them back to the claims of God and His truth, Satan is roused to active hatred. This is not always openly admitted. As in the case before us, his servants are only "grieved" — grieved, of course, that the peace between Israel and their enemies should be disturbed.
This verse is the opening move in a campaign that changes tactics as the work advances. One writer traces the whole sequence through the book.
So we have very briefly examined the seven stages of opposition to God's own work. The grief of the enemy (Neh. 2:10); the laughter of the enemy (Neh. 2:19); his wrath (Neh. 4:1); mocking (Neh. 4:3); fighting (Neh. 4:8); scheming from outside (Neh. 5:1-9); scheming and danger from within (Neh. 6:10).
This verse gives Tobiah only a lowly label: he is "the servant". Later in the book his name returns, and one writer shows how far a link with such a man can spread.
Departure from the will and way of God is, we may say, an infectious thing. The chapter begins with Eliashib forming an alliance with Tobiah the Ammonite. It ends with his grandson making an even closer alliance, by marriage, with a daughter of Sanballat the Horonite. Sanballat was an even more prominent adversary, since Tobiah is introduced as "the servant" in Nehemiah 2:10. If departure from God and His word starts as only a trickle, it may soon become a torrent.
- Welfare. One man came to seek the good of God's people — and that alone is what grieved the enemy, whose aim was to keep Israel in misery.
- Kinship. Sanballat and Tobiah descended from Moab and Ammon, the sons of Lot; those closest by blood have often opposed God's people hardest.
- Source. The grief of two officials was the visible edge of Satan's opposition to God's work, small at first, but confronting Nehemiah at every step.
- Escalation. Grief turns to laughter, then wrath, mocking, fighting, and scheming both outside and inside — seven stages across the book.
- Infection. Tobiah enters here as "the servant", yet later Eliashib's family ties itself to him and to Sanballat by alliance and marriage; a trickle of departure becomes a torrent.
And I came to Jerusalem, and was there three days.
Nehemiah reaches Jerusalem after a long journey. The first thing Scripture records of him there is that he did nothing for three days. That silence is the point of the verse: what a servant does in the gap between arriving and starting.
Reaching the goal ended one set of troubles and opened another.
In verses 9, 10 and 11 there is another point worth noting. Nehemiah reaches his goal — at least, he came to the governors beyond the river. But he himself says in verse 11, "So I went to Jerusalem." His troubles were not all over when he left the king's palace. He ran into a completely different set of trials in the fierce opposition that came from Sanballat and Tobiah.
Nothing in the text explains the delay, and commentators read it in more than one way. One writer takes it as plain recovery, with a lesson for us.
It was three days before Nehemiah began the labor he had come for. He would need some rest after such a long journey. It is important for us too to build a restful spirit before we start any service for the Lord.
Another reads it as deliberate restraint. Nehemiah was about to speak about ruins he had not yet seen with his own eyes.
Arriving at Jerusalem, Nehemiah waits three days. He has a great and serious work in front of him, and he will not act rashly or rush it. He is about to speak of the distress of God's people and the ruined state of Jerusalem. But first he must see for himself the ruins he is going to speak about, so that he can do it in the spirit of the Servant who later could say, "We speak of what we know, and bear witness to what we have seen."
Scripture does not say how Nehemiah spent those three days. One writer reads them as time alone with God, and as a secret he told no one.
"So I went to Jerusalem and was there three days." We can well imagine, though he does not tell us so, that these three days were more than rest after a hard journey. They were days of waiting on God, of fresh prayer for guidance and wisdom. He was alone with his God... No one knows what God had put in his heart; he kept it a secret. He made no boast that he had come to do a big work, and he announced no plans. The man of faith, who trusts God, can go and act without telling others what the Lord has sent him to do.
At the start of this work Nehemiah has no partners.
We may note how much Nehemiah feels and acts alone at first. This was faith — faith before the king, and faith when he arrived at Jerusalem and sought the good of the sons of Israel, to the grief of their enemies (verses 10-16). How often movements of blessing begin with one man!
What Nehemiah does after those three days shows where his confidence lay.
At Jerusalem, the end of his journey, Nehemiah counts it most important to inspect the full extent of the ruin himself. He had come to Judah with the captains and the horsemen of the king of Persia. But when it came to the work, he keeps only "the beast that [he] rode upon" — that is, his own resources. He does not lean at all on the resources the world might offer him... When God entrusts a work to us, we are to take counsel with Him alone. Like Nehemiah, we depend on neither the world, nor even the priests, nobles or rulers (v. 16).
- Arrive — Reaching the place God sent you is not the finish line. Sanballat and Tobiah opposed Nehemiah as soon as he arrived.
- Rest — Nehemiah rests three days before he touches a single stone. Build a restful spirit before you start any service.
- Wait — Those days read best as time alone with God: prayer for guidance and wisdom, and no announcing of plans.
- See — He will not speak of ruins he has not seen. He inspects them first, so he can testify to what he has seen.
- Depend — When the work begins, Nehemiah leaves the royal escort behind and takes counsel with God alone. Movements of blessing have often begun with one man.
And I arose in the night, I and some few men with me -- but I told no man what my God had put in my heart to do for Jerusalem -- and there was no beast with me, except the beast that I rode upon.
Nehemiah has arrived in Jerusalem and waited three days. Now he slips out at night with a few men and one animal to see the ruined walls for himself. The verse names two things that shape all that follows. The work began in God, and for now Nehemiah kept it to himself.
Nehemiah does not present the plan as his own idea. Commentators read his short statement as a portrait of a true servant.
This simple statement reveals the characteristics of a true servant. First, he confesses the source of his inspiration for his work. God had put the thought of it into his heart. The assurance of this is the secret of all strength and perseverance in service.
That assurance mattered because of what the night ride showed him.
Faced with such ruin, the natural heart might well decide the case was hopeless, beyond the power of man to mend. For man on his own it truly was hopeless. But God had put it into Nehemiah's heart to take up this work, and God can enable a man to carry out what He puts into his heart to do. The secret of Nehemiah's power was his assurance that God had given him this work to do.
Nehemiah was about to call God's people to act. First he went out to see the ruin with his own eyes.
He is about to testify to the distress of God's people and the ruined state of Jerusalem. He is about to stir the people of God to action, and to direct them in their work. But first he must see for himself the ruin he is to testify about. Then he can speak in the spirit of the Servant who later said, "we speak of what we know, and bear witness to what we have seen."
The single animal and the few companions rule out any grand official inspection. Kelly sees Nehemiah's silence not as hiding something, but as knowing when to speak.
There was no pomp or show here, nothing of what men usually do. It was not a matter of bringing in many engineers and other skilled workmen to see what needed doing. He went himself: his heart was in it… He goes by night on purpose, so that he can see it at once without drawing needless attention. Lack of openness would be a sad thing among the people of God, but it was no question of openness here. Here it was wisdom, and the man who does not know when to be silent will hardly know when to speak.
There was also a practical danger in speaking too soon.
Telling others might have raised up obstacles on every side. When the Lord plainly lays a service on one of His servants, nothing is often more dangerous than talking it over with others. Talking with others often raises many questions: Is it possible? Is it wise? Is it the right time? The effect is that faith droops under many a suggested doubt, if prudence and common sense do not put it out altogether.
The secrecy had a time limit. Once Nehemiah knew the facts, he brought the leaders in. Notice the difference between what he would and would not share.
He could let no one advise him about the work, because he had received his mission from the Lord. But now it was only a question of carrying it out, so he could welcome the help and fellowship of others. This is always the path of the man of faith. He cannot change or soften his purpose. But he is glad to join others with himself, if they are willing to help forward the goal he has in view, in dependence on the Lord.
One writer applies the night survey to the church today. He does not let the sight end in despair.
As Nehemiah rode around Jerusalem, so ride around Christendom. Oh, I ask you to reflect, what are God's thoughts about it? View the whole scene in the presence of God and in His fear. Did Nehemiah give up in despair? No!
- Source. The work started with what God put in Nehemiah's heart — that, and not his own resolve, was the secret of his strength.
- Strength. The ruin was past human repair, but God enables the man to do what He has put in his heart to do.
- Sight. He surveyed the damage himself before speaking of it, so his testimony was of what he had seen.
- Silence. Telling no one was wisdom, not hiding; the man who cannot be silent will not know when to speak.
- Sharing. After the survey he brought others in. He would not change his purpose, but he welcomed their help.
And I went out by night by the valley-gate, even toward the jackal-fountain, and to the dung-gate; and I viewed the walls of Jerusalem, which were in ruins, and its gates were consumed with fire.
Nehemiah has reached the ruined city with the king's letters in hand. His first act is not a speech but an inspection: a night ride past the broken walls and the burned gates. Why go by night, why tell nobody, and why look so carefully at damage everyone already knew about?
One writer reads the three quiet days before the ride as preparation, and the ride itself as the move of a man who needed no audience.
We can well imagine, though he does not tell us, that his first three days in Jerusalem were more than rest from the hard journey. They were days of waiting on God, of renewed prayer for guidance and wisdom. He was alone with his God. When the three days of waiting were over he began a night ride to inspect the gates and the wall. All was quiet and the people were asleep. This servant of God went out on that memorable night with a few men. No one knew what God had put in his heart; he kept it a secret. There was no boast that he had come to do a big work, and no announcing of his plans.
Nehemiah had heard a report about the walls and gates before he ever reached the city. Now he checks it against the stones themselves.
Verses 13-15 describe Nehemiah's tour of inspection. They show the condition in which he found the walls and gates of the city. It matched exactly the report brought to him in Shushan. (Compare verse 13 with Neh. 1:3.) … He had made his survey in silence — alone with God, though some attendants were with him. He drew strength from talking with God through that solemn night. And if his heart was touched by the ruins of the holy city, that was only a faint reflection of the pity and compassion of the LORD for the place He Himself had chosen.
Nehemiah was about to call a whole city to work. The survey gave his words weight.
He has a great and serious work before him. He will not act rashly or hurry. He is about to bear testimony to the distress of God's people and the ruined condition of Jerusalem. He is about to rouse the people of God to action, and direct them in their work. But first he must see for himself the ruin he is going to speak about. Then he can speak in the spirit of the Servant who later said, "We speak of what we know, and bear witness to what we have seen."
Commentators read the two items Nehemiah lists as pictures of two different losses.
What a picture this is! The walls picture the separation between believers and unbelievers, now broken down. The gates picture the principles of truth, which let in what should be in and keep out what should be out. Those gates are burned — deliberately destroyed! … Can we repair these walls and gates? Certainly not across the whole professing church. But we can do it in whatever small area of responsibility the Lord gives us.
The enemy chose his target well. Gates matter at least as much as the wall:
The enemy knew very well what he was doing when he burned the gates of Jerusalem with fire (Neh. 2:3, 13, 17). The gates of a city are just as important as the wall, and even more so. They can open to let the people of the city go in and out freely. They can also shut out anything foreign, sinful, contagious, or criminal that might try to settle inside the city. At night the city shuts its gates. That keeps the citizens from leaving during the hour of danger. It keeps out anything against the laws of the city. Above all, it stops traitors slipping in and opening the gates to the enemy when the watch grows slack.
An honest look at the ruin could have stopped the work before it started.
He will acquaint himself with the extent of the ruin. He pursued this midnight journey until there was no place to pass. Faced with such ruin, the natural heart might well decide the case was hopeless, beyond any human power to mend. For man on his own it really was hopeless. But God had put it into Nehemiah's heart to take up this work. And God can enable a man to carry out what He puts in his heart to do.
The same refusal to pretend is asked of readers now:
We, too, are not to act as though the ruin did not exist. Nehemiah waited, and went by night to view the situation, so he knew perfectly well what was at stake and what was needed.
- Wait. Three days in the city before he touched a single stone — days of waiting on God, not idleness.
- Look. He rode the walls himself instead of trusting the report he already had. What he saw matched it exactly.
- Know. Seeing came before speaking. He called the city to work only after he had viewed the ruin himself.
- Read. Broken walls picture lost separation. Burned gates picture the loss of what lets the right in and keeps the wrong out. The enemy aimed at both.
- Build. The ruin was hopeless to man. But God had put the work in Nehemiah's heart, and God enables what He assigns.
And I went on to the fountain-gate, and to the king's pool; and there was no place for the beast under me to pass.
Nehemiah has been in Jerusalem three days, and now he rides the broken walls at night until the rubble stops his animal. Two questions follow: why look at ruin before you build, and what does a road too broken to ride say about the work ahead?
Before asking anyone to build, Nehemiah looked at the city with his own eyes. Davison sees the mark of a wise leader in that.
It seems he rose up so he could view the city for himself. As a wise man, he would learn the true state of things before he tried to start the work of recovery. As the one taking the lead, he wanted to know fully all that was needed.
The verse marks the point where the ride ended. Gaebelein pictures what Nehemiah saw along the way, and why the sight grieved him.
It must have been a sad journey as he passed from gate to gate in the walls. Desolation and debris everywhere. Fire had burned the gates to ashes. In the end the rubble in the way was so deep that the animal he rode could go no further. How he must have sighed as he looked at the ruin and wreckage, the results of the judgment of God because of Israel's sin!
The verse names the fountain gate and the king's pool. Davison looks at what Nehemiah found there.
What he found was that all the resources were cut off, and the question was how to open them up again. We are quite sure that the hand of God was not shortened.
For this ride Nehemiah kept no escort at all. Rossier reads that choice as an act of faith.
He had come to Judah with the captains and the horsemen of the king of Persia. But when it came to the work, he keeps only "the animal that was under me", that is to say his own resources. He does not depend at all on the resources the world might offer him. Here his faith shows itself. Jerusalem was defenceless against the enemy, and her ruin was such that the city did not even offer a path where Nehemiah's mount could pass.
A road this broken looks like an argument against building at all. Smith answers that thought.
He kept on through the night until there was no place to pass. Faced with such ruin, the natural heart might well judge the case hopeless, beyond any man's power to mend. For man, it was indeed hopeless. But God had put it into the heart of Nehemiah to take up this work, and God can enable a man to carry out what He puts into his heart to do.
Nehemiah told no one where he was going. Kelly reads both the night and the silence as wisdom.
He goes about it at once with all simplicity, and he goes about it by night with the express purpose of taking a view without drawing needless attention. It was not that he owed anything to others. Lack of openness would be a sad thing among the people of God, but this was not a question of openness. Here it was wisdom, and the man who does not know when to be silent will hardly know when to speak.
Bellett sees a rule of service here. Nehemiah proved the case himself before he announced it to anyone.
By night he inspects the city walls, acquainting himself with the nature of the work that now lay before him. He proves for himself what he is about to announce. Quite right — it is the way of Spirit-led servants. "We speak of what we know, and bear witness to what we have seen." And he is no patron but a fellow-worker, like Paul. He is like Paul's divine Master too, who was Lord of the harvest and yet served in the harvest field Himself.
- Look — Nehemiah learned the true state of things before he started the work of recovery.
- Measure — the rubble was so deep that his animal could not get through, and the resources of the city were cut off.
- Means — he kept only the animal he rode, depending on nothing the world offered him.
- Hope — to the natural heart the case looked hopeless. Yet God can enable a man to carry out what He puts into his heart.
- Timing — he went by night and said nothing; the man who does not know when to be silent will hardly know when to speak. Having proved it himself, he could then call others to build.
And I went up in the night through the valley, and viewed the wall, and turned back, and entered by the valley-gate and returned.
Nehemiah has arrived in Jerusalem with the king's letters. Instead of announcing himself, he slips out after dark to trace the broken line of the wall. Nobody in the city knows. Why start a great public work in silence? And why look hard at the ruin before lifting a single stone?
Nehemiah did not begin the way men usually begin a big project:
It was no matter of pomp or show, or anything that would be usual among men. It was not a question of bringing in engineers and other skilled workers to see what needed doing. It was he himself: his heart was in it. He does not wait for all that. He goes about it at once, with all simplicity. He goes about it by night, for the express purpose of taking a view straight away without drawing needless attention... Here it was a matter of wisdom, and the man who does not know when to be silent will hardly know when to speak.
He does not stop at a glance. He goes up by the valley and keeps going until there is no way through. He means to know how bad it really is.
He wanted to know for himself how far the ruin went. He kept up this midnight journey until there was no way through. Faced with such ruin, the natural heart might well decide the case was hopeless, beyond any man's power to mend. For man on his own it was indeed hopeless. But God had put it into Nehemiah's heart to take up this work. And God can enable a man to carry out what He puts into the heart to do.
The night was more than an inspection. Nehemiah was alone with God, and what he felt there was only a shadow of something greater:
He had made his survey in silence — alone with God, though some attendants were with him. He drew strength from his time with God through that solemn and eventful night. His heart had been touched by the ruins of the holy city. Yet that was only a feeble reflection of the pity and the compassion of Jehovah for the place which He Himself had chosen.
That mixture of sorrow and readiness has been repeated many times since, which is why the scene reads as more than ancient history:
And how many other true servants of God have spent nights like this in considering the failure and ruin among God's people, burdened with sorrow and deep concern, sighing and groaning, with hearts touched like Nehemiah's, ready to do the Lord's will.
He comes back in through the gate he left by, the Valley Gate. One writer finds meaning in the name:
What do we learn by the term, valley gate? A valley in Scripture is evidently a symbol of lowliness and humility. John the Baptist, who came ahead of our Lord, lifted up his voice. He echoed the words of the prophet Isaiah, spoken over seven centuries earlier: "Every valley shall be filled, and every mountain and hill shall be made low... and all flesh shall see the salvation of God" (Luke 3:5-6)... Is this not a beautiful picture of the humble mind that should mark Christians in how they treat one another?
He asked no one for advice. One writer explains why:
There was no need to consult any man about a work that God had given him to do. Advice from men could add nothing to God, but it might well weaken and discourage Nehemiah. Men would probably have told him it was wiser to leave the matter alone, that he would only distress himself by looking at the ruin, and that he would stir up trouble among God's people, and opposition against them, by trying to rebuild the walls.
The silence did not last. Once the survey was done, Nehemiah brought others in — but he drew a line:
He could let no one advise him about the work, because he had received his mission from the Lord. But now it was only a question of carrying it out, so he could welcome the help and fellowship of others. This is always the path of the man of faith. He cannot change or adjust his purposes. But he is glad to join others with himself, if they are willing to help forward the object he has in view, in dependence on the Lord.
One writer brings this straight to us:
We, too, are not to act as though the ruin did not exist. Nehemiah waited, and went by night to view the situation, so he knew perfectly well what was at stake and what was needed.
- Night: he went out unseen, with no show and no needless attention. A man who cannot stay silent will not know when to speak.
- Knowledge: he kept going until there was no way through, so he knew the whole ruin, not a comfortable part of it.
- Dependence: those dark hours were time alone with God. His own grief for the city was only a faint echo of God's.
- Lowliness: he came back in by the Valley Gate. A valley pictures the humility that should mark God's people with each other.
- Speech: only after the survey did he call others in. He took no advice about the mission, but he shared the work with joy.
And the rulers did not know whither I went or what I did, for I had not as yet told it to the Jews, nor to the priests, nor to the nobles, nor to the rulers, nor to the rest that did the work.
Nehemiah has just finished a night ride around Jerusalem's broken walls. No one knew where he had been or why — not the officials, not the priests, not the nobles, not the workers. It raises a question every servant of God faces: when is silence wise, and when is it hiding?
Nehemiah owed these men no report, and withholding one was not a failure of honesty. One writer draws the line carefully, and then turns it into a principle about timing:
It was not that there was anything that he owed to others. A lack of openness would be a sad thing among the people of God, but this was not a question of openness. Here it was wisdom, and the man who does not know when to be silent will hardly know when to speak. It is a great thing to learn that there is a season for both.
Nehemiah did not consult the rulers because the plan was not his own to defend. God had given him the work. Asking men would only have brought back advice to drop it:
There was no need to consult with any man about a work that God had given him to do. Counsel from men could add nothing to God, but might well weaken and discourage Nehemiah. Men would probably have told him it would be wiser to leave the matter alone. They would say he would only distress himself by looking at the ruin. And by trying to rebuild the walls he would stir up trouble among the people of God, and opposition against them.
Telling no one left Nehemiah alone with God that night. One writer says that is where his strength came from:
He had made his survey in silence — alone with God, though some attendants were with him. He gathered strength from talking with God through that solemn and eventful night. And if the ruins of the holy city had touched his heart, that was only a faint reflection of the pity and the compassion of Jehovah for the place which He Himself had chosen.
Nehemiah had arrived with a Persian escort of soldiers and horsemen. For the inspection itself he left all of it behind, and the list of people he did not consult tells the same story:
He had come to Judah with the captains and the horsemen of the king of Persia. But when the work was in question, he keeps only "the beast that he rode upon" — that is to say, his own resources. In no way does he depend on the resources which the world might offer him. Here his faith shows itself… When God entrusts a work to us, we are to take counsel with Him alone. Like Nehemiah, we depend upon neither the world, nor even the priests, nobles or rulers (v. 16). This is a very important principle for all those whom the Lord sends.
The verse says he had not told them yet. The very next words of the chapter are his appeal to build. One commentator explains what changed between the two moments:
He could allow no one to advise him about the work, because he had received his mission from the Lord. But now it was only a question of carrying it out, so he could welcome the help and fellowship of others. This is always the path of the man of faith. He cannot alter or change his purposes. But he is glad to join others with himself, if they are willing to help forward the goal he has in view, in dependence on the Lord.
The pattern is not just biography. A writer applying it to the present points to the inspection as the thing that made Nehemiah's later action realistic:
We, too, are not to act as though the ruin did not exist. Nehemiah waited, and went by night to view the situation. So he knew exactly what was at stake and what was needed.
- Secret, not sly. Nehemiah told no one his plan — not rulers, priests, nobles or workers. Commentators call this wisdom about timing, not a failure of honesty.
- Because God gave it. The plan came from God, so human advice could add nothing to it — and would likely have argued him out of it.
- Alone gains strength. The silence bought him a night alone with God. His grief over the ruins was a faint echo of God's compassion for the city.
- Nothing borrowed. He left the Persian escort behind and rode one animal. He leaned on neither the world's resources nor the leaders of his own people.
- Then he spoke. "As yet" is the key word. Once he had finished the survey, he called the same men in — not for advice about the mission, but for fellowship in the work.
And I said to them, Ye see the distress that we are in, that Jerusalem lies waste, and its gates are burned with fire. Come, and let us build up the wall of Jerusalem, that we be no more a reproach.
Nehemiah has reached Jerusalem and inspected the broken walls by night, telling no one what God had put in his heart. Now he speaks: he names the ruin plainly, calls the rulers and the people to build, and gives them reasons to join him.
The night ride came first. Only after Nehemiah had measured the damage himself, alone with God, did he speak in public.
When God entrusts a work to us, we are to take counsel with Him alone. Like Nehemiah, we depend on neither the world, nor even the priests, nobles or rulers (v. 16). This is a very important principle for everyone the Lord sends. Nehemiah is sure of his mission. But only after he has taken stock of the evil in detail, alone under God's eye, can he urge the people to act and repair the ruin.
Nehemiah does not ask permission to build. He asks for company. He settled the mission with God alone; the work he shares.
He could let no one advise him about the work, because he had received his mission from the Lord. But now it was only a question of carrying it out, so he could welcome the help and fellowship of others. This is always the path of the man of faith. He cannot change or adjust his purpose. But he is glad to join others with himself, if they are willing to help forward the aim he has in view, in dependence on the Lord.
He does not press them once. He lays out three reasons to build.
In verses 17 and 18 he gives them three motives to move them to "Come, let us build the wall of Jerusalem." The first motive is the extreme ruin and misery that they and the city are in. The second motive is the grace of God which had encouraged him: "the hand of my God that had been good upon me." The third motive lies in the king's words and his help, which God Himself had ordained.
The walls did not fall by accident, and they will not rise by accident either. One hand stands behind both, working in two different ways.
The hand of God in government had used Nebuchadnezzar to break down the walls and burn the gates. But the hand of God in goodness was upon Nehemiah to build the walls and set up the gates… Nothing will strengthen our hands for a good work so much as seeing God's hand directing the work. God has put it into the heart of one man to do the work, and now God strengthens their hands to carry out the work.
Nehemiah says "we" — he counts himself inside the distress. Why did the shame press on him so hard?
In his zeal for the Lord and for Jerusalem, he could not bear that His chosen people should be such a reproach to the nations around them. His one desire was to rebuild the wall of separation, and to restore justice and judgment among them by setting up the gates… God worked with His servant's words, and produced a ready response in His people's hearts, so that they said, "Let us rise up and build." When we are in communion with God's mind about our service, He never fails to send the helpers we need.
(Older translations read "that we be no more a reproach"; the ESV renders it "that we may no longer suffer derision".)
The broken wall and burnt gates also carry a picture for God's people today. There is a limit to what we can repair.
What a picture this is! The wall of separation between believers and unbelievers is broken down. The principles of truth seen in the gates — which let in what should be in and keep out what should be out — are burned, that is, deliberately destroyed… Can we repair these walls and gates? Not in the whole Christian world; but we can in whatever small sphere of responsibility the Lord gives us.
- Look — Nehemiah counted the damage in detail under God's eye alone before he asked anyone else to lift a stone.
- Own — he said "we," placing himself inside the distress rather than lecturing from outside it.
- Tell — he gave three reasons: the ruin they could see, God's good hand on him, and the king's word.
- Share — he would not let others revise the mission, but he welcomed their hands in the work.
- Rise — the hand that broke the walls in government now built them in goodness. Hearts answered, "Let us rise up and build."
And I told them of the hand of my God which had been good upon me; as also of the king's words which he had said unto me. And they said, Let us rise up and build. And they strengthened their hands for the good [work].
Nehemiah has already walked the broken walls alone at night, telling no one what God had put in his heart. Now he speaks. This verse shows what turns a discouraged people into builders.
He gave them two facts: God's hand, and the king's permission. The order was deliberate.
When Nehemiah called in his brothers we read, "And I told them of the hand of my God that had been upon me for good, and also of the words that the king had spoken to me." Notice again that he first tells them how the matter stands with God. He does not overlook the king's favour towards him, but he acknowledges that it all came because God's hand was upon him.
Taken with the previous verse, he gives them three reasons to act.
In verses 17 and 18, he presents them with three motives to get them to "come… and build up the wall of Jerusalem". The first motive is the extreme ruin and misery of the people and their city. The second motive is the grace of God which had encouraged him: "the hand of his God had been upon him for good". The third motive lies in the king's words and his help, which God Himself had ordained.
The phrase "the hand of my God" holds a contrast. That same hand had been at work in the ruin.
God's hand in government had used Nebuchadnezzar to break down the walls and burn the gates. But God's hand in goodness was upon Nehemiah to build the walls and set up the gates. When the rulers heard of the hand of God they said, "Let us rise up and build." "So they strengthened their hands for the good work." Nothing will so strengthen our hands for a good work as the recognition of God's hand directing the work.
Nehemiah could have blamed them for the neglect. Instead he stood with them in the distress, and told the story without a hint of what it had cost him.
He does not reproach them or charge them with unfaithfulness and neglect. He does not assume the role of a leader, but identifies himself with the people. "You see the distress that we are in" — he might have said, "You see the distress you are in." Then he told them of what God had done. But we find not a word of credit to himself, nor of the lonely hours spent during that sleepless night. Then the people resolved to rise up and build.
He had kept the plan to himself until now. There is a line between receiving a mission and carrying it out.
He could let no one advise him about the work, because he had received his mission from the Lord. But now it was only a question of doing it, so he could welcome the help and fellowship of others. This is always the path of the man of faith. He cannot change or adjust his purposes. But he is glad to bring others in alongside him, if they are willing to help forward the goal he has in view, in dependence on the Lord.
Nehemiah did not win these helpers by persuasion. His words and their willingness came from one source.
God worked with His servant's words. He produced a ready response in His people's hearts, so that they said, "Let us rise up and build." When we are in fellowship with God's mind about our service, He never fails to send the helpers we need.
The verse does not stop at their agreement. It records what they did with their hands — and that step is where many stall.
They were truly ready to put their hands to the work. Godly thoughts and understanding are not enough. They had to put their hands to the task and work. It is the same with us today. To understand God's mind and purpose is not enough. We must be ready to give ourselves to the service it calls for. Here, we fear, is a very weak spot in many Christian lives.
Nehemiah arrived to find nobody else interested in the ruined wall. One man's devotion changed that.
Then he told them of the goodness of God, and the king's words to him — and what effect did this have on them? They said, "Let us rise up and build." Such was the effect of devotedness in one man. No one can measure the influence of one such person on those around him.
- Hand — Nehemiah named God's hand first, then the king's permission. The favour of a Persian ruler was real, but he traced it back to its true source.
- Good hand — the same hand had once broken these walls through Nebuchadnezzar. Now it was rebuilding them in goodness. Seeing God's hand in a work is what strengthens hands for it.
- We — he took no leader's platform and no credit for his sleepless night. He stood inside the distress, not above it.
- Us — his mission came from God alone, and no one could change it. But he welcomed others into the doing of it, and God supplied the helpers.
- Build — their words turned into work. Understanding God's purpose is not enough until hands take up the task.
And Sanballat the Horonite, and Tobijah the servant, the Ammonite, and Geshem the Arabian, heard it; and they mocked us and despised us, and said, What is this thing which ye do? will ye rebel against the king?
The wall of Jerusalem was still a heap of ruins. Three men outside the city heard that the rebuilding was about to start, and they laughed. The verse shows two weapons used against God's work: ridicule of the builders, and a charge of disloyalty to the king.
The scorn came right after the people agreed to build, not before.
Yet the moment that God begins to act, the devil tries to hinder… This was the enemy's first effort. It was to pour contempt on a work so simple and insignificant; and beyond that, it showed their malice. Yet God used it for their good. Nehemiah learns more than ever before about the adversaries who were there. But this is no reason to be alarmed.
Two opponents appeared earlier in the chapter. A third joins them here, and his ancestry is striking.
As it became plainer that the work would really go ahead, the opposition grew. In verse 19 we find Geshem the Arabian joining the Moabite and the Ammonite. This is remarkable. The people of Arabia came mostly from Ishmael and Esau. To this day the various Arab tribes are the bitterest foes of the Jews. In prophecy these three peoples are linked together too. Daniel 11:41 says that in the coming day the king of the north will overthrow many lands, but Edom, Moab and Ammon will escape him. Isaiah 11:14 says that Israel, brought back and made one again, will then subdue them.
Not all opposition comes from outright unbelief.
These relentless enemies of the Jews hated them all the more because they themselves had some knowledge of the true God. Sanballat was in charge of the forces of Samaria, where their system of idol worship was not fully separated from the worship of the LORD. In religion, the mixture of the true with the false is far more hostile to Christian testimony than plain paganism is… The world's hostility begins with mockery, which frightens the timid more than hatred does. This was one of Sanballat's weapons (Neh. 2:19; 4:1). We all easily feel the influence of mockery if our hearts have not broken with our former ties to the world. Then we will fear ridicule and scorn. We will draw back from open fellowship with this humbled people, "these weak Jews", who claim to repair the breaches.
The second half of the verse is not a joke but an accusation, and it happens to be untrue.
They even accused them of rebelling against the king. That charge was completely false, since the king had encouraged the building of the wall. But Satan will use every kind of falsehood to get his own way.
The threat only bites where the conscience is uneasy.
Sanballat had threatened to report him as a rebel against the king. But where the heart is simple there is no such reason for alarm. The more firmly Nehemiah honoured those in authority, the more he could afford to ignore Sanballat's threats and scorn.
Laughter was only the beginning. One writer traces the whole course of the opposition.
So we have very briefly examined the seven stages of opposition to God's own work. The grief of the enemy (Neh. 2:10); the laughter of the enemy (Neh. 2:19); his wrath (Neh. 4:1); mocking (Neh. 4:3); fighting (Neh. 4:8); scheming from outside (Neh. 5:1-9); scheming and danger from within (Neh. 6:10). Many readers of this booklet will say, "I have seen all seven in the opposition to God's work in our own day."
Nehemiah's reply in the next verse shows why the scorn failed.
In our chapter the opposition for the moment took only the form of mockery — "they jeered at us and despised us." This kind of opposition often has real effect, even on the people of God. But that only happens to those who live and act with an eye on men. Nehemiah and his friends were acting before God in what they planned to do… Their reply was, "The God of heaven will make us prosper." As far as they could, they were already living the triumphant word of Romans 8:31: "If God is for us, who can be against us?"
- Start — Opposition wakes when the work does. The moment God begins to act, the devil tries to hinder, and contempt is his first move.
- Laughter — Ridicule is stage two of seven, after grief and before wrath. What invites it is the small size of the work.
- Grip — Mockery frightens the timid more than open hatred, and it only grips hearts still tied to the world's approval.
- Lie — "Are you rebelling against the king?" was false. The king had approved the building, and a clear conscience leaves the slander nothing to hold.
- Answer — Scorn lands only on people living with an eye on men; Nehemiah lived before God and replied, "The God of heaven will make us prosper."
And I answered them, and said to them, The God of the heavens, he will prosper us, and we his servants will arise and build; but ye have no portion, nor right, nor memorial in Jerusalem.
Nehemiah does not answer the mockery with argument; he answers it with a title for God. That title carries weight in this period, when Israel is under Gentile rule and God's throne is no longer at Jerusalem.
Notice that they pray to the God of heaven. In Israel they knew Him as the Lord of all the earth (Exodus 8:22; Joshua 3:11; 2 Kings 5:15), for He lived and had His throne among His people. But now it was otherwise. He had removed His throne from Jerusalem and handed the rule of the earth to Nebuchadnezzar. So the "four children" called Him the God of heaven with a true understanding of where they stood before God.
Nehemiah carried letters from the king. He never produces them here. (These writers quote an older wording, "He will prosper us"; the ESV reads "will make us prosper.")
Sanballat the Horonite, Tobiah the Ammonite servant, and Geshem the Arabian said with scorn, "What is this thing that you do? Will you rebel against the king?" The striking thing is that Nehemiah does not fall back on the king's authority. He falls back on God Himself. He could have said, "See these letters which I have from the king", but instead he said, "The God of heaven, He will prosper us; therefore we His servants will arise and build." His enemies might have said, "Are you not the servant of the king?" But again and again in this chapter we see that everything he did stood in relation to God.
The scorn is not random, and it does not stay the same.
This working of the Spirit of God aroused again the opposition of the enemy. Whenever God works, Satan counterworks... At first Sanballat and Tobiah were deeply upset that Nehemiah had stepped in. They pretended to be sorry that he had come and disturbed the peace between Israel and the nations around them. But now they "laughed us to scorn, and despised us." One weapon is as good as another in the hands of the enemy. Their grief did not change Nehemiah's plans, so they would try mockery and contempt. At the same time they would, if possible, stir up fear by hinting at a charge of rebellion.
Contempt is a weak weapon against people who are not performing for an audience.
This kind of opposition often works, even on the people of God — but only if they are living and acting for the eyes of men. Nehemiah and his friends were acting before God in what they planned to do, as we see in the last verse of our chapter. Their reply was, "The God of heaven, He will prosper us." In their own measure they were already saying what Romans 8:31 says in triumph: "If God is for us, who can be against us?"
The last clause is not a taunt returned for a taunt. It refuses an offer of partnership. Older translations read "memorial" where the ESV has "claim."
"The God of heaven, He will prosper us." He puts God first. Knowing that they were doing His will in rebuilding the wall, he had the confidence and assurance that God was on their side and none could hinder. "Therefore we His servants will arise and build." This was their determination to do the work. "But you have no portion, nor right, nor memorial in Jerusalem." It is the refusal of their fellow help. Though they might have claimed a relationship with the people of God, they did not belong to Israel. Their help was not wanted. What a contrast with what is now called "work for the Lord," where the unsaved and ungodly are invited to take part!
Who is being shut out matters. The leading opponent was no obvious outsider.
The leader in this opposition is not a heathen but a Samaritan (Nehemiah 4:1-2), one whose religion was a corrupt mixture of idolatry and the worship of Jehovah. In the eyes of the world, his profession no doubt made him look like a true worshipper of Jehovah. Nehemiah, however, is not deceived, for he says, "You have no portion, nor right, nor memorial in Jerusalem."
Nehemiah staked everything on what God would do. The rest of the book shows the outcome.
So they finished the work, but not in their own strength — it was the God of heaven. He prospered them (chapter 2:20). Their confidence was in Him and He did not fail them. He will not fail anyone today who takes up His work, moved to it by the love of Christ. But let us do it in His fear. Heaven keeps a record of all we do, and of how and why we do it, for "each one's work will become manifest, for the Day will disclose it… what sort of work each one has done" (1 Corinthians 3:13).
- God first. Nehemiah's answer opens with God — not with the wall, and not with the king's letters. The God of heaven is the whole ground he stands on.
- God's title fits the hour. He is "the God of heaven" because He had removed His throne from Jerusalem and given the rule of the earth to foreign kings. Faith names Him as He is, even in ruin.
- God's work draws fire. Whenever God works, the enemy works against Him. First grief, then mockery, then a whisper of rebellion — one weapon is as good as another.
- God's servants build anyway. Ridicule only wounds those who act for the eyes of men. Those who act before God read the same scene and say, "If God is for us, who can be against us?"
- God's work refuses mixed help. The three words portion, right, memorial shut the door on helpers who claim a place among God's people but do not belong. And the wall rose by God's strength, not the builders' own.
And Eliashib the high priest rose up with his brethren the priests, and they built the sheep-gate. They hallowed it, and set up its doors; and they hallowed it even to the tower of Meah, to the tower of Hananeel.
Nehemiah 3 begins the building work. The high priest and his fellow priests are named first, and they start at the Sheep Gate. Why does God record who built what? And why start at this gate?
The chapter reads like a register of workers. One writer sees the movement behind it, and reads the roll of names as God's verdict on it.
The Lord used Nehemiah's zeal to rouse almost the whole people... It was, in fact, a real revival, and one that only the Spirit of God could produce. And God showed the value He set on it: He has caused the names of those who did this work to be written down and kept. This shows that they had His mind in building the wall. What did their proposed work mean? It meant that they, led forward by Nehemiah, confessed their need of separation from the nations around them, and took steps to secure it.
Starting the whole repair at this gate is no accident of geography.
Through this gate the sacrificial animals went up to the altar. They were the constant witness that "without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins," and pictures of Him who was "like a lamb that is led to the slaughter"... The lesson here is that the person and work of Christ are the starting point of a true restoration. The cross of Christ, the work God's Son has accomplished, must be guarded above everything else. At the close of this chapter this Sheep Gate is mentioned once more. After going round all the gates, we come back to this first gate. It is with this great truth, the gospel of Christ, that all repairing of the inroads of the world and the flesh must start and end. This gate suggests Him who said, "I am the door. If anyone enters by me, he will be saved" (John 10:9). There is no other gate that leads to life and into God's presence.
The first workers named are priests. One writer weighs what such a lead is worth, and hints at a flaw in the man giving it.
Then, too, we see that with Eliashib a priestly lead was given. Days of recovery bring to light men who know what it is to spend time in God's presence as priests. We can be sure that God will bless the lead such men give. There was a defect in Eliashib, as we shall see, but as the priestly leader of the people he did well in starting this work.
Being first on the list is a matter of office. Compare this verse with the record of other builders, and something is missing.
Eliashib the high priest and his fellow priests are the first workers mentioned. This is not because they surpassed the rest in energy or devotion. It is because of the position they held among the people... The high priest and his brothers built a gate and set up its doors. But they did not lay "its beams" to give it stability, and there is no mention that they provided locks or bars...
At first glance their work looks complete. One writer weighs the stretch they covered against what the gate still lacked.
The Sheep Gate stood closest to the temple, on the north side. The stretch of wall they rebuilt held two towers: a work that was especially important and difficult... It is possible that Eliashib had a personal interest in leaving out the locks and bars. He was allied to Tobijah the Ammonite, one of the three great enemies of the people of God. He had even prepared a room in the court of the temple for this enemy!... A grandson of this same Eliashib was the son-in-law of the second great enemy of the Jews: Sanballat the Horonite. Was Eliashib acting dishonestly here? No one can say for certain. But it is a constant principle that association with the world, because we make room for it, always leaves our work with a character of incompleteness. The enemy takes advantage of that when the moment suits.
Someone else had to repair the stretch by Eliashib's own front door.
Eliashib and his brothers built the Sheep Gate. But a different man, Meremoth, repaired the wall "from the door of the house of Eliashib to the end of the house of Eliashib" (v. 21). What a lesson there is here! A man may care about repairing the public character of Christianity in some measure. Yet he may have little concern for the wall of separation in his family life!... Still, Scripture credits Eliashib with the good he actually did.
- Start — the work begins at the Sheep Gate and circles back to it. The sacrifice of Christ is where all repair begins and ends.
- Stir — nearly the whole people rose up, a movement the Spirit of God produced, and God preserved every name.
- Separation — the wall was their confession: they needed to stand apart from the nations around them.
- Seniority — Eliashib heads the list by rank, not by devotion. A place on the record is not the same as earnestness.
- Shortfall — doors but no bolts, and a house repaired by someone else. Public zeal without private separation leaves the enemy a way in.
And next to them built the men of Jericho. And next to them built Zaccur the son of Imri.
Nehemiah 3 names the people who rebuilt Jerusalem's broken wall. Verse 2 adds two more work parties: a group from another town, and one man known only by his father's name — and it raises the question of what God counts worth writing down.
The verse begins with "next to": these builders worked beside the high priest and his fellow priests. One writer points out how little the men of Jericho did, and why that does not matter.
The men of Jericho built next to the priests (v. 2). They had come up from their city to help their brothers at Jerusalem. Their work does not appear significant: they do not build a gate or a tower, but they do help defend the city against evil from outside. Part of this task falls to one man, Zaccur the son of Imri. God uses many different kinds of instrument. Each one is useful. No one else can take his place, and no one chooses his own work. Whether several work together, or a worker is alone, their only duty is to work in the place God gives to each one.
Where these builders came from matters. One writer sees encouragement in it, and a question for us.
"And next to him the men of Jericho built" (v. 2). That is a most encouraging feature. These men came from a city whose wall God had brought down. Now they are ready to help build a wall around the city of God itself. That is a wonderful thing. Should this not challenge each of us? Have we given more time and interest to the system of things Satan has built up than to the circle of divine interests God has brought us into?
Another writer sees grace in the same fact, and meaning in the two names that close the verse.
The men of Jericho, once under the curse, but now in the place of nearness and blessing, laboured next to the high priest. What grace this reveals! Zaccur ("well remembered") the son of Imri ("the towering one") also was there.
The order of the list carries its own lesson. Look at who began the work, and who came next.
The first to take up the work were the first in rank, as was fitting — the high priest and his fellow priests. They did not plead their sacred duties as an excuse from the new task, but set to work without delay... Notice those who came next, because they belonged to Jericho; yet they gave themselves to the work of Jerusalem. Nothing beyond his building attaches to Zaccur, who follows.
The rest of the chapter names a very mixed company of builders. One writer draws a lesson from that mix.
One feature that comes to light in this chapter is unity. Very different classes of people share the work — "men of Jericho", nobles, goldsmiths, perfumers and others. Does this not suggest that, although we differ from one another in secular things, we should be one in our desires and activities in divine interests?
Zaccur did one thing, and the record keeps his name. Why does God list these names at all?
This unity of mind and activity for such an end is a sure mark of the work of the Spirit of God. Because it is, the Lord shows His special approval. He records the names and families of those who shared a work that means so much for the honour of His name and the blessing of His people.
Another writer turns the list on the reader.
Let me point you to the grace of God here. He notices the work of everyone, and He shows what makes each piece of work distinct. That was an important thing to remember. There is not one of you, beloved friends, who has not a work to do for the Lord. Are you doing it? Further, there is a work that you can do better than any other.
- Next — the verse marks each builder by who he worked beside, not by how much he built.
- Grace — men from a city once under the curse now work next to the high priest, in the place of nearness and blessing.
- Reach — they left their own town to help their brothers at Jerusalem. One writer asks whether we give more time to the system Satan built than to God's interests.
- Unity — priests, nobles, goldsmiths and townsmen differed in secular things, yet shared this one work. Such unity is a sure mark of the Spirit of God.
- Recorded — no gate, no tower, one man with only his father's name — yet God writes it down. Each instrument is useful, and no one else can take his place.
And the fish-gate did the sons of Senaah build they laid its beams, and set up its doors, its locks and its bars.
Nehemiah 3 reads like a building register. Name after name, gate after gate, each stretch of Jerusalem's broken wall goes to someone. The fish gate entry stands out for how much it records: beams, doors, locks, bars. Commentators read that fullness as a contrast with the gate built just before it.
The gate takes its name from what lay outside it.
In the Old Testament we read of the "fish gate" at Jerusalem, which no doubt led to a fish market. Neh. 3:3; Neh. 12:39.
The verse names the builders: the sons of Hassenaah. The same family appears elsewhere in Scripture.
One whose sons built the fish gate at Jerusalem, Neh. 3:3. Probably the same as SENAAH in Neh. 7:38 and Ezra 2:35.
This was not a quiet corner of the wall. It faced the side of the city that armies came from. The writers below quote an older translation, which says "locks" where the ESV says "bolts."
This gate stood in the northern part of Jerusalem. Along with "the gate of the old wall," it was among those most exposed to enemy attack. The Assyrian armies came from the north to surround the city and besiege it. The sons of Senaah saw how important this gate was. They did not stop work until its locks and bars were in place.
The gate just before this one was the work of Eliashib the high priest and his fellow priests. One writer sets the two records side by side.
Some are marked out for the quality of their work, for God makes a difference between "quantity" and "quality." Eliashib and his brothers did more work than the sons of Hassenaah. The priestly company built a gate and, it seems, a large part of the wall. The sons of Hassenaah only set up a gate. Yet the quality of their work was higher than that of the high priest and his brothers. They not only built the gate; they laid its beams and secured it with locks and bars. Such details are not recorded of the high priest's gate.
Later chapters supply the explanation for the omission. The high priest had personal reasons for leaving a way in.
There is a reason for the significant omission of the locks and bars from Eliashib's gate... We shall learn that Eliashib the priest was an ally of Tobiah the Ammonite and Sanballat the Horonite... Moreover he had prepared a great chamber for Tobiah in the house of the Lord. Little wonder then that he put no locks or bars on his gate. If he gives the enemy outside a room inside, he must also leave the way open for that enemy to reach it. He claims to be separate by building the gate and the wall. But he is careful to leave off the locks and bars, so as to keep in with the man of the corrupt and mixed religion of Samaria.
Commentators differ here. Some say the sheep gate was meant to have no fastenings. The same writer then points to what Eliashib did later.
Some have thought it was right that the sheep gate had no locks and bars. But Eliashib was the man who later brought Tobiah into the inside place — a place where he should never have been.
One writer takes the gate's name as a picture of a different catch, and notes where it stands in the order of the gates.
Outside that gate there may have been a fish market. Or it may have been the gate the fishermen went out through to catch fish. It reminds us of the words of our Lord, "Follow me, and I will make you become fishers of men" (Mark 1:17). After we have passed through the sheep gate we must go through the fish gate, to catch fish, to be soul-winners. In this way, by leading others to Christ and bringing sinners to a knowledge of the Saviour, the Church is built up. Hassenaah (the name means "lifted up") was the builder there.
One writer applies this to a company of believers today. He calls the loss of this gate fatal.
If the church ceases to be an evangelical body it ceases to grow or even maintain its footing. Put out that spirit and you have no birth rate. Put out that spirit and believers sink into mere theorists, with no power to reach others... If an assembly, as it were, has no fish gate, it is a fatal and irremediable loss.
- Beams — the sons of Hassenaah laid the beams first, then hung the doors.
- Locks — they kept going until the locks and bars were in place. Their gate faced the side where armies came.
- Quality — God makes a difference between quantity and quality. Less wall, better finished, gets the fuller record.
- Cause — the gate next door had no locks. Its builder was an ally of the enemy and had given him a room inside.
- Fish — the gate named for the catch stands for reaching others. Where it falls out of use, growth stops.
And next to them repaired Meremoth the son of Urijah, the son of Koz. And next to them repaired Meshullam the son of Berechiah, the son of Meshezabeel. And next to them repaired Zadok the son of Baana.
Meremoth, Meshullam, and Zadok each repair a section of a broken wall, each named with his father, each working next to the man before him. Why would God fill a whole chapter of Scripture with builders' names and the sections of wall they repaired?
Such a list of names can look like wasted space. One writer draws the opposite conclusion.
God has seen fit to give a whole chapter to the names of the leaders of families and townships who took part in the work. We might wonder why so much valuable space goes to men who would otherwise be forgotten. But we conclude from it that the humblest service for the will of God is not forgotten. It goes on record, above all when it is carried on in the face of ridicule and opposition.
Meremoth appears here, and then again later in the chapter repairing a second stretch. His earlier history explains the second mention.
In verses 4 and 5 we see first of all Meremoth the son of Urijah the priest. He was a faithful and respected man, and Ezra's companions had entrusted to him all the free-will offerings sent from Babylon to Jerusalem (Ezra 8:33-34). His zeal goes beyond the repair of just one portion of the wall. He is the first to repair "another piece" in front of the house of Eliashib the high priest (v. 21). Afterwards others copy his example. His zeal leads him to defend the representative of the people before God… Faithfulness shown in a service that looks small qualifies the worker for a work that touches Christ, our high priest, directly.
The second builder is harder to read. This same Meshullam son of Berechiah gave his daughter in marriage into Tobijah's family.
Our chapter mentions Meshullam after Meremoth. He was a man of doubtful character, for he had allied himself to Tobijah. He had given his daughter to Tobijah's son Johanan (Neh. 6:18)… Despite this troubling alliance, he shows zeal for the house of God, but not the same zeal as Meremoth. He next works at the "city of David", but he works first of all to protect his own living quarters (v. 30). After him, Zadok is among those who do not fear to work alone, at their own risk and peril.
When Meshullam reappears at the end of the chapter, he is building in front of his chamber, not a house. Commentators differ here: one sees a man guarding his own corner first, another sees faithfulness in a small place.
It seems he had no house, only a lodging. His circle of responsibility was narrow, but he was found faithful. As the apostle says about stewardship, "For if the readiness is there, it is acceptable according to what a person has, not according to what he does not have." This should comfort anyone tempted to long for a wider sphere of service. The Lord values and commends faithfulness in the place where He has put us.
The names in this verse carry meanings of their own.
We do not want to over-stress the meaning of these names. But there are important touches in them, above all in the thought of serving with dignity. Meremoth means elevation. Urijah means the light of Jehovah. Meshullam means devoted. Berechiah means blessed of Jehovah. Meshezabeel means freed by Jehovah. All these are in the fourth verse, and they set out morally the position we are in today. God has brought us into a sphere of light and liberty and blessing… our service should be marked by devotion of heart and mind to the Lord.
The repeated "next to them" describes men of very different rank working in one line.
It is noticeable that from the greatest to the least, all were united in this particular work. Priests, nobles, and common people were of one mind to build the walls and set up the gates… Their daily jobs may be very different. Some are goldsmiths, some are perfumers, and others are merchants.
The list is not only history. It points forward.
We see the people of God at work building and repairing, everyone doing the work in a certain place. God keeps such a record of all His servants and their labours. When all His people appear before the judgment seat of Christ, God will open this book. Then "each will receive his wages according to his labor" (1 Cor. 3:8).
- Recorded — God gives a whole chapter to a list of names. The humblest work for Him, done under ridicule, is never forgotten.
- Trusted — Meremoth had already handled the offerings from Babylon. Faithfulness in a small service fitted him for a second piece at the high priest's house, and others copied him.
- Mixed — Meshullam showed real zeal for the house of God. Yet he was tied by marriage to Tobijah's family, and he built first in front of his own quarters.
- Measured — He had only a lodging, not a house. What a person has, not what he lacks, is the measure of service God accepts.
- Rewarded — God still keeps that record. He will open it at the judgment seat of Christ, and each one receives wages according to his own labour.
And next to them the Tekoites repaired; but their nobles put not their necks to the work of their Lord.
The wall of Jerusalem was going up section by section, family by family. Then one line breaks the honour roll: the nobles of Tekoa would not stoop to the work — older translations say they "put not their necks to the work of their Lord."
Chapter 3 reads like a list of names and wall sections, but one writer calls it a page from God's own book. It records both the diligence of the Tekoites and the failure of their leaders:
This chapter shows the record God keeps, and how He notices what we do. It names each company of workers and what each one did. Notice what it says about the Tekoites. They were so devoted that when they had finished their own work they turned their efforts elsewhere and repaired "another piece" (Neh. 3:27). But it says something else about some among the Tekoites, for God marks everything — "Their nobles put not their necks to the work of the Lord." I call this chapter a specimen page of the book of eternity. It is the Old Testament parallel to Romans 16, where God records the deeds of His people and comments on them.
The phrase is physical: a labourer bends his neck under a load. Commentators read the refusal to bend as a heart problem, not a shortage of time.
Of the nobles of the Tekoites we read that they "put not their necks to the work of their Lord." The stubborn neck that will not bow speaks of the pride that governs the heart. They shrink from a path that makes nothing of man and his self-importance.
The rebuke lands hardest because of who these men were. They had the standing and the means to set the pace.
These men ought to have been at the head, encouraging everyone else. They had the means to do it best. Instead they gained this painful and unenviable reputation, and this solemn rebuke in the word of God: they did not put their necks to the work of their Lord. God is not indifferent. God notices, and no excuses will set aside His rebuke.
Their rank, which might have helped the work, worked against it instead:
All too often worldly elevation proves a hindrance when the work of the Lord is in question. Their "nobles" no doubt liked to talk and direct, but did not like to soil their hands, nor bend their necks, to do the work.
The ordinary Tekoites did not follow their leaders. They carried on, and did more than their share.
On the whole this lack of zeal, this indifference of the nobles, does not bring about the consequences that so often follow in cases like this. May it always be so! On the contrary, the Tekoites do not depend on their leaders, and they redouble their zeal all the more. In verse 27 we see them repair "a second piece."
Commentators differ on how far the failure spread. Another writer sees the people growing as lukewarm as their leaders:
These were the leaders, and if the leaders were lukewarm, so would the people be, and to this day their shame stands on record in the Word of God.
One writer traces years of silence back to the first task a believer refuses:
Doesn't the silence and inability of so many children of God in ministry come largely from this? At the start God set some work before them to do for Him — a work needing effort, perseverance and the sacrifice of their time. Did they not, like the nobles of the Tekoites, refuse to put their necks to the work of their Lord?
Against their unwillingness to stoop stands the one Person who stooped furthest:
They could not stoop low enough. They were not used to the yoke, and so they preferred their own importance and ease to the Lord's work. What a contrast to Him who, though rich, became poor, that we through His poverty might be rich for ever! He came into this world to do the will of God, and was among His own "as the one who serves." Every child of God should learn this lesson: rest for the soul comes only from bowing the neck to the Lord's yoke. The nobles of Tekoa chose their own will. Their stubbornness cost them the blessing of the service offered to them, and earned a mark of condemnation for their pride.
- Neck — the image is a labourer bending under a load; a neck that will not bow shows pride in the heart, not a shortage of time.
- Rank — position that should have set the pace became the hindrance. They liked to talk and direct, but not to soil their hands.
- Record — chapter 3 is a page from God's book: the Tekoites' second section and their leaders' refusal both stand written, and no excuse cancels His rebuke.
- Contrast — those who could not stoop stand opposite the One who, though rich, became poor and moved among His own as the one who serves.
- Cost — the first refused task has a long echo; later silence in service often begins right there, and the nobles lost the blessing of the work offered to them.
And the gate of the old [wall] repaired Jehoiada the son of Paseah, and Meshullam the son of Besodiah; they laid its beams, and set up its doors, and its locks, and its bars.
Nehemiah 3 is a list of names: ordinary people assigned to sections of a ruined wall. In verse 6, two men rebuild one gate, and the record pauses to say that they finished it down to the last bolt. Which gate was this, and why does God record the hardware?
The ESV calls it "the Gate of Yeshanah". Older translations call it "the old gate". The writers here use that name, and read it from the gate's age and position.
Jehoiada the son of Paseah and Meshullam the son of Besodiah (v. 6) are two men with no other reputation in Scripture. They repair "the gate of the old [wall]". This gate stood in the north-west of the enclosure. Judging from its name, it was no doubt one of the oldest gates of the city.
Others identify it with a gate named elsewhere in Scripture, and hear in "old" a pointer to Christ Himself.
The next gate is the old gate. This gate was probably the same one that Scripture elsewhere calls "the corner gate" (2 Kings 14:13; Jer. 31:38). Jehoiada ("the Lord knows") and Meshullam repaired this gate. This gate may also remind us of Him "whose coming forth is from of old, from ancient days." He is the cornerstone, and everything rests on Him.
A wall keeps things out. A gate decides who comes in.
The enemy knew very well what he was doing when he burned the gates of Jerusalem. The gates of a city are just as important as the wall, and even more so. They can be opened to let the people of the city go in and out freely. They can also shut out any foreign, sinful, contagious, or criminal element that might try to settle inside the city.
The detail of verse 6 is deliberate. Beams, doors, bolts and bars — the gate could actually be shut.
These two men join together for this important work. A similar work had needed all the sons of Senaah working together. The agreement of these two men produces a considerable result: a lesson that is most instructive for us. … There is nothing missing in the gate they build: neither beams, nor doors, nor locks, nor bars. And so they serve as a model for others.
Verse 1 shows the opposite. The high priest and his fellow priests built a gate, hung its doors, and stopped there.
The high priest and his brothers built a gate and set up its doors. But they did not lay "the beams of it" to give it stability. The record does not mention locks or bars either. The truth is, they were not so much in earnest as the sons of Hassenaah, and Jehoiada the son of Paseah, and his companion. They were willing to have the gate and its doors; but they made no provision to make it secure, in case of need, against the entry of the enemy. They did not object to the convenience, but they were not prepared to give up all dealings with the enemy.
Commentators differ over the name, and some read it as "the old wall". Neither builder appears anywhere else in Scripture, but their names carry the spirit of the work.
The old gate in verse 6 might also read "the old wall": the part the enemy had not destroyed may be in mind. The names are significant; Jehoiada — the Lord knows; Meshullam — devoted; Besodeiah — in the secret of Jehovah. It is good to be in the secret of what God is doing for the glory of His own Name, whatever may be the activities of the enemy.
The gate's name has given many readers a picture of holding on to what was there from the start rather than chasing what is merely new.
"Moreover the old gate repaired Jehoiada the son of Paseah, and Meshullam the son of Besodeiah" (v. 6). They, too, did their work well, laying the beams and setting up the doors and the locks. Does not this warn Christians against novelties? One has only to look at Christendom today, and one sees with sorrow truth given up and error being run after, even in circles where once it was maintained. One thing is certain. No truth is new. It may be new to me, but it cannot be new.
The same writer sees the repair as unfinished business, not history.
We find the modernist and higher critic battering at the doors of the old gate. They cause immense damage in the church of God, as they seek to undermine the very foundations of the Christian faith. Yet the truth will prevail, for "we cannot do anything against the truth, but only for the truth" (2 Cor. 13:8).
- Old — the gate was likely one of the city's oldest, in the north-west wall. Some link it with the corner gate, and so with Christ the cornerstone, whose coming forth is from of old.
- Gate — gates decide who enters. Rossier says they matter as much as the wall, or more. They let citizens in and out, and shut out what is contagious.
- Finished — beams, doors, bolts, bars: nothing missing. Dennett contrasts the priests in verse 1. They wanted the gate, but made no provision to keep the enemy out.
- Unknown — two men with no other mention in Scripture worked as a pair. They became the model for everyone else on the wall. Their names read: the Lord knows, devoted, in the secret of the Lord.
- Today — the old gate still needs repairing. Nothing true is new; it may only be new to me.
And next to them repaired Melatiah the Gibeonite, and Jadon the Meronothite, the men of Gibeon and of Mizpah, to the seat of the governor on this side the river.
Nehemiah 3 names the people who rebuilt Jerusalem's broken wall, one by one. Verse 7 adds an unlikely group: a Gibeonite, a man from Meronoth, and men from two towns outside the city. Their ancestors had been put to forced labour, yet here they are building God's city — and the verse ends by pointing to the governor's seat.
The Gibeonites had a past in Israel that no one forgot. Their place among the builders is surprising, because of how they first entered the nation and what it cost them.
They were Hivites, and "mighty" men. They deceived Joshua into making a treaty with them, and for that they had to cut wood and carry water for the house of God (Joshua 9:23). Saul had killed some of the Gibeonites… but God could not allow the oath of His people to be broken, so He brought a famine on the land… Ismaiah, one of David's thirty mighty men, was a Gibeonite (1 Chronicles 12:4). Some of them returned from exile and helped to build the wall of Jerusalem (Nehemiah 3:7; Nehemiah 7:25).
The verse names Melatiah first and calls him "the Gibeonite." One writer finds in his name the reason he is on this list at all.
The name Melatiah means "One whom Jehovah sets free", so that whilst as…
…Gibeonites they were under a servile bondage, God evidently came in sovereignly, and as this man's name suggests, set them free so that they might be available for the work. The Gibeonites cut wood and carried water, and they had to be set free from that to be available for this important work.
Melatiah and Jadon have no other claim to fame in Scripture. One is tied to Gibeon; the other is known only by his home town.
Jadon the Meronothite was from Galilee. Although the origin of these two persons is obscure and despised in man's sight, it is not so in God's sight.
The same chapter also records men who held back from the work. One writer sets the two side by side.
While the Tekoites repaired the wall, their nobles did not put their necks to the work of the Lord. Oh, what a solemn rebuke this is — that the men who ought to have been most of all at the head, most of all encouraging, the men who had the means to do it best. Instead they earned a painful reputation, and the solemn rebuke in the word of God that they did not put their necks to the work of their Lord. God is not indifferent. God notices, and no excuses will set aside His rebuke. "And next to them," we are told, "repaired Melatiah the Gibeonite."
Mizpah was more than a nearby town. It had its own long history with Israel's leaders.
A city of Benjamin, near Ramah and Gibeon (Joshua 18:26). Samuel gathered the people there "to the Lord." He judged Israel there, and there he presented Saul to them as their king… after the destruction of Jerusalem, Gedaliah the governor established himself there.
The verse ends by tying these towns to the governor's seat. Translations differ here: some read "the province Beyond the River," others "on this side the river."
Next to them worked not only two men, Melatiah and Jadon, whose titles came from places outside Jerusalem, but also the men of Gibeon and of Mizpah, "to the throne of the governor on this side the river."
One writer takes this detail as more than geography.
In verse 7 we have those who have the "throne of the governor" in view. How vitally important it is in a day of ruin to hold fast the thought of right administration. The Lord would encourage us in our day to maintain what is due to His Name, and to seek to be faithful to Him in all our movement. All true service has in view the advance of the Lord's rights in the affections of His people.
- Bondage — The Gibeonites came into Israel by deception, and their lot was to cut wood and carry water for God's house. That is the background of the man named here.
- Freedom — Melatiah's name means "one whom Jehovah sets free." God set them free, and that freedom made them available for the work.
- Obscurity — Melatiah and Jadon count for little with people. Their origin is despised in man's sight, but not in God's.
- Contrast — The same chapter that honours a Gibeonite records that the nobles of Tekoa would not put their necks to the work of their Lord. God notices both.
- Authority — These builders came from towns tied to the governor's seat. One writer draws from this a call to hold fast to right administration, and to give the Lord's name what is due to it in a day of ruin.
Next to them repaired Uzziel the son of Harhaiah, of the goldsmiths; and next to him repaired Hananiah of the perfumers, and they left Jerusalem [in its state] as far as the broad wall.
Nehemiah 3 lists the people who rebuilt Jerusalem's ruined wall. Verse 8 names two men whose trades had nothing to do with stone: a goldsmith and a perfumer, listed beside priests and nobles.
Neither trade prepares a man to lay stone. That says something about how God picks His workers.
Uzziel the son of Harhaiah, of the goldsmiths, and Hananiah of the perfumers (v. 8), are not paired together like the men before them. Yet they work side by side. Their trades served the luxury of the world. But that was no bar to rebuilding the city of God. The Lord chooses His workers from every class and every position — not only where men would be tempted to look for them.
These men were already busy inside the city. So why join the builders?
No doubt these men had been working inside the city, perhaps on temple work. But if they were to go on properly as goldsmiths and perfumers, they would feel their need of protection inside the divine circle. That is why they wanted their part in repairing the wall.
Their instinct matched the purpose of the whole project:
What was the meaning of their proposed work? It was that they, led forward by Nehemiah, confessed their need of separation from the nations around, and took measures to secure it.
Some commentators look for meaning in the crafts themselves.
We may suppose these men were not used to handling a trowel; they had refined occupations. Perhaps the gold points to what is of the divine nature, what is of God. The perfumer would speak of the fragrance of a service devoted to divine interests. It is a blessed thing to bring into the service precious thoughts of the greatness and deity of Christ, and alongside that the charm and sweetness of His Name.
The same writer finds both gifts in one man:
The brother who can give us the most precious and most intimate thoughts of Christ, and the truth that surrounds Him, can also take his part in defending that truth. We see this in Paul. Who gives us sweeter touches of glory and intimacy than he does in his ministry? And who defended the truth more than Paul did?
The list mixes ranks and trades.
First it is noticeable that, from the greatest to the least, all were united in this particular work. Priests, nobles, and common people were of one mind to build the walls and set up the gates. Those engaged in the work may hold very different social positions — some are nobles, some common people. Their daily callings may be very different: some are goldsmiths, some perfumers, others merchants (8, 31, 32). Their service for the Lord may differ too, for some are priests and some Levites.
Their names survive for a reason:
This unity of mind and activity for such an end are sure marks of a work of the Spirit of God. And because it is such a work, the Lord shows His special approval: He records the names and families of those engaged in it. This work closely concerns the honour of His name and the blessing of His people.
Commentators differ on the closing clause. One reads it as work done, as the ESV does — the two men worked westward to that point:
Next, we hear of Uzziel, and then Hananiah, of the goldsmiths and of the perfumers, who worked as far as the broad wall on the west.
Another follows the Darby translation, where the builders leave that stretch of wall as it stood:
Is that not confirmed by verse eight in the New Translation? "And they left Jerusalem in its state as far as the broad wall." The footnote suggests that the Babylonians had left the wall standing as far as that point.
- Every class. The Lord takes His workers from every walk of life, even from trades built on luxury.
- Every calling. Goldsmith, perfumer, merchant, priest, Levite. Different standing, different work, one mind about the wall.
- Every motive. These men needed the wall themselves. A craftsman goes on properly only inside the protected circle.
- Every gift. Gold and fragrance belong together in service: the greatness of Christ, and the sweetness of His Name. Paul held both.
- Every name. God's approval of such united work shows in this: He wrote down who did it.
And next to them repaired Rephaiah the son of Hur, the ruler of the half part of Jerusalem.
Chapter 3 reads like a work roster: each name tied to the stretch of broken wall that person rebuilt. Verse 9 adds a man of rank, a ruler over half the district of Jerusalem, and it makes us ask why God recorded him at all.
This list is not mere paperwork. One writer reads the saved names as God's own estimate of the work.
The Lord used Nehemiah's zeal to rouse almost the whole people. Their energy came in different degrees. In some hearts there may even have been lukewarmness, if not hostility. But on the surface, and by profession, nearly all came forward and offered their services as builders. It was, in fact, a real revival, and one that only the Spirit of God could produce. We see the value God set on it in this: He has caused the names of those who shared in this work to be written down and kept. This very fact shows that they had His mind in building the wall.
Rephaiah had the wealth to pay someone else to take his place on the wall. He did not — and neither did another wealthy man further along the wall, who worked there with his daughters.
Of the others we mention Rephaiah, who was a wealthy man, who did not hire a substitute, but worked with his own hands, toiling with the rest. Shallum, the son of Halohesh, was another man of power and wealth; he and his daughters repaired like the rest.
A few verses earlier, the leading men of Tekoa held back from this work (v. 5). One writer sets their refusal against the ruler named here.
reason: 64-word sentence split; grounds the Tekoa claim used in the lead-in God is not indifferent. God notices, and no excuses will set aside His rebuke… "The son of Hur, ruler of half the district of Jerusalem," is found. So, though a few held back, we find noble service in others — real devotedness.
One writer notes that a man's trade never decided whether God could use him.
Uzziel the son of Harhaiah, one of the goldsmiths, and Hananiah, one of the perfumers (v. 8), are not linked together like the men before them, though they work side by side. Their trades served the luxury of the world, yet that did not make them unfit to rebuild the city of God. The Lord chooses His workers in every class and every position, and not only where men would be tempted to look for them.
The chapter puts a ruler beside priests and common people.
First it is noticeable that, from the greatest to the least, all were united in this particular work. Priests, nobles, and common people were of one mind to build the walls and set up the gates.
Service in this chapter is personal, yet never separate.
Each of us needs a personal exercise about service, and that is likely why these various details are named. But we are to move before the Lord and in fellowship with our brothers and sisters, not apart from them. Then definite help would be given. It helps us greatly to see the clear difference between what is individual and what is independent. They built together.
Each short section, joined to the next, made one wall — and that shape has been seen again.
In Nehemiah 3 the wall is being built. Each little company is in its place building the wall… the divine Architect has made each piece fit, like the well-worked courses of masonry. The work is of God; His good hand is with the feeble remnant.
- Portion. Every builder had his own stretch of wall, Rephaiah included. Each man worked the piece in front of him, and the wall rose.
- Rank. Rephaiah ruled half a district, yet he hired no substitute and worked with his own hands. The leading men of Tekoa did the opposite: they would not put their necks to the work.
- Range. Rulers, goldsmiths, perfumers, priests and common people all appear. The Lord chooses His workers from every class and position, not only where men expect to find them.
- Together. Repairing "next to them" is individual service without independence. Separate portions, one wall, each builder joined to the one beside him.
- Recorded. God had these names written down and kept. The record is His own verdict: nothing done for Him is lost or overlooked.
And next to them repaired Jedaiah the son of Harumaph, even over against his house. And next to him repaired Hattush the son of Hashabniah.
Nehemiah 3 is a long list of names. At first glance verse 10 is one more entry: Jedaiah repaired the wall in front of his own house, and Hattush worked beside him. Commentators find in that small detail a principle about where real faithfulness starts. They also ask why God had it written down at all.
The building project meant more than stone and mortar. The wall marked out a people who belonged to God and were not to blend in with the nations around them.
Led on by Nehemiah, they confessed their need to be separate from the nations around them, and they took steps to secure it. Long before, Moses had said to the Lord, "How will anyone know that I and Your people have found grace in Your sight? Is it not in that You go with us? So we will be set apart, I and Your people, from all the people on the face of the earth." (Exodus 33:16.) They had forgotten this truth. But now, through grace, they were about to take again the place of a people set apart for God.
Several men in this chapter are described the same way. There is the plain fact, and then there is what the fact teaches.
The fact was that these children of Israel built the wall opposite their own homes. But the Spirit of God would have us understand more than the fact. He would have us see its meaning, and the meaning is not hard to find. Remember that the wall is a picture of separation. These servants of the Lord began with their own houses. They sought first of all to bring their own families under the word of God, and so to separate from evil within the circle of their own responsibility. And this has always been God's order. When God called Gideon to save His people, He first told him to throw down the altar of Baal in his father's house. As another has said, "Faithfulness within comes before outward strength… Obedience first and then strength. This is God's order."
The order matters, because a man cannot cover others while his own door stands open.
Jedaiah (v. 10) repairs "opposite his house". His first care is to keep his own family safe from the attacks of the enemy… All these men take it to heart to begin by sheltering their own household. How good and how useful this practice is among believers at all times. How can a man stand as a defender of the people of God if he does not know how to protect his own home from evil?
Jedaiah is an unknown man doing an ordinary job, yet his name is written in Scripture. That tells us something about how God watches His people at work.
It tells us how closely God looks at His people. He notes the state of their hearts and the character of their service, and He is pleased when they show devotion to His glory. Such commendations come from God and not from man, so they cannot be mistaken. On one side they look ahead to the judgment seat of Christ. On the other they should stir us all up to seek the same zeal and tireless diligence in the Lord's service.
Jedaiah has an opposite number in the same chapter.
Though Eliashib the high priest and his brothers built the sheep gate, it was a different man, Meremoth, who repaired the wall along the house of Eliashib (v. 21). What a lesson is seen here! A man may care about repairing the public character of Christianity to some degree, and yet care little about the wall of separation in his family life!
The chapter cuts both ways. Jedaiah built in front of his own house, but the wall and the gates still needed builders.
Then there are others, as we learn from this chapter, who are full of zeal for their own houses and order them according to God, yet care almost nothing for the welfare of the church… But if we understand the place God's grace has given us, we will long to join the repairing in front of our own houses with the building of the wall and the gates.
There is also plain common sense in the arrangement. Each man took the piece of wall nearest to him.
There were those who built the wall in front of their own houses… wise men, doing the work that was near at hand, and doing it with a will. They did not waste their strength and time telling others how and where they should build.
- Wall — the rebuilding was more than defence. It was a people taking again the place of those set apart for God.
- Home first — Jedaiah's piece of wall shows where evil is shut out first: inside the circle of your own responsibility.
- Shelter — no one can defend God's people while his own household lies open to evil.
- Both — one error is public zeal with a neglected home; the other is a tidy home and no care for God's people. Join the two.
- Recorded — God notes the character of each person's service. So build the nearest, smallest piece of wall with all your will.
Malchijah the son of Harim and Hasshub the son of Pahath-Moab repaired a second piece, and the tower of the furnaces.
Two men, Malchijah and Hasshub, rebuilt a stretch of Jerusalem's broken wall and the tower of the ovens. It was their second turn on the wall, and God had both names written down — why a tower, and why these names?
One writer sees these two following an example set earlier in the chapter, and explains where their tower stood:
In verse 11, the example of Jehoiada and Meshullam continues to bear fruit. Two men, Malchijah and Hasshub, repair the tower of the furnaces, which dominated the entire western wall. That work was as important for signalling danger as for defence. But the two of them also undertook "a second piece", proof of their untiring zeal.
Another writer draws out what a tower pictures:
Those towers! "I will take my stand at my watchpost and station myself on the tower, and look out to see what He will say to me." (Habakkuk 2:1.) Man would say: come down from the watchtower, use your own judgment; break down the wall of separation, and be one with all the false teaching of the land. Satan hates that wall, and hates to see you sitting and watching before the Lord, to learn His mind and do only His will.
The chapter gives each man a section, and most finished one. A few went round again. One writer marks them out:
Then some are distinguished for the quantity of their work. Of "Hanun and the inhabitants of Zanoah" we read that they not only set up "the valley gate" but they also built "a thousand cubits of the wall" (13). The Tekoites repaired a piece of wall, following Zadok's work, and later they repaired "another piece" (5, 27). And of others we read that they "repaired a second piece" (11, 19, 30).
Verse 11 has a pair working together, not a lone builder. The chapter shows both patterns, and puts neither above the other:
The reader will notice that some laboured in companies and some alone. Some were happiest serving alongside their brothers. Others shared the same aim, but chose to work in single-eyed dependence on the Lord, and alone with Him. The same thing is seen in every age... The important thing is to receive the service from the Lord. Labour as He directs. Go where He sends, alone or with others, and always keep a single eye to His glory.
Those who returned for a second section did so as a team that had already proved itself:
It is good when we can move together in an exercise. These men clearly did so. Having finished one task well, they seem quite happy to move together again on "another piece". They plainly regarded the work as their Lord's.
Hasshub's family name points back to Moab, a nation outside Israel. Were Gentiles (people from outside Israel) among God's builders? One writer answers:
It would seem that God in His sovereignty made room for the Gentiles in His interests — here, and in other places too. In 2 Samuel 8, David, after subduing the nations, brought in the dedicated things "of Syria, and of Moab", and so on. Again, we have the devotion to the ark of God shown by men such as Uriah the Hittite and Obed-edom the Gittite. All this would magnify the mercy of God. We might also refer to Ruth being brought into the family line of David the king of Israel.
A single line could have covered the builders. Instead Scripture records each name, and marks the extra effort:
It shows us how closely God surveys His people, how carefully He notes the state of their hearts and the character of their service, and how pleasing to Him is the sight of devotion to His glory. Such commendations — not from man, but from God, and therefore never mistaken — look forward to the judgment seat of Christ, and should stir us all up to seek the same zeal and tireless diligence in the Lord's service.
- Tower. The tower of the ovens overlooked the whole western wall. It served two ends: spotting danger early, and holding the enemy off.
- Watchpost. A tower is where you wait to hear what God will say. The pull will always be to climb down and use your own judgment.
- Second piece. Malchijah and Hasshub finished their section and took another. Scripture marks out those who did more than their share.
- Together. Some built in company, some alone. What matters is taking the work from the Lord and keeping a single eye to His glory.
- Named. A family name reaching back to Moab stands in the record. God's mercy makes room, and He notes every worker by name.
And next to them repaired Shallum the son of Hallohesh, the ruler of the half part of Jerusalem, he and his daughters.
One line in a long building list names a father and his daughters working side by side on Jerusalem's wall. Why did God preserve such a small detail, and what does it settle about who may take part in His work?
One writer reads this record as proof of how carefully God keeps account.
Nothing in the service of the Lord's people passes unnoticed. So in verse 12 we read, "Next to him Shallum the son of Hallohesh, ruler of half the district of Jerusalem, repaired, he and his daughters." The zeal of these godly women has gained them a place in this memorial of the work of the Lord. This Scripture gives us not necessarily what man saw, but what God saw. The father and his daughters were both busy repairing the wall, and the fact that it is mentioned is its commendation.
Shallum governed half of Jerusalem. His rank could have been his daughters' excuse.
Shallum's enthusiasm for the work was such that it inspired his daughters, and they helped him build the wall. Their father held a place of honour. Because of that, his daughters might have argued that their business was to keep up the dignity of the house and not dirty their hands with labour. But no — their ambition was to have a part in the Lord's work, and they had it. The dignity of their house has not suffered, for it is recorded that Shallum built "he and his daughters."
Some assume the Lord's work belongs to men alone. This half-verse says otherwise.
This is an important thing too. It is a very great mistake to suppose that women do not have a fitting and weighty place in the work of the Lord. Indeed they have, and the apostle Paul takes good care to show it.
Another ruler of the same rank appears earlier in the list with no such note. One writer weighs what the daughters' share cost them, and whose authority they worked under.
Rephaiah, named earlier, was also ruler of half the district of Jerusalem (v. 9). Shallum, a respected man, held the same office; only, in speaking of him, the Word adds: "he and his daughters." Here women do the work. But it is work of a public nature, so they do it under their father's responsibility and in dependence on him. Yet how touching it is to see them take up a work their sex was not called to, and one for which their strength seemed too small. They did it out of love for the city of God, and with a view to the restoration of His people.
Father and daughters appear here as one working unit.
The service of the sisters has its record here also: "Next to him Shallum the son of Hallohesh, ruler of half the district of Jerusalem, repaired, he and his daughters" (v. 12). A lovely sight! There was a thoroughly united household — the daughters heart and soul with their father in the work of the Lord.
One writer turns the scene into a parent's prayer.
These girls worked with their father in work for the Lord. To me that is about the most beautiful and most fitting picture we could have to close these meditations. It is what I have longed for, and not for my daughters only but for my sons too. May we strive side by side for the faith of the gospel, with one spirit and one mind (Philippians 1:27). May God grant it to me, and may He grant it to you!
One writer looks from this record forward to the day when the Lord reviews all service.
This was indeed remarkable, for building work does not fall within the sphere of women's work. They were earnest enough to take part in it, though what they did may have been of a lighter kind and not so noticeable. These "daughters" remind us of the two women who laboured with Paul "in the gospel", according to Philippians 4:2-3. What counts with God is not how important or unimportant the work looks. It is the devotion and earnestness that moves us to do it. So the work of these daughters, whatever it was, has a place in the record. Similar devotion and work in the Lord's present interests will find mention and reward at the judgment seat of Christ.
- Noticed. Nothing done for the Lord's people slips past Him. One line of Scripture preserves what these daughters did.
- Named. Rank did not excuse Shallum or his daughters from work. Their dignity lost nothing by it.
- Needed. This half-verse ends the notion that women have no weighty place in the Lord's work.
- United. Scripture records father and daughters together, one household heart and soul in the same task — a pattern to want in our own families.
- Rewarded. God measures devotion, not the size of the job. Lighter work still makes the record, and will find reward.
The valley-gate repaired Hanun, and the inhabitants of Zanoah; they built it, and set up its doors, its locks and its bars, and a thousand cubits of the wall as far as the dung-gate.
Nehemiah 3 is a roll-call of the people who rebuilt Jerusalem's broken wall. Verse 13 records one team that finished a gate and then kept building for another thousand cubits. The gate's name speaks of the low place, the workers came from a town outside Jerusalem, and their wall ran far past the gate itself.
Commentators start with the names — the builder's, his town's, and the gate's.
Hanun (gracious) and the inhabitants of Zanoah (broken) repaired the valley gate. The valley pictures the low place, humility. How needed this is in service for God, for "God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble."
Another writer finds the same picture wherever the Bible speaks of valleys:
What do we learn by the term, valley gate? A valley in Scripture is clearly a symbol of lowliness and humility. John the Baptist, the forerunner of our Lord, lifted up his voice. He echoed the prophetic words of Isaiah, spoken over seven centuries before: "Every valley shall be filled, and every mountain and hill shall be made low… and all flesh shall see the salvation of God" (Luke 3:5-6)… Is this not a beautiful picture of the lowliness of mind that ought to mark Christians in their dealings with one another?
He then turns it on a man in the New Testament who never went through that gate:
If only Diotrephes had passed through that gate, his name would not have been handed down for all time as one who loved to be first. To secure his position he acted in the flesh, removing every rival out of his way by violence and force. Can a Christian have this spirit if he walks with his Master, who said, "Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me, for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls" (Matthew 11:29)? Impossible! May we know how to enter by the valley gate, and to do it often.
Zanoah was not part of Jerusalem. These workers travelled to repair a wall that did not enclose their own homes.
Hanun and the inhabitants of Zanoah repaired the valley gate in the south-west. Zanoah was a town of Judah, and so away from Jerusalem.
The verse lists the doors, the bolts and the bars — and then adds a long run of wall.
Hanun and the inhabitants of Zanoah (v. 13) repaired the valley gate south-west of the city, with the same care as the sons of Senaah. On top of this they repaired a thousand cubits of the wall, as far as the dung gate in the south-east. That is the entire portion of the wall facing south. What zeal! And it seems Hanun — if it is the same Hanun — did not limit himself to this work. Verse 30 says he repaired a second piece.
That extra wall sets them apart:
Then some stand out for the quantity of their work. Of "Hanun and the inhabitants of Zanoah" we read that they not only set up "the valley gate" but they also built "a thousand cubits of the wall" (13).
Their wall ended at the dung gate. One writer sees meaning in that pairing:
Then we have the Valley Gate. We may be more interested in the Gate of the Fountain, but the Valley Gate has its place. Verse 13 suggests some link between the Valley Gate and the Dung Gate. Both gates come up in what Nehemiah does in Nehemiah 2. The name probably refers to the Valley of Hinnom, the place where the bodies of criminals and the refuse were burned. So it does appear to be firmly linked with the Dung Gate.
The same writer points to two men who reached both gates:
Job would have arrived at the truth of the Dung Gate and the Valley Gate, when he said "I despise myself" (Job 42:6). Paul, too, counted as rubbish all that he had once boasted in (Phil. 3:8).
- Low. The valley gate stands for the low place — humility — and God "gives grace to the humble."
- Grace. Hanun means "gracious", Zanoah means "broken". Grace and brokenness are what rebuild the gate of the low place.
- Far. The builders came from Zanoah, a town away from Jerusalem. They repaired a wall that was not around their own homes.
- More. They did not stop at the gate with its doors, bolts and bars. A thousand cubits of wall mark them out for how much they did, and one of them shows up again later, repairing a second piece.
- Out. Their wall runs on to the dung gate, where the refuse goes out. The low place ends where Job said "I despise myself" and Paul counted his old gains as rubbish.
And the dung-gate repaired Malchijah the son of Rechab, the chief of the district of Beth-haccerem; he built it, and set up its doors, its locks and its bars.
One man, one job. Malchijah rebuilds the gate Jerusalem used to carry out its rubbish, and he hangs its doors, bolts and bars. Commentators ask two things here. What does this gate picture for God's people? And why does the record keep the name of the man who repaired it?
Every other gate in the chapter is a way in. This one is different, and that difference carries the meaning.
Dung is not a pleasant subject. It is only filth and corruption, to be got rid of as soon as possible. This is the one gate, we take it, that is not about entrance into the city, as all the other gates are. Its use is to get rid of something objectionable.
One writer notes the meaning of Malchijah's home district, and reads the gate as a call to be clean.
Malchiah repaired the dung gate, and he was the ruler of Beth-haccerem (the place of the vineyard). People used this gate to carry the refuse and filth out of the city. This gate reminds us of the calls for God's people to cleanse themselves from all filth of the flesh and the spirit. "For God has not called us for impurity, but in holiness" (1 Thess. 4:7).
So what would a person agree to throw out? One writer points to Paul.
The apostle Paul knew how to use that gate. He had everything that gives confidence in the flesh: birth, family, circumcision, education, religion. But he met Christ on the road to Damascus, and from then on his values completely changed. Things that were gain to him he counted as loss, because knowing Christ Jesus his Lord was worth far more. He even counted them as rubbish, so that he might gain Christ (see Phil. 3:4-9).
Another writer finds the same gate in what Job finally said about himself.
Job would have arrived at the truth of the Dung Gate and the Valley Gate when he said, "I despise myself" (Job 42:6). Paul, too, counted as rubbish all that he had boasted in before (Phil. 3:8).
Malchijah held office over a district, yet took the section of wall nobody would choose. One writer weighs that against the workers who repaired the stretch in front of their own homes.
The record says that some of the workers, including even some of the priests, repaired "against their house". That means they took the section that interested them most and suited them best. Doing that was not as praiseworthy as working on a piece of no particular interest to the worker, or even repulsive to him. Repairing the "dung gate" is one example. Verse 14 records that a ruler of part of a township took it on.
Such records point on to a weighing.
It should remind us also of what the godly woman Hannah said in her prayer in 1 Samuel 2. She said, "the Lord is a God of knowledge, and by Him actions are weighed". When our actions, as we seek to serve the Lord, are weighed, how will they appear — weighty, or of little worth?
Malchijah comes with his father's name attached. One writer treats that name as part of his fitness for the work.
Malchijah the son of Rechab (v. 14), a recognised leader, repairs the dung gate in the south-east. He is the first to build a gate by himself alone. And note his Rechabite character, which fits him for the perseverance of faith.
That family kept a fixed way of life.
Descendants of Rechab, the father of Jonadab... they abstained from wine, and they did not build houses, nor sow seed. Being nomads they did not plant vineyards, nor had any; but all their days they lived in tents.
- Out, not in. Of all the gates in the wall, this is the one whose whole use is getting rid of what is objectionable.
- Out of the city. Rebuilding it pictures God's people putting their own filth out. God has called us to holiness, not impurity.
- Out of the heart. Paul used this gate when he counted his best credentials rubbish for Christ. Job used it when he said he despised himself.
- Out of sight. A district ruler took the foulest stretch of wall. That counts for more than repairing the easy piece by your own door.
- Out of the tent. The son of Rechab came from a family that built no houses and lived in tents, and he built this gate alone.
And the fountain-gate repaired Shallun the son of Colhozeh, the chief of the district of Mizpah; he built it, and covered it, and set up its doors, its locks and its bars, and the wall of the pool of Shelah by the king's garden, and to the stairs that go down from the city of David.
One man, Shallum, takes on a long stretch of Jerusalem's ruined defences. He rebuilds the fountain gate, roofs it, and hangs its doors. Then he carries the wall on past the king's garden pool to the stairs of the city of David. Why does the record slow down over this one worker, and what do a gate, a fountain and a covering say to us?
The order of the gates is part of the lesson. One writer looks at the gate just before this one, and at what the builders' names mean.
The gate of the fountain was next to the dung gate. The fountain, always flowing, is a blessed picture of the Holy Spirit. He lives in the believer. In him He is the well of living water springing up, like a fountain, into eternal life (John 4:14). The order is suggestive. If a believer cleanses himself from what defiles, nothing hinders the Spirit of God. The Spirit fills the believer and uses him as a vessel fit for the Master's use. Shallun (recompense) the son of Colhozeh (wholly seer) the ruler of Mizpah (watchtower) repaired and built that gate. And these names fit in beautifully with the Spirit of God as the fountain of life and power.
Is honest self-judgment worth the cost? One writer answers with a picture from Israel's history.
In Numbers 21 the people of Israel had the experience of the bronze serpent. It pictures the judgment of the flesh, which opens the way for the energy of a new life. Right after it we read, "Spring up, O well!—Sing to it!" (v. 17). So may this gate not set out the happy portion of the believer, who has made way for the full enjoyment of heavenly things by honest self-judgment as set out by the dung gate, and who finds the immense spiritual gain of doing so?
Shallum's stretch of wall is long, and the whole city gained from it.
He repairs the gate of the fountain in the east on his own, and restores it to a complete state of defence. He also repairs the "wall of the pool of Shelah [Siloam]". Then he works on along "the king's garden" to the stairs that go down from the city of David. The gate gives protection, the fountain gives refreshment and healing, and the shade gives rest. All of this falls within the circle of his activity. Jerusalem owes the enjoyment of these priceless blessings to him as the result of his efforts to secure the good of his brothers!
The verse adds that he covered the gate. Why a covering? One writer answers:
The only thought I have is that the covering would preserve it from defilement.
If the fountain pictures the Spirit, the covering says something about how He must be treated.
Do we not also read, "Whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven" (Matt. 12:32)? He was to be guarded in that way. So we value how refreshing the communications of the Holy Spirit of God are. But we must also keep a right sense of their holy character.
This pool turns up elsewhere in Scripture, and its name carries meaning.
A pool on the south of Jerusalem near the west slope of the Kidron valley. The Old Testament mentions it as lying "by the king's garden" when Nehemiah was rebuilding the walls of Jerusalem (Neh. 3:15). Isaiah 8:6 uses it as a symbol, under the name Shiloah. The people refused its gently flowing waters and preferred Syria and the king of Israel. The strong waters of Assyria would sweep them away. In the New Testament the man born blind had clay put on his eyes and was sent to wash at Siloam, which means "sent." Christ is the Sent One. So this is a picture: light comes when Christ in His humiliation is known as the Sent One of God. John 9:7, 11.
Shallum's long section stands beside Meshullam, who repaired only the wall in front of his lodging. Both get the same notice.
It would seem that he had no house, only a lodging; but though the circle of his responsibility was narrow, he was found faithful. As the apostle says about stewardship, "If the readiness is there, it is acceptable according to what a person has, not according to what he does not have." This should comfort those who are tempted to long for wider spheres of service. The Lord values and commends faithfulness in the place where He has put us. So the record singles out the work of Meshullam just as much as the work of Shallun the son of Col-hozeh, the ruler of part of Mizpah.
- Cleansed — The fountain gate comes right after the dung gate. Deal with what defiles, and nothing hinders the Spirit.
- Filled — The fountain pictures living water springing up inside the believer. Self-judgment ends in gain, not loss.
- Guarded — This gate was covered. A covering keeps a thing from defilement, and our sense of the Spirit's holiness must match.
- Sent — The pool is Siloam, which means "sent." Israel refused its gentle waters. The blind man was sent there to wash, and Christ is the Sent One.
- Recorded — A long stretch and one small wall face get the same notice. The Lord values faithfulness in the place He gives us, not its size.
After him repaired Nehemiah the son of Azbuk, the chief of the half district of Beth-zur, even over against the sepulchres of David, and to the pool that was made, and to the house of the mighty [men].
A long building list names a second Nehemiah here — not the governor, but a district ruler from Beth-zur. His stretch of wall ran past the tombs of David, a pool, and the house of the mighty men. Why would God preserve the name of a man we never hear of again, and the exact landmarks he worked beside?
The whole chapter is a register of workers. One writer reads that register as God's own verdict on what they did:
The zeal of Nehemiah was used by the Lord to stir up almost the whole people... It was, in fact, a real revival; and one that could only be produced by the Spirit of God. And the value God set on it is seen in this, that He has caused the names of those who engaged in this work to be written and preserved.
The same writer draws out what such a record says about God's attention to His servants:
It tells us in what detail (if we may speak that way) God surveys His people. It shows how carefully He notes the state of their hearts and the character of their service. And it shows how welcome to Him is the display of devotion to His glory.
We know nothing else about this Nehemiah son of Azbuk. Yet the verse gives him a title and a long stretch of wall:
Nehemiah the son of Azbuk (v. 16) is unknown to us, like many others, although here he occupies a prominent position. Through his activity he opens the way for works of great importance.
Beth-zur was not a Jerusalem suburb. It lay in the hill country of Judah, on the road up from the south:
City in the mountains of Judah, apparently founded by Maon. The city was built or fortified by Rehoboam when the tribes divided... It commanded the road from Beer-sheba to Jerusalem, and is often referred to in the Wars of the Maccabees.
So a man with authority over half a distant district came and did manual repair work in Jerusalem. That mix of ranks runs through the whole list:
First it is noticeable that, from the greatest to the least, all were united in this particular work. Priests, nobles, and common people were of one mind to build the walls and set up the gates. Those engaged in the work may hold very different social positions; some are "nobles," and some are common people. Their daily callings may be very different — some are goldsmiths, some perfumers, and others merchants. But whatever their social position, their daily calling, or their special service for the Lord, all were of one mind and one purpose in building the walls and setting up the gates. By this unanimity, as one has said, "they confessed their need of separation from the nations around and took measures to secure it."
With this verse the survey reaches the city of David itself, and a small change in wording is worth noticing:
With v. 16 we come to the city of David, properly speaking... Nothing then remains to be repaired but the last and most important part of the holy city. Its position and height above the valley of Kidron had kept it from any direct attack by the enemy. The uncertain topography of this region makes some of the details hard to understand... Also, from v. 16 on, we notice that the words "next to him" are replaced by "after him." This seems to show that the work could be tackled from several sides at once.
The two memorials this man built past — the royal tombs and the house of the mighty men — both look back to David's reign. One note on David's mighty men looks ahead from them to God's own reckoning:
Then follows a list of David's worthies, with their deeds of valour and devotedness. God also will have His valiant men; He will count them when He writes up the people. Ps. 87:6.
That is exactly what this chapter does for a later generation. The old heroes had their house; this obscure ruler has his verse.
- Counted. God had the builders' names written down and kept; the record itself is His commendation of the work.
- Called. A ruler of half the district of Beth-zur left his own territory to repair someone else's wall. Separation for God was a shared need, not a local one.
- Unknown. Nehemiah son of Azbuk is otherwise unknown. Yet here he holds a prominent place and opens the way for important work.
- Joined. From this verse on the wording shifts to "after him." The work went forward on several sides at once — many hands, one wall.
- Remembered. He built past the tombs of David and the house of the mighty men. God counted David's valiant men then, and He counts His workers still.
After him repaired the Levites, Rehum the son of Bani. Next to him repaired Hashabiah, the chief of the half district of Keilah, for his district.
Nehemiah 3 lists the people who rebuilt Jerusalem's wall, and this verse names three kinds of builder: the Levites, a man with no title, and a ruler who repaired for the district he governed. Why did God keep such a list, and why does a ruler stand in it beside ordinary builders?
The chapter is a memorial. One writer takes the kept list as proof that the builders had God's mind in the work:
The Lord used Nehemiah's zeal to stir up almost the whole people… It was, in fact, a real revival, and one that only the Spirit of God could produce. The value God set on it shows in this: He has had the names of those who took part in this work written down and kept. This very fact shows that they had His mind in building the wall. It could not be otherwise; for what did their proposed work mean? It meant that they, led forward by Nehemiah, confessed their need to be separate from the nations around them. They then took steps to secure it.
The record says something about God as well as about the builders:
This shows us how closely God surveys His people. It shows how carefully He notes the state of their hearts and the character of their service, and how welcome to Him is a display of devotion to His glory. Such commendations come not from man but from God, so they cannot be wrong. They look ahead to the judgment seat of Christ, and they should stir us all up to seek the same zeal and tireless diligence in the Lord's service.
The Levites enter the list here. One writer ties their building to the work they were given as a tribe:
In verse 17 we read, "After him the Levites repaired". Their service would have to do with the general service and ministry of the truth, instruction for the saints. We may thank God that this service never stops in the gatherings of the saints. In Deuteronomy 33 we read the particular work given to the Levites: "They shall teach Jacob Your rules, and Israel Your law."
Rehum and Hashabiah appear elsewhere in the book. Their record explains why these two work side by side:
Verses 17 to 21 speak of the work of the Levites. Rehum had returned with Zerubbabel (Neh. 12:3). Later he is among those who signed the covenant (Neh. 10:25), and so was Hashabiah (Neh. 10:12), who repaired "for his district" and who is also a chief Levite appointed especially to give praise (Neh. 12:24). In every way, these two men are qualified to work "next to" one another.
The verse places each man's work next to someone else's. Commentators draw a line between individual service and independent service:
We each need an individual exercise about our own service. That would be why these various features are named. But definite help comes when we move before the Lord and in fellowship with our brothers, not independently of them. It helps us to see the great difference between what is individual and what is independent. They built together.
Hashabiah ruled half a district, yet he repaired the wall himself. Rank made no difference at this work:
They are all a working people together — the nobles and the common folk. The service of God's city had put them all on a level. The rich are made low, the poor are exalted: a beautiful sight in its time and place.
Hashabiah repaired the stretch by his own district. Each builder had a different share of the work:
The variety of the service of these children of Israel is worth noting. One did one thing and one another, while all were working for the same end… Two things cannot be pressed too much: taking up the position we have been given to fill, and using the special gift, or function in the body, given to us. Every Christian has his own place, which no one else can fill. He has his own work, which no other can do. The health and prosperity of the assembly depend on seeing this truth and practising it.
- Named. God had the builders' names written down and kept. That record shows they were doing what He wanted, and that He notes how each one serves.
- Taught. The Levites enter the list here. Their calling was to teach God's law, so teaching is part of what holds a wall up.
- Traced. Rehum and Hashabiah appear later in the book, signing the covenant and leading praise. These men kept going after the wall was done.
- Together. Each man had his own stretch of wall, but no one built alone. Individual service is not independent service.
- Measured. Hashabiah repaired for his own district. In the same way, every believer has a place no one else can fill and a work no one else can do.
After him repaired their brethren, Bavvai the son of Henadad, the chief of the half district of Keilah.
Verse 18 adds one more name to the list of wall-builders: Bavvai son of Henadad, ruler of half the district of Keilah. He repairs the next stretch of wall after Hashabiah, who held the other half of that district. The verse opens not with his name but with two words: "their brothers." So why does God keep such a list, and what does it mean to build beside someone else?
This chapter is mostly a list of names. One commentator sees the list itself as proof of what God thought of the work.
It was a real revival, the kind only the Spirit of God could produce. You can see the value God set on it in this: He caused the names of those who took part in this work to be written down and preserved. That very fact shows they had His mind in building the wall. What did their work mean? Led forward by Nehemiah, they confessed that they needed to be separate from the nations around them, and they took steps to secure it.
So the list is not trivia. The wall marked this people out again as set apart for God, and one line in one chapter was enough for God to keep Bavvai's name in it.
One writer reads those two words as a check on working alone.
That leads to another feature seen in verse 18: "After him their brothers repaired." This confirms the caution given earlier. Individual exercise is needed, and it matters a great deal. Yet we are set together. It is good to see this feature come right after the mention of the Levites: brothers plainly moving together.
The same writer shows what goes wrong when that link is lost.
These men are not working independently of one another. One cause of division among believers has been the effort to pull the exercise of gift apart from the rest. These mighty men, though, are alongside the Levites, and the Levites are seen working with their brothers, with the priests, and with the temple servants. Independence in the things of God is really self-will.
Bavvai's title makes him a man of rank, and he is out on the wall repairing it. Rank did not always end that way. Earlier in this chapter the nobles of Tekoa refused to help. The ESV says they "would not stoop to serve their Lord." The older wording keeps the picture of the neck, and the quote below follows it.
"They put not their necks to the work of their Lord." Pride was governing their hearts. They could not stoop low enough. They were not used to the yoke, and so they preferred their own importance and ease to the Lord's work. Every child of God does well to learn this lesson: rest for the soul comes only by bowing the neck to the Lord's yoke.
Those men hid behind their rank. Bavvai had the same kind of rank, and he used it as a reason to show up.
Verses 17 and 18 pair two men of matching rank over the same territory. One writer notes both the fitness of the pairing and the difference in what follows.
Hashabiah repaired "for his district," and he is also a chief Levite specially appointed to give praise. In every way, these two men are qualified to work "next to" one another. Bavvai (v. 18) has the same dignity and the same district as Hashabiah, but he is not mentioned later.
Same rank, same district, next to each other on the wall. Later one name appears again and the other goes quiet. The work stands recorded either way.
This is the principle running under the whole chapter: the portion is given, not chosen.
The instruments God uses are many and varied, but each one is useful. No one can be replaced, and no one chooses his own work. Whether several work together or a worker is alone, their only responsibility is to work in the place God assigns to each one.
- Recorded — God had every builder's name written down and kept. Commentators read that list as proof the work had His mind.
- Together — "their brothers" comes right after the Levites. Personal service matters, yet we are set together.
- Undivided — pulling gifts apart from each other has caused division. Independence in the things of God is really self-will.
- Stooped — other rulers in this chapter used rank as an excuse. Pride will not bend the neck to the yoke, and rest is found nowhere else.
- Assigned — no worker can be replaced and no worker picks his own portion. Build where God puts you, alone or beside others.
And next to him repaired Ezer the son of Jeshua, the ruler of Mizpah, a second piece over against the going up to the armoury at the angle.
Nehemiah 3 is a register of names. Family after family takes a stretch of Jerusalem's broken wall and rebuilds it. Verse 19 names one man: Ezer, a district ruler who worked by the slope up to the armoury. The details look dry, yet they raise a question: why would God fill a chapter with who built what, and where?
Why does Scripture mention Ezer at all? The builders worked under mockery, and one writer ties that to the record of their names:
Let us never be diverted from the work of God, nor even ashamed, by the ridicule of men who oppose Christ and His service… We note first of all that God has seen fit to fill a whole chapter with the names of the leaders of families or townships who took part in the work. We might wonder why so much valuable space should go to the names of men who would otherwise be forgotten. We conclude from it, however, that the humblest service for the will of God is not forgotten. It is put on record — above all when it is carried on in the face of ridicule and opposition.
Ezer's name surfaces again later in the book, when the singers dedicated the finished wall. One commentator sets him in the stretch of verses about the Levites — the tribe set apart for service at the temple — and notes a neighbour who never reappears:
Verses 17 to 21 speak of the work of the Levites… Bavvai (verse 18) has the same rank and the same district as Hashabiah, but he is not mentioned later. Ezer appears again when the choirs meet, at the dedication of the wall (Neh. 12:42).
Ezer builds inside the Levites' stretch of the wall. The work given to them shapes what their building pictures:
In verse 17 we read, "After him the Levites repaired". Their service would have to do with the general service and ministry of the truth — instruction for the saints. Thank God, that service goes on without stopping in the gatherings of the saints. In Deuteronomy 33 we read that the particular work committed to the Levites was, "They shall teach Jacob Your rules and Israel Your law."
Ezer's portion is a second one — the ESV calls it "another section", older translations "a second piece". The chapter grades its workers by how much they did:
Then some are distinguished for the quantity of their work. Of "Hanun and the inhabitants of Zanoah" we read that they not only set up "the valley gate" but they also built "a thousand cubits of the wall" (13). The Tekoites not only repaired a piece of wall, following Zadok's work, but later we read that they repaired "another piece" (5, 27). And of others we read that they "repaired a second piece" (11, 19, 30).
Ezer held office as ruler of Mizpah, and he still worked on the wall. The same chapter shows the opposite from other men of rank:
The whole chapter appears to us as a miniature forecast of the judgment seat of Christ… The Tekoites were very diligent, for they repaired "another piece" as well as the first they undertook. Yet Scripture records that "their nobles did not put their necks to the work of their Lord". All too often a high place in the world proves a hindrance when the work of the Lord is in question. Their "nobles" no doubt liked to talk and direct, but did not like to soil their hands, or bend their necks, to do the work.
Ezer worked "at the buttress" — the turn, or angle, of the wall. The corner comes up several times in this chapter. One writer draws its meaning from the tabernacle:
When they built the tabernacle, they put a double board at the corners, just where it was liable to fall apart. I think we know from experience that things sometimes come in among us which could divide us at once, if we are not careful. On such occasions we need extra stability and extra wisdom.
- Named. God gave a whole chapter to men we would otherwise forget. The humblest work done for Him goes on record, above all when it is done under mockery.
- Placed. Ezer builds among the Levites, whose work was to teach. His stretch of wall pictures steady instruction in the truth.
- Doubled. His portion is "another section" — a second piece of work. The chapter marks out those who built more.
- Unashamed. He ruled a district and still worked with his hands. Other nobles in the chapter liked to direct the work, but would not bend their necks to it.
- Cornered. His piece met the turn of the wall — the place most likely to fall apart. Corners call for extra strength and extra wisdom, then and now.
After him Baruch the son of Zabbai earnestly repaired another piece, from the angle to the entry of the house of Eliashib the high priest.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
After him repaired Meremoth the son of Urijah, the son of Koz, another piece, from the door of the house of Eliashib as far as the end of the house of Eliashib.
Nehemiah 3 is a roll call of builders, and this verse names a man we have already met: Meremoth, back for a second stretch of wall. It runs the full length of the high priest Eliashib's house — so why was Eliashib not building it himself?
Some names in this chapter appear once. Meremoth's appears twice, and the text keeps count. Where the ESV says "another section," older translations say "another piece."
Some stand out for the quantity of their work. Of "Hanun and the inhabitants of Zanoah" we read that they not only set up "the valley gate" but also built "a thousand cubits of the wall" (13). The Tekoites repaired a piece of wall after Zadok's work, and later they repaired "another piece" (5, 27). Of others we read that they "repaired a second piece" (11, 19, 30).
Meremoth had already built once, in verse 4. His record goes back further still, to the gifts carried from Babylon to Jerusalem.
In verses 4 and 5 we see first of all Meremoth the son of Urijah the priest. He was a faithful and respected man. Ezra's companions had trusted him with all the free-will offerings sent from Babylon to Jerusalem (Ezra 8:33-34). His zeal goes beyond the restoration of just one portion of the wall. He is the first to repair "another piece," and others later copy his example. This second portion was connected with the city of David and the temple, and it stood in front of the house of Eliashib the high priest (v. 21). His zeal leads him to defend the man who represents the people before God... Faithfulness in a service that looks small qualifies the worker for a work that has to do directly with Christ, our high priest.
Verses 20 and 21 show two men dividing one house between them. One builds up to the door, and Meremoth carries the work on from it.
Then Scripture tells us in careful detail that others built in front of the house of Eliashib. One man built up to the door of his house, and another man carried the work on from his door (20, 21). The high priest did not care about his own house, and he put no locks and bars on the gate he built. For his part, he left his house and his gate open to the enemy.
Eliashib is the first builder named in the chapter. Yet the wall beside his own front door needed another man's hands.
Eliashib the high priest is named first among the builders, not because he was the most devoted builder, but because of his position. Chapter 13:4 tells us that he had allied himself with Tobiah, and chapter 13:28 tells us that one of his sons had married the daughter of Sanballat. Besides this, Eliashib and his relatives built the sheep gate, yet a different man, Meremoth, repaired the wall "from the door of the house of Eliashib to the end of the house of Eliashib" (v. 21). What a lesson we see here! A man may care about repairing the public character of Christianity in some measure, and yet care little about the wall of separation in his family life!
Meremoth's stretch was no random gap in the line.
We might notice that this man's work was at a most important point of the wall — the corner of the high priest's house. The enemy would have been delighted to get in at such a point.
Eliashib built in public and left his own doorway to others. The opposite failure is just as real.
Then there are others, as this chapter shows us, who are full of zeal in caring for their own houses and ordering them according to God, yet care almost nothing for the welfare of the church... But if we understand the position grace has given us, we will earnestly desire to join the two: repairing opposite our own houses, and building the wall and the gates.
- Proven first. Meremoth had already been trusted with the offerings brought from Babylon, and he had built once in verse 4. Faithfulness in small service is what fits a worker for the greater task.
- Then extra. His second section is one of several places where Scripture counts the quantity of a man's work. It names those who did more than one piece.
- A gap left open. Eliashib built the sheep gate, yet left the wall by his own house to others. He also left his gate without locks or bars, open to the enemy.
- Covered by another. One man built up to Eliashib's door, and Meremoth from the door to the end of the house. That corner is just where an enemy would have loved to break in.
- Both, not one. Public zeal without a house in order, and a well-ordered house without care for God's people, are two halves of one failure. Build the wall, and repair opposite your own door.
And after him repaired the priests, the men of the plain [of Jordan].
The builder list now reaches a group with no personal names: priests, known only by their office and their home district. Why are priests hauling stone instead of serving at the altar, and why does the record note where they came from?
The chapter is a register of workers. One writer reads that record as a sign of the value God set on what Nehemiah had started.
The Lord used Nehemiah's zeal to rouse almost the whole people. There were degrees of energy among them, and maybe lukewarmness, if not hostility, in the hearts of some. But outwardly, and by profession, nearly all came forward and offered their services as builders. It was, in fact, a real revival, and one that only the Spirit of God could produce. We see the value God set on it in this: He made sure the names of those who worked were written down and preserved. This very fact shows that they had His mind in building the wall.
Priests belonged to the altar, yet here they take a section of wall like anyone else. One writer reads the whole list as a picture of ranks collapsing into a single purpose.
First it is noticeable that, from the greatest to the least, all were united in this particular work. Priests, nobles, and common people were of one mind to build the walls and set up the gates... Their individual work in the service of the Lord may be different, for some are priests and some Levites. But whatever their social position, their daily calling, or their special service for the Lord, all shared one mind and one purpose. By this unanimity, as one has said, "they confessed their need of separation from the nations around and took measures to secure it."
Being levelled did not make them all alike. The same list still marks out how each man worked.
All are a working people together — the nobles and the common folk. The service of God's city had put them all on a level. The rich are made low, the poor are exalted: a beautiful sight in its time and place. Then, some are distinguished... some of the priests "sanctified" their work in their part of the city walls, while others of them worked in an ordinary way.
Translations differ here. The ESV says the priests came from the surrounding area; others read the phrase as the plain of the Jordan. One writer draws a lesson from that older reading, but offers it as a possibility, not a certainty.
No one would value the death of Jesus as the priests do. The more priestly a person is, the more the thought of the death of Christ softens his affections and subdues his spirit. The reference to "men of the plain (of Jordan)" may bear that application. In New Testament language it may point to those whose hearts move with the truth of the Lord's death. They understand what that death has established for the glory and praise of God.
One writer reads the groups in this chapter as a climb, and the climb ends with the priests.
As we noted earlier, there seems to be a moral progression here: from the warriors to the Levites, from the Levites to the brothers, from the brothers to the priests. None of us learn these things quickly. But if we seek grace to go on, and if we do go on earnestly, we will become established in the truth and enter more fully into its privileges.
That order sets the goal for every other kind of labour in the chapter.
It is important to realise this: all service carried on in the energy of the Holy Spirit aims at promoting priestly conditions among the saints of God.
The list is full of different tasks. One writer draws from that variety a lesson about each Christian's own place.
The second noteworthy thing is the variety of the service of these children of Israel. One did one thing and one another, while all were working for the same end... Every Christian has his own place, which no one else can fill, and his own work, which no other can do. The health and prosperity of the assembly depend on recognising this truth and practising it.
- Recorded — God preserved the builders' names, and that record shows they had His mind in the work.
- Ranks — one task levelled priests, nobles and common people; the city's service put them all on one footing.
- Region — other translations read "the men of the plain of Jordan", and one writer links that to hearts softened by the death of Christ.
- Rising — the groups rise in order, warriors to Levites to brothers to priests, and no one learns these things quickly.
- Result — all service done in the power of the Spirit aims at one end: priestly conditions among God's people. Each worker fills a place no one else can fill.
After them repaired Benjamin and Hasshub over against their house. After them repaired Azariah the son of Maaseiah, the son of Ananiah, by his house.
Nehemiah 3 is a builders' register: name after name, section after section, as Jerusalem's broken wall goes up again. Verse 23 belongs to a small group of entries where the men repaired the stretch nearest their own homes. Commentators treat that detail as deliberate.
Commentators read the wall as a picture of separation to God. That gives a deeper meaning to the repeated note about men building next to their own houses.
In several cases the text says that certain men repaired the wall opposite their houses (vv. 10, 23, 28, 29, and others). In these notes we must separate two things — the fact, and what the fact teaches. The fact is that these children of Israel built the stretch of wall opposite their own homes. But beyond that, the Spirit of God wants us to understand what it means. And the meaning is not hard to find. The wall is a picture of separation. So we are taught that these servants of the Lord began with their own houses. They sought first of all to bring their own families under the word of God, and in that way to bring about separation from evil within the circle of their own responsibility.
Rossier puts Benjamin, Hasshub and Azariah beside other builders who chose the same spot, and ends with a test anyone can apply.
Jedaiah (v. 10) repairs "over against his house". His first care is to preserve his own family against the invasions of the enemy. The case is the same for Benjamin, Hasshub and Azariah (v. 23), for the priests and Zadok (vv. 28, 29). All these men make it their concern to begin by sheltering those of their own house. How good and how profitable this practice is among believers at all times! How can one stand as a defender of the people of God, if one doesn't know how to protect his own home from evil?
Dennett finds the same order elsewhere. When God called Gideon to rescue His people, He first told him to pull down the altar of Baal in his own father's house. Dennett then quotes another writer:
Faithfulness within comes before outward strength. Evil must be put away from Israel before the enemy can be driven out. Obedience first, and then strength. This is God's order.
The register does not simply list workers; it distinguishes them. Where a man built is treated as a mark God chose to preserve.
Again others are distinguished for their personal faithfulness in the work. They built over against their own houses (10, 23, 28, 29). God thus marks out for special approval those who are careful to maintain separation within the sphere of their own responsibility.
Grant weighs this pattern against its opposite, and warns that the mistake can run either way.
The record says that many of the people living in Jerusalem made repairs in front of their own houses (vv. 23, 28, 29, 30). This reminds us of 1 Timothy 3:5, "For if he does not know how to manage his own household, how will he care for God's church?" It is also true that some Christians care only about their personal and family responsibilities, and ignore the proper welfare of the church of God. In contrast, we have noticed that Eliashib repaired the sheep gate, but did not make repairs at his own house. How important it is to have a well-balanced concern for the spiritual blessing of our own families, and at the same time for the true prospering of the assembly of God!
Hole asks why a whole chapter of Scripture goes to names like Azariah's.
We note first of all that God has seen fit to use a whole chapter to record the names of the leaders of families or townships who took part in the work. We might wonder why so much valuable space goes to the names of men who would otherwise be forgotten. But we learn from it that God does not forget the humblest service done for His will. He puts it on record, above all when someone carries it on in the face of ridicule and opposition.
reason: hard bullets split; "approved" claim removed with Smith quote
After him repaired Binnui the son of Henadad another piece, from the house of Azariah to the angle, as far as the corner.
This verse is one line in a long roll call of builders. It records a man taking on a stretch of wall for the second time, running from someone else's house to the corner. Why does God's word slow down to keep the names and landmarks no one would otherwise remember?
The whole chapter is a list of names and wall sections.
We note first of all that God has seen fit to fill a whole chapter with the names of the leaders of families or townships who took part in the building. We might wonder that so much valuable space should go to the names of men who would otherwise be forgotten. But we conclude from it that God does not forget the humblest service for His will. He puts it on record, above all when it is carried on in the face of ridicule and opposition.
The record also notes how each person worked:
It tells us in what detail (if we may put it that way) God surveys His people. It shows how closely He notes the state of their hearts and the character of their service. And it shows how welcome to Him is a display of devotion to His glory. Such commendations are not from man, but from God, and therefore infallible. On the one hand they anticipate the judgment seat of Christ. On the other, they should stir us all up to seek the same zeal and tireless diligence in the Lord's service.
Binnui had already been at work. The word "another" places him in a group of builders marked out by how much they did.
Then some are distinguished by the quantity of their work. Of "Hanun and the inhabitants of Zanoah" we read that they not only set up "the valley gate" but also built "a thousand cubits of the wall" (13). The Tekoites not only repaired a piece of wall, following Zadok's work, but later we are told that they repaired "another piece" (5, 27). And of others we read that they "repaired a second piece" (11, 19, 30).
The verse marks Binnui's starting point as another man's house.
Only the "second piece" of Binnui (v. 24) is mentioned, which seems to show that he helped Azariah to protect his house. This Binnui seals the covenant in Nehemiah 10:9.
Several builders in this chapter worked opposite their own homes. One writer reads the wall as a picture.
Keep in mind that the wall is a picture of separation. We are taught that these servants of the Lord began first with their own houses. They sought first of all to bring their own families under the authority of the word of God, and so to carry out separation from evil within the circle of their own responsibility. And this has always been the divine order.
Commentators differ on how much credit this deserves. One reads the same detail the other way:
Some of the workers, including even some of the priests, repaired the wall next to their own house. That meant they took on the section that was of most interest and convenience to themselves. To do this was not as praiseworthy as working on a piece of no particular interest to the worker.
The neglect can also run the other way:
It is true, on the other hand, that some Christians care only about their personal and family responsibilities. They ignore the proper welfare of the church of God... How important it is for us to have a well-balanced concern for the spiritual blessing of our own families, and at the same time for the true prospering of the assembly of God!
Binnui's work ends at the buttress and the corner. One writer explained why corners matter from the tabernacle, Israel's tent of worship:
In the tabernacle a double board stood at each corner, just where it was liable to fall apart. I think we know from experience that things sometimes come in among us which could divide us at once if we are not careful. On such occasions we need, as it were, extra stability and extra wisdom.
- Recorded. God writes down the service the world would forget: He "does not forget the humblest service for His will."
- Repeated. Binnui's mark is a second stretch; some builders stand out "by the quantity of their work."
- For another. His piece starts at Azariah's house: he "helped Azariah to protect his house," building where the gain fell to someone else.
- At the corner. His section runs to the corner, the point "liable to fall apart," where we need "extra stability and extra wisdom."
- Reviewed. Such commendations "anticipate the judgment seat of Christ," and they come "not from man, but from God, and therefore infallible."
Palal the son of Uzai, over against the angle, and the high tower that lies out from the king's house, which was by the court of the prison. After him, Pedaiah the son of Parosh.
Two men get one line each in this verse, and their piece of wall runs past the buttress, the tower jutting out from the king's upper house, and the court of the guard. Why does Scripture keep such small details, and does the place a man works on carry any meaning?
This chapter names ordinary builders one by one. One writer asks what that record shows about the God who kept it.
It tells us how closely God watches over His people, down to the smallest detail. It shows how carefully He notes the state of their hearts and the character of their service, and how pleasing to Him it is when someone is devoted to His glory. Such commendations come not from man but from God, so they cannot be wrong. They look ahead to the judgment-seat of Christ, and they should stir us all up to seek the same zeal and tireless diligence in the Lord's service.
The same thought is pressed further: the whole chapter can be read as a small-scale preview of the day when work is assessed.
The whole chapter appears to us as like a miniature forecast of the judgment-seat of Christ.
One writer traces both men — what Palal's section stood beside, and where Pedaiah's name appears later. Older translations call the court of the guard here the court of the prison.
Palal makes his repairs, and he turns his attention to the buildings that stood as witnesses of royal authority and of the judgment of the guilty (v. 25). In the same verse we find Pedaiah the son of Parosh. Several of his brothers had married foreign wives (Ezra 10:25). Later he is present at the reading of the covenant (Neh. 8:4), and he served as one of the keepers of the storehouses of the Levites (Neh. 13:13).
This verse gives Pedaiah no description at all — only his name and his father's.
Earlier the wall passes the king's garden. Here it passes the king's house. One writer finds meaning in each.
"The King's Garden" is the garden he walks in to gather his fruit. Its scent and fruit are for the delight of his own heart. "The House" speaks of a place of closeness, a place he shares with the one on whom his affections rest. Both thoughts are seen in what the Church is to Christ.
Palal's section starts at the buttress, which older translations call the angle, or corner. The chapter names this corner more than once. One writer draws a lesson from the tabernacle, the tent where Israel worshipped.
When the tabernacle was built, a double board was placed at the corners — just where it was likely to pull apart. And I think we know from experience that things sometimes come in among us which could divide us at once if we are not careful. At such times we need extra stability and extra wisdom.
Two names, two short sections of wall. One writer turns a list like this into a question for the reader.
Notice the grace of God here: He takes note of everyone's work, and He also shows what was distinctive about each one. This was an important thing to remember. There is not one of you, dear friends, who has no work to do for the Lord. Are you doing it? And there is a work that you can do better than anyone else.
The same list also notes where some builders chose to work.
Others again stand out for their personal faithfulness in the work. They built opposite their own houses (10, 23, 28, 29). So God singles out for special approval those who are careful to keep separation within their own area of responsibility.
- Noticed. God watches His people in the smallest detail. He notes their hearts and the quality of their work. That is why two unknown men are named.
- Placed. Palal's stretch of wall ran past buildings that spoke of royal authority and of the judgment of the guilty.
- Intimate. The king's house pictures a place shared with the one on whom his affections rest — what the Church is to Christ.
- Reinforced. The tabernacle had double boards at the corners, where the frame could pull apart. The places most likely to divide need extra strength and wisdom.
- Yours. Everyone has work to do for the Lord. Each of us has one work we can do better than anyone else — often the piece nearest our own door.
(Now the Nethinim dwelt in Ophel, even over against the water-gate toward the east, and the tower which lies out.)
Nehemiah's building list pauses over a group with no famous name. Who were these temple servants, why are they placed at that one gate, and why do older translations say they dwelt there instead of built?
The ESV calls them "temple servants." Older versions keep their old name, Nethinim. The name says what they were and who appointed them.
A name meaning 'given, devoted ones.' The name was given to those who helped the Levites in the service of the tabernacle and the temple... Joshua made the Gibeonites "cutters of wood and drawers of water for the congregation and for the altar." Joshua 9:27. They are not mentioned after 2 Samuel, so they and their descendants may have been the 'Nethinim.' God does not appear to have appointed them, as He did the Levites. Instead, 'David and the princes' appointed them 'for the service of the Levites.' Ezra 8:20... After the return from exile the Nethinim are called the 'ministers of this house of God.'
Ophel was a district of Jerusalem with its own building history. The same word stands behind the "tower" in the verse.
A part of Jerusalem. It is first mentioned in 2 Chronicles 27:3, where Jotham "did much building on the wall of Ophel." When Manasseh built, he "carried it around Ophel, and raised it to a very great height," 2 Chronicles 33:14. On the return from exile the Nethinim dwelt there... People think it stood at the south-east corner of Jerusalem, outside the present walls, near the Virgin's fountain. The same word is translated 'tower' in 2 Kings 5:24.
One writer stops short of a firm reading:
In the account of the rebuilding of the walls of Jerusalem, the wording about the Nethinim is rather obscure. Did the Nethinim renovate the tower of Ophel (which stood on the wall, 2 Chronicles 27:3) while others rebuilt the wall? That is not quite clear.
These men existed to make someone else's work possible. That gives them a modern counterpart.
In Ezra 8:20 we read, "Also of the Nethinim, whom David and the princes had appointed for the service of the Levites." In our day they would perhaps answer to those who do many services behind the scenes, as we may say. Many things are necessary and have to be done week by week. People may often take these things for granted, but someone has to do them.
Their post was no minor one.
It is remarkable that it was the Nethinim who were there, maintaining the source of refreshment for the people of God. That should encourage all those who may not be able to take on any prominent service. Many a simple service can be used to set the affections of the saints free, and so enrich the service of God.
Older translations read that the Nethinim "dwelt in Ophel" by the water gate. One writer draws a point from what that wording does not say.
The verse mentions the water gate. It links the Nethinim with this gate — they were servants and lived in Ophel (the high place). This gate suggests the Word of God, so often spoken of under the symbol of water (John 3:5; 13:1-16; Ephesians 5:26; Psalm 119:136). Notice something very interesting. The verse links the servants with the water gate, but it does not say that they repaired the gate. The Word of God needs no building up or improving; it builds up those who bow to its blessed authority.
On that reading, they simply lived beside the water.
Here it is a case of dwelling. No lack of water. No lack of refreshment. And has not the Christian received what answers to this? Is there not the refreshment of the whole of God's Word by the Spirit as his portion?
The builders in this chapter did not all do the same job:
One did one thing and one another, while all were working for the same end... Every Christian has his own place, which no one else can fill. He has his own work, which no other can do. The health and prosperity of the assembly depend on recognising this truth and living it out.
- Given — the name means "given, devoted ones." They helped the Levites, and may descend from the Gibeonites, who cut wood and carried water for the congregation and the altar.
- Placed — they lived at Ophel, at the city's south-east corner. The same word is also translated "tower," and what work the verse gives them there is not clear.
- Supporting — they existed to serve others, like those today who do the needed jobs no one notices.
- Refreshing — they live by the water gate, a picture of God's Word. They dwell beside it and do not repair it. The Word needs no repair; it builds up those who bow to it.
- Devoted — the name they carried is the lesson: varied work, one aim, and a place for each person that no one else can fill.
After him the Tekoites repaired a second piece, over against the great tower which lies out, as far as the wall of Ophel.
The Tekoites show up twice in the list of wall-builders. This verse is their second turn, and the repeat is the point: why does God record the same workers twice, and why here?
The wall they took on ran through the city of David, out as far as Ophel, next to the temple:
In verse 27 we see them repair "a second piece" of the city of David, "over against the great tower which lies out, as far as the wall of Ophel". Ophel, where the Nethinim lived, joined one of the gates of the temple.
Note: these writers quote older translations. Where they write "a second piece" or "another piece", the ESV reads "another section."
The same place turns up earlier in Israel's history, and the same word is also translated "tower":
Ophel is a part of Jerusalem. It is first mentioned in 2 Chronicles 27:3, which says that Jotham built much "on the wall of Ophel." … After the return from exile the Nethinim lived there. Nehemiah 3:26-27; Nehemiah 11:21. … Translators give the same word as "tower" in 2 Kings 5:24, and in the margin of some of the passages above.
The leading men of Tekoa had refused this work. Their ordinary neighbours answered that refusal by building twice:
The Tekoites were willing servants, for verse 27 says they "repaired another piece." It is obvious that they were zealous men, and this despite the indifference, if not the opposition, of "their nobles." … The reason these nobles held back is plain. They "did not put their necks to the work of their Lord." Pride was governing their hearts. They could not stoop low enough. They were not used to the yoke, so they preferred their own importance and ease to the Lord's work.
The absence of their leaders did not slow them down. It had the opposite effect:
On the whole, this lack of zeal in the nobles does not — and may it always be so — bring about the results it so often brings in cases like this. Instead, because the Tekoites do not depend on their leaders, they double their zeal all the more.
Tekoa had produced one famous man before this, and he was no aristocrat either:
The prophet Amos was a Tekoite who had prophesied many years before, a simple herdsman who gathered sycamore figs. The Lord chose him, and here this record keeps forever the names of other humble workers from Tekoa whom He used in the work. Their nobles were slackers. They had no interest in the work of their Lord. And there are still people like that, who do not work for the Lord, and in that coming day they will suffer loss, though they are saved.
Not every builder in this chapter is described the same way. Some are singled out by how much they did:
Then some are distinguished for the quantity of their work. Of "Hanun and the inhabitants of Zanoah" we read that they not only set up "the valley gate" but they also built "a thousand cubits of the wall" (13). The Tekoites not only repaired a piece of wall, following Zadok's work, but later we are told that they repaired "another piece" (5, 27).
Both stretches of wall were group work:
It is good when we can move together in one common concern. These men did so. Having finished one piece of work well, they seem glad to move together again on "another piece". It is clear that they saw the work as their Lord's.
The chapter records who worked and who held back, and that record looks ahead:
The whole chapter looks to us like a small forecast of the judgment seat of Christ. This stands out most in verses 5, 12, 20, 23 and 27. The Tekoites were very diligent, for they repaired 'another piece' as well as the first piece they took on. Yet the record says that 'their nobles did not put their necks to the work of their Lord'. High standing in the world all too often gets in the way when the work of the Lord is in question. Their 'nobles' no doubt liked to talk and give orders, but they did not like to dirty their hands or bend their necks to do the work.
- Another piece. The Tekoites came back for a second stretch of wall. God wrote it down.
- Another refusal. Their nobles had already turned the work down. That did not slow the Tekoites; they doubled their zeal instead.
- Another sort of great man. Tekoa's famous son Amos was a herdsman. Again it is the town's humble workers, not its nobles, whose names God keeps.
- Another day. The chapter is a small preview of the judgment seat of Christ. There God names diligence, and slackness suffers loss.
- Another Master. They worked as a company twice over, because they counted the task their Lord's.
From above the horse-gate repaired the priests, every one over against his house.
The gate named here had a reputation. Writers who trace the meaning of each gate in the wall connect the horse with strength, and draw a line from that to the strength a believer needs:
The horse is a symbol of power. Read the vivid description of the horse that the Lord gives in Job 39:19-25. Here is part of it. "Have you given the horse his might? Do you clothe his neck with a mane? … He paws in the valley and exults in his strength; he goes out to meet the weapons." Now the Holy Spirit is given that the believer may have power.
Horses are also for battle. Another writer reads the gate as a picture of the fight God's people are in:
Verse 28. The horse gate (2 Kings 11:6; Jer. 31:40) suggests warfare and victory. In a world of evil the people of God wage a warfare. We do not wrestle with flesh and blood, but with wicked spirits. Paul speaks of the believer as a soldier of Christ. Victory is on our side, though the forces of evil may threaten on all sides.
The builders here were priests — men whose whole work was serving God. Even so, each one repaired the wall in front of his own house:
In verse 28 we read, "Above the Horse Gate (note: another sign of power) the priests repaired, each one opposite his own house". If priestly service is to keep its power, how vital it is for each man to see that things are right, according to the truth, in "his house". So we read again in verse 29, "After them Zadok the son of Immer repaired opposite his own house".
The wall is a picture of separation from the nations around. So a man building the stretch in front of his own home is doing something more than protecting his property:
So we are taught this — keeping in mind that the wall is a picture of separation. These servants of the Lord began with their own houses. They sought first of all to bring their own families into obedience to the word of God, and so to separate from evil inside the circle of their own responsibility. This has always been God's order. When God called Gideon to be the deliverer of His people, He told him to pull down the altar of Baal in his father's house before he could go out to battle against the Midianites. As another has said, "Faithfulness within comes before outward strength." The record that each of these men repaired the wall opposite his own house shows that conscience was at work. They rightly understood God's claims on them in their own homes. They felt that setting their houses in order was a necessary qualification for any public service.
God raised up Gideon to rescue Israel from the Midianites. His first job was the idol in his own family's yard.
The chapter is a list of names, and God is the one keeping it. That is a comfort to anyone whose service happens indoors:
The Lord sees and knows what needs to be done opposite our own houses. He takes notice of the work of saints, even when they are busy with what they think is very small service. Home labour is little seen by man, but God marks it well. It is most important service. You may not be able to pray in the assembly; it is not the place God has given to some to do so; but have you unconverted ones at home? Do you seek their souls for Christ?
Nehemiah 3 records two kinds of builder. Some worked at the public gates, some at their own doors. One writer presses for both:
Many of the people of Jerusalem made repairs in front of their own houses (vv. 23,28,29,30). This reminds us of 1 Timothy 3:5, "For if someone does not know how to manage his own household, how will he care for God's church?" On the other hand, some Christians care only about themselves and their families, and ignore the true good of the church of God. We have noticed the opposite case too: Eliashib repaired the sheep gate, but made no repairs at his own house. How important it is to have a well balanced concern for the spiritual blessing of our own families, and at the same time for the true prospering of the assembly of God!
- Power. The horse gate speaks of strength, and points to the Spirit given so the believer may have power.
- Warfare. That strength is for a real fight. It is not against flesh and blood but against wicked spirits, and victory is already on our side.
- Home first. The wall pictures separation from evil. These builders began that work inside their own families, because faithfulness within comes before outward strength.
- Priests too. Serving God in public does not excuse disorder at home. The priests kept their service strong by keeping their own houses right.
- Both, not either. Eliashib repaired a gate but left his own wall to others. God's record asks for the house and the city, not one at the cost of the other.
After them repaired Zadok the son of Immer over against his house. And after him repaired also Shemaiah the son of Shechaniah, the keeper of the east gate.
Two men repair a stretch of Jerusalem's broken wall: one in front of his own door, the other the keeper of the East Gate. Why does Scripture keep such small details, and what does the place each man chose teach us?
The whole chapter is a roll-call of ordinary people, and the fact that their names survived at all says something about how closely God watches work done for Him.
It tells us with what care God surveys His people. He carefully notes the state of their hearts and the character of their service, and a display of devotion to His glory is welcome to Him. Such commendations come not from man but from God, so they cannot be mistaken. They look ahead to the judgment seat of Christ. They should also stir us all up to seek the same zeal and tireless diligence in the Lord's service.
Zadok built the stretch of wall in front of his own house. Several builders did the same. Commentators treat the wall as a picture of separation, so they ask where separation must begin.
We are taught that these servants of the Lord began first with their own houses. Keep in mind that the wall is a picture of separation. They sought first of all to bring their own families under the word of God, and so to bring about separation from evil within the circle of their own responsibility. And this has always been the divine order. As another writer has said: "Faithfulness within comes before outward strength. Evil must be put away from Israel before the enemy can be driven out. Obedience first and then strength. This is God's order."
Another writer traces the same care through builder after builder, Zadok included.
Jedaiah repairs the wall in front of his house. His first care is to keep his own family safe from the enemy's attacks. It is the same for Benjamin, Hasshub and Azariah, and for the priests and Zadok. All these men take it to heart to begin by sheltering those of their own house… How can anyone stand as a defender of the people of God if he does not know how to protect his own home from evil?
There is a danger on the other side too.
There are others, as we learn from this chapter, who are most zealous in tending their own houses and ordering them according to God. Yet they are almost entirely careless about the welfare of the church… But if we understand the position grace has given us, we will earnestly desire to do both. We will repair in front of our own houses and build the wall and the gates.
The verse names Shemaiah by his job, not just by his family. His father's name matters too.
Shemaiah the son of Shechaniah is the "keeper of the east gate", the main gate of the temple precincts. His name appears later on all the main occasions. If his father Shechaniah had been the keeper of the gate, Jerusalem would have been in grave danger from Tobijah (Nehemiah 6:18).
The direction of this gate carries its own meaning, and so do the two names.
Shemaiah, the son of Shechaniah, repaired and kept the east gate. From Ezekiel's prophecy we learn that the glory of God's presence left by the east gate. When that glory returns to dwell in the temple once more… it will enter through the east gate. The east gate faces the rising sun. It suggests the coming of the Lord for His people. And here the two names fit in beautifully. Shemaiah means "heard of the Lord"; even so He will hear His people and some day will answer their prayer for His coming. Shechaniah means "habitation of the Lord." We shall be with Him.
The zeal shown here had results beyond the wall.
Most of these men gain, as we have seen, "a good degree" through their zeal to build the wall of the city of David. Shouldn't we draw a lesson for ourselves from this? Think of the silence and inability of so many children of God in the ministry. Doesn't much of it start at the beginning? God set some work before them to do for Him, work needing effort, perseverance and the sacrifice of their time. And they, like the nobles of Tekoa, did not put their necks to the work of their Lord.
- Named — God keeps a record of who built and how they built, noticing the heart behind the service as much as the stones.
- Home first — Zadok built in front of his own door. Separation from evil starts at home.
- Home and wall — some care for the church and neglect their own house. Others guard their house and ignore the church. Aim at both.
- Gate kept — Shemaiah guarded the main gate, and his name appears later on all the main occasions; his father's name is linked with a danger to the city.
- Degree gained — those who put their necks to the work gained "a good degree". Those who held back explain much of the silence in later service.
After him repaired Hananiah the son of Shelemiah, and Hanun the sixth son of Zalaph, a second piece. After them repaired Meshullam the son of Berechiah over against his chamber.
Verse 30 adds three short notices to the long list of wall builders: a second stretch of wall, a man called a sixth son, and a man who repaired only the piece by his own room. The details look small, yet commentators read them as God's own record of what each worker had to give.
One writer finds the point of the list in the names themselves.
The value God set on their work is seen in this: He caused the names of those who shared in it to be written and preserved... The details of the chapter can hardly fail to remind the reader of Romans 16, where the apostle Paul, guided by the Spirit, names so many of the believers. In many cases he also describes their different characteristics in service... It tells us how closely God surveys His people, down to the smallest detail, if we may speak that way. He notes the state of their hearts and the character of their service, and He welcomes the display of devotion to His glory.
Meshullam repaired only the wall in front of his own room. One writer takes that as a comfort, not a fault.
In the case of Meshullam the son of Berechiah it is said that he repaired opposite his chamber (v. 30). It seems he had no house, only a lodging. His circle of responsibility was narrow, but he was found faithful. As the apostle speaks of stewardship, "if the readiness is there, it is acceptable according to what a person has, not according to what he does not have." This should comfort those who are tempted to long for wider spheres of service. It is faithfulness in the place where the Lord has put us that He values and commends.
Another writer applies that single room to anyone who has no house of their own.
It would be an encouragement to people who are not heads of houses, and do not have a house of their own. If we have only one room, we can hold that for the Lord. There would be nothing in that room which is contrary to His Name. In that way the work of the Lord would be supported.
Other names in the same list stand at the opposite end: they built more than one stretch of wall. Older translations read "a second piece" where the ESV has "another section".
Then some are distinguished for the quantity of their work. Of "Hanun and the inhabitants of Zanoah" we read that they not only set up "the valley gate" but they also built "a thousand cubits of the wall" (13). The Tekoites not only repaired a piece of wall, following Zadok's work, but later we are told that they repaired "another piece" (5, 27). And of others we read that they "repaired a second piece" (11, 19, 30).
One writer stops at the number six and asks about the five brothers the list never names.
Then follow Zadok, Shemaiah, Hananiah; then Hanun described as a sixth son of Zalaph for a second piece. Where were the five? Did none come but this one to glorify God in this work?
Commentators differ on Meshullam. Dennett sees quiet faithfulness in his short stretch of wall. Another writer weighs that zeal against his family ties.
Meshullam, whom our chapter mentions after Meremoth, was a man of doubtful character, for he had allied himself to Tobijah, to whose son, named Johanan, he had given his daughter (Neh. 6:18)... Despite this unfortunate alliance, he shows zeal for the house of God, but not the same zeal as Meremoth. Although he next works at the "city of David", his work aims first of all at protecting his own living quarters (v. 30).
- Measured, not compared. God surveys His people closely. He notes the state of their hearts and the character of their service, so the measure here is His, not ours.
- Measured by readiness. Meshullam had a lodging, not a house. His circle of responsibility was narrow, yet he was found faithful. Service is acceptable according to what a person has, not according to what he does not have.
- Measured room by room. If we have only one room, we can hold that for the Lord, with nothing in it contrary to His Name.
- Measured also by quantity. The same list marks out builders who repaired a second stretch of wall. They finished their share, then started again.
- Measured against the missing. Hanun is named as a sixth son. Where were the other five? The list keeps the names of those who came, and the question stands over those who did not.
After him repaired Malchijah of the goldsmiths to the place of the Nethinim and of the dealers, over against the gate Miphkad, and to the ascent of the corner.
The wall's circuit is almost closed. One craftsman repairs the stretch past the houses of the temple servants and the traders. His section ends opposite the Muster Gate — Miphkad — and that name raises a question: what was this last piece of wall pointing towards?
The man named here is not a mason or a priest but a worker in precious metal. The list of builders crosses every line of rank and trade:
From the greatest to the least, all were united in this one work. Priests, nobles, and common people were of one mind to build the walls and set up the gates… Their daily jobs may be very different — some are goldsmiths, some perfumers, and others merchants (8, 31, 32).
One writer contrasts this with who usually does the Lord's work:
In verse 31 we read again of a goldsmith working. In verse 32 both goldsmiths and merchants take part in the work. Often it is the poor who do the work of the Lord (James 2:5). So it is all the more refreshing when people of means are willing to work for the Lord.
One commentator traces this builder into an earlier record, where he appears as a man who had gone wrong and then put it right:
Malchijah (v. 31) had taken a foreign wife (Ezra 10:25 or 31) and had purified himself.
His name is the last one in the chapter, and it names the aim of the whole project:
The last name mentioned, Malchiah, means "God is king", which would suggest the end in view. The rights of God amongst His people secured.
The verse marks out the house of the Nethinim, the word the ESV translates as "temple servants". Their name says what they were:
The name means "given, devoted ones." It was used of those who helped the Levites in the service of the tabernacle and the temple… It does not appear that God appointed them, as He did the Levites. Instead, "David and the princes" appointed them "for the service of the Levites" (Ezra 8:20).
One writer finds their counterpart today:
In our day they would perhaps match those who do many services behind the scenes. Many things are necessary and have to be done week by week. People often take them for granted, but someone has to do them.
Commentators differ on what this gate pictures, because its name carries more than one meaning. One reads it as the place where judges heard cases:
Malchiah (the Lord is King), the goldsmith's son, repaired the Miphkad gate. Miphkad means "the appointed place" or "a place of visitation." It was probably the gate where the judges sat to settle disputes and arguments. It suggests the judgment seat of Christ.
Another reads the same word as a meeting place, and draws comfort from it:
Miphkad means the place of meeting. How happy it is that God gives His people a place of meeting—an assembly on earth, where our Lord is in the midst of those gathered to His name.
This gate closes the list. Starting a journey is not the same as finishing it:
It is a happy thought that the last gate in Nehemiah 3 shows the work is complete. They have reached this grand goal — "the appointed place". There is a very simple statement about Abraham setting out from Ur of the Chaldees with Sarah his wife. It says, "And into the land of Canaan they came" (Gen. 12:5). He might have set out and never finished the journey. But into the land of Canaan they came. Let us be encouraged not only to have a goal, but to seek grace to reach it.
- Called — a goldsmith builds here, not a mason. Priests, nobles, common people, goldsmiths, perfumers and merchants were all of one mind about the walls and gates.
- Cleansed — Malchijah had taken a foreign wife and had purified himself; a man restored is a man fit to build.
- Crowned — his name means "God is king." It stands last in the list and names the aim of the whole wall: God's rights among His people secured.
- Counted — the wall runs past the house of the "given, devoted ones" who served the Levites. They did the weekly work that gets taken for granted.
- Completed — Miphkad is the appointed place, whether of judgment or of meeting. Either way it ends the list. Abraham set out, and "into the land of Canaan they came". Reach the goal; do not only start for it.
And between the ascent of the corner and the sheep-gate repaired the goldsmiths and the dealers.
The register of wall-builders ends with two trades, and with the Sheep Gate, where the list began. Why do goldsmiths and merchants get the last word, and why does the circuit close at that gate?
This last entry completes the loop around the city.
In verse 32 a great number of goldsmiths and dealers put their hand to the work. They rejoin the walls of the city of David to the Sheep Gate, where the work had begun.
Commentators treat that return as deliberate.
Through this gate the sacrificial animals were led to the altar. … The Sheep Gate at which the work started is typical of the blessed work of the Lamb of God. He bore our sins in His body on the tree, and by the offering of His spotless, holy body we are sanctified. The lesson here is that the person and work of Christ is the starting point of a true restoration. The cross of Christ, the work God's Son has accomplished, must be guarded above everything else. At the close of this chapter this Sheep Gate is mentioned once more. After making the circuit of all the gates, we are led back to this first gate. It is with this great truth, the gospel of Christ, that all repairing of the inroads of the world and the flesh must start and finish. This gate suggests Him who said, "I am the door. If anyone enters by me, he will be saved and will go in and out and find pasture." No other gate leads to life and into God's presence.
The same gate opens and closes the account. What it stands for colours everything in between.
The first man mentioned in the chapter is Eliashib. His name carries the suggestion that God is a God who will restore. He and his brothers built the Sheep Gate, the point from which the work started and also at which it finished. We learn from the fifth chapter of John's Gospel that the Sheep Gate is connected with Bethesda — the house of mercy. The principle of sovereignty in mercy therefore characterises the work throughout.
Verse 32 names two trades with money behind them.
In verse 31 we read again of a goldsmith working, and in verse 32 of both goldsmiths and merchants taking part in the work. Often it is the poor who engage in the work of the Lord (James 2:5), so it is all the more refreshing when those of means are willing to labour for the Lord.
The builders came from very different walks of life.
One of the features that come to light in this chapter is the unity that marks the different classes of those engaged in the work — men of Jericho, nobles, goldsmiths, perfumers and others. Would this not suggest that, although we differ from one another in secular things, we should be united in our desires and activities in divine interests?
Each worker had a stretch nobody else was covering.
One did one thing and one another, while all were working for the same end. It was a true picture of the different functions of the members of the body… Every Christian has his own place, which no one else can fill, and his own work, which no other can do; and the health and prosperity of the assembly depend on the recognition and the practice of this truth.
One writer finds the same care in a New Testament list of names.
This chapter can hardly fail to remind the reader of Romans 16, where Paul names many of the believers one by one and describes their different characteristics in service… This tells us how minutely God surveys His people, how carefully He notes the state of their hearts and the character of their service, and how welcome to Him is a display of devotedness to His glory. Such commendations — not from man, but from God, and therefore infallible — should stir us all up to seek the same zeal and tireless diligence in the Lord's service.
- Start. The work began at the Sheep Gate, the gate of sacrifice. The person and work of Christ is where true restoration starts.
- Circle. Verse 32 joins the last stretch back to that same gate, so the one truth it began with encloses the whole circuit.
- Mercy. That gate points to the house of mercy, so mercy marks the whole work, not just its opening.
- Everyone. Goldsmiths and merchants — people of means — took the last stretch, and every trade in the list had work no one else could do.
- Recorded. God notes each worker's heart and the character of their service, and the names stand on record.
And it came to pass that when Sanballat heard that we built the wall, he was angry and very indignant, and mocked the Jews.
The wall of Jerusalem is going up again, and word of the work reaches Sanballat. Two questions follow: why should a repaired wall enrage a man, and what should the builders do when the mockery starts?
What stirred him now was not the plan but the progress.
It was bad enough to find the work was begun. It was a great deal worse to find that it was going on, and that Nehemiah was not so easily frightened. Sanballat had threatened to report him as a rebel against the king. But where the heart is simple, there is no reason for such alarm. The more firmly Nehemiah honoured the authorities set over him, the more he could afford to ignore Sanballat's threats and scorn.
This wrath is one step in a longer series that runs through the whole book:
So we have very briefly examined the seven stages of opposition to God's own work. The grief of the enemy (Neh. 2:10); the laughter of the enemy (Neh. 2:19); his wrath (Neh. 4:1); mocking (Neh. 4:3); fighting (Neh. 4:8); scheming from outside (Neh. 5:1-9); scheming and danger from within (Neh. 6:10). And many a reader of this tract will say, "I have seen all seven in the opposition to God's work in our own day."
Sanballat was no plain outsider.
These relentless enemies of the Jews hated them all the more because they themselves had some knowledge of the true God. Sanballat led the forces of Samaria, where their idol worship was not completely separated from the worship of the Lord. In religion, mixing the true with the false is far more hostile to Christian testimony than plain paganism. A world that has taken its religion from the Bible and the Gospels often leads this opposition. It has made its creed out of certain scriptural truths. It cannot bear those who build the wall and the gates of the city of God, for these defences are against itself.
Anger came first, but ridicule was what he spoke aloud.
It is worth noticing that, while hatred of God and His will lies underneath, mockery is a common means. No method is more available to shallow people or more effective with the coarse. And we can see in Scripture and in experience that what is high and holy is especially open to ridicule. Some have so little conscience that they indulge in it, and others too little to resent the offence.
Rossier notes that the world's hostility "begins by mockery, which frightens the timid more than hatred does." We feel its pull, he adds, when our hearts have not broken with the world.
The scorn was a mask.
At first, however, the opposers try to hide their real rage. They pretend to despise a feeble people and their puny efforts, which, they say, a fox would bring to nothing. If that were really the case, they need not have troubled themselves further. They could very well leave the matter to the fox to deal with.
His taunting questions each betray something he wanted to prevent:
"Will they fortify themselves?" he asked. His very attitude showed that they did need to fortify themselves against him! Also, "Will they offer sacrifices?" In other words, he did not want them to honour God by sacrificing to Him. "Will they complete it in a day?" He feared the energy with which they were working.
Nehemiah neither argued nor retaliated. He took the insult straight to God, and the ground of his appeal is worth noticing.
He simply turned to God, sure that He cared for His people. God would be their defence and their shield, for they were busy in His own service. And it is always a blessed thing when we can take all the enemy's revilings to God and leave them with Him. In our natural energy and impatience we too often try to meet the enemy in our own strength. But faith turns the eye upward and commits everything to the Lord… And notice his plea — "For we are despised." God's people are precious in His sight, and to despise them is to despise Him.
The outcome settles the argument the mockers started:
Opposition did not stop the work: in fact, "the people had a mind to work." May we too keep on in the work of the Lord despite all opposition. God gives special grace at such times.
- Progress provokes. The wall being begun annoyed Sanballat; the wall going on enraged him. Opposition rising is a sign the work is real, not a sign it is wrong.
- Nearness sharpens hatred. Sanballat knew something of the true God. That mix of true and false proved more hostile than plain paganism.
- Mockery is cheap. Hatred sits underneath, but ridicule is spoken aloud. It is easy for the shallow, effective with the coarse, and frightening to the timid.
- Scorn hides fear. If the builders were truly feeble, the enemy could have left them to the fox; the sneer itself proves he was afraid.
- Prayer answers reproach. Nehemiah handed the insult to God: "we are despised." To despise God's people is to despise Him — and the work went on.
And he spoke before his brethren and the army of Samaria, and said, What do these feeble Jews? shall they be permitted to go on? Will they offer sacrifices? Will they finish in a day? Will they revive the stones out of the heaps of rubbish, when they are burned?
The wall of Jerusalem is going up, and the first counter-attack is not a sword but a speech. Sanballat mocks the builders before the army of Samaria — yet why bother mocking work that is going nowhere?
One commentator points out that the sneer contradicts itself.
The language of both Sanballat and Tobiah did not match their feelings. It is in verse 1 that we find their real state of mind. Wrath and indignation filled their souls. They knew very well what the work of the Israelites meant. But when they spoke, they hid their anger behind pretended contempt. But suppose the "feeble Jews" were working for nothing. Suppose the wall they were building was a worthless thing. Then why the anger of Sanballat and Tobiah?
Notice where Sanballat stood when he spoke: "before his brothers and the army of Samaria."
These relentless enemies of the Jews hated them all the more because they themselves had some knowledge of the true God. Sanballat led the forces of Samaria. There the worship of idols was never fully separated from the worship of Jehovah. This is what we will always find. The mixture of the true with the false, in religion, is far more hostile to Christian testimony than plain paganism is.
Another writer asks who such men represent.
They were active, boastful, clever men of authority in the land, but not of it. Do they not, then, represent the active, boastful, clever men of authority inside the professing church? They are really strangers to God, and not of the church at all. They are the enemies and opposers of those who want to carry on the work of God.
Mockery does its damage inside us, not outside.
The world's hostility begins with mockery, which frightens the timid more than hatred does. Mockery easily takes hold of us all, if our hearts have not broken with our old ties to the world. Then we will fear ridicule and scorn. We will pull back from open fellowship with this humbled people, "these weak Jews," who claim to repair the breaches.
Sanballat asks four questions — about the work, the worship, the speed, and the burnt stones. The ESV reads the first as "Will they restore it for themselves?"; the older wording quoted below is "Shall they be permitted to go on?" None of the four is a pure lie.
Looking only at the outward circumstances, the enemy could call this little remnant "feeble" with some show of truth. They could fairly ask whether these people would be allowed to go on. Would they sacrifice? Would they "finish"? Would they "revive the stones out of the heaps of rubbish"? But in asking such questions they left out God and His grace. They talked nonsense about a fox.
The striking thing is everything Nehemiah does not do.
The course Nehemiah takes to meet this attack is simple and instructive. He faces the rage of Sanballat, "his brothers, and the army of Samaria." He refuses to be drawn into any argument with them. He makes no appeal to them. He suggests no compromise with them. He does not go out to fight them. He turns to God.
His prayer rests on one ground: the insult falls on people God values.
Notice his plea — "for we are despised." God's people are precious in His sight, and to despise them is to despise Him. Nehemiah had grasped this, and so made his appeal to the heart of God.
One writer sets the enemy's boast beside the builders' record.
Tobiah says, "If a fox went up, it would break down their stone wall." But Nehemiah says, "we built the wall." The Jebusites said to David, "You will not come in here, but the blind and the lame will drive you back." Yet "David took the stronghold of Zion."
The taunt still gets repeated, and one writer calls it an honour to hear it.
Men may mock the little, feeble company. They may say, "What are these feeble Jews doing?" as we seek to build the wall, or set up the temple and the altar, separated from everything that is not of God. But if Christ's glory fills the heart, we long to bear His reproach — it is an honour.
- Rage first. The mockery is a mask. Verse 1 shows the real feeling; if the work were truly worthless, no one would bother sneering at it.
- Rage from religion. The attack comes out of Samaria, where religion blended truth with error. That blend fights God's work harder than open unbelief.
- Rage half right. "Feeble," "burnt stones," "in a day" — the facts were roughly right. What the taunt left out was God and His grace.
- Rage answered by prayer. Nehemiah argues nothing and offers no compromise. He turns to God: to despise His people is to despise Him.
- Rage outbuilt. Tobiah predicted a fox could flatten it. The record reads: we built the wall.
And Tobijah the Ammonite was by him, and he said, Even that which they build, if a fox went up, it would break down their stone wall. --
Tobiah stands at Sanballat's elbow as the wall of Jerusalem rises. He adds his own jab: a fox would flatten that stonework. Behind the joke lie two questions for anyone doing God's work. Why does the enemy reach for ridicule, and how do the builders answer it?
The sneer does not match the mood it came from. Read the verses before it, and the real feeling is anger; the contempt is a costume.
The language of both Sanballat and Tobiah did not match their feelings. It is in verse 1 that we find their real state of mind. Wrath and indignation filled their souls. They knew very well what the activity of the children of Israel meant. But when they spoke, they hid their anger behind pretended contempt.
The taunt also argues against itself. If the wall were that flimsy, why fight it at all?
At first the opposers try to cover their real feelings of rage. They pretend contempt for a feeble people and their puny efforts, which, they say, a fox would bring to nothing. If that were true, there would have been no need to trouble themselves further. They could very well leave the matter to the fox.
The insult works by an image. Picture a fox on the stonework, and you have Tobiah's estimate of the builders' work.
Tobiah joined in. "If a fox goes up on it he will break down their stone wall" was his biting taunt. A fox springs lightly. What sort of wall would it be if his spring broke it down? A dry stone dyke — no bonding, no strength — weakness itself.
Scorn is chosen because it lands where threats do not. It works on people who still care what the other side thinks of them.
The world's hostility begins with mockery, which frightens the timid more than hatred does. We all feel the influence of mockery easily if our hearts have not broken with former ties to the world. In that case we will fear ridicule and disdain. We will draw back from openly joining this humbled people, "these weak Jews", who claim to repair the breaches.
Measured by resources alone, the mockers had a case. Their mistake was in what they never entered into the sum.
Looking only at the outward circumstances, the enemy can with some show of truth call this little remnant "feeble." They can well ask whether this remnant will be allowed to go on — to sacrifice, to finish, to raise the stones again out of the heaps of rubbish. But in such questions they left out God and His grace, and talked folly about a fox.
Nehemiah does not answer Tobiah at all. He takes the insult straight to God, and the apostles later did the same.
What does Nehemiah say? At once he turns to the Lord — "Hear, O our God, for we are despised." So it was also in the early days of the church of God. The apostles were beaten and threatened, but what did they do? They spread it out before the Lord, and the Lord answered. He answers with His own power. The Spirit shakes the building where they are, and with great power He gave them to witness for Him.
Nehemiah had known disgrace before, but of an opposite kind. The same word covers two very different situations.
The enemy left God out; Nehemiah brings God in. He admits that the people are despised and under "reproach." When he was in Babylon he had admitted the same reproach. But how different the circumstances! Then they were in reproach because the wall lay in ruins. Now they are in reproach because they are building it. In the first case reproach was to their shame; now it is to their honour.
The taunt gets no argument in reply, only a record of what was done. Boast and outcome stand side by side — twice.
Tobiah says: "If a fox goes up on it he will break down their stone wall." But Nehemiah says, "we built the wall." The Jebusites said to David: "You will not come in here, but the blind and the lame will ward you off." But "David took the stronghold of Zion."
- Mask — The contempt in the taunt is a costume. Verse 1 shows the real feeling: rage. Mockery is only the first weapon reached for.
- Bluff — A wall a fox could flatten needs no enemy. The trouble they take gives their contempt away.
- Omission — Count the outward circumstances and the enemy's sum looks right. It leaves out God and His grace.
- Appeal — Nehemiah answers neither insult nor insulter. He tells God, "we are despised," as the apostles later spread threats before the Lord.
- Honour — Reproach for a ruined wall is shame; reproach for building it is honour. And the chapter's own verdict on the fox is short: "we built the wall."
Hear, our God, for we are despised, and turn their reproach upon their own head, and give them for a prey in a land of captivity!
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And cover not their iniquity, and let not their sin be blotted out from before thee; for they have provoked the builders.
Nehemiah's enemies have just mocked the builders as feeble and joked that a fox could knock their wall down. He does not answer them; he asks God to keep their sin on the record — and that prayer surprises many readers.
Under attack, Nehemiah does none of the four things we might expect from a leader.
He will not be drawn into any argument against them. He makes no appeal to them. He suggests no compromise with them. He does not go out to oppose them. He turns to God.
Why take the insults to God instead of answering them himself?
And it is always a blessing when we can take all the enemy's insults to God and leave them with Him. When our nature is stirred up and impatient, we are too quick to meet the enemy in our own strength. So we often rush into the fight only to meet defeat and disaster. But faith turns the eye upward and commits everything to the Lord... God's people are precious in His sight, and to despise them is to despise Him.
Nehemiah's prayer against his enemies shocks readers today. Two facts explain it.
A shallow reader may be surprised that anyone could pray such a prayer. Keep two things in mind. First, the order God had set for the people at that time. Second, the enemies of Israel were the enemies of God. Sanballat and Tobiah had set themselves against the work of the Spirit of God on purpose. And everyone may learn from this prayer what a solemn thing it is to persecute God's people and to hinder His work. Saul later had to learn it in another way.
God blots out sin on one condition, and these men had not met it.
Where there is true repentance before God, He blots sins out (Isa. 43:25). Israel will learn this at the end of their Great Tribulation. But these men knew nothing of repentance. Instead they provoked the Lord to anger by persecuting His servants. Nehemiah did not speak of how he himself felt about it, but of how they had provoked God to anger.
Commentators differ on the closing words. Many read them as Grant does: the enemies provoked God. Others point out that translators added the word "you".
They may despise the "feeble" Jews and the work as much as they like: Nehemiah turns to God. He calls for judgment here and now on earth, in keeping with the law. Yet it seems that the translations which supply "You" go beyond the inspired record. It was rather the builders they provoked. In fact the work was only spurred on.
Dennett takes the clause the other way, and makes it the ground of the whole prayer.
The ground on which Nehemiah presses his request is this: "They have provoked you to anger in the presence of the builders." The cause of these despised exiles was the cause of God.
Writers agree that a Christian cannot pray these words today. What lies behind them still holds.
We cannot ask God for a thing like this. Our cry in His presence is not and cannot be anything other than the plea of grace. But we know this for certain: God feels the world's hostility against the family of faith as an insult. "God considers it just to repay with affliction those who afflict you" (2 Thess. 1:6). And on the other hand, we know that the enemy's opposition cannot stop God's work from being finished.
Yet the outcome Nehemiah prayed for still comes about.
In this day of grace it is not for us to ask for judgment on those who oppose. And yet, in the government of God, we see it again and again: those who oppose the keeping up of the walls of separation fall into hopeless captivity to the religious world.
The next verse shows how God answered.
Verse 6 shows God's answer to this short prayer: "So we built the wall." Opposition did not stop the work. In fact, "the people had a mind to work." May we too be stirred to keep on in the work of the Lord, whatever the opposition. At such times God also gives special grace.
- Despised — Nehemiah's plea is that the builders are looked down on; to despise God's people is to despise Him.
- Deposited — he does not argue, appeal, or compromise; he leaves every insult with God and keeps building.
- Deserved — Israel's enemies were God's enemies, fighting the Spirit's work; the order God had set for Israel then allowed such a prayer.
- Denied — God blots out sin where there is repentance; these men brought none, so their sin stayed on the record.
- Delivered — grace, not judgment, is our prayer now; and God still answers as He did then: "So we built the wall."
But we built the wall; and all the wall was joined together to the half thereof; for the people had a mind to work.
Sanballat and Tobiah had just mocked the builders as feeble Jews with a wall a fox could knock down. Nehemiah answered by building until the wall stood at half its height, which raises two questions: why did the mockery fail, and what is a "mind to work"?
The enemy talked about what would fall; Nehemiah wrote down what rose. One commentator sets the two sentences side by side.
The opposition of the enemy cannot stop the work of God from being accomplished. All we need is faith that trusts God, and the Spirit who encourages our hearts for the work. Nehemiah adds: "So we built the wall. And all the wall was joined together to half its height, for the people had a mind to work" (v. 6). Whether it is a matter of defending Jerusalem or of conquering it, these principles stay the same. Tobiah says, "If a fox went up, it would break down their stone wall"; but Nehemiah says, "we built the wall."
Their scorn was not new, and it was not confidence.
Those who here sat in the seat of the scornful had already shown their hostility in Nehemiah 2:10, 19, and they were as persistent in evil as Nehemiah was in good. They were really afraid now, but tried to hide their fear behind ridicule and insolence... The work, in fact, was only stimulated.
The word behind "mind" is warmer than it sounds, and who had it matters as much as what it means.
Nehemiah was fully aware of the enemy's opposition, and in secret he met it by the power of prayer. In public the work went on, "for the people had a mind (literally, "a heart") to work." It was not simply that Nehemiah and a few earnest leaders had a mind to work, but "the people" had a mind to work. Their heart was in the work of maintaining what was due to God through the walls and gates. This unity of mind and energy of purpose gave sure evidence of a work of the Spirit of God.
Being of one mind is not always a good thing — a group can agree about the wrong thing.
This is a wonderful record. It testifies to the energy of the Spirit of God acting through Nehemiah upon the people, producing unity and perseverance. For when it says, "The people had a mind to work," it means that they had God's mind. Sometimes people see unity and boast in it, without any thought of whether it is according to the mind of God. To be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment (1 Cor. 1:10) guarantees the successful accomplishment of any service God calls His people to, when it is the result of divine power. The reason is that with His Spirit ungrieved He can work among them without hindrance.
Verse 6 follows straight on Nehemiah's prayer in verses 4 and 5. The order matters: the working came out of the praying.
Nehemiah's praying (as we shall see again) did not interfere with his own work or the people's. We could better say that his perseverance in his work sprang from his prayers... No ear but God's heard these prayers. Yet they are written down to teach us the secret of all true activity and of courage in the face of danger: real dependence on the Lord.
One writer turns this back on the reader.
Perhaps now and then we have a mind to work; but do we come together to pray about the work, as Nehemiah and his people did?... They prayed, they watched, and they worked with a mind. They were in downright earnest.
A mind to work shows up in hours and in ownership.
They laboured from sunrise until the stars came out (v. 21). Their hearts were in it. Their own comfort or time was a very minor matter to them; "the work of their God" was their first consideration. Nor did they labour by proxy — there were no shirkers. Every man had his own work to do, and did it, and more... There were those who built opposite their own houses. They were wise men. They did what was near at hand, did it with a will, and did not waste their energy and time telling others how and where they should build.
- Heart. The word translated "mind" is literally "heart." This was not grim duty. Their hearts were in maintaining what was due to God.
- All. It was not Nehemiah and a few leaders, but the people. That shared purpose was evidence of the Spirit of God at work.
- God's. Unity alone proves nothing. What mattered was that the people had God's mind, and that is what makes a shared work succeed.
- Prayer. The wall rose straight out of the prayer of verses 4–5. They prayed, they watched, and they worked; dependence was the secret of both the energy and the courage.
- Wall. Mockery only stimulated the work. Tobiah described a wall a fox could topple; Nehemiah recorded a wall joined together to half its height.
And it came to pass, when Sanballat, and Tobijah, and the Arabians, and the Ammonites, and the Ashdodites heard that the walls of Jerusalem were being repaired, that the breaches began to be stopped, then they were very wroth,
Progress, not failure, brings the crisis here. The moment the gaps in Jerusalem's walls start closing, enemies who share nothing else join forces. Why does success in God's work stir up such rage, and what can a small, tired people do about it?
The enemies react to a specific report — that the repairs were working. The wall was doing something the enemy could not allow:
What stirred up the enemy again to hinder the work? It was the report they had heard: "the repairing of the walls of Jerusalem was going forward and that the breaches were beginning to be closed." It was now clear that the returned exiles were in earnest. Under Nehemiah's leadership they were determined to shut out evil by building the wall and closing the gaps. This never suits Satan, whose desire is always to break down every distinction between the people of God and the world.
So why build a wall around a city whose temple already stood?
The house of the Lord had already been built, but it stood in a ruined place. Its walls were broken down and its gates burned with fire. The day had not come then, and has not come yet, when the Lord will be to her "a wall of fire all around" and "the glory in her midst" (Zechariah 2:5). So a wall was needed. The city had to be seen again as the place where God had set His name, and His house, as a picture, kept separate from the defilement of the world around it.
This is not the enemies' first move. One writer counts the forms their opposition has already taken:
Now, what will Sanballat and his company do? This brings us to the fifth form of opposition… We have had grief, laughter, wrath, mocking; now there is to be fighting — determined, uncompromising opposition to the work of God.
An alliance forms, and the temper behind it tells you whose work each side is doing:
Up to now the opposition had come from a few people. Now Arabians, Ammonites and Ashdodites unite with Sanballat and Tobiah to fight against Jerusalem. People with very different interests and views can join hands against a movement which is of God… The spirit in which the people carry on the work proves the movement is of God. In the same way, the spirit of the opposition proves it is a work of the enemy. Behind this joint attack there is anger and conspiracy. "The anger of man does not produce the righteousness of God" (James 1:20), and the Spirit of God will take no part in dishonest human schemes.
Nehemiah's answer has two parts, and the order matters:
A very serious time had come to the builders of the wall… "And we prayed to our God." It was prayer, dependence on God, first. The next thing they did was to guard against the enemy — they "set a guard as a protection against them day and night." But was prayer not enough? Why set a watch if they trusted the Lord? Not setting one would have been presumption on their part. Their action did not clash with their trust in God.
One writer calls these two the weapons God puts in His people's hands:
He depended on God, whom he knew to be his only strength and defence. At the same time he kept constant watch against the "roaring lion." These are the two invisible weapons God puts into the hands of His people when the enemy is near. They are enough to defeat his strongest attacks. So the Lord, looking ahead to Satan's advancing power against His disciples, said, "Watch and pray that you may not enter into temptation" (Matthew 26:41).
The conspiracy did not stop the building. One writer sees the same turn today:
Behind the scene are wicked spirits in the heavenly places. We need the whole armour of God, and "Our God will fight for us." The work at Jerusalem still went on. So it is now: the more opposition, the more it drives us to God, and the more the work goes on.
- Progress provokes. The rage starts when word spreads that the gaps are closing. Visible progress in God's work draws the sharpest attack.
- The gaps matter. Closing the gaps shut evil out. It kept God's people distinct from the world — the very line the enemy wants erased.
- Opposition escalates. Grief, laughter, anger, mockery — and now armed conspiracy. The methods harden as the wall rises.
- Enemies combine. Groups with nothing in common unite against a work of God. Their anger and secret plotting show whose work theirs is.
- The answer is two-fold. Prayer came first, then a guard day and night. Trust and watchfulness went together, and the attack only drove the builders to God, so the work went on.
and conspired all of them together to come to fight against Jerusalem, and to hinder it.
The wall stands at half its height, and word spreads that Jerusalem's gaps are closing. Sneers from a few men now harden into an armed alliance — so why does progress in God's work draw the fiercest attack?
The trigger was not failure but success. As the wall rose, the opposition changed both its size and its weapon.
Before there were only a few men, but now there are numbers. Satan found that Sanballat, Tobiah, and Geshem could not succeed by themselves. So he draws others to their help — the Arabians, the Ammonites, and the Ashdodites. These last are new allies. In fact he collects an army, since force is the weapon he is now about to try. But what stirred the enemy up again to try to stop the work? It was the report they had heard, that "the repairing of the walls of Jerusalem was going forward, and that the breaches were beginning to be closed." It was now clear that the people back from exile were in earnest.
This verse is not an isolated flare-up. It belongs to a sequence that runs through the whole book — one a reader can still recognise today.
The grief of the enemy (Neh. 2:10); the laughter of the enemy (Neh. 2:19); his wrath (Neh. 4:1); mocking (Neh. 4:3); fighting (Neh. 4:8); subtlety from outside (Neh. 5:1-9); subtlety and danger from within (Neh. 6:10). And many a reader of this tract will say, "I have seen all seven in the opposition to God's work in our own day."
Arabians, Ammonites and Ashdodites had no natural reason to act as one. A shared target united them, and the way they attacked exposes its source.
People with very different interests and views can join hands in opposing a movement which is of God. And this united movement emboldens the opposition to violent measures. It begins with sneers, grows into rage, and ends in violence... Those who end in taking violent measures usually begin by sneering at their fellow believers... For behind this joint attack there is anger and conspiracy. "The anger of man does not produce the righteousness of God" (James 1:20), and the Spirit of God will be no party to underhand human devices. So the worldly methods of the opposition often reveal its true character.
The plot had two halves: to come and fight, and to throw the work into disorder.
Mockery and ridicule had failed them. So they conspired to attack Jerusalem and spread confusion among the builders (v. 8). But the Jews knew of this determined conspiracy. They did not panic and think of attacking the enemy. They depended on God and stayed watchful against the enemy, and God protected them.
Some would ask whether posting guards showed a lack of trust. The answer given is that the two belong together.
"And we prayed to our God." It was prayer, dependence on God, first. The next thing they did was to guard against the enemy — they "set a guard as a protection against them day and night." But was prayer not enough? Why set a guard if they trusted the Lord? If they had not done this it would have been presumption on their part. Their action did not clash with their trust in God.
Nehemiah's own confidence rested on who God is, not on the size of the opposing army.
Confidence in God alone and dependence on Him, expressed in prayer, come first. He is the great resource. That conviction makes Nehemiah say a little later: "Do not be afraid of them. Remember the Lord, who is great and awesome" (v. 14). In verse 20 he adds: "Our God will fight for us." That is where our strength lies.
The work looked small and the helpers lost heart. What carried it through was steady perseverance.
This time called for perseverance. Such perseverance springs from a deep interest in the people of God, because they are His people. It pursues its object despite the contempt the work stirs up — work that looks so small, yet is still the work of God. It pursues it despite the hatred and opposition of enemies, and despite the faintheartedness of fellow workers (Neh. 4:8-11). Such perseverance gives itself wholly to the work. It defeats all the schemes of the enemy and avoids every trap, for God takes care of those who trust in Him.
- Progress provokes. The closing of the breaches, not the first stone, turned mockers into an army. Real progress in God's work draws real opposition.
- Opposition escalates. Grief, laughter, wrath, mocking, then fighting: verse 8 is stage five. The later stages turn to subtlety, from outside and from within.
- Enemies unite. Groups with nothing in common find one mind against a work of God. Their rage and conspiracy show whose work the opposition really is.
- The target is confusion. The plot aimed at the builders' nerve as much as their stones. A stopped work suits the enemy as well as a broken wall.
- The answer is prayer plus a watch. Prayer came first, as the real resource. The guard day and night was not distrust but plain wisdom. Perseverance in both defeated every scheme.
Then we prayed to our God, and set a watch against them day and night, because of them.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And Judah said, The strength of the bearers of burdens faileth, and there is much rubbish; so that we are not able to build at the wall.
This report comes not from the enemy's camp but from inside the work. The builders themselves — the people of Judah — say the wall cannot be finished. Their strength is gone and the rubble is deep. But do honest facts make an honest excuse?
Up to this point every hindrance had come from enemies outside. This complaint marks a change of front.
But it was not all bright. Decay began to show itself among the workers. Here is the beginning of internal weakness. Until now, what hindered success came from outside. Now faintheartedness appears among the workers.
The builders measure the job against their own resources and find them spent. One writer names the first of the two causes, points to who supplies a servant's strength, and shows what the complaint really was.
Two things caused Judah's despondency. First, "The strength of those who bear the burdens is failing." Judah had forgotten that the Lord was the strength of His people. If He places a burden of service on the shoulders of any of His people, He also gives the strength needed to carry it out... The truth was, the show of the enemy's power and the prospect of constant warfare had discouraged Judah's heart. He looked for something to justify his state of soul, and he found it in the condition of the burden-bearers and in the obstacles to his work.
Nothing Judah says is untrue. The bearers are worn out and the rubble is huge. The error lies in what they draw from those facts.
There are those who take a leading place among the people of God and yet would stop the building of the wall. The facts they bring forward may be true, but the conclusion they build on those facts is false. No one doubts the weakness of those who bear the burdens. It is also plain that there is much rubbish. But it does not follow that building the walls is impossible. People still argue in the same way today. They say "The people of God are so weak, the corruption of Christendom is so great, evil is so universal, that it is really impossible to maintain a strict separation according to the word of God. We must accept things as they are and do the best we can."
Nehemiah had prayed and set watchmen. The men who spoke here took no part in either, and where they looked explains their verdict.
How often, when the task is crushing and the enemy is strong, have we not seen this discouragement? Or felt it ourselves? The burden is too heavy and the rubbish is too great: we cannot build. Those who reasoned this way had no part in Nehemiah's prayer or in setting the watchmen. Instead of looking to God, they looked at themselves and the obstacles.
Clearing the heaps was part of the job, not a distraction from it. One writer sees the same pattern in later revivals.
Their work was one of revival — reviving the wall that separated the temple of God from the outside world. In His mercy God has granted various revivals in the history of the professing church. Every time there has been more or less "rubbish" that needed removing. Think of the terrible pile of worldly and moral rubbish that the church of Rome had heaped up in the thousand years and more before the revival we call the Reformation. Not all of that was cleared away then. The strength of the workers failed before the job was finished. We Christians always have to watch against this kind of rubbish piling up.
Another writer tells us where the rubble came from, and what answers to it today.
The rubbish was no doubt the remains of the wall that had been broken down. The strength of the workers was failing in the face of so huge a task of clearing it away. In Christian profession today there is much rubbish too, the rubbish of much false teaching. Removing it, so that people may be freed from weary confusion, is no easy task. Some are real burden bearers, but the work grows so heavy that it takes away their strength. We do need the exhortation, "let us not grow weary of doing good, for in due season we will reap, if we do not give up" (Gal. 6:9).
Nehemiah's answer was not a better argument. It was a call to remember.
There is much — very much — to discourage and hinder in the state of things around us. We can fairly apply the words of the men of Judah in Nehemiah's day to our own times: "The strength of those who bear the burdens is failing. There is too much rubble." But thank God, the remedy now is what it was then. It lies in one soul-stirring sentence: "Remember the Lord."
- Within — The first crack was not an enemy's sword but Judah's own voice. Until now the hindrance came from outside; now it showed up among the workers.
- Weakness — They forgot that the Lord is the strength of His people. He who lays on a burden of service also gives the strength to carry it.
- Wrong — The facts were true. The conclusion was not. Weakness and corruption are real; "therefore we cannot build" is false.
- Where — Those who spoke had no share in the prayer or the watch. They looked at themselves and the obstacles instead of at God.
- Watchword — Rubbish piles up in every age, and clearing it is real work. The cure is not strength we find in ourselves but two words: "Remember the Lord."
And our adversaries said, They shall not know, neither see, till we come into the midst of them and kill them, and put an end to the work.
The wall of Jerusalem is going up, and mockery has not stopped it. So its enemies plan something quieter — to come unseen, kill the builders, and end the work.
The threat is not a battle at the gates. The enemies plan to get inside, among the people themselves.
The remnant are also harassed by the fear of sudden, unexpected attacks by the enemy (verse 11). The adversaries say they will not be known or seen "till we come among them." This is a deliberate effort to gain a footing among the people of God in order "to kill them and stop the work." There is no shortage today of those who would slip in unnoticed to undermine the principle of separation that people are seeking to maintain.
The plot lands on people already worn down by their own complaints. One writer points to what the enemy was doing while they complained.
If Nehemiah had listened to these complaints, what would have become of Judah? For during this time the enemy took every advantage.
The enemies never strike. The threat does its work before anyone draws a sword. Verse 12 then adds more voices — Jews living near the enemy, repeating the warning.
Two other dangers appear in verses 11 and 12. The adversaries threatened a sudden attack to keep the builders in constant alarm. In this way they hoped to wear them out by the strain of continual fear, as they had partly done with Judah. There were also the Jews who "lived near them" — not people living in Jerusalem, but Jews scattered through the land close to their foes. They came and assured the builders again and again — "ten times" — that danger was really coming, and that their adversaries would certainly carry out their threats. As far as they could see, there was little or nothing to encourage them. Dangers of every kind hemmed them in, threatening both their work and their lives.
The enemies were not acting on their own. One writer names who stands behind them, then meets an obvious objection to what Nehemiah did.
Behind these enemies stood the same enemy of God, Satan, who always hinders the work of God. His work of opposition is the same in every age. "We prayed to our God." It was prayer, dependence on God, first. The next thing they did was to take precaution against the enemy — they "set a guard as a protection against them day and night." But was not prayer enough? Why set a watch if they trusted the Lord? If they had not done this, it would have been presumption on their part. Their action did not clash with their trust in God.
The answer to a hidden attack was open readiness. Nehemiah did not stop the building. He armed the men who were doing it.
Nehemiah positioned men with weapons behind the lower parts of the wall and at the open places. These were ready for conflict with swords, spears and bows (v. 13). May we be willing workers in the work of God, and at the same time prepared for spiritual conflict.
The boast of verse 11 depended on surprise. Verse 15 records what happened to it.
Nehemiah's watchful, energetic activity and his preparations for defence disheartened the foe. "Resist the devil, and he will flee from you" — even if only for a while. The enemy heard that their plans had become known to Nehemiah, and that God had in this way frustrated their counsel. They seem to have retreated for the moment, for the Jews were able to return, all of them, to the wall — every one to his work. So God answered the faith of His devoted servant and defeated the adversary's plans.
- Plot. The enemies aimed to come unseen and gain a footing among God's people. They wanted both the builders and the building.
- Pressure. The enemy used fear to wear the people down, and it landed on builders already worn down by their own complaints.
- Prayer. Nehemiah prayed first, then set a watch day and night. To pray and skip the watch would have been presumption, not trust.
- Posture. The builders worked with weapons at hand — willing workers who were ready for conflict.
- Powerless. The plan depended on secrecy. Once God had brought it to nothing, every man went back to his own work on the wall.
And it came to pass that when the Jews that dwelt by them came and told us so ten times, from all the places whence they returned to us,
Jerusalem's wall is half built. The builders have already met mockery and threats of ambush. Now a stream of alarming messages reaches them from their own countrymen. This verse raises a sharp question: what do you do when discouragement comes not from the enemy outside, but from your own people who live close to him?
These were not people from the city. They lived scattered around the land, close to the men plotting the attack. Ten times they arrived with the same message, urging the builders to come back to them and warning that the threat was real. An older translation reads their words simply as a repeated report of danger, and that is how the writers below take it.
The Jews who "lived near them" were not people living in Jerusalem. They were scattered through the land near their enemies. They came and assured the builders over and over, "ten times," that danger was really coming, and that their adversaries would certainly carry out their threats. Judging by what they could see, there was little, if anything, to encourage them. Dangers of every kind were closing in, threatening both the continuing of their work and even their own lives.
The repetition is the weapon here. Notice who repeats it. Not the enemy, but people on the same side, who may believe a warning is a kindness.
Third, there is the attempt to wear down those doing the work by repeating unsettling rumours over and over (v. 12). Some people live near the enemy and seem to know all he is doing. The reports they bring from time to time tend to distract the builders. They are not enemies. They are Jews who bring these reports. Perhaps they have no wish to oppose the work. They may even think they are helping by giving warnings in good time. Still, they are doing the enemies' work.
Commentators differ on how kindly to read these men. Another writer is harder on them, and points to where safety lay:
It is sad that Jews were not ashamed to share the enemy's secrets and to report their plans to the faithful again and again. They were busy only with discouraging them, if they could, with their tales and fears. But a quiet look to God lifts a person above all fear of man.
A warning that offers no way out leaves people worse off than before. The blow falls hardest on those who are already weak.
No doubt these Jews had no bad intentions. But their link with the adversaries was not what would strengthen the heart of the people. In days of trouble, how many times have we heard warnings like these? Someone has a grudge against us. The enemy is powerful. Be on your guard. If you keep going, you will provoke a full attack. Notice that those who gave the advice had no cure to offer. So they only increased the distress of those who were weak.
The same reports land in a different way on a man who already knows his path. What drained the weak fed Nehemiah, and the people around him changed with him.
But the man of God is already sure of the path to follow. He draws fresh courage from their warnings and strengthens himself. Thanks to the energy he finds in communion with his God, the scene changes. People who had been only labourers up to this point become soldiers, ready to drive off the enemy.
Nehemiah did not ignore the reports, and he did not freeze under them. He acted, and the next verses show what he did.
Nehemiah had Jewish informers who lived near these adversaries. They warned Nehemiah ten times that these enemies meant to attack them, despite all their precautions (v. 12). So Nehemiah positioned armed men behind the lower parts of the wall and at the openings. They stood ready for battle with swords, spears and bows (v. 13). May we be willing labourers in the work of God, and ready for spiritual conflict at the same time.
Placement mattered as much as weapons, and one writer draws the principle out:
These were both properly ordered and fully armed; for when Satan is in question we are powerless unless we are in the right place and equipped with divine weapons.
- Proximity. The discouraging word came from Jews living near the enemy. They were close enough to know all his plans.
- Repetition. "Ten times" shows the method. The same unsettling rumour came again and again, wearing down the builders' nerve.
- Intention. They were not enemies, and may have thought they were helping. Yet they were doing the enemies' work.
- Emptiness. Their advice named the danger but offered no cure. It only deepened the distress of the weak.
- Reversal. The same warnings that drained the weak strengthened Nehemiah. He armed the people at the weak points, and labourers became soldiers.
I set in the lower places behind the wall in exposed places, I even set the people, according to their families, with their swords, their spears and their bows.
Nehemiah's enemies were planning a surprise attack, and his own builders were saying the work was too much for them. He did not stop building. He armed the workers and posted them where the wall lay open. The verse shows how Nehemiah defended the work while it went on.
Trouble came from two sides at once: attack outside, discouragement inside. One writer traces how Nehemiah met both without arguing with either.
There was also discouragement among them. The apostle Paul wrote of himself, "For even when we came into Macedonia, our bodies had no rest, but we were afflicted at every turn—fighting without and fear within" (2 Cor. 7:5). The same was true of them. They became timid and fainthearted... But Nehemiah made no answer to the complaint "we are not able to build the wall." The best remedy was to keep right on praying, working and watching... Then Nehemiah acted in the energy of faith. He knew God was on their side and that He would fight for them. He prepared the people for the coming conflict and armed them with swords, spears and bows.
Nehemiah did two things at once: he stationed his people, and he armed them. One writer reads that pairing as a pattern for spiritual conflict.
First, he arranged the defence. He set "the people by their families, with their swords, their spears, and their bows, in the lower places behind the wall, and on the higher places." Both groups were properly stationed and fully armed. When Satan is the enemy, we are powerless unless we are in the right place and carrying divine weapons (compare Eph. 6:10-17).
(Older translations read "the higher places" where the ESV has "in open places.")
Nehemiah posted his people where the wall lay open. One writer reads those two kinds of open ground as two ways the enemy gets into a church.
First he arms the people for the conflict and sets them in the exposed places (13). The walls had "lower places" and "higher places" that were especially open to attack. The devil does not care how he gets a footing among the people of God, whether by a 'low' walk or a 'high' pretension. May we not say the wall was low in the assembly at Corinth, where the world was getting in through sensual sin? At Colosse the assembly was in danger of letting in religious flesh by lofty pretensions. May we not say the danger there was "in the higher places"?
The list of weapons is not decoration. Each one covers a different range of fighting, and together they leave no gap.
At the first moment, when the attack is close, all take up arms without distinction. "I even set the people, according to their families, with their swords, their spears, and their bows" (v. 13), says Nehemiah. So everything was foreseen: the sword for hand to hand combat, the spear to keep the enemy at a distance, and the bow to strike at a distance. For us, the word of God contains all these weapons at once. Their purpose is to "fight for [our] brothers, [our] sons, [our] daughters, [our] wives, and [our] homes" (v. 14).
Weapons on a wall can quietly become a substitute for trust. The next verse cuts that off and names what the people were to rely on.
To meet either form of evil we need to put on the whole armour of God. But in Nehemiah's day the people were not to put their confidence only in their weapons. The word was "Remember the Lord, who is great and awesome" (14), and in that way they would be free from all fear.
Nehemiah's precautions had an effect on the other side. The enemy pulled back — and Nehemiah refused to treat that as the end.
Nehemiah's watchfulness, energy and preparation for defence disheartened the enemy. "Resist the devil, and he will flee from you," if only "for a season." The enemy heard that Nehemiah knew their plans, and that God had frustrated their counsel. They seem to have retreated for the moment... In this way God answered the faith of His devoted servant by defeating the enemy's plans. But Nehemiah was not ignorant of Satan's devices, and did not for a minute believe the danger was over.
- Act, don't argue. Fear inside, threats outside — and Nehemiah gave no reply to "we are not able." He kept praying, working and watching, and he armed the people.
- Place, then arm. Weapons alone are not enough. Nehemiah also stationed his people, for against Satan we are powerless unless we stand in the right place with divine weapons.
- Guard both walls. The low and high places were the open spots. The devil does not care which door he uses: a loose walk or a lofty pretension.
- Every range covered. Sword for close combat, spear to hold the enemy off, bow to strike far away — and for us the word of God holds all three at once.
- Remember the Lord. The weapons were real, but confidence was not to rest in them. What drove out fear was remembering the Lord, great and awesome.
And I looked, and rose up, and said to the nobles, and to the rulers, and to the rest of the people, Be not afraid of them remember the Lord who is great and terrible, and fight for your brethren, your sons and your daughters, your wives and your houses.
Enemies were plotting a surprise attack on Nehemiah's builders, and the builders themselves had started saying the job was beyond them. Under that double pressure — threat outside, fear inside — Nehemiah gives them one sentence: stop looking at the enemy, remember the Lord, and fight for the people you love.
This word came at the low point of the project, when the tribe that should have led was the first to lose heart. Nehemiah's reply was not an argument but a rallying cry.
There was also discouragement among them... Judah — the royal tribe, whose emblem was the lion — showed discouragement and was ready to give up in despair. But Nehemiah made no answer to the complaint "we are not able to build the wall." The best remedy was to keep right on praying, working and watching... All was at stake. No mercy could be expected from the wicked adversaries. It was a blessed battle-cry he gave to them: "Remember the Lord." If He is remembered and kept before the heart, defeat is impossible.
Nehemiah deals with fear first. One writer shows what fear signals — and the cure Nehemiah hands them with it.
How often Scripture has to tell God's people not to be afraid shows how easily we give way to fear in the conflicts we are called to fight. It is both the first symptom of a lack of confidence in God, and the sure forerunner of defeat if fear keeps its grip on our souls. Nehemiah told them not to fear, and he also gave them the antidote: "Remember the Lord, who is great and awesome." He knew that once they grasped the character and presence of God, brought Him in by faith, and measured the enemy against what He is, they would be filled with courage and able to say, "If God is for us, who can be against us?"
The people had swords, spears and bows. Still, the verse points them past their weapons to the Lord Himself. (Older translations read "great and terrible" where newer ones have "great and awesome.")
In Nehemiah's day the people's confidence was not to rest only in their weapons of defence. The word was "Remember the Lord who is great and awesome," and this is how they would be delivered from all fear. In the same spirit the Apostle introduces his exhortation about the armour by saying, "My brothers, be strong in the Lord and in the strength of His might."
The verse before names three weapons. Each one met the enemy at a different distance.
Everything was foreseen: the sword for hand-to-hand combat, the spear to keep the enemy at a distance, and the bow to strike far off. For us, the word of God contains all these weapons at once, and their purpose is to "fight for your brothers, your sons, your daughters, your wives, and your homes."
The verse ends with a list of people. Each man defended his own family — and those who would come after them.
In defending themselves they were fighting for their brothers and for those who would come after them. In all our conflicts against evil and for the maintenance of the truth, we do well to keep three things before us. First, to remember the Lord — all that He is and all that is due to Him. Second, to remember our brothers — that in holding fast the truth, often in a local conflict, we are fighting for all our brothers. Third, we are helping to keep the truth intact for those who may follow us — our sons and our daughters.
They prepared for a fight that never came. Being ready was itself the victory.
Nehemiah had spoken plainly: "Do not be afraid of them" (v. 14). Having the Lord with them, though they were prepared to fight, they were not required to. Believers today may well experience the same thing. If they study Scripture and stay on guard against the enemy's schemes, Satan will be afraid to attack. He would find himself facing the Lord rather than a weak believer.
- Remember first. Before weapons and before strategy comes one command: remember the Lord. Keep Him before the heart and defeat is impossible.
- Fear exposed. Fear is the first symptom of lost confidence in God. Let it stay, and defeat follows. So Nehemiah deals with fear first.
- Armed, not self-reliant. They carried sword, spear and bow, but their confidence was not to rest in the weapons. The same order comes later: be strong in the Lord, then put on the armour.
- Fighting for others. The battle is never private. Remember the Lord. Remember your brothers. Remember the sons and daughters who will inherit what you hold.
- Ready, therefore spared. They prepared to fight and never had to. An enemy who finds the Lord where he expected a weak believer will not attack.
And it came to pass that when our enemies heard that it was known to us, and that God had defeated their counsel, we returned all of us to the wall, every one to his work.
Nehemiah's people were rebuilding the wall while their enemies planned a surprise attack. This verse is the turning point: the plot came to light, God broke it, and every worker went back to his own task.
The enemy's scheme depended on secrecy. Once the Jews knew of it, the attack never came. One writer sees God answering His servant's faith, and warns that a retreating enemy is not a beaten one.
The enemy heard that Nehemiah knew their plans, and that God had frustrated their counsel. They seem to have retreated for a time. We can see this, because all the Jews were able to return to the wall — every one to his work. In this way God responded to the faith of His devoted servant by baffling the adversary's designs. But Nehemiah was not ignorant of Satan's devices, and did not for a minute believe the danger was over.
They armed, and then never had to strike a blow. One writer draws from this a lesson about staying alert to how the enemy works.
Having the Lord with them, though being prepared to fight, they were not required to do so. Believers today may well experience the same thing. Suppose study of scripture has made them ready to watch against the enemy's subtle ways. Then Satan will be afraid to attack. He would find himself facing the Lord, not a weak believer. Satan wants to catch us off guard, with our confidence not firmly in the Lord. Otherwise he knows he can do no damage. When the adversaries found that the Jews knew of their plotting, they could do nothing (v. 15). If we are ignorant of Satan's devices, he will take advantage of us. If we guard against them properly, the Lord will protect us (2 Cor. 2:11).
What effect did these words of Nehemiah have?… A blessed effect! When they felt their own weakness, their hearts turned to the Lord, and so they were strengthened to go on. They counted on the great and awesome God. He brought the work and plan of the mockers to nothing, and He set the fainthearted burden-bearer eagerly back to work.
Another writer draws out what the people were fighting for, and how that shapes conflict now:
In all our conflicts against evil, and for maintaining the truth, we do well to keep three things before us. 1st. Remember the Lord — all that He is and all that is due to Him. 2nd. Remember our brothers and sisters. When we maintain the truth, often in a local conflict, we are fighting for all of them. 3rd. We are helping to maintain the truth for those who may follow us — our sons and our daughters.
No one was left out, and no one did everything. The work was shared out, one task each.
Every one had his appointed work. Some worked at the actual building, some in conflict against the enemy. Some "built on the wall," some "carried burdens," some "loaded" the burdens. And one sounded the trumpet to warn of danger. Every one had his appointed work but all contributed to one end — to build the wall and set up the gates.
Finding your own place, then, is not a small thing:
Here we see again how happy the people of God are when they see the special place they are qualified for, and fill it for the Lord. It is the forgetfulness of this truth that has in every age produced confusion in the church.
Going back to the wall did not mean putting the weapons down. And no one may hand that duty to someone else.
But those who assist in the work, and even those who are fully given to it, must never slacken in their vigilance. If they cannot hold their weapon in one hand, let them strap their sword by their side. No child of God should leave entirely to others the care of using the Word, that two-edged sword.
- Known — the plot fell apart as soon as the Jews knew of it. Ignorance of his devices is what gives the enemy his advantage.
- Frustrated — God, not greater strength, brought the plan to nothing. He answered the faith of His devoted servant.
- Remembered — the work did not get easier. The fainthearted took heart by remembering the Lord, and by fighting for their families and for those who would follow.
- Returned — all of them went back, each to his own appointed task. All served one end: the wall and its gates.
- Armed — back at work, they kept the sword on. Every believer is to keep the Word to hand, not leave it to others.
And from that time forth the half of my servants wrought in the work, and the other half of them held the spears, and the shields, and the bows, and the corslets; and the captains were behind all the house of Judah.
The wall was going up under threat, and Nehemiah had just uncovered the enemy's plot to attack. His answer was to build and watch at once — half his men worked, half stood armed, and the leaders took post behind the people.
The enemy had backed off, and the workers had gone back to the wall. Nehemiah refused to treat that retreat as the end of the danger, and he posted his leaders to encourage the people to resist.
The enemy heard that Nehemiah knew their plans, and that God had frustrated their counsel. They seem to have retreated for the moment. So the Jews were all able to return to the wall — every one to his work. In this way God responded to the faith of His devoted servant by baffling the adversary's designs. But Nehemiah was not ignorant of Satan's devices, and did not for a minute believe the danger was over… Then he placed the rulers behind all the house of Judah — clearly to encourage them to resist if the enemy attacked.
The last item in the list of arms is the least familiar. Older translations call it a "habergeon"; the ESV has "coats of mail."
In 2 Chronicles 26:14 and Nehemiah 4:16 this word is translated 'habergeon'. That word also means 'coat of mail'. It was made of brass scales fastened together.
Commentators see the split in Nehemiah's household as a picture of different callings among God's people.
There were some wholly devoted to the work. Others gave all their attention to the weapons of war. So it is in the church of God. The Lord calls some of His servants to build others up, and He fits them for it… He calls others to conflict. They are quick to spot the enemy's attacks on the truth of God… It is a happy thing for God's people when they see the place God has qualified them for, and fill it for the Lord. Forgetting this truth has produced confusion in the church in every age.
The men who built with a weapon in reach became a standing image for Christian life. One writer sets the scene beside Jude's letter.
At the start of his letter Jude urges us to contend for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints. At the end he urges us to build ourselves up in our most holy faith. He would have us, in a word, like Nehemiah's builders, with the sword in one hand and the trowel in the other. The reason lies in the character of the times… It was no time for peace, then, when the foundations were under attack… Notice that the sword is for defence rather than attack. But we must not shrink from conflict when the faith once delivered to the saints is at stake.
The arrangement also guards against a real danger: letting the fight swallow the building.
When controversies arise through Satan's attacks on the truth, there is a danger of forgetting the need of souls. We stop building. We grow so taken up with the enemy that we overlook something needful: steady, persistent ministry of Christ to sustain and nourish souls, so that they can repel the enemy's assaults.
Half the men carried the weapons. But that did not excuse the rest.
Offensive and defensive weapons are entrusted to certain of our brothers. But those who help in the work, and even those who give themselves fully to it, must never slacken in their vigilance. If they cannot hold their weapon in one hand, let them gird their sword by their side. No child of God should leave entirely to others the care of using the Word, that two-edged sword.
Rossier even imagines the argument the enemy would have used against a man who worked with a sword on his hip:
Give your swords to others, more qualified than you for combat. Take care of your work: don't attempt to do two things at once… No, the worker replies, everything will not be fine if I allow your words to lull me to sleep. It is an invaluable privilege to let the Lord act, but am I not responsible to fight for Him?
The weapons were real. But they were not where the people's confidence rested.
In Nehemiah's day the people were not to put their confidence only in their weapons of defence. The word was "Remember the Lord, who is great and awesome," and that would free them from all fear.
- Watch. A retreating enemy is not a beaten one. Nehemiah armed his men just when the threat seemed to lift.
- Divide. Half built, half stood guard. Some servants are gifted to build up souls, others to spot and answer attack. Each fills the place God fitted him for.
- Combine. Sword and trowel belong in the same hands. Fighting that stops the building does the enemy's work for him.
- Everyone. Specialists bore the spears, but every builder wore a sword. No believer leaves the use of God's Word to others.
- Remember. The armour was never the confidence. "Remember the Lord" was what drove out fear.
They that built on the wall, and they that bore burdens, with those that loaded, wrought in the work with one hand, and with the other they held a weapon.
The wall of Jerusalem is going up while enemies wait for a chance to attack. Nehemiah's answer is not to choose between building and defending, and not to leave the fighting to a trained few.
Did every man really lay stones one-handed for months on end? One writer reads the next verse as the explanation.
The text says that both the builders and the burden bearers worked with one hand and carried a weapon in the other (v. 17). Verse 18 may explain this further. The sword was not always held in the hand. It was strapped at the worker's side, where he could reach it quickly if he needed it.
One writer reads the verse as naming three groups: the builders, those who carried loads, and those who loaded them. He sees in that division a picture of how God's people share the work.
The builders, the burden-bearers, and those who loaded are also named apart. (v. 17.) Each had his appointed work, and all of it served the same end. God's people are happy when they see the special place they are fitted for, and fill it for the Lord. Forgetting this truth has produced confusion in the church in every age. If we are burden-bearers, let us not try to be builders; and if builders, let us get on with our building. The Lord, not the servant, appoints the work and fits us for it.
Different jobs, yes — but one description covers them all. One writer takes that as a reading of the times, and finds the same pattern in the letter of Jude.
But whether builders, burden-bearers, or "those who loaded," one feature marked them all alike — "each labored on the work with one hand and held his weapon with the other." That alone shows what the times were like. They were dangerous times, when Satan's power showed itself more and more against the people of God. They were like the days when Jude wrote his letter; for we find the same two things in him — the sword and the trowel. He had to contend earnestly for the faith once delivered to the saints, and he also urged his readers to build themselves up on their most holy faith.
The same writer sees the risk running the other way too. Conflict can swallow a person whole, and the building stops.
When controversies arise through Satan's attacks on the truth, there is a danger. We forget the need of souls. We stop building. We get so taken up with the enemy that we overlook the steady, persistent ministry of Christ that sustains and nourishes souls. The weapons must be ready; but our work is to go on with the wall.
Some are better fitted for defence than others. Does that let the rest leave the fighting to them?
Those who help in the work, and even those who give themselves fully to it, must never let their watchfulness slip. If they cannot hold a weapon in one hand, let them strap the sword at their side. No child of God should leave the use of the Word, that two-edged sword, entirely to others. Some may be more qualified than others to apply it at any given moment... but we must all bear it in every circumstance.
The same writer imagines what the enemy would say to a worker who straps on a sword.
Give your swords to others, who are better fitted for fighting than you. Look after your own work: don't try to do two things at once... No, the worker replies, everything will not be fine if I let your words lull me to sleep. It is a priceless privilege to let the Lord act, but am I not responsible to fight for Him? To say "the Lord will step in," while I myself drop the sword of the Spirit, watchfulness, prayer, and perseverance, is to run after certain defeat.
The pattern did not stop with Nehemiah's wall.
True servants of God have always had to spend a large part of their time and energy defending the truth. From the beginning the apostles had to preach the gospel and teach the truth. They also had to spend much time defending it from the enemy's attacks... The truth is worth contending for. If we lose it, we lose almost everything. So let each of us make sure that, in a spiritual sense, we have a sword in one hand and a trowel in the other, to do the Lord's work.
- Two hands. Every worker carried both. The tool was in one hand, and the weapon in the other or strapped at his side.
- Two roles. Loads, loading, building — each had his own appointed work, and all of it went into the same wall. Forgetting this has caused confusion in every age.
- Two dangers. Build without watching, and you stand defenceless. Fight without building, and souls go unfed.
- No exemptions. Some are better armed than others, but no child of God may leave the use of the Word entirely to specialists.
- No end date. From the apostles until now, God's servants have had to defend the truth. Lose it, and you lose almost everything.
And the builders had every one his sword girded by his side, and built. And he that sounded the trumpet was by me.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And I said to the nobles, and to the rulers, and to the rest of the people, The work is great and extended, and we are scattered upon the wall, one far from another
Nehemiah pauses the building to speak to the nobles, the officials and the rest of the people. The job is huge, and the builders are spread thin along the wall, far apart. He says this to explain what comes next: a leader, a trumpeter, and one place to run to.
The builders were far apart because the job was big, not because they were divided. One writer marks the difference between workers who are scattered and workers who are disconnected:
Along with the sword and the trowel there was the trumpet, to be blown when an alarm was needed. The work was great and large, so the workers were spread far apart from one another. Yet they were one in the work, not many disconnected people. So what endangered one endangered all, and their unity in the work had to be preserved.
A gap in the line is exactly what an enemy wants. The answer is a place where the workers gather:
To be effective, the work must be a combined effort. When the enemy appears, believers must not be scattered. If they put up no combined resistance at the point of attack, they are sure to give way. The enemy takes advantage of God's children when they are scattered. Their gathering together is what he is most against, because he knows that it multiplies their strength. So when he attacks them, his first concern is to sow discord and division among them… Let us not say: My work is enough for me. No, our Head says, it is not enough, for if the enemy finds you isolated, he will destroy both you and your work.
Nehemiah did not leave the trumpeter out on the wall somewhere. He kept him at his own side, so the signal always came from one place. One writer notes who was allowed to blow it, and who the leader pictures:
Beside Nehemiah was one who sounded the trumpet. It was priests who did this service (Num. 10:8). If warfare threatened, they were to sound an alarm (Num. 10:9). In this case it would be Nehemiah who gave orders to the trumpeter, for Nehemiah is a type of Christ, the Leader.
The whole workforce would drop everything at that sound. So it mattered who blew it, and when:
Only the priests were to blow the trumpets — only those who stayed near enough to understand the Lord's mind and to be in communion with it. So here, the man who sounded the trumpet was to stay with Nehemiah, and to sound it only at his master's bidding. Nehemiah had to discern the moment to sound. The trumpeter had to catch the first hint of Nehemiah's mind and will. It is the same now. Only those who live in the enjoyment of their priestly privileges, near to the mind of Christ and in communion with it, know how to sound an alarm. If they blew at their own will, or on their own idea of danger, they would only cause confusion. They would call the builders away from their work, and so do the work of the enemy.
Nehemiah spoke to nobles, officials and workmen alike, and gave them all one order to obey. That obedience would sometimes cost them the work they preferred:
For the moment they had to stop their work, gather around the Lord, and make common cause against the enemy. If the trumpet sounded, it would be unfaithfulness to keep on building. The Lord's mind for them at that moment would be defence and conflict, not building. Some of the builders, as often happens, might feel it was far happier work to build than to fight. But the only question for them would be: Has the trumpet sounded? If it had, they were to obey the call… In all these arrangements one mind governs all. Nehemiah commands, and the part of the people — whether rulers, nobles, or the rest — was simply obedience.
- Great — the size of the task is what spreads the workers out. Distance on the wall is a cost of the work, not a fault in it.
- Separated — distance is the enemy's opening. He takes advantage of scattered people, and his first move is to sow discord among them.
- One — workers far apart are still one in the work, so what endangers one endangers all. "my work is enough for me" is the sentence that loses both the worker and his work.
- Gather — the answer to distance is one rallying point. The trumpeter stays beside the leader, so the call always comes from one mind.
- Obey — when the trumpet sounds, the only question is whether it sounded. Building gives way to defence, even for those who love building more than fighting.
in what place ye hear the sound of the trumpet, thither shall ye assemble to us; our God will fight for us.
The wall was long, the builders were spread thin, and enemies were watching for an isolated group to pick off. Nehemiah answered with one signal and one promise. One sound would bring everyone to the same place, and God Himself would do the fighting.
One writer reads the call to gather as the answer to the enemy's favourite move: keeping believers apart.
The work must be done together to be effective. When the enemy appears, believers must not be scattered. If they do not resist together at the point of attack, they are sure to lose. The enemy takes advantage of God's children when they are scattered. Their gathering together is what he opposes most, because he knows it multiplies their strength. So when he attacks them, his first aim is to sow discord and division among them… We have a centre of gathering. Let us gather around our Head. The trumpet has already sounded loud enough for everyone to hear. Let us hurry. Let us not say: My own work is enough for me. No, our Head says, it is not enough, for if the enemy finds you isolated, he will destroy both you and your work.
This trumpet is not just any noise. The law already settled what it was for and who could blow it.
Numbers 10 shows what the holy trumpets were for. They were used "for summoning the congregation and for breaking camp." In times of war they were also to blow an alarm. That alarm did two things: it gathered the people, and it came up before God and called Him in, so that He would save them from their enemies. And the command was that only the priests should blow the trumpets — only those who, being near Him, understood the Lord's mind and were in close fellowship with Him… If they blew whenever they liked, or because they themselves felt danger, they would only cause confusion. They would call the builders away from their work, and so do the enemy's work for him.
The trumpeter did not stand alone. He stood beside Nehemiah, so the sound marked where the leader was.
Beside Nehemiah was one who sounded the trumpet. It was priests who did this service (Numbers 10:8). If warfare threatened, they were to sound an alarm (Numbers 10:9). In this case it would be Nehemiah who gave orders to the trumpeter, for Nehemiah is a picture of Christ, the Leader.
Answering the call meant leaving the wall unfinished for a while. That is hard for anyone who would rather build than fight.
For the moment they had to stop work and gather around the Lord, making common cause against the enemy. If the trumpet sounded, staying at their work would have been unfaithful. At that moment the Lord's mind for them was defence and conflict, not building. Some of the builders, as often happens, might feel that building was much happier work than fighting. But the only question for them was this: had the trumpet sounded? If it had, they were to obey the call.
The verse ends with a promise. It rests on what God had said about the alarm, and it works on two audiences at once.
If God called the people together to defend His cause, He would surely rescue them from the power of the enemy. What courage that promise should give us! If by His grace we stand with God against the enemy, we can count on His help. "Our God will fight for us" is a battle-cry. It encourages His servants and strikes dread into the heart of the enemy at the same time.
Trust in God does not end the believer's own fight. One writer puts the question to himself.
It is a priceless privilege to let the Lord act. But am I not responsible to fight for Him? To say "the Lord will step in" while I myself give up the sword of the Spirit, watchfulness, prayer and perseverance is to run toward certain defeat.
- Scattered. A long wall spreads workers thin. A lone worker is the enemy's easiest target, so he starts with division.
- Sounded. Only those close enough to the Lord to know His mind may sound the alarm. Blowing it out of personal fear just empties the wall and helps the enemy.
- Summoned. Wherever the trumpet sounds, everyone rallies to the leader, even if that means dropping work they enjoyed more than fighting.
- Supported. "Our God will fight for us" is a battle-cry. It steadies His servants and unsettles the enemy at the same moment.
- Sword still on. Counting on God while you drop watchfulness, prayer and perseverance is not faith. It is a run toward defeat.
And we laboured in the work; and half of them held the spears from the rising of the dawn till the stars appeared.
Nehemiah's workers are rebuilding Jerusalem's wall while enemies plan to attack. Verse 21 sums up their day: they worked from first light until the stars came out, and half the men held spears the whole time.
The verse opens with a small word: "so." It is easy to skip, but it tells us how these men worked.
"So" means "in this manner." Nehemiah says, "So we labored at the work, and half of them held the spears from the break of dawn until the stars came out." (v. 21.) They were always on the alert, ready for the enemy, and tireless in their service. They worked while it was day, from early morning till late at night.
Long hours like these do not come from rules. They come from what these workers wanted most.
The people had a mind to work, we are told (chap. 4:6), and they laboured from sunrise until the stars appeared (v. 21). Their hearts were in it. Their own ease or time mattered very little to them. "The work of their God" was their first consideration. Nor did they work by proxy; there were no shirkers. Every man had his own work to do and did it, and more.
The enemy's threats did not shorten the working day. One writer finds the same logic in Paul.
So the opposition did not succeed in hindering the work of God. The labourers continued their work from the break of day until the stars appeared at night (v. 21). This reminds us of Paul's words in 1 Corinthians 16:9, "For a wide door for effective work has opened to me, and there are many adversaries." He does not say, "but there are many adversaries," as though that might excuse him from going on with the work. He simply says "and there are many adversaries." So it was all the more important to have his whole heart in the service of God.
Half the men held spears while the others built. So what does each believer owe to the work?
Those who carried burdens and those who loaded them worked with one hand and held a weapon in the other. Each of the builders had his sword strapped at his side. All these details carry instruction for us. Every one has a duty to defend the work of God in certain pressing dangers. At other times, a purely defensive attitude may slow the work down. At such times offensive and defensive weapons are entrusted to certain of our fellow-believers. But those who help in the work, and even those who are fully given to it, must never slacken in their watchfulness. If they cannot hold their weapon in one hand, let them strap their sword to their side. No child of God should leave entirely to others the care of using the Word, that two-edged sword.
The spears were there so the wall could go up. One writer warns that the fighting can swallow the building.
Nehemiah's builders teach us God's way of being ready for the enemy's attacks. We hold our defensive weapons in one hand, or wear our swords at our side, and we stay busy building. When controversies arise through Satan's attacks on the truth, the danger is that we forget the need of souls. We stop building. We become so taken up with the enemy that we overlook the constant need to minister Christ to sustain and nourish souls, and so enable them to repel the enemy's assaults.
Guard duty and stone-laying looked nothing alike. Both counted as work on the same wall.
Every one had his appointed work. Some worked at the actual building, some in conflict against the enemy. Some "built on the wall," some "carried burdens," some "loaded" the burdens, and one sounded the trumpet to warn of danger. Every one had his appointed work, but all contributed to one end — to build the wall and set up the gates.
The verse ends at nightfall, but the next order shows the day did not simply stop.
Nehemiah also gave orders that the workers and servants were to stay at night inside the walls of Jerusalem. So they served as guards by night as well as working by day (v. 22). This concentrated effort on the work of the Lord continued until the wall was built. What an example for believers today! They might take to heart the appeal of 1 Corinthians 15:58: "Therefore, my beloved brothers, be steadfast, immovable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, knowing that in the Lord your labor is not in vain."
- Mind — The long day started in the heart. They had a mind to work, and their own ease and time counted for little next to the work of their God.
- Manner — "So we labored" describes a method, not just effort. They stayed alert and ready, from first light to the first stars.
- Many adversaries — Enemies were a reason to work harder, not a permission to stop. Paul said "and there are many adversaries," not "but."
- Mixed tasks — Spear-holders, builders, burden-carriers, the trumpeter. Each had his own appointed work, and one wall went up.
- Midnight too — The workers slept inside the city. The day's building ran straight into the night's guard duty, and it held until the wall was built.
Likewise at the same time I said to the people, Let every one with his servant lodge within Jerusalem, that in the night they may be a guard to us, and [be for] labour in the day.
Nehemiah has just armed his builders; now he tells them where to sleep. Each man and his servant stay inside the city. The men who build by day become the guard after dark. Why does the work of God need a night shift at all?
One commentator divides the order into day and night, and says why the night half needs cover:
The day for labour and the night for watchfulness. Satan loves the darkness. It is the element in which he lives and moves, just as his followers love darkness rather than light, because their deeds are evil. (Eph. 6:12; John 3:19.) So the servants of the Lord should never stop being watchful. They must make provision for the night as well as for the day. We read in the Song of Songs of the sixty strong men around Solomon's bed: "all of them wearing swords and expert in war, each with his sword at his thigh, against terror by night." (Song 3:7-8.) We learn then, from this instruction of Nehemiah, that the place of safety was "within Jerusalem," behind the walls they were building. Those who stayed inside were to labour in the day and keep watch during the night.
The order names a place as well as an hour. Staying there cost these men their comfort:
The closing verse of our chapter shows the great zeal and devotion of Nehemiah and his helpers. All of them were to lodge inside Jerusalem, so they gained whatever protection the unfinished walls could offer. None of them took off their clothes to sleep in comfort at night, though they removed them for washing. They were therefore always ready to labour in the work and to meet the foe. A very impressive picture!
The verse does not create a separate corps of night watchmen. The builders themselves do double duty, and one writer treats that as a model for today:
Nehemiah also gave orders that the workers and servants were to stay at night inside the walls of Jerusalem. So they kept guard by night as well as working by day (v. 22). This concentrated effort on the work of the Lord went on until the wall stood finished. What an example for believers today, who might take to heart the exhortation of 1 Corinthians 15:58: "Therefore, my beloved brothers, be steadfast, immovable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, knowing that in the Lord your labor is not in vain."
One writer puts the obvious objection in the enemy's mouth: let the better fighters fight, and let the builders build. Then he answers it:
When the workers strapped their swords to their sides, the enemy could have said to them: Give your swords to others. They are better qualified than you for combat. Look after your work; don't try to do two things at once. Don't concern yourself about the rest, and everything will be fine. No, the worker replies, everything will not be fine, if I let your words lull me to sleep. It is a priceless privilege to let the Lord act, but am I not responsible to fight for Him? Suppose I say "the Lord will intervene" while I myself abandon the sword of the Spirit, watchfulness, prayer, and perseverance. Then I am running after certain defeat.
One writer shows what happens to men who fall asleep on watch:
You cannot be long off your watch before the devil hears of it. The devil knew the apostle's sleeping time, and then he asks leave to winnow them (Luke 22). The thief gets up when honest men go to bed. The devil begins to tempt when saints stop watching… Even the weakest temptation is strong enough to overthrow a Christian who is dozing in false security. Samson asleep, and Delilah cut his hair. Saul asleep, and the spear is taken from his very side, and he never knew it.
- Inside — The order begins with a place. Safety lay behind the wall they were still building. Staying there cost them their comfort.
- By day — Inside the wall, the day belongs to the work of building.
- By night — The same men who worked became the guard. Darkness is the element the enemy prefers, so the night needed cover too.
- Never off duty — You cannot hand the guarding to better-qualified people and then get on with your own task. Trusting the Lord to act does not cancel your call to watch, pray and persevere.
- Until it is finished — They worked and watched until the wall stood finished. That is the picture behind the call to be steadfast, immovable, always abounding in the work of the Lord.
And neither I, nor my brethren, nor my servants, nor the men of the guard that followed me, none of us put off our garments every one had his weapon on his right side.
Nehemiah 4 ends with the wall of Jerusalem rising under threat of attack, and with men who never stood down. So what does that round-the-clock readiness ask of God's people now, and was anything still worth laying aside?
Earlier in the chapter these men worked with a tool in one hand and a weapon in the other. Verse 23 looks like the peak of that spirit.
But the workmen were watchmen as well as builders... The sword and the trowel are as needed in our day as in theirs. Then at verse 23 they seem to have reached the highest point of devotedness.
Notice how short the list of names is.
Notice who this covers: not all the people, but only Nehemiah, his brothers, and his personal following — servants and men of the guard. Within his own circle of responsibility he set a wonderful example of personal devotedness. He knew how to deny himself his own ease and comfort in the Lord's service. He knew how to endure hardship as a good soldier (2 Timothy 2:3).
Staying dressed cost them a comfortable night's sleep.
The closing verse of our chapter gives a glimpse of the great zeal and devotion that marked Nehemiah and his helpers. All of them were to lodge inside Jerusalem, gaining whatever protection the partly built walls could offer. None of them took off their clothes to sleep in comfort at night, though they did remove them to wash. They were therefore always ready to labour in the work and to meet the foe. A very impressive picture!
Each man keeps his own weapon; he does not hand it to a specialist. The same holds for the Word.
Those who assist in the work, and even those who are fully given to it, must never slacken in their vigilance. If they cannot hold their weapon in one hand, let them gird their sword by their side. No child of God should leave entirely to others the care of using the Word, that two-edged sword. Some may be better qualified than others to apply it at a given moment and in a given circumstance. Even so, we must all carry it in every circumstance. Every member of the family of God should be able to use it when the occasion comes.
Armed men can still forget the wall. The danger comes from the fight itself.
Nehemiah's builders teach us God's way to be ready for the enemy's attacks. We hold our weapons of defence in one hand, or wear our swords at our side, and stay busy building. Controversies arise when Satan attacks the truth. The danger then is that we forget the need of souls. We stop building. We become so taken up with the enemy that we overlook the need for steady, persistent ministry of Christ to sustain and nourish souls.
The translation these writers used ends the verse with an exception: "except that everyone put them off for washing." So one thing was still worth undressing for.
However busy we may be in the Lord's work, we must never neglect "the washing of water by the Word." The work itself will cause some defilement, and that defilement must be washed away by applying the Word of God.
Dennett presses the same reading further, into what it takes to be cleansed at all: self-judgment means putting off "everything that might conceal our condition from ourselves, that there may be no hindrance to the washing of water by the word."
- Ready — Nehemiah's men slept in their clothes so they were never more than a moment from the work or the fight.
- Personal — he asks this of no one outside his own circle; devotion starts where your responsibility starts.
- Armed — every worker carried a weapon; using the Word is not a job you delegate to the better qualified.
- Building — the weapon guards the wall; controversy must never crowd out the feeding of souls.
- Washed — they undressed for one thing only: to wash. Work for God defiles; self-judgment under the Word washes it clean.
And there was a great cry of the people and of their wives against their brethren the Jews.
The wall is going up, the work is going well — and then a cry breaks out from inside the city. The danger is no longer the enemy outside the gate but hunger, debt and hard hearts among the builders themselves.
The story so far has been about enemies outside. Now it turns to the workers themselves. One writer notes that the account of the building stops here, and that the pause warns anyone busy fighting evil outside.
Nehemiah stops the story of the wall here. He turns aside to describe the state of things inside — among the people. And this teaches us much. If we are busy dealing with evil outside, we cannot afford to neglect our own moral state, or the state of the assembly. This has happened far too often. You will sometimes see people who fight hard for the truth completely neglect self-judgment and discipline in the house of God.
Another writer puts the greatest danger right after faithfulness, not before it.
Never are we in greater danger of acting in the flesh than when we have acted in faithfulness to the Lord. As one writer rightly said, "We can be lured into moral slackness because we are pleased with our separation in church matters."
The verse names two groups. Commentators read them as the poor and the rich within one nation, and the cry has hard facts behind it.
"The people and their wives" are clearly the poor, while "their Jewish brothers" are the rich. Division had come in because the rich oppressed the poor. They used the poverty of the poor to enrich themselves. Some of the poor had sold their sons and daughters to the rich for grain, so that they could eat and live. Others, pressed by the famine, had mortgaged their lands, vineyards and houses, or borrowed money to pay the king's tax. The rich had used the needs of their poorer brothers to grow richer, and to bring them completely under their power. The poor, bowed to the dust under the heavy burden of their bondage and need, raised "a great outcry."
The times were hard: a food shortage and heavy taxes. What turned hardship into scandal was the response of those who had money.
The daily needs of life, the hard times caused by a famine, and the weight of taxation should have drawn out the sympathy of the richer Jews. Instead they became an occasion for feeding the greed of the flesh… This was not a matter of ordinary business dealings. The rich used the needs and trials of the poor, which came from special circumstances such as a famine, to enlarge their own wealth.
This was not just unkind. It broke a plain command they already had.
Now, who had taken advantage of them when, in their hunger, they needed bread? It was their brothers: and yet the law of Moses forbade them to do this. An Israelite could lend to other nations, but he could not charge his brother interest (Deut. 23:19-20; Ex. 22:25). So the love of money led them into this great sin.
The verse repeats one word: brothers. One writer traces the whole trouble to that word.
Let us then seek to find the root of this festering sore. It lies in one word — used twice — "their brothers," "our brothers." They were brothers as common descendants of Abraham, and in a deeper sense too… So now "the Jews" were treating the people as if they were not their brothers. They completely forgot the common relationship in which they stood before God, and treated them as if they were strangers and pagans.
The cry sounds like rebellion. One writer judges it differently, and asks what had become of love among God's people.
The people's outward testimony went with praiseworthy activity. But their inward testimony left much to be desired, and scandalous events hindered it. What had brotherly relationships among the members of the people of God come to? Could devotion, pity and sympathy for the poor be found; and did love show itself as it should have? No… A great outcry! Complaints and accusations — and they were fully justified!
Writers apply the scene directly to movements of spiritual renewal, and see in it a reason such movements fade.
Again and again even in our day, the work of God in revival among His saints has been damaged in the same way. While outwardly the work of God has been carried on with diligence and success, even in building a wall of spiritual separation from the outside world, there has grown up a spirit of self-seeking within, and so damage and impoverishment for many humbler saints.
- Inside. The wall grew strong outside while the builders ruined each other inside. Zeal against evil outside never excuses neglect at home.
- Occasion. Famine and taxes were the setting. Greed was the sin, turning a neighbour's need into profit.
- Debt. Children sold, lands and houses mortgaged, money borrowed to pay the king's tax — that is what the outcry was about.
- Brothers. One repeated word carries the whole accusation: men treated their own brothers as strangers.
- Cry. The outcry was not rebellion but evidence. One writer calls it fully justified, because love had failed.
And there were that said, We, our sons and our daughters, are many, and we must procure corn that we may eat and live.
The wall of Jerusalem was going up fast, but a new sound rose with it, and it did not come from the enemy. Poor families with many children were out of food, and the people they cried out against were their own neighbours.
The enemy outside is not the only danger a work faces.
Instead of continuing the story of building the wall, Nehemiah turns aside to describe the state of things within — among the people. And this is most instructive. If we are busy dealing with evil from outside, we cannot afford to neglect our own moral condition or the condition of the assembly. This has too often been the case. You will sometimes see zealous defenders of the truth who take no care at all for self-judgment or for discipline in the house of God.
What makes it worse is who these people claimed to be:
It is moving to see and experience the most grievous selfishness among those who boasted of a return to divine ground.
The hunger had a cause, and the building work was part of it.
The work of rebuilding the walls was a labour of love; no wages were paid. While the people were busy with it, their other occupations, including farming, had to be neglected. As a result the poor were driven to mortgage their lands, vineyards and houses in order to buy grain, because of the shortage. The rich took advantage of this and enslaved their sons and daughters, and there seemed no prospect of redeeming them.
They are asking for food, so that the family does not die. That leaves a question for those who had plenty.
The poor asked for grain so that they might live. Where was love? When the rich, following the example of Christ, ought to have laid down their lives for their brothers, did they help them in the ordinary things of life? "But if anyone has the world's goods and sees his brother in need, yet closes his heart against him, how does God's love abide in him?" (1 John 3:17)
The cry in verse 1 is against "their brothers the Jews." The poor use the same word of themselves.
"The people and their wives" are clearly the poor, while "their brothers the Jews" are the rich. Division came in when the rich oppressed the poor, using their poverty to enrich themselves… Let us then try to find the root of this festering sore. It lies in one word — used twice — "their brothers," "our brothers." They were brothers as common descendants of Abraham, and even in a deeper sense. As God's chosen people they stood alike on the ground of redemption, so all were on the same footing before Him… So now "the Jews" treated the people as if they were not their brothers. They gave no thought at all to the shared relationship they held before God, and handled them as if they were outsiders.
Israel's law did not forbid interest everywhere. It drew a line between Israelites, and the reason for that line matters.
The law forbade Israelites to charge interest to one another. Interest was not wrong in itself. It did not fit their exceptional standing and their relation as brothers by birth. They were free to lend at interest to Gentiles, but not to Jews. If a Jew sold himself into servitude, he went free in the seventh year, just as land returned to its true holder in the jubilee year. So the law restrained and regulated a failing people on the Lord's behalf.
Does grace ask less of us than the law asked of them?
The law forbade a Jew to charge interest when lending to a poor fellow Israelite. So now that we are under grace, should we ignore such instruction? Rather, under grace we might go much further, by giving instead of lending.
- Cry. The noise that stops the work comes from inside, not outside. Hungry families cry out against their own people while the wall goes up.
- Cause. No one was paid, and no one could farm. Their poverty grew out of the very work they were doing.
- Plea. "So let us get grain, that we may eat and keep alive" is a plea to survive. It tests whether love is real when a brother is in need.
- Brothers. The repeated word names the injury. They treated God's own chosen people as outsiders to profit from.
- Grace. The law fenced in a failing people by banning interest between brothers. Grace does not lower that fence. It moves past lending to giving.
And there were that said, We have had to pledge our fields, and our vineyards, and our houses, that we might procure corn in the dearth.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And there were that said, We have borrowed money for the king's tribute upon our fields and vineyards;
Nehemiah 5:4 records a third complaint: some had borrowed money to pay the Persian king's tax, pledging their fields and vineyards. Why were people back in their own land paying for the right to hold it, and paying their own brothers interest?
The chapter groups the complaints. Each group had a different reason for going into debt, and one class of people profited from all three.
Some had sold their sons and daughters to the rich for grain, that they might eat and live. For the same reason, under pressure from the famine, some had mortgaged their lands, vineyards, and houses. Others had borrowed money against their lands and vineyards to pay the king's tribute. The rich had used the needs of their poorer brothers to become richer, and to bring them completely under their power.
They had no choice about the tax. Paying it started a chain they could not stop. Land pledged and never redeemed meant children pledged next.
The king demanded this tribute from them (Middah. Ezra 6:8; Ezra 4:20). Everyone had to borrow from his brother, pledging his fields and vineyards. They could not repay the debt. So the land was no longer their own, and they also had to put their children to work as slaves. They could not buy them back, because the fields were in the hands of their brothers. What a miserable situation!
The tax bill points to something larger. The return from exile restored the city, but not the nation's freedom.
There is a return of captives from Babylon. Jerusalem is regained, rebuilt, repeopled. The house of God is raised up again, and the worship of His name and the service of His altar are observed again. But this state of things was something quite new. Israel was no longer a nation set in their own land, as under Joshua and the Judges. It was no longer a kingdom with one of their own children on the throne... The people were now subjects of a Gentile king. They owed him for permission to live in the land of their fathers, and to keep the laws and carry out the service of their God.
The tax came from outside. The interest did not. That is where the verse turns from misfortune into sin.
Some had mortgaged their lands and vineyards and houses to buy grain (v. 3). Others had borrowed money to pay tax on their lands and vineyards. It is evident too that the mortgages and borrowed money carried interest. This was plain disobedience to the law of God. The law said, "If you lend money to any of My people with you who is poor, you shall not be like a moneylender to him, and you shall not exact interest from him" (Ex. 22:25).
The ban had limits. It held between Israelites, and it rested on the nation's place before God.
The Israelites were forbidden to charge interest to one another. This was not because interest is wrong in itself. It was because charging it did not fit their exceptional standing and their tie as brothers by birth. They were free to lend at interest to Gentiles, but not to Jews. If a Jew sold himself into servitude, he went free in the seventh year. In the same way, land returned to its rightful holder at the jubilee.
The mortgages and loans looked normal in the world around them. That is the danger.
Few people read this account without condemning such gross disobedience. Yet what did it amount to? Simply taking up human thoughts instead of God's, and worldly customs and practices instead of those the Scriptures lay down. In a word, these Jews walked as men, and as men who hurried to get rich at the expense of their brothers! And is this sin unknown in the church of God? Do the customs of society and the sayings of the world not often force their way in among Christians? Do they not govern how Christians treat one another?
The law's ban on interest was not the end of the matter.
Under law, the Jews were forbidden to charge interest when lending to a poor Israelite. Now that we are under grace, should we ignore such instruction? Instead, under grace we might go much further, by giving instead of lending.
- Tax — Persia forced the tribute on them, and their fields and vineyards had to stand as security.
- Debt — Debt that cannot be repaid does not stay still: the land went first, then the children.
- Brother — The hardship came from the empire. The profit went to fellow Jews, who traded on their brothers' need.
- Law — Israel could not charge interest inside the family, because it clashed with their standing before God and their tie to one another.
- Grace — Normal business was worldly thinking dressed up. The answer now is not stricter lending, but open-handed giving.
yet now our flesh is as the flesh of our brethren, our children as their children; and behold, we must bring into bondage our sons and our daughters to be servants, and some of our daughters are brought into bondage [already]; neither is it in the power of our hand [to redeem them], for other men have our fields and our vineyards.
Nehemiah 5 stops the story of the wall to expose the trouble inside: the poor had lost food, land, and finally children to their own countrymen. Here their protest peaks — the creditors are their own flesh and blood, yet the debt is taking their sons and daughters.
The enemy outside is not the problem in this chapter.
This is the deeply serious lesson of Nehemiah 5. The opening verses (1-5) expose the corruption of the flesh among those who were building the wall. The rich Jews took advantage of their poorer brothers' poverty and need to enrich themselves. Daily needs, the hard times caused by a famine, and the weight of taxation should have drawn out the sympathy of the richer Jews. Instead, they became a chance to feed the covetousness of the flesh.
The poor do not argue economics. They point to one word — and a commentator finds the root of the whole evil in it.
Let us then seek to discover the root of this festering sore. It lies in a word — used twice — "their brothers," "our brothers." They were brothers as common descendants of Abraham, and even in a deeper sense. As God's chosen people they shared one redemption, so all stood on the same footing before Him... Because of this, Malachi challenged them: "Have we not all one Father? Has not one God created us? Why then are we faithless to one another, profaning the covenant of our fathers?" Yet now "the Jews" were dealing with the people as if they were not their brothers. They had completely forgotten the shared relationship in which they stood before God. So they treated them as if they were foreigners and pagans.
They had split one family into two classes:
The root of the trouble lay in the fact that they were viewing themselves as forming distinct classes of rich and poor, and forgetting that whether rich or poor they were "brothers."
The verse says it was not in their power to help it. Here is why the trap had closed.
Everyone had to borrow from his brother, pledging his fields and vineyards. Then they could not repay the debt. So the land was no longer their own, and they also had to put their children to work as slaves. They could not redeem them, because the fields were in the hands of their brothers. What a miserable situation! How clearly this shows that a testimony which looks right on the outside is no safety for us! It may even be a great snare in our practical life. Being satisfied that we hold a place of separation from the world may feed our spiritual pride. It can make us treat our moral slackness with our brothers as a small thing.
The law did not ban interest everywhere in Israel. It banned interest between brothers, and it gave the poor ways out.
Interest was forbidden between Israelites, not because it was wrong in itself. It did not fit their special standing, or their relation as brothers after the flesh. They were free to lend at interest to Gentiles, but not to Jews. If a Jew sold himself into servitude, the seventh year set him free, just as land returned to its true holder at the jubilee. So the law checked and regulated a failing people on the Lord's behalf. Sadly, self governed the nobles and rulers in the land.
Being right about the enemy is not the same as being right yourself.
If we are busy dealing with evil from outside, we cannot afford to neglect our own moral condition, or the condition of the assembly. This has happened too often. People who fight hard for the truth are sometimes seen to completely neglect self-judgment and discipline in the house of God. There is no sadder sight than a gathering that is completely careless about its own state and its failure to obey the word of God, while it proclaims the need of separation from evildoers or false doctrine.
If law set a floor under a poor brother, grace does not lower it.
The Jews under law were forbidden to charge interest when lending to another poor Israelite. Now that we are under grace, should we ignore such instruction? Rather, under grace we might go much further, by giving instead of lending.
- Brother forgotten — One word appears twice in the verse: brothers. The rich treated them as foreigners instead.
- Brother classified — Once people split into rich and poor instead of family, need becomes a chance to profit.
- Brother enslaved — Fields went first, then children. With the land in other hands, there was no way to buy them back.
- Brother protected — The law banned interest between Israelites and freed slaves in the seventh year. Self-interest ignored it.
- Brother served — Grace does not lower the standard the law set. It raises it, from lending to giving — and it starts with judging ourselves.
And I was very angry when I heard their cry and these words.
The builders had faced down the enemy outside, and the wall was going up. Now a cry rises from inside Jerusalem: the poorer Jews are being crushed by debt to the richer ones. Nehemiah's first recorded response is not a plan but an emotion: he burns with anger at what he hears.
The chapter turns our eyes from the enemy outside to the builders themselves.
We have noticed certain good features that marked the people in chapter 4. But as we start to read chapter 5, we discover that beneath the surface sad mischief had been at work. Under Nehemiah's leadership they met opposition from outside with courage. All the time, though, selfish oppression was going on within. The richer Jews had taken advantage of the plight many poorer ones had drifted into. The shortage of basic necessities had driven them to borrow money or raise mortgages, so as to get food for themselves and their families. Outwardly they presented a picture of commendable zeal in doing what was God's service at that moment. Inwardly they were guilty of much self-seeking and corruption.
The complaint was about lending at interest. Older translations call it "usury."
This word does not in Scripture mean, as it does now, undue interest, but simply interest of any kind. The Israelites were forbidden to demand interest from their brothers. This assumed the borrower was poor — otherwise he would not need to borrow. They were allowed to lend to strangers on interest... On the return of the Jews, Nehemiah sharply rebuked the nobles and the rulers for taking interest from their poorer brothers. Scripture strictly commands the rich to help the poor.
What made the practice wrong was not economics but relationship.
Lending at interest was forbidden among the Israelites toward one another. It was not wrong in itself. It simply did not fit their exceptional standing and their relation as brothers after the flesh.
Anger can be right or wrong. The test is who the injury fell on.
In Mark 3:5 we find the Lord angry, "grieved at their hardness of heart." We feel at once how unselfish this anger is. It is all for their sakes and for God's glory. Righteous anger never has self in any shape or form for its cause... In Nehemiah 5:6 we find Nehemiah very angry against gross injustice done by others, and to others, not against himself. So he did "well" to be angry. In Ephesians 4:26 we get the exhortation to "be angry and do not sin"; that is, not to store up anger and malice in our hearts.
Verse 6 leads straight into "I took counsel with myself" in verse 7. Nehemiah had no one else to turn to.
Nehemiah was rightly very angry when he heard this cry of oppression (v. 6). But there was no one whose help he could enlist in fighting the evil, because the nobles and rulers themselves were the offenders. So, in the energy of personal faith in the Lord, he rebuked the nobles and rulers. He told them they were guilty of charging interest to their own brothers. He called a great assembly, to have these matters publicly faced (v. 7).
Nehemiah's private thinking produced public courage, not delay.
He did not go and seek advice from anyone about what he must do, any more than on the night when he went around the walls of Jerusalem. "I consulted with myself," he said. He knew within himself what his responsibility was, both for the public testimony and for the moral life of the assembly. He did not fear to unmask the chief men in front of a large congregation. Fear of what people thought did not stop him when the truth was at stake.
His rebuke touched three relationships at once.
Nehemiah meets this evil by rebuking the nobles and bringing the matter before "a great assembly." He shows that to act like this toward their brothers did not fit the redemption from captivity they all shared. Toward God it showed a lack of holy fear. As for the nations, it would bring them into reproach (vv. 6-9).
The watching outsiders weigh how believers treat each other more than how carefully they keep their distance from the world.
Brothers who are still tied to the world in many ways often behave much better, out of devotion to their brothers, than others who strongly insist on outward separation. If these two things do not go together, the Christian testimony has no real value. But let us not forget that the world will be more impressed by a testimony given through brotherly love than by a testimony given through outward separation. This is why Nehemiah said to the chief men, "Ought you not to walk in the fear of our God to prevent the taunts of the nations our enemies?" (v. 9).
- Inside first. The wall held against the enemy outside while selfish oppression ran unchecked among the builders. Outward zeal was no guard against inward corruption.
- Brothers, not customers. Israelites could not charge each other interest of any kind. They could lend to a stranger on interest; to a poor brother they could not.
- Anger without self. His anger was over injustice done by others, to others, never to himself. That is the mark of anger that does not sin.
- Counsel then courage. The rulers themselves were guilty, so he took counsel with himself. Then he named the wrong to their faces before a great assembly.
- Watched by the world. The sin denied the redemption they all shared, showed no fear of God, and gave the watching nations something to mock.
And I consulted with myself; and I remonstrated with the nobles and the rulers, and said to them, Ye exact usury, every one of his brother! And I set a great assembly against them.
Nehemiah came back to a ruined Jerusalem and set to work rebuilding its wall. Then he found a worse break inside the city. The poor among the returned exiles were mortgaging their land and selling their children, because the rich among them were lending at interest. This verse is his answer: he weighs the matter alone, charges the leading men to their faces, and calls a public assembly to hear it.
The word behind the charge is narrower in English today than in the law Nehemiah applied.
This word does not in Scripture mean, as it does now, excessive interest, but simply interest of any kind. The Israelites were forbidden to charge their brothers interest. The law always assumed the borrower was poor, since otherwise he would not need to borrow. To strangers, however, they were allowed to lend at interest... Scripture strictly commands the rich to help the poor.
That restriction was not a verdict on lending as such. It rested on who these people were to each other.
The law forbade the Israelites to charge one another interest. Lending at interest was not wrong in itself. It did not fit their exceptional standing, or their relation as brothers. They were free to lend at interest to Gentiles, not to Jews... So the law checked and regulated a failing people on the Lord's behalf. Sadly, it was self that ruled the nobles and rulers in the land.
Nehemiah's charge names the tie they were breaking: "each from his brother."
It lies in one word — used twice — "their brothers," "our brothers." They were brothers as common descendants of Abraham, and even in a deeper sense. As God's chosen people they stood alike on the ground of redemption, and all of them were therefore on the same footing before Him... It was in view of this that Malachi challenged them: "Have we not all one Father? Has not one God created us? Why then are we faithless to one another, profaning the covenant of our fathers?" So now "the Jews" were dealing with the people as if they were not their brothers. They had completely forgotten the shared relationship in which they stood before God, and treated them as if they were foreigners.
Nehemiah takes counsel with no one. One writer explains why he could not.
The nobles and rulers, with whom in ordinary circumstances he might have taken counsel, were the chief offenders, so they could give him no light or help. This threw Nehemiah back on his own resources, or rather shut him up to God for guidance in the matter. When everyone has left the right path, the authority of the word of God is obscured as a result. Then the man of faith — one who wants to walk with God — cannot afford to consult others, or their advice may tie him up. He must act alone and for himself, whatever it costs, according to the Word. In that necessity he finds both strength and courage, because it produces confidence in the Lord and secures His presence.
Nehemiah does not settle it in private. He calls "a great assembly" to hear the charge.
He knew within himself what his responsibility was, both for the public testimony and for the moral life of the assembly. He was not afraid to expose the leading men in front of a large gathering; fear of what people thought did not stop him when the truth was at stake. In the same way, Paul reproached Peter in front of everyone at Antioch and opposed him to his face, because he was in the wrong.
The weight of the rebuke came from what Nehemiah had already done with his own money.
He is able to rebuke the offenders by contrasting their conduct with his own. He had redeemed his brothers from the nations; they had brought them into bondage to themselves... Nehemiah loved his brothers, and he grieved at the dishonour done to the Lord's name by their condition, so he spent his own money to redeem them. They loved themselves and wanted to grow richer, so they used their brothers' hardship to fasten a yoke of slavery on their necks.
One writer draws the lesson for how we treat one another, with the world looking on.
Nehemiah's rebukes remind us clearly that in all our conduct toward one another we should act as brothers, in the fear of God. Then we give the world no occasion to reproach us. His rebukes match what Paul urges on Titus: grace teaches us "to live self-controlled, upright, and godly lives in the present age."
- Brother. The whole charge turns on one word. They lent at interest to brothers — people standing on the same ground of redemption before God.
- Law. The old word "usury" means interest of any kind, not excessive interest. The law allowed it with strangers and forbade it with a poor brother.
- Counsel. "I took counsel with myself" was necessity, not pride. The men he would usually consult were the guilty ones, so he was shut up to God.
- Courage. He named the offence to the leading men and called a great assembly to hear it, unafraid of their standing.
- Credibility. His own money had bought brothers out of slavery. That contrast carried the rebuke.
And I said to them, We, according to our ability, have redeemed our brethren the Jews, who were sold to the nations; and will ye even sell your brethren? or shall they be sold unto us? And they were silent and found no answer.
In Nehemiah 5 the trouble is among God's own people. Rich Jews were lending at interest and selling poorer Jews into slavery — and in verse 8 Nehemiah sets his own record against theirs.
Nehemiah uses the same word on both sides of his charge: brothers. One writer finds the whole failure there:
The root of the trouble was that they saw themselves as separate classes, rich and poor. They forgot that, rich or poor, they were "brothers."
That bond was more than family history. It rested on what God had done for all of them alike:
They were brothers as common descendants of Abraham, and even in a deeper sense. As God's chosen people they were alike on the ground of redemption, and all therefore were on the same footing before Him — the common objects of His grace... So now "the Jews" were dealing with the people as if they were not their brothers. They had completely forgotten the relationship they shared before God, and so they treated them as if they were foreigners and outsiders.
Nehemiah's question turns on a reversal. He had spent money to get these people out of foreign hands. The nobles were making money by putting them back under a yoke.
When Nehemiah came to Jerusalem, he had freed those Jews who were in bondage to the nations because of some debt. Now these rich money-lenders were selling their own brothers.
Another writer shows what that rescue required of them:
Speaking to the whole gathering, Nehemiah reminded them of what they had done. As far as God had given them the ability, they had redeemed their Jewish brothers out of bondage to the nations. This involved proper care and grace toward their brothers... They had once been gracious enough to redeem these people from slavery. Should the rich in Israel now be content to see them sold back into it?
Nehemiah can say "we" because he had paid the cost himself. His rebuke carries weight because his own conduct answers it first:
He is able to rebuke the offenders by setting their conduct beside his own. He had redeemed his brothers from the nations. They had brought them into bondage to themselves, lording it over God's heritage. It is a great blessing when a shepherd among the people of God can point to his own conduct as their guide... Nehemiah loved his brothers, and it grieved him that their condition brought dishonour on the Lord's name. So he spent his own wealth to redeem them. They loved themselves and wanted to grow richer. So they used their brothers' needs to bind the yoke of bondage on their necks.
Nehemiah says this to men standing before the whole gathering. He could not take advice from the usual leaders, because they were the ones at fault:
Normally he might have taken counsel with the nobles and rulers. But they were the chief offenders, so he could look for no light or help from them. So Nehemiah was thrown back on his own resources — or rather, he was shut up to God for guidance in the matter... He convicted them of their sin... and, according to the apostolic instruction, rebuked them before all.
The verse ends with no reply. One writer compares this with a later public correction:
Nehemiah's words here may remind us of how Paul spoke to Peter in public. Peter and other leaders had shown favouritism to Jewish believers over Gentile believers (Gal. 2:11-16). Paul did not first look for someone else to agree with him. He spoke straight to Peter in front of everyone, for he was a true prophet, speaking on God's behalf. Peter could not reply to Paul. In the same way, the nobles and rulers in Jerusalem had nothing to say to Nehemiah's faithful words (v. 8).
Being in the right place did not make them right. One writer draws the uncomfortable comparison:
This is solemn; and we may listen to this, and be warned. It tells us that those who had taken a right position were behaving worse than those still in a wrong one. The Jews at Jerusalem stood in a better religious position. Their brothers, still in Babylon, were in a purer moral condition.
- Brothers. The sin began when that one word was dropped. Rich and poor became classes instead of brothers, though both stood on the same ground of redemption before God.
- Bought. Nehemiah spent his own money to buy Jews out of foreign slavery. The nobles made money selling the same people back into it.
- Obliged. A shared redemption brings an obligation. Those once redeemed by grace cannot trade on a brother's need.
- Example. The rebuke carried weight because Nehemiah's own conduct was the opposite. A leader who can point to his own walk speaks with authority.
- Silenced. Nehemiah spoke faithfully and in the open, and looked for no ally first. The offenders had no answer.
And I said, The thing that ye do is not good. Ought ye not to walk in the fear of our God, so as not to be the reproach of the nations our enemies?
While the wall was going up, the richer exiles were charging their own struggling countrymen interest and pushing them into slavery. In verse 9 Nehemiah answers on two grounds: how they stand toward God, and how they look to the enemies watching outside.
The building work was going well. That is what makes the failure inside so serious.
In chapter 4 we noticed certain good features in the people. But as we start to read chapter 5, we discover that sad mischief had been at work under the surface. Under Nehemiah's leadership the people stood bravely against opposition from outside. All the while, selfish oppression was going on inside.
The law drew a line between lending to a fellow Israelite and lending to an outsider.
The law forbade Israelites to charge interest to one another. This was not because charging interest is wrong in itself. It was because it did not fit their special standing, or their relation to each other as brothers by birth. They were free to lend at interest to Gentiles, but not to Jews. If a Jew sold himself into slavery, he went free in the seventh year, just as land went back to its true owner at the jubilee. In this way the law checked and regulated a failing people on the Lord's behalf.
Corruption at the top raised a practical problem. Who could Nehemiah turn to for advice?
The nobles and rulers were the chief offenders. Normally he might have taken counsel with them, but no light and no help could come from them. So Nehemiah was thrown back on his own resources — or rather, he was left with God alone for guidance in the matter. When everyone has left the right path... the man of faith, the one who wants to walk with God, cannot afford to consult others, or their advice may tie his hands. He must act alone and for himself, whatever it costs, according to the Word.
His rebuke carried weight because his own conduct ran the opposite way.
Nehemiah loved his brothers, and he grieved that their condition brought dishonour on the Lord's name. So he spent his own money to buy them back. The nobles loved themselves, and they wanted to grow richer. So they used their brothers' need to fasten the yoke of slavery on their necks. Nehemiah showed the spirit of Christ (compare 2 Cor. 8:9), and they the spirit of Satan.
The fear of God shows in conduct toward other people. Paul makes the same point in his letter to Titus.
Nehemiah's rebukes remind us clearly that in all our conduct toward one another we should act as brothers, in the fear of God, so that we give the world no occasion to reproach us. His rebukes match what Paul tells Titus: grace teaches us to "live self-controlled, upright, and godly lives in the present age" (Titus 2:12). So we should act with self-restraint and consideration for our brothers, righteously toward those outside, and reverently toward God.
The second half of Nehemiah's appeal points outward. Israel claimed to belong to God, and the nations around could see how they lived.
They claimed, and claimed rightly, to be God's chosen people, set apart from all the other nations for His service. But if their way of life looked like the nations around them, what became of that claim? They did not stop being God's people. Yet by their conduct they denied it, and they publicly profaned the holy name they were called by. God's people can do no greater damage than to give the enemy just ground for taunting them about their practices.
So what do outsiders actually see?
Some believers are still tied to the world in many ways. Yet out of devotion to their brothers, they often behave much better than others who insist on outward separation. If these two things do not go together, Christian testimony has no real value. But let us not forget: the world is more impressed by a testimony of brotherly love than by a testimony of outward separation.
The appeal did not stop at words.
No wonder such a contrast silenced the guilty leaders. Nehemiah could invite anyone to examine him and his servants. His words carried such force that he called on them to stop behaving in a way so far beneath Israel, and to give back that very day what they had taken.
- Inside first. Courage against enemies outside can hide self-seeking inside. The wall was rising while the rich crushed the poor.
- Brothers, not customers. Charging interest was not wrong in itself. It was wrong between Israelites, because they were brothers.
- Fear of God. It shows in three places: restraint with brothers, fairness toward outsiders, reverence toward God.
- Life first, then rebuke. Nehemiah could confront the nobles because his own money had bought back the people they were selling.
- The world is watching. Brotherly love is the testimony outsiders notice. Without it, separation counts for nothing — and here it ended in property handed back the same day.
I also, my brethren and my servants, we might exact usury of them, money and corn. I pray you, let us leave off this usury.
Jerusalem's wall was going up, and inside the city the nobles were charging their poorer countrymen interest. In verse 10 Nehemiah stops accusing and says "let us." How does a leader correct a wrong he stands close to?
Nehemiah was a lender himself. He did not stand outside the problem and point at it.
Nehemiah added that he and his servants were also lending the people money. He certainly was not charging interest. Even so, he linked himself with all the money-lenders and urged, "Please, let us stop this usury!" (v. 10).
One commentator draws out the force of that "us."
Notice that he says, "let us." He put himself in grace alongside them in their sins. He admitted that he was one with them before God, and in this way he sought, in a spirit of meekness, to bring them back.
Older translations use "usury" where the ESV says "exacting of interest." The word did not then mean an outrageous rate.
This word does not in scripture mean, as it does now, excessive interest, but simply interest of any kind. The law forbade the Israelites to charge interest to their brothers. It always assumed the borrower was poor, since otherwise he would not need to borrow... Ex. 22:25; Lev. 25:35-38; Deut. 23:19-20. When the Jews returned home, Nehemiah gave the nobles and the rulers a sharp rebuke for taking interest from their poorer brothers. Neh. 5:3-13.
The ban had a boundary. It ran between an Israelite and an outsider, and it came with other protections for those who had fallen into debt.
Israelites were forbidden to charge usury to one another. Interest was not banned as a thing wrong in itself. It was banned because it did not fit their special standing before God, or their bond as brothers by birth. They were free to lend at interest to Gentiles, but not to Jews. If a Jew sold himself into servitude, he went free in the seventh year. In the same way, land returned to its true holder at the jubilee. In this way the law checked and regulated a failing people on Jehovah's behalf. Sadly, it was self that ruled the nobles and rulers in the land.
Trace it back and you reach a single word.
Let us then seek to find the root of this festering sore. It lies in a word used twice — "their brothers," "our brothers." They were brothers as common descendants of Abraham, and in a deeper sense too. As God's chosen people they all stood on the ground of redemption, so all were on the same footing before Him... So now "the Jews" were dealing with the people as if they were not their brothers. They had completely forgotten the relationship they all shared before God. So they treated their own people as if they were foreigners and heathen.
The same writer then turns the question on the reader today.
They had themselves received grace, and they were to show that grace to their brothers... In a word, these Jews walked as men, and as men who hurried to get rich at the expense of their brothers! And is this sin unknown in the church of God?
Nehemiah's appeal carried weight because his record ran the opposite way to theirs.
He is able to rebuke the offenders by contrasting their conduct with his own. He had redeemed his brothers from the heathen. They had brought their brothers into bondage to themselves, lording it over God's heritage. Nehemiah loved his brothers. He also grieved that their condition brought dishonour on Jehovah's name. So he spent his own money to redeem them. They loved themselves and wanted to grow richer, so they used their brothers' needs to fasten the yoke of bondage on their necks.
The appeal of verse 10 leads straight into a demand for repayment. Then comes a guard against second thoughts.
He urged them to stop charging interest. He also urged them to put right what was already done — to restore at once the vineyards, olive groves and houses, and the hundredth part of the money and grain, wine and oil that they had charged the people... But Nehemiah was not going to drop the matter there. He called the priests. In front of them he made the nobles and rulers swear to do as they promised. Nehemiah knew that even a ruler can find a clever way out of a promise if he is not held to it.
- Brother. The offence was not lending. It was lending to a brother. The law allowed interest from outsiders and banned it inside God's people.
- Forgotten. They forgot that bond and treated their own people as foreigners.
- Grace. They had received grace, so they owed grace. They were not to profit from a brother's need.
- Us. Nehemiah's plea puts him inside the guilty group. It rests on a life that spent money to free brothers, not to bind them.
- Restore. Stopping was only half. The money had to go back that same day. An oath sealed the promise so it could not fade away.
Restore, I pray you, to them this very day their fields, their vineyards, their olive-gardens, and their houses, also the hundredth [part] of the money, and of the corn, the wine and the oil, that ye have exacted of them.
The wall was going up and the enemy outside had backed off. Inside the city, though, richer Jews were squeezing the poor. Nehemiah's answer raises two questions: what had to go back, and what gave one man the right to demand it?
Nehemiah does not stop at "stop doing this." He tells them to hand back on the spot what they had already taken.
He then demanded full restitution... The appeal was effective... Had the oppression continued along with the internal strife, it would have ended in disaster. How often these internal quarrels and acts of injustice have brought reproach on the people of God.
Stopping does not close a wrong already done.
He urged them not only to stop charging interest, but to go back over what was already taken. They were to restore at once the vineyards, olive groves and houses, and the hundredth part of the money, grain, wine and oil that they had charged the people.
The practice behind this verse has a name in older translations: usury.
In Scripture this word does not mean unfair interest, as it does today. It means interest of any kind. Israelites could not charge interest to their brothers. The rule always assumed the borrower was poor — otherwise he would not need to borrow. To strangers, however, they were allowed to lend at interest.
Once the land was gone, a family had nothing left to give but its children.
Everyone had to borrow from his brother, pledging his fields and vineyards. Then, since they could not repay the debt, the land was no longer their own. They also had to hand over their children as slaves, and could not buy them back, because their fields were in the hands of their brothers.
Nehemiah could ask this because of the way he had lived among them.
He also had the rights of a governor — that is, to be fed at the people's expense — but he had given that right up completely... As for Nehemiah, he spent his own possessions to feed 150 Jews and rulers daily, not counting visiting guests. So he was qualified to exhort, and even to require, that this state of things should stop.
His own giving is what made the accusation land.
Nehemiah loved his brothers, and he grieved that their condition dishonoured Jehovah's name. So he spent his own money to redeem them. They loved themselves and wanted to grow richer. So they used the needs of their brothers to fasten the yoke of slavery around their necks.
Outward separation from the world is not, on its own, a testimony.
Some believers are still tied to the world in many ways. Out of devotion to their brothers, they often behave far better than others who strongly insist on outward separation. If these two things do not go together, the Christian testimony has no real value. The world is more impressed by a testimony of brotherly love than by one of outward separation.
They agreed — though commentators read the tone of their agreement differently. Rossier hears something flat in it, while noting the obedience was real and the congregation rejoiced.
Their words seem a little flat for people who are sorry and humbled: "We will restore these and require nothing from them. We will do as you say." But however that may be, they obeyed. That simple act of obedience produced joy in Israel.
Nehemiah did not leave the promise to their good intentions.
But Nehemiah was not going to drop the matter there. He called the priests, and in their presence he required an oath from the nobles and rulers that they would do as they promised. Nehemiah knew that even a ruler could slip out of a promise if he was not held to it. So the priests were witnesses to this oath, and had authority to see that it was kept.
This pattern — good work outside, self-seeking inside — did not stay in Nehemiah's day.
Again and again, even in our day, the work of God in revival among His saints has been damaged in the same way. Outwardly the work of God went on with diligence and success. It even built a wall of spiritual separation from the world outside. But inside, a spirit of self-seeking grew up, and with it harm and poverty for many humbler believers.
- Exacting. The charge was interest taken from poor brothers. The law forbade any interest at all in such cases.
- Stripping. Interest took fields, vineyards, olive orchards and houses — a family's living, and then its children.
- Restoring. Nehemiah asks them to undo the wrong the same day, not just stop it.
- Costing. He could ask it because he had already given up his own rights and spent his own money on the people.
- Rejoicing. They promised under oath, they obeyed, and that one day of obedience ended in praise.
And they said, We will restore [them], and will require nothing of them; so will we do, as thou hast said. And I called the priests, and took an oath of them, that they should do according to this promise.
Nehemiah has just confronted the rich leaders of Jerusalem for charging their own poor countrymen interest. Here they agree to give it all back, and Nehemiah makes them swear to it.
Nehemiah's charge was not that lending money is wrong. Lending at interest was forbidden inside Israel. One writer sets out the rule and the reason behind it:
Charging interest was forbidden among the Israelites toward one another. It was not forbidden because it is wrong in itself. It was forbidden because it did not fit their exceptional standing, or their relation to each other as brothers by birth. They were free to lend at interest to Gentiles, but not to Jews. And if a Jew sold himself into servitude, the seventh year set him free, just as land went back to its true owner at the jubilee. That is how the law checked and regulated a failing people on the Lord's behalf.
Nehemiah's rebuke carried weight because his own conduct stood beside theirs. One writer sets the two side by side:
Nehemiah loved his brothers, and it grieved him that their condition brought dishonour on the Lord's name. So he spent his own wealth to redeem them. They loved themselves and wanted to grow richer, so they used their brothers' needs to fasten the yoke of slavery around their necks. Nehemiah showed the spirit of Christ; they showed the spirit of Satan.
Their answer is not a pledge to behave better from now on. Nehemiah had asked for the past to be undone, and that is what they agree to:
He did not only urge them to stop charging interest. He urged them to undo what was already done — to give back at once the vineyards, olive groves and houses, and the hundredth part of the money and grain, wine and oil that they had charged the people. What else could the nobles and rulers do? They answered as they did: "We will restore these and require nothing from them. We will do as you say." If they had not responded this way, they would have been guilty of defying the law of God.
Nehemiah had argued well, but the change of mind is credited elsewhere. One writer marks the point simply:
So he pleads with them, and the result is that his rebuke was blessed by the Lord. "Then they said, We will restore them, and will require nothing of them; so will we do as you say."
Nehemiah did not treat their agreement as the end of the matter. He feared what might happen once the crowd went home:
The Lord was with His servant, and they consented to do as he had urged. But Nehemiah would not leave the matter in any doubt. Perhaps he also feared that once they went back to their homes they might be tempted to forget their promise. So he "called the priests and made them swear to do as they had promised."
Nehemiah asked for more than regret. That is what God looked for whenever one person wronged another:
God looked for confession and restitution whenever someone had committed a trespass. The second would show whether the first was sincere. It was not enough for a Jew who had wronged his brother to go and say, "I am sorry." He had to restore the thing in which he had trespassed, and add a fifth to it. Now, although we are not under the law, we may still gather much instruction from its institutions... If we have wronged anyone, it is not enough that we confess our sin to God and to our brother; we must make restitution. We are called to give practical proof that we have judged ourselves over the thing in which we trespassed.
- Restore, because they are brothers. Interest was not wrong in itself. God forbade it between Israelites because of their standing before Him and their bond as brothers.
- Restore, because the rebuke was credible. Nehemiah had spent his own money buying Jews back from foreign owners. He could set that beside what the nobles were doing to their own people.
- Restore today, not tomorrow. Nehemiah did not ask for better behaviour from now on. Fields, vineyards, houses and the money already taken had to go back at once.
- Restore under oath. Consent given in a public assembly can fade at home. So Nehemiah had the priests take an oath and hold the leaders to their word.
- Restore, or the sorrow was empty. Saying "I am sorry" was never enough. Giving back what you took is the practical proof that you have judged yourself.
Also I shook my lap, and said, So God shake out every man from his house and from his earnings, that performeth not this promise even thus be he shaken out and emptied! And all the congregation said, Amen! And they praised Jehovah. And the people did according to this promise.
Nehemiah has just confronted the wealthy leaders of Jerusalem. They had been making money off their own struggling countrymen, and now they agree to give it all back. This verse is how he closes the deal: a gesture, a curse on anyone who breaks the agreement, and the crowd's answer.
The thing being renounced was lending at interest to a fellow Israelite. One reference work notes that the word behind "usury" is broader than our modern sense of it, and explains why the practice was forbidden between brothers:
In Scripture this word does not mean, as it does now, excessive interest. It simply means interest of any kind. The Israelites were forbidden to charge interest to their brothers. The law always assumed the borrower was poor, since otherwise he would not need to borrow. To strangers, however, they were allowed to lend at interest. Ex. 22:25; Lev. 25:35-38; Deut. 23:19-20. When the Jews returned, Nehemiah sharply rebuked the nobles and the rulers for taking interest from their poorer brothers. Neh. 5:3-13. Scripture strictly commands the rich to help the poor.
Verse 12 already had their agreement. Nehemiah still brought in the priests and put the men under oath, and commentators read this as a realistic estimate of how easily such an agreement could evaporate:
Nehemiah knew that even a ruler could cleverly slip out of a promise if he is not held to it. So the priests stood as witnesses to this oath, with authority to make sure the men kept it.
Another writer gives two reasons for it:
The gesture is a picture drawn from clothing: the fold of the robe was where a man carried his goods, and Nehemiah emptied his out in front of them all.
Then Nehemiah shook out the fold of his garments and said, "So may God shake out each man from his house, and from his property, who does not perform this promise." At this, all the assembly responded, "Amen!" and praised the Lord.
Its force reached past the restitution owed that day and fixed a standard for the years ahead:
But he added a most solemn denunciation of such conduct for the future.
The crowd's single word was not mild approval. Its earliest uses in Scripture tie the speaker to a curse he has just heard:
A strong assertion of affirmation and assent. It first appears when a woman was suspected of being unfaithful to her husband. She had to drink the bitter water. The priest pronounced a curse upon her if she had been guilty, and the woman had to answer Amen, Amen. Num. 5:22. The same word followed each curse the priest read out on Mount Ebal: "And all the people shall say, 'Amen.'" Deut. 27:14-26.
Were these men really broken over what they had done? One writer leaves that open, and hears something flat in what they said:
Thanks be to God, Nehemiah had the joy of receiving a positive response. Did his exhortations deeply reach the consciences of those who had sinned? We cannot say. In any case, their words seem a little lifeless for people who are sorry and humbled: "We will restore these and require nothing from them. We will do as you say" (v. 12). But however that may be, they obeyed, and this simple act of obedience produces joy in Israel.
The verse closes with the people doing what they had promised. How long that took, the record does not say:
How long the process of restoring took we are not told, but the decisive action of Nehemiah was effective.
Nehemiah could ask this of others because he had first asked it of himself; verses 14-18 record a governor who never claimed his own allowance. The lesson drawn from it is blunt:
There is nothing like example. If you want devotedness, the great thing is to begin with yourself. Be devoted yourself. If you want love, show love. You will very often find that the men who most demand love are those who least show it.
- Promise — the men agreed to stop charging interest to poor fellow Israelites. They would also give back the land and money already taken. The law had forbidden this between brothers.
- Oath — a spoken yes was not enough. Nehemiah called the priests as witnesses, because even a ruler can slip out of a promise no one holds him to.
- Sign — shaking out the fold of his garment acted out the penalty. God would empty any man of house and property who broke his word — then and in the years after.
- Amen — the crowd's word was full agreement. In earlier Scripture the same word bound a person to a curse he had just heard.
- Deed — the account does not stop at the ceremony. The people did what they promised, and that obedience brought joy and praise to the Lord.
Moreover from the time that I was appointed to be their governor in the land of Judah, from the twentieth year even to the thirty-second year of Artaxerxes the king, twelve years, I and my brethren have not eaten the bread of the governor.
Nehemiah stops the story of the wall to put his twelve years as governor on the record, starting with a right he never used. Why would a man refuse what his office owed him — and why did God have it written down?
The verse dates itself: from the twentieth year of Artaxerxes to his thirty-second. Commentators set these twelve years inside a larger picture of two journeys to Jerusalem.
By his own account, Nehemiah travelled twice from Susa to Jerusalem. The first journey took place in the 20th year of Artaxerxes I, king of Persia, and lasted until the king's 32nd year (Neh. 2:1; 5:14; 13:6). After this Nehemiah made a second journey to Jerusalem (Neh. 13:6-7). King Artaxerxes reigned from 464 to 424 BC. So Nehemiah's first stay lasted from 445 to 433 BC.
Reading a man list his own good conduct can look like self-praise. Commentators answer that this is not Nehemiah praising himself. It is the Holy Spirit teaching us through him.
From verse 14 to the end of the chapter, Nehemiah is led to give an account of his own conduct as governor. From a human point of view, this might look like self-praise and self-promotion. But we must never forget that we are reading God's word. The Holy Spirit guided Nehemiah, and He had this description written down for our instruction. As noted before, the lesson is that the shepherds the Lord raises up for His people should always be "examples to the flock." (See 1 Peter 5:1-3.)
The food allowance of the governor was not a bribe. The post carried it, and Nehemiah had every right to it. He gave it up — and that is what gave him the standing to confront the lenders earlier in the chapter.
Nehemiah could speak like this because of his own position. He was devoted to his people without reserve, and he gave up all claim to his personal interests. His private conduct and his public conduct matched… He also had the rights of the governor, which meant being fed at the people's expense. But he gave up that right completely. And the apostle Paul did likewise at Corinth. The man who serves at the altar has the right to eat from the altar, and that holds for everyone who serves in ministry. But Paul had accepted nothing from the Corinthians. He wanted to set an example for that dear assembly, which was in danger from those who were spoiling it.
Nehemiah supplies his own motive in the next verse: the fear of God. Commentators describe it as a constant reverence for God that kept self-will and self-interest from ruling him.
"But I did not do so," he says, "because of the fear of God." This shows us a man with a tender and active conscience. He watched his own ways and conduct, in case self-will or his own advantage ruled him instead of God's word. He kept a constant reverence for His presence and His authority. He held a holy fear in his soul and always sought to commend himself to the Lord. This was the secret of both his uprightness and his devotion.
The rebuke earlier in the chapter and the governor's own expenses belong together. A man who has taken nothing can speak plainly.
Nehemiah's angry charge carried extra force because he himself had been so careful in this matter. Former governors had demanded food and support from the people. He, in contrast, had taken nothing from them, and he had supported 150 Jews and rulers, besides occasional visitors. We are not told how he did it, but he probably drew his supplies from the Persian king. When rebuke is needed, it has far more power if the one giving it is completely free of the error he has to rebuke. The same holds for the happy work of restoring someone, as we see in Galatians 6:1 – "Keep watch on yourself, lest you too be tempted."
The same lesson is turned on the reader directly: reform starts at home.
There is nothing like example. If you want devotedness, the great thing is to begin with yourself. Be you devoted individually. If you want love, show love. You will very often find that the men who most claim love are those that least manifest it.
What Nehemiah did went beyond the law's requirements, and beyond ordinary kindness toward one's own people.
This practical grace rising above law sprang from the fear of God. It was not mere Jewish clannishness or patriotism. It was holy, and it reminds us of someone greater than Nehemiah. He upheld the Lord's command for those who preach the gospel, yet did not use this right himself, in the full spirit of the gospel he preached… the danger is of slipping into mere kindness, which a natural man can manage and which he applauds.
- Right — The food allowance belonged to Nehemiah by right. He refused it for twelve years, from the twentieth to the thirty-second year of Artaxerxes.
- Reason — He names the source himself: the fear of God. His conscience was tender, watching that self-will and self-interest never ruled him.
- Record — This is not self-praise. It is Scripture, written so that those who lead God's people would be examples to the flock.
- Rebuke — Clean hands gave weight to his charge. A rebuke has power when the one giving it is free of the fault himself.
- Reach — This grace rises above law and above ordinary kindness. It points forward to Paul, who upheld the right of gospel preachers to be supported, yet never used it himself.
But the former governors that were before me had been chargeable to the people, and had taken of them bread and wine, besides forty shekels of silver even their servants bore rule over the people. But I did not so, because of the fear of God.
Nehemiah had been governor of Judah for twelve years, and the governors before him had lived off the people they ruled. This verse names what they took, and then gives the one reason Nehemiah refused to take it.
Nehemiah was not refusing something forbidden. The governor's food allowance came with the office, and earlier governors had taken it as a matter of course.
He tells us that for the twelve years he was governor, neither he nor his brothers had eaten the food allowance of the governor, as earlier governors had done. He had not, as he explains, "laid heavy burdens on the people." His office entitled him to do so, but he did not use his authority here. We are again reminded of the apostle Paul, who wrote to the Corinthians, "If we have sown spiritual things among you, is it too much if we reap material things from you? If others share this rightful claim on you, do not we even more? Nevertheless, we have not made use of this right, but we endure anything rather than put an obstacle in the way of the gospel of Christ."
The verse blames the staff of the former governors, not only the governors themselves.
He also refused, unlike the former governors, to let his servants rule over the people. No abuse is more common, even in the church of God, than the one pointed to here.
The verse gives no other motive. Commentators read that fear as a settled habit of soul, not a one-off decision.
Walking and acting before God kept Nehemiah from this abuse. "But I did not do so," he says, "because of the fear of God." This shows us a man whose conscience was tender and awake. He watched his own ways and conduct, in case self-will or his own advantage should govern him instead of God's word. He kept up a habitual reverence for God's presence and His authority. Holding a holy fear in his soul, he always sought to commend himself to the Lord.
Writers apply the same test to public office today, where a post can be a quick road to personal wealth.
More than a few countries today make financial profit the great end of politics. If you were a governor there you would find it so easy to feather your own nest and in a few years retire a wealthy person! But what of God? If God is to control, and if I am to live my life under His eye, then that alters the whole matter. Now godliness is this God-consciousness. It is living under the eye of God, with God as the trust and the glory of our hearts. Godliness, with the contentment that flows from it, is great gain.
Nehemiah broke no law either way. What moved him was not love of his own nation.
This practical grace rising above law sprang from the fear of God. It was not mere Jewish clannishness or patriotism. It was holy... It is lovely where such fruits adorn a righteous and holy walk. It is best of all when the good works done show, not merely or so much the kindness of the doers, but their light, their witness of Christ, shining before men. Those who see it glorify, not them, but their Father Who is in heaven.
The chapter has just shown Nehemiah rebuking others sharply. His own twelve-year record is what gave that rebuke its weight.
Nehemiah's angry charge carried extra force because he himself had been so careful in this matter, as the verses that follow show. Former governors had demanded their food and upkeep from the people. He, on the contrary, had taken nothing from them... When rebuke is needed, it carries far more power if the one giving it is completely free of the error he has to rebuke.
The principle runs wider than correction:
There is nothing like example. If you want devotedness, the great thing is to begin with yourself. Be devoted yourself. If you want love, show love. You will very often find that the men who most demand love are those who least show it.
- Fear — the fear of God is the one reason the verse gives. Out of it came a tender conscience, a guard against self-interest, and a steady reverence for God.
- Freedom — that fear freed Nehemiah to hold a right and never use it. The food allowance came with his office, and he let the claim go.
- Grace — commentators call this grace rising above law, not patriotism. Paul did the same: he upheld the right of preachers to support, yet took none himself.
- Force — his own clean record gave his rebuke its weight. Correction gains power when the one giving it is free of the fault.
- Follow — the example is there to copy. If you want devotedness or love from others, begin with yourself.
Yea, also I applied myself to this work of the wall, and we bought no fields; and all my servants were gathered thither for the work.
Nehemiah had been governor for twelve years. Here he sets his own record beside that of the men he has just rebuked for exploiting their neighbours. This verse is the positive half of that record. It shows where his time went, what he refused to buy, and what his servants were doing while the wall went up.
Nehemiah did not just oversee the building. He stayed with the work himself. One writer traces this back to the words just before, "because of the fear of God":
This reveals a man whose conscience was tender and active. He watched his own ways and conduct, in case self-will or his own advantage should govern him instead of God's word. He held a constant reverence both for His presence and His authority... He gave himself to the work. He sought no earthly possessions for himself. His servants gave themselves to building the wall along with him. This is a blessed example of self-denial and consecration, and the fruit of the grace of God. It is well suited to stir up the godly to follow in his steps. It also rebukes the greed of those who were trading on their brothers' needs.
Buying land was not forbidden to him. That is what makes the refusal worth recording:
Also neither Nehemiah nor his servants bought any land to make a profit from, though this would have been fully within their rights. They occupied themselves only with the work of the Lord (v. 16). However, Nehemiah must have been a man of substantial means. After all, he provided food for 150 Jews and rulers, as well as for visitors who came from the nations around them!
Nehemiah had just rebuked men who were profiting from their neighbours' hardship. One writer explains what gave him the standing to do it:
His own position — unreserved devotion to his people and absolute renouncing of his personal interests — allowed Nehemiah to speak like this. He had brought his private conduct and his public conduct into agreement... He also had the rights of the governor, that is, to be fed at the people's expense, but he completely gave up this right. And the apostle Paul did the same at Corinth. The one who serves at the altar has the right to eat from the altar, and this is true of all servants who minister, but Paul had accepted nothing from the Corinthians, so as to be an example to that dear assembly, which was in danger from those who were spoiling it... So he was qualified to urge them, and even to demand, that this state of things should cease.
The same writer sees a pattern here for anyone who leads God's people:
He is able to rebuke the offenders by contrasting their conduct with his own... It is a most blessed thing when a shepherd among the people of God can point to his own conduct as their guide.
The choice was between a wall and an estate. One writer names what settled it:
And the fear of God kept them from greed and love of gain. The work of the wall — God's work — meant more to them than their own enrichment.
Nehemiah's generosity could look like ordinary kindness. One writer draws the line between the two:
This practical grace rising above law sprang from the fear of God. It was not mere Jewish clannishness or patriotism. It was saintly... It is lovely when such fruit adorns a righteous and holy walk. Best of all is when the good works done show not just the kindness of the doers, but their light, their witness of Christ, shining before men. Those who see it glorify, not them, but their Father who is in heaven... the great lack among Christians is practical faith that the eye of man cannot appreciate. The danger is slipping into mere kindness, which a natural man can show too, and which he applauds.
- Fear — One root explains every refusal here — the fear of God. It kept Nehemiah from greed and from using his office for gain.
- Right — He had a governor's legal claim to be fed at the people's expense, and he was free to buy land. The claim was real, and he let it go.
- Focus — God's work mattered more to him than his own wealth. He stayed on the wall instead of building an estate.
- Reach — His servants joined him in the work, so his devotion shaped more than one life.
- Standing — His private conduct matched his public words. That qualified him to urge change — and to demand it.
And there were at my table a hundred and fifty of the Jews and the rulers, besides those that came to us from among the nations that were about us.
Nehemiah 5 has just exposed rich Jews profiting from their poorer brothers, and the governor answers with more than a rebuke. He opens the books on his own table: 150 men fed daily, plus guests from the nations around, all paid for out of his own pocket.
The position of governor carried a legal claim on the people's food. Nehemiah dropped it, and this is what put weight behind everything he said.
He also had the rights of a governor: the people had to feed him at their own expense. But he gave up that right completely. The apostle Paul did the same at Corinth. Whoever serves at the altar has the right to eat from the altar, and that holds for everyone who serves in ministry. But Paul accepted nothing from the Corinthians. He did it to set an example for that dear assembly, which was in danger from those who were ruining it. As for Nehemiah, he paid out of his own pocket to feed 150 Jews and rulers every day, not counting visiting guests. So he had the right to urge, and even to demand, that this state of things must stop.
Nehemiah demanded nothing of others that his own table had not already done. That order matters.
There is nothing like example. If you want devotedness, the great thing is to begin with yourself. Be devoted yourself. If you want love, show love. You will often find that the people who demand love the most are the ones who show it least.
Read with the verses around it, this verse belongs to a short list of the governor's habits. His open door to outsiders had a purpose.
Nehemiah did not only rebuke and urge others. His own way of life was a pattern to them. He thought of the people (14 and 18). He walked in the fear of God (15). And he welcomed people of the other nations into his home, so that no one had grounds for reproach (17).
Commentators differ on who the extra guests were. Some take them as people of the surrounding nations. Others read the phrase as Jews living outside Jerusalem:
That is, Jews who were scattered among the other peoples living in Palestine at that time.
Either way, the table was open. The same writer sets the cost of that devotion against the greed Nehemiah had just rebuked:
He gave himself to the work. He looked for no property of his own. He and his servants alike gave themselves to building the wall. What a blessed example of self-denial and devotion to God! It is the fruit of the grace of God, well suited to stir godly people to follow in his steps, and to rebuke the greed of those who were trading on their brothers' needs.
A hundred and fifty daily guests sounds lavish until you set it beside the royal table of Solomon. Then the restraint becomes the point.
Nehemiah's doings in Jerusalem after the great break-up were humble by comparison. He often hosted "a hundred and fifty men, Jews and officials, besides those who came to us from the nations that were around us." For this he needed one ox and six choice sheep a day. He kept everything low because the people who had returned were poor (Neh. 5:17-18). This devoted governor sought nothing for himself: only the good of the people. But Solomon needed "ten fat oxen, and twenty pasture-fed cattle, a hundred sheep, besides deer, gazelles, roebucks, and fattened fowl" every day (1 Kings 4:22-23). Solomon is again a picture of Christ, who will reign in Zion. Then He "will abundantly bless her provisions" and "will satisfy her poor with bread" (Psalm 132:15).
The law did not demand this table. Something deeper produced it, and it recalls someone greater than Nehemiah, who also refused a right he held.
This practical grace rising above law sprang from the fear of God. It was not mere Jewish clannishness or patriotism. It was the mark of a saint. It recalls someone greater than Nehemiah. He upheld the Lord's rule for those who preach the gospel, yet did not use that right himself, in the full spirit of the gospel he preached. It is lovely when such fruit adorns a righteous and holy walk. It is best of all when the good works point not so much to the kindness of those who do them, but to their light, their witness to Christ, shining before people. Those who see it then give glory, not to them, but to their Father Who is in heaven.
- The right surrendered. The people owed the governor his food. Nehemiah gave up that claim and paid for the table himself.
- The table spread. A hundred and fifty men every day, yet the food stayed plain — one ox and six sheep — because the people who had returned were poor.
- The reach widened. The table reached past his own circle. Commentators read the extra guests either as people of the nations around, or as Jews living among them.
- The reproach removed. Welcoming outsiders removed every occasion for reproach.
- The rebuke empowered. He began with himself, so he could demand change. Such fruit sends the praise of onlookers to the Father in heaven, not to the doer.
And that which was prepared daily was one ox [and] six choice sheep; also fowls were prepared for me, and once in ten days all sorts of wine in abundance. Yet for all this I demanded not the bread of the governor; for the service was heavy upon this people.
Nehemiah fed a hundred and fifty officials and their guests every day, out of his own pocket. He also refused the food allowance his office gave him — and the verse tells us why.
The verse lists the daily menu in detail. One writer weighs what those numbers meant over twelve years.
Nehemiah must have been a man of substantial means. He provided food for 150 Jews and rulers, as well as for visitors from the nations around them! He had been the king's cupbearer, so of course his salary would have been large. But he supplied his household with one ox and six sheep every day for 12 years, plus fowl and plenty of wine. That seems nothing short of amazing. We might wonder, was the king continuing to pay Nehemiah his salary all this length of time?
Another writer suggests where the supplies came from.
Just how he did it we are not told, but he probably drew his supplies from the Persian king.
Nehemiah gave up a right his office carried. One writer sets that choice beside Paul's refusal of support at Corinth.
He had brought his private conduct and his public conduct into agreement. He could say: "But I did not do so, because of the fear of God." He also had the rights of the governor — the right to have the people pay for his food — but he had completely renounced it. And the apostle Paul did likewise at Corinth. He who serves at the altar has the right to eat of the altar, and this is true of all ministering servants. But Paul had accepted nothing from the Corinthians. He did it to set an example for this dear assembly, which was in danger from those who were spoiling it.
One writer reads the open table as a mark of character. The same quality appears later in the list of things required of a church leader.
From this we learn that Nehemiah was a man of hospitality, and that he did "not neglect to show hospitality to strangers." So he had one of the qualifications the apostle calls essential for an overseer in the church of God — a qualification perhaps valued less now than in the past. But it may be that nothing binds the hearts of the saints together more, and so promotes fellowship, than hospitality according to God... The source of its exercise is the activity of grace in the heart — delighting to give, and made happy in the happiness of others. It is therefore no small expression of the heart of God.
The verse gives his reason: the load already resting on this people. The same writer sees compassion behind the decision.
Their condition touched his heart. He had learned the lesson that it is more blessed to give than to receive. He therefore gave generously to those who came to him, and seems to have welcomed all.
One writer traces this kind of giving to its root. He also warns what it can be mistaken for.
This practical grace rising above law sprang from the fear of God. It was not mere Jewish clannishness or patriotism. It was holy, and it brings to mind someone greater than Nehemiah. He upheld the Lord's ordinance for those who preach the gospel, yet did not use this right himself, in the full spirit of the gospel he preached... But the great lack among Christians is practical faith that the eye of man cannot appreciate. The danger is of slipping into mere kindness, which a natural man can manage and applauds.
The record of his expenses stands right after a sharp rebuke he had given. One writer shows why his own conduct gave that rebuke its force.
What added force to Nehemiah's indignant charge was that he himself had been so careful in this matter... When rebuke is called for, it carries far more power if the one giving it is wholly free of the error he has to rebuke. The same principle holds when the happy work of restoration has to be done, as we see in Galatians 6:1 — "keep watch on yourself, lest you too be tempted."
- Fear — It starts in verse 15: he would not take what he had every right to take, "because of the fear of God."
- Right — He could have made the people pay for his food. He gave that right up, as Paul did with the Corinthians.
- Table — Instead of taking, he gave: an ox, six choice sheep and wine every day, for officials and strangers alike.
- Reason — He gave because the load on the people was already heavy. Their need moved him.
- Weight — He was clear of the sin he condemned, so his rebuke carried force. That still holds for anyone who corrects another.
Remember for me, my God, for good, all that I have done for this people.
After twelve years as governor, Nehemiah turns from the people to God with a short, personal prayer. It raises an old question: may a servant of God ask to be remembered for what he has done?
His prayer rests on a record. As governor he could claim food and support from the people. He gave that claim up. One writer sets this beside Paul's refusal to take money from the Corinthians:
He also had the rights of a governor, including the right to have the people pay for his food. But he gave that right up completely. And the apostle Paul did the same at Corinth. The one who serves at the altar has the right to eat of the altar, and this is true of all serving ministers. But Paul had accepted nothing from the Corinthians, so as to be an example to this dear assembly, which was in danger from those who were spoiling it. As for Nehemiah, he spent his own possessions to feed 150 Jews and rulers daily, not counting visiting guests. So he was in a position to urge, and even to demand, that this should stop.
One commentator looks at what lay behind that self-denial:
This reveals a man whose conscience was tender and always at work. He watched his ways and conduct, so that self-will or his own advantage would never rule him in place of God's word. He kept up a habitual reverence for God's presence and His authority. Holding a holy fear in his soul, he always sought to commend himself to the Lord. This was the secret of both his uprightness and his devotedness.
Verses 14 to 19 read like a man listing his own virtues. That impression is answered by asking who is really doing the recording:
Looking at this in a human way, it might seem that he is praising and exalting himself. But we must never forget that we are reading God's word. The Holy Spirit guided this description, and it stands on record for our instruction. And, as noted before, the lesson is that the shepherds whom the Lord raises up for His people should always be "examples to the flock."
Nehemiah asks with confidence, not anxiety. Having given up his rights, he could face both God and people:
Then Nehemiah turns to God, as he will often do later. His simple heart is sure that God approves him; he can stand before God and men with a good conscience. He has given up all his rights as governor for the service of the Lord and His people. He has no doubt that God is pleased with him. But what gives such authority to his exhortations is that he can truthfully say: "Join in imitating me."
Some hold that a higher devotion would not have mentioned reward at all. One writer weighs that charge and then declines it:
People have often said that this prayer, like others he records, shows that Nehemiah moved on a low spiritual level. A far higher thing, they say, would have been not to think of any reward at all. It may be so… On the other hand, in a day of confusion and ruin he stood out for rare devotedness to the service of his God, for an upright conscience, and for complete self-forgetfulness in his intense desire for the glory of God in the welfare of His people… The Lord Himself said, "whoever gives one of these little ones even a cup of cold water because he is a disciple, truly, I say to you, he will by no means lose his reward." In that spirit Nehemiah turned away from all thought of selfish advantage. He knew the faithful God he was dealing with… Like Moses, he was "looking to the reward," but not from men — from God.
Another writer ties the wording to Nehemiah's place under the law:
We must also remember that Nehemiah was under law when he wrote, "Remember for my good, O my God, all that I have done for this people." Under grace Paul does not ask to be remembered. God has remembered all believers in saving them for eternity, and we may be fully confident that He will not forget any work done for Him.
Whichever view is taken of the wording, the outcome is not in doubt, and it reaches wider than one man:
In everything he had done as a servant of God he had the comfort that God knew and would be his Rewarder… He will have his reward, and so will all His people who serve on behalf of God's people as Nehemiah did.
- Fear — a holy fear of God kept his conscience awake, and that fear was the secret of both his honesty and his self-denial.
- Cost — he gave up a right he held and fed 150 people at his own expense. That cost gave his rebuke of others its force.
- Conscience — with a clear conscience before God and people, he could say, follow my example.
- Question — commentators differ over this prayer. One sees real devotion in it. Another ties it to Nehemiah's place under the law.
- Reward — he looked to God for reward, not to people. God forgets no work done for Him.
And it came to pass when Sanballat, and Tobijah, and Geshem the Arabian, and the rest of our enemies, heard that I had built the wall, and that there was no breach left in it (though at that time I had not set up the doors in the gates),
The wall is closed; only the gates still wait for their doors. That one gap is what Nehemiah's enemies notice, and it decides how they attack next.
Sanballat heard not that the work had stalled, but that it was nearly done.
The wall had been rebuilt, but the doors had not yet been set up in the gates. In only a few days, the city would be protected against a surprise attack. Before it is too late, the enemy hurries to take advantage of this weak point. First of all, they must get rid of the leader of the people.
A wall with no gaps changed what the enemy could try next.
"No breach" was left in the wall, and so there was now no hidden way of entrance. The doors were still unhung, but these were open to view, and by these only could the enemies of God's people approach. It was time therefore to put out their final effort, and so they propose a conference, as if they too were interested in the welfare of Israel!
These three are only the latest in a line of opponents.
One group of men succeeds the other in their hatred against the work of God, some more violent, some less. But the opposition remains. The enemy who uses all these instruments has not changed. Oh, if only faith would never allow itself to be stopped by the obstacles which the agents of Satan raise up! If only we understood well that the work of God cannot be destroyed, because God remains over and above all!
The attack now changes shape, and it targets one man.
Nehemiah has faced, and triumphed over, the open opposition of the enemy; he has met too the corruptions of the flesh. Now he is called on to "stand against the wiles of the devil." The enemy comes with the appearance of friendly interest in Nehemiah and his work. By subtlety he will seek to lure him away from the simplicity of faith in God. In that way he would bring the work to nothing by causing the fall of the leader.
The change of tone calls for no change of judgment.
The first plan was a supposedly friendly interview; but the friendship of the enemy is no more to be trusted than his hostile plans are to be feared.
Stanley puts the invitation into the enemies' own words, and the place they name carries weight.
It is as if they said: do not be so narrow and exclusive. Come down from your sacred enclosure to "one of the villages in the plain of Ono." "Let us meet together." Come down, and give us your approval there. What was this plain of Ono? Nehemiah 11:35 says, "Lod and Ono, the valley of craftsmen." Leave the only centre of worship inside those walls of Jerusalem, and come down to one of the villages of "the craftsmen." They knew well that if the true worship of God was set up inside that holy enclosure, they would feel, like the tradesmen of Ephesus in a later day, that their trade was in danger.
Nehemiah weighed the invitation against the work God had given him.
It seems that Sanballat and Geshem offered a friendly meeting on neutral ground, suggesting some kind of alliance. But Nehemiah, whole-hearted as he was, refused to come down and stop the important God-given work. He would not turn aside from the place given to him by the Lord and the work which he had been called to do. Keeping this separation was his safeguard.
Did any of this hold up the work?
The reader will note that, though this chapter is given to exposing the enemy's schemes, the work of building the wall was in no way hindered. The faith and courage of Nehemiah never faltered... "So the wall was finished on the twenty-fifth day of the month Elul, in fifty-two days." "So" is a remarkable word here. It might mean "in this way," or "despite this," or "in spite of it all."
- Timing. The enemy moved when the wall was whole and the doors were still missing. Pressure comes hardest when the work is nearly finished.
- Constancy. The names change through Ezra and Nehemiah. The hostility behind them does not, and God still finishes His work.
- Change of weapon. Having failed at force and at internal trouble, the enemy switches to friendly interest, aiming at the leader rather than the wall.
- Distrust. The enemy's friendship deserves no more trust than his threats deserve fear. The invitation to Ono was a call to leave the place God had given.
- Result. The schemes fill the chapter, but the wall still went up in fifty-two days — the "so" of verse 15 reads as "in spite of all this."
that Sanballat and Geshem sent to me, saying, Come, let us meet together in the villages in the plain of Ono. But they thought to do me mischief.
The wall is finished and the gaps are closed. Now the enemies who once threatened violence turn polite: they invite Nehemiah to a friendly meeting on neutral ground, and he must judge what lies behind it.
Sanballat and Geshem had fought the rebuilding in the open. Here their approach changes:
Nehemiah has faced the open opposition of the enemy, and won. He has also met the corruptions of the flesh. Now he is called to "stand against the wiles of the devil." The enemy pretends to take a friendly interest in Nehemiah and his work. By this subtlety he will try to draw him away from simple faith in God, and so bring the work to nothing by causing the fall of the leader in the work.
The change of tone is no reason to relax:
The first plan was a friendly-looking meeting. But the enemy's friendship deserves no more trust than his hostile plans deserve fear.
The enemy picked his moment:
The wall had been rebuilt, but the doors were not yet set up in the gates. In a few more days the city would be safe from a surprise attack. So the enemy hurries to use this weak point before it is too late. First of all, the enemy must get rid of the leader of the people.
The unhung doors also explain why the enemy proposed a meeting instead of an ambush:
"No gap" was left in the wall, so there was now no hidden way in. The doors were still unhung, but anyone could see them, and the enemies of God's people could only come that way. So it was time for their final effort. They propose a conference, as if they too cared about the welfare of Israel!
The meeting place mattered. Ono lay outside Jerusalem, and the invitation asked Nehemiah to come down to it:
It is as if they said: Do not be so narrow and exclusive. Come down from your sacred enclosure to "one of the villages in the plain of Ono." Come down, and approve us there. And what was this plain of Ono? Turn to Nehemiah 11:35, "Lod and Ono, the valley of craftsmen." Leave the only centre of worship inside those walls of Jerusalem, and come down to one of the villages of "the craftsmen." They knew well what would happen if the true worship of God was set up inside that holy enclosure. They would feel as the Ephesians did later: their trade was in danger. "Sirs," said the men of Ephesus, "you know that from this business we have our wealth." (Acts 19:23-41.)
More than Nehemiah's safety hung on staying inside the city:
You see, it was not merely some ordinary invitation. The glory of God was bound up with it. God had given the remnant a city, the city where His eyes were. While they were not in that place, while it lay a mere heap of ruins, it was plain that it might be an object of pity; but there was no witness for the Lord there.
Nehemiah saw the intention behind the invitation at once. What let him see it was not cleverness:
But the servant of the Lord who walks in His presence, and pursues the path of His will with set purpose, is never deceived by Satan's tricks... He knew that darkness could have no communion with light. He knew that Satan could take no pleasure in the progress of the Lord's work, and that hating his Master, he must hate His servant too.
The real pressure in this invitation was to stop being separate:
If he cannot succeed by attacking the captives from outside, and if the trouble inside is settled, he will now try to make the remnant less exclusive... Here is the cry for union: "Why are you so exclusive? Can you not join with us in the work of the Lord?" ... God in His grace has called us out from the evil that has come into His Church. There is a distance between the ground we now stand on and the ground we came out from. We must be careful not to make that distance look smaller to others, and not to lose the sense of it in our own souls.
The offer looks reasonable, and that is the difficulty:
But when the truth of God or the work of God is in question, there is no room for compromise. The servant of God today may not fear physical harm. Yet he knows that what is of God is not open to human arrangement, however reasonable such a compromise may look.
- Timing. The gaps were closed, but the doors were not yet hung. The enemy moved while that last weak point lasted.
- Tone. Open attack gave way to friendly interest. The enemy's friendship deserves no more trust than his threats deserve fear.
- Ground. "Come down" meant leaving Jerusalem, the one place where the worship of God stood as a witness. Ono was neutral ground.
- Discernment. Nehemiah saw through the offer because he walked in God's presence with a fixed purpose, not because he was cleverer than his enemies.
- Refusal. A reasonable-sounding compromise is still a compromise. What is of God is not open to human negotiation.
And I sent messengers to them, saying, I am doing a great work, and I cannot come down. Why should the work cease, whilst I leave it and come down to you?
The wall is almost finished, and the enemies who tried force, mockery and threats now try friendliness. They invite Nehemiah down to a meeting on neutral ground, and he answers that the work in his hands is too great to leave.
The offer came at the one moment when the enemy still had a way in. One writer notes both the timing and the friendly mask:
"No breach" was left in the wall, and so there was now no hidden way of entrance. The doors were not yet hung, but anyone could see them, and the enemies of God's people could only come in that way. So it was time for their final effort. They propose a conference, as if they too cared about the welfare of Israel!
A friendly tone is no proof of a friendly heart:
The first plan was a meeting that claimed to be friendly. But the enemy's friendship deserves no more trust than his hostile plans deserve fear.
The enemy's word was "come down," and the place they named carried its own message:
It is as if they said, Do not be so narrow and exclusive. Do come down from your sacred enclosure to "one of the villages in the plain of Ono." "Let us meet together." Do come down, and give us your approval in the plain of Ono. And what was this plain of Ono? Nehemiah 11:35 calls it "Lod, and Ono, the valley of craftsmen." Do leave the only centre of worship inside those walls of Jerusalem, and come down to any one of the villages of "the craftsmen."
There were reasonable arguments for going. Nehemiah weighed the work instead.
They were driven by very different motives. Even so, the natural mind might say that courtesy required Nehemiah to agree to the meeting and hear what they had to say. Surely there can be no harm in listening to their suggestions even if it is impossible to agree. However, such arguments carry no weight with Nehemiah, even if anyone made them… He escapes the trap by seeing how great the work is that he is doing.
What made the work great was what hung on it:
You see, it was not merely some ordinary invitation. It was something with which the glory of God was bound up. The people who had returned were not yet in the place God had given them, the city where His eyes were. While it lay a mere heap of ruins, it might well draw pity. But there was no witness for the Lord there.
Nehemiah does not offer to come later. Even a short absence would cost the work:
Doing a great work, his business was to keep going, even if friends had asked him to leave it; and to leave it even for a moment would make it stop. The Lord's work, if it truly is His work, is not something to pick up and put down as we please. When He puts it into our hands, it claims our first and constant attention.
The enemy would not accept the first refusal, and Nehemiah did not improve on it. Wearing him down was the plan:
If faithfulness marked Nehemiah in refusing to go, divine wisdom is just as clear in the way he answered. It was "after the same manner." The circumstances had not changed, and so his first answer was enough. But Satan was working on the weakness of the human heart. He knew that persistence often betrays people. It was so with Samson. He had as much reason to refuse at the end as at the start, but Delilah pressed him with her words day after day and urged him, until he told her all his heart.
Commentators read the plain of Ono as any meeting ground where the line God has drawn disappears. Stepping onto it has a price:
This was a beautiful answer. If we leave in practice the ground of complete separation our Lord has called us to, we will just as surely see our strength go. Any wavering brings in weakness. The world says, "Nothing succeeds like success." Among believers it is, "Nothing succeeds like consistency."
- Great — Nehemiah measures the invitation against the work, not against courtesy. The work is great because God's glory and His witness in the city hang on it.
- Down — the enemy's word is exact. Ono was the valley of craftsmen, away from the one centre of worship. Every compromise is an invitation to come down.
- Friendly — force had failed, so they offered a conference, as if they cared about Israel too. Their friendship deserves no more trust than their threats deserve fear.
- Again — four invitations, one unchanged answer. Nothing had changed, so the first reply still stood. Samson fell to repetition, not to argument.
- Consistent — wavering costs strength. Steady refusal, not clever talk, keeps the work going.
And they sent to me four times after this sort; and I answered them in the same manner.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
Then sent Sanballat his servant to me in this manner the fifth time, with an open letter in his hand,
Four times Sanballat has approached Nehemiah, and four times Nehemiah has refused. The fifth message comes as a letter carried open in the servant's hand, where anyone can read it.
One writer warns that a firm refusal can weaken over time, and explains why this letter was left open.
This refusal does not repel the enemy. It often happens that we oppose him with a firm refusal at the beginning. Then, when we have grown only a little weary, we end by giving in to him. After four fruitless attempts, Sanballat makes a fifth, with a most dangerous trick. He sends his servant with an open letter in his hand. Anyone might know what that letter contained, and the enemy made sure to spread it. The accusations and threats it held had to reach the ears of the people, so that Sanballat could win recruits.
The wording of the letter sounds like concern for Nehemiah's good name. Its openness gives it away.
The letter uses friendly terms and pretends great concern for Nehemiah's reputation. It claims to fear that his name will suffer from certain damaging reports about him and his work. But as an "open letter" it has one deliberate purpose: to damage Nehemiah by spreading evil reports abroad.
Sanballat does not accuse outright. He passes on what others are said to be saying, and names a witness, Gashmu. Commentators count the charges differently, but each one leads to the same danger — a report to the king.
He put on a very clever mask. In his letter he manages to hint at three distinct charges. If these charges reached the king, they might well endanger Nehemiah's character, if not his life. First, he speaks of rebellion, and even produces a witness — Gashmu or Geshem, the Arabian. Then he suggests what would go with rebellion, if the first claim were true: that Nehemiah's aim in building the wall was to make himself king. And finally, he says people reported that Nehemiah had appointed prophets to preach about him in Jerusalem, saying, "There is a king in Judah."
One of the charges rests on nothing more than a rumour.
There is a rumour spreading (how often souls are frightened by these words: "there is a rumour!") that you have ambitious plans. You want to become their king. They will accuse you of trying to take the place of the ruling authority.
Nehemiah's reply in the next verse is one sentence: "No such things as you say have been done, for you are inventing them out of your own mind." Notice what he does not do.
Nehemiah will not be drawn into any argument with the tempter, and he gives no explanation of his work or his motives. With great wisdom and restraint he denies the accusation and exposes where these evil reports came from. He sees too that the real aim of the "open letter" is to terrify the people. It would lead them to think they are tied to a rebel plotting against the king. Terrified like this, their hands would be "weakened from the work." But, as always with Nehemiah, God was his resource. The enemy attacked Nehemiah to weaken the hands of the people. Nehemiah turns to God to strengthen his own hands, so that he could support the people.
Agreeing to meet would have told the watching people something about Nehemiah.
Satan's method is always to draw us off the ground of faith in the living God. In this case Nehemiah saw their aim: to make the people of God afraid of what the authorities might do. But fear is not faith. If Sanballat could tempt Nehemiah into meeting him, even the Jews would conclude that Nehemiah was afraid. Their confidence in a man of faith would be shaken. Let us not fear any kind of threat if we are doing what the Lord has sent us to do.
One writer points to who stands behind such attacks.
As it was in Nehemiah's day, so it is still. Wherever people do the work of the Lord and God's servants labour to glorify Him, the enemy will rise up and hinder the work. When the Lord opens a door, then many adversaries will appear. The sneers, the hatred, the tricks and the lies of the world are the same today. Behind them stands the same person who acted through Sanballat, Tobiah and Geshem — Satan, the god of this age.
- Persistence. Four refusals did not stop the enemy. He came a fifth time, counting on weariness to soften the answer.
- Publicity. Sanballat left the letter open on purpose. He wanted the people to read the charge, not just Nehemiah.
- Pretence. Friendly concern for his reputation hid three charges: rebellion, crowning himself king, and appointed prophets. Each was aimed at the king's ear.
- Precision. Nehemiah gave no explanation and no debate, only a flat denial that named the charge as invented.
- Prayer. The attack aimed to weaken the workers' hands. Nehemiah turned to God to strengthen his own, so he could hold up the people.
in which was written It is reported among the nations, and Gashmu says [it, that] thou and the Jews think to rebel, for which cause thou buildest the wall, and according to these words thou wilt become their king.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And thou hast also appointed prophets to proclaim concerning thee at Jerusalem saying, There is a king in Judah! And now it will be reported to the king according to these words. Come now therefore, and let us take counsel together.
Sanballat's fifth message came as an open letter . Anyone could read it on the way. It claimed Nehemiah was building the wall to crown himself, and had hired prophets to announce it. Why send an accusation unsealed? And how should a servant of God answer a charge that is false but almost believable?
The letter came unsealed, carried in the open. Writers see that as part of the attack.
After four unfruitful efforts, Sanballat tries a fifth time, with a most dangerous trick. He sends his servant with an open letter in his hand. Everyone might know what that letter contained, and the enemy did not hold back from spreading it. The accusations and threats in it had to reach the ears of the people, to win supporters for Sanballat.
The letter sounds as if Sanballat were shielding Nehemiah from gossip. Underneath, it stacks one charge on top of another.
The third snare is the trick of the "open letter" (6, 7). It is worded in friendly terms and pretends great concern for Nehemiah's reputation. The letter claims that reputation will suffer from certain damaging reports about Nehemiah and his work. But as an "open letter" its real purpose is to damage Nehemiah by spreading evil reports abroad. If true the charges would indeed be serious. For it is said that Nehemiah — the cupbearer and appointed governor of the king — is going to "rebel." What is more, a witness can be produced to support the charge, for "Gashmu says it." It is also said that Nehemiah's ultimate aim, in building the walls, is to raise himself to the throne as king. And finally, report has it that Nehemiah has appointed prophets to preach in Jerusalem. In this way he would back up his claim to royalty by a professed word from God.
Was there anything real behind the charge about the prophets? One writer thinks there may have been — a true event that an outsider read the wrong way.
It is more than likely that there was a show of truth in the last statement. Nehemiah cared deeply about his nation. He would not forget that all their hopes were centred in the promised Messiah. So he may have sought, through the ministry of prophets, to revive the flagging energies of the people. He would do this by reminding them of the glowing descriptions of the future kingdom under the rule of the true David, recorded, for example, in the writings of Isaiah. A stranger could not enter into this or understand it, and might well conclude that Nehemiah was sowing sedition and rebellion.
The letter ends by warning that the king will hear these reports. That threat gave it force. Nehemiah held his post only by the king's trust.
There was enough here to make even the greatest courage fail. There was suspicion cast on the character and purpose of the Lord's servant. And there was the fear of seeing his conduct slandered before the king who had put his confidence in him! The conclusion of the letter was an invitation repeated for the fifth time: "So now come and let us take counsel together."
Sanballat wrote to Nehemiah, but he aimed at the workers on the wall.
He sees, too, that the real aim of the "open letter" is to terrify the people by leading them to suppose they are linked to one who is a rebel plotting against the king. Terrified in this way, their hands would be "weakened from the work." But, as always with Nehemiah, God was his resource. The enemy attacked Nehemiah to weaken the hands of the people. Nehemiah turns to God to strengthen his own hands, so that he might support the people (8, 9).
Nehemiah's reply is a few words long. Writers draw a rule of conduct from its shortness.
His answer is simplicity itself: a plain denial in a few words of the truth of these alleged reports. At the same time he traced them back to their true source — Sanballat's own wicked heart… And this answer teaches us that we should never enter into argument with the tempter. We may repel his accusations. But if we once begin to reason with him, or even to explain, he will surely defeat us.
- Open — Sanballat left the letter unsealed on purpose, so the charge would reach the people and win him supporters.
- Layered — friendly concern on the surface, and underneath it rebellion, a named witness, a bid for the throne, and hired prophets.
- Plausible — talk of a coming king may have echoed real preaching about the promised Messiah. An outsider could only read it as rebellion.
- Aimed — Sanballat struck at the leader to weaken the hands of the builders.
- Answered — a short denial, no argument, no explanation, and then Nehemiah turned to God for strength.
And I sent to him, saying, There are no such things done as thou sayest, but thou feignest them out of thine own heart.
Sanballat's fifth message came as an open letter. In public it accused Nehemiah of plotting rebellion and aiming at a crown. It also invited him to a private meeting to "talk it over." Nehemiah's reply is one short sentence. The charges are fiction, made up in the accuser's own mind.
The letter pretends to be a warning between friends. Its real power was that anyone could read it.
The third snare is the trick of the "open letter" (6, 7). It is written in friendly terms and pretends great concern for Nehemiah's reputation. That reputation, it says, will suffer from certain damaging reports about Nehemiah and his work. But it is an "open letter" and its real design is to damage Nehemiah by spreading evil reports around. If true the charges would indeed be serious. The letter says that Nehemiah — the cupbearer and appointed governor of the king — is going to "rebel." This is alarming, for rebellion is an ugly word. They can even produce a witness to support the charge, for "Gashmu says it."
The letter hides more than one accusation, and each could reach the king.
It was a very clever mask which he put on. In his letter he manages to hint at three distinct charges. If someone reported them to the king, they might well endanger Nehemiah's character, if not his life. First he speaks of rebellion. Then he suggests what would follow if the first charge were true: that Nehemiah's aim in building the wall was to make himself king.
Nehemiah states the fact and stops.
Nehemiah will not let the tempter draw him into any argument. He gives no explanation of his work or motives. With great wisdom and restraint he denies the accusation, and exposes where these evil reports came from. The enemy attacked Nehemiah to weaken the hands of the people; Nehemiah turns to God to strengthen his own hands, so that he might support the people (8, 9).
The invitation itself gave the lie away. A man who believed the charges would not ask for a friendly meeting.
Nehemiah was certainly not deceived by this. In fact, if such charges were true, what reason would there be for consulting together? In that case Sanballat should report the matter to the king. He should present a clear witness to the truth of his charge. But he had no such witness. Nehemiah's answer was therefore precise and clear (v. 8). So Nehemiah refused to be lured in by these men. Satan's method is always to draw us off the ground of faith in the living God.
The sharpness of the reply is not arrogance. Nehemiah had nothing to hide.
The reply was very firm, so like a man who walks in peace with God: "No such things as you say have been done, for you are inventing them out of your own mind." If Nehemiah had been acting in the pride of a self-seeking heart, nothing could be more narrow, petty, even contemptible. But he was acting in the fear of Jehovah, and nothing could be more beautiful and faithful.
He answers the lie with the truth. Then he turns from the letter to God.
Nehemiah is not ignorant of the enemy's plans. He knows that he must resist the enemy, so that the enemy will flee. He sets the truth against the lies meant to frighten him (v. 8). What is more, as he always did, he backs up his actions with prayer to God: "Now therefore strengthen my hands!" (v. 9).
The same pattern repeats wherever God's work goes forward. The writers trace it past the human names to the one behind them.
Nehemiah answered this new attack with a clear conscience. He knew that it was all a wicked invention. As it was in Nehemiah's day so it is still. Wherever the Lord's work goes on and God's servants labour to glorify Him, the enemy will rise up and hinder the work. When the Lord opens a door, then many adversaries will appear. The sneers, the hatred, the tricks and the lies of the world are the same today. Behind them stands the same person who acted through Sanballat, Tobiah and Geshem — Satan, the god of this age.
- The bait — the fifth message came as an open letter. It sounded like concern for Nehemiah's good name. It was written for everyone to read, so the reports would spread.
- The tell — a real charge would go to the king with a witness. Sanballat asked for a meeting instead, and he had no witness.
- The answer — no argument, no defence of motives, no explanation of the work. Nehemiah denied the charge and named where the story came from.
- The ground — a man acting in the fear of God can answer in one line. Had Nehemiah been self-seeking, the same words would be contemptible.
- The aim — the enemy attacked to weaken the people's hands. Nehemiah asked God to strengthen his own hands. The attack drove him to prayer.
For they all would have made us afraid, saying, Their hands shall be slackened from the work, that it be not carried out. -- Now therefore strengthen my hands!
Sanballat and his allies have pressed Nehemiah again and again. This verse names the aim behind it all: frighten the builders until the work stops. His answer is a half-sentence of prayer, thrown up while the accusation is still in the air.
The enemy has tried other forms of attack. This time the target is the one man leading the work.
Nehemiah 6 presents the attack of enemies in a new form. God used Nehemiah as His instrument in these hard circumstances, so the enemies try to get rid of him. If their plan succeeded, the whole work would fall along with the servant God had trusted it to. This effort was the most dangerous of all, and it failed. Nehemiah shows rare qualities in resisting the enemy's attack. But what stands out in him is his full confidence in the Lord and his complete distrust of himself. That confidence comes out in his words in verse 9: "But now, O God, strengthen my hands." He knows he has no strength of his own, so he looks for the strength that is in God.
The charge that Nehemiah planned to make himself king came in an open letter, for anyone to read. Its aim reached past him to the people building beside him. His prayer runs the other way.
He also sees the real aim of the open letter. It is to terrify the people by making them think they are tied to a rebel plotting against the king. Once terrified, their hands would drop from the work. But, as always with Nehemiah, God was his resource. The enemy attacked Nehemiah to weaken the hands of the people; Nehemiah turns to God to strengthen his hands, so that he can hold the people up.
Sitting down with Sanballat would have cost Nehemiah more than time.
If Sanballat could tempt Nehemiah into a meeting with him, even the Jews would decide that Nehemiah was afraid, and their confidence in a man of faith would be shaken. Let us not fear any threat while we are doing what the Lord has sent us to do. In contrast to hands that grow weak in the work, Nehemiah made another short, spontaneous prayer: "But now, O God, strengthen my hands" (v. 9). So the opposition drove Nehemiah into the Lord's presence to find more strength.
Nehemiah does not negotiate or argue his case. He denies the charge, calls it invention, and turns to God. That is where every approach of the enemy ends.
The first plan was a supposedly friendly meeting. But we should trust the enemy's friendship no more than we fear his hostile plans... Then came Sanballat's servant with an open letter. It hinted that Nehemiah was ambitious and rebelling against the Gentile power then in charge. This drew out a plain, indignant denial and a rebuke of the lie. It all led to fresh prayer.
Prayer here is not an emergency measure but a settled habit, wrapped around everything he does.
Nehemiah is not ignorant of the enemy's designs; he knows that the enemy must be resisted so that he will flee; he opposes the truth to the lies destined to frighten him... Moreover, as was his custom, he accompanies his acts by prayer to God: "Now therefore strengthen my hands!" (v. 9). Oh! how good it is to trust in God! If the enemy comes to us, let us not fear him: at the opportune moment we will be delivered, if we persevere in prayer.
The same blunt reply could have been pride. The motive underneath decides it.
The reply was very firm, so like a man who walks in peace with God: "There are no such things done as you say, but you are inventing them out of your own heart." If Nehemiah had been acting from the pride of a self-seeking heart, nothing could be more narrow, petty, even contemptible. But he was acting in the fear of the Lord, and nothing could be more beautiful and faithful.
False charges against God's servants did not end with Sanballat.
They accused him of wanting to throw off Persian rule and make himself a king. Opponents used the same tactics in the early days of the Gospel. Paul, for example, was called "one who stirs up riots among all the Jews throughout the world" (Acts 24:5). Even today people bring completely untrue charges against preachers of the Gospel. These untrue charges against Nehemiah caused fear, though they knew they were untrue. Yet in verse 9 we see that they only cast him on God again. If opposition today casts us on God, we shall gain by it in the end.
- Hands — the enemy aims at hands. Frighten the people, and their hands drop from the work. Nehemiah asks God for hands strong enough to hold the people up.
- Aim — the attack takes a new form and targets one man, because the work would fall along with the servant God trusted it to.
- Fear — a meeting with the enemy would have told the Jews that Nehemiah was afraid and shaken their confidence in him.
- Answer — he refuses to argue and denies the lie outright. Every approach of the enemy ends in nothing but fresh prayer.
- Profit — the pressure meant to weaken him drove him into God's presence for fresh strength. Opposition that casts us on God turns to gain.
And I came to the house of Shemaiah the son of Delaiah, the son of Mehetabeel, who had shut himself up. And he said, Let us meet together in the house of God, within the temple, and let us shut the doors of the temple; for they are coming to kill thee; even in the night are they coming to kill thee.
Nehemiah has survived mockery, threats and a slanderous letter from outside the city. Now it comes from inside, from a friend whose advice sounds holy but asks him to run and hide.
Every earlier assault came from outside the city. This one comes from inside it. A commentator marks the change of plan, and what it cost Nehemiah.
Sanballat found these attacks from outside useless. So next he tried to conspire against Nehemiah from within… Nehemiah was the one obstacle to the enemy's success, and so the object of all his hatred. While others were unfaithful, he was faithful. The grace of his God held him in his path, and for that very reason his path was lonely. He knew there were enemies outside. Now he has to discover that professed friends were among his foes.
The ESV says Shemaiah was "confined to his home"; older translations read that he "was shut up." The text never says why, and commentators differ. One takes it as uncleanness under the law, which barred Shemaiah from the very place he was recommending.
It seems that Shemaiah was unclean under the law. That is probably the meaning of "shut up." In that condition he was not fit to be in the house of God, within the temple. And Nehemiah too, not being a priest, would have sinned if he had followed Shemaiah's suggestion. This was the cunning scheme.
Another writer reads the shutting-in as an act. On his reading, the offer left Nehemiah no innocent choice.
Shemaiah here takes the role of a prophet and speaks to Nehemiah as one. "He had shut himself up" when Nehemiah came to his house, pretending fear when there was nothing to fear. Tobiah and Sanballat had hired this man: the love of money had made him a traitor… He presses Nehemiah toward one of two options. He must either run away in fear, or hide in the temple, where only the priests could go, to escape his would-be assassins. Now, if he had run away, people would have accused him of a bad conscience. If he had hidden in the temple, they would have accused him of profaning it by disobeying God's direct command. Either way, Nehemiah would have started down a path of sin that would have shamed him.
Nehemiah's refusal guarded two things at once: the people he led and the honour of God's house.
Nehemiah utterly refuses… Where would his faith have been? How could a man leave the children and show that all he cared about was his own personal safety? Besides, it would have been a blatant defiance of the glory of God. It was against God for an Israelite to use the sanctuary of the LORD as the pagan nations did. They made their sanctuaries places of refuge when their lives were in danger. God never allowed such a thing in His temple. His temple was for His worship, according to His word.
The threat comes twice in one breath. The hired prophet wanted panic, not a fight.
The next efforts came from within. Their aim was to draw Nehemiah into fear, and to make the house of God a physical refuge. But here again the godly leader spotted the profane and unbelieving snare… Fear is the chief weapon of false religion, whatever it claims to be. But a single eye was enough to keep Nehemiah clear of their influence.
Nehemiah did not unmask Shemaiah and then say no. He said no, and the mask fell off.
It is a remarkable thing. The moment Nehemiah refused the temptation, he saw the whole character of the enemy's plans. He saw through every disguise, and found the evil and hypocrisy at work to trap his feet. It is always so. The temptation blinds us only as long as we do not resist it. Refuse it, and all concealment is gone, and Satan stands fully exposed.
The proposal was not to leave God's house, but to lock its doors. The same temptation lives on.
Doesn't this look very plausible? Surely it is right to meet together in the house of God. But to shut the doors of the temple would be, for us, to put the light under a basket. The temptation is to give up the testimony… let us seek, in shut-up selfishness and fear of man, to enjoy that sacred place of blessing and fellowship among ourselves, and take care of ourselves.
- Inside. Mockery, threats and slander all failed from outside. So the attack came through a professed friend inside the city, and faithfulness turned lonely.
- Bait. The bait looked holy: meet in God's house, lock the doors. Yet for a man who was not a priest, going in was sin.
- Fear. The hired prophet wanted Nehemiah frightened, not dead. Fear is the chief weapon of false religion, and a single eye disarms it.
- Refusal. Nehemiah refused before he understood. Only then did he see the hypocrisy. Resistance, not analysis, strips the disguise.
- Doors. Locked doors would have been light hidden under a basket. Safety at the cost of the testimony is still on offer, and still worth refusing.
And I said, Should such a man as I flee? and who is there, that, being as I am, could go into the temple, and live? I will not go in.
Nehemiah is rebuilding Jerusalem's wall when a man named Shemaiah, posing as a friend, tells him to hide inside the temple because killers are coming that night. His short answer raises two questions: why was running away beneath him, and why did he refuse the safest building in the city?
The suggestion looked like rescue, but it was built so that either response would ruin him.
He pushes Nehemiah toward one of two choices: either to flee, driven by fear, or to hide in the temple, where only the priests could go, to escape the men who wanted to kill him. Now, if he had run away, people would have accused him of having a bad conscience. If he had hidden in the temple, they would have accused him of profaning it by disobeying God's direct commandment. Either way, Nehemiah would have started down a path of sin, which would have given him a bad reputation and put him to shame.
The aim was never simply to scare him. It was to get him to act on the fear.
It was a cleverly laid plan, not only to frighten Nehemiah, but to make him sin, so that they might have something against him.
Nehemiah's two questions sound very different from each other, and that is the point.
The answer of this man of God is an example both of dignity and humility. He asserts his dignity before these men, his enemies: "Should such a man as I flee?" Had he not engaged the people in the work? Had he not courageously armed them? Had he not intervened authoritatively when conflicts erupted between his brothers? Did they think that he would deny his own character before these lying accusations? But Nehemiah also speaks a word of humility, which is more important than the first expression: "And who is there, that, being as I am, could go into the temple, and live?" He uses the same phrase as in his first reply in order to humbly place himself in the presence of God. In the first case, one might accuse him of pride; in the second case, he shows that pride is very far from his heart.
The shut doors of the temple would have kept the killers out. They would also have turned God's house into something it was never meant to be.
He proposed to Nehemiah that he hide himself in the temple. Nehemiah refuses outright… Where would his faith have been? … Besides, it would have been an open defiance of the glory of God. It was against God for an Israelite to use the LORD's sanctuary as the pagan nations did. Those nations made their sanctuaries a place of refuge when their lives were in danger; but God never allowed such a thing in His temple. His temple was for His worship, according to His word.
Nehemiah asks whether a man like him could go in "and live." Israel's past held a warning.
How could he go into the temple, which God allowed only the priests to enter? A king of Judah had dared to do this, setting himself, as king, above the priesthood; for this God punished him with leprosy (2 Chr. 26:16-21). Did Nehemiah dream of repeating that profane act? Did a man like him have some value before God, or some right to break His commandments?
Beneath the legal issue lay a deeper one. A leader running from the work God had put in his heart would have been announcing that he no longer trusted God to keep him.
For Shemaiah suggests that Nehemiah — the leader in the work — should flee from the work that God has put into his heart to do. Like David long before him, he could say, "In the LORD I take refuge; how can you say to my soul, 'Flee like a bird to your mountain'?" (Ps. 11:1). … With the plain directness of this simple-hearted man, Nehemiah says, "I will not go in."
Notice the order of events in the chapter. Nehemiah says no first, and only then sees who was behind the message.
It is a remarkable thing that the moment Nehemiah refused the temptation, he saw the whole character of the enemy's plans. He pierced through every disguise and found the evil and hypocrisy at work to trap his feet. It is always so. We stay blind only as long as we leave the temptation unresisted. Once we refuse it, all concealment is gone.
- The bait. Shemaiah offered safety. Both roads — running away or hiding in the temple — led into sin and a ruined name.
- The dignity. With "Should such a man as I run away?" Nehemiah refuses to deny the character he had shown before the people he had armed and led.
- The humility. His second question puts him under God's law, not above it: a man like him had no right to enter where only priests could go.
- The faith. To flee would have been to abandon the work God had placed in his heart, instead of taking refuge in the LORD as David did.
- The clarity. Saying no came first; seeing through the disguise came after. Resisting the temptation is what stripped the concealment away.
And I perceived, and behold, God had not sent him; for he pronounced this prophecy against me; and Tobijah and Sanballat had hired him.
Nehemiah has just refused to hide in the temple, and only then does he see the plot: the man who spoke in God's name was paid by Tobiah and Sanballat. How can a prophet end up working for the enemy, and how does a servant of God tell a real message from a bought one?
The earlier attacks came from outside. This one wears a friendly face. The danger here is not a weapon but a welcome.
He sees that Shemaiah, though a prophet, was not sent from God. He was paid by the enemy, and so he was working for the enemy while pretending to be Nehemiah's friend. Joined with Shemaiah were "the prophetess Noadiah and the rest of the prophets." To the claim of friendship they would add the weight of a message that claimed to come from God. What trick could be more terrible? A man on the enemy's side comes to a godly man, claiming to be a warm friend with a message from God.
The word "hired" is the hinge of the verse. Gold reached the one group that should have been helping the work.
By means of gold the enemy gains an unholy hold over the very men who should have been the first to help in the Lord's work. Their prophetic office was to pass on the Lord's mind.
Another writer names what the bribe cost the prophets themselves.
They could not serve God and money. The moment they took a bribe from money, they were bound hand and foot in its service, and they also disqualified themselves as the Lord's messengers.
Nehemiah calls it a prophecy "against me." The advice was meant to harm him, not protect him. Whichever way he moved, the same end waited.
He pressures Nehemiah into one of two courses. Either he must flee, driven by fear, or he must hide in the temple to escape the men who wanted to kill him — and only priests could enter there. Now, if he had run away, people would have accused him of a bad conscience. If he had hidden in the temple, they would have accused him of profaning it by disobeying God's direct commandment. Either way, Nehemiah would have started down a path of sin. It would have given him a bad reputation and put him to shame.
The message aimed at Nehemiah's nerves, not his conscience. What kept him steady was not cleverness but one undivided aim.
The next efforts came from within. Their aim was to draw Nehemiah into fear and to turn the house of God into a physical hiding place. But here again the godly leader saw through the profane and unbelieving trap. He would no more go into the temple to save his life than he would stop the work he was devoted to. The "prophecy" of Shemaiah carried no more weight than "the prophetess Noadiah," or "the rest of the prophets." Fear is the chief weapon of false religion, whatever it claims for itself. But one undivided aim was enough to keep Nehemiah clear of their influence.
Notice the order in the chapter. Nehemiah says "I will not go in" before he says he saw through it.
It is a remarkable thing. The moment Nehemiah refused the temptation, he saw the enemy's whole plan. He saw through every disguise and found the evil and hypocrisy at work to trap his feet. It is always so. We stay blind only while we leave the temptation unresisted. Once we refuse it, all concealment is gone, and Satan stands out in full view.
What exposed the lie was not clever detective work. Nehemiah held to what God had already said, and that was enough.
What schemes, what devices, trying if possible to drag the people, and to drag a servant of God among the people, out of the path of faith! So all these things were detected by simplicity, by holding fast to the word of the Lord.
- Hired, not sent. Two words in the verse stand opposed. God had not sent Shemaiah; Tobiah and Sanballat had hired him. Gold bought the very men whose office was to speak the Lord's mind.
- Friendship as disguise. This attack came from inside the city. It wore the face of concern for Nehemiah's safety, and it claimed to speak for God.
- Fear as the lever. The advice was built to frighten him into fleeing or trespassing. Either way he would sin, and the shame would stick to him.
- Refuse, then you will see. Nehemiah saw clearly only after he said no. While you keep a temptation open, it keeps its disguise.
- The word decides. Nehemiah weighed the proposal, not the prophet's reputation. It clashed with God's own command, and that simple test exposed the whole plot.
Therefore was he hired, that I should be afraid, and do so, and sin, and that they might have wherewith to spread an evil report, that they might reproach me.
Nehemiah has just refused to hide inside the temple. Now he names the real plan behind the friendly warning. Money had bought a prophet, and fear was meant to push him into an act his enemies could use against him. The verse exposes how opposition changes shape — from open threat to a whispered word in God's name.
The hired prophet offered Nehemiah two options, and both would have damaged him:
He pressures Nehemiah to take one option or the other. He must either flee in fear, or else hide himself in the temple to escape his would-be assassins. Only priests could enter there. Now, if he had run away, people would have accused him of having a bad conscience. If he had hidden in the temple, they would have accused him of profaning it by disobeying God's direct commandment. Either way, Nehemiah would have started down a path of sin. It would have given him a bad reputation and put him to shame.
The verse runs in order: afraid, then the act, then sin, then the report. What the enemies wanted first was not a scandal but a frightened man.
They wanted to make him afraid by destroying his trust in God, and so to lead him into sin, "so they could give me a bad name in order to taunt me." This one faithful man was the target of all Satan's attacks and tricks. Satan spread the most subtle snares around his feet. If he could overcome this one man, his victory was assured.
The charge the enemies had thrown at Nehemiah turned out to describe themselves.
In the earlier scheme the enemy falsely charges Nehemiah with using prophets for an evil purpose. In this scheme the enemy does in fact use the prophets for his own evil ends. With gold he gains an unholy hold over the very men who should have been the first to help in the Lord's work. Their prophetic office was to pass on the Lord's mind.
A bribe does more than buy one bad message. It changes who the man belongs to:
They could not serve God and money. The moment they took money's bribe, it bound them hand and foot in its service. They also disqualified themselves as the Lord's messengers.
"Matter for an evil report" is the payoff the hirers were after. A leader who panicked over a danger that was never real would lose the people's confidence.
Their wickedness went this far. They wanted to tell the people that Nehemiah was afraid of a danger that was never real, and so was unfit to be a leader. But Nehemiah had "the shield of faith" which always quenches the fiery darts of the wicked one (Eph. 6:16).
Notice the order. Nehemiah says "I will not go in," and only then does he see who is behind it.
It is a remarkable thing. The moment Nehemiah refused the temptation, he saw the whole character of the enemy's plans. He saw through every disguise and found the evil and hypocrisy at work to trap his feet. It is always so. We stay blind only as long as we leave the temptation unresisted. The moment we refuse it, all concealment is gone, and Satan stands fully exposed.
Having seen it all, Nehemiah does not hit back. He takes the names to God instead.
He makes no open attack on the enemy, and he seems to take no action against his tools. Instead he spreads the matter before God. He names the enemies outside and the woman inside who is working behind the scenes. As one has said, "Many forms of evil cannot be attacked openly without damage to ourselves and to others, and many evil workers in the church of God must be left alone. To attack them would only serve the cause of the enemy. Our resource in such circumstances is to cry to God against them."
- Hired — money, not God, stood behind the message; once a man takes the enemy's gold he is no longer free to speak for God.
- Afraid — fear was the first lever. It aimed to destroy his trust in God, and sin would follow from there.
- Sin — either answer was a trap. Fleeing or hiding in the temple would each have given the enemies a fault to point to.
- Report — his character was the real target. A leader who panicked over a danger that was never real would look unfit to lead.
- Refusal — "I will not go in" kept him clear and opened his eyes. What he saw, he carried to God instead of into a fight.
My God, remember Tobijah and Sanballat according to these their works, and also the prophetess Noadiah, and the rest of the prophets who would have put me in fear.
A prophet named Shemaiah, paid by the enemy, had urged Nehemiah to hide inside the temple. Nehemiah refused, and verse 14 shows what he does next: no counter-attack, only a short prayer that leaves the whole affair with God.
Nehemiah could have proved his case in public. What he chose not to do teaches as much as what he did.
This man of God could have stirred the people up against Shemaiah. He could have accused him of being a false prophet. He could have proved in public that he was a traitor. He could have exposed the shameful conduct of Sanballat and Tobiah. But he did nothing of the kind! He commits their judgment to God... The names of the adversaries who were enemies of the people come first. Shemaiah's name does not appear here at all. What a lovely example of a heart that refuses personal resentment against a man who had wronged him so badly!
Paul met the same kind of harm, and answered it the same way.
He avoided all open conflict as useless. He commits the matter to God, like Paul, who says, "Alexander the coppersmith did me great harm; the Lord will repay him according to his deeds." (2 Tim. 4:14.) It would be well for us to pay special attention to these examples. We cannot attack many forms of evil in the open without damage to ourselves and to others. And we must leave alone many evil-workers in the church of God. To attack them would only serve the cause of the enemy; but our resource in such circumstances is to cry to God against them.
These prophets came to Nehemiah as friends. Their office should have made them his best helpers, but money had changed their side.
What could be worse than someone in league with the enemy coming to a godly man, claiming to be a warm friend with a message from God? In the earlier trick the enemy falsely charged Nehemiah with using prophets for an evil purpose. In this trick the enemy does in fact use the prophets for his own evil ends. With gold he gains an unholy influence over the very men who should have been the first to help in the Lord's work. Their prophetic office made it their task to pass on the Lord's mind.
The danger was not only from outside the walls.
We must note verse 14. It records a distressing fact. Certain men who were prophets among the people, and even a prophetess, were in league with the adversaries and acting with them. Some enemies of God's work are of a more secret sort, and are even among the professed people of God. They are more dangerous to the work of God than open opponents.
Nehemiah names their aim: they wanted to make him afraid.
The "prophecy" of Shemaiah carried no more weight than that of "the prophetess Noadiah," or "the rest of the prophets." Fear is the chief weapon of false religion, whatever it claims to be. But a single eye was enough to keep Nehemiah clear of their influence. How sad to hear that Shemaiah was in touch with Tobiah and Sanballat! Here again he finds relief in prayer.
The verse names one woman among them.
Noadiah appears only here: a true prophetess who had lent her hand to this plot with the other prophets. This woman had no excuse, and neither did her companions. We must point out wrongdoing that hides under the cloak of the prophets!
Nehemiah prays like this more than once.
It is another of the brief prayers of Nehemiah shot up to God. There are seven of them in this book: chapters 2:4; 4:4-6; 5:19; 6:14; 13:14, 22, 29... He cast himself wholly upon God.
The same deceit still works today.
How terrible is the deceit that claims to be speaking for God while giving messages from Satan! Are there such prophets today? Sad to say, yes! They can speak in a very subtle way, and they do not see how deceitful they are. Satan deludes them into thinking they are wise.
- The weapon: fear is the chief weapon of false religion, and here it comes dressed as a prophecy from God.
- The hire: gold bought men whose office should have made them the first helpers of the work. They carried a message from Satan in God's name.
- The danger: secret enemies among God's professed people harm His work more than open enemies.
- The refusal: Nehemiah could have exposed the traitor in public. He did not, and even left Shemaiah's name out of the prayer.
- The resource: we must leave some evil-workers alone, because attacking them only serves the enemy. We cry to God instead, as Nehemiah does here in one of his seven short prayers.
So the wall was finished on the twenty-fifth of Elul, in fifty-two days.
The wall around Jerusalem went up in under two months, while the builders were mocked, threatened and plotted against. Writers ask two questions here: how did the work go so fast, and what did the watching world make of it?
Most of the chapter describes attempts to stop the work. Then comes this sentence, and one commentator weighs the small word that opens it.
Though this chapter is given to exposing the enemy's tricks, the work of building the wall was not hindered at all. Nehemiah's faith and courage never faltered. "So" is a remarkable word here. It might mean "in this manner," or "nevertheless," or "in spite of," depending on whether we take it in its literal or spiritual sense. The speed of the work shows the energy of the workmen under Nehemiah's guidance. "The city was large and great," and to surround it with a wall in fifty-two days was no small achievement. That is easy to understand, though, when we remember that the work was of God, and for God, and that He worked with the builders.
Some have doubted that the job could be done that fast. One writer gives both practical reasons and spiritual ones.
Critics have said fifty-two days is too short a time to do that much work. But a large number of people, along with Nehemiah's servants, worked without stopping. The material was ready too, for they probably had to dig out the old stones and put them back in the right place; no new stones had to be cut and carried. God had worked and given His blessing. Next to God, the success came from persevering prayer, personal and united effort, constant watchfulness and unfailing courage.
The verse fixes the day, and one commentator places that day in the Jewish calendar.
Despite all this opposition, the wall was finished on the twenty-fifth day of the month of Elul. Elul is the sixth month of the Jewish year. The year began with the month of Abib, when the ears of grain ripen — the month of the Passover and the exodus from Egypt.
An appeal to God stood behind this work. And what forced the enemies to admit whose work it was? Not the strength of the builders, but the lack of it.
God honours such an appeal to Him. Despite the enemy's tricks, the work goes on and the wall is finished. A people so weak on the outside did it, in front of enemies who were truly strong. That becomes a witness even to the enemy "that the work was done by our God."
The opponents were not simply disappointed at losing a contest. Their reaction exposed where they really stood.
The enemies' determined opposition failed completely, and they could not help realising that God had done this work. Why were they disheartened then? Because they were enemies of God, though they would not have said they were. If God does a work, every creature of God ought to be thankful for it: if not, they declare themselves as His enemies.
The wall meant more than stone. One writer explains what the broken wall and burned gates had cost the people, and what rebuilding restored.
Thirteen years pass, and this remnant that had escaped from captivity was in great affliction and reproach. The reason: "the wall of Jerusalem," which speaks of separation, was broken down. "The gates," which stand for the place of discipline, were burned with fire. Under Nehemiah's exhortations, the people were led to build the walls and set up the gates. The result was that separation and discipline were maintained once again.
Another writer names what the finished wall secured, and on what condition.
The wall was the safety and security of God's people, as long as they kept it in holiness, and it was an unbeatable barrier to the enemy.
Finishing the wall did not finish the danger. Inside the city, leading men now sought friendship with Tobiah, an enemy outside.
Evil, shut out by the completion of the wall, now springs up within, and seeks to link itself with the evil outside. The nobles of Judah wrote letters back and forth to Tobiah... This has always been the source of weakness and corruption among the people of God. The moment anyone, like these nobles, forms ties with the world, they stand against the ground of separation God has set them on.
- Despite — the word "So" carries the whole chapter of plots behind it. The wall rose while the opposition raged, not after it stopped.
- Means — persevering prayer, united effort, constant watchfulness, unfailing courage. Even the stones were the old ones, lifted back into place.
- Proof — a weak people finished a huge work in front of strong enemies. That became the evidence that God had done it.
- Verdict — the enemies' gloom at a work of God showed them for what they were. Anyone who cannot be glad at what God does shows which side he is on.
- After — the wall speaks of separation, the gates of discipline. Kept in holiness, it barred the enemy; and the moment evil was shut out, it looked for friends inside.
And it came to pass that when all our enemies heard [of it], all the nations that were about us were afraid and were much cast down in their own eyes, and they perceived that this work was wrought by our God.
Jerusalem's wall went up in fifty-two days, and the watching nations drew the only conclusion left: human strength did not build it. The verse records a finished job and a change in the enemy's mood.
Most of chapter 6 lists the tricks aimed at stopping Nehemiah. One writer points to the small word that opens verse 15, and to who was at work on the site.
"So" is a remarkable word here. It might mean "in this way," or "despite this," or "in spite of it all," depending on whether we take it in its literal or spiritual sense. The speed of the work shows the energy of the workmen under Nehemiah's guidance. To surround a large city with a wall in fifty-two days was no small achievement. Yet it is easy to understand when we remember that the work was of God, and for God, and that He worked with the builders.
Their mood changed when they saw the finished wall. One writer explains what that wall meant to them. Older translations read "much cast down in their own eyes" where the ESV says they "fell greatly in their own esteem."
Up to that point they had been completely defeated. Now, as they "heard" and "saw" that the wall was finished, their hopes were dashed to the ground. This wall kept God's people safe and secure as long as they held it in holiness, and the enemy could not break through it. They knew this, and so "they were much cast down in their own eyes."
The enemies did not admit God was at work because Judah looked strong. The opposite was true.
God honours such an appeal to Him. Despite the enemy's schemes, the work goes on and the wall is finished. A people who looked so weak did it, while the enemies facing them really were strong. That becomes a witness even to the enemy that "the work was wrought of our God."
The verse credits God. One writer answers the objection that fifty-two days is too short, then lists the habits God used.
Critics have remarked that fifty-two days is too short a time to finish that much work. But many people worked without stopping, and Nehemiah's own servants worked with them. The material was ready too. They likely dug out the old stones and put them back in the right place. No one had to cut and carry new stones. God had worked and given His blessing. Next to God, the success of it was due to persevering prayer, personal and united effort, constant watchfulness and unfailing courage.
The finished wall brought joy to one side and shame to the other. The same writer names the quality God's work needs.
The finished work made the returned Jews as glad as it made the ill-wishers of God and His people ashamed. "They perceived that this work was wrought of our God." The courage of faith is invaluable personally and in God's work. To our faith we need to add virtue — courage — as well.
The enemies outside lost heart at verse 16. Verses 17-19 raise a different problem, and one writer calls it the more serious of the two.
It seems to me the greatest trial and danger was from false brothers. The enemy knew that the wall was built: "They were much cast down in their own eyes: for they perceived that this work was wrought of our God." But the false brothers, even "nobles of Judah, sent many letters to Tobiah, and the letters of Tobiah came to them. For there were many in Judah sworn to him." This is a sad thing, and a great trial. Some people outwardly take the place of being gathered to Christ, yet still try to mix the principles of the world with those of God. No doubt these half-and-half brothers are the greatest stumbling blocks in the way of people searching for the truth.
The chapter shows one man under constant pressure. The writer points past Nehemiah to the One who kept him standing.
We see that this devoted man of God had no rest. He had to fight a constant war against enemies inside and enemies outside. Yet, alone as he was, faith in God strengthened him, and he was above all the power of the enemy. It is a wonderful record. It proves in full that God is enough to hold up His servants, whatever their difficulties or dangers in any service He calls them to. To Him alone be all the praise!
- Despite — the wall rose while the plots were still running. The "so" of verse 15 can carry the sense of "in spite of it all," because the work was of God, for God, and He worked alongside the builders.
- Weakness — weak people finished the wall against strong enemies. That is what turned the job into a witness the enemy could not deny.
- Means — God's working did not replace human effort. Persevering prayer, united work, constant watchfulness and unfailing courage were the channels of the blessing.
- Two sides — one finished wall gladdened God's people and shamed their ill-wishers. The same courage of faith is what God's work still asks of us.
- Inside — the enemies outside were cast down, and then the letters between Judah's nobles and Tobiah began. Writers call this compromise from within the greater danger.
Moreover in those days the nobles of Judah sent many letters to Tobijah, and those of Tobijah came to them.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
For there were many in Judah sworn to him; for he was a son-in-law of Shechaniah the son of Arah; and his son Johanan had taken the daughter of Meshullam the son of Berechiah.
Tobiah had fought the building of the wall from the start, yet letters kept passing between him and the nobles of Judah. This verse explains why: two marriages had tied leading families in Jerusalem to him.
Tobiah was tied to Judah at two points. He had married Shecaniah's daughter, and his son had married the daughter of Meshullam. Edward Dennett reads these marriages as a plain breach of God's command:
They had therefore allied themselves with an Ammonite, on whom the curse of God rested (chapter 13:1), in direct disobedience to the word of God (Deut. 7:3), and by this they also denied the truth of the special place they held as the people He had chosen for Himself and set apart to Himself. This has been the continual source of weakness and corruption among the people of God; for the moment any, like these nobles, enter into relationships with the world, they must be opposed to the ground of separation on which they have been set. There is more. James says, "Do you not know that friendship with the world is enmity with God? Therefore whoever wishes to be a friend of the world makes himself an enemy of God." (James 4:4) Solemn but true words. These nobles of Judah were therefore the enemies of God, as are all who want to be friends of the world.
Ammon and Moab had a long history with Israel. Arno Clemens Gaebelein traces the hostility back to its root:
Sanballat (hate in disguise) is called the Horonite, a resident of Horonaim, a southern Moabite city (Isa. 15:5; Jer. 48:3, 5, 34), and Tobiah, the servant, an Ammonite. They came from Moab and Ammon... The Moabite and the Ammonite were not to come into the congregation of God forever; the curse rested on them. They did not meet Israel with bread and water when they came out of Egypt. They hated the people of God, and had hired Balaam the son of Beor to curse Israel (Deut. 23:3-6).
H. L. Rossier asks why so many men in Judah accepted Tobiah's authority. His answer is a plain one, and he links it to the flattery these same men used on Nehemiah:
"For many in Judah were bound by oath to him." Why had they submitted to him, and why had they accepted his authority? This is a sad and common thing: this association was to their personal advantage... These nobles of Judah were double-hearted. They tried to win Nehemiah over by speaking to him about Tobijah's "good deeds." No doubt they said he was a likeable man who had sought an alliance with the people of God.
Meshullam the son of Berechiah, named in this verse, had worked on the wall himself. Rossier weighs his service against his alliance:
Meshullam, whom our chapter mentions after Meremoth, was a man of doubtful character. He had allied himself to Tobijah, and had given his daughter to Tobijah's son Johanan (Neh. 6:18). From all appearances, he was of the priestly race... Despite this unhappy alliance, he shows zeal for the house of God, but not the same zeal as Meremoth. He next works at the "city of David", but his work is aimed first of all at protecting his own home (v. 30).
Hamilton Smith shows the praise running one way and the report running the other:
There were those among the remnant within who were forever sounding the praises of the enemy without. "They reported" the "good deeds" of Tobiah before Nehemiah... But while they praised the enemy outside to Nehemiah, they were just as ready to belittle Nehemiah before the enemy. Nehemiah says, "They reported my words to him."... Yet the solemn fact was this: those so quick to praise the enemy were in constant contact with him, and sworn to him because of their alliances.
The same tie later reached the high priest himself:
Eliashib, the high priest, had himself set an example of unfaithfulness. His privileged position and his authority made this departure from the law all the more dangerous. Eliashib was allied to Tobijah, the Ammonite. The nobles of Judah who had sworn an oath to Tobijah held him in great favour... his son Johanan was himself the son-in-law of Meshullam, the son of Berechiah, a man of the priestly race (Neh. 6:18), perhaps the same who, in Ezra 10:15, had opposed sending away the foreign wives.
- The tie — Two marriages bound leading families in Judah to an Ammonite. That broke a plain command and denied the separate place God had given them.
- The motive — They swore the oath because the connection paid. Advantage, not conviction, made these men double-hearted.
- The cover — Once tied, they praised Tobiah's "good deeds" to Nehemiah. Then they carried Nehemiah's words back to Tobiah.
- The divided man — Meshullam worked on the wall and still gave his daughter to the enemy's son. Real service does not cancel a wrong alliance.
- The end — Unchecked, the same tie reached the high priest himself, long after the wall was standing.
Also they spoke of his good deeds before me, and reported my words to him. [And] Tobijah sent letters to put me in fear.
The wall was finished, yet the last danger in this chapter came from inside Jerusalem: respected men who praised Tobiah to Nehemiah's face and carried Nehemiah's words back to him. The attack had stopped shouting; now it spoke well of the enemy in Nehemiah's own hearing.
Earlier attacks in this chapter came from outside. Now the trouble starts at home, and one writer names its cause: marriages that tied leading families to Tobiah, an Ammonite whom God's law shut out of Israel:
The wall shut evil out. Now evil springs up inside, and it reaches out to join hands with the evil outside. The nobles of Judah started writing to Tobiah. They were even "bound by oath to him," because two marriages tied him to their families. So they had joined themselves to an Ammonite, a man under the curse of God, in direct disobedience to the word of God. By this they also denied the special place they held as the people He had chosen and set apart for Himself. This has always been a source of weakness and corruption among the people of God. The moment any of them, like these nobles, enter into relationships with the world, they stand against the ground of separation on which God has set them.
Praise and leaking were one strategy, not two. The nobles built the enemy up and cut the builder down:
There is one more trick that Nehemiah has to meet: the trick of the good report (17-19). Some inside the city were forever singing the praises of the enemy outside. They spoke of the "good deeds" of Tobiah in front of Nehemiah. No doubt they argued, "Tobiah does not agree with us about the need to build the wall, but he is such a good man." As proof, they told of his good deeds. But while they praised the enemy to Nehemiah, they were just as ready to run Nehemiah down in front of the enemy. As Nehemiah says, they "reported my words to him." Listening to these nobles of Judah, you would think Tobiah was a man of good works, while Nehemiah at best was only a man of "words."
Nehemiah notes that many in Judah were bound by oath to Tobiah. One writer looks behind that oath to the motive:
Why had they given in to him and accepted his authority? Sadly, this is a common story: the connection paid them personally... These nobles of Judah were double-hearted. They tried to win Nehemiah over by speaking to him of Tobiah's "good deeds." No doubt they said he was a likeable man who had sought an alliance with the people of God.
The nobles could still call Tobiah's record "good deeds." That blindness is not confined to Nehemiah's day:
How sad that they were so deceived that they did not see Tobiah as the enemy he was! But similar things happen among God's people today. How important it is to take to heart the words of Ephesians 6:11: "Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the schemes of the devil." Tobiah kept sending letters to Nehemiah to make him afraid. Did the nobles think these were good deeds?
The verse ends with Tobiah's real aim: fear. One writer calls fear the main tool of religion that has no truth behind it:
Fear is the chief weapon of false religion, whatever its claims. But one undivided purpose was enough to keep Nehemiah clear of their influence.
One man stood against all of it. His strength came from outside himself:
In this way the enemy sent out all his reserve troops to attack one lone man. But God was present, and He strengthened the hands of His servant. He had spoken to Jeremiah long before, and He could say the same now to this new witness: "I will make you to this people a fortified wall of bronze; they will fight against you, but they shall not prevail over you, for I am with you to save you and deliver you, declares the LORD" (Jeremiah 15:20).
- Inside — The wall shut evil out, so evil sprang up inside the city and reached for the evil outside.
- Bound — Oath, marriage and personal advantage held the nobles to Tobiah. Links like these with the world deny the separate ground God sets His people on.
- Praise — The "good deeds" report is a trick. It makes the enemy sound like a good man and the builder a man of mere words.
- Leak — The same mouths that praised Tobiah passed Nehemiah's words back to him. Friendliness and betrayal ran on one line.
- Fear — Tobiah's letters aimed at fear, the chief weapon of false religion. Nehemiah's answer was one undivided purpose and a God who strengthened his hands.
And it came to pass when the wall was built, and I had set up the doors, that the doorkeepers and the singers and the Levites were appointed.
Nehemiah finishes the wall and hangs the doors. The next thing he does is not celebrate but appoint men — gatekeepers, singers, Levites. So the verse asks a practical question: what happens after the building stops?
A wall is only the shell of a city. One writer sets the two halves of the work side by side.
Nehemiah has repaired the walls and set up the gates, and now he goes on to the governing of the city. Without walls and gates there would be no city to govern; and without governing, walls and gates would be useless. So first we have the appointment of the gatekeepers, the singers, and the Levites (verse 1).
The doors are on their hinges. Someone must decide when they open and to whom. One writer carries that duty straight into a congregation today.
The gatekeepers, it hardly needs saying, were the doorkeepers. It was their responsibility to admit only those who had a lawful claim to enter the city, and to keep out all who could not show the necessary qualification to be inside. In a word, they had authority over the opening and the shutting of the doors. Theirs was a most important post, and so is that of the doorkeepers of today. It is true, and must always be insisted on, that every believer — every member of the body of Christ — has his place, for example, at the Lord's supper. But the "doorkeepers" of the assembly have the responsibility of asking for the evidence that people are what they claim to be (see Acts 9:26-27; 1 Peter 3:15). So it matters greatly that only faithful and trusted men should do the work of "doorkeepers," especially in a day when everyone alike claims to be a Christian.
The three groups in this verse are not independent departments. Let the first one slip, and the second falls silent.
The singers gave the Lord His portion. Only the redeemed can sing the songs of Zion. So the gatekeepers must carry out their responsibilities faithfully, if the Lord is to have His portion. To let in those without divine qualifications is to admit those who cannot sing. Slackness in the gatekeepers will mean loss to the singers. Where the gatekeepers are slack, worship is lost.
The order of the three names matters. Praise comes before practical service.
This was the work of the singers — praising the Lord "day and night" (1 Chr. 9:33); a picture of what the redeemed will do for ever in heaven (Rev. 5)... The gates and doors were set up, and the gatekeepers were put in their appointed places. Then the Lord's portion is thought of first, in the singers; and after them come the Levites, to do the necessary service connected with His house. So the very order in which these three groups are named is instructive. It shows how jealous Nehemiah was for the Lord's claims on His people.
Another writer draws out what that order means in practice:
If the singers maintain what is due to the Lord, the Levites care for the needs of the Lord's people. But the Levites must follow the singers. If the Lord does not receive His portion, the people will not receive theirs. The greater the delight in the Lord, the greater the interest in the people of the Lord.
The Levites here are not doing what Levites once did.
Now Nehemiah's first concern is to organize the service of the Lord. The doorkeepers guard the house. The singers lead the praises. The Levites are entrusted with the ministry of the word (compare Neh. 8:7), for they no longer had the charge of carrying the sacred objects of the tabernacle, as they did in the wilderness. All these men are established in their work.
None of this happened in a golden age. The people were few and the ruin was real. The temptation was to give up, or to pretend nothing was wrong.
It was truly a state of ruin. But the return was from God, so despair would have been as wrong as presumption. Nehemiah gives in to neither. He acts in that lowly condition with all due watchfulness, and he trusts faithful men of the same mind as himself, who would naturally care for the state of the people — few as they were, weak and tried... How encouraging this is for us in the strange condition of God's assembly today!
- Walls need wardens. A finished wall with no one to govern the city is useless. So is a government with no wall. The two only work together.
- The door decides. The gatekeepers let in those with a lawful claim and kept out the rest. The same care belongs to those who watch the door today.
- Slack doors, lost song. Let in those who cannot sing the songs of Zion, and worship is what you lose. The singers pay for careless gatekeepers.
- God first, then people. The verse names the singers before the Levites. The Lord receives His portion first. Then comes the service that meets His people's needs.
- Ruin is no excuse. Nehemiah neither despaired nor pretended. He set order in place with watchful care among a small, weak, tried people — and that encourages us in our own day.
And I gave my brother Hanani, and Hananiah the ruler of the citadel, charge over Jerusalem; for he was a faithful man and feared God above many.
The wall is up and the doors are hung, so Nehemiah now has to decide who will run the city he has just secured. He picks two men, and his reason is character, not rank or family.
(The writers below quote an older translation, which reads "he was a faithful man, and feared God above many.")
A finished wall is only half a city. One writer sets verse 2 in that frame:
The walls are repaired and the gates are set up. Now Nehemiah turns to running the city. Without walls and gates there would be no city to run. Without someone to run it, walls and gates would be useless.
The praise is singular — "he was" — so which man does it fit? Commentators differ. Some read it of Hananiah, the officer over the fortress. One writer argues for Hanani, and draws out what that would mean:
The words themselves do not make clear whether this description applies to Hanani or Hananiah. We judge it is Hanani. It was this same Hanani who, with others, brought the news about the state of the remnant and of Jerusalem — news that God used as the means of Nehemiah's mission. Read this way, nothing could show more clearly how single-minded Nehemiah was in his Master's service. Hanani was his brother. But he gave him this post not because he was his brother, or a man of influence, but because "he was a faithful man, and feared God above many."
The same writer sees Nehemiah's choice as a pattern for anyone who is given responsibility among God's people:
It is not enough that they are men of gift, or position, or influence; but they should be faithful — faithful to God and to His truth, and they should be distinguished by fearing, not men, but God, acting as in His sight, and upholding the authority of His word.
Hananiah already had a track record: he held a smaller charge before this larger one. Faithfulness, one writer notes, is what a leader cannot do without. He points to the men Paul chose to work with him:
The second of these men was Hananiah, the ruler of the citadel. He had learned the work in the smaller charge he had held in the "city of David" itself. But he had yet other qualifications in addition to this one: "he was a faithful man and feared God above many" (v. 2). God can entrust His service only to faithful men. If they are not faithful, how can they be qualified as leaders? So Paul, like Nehemiah, surrounded himself with servants of Christ, who had been tested and found faithful.
The praise is comparative: this man feared God more than most. One writer links that fear to the quality that gives a leader real authority:
The verse also says of Hananiah that he "feared God above many". The fear of God always brings humility with it. No one can think himself important while standing in God's presence, and this is one of the real sources of a leader's authority. Someone who thinks he is something is not living in the fear of God. His ministry will not benefit God's people.
Another writer reads the same phrase as a clue to the man's knowledge, and to what such helpers meant to Nehemiah:
"The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge" (Prov. 1:7). Since this man had gone further than many in that fear, we may be sure he had gained wise knowledge in large measure. To have such men stand with him in his service must have been an encouragement to Nehemiah, and God granted it.
One writer applies the same standard to those who serve among Christians today:
It was so in the days of Nehemiah and the city, and it is so now in the Assembly. Those who take up the work of porters, singers, or Levites must be men who, like Hananiah, are marked by faithfulness and the fear of God (2). Social position, wealth and gift qualify no one for the care of the Assembly of God. Such work calls for moral qualifications.
The verse ends up being a description any believer might hope to deserve:
A lovely thing to be able to say of a brother in the Lord. May we deserve such a comment! Let us seek so to live that in truth this could be said of us.
- Finish, then administer. Walls with no one to run the city are useless. A city with no walls has nothing to guard it. Nehemiah does both.
- Character, not connection. Nehemiah's own brother gets the post, but the reason given is faithfulness, not family. Commentators differ over which man the praise describes.
- Faithful first. God entrusts His service only to faithful people — proved in a smaller charge before a larger one.
- Fear that humbles. Fearing God above many goes with humility. A person who thinks he is something is not living in that fear, and his ministry will not help others.
- The test still stands. Position, wealth and gift qualify no one for the care of God's people. Faithfulness and the fear of God do — a description worth living to deserve.
And I said to them that the gates of Jerusalem should not be opened until the sun was hot, and that they should shut the doors and bar them while they stood by; and that there should be appointed watches of the inhabitants of Jerusalem, every one in his watch, and every one over against his house.
The wall is up and the doors are hung, but a city with gates still has to decide when to open them and who will watch. This verse is his standing order for daily security. It fixes the hours for the gates, keeps men at the doors, and puts the residents themselves on watch.
Nehemiah made the gates wait for full daylight because he feared what arrives unseen. One writer applies that same fear to what tries to enter the people of God today.
They were responsible to survey the gates carefully (v. 3). Nothing was to enter the holy city without being carefully controlled. Nehemiah feared that foreign elements would be brought into the city under cover of night, or even dusk. So he ordered the guards to wait until the sun was well risen before opening the gates. That way no one could slip into Jerusalem unnoticed. It is the same today, except that our enemies are spiritual. We must watch that teachings which undermine Christianity do not creep into the city of God. These are not necessarily heresies. We often have to face teachings that are true up to a point, but out of place in relation to other truths. That displacement distorts them and makes them all the more dangerous.
Applied to receiving people into fellowship, the same principle sets the timing:
As long as there was any darkness the door was to be kept shut. It is the same in the assembly of God. If any question is raised about receiving someone, the door should stay shut until everything is clear.
Behind the order lies a practical guard system: fixed hours for entry, and watches through the night.
The city was carefully guarded. Everyone who entered the city had to do so in broad daylight. A system of watches guarded the gates day and night. It seems the Hebrews before the exile, and for some time after, had three night watches of four hours each. Later, when our Lord was on earth, they had four night watches (Mark 13:35).
Night is when the enemy is busiest, and the answer has two parts: the men stand guard, and the doors are barred as well as shut.
The gates were to be shut against "the rulers of the darkness of this world" (Eph. 6), for night is always the time of their greatest activity. The gatekeepers were not to leave their posts or hand their duties to others. They themselves were to stand guard and see that the doors were both shut and barred. Many a house has been robbed because the shut door was not "barred." Many a soul has let the enemy in because its various "doors" were not made secure... We learn from this how necessary it is to guard the doors, whether of the soul or of the assembly.
The last clause spreads the duty across everyone, and ties each man's post to his own house.
Two things of the greatest importance are shown here. First, no resident of Jerusalem was excused from watching over the interests of the city. The watch was to be properly organised, and all were to serve in turn. Secondly, everyone was to keep watch facing his own house... if the head of every household kept the enemy — evil — out of his house, Jerusalem would be kept separate to God. The whole city was necessarily what its individual residents made it... If discipline for God is not kept up in the home, it cannot be kept up in the church either. Worldliness in the one place will be worldliness in the other.
Another writer names the evil that most often gets in through the house rather than the gate:
If we let the enemy into our houses, he will ruin the people of God just as effectively as if he had got in through the gates. We must be watchful against every form of evil, whether false teachings or worldliness. Worldliness is even more contagious than false teachings. It appeals so strongly to the tendencies of our natural hearts that we can never be on our guard enough to push it away.
Shut gates belong to a world where night still exists. One writer sets this order beside the city where night never falls.
During the night, and even while the least trace of darkness lay on the scene, the gates were to be kept closed. Evil men always love darkness rather than light, and evil could steal in with them and corrupt the city... This contrast teaches us something. When we are told there will be no night in the heavenly city, it means all evil will be absent, and so the gates will never be shut.
- Timing. The gates open only when the sun is high, so nothing slips in unseen.
- Presence. The gatekeepers shut the doors themselves. A door shut but not barred still lets the enemy in.
- Spread. No resident is excused; the watch is organised so that all serve in turn.
- Address. Each man's post faces his own house, because the city is only ever what its households make it.
- Horizon. Shut gates suit a world with night in it. In the city where evil is gone, they never close again.
Now the city was large and great; but the people in it were few, and no houses were built.
Nehemiah had finished the wall and hung the gates. Then he looked at what stood inside them: plenty of space, very few people, and no rebuilt homes. A finished defence is not the same as a living city. So who would live there?
The walls were never the goal in themselves.
Having built the walls, Nehemiah sets about filling the city with people. For the walls would be nothing, except as the defence of a place with people living inside it.
The question presses harder when you see all that had already been rebuilt.
The altar, the foundations, the temple, and the wall had been rebuilt, but the people in the city were few, and no houses were built. So the question now is this: had the city been rebuilt only to stay deserted and empty of people? What was the use of defending it if no one gathered there?
The gap between a big city and a small crowd measures how many took up what God had opened.
It reminds us of something. The remnant's zeal may have been bright, and their moral condition may have revived. Yet in outward circumstances they were still very weak. God had opened a door of escape from captivity, but only a "few" made use of God's goodness. God's city is "wide and large," though few of God's people value its greatness. And as it was in the day of Nehemiah so it is in our day.
Another writer reads the same emptiness as a sign that most never answered the call.
Very few then were gathered to the testimony that went out through Nehemiah. The trumpet had sounded to call the assembly together (Numbers 10), and by grace some answered its call. But most of the people were taken up with their own things instead of the things of the Lord, just as they were when Haggai began his ministry. (See Phil. 2:21.)
The phrase is not saying Jerusalem had no buildings standing at all. Some families had recovered their old homes decades earlier.
This does not mean there were no houses at all. Not every house had been destroyed. When the people returned under Zerubbabel, many families were able to move back into their old homes. Some even busied themselves decorating and panelling them (Hag. 1:4)... Our passage means only this: the houses that had been pulled down had not been rebuilt. No doubt large spaces in Jerusalem stood completely empty.
Haggai had rebuked the returned exiles for finishing their own houses. God's house still lay in ruins. Now the fault has flipped, and one writer presses the warning both ways.
Before this the Lord had reproved the people for saying, "The time has not yet come to rebuild the house of the LORD" (Hag. 1:2)... At that time the people neglected the house of God and concentrated on their own houses. Now the reverse was true. How sadly unbalanced we so easily become! Surely we should have true concern for the truth of the house of God, but in doing so, should we neglect our own house?
So how do we build a house today?
If anyone asks how their houses are to be built today, Ephesians 5:22; 6:1-9 and Colossians 3:18 – 4:1 answer the question. It is to establish the Lord's authority over every member of the house, and above all to bring up the children in the discipline and instruction of the Lord.
The small numbers will not last.
Then the city will still be "wide and large," but the people will no longer be few. In that day the land will be too narrow for all who live in it. Of the city they will say, "The place is too narrow for me; make room for me that I may dwell here" (Isa. 49:14-21). This reminds us... that reformation, and restoration, and revivals, however bright and blessed, fall far short of the glory that is to come. It is good for us to recognise and accept these circumstances of outward weakness. Then we shall not be turned aside from the path of separation because those who take it are few.
- Walls first. Nehemiah finished the defence, but a wall is worth nothing unless people live inside it.
- People next. The city was large and the people few — God had opened the door out of captivity, and only a few walked through it.
- Houses last. Only the demolished homes had not been rebuilt. Wide empty spaces still lay inside the walls.
- Balance lost. In Haggai's day they built their own houses and neglected God's house. Now they neglect their own. We build a house today by bringing every member under the Lord's authority.
- Glory ahead. Reformation, restoration and revival always come in weakness. A day is coming when that same wide city will be too narrow for its people.
And my God put into my heart to gather together the nobles, and the rulers, and the people, for registration by genealogy. And I found a genealogical register of those that had come up at the first, and I found written in it
Nehemiah has finished the wall, set the gates, and appointed men to guard the city — and at that point a new thought arrives that he refuses to claim as his own. The chapter turns from stone and timber to people. Who really belongs inside this city, and how can anyone tell?
Nehemiah reports the impulse before he reports the action, and the way he names God carries weight.
He is careful to relate that it was not his own thought. He says, "Then my God put it into my heart to assemble the nobles and the officials and the people to be enrolled by genealogy" (v. 5). This gives us a glimpse into the intimacy of his walk with God. It is "my" God — the One he knew in that personal relationship, which faith and experience alone can recognise. And it is the One in whose presence he lived so constantly that he could tell at once the thought which He put within his heart.
Telling God's thought from his own grew out of living close to Him.
Registers of family descent may look like dry record-keeping. For Israel they were the proof of a promise.
God Himself established this succession by birth, and it became the pride — yes, everything — of a true Israelite. So, as "an elect people," when they came up out of Babylon this was their only remaining glory and boast: they could still be counted by their genealogies and families, because God made the promises to "the Seed" of their father Abraham.
The enrolment settled a practical question too: who had a right to be there at all?
The object in view was to examine the title of the people to be in the place where they were. They had kept up constant dealings with the enemy, and had made alliances, forgetting that the Lord had chosen them out of all the peoples on the earth as His own people. So there would no doubt be many who could not show their genealogy, and had no claim to be numbered with Israel. Now that the wall was built, and the truth of separation was proclaimed, such a mixture inside could no longer be tolerated. Those who occupied this holy ground and claimed the blessed privileges of God's house must have a title that could not be challenged.
Walls and gates were not the end of the work.
Having repaired the walls and set up the gates, Nehemiah proceeds with the administration of the city. Without walls and gates there would be no city to administer; and without administration walls and gates would be useless.
Nehemiah gathered nobles, officials and ordinary people alike. The register runs alongside another concern in these chapters — houses to live in.
Registering the people fitted in with the desire that the houses should be built. It shows that every individual believer is precious to God. So all should have houses — a sphere of family responsibility that shows unity in diversity.
What Nehemiah found was not a fresh list but an old one. It ties his generation to the first group who came back from Babylon, under a leader named Zerubbabel.
The rest of the chapter shows how Nehemiah links the work he had finished with the work of the remnant who first returned with Zerubbabel some eighty years before. Many who made up that remnant must have died by Nehemiah's day. But they are still held in honour, and their various services are remembered. The work they did in their day made the work of Nehemiah's day possible.
None of this happened in a season of strength. A day of ruin invites two opposite mistakes.
It was indeed a state of ruin; but the return was of God, and despair would have been as unworthy as presumption. Nehemiah gives in to neither. He acts in that low condition with all due watchfulness. He trusts faithful men of the same mind as himself, who would care for the state of the people — few as they were, feeble and tried.
- Source. The plan began in God, not in Nehemiah. He traces it back to "my God" — the mark of a man who lived close enough to know God's mind when it came.
- Gift. God gave a concern for people, not just for stonework. Without walls there is no city to run; without people to run it, the walls are useless.
- Reach. The register ran from nobles to ordinary people, and settled who had a right to be there. Every individual believer is precious to God, so each is to have a household of his own.
- Roots. The register Nehemiah found honoured a generation gone eighty years before. Their work made his work possible.
- Result. The city lay in ruins, yet Nehemiah neither despaired nor overreached. He worked with watchful care in a small day, with a few faithful men beside him.