And the Pharisees being gathered together, Jesus demanded of them,
Matthew 22 ends a long day of questioning in the temple, where group after group tried to trap Jesus and failed. Verse 41 turns it around: His opponents are still gathered, and now He is the one asking — about Himself.
Every group had already taken its turn, and each had failed.
W. W. FeredayOur Lord asked His question in the temple, at the close of a day of questioning. The Herodians came with their political query, the Sadducees with their doctrinal quibble, and the Pharisees with their legal question. The Saviour silenced them one after another. It was the last of their questioning. From that day on, no one dared to ask Him any more questions. His time had now come.
They are still gathered, but the group has run dry — and one subject they had never raised.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinThey gathered together in a group, but no one can suggest a new question, another test. Everything they tried had proven useless. The Lord now approaches them. He has a question for them. The Pharisees never touched on the question of the Messiah, His person, and it was after all the most important. The Lord has a question for them about Himself. Unlike the Pharisees, He uses Scripture, quoting from His own Word.
Their reply — "The son of David" — was correct as far as it went. It was also incomplete, and everything hung on the gap.
William KellyNow it was the Lord's turn to ask them the question of questions — not only for a Pharisee, but for any soul: "What do you think about the Christ? Whose son is he?" He was David's son — that was true. But was this truth the whole truth? … How was He both David's Son and David's Lord? It was the key to all Scripture — the way, the truth, the life — the explanation of His position, the only hope for theirs. But they were speechless.
The puzzle He set them has an answer, and it lies in who He is.
H. H. SnellHe asked, "What do you think about the Christ? Whose son is he?" They answered, "The son of David." This, as far as it went, was quite true. So the blessed Lord went on: "How is it then that David, in the Spirit, calls him Lord ... If then David calls him Lord, how is he his son?" This is and always has been the difficult problem for man to solve. How could Jesus be both David's Son and David's Lord? The answer is simple enough. As David's Lord, He was the Creator of David, for God created all things by His Son. But He was born of Mary, who came from the house and family line of David, so He was also David's Son.
Their silence had a cause, and it was not ignorance.
F. B. HoleThe Lord then asked them His great question, based on Psalm 110. Matthew records that no one was able to answer Him a word. No answer was possible except to the faith that saw the divine glory of the Christ, and they had no faith. They were silent in stubborn unbelief. Answer His question they could not; ask Him any further question they dared not.
Their silence was a choice, and it had a cost.
W. W. FeredayEverything depended on their answer to that question. Suppose they had believed the prophecies of the Old Testament about Him. Suppose they had replied that He was Son of God, though born of the line of David and Abraham. Then only one course would have been open to them: to fall at His feet in worship, owning Him God revealed in flesh, the true hope of Israel. The crown and the kingdom would then have been His, instead of the cross and the grave.
What He put to the Pharisees is not left behind in the temple courts.
F. B. HoleThere is no greater question in the whole Book. The Lord Himself raised it with the unbelieving men of His day: "What do you think about the Christ?" (Matt. 22:42). In these few short words He set before them the pivotal point on which everything turns. The deepest foundations of the faith lie here. Any error or fault here is sure to make its influence felt through the whole building.
- Silenced. A full day of hostile questions ended with every group defeated; only then did Jesus ask His own.
- Overlooked. His opponents never raised the one subject that mattered most: the person of the Messiah.
- Incomplete. "Son of David" was true, but not the whole truth; it left David's own words about his Lord unexplained.
- Both. As David's Lord He is David's Creator; as born of Mary, of David's line, He is David's son — divine and human glory in one person.
- Decisive. They could not answer and would not believe. The same question tests every reader, and everything else stands or falls with it.
saying, What think ye concerning the Christ? whose son is he? They say to him, David's.
All day, group after group had come to trap Jesus with questions. Now He turns and asks the Pharisees one of His own. Their answer is true — but it is only half the truth.
The setting is a coordinated attempt to catch Jesus out, and one writer notes who had lined up against Him.
Norman AndersonThe self-appointed shepherds of Israel all made an assault against the Son of God. The Herodians were the political party in Israel. The Sadducees trusted human reason, and the Pharisees kept the rituals. Politicians, reasoners and ritual-keepers all joined together against the concentrated truth of God, shown in the person of the Son of God. They asked Him questions to trap Him, but they could not trap Him. Then He asked them a question: "What do you think about the Christ? Whose son is he?"
He had answered them all. Now He raises the subject that mattered most, and their reply falls far short.
Leslie M. GrantThey are still gathered together. He has answered all their clever questions and left them embarrassed. Now He asks them a question of the greatest possible importance. This is a matter that should have held their deepest interest and concern, because the Old Testament scriptures were full of prophecies about Israel's expected Messiah. Yet in pathetic ignorance all they can answer is, "the son of David."
Their answer was not wrong. It was the easy part — the part any child in Israel could have supplied.
Numerical Bible NotesAnd now the Lord appeals to them as they are gathered there before Him about what was now for them the question of questions: what do they think of Christ? "Whose son is He?" To that they readily reply, "The son of David." This was the truth, and they knew He would not deny it: it was in fact a question which any child among them could have answered.
Their answer was true as far as it went. His next question is where everything for them was at stake.
William KellyNow it was the Lord's turn to ask them the question of questions — a question not only for a Pharisee, but for any soul: "What do you think about the Christ? Whose son is He?" He was David's son — most true. But was this truth the whole truth? "How then does David in the Spirit call him Lord, saying, 'The Lord said to my Lord'?" How was He both David's Son and David's Lord? It was the key to all Scripture — the way, the truth, the life — the explanation of His position, the only hope for theirs. But they had nothing to say.
Matthew's Gospel opens by naming Jesus the son of David; here the same Gospel shows that title is not the ceiling.
Norman AndersonIn Matthew 1:1, He is the Son of David. As such the government shall be on His shoulder, and from Zion He will send out the rod of His strength, ordering the earth according to God. But in Matthew 22:41-46, He emphasises the fact that David's Son is David's Lord. The complex glory of His Person is here before us. A Man — yes, truly a Man — but more, He is God.
Faith does not solve the puzzle. It receives it — and holding both titles marks a Christian.
J T MawsonIn this title divine and human glories unite. Jesus is David's Lord and David's Son. This is the great test for every person. No one has a right to the name Christian if he denies either one or the other… They were silent and had no answer to this great mystery. It is a mystery to us also, for we cannot explain it. But what we cannot explain we can believe, and in the Person of Jesus we see God and Man, the Root and the Offspring of David.
His follow-up question pointed them to a Psalm they had never understood.
J. N. DarbyIf they had understood that Psalm, they would have understood all the ways of God with His Son — and this at the very time they were going to reject Him. So these discourses closed by showing the true position of Christ. He is the Son of David, yet He must go up on high to receive the kingdom. While He waits for it, He sits at the right hand of God, as the rights of His glorious Person require — David's Lord, as well as David's Son.
Commentators read the question not only as an argument but as an offer. One writer sees mercy in it — a last chance held out to men already set against Him.
J T MawsonThe Lord used this great saying against the Pharisees as a challenge and a warning. It gave them a chance to see who He was and to repent of their hatred of Him. The words declare His Deity, for they tell us He was David's Lord. They also proclaim His exaltation, which followed His humiliation and rejection by men.
What was decisive in the temple courtyard has not shifted since.
W. W. FeredayThe test question for that day is the test question for this day also. Everything depends upon the answer that our souls give to it. The Word of God supplies us with the answer, and every heart that values the Word and bows to its authority is satisfied with what God has said there.
And the answer wanted is not merely a correct one. A right reply can still be given by a heart that has no interest in Him.
C. H. MackintoshAll really depends on the heart's estimate of Christ. Like a great moral indicator, it reveals a person's true state, character, direction and aim in all things. It is not merely a question of his outward life, or of his profession of faith. His life may be blameless, and his stated faith may be orthodox. But if underneath all that blameless morality and orthodox profession there is not one true beat of the heart for Christ… then all the morality and the orthodoxy are only fine clothes that a guilty sinner wears to look good in front of others.
- Question. Jesus asks the question they should have been asking. The men trained in Scripture reach only half the answer.
- Half. "The son of David" was true, but it was only part of the truth — and that left them with nothing to say.
- Whole. David's Son is also David's Lord: truly Man, and God. Faith holds both and explains neither away.
- Throne. The Psalm He pointed to showed a Christ who must go up on high to receive the kingdom and sit at God's right hand — and this at the very time Israel was rejecting Him.
- You. The same question still tests the heart, not just the doctrine. A faultless profession without one beat of love for Christ is only decoration.
He says to them, How then does David in Spirit call him Lord, saying,
After all their efforts to condemn Jesus, the Pharisees now face a question from Him, drawn from a psalm they agreed spoke of the Messiah. It turns on three words — "in the Spirit" — and on one puzzle: how could David call his own descendant his Lord?
Jesus brought no new evidence against them. He used what they already believed.
James McBroomThese men knew this Psalm and held that it spoke of the Messiah. Yet they would not acknowledge their Messiah... So the very truth that belonged to their own religious creed condemned them and shut their mouths. They were unhappy, miserable, and had turned away from God. After all their efforts to condemn the Lord of glory, they stood silent — condemned, but still not subdued.
Jesus does not treat Psalm 110 as David's own opinion. Two things point the same way here: the Lord's own word, and plain reason.
The Bible TreasuryThe Lord stated it as fact: the Holy Spirit guided David as he wrote the Psalms... We have the Lord's testimony, and we have the testimony of common sense too. What did those words mean to David as an ordinary human being? Nothing at all. But if they are inspired, the statement is a perfectly ordinary one.
This was not a one-off. It was Jesus' settled way of handling the Psalms.
The Bible TreasuryThe Lord recognizes David as an inspired prophet in this very verse, and He quotes the Psalms as prophecy again and again.
Jesus never denied being David's descendant. The point of His question was that "Son of David" is true but not the whole account of Him.
Frank WallaceThey could not understand, and would not believe, that Jesus was the Lord spoken of in Psalm 110:1. The truth lay in the incarnation of the Son of God, who was God's Anointed One... Jesus was David's Lord, and that affirms His deity. He was also a Son of David, and that shows His true humanity. Notice that Jesus never hinted that He was not from David's line. He knew He was. The question He put to the Pharisees was a test, and they failed it.
This question did not die with the Pharisees. One writer traces the same failure through every age.
William KellyThis is the turning point of unbelief at all times, now as then. It is the constant theme of the Holy Spirit's testimony, and man's usual stumbling block. Man is never so foolish as when he wants to be wisest. He either tries to work out the mystery of Christ's Person by his own cleverness — a mystery no mind can reach — or he denies that there is any mystery in it at all.
The psalm settles more than who Christ is. It also says where He was going. Just before they rejected Him, Jesus pointed them to a throne.
J. N. DarbyHe asks the Pharisees to fit two titles together: Son of David, and the Lord — the title David himself gave Him. He ties this to the ascension of this same Christ, to sit at God's right hand until God has made all His enemies His footstool... In fact, to understand that Psalm would have been to understand all God's ways with His Son — and that at the very time they were going to reject Him.
The Pharisees had no answer. Faith has one — not an explanation, but belief in both halves of the mystery.
J. T. MawsonJesus is David's Lord and David's Son. And this is the great test for every man, for no man has a right to the name of Christian who denies either one or the other... They were dumb and had no answer to this great mystery. It is a mystery to us also, for we cannot explain it. But what we cannot explain we can believe.
- Inspired — David spoke "in the Spirit." So Psalm 110 carries God's authority, not a king's guesswork.
- Prophetic — the words meant nothing in David's own lifetime. That is the mark of prophecy, and Jesus read the Psalms that way.
- Impossible — the leaders held both truths in their own Scriptures. They could not join them, and their own creed shut their mouths.
- Incarnate — the answer stood in front of them. In His humanity He is David's descendant; in His deity, David's Lord.
- Enthroned — the psalm they could not explain named what came next. The Messiah they rejected sits at God's right hand until His enemies become His footstool.
The Lord said to my Lord, Sit on my right hand until I put thine enemies under thy feet?
The Lord has just silenced every group that came to trap Him. Now He asks His own question, drawn from a psalm of David: how can one man be both David's descendant and David's Master?
The first "Lord" in the quoted line is not the same word as the second. One writer explains what the capital letters in older Bibles mean, and how the two titles fit together.
H. H. SnellIn the opening words of this psalm, the first "LORD" is printed in capital letters. When it is printed that way, it usually means Jehovah. So we may read the verse as, "Jehovah said to my Lord" — that is, Jehovah said to Christ… How could Jesus be both David's Son and David's Lord? The answer is simple enough. As David's Lord, He was the Creator of David, for God created all things by His Son. But as born of Mary, who was of the house and family of David, He was David's Son.
Another writer counts the speakers in that line.
Norman AndersonIn the King James Version, the name LORD in capitals stands for God's personal name, Jehovah, and "my Lord" means my Master. So there are two Persons. The God of Israel addressed the Messianic King "Sit at my right hand".
The Pharisees had said the Christ is David's son. The Lord does not deny it.
William KellyHe was David's son — most true. But was this truth the whole truth? How was He both David's Son and David's Lord? It was the key to all Scripture — the way, the truth, the life — the explanation of His position, and the only hope for theirs. But they had nothing to say.
Another writer weighs what any answer would have cost them.
Numerical Bible NotesHe turns on them with a question that goes to the bottom of the whole dispute: the question of His Person, of the true glory of Christ. Was He only David's Son? Why then did David, speaking by the Spirit, call Him "Lord"?… No answer was possible that did not admit His higher nature.
The verse names a seat at God's right hand. One writer explains what that place stands for.
Norman AndersonThe "right hand" speaks of authority, power, and eminence. According to Exodus 15:6, the power to rescue and to subdue belongs to the right hand… Acts 2:32-36 hails His exaltation. It shows God's approval of Him, and at the same time it reverses man's judgment.
At the very time they were about to reject Him, the Lord tells His enemies where He is going and how long He will stay.
J. N. DarbyHe asks the Pharisees to square the title Son of David with the title Lord, which David himself gave Him. And He does it in connection with the ascension of this same Christ, to sit at the right hand of God until God had made all His enemies His footstool… To understand that Psalm would have been to understand all the ways of God with His Son at the very time they were going to reject Him.
The verse reads "until I put your enemies under your feet"; older translations read "until I make your enemies your footstool." One writer weighs who does the work here.
A. PridhamThe Holy Spirit points straight to the last clause of this verse. In Hebrews 10:13 He speaks of the ascended Messiah as now "waiting until His enemies should be made a footstool for His feet." The power that will do this is the same power that raised Him from the dead and gave Him glory. It does not say "until they are made," but "until I make."
The word "until" opens a gap in time, and we are living in it. One writer marks what is not happening in it.
J. N. DarbyThis is the time when He is sitting there — doing nothing for Israel, though He is their great High Priest within… This is not the time when He is making His enemies His footstool. He is gathering the joint-heirs while He sits on the throne of God.
Another writer names what kind of day this is.
F. B. HoleJehovah acknowledges Him as Lord and places Him at His right hand — but it is "until…" Something lies ahead of Him. The seat He is to take is very high, yet it is only for a time, until what lies ahead comes. The day of His poverty is over. The day of His patience has begun.
- Two speakers. Jehovah speaks to another Person and calls Him Lord. David's own words prove the Messiah is more than a descendant.
- One question. Was He only David's Son? No answer works unless it admits His higher nature.
- The seat. The right hand is the place of authority and power. Christ seated there is God's approval of Him, and it reverses man's judgment.
- The promise. The words are not "until they are made" but "until I make." The same power that raised Him will put every enemy under His feet.
- The waiting. We live inside the word "until." His day of poverty is over, His day of patience has begun. He gathers joint-heirs while He waits.
If therefore David call him Lord, how is he his son?
The Pharisees had been questioning Jesus; now He asks one of His own, drawn from a psalm of David. Everyone agreed the Christ would be David's descendant. So how could David call that descendant his Lord?
The puzzle rests on how families worked. Rank ran upward, not downward.
F. B. HoleThe scribes were quite clear that the Messiah was to be the Son of David; yet here is David speaking of Him as his Lord. Among men in those days, a father never spoke to his son like that. It was the other way round: the son called his father lord. How could the Christ then be Son of David? Were the scribes wrong in what they asserted? Or could they explain it?
Their belief was not wrong. It was only half the truth, and the missing half was the one they refused.
The two titles are not in conflict once you see who He is. One belongs to Him as God, the other to His birth.
H H SnellMan assumes he is competent to judge the things of God. One question still confounds him: "If then David calls Him Lord, how is He his son?" The Deity of the Son is the only answer. He is David's Lord as Creator; He is David's Son as having miraculously become man through Mary. In this way Scripture elsewhere calls Him "the root and offspring of David." It also calls Him "the Lion of the tribe of Judah, the root of David." Who but the Son could truly say, "Before Abraham was, I am"?
Being David's root and David's offspring at once is not a contradiction the New Testament tries to hide. Christ uses it as His own title in the last chapter of the Bible.
William KellyTo be David's offspring not even an unbelieving Jew could deny to the Christ. But how could He be David's root when He was born more than a thousand years after David? Yet He says so, which is enough; as the Old Testament scriptures said the same, centuries before. Yes, He was David's root just as surely as, if more wonderfully than, He was David's offspring — the Son of David as well as David's Lord.
Their difficulty was not theirs alone. It is the standing difficulty of the human mind about Christ.
William KellyThey were — indeed, they are — critical questions: If the Christ is David's Son, how is He David's Lord? If He is David's Lord, how is He David's Son? This is the turning point of unbelief at all times, now as then. It is the continual theme of the Holy Spirit's testimony, and the habitual stumbling-block of man. Man is never so vain as when he wants to be wisest. He either tries to sound out the unfathomable mystery of Christ's person by his own wit, or he denies that there is any mystery in it at all.
Jesus did not quote the psalm only to win an argument. The verse He chose maps out where He was about to go.
J. N. DarbyHe asks the Pharisees to reconcile the title Son of David with the title Lord, which David himself gave Him. And He ties this to the ascension of this same Christ, who sits at the right hand of God until God has made all His enemies His footstool and has established His throne in Zion. Now this was the whole of Christ's position at that moment. In fact, to understand that Psalm would have been to understand all the ways of God with respect to His Son at the time they were going to reject Him.
The same words that answer their question also warn them. Peter later pressed that warning on the nation.
J T MawsonThe Lord used this great saying in His conflict with the Pharisees. It was a challenge and a warning. By it He gave them a chance to see who He was and to repent of their hostility towards Him. The words declare His Deity, for they tell us that He was David's Lord. They also proclaim His exaltation, which followed His humiliation and rejection by men. Peter takes them up in this way in his appeal to the nation at Pentecost, and his appeal was most powerful. He set two ways before his hearers. One was to surrender to Him whom God had set at His right hand. The other, for those who refused, was to be crushed beneath His victorious feet. And it must be one or the other for every soul of man.
The Lord's question has an answer, but not an explanation. Holding both halves is what marks out real faith.
J T MawsonJesus is David's Lord and David's Son. And this is the great test for every man, for no man has a right to the name of Christian who denies either one or the other... They were speechless before this great mystery. It is a mystery to us also, for we cannot explain it. But what we cannot explain we can believe, and in the Person of Jesus we see God and Man, the Root and the Offspring of David.
- Question. A son called his father lord, never the reverse. So when David called his own descendant "my Lord," the Pharisees' half-answer collapsed.
- Answer. He is David's Lord as Creator, and David's Son because He became man through Mary. His deity alone reconciles the two.
- Mystery. Both titles are true at once. Faith accepts what it cannot explain, instead of denying either half.
- Throne. The psalm He quoted traced His path: men rejected Him, God seated Him at His right hand, and there He waits until God makes His enemies His footstool.
- Test. That leaves two roads for every person: surrender to the One God exalted, or fall among the enemies beneath His feet.
And no one was able to answer him a word, nor did any one dare from that day to question him any more.
The long day of questioning in the temple is over. Jesus has answered every group that came to trap Him, then asked one question of His own — and the record closes in silence.
Priests, Pharisees, Herodians, Sadducees and lawyers had all taken their turn. One writer notes that each group failed in the very thing it claimed to be expert in.
Hamilton SmithAfter this, no one dared ask the Lord any question. Representatives of all classes had come with their questions to test the Lord: priests, rulers, Pharisees, Herodians, Sadducees and lawyers. They all found themselves exposed and silenced. The Pharisee, who claimed to uphold religion, had not given to God the things that are God's. The Herodian, who claimed to defend the political interests of Caesar, had not given to Caesar the things that are Caesar's. The Sadducee, who boasted in intellect, was remarkable for his ignorance. And the scribe, who explained the law, had not kept the law. They were opposed to one another, yet they were all united in opposing Christ. Together they showed how completely man has failed in his responsibility.
Jesus' question came from Psalm 110, where David calls his own descendant "Lord." Only one answer fits.
H H SnellOur Lord used this passage from the Psalms to silence the objecting Pharisees. David said, "The LORD says to my Lord: 'Sit at my right hand, until I make your enemies your footstool'" (Psalm 110:1). One question still defeats man's assumed ability to judge the things of God: "If then David calls Him Lord, how is He his son?" The Deity of the Son is the only answer. He is David's Lord as Creator. He is David's Son because He miraculously became man through Mary.
Why could none of them answer? One writer traces the silence to what they did not have.
F. B. HoleThe Lord then asked them His great question, based upon Psalm 110. Matthew records that no one was able to answer Him a word. No answer was possible except to the faith that perceived the divine glory of the Christ, and they had no faith. They were silent in stubborn unbelief. Answer His question they could not; ask Him any further question they dared not.
The verse Jesus quoted was not only a riddle about His person. It described what He was days away from doing.
J. N. DarbyNow He puts a question to them that is serious and decisive for them. It is about the judgment they had formed about Christ, and so about His own person. He asks whose son the Christ is. They answer, David's. He then asks how David, in the Spirit, calls Him Lord and speaks of Him sitting at the LORD's right hand. That is what was going to happen. He was about to leave the position of Son of David on earth, the Heir of the promises made to the Jews. He was going to take His seat at the right hand of the Majesty on high.
Winning an argument was never the point. One writer draws attention to what Jesus was really offering His opponents, and to the sad outcome.
C E StuartBy His question the Lord gave the key to what so many had not understood. But it was in vain. We do not read that it convinced one person. No Gospel writer tells us that it added a single new disciple to His followers... He had silenced His opponents, yet He did not only silence them. A spirited reply or a clever retort has crushed many a debater. The Lord's aim was to silence all and, at the same time, to help all who really wanted help. So He drew attention to that verse, whose meaning they had missed.
These words close the door on their questions. The next words they speak about Him are of a very different kind.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinThey claimed to be teachers of Israel, and still they did not understand the Scriptures... The passage teaches clearly who Messiah is. He is Jehovah incarnate, the Son of David and David's Lord. And the One asking the question is He Himself... They could give Him no answer. It was a solemn moment. No answer! No repentance! They are silenced, and when they open their lips again it is to cry "Crucify Him!" The end is now coming quickly. In the next chapter He speaks as Judge, and pronounces His judgment on the leaders of the nation.
- Question — after a day of hostile testing, Jesus turns the tables. One question about His own person silences every party that came to trap Him.
- Answer — only His deity answers it: David's Lord as Creator, David's Son through Mary.
- Announcement — the psalm He quoted described what was coming. He would leave the earthly place of David's Son and take His seat at the right hand of the Majesty on high.
- Refusal — the silence was not ignorance but unbelief. They could not answer, and they dared not ask again.
- Outcome — Jesus aimed to help, not to crush; yet it convinced no one, and the next words from those lips were "Crucify Him!"