Matthew 25:31–46

Matthew 25:31

But when the Son of man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, then shall he sit down upon his throne of glory,

Jesus closes His last long prophecy by describing the moment He takes His seat as King. Three questions follow: which throne is this, why does He come as "Son of Man," and who is gathered before Him?

A throne He has not yet taken

Kelly points out that Jesus is not yet seated on the throne this verse describes:

Here are proofs enough of the time and circumstances our Lord is speaking about. He is taking His seat upon His own throne as the Son of Man... The Lord Jesus is not even yet seated upon His own throne. When on earth He had no throne. When He went to heaven, He sat down on His Father's throne. Revelation 3:21 says: "The one who conquers, I will grant him to sit with me on my throne, as I also conquered and sat down with my Father on his throne." When that promise is fulfilled, He must have left His Father's throne and sat down on His own throne. It is a future thing.

William Kelly

Darby draws out the force of the word "sit."

This will not be a passing act. He will then sit on the throne of His glory, the glory of the Son of Man, for He is now spoken of as coming to earth as Son of Man. Not until then will He sit on the throne of the Son of Man's glory, though divine glory is always His.

J. N. Darby

Why He judges as Son of Man

Why does the judge take a human title? Kelly finds the answer in what men did to Christ as a man.

It is as Son of Man that the Lord Jesus will sit on the throne. No doubt He will show His divine knowledge in judging. But, as He plainly says, the Father gives Him authority to execute judgment, because He is Son of Man. As Son of God He gives life; as Son of Man He will judge. How solemn! Had He been only Son of God, who would have dared to despise Him?... It was His grace, then, in becoming man to save men, which exposed Him to contempt in His path of lowly obedience and suffering in love.

William Kelly

The angels who attend Him

The angels are not there as decoration. Smith names the work they come to do:

Carrying out judgment is one of the functions of the angels. Matthew 25 opens its account of the judgment of the living nations with the Son of Man coming to His throne of glory, and "all the angels with him."

Hamilton Smith

Where verse 31 sits in the discourse

The prophecy moves in stages, and this verse picks up a thread dropped earlier.

The course of events now picks up again at the point where it broke off in Matthew 24:31. Up to that point the teaching had concerned the Jew in particular. Then came general instructions for those left waiting for the events announced beforehand... From verse 31 the Gentiles come in view. For when the Son of Man comes in His glory and all the angels with Him — that is, back to this world — it is an earthly scene.

J. A. Trench

Not the great white throne

Kelly sets this scene against the judgment scene of Revelation 20.

There can be no question about this throne. It can have nothing to do with the earth, because the text itself tells us that the earth and heaven fled away. I learn at once the positive contrast between Matthew and Revelation. Only in Revelation do we hear a word about heaven and earth fleeing away. Only in Matthew do we find very plain signs that the Lord is taking His throne to govern the earth and the men living on it. Those gathered before Him here are "all the nations." That term is never used of the dead or the risen. It is used only of men here below, and in fact only of the Gentiles as distinct from the Jews.

after_note: DELETE

William Kelly

Where believers stand

Those who belong to Christ are not among the gathered; they arrive with Him.

When Christ appears, all the saints, conformed to His risen image, will appear with Him in glory. He will "be glorified in his saints, and marveled at among all who have believed." He will also come with all His holy angels around Him. It is evident that He can come with only those who are with Him.

J. N. Darby

Summary

- Throne. He rules now from His Father's throne; this verse describes the day He takes His own.

- Title. He judges as Son of Man — the very manhood in which He was despised is the nature in which He is honoured.

- Train. He does not come alone: the holy angels attend Him, and His saints appear with Him in glory.

- Terrain. It is an earthly scene of living nations, not the great white throne, from which heaven and earth flee away.

- Timing. It is still future. When it comes He does not flash past; He sits, and the sitting is the start of His reign.

Matthew 25:32

and all the nations shall be gathered before him; and he shall separate them from one another, as the shepherd separates the sheep from the goats;

The Son of Man has just taken His seat on the throne of His glory. His first act as King is to gather the nations and sort them one by one, the way a shepherd parts his flock. Two questions shape the whole passage: when does this happen, and who are the sheep?

A Judgment of the Living, on Earth

Commentators place this scene at the start of Christ's reign on earth, not at the end of history. The word "nations" is the clue. It describes people who are alive, still living in their national groups.

On the contrary, Matthew shows the Son of Man come to the earth and all the nations gathered before Him. Here they are all living, and only living people can be called "nations." At the great white throne only the wicked dead are present, for the righteous dead had been raised long before, at the first resurrection.

William Kelly

Not the Great White Throne

Many merge this scene with the final judgment of the dead. The details of the verse resist that. A mixed crowd that needs sorting can only exist in one place.

This is a careful, divine sorting — not a mere act of vengeance that deals with whole masses and sweeps them all into one common ruin. He separates them one from another. At the great white throne the dead stand for judgment, and there is no need to separate them there. But here we have a mixed company. You never find such a mixture in heaven or hell, only on the earth. So every clause proves that our Lord is speaking of a judgment of the living on the earth.

William Kelly

The Shepherd's Picture

Anyone who had watched a flock in that part of the world knew the sight at once.

It is interesting that sheep and goats are always found mixed together in the flocks of Palestinian shepherds, and the separation of the sheep from the goats would be a vivid way of presenting what will take place in the last days.

A. J. Pollock

The picture does not run long.

The Lord simply compares the separation He makes that day between the righteous and the wicked to a shepherd dividing his sheep from the goats. Then the righteous are called "sheep" and the wicked "goats." After that the figure is not kept up. It is dropped at once, and this language never comes back.

Frederick W. Grant

Three Groups, Not Two

Read on a few verses and a third group appears: those the King calls "My brethren." That group rules out a common idea — that the sheep stand for all the saved of every age.

The King addresses both the sheep and the goats in respect to this third class. Indeed the very ground of judgment is the treatment of the King's brethren. It would be plainly absurd to say that the sheep are the very people He means. If that were so, the language would be completely different. Instead of saying, "Inasmuch as you have done it to one of the least of these My brethren," we would hear the King say, "Inasmuch as you have done it to one another," or "among yourselves."

C. H. Mackintosh

What Decides the Verdict

If the treatment of these brethren is the test, then the verdict turns on how people received a message — and on who carried it.

He will sit on the throne of His glory. All the nations will be gathered before Him at His throne of judgment, and He will judge them by the way they treated the messengers of the kingdom, who had gone out to preach it to them. These messengers are the brethren (v. 40); those who received them are the sheep; those who neglected their message are the goats… I do not doubt that these brethren are Jews, as the disciples were — people who will be in a similar position as to their testimony. The Gentiles who received this message will be accepted, as though they had treated Christ in the same way. His Father had prepared the enjoyment of the kingdom for them, and they will enter it while still on earth.

J. N. Darby

The Sheep Are Not the Church

Being counted a sheep here is not the same as belonging to the church.

But those Gentile sheep at the consummation of the age are not the church… The church will be glorified on high. Remnants from both Israel and the nations are about to be blessed on the earth in that day. The sheep of Matt. 25:32 are by no means all the sheep of God.

William Kelly

How Wide Is "All"?

Commentators differ on how far the word "all" reaches.

"All" may refer only to those nations directly connected with Israel, for the Lord speaks of "My brethren"… However, it may mean every nation.

Various

Summary

- Throne — Christ sits in glory on earth at the start of His reign. This is not the final judgment of the dead.

- Gathering — the living nations stand before Him. Only living people can be called "nations."

- Separation — He divides people "one from another." That is careful sorting, not a mass sentence, and it fits only a place where good and bad are still mixed.

- Standard — the test is how each one treated the King's brethren, the Jewish messengers who carried His kingdom message to the nations.

- Scope — the sheep are truly blessed, but they are Gentiles blessed on earth. They are not the church, and by no means all the sheep God owns.

Matthew 25:33

and he will set the sheep on his right hand, and the goats on [his] left.

The Son of Man sits on His throne, the nations stand before Him, and a shepherd's simple act settles everything. Who are these sheep and goats, when does this happen, and why does the right hand differ from the left?

A separation, not a mass judgment

Notice the manner of it. This is not judgment poured out on a crowd. It is a sorting done one by one. And because good and bad stand together, we learn where it happens.

This is a careful and divine sorting. It is not a mere act of vengeance that deals with masses and could sweep them all into common ruin. He separates them one from another. At the great white throne, where the dead stand for judgment, there is no need to separate them. But here there is a mixed company. You never find such a mixture in heaven or hell, but only on the earth. So every clause proves that our Lord speaks of a judgment of the living on the earth. It follows that the people meant by "the sheep" and "the goats" are the righteous and the ungodly among the nations then living on the earth, when our Lord comes to judge as Son of Man.

William Kelly

Why a shepherd

The Lord drew His picture from ordinary working life. Here is why it fits so well:

Sheep and goats are always mixed together in the flocks of Palestinian shepherds. So separating the sheep from the goats would be a vivid way of showing what will take place in the last days.

A. J. Pollock

What the goat suggests

The choice of animal is not random. The goat's own nature carries a meaning:

One thought connected with the goat is this. By its independence, self-will, hardness and the dark colour of its hair, it naturally suggests sin. Our Lord shows this in the parable of the judgment of the nations. There the sheep stand for the blessed, and the goats for those who are under the curse.

Samuel Ridout

Right hand, left hand

The two sides are not just places. And what the right-hand group receives is not what belongs to the church.

He will separate the sheep from the goats. The sheep stand at the right hand of His approval, the goats at the left hand of His refusal. He knows how to express His approval to the sheep, and how to welcome them into the earthly kingdom. That kingdom was prepared for them from the foundation of the world. This is a contrast to the portion of the church, God's heavenly people. God chose them in Christ "before the foundation of the world" (Eph. 1:4).

Leslie M. Grant

A third group in the scene

The common reading treats the sheep as every saved person and the goats as every lost person, from first to last. One detail in the passage resists that reading.

Almost everyone in the professing Church believes that "the sheep" represent all the people of God, from the beginning to the end of time. And "the goats" stand for all the wicked, from first to last. But if this is so, what are we to make of the third group mentioned here, whom He calls "these My brothers"? The King speaks to both the sheep and the goats about this third group. Indeed the very ground of judgment is how they treated the King's brothers.

C. H. Mackintosh

Another writer names these brothers, and shows why the way the nations treated them decides the case:

This sitting of the court is not the final judgement of the dead. It is the King's inquiry into one matter. How have the Gentiles treated those whom He graciously calls "My brothers"? These are the Jewish preachers of the gospel of the kingdom during the sorrows of the last days. Some will treat them well and receive their message, and they will be spared to enjoy the blessings of Christ's reign. Others will treat them with scorn and cruelty, and so bring solemn judgement on themselves.

W. W. Fereday

Not the last judgment

Commentators differ on whether to call this scene a parable. One writer states plainly what it is:

It is indeed no parable. It is a very simple statement of the separation of the living on the earth, when the Lord comes to it and sets up His throne there. He compares that separation to a shepherd separating his sheep from the goats. So it is part of that judgment of the living already spoken of, and it comes more than a thousand years before the judgment of the dead at the great white throne.

Frederick W Grant

Summary

- Mixed — Sheep and goats graze in one flock. Good and bad stand together, a mixture found only on earth.

- Sorted — The Shepherd separates them one by one. It is not a sweeping ruin that swallows everyone alike.

- Named — The names are not neutral. The goat's self-will and hardness suggest sin; the sheep stand for the blessed.

- Placed — The right hand means approval and a kingdom on earth prepared from the foundation of the world. The left hand means refusal.

- Tested — What divided them was their treatment of the King's brothers, the preachers He sent during the last days.

Matthew 25:34

Then shall the King say to those on his right hand, Come, blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from [the] world's foundation

The King's first words, once the sheep and goats are separated, are words of welcome. Every phrase in them counts. Who are these people, what kingdom do they receive, and why does it date from the world's founding and not before it?

A King on His throne, not a general judgment

The speaker is already reigning. Commentators note two things here: the title is unusual, and the crowd before Him is living nations, not the raised dead.

This is directly connected with His kingdom... It is the only time our Lord uses the title of King for Himself: "Then the King will say to those on His right" (vv. 34-40). This shows that the kingdom has been founded — it marks the start of His thousand-year reign... There is no ground at all for confusing it with the great white throne (Rev. 20). And there is no ground for drawing from it the popular idea of a general judgment — believers and unbelievers together. It is, in fact, a judgment of living nations. There is no scriptural precedent for calling the dead "the nations."

Edward Dennett

"Blessed of My Father" — a deliberate word

He does not say your Father. The Lord guarded that difference elsewhere too.

The Lord Jesus spoke of "the Father" and "My Father." In John 17 He had said, "I made known to them Your name, and I will continue to make it known." Then, after His resurrection, He sends the message, "I am ascending" (not "to our") "to My Father and your Father." There is a very pointed guard there. So they are blessed of His Father here.

The Bible Treasury

"Inherit" — taking possession of what was held in reserve

The word carries a definite sense: taking hold of something kept back until now.

"Inherit life eternal." Inherit stands for "take possession of," as in Matt. 25:34 (Dalman). So in Luke 18:18. In the Synoptic Gospels it is regarded as in reserve.

William Kelly

A kingdom in view since creation

The kingdom's date reaches back to the making of the world. That says something about how God has read history ever since.

They are called to inherit the kingdom prepared for them from the foundation of the world. When God laid the foundations of the earth, He was looking onward to this blessed time. Satan's getting power over man was only a terrible interruption, but not one whose consequences the Lord could not overcome and purge out: He means to do it; and to make this world the scene of far greater blessedness than its present misery is through Satan's work.

William Kelly

"From" the foundation, not "before" it

Writers repeatedly stop on that one preposition, because a different company is described elsewhere with a different one.

The sheep He pronounces blessed of His Father, and invites them to inherit the kingdom prepared for them from the foundation of the world. They shall enjoy all the blessings of His millennial reign. They are not a heavenly company, but an earthly one; and their portion is not said to have been arranged before the foundation of the world, as ours is (Eph. 1:4), but from its foundation. This distinction is of great importance.

W. W. Fereday

Why these are the ones welcomed

The King sorts the nations by how they treated a third group standing in the scene.

There are three classes here — the sheep, the goats, and the "brothers" of the King. The way the nations had treated the King's "brothers" becomes the ground of their sorting. This fact is the key to the whole scene. Who then are the King's "brothers"? Very clearly they must be Jews — His kinsmen by natural descent, but also His true servants... they have gone out as His messengers among the nations. The principle on which they are sent out is the one the Lord used when He sent out the twelve apostles: "Whoever receives you receives Me."

Edward Dennett

That kindness is the reason given for the welcome. It is not what makes them acceptable.

So all rests on Christ, though His grace makes the most of what to others might seem trivial. In the one class there was faith working by love; in the other, utter unconcern. That laid bare their fitness or unfitness for inheriting the kingdom. With all saints it is the same: works are the evidence, faith in the Word the instrument, Christ's work the ground, and God's grace the source.

William Kelly

What was prepared, and for whom

Read this verse against its opposite in verse 41 and the wording refuses to be symmetrical.

It is worth noticing how Scripture guards against the repulsive doctrine of reprobation. Look, for example, at Matthew 25:34... Now contrast the words to those on His left hand: "Depart from Me, you cursed" — He does not say "of My Father" — "into the eternal fire prepared" — not for you, but — "for the devil and his angels."

Charles Henry Mackintosh

Summary

- Prepared — God made the kingdom ready from the world's founding. When He laid earth's foundations He was already looking to this day. Satan's grab for power only interrupted the plan.

- Pronounced — the King speaks from His throne to living nations, not to the raised dead. This is not the great white throne.

- Positioned — they are blessed of His Father, and theirs is an earthly place. Their portion was not arranged before the foundation of the world, as ours was.

- Possessed — to inherit is to take possession of what was held in reserve until the King gives it.

- Proved — their kindness to His brothers was evidence, not ground. Grace is the source, Christ's work the ground, faith the instrument, works the proof.

Matthew 25:35

for I hungered, and ye gave me to eat; I thirsted, and ye gave me to drink; I was a stranger, and ye took me in;

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Matthew 25:36

naked, and ye clothed me; I was ill, and ye visited me; I was in prison, and ye came to me.

The scene is the King on His throne after His return. The nations stand before Him, and He separates them like sheep from goats. The kindnesses listed here — clothing, visiting the sick, coming to a prisoner — raise two questions. Who were these sick and imprisoned people? And do such acts earn the sheep their place?

A Throne Set Up on Earth

This is not the judgment of the dead. It is the King taking up His rule over the living world.

Now the "King" — a title used only here — begins the formal judgment of His throne, and all the nations must appear before it... The Lord and the apostles pressed hard the coming judgment of living people on earth, in the middle of their busy, selfish, greedy and sinful life.

William Kelly

Three Groups, Not Two

A third group appears in this scene, besides the sheep and the goats.

Notice, too, that there are three groups — the sheep, the goats, and the brothers of the King. That fact alone settles how we read the whole scene. It shows clearly that this is the judgment of the living nations, after the Son of Man appears in His glory and takes His throne.

Edward Dennett

Who the Brethren Are

The clothing, the visit, the prison call — these were shown to people the King calls His brothers.

In the closing years of the Jewish age, a remnant of Jews will preach this Gospel. They are "brothers" of our Lord by natural descent. They will move among the nations of the world and give their startling testimony. They will preach the Gospel that announces the King and His Kingdom are near. How will the nations receive them?

Arno Clemens Gaebelein

Why Naked, Sick and Imprisoned

The specific hardships named in this verse are not random misfortunes. They are the cost of carrying that message into a hostile world.

Those who announced the news of the coming King did so against the greatest difficulties... The people around them wanted neither God's King nor God's righteousness. So hunger and thirst, exile, nakedness and prison lay ahead of these preachers. The King identifies Himself with these servants, just as He did with another persecuted group when He stopped their persecutor, Saul of Tarsus.

Messiah, the Prince

"You Came to Me"

The King does not say the kindness was like kindness to Him. He counts it as done to Himself. He counts neglect the same way.

The sheep make no claim to have shown any regard to the King Himself. But He takes as done to Himself everything they did for His messengers, whom He owned as His brothers. The goats, on the other hand, claim they never failed the great King. But by the same rule, the indifference they showed toward His messengers counts in the King's heart as indifference toward Him... He always thinks of His own as if they were Himself.

J. N. Darby

Not a Charter for General Charity

Because the acts listed are ordinary human kindnesses, the verse is often read as a promise that good deeds will secure a person's standing before God. Commentators warn against this reading in strong terms.

People commonly think our Lord means acts of charity — hospitals and prison work, feeding the hungry and clothing the naked through church work or charities. They think that if a person does these things and stays faithful in them, the King will approve of them in the judgment. Many a soul builds on this foundation of sand. All this is completely wrong.

Arno Clemens Gaebelein

So why do the kindnesses matter at all?

So everything rests on Christ, though His grace makes the most of what others might think small. Faith working by love in the one group, and complete unconcern in the other, showed plainly who was fit and who was unfit to inherit the kingdom. With all God's people, works are the evidence, faith in the Word is the instrument, Christ's work is the ground, and God's grace is the source.

William Kelly

The Principle Already at Work

Though this scene is still future, the principle already works. Onesiphorus is one example.

This godly man was not ashamed of Paul or his chain. He was in Rome, and he searched hard for him, and did not rest until he found him. The Lord used him to bring refreshment to the imprisoned Apostle... And the Lord saw this good service, and valued it as done to Himself.

Edward Dennett

Summary

- Throne — When He appears, the King judges the living nations on earth. This is not the judgment of the dead. Three groups stand in the scene, not two.

- Brothers — The hungry, naked and imprisoned ones are His messengers. They carry news of the coming kingdom into a world that wants neither Him nor His righteousness.

- Identification — He counts their prison bars as His own. He thinks of His own as if they were Himself, so coldness toward them is coldness toward Him.

- Evidence — The kindness does not buy the kingdom. Works are the evidence, faith is the instrument, Christ's work is the ground, God's grace is the source.

- Now — The principle is already live. What Onesiphorus brought to a prisoner in Rome, the Lord received as brought to Himself.

Matthew 25:37

Then shall the righteous answer him saying, Lord, when saw we thee hungering, and nourished thee; or thirsting, and gave thee to drink?

The King has just named six kindnesses done to Him: food, drink, welcome, clothing, care in sickness, a visit in prison. The people He praises cannot remember a single one of them. Their reply is not modesty but genuine bewilderment: when did any of this happen?

The Scene Behind the Question

This is not a general judgment of the dead at the end of all things. The wording settles it: nations, not the risen dead.

A careful look at our Lord's words shows that He does not speak about resurrection. He says: "When the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the angels with Him, then He will sit on His glorious throne. Before Him will be gathered all the nations" (vv. 31, 32). The reference is therefore to His appearing and kingdom, and to His judgment of the living, not of the dead. We do not speak of "the nations" in respect of the dead: this term describes the living.

Edward Dennett

The absence of any mention of rising from the dead is itself part of the argument.

Notice especially that there is no reference to resurrection here for either "the righteous" or "the accursed." On both sides they were Gentiles living in their natural bodies, for they are expressly said to be "all the nations" when they were gathered before the glorious throne of the Son of Man.

William Kelly

Why They Are Surprised

Their question is not a formality. They are learning something at that very moment which they had never known before.

Notice what they answer: "Lord, when did we see You hungry and feed You, or thirsty and give You drink?" Could a Christian say such a thing in heaven, where we will know even as we are known? … However blessed this scene may be, it is still the Lord as Son of Man judging all nations. He blesses the righteous from among them. Up to that moment they did not know that in showing acts of love and kindness towards Christ's messengers, they had done so much towards Christ Himself. Their last lesson was the first that Paul learned on the road to Damascus. That truth startled his soul: "I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting."

William Kelly

The People They Served

The King answers by pointing to a third group in the scene — the people He calls His brothers. Kindness to them reached Him.

The sheep showed them love, care, sympathy in their sorrows. So these brothers of the King must have gone through tribulation before the King appears. The conclusion is obvious. In that day, the ground on which He will deal with the nations will be this — "How did you behave towards My messengers?" … Those who honour the message treat the messengers well. They care for them and identify themselves with them. The Lord remembers this, and counts what was done to His messengers as done to Himself.

William Kelly

Kindness as the Evidence of Faith

The acts listed were not random decency. Who received the kindness matters as much as the kindness itself.

Some had shown more than kindness, self-denial, or moral excellence in any marked degree. They had shown love in various ways to the servants who preached in the King's name. Those servants preached the same truth which He had preached at the start of His public ministry. But it was faith which worked in their love. If the King and His coming kingdom had been only a myth in their eyes, they would have at least ignored His messengers as impostors.

William Kelly

One woman in Jericho shows the same pattern.

We may see Rahab's case as an early picture of this. She believed. At that time judgment was gathering over Jericho, a picture of the world. It is written of her, "And in the same way was not also Rahab the prostitute justified by works when she received the messengers and sent them out by another way?" She had faith and showed it by works. And so these nations believe the messengers and treat them with kindness. Grace covers them because they believed.

Arno Clemens Gaebelein

Where Readers Go Wrong

Many read this scene as praise for charity work in general. Commentators warn that this misses the point.

How great the confusion is among Christians about the meaning of these words! Often the interpretation given strikes at the very foundations of the gospel. People think our Lord means charitable acts: hospitals and prison work, feeding the hungry and clothing the naked through church work or charitable institutions. … If anyone does these things and is faithful in them, the King will approve of them in the judgment — and many a soul builds on this foundation of sand. All this is completely wrong. The works have an entirely different meaning.

Arno Clemens Gaebelein

Goodness That Keeps No Record

The forgetfulness of these people is held up as the shape real service takes.

John Newton had been writing about A B C Christians, and a young clergyman wrote to him and said he had been testing himself by it and found he was in the "C" class, the highest. John Newton wrote back and said there was one thing he had forgotten to mention — namely, that those in the "C" class did not know it. … So in Matthew 25, those who pleased Him were quite unconscious of what they had done. And the principle is the same for us.

The Bible Treasury

What is forgotten below is not lost above.

He forgets nothing that is done for His sake, though they have no recollection of what He speaks of. Faith does what is right and thoughtful without expecting any recognition for it. As the hymn says, "Little things we had forgotten He will tell us were for Him."

Leslie M. Grant

Summary

- Faith first. The sheep did not earn their place by good deeds. Their kindness to the King's messengers proved they had believed His message.

- Faith hidden. Their question shows they never counted their acts as service to Christ. They showed love to His messengers and thought no more of it.

- Faith reaching. The King ties Himself to His brothers: help given to them reached Him. Paul learned the same lesson on the Damascus road.

- Faith mistaken. Reading this scene as a reward for charity work is a foundation of sand. It turns a judgment of belief into a scorecard of good causes.

- Faith rewarded. Christ forgets nothing done for His sake; the little things we no longer remember He will name as done for Him.

Matthew 25:38

and when saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in; or naked, and clothed thee?

The sheep do not accept the King's praise — they cannot remember ever taking Him in or clothing Him. Their reply raises two questions: who did they help, and why does the King count it as done to Himself?

The setting of the question

This scene is a judgment on earth, not a judgment of the dead. Two details in the text show it.

The reference is therefore to His appearing and kingdom, and to His judgment of the living, and not of the dead. We do not speak of "the nations" in respect of the dead: this term describes the living. And notice too that there are three groups — the sheep, the goats, and the brethren of the King. That fact alone settles how we read the whole scene.

Edward Dennett

Who the stranger was

The King tells them they showed kindness to "the least of these my brothers." Naming that third group explains who stood at their door, and why he needed shelter.

Who are "these my brethren?" We have had the sheep and goats — the righteous and the unrighteous Gentiles; but who are the King's brethren? Those whom the Lord will send out before He comes in the glory of the kingdom; men sent to announce that He is coming in His kingdom. The sheep showed them love, care, sympathy in their sorrows. So these brethren of the King must have gone through tribulation before the King appears. The conclusion is obvious that, in that day, the ground on which He will deal with the nations will be this — "How did you behave to My messengers?"

William Kelly

Why a meal and a coat prove faith

Feeding and clothing sound like plain decency. But the King does not reward kindness in general. He rewards kindness aimed at one group, and that aim shows what the giver believed.

What some had shown was not just kindness, self-denial, or notable moral character. It was love, shown in many ways, to the servants who preached in the King's name the same truth which He had preached at the beginning of His public ministry. But it was faith which worked in their love. If the King and His coming kingdom had only been a myth in their eyes, they would have at least ignored His messengers as impostors. They believed the message to be of God and therefore treated its preachers with kindness.

William Kelly

One woman did the same long before, while judgment hung over her city.

We may look at Rahab as an early foreshadowing. She believed. At that time judgment was gathering over Jericho — a picture of the world. "By faith Rahab the prostitute did not perish with those who were disobedient, because she had given a friendly welcome to the spies." She had faith and showed it by works. The preachers going about are persecuted and hated by others — suffering, hungry, some thrown into prison. And so these nations believe the messengers and treat them with kindness. Grace covers them because they believed.

Arno Clemens Gaebelein

Genuine astonishment

Their question is not false modesty.

They had shown such kindness to poor Jewish preachers of the gospel of the kingdom, but had not thought of their deeds at all as done to the Lord Himself.

W. W. Fereday

Their surprise also shows where they stand. One man learned their lesson first, and learned it the hard way.

Could a Christian say such a thing in heaven, where we will know even as we are known? But these godly Gentiles are clearly still in their natural bodies, and the Lord is teaching them even after He appears in glory. However blessed this scene may be, it is still the Lord as Son of Man judging all nations and blessing the righteous from among them. Up to that moment they did not know that their acts of love and kindness towards Christ's messengers were so much done to Christ Himself. Their last lesson was the first that Paul learned on the road to Damascus — the truth that startled his soul: "I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting."

William Kelly

What He remembers

Their forgetting is not a fault — it is how faith works.

He speaks to them of showing Him many kindnesses in times of special need. For He forgets nothing that is done for His sake, though they have no recollection of what He speaks of. Faith does the things that are right and considerate without expecting any recognition. As the hymn reads, "Little things we had forgotten He will tell us were for Him."

Leslie M. Grant

Summary

- Living, not dead. Christ judges the nations alive on earth when He appears. The third group in the scene — the King's brethren — settles how we read it.

- The stranger had a name. The hungry, homeless visitor was one of the King's messengers. He carried news of the coming kingdom, and suffered for it.

- The welcome was the evidence. Nobody shelters a messenger he thinks is a fraud. Taking him in showed faith in the King who sent him, as Rahab's welcome of the spies did.

- The surprise was real. They never linked the coat they gave to the Christ now on the throne. He counts kindness to His own as kindness to Himself.

- He keeps the record. Faith acts without expecting credit. The small things the doer forgot are the ones the King names back to him.

Matthew 25:39

and when saw we thee ill, or in prison, and came to thee?

The King has just listed six kindnesses shown to Him, and the righteous cannot place a single one of them. Their surprise raises two questions: who is on trial here, and why do the accepted not remember the deeds that mark them out?

A judgment of the living, with three groups

The scene is often read as the last judgment of everyone who has ever lived. Commentators point instead to a detail in the text. Besides the sheep and the goats, the passage names a third group — the King's brethren.

Could anybody show me a single passage about a general resurrection? There is no such thought in Scripture. You get Matthew 25 quoted for it, that the goats and sheep represent the two classes; but He has come in His glory down here. He is not sitting on the great white throne: before this heaven and earth flee away. Here He is come and sits on His throne. When He does come and sits there, He gathers all the Gentiles, the nations, to judge them. It is the judgment of the living. You have three sets of people, not two; and you have nothing of resurrection. You have sheep, goats, and brethren.

J. N. Darby

Why the King was hungry, sick and in prison

The kindnesses in this question went to people in real trouble. That points to who these brethren were and what they went through.

We have had the sheep and goats — the righteous and the unrighteous Gentiles. But who are the King's brethren? They are the men the Lord will send out before He comes in the glory of the kingdom, sent to announce that He is coming in His kingdom. The sheep showed them love — care — sympathy in their sorrows. So these brethren of the King must have gone through tribulation before the King appears. The conclusion is obvious. In that day, He will deal with the nations on this ground — "How did you behave to My messengers?"

William Kelly

They never knew whom they were serving

The righteous are not being modest. They truly do not know, and one writer asks whether anyone in heaven could speak like this.

Could a Christian say such a thing in heaven, where we shall know even as we are known? … However blessed this scene may be, it is still the Lord as Son of Man judging all nations and blessing the righteous from among them. Up to that moment they did not know that their acts of love and kindness towards Christ's messengers were done towards Christ Himself. Their last lesson was the first that Paul learned on the road to Damascus — the truth that startled his soul: "I am Jesus whom you are persecuting."

William Kelly

Kindness that was really faith

If the sheep did not know they were serving Christ, what made their kindness count? One writer answers: how they treated the messengers showed what they thought of the One they represented.

God knows the true state of every heart quite apart from works. Yet public judgment is always according to works, since works show plainly and without fail what that state is. So everyone watching can see that God's judgments are right. These messengers, whom the King calls "My brethren," had gone out as His representatives. People treated them according to the view they took of the Son of Man whom they represented. Those who believed in Him stood with His messengers and cared for them in their rejection and suffering. Those who did not believe in Him paid them no attention at all. Those who had faith declared it by their works. Those who had no faith equally declared it by their works.

F. B. Hole

What the surprise teaches everyone else

One writer applies their unawareness to service today.

In Matthew 25, those who pleased Him were quite unconscious of what they had done. And the principle is the same for us.

The Bible Treasury

What the doers forget, He keeps.

He speaks to them of showing Him many kindnesses in times of special need. For He forgets nothing that is done for His sake, though they have no recollection of what He speaks of. Faith does what is right and considerate without expecting any recognition for it.

Leslie M. Grant

Summary

- Three, not two. Sheep, goats and "these My brethren" stand before a throne set up on earth. This scene says nothing about resurrection.

- The brethren. They are messengers sent out ahead of the King. Their hunger, sickness and prison show they passed through tribulation.

- The test. How the nations treated those messengers decides the case. It showed what they thought of the King who sent them.

- The evidence. Works are not merit; they are the visible proof of faith or unbelief, so that everyone can see the judgment is right.

- The surprise. The accepted cannot recall one kindness. That is the point: faith serves without keeping score, and He forgets nothing done for His sake.

Matthew 25:40

And the King answering shall say to them, Verily, I say to you, Inasmuch as ye have done it to one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it to me.

The King has taken His throne, the nations stand before Him, and He has just given His verdict — now He gives His reason. It is startling: He counts kindness shown to poor, suffering people as kindness done to Himself — so who are these "brothers" whose treatment decides everything?

Not the last judgment

One writer says the common reading of this scene gets it wrong. The sorting of sheep and goats belongs to the living, not the dead:

It is commonly supposed that the judgment spoken of in this chapter is the last judgment — the general judgment. This is a mistake. It is the judgment of the nations living on the earth, and not of the dead. There is no question of resurrection here. It is the judgment of the nations… People think it is the judgment of the dead because of this sentence: "And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life." But that only means the judgment of the living will be final, just as the judgment of the dead is final.

The Bible Treasury

Three parties, not two

Many assume the sheep are all the saved and the goats all the lost. But the verse names a third group:

Almost everyone in the Christian world believes that "the sheep" stand for all God's people, from the beginning of time to the end. They believe "the goats" stand for all the wicked, from first to last. But if that is so, what are we to make of the third party referred to here, under the title of "these My brethren"? The King addresses both the sheep and the goats about this third class. Indeed, the very ground of judgment is the treatment of the King's brethren. It would be an obvious absurdity to say the sheep were themselves the people referred to. If that were so, the wording would be quite different. Instead of "as you did it to one of the least of these My brothers," we would hear the King say, "as you did it to one another."

C. H. Mackintosh

Who the "brethren" are

Darby identifies the brothers as Jewish messengers who will carry the message of the coming kingdom to the nations.

The "brethren," I have no doubt, will be the remnant who will have preached the gospel of the kingdom among the Gentiles. The welcome given to those messengers decides the outcome for those who now appear in judgment. Just as surely, I believe they are Jews who will carry this testimony, and whom Jesus calls His brethren at that time.

J. N. Darby

Why a meal counts as evidence

A meal sounds too small to settle anyone's eternity. But see what it cost the giver, and what it showed:

The pressure against His messengers will be enormous. If any receive them well, it will be from faith. I grant that the measure of their faith is small. They do not yet know that honouring His brothers is honouring Him.

William Kelly

This is why an open judgment can proceed on deeds without making deeds the source of blessing:

The true state of every heart is known to God quite apart from works. Yet public judgment always goes by works. Works show exactly what that state is. So everyone can see that God judges rightly… Those who had faith declared it by their works. Those who had no faith equally declared it by their works.

F. B. Hole

The surprise of the righteous

The sheep are surprised by the King's praise. They do not remember feeding Him:

They were, up to that moment, ignorant that in showing acts of love and kindness toward Christ's messengers, so much was done toward Christ Himself. Their last lesson was the first one Paul learned on the road to Damascus. The words that shook him were these: "I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting." The Lord taught Paul that to persecute His people on earth is to persecute Christ in heaven. They and Christ are one.

William Kelly

The principle that reaches us

The scene is still future, but the truth behind it works now:

Those who would strike a blow at Christ today strike at His saints. Those who would serve Christ today care for and serve His saints. What is done to even the least of His brethren, He will accept as done to Himself… Real devotion to Christ shows itself in service to His cause and His people, far more than in warm words.

F. B. Hole

And nothing is too small to be filed away:

We know this verse applies to others, not to us, but the principle still holds for everyone. The act here is done in secret. Where the heart is moved by love for Christ to show even the smallest kindness, the Lord will not forget it.

The Bible Treasury

Summary

- Throne — Here the King judges the living nations, not the dead. The outcome is eternal, and that is what makes it final.

- Three — Sheep, goats, and "My brothers" are three separate groups. How people treat the brothers decides the other two.

- Test — Food, water, shelter, clothing, and prison visits came under heavy pressure. They were not simple charity. They were faith at work when turning away would have been safer.

- Me — The King takes every act as done to Himself. That is the truth that stopped Paul on the road: to touch His people is to touch Him.

- Memory — The righteous had forgotten what they did; He had not. The smallest kindness done for love of Christ is never lost.

Matthew 25:41

Then shall he say also to those on the left, Go from me, cursed, into eternal fire, prepared for the devil and his angels

The King's last word to those on His left hand sends them away, into a fire never built with them in mind. Two questions press: who stands there, and why does a place "prepared for the devil and his angels" become the portion of human beings?

Who the King judges

This scene is not the judgment of the raised dead. It is a sifting of people alive on earth when the Son of Man takes His throne. William Kelly points to the mixed crowd itself as the proof:

He separates them one from another. At the great white throne, where the dead stand to be judged, there is no need of separating them there. But here there is a mingled company. Such a mixture is never found in heaven or hell, but only on the earth. So every clause gives proof that our Lord speaks of a judgment of the living on the earth.

William Kelly

What put them on the left hand

Their sentence turns on what they left undone toward the King's messengers.

The remarkable thing about the latter is that their judgment, as here set out, rests only on what they had not done. It looks as if they had tried to take a middle course between being "for" and "against." They had not joined the followers of the beast. Those men rose in open rebellion against the King, and the sword killed them (Rev. 19:21). But neither had they identified themselves with His cause and with His servants. They had seen the servants persecuted and killed. They gave them neither help nor sympathy, and so showed the state of their hearts. Is not the lesson here that in divine things there can be no middle ground?

Messiah Prince

A word left unsaid

The two sentences in this chapter are not mirror images. To the sheep the King says they are "blessed by my Father." Here He stops short. Kelly makes the omission speak:

Notice, He does not say, Cursed by My Father, matching "Blessed by My Father." God hates putting away. So when the awful moment comes to pronounce the curse on these wicked nations, He says, "Depart from Me, you cursed." I believe this is the deepest sorrow to God. It throws the whole weight of destruction on those whose own sin it was. They rejected His love and holiness and glory when they rejected His Son.

William Kelly

A fire never prepared for man

The kingdom was "prepared for you." The fire was not. That difference shows where the responsibility lies.

In a word, then, it is plain that God has "prepared" a kingdom of glory, and "vessels of mercy" to inherit that kingdom. But He has not prepared "everlasting fire" for men. He prepared it for the "devil and his angels." And He has not fitted the "vessels of wrath" — they have fitted themselves.

C. H. Mackintosh

Kelly adds a note of pity from the same passage:

Hell was not prepared for poor guilty man. He deserves it, but it was prepared for the devil and his angels. There was no hope of deliverance for these fallen angels — no redemption for them. They left God deliberately, and no one tempted them. Man was tempted by an enemy, and God feels for guilty man, drawn away by a rebel mightier than himself, even if not more guilty.

William Kelly

How long "eternal" lasts

The chapter closes by setting eternal punishment beside eternal life. W. W. Fereday weighs the wording:

The awful future of the ungodly could hardly be stated more clearly than in the Scripture before us: "These will go away into eternal punishment." The same word covers both "punishment" and "life." The length of the one is the length of the other. Yet eternal fire was not prepared for men. It was prepared for the devil and his angels. But those who prefer the voice of the devil to the voice of God while on earth must share his doom for ever.

W. W. Fereday

Where that fire is

Later Scripture gives the fire a name and a place. Fereday describes it:

Somewhere in God's universe there will be a restricted area ("a lake"). God will shut evil up there and punish it for ever. No one there will be able to act in sin, though hatred in the heart towards God and His Son must remain. Neither new birth nor repentance is possible there. God will enforce complete subjection (Phil. 2:10-11). Satan and all those he deceived, whether angelic or human, will be found together.

W. W. Fereday

Summary

- Prepared — God prepared a kingdom for the blessed. He prepared the fire for the devil and his angels, and He fitted no one for it.

- Chosen — those who take no side have still taken a side. Refusing help to His servants showed hearts already turned away.

- Cursed — He says "you cursed," not "cursed of My Father," and so lays the whole weight of ruin on the sinner's own choice.

- Shared — people who preferred the devil's voice on earth end up sharing the devil's portion for ever.

- Eternal — one word covers both the life and the punishment. Its length is the same on both sides of the throne.

Matthew 25:42

for I hungered, and ye gave me not to eat; I thirsted, and ye gave me not to drink;

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Matthew 25:43

I was a stranger, and ye took me not in; naked, and ye did not clothe me; ill, and in prison, and ye did not visit me.

In this verse the King finishes His charge against those on His left, and every count is something they failed to do. So who is the "Me" they never welcomed or visited, and how can doing nothing end in such a sentence?

What they failed to do

Notice the shape of the accusation. Nothing is said about robbery, violence, or open hostility — only about supplies never offered.

"I was hungry and you gave me no food, I was thirsty and you gave me no drink" (Matthew 25:42). Christ does not say you took away My food, but you gave Me none.

Hamilton Smith

One writer connects this silence about active wrongdoing with another story the Lord told, where a man is condemned without a single act of cruelty being named.

He does not point to the evil they did. He points to the way they ignored Him, seen in the way they ignored the needs of His brethren. This is their serious sin of omission. Nothing is said about the active guilt of the rich man in Luke 16, though he lived in ease and luxury. But he ignored the poor man Lazarus, who was laid at his gate wanting only the crumbs from his table.

Leslie M. Grant

Who was the stranger

The King speaks as if He Himself stood at their door. Commentators ask who was turned away, and point to a third group in the scene — neither the sheep nor the goats.

Who are "these My brethren"? We have had the sheep and the goats — the righteous and the unrighteous Gentiles. But who are the King's brethren? They are the men the Lord will send out before He comes in the glory of the kingdom, sent to announce that He is coming in His kingdom... The conclusion is obvious. In that day, He will deal with the nations on this ground — "How did you behave towards My messengers?"

William Kelly

One writer sets the goats' claim of innocence beside the King's question to Saul.

"The goats," on the other hand, claim they never failed the great King. But by the same principle, the indifference they showed towards His messengers counts in the King's heart as indifference towards Him... He always thinks of His own as if they were Himself. "Why," He says to Saul, "do you persecute Me?"

J. N. Darby

No middle ground

These people seem to have wanted a middle path. That choice was itself an answer.

It seems as if they had tried to take a middle course between the "for" and the "against"... Still, they had not joined themselves to His cause and to His servants either. They had seen those servants persecuted and even killed. They gave them no help and no sympathy, and so showed the state of their hearts. Is not the lesson here that, in divine things, there can be no middle ground?

Messiah the Prince

The deeds on both sides point to something deeper.

In the one group there was faith working by love; in the other, complete unconcern. This laid bare whether they were fit or unfit to inherit the kingdom. In every case of the saints, works are the evidence, faith in the Word is the instrument, Christ's work is the ground, and God's grace is the source.

William Kelly

Which judgment this is

Many readers take the scene as the final judgment of everyone who has ever lived. One writer answers that the scene holds a third party — "these My brethren."

Almost the whole professing Church believes that "the sheep" stand for all the people of God, from the beginning of time to the end, and that "the goats" stand for all the wicked, from first to last. But if that is so, what do we make of the third party mentioned here, called "these My brethren"?... It would be plainly absurd to say that the sheep were themselves the people He means.

C. H. Mackintosh

The wording of the sentence

His words to those on the left do not mirror His words to those on the right.

Notice, He does not say, "Cursed by My Father," to match "Blessed by My Father." God hates putting away... Of the kingdom He said it was "prepared for you." He does not speak that way about the curse. Hell was not prepared for poor guilty man. He deserves it, but it was prepared for the devil and his angels.

William Kelly

The warning for us

Placing this scene in a future day does not put us outside its reach.

The theme of each part of Matthew 25 is "omission." The foolish virgins failed to take oil with their lamps. The wicked servant failed to use the talent entrusted to him. Those condemned as "goats" failed to serve the Lord, because they failed to serve His brethren in their need... If people with little light will be treated so severely for neglect, what can we with our much light expect, if we do the same?

Omission

Summary

- Omission. The charge lists no violence — only a welcome refused, clothing never given, a visit never made. What was never done is enough to condemn.

- Identification. The stranger and the prisoner are His messengers. What you do to them, the King counts as done to Him.

- Neutrality. Trying to stay out of it was not safety. Commentators read the refusal to help as the verdict the heart had already reached.

- Evidence. The deeds do not earn the kingdom; they reveal whether faith was there. Works are the evidence, grace the source.

- Application. Commentators differ on when this scene happens. But if neglect condemns those with little light, it warns those with much.

Matthew 25:44

Then shall *they* also answer saying, Lord, when saw we thee hungering, or thirsting, or a stranger, or naked, or ill, or in prison, and have not ministered to thee?

The King has just told those on His left why He is sending them away. Now they answer back, asking when they ever saw Him in need at all — the same question the righteous asked a few verses earlier, but from a very different heart.

Living Nations, Not the Last Judgment

This is not the judgment of the dead. The Lord's own words fix who is judged, and when.

But even a brief look at the words our blessed Lord used will show that He does not mention the subject of resurrection... The reference is therefore to His appearing and kingdom, and to His judgment of the living, not of the dead. We do not speak of "the nations" in respect of the dead: this term describes the living. And notice, too, that there are three groups here — the sheep, the goats, and the brethren of the King. That fact by itself settles how the whole scene should be read.

Edward Dennett

Three Parties, Not Two

The popular reading treats the sheep as all the saved and the goats as all the lost. That reading has nowhere to put the people the King keeps pointing at.

Almost everyone in the professing Church believes that "the sheep" stand for all the people of God, from the beginning to the end of time. And "the goats," on the other hand, stand for all the wicked, from first to last. But if this is so, what are we to make of the third party referred to here, under the title of "these My brethren"? The King addresses both the sheep and the goats about this third class. Indeed the very ground of judgment is the treatment of the King's brethren.

C. H. Mackintosh

Why the Question Has an Answer

The goats speak as though they never once met Christ in need. They had — in the messengers who carried His testimony.

Such was His affection for His faithful servants, and so much did He value them, that He judged the people He sent the testimony to by the way they received these messengers. Whether they received them well or badly, He treated it as done to Himself. What an encouragement for His witnesses during that time of trouble, when their faith would be tested in service!

J. N. Darby

So one question decides the case for every nation.

So the conclusion is clear. In that day He will deal with the nations on this ground — "How did you behave to My messengers?" The King's messengers will go out just before He appears in glory, preaching the gospel of the kingdom everywhere. When the King takes His throne, those among the nations who received that message are recognized as "sheep," and those who despised it perish as "goats." Those who honour the message treat the messengers well. They care for them and stand with them. The Lord remembers this, and He counts what they did to His messengers as done to Himself.

William Kelly

Condemned for What They Never Did

Notice what is not charged against them. There is no list of crimes here — only a list of absences.

The remarkable thing about the goats is that their judgment here rests only on what they had not done. It seems as if they had tried to take a middle course between the "for" and the "against."... They had seen the servants persecuted and killed. They offered neither help nor sympathy, and that showed the state of their hearts. Is not the lesson here that, in divine things, there can be no middle ground.

Messiah, the Prince

The sentence falls on withholding, not on robbery.

"I was hungry, and you gave Me no food: I was thirsty, and you gave Me no drink" (Matt. 25:42). Christ does not say you took away My food, but you gave Me none.

Hamilton Smith

The Tone of the Reply

This is not a plea for mercy. It is a defence.

But notice: the display of glory around them does not shame them. Firm in defending themselves, the wicked answer, "Lord, when did we see You hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister to You?" Oh, the daring spirit of self-righteousness! Does not even the solemnity of this awful court strike you with terror and break you down?

J Wilson Smith

Works as Evidence, Never as Ground

Kindness does not buy the kingdom. The deeds show what was already inside.

Thus everything rests on Christ, though His grace makes the most of what to others might seem trivial. One group had faith working by love. The other showed complete unconcern. That laid bare which of them was fit to inherit the kingdom and which was not. In all cases of saints, works are the evidence, faith in the Word the instrument, Christ's work the ground, and God's grace the source.

William Kelly

Summary

- Three, not two. The scene holds sheep, goats, and a third group — "these My brethren." Everything turns on how the first two treated the third.

- The messengers are the test. They carry the announcement of the coming King; the welcome given them is the welcome given Him.

- Christ counts it as His own. Help given to the least of them, He receives as given to Himself. Help refused, He takes as refused to Himself.

- The charge is omission. Not what they seized, but what they never gave. In divine things there is no middle ground.

- The reply exposes the heart. They defend themselves before the throne. But works were only ever the evidence — Christ's work the ground, God's grace the source.

Matthew 25:45

Then shall he answer them saying, Verily I say to you, Inasmuch as ye have not done it to one of these least, neither have ye done it to me.

This is the King's verdict on those at His left hand — the mirror of what He had just said to those on His right. Everything turns on one question: who are these "least" ones, and why does their treatment decide the fate of nations?

Three Parties, Not Two

The King's own words point to a group standing apart from both the sheep and the goats.

Almost everyone in the professing Church believes that "the sheep" stand for all the people of God, from the beginning of time to the end, and that "the goats" stand for all the wicked, from first to last. But if that is so, what are we to make of the third party mentioned here, called "these My brethren"? The King speaks to both the sheep and the goats about this third group. In fact, the very ground of judgment is how the King's brethren were treated. It would be plainly absurd to say that the sheep were themselves the people He means. If they were, the wording would be quite different. Instead of saying, "As you did it to one of the least of these My brethren," we would hear the King saying, "As you did it to one another."

C. H. Mackintosh

Who "These Least" Are

Commentators here identify the brethren as messengers who will carry the message of the coming kingdom.

There are three groups of people in this scene: the goats, the sheep, and His brethren. The judgment of the first two depends on how they treat the third. To do these things to one of His brethren is to do them to Himself. Not to do them to one of the least of these is not to do them to Himself. The "brethren," I have no doubt, will be the remnant who will have preached the gospel of the kingdom among the Gentiles. The welcome given to those messengers decides the fate of those who now stand in judgment.

J. N. Darby

The Charge Is Neglect, Not Cruelty

Look again at the list in verses 42–43. Not one item accuses these people of violence.

Notice that the King does not charge the condemned with persecuting and imprisoning His servants, but only with ignoring them — treating them with neglect. It fits in with the great question of Hebrews 2, "How shall we escape if we neglect so great salvation?" On that day all will see that if men treat Christ with neglect, by neglecting His servants, they came under eternal condemnation.

F. B. Hole

The wording itself is precise about this. The accusation is not robbery but withholding.

"I was hungry, and you gave Me no food: I was thirsty, and you gave Me no drink" (Matt. 25:42). Christ does not say you took away My food, but you gave Me none.

Hamilton Smith

Indifference Toward Them, Indifference Toward Him

Listen to how the two groups answer the King in verses 37 and 44.

"The sheep" make no claim to have paid any attention to the King Himself. But He counts as done to Himself everything they had done to His messengers, whom He owned as His brethren. "The goats," on the other hand, claim they never failed the great King. But by the same rule, the indifference they showed toward His messengers counts in the King's heart as indifference toward Him... He thinks always of His own as if they were Himself. "Why," says He to Saul, "are you persecuting Me?"

J. N. Darby

No Middle Ground

These people were not open enemies of the King. They simply stayed out of it.

The remarkable thing about the goats is that their judgment here rests only on what they had not done. It would seem as if they had tried to take a middle course between the "for" and the "against"... They had seen the servants persecuted and killed, and gave them neither help nor sympathy. That showed the state of their hearts. Is not the lesson this: in the things of God there can be no middle ground?

Messiah, the Prince

Deeds as Evidence, Not Payment

The kindness shown or withheld is the visible proof of something underneath it.

So everything rests on Christ, though His grace makes the most of what others might think trivial. Faith working by love in the one group, and complete unconcern in the other, laid bare who was fit and who was unfit to inherit the kingdom. For every believer, works are the evidence, faith in the Word is the instrument, Christ's work is the ground, and God's grace is the source.

William Kelly

The Same Warning Today

Placing the scene in the future does not remove its edge from the present.

The theme of each part of Matthew 25 is plainly what was left undone. The foolish virgins failed to take oil with their lamps. The wicked servant failed to use the talent given to him. Those condemned as "goats" failed to serve the Lord, because they failed to serve His brethren in their need... If the nations with their little light face such severe judgment for neglect, what can we with our much light expect, if we do the same?

Omission

Summary

- Three, not two. The scene holds sheep, goats, and a third group — "these My brethren." How that third group was treated is the whole ground of the verdict.

- The least. Commentators here take the brethren to be messengers of the kingdom, so how people met those messengers is how they met the King.

- Not done. The charge is never cruelty; it is the food not given, the stranger not welcomed, the prisoner not visited.

- Not to Me. What you withhold from His own, you withhold from Him. It is the word that met Saul: "Why are you persecuting Me?"

- No neutral. Trying to stand between "for" and "against" is itself the verdict. The deeds only expose the faith or the unconcern already there.

Matthew 25:46

And these shall go away into eternal punishment, and the righteous into life eternal.

This verse ends the Lord's long prophetic speech. It gives the verdict on the scene He has just described: the King on His throne, the nations before Him, the sheep divided from the goats. Everything hangs on one word — "eternal" — and on the two destinies it measures.

The Close of the Discourse

The verse is not a stray remark about hell. It sums up a whole scene.

In the closing paragraph of Matthew 25 the end has come. The Son of Man is King. The disciples who endured to the end are saved. The nations come under judgment. The good and the evil are now fully separated, and the result of the judgment is eternal. Three times the word eternal occurs. The punishment of the wicked and the fire into which they go are eternal; the life into which the righteous pass is eternal. The opposite of life is not the ending of existence, as it would be if life merely meant existence... it is punishment, because eternal life means the whole realm of blessed and eternal realities in which the righteous will move for ever. The point here is not that the life is in them, but that they pass into it.

F. B. Hole

Who Is Standing There

This scene is not the same as the later judgment of the dead. The clue is the crowd itself: two kinds of people stand mixed together.

He separates them one from another. At the great white throne, where the dead stand to be judged, there is no need of separating them there. But here there is a mixed company. Such a mixture is never found in heaven or hell, but only on the earth. So every clause proves that our Lord is speaking of a judgment of the living on the earth... Here the judgment is calm but very solemn. Its results last for ever. It follows the distinction the Lord makes between one person and another.

William Kelly

The Ground of the Verdict

The King gives His reason before He passes this sentence. It rests on what these people did, or failed to do, for those He calls His brothers.

Who are these brothers of the King? They are the men He will send out before He comes in the glory of the kingdom, sent to announce that He is coming. So the conclusion is obvious. In that day, the ground on which He will deal with the nations will be this — "How did you behave toward My messengers?" Just before He appears in glory, the King's messengers will go out preaching the gospel of the kingdom everywhere. When the King takes His throne, those among the nations who received that message are recognised as "sheep," and those who despised it perish as "goats."... The Lord remembers this, and counts what was done to His messengers as done to Himself.

William Kelly

What "Punishment" Means

Two words here repay a close look: "eternal" and "punishment." Scripture uses both elsewhere, and those other uses fix what they mean.

Notice one thing. In Matthew 25 our Lord uses the same word for "everlasting life" and for "everlasting punishment." It is the word used for the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only wise God (1 Timothy 1:17). Note also that the word translated "punishment" must be translated "torment" in 1 John 4:18: "fear has torment." Happy are those who agree with childlike simplicity to wholesome words, the words of our Lord Jesus Christ.

H. H. Snell

(Older translations render 1 John 4:18 "fear has torment"; the ESV reads "fear has to do with punishment.")

Not Extinction

Some argue that the fire means the wicked simply stop existing. What the fire produces points the other way.

The explanation shows that the thought is not extinction. That idea is only a conclusion drawn from what fire does to weeds. The effect of the fire, like that of the outer darkness, is weeping and gnashing of teeth. So the effect is not a ceasing to exist, as they claim. It is suffering — suffering called everlasting (Matthew 25:46), in contrast with everlasting life.

J. N. Darby

One Word, Two Destinies

The same word covers both halves of the verse. It cannot mean one thing on one side and something else on the other.

Both the life and the punishment are eternal. No one seems anxious to prove that eternal life is not eternal. Multitudes labour to explain that eternal punishment is not eternal. Why? It is simply a case of the prisoner in the dock revolting against his sentence!... there is no reason to deny to "eternal" in the first half of the sentence what everyone grants it in the second. Scripturally both parts stand or fall together.

F. B. Hole

The same test runs across the rest of the New Testament, where the word attaches to things no one wants to shorten.

If the destruction in 2 Thessalonians 1:9 is not really "everlasting," then the salvation in Hebrews 5:9 is not either. If the fire in Jude 7 is not "eternal," neither is the glory in 2 Timothy 2:10.

William Kelly

Summary

- Scene — The verse closes a judgment of living nations on earth. Sheep and goats stand mixed together, and the King separates them.

- Ground — The dividing line is how people treated the King's messengers. What they did to them, He counts as done to Himself.

- Word — "Punishment" here is the word translated "torment" elsewhere. It means suffering, not the end of existence.

- Measure — One word, "eternal," covers both destinies. Shorten one and you shorten the other.

- Destination — The righteous do not just receive life. They pass into it — into the whole realm of blessing where they will move for ever.