Matthew 20:30–31

Matthew 20:30

And lo, two blind men, sitting by the wayside, having heard that Jesus was passing by, cried out saying, Have mercy on us, Lord, Son of David.

Two blind men sit by the road outside Jericho and shout for mercy, using a royal title — "Son of David." Their cry raises three questions: why Matthew counts two men, why that title, and why the people who could see were the ones who missed Him.

The Place: Jericho

The healing happens at the one city in Israel that carried a curse from Joshua's day.

The royal proclamation begins at Jericho, the city of the curse; which does not and cannot, however, prevail over the blessing. Jericho, which even in Joshua's day had witnessed the salvation of Rahab from its own doom, now witnesses the grace of the Son of David. Two blind men, sitting by the wayside, cry out to Him as this, only to find the crowd rebuke them. But they cry out all the more, until He who can never turn away from the voice of need answers and heals them. The light dawns on those sightless eyes, they see their Saviour, and then they follow Him.

F. W. Grant

Why Two Men

Matthew counts two men. That fits a rule of law Jewish readers knew well.

Matthew names two blind men. That suited the writer whom God inspired to bear witness of Jehovah-Messiah to the Jews, for the law had a well established rule that they should look for at least two witnesses. Matthew also names two demon-possessed men in an earlier account, where Mark and Luke found it enough to dwell on the more striking of the two.

William Kelly

Why "Son of David"

The title is a claim staked on prophecy. One writer says these men were taught by God what to say.

It was there that two blind men, sitting by the wayside, cried out, and most fittingly, "Lord, have mercy on us, Son of David!" God led and taught them. This was not a matter of law; they appealed to Him strictly as Messiah. Here is something remarkable. From time to time Israel had seen signs and wonders: miraculous cures, the dead even raised to life, leprosy cleansed. Yet before the Messiah we never hear of anyone giving sight to the blind. The Rabbis held that this was reserved for the Messiah.

William Kelly

Their cry stacks two names together — "Lord" beside "Son of David." One writer takes the first as more than politeness.

As the Lord goes out of Jericho, He accepts from the blind men the title He bears in relation to Israel. He is about to present Himself to Israel for the last time as having a right to this title... The world was impatient and would not trouble itself with the misery of the blind men. The Lord did not give in to that. He stops to heal them, and they follow the Son of David — a clear testimony to the reality of His title. But He presents Himself here too as the "Lord," that is, as Jehovah Himself.

J. N. Darby

The Reversal

This cry comes just before the last public presentation of the King. The irony is sharp.

If they knew nothing of the coming crisis, they were still completely in the spirit of the scene. The Holy Spirit was acting on them so that they might bear testimony to Jesus. He was now being presented in public for the last time as Heir to the throne. What a picture! Those who could see rejected their own Messiah in the blind hardness of their hearts, even though Gentiles owned Him as the born King of the Jews. And the poor blind ones, through faith, confessed Him aloud as the true King. Perhaps their main desire, their only desire, was to have their sight back. Let that be so. God still gave their faith the proper object and the right confession for that moment, for He was guiding the scene.

William Kelly

A Picture of Israel's Future

One writer reads the scene as more than history.

These two blind men sit by the road, groping in the dark, crying to the Son of David to rescue them. They are a picture of the poor and weak remnant of Israel at the end of this age... That remnant of Israel will cry to Him as Son of David and call upon Him for deliverance... The cry of the blind men was the work of the Holy Spirit. In the same way, the Spirit of God will produce the seeking, the longing and the prayer of that future remnant.

Arno Clemens Gaebelein

Summary

- Curse. The proclamation of the King starts at Jericho, the cursed city. Grace has the last word there, not the curse.

- Cry. "Son of David" is a claim on prophecy. Israel's teachers held that opening blind eyes was the sign of the Messiah alone.

- Confession. The Spirit gave them the words. Their one wish may have been sight, but God secured the right testimony at the right moment.

- Contrast. Those with working eyes rejected their King. Two blind beggars named Him aloud, and named Him right.

- Coming. The scene previews a remnant of Israel who will one day cry to the Son of David out of darkness, moved by the same Spirit.

Matthew 20:31

But the crowd rebuked them, that they might be silent. But they cried out the more, saying, Have mercy on us, Lord, Son of David.

Two blind men sit by the road outside Jericho and call after Jesus. The crowd tries to silence them, and the rebuke only makes them louder. Why would a crowd following Jesus object to a cry for mercy, and what did these men see that the crowd did not?

The title they used

The men do not beg for money. They call Jesus by the royal name of Israel's promised King. And they ask for the one miracle the teachers of the law expected from the Messiah alone.

It was there that two blind men, sitting by the road, cried out — and their words fit the moment: "Have mercy on us, O Lord, You Son of David!" God led them and taught them. Their appeal rested on no question of law, but on His place as Messiah, and it fit the scene exactly. They felt that the nation had no sense of its own blindness... It is remarkable that Israel had seen signs and wonders from time to time — miraculous cures, even the dead raised to life, and leprosy cleansed. Yet never, before the Messiah, do we hear of anyone restoring sight to the blind. The teachers of the law taught that only the Messiah would do this.

William Kelly

Matthew names two men here. One writer links that detail to the standard of evidence Israel's law required:

Matthew names two blind men. That detail suits the writer God inspired to testify of Jehovah-Messiah to the Jewish people. Their law held a well established rule: look for at least two witnesses.

William Kelly

Why the crowd tried to silence them

The rebuke is not about noise. It is about the words they shouted, and it shows where the crowd itself stood.

They had faith in Him, that He could do it. But it was the Holy Spirit who put that confession and cry in their hearts and on their lips: "Have mercy on us, Lord, Son of David." And the crowd rebuked them to make them be quiet. Surely this is proof enough of the unbelief and state of this great company of people following Him. Why would they rebuke these men and order them to be silent, if they shared the faith of these two? Calling this Jesus "Son of David" offended the crowd. But no one could silence them.

Arno Clemens Gaebelein

Faith under rebuke

The order to stop did not weaken the cry. It made it louder. One writer treats such rebuke as normal:

We must expect rebukes when faith is at work. To others it looks troublesome and unreasonable. Why? They do not have the same spiritual urgency — but it is true faith. "He cried out all the more." And the Lord will stop, though people would not. Their minds will change then, when they see that the Lord pays attention to the cry.

J. N. Darby

Another sees a purpose in the gap between the first cry and the answer:

Popular opinion will not silence faith. In fact, the Lord waited to answer until they showed this evidence of serious concern.

Leslie M. Grant

The Lord who refuses to be hurried past misery

The world around Him was impatient to move on. He stopped anyway, and in stopping He owned both names the men had given Him.

As He goes out of Jericho, the Lord accepts from the blind men the title He holds in relation to Israel. He is about to present Himself to Israel for the last time as having a right to this title. "Have mercy on us, O Son of David," say the blind men. The world was impatient and would not bother itself with the misery of the blind men. The Lord would not go along with that. He stops to heal them, and they follow the Son of David — clear testimony to the reality of His title. But He presents Himself here too as the "Lord," that is, as Jehovah Himself.

J. N. Darby

A scene that happens again

One writer reads the scene forward, to a small group in Israel in the days still to come.

We have seen in the blind men here (for Matthew shows us two of them) a picture of that remnant in the last days who will have their eyes opened to see and follow Jesus as their King. They cry after Him, and the crowd in that day will indeed "rebuke them, telling them to be silent." But they will only cry to Him the louder. He finds them in the city of the curse, and He will soon lead them up to the city of blessing, and of His rest forever.

Numerical Bible Notes

Summary

- Cry — Two men beg for mercy, not money. They call Jesus "Son of David," and ask for the one sign the teachers expected from the Messiah alone.

- Rebuke — The crowd tries to silence them, and that shows its own unbelief. What offended them was the name "Son of David."

- Louder — Expect rebuke when faith is at work. Here it only raises the cry, and the Lord waits until that earnestness shows.

- Stopped — The world was too impatient to care about two blind beggars. The Lord stopped anyway, and answered as Son of David and as Lord.

- Picture — The scene sketches a future remnant in Israel. They cry to their King while the crowd objects, and He leads them from the city of the curse to lasting blessing.