But seeing the crowds, he went up into the mountain, and having sat down, his disciples came to him;
API Error: Stream idle timeout - partial response received
and, having opened his mouth, he taught them, saying,
この節の注解はまだ生成されていません。
Blessed [are] the poor in spirit, for *theirs* is the kingdom of the heavens.
I have rich material from four authors. Writing the answer now.
The opening beatitude stands at the head of the Sermon on the Mount and announces the whole moral character of Christ's kingdom. It pronounces blessed not the self-assured or the mighty, but those who are emptied of self — and it hangs over them the greatest of all promises.
W. T. P. Wolston puts the matter plainly:
W. T. P. Wolston"Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven" (Matt. 5:3). What is it then to be poor in spirit? Exactly the reverse of what you find in the world. In the world people stick up for themselves, stand for their rights. A person who does that is not in the kingdom of heaven at all, that is, is not in it in spirit. One who is poor in spirit, is self-emptied, self is out of sight.
He goes further, tying the expression back to Psalm 41 and making Christ Himself the pattern:
You will find a lovely connection with this in Psalm 41:1: "Blessed is he that considers the poor" — that is, the poor Man; and who is the poor Man? Christ! That is, considering the poor Man does not mean giving alms, but considering Him. "Blessed are the poor in spirit." It is a blessed thing thus to be self-emptied: poor-spirited the world would call you; that is it, but the Lord reckons such "blessed."
J. McBroom links the phrase to Isaiah's description of the soul God regards, showing it as dependence rather than mere low spirits:
J. McBroom"Blessed are the poor in spirit for theirs is the kingdom of the heavens." Trust in the hand of Omnipotence and dependence upon God is a law in the sphere of creature obligation. "To this man will I look: to the afflicted and contrite in spirit, and who trembles at my word." This draws down the complacency of God in a world of man's self-confident boasting.
McBroom underlines how alien this is to the wisdom of the world:
The opening verses describe a class of moral virtues different from every other system of teaching that men followed. The seven virtues in verses 3-9 are not what men call the heroic virtues, but in the sight of God they are blessed. There is little room in the schools of philosophy for the poor in spirit and for those that mourn. These blessed things are the reproduction of the life and character of Christ in His people in a world where all is out of gear as the result of man's departure from God.
J. N. Darby reads the beatitudes as giving, first of all, the character of Christ Himself — and then of the remnant who would share His lot. He explains what kind of "poverty" the Lord has in view:
J. N. DarbyIn examining the beatitudes, we shall find that this portion in general gives the character of Christ Himself. They suppose two things; the coming possession of the land of Israel by the meek; and the persecution of the faithful remnant, really righteous in their ways, and who asserted the rights of the true King (heaven being set before them as their hope to sustain their hearts).
And in the footnote on that same passage Darby traces the progression:
The characters pronounced blessed may be briefly noted. They suppose evil in the world, and amongst God's people. The first is not seeking great things for self, but accepting a despised place in a scene contrary to God. Hence mourning characterises them there, and meekness, a will not lifting up itself against God, or to maintain its position or right.
So for Darby, to be "poor in spirit" is to decline to seek great things for oneself in a world that has turned from God — it is the disposition of one who takes the despised place with the rejected King.
McBroom presses this practical bearing very sharply, drawing a line from Jeremiah's word to Baruch straight to the believer today:
The bearing of this upon us today may be seen by comparing Jer. 45. In the crisis preceding the destruction of Jerusalem by the Babylonian, the word of God through Jeremiah to his servant was, "Seekest thou great things for thyself? Seek them not: for behold I will bring evil upon all flesh, saith the Lord." We are today nearing a greater judgment ... We may well take heed to such words. The promise attached to the state of soul in this first beatitude would cover all the virtues mentioned, "Theirs is the kingdom of the heavens."
William Kelly shows why this beatitude must head the list. The sermon begins with righteousness — and nothing is more foundational to righteousness before God than self-emptying:
William KellyFirst of all He pronounces certain classes blessed. These blessednesses divide into two classes. The earlier character of blessedness savours particularly of righteousness, the later of mercy, which are the two great topics of the Psalms. These are both taken up here: "Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted. Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth. Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled." ... it is plain enough that all these four classes consist in substance of such as the Lord pronounces blessed, because they are righteous in one form or another.
Kelly also makes the vital point that the whole sermon presupposes new birth — these traits are not heroic acts of natural man but the character of one who has been made partaker of Christ's own life. McBroom says the same thing explicitly:
The discourse supposes regeneration in those addressed and the new relationship which redemption brings. "Having sat down His disciples came to Him and having opened His mouth He taught them." Because it is not understood that the Lord was addressing those in relationship with Himself as subjects of grace, it is assumed that these moral traits can be produced by man in the flesh, apart from the new nature which is implanted at new birth, and the whole truth of the gospel set aside.
W. T. P. Wolston points out that this beatitude is not first of all about getting to heaven one day, but about heaven governing the heart now:
W. T. P. WolstonWhat then is the kind of behaviour that becomes His kingdom? The Sermon on the Mount gives the answer, and the first beatitude is characteristically descriptive: "Blessed are the poor in spirit; for theirs is the kingdom of heaven" (Matt. 5:3). This is not a question of persons going to heaven, by-and-by, but of heaven ruling them now; it is how to go on before you get to heaven.
Notice also that of all the beatitudes, this one and the last (v. 10) share the identical present-tense promise — "theirs is the kingdom of heaven" — where the others use the future ("they shall be comforted," "they shall inherit"). McBroom sees the first promise as covering the whole list:
The promise attached to the state of soul in this first beatitude would cover all the virtues mentioned, "Theirs is the kingdom of the heavens."
To be poor in spirit is to stand on the opposite ground from the natural man. It is not poverty of purse, nor mere low spirits, nor weakness of character. It is the soul self-emptied — not seeking great things for itself, not standing up for its rights, not boasting, but leaning in conscious dependence upon God and taking the despised place with a rejected Christ. It is the first trait in the portrait because it is the door of the kingdom: as long as self is full, there is no room for God. And it is the one beatitude whose blessing is already present — the kingdom of heaven is theirs. The one who has let go of self has, in that very moment, the only King and the only kingdom worth possessing.
Blessed they that mourn, for *they* shall be comforted.
Darby's reference isn't directly on Matt 5:4. I have enough rich material. Now I'll compose the answer.
The second Beatitude stands as one of the most striking paradoxes the Lord ever uttered. How can sorrow be blessedness? And what is this mourning that draws down divine comfort? Those who have written most helpfully on Matthew 5:4 open its depths along several complementary lines.
This is not the ordinary grief of nature, nor a gloomy disposition. Andrew Miller is careful to draw the distinction:
Andrew Miller"To be a 'mourner' in the sense of our text, is to be deeply and tenderly affected by the condition — especially the moral and spiritual condition — of others around us. For example: The worldliness of true Christians; the manifest delusion of mere professors; the godless ways of those who may be our near neighbours, accompanied with a deep sense of inability to witness for God in such a scene, fills the heart with holy sorrow."
And lest the reader mistake a melancholy temperament for this beatitude, he presses the warning home:
"At the same time, this holy sorrow, which is so good and wholesome, and which leads to much prayer and dependence on God, must not be mistaken for a low, complaining, unhappy, discontented, mournful spirit in ourselves, which we may think answers to this beatitude. Not so; such would be little likely to enter into the sorrows of others, or mourn over the dishonour done to God and His truth in this world. They are too much occupied with their own state of mind, and that which immediately concerns themselves."
So the true mourner is one whose heart has been awakened to feel what Christ feels in a world that will not have Him.
William Kelly shows that this second blessing is not a repetition of the first but a real advance, moving from what is between the soul and God alone to what the soul tastes in the world around it:
William Kelly"'Blessed are they that mourn' is the second feature. There is more activity of life, more depth of feeling, more entrance into the condition of things around them. To be 'poor in spirit' would be true if there were not a single other soul in the world; he thus feels because of what he is in himself; it is a question between him and God that makes him to be poor in spirit. But 'blessed are they that mourn' is not merely what we find in our own condition, but the holy sorrow that a saint tastes in finding himself in such a world as this, and, oh, how little able to maintain the glory of God!"
The two belong together but are not identical. Poverty of spirit comes first — the sense that the dust is our right place before God. Mourning follows as the heart, now alive to God, feels what is due to Him and how little that honour is upheld. Kelly adds a most tender assurance:
"'Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted' (ver. 4). There is not a single sigh that goes up to God but He treasures and will answer it; 'Ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves.' Here, then, we have the sorrowing of the godly soul."
T. Oliver McBroom links this mourning directly to the absence of the Bridegroom and the dishonour done to God in a godless age:
T. Oliver McBroom"This is apt to be misunderstood, particularly at a time like the present when the hunt for pleasure and fashion is engaging the mass of men. There were those who sighed and cried in Ezekiel's time for the abominations done at Jerusalem, and we live in the midst of a godless and suicidal infatuation which calls for the judgment of God. Such a state of things calls for mourning on their part of those that know God. Every divinely taught heart knows that the time of the Bridegroom's absence is the mourning time (Matt. 9), but like Mary of old has divine comfort even now (John 20). To appoint unto them that mourn in Zion; to give unto them beauty for ashes, the oil of joy for mourning."
Kelly, in his Lectures on Matthew's Gospel, draws attention to the very atmosphere of the whole Sermon on the Mount, which has this sorrow as its undertone:
"The King has the sense of the true state of the people, who had no heart for Him. Hence there is a certain tinge of sorrow that runs through it. That must ever characterize real godliness in the world as it is."
Those who truly belong to the rejected King share in that "tinge of sorrow" which marked His own path as the Man of sorrows.
Miller is quick to guard the beatitude from any notion that the mourner must walk with a clouded countenance before God. He writes beautifully of the double character of the saint's experience:
"We may, and ought — if we are poor in spirit and true mourners — to be bright and happy in the divine presence, where all is peace and joy, and yet have fellowship with the deep sympathies of Him who was 'a man of sorrows,' in our journey through this world. And the more we know of His Spirit, the deeper will be our sense of what is due to Him, and the keener will be our sorrow when we see so many who set themselves against His authority."
The saint walks, as he puts it, "in the midst of ruins":
"It can only be tasted when the heart has a true sense of the moral condition of the church and the world. Then we must 'mourn' over the fearful effects of sin and apostasy which meet us at every step. We walk in the midst of ruins. Wrecks of every kind lie strewed around us. Blighted hopes, unexpected calamities, with a multitude of little secret sorrows, characterise the land in which we are strangers and pilgrims, so that like captive Israel of old, 'by the waters of Babylon,' we may 'sit down and weep,' though we need not hang our harps on the willows; we are privileged to rejoice daily in the blessed hope of the Lord's coming, when we shall be fully and for ever comforted."
Miller closes with a word that has strengthened many a weary heart:
"The mourner must now retire into his secret chamber and breathe out his sorrow into the bosom of his Lord. He must stand aloof from all this sad mixture of the church and the world, well knowing that he will be judged as wanting in brotherly love, and uncharitably affected towards other Christians. He will not have his sorrows to seek; but the Lord knows it all, and he shall be comforted. The time is coming when he will enter into the joy of his Lord, and reap the fruit of his testimony for Him throughout eternity. 'Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted.' Every tear that has been shed, every sigh that has gone up to God, every groan that has been uttered in sympathy with a rejected Christ, are all treasured by Him as the memorials of His own grace working in us, and will surely be held in everlasting remembrance."
Matthew 5:4 does not pronounce a general blessing upon human grief. The Lord is speaking of a specific, holy sorrow — the sorrow of a heart awakened to God in a world that has rejected Him. It is the second step in the spiritual order of the Beatitudes: first, poverty of spirit toward God; then, the outward-looking grief that feels what is due to Him and how little it is honoured. This mourning is the natural overflow of fellowship with the Man of sorrows Himself, and it coexists with real joy in the divine presence. The comfort promised is not merely a temporary consolation but the full and eternal answer of God — every sigh remembered, every tear treasured, and at last "beauty for ashes, the oil of joy for mourning" when the Bridegroom returns and fills the scene with gladness.
Blessed the meek, for *they* shall inherit the earth.
The third beatitude marks a deep advance in the soul's blessedness. Where the first beatitude looks at what we are in God's sight, and the second at our sorrow over the world's condition, this one describes a spirit so schooled in the knowledge of God that it no longer frets against the evil around it, but bows to the Father's will.
Andrew Miller sees the meek man as one who has been taught in the school of Christ to meet trouble as Christ met it:
Andrew MillerMatthew 5:5. Blessed are the meek; for they shall inherit the earth. In our meditations on the third beatitude, we find ourselves in happy company with that blessed One who was "meek and lowly in heart." There is evidently, in this third class, a great advance in the soul's blessedness. The heir of glory has been learning in the school of Christ how to meet the troubles of this life, as He met them. This is a great lesson, and greatly needed.
He then draws out exactly what that advance consists in — the exchange of a self-willed spirit for quiet submission:
The great advance in the third class seems to be this: the soul has so grown in grace, that now, in place of a questioning, reasoning, self-willed spirit being manifested in this scene of trial, the disciple meekly bows his head in submission to the Father's will, and learns of Jesus to be meek and lowly in heart; for, after all, in these circumstances it is a question of either self-will or submission.
And he paints what this looks like in daily life:
Though groaning in spirit, and mourning over the wickedness of man, the rejection of Christ by those we love, and the failure of those who bear His name, the man of faith is quiet and humble! he walks with God in the midst of it all, and refers everything to Him. In the lowest murmur of the enemy, or in his loudest roar, he hears his Father's voice; in the smallest injury or in the greatest outrage, he owns His hand; he envies not the world its pleasures, or the wicked their prosperity; all his resources are in the living God.
William Kelly traces this quality to its perfect pattern in Christ, and notes that it was displayed precisely at the moment of deepest sorrow over human rejection:
William KellyHe was "meek and lowly in heart;" and this was what the Lord said after He had been groaning in spirit, for He knew what it was to have a deeper sorrow than we have spoken of, over the condition of men and the rejection of God that He witnessed here below. He could only say "Woe" to those cities in which He had done so many mighty works ... But at the same hour we find He rejoices in spirit, and says, "I thank Thee, O Father." Such is the blessed proof of matchless meekness in Jesus. The same hour which sees the depth of His sorrow over man sees also His perfect bowing to God, though at the cost of everything to Himself.
Kelly is careful to distinguish meekness from mere passivity or low self-estimate:
Meekness is not merely to have a sense of nothingness in ourselves, or to be filled with sorrow for the opposition to God here below; but it is rather the calmness which leaves things with God, and bends to God, and thankfully owns the will of God, even where naturally it may be most trying to ourselves.
Thomas McBroom insists that meekness must not be confused with weakness — quite the opposite:
Thomas McBroom"Blessed the meek for they shall inherit the earth." Meekness contrasts with the bold boasting of man, but is far from being a sign of weakness. It was no sign of weakness in Abram when he yielded up his right to Lot, as may be seen from his exploits in the following chapter. Moses was the meekest man in all the earth, but there was none so valiant as he.
Kelly raises the question directly:
Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth (ver. 5). The earth — why not heaven? The earth is the scene of all this evil, causing such sorrow and mourning. But now, having better learnt God's ways, they can commit all to Him.
Andrew Miller links the promise to Psalms 25 and 37, and notes that it is the very scene of present trial which becomes the scene of future glory:
Andrew Miller"The meek will he guide in judgment, and the meek will he teach his way. … The meek shall inherit the earth, and shall delight themselves in the abundance of peace." (Ps. 25, 37) These passages no doubt refer to the millennial earth, when the God-fearing remnant shall possess it, in association with Christ as their king of glory. It is not said, observe, that they shall inherit heaven, but the earth. The place of their trial and sorrow will one day be the scene of their rest, their glory, and blessedness. The Christian will possess it in a higher way — as one with Christ, who will then feed the poor with bread.
McBroom draws the same contrast between the present grasping of men and the coming possession by the Lamb:
The land for the people is the cry to-day, and large estates are changing hands constantly. The time is near when in bold apostasy "the wilful king" shall divide the land among his favourites for gain (Daniel 11:39). But at that time the Lamb will take possession and overthrow every opposer. While we wait of that day it is well to be able to say, Jehovah is the portion of mine inheritance and of my cup (Ps. 16).
Miller presses home that this meekness is not produced by effort or by brooding on one's reputation, but by taking up Christ's yoke:
The reason why so few have learnt to meet the troubles of this life as He met them, is, because they are not under His yoke, and learning of Him. They are thinking of their own character; how much they have been misunderstood, how grossly they have been misrepresented, how falsely accused, and how unjustly or unkindly treated. They have not learnt that their own reputation is the last thing they should think about; that now they have only to care for the character of Christ.
The meek man is not the man without backbone, nor the man crushed by circumstance, but the man who has learned in the presence of God to let go of his own rights and reputation and to commit everything — every injury, every disappointment, every apparent triumph of evil — to his Father's hand. He is the one who, like Abraham yielding to Lot, or Moses bearing the murmurings of the congregation, or the Lord Himself thanking the Father at the hour of His rejection, meets provocation with calm submission rather than self-assertion.
And the reward fits the character exactly. The man who refuses to seize and defend his portion in this present scene is promised the very scene itself. The earth, which is now the platform of human boasting and grasping, will one day be possessed by those who were willing to walk across it with empty hands, trusting the Father's will — because the Lamb whom they followed will take it, and they will inherit it with Him.
Blessed they who hunger and thirst after righteousness, for *they* shall be filled.
The Fourth Beatitude — "Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled" (Matt. 5:6) — is treated by these writers as the turning-point of the Beatitudes: the most active of the inward graces, and the one that secures perfect satisfaction from God's own hand.
Walter Scott (in his exposition of the Sermon on the Mount) sets this fourth saying at the very center of the series:
Walter Scott"Blessed they which hunger and thirst after righteousness for they shall be filled." This is the central trait of the seven, and it seems to bind them all together like the central light on the candlestick. Do we know what this means? David cried, "As the hart pants after the water-brook so pants my soul after God. My soul thirsts for God, for the living God." No person ever sought the Lord and was disappointed, and no amount of this world's goods can ever satisfy the heart that has fed upon the bread of God.
William Kelly sees it as the climax of the first half of the Beatitudes — the active side, before the Lord turns to speak of mercy, purity and peace-making:
William KellyThe fourth blessedness is much more active. "Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled" (ver. 6). Perfect soul-satisfaction they shall have. Whatever was the form of the spiritual feeling of the heart, there is always the perfect answer to it on God's part. If there was sorrow, they shall be comforted; if there was meekness, they shall inherit the earth, the very place of their trial here. Now, there is this activity of spiritual feeling, the going out after what was according to God, and what maintained the will of God.
W. T. P. Wolston likewise marks this verse as closing the first group of Beatitudes — those which have righteousness as their key — before the subject changes to grace:
W. T. P. Wolston"Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness, for they shall be filled" (Matt. 5:6). Those who hunger and thirst after righteousness, God will fill. It is a hungering, and thirsting, after practically meeting the mind of God. Do we know that? I suppose the reason why we know so little of what it is to be filled, is because we so little hunger and thirst after righteousness.
Now the subject changes. Hitherto we have had righteousness. It is a right thing to be poor in spirit, it is a right thing to mourn, it is a right thing to be meek, it is a right thing to hunger and thirst after practically meeting the mind of God. Now we come to the other side of the subject. Grace. Christ!
For these writers, the language is not about longing for imputed righteousness in a forensic sense, but for practical righteousness — the will of God carried out in a world that opposes it.
Andrew Miller devotes his fullest meditation to this beatitude, and insists that the desire itself is already the work of grace in the soul:
Andrew MillerThis is grace, and like the ways of the Lord in grace, from the beginning. His answer meets the felt need of the soul. He creates the desire that He may satisfy it. When the heart desires that which is good, we may be sure that His grace is there. As there is nothing spiritually good in the natural heart, the first, as every good desire after, must come from God. "I will arise, and go to my father," was the effect of grace working in the heart of the prodigal; and he was then as safe as when he was in his father's arms, though he did not know it. So that a good desire is the fruit of grace, and, in a certain sense, the possession of all that is desired. It is like the earnest of the inheritance.
Miller then defines the appetite itself:
As we are all well acquainted with the force of the figure, we can easily see its spiritual application. To hunger and thirst after righteousness evidently means an earnest desire of the renewed mind to do the will of God in this world; and this desire is increased from finding the world opposed to what is right in the sight of God — to righteousness. Hence the intensified feeling of hungering and thirsting.
He warns that this appetite will always be costly to the one who has it:
But though blessedness is the sure reward of righteousness, the righteous path will be one of great trial and many difficulties. The maxim of the world is, not what is right before God, but what is convenient, profitable, or suitable to self. What the mind of God may be on the subject is never thought of; and he who would suggest the inquiry would be set down as unfit for the practical realities of this life.
And Miller fastens the whole thing to a single piercing question the Christian is to ask about every course of action:
As a test of the real character of much that we allow and do, it would be impossible to over-estimate the value of this short and simple question, Is it right? Not that we are to expect an express passage of scripture for everything we do or allow; but we may seriously inquire, is this in accordance with the revealed will of God in Christ? Are we sure that it has His approval? If not, what is it worth? It is worse than useless, it is wrong… To hunger and thirst after righteousness is the earnest desire to maintain what is right in the sight of God, though it may expose us to the opposition and oppression of the world, or to that of worldly-minded Christians.
Thomas Watson, quoted at length in William Smith's compilation, makes this verse the touchstone of a real Christian as distinguished from a hypocrite. It is the desire, not merely the outward act, that tells the story:
Thomas Watson"BLESSED are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled" (Matt. 5:6). Though thou hast not so much righteousness as thou wouldst, yet thou art blessed, because thou hungerest after it; desire is the best discovery of a Christian, actions may be counterfeit; a man may do a good action for a bad end. So did Jehu. Actions may be compulsory: a man may be forced to do that which is good, but not to will that which is good. These hungerings after righteousness proceed from love; a man doth not desire that which he doth not love; if thou didst not love Christ, thou couldst not hunger after Him.
Watson then draws a sharp line between the true appetite and its counterfeit:
The hypocrite doth not so much desire the way of righteousness as the crown of righteousness: his desire is not to be made like Christ, but to reign with Christ. This was Balaam's desire, "Let me die the death of the righteous" (Num. 23:10). This is the hypocrite's hunger; a child of God desires Christ for Himself. To a believer, not only heaven is precious, but Christ is precious (1 Peter 2:7). Hypocrites' desires are but desires, they are lazy and sluggish. "The desire of the slothful killeth him; for his hands refuse to labour" (Prov. 21:25). But true desire is quickened into endeavour, "With my soul have I desired Thee in the night; yea, with my spirit within me will I seek Thee early" (Isa. 26:9).
On the promise itself, Watson gives the richest treatment:
"They shall be filled." God never bids us seek Him in vain. "He has filled the hungry with good things" (Luke 1:53). "He satisfieth the longing soul" (Ps. 107:9). God will not let us lose our longing.
A man may hunger after the world and not be filled; the world is fading, not filling. A man may be filled and not satisfied. A sinner may take his fill of sin, but it is far from satisfaction… but he that hungers after righteousness shall be satisfyingly filled. "My people shall be satisfied with My goodness" (Jer. 31:14).
God can fill the hungry soul. "With Thee is the fountain of life" (Ps. 36:9). The cistern may be empty and cannot fill us. But the fountain is filling. The fulness of God is an infinite fulness, it knows neither bounds nor bottom. It is a constant fulness, "Thou art the same" (Ps. 102:27). God can never be exhausted, His fulness is overflowing and ever-flowing.
Miller closes his own meditation on the same note, that no heart which has begun to long for Christ will be disappointed:
We conclude, then, from these reflections… that every desire of the heart after Christ shall be satisfied for ever. So far this is true now. May the Lord awaken and draw forth many deep, earnest, longing desires after Himself, in these last and closing days.
Four threads run through all of this. First, the hunger itself is already grace at work — no unrenewed heart ever reached after the righteousness of God, so the ache is God's own pledge that He intends to satisfy it. Second, the righteousness in view is practical: an eager desire to do God's will in a world that contradicts it, not a merely imputed standing. Third, the desire is the truest mark of a Christian — actions may be forged, but longing cannot; the hypocrite wants the crown without the Christ, while the child of God wants Christ Himself. And fourth, the promise is absolute — "they shall be filled." The world is a cistern that cannot fill; God is a fountain that never runs dry, and He has never yet allowed a soul that hungered after Him to go away empty. The very fact that you hunger after His righteousness is His own work in you, and is itself the earnest of the fullness He has pledged to pour in.
Blessed the merciful, for *they* shall find mercy.
I have enough. Let me compose the answer.
Before we come to the words themselves, it helps to see where this fifth beatitude sits in the sermon. Andrew Miller shows that the seven beatitudes fall into two groups — four of righteousness, three of grace — and mercy opens the second:
Andrew MillerWe now enter on what may be called the second section of the Beatitudes. They are evidently divided into four and three — a division not uncommon in scripture. The first four are characterised by righteousness, or that which is due to God: the last three by grace, or the activities of grace towards others. There is great moral beauty, order, and instruction, in these two classes.
William Kelly draws the same dividing line and says that after poverty of spirit has opened the soul to God, mercy now opens it toward others:
William KellyAs righteousness is the key note of the first four, so grace is that which lies at the root of the latter three; and, therefore, the very first of them demonstrates not merely that they are righteous and that they feel what is due to God, but they appreciate the love of God, and maintain it in the midst of surrounding evil.
And elsewhere in the same volume Kelly adds that mercy stands at the head of this new group exactly as poverty of spirit stood at the head of the first:
This is the characteristic feature of the new class of blessing; just as poverty of spirit was the introduction to the first blessings, so mercy is to these.
Both Miller and Kelly insist that "the merciful" are pronounced blessed because mercy is the native atmosphere of God Himself. Andrew Miller writes with unusual warmth here:
Andrew MillerNo word within the compass of our language has a sweeter sound than mercy; and no other word could bring the character of God more fully before thy mind... He is "the Father of mercies." Mercy is not merely a resource of God, but He is its source — "the Father of mercies." He is the well-spring of all the pity, compassion, tenderness, kindness, and charity, whether temporal or spiritual, which flow through this world of misery.
There is no interruption to His mercy: it is the active principle of His being in this world of sin and misery. "For his mercy endureth for ever."
W. Kelly puts it almost identically — mercy is what God most fully is while sin is in the world:
There is nothing on which God more takes His stand (as the active principle of His being in a world of sin) than His mercy. The only possibility of salvation to a single soul is that there is mercy in God; that He is rich in mercy; that there is no bound to His mercy; that there is nothing in man, if he only bows to His Son, which can hinder His constant flowing spring of mercy.
Because mercy is this flowing spring in God, those who are truly His will be channels of the same stream.
A question often raised here is whether "merciful" is simply another word for "gracious." Andrew Miller carefully separates them:
Andrew MillerIn what way, we may inquire, does mercy differ from grace? Clearly they are not the same thing, though they may come very near to each other... Both words, we find, are prominent in the character of God, as proclaimed to Moses — "The Lord, the Lord God, merciful and gracious." He is merciful to forgive, and gracious to help in every time of need.
And he sharpens the definition:
He is merciful to forgive, and gracious to help in every time of need.The term grace evidently conveys the idea of free gift, favour; without obligation on God's part, without claim on ours... But mercy always marks the receiver as a wrong-doer. To be "merciful" is to be ready to overlook or forgive a wrong, at the same time conscious that he to whom mercy is shown deserves a contrary kind of treatment.
So to be "merciful" in Matthew 5:7 is not merely to be kind-hearted in the abstract — it is to be ready to forgive a real wrong, exactly as we ourselves have been forgiven real wrongs by God.
Miller is very practical about the manner of showing mercy, holding up the Lord's dealings with blind Bartimaeus as the pattern:
And here learn also, as a believer, how to show mercy. Give not thy alms to the poor as thou wouldst throw a bone to a dog. With what grace Jesus bends over the poor man, and asks, as if He were his servant, "What wilt thou that I shall do unto thee?" Far from taking a place of manifest superiority, and causing the poor man to feel as if in a far distant place, He gave him to know and feel that He was dealing with him in love and grace...
The Christian must not only be merciful — most merciful, always merciful — but he must learn to show mercy after the manner of his Lord and Master. The way of the world is to patronise, and to be esteemed as benefactors; and many will give for the sake of this honour. But not so those on whom the Lord lays His hand and pronounces blessed.
W. T. P. Wolston adds that mercy of this kind cuts straight against our natural hardness of heart:
W. T. P. WolstonAll through Scripture this word mercy abounds: it is a beautiful word, mercy. "Blessed are the merciful." Ah, beloved, I believe we are a hard lot. God delights in mercy. If a person has this thought inwrought in his soul, he will be quit of his hardness.
Wolston is careful, however, that mercy never lowers the standard of holiness:
Not that mercy makes light of sin. Not at all! Those who are nearest to God have this too, they are "pure in heart" likewise, for they are the most like Christ.
W. Kelly makes exactly the same point — mercy rightly tasted does not soften the conscience, it deepens it:
The effect of mercy is not a compromising of the holiness of God, but a larger and deeper standard of it. The fuller your hold of grace is, the higher will be your maintenance of holiness.
What of the promised reward? Andrew Miller faces the obvious objection — surely the saint in glory has no need of mercy — and answers it from Paul's prayer for Onesiphorus:
Andrew MillerBut thou mayest yet inquire, my soul, what is the promised reward here assured to the merciful — "They shall obtain mercy?" We cannot need mercy in heaven. Surely not. Nevertheless, the promise is future, whether strictly applied to the Jew, or morally to the Christian. Onesiphorus was no doubt a Christian, and Paul prayed for him, "that he might find mercy of the Lord in that day" — the time of future rewards.
And in the present life the merciful already taste a reward of their own kind:
In the exercise of mercy towards others, thou shalt taste afresh the sweetness of God's mercy to thine own soul. A gracious eye, a tender heart, an open hand, carry with them their divine reward.
Kelly says the same — those who show mercy are repaid, not with ease, but with a fresh sense of God's mercy toward themselves:
They will find, not that there is not difficulty and trial, but that though they shall know the cost of it, they shall know the sweetness of it; they shall taste afresh what the mercy of God is towards their own souls, in the exercise of mercy towards others.
W. T. P. Wolston extends the promise all the way to glory, pointing to Jude 21:
W. T. P. WolstonWhat met us at first? Mercy! What keeps us all along the road? Mercy! What does the Holy Ghost bid us look for? Mercy! We have received mercy to begin with, but the biggest mercy of the lot is to be delivered from this place and scene of corruption... To be taken up out of it all to be with Himself will be an immense mercy. We are exhorted to be "looking for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ, to eternal life."
Finally, Wolston reminds us that none of this is abstract virtue — every line of the beatitudes was first perfectly realised in the Lord Jesus:
These last three blessednesses partake largely of the character of grace, the merciful, the pure in heart, and the peacemakers. They are the reproduction of Christ in us... Was He not poor in spirit? Was he not a mourner? Was He not meek?... Was He not merciful? Pure in heart? A peacemaker? He was all these, and more, in perfection.
Matthew 5:7 opens the second half of the beatitudes by turning the disciple outward. The first four blessings describe the soul emptied before God; mercy is the first fruit of that emptied soul going out to others. To be "merciful" is not simply to be soft-hearted — it is, as Miller puts it, to be ready to forgive a real wrong while fully aware that strict justice would entitle us to do the opposite. Such mercy is possible only because God Himself is its source, the "Father of mercies," whose mercy is the very "active principle of His being in a world of sin." Those who have truly drunk from that spring cannot help but let it flow through them, and in doing so they taste afresh the sweetness of the mercy they once received. The promise — "they shall obtain mercy" — reaches from the daily comfort of the present hour, through Paul's longing for Onesiphorus "in that day," to the final mercy of the Lord Jesus Christ unto eternal life. And all of this is simply the reproduction in the disciple of what shone perfectly in Christ Himself, who was "the faithful witness of the mercy and of the purity of God."
Blessed the pure in heart, for *they* shall see God.
Good — James McBroom. Now I have all I need.
The sixth of the Lord's beatitudes stands at the peak of the gracious qualities He sets before His disciples. It fuses the deepest inward reality — a clean, undivided heart — with the greatest conceivable blessing: to see God Himself.
William Kelly emphasizes that this is no merely outward religion but a quality wrought by Christ Himself in those who are born anew. Having set out the seven characters of the beatitudes, he writes:
William KellyTheirs too is purity in heart, and as by faith they see God now, so shall they beyond others by-and-by (Rev. 22:4).
— `authors/kelly/gospel/11.html`
For Kelly, these qualities are not native to fallen man, nor even to unfallen Adam. They are the features of Christ reproduced in the disciple:
Such are the qualities, said the Lord, which suit the kingdom. They are not those of man fallen nor even unfallen. The first man in Paradise had none of them any more than the outcast race. "Ye must be born anew," and even then have your new character formed and impressed by the Lord Jesus… Those that follow Him, having Him as their life, must have His qualities reproduced and manifested in them.
— `authors/kelly/gospel/11.html`
James McBroom draws the sharp contrast between the natural heart — which Scripture elsewhere calls deceitful and desperately wicked — and the heart God Himself creates in the believer:
James McBroomThe same lips describe the human heart in its sinfulness, but by His power He can change it from being hard and stony and write His laws upon it, that in boundless grace it might be like His own. It is said of the elders of Israel that they saw God and did eat and drink. Surely it is blessed to behold the beauty of the Lord and inquire in His Temple. Have we ever beheld the King in His beauty? Can we say, "We see Jesus crowned with glory and honour"? If so we can look forward to the time when His servants shall serve Him and shall see His face (Rev. 21). Meantime there is a wholesome word for us, "Pursue peace with all, and holiness without which no man shall see the Lord."
— `authors/mcbroom/Notes_on_Matthew.html`
A reading on Matthew 5 in The Bible Treasury stresses that the Lord here is dealing with what is inside — with motives, not outward ceremonies. The writer links the beatitude to the new covenant promise of a new heart:
The Bible TreasuryIf we love it there is that word in the Proverbs, "He that loves pureness of heart, for the grace of his lips the king shall be his friend." It will show itself in conversation. The wisdom from above is first pure, then peaceable. When the kingdom comes a new heart will be given… He will take away the stony heart that said, "Away with Him"; but the new heart will say, "With His stripes we are healed." The blessing of the new covenant is not only, "their sins and iniquities will I remember no more," but "I will put my laws in their heart," and there will then be a people who shall love the Lord with all their heart.
— `magazines/bt/BT_NS11/1917_209_Matthew_Reading.html`
He then explains what a "pure heart" really is — a heart without reserve:
A new heart is a heart without any reserve. An evil conscience would keep you away. A true heart rests on the knowledge that all is done; so I am able to draw near, not in presumption, but having the heart sprinkled from an evil conscience… Motives are dealt with here and that which is inward.
— `magazines/bt/BT_NS11/1917_209_Matthew_Reading.html`
Writing in An Outline of Sound Words, the author of "Things That Are Pure" insists that purity of heart is not an exceptional attainment reserved for spiritual giants, but the ordinary condition in which a Christian ought to be found:
When the Lord Jesus said in Matthew 5:8, "Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God," He was speaking of His people in their normal condition, for it is normal for a Christian to have a heart that is free from the pollution of the flesh, and that answers to the divine exhortation, "Be ye holy, for I am holy."
— `magazines/OSW/later_articles/1967 c/28 Things that are Pure.html`
He ties the practical keeping of this purity to Paul's words to Timothy — love flowing out of a heart kept pure:
"Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned" (1 Tim. 1:5). These practical features are to mark us, love flowing out towards others from a heart that is kept pure by obedience to the word of God, with all that belongs to the flesh kept in the place of death.
— `magazines/OSW/later_articles/1967 c/28 Things that are Pure.html`
J. N. Darby, in a reading, treats the promise itself with reverent reserve. When pressed whether the pure shall actually behold God in His essence, he answers:
J. N. DarbyI do not believe a creature can see God in His essence. But it is said that the pure in heart shall see God, and "in heaven … angels do always behold the face of my Father which is in heaven."
— `authors/darby/NOTESJOT/40017_8E.html`
And in another reading, Darby warns against taking the promise for granted — it is a searching word, not a comfortable assumption:
I remember a brother speaking to a fellow-traveller, who answered him, "Oh, I am quite sure that the pure in heart will see God." Well, he replied, do you think you are pure enough in heart to see God? "Oh, you are beginning to be personal," said he.
— `authors/darby/NOTESJOT/40041E_B.html`
Drawing these threads together: "Pure in heart" is not moral blamelessness summoned up by the natural man, but a heart made new by the Spirit of God — a heart without reserve, undivided in its affections, free from the pollution of the flesh, with Christ Himself as its object. Such purity is inward; it deals with motives beneath the surface of the act. It is normal for a Christian and not an exotic attainment — Peter says God purified the hearts of the Gentiles by faith — but it must also be maintained in practice, by obedience to the Word and watchfulness against defilement.
The promise, "they shall see God," works on two planes. By faith, the pure in heart see God now — they behold the beauty of the Lord, they see Jesus crowned with glory and honour, they draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith. And by sight, they shall see Him hereafter, when His servants shall serve Him and shall behold His face (Rev. 22:4). The sight of God is both the present privilege and the final reward of those whose hearts belong undividedly to Him.
Blessed the peace-makers, for *they* shall be called sons of God.
I have enough rich material from three distinctive voices. Composing the commentary now.
The seventh beatitude — "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the children of God" — crowns the group of graces that flow outward toward others. It is not a passive temperament being blessed, but an active ministry that reflects God Himself.
Andrew Miller is careful to draw out this distinction, which is easily missed:
Andrew Miller"Blessed are the peacemakers; for they shall be called the children of God." It is not, observe, they who live in peace, walk in peace, or keep peace, that are crowned with the divine blessing, but they who make peace — "peace-makers."
He presses the point, because a quiet disposition is not at all the same thing as the grace the Lord is describing:
The distinction is important, as many who have a peaceable nature are the least qualified to make peace, and are in danger of being unfaithful for the sake of peace. But peace-making is quite another thing. It is the grace of the Lord Jesus in blessed activity, pouring oil on the troubled waters — on the tumultuous passions of men. And this, mark, without compromising the holiness of God, or saying, Peace, peace, when there is no peace.
The work, he insists, is costly and spiritual, never cheap:
It may occasion much self-denial, much anxiety, much waiting on God much disquiet to one's own mind… But the peace-maker must be impartial; he must see that "mercy and truth meet together, that righteousness and peace kiss each other." There must be truth as well as grace, purity as well as peace. Time must be given for God to work: peace cannot be forced.
Miller also shows why this beatitude is placed seventh, and not earlier. It requires the previous graces as its foundation — especially the purity of heart that immediately precedes it:
The pure in heart are at peace with God through the precious blood of Christ. Cleansed from all sin — whiter than snow — they see God, and have learnt much in the divine presence that fits them for peace-making. He who walks with God must live in the spirit of self-judgment — must judge all that belongs to himself naturally, and thereby gain complete control over his own spirit, temper, words and ways… The sixth beatitude, we have no doubt, is the true preparation for the exercise of the God-like grace of the seventh; or as James says, "First pure, then peaceable."
The reason the peacemakers are called sons of God is that in this very activity they show the family likeness. Miller continues:
None of the Christian graces so distinctly reveals God in His children as this peace-making spirit. "They shall be called the children of God." That which God is, and delights in, is seen in them. The moral resemblance is manifest, and their sonship is declared… God is the great Peace-maker. This is what He has been doing, what He is doing, and what He will do until peace is established for ever in the new heavens and the new earth. He delights in the title "God of peace;" which occurs seven times in the Epistles. He loves peace: strife and contention cannot dwell with Him.
He roots it, as he must, in the cross:
The true ground of peace between God and man was laid in the great work of the cross… Christ made peace by the blood of His cross: and when His blessed work was finished, He returned to His Father, leaving behind Him the full blessing of peace for His disciples; "Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you; not as the world giveth, give I unto you." The peace which He made on the cross, and His own personal peace which He enjoyed with His Father while passing through the sorrows of this world, He leaves as the rich legacy of His love for all who believe in Him.
J. N. Darby draws the same thread — that peacemaking is tied inseparably to God's own great work of reconciliation, and that this is why the peacemaker bears the family name:
J. N. DarbyIn Christians He glorifies Himself in reconciliation, to make them the first-fruits of His new creation, when He shall have reconciled all things in heaven and on earth by Christ. Therefore it is written "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the children [sons] of God." They have His nature and His character.
William Kelly sets this seventh blessing within the shape of the whole Sermon on the Mount, noting how the beatitudes divide into two groups of four and three:
William KellyFirst of all He pronounces certain classes blessed. These blessednesses divide into two classes. The earlier character of blessedness savours particularly of righteousness, the later of mercy, which are the two great topics of the Psalms… The next three are founded upon mercy. Hence we read as the very first — "Blessed are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy. Blessed are the pure in heart: for they shall see God. Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God."
For Kelly, then, the peacemaker's blessing is the climax of the line of grace — the overflow of mercy purified in heart that now goes out to heal breaches among men. He also notes how utterly opposed this spirit is to the proud and angry flesh the Lord condemns immediately afterwards in Matthew 5:21-22:
How too could it agree with being persecuted for righteousness' sake? how with being reproached, and having all manner of evil said and done against one falsely for Christ's sake, yet, rejoicing and being exceeding glad to be thus defamed and ill-used for His name?
And he marks that peacemaking is among the hardest graces to produce, because it demands the partaking of a divine nature:
Harder still was the actively gracious spirit of mercifulness, purity in heart, and peace-making according to God, with the persecutions which such righteousness entails.
So the Lord's seventh beatitude is not a blessing on the mild or the conflict-averse. It is a blessing on those who, being themselves at peace with God through the blood of the cross, carry that peace into troubled situations without compromising truth — who, like their Father, reconcile where there is enmity. Peace-making is the Father's own work, supremely accomplished in the cross of Christ; and when His children take up that work in the power of a new nature, the family likeness is so unmistakable that heaven gives them the name — "sons of God." Miller's warning is worth keeping: a naturally peaceable man who buys quiet at the price of faithfulness is not the peacemaker Christ blesses. The true peacemaker holds mercy and truth together, waits on God, endures the cost, and in doing so shows whose child he is.
Blessed they who are persecuted on account of righteousness, for *theirs* is the kingdom of the heavens.
This final beatitude turns a corner. The seven that precede it describe what the disciple is; this one describes what will happen to him because of what he is. The writers on stempublishing.com draw out both the structural beauty of its placement and the searching practical edge of its promise.
Andrew Miller calls this "The Beatitude of Position" and explains that it completes a picture which would otherwise be incomplete:
Andrew MillerWere it not that we leave the children of the kingdom in a hostile world, we might here conclude our "Meditations," in the full assurance of their perfect blessedness. Seven times blessed is divine completeness. But however blessed, however happy in the divine presence... they still stand in this world just where they stood before they were born of God, and surrounded it may be with the same persons and circumstances as they ever were.
He continues:
So far, it will be observed, we have spoken chiefly of the character of God's children, now we turn to meditate for a little on their position in an evil world. The moral character of those who belong to Christ rising in grace to the seventh beatitude, must necessarily arouse the spirit of persecution, and expose them to trial, until the kingdom of heaven is set up in power and glory.
Miller notes the gracious touch of the Lord who anticipates how strange this must sound:
Had no special blessing been pronounced on this condition of things the disciples might have been ready to say that their state was anything but blessed; that the benediction of heaven on their character only brought down upon themselves the hatred and oppression of mankind... But oh, the grace, the rich, the abounding grace, of our Lord Jesus! He pronounces those twice blessed who are exposed to persecution from the world.
William Kelly draws attention to the precise architecture of the passage. This beatitude mirrors the very first one and answers back to the first group of four, all characterized by righteousness:
William KellyThis is evidently to begin over again. The first blessedness was, "Blessed are the poor in spirit; for theirs is the kingdom of heaven;" and the next three were all marked by righteousness... But here it is not so much what they are, as what their lot is from others. The last two beatitudes speak of their portion in the world from the hands of other people. The first four are characterized by intrinsic righteousness — the last three by intrinsic grace. These two, then, answer, one to the first four, and the other to the last three.
Kelly presses the reason why the kingdom of heaven returns as the promise:
This does not go beyond the blessed state of things that the power of God will bring in upon the earth in connection with the Messiah. Being rejected, the kingdom of heaven is His with a stronger and deeper title, as it were — certainly with the means of blessing by grace for the lost. A suffering and despised Messiah is still dearer to the heart of God than if received all at once. And if He does not lose the kingdom because He was persecuted, neither do they.
Kelly turns the verse into a pointed question of motive. The test is not who persecutes, but why:
Persecuted, not merely by the Gentiles or the Jews, but for righteousness' sake. Do not be looking at the people that persecute you, but at the reason why you are persecuted. If it is because you desire to be found in obedience to the will of God, blessed are you. You fear to sin? you suffer for it? Blessed are they which suffer for righteousness' sake: they will have their portion with the Messiah Himself.
Miller gives a concrete illustration so the verse cannot remain abstract:
For example, a Christian who is walking with the Lord, fears to do what is wrong, he desires to do what is right; he seeks to maintain a conscience void of offence towards God and towards man. This is the breastplate of righteousness. But he is offered, it may be, certain preferment in his position if he will agree to do something which he fears not to be right. The offer may be a tempting one and he is needy; but no; he waits on the Lord; he brings the matter before Him; light shines, the tempter's object is seen, he positively refuses; righteousness prevails, but he suffers for it. He is misunderstood, is called foolish, or it may be fanatic and madman. He not only loses what was offered, but what he had; he is no use, he is turned out. Still he can say, My present loss, under the righteous government of God, will prove my eternal gain.
Miller is careful to distinguish this verse from the one that follows. Verse 10 covers a suffering that even a merely upright man may taste; verse 11 rises higher:
This is a much higher thing than suffering for righteousness' sake, though the two may often go together. Many an upright mind has suffered for righteousness' sake, who knew not the Saviour's love or His saving grace. Naturally upright, they would not stoop to deceive, and suffered for it. Even natural uprightness is too straight for the crooked ways of this sad, deceitful world.
Kelly makes the same distinction in slightly different words:
There is something still more precious than righteousness, and that is Christ. And when you have Christ, you can have nothing higher... The difference is just this: when a man suffers for righteousness' sake, it supposes that some evil has been put before him which he refuses... Righteousness prevails, and he suffers.
Miller anticipates the objection that persecution has largely gone out of fashion, and answers it with characteristic bite:
There may be more than thou art aware of. The Christianity that is positive and aggressive, and pursues its path outside the camp where Jesus suffered, must taste the bitterness, or rather the sweetness, of persecution. Such Christians will be avoided, if not despised, by those in favour with the world. The outside place, the unworldly life, is a stinging rebuke to the time-serving, or merely professing Christian.
And he warns that the cold sneer is only a softer form of the old fire:
So far this may be harmless, thou wilt say; true, it opens no dungeons, it breaks no bones, it kindles no fires, it sharpens no swords: but how much further would the spirit of persecution go if let loose? Let the history of the church say.
Matthew 5:10 stands where it does by deliberate design. The first four beatitudes trace the soul's interior righteousness, the next three its outflowing grace — and just where the portrait seems complete, the Lord adds a line about the world outside the frame. Being what He has described will bring opposition; the deeper the likeness to Him, the surer the suffering.
But the promise is neither an apology nor a consolation prize. The identical phrase that opened the Beatitudes — "theirs is the kingdom of heaven" — closes this one, and with an even stronger title, because a despised and rejected Messiah holds the kingdom by a deeper right, and His persecuted disciples share it on the same ground. The test, as Kelly urges, is not who opposes you but why you are opposed: if it is because you feared to sin and obeyed God instead, the word of Christ has already settled the account — blessed. The loss is momentary, the kingdom is theirs, and the Lord Himself has gone this way first.
Blessed are ye when they may reproach and persecute you, and say every wicked thing against you, lying, for my sake.
API Error: Stream idle timeout - partial response received
Rejoice and exult, for your reward is great in the heavens; for thus have they persecuted the prophets who were before you.
API Error: Stream idle timeout - partial response received
*Ye* are the salt of the earth; but if the salt have become insipid, wherewith shall it be salted? It is no longer fit for anything but to be cast out and to be trodden under foot by men.
I have enough material. Drafting the commentary now.
In the opening of the Sermon on the Mount, the Lord has just sketched the character of those who belong to the kingdom — the poor in spirit, the mourners, the meek, the hungry after righteousness, the merciful, the pure, the peacemakers, the persecuted. Then, turning from what they are to where they stand, He says: "Ye are the salt of the earth."
William Kelly devoted an entire paper to this single verse, and explains why it follows exactly where it does:
William KellyThe Lord had laid down in vers. 5-9 the distinctive moral qualities suited to the kingdom of the heavens, with the supplemental blessednesses in sufferings (10-12). He now proceeds to state definitely their position here below according to His mind. The first is given in ver. 13, answering to righteousness, as we saw in the earlier qualities He endorses; the second in 14-16, answering to the outgoing energy of grace.
So salt corresponds to the inward, preserving, righteous character Christ had just described, while light (vv. 14-16) corresponds to the outgoing witness of grace.
Kelly grounds the figure in the Old Testament, where salt was bound up with sacrifice and covenant:
The disciples were familiar with salt not only in ordinary life but in the oblation to Jehovah, "the salt of the covenant of thy God": "with all thine offerings thou shalt offer salt" (Lev. 2:13). And so we read of "a covenant of salt": as expressive figuratively of what was to be preserved inviolate and unchanging (Num. 18:19; 2 Chron. 13:5).
From that Kelly draws salt's double force — it speaks of God's preserving power answering to His holy nature:
If fire represents God's avenging judgment of evil, salt does no less clearly His preserving power in relation with Himself... as offered to God, our bodies even as a living sacrifice, we know and have the seasoning with salt that we may be kept pure and incorrupt, abhorring any working of flesh as vile and condemned in Christ's death.
F. B. Hole gives the same thought in simpler language, tying it directly to the believer's separation from the world:
F. B. HoleSalt preserves, and light illuminates. We cannot be like healthful salt in the earth if we are of the earth. We cannot be as a light lifted up in the world if we are of the world. Now nothing more helps to keep us distinct and separate from the earth and world than persecution from the world, no matter what form it takes. Persecuted for Christ's sake, the disciple is real salty salt, and he also emits a maximum of light. Does not this word of our Lord reveal to us the secret of much of our feebleness?
Hole notices something easy to miss: the salt-saying comes immediately after the beatitude on persecution. It is precisely under reproach for Christ's sake that the disciple is most unmistakably the salt.
Kelly presses a distinction many readers pass over. The Lord deliberately calls them salt of the earth, and reserves "world" for the next verse about light:
Let it be noticed that they, and only they, and they emphatically, were "the salt of the earth." The Lord does not say the salt "of the world." ... when thus distinguished as here, we may remark now in pointing out the force of our text, that "the earth" means that ordered scene where God had dealings beyond other parts. It was then as of old where Israel was set; as it was about to be enlarged by the outward profession of His name far beyond the land of Palestine. The Lord accordingly begins with that position of conserving purity, alike privilege and responsibility. "Ye are the salt of the earth."
The earth, in this use, is the sphere where God's name is owned — the professing scene. Inside that scene, the disciples are the one element that keeps corruption at bay.
J. T. McBroom puts the same thought in practical terms, linking it to the persecution in verses 10-12:
J. T. McBroomSuffering whether for the kingdom or the King was to be esteemed a favour, and it would have its bearing both on the present and the future... it also gave the present distinction of being in the ranks of heaven's most distinguished witnesses on earth, and set them in the line of divine testimony. They were the salt of the earth and the light of the world. Notwithstanding the persecution and hatred of men they were to be a force for good, able to meet and counteract in divine power the corruption that is in the world through lust, and shed a beneficent influence on all around them.
The Lord does not leave the saying as a compliment. He attaches a grave condition. Kelly handles this with unusual weight:
But He adds words — most grave words — "If the salt lose its savour, wherewith shall it be salted?" Profession there would be, and an excellent thing it is, if it be a heart testimony to God, true not only in word but in deed. Here, at the beginning and still more clearly at the end of His communications the Lord prepares us to expect what soon and increasingly became evident how hollow and false it was to become; and He intimated by His question and comment that the true and holy savour if once lost would be irreparable. Whatever grace might work individually, or with a few here and there, the pure position cannot be restored. Salt is itself. Nothing outside can give the saltness that disappears. Wherewith shall it be salted?
That last sentence is the heart of it. Salt cannot be re-salted from outside. If the thing whose very office is to preserve loses its own character, there is no second preservative to restore the first.
Kelly then turns to the end of the verse — cast out, trodden under foot:
He goes farther, and pronounces its unfitness even for the useful purpose of fertilising supplied by that which is most offensive. Saltless salt is unavailing even to manure the earth. It is only fit to be thrown outside, and trodden under foot of men. And so it will be, as it has been. When Christianity vanishes and only a savourless Christendom remains, men have trodden it down as more worthless than Judaism or even Gentilism, and the more insufferable as so much prouder and more persecuting.
J. N. Darby, reflecting on the chapter, draws the same sorrowful application to the state of the professing Church:
J. N. DarbyHow evidently, in the Sermon on the Mount, the Lord speaks of those in the midst of evil, and who in fact had a heavenly, divine mind in the midst of it!... But if those so-called were the salt of the earth, what is it all become? What a judgment on the now professing Church!
Matthew 5:13 does three things at once.
First, it defines the disciple's position. Christ does not say "you ought to become" or "try to be" — He says "Ye are." Those who own Him are placed by Him as the preservative element in a scene otherwise given over to corruption. It is the answering counterpart to the inward righteousness just described in the beatitudes.
Second, it measures that position by an impossible demand. What makes salt useful is its own intrinsic character. A disciple whose distinctness from the earth is lost cannot be restored by any external force. The testimony has no substitute outside itself — it is either itself, or nothing.
Third, it forecasts the history of profession. Kelly sees the warning already being fulfilled where mere savourless Christendom remains — a profession emptied of its preserving power, despised even by the men it once claimed to season. The verse is therefore not only personal ("keep your saltness") but prophetic, preparing the disciples for what the outward kingdom would become.
Put simply: to be salt of the earth is to carry, in the midst of a corrupt scene, the moral savour of Christ Himself — and the Lord will have nothing less.
*Ye* are the light of the world a city situated on the top of a mountain cannot be hid.
I have enough from three rich sources. Writing the answer.
The Lord's words in Matthew 5:14 — "Ye are the light of the world: a city set on a hill cannot be hid" — mark a step beyond what has just been said. The disciples have already been named the salt of the earth; now they are named something more outward and more public.
William Kelly draws the distinction carefully:
William Kelly"Here the character of the position for the disciples goes beyond 'the salt of the earth.' For this was expressive of righteousness; a righteousness not outward like that of the scribes and Pharisees (which sought reputation of man, and was little beyond the pride of a Stoic), but lowly and real as in God's sight. Whereas 'the light of the world' is the shining forth of grace, and inseparable from the confession of Christ in that respect. Salt preserves, but does not make everything manifest as the light does."
So the figure changes from a hidden preservative to an open testimony. The salt keeps corruption at bay; the light brings things into view. The one is a quiet work of holiness, the other an unmistakable declaration.
Kelly notices that the Lord does not repeat the word "earth" here, but enlarges the scene:
"'The world' had no such special dealing of God as 'the earth.' There moral darkness had reigned, which the light was to dispel as far as He gave it scope and power. Redemption, Christ's death, resurrection, and ascension, would give the light a penetrating energy unknown before. For such was the deadly pall which overhung the favoured land during our Lord's earthly sojourn that, contrary to nature, the darkness resisted the light, and 'comprehended not' even the True Light in His person. But when He rose victorious over all the power of the wicked one, the old commandment became the new, and was true not in Him only but in us, Christians, because the darkness is quite passing and the true light already shines."
The shining therefore is not limited to Israel. The disciples are placed in relation to the whole moral night of mankind, and their light has its source and its energy in a risen Christ.
The figure is meant to press home that this testimony cannot be a private thing. Kelly continues:
"This is confirmed by the figure which follows and carries the truth out farther. 'A city set, or situated, upon a hill-top cannot be hid.' The sphere is no longer the circumscribed area of the earth or land, but, as for another aspect we read, 'the field is the world.'... And they, His disciples, are the light of the world: a city set upon a hill-top cannot be hid. Once darkness, they are now light in the Lord, and responsible to walk as children of light, corporately as well as individually. For the fruit of light is in all goodness, and righteousness, and truth."
The city is corporate — a company together on a height, visible from every side. Concealment is not open to them; the only question is whether the light shines brightly or dimly.
Kelly then turns from the city to the lamp, and here the indictment is sharp:
"Men treat their light more fairly than Christendom does the light of which our Lord spoke. Men shrink from natural darkness, its inconveniences, and its dangers; and when they light a lamp, they do not put it under the dry measure (which of course would quite hide it) but on the lampstand, and it shines to all that are in the house. But Christendom fears the light that exposes its neglect of scripture, and of the Holy Spirit's guidance, and of Christ who is and ought to be the all."
The point is not that the light is weak but that those who bear it too often cover it. The remedy is courage — "the faithful are bound with humility yet in courage of faith to let the light shine; for it is not of self, but the confession of Christ in everything going forth as God has taught them, whether men hear or forbear."
One of the most careful observations belongs to F. W. Grant, who warns against collapsing the light into mere benevolence:
F. W. Grant"From it being said, 'let men see your good works,' people often imagine that these are the light itself, and thus make the two things we are considering practically one. Indeed they are made for one another: separate them, and there is at once a fatal deficiency in each. What testimony to Christ can there be, if there be not the life giving evidence? But again, what evidence in the life if the lips are silent as to Christ?"
Grant then presses that the light must shine upon the works, or else the works will be misread:
"Thus it needs the light to shine upon the good works, that they may be seen as such, and glorify your Father who is in heaven. Apart from this, they may glorify humanity, or glorify any lie under the sun. Christ is He with whom in the full reality of it, 'light is come into the world,' and if 'men love darkness rather than light,' it is, as He Himself says, 'because their deeds are evil'... Thus if any are to be in any sense a light of the world, there is but one way of it — by reflecting Him."
Kelly puts the same guard in his own words:
"Benevolent works are no test, and are not what Christ looked for and here expresses. He spoke of works excellent in the sense of what suits the Father and the Son, and of which the Holy Spirit is the sole power in us. It is not His mind to let our good works shine before men, but our light, or confession of Himself in word and deed."
And he follows with a striking warning:
"Nor can anything other or short of this secure the end He proposes. For I might dole out all my goods in what men call charity, or deliver up my body to be burned without confessing Christ, and therefore without in any way glorifying the Father. There is neither light nor love without the faith and the confession of Christ; and self might thereby be honoured, but not the Father."
J. T. McBroom places the saying in its context among the beatitudes, and shows how this shining follows directly upon a willingness to suffer for Christ:
J. T. McBroom"Verses 10-16 show the submission of heart which accompanies the foregoing. Suffering whether for the kingdom or the King was to be esteemed a favour, and it would have its bearing both on the present and the future... They were the salt of the earth and the light of the world. Notwithstanding the persecution and hatred of men they were to be a force for good, able to meet and counteract in divine power the corruption that is in the world through lust, and shed a beneficent influence on all around them."
The shining and the suffering belong together: those who take their place with a rejected Christ become His luminaries in the very scene that rejected Him.
Matthew 5:14 presses two things together that ought never to be separated. First, the disciple's place is necessarily visible — a city on a hill, a lamp on its stand. Concealment is a contradiction of calling. Second, the light itself is Christ confessed, not philanthropy, not reputation, not mere moral decency. The good works that men glorify the Father for are the works that the light shines upon — works that could not be accounted for apart from the open confession of Christ. The warning, then, is twofold: do not hide, and do not substitute. Do not hide, for the whole purpose of a lamp is to shine to all in the house; and do not substitute something lesser — even burning charity — for the one thing that makes the light a light at all, which is the presence of Christ owned in word and life before men.
Nor do [men] light a lamp and put it under the bushel, but upon the lamp-stand, and it shines for all who are in the house.
Now I have enough material. Let me write the answer.
Matthew 5:15 reads: "Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house." It is the middle verse in a trio (vv. 14–16) where the Lord declares His disciples "the light of the world" and presses home that this light is meant to shine outward, not to be covered over.
The Lord has just called His disciples the salt of the earth, and now speaks of them as the light of the world. The two figures are not synonyms. William Kelly draws the distinction sharply:
"The salt of the earth represents the righteous principle… But now, in verse 14, we have not only the principle of righteousness, but of grace — the outflowing and strength of grace. And here we find a new title given to the disciples, as descriptive of their public testimony — 'the light of the world.' The light is clearly that which diffuses itself. The salt is what ought to be inward, but the light is that which scatters itself abroad."
That is the key to verse 15. Light, by its very nature, goes out. To hide it under a corn-measure is to contradict the reason it was kindled. Kelly continues:
"'A city that is set on a hill cannot be hid.' There was to be a diffusion of its testimony around. Man does not light a candle to put it under a corn measure, but on a candlestick, 'and it giveth light unto all that are in the house.' After this manner let your light shine before men, 'that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.' Mark it well."
J. N. Darby puts the same thought in his synopsis with characteristic brevity:
J. N. Darby"The disciples of Christ were the preservative principle in the earth. They were the light of the world, which did not possess that light. This was their position, whether they would or no. It was the purpose of God that they should be the light of the world. A candle is not lighted in order to be hidden."
The phrase "whether they would or no" is weighty. The disciple does not choose whether to be a light; the Lord has made him one. The only question is whether the light will be set where it can do its work, or smothered under the bushel.
The bushel is any covering — timidity, worldly prudence, the fear of man, the pursuit of comfort — that would hide the testimony the Lord has kindled. J. T. McBroom ties this back to the beatitudes that precede it:
J. T. McBroom"Suffering whether for the kingdom or the King was to be esteemed a favour, and it would have its bearing both on the present and the future… They were the salt of the earth and the light of the world. Notwithstanding the persecution and hatred of men they were to be a force for good, able to meet and counteract in divine power the corruption that is in the world through lust, and shed a beneficent influence on all around them."
Persecution, in other words, is precisely the pressure that tempts the candle under the bushel — and the Lord forestalls it by reminding His disciples that a hidden light is a contradiction in terms.
A common misreading turns verse 15 into a summons to display our own good deeds. Kelly warns against this firmly — the object is not our works but the shining of Christ through us, out of which good works will follow:
"When people talk about this verse thinking of their own works, they are generally not good works at all; but even if they were, works are not light. Light is that which comes from God, without admixture of man. Good works are the fruit of its action upon the soul; but it is the light which is to shine before men. It is the confession of Christ that is the point before God. It is not merely certain things to be done."
And further:
"The moment you make good works the object, and their shining before men, you find yourself on common ground with Jews and heathen… What so bad, in the way of a thing done professedly for God, as a work that leaves out Christ, and that shows a man who loves Christ to be on comfortable terms with those that hate Him?… Let your confession of what God is in His nature and of what Christ is in His own person and ways — let your acknowledgment of Him be the thing that is felt by and brought before men; and then, when they see your good works, they will glorify your Father which is in heaven. Instead of saying, What a good man such a one is, they will glorify God on his behalf."
Matthew 5:15, then, is no mere proverb about visibility. It is the Lord's insistence that the testimony He kindles in His own must not be smothered. The disciple is a light by the Lord's own appointment, not by his own choosing, and the light he bears is not his character or his charities but the shining of Christ Himself. To put that light under a bushel — whether through the fear of man, the love of ease, or the wish to be on easy terms with a world that hates the Master — is to frustrate the very reason the candle was lit. Set it on the candlestick, and it will do what light does: illuminate the whole house, and bring men not to admire the disciple but to glorify the Father which is in heaven.
Let your light thus shine before men, so that they may see your upright works, and glorify your Father who is in the heavens.
After the Beatitudes, the Lord Jesus turns from describing the character of His disciples to declaring their public effect — salt and light in a corrupt and dark world. Verse 16 closes that section with a positive command that reveals two questions: what is the "light" that is to shine, and whose glory does it serve?
Commentary draws a careful line between the light itself and the works that accompany it. The light is testimony to Christ; the works prove that testimony is real.
Leslie M. GrantIn verse 16 the light is distinct from good works, but both are closely connected. The light speaks of moral and spiritual testimony to Christ. The good works are works that back up this testimony as being real. Apparent good works by themselves would draw attention to the person who does them, that he might be honored; but if the light of testimony for Christ accompanies the good works, this influences others to recognize that God our Father is the source of the works and therefore to glorify Him in heaven, the place of highest authority.
The disciple has nothing of his own to display. What is to shine is the reflection of the One who alone is the Light of the world.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinBut what light is it which is to shine? Surely this can mean only the reflection of Him who is the Light. "He does not say let your good works shine, but let your light shine; that is, let Christ shine in your life; not that ye may see your good works, but that men see them; not to your glory, but to the glory of your Father."
This is also why the lamp must not be hidden by man's activity:
Leslie M. GrantA lamp too is not to be put under a bushel measure, that is, obscured by that which speaks of man's work. Let us not allow our work to get in the way of the light of Christ, who is the only source of light for darkened men.
The two figures of verses 13–16 work together but are not the same. Salt holds back corruption; light pushes back darkness.
W. T. P. Wolston"Ye are the salt of the earth." Now salt is preservative, it preserves from corruption... Salt answers to righteousness. But "Ye are the light of the world," gives another thought. Light answers to grace. Salt merely preserves things pure from corruption, but light is aggressive, it drives out the darkness. So grace goes forth outside and seeks. "It gives light."
The works are seen, but the eye of those who see is to be lifted past the doer to the Father in heaven. The whole Sermon on the Mount focuses on what the disciple is to be before the world, not on the conversion of the world itself.
MagazinesThe Lord Jesus does not speak in these verses of the preaching of the gospel for the salvation of the lost. The entire "sermon on the mount" does not deal with this, but with the Christ-like walk of the disciples of the Lord... it is not the purpose of the "sermon on the mount" that they may receive blessing or be led to the Lord, but that the character of the Kingdom of God may be expressed in His disciples.
The works flow out of the light, not the other way round:
MagazinesHere, the good works are the fruit of the working of divine light in the soul. If we let our light shine, good works will also be connected with it. But they are not the focus of our attention here... Therefore He does not exhort us here to do good works, but to let our light shine. We should not think of "our" works, but of Him. Good works will then be the result. The apostle Paul speaks of the fruit of the light which is in all goodness, righteousness and truth (Eph. 5:9).
This shining is not abstract; it is daily conduct.
MagazinesAre we friendly, helpful, peaceable and righteous in our dealings with colleagues, neighbours and other people? In this way we can let our light shine before men. "Do all things without murmurings and reasonings, that ye may be harmless and simple, irreproachable children of God in the midst of a crooked and perverted generation; among whom ye appear as lights (heavenly lights) in the world, holding forth the word of life" (Phil. 2:14-15 J.N.D. Trans.). To let our light shine means that as well as our spoken testimony for our Lord in the world, our new nature and our position as children of God are expressed by our behaviour.
- Light first. The Lord does not say "let your good works shine" but "let your light shine"; works are the fruit, not the focus.
- Christ reflected. The light is testimony to Christ — His own life shining through the believer, since He alone is the Light of the world.
- Works confirm. Good works back up the testimony as real, so that men cannot dismiss the light as words only.
- Father's glory. The whole point is to lift the onlooker past us to the Father in heaven; if attention stops at us, the lamp is hidden under a bushel.
- Daily walk. Shining is practical — friendly, peaceable, irreproachable conduct as children of God in a crooked generation (Phil. 2:14-15).