Matthew 21:18–19

Matthew 21:18 · Darby

But early in the morning, as he came back into the city, he hungered.

Jesus walks the short road from Bethany back to Jerusalem, the morning after the city rejected Him. Commentators read His hunger both as plain fact about His body and as a window into what He was looking for from Israel.

Nights in Bethany

He spent each night of that last week outside Jerusalem. Rest was not the only reason.

Every miracle the Son of God performed on earth was an act of goodness and mercy. The one exception was the cursing of the fig tree. This happened during His last week of sorrow. That week He carried on His ministry in Jerusalem, but each evening He went out of the city to stay in Bethany. He preferred the simple reality of Lazarus and his sisters to the dead religious formalism that filled Jerusalem.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The direction of the walk matters. His errand in the city had changed.

Bethany was His retreat at this time. He was rejected, and so a stranger here. He finds His place in the family of faith that loved Him while the world was full of enmity. And He does come back again, from the village to the city, from Bethany to Jerusalem. But it is not, as it had been until now, to renew and continue His service of love and power. It is to expose and convict Israel, and to leave them under condemnation.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

A real, bodily hunger

Nothing here is symbolic first. A man walked a short road on an empty stomach.

The Lord had been rejected at Jerusalem the day before, and had looked for lodging in Bethany. The next morning He set out to pay another visit to the doomed city. The journey was short, yet He grew hungry on the way — a touching sign that He had taken no food, no morning meal. A fig would have refreshed Him, but there was none. Think of this, and who and what He was!

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

One writer stops at the older wording of this verse, "He hungered."

Early in the morning the blessed One is up to return to the city. What a story the two words tell us — "He hungered." The King was hungry. He who was rich had indeed become poor.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A hunger that went deeper than food

His bodily need opens onto something larger. He looked for food from what He Himself had made and planted.

The Lord returned to Bethany. The next morning, going out from Bethany, He was hungry, for the Lord was indeed subject to all our weaknesses — He took them. Yet all of this was ordered. So the Lord looks for food in what He has created and planted. He did not create it to give Himself no delight, nor plant it to find no food or fruit. In His own delight and love He looked for fruit in the place and vineyard of His own planting, so that He might take pleasure in it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The tree He passed on that road tells the same story from Israel's side.

Again He returns to the city in the morning, and He is hungry — just as He hungers for some response to His love from Israel. A fig tree was in the way, but He found nothing but leaves on it. The fruit appears before the leaves on the fig, but in this case there was no fruit at all — an abnormal condition. What a picture of Israel's state! They had borne no fruit for God, despite all their many leaves of professed godliness.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Hunger that will be satisfied

The tree by the road was finished, but writers who read it as a picture of Israel still look ahead.

He hungered. There were no figs on the barren fig tree, no response from Israel for the heart of Christ. He hungered. His hunger shall be satisfied. The actual fig tree the Lord cursed may bear no fruit forever. Yet the fig tree of Israel shall bear fruit, even if God has to prune it for two thousand years.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Hungry — He walked a short road with no morning meal. The hunger was real: He shared our weaknesses.

- King — the King Himself had nothing to eat. He who was rich had become poor.

- Seeking — the Creator looked for food from what He Himself had planted; He did not plant it to find nothing.

- Empty — the tree carried leaves but no fruit. It pictured a people full of professed godliness and barren toward God.

- Satisfied — that tree bore nothing again. Yet Christ's hunger for His people will be met at last.

Matthew 21:19 · Darby

And seeing one fig-tree in the way, he came to it and found on it nothing but leaves only. And he says to it, Let there be never more fruit of thee for ever. And the fig-tree was immediately dried up.

Near Jerusalem, days before the cross, Jesus comes to a fig tree in full leaf and finds no fruit on it. His word withers it on the spot — so why a tree, and why this tree?

Leaves that promised fruit

Cursing a tree for having no fruit sounds unfair — until you know how a fig tree grows.

The fruit comes before the leaves. So the fig tree the Lord cursed had leaves on it, and it should have had fruit too, even though the usual fig season had not arrived. This pictured Israel, whom Hosea 9:10 compares to a fig tree bringing forth its first-ripe figs. But in the days of the Lord, Israel had plenty of leaves. The nation claimed to be God's favoured people, yet produced no real fruit for Him.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The tree was not just unripe. It was making a promise it could not keep.

A picture of a nation

The tree was chosen for what it stood for.

The fig tree was the symbol of the Jews as a nation. The vine pictured them as a religious system. Now the Lord had come seeking fruit, and at that very moment He was really passing sentence on the nation. Each part of it comes up in turn — Herodians, Pharisees, Sadducees, lawyers, scribes, priests. They seem to be questioning Him, but they are really receiving their judgment from His mouth.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The withered tree and the disputes that follow are one act. In both, the Lord passes sentence.

The hunger of the King

Why did He come looking for fruit at all?

May we not say that the Lord's hunger was not only physical? It was also a spiritual hunger. It sought some return from Israel for all the centuries of goodness God had given the nation — something that would be fruit to satisfy the heart of God. In the tree, the Lord found plenty of leaves but no fruit. In the nation, He found a great show of piety before men, but nothing in the secret life that would be fruit for God.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The sentence pronounced

What He says to the tree, He is saying to the nation.

The sentence on the fig tree was a symbolic curse upon the people — Israel was the fig tree. The Lord found nothing but leaves, and the word is that from now on no fruit shall grow on it for ever. The nation had failed to bear fruit for God, though they had every means and opportunity for glorifying and serving Him. Now God takes away all their advantages and gives up the old stock — a dead tree.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Set this act beside the rest of His miracles.

Our Lord's cursing of the barren fig tree shows how Israel failed to respond to all God's goodness. This was the only miracle our Lord performed that did good to no one. It tells us that grace and blessing are what God delights in. Yet judgment must still find its place, for God is righteous and must uphold His name.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

What "for ever" means here

The sentence falls on the tree as it then stood — on the nation in its own strength. It is not God abandoning His purpose for that people.

There were no figs on the barren fig tree, no response from Israel for the heart of Christ. He hungered. His hunger shall be satisfied. The actual fig tree the Lord cursed may bear no fruit for ever. Yet the fig tree of Israel shall bear fruit, even if God has to prune it for two thousand years.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

The tree itself is finished. Darby points past it. Israel was never going to bear fruit under the old covenant. The fruit comes when God brings them back through grace, under the new covenant and the Messiah — then Israel "will blossom and bud, and fill the face of the world with fruit."

A warning that outlives the nation

The Lord cursed the tree for a fault anyone can share: a show without the substance behind it.

He cursed it and it quickly withered up. This was no doubt a warning to the nation that had been so highly favoured and yet was about to crucify the very Son of God... It is easy for us to go along with Christian people. We can use the right language, sing the hymns and quote texts, and still not be sincere. We are told to beware of hypocrisy.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

Summary

- Hunger — Christ came to the tree hungry. He came to His people looking for some return for centuries of God's goodness.

- Leaves — On a fig tree, fruit comes before leaves; foliage advertises a crop. Israel had the profession of being God's people without the fruit.

- Sentence — Finding none, He gave the tree up to its own barrenness. It is His only miracle that blesses no one, because righteousness must also act.

- Withering — With every advantage in its hands, the nation in its own strength ends as a dead tree.

- Fruit at last — The curse ends that tree, not God's purpose. Writers look on to a day when Israel blossoms under grace and Christ's hunger finds its answer. Until then, the warning stands — beware of leaves without fruit.