Matthew 17:1–8

Matthew 17:1 · Darby

And after six days Jesus takes with [him] Peter, and James, and John his brother, and brings them up into a high mountain apart.

This verse opens the account of the transfiguration. It follows straight on from what Jesus had just said about the Son of Man coming in His kingdom. Every part of this short line carries weight: the counted days, the three named men, the climb, and the words "by themselves".

A Promise Kept Within the Week

This is not a fresh start but a fulfilment. The count of days and the choice of men both point back to words Jesus had spoken six days earlier.

So, "After six days" (a type of the ordinary span of work down here), "Jesus took with him Peter and James, and John his brother, and led them up a high mountain by themselves" (v. 1). That is, He takes chosen witnesses. It was only a testimony to the kingdom — the sample of what He had referred to when He said, "There are some standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The glory of that kingdom rests on the Man at its centre, who suffered before He was exalted.

The glory of the kingdom, as we saw, depends on His being the Son of Man. He is the exalted Man who had once suffered, and all glory is committed into His hands. He had at every cost retrieved the honour of God, and He is to make the blessing of man effective.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Six Days Or Eight?

Luke dates the same event "about eight days after", and readers notice the gap. Writers treat this as a difference of counting, not of fact.

Matthew writes from a Jewish point of view, where the seventh day is the day of glory. So he says "After six days". Luke looks at things from another angle, the resurrection aspect that the eighth day shows. So he says "about eight days". Both are correct. Matthew does not include the two end days, while Luke does. Exactly six days — complete days — came between the prophecy and its fulfilment. There is no discrepancy or mistake in this, or in any other Scripture.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Another writer looks past the count to what the six days picture.

The "after six days" that opens the account, here and in Mark, points, I believe, to the final character of what this scene pictures. It comes after the time of work and of overcoming is finished.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Why These Three

Matthew names three men, and what happened to them later shows how much hung on them.

John, Peter and James were the three witnesses Peter has in mind — they were on the holy mount, the mount of transfiguration. These three disciples were the eyewitnesses whom Satan tried to remove. He wanted to stop any divine and perfect testimony about the prophetic word, for that is the point before us.

Modernised from Arend RemmersOriginal wording

The choice also had a purpose for the three men themselves.

What I said about the transfiguration was that those three men were going to be pillars (see Gal. 2), and that this was to clear and strengthen their faith.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Led Up, And Alone

The verb behind "led them up" carries a second sense in the New Testament.

The other word is ἀναφέρω, 'to bring up', and so 'to offer up'. In Matt. 17:1, Jesus 'brings up' Peter and the others; and in Luke 24:51 the Lord was 'carried up' into heaven. Hebrews 7:27 uses this word both of the high priest 'offering up' sacrifices and of Jesus who 'offered up' Himself.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Matthew never names the mountain. One writer draws a lesson from both the height and the small company.

The Lord takes only three disciples up with Him to witness it. They show us that if we want such disclosures, we need a closeness to Him that only a few have. The "high mountain" was most probably Hermon, near Caesarea Philippi. But it is not named, and even if we were sure, we could base nothing on it. Earth in fact has no knowledge of the heights where such visions of the future may be enjoyed.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Glory To Steady Them

Hard days lay ahead for the Lord and for these three. The glimpse of glory came first, and with a purpose.

The Lord Jesus had taken Peter, James, and John with Him. He brought them up into a high mountain apart, to show them a sample of His future glory. That sight would strengthen their spirits against the trying scenes through which both He and they had yet to pass.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Promise — the count of days ties the scene to the words Jesus had just spoken about the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.

- Days — Matthew's "six days" and Luke's "about eight days" agree. Matthew counts only the days in between; Luke counts both ends as well.

- Witnesses — the Lord chose three men, so the testimony would be complete; Satan later went after them as the ones who had seen it.

- Ascent — the word for leading them up is the word for offering up. Scripture leaves the height unnamed, and only those close to Him climb it.

- Purpose — the Lord gave this sample of glory to men facing suffering, so that the sight would hold them steady.

Matthew 17:2 · Darby

And he was transfigured before them. And his face shone as the sun, and his garments became white as the light;

On a mountain, Jesus looked like any other man. Then He blazed with light in front of three of His disciples. Where did that light come from, and what was it meant to show?

Glory that broke out from inside

Nothing about the Lord's body marked Him out as He climbed the mountain. One writer presses this point before explaining the change:

When He went up the mountain with His disciples, He was, to all outward appearance, only a man among men. To the natural eye there was nothing to distinguish Him from Peter, James, or John... But on the mountain this amazing change (called transfiguration) happened. What was its nature? May we not say this? It was His essential purity or holiness breaking out and flooding the vessel that held it. So He stood before His disciples as a being of light. For "his face shone like the sun, and his clothes became white as light." This vessel — His body — screened these rays of His beauty and glory at other times. But now nothing held them back. They shone through and lit up both His body and His clothes, so that He stood there truly glorified before their eyes.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Not a borrowed shining

Moses' face once shone too. One writer marks the difference, and where the scene points:

In the middle of His service of humiliation our Lord was for a little while transfigured. It was not like Moses, whose face shone because he had been near the divine Presence. Our Lord was with His own here below... "His face shone like the sun, and his clothes became white as light. And behold, there appeared to them Moses and Elijah, talking with him." It is a small picture of His kingdom. In that kingdom there will be risen and changed saints, along with others in their natural bodies, and the Lord at the centre of it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Two glories: face and clothing

Writers read the two details as two glories — one of position, one of character:

"His face shone like the sun" would suggest a place of supreme power and authority. "And his clothes became white as light" would refer to His intrinsic purity. He had always moved in the light, and there was no darkness in Him at all.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Another writer ties the sun to a promise, and the white clothing to His coming rule:

The Saviour's face shone like the sun. As the Sun of righteousness He will yet rise upon this poor earth (Mal. 4:2). The sun is the emblem of supreme authority, which God will before long put into the hands of the Crucified. His clothing, too, became white as the light. It suggested the absolute purity of His coming rule.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The same word for believers

One writer follows the same word into the letters, where it describes believers:

If that is so, Christ, as He was in His transfiguration, is the presentation of what believers will be when they are glorified with Him... Christ on the mountain shows us what His people will be when He comes to receive them to Himself; but this mighty change is morally begun in them while here. So in Rom. 12:2 the apostle says, "Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed (transfigured) by the renewal of your mind"... This Scripture shows that our transfiguration must begin from within... But how is this to be done? Passing now to 2 Cor. 3:18, we find the answer... "We all, with unveiled face, beholding the glory of the Lord"... it is by beholding that we "are being transformed (transfigured) into the same image from one degree of glory to another."

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

What the vision showed about His people

The scene was not only about Christ. Moses and Elijah were part of the message:

The whole purpose of the vision was to show the church her portion in the glory. The God of all grace has called us to His eternal glory by Christ Jesus, and that is what this scene showed. So the transfiguration passed on the Lord, on Moses and Elijah — they all appeared in the same glory. Moses and Elijah were no longer what they had once been on earth, and neither was the Lord Himself. Their lowly bodies had been made like His glorious body. He appeared for a little while in glory, and they appeared in glory with Him.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Commentators differ in emphasis. Some read the scene as a preview of Christ's kingdom on earth. Others read it as a sight of the heavenly portion of His people.

Summary

- Veiled. The light did not fall on Jesus; it came out of Him. His body had been screening those rays all along.

- Unborrowed. Moses shone because he had been near God. Christ shone with His own glory, giving a small picture of His kingdom.

- Twofold. The face like the sun speaks of supreme authority; the clothing white as light speaks of purity with no darkness in it.

- Shared. The same word describes what happens to believers: begun now by a renewed mind, completed when we are glorified with Him.

- Beheld. The route from His glory to ours is looking — beholding the glory of the Lord, we are being transformed into the same image.

Matthew 17:3 · Darby

and lo, Moses and Elias appeared to them talking with him.

Three disciples climb a mountain with Jesus. His face begins to shine. Two men from Israel's past are standing there, talking with Him. The verse raises the obvious questions: why these two, why are they talking, and why does the scene not last?

Two Pillars of Israel

Each of the two stands at the head of an era. Each left the world in a way no one else did.

Moses was the man through whom God gave the law. Elijah was the great example of the prophets, who called the people back to the law of Jehovah. They were the pillars of the Jewish system. Every true Israelite looked back to them with the deepest reverence. One of them was the only Jew taken to heaven without passing through death. The other had a singular honour: Jehovah Himself buried him, so that he should not become an object of worship after his death.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Their appearing together also marks an ending.

The law and the prophets are the two great witnesses. They come in here for this reason: everything was about to disappear, and Jesus would be left alone. At the end everything goes. Moses is gone, Elijah is gone, and Christ alone is left, and remains for evermore.

Modernised from W T TurpinOriginal wording

A Preview of the Kingdom

The scene is small, but it holds the shape of something much bigger.

It is a miniature of His kingdom. In it will be the risen and changed saints, along with others in their natural bodies, and the Lord the centre of all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Writers see the two men as pictures of two groups of believers. They are careful, though, about how far the picture goes.

Elijah represents the saints who have been caught up to heaven without dying (2 Kings 2:11). Moses represents those who have died and been raised again — though Moses himself had not been raised. In what body he appeared we do not know. Peter, James and John illustrate the earthly side of the coming kingdom.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Talking With Him

Matthew tells us that they were talking. What did they talk about?

They "spoke of His decease which He should accomplish at Jerusalem." Just before the scene on the Mount, and again just after it, the Lord speaks of His death, but we read "they understood not." On the plain the disciples are dull of hearing. On the Mount there is divine intelligence in the mind of heaven and the heart of Jesus. There Moses and Elijah share with Christ what fills His heart. They lose sight of the enmity of men; they no longer think of the death of Christ as something wicked hands brought about, but of "His decease which He should accomplish."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

(Older translations read "decease"; the ESV says "departure.")

The subject does not stay on the mountain.

Surely this will be our joy for ever, when we are in glory with Christ — to dwell on this theme: His decease accomplished at Jerusalem.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Known By Name

The disciples had never met either man, yet they knew them at once.

And of course Moses and Elijah were known. Their individuality was not swallowed up by death, or by removal from the earth without death. This should settle the question people often ask: shall we know each other in resurrection glory? Of course we will. The disciples easily recognised Moses and Elijah; in the same way every saint will be known.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A Place Below the Son

Peter put the three on one level. The voice from the cloud did not.

The moment anyone puts Moses and Elijah on a level with Jesus, they both disappear. A voice came out of the cloud, saying, "This is my beloved Son; listen to Him." It does not say, "Listen to them," but "Listen to Him." Christ in His wondrous grace shows Moses and Elijah as His companions in the glory. But the moment Peter speaks the thought that would place them on an equality with Christ, they must both vanish from the scene.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Grace After Failure

Moses lost the promised land through one failure. The mountain answers that story.

Moses loses Canaan through speaking rashly with his lips. But does that change God's intention to bless him for ever?... We afterwards see Moses on the mount of glory, with the Lord, at the transfiguration. There he could surely look back and see the path along which the goodness of the Lord had led him, and the links of the chain that we cannot see.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Witnesses. Moses gave the law and Elijah called Israel back to it — the two pillars of the old order, standing beside the One who outlasts them both.

- Companions. God buried one of them; the other never died at all. Together they picture the raised and the changed sharing His glory.

- Conversation. In the brightest scene on earth, the theme is His death at Jerusalem — heaven's chosen subject, and ours for ever.

- Recognition. They were known at sight, so individuality survives death and glory; we will know each other there.

- Subordination. When Peter levels them with Christ they vanish, and the voice says "listen to Him" — the two witnesses point away from themselves to Jesus alone.

Matthew 17:4 · Darby

And Peter answering said to Jesus, Lord, it is good we should be here. If thou wilt, let us make here three tabernacles for thee one, and for Moses one, and one for Elias.

Peter had just confessed Jesus as the Son of the living God. Now he sees his Master shine with Moses and Elijah, and he speaks words that God Himself corrects.

Words spoken without the Lord's mind

Two other Gospel writers add that Peter did not know what he was saying. (The commentators quote an older translation: "tabernacles" where the ESV has "tents.")

As the scene of glory burst on him, he said to Jesus, "Lord, it is good for us to be here: if you will, let us make here three tabernacles; one for you, and one for Moses, and one for Elijah." Luke adds, "not knowing what he said"; while Mark reads that "he did not know what to say, for they were terrified." This shows how dangerous it is for a believer to speak. He must first be sure he has the Lord's mind in what he says.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Three shelters for three persons

Peter offers the Lord and the two visitors the same thing.

Peter counted it a great thing to see His Master with saints so renowned and glorious. ... He made the natural but fatal mistake of equalising all three. Yet only a short time before, he had confessed His Master to be not only the Messiah, but the Son of the living God. He ought not to have gone so wrong.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The three accounts record Peter addressing Jesus differently, and Matthew preserves the highest of the three titles.

In the account of the Transfiguration, Mark 9:5 has "Rabbi," Matt. 17:4 "Lord," Luke 9:33 "Master." It is easy to see that for these a mere difference of translation may arise.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Where the error starts

Peter meant his plan as an honour to Jesus.

It was sheer forgetfulness of the personal dignity of Jesus. "Let us make three tabernacles," one for his Master and the other two for His servants, Moses and Elijah. Would he, then, put his Master, the Lord of all, on the same level with the head of the law and the chief of the prophets? Peter thought this would be great honour for Him! He was altogether astray. The root of all wrong is depreciation of Jesus. The power for all that is good is faith in His glory. Thus Peter, in a human way, seeking to honour Jesus, in reality lowers Him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Glory without the cross

In the chapter before, Peter had objected to the Lord's death. His suggestion here reaches for the same result by a different route.

Behind Peter's words lurked another thought. It was the very same attempt to keep the Lord from obeying to the point of death on the cross. That attempt appeared in the temptations in the wilderness. It hid in Peter's "God be favourable to You." Here it comes once more. Peter would have a Christ in glory and the state of the kingdom there without the cross, and he is even willing with his two companions to work for it, for he says, "Let us make here three tabernacles."

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Dying, not dwelling

A tent is for staying. The Lord's own announcement pointed the other way.

Instead of deeply admiring the Lord Himself, he says, "Lord, it is good for us to be here." Then he adds his own proposal: "if you will, let us make three tabernacles." Are we not also too quick to propose what we should do for the Lord? In such a case, man's natural desires will come to the fore, for a present kingdom with man exalted. The Lord had before spoken of His death, not of dwelling in tabernacles.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Separate shelters, divided people

Three tents would mean three centres.

So God rebuked the thought of Peter to make three tabernacles — "One for You, one for Moses, and one for Elijah." There was only One whom they should honour in this way. He alone is the centre of His people: "This is My beloved Son, hear Him." Do you think no man could ever be made a rival centre where God intends unity? Then read the first chapter of 1 Corinthians: "Each one of you says, I follow Paul, or I follow Apollos, or I follow Cephas, or I follow Christ," which the apostle rebukes with: "Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?"

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The purpose of the vision

Peter's delight was real, but the vision had a purpose beyond it.

Peter was full of joy in the presence of this glory, and he wanted to stay there. Such was the delight his soul was taking in the scene. This may give us some idea of the blessedness of Israel and the nations in the kingdom of the Son of Man, when this glory of His appears. But all this was merely incidental. The single purpose of the vision was to show the church her portion in the glory.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Good — Peter was right that the scene was good. He was wrong to speak without the Lord's mind.

- Level — his three tents put Moses and Elijah alongside the Son of God. Lowering Jesus is the root of all wrong.

- Shortcut — tents on the mountain meant the kingdom now: glory without the cross.

- Centre — three tents make three centres. God's people have only One, and rival centres split the church.

- Purpose — the vision was not a place to settle. It was a preview of the church's portion in the glory.

Matthew 17:5 · Darby

While he was still speaking, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them, and lo, a voice out of the cloud, saying, *This* is my beloved Son, in whom I have found my delight hear him.

Peter had just offered to build three shelters — one each for Jesus, Moses and Elijah — when the Father cut him off mid-sentence. What follows is one of the few times God spoke aloud on earth, and every word is about His Son.

The Father Interrupts

Peter's suggestion put the Son on the same level as two servants. The answer came from above, not from Jesus:

This was not the crushing rebuke of the Lord, who knew that in a ruined world all blessing for man and all glory for God hung on His being rejected. It was the Father's voice out of the excellent glory. The Father then displayed His jealousy for the honour of His Son. He would not allow the law-giver or the law-restorer to stand on such a level. They were servants, to be honoured in the place He gave them. But His beloved Son! — there were His delights.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Bright Cloud

These men knew that cloud at once:

"There came a bright cloud and overshadowed them" — the well-known sign of God's presence, which had led Israel through the desert long ago and lived in the sanctuary — "and behold a Voice out of the cloud which said: This is My beloved Son; in whom I am well pleased; hear Him." No wonder that "when the disciples heard this, they fell on their faces and were terrified." In fact, the Most Holy Place stood open before them. They were standing where only the high priest could stand, and only once a year, with incense to cover him and the blood of atonement. And they were ordinary men, with no sacrifice in their hand and no incense to cover them.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Yet the cloud did not shut them out. It covered them, and the voice came from inside it:

Now Peter and the others had entered into the cloud; and so we get the wonderful fact that saints may stand in the glory the voice comes from, and there, in that glory, share the Father's delight in His beloved Son. God calls us not only into fellowship with His Son, Jesus Christ, but into fellowship with the Father. The Father lets us share His own satisfaction in His beloved Son.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

"This Is My Beloved Son"

The Father does not announce Him by the title Israel was waiting for:

It is not, This is your Messiah — He was that, of course, but He brings out the grand New Testament revelation of Jesus. He reveals Him as His own beloved Son, and His unqualified delight in Him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Notice how the Father words it:

As one has said, "the Father does not say, This is the Son whom you ought to adore and admire, but He tells us His own thoughts about Him." We are not simply reminded that Christ is our Beloved, as the bride in the Song of Songs can say, "My Beloved is mine, and I am His." We hear the Father saying, "This is My Beloved."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

"In Whom I Am Well Pleased"

Older translations render the ESV's "with whom I am well pleased; listen to him" as "in whom I am well pleased; hear him." The Father had said the same words once before, at the Jordan. Hearing them twice shows a pleasure that never shifted with the Son's circumstances:

And that same voice, "This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased," sounds a second time. It was heard on the holy mountain as it was on the bank of the Jordan — on the day of the transfiguration as at the baptism. The transfiguration was a pledge and picture of the Kingdom, as the baptism was His entry on His ministry and witness. But the same delight stirs in the heart of the Father, where the Son lay. It stirs whether God's eye follows Him along the lonely path of Jesus the Servant in a defiled world, or sees Him on the heights as King of glory in the coming kingdom.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

"Hear Him"

The Father added two words this time that He had not spoken at the Jordan. He added them the moment Peter tried to level the Son with the servants:

He did not say "hear him" at the baptism of Jesus by John. He took it for granted, so to speak, that once He had proclaimed Him Son of God, everybody would listen to Him. But when Peter would put the Saviour on the same level with the Lawgiver and the Reformer, the Father steps in at once and sweeps Moses and Elijah off the scene. Do not forget this. Moses is gone, for the law could not save you: Elijah's day is gone by, for reformation could not meet your case.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

This is not contempt for the older witnesses. It is a matter of proportion:

The dignity of the others is not denied, nor their due position slighted. To assert the glory of the sun in the heavens is in no way to despise the stars. God set Moses in his place, and Elias in another, as He saw fit; but what were they compared with His Son?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Fear Answered by a Touch

The voice flattened them. The hand that lifted them belonged to the very One the voice had named:

They were far from knowing yet His love; but He, who brought it in His own person, was at hand to strengthen their hearts. "And Jesus came and touched them and said, Arise, and be not afraid."... Can you say that you have heard the voice of Jesus by faith, and that you are "not afraid"? This is His will, not only for the three who then heard, but for all that believe the gospel of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Hear — the Son is not one voice among three; He is the one voice to be heard.

- Hear whom — not "your Messiah," but "My beloved Son": the Father is telling us His own thoughts about Him, not calling us to admire.

- Hear always — the same words at the Jordan and on the mountain show one unchanging delight.

- Hear from inside — the cloud once kept Israel outside. Now it covers the disciples, and they hear the Father's delight from within the glory.

- Hear Him alone — the law could not save you and reform could not meet your case, so Moses and Elijah are swept from the scene.

Matthew 17:6 · Darby

And the disciples hearing [it] fell upon their faces, and were greatly terrified.

Peter had just offered to build three shelters on the mountain, and the Father's voice answered him out of the bright cloud. Why did the sound of the Father praising His Son leave these three men face-down and afraid?

The answer to Peter's mistake

The fear did not come out of nowhere. One commentator traces it back to what Peter had just said. The voice was a correction, and the cloud deepened the alarm.

Peter's hasty, shallow, and irreverent proposal drew out the lesson "listen to Him." He wanted to make three shelters here, one for the Lord, one for Moses, and one for Elijah. For, as Mark adds, and Luke too, he did not know what to answer, because he was frightened, as the others were too. Their fear could only be increased by the bright cloud (the tent of God's presence) that overshadowed them. They entered it, and out of it the Father's voice said in gracious rebuke, "This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased; listen to him." Moses and Elijah disappeared.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Standing where only the high priest could stand

Why such fear at a voice of approval? One writer answers by naming where these men were standing, and what they did not have in their hands.

No wonder that "when the disciples heard this, they fell on their faces and were terrified." It was, in fact, the holiest of all unveiled. Only the high priest might stand where they stood, once a year, and only with covering incense and atoning blood. And they were only men of the people. They had no sacrifice in their hand and no covering incense. Yet the glorious Presence was truly here — the Presence that had long been absent from the temple, and had never appeared since the captivity in Babylon. He whom none could see and live had drawn near to them. They heard His voice, as the people had heard it long ago, when in their fear they prayed that they might never hear it again.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

What the voice was not

The same writer compares this moment with the shaking mountain where the law was given. He marks what has changed.

Yet everything else was changed from the time of the shaking mountain. What was proclaimed to them now was not the Law — a law that brought only the knowledge of sin, and was indeed its "strength" (1 Cor. 15:56). This Voice pointed them only to the Son of God. Peter had just confessed Him as exactly that, their own gracious Master. The Voice put Him in His rightful place, and separated Him from all their misconceptions.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Terror and worship together

Falling on the face was not only collapse. One writer reads it as an act of worship too.

I suppose "they fall on their face" would imply they paid homage. They recognised they were in the presence of the glory that required homage, and they feared greatly.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Awe without communion

Commentators differ on what state the disciples were in. One sees homage. Another says they could not yet share what they saw.

The disciples, confused by what they heard, fall on their faces and are greatly afraid. There was no communion with it yet. For the present they enter into it only slightly, though it was afterwards recalled to them by the Spirit of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The fear He came to remove

The same writer treats their dread as a fear the Lord was there to answer. Then he turns the question on the reader.

When the disciples heard the Father's voice, they fell on their faces and were greatly afraid. They were far from knowing His love yet; but He, who brought it in His own person, was at hand to strengthen their hearts... Can you say that you have heard the voice of Jesus by faith, and that you are "not afraid"? This is His will, not only for the three who then heard, but for all who believe the gospel of God. Perfect love casts out the fear that has torment, and creates the fear of reverence.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. Peter offered to shelter three equals. The Father answered by naming one beloved Son, and the men who wanted to stay fell down instead.

- Exposure. They stood where only the high priest could stand, one day a year, with blood and incense — and they had neither. The cloud showed them where they were.

- Contrast. What spoke from that cloud was not the law that gives the knowledge of sin, but a voice pointing to the Son alone.

- Posture. Falling on the face is dread and homage in one motion; they knew the glory before them called for worship.

- Cure. They feared because they did not yet know His love. The same love that met them there casts out the fear that torments and leaves the fear that reveres.

Matthew 17:7 · Darby

And Jesus coming to [them] touched them, and said, Rise up, and be not terrified.

The Father's voice has just sounded from the bright cloud, and the three disciples lie face down in terror. What comes next is not more glory. It is a hand and a few quiet words.

The hand of a Man

The touch matters as much as the words. A voice and a hand belong to a real man. That is what the disciples needed once the glory had overwhelmed them.

Only one thing will strengthen us to stand assured in the presence of the glory: knowing the humiliation of Christ. Peter and those with him did not yet know it. His humiliation is the only ground of fellowship with even that excellent glory, and it is a sure and most blessed ground. It assures us of this: everything in us that this glory would otherwise judge and consume has already been judged and put away in Him who bore all our shame. In His grace He gave the disciples that assurance on this very occasion. For Jesus came to them, amazed and confused as they were, and with the voice and touch of the Son of Man He restored them. These were the signs of His humiliation. The voice and the touch could tell them that He who was in the form of God was found in the likeness of a man like themselves. They need not fear.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

No reason to fear

Jesus was at home in this glory. The disciples were not.

Jesus, to whom this glory and this voice were natural, encourages them, as He always did when on earth, saying, "Be not afraid." Being with Him who was the object of the Father's love, why should they fear? Their best Friend was the One who made God known on the earth; the glory belonged to Him.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Love casting out fear

Their terror came from what they did not yet know. The same words still reach believers today.

They were far from knowing His love yet; but He who brought it in His own person was at hand to strengthen their hearts. "And Jesus came and touched them and said, Arise, and be not afraid." Now, even more than then, Jesus makes His word come home in the power of redemption to those who believe... Can you say that you have heard the voice of Jesus by faith, and that you are "not afraid"? This is His will, not only for the three who heard Him then, but for all who believe the gospel of God. Perfect love casts out the fear that has torment, and creates the fear of reverence.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Comfort after failure

The disciples were not only frightened. They also knew they had got it wrong.

They felt that they had missed God's mind entirely. But "Jesus came and touched them, and said, Arise, and be not afraid." Are you troubled, trembling and anxious because you have missed the mind of the Lord? Have you missed blessing by not hearing Him and loving Him? He has not changed. He is the same Jesus now. He filled their hearts with peace, not fear.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

What remained on the mountain

When they lifted their eyes, the vision had gone. Commentators count that loss as gain.

The disciples, confused by what they heard, fall on their faces and are greatly afraid. There was no fellowship with the glory yet... "And when they lifted up their eyes, they saw no one but Jesus only." The heavenly vision had passed away for a time. They were on the mountain alone with Jesus. What a joy! — if it vanishes, He abides.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The apostle John later saw the Lord in glory and was overwhelmed. The same hand and the same words met him there.

The vision of glory overpowers the apostle: he fell at the Lord's feet as though dead, and the Lord laid His right hand on him, saying, "Fear not." How the Christ of the gospel comes out here! What words are more characteristic of Him than this, "Fear not"? "Perfect love casts out fear," and that love belongs to Him who speaks. He says it not to John alone, but to everyone who feels His majesty more than His grace. Such people would push Him back into the distance and darkness He has come out of to reach us.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Fear — the glory and the voice left them face down. They did not yet know His love, and terror filled the gap.

- Touch — the hand laid on them was the hand of a real man. That sign of His humiliation is what steadies us before the glory.

- Word — "have no fear" is not a rebuke. It is comfort for men who felt they had missed God's mind entirely.

- Reach — the same hand and words met John when the vision of glory overwhelmed him. This comfort was not just for three men on one mountain.

- Remains — the vision passed, and Jesus alone was with them. What vanishes was never the treasure, because He abides.

Matthew 17:8 · Darby

And lifting up their eyes, they saw no one but Jesus alone.

The transfiguration ends as fast as it began. The cloud lifts, Moses and Elijah are gone, and three frightened men are left with one Person — so why is that Person enough on His own?

Why Moses and Elijah Vanished

The vision did not fade at random. It broke up the moment Peter put Moses and Elijah on the same level as the Lord.

At the mount of transfiguration, the moment there is any question of putting Moses and Elijah on an equal footing with Jesus, they both disappear... The words are not "Hear them," but "Hear Him." Christ, in His wonderful grace, shows Moses and Elijah as His companions in the glory. Yet the moment Peter foolishly speaks the thought that would place them on a level with Christ, they must both vanish from the scene.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer reads the empty scene the same way. God has no colleague to set beside His Son.

How could God have a servant working at the same time as His Son? As He has no equal, so this Servant needs no helper. Even Moses and Elijah must vanish as soon as Simon Peter tries to class them with Jesus. So he and his astonished companions see "no one but Jesus only," which teaches them and all people that the Son is beyond compare.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Law and the Prophets Step Aside

Moses stood for the law, Elijah for the prophets. When they go, the whole system they stood for goes with them.

The law and the prophets are these two great witnesses, and they come in here for this reason: everything was about to disappear, and Jesus would be left alone. At the end everything goes. Moses is gone, Elijah is gone, and Christ alone is left, and He remains for ever. This will bring to your mind that scripture, "The Law and the Prophets were until John" (Luke 16:16).

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

That takes nothing away from what Moses and Elijah said. The question is who has first place now.

The law and the prophets were excellent forerunners, and not the smallest part of them can fall to the ground unfulfilled. But the Son of God comes, and He must take first place over all... Almost every working of unbelief in Christianity today comes down to lowering Jesus to the level of the law and the prophets, or at least to the level of man, the first man. No one born of God would treat the law and the prophets lightly. But it is one thing to accept that they have divine authority, and quite another to put them on a level with the Son of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Laid Aside, Not Lost

Their disappearance is not a cancelling. All they spoke of still stands, yet the Son brought to light more than they ever carried.

Note we said "laying aside", not "giving up", for those things will still have their answer in the coming day of glory... What Moses and Elijah said, in the words of this vision, was the truth but not all the truth. Much has come to light through Christ becoming Man which Moses and Elijah knew nothing of... We do not take our teaching about the kingdom from the law and the prophets, but from all that the Son has brought to light.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

When the Glory Goes, He Stays

For the three disciples, the shining faded and the heavenly visitors left. What they were given instead was better than what they lost.

The heavenly vision had passed away for a time: they were on the mount alone with Jesus. What a joy! — if it vanish, He abides!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same comfort is drawn out for anyone who has watched valued people or bright moments be taken away.

The lesson they had to learn here was that, though those two might disappear, Jesus remains... Moses may go and Elijah may go, but if you still have Jesus you have everything your heart can desire.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Seeing Him Only, Now

The same sight can mark a believer today. The test is how much of the picture Jesus fills.

God's people disappear, but Jesus remains. The words, "they saw no one but Jesus only," are very significant. If any of us come near to that in our own experience... Jesus will fill the picture as far as we are concerned, and man will fade from view.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

That claim is easy to repeat. One writer turns it into a personal question.

It does great damage to our souls in the things of God if we say "we see Jesus" only because we know we should have no other object... Is it true of me that I see Jesus? That is the question. If I do, if I see Him at all, He must become the all-absorbing object of my life.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. Peter tried to put Moses and Elijah on a level with the Lord; that thought is what emptied the scene.

- Verdict. The Father did not say "hear them" but "hear Him" — the Son has no equal and needs no colleague.

- Transfer. The law and the prophets were true witnesses, but they step aside. Our teaching now comes from what the Son has brought to light.

- Reserve. They are laid aside, not given up; all Moses and the prophets spoke of will still find its answer in the day of glory.

- Result. The vision faded and He remained — if Jesus alone is left, nothing your heart needs has been lost.