Matthew 2:1–6

Matthew 2:1 · Darby

Now Jesus having been born in Bethlehem of Judaea, in the days of Herod the king, behold magi from the east arrived at Jerusalem, saying,

Matthew fixes the birth of Jesus in real history: a town, a king, and travellers from far away. Two questions follow: when did these visitors arrive, and why were strangers seeking a King that Jerusalem was not expecting?

The Timing: How Long After the Birth?

Older versions open with "when Jesus was born," which sounds like the visitors came at once. The ESV reads "after Jesus was born." The Greek settles it.

The fact is, the word "when" in English sounds to the ordinary English reader like a note of time. Nothing in the Greek answers to it. The Greek is simply "Now Jesus having been born in Bethlehem of Judea" — a fact of all importance to His history.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The journey itself accounts for the gap.

It simply means that these easterners came after He was born. Many months, or more than a year, might have passed in between. The wise men had first seen the star in the east, most probably at the time of our Lord's birth. That confirms it. After seeing the star, they had many preparations to make before they could set out. Then they had a long way to travel. Travelling in those days was hard and slow in the eastern parts of the world.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Bethlehem: The Small Town Chosen

The town has a history with David, and its name fits the child born there.

David was anointed in the house of Jesse the Bethlehemite, so it seems this was the place of David's birth. That is why Luke 2:11 calls it the "city of David." It was also the birthplace of Jesus. Though it was "little among the thousands of Judah," it agreed better with His humiliation. Bethlehem means "house of bread." That is a very fitting name for the place the Saviour should come from as a man — He who was the living bread that came down from heaven.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Their home was somewhere else. An emperor's decree settled where the birth happened.

Joseph and Mary are at Nazareth, but Christ must be born at Bethlehem. And the decree goes out from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be registered. All the machinery of that vast empire is set in motion to bring God's purpose about. This is very comforting to His own.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Herod the King: The Wrong Man on the Throne

Matthew dates the birth by a king who was not of Israel at all.

The Herods came from Idumea. The Roman government made them rulers in name over Judea and Galilee. The name Idumea is the Greek equivalent of Edom, the land of the descendants of Esau. So the position of the Jews in the days of the Gospels was deeply humiliating. They were not only under the rule of the Gentile power at Rome, but a son of Esau ruled over them in the land... And the New Testament opens with an Edomite trying to destroy Him who was born King of the Jews. This ruler held Edom as well as Judea and Galilee.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Wise Men From the East

Who were these travellers, and how did they link a star with a Jewish king?

The Greek word here, translated "wise men," is magi. Magicians and magi are often lumped together, but they are not necessarily the same. Philo describes the magi as men who gave themselves to studying nature and to thinking on the divine perfections — men worthy to be the counsellors of kings. How the magi connected the star with "the King of the Jews" is not known. The Jews had been scattered among the nations, so the magi may have heard of the prophecy of Balaam (Numbers 24:17) or of Daniel's prophecy. God warned them in a dream not to return to Herod. In the same way He may have led them to connect these prophecies with the appearance of the star.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The Whole Gospel in Miniature

The scene sets the pattern for everything that follows in this Gospel.

The chapter gives us in a nutshell the story of the entire Gospel. Jerusalem is the City of a great King, yet the true King is not known there. In His own royal residence, His people do not know He has come. Strangers from distant lands seek Him and want to know and worship Him.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Israel had no welcome ready for its Messiah. God found one elsewhere.

God would have a fitting testimony to such a Messiah; and if the Jews were unready, He would gather from the very ends of the earth some hearts to welcome Jesus.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Born — the Greek reads "Jesus having been born." The magi came months, maybe more than a year, later — not at the manger.

- Bethlehem — "house of bread" and David's town — small, yet chosen. A Roman census brought Joseph and Mary there.

- Herod — a son of Esau ruled Jacob's land. The New Testament opens with an Edomite trying to destroy Him who was born King of the Jews.

- Strangers — men from the east came looking for the King. Balaam's or Daniel's prophecy may have stirred them.

- Pattern — the whole Gospel in miniature. His own people do not know He has come. God gathers hearts from the ends of the earth instead.

Matthew 2:2 · Darby

Where is the king of the Jews that has been born? for we have seen his star in the east, and have come to do him homage.

Strangers from the east arrive in Jerusalem. They ask for a king the city does not know it has. Their question is the first one recorded in the New Testament, and the rest of the book answers it.

The First Question of the New Testament

One writer sets it beside the Old Testament's first question, which was about fallen man.

What is man's position as a fallen sinner? Where is he, now that he has broken loose from God's control? This is the first question of the Old Testament. The rest of the Old Testament works out the answer in all its ugly detail, until we reach the closing chapter of Malachi, which ends with the significant word "curse." Then we open the New Testament. Not by accident, the first question on record there is "Where is He …?" We read on, and find the glorious answer.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Born a King

What gives Him the right to Israel's crown?

"I am the root and the descendant of David." The "I" is emphatic. His connection with Israel in royalty is asserted here. As divine He is the Root of David's house. As man He is the descendant of David. He is David's Lord and David's Son. The crown of Israel is His because of who He is, and His too by promise and prophecy. He was born King of the Jews. He died as King of the Jews. He shall reign as King of the Jews.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

It is Gentiles who acknowledge Him by that title.

The Gentiles formally acknowledge Him as King of the Jews. The will of God guides them, acting on the hearts of their wise men.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

His Star

One writer weighs how the Greek tense should come across in English. He quotes the older translation of the verse.

"We saw his star in the east." This is merely a historical fact. There is nothing wrong in the translation, but "we have seen it" has quite a different force to the mind. "We have seen" is a present, lasting effect in their minds. His star had been revealed to them, and under the present influence of that they had come to worship.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why should a star mean a king? The link goes back to Balaam, a prophet in the east.

Balaam was the last man known in the east as a prophet, before the Gentiles were broken in the presence of Israel. He was certainly a wicked man, but God used him to speak the most remarkable predictions of Israel's coming glory. And that very prophecy had closed with a reference to the Star that should rise out of Jacob. Hundreds of years later, traces of this prophecy still lingered among the people of the east.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer rules out every natural explanation of what they saw.

The star was surely supernatural. Kepler pointed to a conjunction of planets. But no conjunction of planets could be called a star. And none could have produced such a complete conviction in men who knew the heavens well. It was, in fact, a beautiful witness of the God of nature to the men of nature.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

"Come to Worship Him"

They travelled to give, not to get. Their gifts suited a king. What they did before giving suited more than a king.

These princes brought their gifts, gifts such as nobles from far away would bring to a king. But "when they saw the child with Mary His mother," they recognised His divine glory first, and they "fell down and worshipped Him." Then they acknowledged His kingship and brought out their gifts. They worshipped God and gave gifts to the King.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

The City That Knew the Answer

The men who could answer the question from Scripture did answer it. Then they did nothing.

With the greatest readiness these men of the Bible turned up Micah 5:2 and read out to the king the well-known words. Yet not one step did these men take in the direction of Bethlehem to see if the promised King was there. There is nothing more heartless than mere Bible knowledge without faith.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Their loss was not information. It was the voice of God.

God spoke to the wise men, first by a star and then by a dream. To the religious men in Jerusalem He did not speak at all. There had been days when the high priest among them had been in touch with God by means of the Urim and Thummim. Now God was silent to them.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Question. The New Testament opens with the search God's own city never started: "Where is He?" — asked by outsiders.

- Star. A supernatural light drew men who watched the heavens — a witness of the God of nature to the men of nature.

- Seeking. The scribes had the verse; the strangers took the road. Bible knowledge without faith is heartless.

- Sovereign. The crown is His because of who He is: born King of the Jews, crucified as King, set to reign as King.

- Submission. The search ended in worship. They saw His divine glory first, then gave a king's gifts.

Matthew 2:3 · Darby

But Herod the king having heard [of it], was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him;

The birth of a King should have set the city celebrating. Instead it put the city on edge. The verse raises two questions: why would a king fear a baby, and why would the whole capital of God's people share that fear?

Herod's throne

The trouble Herod felt was personal. He held the title, and the arrival of the real owner of it left him no room.

Herod was king at Jerusalem, so he was deeply shaken by the announcement that the King of the Jews was born. It touched him very closely, because he knew that if the true Messiah had come, he could no longer be king himself. Besides, the news that God's King had come was enough to alarm the conscience and awaken fear and dread. Others felt the same... There were no thunderclaps or lightning, no threats, no sound of alarm; yet they were troubled... The king's troubled state of mind led him to make inquiry... but with all the unquestionable evidence in front of him, he did not think the Messiah worth seeking.

Modernised from H. H. SnellOriginal wording

The city had its own reason to be uneasy. Living under a ruler like Herod, they could guess what his panic would cost them.

Herod, the king, was troubled and all Jerusalem with him. He feared for his throne, which was not his. Jerusalem knew what Herod's fear meant — rebellion, bloodshed, and suffering.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The whole city

Herod's alarm is easy to explain. The second half of the verse is the shock. These were the people who claimed to be waiting for this very birth.

It is not surprising, we say again, that Herod should be troubled when he heard the news, for here was apparently a rival claimant to his throne. But we read that "he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him." So the coming of the Saviour produced not celebration but dismay among the very people who claimed to be waiting for Him! Something was terribly wrong, since so far this was only the recoil of their twisted instincts. They had not seen Him. He had done nothing yet. They only sensed that His coming would mean the spoiling of their pleasures instead of the fulfilment of their hopes.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The word "all" leaves no group standing outside the reaction.

"All Jerusalem" is sweeping enough, surely. The expression would include the learned and the unlearned, old and young, clergy and laity. All Jerusalem was troubled!

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Scripture without desire

The men Herod called in could answer his question instantly from Micah's prophecy. Their accuracy only made their coldness plainer.

Look at the words, "and all Jerusalem with him." Let each of us underline that word "all" in our minds. It clearly means Pharisees and Sadducees included. True, these religious men had a knowledge of their Scriptures, for they could quote Micah 5:2 at once in reply to Herod's demand. Yet the only practical use they made of their knowledge was to give Herod an opportunity to kill the infant Messiah.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Knowing the text is not the same as wanting the One it speaks of.

Yet these men did not take one step toward Bethlehem to see if the promised King was there. There is nothing more heartless than mere Bible knowledge without faith. Strange as it may seem, it is possible to go down to an eternal hell with a mind crammed with Bible truth.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Strangers welcome Him

The men who travelled furthest were the ones who came to worship.

When the first breath of this news reaches Jerusalem, the result is dismay in everyone. The king, the priests, the scribes — all are in turmoil. There was no heart for Jesus. But God will always have a testimony. If the Jews will not have Him, the Gentiles come; and it is grace that brings this about... Jerusalem sides with the false king, and does not care to receive Him. Those who were despised as dogs have the honour of truly recognising the claims of the Messiah. The Jews themselves had to teach them the first lessons of prophecy.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same news today

Herod's reaction becomes a mirror. News about Christ still troubles people. The question is what that trouble leads to.

But does news of Christ trouble you now? Then you are like Herod. I wish to God that you were troubled, but on the right account. I wish you were anxious about your soul and crying, "What must I do to be saved?"

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Troubled, not glad. There were no thunderclaps and no threats, yet the whole city was shaken. The birth that should have brought celebration brought dismay instead.

- Troubled by a throne. Herod feared for a crown that was not his. If the true Messiah had come, he could no longer be king himself.

- Troubled before He acted. He had done nothing yet, and they had not even seen Him. They sensed His coming meant the spoiling of their pleasures. That instinct alone showed something was terribly wrong.

- Troubled with Scripture open. The scribes quoted the right verse and never walked to Bethlehem. Bible knowledge without desire for Christ served a murderer's plot.

- Troubled, or seeking? Strangers from the east came to worship Him. The city next door sided with the false king. The same news still divides people that way.

Matthew 2:4 · Darby

and, assembling all the chief priests and scribes of the people, he inquired of them where the Christ should be born.

News of a newborn King has reached Jerusalem. The man on the throne calls in the nation's religious experts and asks them one question. The scene is strange. A king fears the Messiah, and the Bible teachers can say where He is without going to Him.

Why Herod Called Them

Herod's summons was not curiosity. He held the title "king of the Jews" himself. The news struck at everything he owned. The answer he got did not settle him.

Herod was king at Jerusalem, so he was deeply shaken by the announcement that the King of the Jews was born. It touched him very closely, because he knew that if the true Messiah had come, he could no longer be king himself. Besides, the news that God's King had come was enough to alarm the conscience and stir up fear and dread... The king's troubled state of mind led him to make inquiry. He first gathered the men he judged best able to give him information. He demanded that they tell him where the Christ was to be born. But though their reply was correct, it did not relieve his trouble.

Modernised from H. H. SnellOriginal wording

What the Gathering Was

Herod's question is about "the Christ" — the Messiah the prophets promised. Look at who he called in and how they replied.

By order of the king they were called together, not in a special session of the Sanhedrin, but in a larger gathering. He commanded all the chief priests and scribes to present themselves and to bring out the scrolls of the law, the prophets and the writings. Now Herod puts his question: where is the Messiah to be born? The answer comes at once from the prophecies of Micah, at the start of his fifth chapter: Bethlehem of Judea. There was no dissenting voice. They were all orthodox and knew the Scriptures perfectly. But it was head knowledge, and it never touched their consciences.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Where Herod Went for Facts

Notice where Herod had to turn when he wanted facts he could trust.

It is a very striking thing. If you want solid information you must go to the Scriptures. Even that godless man Herod had to go to Scripture. Where did Herod get his information? From the pages of Scripture. And where do men get real light and truth today? Again, it is from the Scriptures.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Right Answers, No Steps Taken

Herod called these men in as the experts, and they performed perfectly. They never acted on what they read out to him.

With the utmost readiness these men of the Bible turned up Micah 5:2 and read out the well-known words to the king... Yet not one step did these men take in the direction of Bethlehem to see if the promised King was there. There is nothing more heartless than mere Bible knowledge without faith. Strange as it may seem, it is possible to go down to an eternal hell with a mind crammed full of Bible truth.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The test of the moment was not whether they could answer, but whether they wanted the One they were answering about.

They knew the answer (from Micah 5:2), but they seemed to have no more desire for Christ than Herod did. Surely any honest reality of faith would have gladly desired to join the wise men in such a quest.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

God's Silence Toward the Experts

These men should have been the closest to God of anyone in Israel. Their high priest once got answers from Him directly. See who was actually hearing from Him now.

The shepherds of Luke 2 knew of His birth within a few hours. These eastern astronomers knew within a few days, or weeks at the most. But several months must have passed before the priests and scribes had the smallest hint of what had happened. God spoke to the wise men first by a star and then by a dream. To the religious leaders in Jerusalem He did not speak at all. Yet there had been days when the high priest among them was in touch with God through the Urim and Thummim. Now God was silent to them.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Study That Stays Lifeless

Their careful study is a warning, not a model. It leaves a rule for everyone who reads the Bible.

People generally felt that someone was coming. They studied the letter of the word with such remarkable care that they could say where the Messiah would be born. Yet that study was lifeless. Unless we connect everything with Jesus, we fail to get the profit from any portion of Scripture.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Fear asks. The birth of the true King threatened Herod's throne, so he called the council. Their correct answer left his trouble exactly where it was.

- Knowledge answers. The chief priests and scribes replied at once, and no one disagreed. Their facts were flawless. Their consciences were untouched.

- Scripture supplies. Even a godless king had to go to the written word for anything solid. That is still where men find light and truth.

- Faith walks. Not one of these Bible men took a step toward Bethlehem. A mind crammed with Bible truth is no proof of a heart that wants Christ.

- Silence follows. God spoke to strangers from the east by a star and a dream. To the men holding the scrolls He said nothing. Study stays lifeless until we connect everything with Jesus.

Matthew 2:5 · Darby

And they said to him, In Bethlehem of Judaea; for thus it is written through the prophet

Herod's question gets an immediate answer from the scribes. It comes not from the star, and not from palace guesswork, but from a written line of prophecy. The striking thing is how much these men know and how little they do with it.

Scripture answers what the star could not

The men from the east had a sign in the sky, but not an address.

When these strangers saw the star, they set out for Jerusalem, the traditional royal capital. When they arrived, God meets them; and it is remarkable how He does so. It is by His word, and His word interpreted by those who had not the smallest interest of heart in the Messiah. They were quite right in their interpretation; they knew where Messiah was to be born.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Even Herod had to open the book. There was nowhere else to go for a reliable answer.

It is a very striking thing that if you want solid information you must go to the Scriptures. Even that godless man Herod had to go to Scripture. Where did Herod get his information? From the pages of Scripture. And where do people get real light and truth today? Again, it is from the Scriptures.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The town God named

The prophet named a small town, not the capital. Both its size and its name fit the One born there.

David was anointed in the house of Jesse the Bethlehemite. So it appears to have been the place of David's birth, and this is why Luke 2:11 calls it the "city of David." It was also the birthplace of Jesus. Though it was "little among the thousands of Judah," that matched His lowliness all the better. Bethlehem means "house of bread." That is a very fitting name for a place from which the Saviour should come as a man — He who was the living bread that came down from heaven.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

History bent to fit the prophecy

Mary and Joseph did not live in Bethlehem. Getting them there took an empire — and that is exactly what God used.

The greatest interest of Bethlehem is that it marks the birthplace not only of David, but of his greater Son. God is overruling all, He brings this about. Joseph and Mary are at Nazareth, but Christ must be born at Bethlehem. And the decree goes out from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be enrolled. All the machinery of that vast empire is set in motion to bring God's purpose about. This is very comforting to His own.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Correct answer, unmoved feet

These teachers gave the right answer and then stayed where they were.

The scribes in Herod's court hold the prophetic word in their minds, clear, full and correct. They can teach it to others. It is bright and exact in their intellect and memory. But they make no use of it themselves. A solemn sight indeed! They sent the men of the east on their way from Jerusalem to Bethlehem in the bright light of the prophet Micah. But they do not take one step along that road themselves.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Writers press this as a warning rather than as a curiosity of history.

Yet not one step did these men take in the direction of Bethlehem to see if the promised King was there. There is nothing more heartless than mere Bible knowledge without faith. Strange as it may seem, it is possible to go down to an eternal hell with the mind crammed with Bible truth.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

A rebuke carried by strangers

There was a purpose in God letting visitors from another nation ask the question first.

Through these Gentiles He sent a testimony to Jerusalem about the birth of the Messiah. God knew how to do this, and to rebuke, through their testimony, those who should above all have watched for and welcomed their own Messiah.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The half they did not read out

Micah's sentence does not stop where the scribes stopped it. The next clause — quoted here from an older English Bible — says who this ruler is.

These scribes quoted Micah 5:2, and they mentioned the "Governor." But they chose to leave out the wonderful words that follow: "whose goings forth have been from everlasting," or, as the margin has it, "from the days of eternity." They hid the truth that this King was the Lord, Jehovah!

Modernised from J Wilson SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Written. Micah's prophecy fixed the birthplace long before the birth. The answer to Herod was a quotation, not an opinion.

- Written for the seeker. The star brought the travellers as far as Jerusalem. Only Scripture told them where to go next, and even a godless king had to consult it.

- Written, then arranged. Joseph and Mary lived in Nazareth. God set a whole empire's census in motion to bring the birth to Bethlehem, "the house of bread," the town of David.

- Written but half-quoted. The scribes named the Governor. They stopped short of "whose goings forth have been from everlasting" — the words that show this King is the Lord Himself.

- Written but not obeyed. They gave directions they never followed. Bible knowledge without love for Christ leaves a person right where it found them.

Matthew 2:6 · Darby

And *thou* Bethlehem, land of Juda, art in no wise the least among the governors of Juda; for out of thee shall go forth a leader who shall shepherd my people Israel.

Herod asks the scribes in his court where the Christ will be born. They answer at once by quoting Micah. The verse names a small town, a Ruler, and a people. It also leaves one question hanging: why did the men who knew the place never go there themselves?

A small town made famous

Bethlehem had nothing to recommend it. The prophecy is the only reason anyone remembers it.

Bethlehem was of small consequence in itself, insignificant among the thousands of Judah, yet it was to leap into undying fame. And why? "Out of you shall He come forth to Me who is to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting."

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

(The ESV puts that last line as "whose coming forth is from of old, from ancient days.") The town was not the only lowly thing lifted up by Him.

Here the Messiah, the ruler, appears in many glories, both personal and official. And poor Bethlehem, little in Judah, is honoured because of Him. His mother was the poor carpenter's wife of Nazareth. His birthplace was the poor town of Bethlehem. Both take honour and blessing because of Him.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Why the wording differs from Micah

Set this verse next to Micah 5:2 and the words do not match. Micah calls the town little; here it is by no means least.

The Gospel writer gives the sense rather than the exact words of the Hebrew or of the Greek Old Testament. Here the literal translation of the Hebrew does agree with the Greek.

Modernised from VariousOriginal wording

The half the scribes never quoted

Micah's sentence does not stop at the Ruler. The scribes' answer does.

"Bethlehem," said the scribes, and they quoted the prophet's words about the "Governor" who would rule God's people Israel (Micah 5:2). But they chose to leave out the wonderful words that follow: "whose goings forth have been from everlasting," or, as the margin note puts it, "from the days of eternity." They hid what this King really was: the Lord, Jehovah!

Modernised from J Wilson SmithOriginal wording

Those omitted words settle who this Ruler is.

He was born in Bethlehem. But that is not all, for "His goings forth have been of old from everlasting." He was a divine person. In grace He became a baby in Bethlehem, but He was Jehovah the true God of Israel.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Shepherd-rule

Everything turns on the verb behind "rule" in this verse.

poimainō means to feed cattle, as in Luke 17:7. It is also used as a picture of feeding the flock or church of God (Acts 20:28; 1 Peter 5:2). Four times it is translated "rule," where it applies to the people of Israel and to the nations in a future day: Matthew 2:6; Revelation 2:27; 12:5; 19:15. It comes from the root poimēn, "a shepherd," and may be translated "to shepherd," because it means care or oversight as well as feeding.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Micah's picture of the coming Ruler is more than a prediction.

That is God's thought of a true ruler… The true Shepherd of the sheep will never give up the service to which love set Him apart, whatever the circumstances. With love, rule is service, and how blessed the time when love alone shall rule!

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

"My people Israel"

The last words of the verse say whose Shepherd He is.

He was born into this world as the heir to David's throne. That throne had stood empty for centuries, waiting for its rightful and expected occupant. By birth He was the Shepherd of Israel (Matthew 2:6, Greek), for the Old Testament Scriptures use that title for kings… So all Israel were the sheep whose interests and welfare the Son of David would be expected to promote.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Right answer, unmoved heart

The tragedy of the verse is who spoke it.

The scribes in Herod's court hold the prophetic word in their minds, clear, full and exact. They can teach it to others… But they make no use of it themselves. A solemn sight indeed! They sent the men from the east on their way from Jerusalem to Bethlehem in the bright light of the prophet Micah. Yet they never take one step along that road themselves.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Summary

- Small town. Bethlehem was insignificant among the thousands of Judah. The Ruler born there gave it undying fame.

- Eternal Person. Micah's next line calls His goings forth "from everlasting." The Baby of Bethlehem was a divine person. The scribes quoted up to that line and stopped.

- Shepherd rule. The word for "rule" is poimainō, to shepherd; it carries care and feeding, not only authority.

- His people. By birth He is the Shepherd of Israel, David's heir to a throne empty for centuries, with all Israel as His sheep.

- Cold knowledge. The scribes pointed out the road to Bethlehem and never walked it. A right answer is not the same as taking the road yourself.